A higher Dimensional Marcinkiewicz Exponent and the Riemann Boundary Value Problems for Polymonogenic Functions on Fractals Domains
cdtamayoc@comunidad.unam.mx
bSEPI-ESIME-Zacatenco, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
juanboryreyes@yahoo.com )
Abstract
We use a high-dimensional version of the Marcinkiewicz exponent, a metric characteristic for non-rectifiable plane curves, to present a direct application to the solution of some kind of Riemann boundary value problems on fractal domains of Euclidean space for Clifford algebra-valued polymonogenic functions with boundary data in classes of higher order Lipschitz functions. Sufficient conditions to guarantee the existence and uniqueness of solution to the problems are proved. To illustrate the delicate nature of this theory we described a class of hypersurfaces where the results are more refined than those that exist in literature.
Keywords: Clifford analysis, Riemann boundary value problem, polymonogenic functions, fractal boundaries.
MSC(2020): Primary 30G35, 28A80, Secondary 30E20, 30G30
1 Introduction
Riemann boundary value problems (RBVP for short) for analytic functions in a bounded Jordan domain of the complex plane are widely discussed and applied to many branches of mathematics, physics and engineering. Along classical lines, the Cauchy type integral is used as the main tool in the treatment of these boundary value problems, see [13, 23, 27] for more details.
Although the Cauchy type integral loses its meaning on fractal curves, the RBVP is equally valid. Pioneering works in the field were given by Kats in [15]. In particular, solvability conditions involving the Hölder exponent of the data function associated with the problem and the upper Minkowski dimension of the boundary are established. For a recent account of this approach we refer the reader to [3, 16, 17].
The Marcinkiewicz exponent was introduced in [18, 20, 19], once again restricting the discussion to the complex analysis context. The use of this new metric characteristic of the boundary of the domains, considerably sharp the solvability conditions in the mentioned above study of the RBVPs.
Clifford analysis [9, 14] offers an elegant generalization of analytic functions from the complex plane to higher-dimensions. Monogenic functions on Euclidean space are basic to Clifford analysis, they are defined as smooth functions with values in the corresponding Clifford algebra, which are null solutions to a generalized Cauchy-Riemann operator. In view of the fact that the generalized Cauchy-Riemann operator factorizes the higher Laplace operator, monogenic functions are also harmonic.
As was early pointed out in [28, pp 22, 24], significant obstacles exist when trying to give a thorough treatment to the RBVP for monogenic functions. These are influenced by the fact that the product of two monogenic functions is not necessarily a monogenic. This is due to the non-commutativity properties of the Clifford algebra. This explains why an explicit solution to these boundary value problems has been found only for the jump problem and some slight modifications, see [2, 7] and the references given there.
Almost all uniqueness and existence theorems for the solutions of RBVPs for analytic functions on the complex plane involving the Minkowski dimension of the boundary can be set in the context of Clifford analysis, see for instance [4, 5, 30].
In [1, 10, 32, 26, 21] a kind of RBVPs have been studied for polymonogenic functions, i.e., null solutions to iterated generalized Cauchy-Riemann operator.
However, to the best of our knowledge, a full description of the relations between the high-dimensional version of the Marcinkiewicz exponent, introduced in [30] and the RBVPs in fractal domains of Euclidean spaces for polymonogenic functions with boundary data in classes of higher order Lipschitz functions still remains open.
This paper aims to obtain solvability conditions to RBVPs for Clifford algebra-valued polymonogenic functions involving the high-dimensional Marcinkiewicz exponent of the hypersurface. Besides, to show that this condition strictly improves those requiring the Minkowski dimension, we need to describe an uncountable class of hypersurfaces, such that the relationship between its Minkowski dimension and Marcinkiewicz exponent is with strict inequality.
The content of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the basic notions and terminology of the theory of monogenic functions. Moreover, we give a brief review of the definitions of higher order Lipschitz functions, fractal dimensions and Marcinkiewicz exponent. Also, a Whitney type extension theorem is stated. In Section 3, we obtain solvability and uniqueness conditions to a kind of RBVPs for Clifford algebra-valued polymonogenic functions with data higher order Lipschitz functions. Section 4 provides a description of a class of hypersurfaces, where the conditions obtained in Section 3 improve those involving the Minkowski dimension that exist in literature.
2 Preliminaries and Notations
This section presents the essential background needed for developing the results in the subsequent sections. It is divided into three subsections, each devoted to a fundamental component of the strategy for proving the results. The first subsection contains some basic facts about Clifford analysis. In second subsection, we give a brief exposition of the data classes of functions required in the problems considered, and a corresponding Whitney-type extension theorem is presented. Finally, we introduce the fractal dimensions and characteristics of the boundaries that will be treated in the work.
2.1 Clifford Algebras and Monogenic Functions
In this section, we recall some basic facts about Clifford analysis which will be needed in the sequel. It could be seen in more detail in the literature, for instance [9, 14].
Definition 1.
We consider the Clifford algebra associated with and endowed with the usual Euclidean metric, as the minimal extension of to a unitary, associative algebra over the real numbers, satisfying
for any .
It thus follows that, the standard orthonormal basis of , denoted by , is subject to the basic multiplication rules
were is the Kronecker delta.
For arbitrary we have , , where , and for with and .
An important subspace of is the so-called space of paravectors and its elements have the form . Each will be identified with a paravector.
The algebra norm of arbitrary is defined by and becomes an Euclidean space.
The conjugation in is defined as the anti-involution such that
For every paravector the relation
holds.
An valued function defined over has the representation
where are -valued components.
Unless otherwise states we assume that to be valued. Properties such as continuity or differentiability have to be understood component-wise.
Clifford analysis is mainly centered around the concept of monogenic functions which are null solutions of the generalized Cauchy-Riemann operator in defined by
Let be an open set and then will be called left (respectively right) monogenic in if (respectively ) in .
The fundamental solution for the Cauchy-Riemann operator is
where stands for the hypersurface area of the unit sphere in .
Polymonogenic functions of order , emerge as the solutions of the iterated action of the operator
For arbitrary , let us introduce
Note that for
as it is easy to check.
A direct computation shows that
Consequently, by decreasing induction on ,
Let us now introduce the Teodorescu transform related to the theory of monogenic functions, see [14] for more details.
Definition 2.
Let be a domain and let , the so-called Teodorescu transform is defined by
where is the volume element.
Sufficient conditions for the Hölder continuity of are established by our next theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let be a domain and let for . Then
-
•
The integral exists in the whole and tends to zero as . Besides, is a monogenic function in .
-
•
For , and , we have
Conditions for the derivability of on are given as follows
Theorem 2.
Let be as stated above. Then is a differentiable function for every with
In particular, the identity
holds.
Now, we introduce a kind of polymonogenic Teodorescu transform following [6]. Due to its good properties, this integral operator will play an essential role in the strategies described below. For a recent account of the subject we refer the reader to [22].
Definition 3.
Let be a bounded domain and . Then for we define the -polymonogenic Teodorescu transform as follow
where is the volume element.
2.2 Function Classes and a kind of a Whitney Type Theorem
In order to state the main problems that we address, it is necessary to define the suitable classes where the data functions will be considered. These are the higher order Lipschitz classes, on the basis of which some Whitney-type extension theorems will be presented.
As a first step, we shall recall the class of -integrables functions, see [14].
Definition 4.
Let be a domain and let . denotes the space of all equivalence classes of Lebesgue measurable functions equal almost everywhere, such that
where
Let be a closed subset of . We write a n-dimensional multi-index of order , where are non-negative integers. In addition, we have, and .
Definition 5.
Let . We shall say that a real-valued function , defined in , belongs to if there exist real-valued bounded functions , , defined on , with , and so that
(2) |
where
(3) |
being a positive constant.
The space of all these functions is named higher order Lipschitz spaces, see for instance [29]. When and is a compact set, these functions reduce to the classical Hölder continuous functions.
A norm in is defined as the smallest satisfying (3). In [31] was proved that endowed with this norm is a Banach space. Also, conditions for continuous and compact embeddings of generalized higher-order Lipschitz classes on a compact subset of Euclidean spaces were obtained, showing that these spaces are not only a generalization but also a refinement of the classical Lipschitz classes.
In general, an element of should be interpreted as a collection
In order to present a kind of a Whitney type extension theorem for polymonogenic functions, let us recall the following classical theorem by Whitney, see [29, pag. 177].
Theorem 3.
Let be a closed set and let with values in . Then, there exists a -valued function satisfying
-
•
,
-
•
,
-
•
for and .
Here and subsequently the symbol
stands for the higher-order partial derivatives.
In order to present a suitable version of Whitney extension theorem for -valued function, in [1] are constructed the following functions,
(4) |
Here is the multi-index with
(5) |
We should note that the functions are an appropriate arranged of every function with . In addition, = = .
Theorem 4.
Let be a closed set and let with values in . Then, there exists a -valued function satisfying
-
•
,
-
•
,
-
•
for .
2.3 Fractal Dimensions and Characteristics
To make the presentation self-contained, we review some basic ideas about fractal dimensions of sets that will be required to work with domains with fractal boundaries. For a deeper discussion of this topic, we refer the reader to [12, 24, 25].
Let a non-empty set. For any and , is defined as,
where is the diameter of the set . The infimum here is taken over all countable -coverings of E for open or closed balls. Now, we can present the Hausdorff measure.
Definition 6.
The -dimensional Hausdorff measure is defined by the limit
It can be shown that the -dimensional Hausdorff measure of a set E is almost always 0 or . There is only one value of where the measure change between these two values. Therefore, it looks natural to define the Hausdorff dimension as this value.
Definition 7.
The Hausdorff dimension of E is defined as
The following theorem can be found in [5].
Theorem 5.
Let be a domain in and be a compact set. Let be where . If , and it is monogenic in , then is also monogenic in .
The following definition of fractal set is due to Mandelbrot [24]
Definition 8.
If an arbitrary set with topological dimension has , then E is called a fractal set.
The results presented in this paper are intended to deal with sets such that as well as fractals from Definition 8. Throughout this paper, the expression ‘fractal domain’ will always refer to a domain with a fractal boundary.
The Minkowski dimension is widely used when working with fractals. That is due to the fact that computations are easier than with other fractal dimensions. We will only consider the upper Minkowski dimension.
Definition 9.
Let E be a non-empty bounded subset of and let be the smallest number of sets of diameter at most , covering E. The upper Minkowski dimension of E is defined as
We denote the grid covering which consists of -dimensional cubes with vertices with integer coordinates and edges of length one. From is generated the grid by dividing every cube in into different cubes with edges lengths . Let be the amount of cubes of the grid which intersect E. Then as can be found in [12] we have
(6) |
In [25, pp 77] is given the next theorem relating the Hausdorff and Minkowski dimensions.
Theorem 6.
For the bounded set with topological dimension , we have
The following new metric characteristics of a fractal set in are mainly included to keep the exposition as self-contained as possible. These can be found in [30].
Let be a topologically compact hypersurface in , which bounds a Jordan domain . We write for the unbounded complement. It is assumed to be fractal.
Let be a bounded set, which does not touch the hypersurface . We will consider the integral
For completeness, we recall:
Definition 10.
Let be a topologically compact hypersurface which is the boundary of a Jordan domain in . We define the inner and outer Marcinkiewicz exponent of , respectively, as
and the (absolute) Marcinkiewicz exponent of as,
Here, the domain , where is chosen in a way that is completely contained inside the ball of radius . We should note that the value of does not depend on the selection of the radius when constructing , due to the fact that only the points closest to influence the convergence of the integral .
The following theorem expresses the relationship between the Minkowski dimension with the Marcinkiewicz exponent, it was proved in [19] and in a different way in [30].
Theorem 7.
Let be a topologically compact hypersurface which is the boundary of a Jordan domain in , then .
3 Riemann Boundary Value Problems
In this section our main results concerning RBVPs for polymonogenic functions on fractal domains using the absolute Marcinkiewicz exponent are stated and proved.
Let be a valued function. We are first interested in the following boundary value problem: To find a polymonogenic function of order k on continuously extendable from to such that its boundary values on satisfy the following conditions
(7) |
where the functions were defined in (4).
As a special case when the polymonogenic functions derive to monogenic functions. At the same time, the higher order Lipschitz class becomes the standard Lipschitz class with exponent . Consequently, problem (7) reduces the classical jump problem for monogenic functions:
(8) |
Hence, problem (7) generalizes problem (8) presented and studied in [30].
The following lemma was proved in [1] and takes part of the proof of the upcoming theorem.
Lemma 1.
Let be a bounded domain of and let with . Then,
with .
The following theorem provides a sufficient solvability condition to problem (7) and generalizes and strengthens [30, Theorem 9].
Theorem 8.
Proof.
We need to show that the solution is given by
(10) |
when , or by
(11) |
when .
Here, and are the characteristic functions of and respectively. Besides, is the Whitney extension of and where is defined as follows. We will fix large enough such that is entirely contained inside the ball . We choose , and define . Due to the fact that the value of do not depend on the selection of then, let be . Thus, let be a real valued function in such that , equal to 0 outside of , and equal to 1 over .
The same proof works for and , we will consider the first case.
We must have that L with , being the Whitney extension of . Theorem 4 now show that
The right-hand integral above converges for , which is a direct consequence of Definition 10,. Then the main requirement is
From (1) it follows that is a polymonogenic function of order on . Combining Lemma 1 with the fact that we obtain that the functions , ; are continuous functions on and .
We can also prove a sufficient condition for unicity. The next theorem is a generalization of [30, Theorem 10].
Theorem 9.
Let be with and , let
Then there is a unique solution of the problem (7), such that belongs to the classes and , for .
Proof.
From Lemma 1 and the proof of Theorem 8 we deduce that the solution to the problem (7), defined by (10) or (11), belongs to and for .
Now, let us suppose that there exist two solutions and to the problem (7), and define . This function is a solution to the homogeneous problem
(12) |
We shall prove that is the unique solution to this problem such that belongs to the classes and , for . The proof is carried out by induction on , by a repeated application of [30, Theorem 10].
Now we assume that (7) has the unique solution such that belongs to the classes and for ; for , and let us consider the problem for
(13) |
Let be a solution of (13). If we denote , then in and
Consequently, represents a solution of (12) with . Then, by the induction hypothesis, is the only solution in this class. As a result in , and
Therefore, as in the proof of [30, Theorem 10], we have in , and the proof is complete. ∎
4 A Class of hypersurfaces in
A new solvability condition for RBVPs for polymonogenic functions via a high-dimensional Marcinkiewicz exponent has been proved. However, there naturally arises the question of whether this condition improves those involving the Minkowski dimension presented in [1]? As a matter of fact, Theorem 7 is sufficient to guarantee that new condition does not ever be worth the effort of formulating them based on the Minkowski dimension. Indeed, a class of hypersurfaces in three-dimensional spaces so constructed in [30] shows that strict inequality can occur in Theorem 7, what is an extension to the case of the complex plane given in [20].
In this section, we generalize these constructions to a class of hypersurfaces in the -dimensional space. Summarizing we have.
Theorem 10.
Let and . For each value , there exists a uncountable collection of topologically compact hypersurfaces , which are the boundary of a Jordan domain in such that and for suitable values of and .
Proof.
The proof consists in the construction of hypersurfaces having the desired properties.
Let be a -dimensional cube. We will add infinitely many -dimensional rectangles with suitable dimensions to this cube. In order to do that, let us fix and . Initially, we will conveniently divide the segment in the axis. We break down it into the sub-segments for every , and we divide each of this sub-segments into equally spaced segments where is the integer part of . The endpoints at the right side of these segments will be denoted by , where . In addition, let be the distance between two consecutive points and , and . Then, let be the -dimensional rectangles defined as
Hence, we define
The claimed hypersurfaces are the boundaries of the corresponding .
We first obtain a suitable lower bound on the Marcinkiewicz exponent of hypersurfaces . To do this, split up the integral as follows
(14) |
Let be the subset of such that where , then
and
Hence, using the estimate
and after some straightforward computations, we obtain that if the sum
(15) |
converges, then so is the integral in (14). This geometric sum (15) converges if and only if the condition
is fulfilled. Thus, the following estimation for the inner Marcinkiewicz exponent holds
We have proved more, namely that the absolute Marcinkiewicz exponent satisfies
We proceed to calculate the value of the Minkowski dimension of hypersurfaces . It is sufficient to show that its lower and upper bounds are the same.
First, look for a suitable upper bound for . We define the sets and . Furthermore, , we can see that .
The following step makes use of the grid defined in Subsection 2.3. Initially, note that with cubes of , we can cover . In order to study , we need to consider three cases. The first case is if and , then cubes have to be used to cover the faces of the -dimensional rectangles parallel to , in . No more than cubes are required to cover the -dimensional rectangles in parallel to the coordinate plane , for every .
The second, and main case, is if and . Here we must study two more cases. When , , and also , thus analogously than in the previous step cubes are sufficient to cover the faces of ’s parallel to in . While, to cover the -dimensional rectangles in parallel to the coordinate plane are not required more than cubes of , for every
If , , and , hence cubes in are adequate to cover .
Finally, when , by definition, the hypersurfaces , with , are all covered by only one cube of the grid . While the hypersurface is covered by another of these cubes. Therefore, we obtain
Working with the conditions on the sums in the previous inequality, we are able to obtain the following greater estimates
We will denote by and the integers defined by the conditions
(16) | |||
(17) |
It is easy to check that the condition is satisfied if and only if . By taking into account for the sum under the conditions ; and for those under the conditions , we get through some estimates the following inequality
where ; here and only depend on and . Then,
Now we will compute a lower bound. In order to do that, we will build a set such that and therefore .
We will present the auxiliary -dimensional rectangles
and the set is given by
Observe, by construction, that . The task is now to find a lower bound on .
The distance between and is . If , and , then two of these rectangles can not be intersected by the same cube in the grid . Then, cubes in cover a single -dimensional rectangle , due to the fact that the lengths of each edge in these -dimensional rectangles is .
Therefore, the total number cubes required to cover the rectangles for a fixed is . Thus we get
where is the smallest amount of cubes in which cover .
Being as in (16) we get
where does not depend on . Hence
Therefore,
Having disposed the value of the Minkowski dimension and a lower bound on the Marcinkiewicz exponent of every hypersurface , we are in a position to finish the proof of Theorem 10.
Indeed, when and we have
Setting , for every , we obtain for each . This means that is an uncountable family, which completes the proof. ∎
Funding: C. D. Tamayo Castro gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Postgraduate Study Fellowship of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) (Grant Number 957110). J. Bory Reyes was partially supported by Instituto Politécnico Nacional in the framework of SIP programs (SIP20230312).
References
- [1] R. Abreu Blaya, R. Ávila Ávila, and J. Bory Reyes. Boundary value problems with higher order Lipschitz boundary data for polymonogenic functions in fractal domains. Appl. Math. Comput., 269:802–808, 2015.
- [2] R. Abreu Blaya and J. Bory Reyes. On the Riemann-Hilbert type problems in Clifford analysis. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr., 11(1):15–26, 2001.
- [3] R. Abreu Blaya, J. Bory Reyes, and B. A. Kats. Integration over non-rectifiable curves and Riemann boundary value problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 380(1):177–187, 2011.
- [4] R. Abreu Blaya, J. Bory Reyes, and B. A. Kats. On the solvability of the jump problem in Clifford analysis. J. Math. Sci., 189(1):1–9, 2013.
- [5] R. Abreu Blaya, D. Peña Peña, and J. Bory Reyes. Jump problem and removable singularities for monogenic functions. J. Geom. Anal., 17(1):1–13, 2007.
- [6] H. Begehr. Iterated integral operators in Clifford analysis. Z. Anal. Anwend, 18 (2)(2):361–377, 1999.
- [7] S. Bernstein. Riemann-Hilbert problems in Clifford analysis. In Clifford analysis and its applications (Prague, 2000), volume 25 of NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem., pages 1–8. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2001.
- [8] F. Brackx. On (k)-monogenic functions of a quaternion variable. In R. P. Gilbert and R. J. Weinacht, editors, Function theoretic methods in differential equations, Research Notes in Mathematics 8. Pitman Publishers, 1976.
- [9] F. Brackx, R. Delanghe, and F. Sommen. Clifford Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC research notes in mathematics series. Pitman Advanced Pub. Program, 1982.
- [10] P. Cerejeiras, U. Kähler, and M. Ku. On the Riemann boundary value problem for null solutions to iterated generalized Cauchy–Riemann operator in Clifford analysis. Results Math., 63(3-4):1375–1394, 2012.
- [11] R. Delanghe and F. Brackx. Hypercomplex function theory and Hilbert modules with reproducing kernel. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 37(3):545–576, 1978.
- [12] K. Falconer. Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications. Wiley, 2003.
- [13] F. D. Gakhov. Boundary value problems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1966.
- [14] K. Gürlebeck, K. Habetha, and W. Sprössig. Holomorphic Functions in the Plane and n-dimensional Space. Birkhäuser Basel, 2008.
- [15] B. A. Kats. The Riemann problem on a closed Jordan curve. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat., 251(4):68–80, 1983.
- [16] B. A. Kats. On solvability of the jump problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 356(2):577–581, 2009.
- [17] B. A. Kats. The Riemann boundary value problem on non-rectifiable curves and related questions. Complex Var. Elliptic Equ., 59(8):1053–1069, 2014.
- [18] B. A. Kats and D. B. Katz. Marcinkiewicz exponents and integrals over non-rectifiable paths. Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 39(12):3402–3410, 2016.
- [19] D. B. Katz. Local and weighted Marcinkiewicz exponents with applications. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 440(1):74–85, 2016.
- [20] D. B. Katz. New metric characteristics of nonrectifiable curves and their applications. Sib. Math. J., 57(2):285–291, 2016.
- [21] J Le and D. Jinyuan. Riemann boundary value problems for some -regular functions in Clifford analysis. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.), 32(5):2029–2049, 2012.
- [22] W. Liping. Some properties of a kind of generalized Teodorescu operator in Clifford analysis. J. Inequal. Appl., pages Paper No. 102, 11, 2016.
- [23] J. K. Lu. Boundary Value Problems for Analytic Functions. Series in pure mathematics. World Scientific Publish., 1993.
- [24] B. B. Mandelbrot. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman and Co., 1982.
- [25] P. Mattila. Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals and Rectifiability. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
- [26] K. Min, U. Kähler, and W. Daoshun. Riemann boundary value problems on the sphere in Clifford analysis. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebr., 22(2):365–390, 2012.
- [27] N. I. Muskhelishvili. Singular Integral Equations. Boundary problems of function theory and their application to mathematical physics. Springer Netherlands, 1953.
- [28] John Ryan, editor. Clifford algebras in analysis and related topics, Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1996.
- [29] E. M. Stein. Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Monographs in harmonic analysis. Princeton University Press, 1970.
- [30] C. D. Tamayo Castro. Marcinkiewicz exponent and boundary value problems in fractal domains of . Preprint, 2022.
- [31] C. D. Tamayo Castro, R. Abreu Blaya, and J. Bory Reyes. Compactness of embedding of generalized higher order Lipschitz classes. Anal. Math. Phys., 9(4):1719–1727, 2018.
- [32] B. Yude and D. Jin Yuan. The Riemann boundary value problem for -monogenic functions in Clifford analysis. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. A (Chinese Ed.), 29(5):1321–1330, 2009.