keywords:
Exact solution , Improved
expansion method , tanh
method
1 Introduction
Recently, Many methods have been proposed for obtaining exact
traveling wave solutions of partial differential equations. An
example of these methods is the expansion
method [1] which is used to obtain traveling wave solutions
of many models (see for example [2, 3]). Also, many
improved and extended versions of this method have been proposed to
get more exact solutions of partial differential equations (see for
example [4, 5, 6]).
Many papers are published to comment on the classical version of the expansion method. For example, the
equivalence between the expansion method and the tanh
method is proved in [7, 8, 9]. Moreover, in
[10], it is shown that the expansion method is a
specific form of the simplest equation method [11].
The improved expansion method [5] is used to obtain
new exact solutions of some models [12, 13]. In this paper, we
show that this improved - expansion method is equivalent to
the tanh method and doesn’t give any new exact solutions of
nonlinear partial differential equations.
2 The tanh method [8]
In this section, we give the detailed description of the tanh
method. Suppose that a nonlinear evolution equation (NLEE) with
independent variable and two independent variables and
is given by
|
|
|
(1) |
where, is a polynomial in and its various partial
derivatives, in which the highest order derivatives and nonlinear
terms are involved. To determine explicitly, one can follow the
following steps:
Step 1: Use the traveling wave transformation:
|
|
|
(2) |
where, is a constant to be determined latter. Then, the NLEE
(1) is reduced to a nonlinear ordinary differential
equation (NLODE) for :
|
|
|
(3) |
step 2: Suppose that the NLODE (3) has the following
solution:
|
|
|
(4) |
where, are constants to be determined later,
is an arbitrary constant and is a positive integer to be
determined in step 3.
Step 3: Determine the positive integer by balancing the highest
order derivatives and nonlinear terms in Eq. (3).
Step 4: Substituting Eq. (4) into Eq. (3) and
equating expressions of different power of
to zero, we obtain coefficients and the parameter .
Step 5: Substituting and into Eq. (4), we can
obtain the explicit solutions of Eq. (1) immediately.
3 The improved - expansion method [5]
In this section, we give the detailed description of the improved
(G’/G) -expansion method. To determine in Eq. (1)
explicitly using the improved - expansion method, one can
follow the following five steps:
Step 1: Use the traveling wave transformation (2) to
reduce the NLEE (1) to the NLODE (3)
Step 2: Suppose that the NLODE (3) has the following
solution:
|
|
|
(5) |
where, and are constants to be determined
later, is a positive integer, and satisfies the
following second order linear ordinary differential equation(LODE):
|
|
|
(6) |
where, is a real constant. The general solutions of Eq.
(6) can be listed as follows. When , we obtain
the hyperbolic function solution of Eq. (6)
|
|
|
(7) |
where, and are arbitrary constants. When , we
obtain the trigonometric function solution of Eq. (6)
|
|
|
(8) |
where, and are arbitrary constants. When , we
obtain the linear solution of Eq. (6)
|
|
|
(9) |
where, and are arbitrary constants
Step 3: Determine the positive integer by balancing the highest
order derivatives and nonlinear terms in Eq. (3).
Step 4: Substituting (5) along with (6)
into Eq. (6) and then setting all the coefficients of
of the resulting systems
numerator to zero, yields a set of over-determined nonlinear
algebraic equations for and .
Step 5: Assuming that the constants and
can be obtained by solving the algebraic equations
in Step 4, then substituting these constants and the known general
solutions of Eq. (6) into (5), we can
obtain the explicit solutions of Eq. (1) immediately.
4 Equivalence of the two methods
In the second step of the improved - expansion method let
,
Eqs. (5), (6) are transformed into
|
|
|
(10) |
|
|
|
(11) |
The general solution of Eq. (11) is given by
[8]
|
|
|
(12) |
where, and
.
Substituting solution (12) into expansion
(10) we have
|
|
|
(13) |
where,
|
|
|
(14) |
|
|
|
(15) |
therefore, may be rewritten as
|
|
|
(16) |
hence,
|
|
|
(17) |
since is an arbitrary constant, then we can write
|
|
|
(18) |
where, is an arbitrary constant. It is now clear that the
two methods will give the same solutions expressed in terms of the
tanh function.
5 Another proof of equivalence
In this section we will proof that The solution formula
(5) will give solutions in the form of the tanh
function and the rational function only.
Case 1: When , we have
|
|
|
(19) |
|
|
|
(20) |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
|
|
(22) |
|
|
|
(23) |
So, in this case (when ) Eq. (5) can be
rewritten as
|
|
|
(24) |
where, is an arbitrary constant.
Case 2: When , we have
|
|
|
(25) |
|
|
|
(26) |
|
|
|
(27) |
|
|
|
(28) |
|
|
|
(29) |
So, in this case (when ) Eq. (5) can be
rewritten as
|
|
|
(30) |
where, is an arbitrary constant. By considering the formula
[14]
|
|
|
(31) |
Eq. (30) can be reformulated as
|
|
|
(32) |
which is equivalent to the solution (24) in case 1.
Case 3. When , in this case we will simply obtain the
rational solution.