This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

A note on the rational homological dimension of lattices in positive characteristic

Sam Hughes Mathematical Institute, Andrew Wiles Building, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK sam.hughes@maths.ox.ac.uk
(Date: September 24, 2025)
Abstract.

We show via 2\ell^{2}-homology that the rational homological dimension of a lattice in a product of simple simply connected Chevalley groups over global function fields is equal to the rational cohomological dimension and to the dimension of the associated Bruhat–Tits building.

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
20J05, 20J06

1. Introduction

Let kk be the function field of an irreducible projective smooth curve CC defined over a finite field 𝔽q\mathbb{F}_{q}. Let SS be a finite non-empty set of (closed) points of CC. Let 𝒪S{\mathcal{O}}_{S} be the ring of rational functions whose poles lie in SS. For each pSp\in S there is a discrete valuation νx\nu_{x} of kk such that νp(f)\nu_{p}(f) is the order of vanishing of ff at pp. The valuation ring 𝒪p{\mathcal{O}}_{p} is the ring of functions that do not have a pole at pp, that is

𝒪S=pS𝒪p.{\mathcal{O}}_{S}=\bigcap_{p\not\in S}{\mathcal{O}}_{p}.

Let k¯\bar{k} denote the algebraic closure of kk. Let 𝐆\mathbf{G} be an affine group scheme defined over k¯\bar{k} such that 𝐆(k¯)\mathbf{G}(\bar{k}) is almost simple. For each pSp\in S there is a completion kpk_{p} of kk and the group 𝐆(kp)\mathbf{G}(k_{p}) acts on the Bruhat–Tits building XpX_{p}. Thus, we may embed 𝐆(𝒪S)\mathbf{G}({\mathcal{O}}_{S}) diagonally into the product pS𝐆(kp)\prod_{p\in S}\mathbf{G}(k_{p}) as an arithmetic lattice.

The rational cohomological dimension of a group Γ\Gamma is defined to be

cd(Γ)sup{n:Hn(Γ;M)0,M a Γ-module},\mathrm{cd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)\coloneqq\sup\{n\colon H^{n}(\Gamma;M)\neq 0,\ M\text{ a }\mathbb{Q}\Gamma\text{-module}\},

the rational homological dimension is defined completely analogously as

hd(Γ)sup{n:Hn(Γ;M)0,M a Γ-module}.\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)\coloneqq\sup\{n\colon H_{n}(\Gamma;M)\neq 0,\ M\text{ a }\mathbb{Q}\Gamma\text{-module}\}.

In [Gan12] it is shown that cd(𝐆(𝒪S))=pSdimXp\mathrm{cd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\mathbf{G}({\mathcal{O}}_{S}))=\prod_{p\in S}\dim X_{p}. In light of this Ian Leary asked the author what is hd(𝐆(𝒪S))\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\mathbf{G}({\mathcal{O}}_{S}))?

Theorem A.

Let 𝐆\mathbf{G} be a simple simply connected Chevalley group. Let kk and 𝒪S{\mathcal{O}}_{S} be as above, then

hd(𝐆(𝒪S))=cd(𝐆(𝒪S))=pSdimXp.\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\mathbf{G}({\mathcal{O}}_{S}))=\mathrm{cd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\mathbf{G}({\mathcal{O}}_{S}))=\prod_{p\in S}\dim X_{p}.

More generally, we obtain the following.

Corollary B.

Let Γ\Gamma be a lattice in a product of simple simply connected Chevalley groups over global function fields with associated Bruhat–Tits building XX, then hd(Γ)=cd(Γ)=dimX\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)=\mathrm{cd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)=\dim X.

The author expects these results are well-known, however, they do not appear in the literature so we take the opportunity to record them here.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank his PhD supervisor Professor Ian Leary for his guidance, support, and suggesting of the question. This note contains material from the author’s PhD thesis [Hug21] and was originally part of [Hug21a], but was split off into a number of companion papers [Hug21b, Hug22] (see also [HV21]) at the request of the referee. This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant number 2127970. The author would like to thank the referee for a number of helpful comments.

2. 2\ell^{2}–homology and measure equivalence

Let Γ\Gamma be a group. Both Γ\Gamma and the complex group algebra Γ\mathbb{C}\Gamma act by left multiplication on the Hilbert space 2Γ\ell^{2}\Gamma of square-summable sequences. The group von Neumann algebra 𝒩Γ{\mathcal{N}}\Gamma is the ring of Γ\Gamma-equivariant bounded operators on 2G\ell^{2}G. The non-zero divisors of 𝒩G{\mathcal{N}}G form an Ore set and the Ore localization of 𝒩Γ{\mathcal{N}}\Gamma can be identified with the ring of affiliated operators 𝒰Γ{\mathcal{U}}\Gamma.

There are inclusions Γ𝒩Γ2Γ𝒰Γ\mathbb{Q}\Gamma\subseteq{\mathcal{N}}\Gamma\subseteq\ell^{2}\Gamma\subseteq{\mathcal{U}}\Gamma and it is also known that 𝒰Γ{\mathcal{U}}\Gamma is a self-injective ring which is flat over 𝒩Γ{\mathcal{N}}\Gamma. For more details concerning these constructions we refer the reader to [Lüc02] and especially to Theorem 8.22 of Section 8.2.3 therein. The von Neumann dimension and the basic properties we need can be found in [Lüc02, Section 8.3].

The 2\ell^{2}-Betti numbers of a group Γ\Gamma, denoted bi(2)(Γ)b_{i}^{(2)}(\Gamma), are then defined to be the von-Neumann dimensions of the homology groups Hi(Γ;𝒰Γ)H_{i}(\Gamma;{\mathcal{U}}\Gamma). The following lemma is a triviality.

Lemma 2.1.

Let Γ\Gamma be a discrete group and suppose that bi(2)(Γ)>0b^{(2)}_{i}(\Gamma)>0, then the homology group Hi(Γ;𝒰Γ)H_{i}(\Gamma;{\mathcal{U}}\Gamma) is non-trivial.

Two countable groups Γ\Gamma and Λ\Lambda are said to be measure equivalent if there exist commuting, measure-preserving, free actions of Γ\Gamma and Λ\Lambda on some infinite Lebesgue measure space (Ω,m)(\Omega,m), such that the action of each of the groups Γ\Gamma and Λ\Lambda admits a finite measure fundamental domain. The key examples of measure equivalent groups are lattices in the same locally-compact group [Gro93]. The relevance of this for us is the following deep theorem of Gaboriau.

Theorem 2.2 (Gaboriau’s Theorem [Gab02]).

Suppose a discrete group Γ\Gamma is measure equivalent to a discrete group Λ\Lambda, then bp(Γ)=0b_{p}(\Gamma)=0 if and only if bp(Λ)=0b_{p}(\Lambda)=0.

3. Proofs

Proof of Theorem A.

We first note that the group Γ:=𝐆(𝒪S)\Gamma:=\mathbf{G}({\mathcal{O}}_{S}) is measure equivalent to the product Λ:=pS𝐆(𝔽q[tp])\Lambda:=\prod_{p\in S}\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{F}_{q}[t_{p}]) for some suitably chosen tp𝒪pt_{p}\in{\mathcal{O}}_{p}. By [PST18, Theorem 1.6] (see also [Dym04, Dym06, Dav+07]) the group 𝐆(𝔽q[tp])\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{F}_{q}[t_{p}]) has one non-vanishing 2\ell^{2}-Betti number in dimension dim(Xp)\dim(X_{p}). Hence, by the Künneth formula Λ\Lambda has one non-vanishing 2\ell^{2}-Betti number in dimension d=pSdimXpd=\prod_{p\in S}\dim X_{p} Thus, by Gaboriau’s theorem, the group Γ\Gamma has exactly one non-vanishing 2\ell^{2}-Betti number in dimension dd. It follows from Lemma 2.1 that hd(Γ)d\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)\geq d. The reverse inequality follows from the fact that Γ\Gamma acts properly on the dd-dimensional space pSdimXp\prod_{p\in S}\dim X_{p}. ∎

Proof of Corollary B.

The proof of the corollary is entirely analogous. First, we split 𝐆\mathbf{G} into a product of simple groups i=1n𝐆i\prod_{i=1}^{n}\mathbf{G}_{i} corresponding to the decomposition of the Bruhat–Tits building X=i=1nXiX=\prod_{i=1}^{n}X_{i}. Let Λi\Lambda_{i} be a lattice in 𝐆i\mathbf{G}_{i} and let Λ=i=1nΛi\Lambda=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\Lambda_{i}. Each Λi\Lambda_{i} has a non-vanishing 2\ell^{2}-Betti Number in dimension dimXi\dim X_{i}. In particular, Λ\Lambda has a non-vanishing 2\ell^{2}-Betti Number in dimension dimX=i=1ndimXi\dim X=\prod_{i=1}^{n}\dim X_{i}. By Gaboriau’s Theorem Γ\Gamma also has non-vanishing 2\ell^{2}-Betti Number in dimension dimX\dim X. It follows from Lemma 2.1 that hd(Γ)d\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)\geq d. The reverse inequality follows from the fact that Γ\Gamma acts properly on the dd-dimensional space pSdimXp\prod_{p\in S}\dim X_{p}. ∎

Remark 3.1.

A similar argument can be applied to lattices in products of simple simply-connected algebraic groups over locally compact pp-adic fields. One obtains the analogous result for such a lattice Γ\Gamma that cd(Γ)=hd(Γ)=dimX\mathrm{cd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)=\mathrm{hd}_{\mathbb{Q}}(\Gamma)=\dim X, where XX is the associated Bruhat–Tits building.

\AtNextBibliography

References

  • [Dav+07] Michael W. Davis, Jan Dymara, Tadeusz Januszkiewicz and Boris Okun “Weighted L2L^{2}-cohomology of Coxeter groups” In Geom. Topol. 11, 2007, pp. 47–138 DOI: 10.2140/gt.2007.11.47
  • [Dym04] Jan Dymara L2L^{2}-cohomology of buildings with fundamental class” In Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132.6, 2004, pp. 1839–1843 DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07234-4
  • [Dym06] Jan Dymara “Thin buildings” In Geom. Topol. 10, 2006, pp. 667–694 DOI: 10.2140/gt.2006.10.667
  • [Gab02] Damien Gaboriau “Invariants l2l^{2} de relations d’équivalence et de groupes” In Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 95, 2002, pp. 93–150 DOI: 10.1007/s102400200002
  • [Gan12] Giovanni Gandini “Bounding the homological finiteness length” In Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 44.6, 2012, pp. 1209–1214 DOI: 10.1112/blms/bds047
  • [Gro93] M. Gromov “Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups” In Geometric group theory, Vol. 2 (Sussex, 1991) 182, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 1–295
  • [Hug21] Sam Hughes “Equivariant cohomology, lattices, and trees”, 2021
  • [Hug21a] Sam Hughes “Graphs and complexes of lattices”, 2021 arXiv:2104.13728 [math.GR]
  • [Hug21b] Sam Hughes “Lattices in a product of trees, hierarchically hyperbolic groups, and virtual torsion-freeness” In Bull. London Math. Soc., 2021 arXiv:2105.02847 [math.GR]
  • [Hug22] Sam Hughes “Irreducible lattices fibring over the circle”, 2022 arXiv:2201.06525 [math.GR]
  • [HV21] Sam Hughes and Motiejus Valiunas “Commensurating HNN-extensions: hierarchical hyperbolicity and biautomaticity”, 2021 arXiv:2203.11996 [math.GR]
  • [Lüc02] Wolfgang Lück L2L^{2}-invariants: theory and applications to geometry and KK-theory” 44, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics] Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002, pp. xvi+595 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04687-6
  • [PST18] Henrik Densing Petersen, Roman Sauer and Andreas Thom L2L^{2}-Betti numbers of totally disconnected groups and their approximation by Betti numbers of lattices” In J. Topol. 11.1, 2018, pp. 257–282 DOI: 10.1112/topo.12056