A note on the rational homological dimension of lattices in positive characteristic
Abstract.
We show via -homology that the rational homological dimension of a lattice in a product of simple simply connected Chevalley groups over global function fields is equal to the rational cohomological dimension and to the dimension of the associated Bruhat–Tits building.
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
20J05, 20J061. Introduction
Let be the function field of an irreducible projective smooth curve defined over a finite field . Let be a finite non-empty set of (closed) points of . Let be the ring of rational functions whose poles lie in . For each there is a discrete valuation of such that is the order of vanishing of at . The valuation ring is the ring of functions that do not have a pole at , that is
Let denote the algebraic closure of . Let be an affine group scheme defined over such that is almost simple. For each there is a completion of and the group acts on the Bruhat–Tits building . Thus, we may embed diagonally into the product as an arithmetic lattice.
The rational cohomological dimension of a group is defined to be
the rational homological dimension is defined completely analogously as
In [Gan12] it is shown that . In light of this Ian Leary asked the author what is ?
Theorem A.
Let be a simple simply connected Chevalley group. Let and be as above, then
More generally, we obtain the following.
Corollary B.
Let be a lattice in a product of simple simply connected Chevalley groups over global function fields with associated Bruhat–Tits building , then .
The author expects these results are well-known, however, they do not appear in the literature so we take the opportunity to record them here.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank his PhD supervisor Professor Ian Leary for his guidance, support, and suggesting of the question. This note contains material from the author’s PhD thesis [Hug21] and was originally part of [Hug21a], but was split off into a number of companion papers [Hug21b, Hug22] (see also [HV21]) at the request of the referee. This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant number 2127970. The author would like to thank the referee for a number of helpful comments.
2. –homology and measure equivalence
Let be a group. Both and the complex group algebra act by left multiplication on the Hilbert space of square-summable sequences. The group von Neumann algebra is the ring of -equivariant bounded operators on . The non-zero divisors of form an Ore set and the Ore localization of can be identified with the ring of affiliated operators .
There are inclusions and it is also known that is a self-injective ring which is flat over . For more details concerning these constructions we refer the reader to [Lüc02] and especially to Theorem 8.22 of Section 8.2.3 therein. The von Neumann dimension and the basic properties we need can be found in [Lüc02, Section 8.3].
The -Betti numbers of a group , denoted , are then defined to be the von-Neumann dimensions of the homology groups . The following lemma is a triviality.
Lemma 2.1.
Let be a discrete group and suppose that , then the homology group is non-trivial.
Two countable groups and are said to be measure equivalent if there exist commuting, measure-preserving, free actions of and on some infinite Lebesgue measure space , such that the action of each of the groups and admits a finite measure fundamental domain. The key examples of measure equivalent groups are lattices in the same locally-compact group [Gro93]. The relevance of this for us is the following deep theorem of Gaboriau.
Theorem 2.2 (Gaboriau’s Theorem [Gab02]).
Suppose a discrete group is measure equivalent to a discrete group , then if and only if .
3. Proofs
Proof of Theorem A.
We first note that the group is measure equivalent to the product for some suitably chosen . By [PST18, Theorem 1.6] (see also [Dym04, Dym06, Dav+07]) the group has one non-vanishing -Betti number in dimension . Hence, by the Künneth formula has one non-vanishing -Betti number in dimension Thus, by Gaboriau’s theorem, the group has exactly one non-vanishing -Betti number in dimension . It follows from Lemma 2.1 that . The reverse inequality follows from the fact that acts properly on the -dimensional space . ∎
Proof of Corollary B.
The proof of the corollary is entirely analogous. First, we split into a product of simple groups corresponding to the decomposition of the Bruhat–Tits building . Let be a lattice in and let . Each has a non-vanishing -Betti Number in dimension . In particular, has a non-vanishing -Betti Number in dimension . By Gaboriau’s Theorem also has non-vanishing -Betti Number in dimension . It follows from Lemma 2.1 that . The reverse inequality follows from the fact that acts properly on the -dimensional space . ∎
Remark 3.1.
A similar argument can be applied to lattices in products of simple simply-connected algebraic groups over locally compact -adic fields. One obtains the analogous result for such a lattice that , where is the associated Bruhat–Tits building.
References
- [Dav+07] Michael W. Davis, Jan Dymara, Tadeusz Januszkiewicz and Boris Okun “Weighted -cohomology of Coxeter groups” In Geom. Topol. 11, 2007, pp. 47–138 DOI: 10.2140/gt.2007.11.47
- [Dym04] Jan Dymara “-cohomology of buildings with fundamental class” In Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132.6, 2004, pp. 1839–1843 DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07234-4
- [Dym06] Jan Dymara “Thin buildings” In Geom. Topol. 10, 2006, pp. 667–694 DOI: 10.2140/gt.2006.10.667
- [Gab02] Damien Gaboriau “Invariants de relations d’équivalence et de groupes” In Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 95, 2002, pp. 93–150 DOI: 10.1007/s102400200002
- [Gan12] Giovanni Gandini “Bounding the homological finiteness length” In Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 44.6, 2012, pp. 1209–1214 DOI: 10.1112/blms/bds047
- [Gro93] M. Gromov “Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups” In Geometric group theory, Vol. 2 (Sussex, 1991) 182, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 1–295
- [Hug21] Sam Hughes “Equivariant cohomology, lattices, and trees”, 2021
- [Hug21a] Sam Hughes “Graphs and complexes of lattices”, 2021 arXiv:2104.13728 [math.GR]
- [Hug21b] Sam Hughes “Lattices in a product of trees, hierarchically hyperbolic groups, and virtual torsion-freeness” In Bull. London Math. Soc., 2021 arXiv:2105.02847 [math.GR]
- [Hug22] Sam Hughes “Irreducible lattices fibring over the circle”, 2022 arXiv:2201.06525 [math.GR]
- [HV21] Sam Hughes and Motiejus Valiunas “Commensurating HNN-extensions: hierarchical hyperbolicity and biautomaticity”, 2021 arXiv:2203.11996 [math.GR]
- [Lüc02] Wolfgang Lück “-invariants: theory and applications to geometry and -theory” 44, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics] Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2002, pp. xvi+595 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04687-6
- [PST18] Henrik Densing Petersen, Roman Sauer and Andreas Thom “-Betti numbers of totally disconnected groups and their approximation by Betti numbers of lattices” In J. Topol. 11.1, 2018, pp. 257–282 DOI: 10.1112/topo.12056