A Probabilistic Model-Based Robust Waveform Design for MIMO Radar Detection
Abstract
This paper addresses robust waveform design for multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) radar detection. A probabilistic model is proposed to describe the target uncertainty. Considering that waveform design based on maximizing the probability of detection is intractable, the relative entropy between the distributions of the observations under two hypotheses (viz., the target is present/absent) is employed as the design metric. To tackle the resulting non-convex optimization problem, an efficient algorithm based on minorization-maximization (MM) is derived. Numerical results demonstrate that the waveform synthesized by the proposed algorithm is more robust to model mismatches.
Index Terms:
MIMO radar, robust waveform design, probabilistic model, minorization-maximization (MM), relative entropy.I Introduction
In recent years, multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) radar has gained considerable attentions because of its superior performance [1]. Generally, MIMO radar can be divided into two categories. One is called statistical MIMO radar (or distributed MIMO radar), i.e., MIMO radar systems with widely separated antennas [2]. The spatial diversity provided by statistical MIMO radar allows to improve the detection performance of a fluctuating target. The other type is called colocated MIMO radar, whose antennas are closed to each other [3]. Different from the phased-array radar, the antennas of colocated MIMO radar can emit different waveforms. The additional waveform diversity of colocated MIMO radar enables better target detection performance in the presence of interference and improved parameter identifiability.
For both types of MIMO radar, it is important to design the waveforms appropriately. In the past years, many criteria have been adopted to design MIMO radar waveforms, including minimizing the auto-correlations and cross-correlations of the waveforms (see, e.g., [4, 5] and the references therein), maximizing the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) [6, 7, 8, 9], maximizing the mutual information between the receive signals and the target response [10, 11, 12], to name just a few.
In this paper, we consider waveform design for MIMO radar detection. Different from the previous studies [11, 13, 14], we take account of the model uncertainty about the target (due to estimation errors, inaccurate prior knowledge, etc.). A probabilistic model is proposed to describe the target uncertainty. Then a hypothesis testing is established for the proposed target detection problem. Given that the optimization of waveforms based on maximizing the probability of detection is intractable, we resort to an information-theoretic approach to design the waveforms. We devise a minorization-maximization (MM) based algorithm to tackle the non-convex waveform design problem. Results are provided to show the robustness of the proposed algorithm.
II Problem Formulation
Consider a MIMO radar with transmit antennas and receive antennas. Let denote the waveform transmitted by the th transmitter and let denote its code length. Similar to [11, 13, 15], we consider a unified signal model, which can be written as
(1) |
where denotes the received signals, is the waveform matrix, denotes the target response (the th element of stands for the response from the th transmitter to the th receiver), and is the receiver noise. As shown in [16], the signal model in (1) can be used for various types of MIMO radar, including the colocated MIMO radar and distributed MIMO radar. For example, if we consider a colocated MIMO radar, then the target response can be written as
(2) |
where , , , and are the amplitude, the direction of arrival (DOA), the transmit array steering vector, and the receive array steering vector of the th target, respectively.
In this paper, we focus on the design of waveforms to enhance the detection performance of MIMO radar systems. Note that the detection performance of radar systems is closely related to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which can be defined as follows:
(3) |
Assume that the receiver noise is white, then , where is the power of the noise. Therefore, to improve the target detection performance, we can maximize the SNR via the design of waveforms. The associated waveform design problem can be formulated as
(4) |
where denotes the total available transmit energy. It is well-known that the optimization problem in (4) admits a closed-form solution (see, e.g., [15] for the details):
(5) |
where is an arbitrary normalized vector, is the eigenvector associated with the largest eigenvalue of . Note that to obtain the optimal solution in (5), the target response matrix should be known a priori. However, due to estimation errors, the estimated target response might be inaccurate. As a result, when the transmit waveforms are designed based on (5), the performance of MIMO radar system might degrade.
To improve the target detection performance in the presence of estimation errors, we consider the robust design of waveforms. To this end, we define . We consider a probabilistic model for and assume that is circularly-symmetric Gaussian, with mean and covariance matrix , respectively. It is worth noting that can be obtained by the available prior knowledge , and , which is used to rule the uncertainty, can be obtained by the data from previous scans or specified by the user.
Next we establish the following binary hypothesis test for the target detection problem:
(6) |
where , , , and we have used the fact that .
Note that the probability density function (PDF) of under is given by
and under , the PDF of is given by
where
(7) |
and . Therefore, the Neyman-Pearson (NP) detector[17] decides if
(8) |
where is the detection threshold.
One straightforward way to design the robust waveform is to analyze the probability of detection for the NP detector in (8) first (given the probability of false alarm), and optimize the waveform based on maximizing the probability of detection. However, the probability of detection associated with (8) is too complex to be used as a design metric. Alternatively, we resort to relative entropy to design the waveforms. Indeed, Stein’s lemma states that a larger relative entropy can result in a higher probability of detection asymptotically. Therefore, to improve the target detection performance of MIMO radar systems, we aim to design waveforms to maximize the relative entropy.
The relative entropy between and is given by
(9) |
Then the waveform design problem based on maximizing relative entropy can be formulated by
s.t. | (10) |
It can be checked that the optimization problem is non-convex and difficult to solve. In the following, we develop an efficient algorithm based on MM to tackle the optimization problem in (II).
III Algorithm Design
For simplicity we assume that the power of noise is . Let denote the waveform covariance matrix, and . Using the standard property of matrix determinant that , we can rewrite as
Then the objective of (II) can be divided into three parts:
(11) |
The key step of MM methods is to find a surrogate function (i.e., a minorizer) , which satisfies:
(12a) | ||||
(12b) |
To this purpose, next we construct minorizers for each part of (III), respectively.
III-A Minorizing Part I
By using the standard property of matrix determinant, we have
According to the matrix inversion lemma [18], we obtain
(13) |
We can rewrite (13) into the following form by using the block matrix inversion lemma [18]:
where ,
(14) |
and .
Thus, Part I of the objective function can be rewritten as:
(15) |
Noting that has full row rank, we can verify that is convex with respect to (w.r.t.) [19]. In addition, since convex functions are minorized by their supporting hyperplanes [20], we have
(16) |
where is the gradient of at [21]. Then we let be partitioned as
(17) |
where , , and . Then tr can be written as
where is a constant not depending on .
Therefore, a minorizer of is given by
(18) |
where .
III-B Minorizing Part II
Note that
(19) |
where . According to [22, Lemma 1], is jointly convex w.r.t. and . Using the property of convex functions, we can obtain
where .
As a result, a minorizer of Part II of the objective is given by
(20) |
where , , and .
III-C Minorizing Part III
Since is convex w.r.t. , we can obtain
Thus, a minorizer of (i.e., Part III of the objective) is given by
(21) |
where .
III-D The Minorized Problem at the th Iteration
With the results in (18), (20), and (21), the minorized problem at the th iteration can be formulated as
s.t. | (22) |
where , , and we have ignored the constant terms.
According to [16], is a linear function of , which can be written as , where , , with , denoting an elementary matrix which has a unity in the -th element and zeros in all other positions, , and . Then we can reformulate the optimization problem in (III-D) as
(25) |
where , , and we have used the fact that .
It can be proved that (25) is a hidden convex problem [24] and can be solved via the Lagrange multipliers method. Specifically, the associated Lagrangian is given by
(26) |
where is the Lagrange multiplier associated with the constrained set. The maximizer can be obtained by differentiating (26) w.r.t and setting the differentiation to zero:
(27) |
where is the solution to the following equation:
(28) |
IV Numerical Examples
In this section, we provide numerical examples to verify the performance of the proposed algorithm. We consider a colocated MIMO radar with transmitters and receivers. The inter-element spacings of the transmit array and the receive array are and , respectively ( is the wavelength). The code length is . We assume that the nominal DOA of the target is (i.e., the prior knowledge). with denoting the target amplitude. We model by , where , and are uniformly distributed from to . We initialize the proposed algorithm with randomly generated quasi-orthogonal waveforms. Finally, the proposed algorithm terminates if .
Now we compare the performance of the waveforms synthesized by the proposed algorithm with that of the waveforms synthesized by (5). Note that to design the waveforms by (5), we replace by the nominal target response matrix , and . Fig. 1 shows the relative entropy of the synthesized waveforms versus different transmit energy, where the DOA of the true target is (i.e., a mismatch between the nominal DOA and the true DOA). We can observe that the waveforms synthesized by the proposed algorithm always have a larger relative entropy. Fig. 2 shows the probabilities of detection associated with Fig. 1, where the NP detector in (8) is used to analyze the detection performance, the probability of false alarm is , and Monte Carlo trials are conducted to obtain the threshold and the probability of detection, respectively. We can find that the results in Fig. 2 are consistent with Fig. 1, showing the robustness of the proposed waveforms against the angle mismatch.
Fig. 3 compares the detection probability of the proposed algorithm with that of the nominal design, where we assume that the true DOA of the target is fixed to be , the nominal DOA of the target varies from to , and the transmit energy is . The results demonstrate that when the angle mismatch is larger than , the proposed algorithm exhibits better robustness.
V Conclusion
This paper considered robust waveform design for MIMO radar target detection. A probabilistic model was proposed to describe the target uncertainty, and the relative entropy between the PDF of the observations under two hypotheses was employed as the waveform design metric. To tackle the non-convex waveform design problem, an efficient optimization algorithm based on MM was developed. Numerical results show that the waveforms synthesized by the proposed algorithm are more robust to the target mismatches.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62171450 and 61671453, the Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation under Grant 2108085J30, and the Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program of CAST under Grant 17-JCJQ-QT-041.
References
- [1] J. Li and P. Stoica, MIMO Radar Signal Processing. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2008.
- [2] A. M. Haimovich, R. S. Blum, and L. J. Cimini, “MIMO radar with widely separated antennas,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 116–129, 2008.
- [3] J. Li and P. Stoica, “MIMO radar with colocated antennas,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 106–114, 2007.
- [4] H. He, P. Stoica, and J. Li, “Designing unimodular sequence sets with good correlations-including an application to MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 4391–4405, 2009.
- [5] H. He, J. Li, and P. Stoica, Waveform Design for Active Sensing Systems: A Computational Approach. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.
- [6] C. Chen and P. P. Vaidyanathan, “MIMO radar waveform optimization with prior information of the extended target and clutter,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 3533–3544, 2009.
- [7] B. Tang and J. Tang, “Joint design of transmit waveforms and receive filters for MIMO radar space-time adaptive processing,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 64, no. 18, pp. 4707–4722, 2016.
- [8] G. Cui, X. Yu, V. Carotenuto, and L. Kong, “Space-time transmit code and receive filter design for colocated MIMO radar,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1116–1129, 2017.
- [9] B. Tang, J. Tuck, and P. Stoica, “Polyphase waveform design for MIMO radar space time adaptive processing,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 68, pp. 2143–2154, 2020.
- [10] A. D. Maio and M. Lops, “Design principles of MIMO radar detectors,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 886–898, 2007.
- [11] B. Tang, J. Tang, and Y. Peng, “MIMO radar waveform design in colored noise based on information theory,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 9, pp. 4684–4697, 2010.
- [12] B. Tang and J. Li, “Spectrally constrained MIMO radar waveform design based on mutual information,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 821–834, 2019.
- [13] B. Tang, M. M. Naghsh, and J. Tang, “Relative entropy-based waveform design for MIMO radar detection in the presence of clutter and interference,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 63, no. 14, pp. 3783–3796, 2015.
- [14] B. Tang and P. Stoica, “Information-theoretic waveform design for MIMO radar detection in range-spread clutter,” Signal Processing, vol. 182, p. 107961, 2021.
- [15] B. Tang, J. Tang, and Y. Zhang, “Design of multiple-input-multiple-output radar waveforms for Rician target detection,” IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1583–1593, 2016.
- [16] B. Tang, Y. Zhang, and J. Tang, “An efficient minorization maximization approach for MIMO radar waveform optimization via relative entropy,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 400–411, 2018.
- [17] S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of statistical signal processing, vol. ii: detection theory, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, Newer Jersey, 1998.
- [18] R. A. Horn and C. R. Jonson, Matrix Analysis. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
- [19] M. M. Naghsh, M. Modarres-Hashemi, M. A. Kerahroodi, and E. H. M. Alian, “An information theoretic approach to robust constrained code design for MIMO radars,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 65, no. 14, pp. 3647–3661, 2017.
- [20] S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge, U.K: Combridge Univ. Press, 2004.
- [21] A. Hjorungnes and D. Gesbert, “Complex-valued matrix differentiation: Techniques and key results,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2740–2746, 2007.
- [22] B. Tang, J. Liu, H. Wang, and Y. Hu, “Constrained radar waveform design for range profiling,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 69, pp. 1924–1937, 2021.
- [23] D. S. Bernstein, Matrix Mathematics: Theory, Facts, and Formulas. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 2009.
- [24] A. Ben-Tal and M. Teboulle, “Hidden convexity in some nonconvex quadratically constrained quadratic programming,” Math. Program., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 52–63, 1996.