Advances in Complex Oxide Quantum Materials Through New Approaches to Molecular Beam Epitaxy
Abstract
Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), a workhorse of the semiconductor industry, has progressed rapidly in the last few decades in the development of novel materials. Recent developments in condensed matter and materials physics have seen the rise of many novel quantum materials that require ultra-clean and high-quality samples for fundamental studies and applications. Novel oxide-based quantum materials synthesized using MBE have advanced the development of the field and materials. In this review, we discuss the recent progress in new MBE techniques that have enabled synthesis of complex oxides that exhibit “quantum” phenomena, including superconductivity and topological electronic states. We show how these techniques have produced breakthroughs in the synthesis of 4d and 5d oxide films and heterostructures that are of particular interest as quantum materials. These new techniques in MBE offer a bright future for the synthesis of ultra-high quality oxide quantum materials.
1 Introduction
Transition metal complex oxides have been a source of rich new physics for decades, dating back to the discovery of the high Tc cuprate superconductors in the 1980s [1], colossal magnetoresistance in manganites in the 1990s [2], multiferroicity in BiFeO3 in the 2000s [3], and the topological Hall effect in iridates and ruthenates in the 2010s [4]. These are just a smattering of the many “quantum” phenomena observed in complex oxides. However, as with any complex materials system, the field is rife with difficulties in repeatable synthesis of these materials. Careful synthesis and characterization is critical to decouple intrinsic physics in oxide materials from extrinsic effects that emerge due to growth-induced defects in these systems. Over the past 20 years, molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) of complex oxides has grown by leaps and bounds to become the state-of-the-art growth technique for epitaxial quantum oxide films. For details on the history of oxide MBE, we refer the readers to past review articles [5, 6].
While we will focus primarily on challenges and opportunities in MBE synthesis of oxide quantum materials, it is worth defining the field in a broader sense. Much ink has been spilled on defining a “quantum material.” For a working definition of the field, we refer the reader to the United States Department of Energy Basic Research Needs Workshop on Quantum Materials for Energy Relevant Technology from 2016 [7]. The workshop report emphasized that a variety of physical phenomena tied to quantum mechanics can be harnessed for future technologies. These include novel magnetic states, such as topological skyrmions, which may be useful for magnetic data storage. Novel superconducting materials that exhibit topological states are also of interest, as these are potential candidates for braided topological quantum computing systems [8]. An introduction to the field is also available through the review article of Cava, et al. [9] and references therein. A common theme in many proposed systems is the need for strong spin-orbit coupling within the material to produce emergent topological states. A qualitative phase diagram for quantum matter that compares electron-electron repulsion U and the atomic spin-orbit coupling is shown in Figure 1 [10]. Several oxide systems lie within these classes of materials, which we will highlight within this article. Strong spin-orbit coupling is present in atoms with high atomic number, such as 5d transition metals, making these elements particularly important for quantum materials.

In this perspective article, we introduce readers to the MBE technique while also discussing trends and advances that will continue to improve our ability to synthesize ultra-high-quality quantum materials. We note the challenges associated with MBE growth in 4d and 5d transition metal systems and some of the developments that have enabled successful MBE synthesis of such materials. We have structured this article to offer discussion on some of the most exciting materials systems in the field today, including superconductors, such as nickelates and tantalates, and topological systems, such as iridates and ruthenates. Within these sections, we discuss how MBE has enabled some important breakthroughs and also how it has answered outstanding questions from previous research performed using other growth techniques.
1.1 Approaches to Synthesis
For many years, complex oxides were primarily synthesized via pulsed laser deposition (PLD) from stoichiometric ceramic targets. This approach was first developed as a means to examine superconducting oxides, including bismuthates and cuprates[11]. It was initially thought to be a straightforward way to produce stoichiometric films, which is non-trivial for complex materials that do not exhibit an epitaxial growth window. Beyond superconducting materials, key breakthroughs came in the form of multiferroic BiFeO3 thin films[3], interfacial 2D electron gases (2DEGs) in LaAlO3/SrTiO3 [12], and numerous other systems. Over time, however, it became clear that material transfer was not uniformly stoichiometric and that growth conditions in PLD had significant impacts on resulting material properties [13, 14]. While PLD is still commonly employed for research in oxide films, including recent advances in superconducting nickelates [15], more and more groups have begun employing molecular beam epitaxy as a way to grow films using thermalized adatoms that can be carefully controlled from elemental sources.
Initial efforts in molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) of complex oxides focused primarily on 3d transition metals, beginning circa 1990. SrTiO3 films were a primary focus for technique development in the emerging field since they can be grown homoepitaxially [16] and are also of interest for their prospects as high-k gate oxides in silicon devices [17]. Additionally, efforts in cuprate film synthesis reflected the primary motivations of the era in condensed matter physics to better understand the high Tc superconducting materials [18]. Over time, numerous other materials of interest in the 3d block generated attention, including nickelates [19, 20], manganites [21, 22, 23], ferrites [24, 25, 26], vanadates [27], cobaltates [28, 29], and chromites [30, 31, 32, 33]. Additional efforts on band-insulating LaAlO3 synthesis by MBE helped to resolve long-standing controversies in the field regarding the 2D electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface [34, 35, 36]. These works showed that stoichiometric films did not yield conductive interfaces or built-in electric fields, clarifying that the polar catastrophe model did not govern the behavior [37]. As the field has come to better understand the 3d perovskite oxides, however, new challenges have emerged, with shifts in the field towards quantum materials that often involve refractory 4d or 5d transition metals on the B site. Because refractory elements generally cannot be grown from an effusion cell due to the extreme temperatures required for thermal evaporation, this has led to significant efforts to find alternative approaches for delivery of these cations.
2 Developments in Oxide Molecular Beam Epitaxy
In this section, we will discuss progress in the development of new ways to deliver transition metal cations. In general, in perovskite oxides (ABO3), A site cations are straightforward to deliver from elemental source material via an effusion cell. However, B site ions provide much of the functionality for these materials. As we move into materials that exhibit quantum phenomena, we need the ability to repeatably and controllably deliver refractory elements that have historically been deposited via electron-beam evaporation within an MBE, as in the cases of SrRuO3 [38] and SrIrO3 [39]. While electron-beam evaporation can in principle be viable with sufficiently precise atomic-absorption control [40], we know of no MBE system that has implemented atomic-absorption in a reproducible fashion. Thus we focus our discussion on emerging techniques that offer an alternative to e-beam evaporation, as these hold greater promise for precise control of material quality.
One emerging approach to MBE synthesis that we will touch on only briefly is machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AI) driven synthesis, which is still in its infancy. An enormous amount of data is available during the growth process, including in situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED), cell and sample stage temperatures, chamber pressures, source flux measurements, and other growth parameters. Post-growth characterization via X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and electron and scanning probe microscopy can also provide key details on film quality. By recording full videos of RHEED patterns acquired during growth and combining these with log files of growth conditions and post-growth characterization, it is in principle possible to generate sufficient data to train neural networks that could ultimately provide feedback to enable AI-driven synthesis. To date, machine learning and data analytics efforts have focused primarily on either interpretation of RHEED videos to extract additional information [41, 42, 43] or ML-assisted optimization of growth conditions, such as in SrRuO3 [44]. These approaches take promising initial steps, but much work remains to be done in the area. We note that groups employing MBE in their work can contribute to the cause even if they do not develop ML algorithms themselves simply by recording full-length RHEED videos with corresponding metadata and log files for all of their growths so that others may use the videos in training of ML codes.
In the sections below, we discuss three new techniques for the delivery of refractory transition metals that are important for quantum materials. These include hybrid or metalorganic MBE, suboxide MBE, and thermal laser epitaxy. One can imagine a future where different sources are integrated into the same growth chamber to optimize the deposition for a particular class of materials. We show such a hypothetical system in Figure 2. These techniques have been improving over the past decade, and many elements have already been incorporated using one or more approaches. A periodic table of the relevant elements for complex oxide films is shown in Figure 3. This figure highlights the refractory elements, as well as high vapor pressure elements such as K, that have been historically difficult to implement in an MBE system via an effusion cell. It also shows the progress of the various techniques in depositing the elements of interest.

2.1 Hybrid and Metalorganic MBE
One avenue to delivery of metals that are challenging to evaporate in a conventional effusion cell is the use of a metalorganic precursor, many of which are now ubiquitous thanks to the widespread use of atomic layer deposition (ALD). While this approach is not new, dating back to the growth of metalorganic MBE (MOMBE) in the 1980s [45], it has only been commonly applied in oxide MBE since circa 2007 [5, 46]. By redesigning an MBE chamber to accommodate a heated gas injector and developing a pressure-regulated feedback loop, metalorganic precursors can be delivered into an ultra-high vacuum environment. This approach has commonly been referred to as hybrid MBE, because the A site cations in a perovskite are still delivered from an effusion cell, while the B site cations are delivered through a metalorganic MBE source. For extensive details on the history of the approach, see the work of Brahlek et al [5]. Materials that have been synthesized include SrTiO3 [46, 47, 48], rare-earth titanates [49, 50, 51], SrVO3 [52, 53], BaSnO3 [54, 55], and SrNbO3 [56], among others.

Among the greatest accomplishments of hybrid MBE has been the demonstration of materials with some of the highest quality on record. SrTiO3 films have been shown to exhibit an epitaxial growth window for cation stoichiometry [47], analogous to what is seen in III-V materials grown by MBE. This has led to the highest reported carrier mobilities on record for SrTiO3 films [48]. While it is still not entirely clear what surface chemistry produces the stoichiometric growth window, it is apparent that the titanium tetra-isopropoxide (TTIP) precursor preferentially adheres to a surface with a SrO termination and is more likely to desorb from a TiO2-terminated surface [5, 57]. Stoichiometric growth windows have also been reported for SrVO3 [53] and BaSnO3 films [54].
Because stoichiometric control of complex oxide films has historically been such a challenge in conventional MBE, the availability of a growth window for these materials gives hybrid MBE a great deal of promise for quantum materials further down the periodic table. Perhaps the biggest challenge to date has been in the determination of suitable metalorganic precursors that span the constituent elements in the transition metal block. Difficulties related to the vapor pressure of the precursor, its melting temperature, and the radicals that are released after dissociation on the film surface all play a significant role in this selection. Specifically, ligands cannot contain elements that will contaminate a UHV chamber, such as Cl, F, or P, which are sometimes used in ALD processes. While most precursors contain some variation on hydrocarbon ligands that contain C, H, and O, in some cases a precursor that contains nitrogen-based ligands has proven to be more suitable, as in the case of SrNbO3 growth using a (t-butylimido)tris(diethylamino) niobium (C16H39N4Nb) precursor [56]. An analogous precursor exists for Ta, offering a route to the synthesis of tantalate films as well.
One alternative that overcomes the challenges of some liquid precursors that require pressure regulation has been to use a solid metalorganic source material. Groups have demonstrated this approach for Pt, Ru, and Ir using acetylacetonate (acac) ligands [58, 59, 60]. These precursors are solid at room temperature and evaporate above 100 °C, making them viable in low temperature effusion cells. Several examples of this new technique will be discussed below in the sections on iridate and ruthenate films.
2.2 Suboxide MBE
Recent advances in the growth of wide bandgap semiconductors such as Ga2O3 [61] have led to spillover into the complex oxide film community and have generated new approaches for obtaining high quality films. New ideas have been applied to MBE growth of binary and ternary oxide semiconductors by using metal-oxide sources rather than elemental metals. This approach relies on difference in vapor pressures between metallic sources and oxide sources. In many cases, a binary oxide of the form AxOy will produce a higher flux of metal adatoms at the same effusion cell temperature than an elemental metallic source. This is particularly important for refractory elements that are difficult to evaporate from an effusion cell, such as 4d and 5d transition metals. Thermodynamic calculations by Adkison et al [62] showed that much of the periodic table is accessible through suboxide MBE, including low vapor-pressure transition metal elements such as Zr via ZrO, Nb via NbO2, Mo via MoO3, Ru via RuO2, Hf via HfO, Ta via TaO2, W via WO3, Ir via IrO2, and Pt via Pt2O. To date, suboxide sources have been employed for the growth of MoO3 films [63] and WO3 films [64] by MBE, and there have been limited reports of the use of suboxide MBE for transition metal perovskite oxides. We highlight the most prominent example, KTaO3 [65], below and note that oxides such as SrMoO3 [66], BaSnO3 [67] and Ban+1InnO2.5n+1 [68] have been successfully synthesized. This method has also been employed to catalyze surface reactions that results in higher growth rates [69]. As the oxide field moves towards a greater emphasis on quantum materials that employ 4d and 5d transition metals, we expect that suboxide MBE will fill a significant gap in the current synthesis capabilities.
2.3 Thermal Laser MBE
One additional approach to the delivery of refractory elements has emerged over the past 3 years that offers significant promise for the delivery of refractory elements in ultraclean conditions. Using a continuous-wave thermal infrared laser, refractory elements can be evaporated at high deposition rates, comparable to those attained by electron-beam evaporation [70, 71, 72, 73]. With this approach, the surface of a refractory element can be heated to the sublimation or evaporation temperature of the material while the rest of the material remains solid. Such a technique bridges the gap between electron-beam evaporation, which is difficult to control with sufficient precision for stoichiometric MBE growth, and effusion cells, which are not able to achieve sufficiently high temperatures. In particular, binary oxides of refractory 4d and 5d transition metals have been produced using this approach, including Nb, Hf, Zr, Ru, and Mo [72]. Ongoing efforts in this area have focused on the development of careful temperature control such that laser power can be controlled via a feedback loop to maintain constant flux that is comparable to what can be achieved via an effusion cell. If appropriate control systems and growth chamber designs can be engineered, thermal laser MBE has a bright future for oxide and other quantum materials systems.
In addition, the same thermal laser heating approach has been shown to produce pristine substrate surfaces through in situ annealing to 1500 °C immediately before film growth [74]. This approach to sample heating in MBE can potentially remove the need for chemical pre-treatments for substrates and reduce outgassing from SiC heaters in oxide MBE systems.
2.4 Other Developments
Additional developments in material processing techniques have provided a route to grow high-quality oxide films. Recently, it was demonstrated that kinetics of noble metals may be utilized to grow films in a fashion similar to adsorption control [75]. In such a method, excess amount of a transition metal species can diffuse into the substrate through the film, while the film retains its stoichiometry. This proof-of-concept method was demonstrated in the growth of CuCrO2, wherein excess Cu diffuses into an Al2O3 substrate due to its high diffusion kinetics. It was demonstrated that the CuCrO2 film also acts as a filter that remains stoichiometric, yet helps excess Cu to diffuse through the substrate. Questions still remain on the nature of the diffused atoms, and whether a topotactic reaction occurs around the interface, but this method is likely to be useful in the case of materials involving other noble species where adsorption control is generally not feasible. Further studies on this behavior is likely to answer many details that leads to this behavior.
A new method also combines laser in MBE. In this case, dubbed the hybrid PLD, pulsed laser sources, which are typically used in PLD, are used to to ablate binary oxide targets and generate reasonable fluxes of one species of atoms while traditional effusion cells are used for secondary species. This was recently demonstrated in the adsorption-controlled growth of KTaO3 [76]. In this instance, a ceramic Ta2O5 target is ablated by a pulsed laser while a conventional effusion cell is used to generate excess K flux. It should be noted that the critical difference between this technique and thermal laser method is that in this method, flux is generated from a target is being ablated, not heated as in thermal laser MBE. However, the ability to use ceramic targets may expand the possibility to use numerous types of low vapor pressure oxides as the molecular source.
Finally, another development in epitaxial film growth is the concept of remote epitaxy [77, 78]. In this method, the film is grown on a substrate that has been convered by an atomically thin 2D material template. It was found that even though the substrate is covered by a layer of a 2D material, the film is commensurate with the substrate lattice. This method has been applied mainly to obtain free-standing oxide films, such that the film properties are not influenced by the substrate. However, one main challenge for oxide growth lies in the potential destruction of the 2D layer in activated oxygen or elevated temperatures. Hybrid MBE is therefore a promising avenue for growth of oxide films by remote epitaxy, because for growing materials such as SrTiO3, the oxygen ligands in the precursor supply the necessary oxygen and the use of an additional oxygen source can be circumvented [79]. The use of these membranes is now being investigated for various applications, including twisted bilayer structures [80].
3 Magnetic and Ferroelectric Oxides
MBE has been applied for growing many conventional magnetic and ferroelectric materials. The advantage of being able to span over five orders of magnitude of oxygen partial pressure, along with more powerful oxidants has allowed the growth of materials that are difficult to grow. Numerous ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic and other magnetic materials have been investigated using MBE. The same can be said of ferroelectrics and multiferroics, and we refer to other review articles that have been published in this topic [81, 82, 83, 84].
4 Superconducting Oxides
Superconductivity in oxides was first discovered in SrTiO3 [85], followed by Pb doped BaBiO3 [86]. However, it was the discovery of high temperature superconductivity in cuprates [87, 88] that changed the direction of materials and condensed matter physics research. Subsequently, PVD methods such as PLD, sputtering, and MBE were modified to deposit and grow thin films of these wonder materials. MBE was identified as a powerful method to obtain high quality superconductors for both fundamental and applied research. Below, we discuss how MBE has been applied and adapted to some exemplary superconducting material systems.
4.1 Cuprates: The original high Tc superconductor
The potential and the development of oxide MBE can be traced to the growth of cuprate thin films [89]. Precise control of doping and oxidation are some of the strong reasons that MBE is used to grow superconducting films and heterostructures. Extensive studies have been carried out on MBE-grown cuprates, such as LaxSr1-xCuO4 (LSCO), Bi2Sr2CuO6+x (BSSCO), YBa2Cu3O7-x (YBCO) and variants [90, 91], often involving custom-designed MBE systems that allows fine-tuning of various subtle growth parameters [92]. There are two main challenges in the growth on superconducting cuprates: oxidation and stoichiometry control. The issue with oxidation can be easily circumvented by using gas sources such as ozone or oxygen plasma. The more challenging issue arises from proper stoichiometry control. Superconductivity is due to the 2D copper oxide layers and since the properties of the films are highly dependent on doping, precise flux control is critical. Multiple in-situ methods such as a beam flux monitor, QCM, RHEED oscillations, and atomic absorption spectroscopy-based calibration provide high confidence in stoichiometry control of these materials.
Recent progress on MBE-grown cuprates as been exemplified by heterostructures involving La2CuO4 [93] and YBa2Cu3O7-x [94]. In heterostructures of Sr2CuO4 and La2CuO4, STEM and EELS was used to obtain the spatial information on different CuO planes to help understand the localization of holes in superconducting heterostructures [95]. Further progress has also been made in the infinite-layer cuprates such as SrCuO2. This phase of the cuprates are generally not as well studied as the others, since the thermodynamic stability is a big issue. Recently, detailed thermodynamic studies on the growth of the infinite layer cuprates was carried out, and plasma-assisted MBE was employed to successfully grow superconducting Ca1-xSrxCuO2 [96]. Other groups have also been able to synthesize infinite layer cuprates using ozone [97, 98].
The ease of doping and thickness control has resulted in ultra-high quality films and hetrerostructures allowing the investigation of the nature of the dimensionality of copper oxide [99, 100, 101]. For more details on the synthesis-related details, we refer to recent review articles on the growth of cuprates using layer-by-layer MBE [102, 103].
As a final note, recent theories on twisted layers of cuprates have predicted novel states such as topological superconductivity [104, 105], majorana modes [106] and pair density waves [107]. Experiments are already ongoing on exfoliated layers of BSSCO [108] and the renewed interest on this old material system is certainly exciting from a synthesis perspective.
4.2 Nickelates: Isoelectronic analogue to the cuprates
Rare-earth nickelate thin films with the chemical formula RNiO3 have been explored extensively over the past two decades due to the metallic nature of LaNiO3 and the metal-insulator transition and antiferromagnetism present when other rare-earth elements are substituted, such as Nd, Sm, and Pr. For a review on the physics of perovskite nickelates with the wide range of phenomena they exhibit, readers are referred to the work of Catalano et al [109]. Much of this work was ultimately motivated by the analogy of the nickelates to cuprate superconductors, where the Ni1+ ion is isoelectronic to the Cu2+ ion.
In general, perovskite nickelate thin films are a challenge to synthesize by MBE with ideal oxygen stoichiometry, due to the lower oxidation potential of late 3d transition metal ions such as Ni. Groups have found success with synthesis of LaNiO3 using distilled ozone[110] or oxygen plasma sources to enhance oxidation potential. Annealing after each unit cell of growth in the materials has also been shown to enhance the oxidation of the materials [41, 111]. Various other in situ synchrotron studies during growth have focused on structural recovery of epitaxial films during the initial growth stages on mixed-termination substrates [112, 113]. However, MBE-grown films have provided excellent platforms for studies of nickelate physics, including the effects of surface termination [19] and thickness [110] on the metallicity of LaNiO3. These results suggest that surface effects, due to the combined contributions of octahedral distortions and surface chemistry, play a significant role in transport in nickelate films. In the case of the highest quality LaNiO3 films grown via MBE, evidence of antiferromagnetism has been seen below 1 K, with a strong dependence on film disorder in the form of cation off-stoichiometry (2%) and differing oxidation conditions [114]. Given the similarities between nickelate and cuprate physics, significant efforts were undertaken to use interfaces to engineer orbital polarization in LaNiO3 to drive the material closer to the cuprate electronic configuration [115, 20]. Collectively, our understanding of nickelate physics has been significantly advanced through careful studies of MBE-grown films.
A significant breakthrough within the nickelate research field came with the first observation of superconductivity in nickelate films grown by PLD [15]. In this work, Li et al reported that a layered phase of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 could be produced via chemical reduction of Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO3 using a topotactic phase transition induced by annealing in CaH2 powder in a tube furnace. This layered phase is analogous to the SrCuO2 phase in the cuprates, but is unstable in atmospheric conditions and required a SrTiO3 capping layer in the initial work [15]. Further work has been performed on PLD-grown infinite-layer nickelates with this structure, as is discussed in recent reviews by Nomura and Arita[116] and Bernardini et al [117]. Notably, a recent work in PLD nickelate films argued that hydrogen incorporation into the films during the CaH2 annealing step was responsible for the superconductivity [118]. This result raises important questions as to the effects of the synthesis process, particularly the annealing step. Efforts to explore alternative synthesis avenues to achieve the same effective Ni charge state as the infinite-layer structure are critical to understand the mechanisms of the superconductivity in nickelate films.
Two particularly noteworthy approaches have been pursued through MBE film growth in superconducting nickelates. In the first case, Pan et al. synthesized layered Ruddelsden-Popper (RP) nickelates that are analogous to the layered cuprate superconductors [119]. Nd6Ni5O16 films were grown by MBE and then reduced to Nd6Ni5O12 using the same CaH2 reduction process. These films have an average Ni formal charge of Ni1.2+, producing a 3 electronic configuration that matches the configuration for the layered cuprates. Such layered materials would be a significant challenge to grow by PLD, but by alternating between NdO and NiO2 layers via shuttering the group was able to stabilize the RP phase. After reduction, the films showed maximum Tc values of 13 K, with a broad superconducting transition that does not reach zero resistance until 1 K. These results are notable for the lack of a SrTiO3 capping layer due to the greater atmospheric stability of the RP phase in comparison to the infinite-layer phase. Also notable is the broad phase transition in comparison to the infinite-layer structures. Given the complexity of the RP phase and the propensity of such films to form stacking faults that reduce the uniformity of the layered structure [120, 121], it suggests that structural inhomogeneities play a significant role in the superconducting behavior of the materials. Additionally, hydrogen may also be present within the films thanks to the CaH2 reduction process.
Recent studies have particularly focused on reduction of nickelate films without CaH2 using metallic aluminum capping layers [122, 123]. In these works, the authors grew epitaxial nickelate films followed by Al capping layers without air exposure. The Al film is highly reducing to the underlying nickelate material, driving the valence from the stoichiometric perovskite or Ruddelsden-Popper phase to the reduced phases. In the case of Ruddelsden-Popper films with the initial stoichiometry of Nd6Ni5O16, the reduced films did not exhibit superconductivity in the Nd6Ni5O12 phase [123], contrary to the reports for MBE-grown films synthesized via CaH2 reduction [119]. Interestingly, infinite-layer Nd1-xEuxNiO2 films synthesized in this manner were superconducting and exhibit Tc values of 21 K for [122], higher than any previous reports for MBE or PLD-grown films. Transport data for these films is shown in Figure 4. Clearly, there are still numerous questions left to address in regards to the origins of superconductivity in nickelate materials and the role of hydrogen, but MBE film growth has proven to be quite valuable thus far.

4.3 Tantalates: A 5d superconductor
Superconductivity was first discovered in KTaO3 surfaces by field-effect induced doping [124], and work over the past few years examining tantalate films and heterostructures has also shown the analogy of KTaO3 to SrTiO3 in terms of its tunability at epitaxial interfaces. These studies were first inspired by the work of Liu et al. on EuO/KTaO3 heterostructures grown by MBE on KTaO3 (111) substrates, where superconductivity with Tc of 1.5 K was reported [125]. This superconducting phase transition was attributed to electron doping of the KTaO3 crystal due to creation of oxygen vacancies by the overgrowth of EuO by MBE and LaAlO3 by PLD. Subsequent work by the same group showed that the critical temperature could be tuned electrostatically by varying the carrier concentration in the interfacial 2DEG and explained how phonon-mediated pairing drove the superconductivity at the (111)-oriented interfaces but not in (100)-type interfaces [126]. Other works have employed magnanite capping layers grown by MBE on KTaO3 (111) substrates to achieve similar superconducting behavior [127, 128]. These films showed that the higher spin-orbit coupling in KTaO3 in comparison to the analogous superconducting titanate interfaces led to more complex dependence on the in-plane direction of current flow and direction of applied magnetic field [127]. In general, the promise of superconducting materials that exhibit strong spin-orbit coupling such as KTaO3 leaves a great deal of room for future exploration.
One of the biggest challenges in the field is the need to develop ways to synthesize tantalate films by MBE. In the works from the preceding paragraph, KTaO3 single crystal substrates were used for film growth and only non-refractory materials were deposited by MBE. While others have grown KTaO3 by PLD [129], only recently have attempts to synthesize the material by MBE been reported [65]. In that work, K, which has an extremely high vapor pressure at near-ambient conditions in elemental form, was delivered from an effusion cell that contained an In-K alloy. Meanwhile, Ta was delivered in the form of TaO2 by suboxide MBE from a Ta2O5 source and as Ta metal from an e-beam source. A STEM image from a film grown from the suboxide source is shown in Figure 5. This is an important demonstration of suboxide MBE and is the first step towards more complex tantalate heterostructures that can be grown by MBE.

4.4 Non transition metal oxides
The perovskite BaPb1-xBixO3 was the second oxide that was shown to be a superconductor, exhibiting a relatively high TC of about 13 K [86]. Further research led to the discovery of superconductivity in Ba1-xKxSbO3 (with a lower TC) [130] and Ba1-xKxBiO3 with a higher TC of over 30 K [131, 132].
Studies of MBE-grown thin films of these materials soon followed [133] and more efforts were made to investigate potential superconductivity in heterostructures involving the bismuthates [134]. Recently, superconductors based on group III and IV metals have gained a new interest, driven by the possibility of topological phenomena due to their high spin-orbit coupling. First principles calculations has also predicted a topological insulator state in doped BaBiO3 surface [135], showing the possibility for complex phases to exist in this system. Research on this system involving thin films and heterostructures is still ongoing [136, 137] and new insights on the interplay of strong spin-orbit coupling, superconductivity and symmetry breaking have been found. It should be pointed out that one challenge in the growth and heterostructuring of the bismuthates also lies in the charge disproportionation of Bi. Since Bi cannot stabilize in Bi+4 state, it forms Ba2Bi+3Bi+5O6 structure involving distortions, octahedral tilts, and a charge density wave [138].
Although superconductivity was discovered in Sb-doped BaPbO3, the first report on only Sb based material was reported only recently, with TC reaching 15 K [139]. A charge density wave was also found, similar to the bismuthates. These old, yet relatively unexplored systems provide incentives and new avenues for novel properties and phases in a non transition metal oxide.
5 Topological Phenomena in Oxides
Topological phenomena are ubiquitous in modern day condensed matter and materials physics. Topological effects have been invoked since the discovery of quantum Hall effects in high-mobility 2DEG semiconductors [140]. The prediction and discovery of the quantum spin-hall effect [141, 142] and topological insulators accelerated the research on topological materials. In general, most studies on topological materials are focused on high spin-orbit coupled materials with broken symmetry, which results in electronic bands crossing or inversion [143, 144]. Competition between different energies provides new routes to novel phases [145].
Although oxides do not garner much attention during discussion of topological materials, a search of oxides in topological databases [146, 147] shows that over 25% of candidates are predicted to be either semimetals or topological insulators. In fact, detailed studies have predicted topological band crossings in numerous oxides, and many oxides are predicted to host Dirac and Weyl fermions, including SrRuO3 [148, 149], EuTiO3 [150, 151], RbCr4O8 [152], Ag2BiO3 [153], pyrochlore iridates [154] and others [155]. SrRuO3 has been widely discussed in the literature as a Weyl material, with some experiments showing signatures for such a case [156, 157, 158].
Thin film heterostructures are also predicted to host topological Dirac and Weyl nodes, for example in rutile heterostructures [159, 160] and perovskites[161]. Epitaxial films of SrRuO3 [149] and La-doped EuTiO3 [151] have been studied, and signatures of topological behavior has been observed. Similarly, real space topological textures called skyrmions are also being actively investigated in oxide films and heterostructures. We refer the readers to a recent review which provides examples of these oxide materials [155]. Below we discuss two of the typical oxide materials systems in terms of topological behavior: ruthenates and iridates.
5.1 Ruthenates: Topological textures and superconductivity
Real space topology, namely topological spin textures (skyrmions and its variants) have been widely investigated, especially in the spintronics community [162]. For recent review on these topological spin textures, see Junquera et al [163] and Tokura et al [164]. Generally, inversion symmetry needs to be broken for skyrmions to exist, and the antisymmetric Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction is invoked in explaining many features of skyrmion-like behavior in SrRuO3 films and heterostructures. Various numerical and experimental methods are being used to predict or measure the effects of this interaction [165].
Transport based measurements, namely involving the topological Hall effect, have claimed to prove the existence of skyrmions in various oxides [166, 167, 168, 169]. SrRuO3 is an exemplary oxide that is frequently cited in literature for hosting skyrmions, with many experiments linking the topological Hall effect to the existence of skyrmions. However, recent experiments using engineered films and heterostructures, many using MBE, show that factors such as sample inhomogeneity and competing anomalous Hall effect and Berry phases are responsible for these hump-like features [170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175]. Therefore, careful assessment of material properties is required and these features in anomalous Hall effect may not be necessarily related to topological Hall effect caused by skyrmions or similar textures.
MBE-grown SrRuO3 films have been used for investigating multiple physical phenomena. High residual resistivity ratio (RRR), which is tied to the higher quality and lower defects, has been achieved for films grown using e-beam evaporated MBE [38] and hybrid metalorganic MBE [175]. As a ferromagnetic conductor with high spin-orbit coupling, SrRuO3 has been investigated from spintronic and topological perspectives, and a recent review by Gu et al provides an good overview [149].
Because of the unusual p-wave spin-triplet superconductivity believed to be present in the Ruddelsden-Popper Sr2RuO4 phase[176, 177], these materials have also been an area of significant interest for epitaxial films for many years as possible candidates for topological quantum computation [8]. Because of the sensitivity of spin-triplet superconductors to impurities and defects, efforts to achieve superconducting films via PLD took many years with few reports of success and Tc values up to 1.0 K [178, 179]. Subsequent work using MBE via electron-beam evaporation [180, 181] of Ru later produced films with Tc values up to 1.8 K on NdGaO3 substrates [180]. This work clarified the importance of both film purity and choice of substrate to yield superconducting films. Recent work in metal-organic MBE using a Ru(acac)3 solid precursor demonstrated that superconductivity could also be achieved via this novel method, with a reported Tc of 0.8 K [182]. A comparison of the critical temperatures for various film growth techniques, RRR values, and substrates is shown in Figure 6. Further work with thermal laser MBE to synthesize superconducting films from a metallic Ru source is also ongoing [183].

5.2 Iridates: Dirac and Weyl materials
Pyrochlore and honeycomb lattice based phases of iridates, along with heterostructures, have been predicted to host novel electronic states [145, 154]. Most of these materials have been studied in bulk single-crystal form and thin films are slowly being developed. Other phases such as Sr2IrO4 has also been predicted to be a superconductor, although no experimental verification has been realized. Similarly, SrIrO3-based (hetero)structures have been predicted to be topological insulators [188].
Thin films have been fabricated using various methods, and we would like to refer to some recent reviews and articles that focus on iridate thin films [189, 190]. Heterostructures based on iridates and other transition metal oxides are being actively investigated that allows for fine tuning of interfacial effects. Particularly, SrIrO3 is interfaced with magnetic complex oxides such as LaMnO3 and SrRuO3 that may result in interfacial topological textures [191, 192, 193, 194]. At the interface of this high spin-orbit coupled material, charge transfer, combined with symmetry breaking and hybridization effects, may allow the development of novel phases. Sharp interfaces require the growth of defect-free, high-quality films and new methods are actively being investigated to grow these materials.
The extremely low vapor pressure of Ir is the main bottleneck for MBE growth of the iridates, and e-beam evaporation of Ir was typically used [39, 195]. The challenge in using e-beam evaporator is flux stability and source degradation. To overcome those issues, recent developments in hybrid MBE [196] has provided new routes. So far, MBE has been used for the growth of the binary oxide IrO2 [195] and the Ruddlesden-Popper phases SrIrO3 and Sr2IrO4 [39, 195, 196, 197]. Heterostructures involving SrIrO3 and SrRuO3 were also investigated, and the role of charge transfer was investigated using ARPES [198]. Their work showed that Ir donates a fraction of an electron to Ru at the interface, changing the Fermi surface of the materials. ARPES measurements of these samples are shown in Figure 7.

A challenge in MBE synthesis of iridates lies with the pyrochlores. Other methods such as PLD has been used to grow many pyrochlore iridates and signatures of topological phases have been found in these films [190]. It is thus appealing to investigate how pyrochlores grow, and determine the potential of heterostructures involving these materials.
6 Future Directions and Conclusion
There is a large role of oxide MBE in driving fundamental and applied research, and the prospects look promising. The development of new MBE methods that were outlined above has allowed the exploration of multitude of phases. Much work remains to be done in refining these techniques and implementing them into research-scale MBE systems that are widely available within academic and government labs and industrial research and development.
It must be noted that one of the big challenges in MBE growth of some of the outlined materials is the availability of proper substrates. There are already numerous substrates that allow lattice and symmetry matching for many transition metal oxides. Currently, substrates with (pseudo)cubic lattice constant of Å are available commercially. Buffering with different materials can also be used for lattice matching, but may damage the functional properties of a given film or heterostructure. As new materials with novel properties are added to the collection, new types of substrates are needed. Collaboration between thin film and bulk crystal growers enables development of new substrate materials that can potentially be used for materials of the future. For example, synthesis of (La,Nd)(Lu,Sc)O3 bulk crystal provides greater lattice constant for growing the wide-bandgap material BaSnO3 which has a much higher lattice constant than the available substrates [199]. Development of substrates for pyrochlore phases such as the iridates described above is also underway [200, 201].
Another challenge is inherent to materials with hexagonal symmetry. Most of the commercially available oxide substrates have cubic crystal structure, and although cutting along the hexagonal (111) axis is possible, this cut in a perovskite has high surface energy resulting in uneven surfaces. Chemical treatments sometimes allow flattening of these surfaces in some substrates, but there is no single method that works for all. Since numerous topological materials have hexagonal symmetry, development of new hexagonal substrates is a necessity. As an example, CuFeO2 single crystals have been developed as substrate candidates for delafossite films [202].
Additionally, there is a long-standing challenge in directly probing the electronic structure of topological materials. While indirect evidence may be obtained by electronic transport [203], first principles calculations are typically employed to predict if a material is topological [204], and experimental evidence can be provided via techniques such as ARPES which can directly probe the band structure [205]. Recently, MBE has been integral in determining the topological properties of materials. By in-situ transfer from growth to analysis chambers with XPS, ARPES, and/or STM capabilities [206], band structure and interfacial phenomena can be directly probed without exposing the surface to atmosphere. Similar challenges are encountered in materials with real-space topology, especially in cases where skyrmions are predicted to be confined at interfaces. New developments in integrated experimental probes with real-space sensitivity are thus required for properly determining the topological properties of thin films and heterostructures. These may include spin-resolved ARPES in a photoemission electron microscope (PEEM) or spin-resolved STM, either of which can be integrated with an MBE.
To summarize, we have discussed how advances in oxide thin film growth by MBE have pushed the field in new directions for quantum materials synthesis. MBE has been used to answer outstanding questions and design new layered materials that would not be possible via other techniques. Developments in new approaches to cation delivery, including the use of metalorganic precursors, suboxide sources, and thermal laser heating, have enabled better control of growth of refractory 4d and 5d elements with high spin-orbit coupling that are widely used in quantum materials. These new techniques will push the field forward in coming years as we continue to explore exciting new functional behavior of complex oxides for quantum applications.
7 Acknowledgements
Work at Auburn University was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under Award DE-SC0023478 (GR, topological materials) and by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Award DMR-2045993 (RBC, superconducting materials).
8 References
References
- [1] Bednorz J G and Müller K A 1986 Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 64 189–193 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303701
- [2] Jin S, Tiefel T H, McCormack M, Fastnacht R A, Ramesh R and Chen L H 1994 Science 264 413–415 URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.264.5157.413
- [3] Wang J, Neaton J B, Zheng H, Nagarajan V, Ogale S B, Liu B, Viehland D, Vaithyanathan V, Schlom D G, Waghmare U V, Spaldin N A, Rabe K M, Wuttig M and Ramesh R 2003 Science 299 1719–1722 URL http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/299/5613/1719
- [4] Matsuno J, Ogawa N, Yasuda K, Kagawa F, Koshibae W, Nagaosa N, Tokura Y and Kawasaki M 2016 Science Advances 2 e1600304 URL http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/2/7/e1600304
- [5] Brahlek M, Gupta A S, Lapano J, Roth J, Zhang H T, Zhang L, Haislmaier R and Engel‐Herbert R 2018 Advanced Functional Materials 28 1702772 URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.201702772
- [6] Schlom D G 2015 APL Materials 3 062403 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4919763
- [7] Broholm C, Fisher I, Moore J, Murnane M, Moreo A, Tranquada J, Basov D, Freericks J, Aronson M, MacDonald A, Fradkin E, Yacoby A, Samarth N, Stemmer S, Horton L, Horwitz J, Davenport J, Graf M, Krause J, Pechan M, Perry K, Rhyne J, Schwartz A, Thiyagarajan T, Yarris L and Runkles K 2016 Basic research needs workshop on quantum materials for energy relevant technology Tech. rep. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) URL https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1616509
- [8] Das Sarma S, Nayak C and Tewari S 2006 Physical Review B 73 220502 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.220502
- [9] Cava R, de Leon N and Xie W 2021 Chemical Reviews 121 2777–2779 URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01322
- [10] Witczak-Krempa W, Chen G, Kim Y B and Balents L 2014 Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 5 57–82
- [11] Christen H M and Eres G 2008 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20 264005 URL http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/20/26/264005
- [12] Ohtomo A and Hwang H Y 2004 Nature 427 423–426 URL http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v427/n6973/abs/nature02308.html
- [13] Breckenfeld E, Bronn N, Karthik J, Damodaran A R, Lee S, Mason N and Martin L W 2013 Physical Review Letters 110 196804 00000 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.196804
- [14] Breckenfeld E, Chen Z, Damodaran A R and Martin L W 2014 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 141202094606001 00000 URL http://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/am506436s
- [15] Li D, Lee K, Wang B Y, Osada M, Crossley S, Lee H R, Cui Y, Hikita Y and Hwang H Y 2019 Nature 572 624–627 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1496-5
- [16] Haeni J H, Theis C D and Schlom D G 2000 Journal of Electroceramics 4 385–391 URL http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1009947517710
- [17] McKee R A, Walker F J and Chisholm M F 1998 Physical Review Letters 81 3014–3017 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3014
- [18] Bozovic I and Eckstein J N 1997 Applied Surface Science 113-114 189–197 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169433296008744
- [19] Kumah D P, Malashevich A, Disa A S, Arena D A, Walker F J, Ismail-Beigi S and Ahn C H 2014 Physical Review Applied 2 054004 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.054004
- [20] Disa A S, Kumah D P, Malashevich A, Chen H, Arena D A, Specht E D, Ismail-Beigi S, Walker F J and Ahn C H 2015 Physical review letters 114 026801
- [21] May S J, Ryan P J, Robertson J L, Kim J W, Santos T S, Karapetrova E, Zarestky J L, Zhai X, Velthuis S G E t, Eckstein J N, Bader S D and Bhattacharya A 2009 Nature Materials 8 892–897 URL http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v8/n11/full/nmat2557.html
- [22] Bhattacharya A, May S J, te Velthuis S G E, Warusawithana M, Zhai X, Jiang B, Zuo J M, Fitzsimmons M R, Bader S D and Eckstein J N 2008 Physical Review Letters 100 257203 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.257203
- [23] Monkman E J, Adamo C, Mundy J A, Shai D E, Harter J W, Shen D, Burganov B, Muller D A, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2012 Nature Materials 11 855–859 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat3405
- [24] Ihlefeld J F, Kumar A, Gopalan V, Schlom D G, Chen Y B, Pan X Q, Heeg T, Schubert J, Ke X, Schiffer P, Orenstein J, Martin L W, Chu Y H and Ramesh R 2007 Applied Physics Letters 91 071922 URL http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/apl/91/7/10.1063/1.2767771
- [25] Scafetta M D, Cordi A M, Rondinelli J M and May S J 2014 Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 26 505502 URL http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/26/50/505502
- [26] Comes R and Chambers S 2016 Physical Review Letters 117 226802 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.226802
- [27] Caspi S, Shoham L, Baskin M, Weinfeld K, Piamonteze C, Stoerzinger K A and Kornblum L 2022 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films 40 013208
- [28] Lee S, Lee A T, Georgescu A B, Fabbris G, Han M G, Zhu Y, Freeland J W, Disa A S, Jia Y, Dean M P, Walker F J, Ismail-Beigi S and Ahn C H 2019 Physical Review Letters 123 117201 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.117201
- [29] Andersen T K, Cook S, Wan G, Hong H, Marks L D and Fong D D 2018 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 10 5949–5958 URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16970
- [30] Chambers S A, Qiao L, Droubay T C, Kaspar T C, Arey B W and Sushko P V 2011 Physical Review Letters 107 206802 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.206802
- [31] Comes R B, Spurgeon S R, Kepaptsoglou D M, Engelhard M H, Perea D E, Kaspar T C, Ramasse Q M, Sushko P V and Chambers S A 2017 Chemistry of Materials 29 1147–1155 URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04329
- [32] Lin S C, Kuo C T, Comes R B, Rault J E, Rueff J P, Nemšák S, Taleb A, Kortright J B, Meyer-Ilse J, Gullikson E, Sushko P V, Spurgeon S R, Gehlmann M, Bowden M E, Plucinski L, Chambers S A and Fadley C S 2018 Physical Review B 98 165124 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.165124
- [33] Al-Tawhid A H, Kumah D P and Ahadi K 2021 Applied Physics Letters 118 192905 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0049119
- [34] Qiao L, Droubay T C, Varga T, Bowden M E, Shutthanandan V, Zhu Z, Kaspar T C and Chambers S A 2011 Physical Review B 83 085408 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.085408
- [35] Warusawithana M P, Richter C, Mundy J A, Roy P, Ludwig J, Paetel S, Heeg T, Pawlicki A A, Kourkoutis L F, Zheng M, Lee M, Mulcahy B, Zander W, Zhu Y, Schubert J, Eckstein J N, Muller D A, Hellberg C S, Mannhart J and Schlom D G 2013 Nature Communications 4 2351 URL http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/130822/ncomms3351/full/ncomms3351.html?WT.ec_id=NCOMMS-20130828
- [36] Segal Y, Ngai J H, Reiner J W, Walker F J and Ahn C H 2009 Physical Review B 80 241107 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.241107
- [37] Chambers S A, Engelhard M H, Shutthanandan V, Zhu Z, Droubay T C, Qiao L, Sushko P V, Feng T, Lee H D, Gustafsson T, Garfunkel E, Shah A B, Zuo J M and Ramasse Q M 2010 Surface Science Reports 65 317–352 URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167572910000671
- [38] Nair H P, Liu Y, Ruf J P, Schreiber N J, Shang S L, Baek D J, Goodge B H, Kourkoutis L F, Liu Z K, Shen K M and Schlom D G 2018 APL Materials 6 046101 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023477
- [39] Nie Y F, King P D, Kim C H, Uchida M, Wei H I, Faeth B D, Ruf J P, Ruff J P, Xie L, Pan X, Fennie C J, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2015 Physical Review Letters 114 016401
- [40] Du Y, Droubay T C, Liyu A V, Li G and Chambers S A 2014 Applied Physics Letters 104 163110 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4873544
- [41] Provence S R, Thapa S, Paudel R, Truttmann T K, Prakash A, Jalan B and Comes R B 2020 Physical Review Materials 4 083807 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.083807
- [42] Vasudevan R K, Tselev A, Baddorf A P and Kalinin S V 2014 ACS Nano 8 10899–10908 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn504730n
- [43] Suyolcu Y E, Christiani G, Gemperline P T, Provence S R, Bussmann-Holder A, Comes R B, van Aken P A and Logvenov G 2022 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 40 013214
- [44] Wakabayashi Y K, Otsuka T, Krockenberger Y, Sawada H, Taniyasu Y and Yamamoto H 2019 APL Materials 7 101114 URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/1.5123019
- [45] Kuech T 1992 Proceedings of the IEEE 80 1609–1624 conference Name: Proceedings of the IEEE
- [46] Jalan B, Engel-Herbert R, Wright N J and Stemmer S 2009 Journal of Vacuum Science and Techology A 27 461–464 URL http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9wb876dn
- [47] Jalan B, Moetakef P and Stemmer S 2009 Applied Physics Letters 95 032906 URL http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/apl/95/3/10.1063/1.3184767
- [48] Son J, Moetakef P, Jalan B, Bierwagen O, Wright N J, Engel-Herbert R and Stemmer S 2010 Nature Materials 9 482–484 URL http://www.nature.com/nmat/journal/v9/n6/full/nmat2750.html
- [49] Xu P, Phelan D, Seok Jeong J, Andre Mkhoyan K and Jalan B 2014 Applied Physics Letters 104 082109 URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4866867
- [50] Xu P, Ayino Y, Cheng C, Pribiag V S, Comes R B, Sushko P V, Chambers S A and Jalan B 2016 Physical Review Letters 117 106803 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.106803
- [51] Moetakef P, Ouellette D G, Zhang J Y, Cain T A, Allen S J and Stemmer S 2012 Journal of Crystal Growth 355 166–170 URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024812004721
- [52] Eaton C, Moyer J A, Alipour H M, Grimley E D, Brahlek M, LeBeau J M and Engel-Herbert R 2015 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 33 061504 URL http://scitation.aip.org/content/avs/journal/jvsta/33/6/10.1116/1.4927439
- [53] Brahlek M, Zhang L, Eaton C, Zhang H T and Engel-Herbert R 2015 Applied Physics Letters 107 143108 URL http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4932198
- [54] Prakash A, Xu P, Wu X, Haugstad G, Wang X and Jalan B 2017 Journal of Materials Chemistry C 5 5730–5736 URL http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/tc/c7tc00190h
- [55] Prakash A, Xu P, Faghaninia A, Shukla S, Ager Iii J W, Lo C S and Jalan B 2017 Nature Communications 8 15167 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15167
- [56] Thapa S, Provence S R, Gemperline P T, Matthews B E, Spurgeon S R, Battles S L, Heald S M, Kuroda M A and Comes R B 2022 APL Materials 10 091112 URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0097699
- [57] Thapa S, Provence S R, Jessup D, Lapano J, Brahlek M, Sadowski J T, Reinke P, Jin W and Comes R B 2021 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 39 053203 URL https://avs.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1116/6.0001159
- [58] Nunn W, Manjeshwar A K, Yue J, Rajapitamahuni A, Truttmann T K and Jalan B 2021 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 e2105713118
- [59] Nunn W, Nair S, Yun H, Kamath Manjeshwar A, Rajapitamahuni A, Lee D, Mkhoyan K A and Jalan B 2021 APL Materials 9 091112 URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1063/5.0062726
- [60] Nair S, Yang Z, Lee D, Guo S, Sadowski J T, Johnson S, Saboor A, Li Y, Zhou H, Comes R B, Jin W, Mkhoyan K A, Janotti A and Jalan B 2023 Nature Nanotechnology 18 1005–1011 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41565-023-01397-0
- [61] Vogt P, Hensling F V E, Azizie K, Chang C S, Turner D, Park J, McCandless J P, Paik H, Bocklund B J, Hoffman G, Bierwagen O, Jena D, Xing H G, Mou S, Muller D A, Shang S L, Liu Z K and Schlom D G 2021 APL Materials 9 031101 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0035469
- [62] Adkison K M, Shang S L, Bocklund B J, Klimm D, Schlom D G and Liu Z K 2020 APL Materials 8 081110 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0013159
- [63] Du Y, Li G, Peterson E W, Zhou J, Zhang X, Mu R, Dohnálek Z, Bowden M, Lyubinetsky I and Chambers S A 2016 Nanoscale 8 3119–3124 URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/nr/c5nr07745a
- [64] Li G, Varga T, Yan P, Wang Z, Wang C, Chambers S A and Du Y 2015 Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 17 15119–15123 URL https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2015/cp/c5cp01344e
- [65] Schwaigert T, Salmani-Rezaie S, Barone M R, Paik H, Ray E, Williams M D, Muller D A, Schlom D G and Ahadi K 2023 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 41 022703 URL https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0002223
- [66] Kuznetsova T, Roth J, Lapano J, Pogrebnyakov A and Engel-Herbert R 2023 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 41 053412 URL https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0002853
- [67] Raghavan S, Schumann T, Kim H, Zhang J Y, Cain T A and Stemmer S 2016 APL Materials 4 016106 URL http://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.4939657
- [68] Hensling F V E, Smeaton M A, Show V, Azizie K, Barone M R, Kourkoutis L F and Schlom D G 2022 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 40 062707 URL https://doi.org/10.1116/6.0002205
- [69] Vogt P, Hensling F V, Azizie K, McCandless J P, Park J, DeLello K, Muller D A, Xing H G, Jena D and Schlom D G 2022 Phys. Rev. Appl. 17(3) 034021 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.17.034021
- [70] Smart T J, Mannhart J and Braun W 2021 Journal of Laser Applications 33 022008 URL https://doi.org/10.2351/7.0000348
- [71] Braun W and Mannhart J 2019 AIP Advances 9 085310 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111678
- [72] Kim D Y, Mannhart J and Braun W 2021 APL Materials 9 081105 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0055237
- [73] Kim D Y, Smart T J, Majer L, Smink S, Mannhart J and Braun W 2022 Journal of Applied Physics 132 245110 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0114600
- [74] Braun W, Jäger M, Laskin G, Ngabonziza P, Voesch W, Wittlich P and Mannhart J 2020 APL Materials 8 071112 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008324
- [75] Rimal G, Mazza A R, Brahlek M and Oh S 2022 Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A 40 060401
- [76] Kim J, Yu M, Lee J W, Shang S L, Kim G Y, Pal P, Seo J, Campbell N, Eom K, Ramachandran R, Rzchowski M S, Oh S H, Choi S Y, Liu Z K, Levy J and Eom C B 2023 arXiv e-prints arXiv:2308.13180 (Preprint 2308.13180)
- [77] Kum H S, Lee H, Kim S, Lindemann S, Kong W, Qiao K, Chen P, Irwin J, Lee J H, Xie S, Subramanian S, Shim J, Bae S h, Choi C, Ranno L, Seo S, Lee S, Bauer J, Li H, Lee K, Robinson J A and Ross C A 2020 Nature 578 75–81 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1939-z
- [78] Kim H, Chang C S, Lee S, Jiang J, Jeong J, Park M, Meng Y, Ji J, Kwon Y, Sun X, Kong W, Kum H S, Bae S H, Lee K, Hong Y J, Shi J and Kim J 2022 Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2 1–21 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s43586-022-00122-w
- [79] Yoon H, Truttmann T K, Liu F, Matthews B E, Choo S, Su Q, Saraswat V, Manzo S, Arnold M S, Bowden M E, Kawasaki J K, Koester S J, Spurgeon S R, Chambers S A and Jalan B 2022 Science Advances 8 eadd5328 URL https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.add5328
- [80] Li Y, Xiang C, Chiabrera F M, Yun S, Zhang H, Kelly D J, Dahm R T, Kirchert C K R, Cozannet T E L, Trier F, Christensen D V, Booth T J, Simonsen S B, Kadkhodazadeh S, Jespersen T S and Pryds N 2022 Advanced Materials 34 2203187 (Preprint https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adma.202203187) URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.202203187
- [81] Chambers S A 2000 Surface Science Reports 39 105–180
- [82] Mannhart J and Schlom D G 2010 Science 327 1607–1611
- [83] Ramesh R and Schlom D G 2019 Nature Reviews Materials 4 257–268 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0095-2
- [84] Bhattacharya A and May S J 2014 Annual Review of Materials Research 44 65–90
- [85] Cohen M L, Schooley J F and Hosier W R 1964 Phys. Rev. Lett. 12 474–475
- [86] Sleight A W, Gillson J L and Bierstedt P E 1975 Solid State Communications 88 841–842
- [87] Bednorz J G and Müller K A 1986 Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter 64 189
- [88] Wu M K, Ashburn J R, Torng C J, Hor P H, Meng R L, Gao L, Huang Z J, Wang Y Q and Chu C W 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 58(9) 908–910 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.908
- [89] Webb C, Weng S L, Eckstein J N, Missert N, Char K, Schlom D G, Hellman E S, Beasley M R, Kapitulnik A and Harris J S 1987 Applied Physics Letters 51 1191–1193
- [90] Baiutti F, Wrobel F, Christiani G and Logvenov G 2018 Oxide molecular beam epitaxy of complex oxide heterointerfaces (Elsevier Inc.) ISBN 978-0-12-811166-6 publication Title: Metal Oxide-Based Thin Film Structures URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811166-6.00003-0
- [91] Yamamoto H, Krockenberger Y and Naito M 2015 Epitaxial growth of superconducting oxides (Elsevier Ltd) ISBN 978-1-78242-255-6 publication Title: Epitaxial Growth of Complex Metal Oxides URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-245-7.00005-1
- [92] Bozovic I 2001 IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 11 2686–2695
- [93] Suyolcu Y E, Wang Y, Sigle W, Baiutti F, Cristiani G, Logvenov G, Maier J and van Aken P A 2017 Advanced Materials Interfaces 4 1700737 URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/admi.201700737
- [94] Suyolcu Y E, Sun J, Goodge B H, Park J, Schubert J, Kourkoutis L F and Schlom D G 2021 APL Materials 9 021117 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0034648
- [95] Bonmassar N, Christiani G, Salzberger U, Wang Y, Logvenov G, Suyolcu Y E and van Aken P A 2023 ACS Nano 17 11521–11526 publisher: American Chemical Society URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01422
- [96] Krockenberger Y, Ikeda A, Kumakura K and Yamamoto H 2018 Journal of Applied Physics 124 073905 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4985588
- [97] Harter J W, Maritato L, Shai D E, Monkman E J, Nie Y, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2015 Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 92 035149 arXiv: 1508.03023v1
- [98] Zhong Y, Han S, Wang Y, Luo Z, Zhang D, Wang L, Li W, He K, Song C l, Ma X C and Xue Q K 2018 Physical Review B 97 245420 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.245420
- [99] Logvenov G, Gozar A and Bozovic I 2009 Science 326 699–702
- [100] Logvenov G, Gozar A and Bozovic I 2013 Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 26 2863–2865 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2016.01.003
- [101] Božović I, He X, Wu J and Bollinger A T 2016 Nature 536 309–311 URL http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nature19061
- [102] Suyolcu Y E, Christiani G, van Aken P A and Logvenov G 2020 Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 33 107–120 URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-019-05285-4
- [103] Xu X, He X, Shi X and Božović I 2022 APL Materials 10 061103
- [104] Haenel R, Tummuru T and Franz M 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106(10) 104505 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.104505
- [105] Tummuru T, Plugge S and Franz M 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105(6) 064501 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.064501
- [106] Margalit G, Yan B, Franz M and Oreg Y 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106(20) 205424 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.205424
- [107] Song X Y, Zhang Y H and Vishwanath A 2022 Phys. Rev. B 105(20) L201102 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L201102
- [108] Zhao S Y F, Poccia N, Cui X, Volkov P A, Yoo H, Engelke R, Ronen Y, Zhong R, Gu G, Plugge S, Tummuru T, Franz M, Pixley J H and Kim P 2021 Emergent interfacial superconductivity between twisted cuprate superconductors (Preprint 2108.13455)
- [109] Catalano S, Gibert M, Fowlie J, Íñiguez J, Triscone J M and Kreisel J 2018 Reports on Progress in Physics 81 046501 URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aaa37a
- [110] King P D C, Wei H I, Nie Y F, Uchida M, Adamo C, Zhu S, He X, Božović I, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2014 Nature Nanotechnology 9 443–447 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2014.59
- [111] May S J, Santos T S and Bhattacharya A 2009 Physical Review B 79 115127 URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.115127
- [112] Li Y, Wrobel F, Cheng Y, Yan X, Cao H, Zhang Z, Bhattacharya A, Sun J, Hong H, Wang H, Liu Y, Zhou H and Fong D D 2022 ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14 16928–16938 URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c02357
- [113] Yan X, Wrobel F, Li Y, Zhou H, Wang H h, Bhattacharya A, Sun J, Hong H and Fong D D 2020 APL Materials 8 101107 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025849
- [114] Liu C, Humbert V F C, Bretz-Sullivan T M, Wang G, Hong D, Wrobel F, Zhang J, Hoffman J D, Pearson J E, Jiang J S, Chang C, Suslov A, Mason N, Norman M R and Bhattacharya A 2020 Nature Communications 11 1402 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15143-w
- [115] Disa A S, Walker F J, Ismail-Beigi S and Ahn C H 2015 APL Materials 3 062303 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921456
- [116] Nomura Y and Arita R 2022 Reports on Progress in Physics 85 052501 URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ac5a60
- [117] Bernardini F, Iglesias L, Bibes M and Cano A 2022 Frontiers in Physics 10 URL https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.828007
- [118] Ding X, Tam C C, Sui X, Zhao Y, Xu M, Choi J, Leng H, Zhang J, Wu M, Xiao H, Zu X, Garcia-Fernandez M, Agrestini S, Wu X, Wang Q, Gao P, Li S, Huang B, Zhou K J and Qiao L 2023 Nature 615 50–55 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05657-2
- [119] Pan G A, Ferenc Segedin D, LaBollita H, Song Q, Nica E M, Goodge B H, Pierce A T, Doyle S, Novakov S, Córdova Carrizales D, N’Diaye A T, Shafer P, Paik H, Heron J T, Mason J A, Yacoby A, Kourkoutis L F, Erten O, Brooks C M, Botana A S and Mundy J A 2022 Nature Materials 21 160–164 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-021-01142-9
- [120] Ferenc Segedin D, Goodge B H, Pan G A, Song Q, LaBollita H, Jung M C, El-Sherif H, Doyle S, Turkiewicz A, Taylor N K, Mason J A, N’Diaye A T, Paik H, El Baggari I, Botana A S, Kourkoutis L F, Brooks C M and Mundy J A 2023 Nature Communications 14 1468 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-37117-4
- [121] Pan G A, Song Q, Ferenc Segedin D, Jung M C, El-Sherif H, Fleck E E, Goodge B H, Doyle S, Córdova Carrizales D, N’Diaye A T, Shafer P, Paik H, Kourkoutis L F, El Baggari I, Botana A S, Brooks C M and Mundy J A 2022 Physical Review Materials 6 055003 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.055003
- [122] Wei W, Vu D, Zhang Z, Walker F J and Ahn C H 2023 Science Advances 9 eadh3327 URL https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh3327
- [123] Wei W, Shin K, Hong H, Shin Y, Thind A S, Yang Y, Klie R F, Walker F J and Ahn C H 2023 Physical Review Materials 7 013802 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.013802
- [124] Ueno K, Nakamura S, Shimotani H, Yuan H T, Kimura N, Nojima T, Aoki H, Iwasa Y and Kawasaki M 2011 Nature Nanotechnology 6 408–412 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nnano.2011.78
- [125] Liu C, Yan X, Jin D, Ma Y, Hsiao H W, Lin Y, Bretz-Sullivan T M, Zhou X, Pearson J, Fisher B, Jiang J S, Han W, Zuo J M, Wen J, Fong D D, Sun J, Zhou H and Bhattacharya A 2021 Science 371 716–721
- [126] Liu C, Zhou X, Hong D, Fisher B, Zheng H, Pearson J, Jiang J S, Jin D, Norman M R and Bhattacharya A 2023 Nature Communications 14 951 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-36309-2
- [127] Arnault E G, Al-Tawhid A H, Salmani-Rezaie S, Muller D A, Kumah D P, Bahramy M S, Finkelstein G and Ahadi K 2023 Science Advances 9 eadf1414 URL https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.adf1414
- [128] Al-Tawhid A H, Poage S J, Salmani-Rezaie S, Gonzalez A, Chikara S, Muller D A, Kumah D P, Gastiasoro M N, Lorenzana J and Ahadi K 2023 Nano Letters URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01571
- [129] Gupta A, Silotia H, Kumari A, Dumen M, Goyal S, Tomar R, Wadehra N, Ayyub P and Chakraverty S 2022 Advanced Materials 34 2106481 URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adma.202106481
- [130] Batlogg B, Cava R J, Rupp L W, Espinosa G P, Krajewski J J, Peck W F and Cooper A S 1989 Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 162-164 1393–1396 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/092145348990748X
- [131] Mattheiss L F, Gyorgy E M and Johnson D W 1988 Physical Review B 37 3745–3746 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3745
- [132] Cava R J, Batlogg B, Krajewski J J, Farrow R, Rupp L W, White A E, Short K, Peck W F and Kometani T 1988 Nature 332 814–816 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/332814a0
- [133] Hellman E S, Hartford E H and Fleming R M 1989 Applied Physics Letters 55 2120–2122
- [134] Bozovic I, He X, Bollinger A T, Han M G and Zhu Y 2020 Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism 33 241–248
- [135] Yan B, Jansen M and Felser C 2013 Nature Physics 9 709–711
- [136] Harris D T, Campbell N, Uecker R, Brützam M, Schlom D G, Levchenko A, Rzchowski M S and Eom C B 2018 Physical Review Materials 2 041801
- [137] Harris D T, Campbell N G, Di C, Park J M, Luo L, Zhou H, Kim G Y, Song K, Choi S Y, Wang J, Rzchowski M S and Eom C B 2020 Physical Review B 101 064509
- [138] Sleight A W 2015 Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications 514 152–165
- [139] Kim M, McNally G M, Kim H H, Oudah M, Gibbs A S, Manuel P, Green R J, Sutarto R, Takayama T, Yaresko A, Wedig U, Isobe M, Kremer R K, Bonn D A, Keimer B and Takagi H 2022 Nature Materials 21 627
- [140] Avron J E, Osadchy D and Seiler R 2003 Physics Today 56 38–42 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1611351
- [141] Murakami S, Nagaosa N and Zhang S C 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93(15) 156804 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.156804
- [142] König M, Molenkamp L W, Qi X l and Zhang S c 2012 Science 766 766–771
- [143] Bansil A, Lin H and Das T 2016 Reviews of Modern Physics 88 021004 (Preprint 1603.03576)
- [144] Narang P, Garcia C A C and Felser C 2020 Nature Materials 1–8 URL http://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-020-00820-4
- [145] Witczak-Krempa W, Chen G, Kim Y B and Balents L 2014 Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 5 57–82 URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2193%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125138
- [146] Vergniory M G, Elcoro L, Felser C, Regnault N, Bernevig B A and Wang Z 2019 Nature 566 480–485 (Preprint 1807.10271)
- [147] MS Windows NT kernel description https://www.topologicalquantumchemistry.com/#/?include=O accessed: 2023-08-23
- [148] Chen Y, Bergman D L and Burkov A A 2013 Physical Review B 88 125110 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.125110
- [149] Gu Y, Wang Q, Hu W, Liu W, Zhang Z, Pan F and Song C 2022 Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 55 233001 URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ac4fd3
- [150] Takahashi K S, Onoda M, Kawasaki M, Nagaosa N and Tokura Y 2009 Physical Review Letters 103 1–4
- [151] Takahashi K S, Ishizuka H, Murata T, Wang Q Y, Tokura Y, Nagaosa N and Kawasaki M 2018 Science Advances 4 eaar7880 URL https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.aar7880
- [152] Xia B, Jin Y, Zhao J, Chen Z, Zheng B, Zhao Y, Wang R and Xu H 2019 Physical Review Letters 122 057205 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.057205
- [153] He J, Di Sante D, Li R, Chen X Q, Rondinelli J M and Franchini C 2018 Nature Communications 9 492 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02814-4
- [154] Bzdušek T, Rüegg A and Sigrist M 2015 Physical Review B 91 165105 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.165105
- [155] Uchida M and Kawasaki M 2018 Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 51 143001
- [156] Itoh S, Endoh Y, Yokoo T, Ibuka S, Park J G, Kaneko Y, Takahashi K S, Tokura Y and Nagaosa N 2016 Nature Communications 7 11788 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms11788
- [157] Takiguchi K, Wakabayashi Y K, Irie H, Krockenberger Y, Otsuka T, Sawada H, Nikolaev S A, Das H, Tanaka M, Taniyasu Y and Yamamoto H 2020 Nature Communications 11 4969 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18646-8
- [158] Toyoda S, Yamada R, Kaneko Y, Tokura Y and Ogawa N 2022 Applied Physics Letters 120 242408 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0096687
- [159] Pardo V and Pickett W E 2009 Physical Review Letters 102 166803 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.166803
- [160] Lado J L, Guterding D, Barone P, Valentí R and Pardo V 2016 Physical Review B 94 235111 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235111
- [161] Xiao D, Zhu W, Ran Y, Nagaosa N and Okamoto S 2011 Nature Communications 2 596 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms1602
- [162] He Q L, Hughes T L, Armitage N P, Tokura Y and Wang K L 2022 Nature Materials 21 15–23
- [163] Junquera J, Nahas Y, Prokhorenko S, Bellaiche L, Íñiguez J, Schlom D G, Chen L Q, Salahuddin S, Muller D A, Martin L W and Ramesh R 2023 Rev. Mod. Phys. 95(2) 025001 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.025001
- [164] Tokura Y and Kanazawa N 2021 Chemical Reviews 121 2857–2897 URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00297
- [165] Kuepferling M, Casiraghi A, Soares G, Durin G, Garcia-Sanchez F, Chen L, Back C, Marrows C, Tacchi S and Carlotti G 2023 Reviews of Modern Physics 95 015003 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.015003
- [166] Ohuchi Y, Kozuka Y, Uchida M, Ueno K, Tsukazaki A and Kawasaki M 2015 Physical Review B 91 245115
- [167] Yun Y, Ma Y, Su T, Xing W, Chen Y, Yao Y, Cai R, Yuan W and Han W 2018 Physical Review Materials 2 034201 publisher: American Physical Society URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.034201
- [168] Ohuchi Y, Matsuno J, Ogawa N, Kozuka Y, Uchida M, Tokura Y and Kawasaki M 2018 Nature Communications 9 213 number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-02629-3
- [169] Sohn B, Kim B, Park S Y, Choi H Y, Moon J Y, Choi T, Choi Y J, Zhou H, Choi J W, Bombardi A, Porter D G, Chang S H, Han J H and Kim C 2021 Phys. Rev. Res. 3(2) 023232 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023232
- [170] Kimbell G, Sass P M, Woltjes B, Ko E K, Noh T W, Wu W and Robinson J W 2020 Physical Review Materials 4 54414 arXiv: 2002.06062 Publisher: American Physical Society URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.054414
- [171] Kim G, Son K, Suyolcu Y E, Miao L, Schreiber N J, Nair H P, Putzky D, Minola M, Christiani G, Van Aken P A, Shen K M, Schlom D G, Logvenov G and Keimer B 2020 Physical Review Materials 4 104410
- [172] Skoropata E, Mazza A R, Herklotz A, Ok J M, Eres G, Brahlek M, Charlton T R, Lee H N and Ward T Z 2021 Physical Review B 103 085121
- [173] Wang L, Feng Q, Lee H G, Ko E K, Lu Q and Noh T W 2020 Nano Letters 20 2468–2477
- [174] Schreiber N J, Miao L, Goodge B H, Kourkoutis L F, Shen K M and Schlom D G 2023 APL Materials 11 061117 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0151126
- [175] Manjeshwar A K, Nair S, Rajapitamahuni A K, James R D and Jalan B 2023 ACS Nano Publisher: American Chemical Society URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c03625
- [176] Ishida K, Mukuda H, Kitaoka Y, Asayama K, Mao Z Q, Mori Y and Maeno Y 1998 Nature 396 658–660 URL http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v396/n6712/abs/396658a0.html
- [177] Mackenzie A P, Scaffidi T, Hicks C W and Maeno Y 2017 npj Quantum Materials 2 1–9 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41535-017-0045-4
- [178] Krockenberger Y, Uchida M, Takahashi K S, Nakamura M, Kawasaki M and Tokura Y 2010 Applied Physics Letters 97 082502 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3481363
- [179] Kim J, Mun J, Palomares García C M, Kim B, Perry R S, Jo Y, Im H, Lee H G, Ko E K, Chang S H, Chung S B, Kim M, Robinson J W A, Yonezawa S, Maeno Y, Wang L and Noh T W 2021 Nano Letters 21 4185–4192 URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04963
- [180] Nair H P, Ruf J P, Schreiber N J, Miao L, Grandon M L, Baek D J, Goodge B H, Ruff J P C, Kourkoutis L F, Shen K M and Schlom D G 2018 APL Materials 6 101108 URL https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.5053084
- [181] Uchida M, Ide M, Watanabe H, Takahashi K S, Tokura Y and Kawasaki M 2017 APL Materials 5 106108 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007342
- [182] Choudhary R, Liu Z, Cai J, Xu X, Chu J H and Jalan B 2023 APL Materials 11 061124 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0150893
- [183] Faeth B D, Hensling F, Harbola V, Majer L, Boschker H, Braun W and Mannhart J 2023 Growth of Ruddlesden-Popper Ruthenates via Thermal Laser Epitaxy 37th North American Conference on Molecular Beam Epitaxy (American Vacuum Society)
- [184] Cao J, Massarotti D, Vickers M E, Kursumovic A, Bernardo A D, Robinson J W A, Tafuri F, MacManus-Driscoll J L and Blamire M G 2016 Superconductor Science and Technology 29 095005 URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/29/9/095005
- [185] Goodge B H, Nair H P, Baek D J, Schreiber N J, Miao L, Ruf J P, Waite E N, Carubia P M, Shen K M, Schlom D G and Kourkoutis L F 2022 APL Materials 10 041114 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085279
- [186] Garcia C M P, Di Bernardo A, Kimbell G, Vickers M E, Massabuau F C P, Komori S, Divitini G, Yasui Y, Lee H G, Kim J, Kim B, Blamire M G, Vecchione A, Fittipaldi R, Maeno Y, Noh T W and Robinson J W A 2020 Communications Materials 1 1–8 URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s43246-020-0026-1
- [187] Fang Y, Nair H P, Miao L, Goodge B, Schreiber N J, Ruf J P, Kourkoutis L F, Shen K M, Schlom D G and Ramshaw B J 2021 Physical Review B 104 045152 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.045152
- [188] Carter J M, Shankar V V, Zeb M A and Kee H Y 2012 Physical Review B 85 115105 URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115105
- [189] Kim W J, Song J, Li Y and Noh T W 2022 APL Materials 10 080901 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0097608
- [190] Liu X, Fang S, Fu Y, Ge W, Kareev M, Kim J W, Choi Y, Karapetrova E, Zhang Q, Gu L, Choi E S, Wen F, Wilson J H, Fabbris G, Ryan P J, Freeland J, Haskel D, Wu W, Pixley J H and Chakhalian J 2021 Physical Review Letters 127 277204 URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.04062
- [191] Liu X, Kotiuga M, Kim H S, N’Diaye A T, Choi Y, Zhang Q, Cao Y, Kareev M, Wen F, Pal B, Freeland J W, Gu L, Haskel D, Shafer P, Arenholz E, Haule K, Vanderbilt D, Rabe K M and Chakhalian J 2019 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 19863–19868 URL https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1907043116
- [192] Skoropata E, Nichols J, Mok Ok J, Chopdekar R V, Sang Choi E, Rastogi A, Sohn C, Gao X, Yoon S, Farmer T, Desautels R D, Choi Y, Haskel D, Freeland J W, Okamoto S, Brahlek M and Nyung Lee H 2020 Science Advances 6 eaaz3902 URL https://www.science.org
- [193] Liu J, Zhang X, Ji Y, Gao X, Wu J, Zhang M, Li L, Liu X, Yan W, Yao T, Yin Y, Wang L, Guo H, Cheng G, Wang Z, Gao P, Wang Y, Chen K and Liao Z 2022 Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13 11946–11954
- [194] Jeong S G, Oh J Y, Hao L, Liu J and Choi W S 2023 Advanced Functional Materials 33 2301770 URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/adfm.202301770
- [195] Kawasaki J K, Uchida M, Paik H, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2016 Physical Review B 94 121104(R)
- [196] Choudhary R, Nair S, Yang Z, Lee D and Jalan B 2022 APL Materials 10 091118 URL https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110707
- [197] Nelson J N, Parzyck C T, Faeth B D, Kawasaki J K, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2020 Nature Communications 11 2597
- [198] Nelson J N, Schreiber N J, Georgescu A B, Goodge B H, Faeth B D, Parzyck C T, Zeledon C, Kourkoutis L F, Millis A J, Georges A, Schlom D G and Shen K M 2022 Science Advances 8 eabj0481 URL https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.abj0481
- [199] Guguschev C, Klimm D, Brützam M, Gesing T, Gogolin M, Paik H, Markurt T, Kok D, Kwasniewski A, Jendritzki U and Schlom D 2020 Journal of Crystal Growth 536 125526 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002202482030049X
- [200] Bovo L, Rouleau C M, Prabhakaran D and Bramwell S T 2016 Nanotechnology 28 055708 URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/aa5112
- [201] Klimm D, Guguschev C, Kok D J, Naumann M, Ackermann L, Rytz D, Peltz M, Dupré K, Neumann M D, Kwasniewski A, Schlom D G and Bickermann M 2017 CrystEngComm 19(28) 3908–3914 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7CE00942A
- [202] Wolff N, Schwaigert T, Siche D, Schlom D G and Klimm D 2020 Journal of Crystal Growth 532 125426 URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024819306414
- [203] Hu J, Xu S Y, Ni N and Mao Z 2019 Annual Review of Materials Research 49 207–252
- [204] Bradlyn B, Elcoro L, Cano J, Vergniory M G, Wang Z, Felser C, Aroyo M I and Bernevig B A 2017 Nature 547 298–305 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature23268
- [205] Lu D, Vishik I M, Yi M, Chen Y, Moore R G and Shen Z X 2012 Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 3 129
- [206] Thapa S, Paudel R, Blanchet M D, Gemperline P T and Comes R B 2021 Journal of Materials Research 36 26–51 URL https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-020-00070-9