An affine isoperimetric inequality for log-concave functions∗
Abstract.
The authors gave an affine isoperimetric inequality [38] that gives a lower bound for the volume of a polar body and the equality holds if and only if the body is a simplex. In this paper, we give a functional isoperimetric inequality for log-concave functions that contains the affine isoperimetric inequality of Lutwak, Yang and Zhang in [38].
Key words and phrases:
LYZ ellipsoid; LYZ polar inequality; log-concave function; affine isoperimetric inequality; reverse affine isoperitmetric inequality.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
52A40, 52A411. Introductions
The isoperimetric problem was known in Ancient Greece. However, the first mathematically rigorous proof was obtained only in the 19th century by Weierstrass based on works of Bernoulli, Euler, Lagrange and others. The isoperimetric problem is equivalent to the isoperimetric inequality that is bounding by the surface area and volume of the geometric domain in the Euclidian space with equality if and only if is a standard ball. The natural generalizations of the isoperimetric inequality are Alexandrov-Fenchel inequalities that are bounding by mixed volumes of convex bodies in integral and convex geometry analysis. Blascheke-Santaló inequality, differential affine isoperimetric inequality, Busemann-Petty centroid inequality, Petty projection inequality and more affine isoperimetric inequalities are found with equalities for ellipsoids, polar bodies or simplices [8, 14, 15, 27, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 41, 46].
During past decades, the reverse affine isoperimetric inequalities, with simplices, cubes or polar bodies as extremal, received more attentions. Usually, reverse affine isoperimetric inequalities are much harder to establish. One of the known open problem about the reverse affine isoperimetric inequalities is the Mahler conjecture.
Let denote the set of compact convex sets that contain the origin in their interiors in . Let , the polar body of , is defined by
| (1.1) |
and denotes the inner product of and .
If is symmetric, Mahler[40] conjectured that
| (1.2) |
where denotes the volume of , with equality if and only if either or is a parallelepiped.
Inequality (1.2) was proved by Mahler [40] for , the -dimensional case was solved by Iriyeh and Shibata [28], and the case when is still open. One can see [8, 9, 10, 14, 15, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 41, 46, 47, 48, 49] for more references on Mahler’s conjecture, affine isoperimetric inequalities and reverse affine isoperimetric inequalities.
Let . The radial function of , usually called the LYZ ellipsoid, is defined by
| (1.3) |
where denotes the outer unit normal vector of at , is the support function of and is the -dimensional Hausdorff measure. Another known reverse affine isoperimetric inequality is the following LYZ polar inequality [38].
LYZ polar inequality. Let , then
| (1.4) |
with equality if and only if is a simplex whose centroid is at the origin.
Recently, Fang and Zhou [20] introduced the LYZ ellipsoid of log-concave functions by solving an extremum problem. A function is called a log-concave function if is concave. Log-concave functions would be considered as extension of convex bodies. Usually, the results of convex bodies can be covered by taking log-concave functions, such as the Gaussian function or the characteristic function of convex bodies. The researches on log-concave functions originated from Ball’s Phd thesis [7], in which the Blaschke-Santaló inequality of even log-concave function was established. In recent years, some considerable progress has been made in establishing the geometric inequalities of log-concave function. Colesanti and Fragalà[17] established the Minkowski inequality of log-concave function via the Prékopa-Leindler inequality. Fang, Xing and Ye[19] further gave Minkowski inequalities and solved the existence of the even Minkowski problem of log-concave functions for . John and Löwner ellipsoids for log-concave functions and their related inequalities were given in [3, 32]. Some affine isoperimetric inequalities of the affine surface areas of log-concave functions were obtained in [12, 13]. Other inequalities, such as Pólya-Szegö inequality, Rogers-Shephard inequality and its reverse and some stability results for log-concave functional inequalites can be found in [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 16, 22, 23, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].
In this paper, for a convex function , we use to denote the Legendre transform of , and to denote the dual of a log-concave function . The integral of on is denoted by and the domain of is denoted by . For any function and , the upper level set of is defined by
Let denote the class of all upper semi-continuous log-concave functions with and .
Let , for the LYZ ellipsoid of the log-concave function , defined in Definition 4.1, we have the following affine isoperimetric inequality, the functional LYZ polar inequality of (1.4).
Theorem. Let and be the surface area measure of . Suppose that on and , then
| (1.5) |
Moreover, if for all , then equality holds if and only if and is a simplex whose centroid is at the origin.
Note that the inequality (1.5) is affine invariant, that is, the inequality (1.5) does not change under compositions of with affine transformations of . Inequality (1.5) includes the LYZ polar inequality as a special case. In particular, when and is a convex body contains origin in its interior, the inequality (1.5) becomes the LYZ polar inequality (1.4). A detailed derivation can be found in Section 5. The supremum may achieve infinity and in this case the inequality (1.5) is strict. However, is often bounded and some examples of the function will be given in Section 5.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide some basics of convex bodies and log-concave functions. The Ball-Barth inequality for isotropic embeddings, which is a key tool to establish our main theorem, is introduced in Section 3. In Section 4, the definition of the LYZ ellipsoid of the log-concave function is given, and its properties is listed. In Section 5, we give the proof of the main theorem and show that LYZ’s polar inequality is a direct result of inequality (1.5) ((Theorem 5.1).
2. Preliminaries and notations
In this section, we list some preliminaries and notations about convex bodies and log-concave functions. Good general references for the theory of convex bodies and log-concave functions are provided by the books of Gardner [24], Schneider[45] and Rockfellar [43].
2.1. Basics regarding convex bodies
Let denote the standard Euclidean basis in the dimensional Euclidean space . For , stands for the inner product of , and for the Euclidean norm of . Let be a convex body (non-empty compact convex set of ) contains the origin in its interior. The Minkowski function of is defined by
| (2.1) |
Clearly, if is the unit ball in , the Minkowski function becomes the Euclidean norm.
For convex body , its support function is defined by
and its radial function is defined by
The support function and Minkowski function are homogeneous of degree while the radial function is homogeneous of degree . From the definitions of the support, Minkowski and radial functions and the definition of the polar body, one can see that
| (2.2) |
for any . Let denote the general linear group of . For ,
| (2.3) |
where is the inverse of transpose of .
2.2. Functional setting
Let . If for every and ,
then is a convex function. Let Clearly, is a convex set for any convex function . The Legendre trasformation of is the convex function defined by
| (2.4) |
Clearly, for all , there is an equality if and only if and is the gradient of at . Hence,
The convex function is lower semi-continuous, if the subset is a closed set for any . If is a lower semi-continuous convex function, then also is a lower semi-continuous convex function, and .
Let be a log-concave function. The total mass of is defined by
For and , the Asplund sum of and is defined by
Let . Rotem [44] gives the following first variational formula
| (2.5) |
where is the surface area measure of , which is defined by
for any .
3. The Ball-Barth inequality
Let be a positive Borel measure on . A positive semi-definite matrix can be generated by , which is defined by
| (3.1) |
where is the rank matrix generated by , or, equivalently by
| (3.2) |
for all . A positive Borel measure is said to be an isotropic measure if
| (3.3) |
where is the identity matrix. If is isotropic, summing the equation (3.2) with , one has
| (3.4) |
The following Ball-Barth inequality was established in [36]. The Ball-Barth inequality. Let an isotropic measure on and be a continuous function. Then
| (3.5) |
with equality if and only if is a constant for linearly independent in .
The isotropic embedding from to is given as follows.
Definition 3.1.
Let be a Borel measure space. A continuous function is an isotropic embedding of into if
| (3.6) |
for all .
Let and have been given in Definition 3.1. Summing the equation (3.6) with , one has
| (3.7) |
Define a new Borel measure on , which is the push-forward of by , by
for any Borel function . Definition 3.1 shows that is an isotropic measure on , by applying the Ball-Barthe inequality to , we can obtain the following Ball-Barthe inequality for isotropic embeddings.
Proposition 3.1.
If is an isotropic embedding of the Borel measure space into , then for each continuous
| (3.8) |
with equality if and only if is constants for in such that are linearly independent.
4. The LYZ ellipsoid of log-concave functions
In this section, we will define the LYZ ellipsoid of log-concave functions, and introduce its properties.
Definition 4.1.
Let . Suppose that for any , then the LYZ ellipsoid of , denoted by , is defined as
| (4.1) |
Note that the function is a Minkowski functional of an ellipsoid. Indeed, if is an ellipsoid generated by real symmetric matrix , that is
one can check that the Minkowski function of is given by From this, we see that the function is a Minkowski functional of an ellipsoid, which is generated by real symmetric matrix , where
Property 4.1.
Let and . Then
| (4.2) |
Proof.
The following corollary shows that the quantity is invariant under the operation of .
Corollary 4.1.
Let and . Then for any
When with , can be calculated precisely.
Property 4.2.
Let . If , then
Proof.
When is the Gaussian function , the following result can be obtained directly from Property 4.2 and the fact that .
Corollary 4.1.
If , then
5. LYZ polar inequality for log-concave functions
In this section, we will establish the LYZ polar inequality for log-concave functions. The following lemmas are needed.
Lemma 5.1.
Let and be the upper level set of . If is a finite, positive Borel measure on and on , then
where and .
Proof.
Let
By the convexity of , we have
Hence
Then . ∎
Note that may reach infinity, but it is often bounded for many log-concave functions, such as with for and . We first need to show . For the Legendre transformation of ,
we have as and hence . Moreover, . [17, Lemma 2.5] shows that there exists two constants and such that
| (5.1) |
for any . Hence
that is, for any , there exists a constant such that for and the unit ball in . Then is bounded for any as the continuity of . Set , then for any . Hence is bounded on and is a finite constant.
The following lemma is the key for the equality condition of our main inequality.
Lemma 5.2.
Let be convex function and dom and for all . Suppose that satisfies the equality
| (5.2) |
a.e. on , where is a constant. Then for some .
Proof.
Firstly, we consider the case when , in which case we claim that
| (5.3) |
for all and any . Since is finite near the origin, hence , which implies that (5.3) holds for . Otherwise, if for some points , where is differentiable, then by the convexity of , one has
for all . Note that the above inequality is strictly when due to the assumptions and . Then by taking , we have , which contradicts with (5.2). Thus at every differentiable points. Moreover, this also holds on whole as is continuous and is differentiable almost everywhere. Combined with the convexity of , one sees is sublinear. By the fact that every sublinear function from to is a support function of a convex body, we have for some convex body . Since for all , one can see that is a convex body that contains the origin in its interior. In this case, one has and (5.2) follows. ∎
For a real function , let
| (5.4) |
The transformation is defined by
for , with for .
By the Ball-Barth inequality, we obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 5.3.
Let be a Borel measure space and be an isotropic embedding of the Borel measure space into . Then
| (5.5) |
with equality if and only if is constant on , and there exists a with respect to such that
for with linearly independent.
Proof.
Deriving both sides of (5.4) with respect to , we have
Taking , one has
| (5.6) |
Now we integrate (5.6) over all with respect to the measure . From the definition of isotropic embedding (3.6), the integral of the left hand side on (5.6) is equal to
| (5.7) |
Next we deal with the integral of the last term on the right hand side of (5.6). From (3.7), one can see that the measure is a probability measure. By the fact that the -mean of a function is dominated by its -mean on a probability space and (3.6), one has
| (5.8) |
with equality if and only if is constant on . Hence
Calculating the derivative of with respect to , we have
From Proposition 3.1, we infer that
| (5.9) |
with equality if and only if
is constant for such that are linearly independent.
Now we are ready to prove our functional isoperimetric inequality for log-concave functions.
Theorem 5.1.
Let and be the surface area measure of . Suppose that on and , then
| (5.10) |
Moreover, if for all , then equality holds if and only if and is a simplex whose centroid is at the origin.
Proof.
From Property 4.1, (2.3) and the fact that is a Minkowski function of an ellipsoid, we only need to prove (5.10) holds for . This means that the measure
is isotropic. Let . For any , define a function by and by Assume that . By the fact that the barycenter of is at the origin, we have
Hence is an isotropic embedding of the Borel measure space into . From Lemma 5.3, one can see that
| (5.11) |
Here is given by
Lemma 5.1 implies that
Therefore,
This together with the fact that gives (5.10).
From the equality condition of inequality (5.5), we have that is a positive constant on , that is, on due to on and on . Since , one can see that
| (5.12) |
almost everywhere on . If for any , Lemma 5.2 implies that for some convex body . In this case, by (4.4), one can calculate that
| (5.13) |
and
This together with the definition of and (5.13) shows that
For any and convex body ,
Hence
By the definition of Legendre transform and , we have
For any and , we obtain
Hence
and the inequality (5.10) becomes
| (5.14) |
Let denote the convex hull of and denote the closure of . For the surface area of the log-concave function, [18, (16)] says that
therefore .
References
- [1] D. Alonso-Gutiérrez, J. Bernués and B.G. Merino, Zhang’s inequality for log-concave functions, In Geometric Aspects of Functional Analysis (pp. 29-48), Springer, Cham, 2020.
- [2] D. Alonso-Gutiérrez, B.G. Merino, C.H. Jiménez and R. Villa, Rogers-Shephard inequality for log-concave functions, J. Funct. Anal., 271 (2016), 3269-3299.
- [3] D. Alonso-Gutiérrez, B.G. Merino, C.H. Jiménez and R. Villa, John’s ellipsoid and the integral ratio of a log-concave function, J. Geom. Anal., 28 (2018), 1182-1201.
- [4] S. Artstein-Avidan, D.I. Florentin and A. Segal, Functional Brunn-Minkowski inequalities induced by polarity, Adv. Math., 364 (2020), 107006.
- [5] S. Artstein-Avidan, B. Klartag and V.D. Milman, The Santaló point of a function, and a functional form of Santaló inequality, Mathematika, 51 (2004), 33-48.
- [6] S. Artstein-Avidan, B. Klartag, C. Schütt and E.M. Werner, Functional affine-isoperimetry and an inverse logarithmic Sobolev inequality, J. Funct. Anal., 262 (2012), 4181-4204.
- [7] K. Ball, Isometric problems in and sections of convex sets, PhD dissertation, Cambridge, 1986.
- [8] K. Ball, Volume ratios and a reverse isoperimetric inequality, J. London Math. Soc., 44 (1991), 351-359.
- [9] F. Barthe, On a reverse form of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality, Invent. Math., 134 (1998), 335-361.
- [10] F. Barthe, K.J. Böröczky and M. Fradelizi, Stability of the functional forms of the Blaschke-Santaló inequality, Monatsh. Math., 173 (2014), 135-159.
- [11] K. Böröczky and A. De, Stability of the Prékopa-Leindler inequality for log-concave functions, Adv. Math., 386 (2021), 107810.
- [12] U. Caglar, M. Fradelizi, O. Guedon, J. Lehec, C. Schütt and E.M. Werner, Functional versions of -affine surface area and entropy inequalities, Int. Math. Res. Not., 2016 (2016), 1223-1250.
- [13] U. Caglar and D. Ye, Affine isoperimetric inequalities in the functional Orlicz-Brunn-Minkowski theory, Adv. Appl. Math., 81 (2016), 78-114.
- [14] S. Campi and P. Gronchi, The -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality, Adv. Math., 167 (2002), 128-141.
- [15] S. Campi and P. Gronchi, On the reverse -Busemann-Petty centroid inequality, Mathematika, 49 (2002), 1-11.
- [16] A. Colesanti, Functional inequalities related to the Rogers-Shephard inequality, Mathematika, 53 (2006), 81-101.
- [17] A. Colesanti and I. Fragalà, The first variation of the total mass of log-concave functions and related inequalities, Adv. Math., 244 (2013), 708-749.
- [18] D. Cordero-Erausquin and B. Klartag, Moment measures, J. Funct. Anal., 268 (2015), 3834-3866.
- [19] N. Fang, S. Xing and D. Ye, Geometry of log-concave functions: the Asplund sum and the Minkowski problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 21 (2022), Art. 45.
- [20] N. Fang and J. Zhou, LYZ ellipsoid and Petty projection body for log-concave functions, Adv. Math., 340 (2018), 914-959.
- [21] N. Fang and J. Zhou, The Busemann-Petty problem on entropy of log-concave functions, Sci. China Math., 65 (2022), 2171-2182.
- [22] M. Fradelizi and M. Meyer, Some functional forms of Blaschke-Santaló inequality, Math. Z., 256 (2007), 379-395.
- [23] M. Fradelizi and M. Meyer, Some functional inverse Santaló inequality, Adv. Math., 218 (2008), 1430-1452.
- [24] R. J. Gardner, Geometric tomography, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995.
- [25] A. A. Giannopoulos and V. D. Milman, Extremal problems and isotropic positions of convex bodies, Israel J. Math., 117 (2000), 29-60.
- [26] A. A. Giannopoulos and M. Papadimitrakis, Isotropic surface area measures, Mathematika, 46 (1999), 1-13.
- [27] C. Haberl and F. Schuster, General affine isoperimetric inequalities, J. Differential Geom., 83 (2009), 1-26.
- [28] H. Iriyeh and M. Shibata, Symmetric Mahler¡¯s conjecture for the volume product in the -dimensional case, Duke Math. J., 169 (2020), 1077-1134.
- [29] G. Ivanov and M. Naszódi, Functional John ellipsoids, J. Funct. Anal., 282 (2022), 109441.
- [30] B. Klartag and V.D. Milman, Geometry of log-concave functions and measures, Geom. Dedicata, 112 (2005), 169-182.
- [31] B. Li, C. Schütt and E.M. Werner, Floating functions, Israel J. Math., 231 (2019), 181-210.
- [32] B. Li, C. Schütt and E.M. Werner, The Löwner function of a log-concave function, J. Geom. Anal., 31 (2021), 423-456.
- [33] Y. Lin, Affine Orlicz Pólya-Szegö principle for log-concave functions, J. Funct. Anal., 273 (2017), 3295-3326.
- [34] E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, affne isoperimetric inequalities, J. Differential Geom., 56 (2000), 111-132.
- [35] E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, A new ellipsoid associated with convex bodies, Duke Math. J., 104 (2000), 375-390.
- [36] E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, Volume inequalities for subspaces of , J. Differential Geom., 68 (2004), 159-184.
- [37] E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, Volume inequalities for isotropic measures, Amer. J. Math., 129 (2007), 1711-1723.
- [38] E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, A volume inequality for polar bodies, J. Differential Geom., 84 (2010), 163-178.
- [39] E. Lutwak and G. Zhang, Blaschke-Santaló inequalities, J. Differential Geom., 45 (1997), 1-16.
- [40] K. Mahler, Ein Minimalproblem für konvexe Polygone, Mathematica (Zutphen), B7 (1939), 118-127.
- [41] M. Meyer and E. Werner, On the -affine surface area, Adv. Math., 152 (2000), 288-313.
- [42] V.D. Milman and L. Rotem, Mixed integrals and related inequalities, J. Funct. Anal., 264 (2013), 570-604.
- [43] T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, (1970).
- [44] L. Rotem, The anisotropic total variation and surface area measures, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13146 (2022).
- [45] R. Schneider, Convex bodies: the Brunn-Minkowski theory, Cambridge University Press, 2014.
- [46] F. Schuster and M. Weberndorfer, Volume inequalities for asymmetric Wulff shapes, J. Differential Geom., 92 (2012): 263-283.
- [47] B. Zhu, H. Hong and D. Ye, The Orlicz-Petty bodies, Interna. Math. Res. Notices, 14 (2018), 4356-4403.
- [48] D. Zou and G. Xiong, Orlicz-John ellipsoids, Adv. Math., 265 (2014), 132-168.
- [49] D. Zou and G. Xiong, Orlicz-Legendre ellipsoids, J. Geom. Anal., 26 (2016), 2474-2502.