This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Anisotropy study of multiferroicity in the pyroxene NaFeGe2O6

M Ackermann1, L Andersen2, T Lorenz2, L Bohatý1 and P Becker1 1 Institut für Kristallographie, Universität zu Köln, Greinstraße 6, 50939 Köln, Germany 2 II. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Straße 77, 50937 Köln, Germany petra.becker@uni-koeln.de
Abstract

We present a study of the anisotropy of the dielectric, magnetic and magnetoelastic properties of the multiferroic clinopyroxene NaFeGe2O6. Pyroelectric currents, dielectric constants and magnetic susceptibilities as well as the thermal expansion and the magnetostriction were examined on large synthetic single crystals of NaFeGe2O6. The spontaneous electric polarization detected below TC11.6KT_{\rm C}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K} in an antiferromagnetically ordered state (TN13KT_{\rm N}\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K}) is mainly lying within the acac plane with a small component along b\bi{b}, indicating a triclinic symmetry of the multiferroic phase of NaFeGe2O6. The electric polarization can be strongly modified by applying magnetic fields along different directions. We derive detailed magnetic-field versus temperature phase diagrams and identify three multiferroic low-temperature phases, which are separated by a non-ferroelectric, antiferromagnetically ordered state from the paramagnetic high-temperature phase.

pacs:
75.85.+t, 77.80.-e, 75.30.Cr, 77.70.+a
: New J. Phys.

1 Introduction

Spin-driven multiferroics with complex antiferromagnetic orders, such as spiral or cycloidal spin structures, are in the focus of scientific interest since the last ten years [1, 2, 3, 4]. Because in this class of materials ferroelectricity usually is induced by a primary magnetic ordering, ferroelectric and magnetic order show strong magnetoelectric coupling. Therefore, the rather small spontaneous electric polarizations, compared to conventional ferroelectrics, can be strongly modified and controlled by external magnetic fields. As a result of the intense research activities, a series of new spin-driven multiferroic materials was found in the last few years, e.g. [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. In particular the pyroxenes (general formula AMX2AMX_{2}O6 with A=A= mono- or divalent metal, M=M= di- or trivalent metal and X=X= tri- or tetravalent cation) form a huge family of potentially multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials [17]. The mineral aegirine of the composition Na1.04Fe0.83Ca0.04Mn0.02Al0.01Ti0.08Si2O6 was identified as multiferroic a few years ago, while LiFeSi2O6 and LiCrSi2O6 were found to be linear magnetoelectrics [17]. Interestingly, synthetic NaFeSi2O6 apparently has a modified magnetic structure compared to natural aegirine indicating that it probably is only linear magnetoelectric [18]. Although in the years after the pioneering work of Jodlauk et al. [17] intense research activities set in to find more multiferroic materials within the pyroxene family [21, 22, 24, 23, 19], up to date only one further multiferroic compound could be identified, namely NaFeGe2O6 [25].

NaFeGe2O6 belongs to the subgroup of clinopyroxenes and crystallizes at room temperature in the space group C2/cC2/c with the lattice parameters a=10.0073(8)Åa=10.0073(8)\,\mathrm{\AA }, b=8.9382(7)Åb=8.9382(7)\,\mathrm{\AA }, c=5.5184(4)Åc=5.5184(4)\,\mathrm{\AA } and β=107.524(1)\beta=107.524(1)\,\mathrm{{}^{\circ}} [19]. The structure consists of one-dimensional zigzag chains of edge-sharing FeO6 octahedra, which are connected by chains of GeO4 tetrahedra within the (110)(110) and (1¯10)(\bar{1}10) planes. Both chain systems are running along the c\bi{c} axis, see figure 1 (a). There are three relevant magnetic exchange interactions J1,J2J_{1},J_{2} and J3J_{3} [20]. Along the zigzag chains J1J_{1} connects neighbouring Fe3+ sites via Fe–O–Fe super-exchange pathways. The super-exchange interactions J2J_{2} and J3J_{3} connect Fe3+ sites of different chains via one or two [GeO4] tetrahedra, respectively. In this context, the Fe3+ moments form triangular lattices within the (110)(110) and (1¯10)(\bar{1}10) planes, which can give rise to a magnetic frustration.

The vast majority of the investigations of NaFeGe2O6 were performed on polycrystalline powder samples [27, 28, 26, 19, 25]. Measurements of the magnetic susceptibility revealed the occurrence of low-dimensional magnetic correlations around 35 K, succeeded by the onset of a three-dimensional antiferromagnetic order below 13K\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K} [26, 19, 25]. Previous results of magnetic-susceptibility and Mössbauer-spectroscopy measurements had indicated a slightly higher Néel temperature of about 15 K [27, 28]. Among the group of Fe3+-based pyroxenes, NaFeGe2O6 exhibits the most pronounced low-dimensional magnetic characteristics [19]. Specific-heat measurements revealed a further phase transition at about 12 K [26]. Dielectric investigations on sintered polycrystalline pellets revealed that this second transition coincides with the onset of a spontaneous polarization of about 13μC/m213\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}}, which decreases with increasing magnetic field [25]. Two different neutron-diffraction experiments on powder as well as on single-crystal samples of NaFeGe2O6 are reported in literature [29, 19, 26]. The results of both studies indicate that the magnetic structure of NaFeGe2O6 forms an incommensurate cycloidal spin arrangement below the second transition at 12K\simeq 12\,\mathrm{K} with the spins lying mainly within the acac plane. The reported propagation vectors k=(0.3357,0,0.0814)\bi{k}=(0.3357,0,0.0814) [29, 26] and k=(0.323,1.0,0.080)\bi{k}^{\prime}=(0.323,1.0,0.080) [19], however, are contradictory and the magnetic structure between 12K\simeq 12\,\mathrm{K} and 13K\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K} has not been resolved yet.

Here, we present a detailed study of thermodynamic properties of NaFeGe2O6, using large synthetic single crystals, elucidating the whole anisotropy of its magnetic and multiferroic properties. The spontaneous electric polarization detected below TC11.6KT_{\rm C}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K} is mainly lying within the acac plane with a small component along b\bi{b}, indicating a triclinic symmetry of the multiferroic phase of NaFeGe2O6. The electric polarization can strongly be modified by applying magnetic fields, which induce transitions to other phases. The paper is organized as follows. First, the crystal growth of NaFeGe2O6 and the experimental techniques for the study of its multiferroic properties are described. Then, the results of the magnetic-susceptibility measurements and the dielectric investigations are presented and discussed. Combining these data with measurements of thermal expansion and magnetostriction, detailed magnetic-field versus temperature phase diagrams are derived. Finally the multiferroic properties of NaFeGe2O6 are compared with those of the first multiferroic pyroxene, the mineral aegirine (of the composition Na1.04Fe0.83Ca0.04Mn0.02Al0.01Ti0.08Si2O6).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Main features of the crystal structure of NaFeGe2O6. The chains of edge-sharing [FeO6] octahedra (orange) running along c\bi{c} are linked via chains of corner sharing [GeO4] tetrahedra (green). The structural data are taken from [19]. (b) Synthetic crystals of NaFeGe2O6.

2 Experiments

Due to their incongruent melting behaviour single crystals of NaFeGe2O6 were grown from high-temperature solution by the top seeding technique. By the use of a solvent of nearly eutectic composition from the system Na2MoO4–NaVO3 and a ratio solvent : NaFeGe2O6 of 4 : 1, untwinned large single crystals of high quality were obtained and the formation of additional parasitic phases, such as hematite (α\alpha-Fe2O3) and maghemite (γ\gamma-Fe2O3) could be suppressed to a large extend. The growth was performed in the temperature range between 1295 K and 1288 K with an applied cooling rate of 0.2 K/day, which resulted in crystals of dimensions up to 10×10×15mm310\times 10\times 15\,\mathrm{mm^{3}} with a well-developed morphology, see figure 1 (b). The crystal morphology is dominated by the prisms {110}\{110\} and {1¯11}\{\bar{1}11\} and, minor, the pinacoids {100}\{100\} and {010}\{010\}. The morphological faces, which were identified via X-ray diffraction, were used as reference planes for the sample orientation. Samples with faces perpendicular to b×c\bi{b}\times\bi{c}, b\bi{b} and c\bi{c} were prepared. The magnetic susceptibility, thermal expansion and magnetostriction were measured on one single sample with dimensions of 2×1×1\simeq 2\times 1\times 1 mm3. The dielectric investigations were performed on typically 1 mm thick plates of surfaces in the range of \sim30mm230\,\mathrm{mm^{2}}, which were vapour-metallized with silver electrodes.

The magnetization was measured with a commercial vibrating sample magnetometer (PPMS, Quantum Design) from about 2 K to room temperature in magnetic fields up to 14 T. The dielectric measurements were performed in the temperature range from about 3 to 25 K in a cryostat equipped with a 15 T magnet and a variable temperature insert (KONTI cryostat, CryoVac). The electric polarization was calculated via time integration of the pyroelectric currents measured by an electrometer (Keithley 6517) as a function of increasing temperature. During the cooling process, an electric poling field of at least 200 V/mm was applied well above the ordering transition temperatures in order to reach a single-domain phase. The poling fields were removed at base temperature and the pyroelectric currents was recorded while heating the sample with a rate of 3 K/min. In all cases, the electric polarization could be completely inverted by reversing the electric poling field. In the same setup we also determined the relative dielectric constants ϵir\epsilon_{i}^{r} (i=b×c,b,ci=b\times c,b,c)111Tensors are related to a Cartesian reference system with unit axes running along the directions of b×c\bi{b}\times\bi{c}, b\bi{b} and c\bi{c}, where b\bi{b} and c\bi{c} are the crystallographic axes. from the measured capacitance of the metallized samples as a function of temperature or magnetic field using a capacitance bridge (Andeen-Hagerling 2500A) at a frequency of 1 kHz. The thermal expansion and magnetostriction up to 15 T were measured on a home-built capacitance dilatometer in the temperature range between 3 and 15 K. The magnetic field was applied either along b×c\bi{b}\times\bi{c}, b\bi{b}, or c\bi{c} and in each case the length change ΔLc(T,B)\Delta L_{c}(T,\bi{B}) along the c\bi{c} axis was measured, either as a function of continuously varying TT or B\bi{B} with rates of ±0.05\pm 0.05 to ±0.1K/min\pm 0.1\,\mathrm{K/min} or ±0.1T/min\pm 0.1\,\mathrm{T/min}, respectively. The thermal-expansion coefficient αc=1/Lc0ΔLc/T\alpha_{c}=1/L_{c}^{0}\cdot\partial\Delta L_{c}/\partial T was obtained by numerically calculating the temperature derivative of the length change ΔLc\Delta L_{c}, where Lc0L_{c}^{0} denotes the sample length along c\bi{c}.

3 Results and discussion

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a)-(c) Magnetic susceptibilities χb×c\chi_{b\times c}, χb\chi_{b}, and χc\chi_{c} of NaFeGe2O6 for different magnetic fields as functions of temperature. The inset in (b) shows χb\chi_{b}, measured at 0.1 T in a wider temperature range. (d) Magnetic-field dependent magnetization at 8 K for different field directions; the inset displays the same data as M/BM/B versus BB. (e) Hysteretic magnetization exemplified for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} at different temperatures, which probably arises from an impurity phase of ferrimagnetic γ\gamma-Fe2O3.

Figure 2 displays measurements of the magnetic susceptibility and the magnetization of NaFeGe2O6. Magnetic fields up to 14 T were applied along the b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} and c\bi{c} direction. The low-field curves confirm previous results [26, 19, 25] and signal the onset of magnetic ordering at TN13KT_{\rm N}\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K} and a second transition at TC11.6KT_{\rm C}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K}, where apparently a spin reorientation occurs. Both, χb(T)\chi_{b}(T) and χc(T)\chi_{c}(T) have only weak anomalies at TNT_{\rm N} and then hardly change in the temperature interval [TC,TN][T_{\rm C},T_{\rm N}], while χb×c(T)\chi_{b\times c}(T) shows a pronounced kink at TNT_{\rm N} and a subsequent decrease on lowering the temperature to TNT_{\rm N}. This indicates that the spins are oriented along the b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} axis, which thus forms a magnetic easy axis below TNT_{\rm N}. The second transition at TC11.6KT_{\rm C}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K} causes further kinks in all three susceptibilities. Below TCT_{\rm C}, χb(T)\chi_{b}(T) slightly increases with decreasing temperature whereas χb×c(T)\chi_{b\times c}(T) and χc(T)\chi_{c}(T) both decrease. This indicates that now the spins are within the acac plane. The very similar behavior of χb×c\chi_{b\times c} and χc\chi_{c} and the fact that none of them approaches zero for T0KT\rightarrow 0\,\mathrm{K} implies, that there is no magnetic easy axis within the acac plane below TCT_{\rm C}. Thus, in the low-temperature regime the spins of NaFeGe2O6 show an XY anisotropy with the acac plane as magnetic easy plane. This result is in accordance with two different neutron diffraction studies [29, 19, 26], which revealed that below 5 K the spin structure of NaFeGe2O6 forms an incommensurate cycloid within the acac plane. The magnetic structure between 11.6 K and 13 K has not been resolved yet. The inset of figure 2 (b) presents χb(T)\chi_{b}(T) up to 200 K. At about 35 K a broad maximum is visible confirming that the antiferromagnetic ordering in NaFeGe2O6 at TN13KT_{\rm N}\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K} is preceded by low-dimensional magnetic correlations, as already reported in literature [19].

As can be seen in figure 2 (a) and (c), the decrease for T<TCT<T_{\rm C} of both, χb×c(T)\chi_{b\times c}(T) and χc(T)\chi_{c}(T), systematically vanishes for larger fields and above about 9 T the temperature dependences of χi(T)\chi_{i}(T) are almost identical for all three field directions. This is naturally explained by spin-flop transitions for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} or B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c} where the spin orientation changes from the easy acac plane to the plane perpendicular to the respective magnetic field direction. As shown figure 2 (d), the spin-flop transitions cause abrupt changes in the corresponding low-temperature magnetization as a function of the magnetic field. The spin-flop fields at T=8KT=8\,\mathrm{K} are 2T\simeq 2\,\mathrm{T} and 5T\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T} for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} and B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c}, respectively. Indications for spin-flop transitions were already found in magnetic and dielectric investigations on polycrystalline samples of NaFeGe2O6 [25]. As will be shown below, structural changes and reorientations of the electric polarization accompany these spin-flop transitions. For B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c}, the transition is much sharper and the transition field is smaller than for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} illustrating that the magnetic properties of NaFeGe2O6 are not fully isotropic within the easy acac plane.

Around 0 T the magnetization M(B)M(B) shows a hysteretic behaviour for all magnetic field directions, which is exemplary illustrated in figure 2 (e) for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} at different temperatures. It is present in a wide temperature range also well above the magnetic ordering temperature of NaFeGe2O6 and the width of the hysteresis is nearly temperature independent. This indicates that the flux-grown NaFeGe2O6 crystals contain an impurity phase, probably maghemite γ\gamma-Fe2O3, which is ferrimagnetic and occasionally was formed during the crystal growth experiments, see section 2. From the observed saturation magnetization value of 0.01μB\simeq 0.01\,\mathrm{\mu_{B}} a contamination of less than 1% can be estimated. The magnetic-susceptibility and magnetization data shown in figure 2 (a)-(d) have been corrected for the ferrimagnetic background signal.

The electric polarization of NaFeGe2O6 depending on temperature and magnetic field is summarized in Figure 3, which displays the components Pb×cP_{b\times c}, PbP_{b} and PcP_{c} for magnetic fields applied either along b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c}. As mentioned above, the electric polarization is completely invertible by inverting the electric poling fields. In figure 3, only one poling direction is displayed. In zero magnetic field, a spontaneous electric polarization arises below TC11.6KT_{\mathrm{C}}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K}, with the components Pb×c27μC/m2P_{b\times c}\simeq 27\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}}, Pb2μC/m2P_{b}\simeq 2\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}} and Pc17μC/m2P_{c}\simeq 17\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}} at 3 K. This yields an absolute value of 32μC/m2\simeq 32\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}}, which is almost lying within the acac plane with a small component along b\bi{b}. It is about a factor of 2.5 larger than the spontaneous electric polarization of aegirine (Na1.04Fe0.83Ca0.04Mn0.02Al0.01Ti0.08Si2O6), the second known multiferroic compound within the pyroxenes [17]. According to these results the crystallographic point group symmetry of the considered ferroelectric phase of NaFeGe2O6 would be triclinic, 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Electric polarization Pb×cP_{b\times c}, PbP_{b} and PcP_{c} (top to bottom) of NaFeGe2O6 measured as a function of temperature for constant magnetic fields applied parallel to the b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c} axis (left to right).
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Electric polarization Pb×cP_{b\times c}, PbP_{b} and PcP_{c} as a function of magnetic field applied parallel to b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} (left) or c\bi{c} (right) at T=3.5KT=3.5\,\mathrm{K}. The data are taken from the temperature-dependent polarization measurements shown in figure 3. Note the different scales used for PiP_{i} (i=b×c,ci=b\times c,c) and for PbP_{b}.

The electric polarization of many multiferroic materials with cycloidal spin structures can be described by the relation Peij×(S(i)×S(j))\bi{P}\propto\bi{e_{ij}}\times(\bi{S^{(i)}}\times\bi{S^{(j)}}), where eij\bi{e_{ij}} denotes the unit vector connecting the ions with the spins S(i)\bi{S^{(i)}} and S(j)\bi{S^{(j)}} [30, 31]. Taking into account the results of the magnetic investigations of the present work and those reported in literature with the spins lying within the acac plane [29, 19, 26], this relation would predict an electric polarization confined to the acac plane as well, which is inconsistent with the present results. Either the spins in the cycloidal phase of NaFeGe2O6 need to have a finite component along b\bi{b}, which was at least not excluded in [26] or the model cannot be applied in this case. Another possible explanation for the observed inconsistency would be an erroneous sample orientation of the (010) sample. The observed polarization of 2μC/m2\simeq 2\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}} along b\bi{b} would require a misorientation of 4\simeq 4\,\mathrm{{}^{\circ}} from (010). This is, however, unlikely because investigations with a Laue camera revealed a maximum misorientation of less than 1.51.5\,\mathrm{{}^{\circ}}. Moreover, the electric polarization along b\bi{b} was examined on two (010) samples cut from two different single crystals, which revealed absolute values for PbP_{b}, that only differ by 0.2μC/m20.2\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}} from each other.

For a magnetic field along b\bi{b}, we observe a weak systematic increase of the transition temperature TC11.6KT_{\mathrm{C}}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K} and also the magnitude of the electric polarization is slightly enlarged, but its orientation remains almost unchanged. In contrast, magnetic fields along b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} or c\bi{c} strongly change the electric polarization. For both field directions, the acac-plane components Pb×cP_{b\times c} and PcP_{c} are suppressed at the respective spin-flop fields BSFb×c5TB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{b\times c}\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T} or BSFc2TB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{c}\simeq 2\,\mathrm{T}. Moreover, for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} also the component PbP_{b} is suppressed in the high-field range, but the suppression of PbP_{b} sets in at slightly larger magnetic fields, compared to the suppression of the other two components Pb×cP_{b\times c} and PcP_{c}, and it is preceded by a slight increase of that component with a maximum at BSFb×cB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{b\times c}. For B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c}, the component PbP_{b} is first slightly suppressed in the vicinity of the corresponding spin-flop field, but then PbP_{b} again increases with increasing field until Pb3μC/m2P_{b}\simeq 3\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}} is reached at 15 T. This magnetic-field behaviour is illustrated in figure 4, where the components Pb×cP_{b\times c}, PbP_{b} and PcP_{c} are displayed as functions of the magnetic field for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} and B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c} at a constant temperature of 3.5 K. The data are taken from the temperature-dependent polarization measurements shown in figure 3. Due to the anomalous magnetic-field dependence of the component PbP_{b}, described above, which is different from that of the components within the acac plane, one may speculate that a different underlying mechanism could be responsible for its generation.

The magnetic-field dependent modifications of the electric polarization of NaFeGe2O6 can be summarized as follows: In zero magnetic field the spontaneous polarization is mainly lying within the acac plane with a small component along b\bi{b}. A magnetic field along b\bi{b}, does not cause any reorientation of the electric polarization. A magnetic field along b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} or c\bi{c} causes a strong suppression of the electric polarization within the acac plane, which coincides with the respective spin-flop fields at 5T\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T} and 2T\simeq 2\,\mathrm{T}, respectively. For B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} also the component PbP_{b} is suppressed, but this suppression sets in above BSFb×cB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{b\times c} while close to BSFb×cB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{b\times c}, PbP_{b} shows a weak maximum. For B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c}, PbP_{b} has a minimum around BSFcB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{c} and is then even slightly increased with field. In both cases the total electric polarization is strongly decreased.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Longitudinal components of the dielectric tensor ϵir\epsilon^{r}_{i} (i=b×c,b,ci=b\times c,b,c) of NaFeGe2O6 as functions of temperature for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}. With increasing field, the curves are shifted with respect to each other by constant offsets of 0.4 in (a), 0.01 in (b) and 0.2 in (c).

The ferroelectric ordering is also reflected by distinct anomalies in the temperature dependences of the corresponding longitudinal components ϵir\epsilon_{i}^{r} of the dielectric tensor. This is illustrated in figure 5 for representative measurements of the temperature dependences of ϵir\epsilon_{i}^{r} (i=b×c,b,ci=b\times c,b,c) for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}. Below the corresponding spin-flop transition, all components ϵir\epsilon_{i}^{r} display spiky anomalies for temperatures between 9 K and 12 K. Above BSF5TB_{\mathrm{SF}}\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T}, the anomalies of all components ϵir\epsilon_{i}^{r} essentially vanish. In addition, the anomalies of ϵb×cr\epsilon_{b\times c}^{r} have two maxima. An explanation of this behaviour is, however, still missing. Combining the observed dielectric constants with the measured electric polarization allows to conclude that the spikes signal the transitions to ferroelectric phases in which the spontaneous polarization either lies mainly in the acac plane or is oriented nearly along the b\bi{b} axis.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Thermal expansion of NaFeGe2O6 along the c\bi{c} direction for magnetic fields applied either parallel to the b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c} axis (from left to right). For clarity, with increasing field strengths the curves are shifted with respect to each other by constant offsets of 0.03104K1-0.03\cdot 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{K^{-1}}. Measurements with increasing and decreasing temperature are plotted as red and black symbols, respectively.

In order to determine the temperature versus magnetic field phase diagrams of NaFeGe2O6 thermal-expansion and magnetostriction measurements along c\bi{c} for magnetic fields applied parallel to the b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c} axis were performed. The thermal-expansion coefficient αc(T)=1/Lc0ΔLc/T\alpha_{c}(T)=1/L_{c}^{0}\cdot\partial\Delta L_{c}/\partial T measured as a function of increasing or decreasing temperature at constant magnetic fields is presented in figure 6. Magnetic fields applied either along b\bi{b} or c\bi{c} have only little influence. In both cases, the zero-field transition temperatures TN13KT_{\rm N}\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K} and TC11.6KT_{\rm C}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K} continuously increase with increasing field. Moreover, the anomaly at TC11.6KT_{\rm C}\simeq 11.6\,\mathrm{K} grows in intensity with increasing magnetic fields, compared to the anomaly at TN13KT_{\rm N}\simeq 13\,\mathrm{K}. As can be seen in figure 6 (a), for B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} the two transitions occurring at TNT_{\rm N} and TCT_{\rm C} in zero field converge with increasing field strength until above 7 T only one single transition can be resolved. The corresponding anomaly gets stronger with further increasing magnetic field.

Representative magnetostriction measurements along the c\bi{c} direction for magnetic fields applied either parallel to b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c} are displayed in Fig. 7. Here, the relative length changes ΔLc(T0,B)/Lc0\Delta L_{c}(T_{0},\bi{B})/L_{c}^{0} as a function of the magnetic field B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, B||b\bi{B}||\bi{b} or B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c} are shown. The data have been studied up to a maximum field of 15 T, but for clarity the field scales of figure 7 (a) and (c) have been limited to 10 T, because there are no anomalies in the higher field range. For B||b\bi{B}||\bi{b}, a quadratic magnetostriction ΔLc/Lc0B2\Delta L_{c}/L_{c}^{0}\propto B^{2} is observed over the entire field range, see the inset of figure 7 (b), as it is typical for materials with a linear field dependece of the magnetization. For B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c}, the corresponding spin-flop transition around BSF2TB_{\mathrm{SF}}\simeq 2\,\mathrm{T} coincides with positive, almost discontinuous length changes of ΔLc/Lc0\Delta L_{c}/L_{c}^{0}, indicating that the spin-flop transition is of first order. With increasing temperature, the spin-flop transition shifts towards higher magnetic-field strength and the length changes decrease. For B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, at 3 K there is a phase transition with a blurred, positive length change ΔLc/Lc0\Delta L_{c}/L_{c}^{0}, which again coincides with the corresponding spin-flop transition at BSF5TB_{\mathrm{SF}}\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T}, see figures 7 (a) and 2. Already the magnetization, as well as the electric polarization data indicated that the spin-flop transition for this field direction is rather broad. Moreover, there is a slight hysteresis between the measurements with increasing and decreasing magnetic field. As a function of increasing temperature the transition shifts towards higher magnetic fields and the corresponding length changes decrease.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Magnetostriction of the c\bi{c} axis of NaFeGe2O6 for magnetic fields parallel to b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c}. For clarity, with increasing temperature the curves are shifted with respect to each other by constant offsets of 0.1104-0.1\cdot 10^{-4} in (a) and (c). In the main panel of (b) an offset of 0.05104-0.05\cdot 10^{-4} was used and the inset shows the same data versus B2B^{2} with an offset of 0.2104-0.2\cdot 10^{-4}. Measurements with increasing and decreasing magnetic field are plotted as red and black symbols, respectively.

4 Phase diagrams and conclusion

By combining all the results of the present work, detailed magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams are derived for B\bi{B} parallel to b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} and c\bi{c}, see figure 8. The critical fields and temperatures are determined from the anomalies in ΔLc(T,B)/Lc0\Delta L_{c}(T,\bi{B})/L_{c}^{0} from the thermal-expansion and magnetostriction measurements. For most of the detected phase transitions there are also anomalies in the polarization and magnetization measurements and within the experimental uncertainties their positions agree with the anomalies of ΔLc(T,B)/Lc0\Delta L_{c}(T,\bi{B})/L_{c}^{0}. In addition, the electric polarization and magnetization data also allow to identify the dielectric and magnetic properties of the various phases. In zero magnetic field, NaFeGe2O6 undergoes a phase transition at TNT_{\rm N}\simeq13K13\,\mathrm{K} from its paramagnetic and non-ferroelectric high-temperature phase to an antiferromagnetically ordered, non-ferroelectric phase. The magnetic-susceptibility measurements indicate a collinear spin structure with the spins being oriented mainly along the b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} axis in this phase, see figure 2. On further cooling, a spin reorientation occurs at TCT_{\rm C}\simeq11.6K11.6\,\mathrm{K} leading to an XYXY anisotropy and to the onset of ferroelectricity. The ferroelectric phase extends down to the experimental low-temperature limit of 2.5 K. The spontaneous polarization of this ferroelectric phase I has an absolute value of 32μC/m2\simeq 32\,\mathrm{\mu C/m^{2}} and is mainly lying within the acac plane with a small component along b\bi{b}.

A magnetic field B||b\bi{B}||\bi{b} is perpendicular to the magnetic easy plane and has only little influence. As shown in figure 8 (b), it only causes a weak simultaneous increase of both transition temperatures TC(B)T_{\rm C}(\bi{B}) and TN(B)T_{\rm N}(\bi{B}). Moreover, the magnetization linearly increases with field there is also a weak increase of the electric polarization, see figures 2 and 3.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Magnetic field versus temperature phase diagrams of NaFeGe2O6 for B\bi{B} parallel to b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, b\bi{b} or c\bi{c}. The phase boundaries are based on the thermal-expansion (αc\alpha_{c}) and magnetostriction (λc\lambda_{c}) measurements.

Magnetic fields along b×c\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} or c\bi{c} induce spin-flop transitions, which are accompanied by strong modifications of the electric polarization. With increasing B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c}, above BSFb×c5TB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{b\times c}\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T} the electric polarization within the acac plane is continuously suppressed. Interestingly, the suppression of PbP_{b} sets in at a slightly higher field strength near 7 T and is preceded by a maximum at BSFb×c5TB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{b\times c}\simeq 5\,\mathrm{T}. Around 7 T also the intermediate antiferromagnetically ordered but non-ferroelectric phase vanishes, which is illustrated by the horizontal dashed line in figure 8 (a). For B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c}, only the electric polarization within the acac plane is continuously suppressed above BSFc2TB_{\mathrm{SF}}^{c}\simeq 2\,\mathrm{T}, while the polarization along b\bi{b} has a minimum at BSFB_{\mathrm{SF}} and then grows with increasing field strength. The intermediate antiferromagnetially ordered, non-ferroelectric phase stays present for the whole investigated magnetic-field range in this case.

Compared to aegirine (of the composition Na1.04Fe0.83Ca0.04Mn0.02Al0.01Ti0.08Si2O6), the second multiferroic compound among the pyroxenes, there are some clear differences in NaFeGe2O6. First of all, the spin structure of the multiferroic phase of aegirine forms a spiral with the spins lying mainly within the acac plane and a propagation vector along the monoclinic b\bi{b} axis [32]. In contrast, in the multiferroic phase of NaFeGe2O6 the spins apparently form a cycloid within the acac plane [29, 19, 26]. Secondly, the presence of all three components of the electric polarization in NaFeGe2O6 indicate a triclinic symmetry 11 for its multiferroic phase. The spontaneous electric polarization in the multiferroic phase of aegirine points along the monoclinic b\bi{b} axis and is about a factor of 2.5 smaller than the electric polarization of NaFeGe2O6 [17]. Consequently the symmetry of the multiferroic phase of aegirine is higher compared to that of NaFeGe2O6 with the point group 22. Finally, also the magnetic-field dependence of the electric polarization is different in both compounds. In aegirine a magnetic field within the acac plane causes a rotation of the electric polarization from parallel b\bi{b} towards c\bi{c}, which is connected with a strong decrease [17]. In contrast, in NaFeGe2O6 a magnetic field within the acac plane causes a strong suppression of the electric polarization within this plane. For B||b×c\bi{B}||\bi{b}\!\!\times\!\!\bi{c} also PbP_{b} is suppressed, while for B||c\bi{B}||\bi{c} this component is even slightly increased.

The spontaneous electric polarization of many spin-driven multiferroics with cycloidal spin structures can be described by the relation Peij×(S(i)×S(j))\bi{P}\propto\bi{e_{ij}}\times(\bi{S^{(i)}}\times\bi{S^{(j)}}) [30, 31]. Here, however, the prediction of the relation is inconsistent with the present results of NaFeGe2O6, if a cycloid within the acac plane is assumed. The zero-field orientation of the electric polarization, found in this work, indicates the presence of a more complex spin structure than that reported in [29, 19, 26] with a finite spin component along b\bi{b} within the ferroelectric phase I. Furthermore, the different magnetic-field characteristics of PbP_{b} compared to the acac-plane components indicate a possibly different underlying mechanism for the generation of PbP_{b}. In order to clarify the microscopic mechanisms leading to multiferroicity in NaFeGe2O6 and in order to resolve the inconsistencies and open questions discussed above, more detailed information about the magnetic structure is needed. Therefore, as a future task neutron-diffraction experiments should be performed on single crystals of NaFeGe2O6.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via SFB 608 and through the Institutional Strategy of the University of Cologne within the German Excellence Initiative.

References

References

  • [1] Kimura T, Goto T, Shintani H, Ishizaka K, Arima T and Tokura Y 2003 Nature 426 55
  • [2] Spaldin N A and Fiebig M 2005 Science 309 391
  • [3] Cheong S-W and Mostovoy M 2007 Nature Mater. 6 13
  • [4] Kimura T 2007 Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 37 387
  • [5] Kimura T, Lawes G, Goto T, Tokura Y and Ramirez A P 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 224425
  • [6] Lawes G, Harris A B, Kimura T, Rogado N, Cava R J, Aharony A, Entin-Wohlman O, Yildirim T, Kenzelmann M, Broholm C and Ramirez A P 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 087205
  • [7] Park S, Choi Y J, Zhang C L and Cheong S-W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 057601
  • [8] Heyer O, Hollmann N, Klassen I, Jodlauk S, Bohatý L, Becker P, Mydosh J A, Lorenz T and Khomskii D I 2006 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 18 L471
  • [9] Taniguchi K, Abe N, Takenobu T, Iwasa Y and Arima T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 097203
  • [10] Arkenbout A H, Palstra T T M, Siegrist T and Kimura T 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 184431
  • [11] Kimura T, Sekio Y, Nakamura H, Siegrist T and Ramirez A P 2008 Nature Mater. 7 291
  • [12] Johnson R D, Chapon L C, Khalyavin D D, Manuel P, Radaelli P G and Martin C 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 067201
  • [13] Seki S, Kurumaji T, Ishiwata S, Matsui H, Murakawa H, Tokunaga Y, Kaneko Y, Hasegawa T and Tokura Y 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 064424
  • [14] Blinc R, Tavčar G, Žemva B, Hanžel D, Cevc P, Filipič C, Levstik A, Jagličić Z, Trontelj Z, Dalal N, Ramachandran V, Nellutla S and Scott J F 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 074114
  • [15] Ackermann M, Brüning D, Lorenz T, Becker P and Bohatý L 2013 New. J. Phys. 15 123001
  • [16] Ackermann M, Lorenz T, Becker P and Bohatý L 2014 arXiv:1408.3997
  • [17] Jodlauk S, Becker P, Mydosh J A, Khomskii D I , Lorenz T, Streltsov S V, Hezel D C and Bohatý L 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 432201
  • [18] Baker P J, Lewtas H J, Blandell S J, Lancaster T, Franke I, Hayes W, Pratt F L, Bohatý L and Becker P 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 214403
  • [19] Redhammer G J, Senyshyn A, Meven M, Roth G, Prinz S, Pachler A, Tippelt G, Pietzonka C, Treutmann W, Hoelzel M, Pedersen B and Amthauer G 2011 Phys. Chem. Minerals 38 139
  • [20] Streltsov S V and Khomskii D I 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 064405
  • [21] Redhammer G J, Roth G, Treutmann W, Hoelzel M, Paulus W, André G, Pietzonka C and Amthauer G 2009 J. Solid State Chem. 182 2374
  • [22] Nénert G, Isobe M, Ritter C, Isnard O, Vasiliev A N and Ueda Y 2009 Phys. Rev. B 79 064416
  • [23] Nénert G, Ritter C, Isobe M, Isnard O, Vasiliev A N and Ueda Y 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 024402
  • [24] Nénert G, Kim I, Isobe M, Ritter C, Vasiliev A N, Kim K H and Ueda Y 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 184408
  • [25] Kim I, Jeon B-G, Patil D, Patil S, Nénert G and Kim K H 2012 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24 306001
  • [26] Drokina T V, Petrakovskii G A, Keller L, Schefer J, Balaev A D, Kartashev A V and Ivanov D A 2011 JETP 112 121
  • [27] Drokina T V, Bayukov O A, Petrakovskii G A, Velikanov D A, Bovina A F, Stepanov G N and Ivanov D A 2008 Phys. Solid State 50 2141
  • [28] Drokina T V, Bayukov O A, Petrakovskii G A and Velikanov D A 2009 Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. Phys. 73 1054
  • [29] Drokina T V, Petrakovskii G A, Keller L and Schefer J 2010 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 251 012016
  • [30] Sergienko I A and Dagotto E 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 094434
  • [31] Katsura H, Nagaosa N and Balatsky A V 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 057205
  • [32] Baum M 2013 Neutron Scattering Studies of Chiral Multiferroics PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln