This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

\UseRawInputEncoding

Bioinspired magnetic active matter and the physical limits of magnetotaxis

Néstor Sepúlveda Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile, Av. Blanco Encalada 2008, Santiago, Chile    Francisca Guzmán-Lastra Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Av. Manuel Montt 367, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.    Miguel Carrasco Condensed Matter i-Lab, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal las Torres 2640, Building D, Peñalolen, Santiago, Chile. School of Engineering and Sciences, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal las Torres 2640, Peñalolen, Santiago, Chile.    Bernardo González School of Engineering and Sciences, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal las Torres 2640, Peñalolen, Santiago, Chile. Center of Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES).    Eugenio Hamm Departamento de Física, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, av. Víctor Jara 3493, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile.    Andrés Concha andres.physics.research@gmail.com Condensed Matter i-Lab, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal las Torres 2640, Building D, Peñalolen, Santiago, Chile. School of Engineering and Sciences, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Diagonal las Torres 2640, Peñalolen, Santiago, Chile. CIIBEC, Research Center, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) are endowed with an exquisite orientation mechanism allowing them to swim along the geomagnetic field lines blakemore1975magnetotactic ; frankel1981magnetotactic ; smith2006quantifying . This mechanism consists of a chain of bio-synthesized magnetic nano-crystals blakemore1975magnetotactic ; dunin1998magnetic ; komeili2006magnetosomes . Although the physics behind the minimum size of this biological compass is well understood frankel1980navigational , it is yet unclear what sets its maximum size frankel1980navigational ; blakemore1982magnetotactic ; esquivel1986motion . Here, by using a macroscopic experiment inspired in these microorganisms, we show that larger magnetic moments will drive the collective behavior of MTB into a phase where bacteria are unable to swim freely, in detriment of their evolutive fitness darwin1964origin ; smith2006quantifying . Simple macroscopic experiments, numerical simulations, and analytic estimates are used to explain the upper limit for the size of the chain of nano-crystals in MTB. Our macroscopic bio-inspired experiment, and physical model provide new opportunities to explore and understand the phases of magnetic active matter at all scales.

Magnetotactic bacteria (MTB) contain magnetosomes, which are intracellular, ferrimagnetic nano-crystals of magnetite or greigite. Magnetosomes are usually arranged in a linear chain within each bacterium (e.g: Magnetospirillum magneticum, Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum)blakemore1975magnetotactic ; frankel1980navigational ; dunin1998magnetic ; schuler1999bacterial ; komeili2006magnetosomes , with few known exceptions (Magnetobacterium bavaricum) jogler2010cultivation . This linear chain provides a net magnetic moment, M\vec{M}, that allows MTB to align to the geomagnetic field, H\vec{H}, in a noisy environment frankel1980navigational . The reason for this, is that oxygen is toxic for these microaerophilic or anaerobic organisms, and it is beneficial for them to be directed toward and kept in the sediments away from the water surface where oxygen is abundant blakemore1975magnetotactic ; smith2006quantifying . This mechanism can be understood as the competition between the aligning dipolar energy, MH\vec{M}\cdot\vec{H}, and the thermal noise kBTk_{B}T. Thus, for MTB to align respect to the Earth’s magnetic field, both quantities should be comparable. This well known and accepted criterion provides a lower bound for the magnetosome chain size frankel1980navigational ; esquivel1986motion ; klumpp2016magnetotactic . In the same spirit, we should expect that the larger the dipolar moment of MTB, the better. However, MTB with large magnetic moments have not been observed in nature. Inspired by this apparent paradox, and the general subject of the effect of long range interactions in active matter, we have built an artificial system that allows for the exploration of these questions, and provide a flexible tabletop experiment to investigate magnetic active matter (MAM), Fig.1.

In this article, we demonstrate that there is a strong physical constraint for the maximum dipolar moment of single magnetosome chains. This constraint arises from the fact that MTB need to be able to swim into regions of low oxygen, but for large dipolar moments a collection of MTB will enter into a phase where they will form magnetic clusters making it impossible for them to efficiently swim (See Figs.1-4). Thus, if mutants grow magnetosome chains with extremely large magnetic moments they will self-assemble into dimers, or magnetic clusters (See Figs. 1, 3 and 4), generating a new compound object in which flagellar motion will be suppressed, decreasing their ability to swim. Thus, MTB with extremely large magnetic moments will not prevail.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Magnetic Active Matter (MAM) and its phase diagram: (𝐚𝐜\mathbf{a-c}), Models built with a Hexabug Nano covered by a 3D printed armor, and Neodymium magnets of different sizes. L=51.8L=51.8 mm in all cases, and Neodymium magnets have a length, 2a=38.12a=38.1 mm, 19.0519.05 mm, and 42.8642.86 mm, respectively. The purpose of the armor is twofold, to hold the magnets that will generate the long range interaction, and to simplify the collisions by providing a hard and smooth boundary. Each cylindrical magnet shown has radius r=1.5875×103r=1.5875\times 10^{-3} m, and saturation magnetization Ms=1.1×106M_{s}=1.1\times 10^{6}A/m (See Supplementary Material S5). (𝐝\mathbf{d}) In MAM each dipole is modeled as a magnetic dumbbell mellado2012macroscopic ; concha2018PRL having two magnetic charges +Q,Q+Q,-Q at the poles of the rod, where Q=Msπr2Q=M_{s}\pi r^{2}. Their north and south poles are highlighted in red and blue, respectively. The shortest distance between two colinear magnets is Δ\Delta, and n^i\hat{n}_{i} is the vector director for the i-th particle. See Supplementary Movies 1 to 6 for experiments. (𝐞\mathbf{e}) Schematic phase diagram for MAM as function of the dimensionless parameters α\alpha, and β\beta. α\alpha representing the competition between inertia and activity, and β\beta the competition between rotational noise and magnetic interactions. We have found five phases where four of them could be relevant for MTB. (𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞\mathbf{Free}) Non-interacting regime, (𝐃𝐢\mathbf{Di}) dimers, (𝐅𝐌\mathbf{FM}) winding and unwinding of magnetic vortices with local ferromagnetic order, (𝐕\mathbf{V}) stable vortices, and (𝐂𝐀𝐅\mathbf{C-AF}) anti-ferromagnetic clusters. The α=0\alpha=0 lines (Cyan) is the region relevant for natural or artificial micro-swimmers.

The generic formation of clusters of particles being them inanimate or active shows up in a plethora of phenomena ranging from chemistry to physics, biology to astrophysical objects whitesides2002self ; whitesides2002beyond ; ong2017programmable ; makey2020universality ; lee2015direct ; kravtsov2012formation ; balbus1998instability . The existence and evolution of these structures at different length scales are intimately tied to the type of interactions between their basic constituents, particle symmetries, and emergent symmetries that may show up due to interactions anderson1972more ; huber2018emergence ; denk2020pattern . For active agents endowed only with self-avoidance and/or local aligning interactions, there are different phases that have been theoretically analyzed and experimentally observed vicsek1995novel ; marchetti2013hydrodynamics ; deblais2018boundaries ; giomi2013swarming ; dauchot2019dynamics ; peruani2018cold . For example, the full phase diagram of Brownian disks has been discussed PhysRevLett.121.098003 , the effect of hydrodynamic interactions in the collective behavior of fish filella2018model , the onset of collective and cohesive motion gregoire2004onset , the existence of a spontaneously flowing crystal of self-propelled particles briand2018spontaneously , to name a few. In the previous cases no long-range interaction has been taken into account vicsek1995novel ; deseigne2010collective ; giomi2013swarming ; marchetti2013hydrodynamics ; peruani2018cold ; deblais2018boundaries ; PhysRevLett.121.098003 ; filella2018model ; dauchot2019dynamics . However, recently it has been proposed that dipolar active matter can show a rich phenomenology, where depending on several parameters fission or fusion of particle clusters have been predicted kaiser2015active ; guzman2016fission , directed self-assembly of quadrupolar particles has been reported gu2019magnetic , and in ferromagnetic colloids the collective motion and its different phases experimentally analyzed kaiser2017flocking . The previous results are a clear call to analyze the impact of cluster formation in the evolution of swimming bacteria that contain a chain of magnetic nano-crystals endowing these organisms with a dipolar moment.

In what follows, we set a general framework to study MAM (Fig.1), provide simple methods to measure all parameters of the model, characterize the phases shown by MAM at low densities, define the relevant dimensionless parameters at play in this system (See Supplementary Information S1 and S2), and provide strong evidence for our claims about the maximum dipolar moment for MTB. We observed the evolution of a group of these active particles for several interaction strengths and activities. Using this experimental insight, we implemented a model that accurately reproduces the different dynamical structures observed in experiments (Figs.1 and 2): free single particles, quadrupolar dimers, winding of magnetic vortices, unwinding of vortices into ferromagnetic chains, and multipolar clusters (See details of experiments and numerical simulations in Supplementary Information S1-S8). We rationalize these findings using dimensionless numbers that depend on the strength of the magnetic interactions between particles, activity, and angular noise (See Supplementary Information and Eqs.1-3).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Experimental configurations and correlations of magnetic active matter: (𝐚\mathbf{a}) The case of zero magnetic interactions. (𝐛\mathbf{b}) MagD-bots have been decorated with magnets of length 2a=19.052a=19.05 mm, and diameter 2r=3.1752r=3.175 mm, Q=7.9Q=7.9 Am and N=25N=25. (𝐜\mathbf{c}) MagD-bots have been decorated with magnets of length 2a=38.102a=38.10 mm, and diameter 2r=3.1752r=3.175 mm, Q=7.9Q=7.9 Am and N=25N=25. (𝐝\mathbf{d}) MagD-bots have been decorated with magnets of length 2a=44.452a=44.45 mm, and diameter 2r=3.1752r=3.175 mm, Q=7.9Q=7.9 Am and N=26N=26. Below each panel the average magnitude of the n^i\hat{n}_{i} variable, and the n^in^j\langle\hat{n}_{i}\cdot\hat{n}_{j}\rangle correlations are shown. The domain diameter was 400400 mm. See also Supplementary Movies 1 to 6.

We explored an enlarged parameter space by using numerical simulations and analytic estimates to understand the main factors that impact in the different phases that MAM display. The phases found in our experiments are relevant for programmed self-assembly, and they should persist across different length scales kantorovich2013nonmonotonic ; whitesides2002self ; whitesides2002beyond . The latest allows us to understand the physical constraints that affect key aspects of the evolution of MTB bellini1963 ; frankel2009discovery ; blakemore1975magnetotactic using the insight from our macroscopic experiments.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Numerical configurations and correlations of magnetic active matter: We have simulated the evolution of N=25N=25 MagD-bots starting from a random initial condition (t=0t=0). The simulation domain diameter was 400400 mm. (𝐚\mathbf{a}) Evolution for Q=0Q=0 considering the other physical parameters fixed . (𝐛\mathbf{b}) Evolution of Q=8Q=8 and 2a=19.052a=19.05 mm for all other physical parameters fixed. (𝐜\mathbf{c}) Evolution of Q=8Q=8 and 2a=38.102a=38.10 mm for all other physical parameters fixed. (𝐝\mathbf{d}) From top to bottom: n^in^j\langle\hat{n}_{i}\cdot\hat{n}_{j}\rangle correlation, the magnitude of n^i\langle\hat{n}_{i}\rangle, and the magnitude of the average velocity vi\langle\vec{v}_{i}\rangle, as function of time for the above configurations. 𝐚\mathbf{a}, 𝐛\mathbf{b}, 𝐜\mathbf{c} correspond to red dots, green triangles, and blue rhombi respectively. See also Supplementary Movies 7 to 9.

The system that we study is composed of bacillus shaped active particles that are built with commercially available Hexbug Nano (HEXBUG Nano, https://www.hexbug.com/nano). We dubbed these macroscopic agents MagD-bots. Even though vibration-driven vehicles of this type have been used before in several experiments patterson2017clogging ; deblais2018boundaries ; dauchot2019dynamics ; boudet2021collections ; zheng2021self , the sharp geometry of its body, and highly frictional material they are made, makes it unclear that the agreement between experiments and models is real or an artifact. To overcome this difficulty, we have dressed the Hexbugs with a 3D printed armor with a bacillus shape. The total body length L=51.8×103mL=51.8\times 10^{-3}m, width W=20.4×103mW=20.4\times 10^{-3}m, mass M10×103kgM\sim 10\times 10^{-3}kg, and simple geometry have allowed us not only to improve the stability of the system by lowering its center of mass, lower the friction between walls and active agents, but also, to simplify numerical simulations. These structured armors allow for the precise positioning of a Neodymium magnet on top of them. Thus, we have built a set of active agents that interact via a magnetic field, and hard-core interactions. We emphasize that in this work the size of magnet is not small compared with the size of the object, making it mandatory to adopt a dumbbell model instead of a point-like dipole Vokoun201155 ; Vokoun20093758 ; ryzhkin2005magnetic ; castelnovo2008magnetic ; mellado2010dynamics ; concha2018PRL ; cisternas2021stable .

Our main findings are summarized in Fig.1 where five qualitatively different phases are shown. In the non-magnetic case, phase 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞{\bf{Free}} (Fig.2a and Supplementary Movie 1) we observed weak correlations and mainly geometric effects in agreement with previous reports giomi2013swarming . For large activity and short magnets, we observed particles that show weak ferromagnetic correlations that influence the final state, but still without forming any spontaneously self assembled structure, phase 𝐃𝐢{\bf{Di}} (Fig.2b and Supplementary Movie 2). As activity decreases or increasing the strength of magnetic interactions we observed strong ferromagnetic correlations and the formation of new structures such as dimers, ferromagnetic chains, and vortices not found in the previous cases, phase 𝐅𝐌{\bf{FM}} (Fig.2 c and Supplementary Movie 3). As magnetic interactions increased long chains assemble and the system shows clear ferromagnetic order, stable vortices, and the fusion of different objects, phases 𝐅𝐌{\bf{FM}}, and 𝐕{\bf{V}} (Fig.2 d, Supplementary Movies 4, and 5). Finally, for low rotational noise we observe the formation of anti-ferromagnetic ordered clusters that are relevant for the quasi-static self-assembly of magnetic particles, phase 𝐂𝐀𝐅{\bf{C-AF}} Fig.1 (See Supplementary Movie 6).

We rationalize our findings considering the Newtonian dynamics of active magnetic matter described by

Mdvidt\displaystyle M\frac{d\vec{v_{i}}}{dt} =F0n^iΓvi+fia+fic\displaystyle=F_{0}\hat{n}_{i}-\Gamma\vec{v_{i}}+\vec{f}_{i}^{a}+\vec{f}_{i}^{c} (1)
Izd2θidt2\displaystyle I_{z}\frac{d^{2}\theta_{i}}{dt^{2}} =Γrdθidt+(τic+τia)z^+2Drηi(t)\displaystyle=-\Gamma_{r}\frac{d\theta_{i}}{dt}+\left(\vec{\tau}_{i}^{c}+\vec{\tau}_{i}^{a}\right)\cdot\hat{z}+\sqrt{2D_{r}}\eta_{i}(t)

where ii is the particle index, θi\theta_{i} is the angle between the horizontal axis and the n^i\hat{n}_{i} vector shown in Fig.1d. In this model, the tip of each rod has a magnetic charge of magnitude Q=Msπr2Q=M_{s}\pi r^{2} that interacts with all other magnetic poles (note that the total magnetic charge per dipole is zero). MM, F0F_{0}, Γ\Gamma, IzI_{z}, Γr\Gamma_{r}, and DrD_{r} are the MagD-bot mass, activity, damping, moment of inertia, rotational damping, and rotational diffusion respectively (See Supplementary Information S1-S3). fia\vec{f}^{a}_{i}, and τia\vec{\tau}^{a}_{i} represents forces and torques due to contacts. fic\vec{f}^{c}_{i}, τic\vec{\tau}^{c}_{i} are the force and torque due to Coulomb interactions, and ηi(t)\eta_{i}(t) is a white noise with mean 0 and variance 11.

Analyzing the translational equation of motion the dimensionless numbers F0τ(Mv0)1F_{0}\tau(Mv_{0})^{-1} and ΓτM1\Gamma\tau M^{-1} emerge, where τL/v0\tau\sim L/v_{0} is a typical time scale for the translational motion of each MagD-bot. In steady-state both terms should be comparable. Therefore, it is enough to consider only one of them to understand the competition between different forcing terms. We called the inverse of the first dimensionless number

α=Mv02F0L.\displaystyle\alpha=\frac{Mv_{0}^{2}}{F_{0}L}. (2)

This dimensionless parameter quantify the competition between the centripetal force (Mv0/τMv02/LMv_{0}/\tau\sim Mv_{0}^{2}/L), and the activity, F0F_{0}, of the MagD-bot. The second dimensionless number relevant in this case appears by considering the rotational dynamics. In the low mass limit, the one relevant for MTB, the main forces competing will be the Coulombic torque τc\tau^{c} and the torsional noise amplitude τr\tau^{r}. We called this parameter:

β=τrτc\displaystyle\beta=\frac{\tau^{r}}{\tau^{c}} (3)

where τr=(2Dr)1/2\tau^{r}=\left(2D_{r}\right)^{1/2} and τc=(μo4π)Q2(2R)2a\tau^{c}=\left(\frac{\mu_{o}}{4\pi}\right)\frac{Q^{2}}{(2R)^{2}}a. In this article we focus on two dimensionless parameters (α\alpha and β\beta), but the richness of the dynamics defined by Eqs.1 is enormous. Indeed, there are five dimensionless parameters (See Supplementary Information S1, S2).

We proceed to examine the dynamics of the system in detail using molecular dynamics simulations (See Fig.3 and Supplementary Information). In this description, inertial magnets interact through the full long-range Coulomb potential in the dumbbell approach Vokoun201155 ; Vokoun20093758 ; ryzhkin2005magnetic ; castelnovo2008magnetic ; mellado2010dynamics ; concha2018PRL ; cisternas2021stable .

The physical parameters employed in numerical simulations were directly measured (See details in Supplementary Information). The measurement of F0F_{0}, and Γ\Gamma was done by using an incline and analyzing quasi-1D trajectories (See Supplementary Information S4). IzI_{z} was measured using a torsion pendulum configuration (See Supplementary Information S7), and Γr\Gamma_{r} was measured by analyzing the angular dynamics after a MagD-bot hits a hard wall (See Supplementary Information S8). Magnetic interactions were measured using special non magnetic holders installed on an Instron universal testing machine that measured the interaction force between magnets (Supplementary Information S6). From this information we calibrated the magnets used in our experiments obtaining a saturation magnetization as Ms=(1.1±0.10)×106M_{s}=(1.1\pm 0.10)\times 10^{6} A m1m^{-1} which is in agreement with the available data for the magnetization of Neodymium rods, validating the dumbbell approximation when the rods are separated by a distance z>2rz>2r, as previously pointed out Vokoun201155 ; Vokoun20093758 ; mellado2012macroscopic . That information allowed the measurement of the magnetic charge in the dumbbell approximation. The ratio between Γr\Gamma_{r} and the rotational noise amplitude, DrD_{r}, was measured using the angular autocorrelation of θ(t)\theta(t) (See Supplementary Information S8). Therefore, in our simulations there are no free parameters in striking contrast with most available literature. Simulation results for MagD-bots are shown in Fig.3 in good agreement with experimental results (Fig.2). The evolution of three different regimes are shown in Supplementary Movies 7-9.

We characterized the system by computing the correlations n^in^j\langle\hat{n}_{i}\cdot\hat{n}_{j}\rangle, the magnitude of the average |n^i||\langle\hat{n}_{i}\rangle|, the magnitude of the average velocity |vi||\langle\vec{v}_{i}\rangle|, and average speed |vi|\langle|\vec{v}_{i}|\rangle as functions of time gregoire2004onset ; vicsek2012collective ; giomi2013swarming . In Fig.3 we show representative frames for numerical simulations of MAM where no magnets were present (Fig.3 a), magnets of length 2a=19.052a=19.05 mm (Fig.3 b), and magnets of length 2a=38.12a=38.1 mm (Fig.3 c). For Fig.3 a, we found no ferromagnetic order, but from time to time a boundary driven stagnation state giomi2013swarming . In Fig.3 b a signal of ferromagnetic correlations emerges, and finally it is quite clear that ferromagnetic order is present in Fig.3 c. In agreement with experiments, see Fig.2 and supplementary movies 7-9.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Numerical simulation for parameters relevant for MTB: (𝐚\mathbf{a}) Using the parameters Q0=9.41010Q_{0}=9.4\cdot 10^{-10}Am, 2a=1.1μ2a=1.1\mum, L=5μL=5\mum, W=1.6μW=1.6\mum, and M1015M\sim 10^{-15} kg, we simulated the dynamics of MTB. In this case, they do not self-assemble in any superstructure. (𝐛\mathbf{b}) In this simulation we have increased the dipolar moment of our in-silico MTB by increasing the magnetic charge Q=4Q0Q=4Q_{0}, while keeping all other parameters fixed. (𝐜\mathbf{c}) Case for Q=10Q0Q=10Q_{0}, MAM in this parameters region quickly self-assemble in clusters that show anti-ferromagnetic order, making it impossible for MTB to freely swim. (𝐝\mathbf{d}) From top to bottom: Nearest neighbor correlations, average spin, and average velocity (inset: average speed) as function of time for the above configurations. 𝐚\mathbf{a}, 𝐛\mathbf{b}, 𝐜\mathbf{c} correspond to red dots, green triangles, and blue rhombi, respectively. See also Supplementary Movies 10 to 12. (𝐞\mathbf{e}) Nearest neighbor correlations as function of magnetic charge QQ. This plot shows a transition from ferromagnetic order to anti-ferromagnetic order at Q=7.5109Q=7.5\cdot 10^{-9}Am.

Our macroscopic experiment, and detailed numerical model allow us to draw conclusions and make predictions on the phases, and stability of MAM at the microscale. To analyze the impact of increasing magnetic moment in MTB we have performed detailed numerical simulations in a region of physical parameters relevant for MTB (See Supplementary Tables VIII and IX). Furthermore, the view of the magnetosome chain in MTB as a magnetic dumbbell has been directly measured using extremely sensitive Nitrogen vacancy centers le2013optical . For the simulations shown in Fig.4, we have used bacterium length L=5μL=5\mum, width W=1.6μW=1.6\mum, magnetic chain length 2a=1.1μ2a=1.1\mum, Qo9.41010Q_{o}\sim 9.4\cdot 10^{-10} Am, and average swimming speeds of order v30μv\sim 30\mum//s khalil2013control ; seong2001swimming ; schuler1999bacterial ; frankel1981magnetotactic ; frankel1980navigational ; komeili2006magnetosomes . This lead to dimensionless parameters β10\beta\sim 10 and α1.5107\alpha\sim 1.5*10^{-7}, which are far from clustering (see Fig.1e). To increase the magnetic moment in our in-silico experiments we have increased the charge from Q0Q_{0} to 4Q04Q_{0}, and then to 10Q010Q_{0}. We obtained the dynamics of that microscale MAM, Fig.4 a-c (See Supplementary Movies 10, 11, and 12), and computed the evolution of different order parameters Fig.4 d,e. Our data shows the emergence of a 𝐂𝐀𝐅{\bf{C-AF}} phase at large dipolar moment (β<1.0\beta<1.0), and a sharp decrease in the average speed of the collective motion, which will be detrimental for MTB survival darwin1964origin . For MTB to have an efficient magnetotactic advantage, they should inhabit the Free phase region of the phase diagram. That means that in nature the 𝐅𝐌{\bf{FM}}, 𝐕{\bf{V}}, and 𝐂{\bf{C}}-𝐀𝐅{\bf{AF}} configurations should be avoided as they strongly lower the swimming efficiency of MTB by interfering with flagella motion dauparas2016flagellar , or by forming clusters of extremely low magnetic moment.

Given that dipolar moment can be increased by increasing QQ, or by increasing 2a2a, we provide a simple bound for QmaxQ_{max} the maximum magnetic charge that a magnetosome chain can have before going into a 𝐂{\bf{C}}-𝐀𝐅{\bf{AF}} phase. Considering two MTB aligned side by side (Fig.1d), they will not form a cluster as long as β>1\beta>1. That is, (μ0/2π)Qmax2a/(2R)2(2Dr)1/2(\mu_{0}/2\pi)Q_{max}^{2}a/(2R)^{2}\leq(2D_{r})^{1/2}. This bound gives Qmax91010Q_{max}\sim 9\cdot 10^{-10}Am, for Dr=2.51038kg2m4s3D_{r}=2.5\cdot 10^{-38}kg^{2}m^{4}s^{-3} , R=0.30μR=0.30\mum, and 2a=1.0μ2a=1.0\mum, consistent with observations dunin1998magnetic ; frankel1980navigational ; rosenblatt1982birefringence ; rosenblatt1985birefringence . On the other hand, considering a fixed the magnetic charge, we can find the maximum length for the magnetosome chain to avoid cluster formation. In this case, amax=(2π/μ0)(2Dr)1/2(2R)2/Q2450a_{max}=(2\pi/\mu_{0})(2D_{r})^{1/2}(2R)^{2}/Q^{2}\sim 450nm in agreement with reported chain lengths dunin1998magnetic ; schuler1999bacterial ; frankel1980navigational ; komeili2006magnetosomes . That is, MTB grow magnetic dipoles that are strong enough to align MTB to the geomagnetic field in a noisy environment, but weak enough to avoid the formation of magnetic clusters.

Our platform, physical model, and numerical simulations of MAM have allowed us to explore the effects of magnetic interactions in active matter at very dissimilar length scales, and show that increasingly large magnetic moments, which in theory should provide an evolutive advantage for MTB, will do the opposite. Large magnetic moments will promote the formation of clusters of MTB that are detrimental for these organisms. Our work paves the way not only to a better understanding of the evolution of MTB, but also to explore magnetic self-assembly at diverse length scales. We anticipate that MAM can be programmed by modifying its magnetic textures, activity, geometry, or the related dimensionless parameters that characterize this system. This is a first step towards functional bioinspired magnetic active matter at all scales.

Acknowledgements.
N.S., and F.G.L. acknowledge ANID (Chile) –Millennium Science Initiative Program– NCN19 170. B.G. acknowledges support from ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002. E.H. was funded by VRIDEI - DICYT project 041931HH. A.C acknowledges support from the CODEV Seed Money Program of the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), the partial support of FONDECYT (Chile) through grant 1210297, and the support of the Design Engineering Center at UAI.

Contributions

A.C conceived the study, designed, and performed experiments. B. G. advised on MTB biology and evolutive mechanism. N.S. performed numerical simulations. N.S. and A.C developed analytical tools. FGL advised on active matter simulations and performed preliminary numerical simulations. M.C. performed image analysis. A.C. and E.H. discussed experimental setup and performed magnetic and elastic interaction measurements. A.C and N.S wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

References

  • (1) Blakemore, R. Magnetotactic bacteria. Science 190, 377–379 (1975).
  • (2) Frankel, R. B., Blakemore, R., De Araujo, F. T., Esquivel, D. M. S. & Danon, J. Magnetotactic bacteria at the geomagnetic equator. Science 212, 1269–1270 (1981).
  • (3) Smith, M. et al. Quantifying the magnetic advantage in magnetotaxis. Biophysical journal 91, 1098–1107 (2006).
  • (4) Dunin-Borkowski, R. E. et al. Magnetic microstructure of magnetotactic bacteria by electron holography. Science 282, 1868–1870 (1998).
  • (5) Komeili, A., Li, Z., Newman, D. K. & Jensen, G. J. Magnetosomes are cell membrane invaginations organized by the actin-like protein mamk. Science 311, 242–245 (2006).
  • (6) Frankel, R. B. & Blakemore, R. Navigational compass in magnetic bacteria. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 15, 1562 (1980).
  • (7) Blakemore, R. P. Magnetotactic bacteria. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 36, 217–238 (1982).
  • (8) Esquivel, D. M. S. & Lins de Barros, H. G. Motion of magnetotactic microorganisms. Journal of Experimental Biology 121, 153– 163 (1986).
  • (9) Darwin, C. On the origin of species: A facsimile of the first edition (Harvard University Press, 1964).
  • (10) Schüler, D. & Frankel, R. B. Bacterial magnetosomes: microbiology, biomineralization and biotechnological applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 52, 464–473 (1999).
  • (11) Jogler, C. et al. Cultivation-independent characterization of ‘candidatus magnetobacterium bavaricum’ via ultrastructural, geochemical, ecological and metagenomic methods. Environmental Microbiology 12, 2466–2478 (2010).
  • (12) Klumpp, S. & Faivre, D. Magnetotactic bacteria. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 225, 2173–2188 (2016).
  • (13) Mellado, P., Concha, A. & Mahadevan, L. Macroscopic magnetic frustration. Physical Review Letters 109, 257203 (2012).
  • (14) Concha, A., Aguayo, D. & Mellado, P. Designing hysteresis with dipolar chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 157202 (2018).
  • (15) Whitesides, G. M. & Grzybowski, B. Self-assembly at all scales. Science 295, 2418–2421 (2002).
  • (16) Whitesides, G. M. & Boncheva, M. Beyond molecules: Self-assembly of mesoscopic and macroscopic components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99, 4769–4774 (2002).
  • (17) Ong, L. L. et al. Programmable self-assembly of three-dimensional nanostructures from 10,000 unique components. Nature 552, 72–77 (2017).
  • (18) Makey, G. et al. Universality of dissipative self-assembly from quantum dots to human cells. Nature Physics 1–7 (2020).
  • (19) Lee, V., Waitukaitis, S. R., Miskin, M. Z. & Jaeger, H. M. Direct observation of particle interactions and clustering in charged granular streams. Nature Physics 11, 733–737 (2015).
  • (20) Kravtsov, A. V. & Borgani, S. Formation of galaxy clusters. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 50, 353–409 (2012).
  • (21) Balbus, S. A. & Hawley, J. F. Instability, turbulence, and enhanced transport in accretion disks. Reviews of Modern Physics 70, 1 (1998).
  • (22) Anderson, P. W. More is different. Science 177, 393–396 (1972).
  • (23) Huber, L., Suzuki, R., Krüger, T., Frey, E. & Bausch, A. Emergence of coexisting ordered states in active matter systems. Science 361, 255–258 (2018).
  • (24) Denk, J. & Frey, E. Pattern-induced local symmetry breaking in active-matter systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 117, 31623–31630 (2020).
  • (25) Vicsek, T., Czirók, A., Ben-Jacob, E., Cohen, I. & Shochet, O. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters 75, 1226 (1995).
  • (26) Marchetti, M. C. et al. Hydrodynamics of soft active matter. Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 1143 (2013).
  • (27) Deblais, A. et al. Boundaries control collective dynamics of inertial self-propelled robots. Physical Review Letters 120, 188002 (2018).
  • (28) Giomi, L., Hawley-Weld, N. & Mahadevan, L. Swarming, swirling and stasis in sequestered bristle-bots. Proc. R. Soc. A 469, 20120637 (2013).
  • (29) Dauchot, O. & Démery, V. Dynamics of a self-propelled particle in a harmonic trap. Physical Review Letters 122, 068002 (2019).
  • (30) Peruani, F. & Aranson, I. S. Cold active motion: How time-independent disorder affects the motion of self-propelled agents. Physical Review Letters 120, 238101 (2018).
  • (31) Digregorio, P. et al. Full phase diagram of active brownian disks: From melting to motility-induced phase separation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 098003 (2018).
  • (32) Filella, A., Nadal, F., Sire, C., Kanso, E. & Eloy, C. Model of collective fish behavior with hydrodynamic interactions. Physical Review Letters 120, 198101 (2018).
  • (33) Grégoire, G. & Chaté, H. Onset of collective and cohesive motion. Physical Review Letters 92, 025702 (2004).
  • (34) Briand, G., Schindler, M. & Dauchot, O. Spontaneously flowing crystal of self-propelled particles. Physical Review Letters 120, 208001 (2018).
  • (35) Deseigne, J., Dauchot, O. & Chaté, H. Collective motion of vibrated polar disks. Physical Review Letters 105, 098001 (2010).
  • (36) Kaiser, A., Popowa, K. & Löwen, H. Active dipole clusters: from helical motion to fission. Physical Review E 92, 012301 (2015).
  • (37) Guzmán-Lastra, F., Kaiser, A. & Löwen, H. Fission and fusion scenarios for magnetic microswimmer clusters. Nature Communications 7, 13519 (2016).
  • (38) Gu, H., Boehler, Q., Ahmed, D. & Nelson, B. J. Magnetic quadrupole assemblies with arbitrary shapes and magnetizations. Science Robotics 4 (2019).
  • (39) Kaiser, A., Snezhko, A. & Aranson, I. S. Flocking ferromagnetic colloids. Science Advances 3, e1601469 (2017).
  • (40) Kantorovich, S., Ivanov, A. O., Rovigatti, L., Tavares, J. M. & Sciortino, F. Nonmonotonic magnetic susceptibility of dipolar hard-spheres at low temperature and density. Physical Review Letters 110, 148306 (2013).
  • (41) Bellini, S. Su di un particolare comportamento di batteri dácqua dolce (on a unique behavior of freshwater bacteria). Institute of Microbiology, University of Pavia, Italy. (1963).
  • (42) Frankel, R. B. The discovery of magnetotactic/magnetosensitive bacteria. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 27, 1 (2009).
  • (43) Patterson, G. A. et al. Clogging transition of vibration-driven vehicles passing through constrictions. Physical Review Letters 119, 248301 (2017).
  • (44) Boudet, J. et al. From collections of independent, mindless robots to flexible, mobile, and directional superstructures. Science Robotics 6 (2021).
  • (45) Zheng, E. et al. Self-oscillation and synchronisation transitions in elasto-active structures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05721 (2021).
  • (46) Vokoun, D., Tomassetti, G., Beleggia, M. & Stachiv, I. Magnetic forces between arrays of cylindrical permanent magnets. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 323, 55–60 (2011).
  • (47) Vokoun, D., Beleggia, M., Heller, L. & ittner, P.  . Magnetostatic interactions and forces between cylindrical permanent magnets. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 321, 3758–3763 (2009).
  • (48) Ryzhkin, I. Magnetic relaxation in rare-earth oxide pyrochlores. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 101, 481–486 (2005).
  • (49) Castelnovo, C., Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S. L. Magnetic monopoles in spin ice. Nature 451, 42 (2008).
  • (50) Mellado, P., Petrova, O., Shen, Y. & Tchernyshyov, O. Dynamics of magnetic charges in artificial spin ice. Physical Review Letters 105, 187206 (2010).
  • (51) Cisternas, J. et al. Stable and unstable trajectories in a dipolar chain. Physical Review B 103, 134443 (2021).
  • (52) Vicsek, T. & Zafeiris, A. Collective motion. Physics reports 517, 71–140 (2012).
  • (53) Le Sage, D. et al. Optical magnetic imaging of living cells. Nature 496, 486–489 (2013).
  • (54) Khalil, I. S. & Misra, S. Control characteristics of magnetotactic bacteria: Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum strain ms-1 and magnetospirillum magneticum strain amb-1. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 50, 1–11 (2013).
  • (55) Seong, S. & Park, T. H. Swimming characteristics of magnetic bacterium, magnetospirillum sp. amb-1, and implications as toxicity measurement. Biotechnology and bioengineering 76, 11–16 (2001).
  • (56) Dauparas, J. & Lauga, E. Flagellar flows around bacterial swarms. Physical Review Fluids 1, 043202 (2016).
  • (57) Rosenblatt, C., de Araujo, F. F. T. & Frankel, R. B. Birefringence determination of magnetic moments of magnetotactic bacteria. Biophysical journal 40, 83 (1982).
  • (58) Rosenblatt, C., Frankel, R. B. & Blakemore, R. P. A birefringence relaxation determination of rotational diffusion of magnetotactic bacteria. Biophysical journal 47, 323 (1985).