This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Breakdown of Long-Range Correlations in Heart Rate Fluctuations During Meditation

Nikitas Papasimakis111Current Affiliation: Optoelectronics Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom222Electronic Address: N.Papasimakis@orc.soton.ac.uk University of Athens, Faculty of Physics, Department of Solid State Physics, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15784 Athens, Greece    Fotini Pallikari University of Athens, Faculty of Physics, Department of Solid State Physics, Panepistimiopolis Zografou, 15784 Athens, Greece
Abstract

The average wavelet coefficient method is applied to investigate the scaling features of heart rate variability during meditation, a state of induced mental relaxation. While periodicity dominates the behavior of the heart rate time series at short intervals, the meditation induced correlations in the signal become significantly weaker at longer time scales. Further study of these correlations by means of an entropy analysis in the natural time domain reveals that the induced mental relaxation introduces substantial loss of complexity at larger scales, which indicates a change in the physiological mechanisms involved.

I INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, the erratic behavior of heart interbeat intervals in humans has attracted considerable attention and its study has evolved to a virtually interdisciplinary topic, encompassing diverse disciplines, such as cardiology, engineering and more recently physics. It has been suggested that heart rate variability (HRV) can provide non-invasive prognosis and diagnosis tools for a number of pathological conditions peng93 ; peng97 . Most importantly, it was demonstrated that heart rate variability exhibits various features that can be used to distinguish between heart rate under healthy and life-threatening conditions raab ; ivanov99 ; kotani . Furthermore, it has been shown that the study of HRV can lead to a better understanding of the dynamics of the underlying physiological mechanisms struzik in a variety of different conditions, such as apnea ivanov98 , sleep bunde etc. It is widely accepted that neuroautonomic control results in modulation of HRV parati through the antagonistic action of the two branches of the autonomic system, namely the sympathetic (SNS) and parasympathetic (PNS). The first tends to increase heart rate and acts on long time scales (below 0.15 Hz, while the latter is related to decreased heart rate and dominates frequencies above 0.15 Hz. The effects of meditation on heart rate were observed to excite prominent low frequency oscillations appearing to be driven by the regularity of the imposed breathing pattern. This observation is rather unexpected considering that meditation is thought of as a quiescent state of the brain. peng99 . Further studies suggested that different meditative protocols induce different types of cardiovascular response that are not necessarily linked to respiratory conditions (sinus arrhythmia) peng04 . In this work we investigate the behavior of heart rate variability during meditation at even longer time scales that range from roughly 15sec15~sec to 20min20~min covering the low (LF) and very low (VL) frequency band. By estimating the corresponding scaling exponent, we show that meditation leads to the breakdown of long-range correlations and loss of the 1/f character. Our findings extend previous studies fractal ; sarkar to indicate that complex physiological changes take place during meditation.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: RR intervals before (a) and during (b) meditation.

II METHODS

We studied a publicly available (RR) interbeat interval database (www.physionet.org) consisting of data collected from eight healthy subjects (aged 29-35) before and during Qigong meditation (more information on the dataset and the meditation method can be found in peng99 ). The length of the time series varied between 5050 and 8080 minutes. One characteristic case of the RR interval time series, before and during meditation, is presented in Figs. 1a & 1b, respectively, where the evident irregular character of the time series before meditation gives its place to smoother cyclic oscillations during meditation. The evolution of the time series was studied by the application of two techniques, namely the average wavelet coefficient (AWC) method, which quantifies the intensity of long-range correlations and the method that estimates the entropy in the natural time domain which captures the complexity characteristics of the time series.

II.1 Scaling exponent estimation - average wavelet coefficient method

The complex features exhibited by HRV stem from the presence of the regulatory systems operating at different time scales. Such systems that that generate fluctuations in the heart rate at all time scales, can be characterized by means of a fractal analysis bunde . A time series is termed fractal, when it possesses scale invariant characteristics at all scales. In practice the fractal character is usually limited to a range of scales and is traditionally quantified by a scaling exponent HH. When 0<H<10<H<1, then the process possesses stationary increments and HH is usually called the Hurst exponent. In particular, a truly random process, YH(t)Y_{H}(t), with uncorrelated but stationary increments exhibits H=0.5H=0.5. For H<0.5H<0.5 the process is mean-returning and is said to demonstrate anti-persistent fractal behavior, while for H>0.5H>0.5 the process is mean-averting and persistent feder . The graph of YH(t)Y_{H}(t) is then a fractal, with fractal dimension D=2HD=2-H feder ; pallik . The increments of YH(t)Y_{H}(t) also exhibit scale invariance with a scaling exponent equal to H1H-1, where HH is the scaling exponent of YH(t)Y_{H}(t). Therefore, it is through integration that one goes from a process of negative scaling exponents to one whose scaling exponents range in the interval (0,1). For differentiable processes or processes with non-stationary increments H>1H>1. Heart rate variability, on the other hand, has characteristics lying on the threshold of non- stationarity for which H1H\simeq 1, a behavior typical for systems far from equilibrium. The power spectrum of such a process scales with frequency ff as 1/f, known from this as 1/f noise. In the present study, the analyzed time series exhibit close to zero or negative scaling exponents. In order to facilitate interpretation, they will always be considered to be the increments of the process of interest; hence all values of HH will refer to the latter and not to the original time series.

The estimation of the scaling exponent in the case of non-stationary processes is a complex problem, especially when deterministic trends are superimposed on the stochastic signal of interest. A range of methods has been developed to overcome this obstacle, each one being more appropriate for a specific kind of trends DFA ; FDFA ; simonsen . A very popular approach is the use of detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA). During DFA the data are coarse-grained and a best-fit polynomial is selected at each segment of the time series for every scale DFA . While this method is ideal for slowly varying polynomial trends, it fails when it comes to cyclic components. Its shortcoming is illustrated in Fig. 2a, where DFA is applied on a random Gaussian noise signal of standard deviation σ=1\sigma=1 with a superimposed sinusoidal trend of amplitude 11 and frequency 0.15Hz0.15~Hz. DFA identifies correctly the global scaling behavior of the random signal yielding a scaling exponent H=0.51H=0.51 with standard error 0.030.03. On the contrary, when the sinusoidal component is introduced, DFA indicates three different scaling regions each yielding a different scaling exponent and fails to isolate the behavior of the stochastic component which might lead to spurious results struzik . Measures to overcome such difficulties have been addressed in the past Hu .

Refer to caption
Figure 2: DFA (a) and AWC analysis (b) of Gaussian noise (σ=1\sigma=1) with (blue squares) and without (red circles) a superimposed sinusoidal trend (sin(0.15x)sin(0.15x)).

We have adopted here the wavelet-based method, since the wavelet transform provides localization both in the time and frequency domain, while at the same time it can be made orthogonal to polynomial trends. More precisely, the wavelet transform W[f(t)]W[f(t)] of a function f(t)f(t) is given by: Wa,b[f(t)]=f(t)ψa,b(t)𝑑tW_{a,b}[f(t)]=\int{f(t)\psi_{a,b}(t)^{*}dt}, where aa and bb are scale and location parameters, respectively, while the ”child” wavelet ψa,b(t)\psi_{a,b}(t) is derived by appropriate scaling of the so-called ”mother” wavelet ψ(t)\psi(t) through the transformation ψa,b(t)=1aψ(tba)\psi_{a,b}(t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}\psi(\frac{t-b}{a}) daubechies . Figure 3 presents color maps of wavelet coefficients over the time-scale plane before and during meditation. In both cases, the behavior of the interbeat intervals shows great complexity as fluctuations of varying intensity occur at all scales. However, during meditation increased values of the wavelet coefficient can be observed as a light colored band parallel to the horizontal (time) axis at scales in the range of 8328-32 beats. This is a signature of periodic components present at these frequencies in agreement with previous studies peng97 . In our analysis we apply the average wavelet coefficient method simonsen . According to this approach, at every scale aa, the average value, <Wa><W_{a}>, of the wavelet coefficients (over all values of the location parameter bb) is calculated. If the analyzed time series is self-similar with scaling exponent HH, then its average wavelet coefficient will scale as aH+0.5a^{H+0.5} simonsen . Therefore, one can estimate the scaling exponent of a given time series by plotting the average wavelet coefficient versus the scale parameter aa in a log-log plot (scalogram) and performing a linear least-squares fit to the graph.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Absolute values of wavelet transform coefficients, |W||W|, of interbeat intervals for subject no. 1 of the studied dataset before (a) and during (b) meditation.

Figure 2b illustrates how the sinusoidal component can be isolated in the frequency (scale) domain by the AWC method. Indeed, both the Gaussian noise and that with the superimposed sinusoidal trend are indistinguishable and exhibit linear scaling apart from a small frequency region around the frequency of the sinusoidal component, where the scalogram shows an isolated peak indicative of the narrow frequency spectrum of the sinusoidal component. These localization properties of the wavelet transform allow for a robust estimation of the scaling exponent, even in the presence of strong cyclic components.

II.2 Entropy in the natural time domain

The complexity characteristics of the heart rate time series are investigated by means of an entropy approach based on the concept of natural time xx, which has originally been introduced in varotsos02 ; varotsos03 ; varotsos05 to distinguish seismic electric signals varotsos82 from artificial noise. This analysis was later extended varotsos04 ; varotsos05b to electrocardiograms (ECG) varotsos03b , since it is equally applicable to deterministic as well as stochastic processes and physiological time series most likely contain components of both types (see varotsos04 ; varotsos07 and references therein). The entropy approach in natural time works as follows. In a signal composed of NN pulses, the natural time xx is introduced by ascribing the value xm=m/Nx_{m}=m/N to the mthm-th pulse, so that the analysis is made in terms of the couple (xm,Qm)(x_{m},Q_{m}), where QmQ_{m} denotes the duration of the mthm-th pulse varotsos02 . The entropy SS is defined as varotsos03b S=<xlnx><x>ln<x>S=<xlnx>-<x>ln<x>, where <f(x)>=m=1Nρmf(xm)<f(x)>=\sum_{m=1}^{N}\rho_{m}f(x_{m}) and ρm=Qm/n=1NQn\rho_{m}=Q_{m}/\sum_{n=1}^{N}Q_{n}. The entropy SS_{-} obtained after time reversal TT varotsos07b so that Tpm=pNm+1Tp_{m}=p_{N-m+1}, is different from the initial SS and their difference ΔS=SS\Delta S=S-S_{-} was found to be of major importance towards distinguishing sudden cardiac death (SCD) individuals from healthy subjects (H) varotsos07 . In particular, the analysis considers a window of width ii sliding over the whole RR (beat-to-beat) interval time series, read in natural time, one pulse at a time. The entropies SS, SS_{-} and their difference ΔSi\Delta S_{i} are then estimated at every step. This difference provides a measure of the temporal asymmetry of the correlations in the time series. More precisely, the physical meaning of ΔSi\Delta S_{i} is derived in the following way. It has been shown varotsos06 (see also Appendix 44 of Ref. varotsos07 ) that the estimated ΔSi\Delta S_{i} for the parametric family p(x,ϵ)=1+ϵ(x1/2)p(x,\epsilon)=1+\epsilon(x-1/2), (|ϵ|<1)(|\epsilon|<1) becomes negative for values of ϵ\epsilon in the range 0<ϵ<10<\epsilon<1 (increasing trend). ΔSi\Delta S_{i} becomes positive for ϵ<0\epsilon<0 ( decreasing trend). Applying this result in the case of ECGs indicates that the variation of the ΔSi\Delta S_{i} with scale ii may be thought of as capturing the net result of the competing mechanisms that either decrease or increase the heart rate (cf. the complex dynamics of heart rate is attributed to the antagonistic activity of the parasympathetic and the sympathetic nervous systems decreasing and increasing heart rate,respectively kotani . Furthermore, the variability of ΔSi\Delta S_{i}, quantified by its standard deviation σ[ΔSi]\sigma[\Delta S_{i}] with respect to time, indicates whether one of the two mechanisms is dominant (large values σ[ΔSi]\sigma[\Delta S_{i}]) or both are of roughly the same intensity (small values σ[ΔSi]\sigma[\Delta S_{i}]). Such an analysis performed on 159159 ECG cases in natural time has shown varotsos07 that ventricular fibrillation starts within three hours after ΔSi\Delta S_{i} (at the scale i=13i=13 heartbeats) had become maximum for the 1616 out of 1818 SCD subjects. This time scale corresponds to the so-called low frequency (LF) band found in heart rate (from 0.040.04 to 0.15Hz0.15~Hz), i.e. at around 0.1Hz0.1~Hz, which is usually attributed to ”the process of slow regulation in blood pressure and heart rate” prokh . Beyond the LF band, it was demonstrated that at scale i= 3 (HF band) a similar complexity measure based on natural time domain entropy allows for the distinction between SCD and in the healthy subjects, since a smaller variability in entropy was observed in SCD than the healthy subjects, suggesting a breaking down of the high complexity varotsos07 . In the present study, it is shown that the variance of the ΔS\Delta S can be used to probe distinctive physiological changes occurring at the VLF band during meditation, marking the loss of the 1/f character of heart rate at normal breathing conditions.

III RESULTS

The AWC analysis was applied in the range of scales from Nmin=4N_{min}=4 up to Nmax=512N_{max}=512 conditioned by the prerequisite that the average must be estimated over a sufficient number of uncorrelated wavelet coefficients even for NmaxN_{max}. Color maps of the wavelet coefficients as a function of scale and time before and during meditation are shown in Fig. 3 for one characteristic case. While before meditation, the wavelet transform exhibits complex behavior over all scales, during meditation the wavelet presents strong maxima at a narrow scale region around N=15N=15 beats, where most of the signal power is concentrated. This variance of behavior is more clearly seen in Fig. 4, where the corresponding scalograms are presented before (blue) and during meditation (red) obtained by averaging the wavelet coefficients over the time axis. The time series before meditation exhibits the typical 1/f behavior of HRV with linear scaling across all scales and a scaling exponent of 1.11.1 with standard error 0.10.1. The picture changes dramatically during meditation. A strong peak appears in the scalogram at a frequency of about 0.22Hz0.22~Hz, which marks the maximum of spectral power. At longer time scales, the graph returns to linear scaling, but with a much lower scaling exponent, H=0.43H=0.43 with standard error 0.10.1, which indicates the weak anti-persistence of a mean-returning process.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Characteristic scalogram before (blue) and during (red) meditation for subject no. 1 of the studied dataset.

A summary of the results for all subjects is presented in Fig. 5. In all cases but two (6 and 7), the scaling exponent during meditation drops significantly. In the two other cases there is no statistically significant change in the scaling exponents before and after meditation (at a p=0.05p=0.05 level). The collective average scaling exponent before meditation is 1.151.15 with standard error 0.030.03, while during meditation it drops to 0.710.71 with standard error 0.080.08. This decrease indicates a change from the verge of non-stationarity to a medium level of persistence. It implies that the overall long-range correlations of the RR interbeat intervals at normal breathing have gotten significantly weaker during meditation. The HH values exhibit now a persistent fBm character feder ; pallik most likely induced by the regularity of the breathing pattern.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Scaling exponents before (blue) and during (red) meditation.

The entropy SS in the natural time domain was calculated in a range of scales from Nmin=3N_{min}=3 to Nmax=60N_{max}=60 beats. Then the time series were inverted with respect to time so that SS_{-} and consequently the difference ΔS\Delta S was estimated. The standard deviation of ΔS\Delta S as a function of scale (number of beats) is presented in Fig. 6 for a characteristic case (subject no. 1). In both conditions before (blue) and during (red) meditation, σ[ΔS]\sigma[\Delta S] increases rapidly at small scales up to about 10-15 beats. At larger scales however, the two curves present distinctively different features. Before meditation, σ[ΔS]\sigma[\Delta S] increases steadily with increasing scale but at a lower rate than before. On the other hand, during meditation, the situation reverses and σ[ΔS]\sigma[\Delta S] decreases with increasing scale. The decrease or increase of σ[ΔS]\sigma[\Delta S] at longer time scales, is quantified by fitting a linear trend and calculating the corresponding slope, ss. Most other subjects’ σ[ΔS]\sigma[\Delta S] behaves similarly, increasing before meditation and decreasing during meditation. An exception was seen for subject no. 77, where the two slopes are practically indistinguishable. Including this odd case, the average slope before meditation (over all subjects) is found to be 1410614\cdot 10^{-6} with standard error 31063\cdot 10^{-6}, while during meditation its value is 10106-10\cdot 10^{-6} with standard error 41064\cdot 10^{-6}, implying that the two values are statistically different.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Standard deviation of ΔS\Delta S before (blue) and (red) during meditation for subject no. 1 of the studied dataset. Dashed lines represent linear fits on the estimated values.

IV DISCUSSION

This study provides evidence that meditation, a state of induced deep mental relaxation, brings about changes in the cardiovascular system in addition to the previously observed enhancement of its low frequency components peng99 . Such changes occur at even lower frequencies and cannot be attributed to cardio-respiratory synchronization. In particular, the drop of the scaling exponent during meditation suggests that the 1/f1/f-noise character that was previously identified to portray infinite long-range correlations within the heart rate time series is now lost. That result can be related to the antagonistic control between the two branches of the autonomic nervous system which is responsible for the HRV at the LF band struzik . In particular, it appears that the heart rate interbeat interval time series during meditation exhibits fBm character feder ; pallik , either appearing as weak persistence or as anti-persistence. This diversity can be considered as evidence of an irregular competitive interplay between the sympathetic (SNS) and the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS). Whereas for 1/f1/f noise large deviations from the average behavior of heart rate are common, such deviations become rare when persistence is observed (1>H>0.51>H>0.5). They get however quite sparse in the case of anti-persistence, i.e. when mean-returning traits are present in the heart rate time series.

We argue here that during meditation the balance between SNS and PNS can be readily restored and consequently, small deviations of one of the two are quickly compensated by the other, avoiding thus the known large excursions from the typical heart rate behavior. Such a view can also explain the fact that the characteristic features are located even further at the VLF band. Indeed, although the physiological mechanisms responsible for HRV at this band have not been yet elucidated, it is believed that they include a strong contribution from the autonomic nervous system tforce .

The results of the entropy analysis performed on the same data confirm the above picture. The standard deviation of ΔS\Delta S during meditation exhibits an overall decreasing trend at large scales, as opposed to its premeditation trend. A diminishing trend in the standard deviation of ΔS\Delta S at larger scales, implies that the correlations in the heart rate do not vary considerably during meditation. In fact, since ΔS\Delta S quantifies the temporal asymmetry of these correlations, the observed behavior can be interpreted as follows: Under normal conditions, the asymmetry seen in the correlations of the heart rate picture under time reversal, varies strongly and becomes more intense at larger scales varotsos08 . On the contrary, during meditation this variation is much weaker and it diminishes further with increasing scale. Hence, we can argue that during meditation the mechanisms responsible for the observed correlations (and their asymmetries) in heart rate variability do not vary considerably with respect to time. Plausible causes for this change of behavior under meditation may involve both internal and external sources. One possible origin can be the calm, quiescent state adopted by those who meditate. Another factor may be the shielding from external stimuli and the absence of physical movement, frequent in normal waken states that may no more pose great demands towards the balancing action between the two nervous systems.

It is inevitable to question the implications of the current results regarding the state of health of a subject who is meditating. There is the assumption that the 1/f behavior is a sign of a healthy condition goldberger and given that meditation seems to alter this state of being, one may wonder if meditation is beneficial condition for the heart. This line of thinking, however, may lead to wrong assumptions, because an induced decrease in heart rate variability does not exclude its ability to behave in reverse fashion at normal conditions. In any case, further study comparing the heart rate variability of both meditating and non-meditating subjects under non-meditating conditions is needed in order to clarify whether the physiological effects of meditation are beneficial to the cardiovascular system.

V CONCLUSIONS

In summary, we show that meditation induces distinct patterns in the heart interbeat intervals. One is a periodic feature in the LF band and another is the loss of the 1/f character in the VLF band. Our findings are corroborated through the study of the entropy of the time series which reveals substantial loss of complexity in the LF and VLF bands. We argue that the observed behavior can be attributed, at least partly, to changes in the balance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic branch of the autonomous nervous system.

References

  • (1) K. K. L. Ho et al., Circ. 96, 842-848 (1997).
  • (2) C. K. Peng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1343-1346 (1993).
  • (3) C. Raab, N. Wessel, A. Schirdewan, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 73, 041907 (2006).
  • (4) P. C. Ivanov, L. A. N. Amaral, A. L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, M. G. Rosenblum, Z. R. Struzik, and H. E. Stanley, Nature 399, 461 (1999).
  • (5) K. Kotani, Z. R. Struzik, K. Takamasu, H. E. Stanley, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. E 72, 041904 (2005).
  • (6) Z. R. Struzik, J. Hayano, S. Sakata, S. Kwak, and Y. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. E 70, 050901(R) (2004).
  • (7) P. C. Ivanov, M. G. Rosenblum, C. K. Peng, J. E. Mietus, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Physica A 249, 587 (1998).
  • (8) A. Bunde, S. Havlin, J. W. Kantelhardt, T. Penzel, J. H. Peter, and K. Voigt, Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 3736 (2000).
  • (9) G. Parati, G. Mancia, M. D. Rienzo, P. Castiglioni, J. A. Taylor, and P. Studinger, J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 676 (2006).
  • (10) C. K. Peng et al., Int. J. Cardiol. 70, 101-107 (1999).
  • (11) C. K. Peng et al., Int. J. Cardiol. 95, 19-27 (2004).
  • (12) N. Papasimakis and F. Pallikari, Fractal 2006, Vienna, Austria, 12-15 February 2006.
  • (13) A. Sarkar and P. Barat, Fractals 16, 199 (2008).
  • (14) J. Feder, Fractals (Plenum New York, 1989).
  • (15) F. Pallikari, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 12, 1499 (2001).
  • (16) C. K. Peng, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Chaos 5, 82 (1995).
  • (17) C. V. Chianca, A. Ticona, and T. J. P. Penna, Physica A 357, 447 (2005).
  • (18) I. Simonsen, A. Hansen, and O. M. Nes, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2779-2787 (1998).
  • (19) K. Hu, P. C. Ivanov, Z. Chen, P. Carpena, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 64, 011114 (2001).
  • (20) I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets (SIAM, Philladelphia, 1992).
  • (21) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, and E. S. Skordas, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011902 (2002).
  • (22) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, and E. S. Skordas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 148501 (2003).
  • (23) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, H. K. Tanaka, and E. S. Skordas, Phys. Rev. E 72, 041103 (2005).
  • (24) P. Varotsos, K. Alexopoulos and K. Nomicos, Phys. Status Solidi B 111, 581 (1982)
  • (25) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, E. S. Skordas, and M. S. Lazaridou, Phys. Rev. E 70, 011106 (2004).
  • (26) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, E. S. Skordas, and M. S. Lazaridou, Phys. Rev. E 71, 011110 (2005).
  • (27) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, and E. S. Skordas, Phys. Rev. E 68, 031106 (2003).
  • (28) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, and E. S. Skordas, and M. S. Lazaridou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 064106 (2007).
  • (29) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, H. K. Tanaka, and E. S. Skordas, Phys. Rev. E. 71, 032102 (2005)
  • (30) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, E. S. Skordas, H. K. Tanaka, and M. S. Lazaridou, Phys. Rev. E 73, 031114 (2006).
  • (31) M. D. Prokhorov, V. I. Ponomarenko, V. I. Gridnev, M. B. Bodrov, and A.B. Bespyatov, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041913 (2003).
  • (32) Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology the North American Society of Pacing and Electrphysiology, Circulation 93, 1043 (1996).
  • (33) P. A. Varotsos, N. V. Sarlis, E. S. Skordas, and M. S. Lazaridou, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 014906 (2008).
  • (34) A. L. Goldberger, L. A. N. Amaral, J. M. Hausdorff, P. C. Ivanov, C. K. Peng, and H. E. Stanley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2466 (2002).