This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Caustic effects on high-order harmonic generation in graphene

Fulong Dong1, Qinzhi Xia2, Jie Liu1,∗ 1Graduate School, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Beijing 100193, China
2Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100088, China
(June 25, 2025)
Abstract

We employ the two-band density-matrix equations and time-dependent density functional theory to calculate high-order harmonic generation (HOHG) in graphene under a femtosecond laser irradiation. Our investigation uncovers a striking harmonic enhancement structure (HES) within a specific energy range of the HOHG spectrum. In this regime, we find the convergence of multiple interband electron-hole recombination trajectories, leading to the zero determinant of the Hessian matrix of the semiclassical action. This trajectory convergence exhibits the characteristics akin to the focusing behavior of light rays, commonly known as caustic effects. In contrast to atom situation, where caustic effects are confined to a narrow energy regime around the HOHG cut-off energy and the enhancement due to caustic trajectory convergence is less apparent, the two-dimensional nature of graphene results in a broad energy region for HOHG enhancement that the caustic trajectories can even dominate the entire interband harmonic generation regime. The magnitude of enhancement is significant and can be estimated to be on the order of N2/3\sim N^{2/3}, with NN representing the harmonic order, according to the catastrophe theory. These mechanisms have broad applicability and hold significant implications for other two-dimensional materials, as well as bulk materials, providing crucial insights into the understanding of HOHG phenomena in diverse material systems.

Introduction. As light propagates, it exhibits a fascinating phenomenon where multiple light rays converge, giving rise to bright focusing features known as caustic effects RThom ; MBerry ; YAKravtsov . In analogous to the situation of light propagation, the generalized caustic effects occur when multiple trajectories converge, resulting in the formation of a singularity and the subsequent enhancement of physical phenomena KWFord ; PSikivie ; MVBerry ; QZXia ; SBrennecke ; LGLiao . The prediction of intensity enhancement can be achieved using catastrophe theory, which associates each caustic with a specific topological type of catastrophe YAKravtsov . These caustics can be observed in diverse fields, including acoustics FDTappert , radio propagation TACroft , as well as high-order harmonic generation (HOHG) ORaz ; VABir ; AJUzan ; JChen .

The generation of attosecond pulses Ferenc has sparked considerable research interest in HOHG across various media, including gases ALHuillier ; Corkum1 ; Lewenstein ; Itatani ; Meckel ; YJChen , crystalline solids RLu ; Ghimire ; Luu ; Georges ; RostCYu , and two-dimensional materials Hanzhe ; Rost ; CHeide ; Dong1 ; Dong2 . When considering atoms irradiated by a femtosecond laser, caustic effects occur at the cut-off energy of HOHG. At this critical point, two branches of electron trajectories, commonly referred to as ‘short’ and ‘long’ trajectories, coalesce and contribute to the same harmonic energy, resulting in an enhancement in the spectrum magnitude ORaz ; DFacciala . Recently, the discussions of caustic effects on HOHG are extended to solid material such as MgO AJUzan . It was claimed that the Van Hove singularities in the energy band structure might result in the caustic singularity. However, the enhanced HOHG spectra observed in the experiment apparently deviate from the locations of the Van Hove singularities AJUzan . On the other hand, theoretical investigations of the caustic effects on the HOHG of a one-dimensional periodic potential model has been made theoretically JChen . Similar to atomic scenarios, it is found that the caustic enhancement emerges only at a cut-off regime determined by the maximum electron-hole recombination energy JChen .

In this Letter, we present the inaugural theoretical exploration of caustic effects in HOHG within the practical two-dimensional material, exemplified by the widely recognized material, graphene. Graphene features a periodic hexagonal lattice with precisely two carbon atoms per unit cell. We focus on investigating the caustic effects of HOHG in graphene under the influence of linearly polarized mid-infrared (MIR) laser irradiation. In contrast to atom scenario, we find that the two-dimensional nature of graphene leads to HOHG enhancement across a wide energy range, potentially encompassing the entire interband harmonics. In particular, the location of HOHG enhancement peak is found to exactly correspond to the zero determinant of the Hessian matrix of the semiclassical action of the electron-hole recombination trajectories and has nothing to do with the Van Hove singularities in the energy band structure.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The harmonic spectra calculated by TBDMEs (a) and TDDFT (b) with the laser intensity of 8×10118\times 10^{11} W/cm2 and the wavelength of 55005500 nm. In panels (a) and (b), the obvious HES are marked by dashed rectangles, and the peaks of HES are indicated by red arrows. The vertical dotted lines label the energy difference between the cc and vv bands at the Van Hove singularities (MM and Γ\Gamma points of graphene). Notably, it is evident that the HES peaks are significantly far away from the Van Hove singularities.

Harmonic enhancement structure (HES). We perform calculations of HOHG using the two-band density-matrix equations (TBDMEs) as well as the time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). Here, the vector potential of the MIR laser field is A(t)=A0sin2(ω0t/2n)sin(ω0t)e\textit{{A}}(t)=\textit{A}_{0}\sin^{2}(\omega_{0}t/2n)\sin(\omega_{0}t)\textit{{e}}, where n=3n=3, and A0\textit{A}_{0} denotes the amplitude. The frequency of the MIR laser field, denoted as ω0\omega_{0}, corresponds to a wavelength of λ=5500\lambda=5500 nm. The unit vector e indicates the direction along the ΓM\Gamma-M axis of graphene SupplMate . Throughout the paper, atomic units are employed unless otherwise specified. The harmonic spectra shown in Fig. 1 are simulated with the laser intensity of 8×10118\times 10^{11} W/cm2. It is apparent that the harmonic spectra obtained through both methods exhibit qualitative consistency. In particular, the both spectra exhibit the apparent HES (marked by dashed rectangles) with a distinct peak (marked by the red arrows). As comparison, we also label the Van Hove singularities (MM and Γ\Gamma points of graphene) with the vertical dotted lines in Fig. 1. Obviously, our calculated HES peaks are far away from the Van Hove singularities, similar to the observations in Ref. AJUzan .

Electron-hole recombination trajectory. To unveil the underlying mechanisms behind the HES in graphene, we investigate the electron-hole recombination trajectories, leveraging the framework of TBDMEs SupplMate . Within the strong field approximation formulation Keldysh ; GVampa , the intraband currents become negligible and the interband currents play a dominant role in the harmonic generation. The Fourier transform of the total current can be expressed as:

j(ω)\displaystyle\textit{j}(\omega)\sim BZ𝑑K0xBZ𝑑K0y𝑑tt𝑑tg(K0x,K0y,t,t)\displaystyle\int_{\textrm{BZ}}d\textrm{K}_{0x}\int_{\textrm{BZ}}d\textrm{K}_{0y}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dt\int_{-\infty}^{t}dt^{\prime}g(\textrm{K}_{0x},\textrm{K}_{0y},t,t^{\prime})
×eiS(K0x,K0y,t,t,ω)+c.c.,\displaystyle\times e^{-iS(\textrm{K}_{0x},\textrm{K}_{0y},t,t^{\prime},\omega)}+c.c., (1)

where K0=(K0x,K0y)\textbf{K}_{0}=(\textrm{K}_{0x},\textrm{K}_{0y}) represents the lattice momentum within the first Brillouin zone (BZ). S(K0x,K0y,t,t,ω)=ttεcv(Kx(τ),K0y)𝑑τωtS(\textrm{K}_{0x},\textrm{K}_{0y},t,t^{\prime},\omega)=\int_{t^{\prime}}^{t}\varepsilon_{cv}(\textrm{K}_{x}(\tau),\textrm{K}_{0y})d\tau-\omega t denotes the semiclassical action, with Kx(t)=K0x+A(t)\textrm{K}_{x}(t)=\textrm{K}_{0x}+A(t). The term εcv(k)\varepsilon_{cv}(\textbf{k}) represents the energy difference between the cc and vv bands for the lattice momentum k. Notably, in contrast to the rapidly oscillating exponent, g(K0x,K0y,t,t)g(\textrm{K}_{0x},\textrm{K}_{0y},t^{\prime},t) constitutes a slowly varying component within the expression SupplMate .

Refer to caption
Figure 2: For the harmonic frequency of ω=0.22\omega=0.22 a.u. [(a) and (c)] and ω=0.33\omega=0.33 a.u. [(b) and (d)], the red dots in (a) and (b) mark the saddle point momenta K0st\textbf{K}_{0}^{st} calculated using Eqs. (2). The harmonic intensities H(K0,ω)H(\textbf{K}_{0},\omega) calculated by TBDMEs are shown in (c) and (d).

In contrast to other solid materials such as MgO and ZnO AJUzan ; GVampa , graphene is unique lying in the existence of Dirac cones and zero energy gaps at the Dirac points. Consequently, when employing the stationary phase approximation to all four integral variables in Eq. (1), a constraint arises where electrons in the valence band can only be excited to the conduction band through the Dirac points. Based on our semiclassical trajectory calculations, under this constraint, the excited electrons do not have the opportunity to recombine with the hole YFeng . Our numerical simulations suggest that the electrons excited in the proximity of Dirac points can recombine with the hole and emit harmonics successfully. With these considerations, we apply the stationary phase approximation only to three integral variables of K0x,K0y,t\textrm{K}_{0x},\textrm{K}_{0y},t and obtain following three saddle point equations,

titrKxst(τ)εcv(Kxst(τ),K0yst)𝑑τ=\displaystyle\int_{t_{i}}^{t_{r}}\nabla_{\textrm{K}_{x}^{st}(\tau)}\varepsilon_{cv}\left(\textrm{K}_{x}^{st}(\tau),\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}\right)d\tau= 0,\displaystyle 0, (2a)
titrK0ystεcv(Kxst(τ),K0yst)𝑑τ=\displaystyle\int_{t_{i}}^{t_{r}}\nabla_{\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}}\varepsilon_{cv}\left(\textrm{K}_{x}^{st}(\tau),\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}\right)d\tau= 0,\displaystyle 0, (2b)
εcv(Kxst(tr),K0yst)ω=\displaystyle\varepsilon_{cv}\left(\textrm{K}_{x}^{st}\left(t_{r}\right),\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}\right)-\omega= 0,\displaystyle 0, (2c)

in which tit_{i} and trt_{r} represent the birth and recombination times of electron-hole pair, respectively. K0st=(K0xst,K0yst)\textbf{K}_{0}^{st}=(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}) is saddle point momentum and Kxst(t)=K0xst+A(t)\textrm{K}_{x}^{st}(t)=\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}+\textit{A}(t). Equations (2a) and (2b) represent the conditions for the perfect electron-hole recombination trajectories, in contrast to the imperfect recollisions LYue ; AMParks ; YFeng . The harmonic energy ω\omega emitted during the electron-hole pair recombination is given by Eq. (2c).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a), (b) The time-frequency distributions corresponding to the harmonic spectra shown in Fig. 1. In panels (a) and (b), the dark cyan points represent the recombination trajectories calculated by Eqs. (2). (c) The recombination energy ω\omega as a function of the saddle point momenta K0st=(K0xst,K0yst)\textbf{K}_{0}^{st}=(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}). The black curves show the relationship between the recombination energy ω\omega and K0xst\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st} for specific K0yst\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}. In panels (a), (b), and (c), the blue dots indicate 1D caustic trajectories with ω/K0xst=0\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}=0, and the red points indicate 2D caustic trajectories with ω/K0xst=ω/K0yst=0\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}=\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}=0.

To validate the applicability of our recombination trajectory theory for graphene, we examine the feasibility of our approach. In Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), we illustrate the saddle point momenta K0st\textbf{K}_{0}^{st} calculated by Eqs. (2) as red dots, which correspond to recombination energies of ω=0.22\omega=0.22 and 0.330.33 a.u., respectively. In Figs. 2(c) and 2(d), we present the harmonic intensities H(K0,ω)H(\textbf{K}_{0},\omega) at the frequency ω\omega, emitted by electrons with lattice momenta K0\textbf{K}_{0} SupplMate . Upon comparing Fig. 2(a) with Fig. 2(c) and Fig. 2(b) with Fig. 2(d), it becomes evident that the saddle point momenta predicted by our recombination trajectory align qualitatively with the lattice momenta that emit high-intensity harmonics as determined through numerical calculations. These findings strongly suggest that our recombination trajectory theory is indeed applicable to graphene.

Caustic effects on HOHG. The harmonic intensity, denoted by H(ω)H(\omega), can be evaluated using H(ω)=ω2|j(ω)|2H(\omega)=\omega^{2}|\textit{j}(\omega)|^{2}, where j(ω)\textit{j}(\omega) from Eq. (1) can be deduced according to the saddle point trajectories that satisfy Eqs. (2):

j(ω)\displaystyle\textit{j}(\omega)\sim K0xst,K0yst,tr,tig(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti)×\displaystyle\sum_{\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i}}g\left(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i}\right)\times
eiS(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti,ω)|det[S′′(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti,ω)]|+c.c.\displaystyle\frac{e^{-iS\left(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i},\omega\right)}}{\sqrt{\left|\operatorname{det}\left[S^{\prime\prime}\left(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i},\omega\right)\right]\right|}}+c.c. (3)

Here, S′′(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti,ω)S^{\prime\prime}(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i},\omega) is the Hessian matrix of the semiclassical action S(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti,ω)S(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i},\omega) with respect to K0xst\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}, K0yst\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st} and trt_{r}, whose determinant is

det[S′′]=ωK0xst1ωK0yst2E(tr)ωK0xst3.\displaystyle\operatorname{det}\left[S^{\prime\prime}\right]=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}}\mathcal{H}_{1}-\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}}\mathcal{H}_{2}-E\left(t_{r}\right)\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}}\mathcal{H}_{3}. (4)

Here, 1\mathcal{H}_{1}, 2\mathcal{H}_{2} and 3\mathcal{H}_{3} are the second order determinants SupplMate .

We can then obtain following caustic equations,

ω/K0xst=0,ω/K0yst=0,\displaystyle\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}=0,\,\,\,\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}=0, (5)

which determines a specific saddle point trajectory that originates from the lattice momenta of (K0xst,K0yst)(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st*},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st*}) and finally emits a harmonic photon with the energy ω\omega^{*} through a perfect electron-hole recombination. It also implies that the saddle point trajectories originating from the vicinity of (K0xst,K0yst)(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st*},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st*}) tend to emit harmonic photons with the same energy ω\omega^{*}, demonstrating a kind of 2D trajectory caustic phenomenon. According to Eqs. (3) and (4), one can find that, for this specific trajectory, the determinant of the Hessian matrix S′′(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti,ω)S^{\prime\prime}(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st*},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st*},t_{r}^{*},t_{i}^{*},\omega^{*}) becomes zero and the corresponding harmonic intensity diverges into infinity. This caustic singularity indicates a potentially significant amplification in the magnitude of the harmonics in the energy range around ω\omega^{*}.

Using the field parameters in Fig. 1 and with the help of saddle point equations (2), we have solved the caustic equations (5) and obtained ω=0.35\omega^{*}=0.35 a.u., which is in complete agreement with the location of the HES peaks illustrated in Fig. 1. Notice the caustic singularity is totally different from the Van Hove singularities AJUzan of energy bands that are determined by |kεcv(k)|=0|\nabla_{\textbf{k}}\varepsilon_{cv}(\textbf{k})|=0 and correspond to ω=0.2\omega=0.2 and 0.60.6 a.u. as shown in Fig. 1.

In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), we present the time-frequency distributions corresponding to the harmonic spectra depicted in Fig. 1 SupplMate . The results obtained from both TBDMEs and TDDFT demonstrate qualitative agreement. The red points correspond to the specific 2D caustic trajectory. One can find that the red point exactly locates at the brightest spot of the time-frequency distributions.

Corresponding to the recombination trajectories shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), we illustrate the recombination energy ω\omega as a function of the saddle point momenta K0st=(K0xst,K0yst)\textbf{K}_{0}^{st}=(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}) in Fig. 3(c). In one-dimensional sections for a fixed K0yst\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}, the blue dots indicate the local maxima of the recombination energies where ω/K0xst=0\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}=0. These trajectories are also marked by the blue dots in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b).

The blue dots in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) represent trajectories that only satisfy ω/K0xst=0\partial\omega/\partial\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}=0 for a fixed K0yst\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}, and are referred to as 1D caustic trajectories. Additional calculations reveal that for these trajectories, the determinant of S′′(K0xst,K0yst,tr,ti,ω)S^{\prime\prime}(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},t_{r},t_{i},\omega) is not zero but is relatively small, indicating a relatively higher harmonic enhancement. It is noteworthy that the blue dots in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) are approximately situated at the central area of the highlighted time-frequency distributions, suggesting that these particular trajectories may play a dominant role in the generation of interband harmonics SupplMate .

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) The gray area corresponds to the region where the interband currents dominate the harmonic generation according to TBDMEs SupplMate . The energy regions of HES are indicated by bars (e.g. refer to the dashed rectangles in Fig. 1). The pink area indicates the energy regions where 1D caustic singularities emerge. (b) The black squares and blue stars indicate the energies corresponding to the HES peaks, and the red lines are the predictions of caustic equations (5). (c) The black square and blue star show the amplification of harmonic intensity at the HES peaks. The red line is the prediction of the catastrophe theory.

Laser parameter dependent caustic effects. We perform extensive calculations of HOHG across a broad range of laser intensities. The HES information as a function of amplitude A0A_{0} of the laser vector potential is shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4(a) shows that the regimes of 1D caustic singularity are qualitatively consistent with the energy region of HES simulated by both TBDMEs and TDDFT. In contrast to atom situation where caustic effects are limited to a narrow regime around the cut-off energy of HOHG ORaz ; SupplMate , the caustics in graphene will lead to a broad energy region of HOHG enhancement and even dominate the entire interband harmonic generation process. Figure 4(b) clearly demonstrates that the locations of HES peaks can be well predicted by the caustic equations (5).

The relative enhancement of the HES peaks can be evaluated by the catastrophe theory Ien/I0N2δI_{en}/I_{0}\approx N^{2\delta} YAKravtsov ; ORaz . Here, IenI_{en} represents the intensity at the caustic peaks, and I0I_{0} is the intensity far from the caustic region. NN is the harmonic order corresponding to the caustic peak. The focusing index δ\delta depends on the types of catastrophes, which are determined by the number of the control parameters and state variable. In the case of atoms excited by linearly polarized monochromatic laser field, the harmonic amplitude can be evaluated by E(ω)=EXUV(ti,ω)eiS0(ti,ω)𝑑tiE(\omega)=\int E_{\textrm{XUV}}(t_{i},\omega)e^{-iS_{0}(t_{i},\omega)}dt_{i} ORaz , in which EXUV(ti,ω)E_{\textrm{XUV}}(t_{i},\omega) is the amplitude of the quantum trajectory associated with the ionization time tit_{i}. In the semiclassical action S0(ti,ω)S_{0}(t_{i},\omega), there is only one control parameter (ω\omega) and one state variable (tit_{i}), corresponding to the fold catastrophe with δ=1/6\delta=1/6. To amplify the caustic effect, in Ref. ORaz , the authors increase the number of control parameters by using a two-colour laser. Then, the type of catastrophes turns to be swallowtail, corresponding δ=3/10\delta=3/10.

In our case of graphene irradiated by a linearly polarized MIR laser field, according to the saddle point equations (2), there are two state variables of K0xst\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}, and K0yst\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}. Then, the harmonic amplitude can be evaluated as E(ω)=𝑑K0xst𝑑K0ystg(K0xst,K0yst,ω)eiS(K0xst,K0yst,ω)E(\omega)=\int\int d\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st}d\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st}g(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},\omega)e^{-iS(\textrm{K}_{0x}^{st},\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st},\omega)}. The types of catastrophes turn to be elliptic umbilic or hyperbolic umbilic with the focusing index δ=1/3\delta=1/3. If we assume that K0yst\textrm{K}_{0y}^{st} is fixed, the above 2D caustic singularity will degenerate to be 1D caustic singularity corresponding to the fold catastrophe with focusing index δ=1/6\delta=1/6, in analogous to atomic or 1D periodic potential cases ORaz ; JChen . Figure 4(c) shows that our numerical results are qualitatively consistent with the predictions of the catastrophe theory.

Summary. Our numerical simulations with both TBDMEs and TDDFT uncover a striking HES for the HOHG in graphene, which we attribute to the fantastic caustic effects. We have developed the electron-hole recombination trajectory theory and then deduced the caustic equations that can precisely predict the location of the HES peak as well as width of HES. With the help of the catastrophe theory, we can also estimate the magnitude of the enhancement in graphene’s HOHG. Our findings can be experimentally observed utilizing contemporary techniques NYoshikawa , and our theoretical analysis holds relevance for other two-dimensional materials as well as bulk materials.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported by NSAF (Grant No. U1930403) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11974057). We acknowledge valuable discussions with Dr. Jiaxiang Chen.

References

  • (1) R. Thom, Structural stability and morphogenesis: an outline of a general theory of models, (Perseus Books, 1989).
  • (2) M. Berry, and C. Upstill, Catastrophe Optics: Morphologies of Caustics and their Diffraction Patterns, (Elsevier, 1980).
  • (3) Y. A. Kravtsov, and Y. I. Orlov, Caustics, catastrophes, and wave fields, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26, 1038 (1983).
  • (4) K. W. Ford, and J. A. Wheeler, Semiclassical description of scattering, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 7, 259 (1959).
  • (5) P. Sikivie, Caustic ring singularity, Phys. Rev. D 60, 063501 (1999).
  • (6) M. V. Berry, Nature’s optics and our understanding of light, Contemp. Phys. 56, 2 (2015).
  • (7) Q. Z. Xia, J. F. Tao, J. Cai, L. B. Fu, and J. Liu, Quantum Interference of Glory Rescattering in Strong-Field Atomic Ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 143201 (2018).
  • (8) S. Brennecke, N. Eicke, and M. Lein, Gouy’s Phase Anomaly in Electron Waves Produced by Strong-Field Ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153202 (2020).
  • (9) L. G. Liao, Q. Z. Xia, J. Cai, and J. Liu, Semiclassical trajectory perspective of glory rescattering in strong-field photoelectron holography, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053115 (2022).
  • (10) F. D. Tappert, Wave Propagation and Underwater Acoustics (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1977).
  • (11) T. A. Croft, HF radio focusing caused by the electron distribution between ionospheric layers, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 2343 (1967).
  • (12) O. Raz, O. Pedatzur, B. D. Bruner, and N. Dudovich, Spectral caustics in attosecond science, Nat. Photonics 6, 170 (2012).
  • (13) V. A. Birulia, and V. V. Strelkov, Spectral caustic in two-color high-order harmonic generation: Role of Coulomb effects, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043413 (2019).
  • (14) A. J. Uzan, G. Orenstein, Á. Jiménez-Galán, C. McDonald, R. E. F. Silva, B. D. Bruner, N. D. Klimkin, V. Blanchet, T. Arusi-Parpar, M. Krüger, A. N. Rubtsov, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, B. Yan, T. Brabec, and N. Dudovich, Attosecond spectral singularities in solid-state high-harmonic generation, Nat. Photonics 14, 183 (2020).
  • (15) J. Chen, Q. Xia, and L. Fu, Spectral caustics of high-order harmonics in one-dimensional periodic crystals, Opt. Lett. 46, 2248 (2021).
  • (16) F. Krauzs and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 163 (2009).
  • (17) X. F. Li, A. L’Huillier, M. Ferray, L. A. Lompre, and G. Mainfray, Multiple-harmonic generation in rare gases at high laser intensity, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5751 (1989).
  • (18) P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1994 (1993).
  • (19) M. Lewenstein, Ph. Balcou, M. Yu. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994).
  • (20) J. Itatani, J. Levesque, D. Zeidler, H. Niikura, H. Pépin, J. C. Kieffer, P. B. Corkum, and D. M. Villeneuve, Tomographic imaging of molecular orbitals, Nature 432, 867 (2004).
  • (21) M. Meckel, D. Comtois, D. Zeidler, A. Staudte, D. Pavicˇ\check{\rm{c}}ić, H. C. Bandulet, H. Pépin, J. C. Kieffer, R. Dörner, D. M. Villeneuve, and P. B. Corkum, Laser-induced electron tunneling and diffraction, Science 320, 1478 (2008).
  • (22) Y. J. Chen, L. B. Fu, and J. Liu, Asymmetric Molecular Imaging through Decoding Odd-Even High-Order Harmonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 073902 (2013).
  • (23) C. Yu, S. Jiang, and R. Lu, High order harmonic generation in solids: a review on recent numerical methods. Adv. Phys. X 4, 1562982 (2019).
  • (24) S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nat. Phys. 7, 138 (2011).
  • (25) T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Yu. Kruchinin, A. Moulet, M. Th. Hassan, and E. Goulielmakis, Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature 521, 498 (2015).
  • (26) G. Ndabashimiye, S. Ghimire, M. X. Wu, D. A. Browne, K. J. Schafer, M. B. Gaarde, and D. A. Reis, Solid-state harmonics beyond the atomic limit, Nature 534, 520 (2016).
  • (27) C. Yu, U. Saalmann, and J. M. Rost, High-order harmonics from backscattering of delocalized electrons, Phys. Rev. A 105, L041101 (2022).
  • (28) H. Z. Liu, Y. L. Li, Y. S. You, S. Ghimire, T. F. Heinz, and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from an atomically thin semiconductor, Nat. Phys. 13, 262 (2017).
  • (29) H. K. Kelardeh, U. Saalmann, and J. M. Rost, Ultrashort laser-driven dynamics of massless Dirac electrons generating valley polarization in graphene, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L022014 (2022).
  • (30) C. Heide, Y. Kobayashi, A. C. Johnson, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, F. Liu and S. Ghimire, High-harmonic generation from artificially stacked 2D crystals, Nanophotonics 12, 255 (2023).
  • (31) F. Dong, Q. Xia, and J. Liu, Ellipticity of the harmonic emission from graphene irradiated by a linearly polarized laser, Phys. Rev. A 104, 033119 (2021).
  • (32) F. Dong, and J. Liu, Knee structure in the laser-intensity dependence of harmonic generation for graphene, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043103 (2022).
  • (33) D. Faccialà, S. Pabst, B. D. Bruner, A. G. Ciriolo, S. De Silvestri, M. Devetta, M. Negro, H. Soifer, S. Stagira, N. Dudovich, and C. Vozzi, Probe of Multielectron Dynamics in Xenon by Caustics in High-Order Harmonic Generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 093902 (2016).
  • (34) See Supplemental Material for details about graphene structure, numerical calculation methods, derivations of the Hessian matrix, and caustic effects on HOHG in a model atom.
  • (35) L. Keldysh, Ionization in the field of a strong electromagnetic wave. Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1965).
  • (36) G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, D. D. Klug, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Theoretical Analysis of High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 073901 (2014).
  • (37) Y. Feng, S. Shi, J. Li, Y. Ren, X. Zhang, J. Chen, and H. Du, Semiclassical analysis of ellipticity dependence of harmonic yield in graphene, Phys. Rev. A 104, 043525 (2021).
  • (38) L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Imperfect Recollisions in High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153204 (2020).
  • (39) A. M. Parks, G. Ernotte, A. Thorpe, C. R. McDonald, P. B. Corkum, M. Taucer, and T. Brabec, Wannier quasi-classical approach to high harmonic generation in semiconductors, Optica 7, 1764 (2020).
  • (40) N. Yoshikawa, T. Tamaya, and K. Tanaka, High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation, Science 356, 736 (2017).
  • (41) jliu@gscaep.ac.cn