Complexifiable characteristic classes
Abstract
We examine the
topological characteristic cohomology classes of complexified
vector bundles. In particular, all the classes coming from the real vector bundles underlying the complexification are determined.
This article is dedicated to Mark F. Feshbach (1950-2010), for his valuable work on cohomology rings of classifying spaces.
:
55R40, Homology of classifying spaces, characteristic classes.keywords:
Characteristic classes, Classifying spaces of groups and -spaces, Stable classes of vector space bundles.Month Day, Year \submittedJames D. Stasheff \volumeyear2013 \volumenumber1 \issuenumber1
1
1 Introduction and statement of the results
In the theory of characteristic classes (in the sense of Milnor and Stasheff [MilnorStasheff], whom we follow in terminology and notation in this article), it is well-known how the Chern classes are mapped to even Stiefel-Whitney classes when converting complex vector space bundles to real vector space bundles by forgetting the complex structure. In the other direction, we have the fibre-wise complexification: Given a real vector bundle with fibre , its complexification is the complex vector bundle obtained by declaring complex multiplication on in each fibre by for the imaginary unit . The Pontrjagin classes of a real vector bundle are (up to a sign) constructed as Chern classes of its complexification. Conversely, which classes of a real vector bundle can be attributed to its complexification? These are the complexifiable characteristic classes which we determine in this article, under the request that they are characteristic classes in the sense of [MilnorStasheff].
Consider a real vector bundle and a complex vector bundle over the same paracompact Hausdorff base space (we keep the latter assumption on throughout this article).
Definition 1.
A real vector bundle is called a real generator bundle of , if its complexification is isomorphic to . In the case that such a bundle exists, we call real-generated.
Not every complex vector bundle is real-generated; as the odd degree Chern classes have the property on the complex conjugate bundle , it is an easy exercise to show that no complex vector bundle with some nonzero and non--torsion odd Chern class can admit a real generator bundle. This makes it seem possible that the subcategory of real-generated vector bundles could admit information additional to its Chern classes, in terms of complexifiable classes of the real generator bundles. However, we will see that the Chern classes already contain all of the relevant information.
Definition 2.
A characteristic class of real vector bundles is complexifiable if for all pairs (, ) of real vector bundles with isomorphic complexification , the identity holds.
We will now give a complete classification of the complexifiable characteristic classes. Denote by the group with two elements.
Theorem 1.
Let be a polynomial in the Stiefel-Whitney classes , . Then the following two conditions are equivalent:
-
(i)
The class is an element of the sub-ring of the polynomials in the Stiefel-Whitney classes.
-
(ii)
The class is complexifiable.
The implication (i)(ii) follows easily from the fact that the square of the -th Stiefel-Whitney class of a real vector bundle is the mod--reduction of the -th Chern class of the complexified vector bundle. The proof of the implication (ii)(i) is prepared with several intermediary steps leading to it. One ingredient, Lemma 1, follows essentially from work of Cartan on fibrations of H-spaces (at Cartan’s time called Hopf spaces). But this only allows us to show that complexifiable characteristic classes in cohomology with –coefficients are contained in the ideal generated by the squares of the Stiefel-Whitney classes. To show that they constitute exactly the subring generated by the squares of the Stiefel-Whitney classes, which is much smaller, we need the technical decomposition of Lemma 2 that we prove by induction.
By their naturality, characteristic classes are uniquely determined on the universal bundle over the classifying space ( for real vector bundles). As the cohomology ring is generated by the Stiefel-Whitney classes of the universal bundle, all modulo characteristic classes are polynomials in the Stiefel-Whitney classes, and Theorem 1 tells us which of them are complexifiable.
We build on this result to investigate which integral cohomology classes are complexifiable. To express our result, we use Feshbach’s description [Feshbach] of the cohomology ring of the classifying space with –coefficients. Generators for this ring are known since Thomas [polynomialAlgebras], [realGrassmann], and all the relations between its generators are known since Brown [Brown] and Feshbach [Feshbach]. Consider the Steenrod squaring operation and the mod–2–reduction homomorphism
As generators for , Feshbach uses Pontrjagin classes and classes with index sets that are finite nonempty subsets of admitting mod–2–reductions
where is the -th Stiefel Whitney class of the universal bundle over . In particular, we have a generator . We give the details of Feshbach’s description in the appendix. Our final result now takes the following shape.
Theorem 2.
Let be a polynomial in , with arbitrary, and the Pontrjagin classes. Then is complexifiable.
And conversely, we can say the following.
Theorem 3.
Let be a complexifiable integral characteristic class. Then for any real vector bundle , is completely determined by some Chern classes , .
2 Classes in cohomology with –coefficients
In this section, we shall prove Theorem 1, after developing all the tools we need to do so.
For this entire section, we only consider cohomology with –coefficients.
We write for the natural numbers without .
Let be a real vector bundle over a paracompact Hausdorff base space.
Let be a complexifiable polynomial in the Stiefel-Whitney classes .
Let be the direct limit of the orthogonal groups,
the direct limit of the unitary groups and the universal total
space to the classifying space for stable complex vector
bundles. Let , via the
inclusion induced by the canonical
inclusion .
Let be the universal bundle over , and denote its Stiefel-Whitney classes by
.
Let be the trivial vector bundle.
Lemma 1.
Let be a complexifiable class in cohomology with –coefficients.
Then
is contained in the ideal
Proof.
We use Cartan’s fibration of H-spaces [Cartan]*p. 17-22 (fibration en espaces de Hopf),
The cohomology ring is the polynomial algebra with generators the Stiefel-Whitney classes of the universal bundle. Cartan [Cartan]*p. 17-22 has shown that maps these generators to the generators of the exterior algebra
which is obtained by dividing out the ideal of the polynomial algebra . Hence, exactly the ideal is mapped to zero. So,
Composing with the projection , we obtain a constant map and therefore a trivial bundle . This pullback of the complex universal bundle is the complexification of :
So, admits a trivial complexification, and all
of the complexifiable classes must treat it like
the trivial bundle :
. A pullback
of the trivial bundle is trivial too, so
by naturality. Whence, is an element of the kernel of , which we have identified with the ideal ∎
The above lemma allows us to write the characteristic class under investigation as a sum over products with squares of Stiefel-Whitney classes,
with some polynomials in the Stiefel-Whitney classes. We must inductively identify squares of Stiefel-Whitney classes as factors of the remainders , until we achieve the decomposition claimed in the following lemma.
Notation.
For indices and , we shall write and . We set .
Note that the classes of the trivial bundle that we are going to use now, are just coefficients in .
Lemma 2.
Any complexifiable characteristic class admits a decomposition
for some , some ,
some , and some coefficients ,
such that the following inequality holds:
Remark A.
Once that this lemma is established, we use that the degree must be the same on both sides in order to deduce that the sum over all terms containing a factor exceeding the degree of via the requested inequality must already be zero. So in fact, the decomposition is of the form
meaning that is a polynomial in some squares , , which implies Theorem 1, (ii)(i).
Before giving the proof of Lemma 2, we shall introduce two notations just to make that proof more readable.
Definition 3.
An index vector
appears in a given decomposition of
if both
and this decomposition admits a summand of the form
.
Note that the terms with must vanish in any decomposition of . That is why we do not let them contribute in the last definition.
Definition 4.
Set Consider an
index vector appearing in a given decomposition of
.
If , then we call a lower degree remainder.
As seen in Lemma 1, lies in , so there is a decomposition
for some , some , and some . We will show that there is a lower degree remainder in this decomposition that lies in . Then, that lower degree remainder admits a decomposition as a linear combination of squares with coefficients in , leading to a new decomposition of . So, inductively, we will replace a lower degree remainder in any given decomposition of by a linear combination the coefficients of which are remainders with longer index vectors. That is why after a finite number of these steps, the index vectors will no longer appear, because the sums will exceed the degree of . This is the moment when all lower degree remainders are eliminated and the decomposition described in Lemma 2 is achieved.
To carry out this strategy, we first need to introduce the following truncation procedure.
Truncated stable invariance
With Lemma 3, we shall give a sense to “the truncation of the equation at the dimension ”. Define the bundles
and
where is the projection on the -th factor of the base space . Let . Consider the map
where is the natural embedding into the direct limit. Then the bundle admits Stiefel-Whitney classes that are in bijective correspondence with those of the -dimensional universal bundle .
To be precise, and the situation is
Especially, vanishes for . Compare the latter statements with [MilnorStasheff].
Lemma 3.
Under the above assumptions, the following equation holds:
We will call it the equation truncated at dimension .
Proof.
The bundle inherits from the property of admitting a trivial complexification. As is complexifiable, we have Applying the induced cohomology map to this equation, we obtain
and hence
By the universality of , and the naturality of all characteristic classes with respect to the classifying maps of and , any given decomposition
gives analogous decompositions
and
By Theorem 1, (i)(ii) the square is complexifiable and hence invariant under adding the bundle of trivial complexification :
Thus, the equation can be rewritten using that all summands containing a factor with vanish:
In order not to exceed the degree of , also all terms with must vanish:
So, this last equation is the equation truncated at the dimension . ∎
Proof of Lemma 2.
We carry out the proof by induction over the index vector identifying a lower degree remainder.
Base case. Lemma 1 implies
,
with some polynomials in the Stiefel-Whitney classes.
Rename such that .
We truncate the equation at the dimension , and obtain
As ,
this is just .
Injectivity of the multiplication map
in then holds
.
Then we pull this back with
(where the map takes just one, arbitrary, value), to obtain
Due to the Whitney sum formula, the Stiefel-Whitney classes in which is a polynomial are stable under adding a trivial bundle;
and the above left hand term equals
Using naturality of characteristic classes with respect to pullbacks,
this shows that
lies in
. So we can replace it with a linear (over the field with 2 elements) combination of strictly quadratic terms, providing a new decomposition,
Induction hypothesis. Consider a given decomposition
Inductive claim. The decomposition of the induction hypothesis admits a lower degree remainder that lies in .
We show this in the inductive step.
Inductive step. We truncate the equation
at the dimension
Then the remaining terms of do all have the common factor . This is not a zero divisor in and furthermore its multiplication map is injective. Now, in , this injectivity implies
If there is just one lower degree remainder , then we use the injectivity of the multiplication map
on
to obtain . Then we pull this back with
to obtain . Using naturality, we see now that the lower degree remainder lies in .
Otherwise, we truncate the remaining equation again at the dimension
so as to obtain
Now we proceed analogously with the choice marked with the “” signs and, after finitely many steps, find a lower degree remainder in . This lower degree remainder can be replaced by a linear combination of squares, holding a new decomposition of . This completes the induction.
Proof of Theorem 1, (ii)(i).
Let be a complexifiable characteristic class. By Remark A and the universality of , the decomposition of Lemma 2 yields the decomposition
As are elements of the class is in the sub-ring of the polynomial ring of Stiefel-Whitney classes. ∎
This completes the proof of Theorem 1.
3 Classes in cohomology with integral coefficients
We will build on our results obtained for –coefficients and use the mod–2–reduction homomorphism
to prove the theorems with –coefficients stated in the introduction. Define the element as in the appendix, and let be the characteristic class that is on the universal bundle.
Lemma 4.
For any real bundle , the mod––reduced class equals
Proof.
By Feshbach’s description (in the appendix), the mod–2–reduction is
We expand this expression until it is a polynomial in the Stiefel-Whitney classes. Then we rearrange the expression using the Whitney sum formula and the symmetry of the terms. ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.
For and the Pontrjagin classes, the result is obvious. Now let , be real bundles with . Forgetting the complex structure, this is . By naturality of the Stiefel-Whitney classes, for any finite nonempty index set , the polynomial given in Lemma 4 is the same for the arguments and . Applying Lemma 4, this means that . As is in the torsion of , restricted on which is injective [Feshbach]p. 513, this proves the theorem: . ∎
Proof of Theorem 3.
Feshbach [Feshbach]p. 513 shows that
{2–torsion},
where is the -th Pontrjagin class of the universal bundle. Then with a polynomial in the Pontrjagin classes and some 2-torsion class. So for every real bundle ,
By definition of the Pontrjagin classes, ; and using the reduction from Chern classes to Stiefel-Whitney classes, further the Whitney sum formula and the symmetry of the summands, we deduce
It follows from Theorem 1 that the mod--reduction is a polynomial in the squares of Stiefel-Whitney classes; and hence also is a polynomial in the squares of Stiefel-Whitney classes. As according to [Feshbach]p. 513, is injective on the torsion elements, there is an inverse for the restricted map , lifting back to . So, from
we obtain
∎
The author would like to thank Graham Ellis and Thomas Schick for support and encouragement, the latter also for posing the questions treated in this article and giving advice on them.
Appendix. The cohomology ring of with –coefficients
The cohomology ring of with
–coefficients is known since Thomas [polynomialAlgebras], [realGrassmann]
and with all relations between its generators since Brown [Brown] and Feshbach [Feshbach].
It can be derived as follows.
Define the set of generators of
as in [Feshbach]*definition 1:
It consists of the Pontrjagin classes of the universal
bundle over , and classes with ranging
over all finite nonempty subsets of
with the proviso that does not contain both and
, for .
According to [Feshbach]*theorem 2,
is for all
isomorphic to the polynomial ring over generated by
the above specified elements modulo the ideal generated by the
following six types of relations.
In all relations except the first, the cardinality of is less
than or equal to that of and greater than one.
On the index sets and , we perform set-theoretic unions (), intersections () and differences ().
By convention, where it occurs means .
Also, if , then shall mean .
As Feshbach remarks, most of the restrictions on and are to avoid repeating relations.
.
(for .
(for ).
(for ; if and have the
same cardinality, then the smallest element of is to be less than that of ).
.
, if is even.
Then .
References
- \ProcessBibTeXEntry \ProcessBibTeXEntry \ProcessBibTeXEntry \ProcessBibTeXEntry \ProcessBibTeXEntry \ProcessBibTeXEntry