Congruence relations for -colored partitions
Abstract.
Let be prime. For the partition function and , Atkin found a number of examples of primes such that there exist congruences of the form Recently, Ahlgren, Allen, and Tang proved that there are infinitely many such congruences for every . In this paper, for a wide range of , we prove congruences of the form for infinitely many primes . For a positive integer , let be the -colored partition function. Our methods yield similar congruences for . In particular, if is an odd positive integer for which and , then we show that there are infinitely many congruences of the form . Our methods involve the theory of modular Galois representations.
1. Introduction
Let be an integer. A partition of is any non-increasing sequence of positive integers whose sum is . The partition function counts the number of partitions of . We agree that and that if It is well-known that we have
(1.1) |
The study of the arithmetic properties of has a long history. For example, Ramanujan [Ram21] proved the following congruences for :
(1.2) |
where . Since the work of Ramanujan, many authors found more examples of congruences for . These take the form
(1.3) |
where is prime, is a prime distinct from and is an integer. In his breakthrough work, Ono [Ono00] showed that for every , there are infinitely many primes for which (1.3) holds with . Such arithmetic phenomena also occur for the coefficients of a wide class of weakly holomorphic modular forms (see e.g. [Tre06] and [Tre08]). In contrast to this, Ahlgren and Boylan [AB03] showed that if (1.3) holds for , then . For , Ahlgren, Beckwith, and Raum [ABR22] have shown that congruences of the form (1.3) are scarce in a precise sense.
In the 1960s, Atkin discovered examples of congruences (1.3) with . In recent work, Ahlgren, Allen, and Tang [AAT21] study the existence of such congruences. These come from two families which we describe below.
For primes , Atkin [Atk68a, eq. ] gave examples of primes for which
(1.4) |
where . By fixing in one of the allowable residue classes modulo , we obtain a congruence (1.3) with . We refer to these as type I congruences. For each of , Atkin [Atk68a, Thm. , ] showed that for , we have
(1.5) |
We refer to these as type II congruences. By using modular Galois representations, Ahlgren, Allen and Tang proved that there are infinitely many type I congruences for every prime and that there are infinitely many type II congruences for of the primes .
For a positive integer , define the -colored partition function by
We agree that if . Let be prime. Many congruences have been proven for (see e.g. [Atk68b, Thm. ] and [Gor83, Thm. ]). In this paper, for a wide range of , we prove congruences of the form for infinitely many primes . In particular, when , we get congruences analogous to (1.4). Our first result relies on the assumption that and are compatible (we choose to delay the precise definition to Section for ease of exposition). Moreover, we will prove in Section that and are compatible if we have and . We will also prove in Section that if and , then and are compatible whenever . Stating the result requires some notation. Define
Our first result states that we have type I congruences modulo for the functions when and are compatible. We state these theorems under the assumption that . When , the situation is much simpler and will be discussed in the last section.
Theorem 1.1.
Suppose that is prime, that is an odd positive integer and that and are compatible. Then there exists a positive density set of primes such that if , then we have and
Thus, by choosing in any of the allowable residue classes modulo , we obtain congruences of the form
Remark.
In the above theorem and the theorems which follow, our definition of density is that of natural density.
Remark.
When and are close, the modular form which captures the relevant values of modulo has small weight. We illustrate this when . In this case, the form is in (see Section for a definition of this space), which has dimension if . For such , we have , which implies that
We prove a more general result from which Theorem 1.1 follows by setting .
Theorem 1.2.
Suppose that is prime, that is an odd positive integer and that and are compatible. Suppose that is an integer. Then there exists a positive density set of primes such that if , then and
Thus, by choosing in any of the allowable residue classes modulo we obtain congruences of the form
Remark.
If we make the further assumption that there is no congruence modulo any prime above between distinct newforms in (see Section for the definition), Theorem 1.2 also holds when .
The next result gives congruences analogous to and involving primes in a different residue class modulo . Our result does not rely on the assumption of compatibility.
Theorem 1.3.
Suppose that is an odd positive integer. Suppose that is prime, that and that
(1.6) |
-
(1)
There exists a positive density set of primes with the property that if , then and there exists such that
-
(2)
Suppose that all of the integers with satisfy . Then there exists a positive density set of primes with the property that if , then and there exists such that
Remark.
The value of in and can be made explicit for any and using the arguments at the end of Section .
Remark.
The condition on the integers with in is necessary to ensure that the form which we construct in Section is a cusp form. We can use the same method to prove an analogous result for primes with the property that for some integer . However, we would need to add the condition that there are no congruences between distinct newforms in the spaces under consideration.
Remark.
If , then the condition on the integers with is always satisfied, since the only choice for is . It also holds for (since it is a square) and (since ). For a fixed , we can use the quantitative version of Dirichlet’s theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions, quadratic reciprocity, and the Chinese remainder theorem to prove that the condition holds for a positive proportion of the primes .
The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section , we give some background on modular forms and Galois representations. In Section , we construct for each and important modular forms whose coefficients capture the relevant values of modulo . In the remaining sections (save for Section ), our main tool is the theory of modular Galois representations. In Section , we prove that a wide range of and are compatible. In Section , we prove the main technical result which we will need in order to prove Theorem 1.2. In Section , we prove Theorems . Finally, in Section , we discuss congruences for when ; in particular, we give a short proof of [Boy04, Thm. , ].
2. Background
We follow the exposition in [ABR22] and [AAT21]. Throughout, let be prime and set . Suppose that and that is a positive integer. For a function on the upper half plane and
we have the weight slash operator
Let be a subring. If is a multiplier system on , we denote by (resp. ) the space of modular forms (resp. cusp forms) of weight and multiplier on whose Fourier coefficients are in . When or is the subring of algebraic numbers that are integral at all of the primes above , we omit them from the notation. Forms in these spaces satisfy the transformation law
and the appropriate conditions at the cusps of .
If is even, we denote by the new subspace. Let be defined by . When is square-free, there is an Atkin-Lehner involution on for every prime divisor of . Given a tuple (where each ), let be the subspace of forms with for . If and are coprime, then we let be the subspace of attached to the tuple (for such , the operator acts on ). We define the eta function by
and the theta function by
The eta function has a multiplier satisfying
throughout, we choose the principal branch of the square root. For , we have the formula [Kno70, ]
(2.1) |
For the multiplier of the theta function we have
where
For odd values of , we have the formula
(2.2) |
For , we have
(2.3) |
If , then is a weakly holomorphic form on . This implies that each has a Fourier expansion of the form
(2.4) |
We have when .
We next recall the and operators. For a positive integer , we define them on Fourier expansions by
If , then for each prime we have the Hecke operator
For and , we have
(2.7) |
(see e.g. [Yan14, Proposition ]). Yang only states the result for such that . The result when follows from (2.6) and [Shi73, Thm. ]. When , we also have (2.7) for .
For such that and each odd squarefree , if (resp. ), then we have a Shimura lift on defined via (2.5) (resp. (2.6)) and the usual Shimura lift [Shi73] on (resp. ). Define
and
The action on Fourier expansions is given by
where
We have (see e.g. [ABR22, ])
(2.8) |
They only state their result for when , but the same argument applies when . From [Yan14, Thm. , ], it follows that
and
(note that Yang uses in place of ). Moreover, we have
where is the Hecke operator of index on the integral weight space.
We now summarize some facts about modular Galois representations. See [Hid00] and [Edi92] for more details. We begin with some notation. Recall that is prime. Let be an even integer and with . Let be the algebraic closure of in . If is prime, let be a fixed algebraic closure of and fix an embedding . The embedding allows us to view the coefficients of forms in as elements of , and for each prime , the embedding allows us to view as a subgroup of . If is the inertia subgroup, we denote the coset of absolute Frobenius elements above in by . For any finite extension , denote by the restrictions to of elements in . For representations which are unramified at (which is to say that ), the image of any under only depends on (the same conclusion holds for representations of and ); for any such representation, we denote by the image of any element in under and make a similar definition for representations of and .
We denote by and the -adic and mod cyclotomic characters, respectively. We let denote Serre’s fundamental characters of level (see [Ser87, ]). Both characters have order , and we have .
The following theorem is due to Deligne, Fontaine, Langlands, Ribet, and Shimura (see [AAT21, Thm. 2.1]).
Theorem 2.1.
Let be a normalized Hecke eigenform. There is a continuous irreducible representation with semisimple mod reduction satisfying the following properties.
-
(1)
If , then is unramified at and the characteristic polynomial of is .
-
(2)
If and , then is unipotent. In particular, the prime-to- Artin conductor of is not divisible by . If further is -new, then we have
where is the unramified character with .
-
(3)
Assume that . Then
-
•
If is an -adic unit, then is reducible and we have
-
•
If is not an -adic unit, then is irreducible and .
-
•
Remark.
The Galois representations depend on the choice of embedding , but we have suppressed this from the notation.
We now define what it means for and to be compatible. Define
and
Definition 2.2.
Suppose that is prime and that is an odd positive integer such that . We say that and are compatible if for every newform the image of contains a conjugate of .
We now discuss filtrations. Recall that is prime. If is given by , then we define
and
We also define
(2.9) |
We require the following facts (see e.g. [Ser73, ] and [Joc82, ]).
Lemma 2.3.
Let and be even integers. Let and be prime.
-
(1)
We have
-
(2)
If satisfies , then we have .
-
(3)
There exists a form with .
-
(4)
For , we have .
Finally, for an even integer , denote the weight Eisenstein series on by .
3. The modular forms and
Let
be the unique normalized cusp form of weight on . Set
By studying the filtration , we prove the following result.
Proposition 3.1.
Suppose that is prime. Assume that is an odd positive integer with . Then there exists a modular form with
(3.1) |
Remark.
Boylan [Boy04, Theorem ] gave the complete list of pairs with for which .
Proof.
Note that
(3.2) |
Thus, we have
(3.3) |
Define
If , then the right hand side of (3.3) is congruent to , so there is nothing to prove. Therefore, we assume that . By definition, there exists a form with
By of Lemma 2.3, we see that . By of Lemma 2.3, we have
Since and has weight , we see by of Lemma 2.3 that
(3.4) |
If , we have
which implies by (3.4) that
(3.5) |
Let The space has a basis of forms such that
(3.6) |
After subtracting an appropriate integral linear combination of these basis elements from , we may assume that . If satisfies , then ; this is a contradiction since . This implies that , so
This form satisfies (3.1). Since and , it follows that . By (3.5), we get ; the result follows. ∎
We now construct the half-integral weight forms which we will need in order to prove the second assertion of Theorem 1.3.
Proposition 3.2.
Let be an odd positive integer. Let be a prime such that . Suppose that all of the integers satisfying have the property that . Then there exists a form in satisfying
(3.7) |
Proof.
By of Lemma 2.3, there exists a form with
Recall that . Define by
By (3.2), we have
This implies that
Since for all of the integers which satisfy , we conclude that vanishes to order modulo . By arguing as in the proof of Proposition 3.1 using (3.6), we may assume that vanishes to order , so
We have a form which satisfies (3.1), so the form has the property that
Let satisfy , and define by
This concludes the proof. ∎
4. Compatibility
Suppose that is prime and that is an odd positive integer such that . Recall that
and that
Recall also that and are compatible if for every newform , the image of contains a conjugate of . Finally, recall for each newform that we have a mod reduction . We now show that we have compatibility for a wide range of and .
Proposition 4.1.
If and , then and are compatible.
Proof.
Let be a newform. By [DDT97, Theorem ], there are four possibilities for the image of :
-
(1)
is reducible.
-
(2)
is dihedral, i.e. is irreducible but is reducible for some quadratic .
-
(3)
is exceptional, i.e. the projective image of is conjugate to one of , , .
-
(4)
The image of contains a conjugate of .
Since , we have . By [AAT21, Lemma 3.2], we conclude that is irreducible. By the condition , we have ; by the same lemma, we see that is not dihedral.
Thus, in order to show that and are compatible, it suffices to show that the image of cannot be exceptional. To this end, we show that the projective image contains an element of order . Suppose that is an -adic unit. Recall that is the -adic cyclotomic character. By part of Theorem 2.1, we know that
Recall that is the mod cyclotomic character. Since has order , we see that the projective image of contains an element of order . Since , we see that .
Recall that and are Serre’s fundamental characters of level . If is not an -adic unit, then part of Theorem 2.1 implies that
Since has order , we know that the projective image of contains an element of order . By the fact that , we see that . ∎
By computing in Magma, for small we can establish compatibility for a wide range of .
Proposition 4.2.
Let be an odd positive integer satisfying .
-
(1)
If is a prime such that , then and are compatible.
-
(2)
In particular, if or and is prime, then and are always compatible.
Proof.
Fix an odd integer such that . Our strategy to prove is to compute in Magma to rule out each of the first three possibilities in Proposition 4.1 as we vary over the primes such that . By the same proposition, we may assume that . Fix such a prime . Arguing as in the proof of Proposition 4.1, we conclude that is irreducible for each newform .
For each newform , by [AAT21, Lemma 3.2], we see that is dihedral only if and or . If is prime, then . if or , then we compute in Magma to conclude that there exists with the properties that , (which would mean that ) and . However, this contradicts the fact that . Therefore, is not dihedral for each newform .
Thus, to prove , it suffices to show for each newform that does not have exceptional image. From the proof of Proposition 4.1, we know that this condition holds if If either of these inequalities fails to hold, then let be a prime. Define . If the projective image of is , then we have
(4.1) |
depending on the order of the image of in (see e.g. [Rib75, p. 264] and [Rib85, p. 189]). To prove our result, it suffices to check for each newform that there exists a prime such that (4.1) does not hold. For such , we compute with Magma to show that there exists such that (4.1) does not hold for .
To prove , note that if or , then only fails when or , respectively; this contradicts the assumption that . ∎
5. The main technical result
Choose a number field containing all of the coefficients of all of the normalized Hecke eigenforms in . Recall that for each prime we have fixed an embedding . If is the prime of induced by the embedding , then let be the completion of at with ring of integers . For a fixed , we can assume without loss of generality that has the property that
(5.1) |
We now prove the main technical result which we will need in order to prove Theorem 1.2.
Theorem 5.1.
Let be prime. Suppose that , , , and are defined as above and that . Let be an integer. Suppose that and are compatible. Then there exists a positive density set of primes such that if , then and for all of the newforms , we have
Proof.
By the assumption that , we know that . For each newform , the Galois representations and can be defined over and , respectively. Define . Since and are compatible, we know that the image of each contains a conjugate of , so we can use [AAT21, Proposition ] to find an element such that each is conjugate to . It follows that the characteristic polynomial of is congruent to modulo . Since , we can use Hensel’s lemma to factor the characteristic polynomial of over . Thus, is conjugate to a diagonal matrix with entries and in with the properties that and . By induction, we see that and . This implies that the characteristic polynomial of is congruent to
Since has order , we have . By composing with the projection , we have a representation . This representation has finite image, so there exists a finite extension such that if is the restriction map, then there exists a representation such that . The Chebotarev density theorem implies that there is a positive density set of primes such that if , then is conjugate to ; the fact that for such implies that . For such and any newform , we have
∎
Remark.
We assume that so that we can apply Hensel’s lemma. However, we do not need Hensel’s lemma when . Thus, if , then we have the result when .
6. Proofs of Theorems and
We now prove Theorems . First, we introduce some notation. Let be prime. Suppose that with , where is an odd positive integer and satisfies . We define
and (as in the introduction)
For each squarefree , let be the form with . As ranges over all of the squarefree integers, there are only finitely many non-zero possibilities for . Let be a collection which represents all of these possibilities. By (2.8), we see that is not empty.
The space is spanned by newforms . For , write
and let be a number field which contains the coefficients of each as well as all of the coefficients . Fix a prime of over and define
(the definition depends on the choice of , but this is not important to us). Before we prove Theorem 1.2, we require the following lemma.
Lemma 6.1.
Suppose that is prime and that , where is an odd positive integer. Suppose that the newforms and the integer are defined as above. Suppose that is a prime and that is an algebraic integer in with the property that for all . Then
Proof.
For each we have
and for each we have
By the definition of , it follows for each that
Thus, for each squarefree , we have
The result follows from (2.8). ∎
The next result explains how to produce congruences from Lemma 6.1.
Lemma 6.2.
Suppose that is prime, that is an odd positive integer, and that . Suppose that is prime. Suppose that there exists and with
Then we have
Proof.
This follows from the definition of the Hecke operator in (2.7). If , then the third term of does not contribute and if , then the middle term of becomes . ∎
We now prove Theorem 1.2.
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
Suppose that is prime, that is an odd positive integer and that and are compatible. By Proposition 3.1, there is a modular form such that
Since , each of its Shimura lifts lands in the space .
Remark.
To prove Theorem 1.3, we make use of the following consequence of [AAT21, Thm. ]. They only state the result for , but the same argument applies with replaced by .
Theorem 6.3.
Suppose that is prime, that is an odd positive integer, and that there exists an integer for which . Let . Then there exists a positive density set of primes such that if , then and for every we have , where is the eigenvalue of .
Proof of Theorem 1.3.
Suppose that is an odd positive integer. Suppose that is prime, that and that there exists an integer with . For each squarefree , let be the form with . By Theorem 6.3, we see that there exists and a positive density set of primes such that if , then and
for all . Thus, for all , we have
which means that
It follows from (2.8) that
It then follows (after setting and ) from Lemma 6.2 that there exists with the property that
This proves part of Theorem 1.3.
We now prove part . Under the hypotheses on the integers which satisfy , we have the form constructed in Proposition 3.2. It satisfies
We now argue as in the proof of part to conclude that there exists for which
The result follows. ∎
7. The case when
When , we obtain results stronger than Theorems . The following result gives a short proof of [Boy04, Thm. , ].
Lemma 7.1.
If is prime, then . Thus, we have
Proof.
Note that
(7.1) |
Let be such that and . By (2.4), we see that vanishes to order . Since , we have , so . The result follows. ∎
When , we can use the fact that is an eigenform for the Hecke operators for all primes to produce the following congruences.
Lemma 7.2.
If is prime, then for some . For all primes , if , then
8. Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Scott Ahlgren for suggesting this project and making many helpful comments. The author would also like to thank the Graduate College Fellowship program at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for their generous research support.
References
- [AAT21] Scott Ahlgren, Patrick B. Allen, and Shiang Tang, Congruences like Atkin’s for the partition function, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.09481.pdf (2021).
- [AB03] Scott Ahlgren and Matthew Boylan, Arithmetic properties of the partition function, Invent. Math. 153 (2003), no. 3, 487–502. MR 2000466
- [ABR22] Scott Ahlgren, Olivia Beckwith, and Martin Raum, Scarcity of congruences for the partition function, American Journal of Math, to appear (2022).
- [Atk68a] A. O. L. Atkin, Multiplicative congruence properties and density problems for , Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 18 (1968), 563–576. MR 227105
- [Atk68b] by same author, Ramanujan congruences for , Canad. J. Math. 20 (1968), 67-78; corrigendum, ibid. 21 (1968), 256. MR 0233777
- [Boy04] Matthew Boylan, Exceptional congruences for powers of the partition function, Acta Arith. 111 (2004), no. 2, 187–203. MR 2039422
- [DDT97] Henri Darmon, Fred Diamond, and Richard Taylor, Fermat’s last theorem, Elliptic curves, modular forms & Fermat’s last theorem (Hong Kong, 1993), Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 2–140. MR 1605752
- [Edi92] Bas Edixhoven, The weight in Serre’s conjectures on modular forms, Invent. Math. 109 (1992), no. 3, 563–594. MR 1176206
- [Gor83] Basil Gordon, Ramanujan congruences for , Glasgow Math. J. 24 (1983), no. 2, 107–123. MR 706138
- [Hid00] Haruzo Hida, Modular forms and Galois cohomology, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 69, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000. MR 1779182
- [Joc82] Naomi Jochnowitz, Congruences between systems of eigenvalues of modular forms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 270 (1982), no. 1, 269–285. MR 642341
- [Kno70] Marvin I. Knopp, Modular functions in analytic number theory, Markham Publishing Co., Chicago, Ill., 1970. MR 0265287
- [Ono00] Ken Ono, Distribution of the partition function modulo , Ann. of Math. (2) 151 (2000), no. 1, 293–307. MR 1745012
- [Ram21] S. Ramanujan, Congruence properties of partitions, Math. Z. 9 (1921), no. 1-2, 147–153. MR 1544457
- [Rib75] Kenneth A. Ribet, On -adic representations attached to modular forms, Invent. Math. 28 (1975), 245–275. MR 419358
- [Rib85] by same author, On -adic representations attached to modular forms. II, Glasgow Math. J. 27 (1985), 185–194. MR 819838
- [Ser73] Jean-Pierre Serre, Formes modulaires et fonctions zêta -adiques, Modular functions of one variable, III (Proc. Internat. Summer School, Univ. Antwerp, 1972), 1973, pp. 191–268. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 350. MR 0404145
- [Ser76] by same author, Divisibilité de certaines fonctions arithmétiques, Enseign. Math. (2) 22 (1976), no. 3-4, 227–260. MR 434996
- [Ser87] by same author, Sur les représentations modulaires de degré de , Duke Math. J. 54 (1987), no. 1, 179–230. MR 885783
- [Shi73] Goro Shimura, On modular forms of half integral weight, Ann. of Math. (2) 97 (1973), 440–481. MR 332663
- [Tre06] Stephanie Treneer, Congruences for the coefficients of weakly holomorphic modular forms, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 93 (2006), no. 2, 304–324. MR 2251155
- [Tre08] by same author, Quadratic twists and the coefficients of weakly holomorphic modular forms, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 23 (2008), no. 3, 283–309. MR 2446602
- [Yan14] Yifan Yang, Modular forms of half-integral weights on , Nagoya Math. J. 215 (2014), 1–66. MR 3263525