This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Constructing exact Lagrangian immersions with few double points

Tobias Ekholm Tobias Ekholm, Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Box 480, 751 06 Uppsala, Sweden, and Institute Mittag-Leffler, Aurav 17, 182 60 Djursholm, Sweden Yakov Eliashberg Yakov Eliashberg, Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2125 U.S.A. Emmy Murphy Emmy Murphy, Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 U.S.A.  and  Ivan Smith Ivan Smith, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WB, England.
(Date: March 2013)
Abstract.

We establish, as an application of the results from [13], an hh-principle for exact Lagrangian immersions with transverse self-intersections and the minimal, or near-minimal number of double points. One corollary of our result is that any orientable closed 33-manifold admits an exact Lagrangian immersion into standard symplectic 66-space st6\mathbb{R}^{6}_{\mathrm{st}} with exactly one transverse double point. Our construction also yields a Lagrangian embedding S1×S2st6S^{1}\times S^{2}\to\mathbb{R}^{6}_{\mathrm{st}} with vanishing Maslov class.

T.E. is partially supported by Swedish Research Council Grant 2012-2365 and by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation as a Wallenberg Scholar.
Y.E. is partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1205349
E.M. is partially supported by NSF grant DMS-0943787
I.S. is partially supported by grant ERC-2007-StG-205349 from the European Research Council.

1. Introduction

Lagrangian self-intersections

In this paper we study the problem of constructing Lagrangian immersions with the minimal possible number of transverse self-intersection points. It is well known that the existence of a Lagrangian embedding imposes strong topological constraints (e.g. Gromov’s theorem about non-existence of exact Lagrangian submanifolds in standard symplectic 2n2n-space, st2n=(2n,i=1ndxidyi)\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}=(\mathbb{R}^{2n},\sum_{i=1}^{n}dx_{i}\wedge dy_{i})), and also that, in many cases, two Lagrangian submanifolds must intersect in more points than is suggested by topological intersection theory alone (e.g. results confirming Arnold’s conjectures). In view of this, it was expected that there should be similar lower bounds on the minimal number of double points for Lagrangian immersions, e.g. that an exact Lagrangian immersion of an nn-torus into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with transverse self-intersections would have at least 2n12^{n-1} double points.

Bounds of this kind have been proved for Lagrangian immersions satisfying additional conditions. For instance, it was shown in [6, 8] that any self-transverse exact Lagrangian immersion f:Lst2nf\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} of a closed nn-manifold, for which the Legendrian lift f~:Lst2n×\tilde{f}\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}\times\mathbb{R} has Legendrian homology algebra that admits an augmentation, satisfies the following analogue of the Morse inequalities: the number of double points of ff is at least 12j=0nrank(Hj(L))\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=0}^{n}\mathrm{rank}(H_{j}(L)).

Here we prove a surprising result in sharp contrast to such lower bounds: if no extra constraints are imposed then Lagrangian immersions into symplectic manifolds of dimension >4>4 with nearly the minimal number of self-intersection points satisfy a certain hh-principle. Let us introduce the notation needed to state the result. Let XX be an oriented 2n2n-manifold and f:LXf\colon L\to X a proper smooth immersion of a connected nn-manifold. If LL is non-compact we will assume that ff is an embedding outside of a compact set. Following Whitney [22], if ff is self-transverse we assign a self-intersection number I(f)I({f}) to ff, where I(f)I({f}) is the mod 2 number of self-intersection points if nn is odd or LL is non-orientable, and the algebraic number of self-intersection points counted with their intersection signs if nn is even and LL is orientable. Note that I(f)I(f) depends only on the regular homotopy class of ff provided that LL is closed or that the regular homotopy is an isotopy at infinity. When n>2n>2 and XX is simply connected, a theorem of Whitney [22] asserts that an immersion ff is regularly homotopic to an embedding if and only if I(f)=0I(f)=0. If f:LXf\colon L\to X is a self-transverse immersion, then we let SI(f)0\mathrm{SI}(f)\geq 0 denote its total number of double points. Clearly, SI(f)|I(f)|\mathrm{SI}(f)\geq|I(f)|.

Similarly, given an orientable (2n1)(2n-1)-dimensional manifold YY and an (n1)(n-1)-dimensional manifold Λ\Lambda, consider a smooth regular homotopy ht:ΛYh_{t}\colon\Lambda\to Y, 0t10\leq t\leq 1, which connects embeddings h0h_{0} and h1h_{1} and is an isotopy outside of a compact set. Let H:Λ×[0,1]Y×[0,1]H\colon\Lambda\times[0,1]\to Y\times[0,1] be given by H(x,t)=(ht(x),t)H(x,t)=(h_{t}(x),t); then HH is an immersion. We say that the regular homotopy hth_{t} has transverse intersections if the immersion HH has transverse double points. In this case we define I({ht}t[0,1]):=I(H)I(\{h_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}):=I(H) and SI({ht}t[0,1]):=SI(H)\mathrm{SI}(\{h_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}):=\mathrm{SI}(H). Note that if nn is even and Λ\Lambda is orientable then I({ht}t[0,1])=I({h1t}t[0,1])I(\{h_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]})=-I(\{h_{1-t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}).

Consider next a Lagrangian regular homotopy, ft:LXf_{t}\colon L\to X, 0t10\leq t\leq 1, and write F:L×[0,1]XF\colon L\times[0,1]\to X for F(x,t)=ft(x)F(x,t)=f_{t}(x). Let α\alpha denote the 1-form on L×[0,1]L\times[0,1] defined by the equation α:=ι/t(Fω)\alpha:=\iota_{\partial/\partial t}(F^{*}\omega), where ι\iota denotes contraction and tt is the coordinate on the second factor of L×[0,1]L\times[0,1]. Then the restrictions αt:=α|L×{t}\alpha_{t}:=\alpha|_{L\times\{t\}} are closed for all tt. We call the Lagrangian regular homotopy ftf_{t} a Hamiltonian regular homotopy if the cohomology class [αt]H1(L)[\alpha_{t}]\in H^{1}(L) is independent of tt. The following theorem is our main result:

Theorem 1.1.

Suppose that XX is a simply connected 2n2n-dimensional symplectic manifold, n>2n>2. If n=3n=3 we assume further that XX has infinite Gromov width (that is, it admits a symplectic embedding of the standard ball B6(R)B^{6}(R) for any large RR). If f:LXf\colon L\to X is a Lagrangian immersion then there exists a Hamiltonian regular homotopy ft:LXf_{t}\colon L\to X, 0t10\leq t\leq 1, with f0=ff_{0}=f such that f1f_{1} is self-transverse and

SI(f1)={1,if n is odd or L is non-orientable and I(f0)=1;2,if n is odd or L is non-orientable and I(f0)=0;|I(f0)|,if n is even, L is orientable and (1)n2I(f0)<0;|I(f0)|+2,if n is even, L is orientable and (1)n2I(f0)0.\mathrm{SI}(f_{1})=\begin{cases}1,&\text{if $n$ is odd or $L$ is non-orientable and $I(f_{0})=1$};\\ 2,&\text{if $n$ is odd or $L$ is non-orientable and $I(f_{0})=0$};\\ |I(f_{0})|,&\text{if $n$ is even, $L$ is orientable and $(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}I({f_{0}})<0$};\\ |I(f_{0})|+2,&\text{if $n$ is even, $L$ is orientable and $(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}I({f_{0}})\geq 0$.}\end{cases}
Remark 1.2.

There is a version of Theorem 1.1 in the non-simply connected case where the intersection number I(f0)I(f_{0}) is defined as an element of the group ring of π1(X)\pi_{1}(X) and where |I(f0)||I(f_{0})| denotes an appropriate norm on this ring. For simplicity, we focus on the simply connected case in this paper.

Theorem 1.1 is proved in Section 4.1 as an application of results in [13].

This result has the following consequences for exact Lagrangian immersions into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}. Let LL be an nn-dimensional closed manifold. Recall that according to Gromov’s hh-principle for Lagrangian immersions the triviality of the complexified tangent bundle TLTL\otimes\mathbb{C} is a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an exact Lagrangian immersion Lst2nL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, while exact Lagrangian regular homotopy classes are in natural one to one correspondence with homotopy classes of trivializations of TLTL\otimes\mathbb{C}. We write s(L)s(L) for the minimal number of double points of a self-transverse exact Lagrangian immersion Lst2nL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}. Given a homotopy class σ\sigma of trivializations of TLTL\otimes\mathbb{C}, the refined invariant s(L,σ)s(L,\sigma) denotes the minimal number of double points of an exact self-transverse Lagrangian immersion Lst2nL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} representing the exact Lagrangian regular homotopy class σ\sigma.

Corollary 1.3.

Let LL be an nn-dimensional closed manifold with TLTL\otimes\mathbb{C} trivial and let σ\sigma be a homotopy class of trivializations of TLTL\otimes\mathbb{C}. Then the following hold:

  1. (1)

    If n>1n>1 is odd or if LL is non-orientable, then s(L,σ){1,2}s(L,\sigma)\in\{1,2\}.

  2. (2)

    If n=1n=1, then s(L)=1s(L)=1 and there exist σ\sigma with s(L,σ)=ds(L,\sigma)=d for any integer d>0d>0; if n=3n=3, then s(L)=1s(L)=1 and for one of the two regular homotopy classes σ\sigma, s(L,σ)=2s(L,\sigma)=2.

  3. (3)

    If nn is even and LL is orientable, then for χ(L)<0\chi(L)<0, s(L,σ)=12|χ(L)|s(L,\sigma)=\frac{1}{2}|\chi(L)|, and for χ(L)0\chi(L)\geq 0, either s(L,σ)=12χ(L)s(L,\sigma)=\frac{1}{2}\chi(L) or s(L,σ)=12χ(L)+2s(L,\sigma)=\frac{1}{2}\chi(L)+2.

Corollary 1.3 is proved in Section 4.2; in Section 4.3 we then give more detailed information about the case when nn is odd, respectively discuss the Lagrangian embeddings obtained from these immersions by Lagrange surgery. The case n=2n=2 in both (1) and (3) above does not follow from our proof of Theorem 1.1; rather, these are results of Sauvaget [20], who gave direct geometric constructions of self-transverse exact Lagrangian immersions of both oriented and non-oriented surfaces. In particular, Sauvaget constructed, as the key point for his result, an exact immersed genus two surface in 2\mathbb{C}^{2} with exactly one double point. In Appendix A we describe a higher dimensional analogue of that construction.

It is interesting to compare Corollary 1.3 with the results of [9, 10] which show that any homotopy nn-sphere Σ\Sigma that admits a Lagrangian immersion into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with exactly one transverse double point of even Maslov grading and with induced trivialization of the complexified tangent bundle homotopic to that of the Whitney immersion of the standard nn-sphere111i.e. the trivializations σ:TSnn\sigma\colon TS^{n}\otimes\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}^{n} and σ~:TΣn\widetilde{\sigma}\colon T\Sigma\otimes\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}^{n} are related as σ~=σ(h)\widetilde{\sigma}=\sigma\circ(h\otimes\mathbb{C}), where h:TΣTSh\colon T\Sigma\to TS is a bundle isomorphism covering a homotopy equivalence ΣSn\Sigma\to S^{n}., must bound a parallelizable (n+1)(n+1)-manifold. If nn is even, both the Maslov grading condition and the homotopy condition are automatically satisfied, and moreover the standard nn-sphere is the only homotopy nn-sphere that bounds a parallelizable (n+1)(n+1)-manifold. Thus, if nn is even the standard nn-sphere is the only homotopy nn-sphere that admits a self-transverse Lagrangian immersion into Euclidean space with only one double point. This means in particular that in the case when dim(L)\dim(L) is even and χ(L)>0\chi(L)>0, s(L)s(L) is generally not determined by the homotopy type of LL. The following result constrains the homotopy type of a manifold for which this phenomenon may occur.

Theorem 1.4.

Let LL be an even dimensional spin manifold with χ(L)>0\chi(L)>0. If s(L)=12χ(L)s(L)=\frac{1}{2}\chi(L) then π1(L)=1\pi_{1}(L)=1 and H2k+1(L)=0H_{2k+1}(L)=0 for all kk. In particular if dimL>4\dim L>4 then LL has the homotopy type of a CW-complex with χ(L)\chi(L) even-dimensional cells and no odd-dimensional cells.

Theorem 1.4 is proved in Section 4.4. The proof uses lifted linearized Legendrian homology, introduced in [10] following ideas in [5]. Note that this result can be viewed as an obstruction to an hh-principle for exact Lagrangian immersions having the minimal, rather than near-minimal, number of self-intersection points.

Surgery, Lagrangian embeddings and the Maslov class

In [19] Polterovich describes a local Lagrangian surgery construction which resolves a double point of a Lagrangian immersion. Let Q+Q_{+} denote the manifold S1×Sn1S^{1}\times S^{n-1}, and QQ_{-} the mapping torus of an orientation-reversing involution of Sn1S^{n-1}. Given a Lagrangian immersion f:LXf\colon L\rightarrow X of an oriented nn-manifold with a single double point pp, [19, Propositions 1 & 2] imply:

  1. (1)

    if nn is odd, there are Lagrangian embeddings L#Q±XL\#Q_{\pm}\rightarrow X;

  2. (2)

    if nn is even, there is a Lagrangian embedding L#QϵXL\#Q_{\epsilon}\rightarrow X, where the sign of ϵ\epsilon is given by (1)n(n1)/2+1sign(p)(-1)^{n(n-1)/2+1}\textrm{sign}(p),

where sign(p){±1}(p)\in\{\pm 1\} denotes the intersection index of the double point. Combining this with Corollary 1.3 yields:

Corollary 1.5.

Let YY be a closed orientable 3-manifold. Then there is a Lagrangian embedding Y#(S1×S2)st6Y\#(S^{1}\times S^{2})\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{6}_{\mathrm{st}}.

The question of determining the minimal number kk for which there is a Lagrangian embedding Y#k(S1×S2)st6Y\#k(S^{1}\times S^{2})\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{6}_{\mathrm{st}} was raised explicitly by Polterovich [19, Remark 2]. The construction in Appendix A, in combination with Lagrange surgery, gives an explicit Lagrangian embedding of Q+#Q+#Q+Q_{+}\#Q_{+}\#Q_{+} into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} for any odd n3n\geq 3.

In another direction, in each odd dimension n=2k+1n=2k+1 our construction yields a Lagrangian immersion of the sphere Snst2nS^{n}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with a single double point of Maslov grading 11 (note the double point of the Whitney sphere has Maslov grading nn). Using Lagrange surgery we conclude:

Corollary 1.6.

There exists a Lagrangian embedding S1×S2kst4k+2S^{1}\times S^{2k}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4k+2}_{\mathrm{st}} for which the generator of the first homology of positive action has non-positive Maslov index 22k2-2k. In particular, there exists a Lagrangian embedding S1×S2st6S^{1}\times S^{2}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{6}_{\mathrm{st}} with zero Maslov class.

The (non-)existence question for Lagrangian embeddings into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with vanishing Maslov class is a well-known problem in symplectic topology. Viterbo proved in [21] that if LL admits a metric of non-positive sectional curvature then any Lagrangian embedding Lst2nL\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} has non-trivial Maslov class, whilst Fukaya, Oh, Ohta and Ono infer the same conclusion in Theorem KK of [15] whenever LL is a spin manifold with H2(L;)=0H^{2}(L;\mathbb{Q})=0. Corollary 1.6 shows that the hypotheses in these theorems play more than a technical role; in particular, the assumption on second cohomology in the latter result cannot be removed. Note that by taking products of the Maslov zero S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2} in st6\mathbb{R}^{6}_{\mathrm{st}}, one obtains Maslov zero Lagrangian embeddings in st6k\mathbb{R}^{6k}_{\mathrm{st}} for every k>1k>1. We point out that the Lagrangian embedding in Corollary 1.6 is not monotone. In the monotone case, the Maslov index of the generator of the first homology of positive action necessarily equals 22, see [14, Proposition 2.10] (and references therein) and [5, Theorem 1.5 (b)].

Plan of the paper

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we recall the notions and the main results of the theory of loose Legendrian knots from [18]. In Section 3 we formulate the hh-principle for Lagrangian embeddings with conical singularities, established in [13], and deduce from it its own generalization: in the presence of a conical singularity, Lagrangian immersions with the minimal number of self-intersections abide an hh-principle. Theorem 1.1 is then proved in Section 4.1 as an application of this hh-principle. Corollary 1.3 and related explicit results about Lagrangian immersions into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} are proved in Sections 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4. As is typical with hh-principles, Theorem 1.1 does not provide explicit constructions of Lagrangian immersions with the minimal number of double points. In Appendix A we complement Theorem 1.1 by constructing an explicit exact Lagrangian immersion of P=(S1×Sn1)#(S1×Sn1)P=(S^{1}\times S^{n-1})\#(S^{1}\times S^{n-1}) into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with exactly one transverse double point (in particular, yielding an immersion in each dimension violating the Arnold-type bound which pertains in the presence of linearizable Legendrian homology algebra). Our construction is a generalization of Sauvaget’s construction in the case n=2n=2. The construction of the appendix seems to have no elementary relation to the arguments earlier in the paper; in general, our immersions with few double points are obtained by first introducing many double points and then canceling them in pairs, whilst in the Appendix considerable effort is expended to keep the Lagrangians swept by appropriate Legendrian isotopies embedded.

Acknowledgements. T.E. and I.S. are grateful to François Laudenbach for drawing their attention to Sauvaget’s work. Y.E. is grateful to the Simons Center for Geometry and Physics where a part of this paper was completed. The authors thank Alexandr Zamorzaev for pointing out a gap in the original proof of Lemma 3.4.

2. Loose Legendrian knots

The theory of loose Legendrian knots and the hh-principle for Lagrangian caps with loose Legendrian ends, developed in [18] and [13], respectively, are crucial for the proof of our main result, Theorem 1.1. In this section we recall the concepts and results from these theories that will be used in later sections.

2.1. Stabilization

We start with a discussion of the stabilization construction for Legendrian submanifolds, see [11, 4, 18].

Consider standard contact 2n1\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}:

st2n1=(2n1,ξst=ker(dz1n1yidxi)),\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}=\left(\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}\ ,\ \xi_{\mathrm{st}}=\mathrm{ker}\left(dz-\sum\limits_{1}^{n-1}y_{i}dx_{i}\right)\right),

where (x1,y1,,xn1,yn1,z)(x_{1},y_{1},\dots,x_{n-1},y_{n-1},z) are coordinates in 2n1\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}, with the Legendrian coordinate subspace Λ0st2n1\Lambda_{0}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} given by

Λ0={(x1,y1,,xn1,yn1,z):x1=y2=y3==yn1=0,z=0}.\Lambda_{0}=\left\{(x_{1},y_{1},\dots,x_{n-1},y_{n-1},z)\colon x_{1}=y_{2}=y_{3}=\dots=y_{n-1}=0,\;z=0\right\}.

Then (st2n1,Λ0)(\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}},\Lambda_{0}) is a local model for any Legendrian submanifold in a contact manifold. More precisely, if ΛY\Lambda\subset Y is any Legendrian (n1)(n-1)-submanifold of a contact (2n1)(2n-1)-manifold YY then any point pΛp\in\Lambda has a neighborhood ΩY\Omega\subset Y that admits a map

Φ:(Ω,ΛΩ)(st2n1,Λ0),Φ(p)=0,\Phi\colon(\Omega,\Lambda\cap\Omega)\to(\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\rm st},\Lambda_{0}),\quad\Phi(p)=0,

which is a contactomorphism onto a neighborhood of the origin.

We will carry out the stabilization construction in a local model that is slightly different from (st2n1,Λ0)(\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}},\Lambda_{0}), which we discuss next. Let F:st2n1st2n1F\colon\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} denote the contactomorphism,

F(x1,y1,,xn1,yn1,z)=(x1+12y12,y1,x2,y2,,xn1,yn1,z+13y13).F(x_{1},y_{1},\,\dots,\,x_{n-1},y_{n-1},\,z)=\left(x_{1}+\frac{1}{2}y_{1}^{2},y_{1},\,x_{2},y_{2},\,\dots,\,x_{n-1},y_{n-1},\,z+\frac{1}{3}y_{1}^{3}\right).

Then FF maps Λ0\Lambda_{0} to

Λcu={(x1,y1,,xn1,yn1,z):x1=12y12,y2==yn1=0,z=13y13}\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu}}=\left\{(x_{1},y_{1},\dots,x_{n-1},y_{n-1},z)\colon x_{1}=\frac{1}{2}y_{1}^{2},\;y_{2}=\dots=y_{n-1}=0,\;z=\frac{1}{3}y_{1}^{3}\right\}

In the language of Appendix A.2, the front Γcu\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}} of Λcu\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu}} in n1×\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R} is the product of n2n1\mathbb{R}^{n-2}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n-1} and the standard cusp {(x1,z):9z2=8x13}\{(x_{1},z)\colon 9z^{2}=8x_{1}^{3}\} in ×\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}. In particular, the two branches of the front are graphs of the functions ±h\pm h, where

h(x)=h(x1,,xn1)=223x132,h(x)=h(x_{1},\dots,x_{n-1})=\tfrac{2\sqrt{2}}{3}\,x_{1}^{\frac{3}{2}},

defined on the half-space +n1:={x=(x1,,xn1):x10}\mathbb{R}^{n-1}_{+}:=\{x=(x_{1},\dots,x_{n-1})\colon x_{1}\geq 0\}.

Let UU be a domain with smooth boundary contained in the interior of +n1\mathbb{R}^{n-1}_{+}, Uint(+n1)U\subset\operatorname{int}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}_{+}). Pick a non-negative function ϕ:+n+1\phi\colon\mathbb{R}^{n+1}_{+}\to\mathbb{R} with the following properties: ϕ\phi has compact support in int(+n1)\operatorname{int}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}_{+}), the function ϕ~(x):=ϕ(x)2h(x)\widetilde{\phi}(x):=\phi(x)-2h(x) is Morse, U=ϕ~1([0,))U=\widetilde{\phi}^{-1}([0,\infty)), and 0 is a regular value of ϕ~\widetilde{\phi}. Consider the front ΓcuU\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}}^{U} in n1×\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R} obtained from Γcu\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}} by replacing the lower branch of Γcu\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}}, i.e. the graph z=h(x)z=-h(x), by the graph z=ϕ(x)h(x)z=\phi(x)-h(x). Since ϕ\phi has compact support, the front ΓcuU\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}}^{U} coincides with Γcu\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}} outside a compact set. Consequently, the Legendrian embedding ΛcuU:n12n1\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu}}^{U}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n-1} defined by the front ΓcuU\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}}^{U} coincides with Λcu\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu}} outside a compact set.

Lemma 2.1 ([4, 18]).

There exists a compactly supported Legendrian regular homotopy Λcu;t\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};\,t}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1] connecting Λcu\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu}} to ΛcuU\Lambda^{U}_{\mathrm{cu}} with SI({Λcu;t}t[0,1])\mathrm{SI}\left(\{\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};\,t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}\right) equal to the number of critical points of ϕ(x)h(x)\phi(x)-h(x), and with I({Λcu;t}t[0,1])=(1)k1χ(U)I\left(\{\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};\,t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}\right)=(-1)^{k-1}\chi(U) if n=2kn=2k and I({Λcu;t}t[0,1])χ(U)(mod 2)I\left(\{\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};\,t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}\right)\equiv\chi(U)\;(\mathrm{mod}\,2) if nn is odd.

Proof.

It is straightforward to construct a family of functions ϕt(x)\phi_{t}(x), t[0,1]t\in[0,1], with the following properties:

  1. (1)

    ϕ0(x)=0\phi_{0}(x)=0 and ϕ1(x)=ϕ(x)\phi_{1}(x)=\phi(x);

  2. (2)

    the functions are monotonically increasing in tt;

  3. (3)

    for each critical point xx of ϕ~|U=(ϕ2h)|U\widetilde{\phi}|_{U}=(\phi-2h)|_{U}, there is a unique t[0,1]t\in[0,1] such that xx is a critical point of the function ϕt2h\phi_{t}-2h, of the same index and of critical value 0.

We associate with ϕt\phi_{t} the front Γcu;t\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu};t} obtained from Γcu=Γcu;0\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}}=\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu};0} by replacing the lower branch of Γcu\Gamma_{\mathrm{cu}}, which by definition is the graph z=h(x)z=-h(x), by the graph z=ϕt(x)h(x)z=\phi_{t}(x)-h(x). The Legendrian regular homotopy Λcu;t\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};t} determined by this family of fronts has transverse self-intersections which correspond to critical points of ϕt2h\phi_{t}-2h of critical value 0. One can show that when n=2kn=2k the sign of each intersection point equals (1)indx+k1(-1)^{\mathrm{ind}\,x+k-1}, where indx\mathrm{ind}\,x is the Morse index of the critical point xx of the function (ϕ2h)|U(\phi-2h)|_{U}, see [4]. ∎

To transport the stabilization construction to our standard local model, let Λ0U=F1(ΛcuU)\Lambda_{0}^{U}=F^{-1}(\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu}}^{U}) and Λ0;t=F1(Λcu;t)\Lambda_{0;\,t}=F^{-1}(\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};\,t}), where Λcu;t\Lambda_{\mathrm{cu};\,t}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], is the regular Legendrian homotopy constructed in Lemma 2.1. Then Λ0;t\Lambda_{0;\,t}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], is a compactly supported Legendrian regular homotopy connecting Λ0\Lambda_{0} to Λ0U\Lambda^{U}_{0}.

Consider a Legendrian (n1)(n-1)-submanifold Λ\Lambda of a contact (2n1)(2n-1)-manifold YY and a point pΛp\in\Lambda. Fix a neighborhood ΩY\Omega\subset Y of pp and a contactomorphism

Φ:(Ω,ΛΩ)(st2n1,Λ0).\Phi\colon(\Omega,\Lambda\cap\Omega)\to(\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\rm st},\Lambda_{0}).

Replacing ΩΛ\Omega\cap\Lambda with Φ1(Λ0U)\Phi^{-1}(\Lambda_{0}^{U}) we get a Legendrian embedding ΛU\Lambda^{U} which coincides with Λ\Lambda outside of Ω\Omega, and replacing it with Φ1(Λ0;t)\Phi^{-1}(\Lambda_{0;\,t}) we get a Legendrian regular homotopy Λt\Lambda_{t}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1] connecting Λ\Lambda to ΛU\Lambda^{U} with SI({Λt}t[0,1])\mathrm{SI}\left(\{\Lambda_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}\right) equal to the minimal number of critical points of a Morse function on UU which attains its minimum value on U\partial U, and with I({Λt}t[0,1])=(1)k1χ(U)I\left(\{\Lambda_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}\right)=(-1)^{k-1}\chi(U) if n=2kn=2k and I({Λt}t[0,1])χ(U)mod 2I\left(\{\Lambda_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}\right)\equiv\chi(U)\;\mathrm{mod}\,2 if nn is odd. We say that ΛU\Lambda^{U} is obtained from UU via UU-stabilization in Ω\Omega. The most important case for us will be when UU is the ball. We say in this case that ΛU\Lambda^{U} is the stabilization of Λ\Lambda in Ω\Omega or simply the stabilization of Λ\Lambda.

Let ξ\xi denote the contact plane field on YY, and note that there is an induced field of (conformally) symplectic 2-forms on ξ\xi. We say that two Legendrian embeddings f0,f1:ΛYf_{0},f_{1}\colon\Lambda\to Y are formally Legendrian isotopic if there exists a smooth isotopy ft:ΛYf_{t}\colon\Lambda\to Y connecting f0f_{0} to f1f_{1} and a 22-parametric family of injective homomorphisms Φs,t:TΛTY\Phi_{s,t}:T\Lambda\to TY such that Φ0,t=dft\Phi_{0,t}=df_{t} for all t[0,1]t\in[0,1], Φs,0=df0\Phi_{s,0}=df_{0} and Φs,1=df1\Phi_{s,1}=df_{1} for all s[0,1]s\in[0,1], and such that Φ1,t\Phi_{1,t} is a Lagrangian homomorphism TΛξT\Lambda\to\xi for all t[0,1]t\in[0,1]. We will need the following simple lemma, see [11, 4, 18].

Lemma 2.2.

Let ΛY\Lambda\subset Y be a Legendrian submanifold and ΛU\Lambda^{U} its UU-stabilization. Then if the Euler characteristic χ(U)\chi(U) of UU satisfies χ(U)=0\chi(U)=0, then Λ\Lambda and ΛU\Lambda^{U} are formally Legendrian isotopic.

2.2. Loose Legendrian submanifolds

Let YY be a contact (2n1)(2n-1)-manifold, n>2n>2. We continue using the notation from Section 2.1. A Legendrian embedding ΛY\Lambda\to Y of a connected manifold Λ\Lambda (which we sometimes simply call a Legendrian knot) is called loose if it is isotopic to the stabilization of another Legendrian knot. We point out that looseness depends on the ambient manifold. A loose Legendrian embedding Λ\Lambda into a contact manifold YY need not be loose in a smaller neighborhood YY^{\prime}, ΛYY\Lambda\subset Y^{\prime}\subset Y.

Any Legendrian submanifold ΛY\Lambda\subset Y can be made loose by stabilizing it in arbitrarily small neighborhood of a point. Moreover, it can be made loose even without changing its formal Legendrian isotopy class. Indeed, one can first stabilize it and then UU-stabilize for some UU with χ(U)=1\chi(U)=-1.

The following hh-principle for loose Legendrian knots in contact manifolds of dimension 2n1>32n-1>3 is proved in [18]:

Theorem 2.3 ([18]).

Any two loose Legendrian embeddings which coincide outside a compact set and which can be connected by a formal compactly supported Legendrian isotopy can be connected by a genuine compactly supported Legendrian isotopy.

Remark 2.4.

It is also shown in [18] that the UU-stabilization of a Legendrian knot is loose for any non-empty UU.

These results imply the following:

Corollary 2.5.

Any loose Legendrian knot Λ\Lambda is a stabilization of some other loose Legendrian knot Λ\Lambda^{\prime}.

Proof.

Let Uint(+n1)U\subset\operatorname{int}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}_{+}) be a ball and Cint(+n1)C\subset\operatorname{int}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}_{+}) be a domain with Euler characteristic 1-1 disjoint from UU. If Λ\Lambda is loose then according to Lemma 2.2 the stabilization ΛCU=(ΛC)U\Lambda^{C\cup U}=(\Lambda^{C})^{U} is formally Legendrian isotopic to Λ\Lambda. Hence in view of Theorem 2.3 there is a genuine Legendrian isotopy connecting the stabilization (ΛC)U(\Lambda^{C})^{U} of the loose Legendrian knot Λ=ΛC\Lambda^{\prime}=\Lambda^{C} to Λ\Lambda. ∎

3. Lagrangian immersions with a conical singular point

In this section we establish an hh-principle for maps which are self-transverse Lagrangian immersions with the minimal possible number of double points away from a single conical singularity. This result is a generalization and a corollary of the corresponding result for Lagrangian embeddings from [13] which we state as Theorem 3.6 below.

3.1. Legendrian isotopy and Lagrangian concordance

The following result about realizing a Legendrian isotopy as a Lagrangian embedding of a cylinder is proved in [12, Lemma 4.2.5]. Let YY be a contact manifold with contact structure ξ\xi given by the contact 11-form α\alpha, ξ=ker(α)\xi=\mathrm{ker}(\alpha). The symplectization of YY is the manifold ×Y\mathbb{R}\times Y with symplectic form d(esα)d(e^{s}\alpha), where ss is a coordinate along the \mathbb{R}-factor.

Let ft:ΛYf_{t}\colon\Lambda\to Y, t[1,1]t\in[-1,1], be a Legendrian isotopy that is constant near its endpoints and which connects Legendrian embeddings f=f1f_{-}=f_{-1} and f+=f1f_{+}=f_{1}. We extend ftf_{t} to all tt\in\mathbb{R} by setting ft=ff_{t}=f_{-} for t1t\leq-1 and ft=f+f_{t}=f_{+} for t1t\geq 1.

Lemma 3.1.

There exists a Lagrangian embedding

G:×Λ×Y,G\colon\mathbb{R}\times\Lambda\to\mathbb{R}\times Y,

given by the formula G(t,x)=(h(x,t),f~t(x))G(t,x)=(h(x,t),\widetilde{f}_{t}(x)) and with the following properties:

  • there exists T>0T>0 such that G(t,x)=(t,f(x))G(t,x)=(t,f_{-}(x)) for t<Tt<-T and G(t,x)=(t,f+(x))G(t,x)=(t,f_{+}(x)) for t>Tt>T;

  • f~t\widetilde{f}_{t} is a Legendrian embedding CC^{\infty}-close to ftf_{t}.

We will need the following modification of Lemma 3.1 for Lagrangian immersions. Let ft:ΛYf_{t}\colon\Lambda\to Y, t[1,1]t\in[-1,1], be a self-transverse regular Legendrian homotopy constant near its endpoints that connects Legendrian embeddings ff_{-} and f+f_{+}. As in Lemma 3.1 we extend ftf_{t} to all tt\in\mathbb{R} as independent of tt for |t|1|t|\geq 1.

Lemma 3.2.

There exists a self-transverse Lagrangian immersion

G:×Λ×Y,G\colon\mathbb{R}\times\Lambda\to\mathbb{R}\times Y,

given by the formula G(t,x)=(h(x,t),f~t(x))G(t,x)=(h(x,t),\widetilde{f}_{t}(x)) and with the following properties:

  • there exists T>0T>0 such that G(t,x)=(t,f(x))G(t,x)=(t,f_{-}(x)) for t<Tt<-T and G(t,x)=(t,f+(x))G(t,x)=(t,f_{+}(x)) for t>Tt>T;

  • f~t\widetilde{f}_{t} is CC^{\infty}-close to ftf_{t};

  • the double points of GG are in one-to-one index preserving correspondence with the double points of the regular homotopy ftf_{t}.

Proof.

The construction from [12, Lemma 4.2.5] which proves Lemma 3.1 can be applied with some additional care near the self-intersection instances of the Legendrian regular homotopy to prove Lemma 3.2. Here, however, we will use a different argument.

Note that it is sufficient to consider the case when there is exactly one transverse self-intersection point qYq\in Y of the regular homotopy ftf_{t} at the moment t=0t=0. It is also sufficient to construct the immersed Lagrangian cylinder that corresponds to the Legendrian regular homotopy restricted to some interval [ϵ,ϵ][-\epsilon,\epsilon] for a small ϵ>0\epsilon>0, because then one can apply Lemma 3.1 for the isotopy ftf_{t} restricted to the rest of \mathbb{R}.

There exist local coordinates (x,y,z)n1×n1×=st2n1(x,y,z)\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} in a neighborhood Ω\Omega of qq such that the two intersecting branches B0B_{0} and B1B_{1} of f0f_{0} at qq are given by the inclusion of

B0\displaystyle B_{0} ={(x,y,z):y=0,z=0,|x|<1},\displaystyle=\{(x,y,z)\colon y=0,z=0,|x|<1\}, (3.1)
B1\displaystyle B_{1} ={(x,y,z):x=0,z=0,|y|<1}.\displaystyle=\{(x,y,z)\colon x=0,z=0,|y|<1\}. (3.2)

into st2n1\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}.

Modifying the regular homotopy ftf_{t} slightly for tt close to 0 we obtain a regular homotopy f~t\widetilde{f}_{t} without self-intersections for t[0,ϵ]t\in[0,\epsilon] and which, for t[ϵ,0]t\in[-\epsilon,0], is supported in Ω\Omega and has the following special properties:

  • f~tf~0\widetilde{f}_{t}\equiv\widetilde{f}_{0} on B1B_{1} and near B0\partial B_{0};

  • f~ϵ|B0\widetilde{f}_{-\epsilon}|_{B_{0}} is given by the formula

    f~ϵ(ξ)=(x(ξ),y(ξ),z(ξ))=(ξ,0,δ),ξn1,|ξ|1\widetilde{f}_{-\epsilon}(\xi)=(x(\xi),y(\xi),z(\xi))=(\xi,0,-\delta),\quad\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1},\;|\xi|\leq 1

    and, using the same notation, f~0|B0\widetilde{f}_{0}|_{B_{0}} is given by the formula

    ξ(ξ,ϕξ,ϕ(ξ)),\xi\mapsto\left(\xi,\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial\xi},\phi(\xi)\right),

    where ϕ(ξ)=δθ(|ξ|)\phi(\xi)=\delta\theta(|\xi|) for a small positive constant δϵ\delta\ll\epsilon and a CC^{\infty}-function θ:[0,1][1,1]\theta\colon[0,1]\to[-1,1], which is equal to 1-1 near 11, is equal to 11 near 0, and which has non-positive derivative.

The isotopy {f~t}t[0,ϵ]\{\widetilde{f}_{t}\}_{t\in[0,\epsilon]} can be lifted to a Lagrangian cylinder in the symplectization using Lemma 3.1. Consider a CC^{\infty}-function σ:[ϵ,0]×B0\sigma\colon[-\epsilon,0]\times B_{0}\to\mathbb{R} with the following properties (using coordinates (τ,ξ)[ϵ,0]×n1(\tau,\xi)\in[-\epsilon,0]\times\mathbb{R}^{n-1}, |ξ|<1|\xi|<1 in analogy with the above):

  • σ(τ,ξ)=eτδ\sigma(\tau,\xi)=-e^{\tau}\delta near ({ϵ}×B0×)([ϵ,0]×B0)(\{-\epsilon\}\times B_{0}\times)\cup([-\epsilon,0]\times\partial B_{0});

  • σ(τ,ξ)=eτϕ(ξ)\sigma(\tau,\xi)=e^{\tau}\phi(\xi) near 0×B00\times B_{0};

  • the function σ(τ,0)\sigma(\tau,0), τ[ϵ,0]\tau\in[-\epsilon,0] has a unique zero in (ϵ,0)(-\epsilon,0), which is moreover a regular value.

Now the required Lagrangian immersion G|[ϵ,0]×(B0B1)G|_{[-\epsilon,0]\times(B_{0}\cup B_{1})} lifting {f~t}t[ϵ,0]\{\widetilde{f}_{t}\}_{t\in[-\epsilon,0]} to the symplectization ×st2n1\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} can be defined by the formula

G(τ,η)\displaystyle G(\tau,\eta) =(t(τ,η),x(τ,η),y(τ,η),z(τ,η))\displaystyle=(t(\tau,\eta),x(\tau,\eta),y(\tau,\eta),z(\tau,\eta))
=(τ,0,η,0),\displaystyle=(\tau,0,\eta,0), if (0,η,0)B1,\displaystyle\text{ if }(0,\eta,0)\in B_{1},
G(τ,ξ)\displaystyle G(\tau,\xi) =(t(τ,ξ),x(τ,ξ),y(τ,ξ),z(τ,ξ))\displaystyle=(t(\tau,\xi),x(\tau,\xi),y(\tau,\xi),z(\tau,\xi))
=(τ,ξ,eτσξ(τ,ξ),eτστ(τ,ξ)),\displaystyle=\left(\tau,\xi,e^{-\tau}\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\xi}(\tau,\xi),e^{-\tau}\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\tau}(\tau,\xi)\right), if (ξ,0,0)B0.\displaystyle\text{ if }(\xi,0,0)\in B_{0}.

Note that G|B0G|_{B_{0}} and G|B1G|_{B_{1}} are Lagrangian embeddings with respect to the symplectic form ω=d(et(dzydx))\omega=d(e^{t}(dz-ydx)). This is obvious for G|B1G|_{B_{1}}, for G|B0G|_{B_{0}} we calculate

G(d(et(dzydx))=d(eτd(eτστ)σξdξ)=d(στdτσξdξ)=0.\displaystyle G^{*}(d(e^{t}(dz-ydx))=d\left(e^{\tau}d\left(e^{-\tau}\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\tau}\right)-\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\xi}d\xi\right)=d\left(-\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\tau}d\tau-\frac{\partial\sigma}{\partial\xi}d\xi\right)=0.

We also have G(ϵ,ξ)=(ϵ,ξ,0,δ)=(ϵ,f~ϵ)G(-\epsilon,\xi)=(-\epsilon,\xi,0,-\delta)=(-\epsilon,\widetilde{f}_{-\epsilon}) and G(0,ξ)=(0,ξ,ϕξ,ϕ)=(0,f~0).G(0,\xi)=\left(0,\xi,\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial\xi},\phi\right)=(0,\widetilde{f}_{0}). On the other hand, the last property of the function σ\sigma guarantees that G(B0)G(B_{0}) and G(B1)G(B_{1}) intersect transversely at a unique point and that the index of intersection is the same as the self-intersection index of the regular homotopy ftf_{t}. ∎

3.2. Lagrangian immersions with a conical point

Let Sst2n1=(S2n1,ξst)S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}=(S^{2n-1},\xi_{\mathrm{st}}) be the sphere with the standard contact structure ξst\xi_{\mathrm{st}} defined by the restriction αst\alpha_{\mathrm{st}} to the unit sphere S2n12nS^{2n-1}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n} of the Liouville form λst:=12j=1n(xjdyjyjdxj)\lambda_{\mathrm{st}}:=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{n}(x_{j}dy_{j}-y_{j}dx_{j}) in st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}.

For any integer mm we denote by (r,x)(0,)×Sm1(r,x)\in(0,\infty)\times S^{m-1} polar coordinates in m{0}\mathbb{R}^{m}-\{0\}, i.e. xx is the radial projection of a point to the unit sphere, and rr is its distance to the origin. The symplectic form ωst\omega_{\mathrm{st}} in 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n} has the form d(r2αst)d(r^{2}\alpha_{\mathrm{st}}) in polar coordinates.

A map h:nst2nh\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} is called a Lagrangian cone if h1(0)=0h^{-1}(0)=0 and if it is given by the formula h(r,x)=(cr2,ϕ(x))h(r,x)=(cr^{2},\phi(x)) in polar coordinates, where ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} is a Legendrian embedding and cc is a positive constant.

Note that there exists a symplectomorphism

C:(×S2n1,d(etαst))(2n{0},ωst)C\colon(\mathbb{R}\times S^{2n-1},d(e^{t}\alpha_{\mathrm{st}}))\to(\mathbb{R}^{2n}-\{0\},\omega_{\mathrm{st}}) (3.3)

given by the formula C(t,x)=(et2,x)C(t,x)=\left(e^{\frac{t}{2}},x\right) in polar coordinates. Under this symplectomorphism Lagrangian cones in st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} correspond to cylindrical Lagrangian manifolds in the symplectization (×S2n1,d(etαst))(\mathbb{R}\times S^{2n-1},d(e^{t}\alpha_{\mathrm{st}})) of Sst2n1S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}.

Let LL be an nn-dimensional manifold and XX a 2n2n-dimensional symplectic manifold. A map f:LXf\colon L\to X is called a Lagrangian immersion with a conical point at pLp\in L, if f|L{p}f|_{L-\{p\}} is a Lagrangian immersion, and if in a neighborhood of pp and in a Darboux chart around f(p)f(p), the map is equivalent to a Lagrangian cone h:nst2nh\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} near the origin. The Legendrian embedding ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} corresponding to this cone is called the link of the conical point.

We define a regular Lagrangian homotopy ft:LXf_{t}\colon L\to X, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], of immersions with a conical point at pp to be a homotopy which is fixed in some neighborhood of the singular point pp and that is an ordinary regular Lagrangian homotopy when restricted to L{p}L-\{p\}. For a self-transverse immersion ff with a conical point at pp, we define the self-intersection number I(f)I(f) as I(f|L{p})I(f|_{L\setminus\{p\}}). Then I(f)I(f) is invariant under regular homotopies fixed near pp.

Let g:nst2ng\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} be a Lagrangian immersion with a conical singularity at the origin 0n0\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, and which also coincides with a Lagrangian cone over a Legendrian link ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} outside a compact set. Note that given a path γ:[0,1]n\gamma\colon[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}^{n} connecting a point γ(0)n\gamma(0)\in\mathbb{R}^{n} near infinity (i.e. where the immersion is conical) and the origin γ(1)=0n\gamma(1)=0\in\mathbb{R}^{n}, the integral gγλst\int_{g\circ\gamma}\lambda_{\mathrm{st}} is independent of the choice of γ\gamma. We will call it the action of the singularity 0 with respect to infinity, and denote it by a(g,0|)a(g,0|\infty). Let gt:nst2ng_{t}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, with g0=gg_{0}=g, denote a Lagrangian regular homotopy, compactly supported away from 0. Then gtg_{t} is Hamiltonian if and only if a(gt,0|)=consta(g_{t},0|\infty)=\mathrm{const}.

Lemma 3.3.

For any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, any smooth real-valued function c:[0,1]c\colon[0,1]\to\mathbb{R}, c(0)=0c(0)=0, and any Lagrangian cone h:nst2nh\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} over a Legendrian link ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}, there exists a Lagrangian isotopy ht:nst2nh_{t}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} beginning at h0=hh_{0}=h, fixed near the singularity and outside the ball of radius ϵ\epsilon, and such that a(ht,0|)=c(t)a(h_{t},0|\infty)=c(t), t[0,1]t\in[0,1].

Proof.

Let Rs:S2n1S2n1R^{s}\colon S^{2n-1}\to S^{2n-1}, ss\in\mathbb{R}, denote the time ss Reeb flow of the contact form αst\alpha_{\mathrm{st}}. Fix a non-positive CC^{\infty}-function β:\beta\colon\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} with the following properties:

  • β(s)=0\beta(s)=0 for s(1e,e)s\notin(\frac{1}{e},e);

  • 1/eeβ(u)𝑑u=1\int\limits_{1/e}^{e}\beta(u)du=-1.

Given T,ET,E\in\mathbb{R} let

gT,E:×Sn1(×Sst2n1,d(etαst))g_{T,E}\colon\mathbb{R}\times S^{n-1}\to(\mathbb{R}\times S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}},d(e^{t}\alpha_{\mathrm{st}}))

be the Lagrangian embedding given by the formula

gT,E(s,x)=(sE,RTβ(es)(ϕ(x))).g_{T,E}(s,x)=(s-E,R^{T\beta(e^{s})}(\phi(x))).

Then, for x0Sn1x_{0}\in S^{n-1},

×x0(gT,E)(etαst)\displaystyle\int\limits_{\mathbb{R}\times x_{0}}\left(g_{T,E}\right)^{*}(e^{t}\alpha_{\mathrm{st}}) =TeEe2sβ(es)𝑑s=TeE11e2sβ(es)𝑑s\displaystyle=Te^{-E}\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{2s}\beta^{\prime}(e^{s})ds=Te^{-E}\int\limits_{-1}^{1}e^{2s}\beta^{\prime}(e^{s})ds
=TeE1eeuβ(u)𝑑u=TeE1eeβ(u)𝑑u=TeE.\displaystyle=Te^{-E}\int\limits_{\frac{1}{e}}^{e}u\beta^{\prime}(u)du=-Te^{-E}\int\limits_{\frac{1}{e}}^{e}\beta(u)du=Te^{-E}.

Then the required Lagrangian isotopy ht:nst2nh_{t}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with a conical singularity at the origin can be defined as

ht(x)=Cgc(t)/ϵ,E,h_{t}(x)=C\circ g_{{c(t)}/\epsilon,E},

for E=2logϵE=-2\log\epsilon, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], and xΛx\in\Lambda. ∎

We will need the following result.

Lemma 3.4.

Let h:nst2nh\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} be a Lagrangian cone over a Legendrian link ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}. Then there exists a Hamiltonian regular homotopy ht:nst2nh_{t}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], with h0=hh_{0}=h, which is fixed near the singularity and outside of a ball BRnB_{R}\subset\mathbb{R}^{n} of some radius R>0R>0 centered at 0, and such that the following hold:

  • h1h_{1} coincides with the cone over a loose Legendrian knot ϕ~\widetilde{\phi} near BR2\partial B_{\frac{R}{2}};

  • the immersion h1:=h1|h11(BR/2)h_{1}^{-}:=h_{1}|_{h_{1}^{-1}(B_{R/2})} has exactly one transverse self-intersection point;

  • if n=2kn=2k then, for any ϕ\phi, we can arrange that I(h1)=(1)k1I(h_{1}^{-})=(-1)^{k-1}, and if in addition ϕ\phi is assumed to be a loose Legendrian knot, then we can arrange also that I(h1)=(1)kI(h_{1}^{-})=(-1)^{k}.

Remark 3.5.

Note that by scaling we can make the radius of the ball RR arbitrarily small.

Proof.

Let ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} be the Legendrian link of the conical point. Let us denote by ϕ1\phi_{1} its stabilization. Note that ϕ1\phi_{1} is a loose knot. If ϕ\phi is itself loose then according to Corollary 2.5 there exists another loose Legendrian knot ϕ1\phi_{-1} such that ϕ\phi is the stabilization of ϕ1\phi_{-1}. We will call ϕ1\phi_{-1} the destabilization of ϕ\phi. According to Lemma 2.1 the embeddings ϕ0:=ϕ\phi_{0}:=\phi and ϕ1\phi_{1} can be included into a regular Legendrian homotopy ϕt:Sn1Sst2n1\phi_{t}\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], such that there is exactly one self-intersection point for t(0,1)t\in(0,1), and when n=2kn=2k we have I({ϕt}t[0,1])=(1)k1I(\{\phi_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]})=(-1)^{k-1}. Similarly, if ϕ\phi is loose then ϕ1\phi_{-1} and ϕ0=ϕ\phi_{0}=\phi can be included into a regular Legendrian homotopy ϕt:Sn1Sst2n1\phi_{t}\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}}, t[1,0]t\in[-1,0], with one transverse self-intersection point which for an even n=2kn=2k has index (1)k1(-1)^{k-1}.

Next, we use Lemma 3.2 to lift the Legendrian regular homotopy {ϕt}t[0,1]\{\phi_{t}\}_{t\in[0,1]} and its inverse {ϕ1t}t[0,1]\{\phi_{1-t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}, and in the loose case {ϕt}t[1,0]\{\phi_{t}\}_{t\in[-1,0]} and its inverse {ϕt}t[0,1]\{\phi_{-t}\}_{t\in[0,1]}, respectively, to Lagrangian immersions

G1,G2,G3,G4:×Sn1(×S2n1,d(etαst))G_{1},G_{2},G_{3},G_{4}\colon\mathbb{R}\times S^{n-1}\to(\mathbb{R}\times S^{2n-1},d(e^{t}\alpha_{\mathrm{st}}))

with the following properties

  • for a sufficiently large positive tt we have

    G1(t,x)=(t,ϕ(x)),G1(t,x)=(t,ϕ1(x)),\displaystyle G_{1}(-t,x)=(-t,\phi(x)),\quad\quad G_{1}(t,x)=(t,\phi_{1}(x)),
    G2(t,x)=(t,ϕ1(x)),G2(t,x)=(t,ϕ(x)),\displaystyle G_{2}(-t,x)=(-t,\phi_{1}(x)),\quad\;\;G_{2}(t,x)=(t,\phi(x)),
    G3(t,x)=(t,ϕ1(x)),G3(t,x)=(t,ϕ(x)),\displaystyle G_{3}(-t,x)=(-t,\phi_{-1}(x)),\quad G_{3}(t,x)=(t,\phi(x)),
    G4(t,x)=(t,ϕ(x)),G4(t,x)=(t,ϕ1(x));\displaystyle G_{4}(-t,x)=(-t,\phi(x)),\quad\quad G_{4}(t,x)=(t,\phi_{-1}(x));
  • each of these Lagrangian immersions has exactly 1 transverse self-intersection point;

  • if n=2kn=2k then

    I(G1)=I(G3)=(1)k1,I(G2)=I(G4)=(1)k.I(G_{1})=I(G_{3})=(-1)^{k-1},\quad I(G_{2})=I(G_{4})=(-1)^{k}.

Composing these immersions with the symplectomorphism C1C^{-1} from (3.3) (and compactifying with a conical point) we get Lagrangian immersions

H1,H2,H3,H4:nst2nH_{1},H_{2},H_{3},H_{4}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}

with a conical singularity at the origin. With appropriate rescaling we can glue together the immersions H1H_{1} and H2H_{2} to get an immersion H12:nst2nH_{12}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, and in the loose case glue H4H_{4} and H3H_{3} to get an immersion H43:nst2nH_{43}\colon\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, such that both are immersions with a conical singularity with Legendrian link ϕ\phi, and both coincide with the cone over ϕ\phi outside of the a ball BRB_{R} of some radius R>0R>0. In addition, near BR/2\partial B_{R/2} the immersion H12H_{12} coincides with the cone over ϕ1\phi_{1} and H43H_{43} coincides with the cone over ϕ1\phi_{-1}. Using Lemma 3.3 we can modify the immersions H12H_{12} and H43H_{43} to arrange that a(H12,0|)=a(H43,0|)=0a(H_{12},0|\infty)=a(H_{43},0|\infty)=0. Again with the help of Lemma 3.3, we can therefore construct a regular Hamiltonian homotopy hth_{t} connecting hh with H12H_{12}, which has the required properties in the general case. In the case of loose ϕ\phi and even n=2kn=2k, we can construct a Lagrangian immersion with the index of its unique self-intersection point equal to (1)k(-1)^{k}, by taking hth_{t} to be a regular Hamiltonian homotopy connecting hh with H43H_{43}. ∎

3.3. The hh-principle for self-transverse Lagrangian immersions with a conical singularity and minimal self-intersection

Let XX be a symplectic 2n2n-manifold of dimension 2n>42n>4. The following hh-principle for Lagrangian embeddings into XX with a conical point is proved in [13].

Theorem 3.6.

Let f0:LXf_{0}\colon L\to X be a Lagrangian immersion with a conical point pLp\in L into a simply connected symplectic manifold XX of dimension 2n>42n>4. If n=3n=3 we further assume that Xf0(L)X\setminus f_{0}(L) has infinite Gromov width, i.e. admits a symplectic embedding of an arbitrarily large ball. If the Legendrian link of f0f_{0} at pp is loose and if I(f0)=0I(f_{0})=0, then there exists a Hamiltonian regular homotopy ft:LXf_{t}\colon L\to X, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], that is fixed in a neighborhood of pp and that connects f0f_{0} to a Lagrangian embedding f1f_{1} with a conical point at pp.

As we shall see, Theorem 3.6 generalizes to self-transverse Lagrangian immersions with a conical point of non-zero Whitney index and with the minimal number of self-intersection points. In fact, Theorem 3.6 itself is the key ingredient in the proof of its generalization, which we state next.

Theorem 3.7.

Let f0:LXf_{0}\colon L\to X be a Lagrangian immersion with a conical point pLp\in L into a simply connected symplectic manifold XX of dimension 2n>42n>4. If n=3n=3 we further assume that Xf0(L)X\setminus f_{0}(L) has infinite Gromov width. If the Legendrian link of f0f_{0} at pp is loose, then there exists a Hamiltonian regular homotopy ft:LXf_{t}\colon L\to X, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], that is fixed in a neighborhood of pp and that connects f0f_{0} to a self-transverse Lagrangian immersion f1f_{1} with a conical point at pp and with SI(f1)=|I(f0)|\mathrm{SI}(f_{1})=|I({f_{0}})|.

Proof.

We argue by induction on d=|I(f0)|d=|I({f_{0}})|, using Theorem 3.6 as the base of the induction for d=0d=0. Suppose the theorem holds for |I(f0)|=d1|I({f_{0}})|=d-1. Let ϕ:Sn1Sst2n1\phi\colon S^{n-1}\to S^{2n-1}_{\mathrm{st}} be the loose Legendrian link of the conical point and consider the immersion f0:LXf_{0}\colon L\to X. By definition, in some local Darboux neighborhood near the singular point it is equivalent to a Lagrangian cone over ϕ\phi in a ball BϵB_{\epsilon}, ϵ>0\epsilon>0. We use Lemma 3.4 to construct a Hamiltonian regular homotopy supported in BϵB_{\epsilon} from f0f_{0} to a new immersion f^0\widehat{f}_{0} that coincides with the cone over a loose knot ϕ~\widetilde{\phi} near Bϵ/2\partial B_{\epsilon/2} and which has exactly one transverse self-intersection point in Bϵ/2B_{\epsilon/2}. If n=2kn=2k, we arrange the index to be of the same sign as I(f0)I(f_{0}).

Let f~0\widetilde{f}_{0} be a Lagrangian immersion obtained from f^0\widehat{f}_{0} by modifying it to the cone over ϕ~\widetilde{\phi} in Bϵ/2B_{\epsilon/2}. We note that |I(f~0)|=d1|I(\widetilde{f}_{0})|=d-1, and by the induction hypothesis we find a Hamiltonian regular homotopy f~t\widetilde{f}_{t}, t[0,1]t\in[0,1], fixed near the singularity and such that SI(f~1)=|I(f~0)|=d1\mathrm{SI}(\widetilde{f}_{1})=|I(\widetilde{f}_{0})|=d-1. Note that the regular homotopy f~t\widetilde{f}_{t} is fixed in BσB_{\sigma} for σϵ2\sigma\ll\frac{\epsilon}{2}, but not necessarily fixed in Bϵ/2B_{\epsilon/2}.

The required regular homotopy ftf_{t} is then obtained by deforming f0f_{0} into f^0\widehat{f}_{0}, then scaling it inside Bϵ/2B_{\epsilon/2} to make it coincide with a cone in Bϵ/2BσB_{\epsilon/2}-B_{\sigma}, and finally deforming it outside BσB_{\sigma}, keeping it fixed in BσB_{\sigma}, using the Hamiltonian regular homotopy f~t\widetilde{f}_{t}. ∎

4. Proofs of the main results

4.1. Proof of Theorem 1.1

Any simple (i.e. not double) point pf0(L)p\in f_{0}(L) can be viewed as a conical point over a trivial Legendrian knot. Hence, we can apply Lemma 3.4 to find a Hamiltonian regular homotopy supported in a Darboux neighborhood of pp, symplectomorphic to BϵB_{\epsilon}, such that the resulting Lagrangian immersion f~0\widetilde{f}_{0} coincides with a Lagrangian cone over a loose knot near Bϵ/2\partial B_{\epsilon/2} and has exactly one transverse self-intersection point in Bϵ/2B_{\epsilon/2}, with index equal to (1)k1(-1)^{k-1} if n=2kn=2k. Note that in all cases one then has I(f~0|Lf~01(Bϵ/2))=I(f0)+(1)kI(\widetilde{f}_{0}|_{L-\widetilde{f}_{0}^{-1}(B_{\epsilon/2})})=I(f_{0})+(-1)^{k}. Hence, arguing as in the proof of Theorem 3.7, we replace f~0(L)Bϵ/2\widetilde{f}_{0}(L)\cap B_{\epsilon/2} by a cone over a loose Legendrian knot ϕ~\widetilde{\phi}, and then using Theorem 3.7 we construct a Hamiltonian regular homotopy f~t\widetilde{f}_{t} of the resulting immersion f^0\widehat{f}_{0}, that is fixed in a neighborhood BσB_{\sigma}, σϵ2\sigma\ll\frac{\epsilon}{2}, of the conical point, to an immersion with transverse self-intersections and with exactly |I(f0)+(1)k||I(f_{0})+(-1)^{k}| double points. Finally the required regular homotopy ftf_{t} consists of first deforming f~0\widetilde{f}_{0} into f^0\widehat{f}_{0}, then scaling it inside Bϵ/2B_{\epsilon/2} in such a way that it becomes a cone in Bϵ/2BσB_{\epsilon/2}-B_{\sigma}, and then deforming it outside BσB_{\sigma} using the Hamiltonian regular homotopy f~t\widetilde{f}_{t} outside BσB_{\sigma} and keeping it fixed in BσB_{\sigma}. The Lagrangian immersion f1f_{1} is self-transverse and has exactly

|I(f0)+(1)n2|+1={|I(f0)|,if (1)n2I(f0)<0,|I(f0)+2|,if (1)n2I(f0)0|I(f_{0})+(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}|+1=\begin{cases}|I(f_{0})|,&\text{if }(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}I(f_{0})<0,\\ |I(f_{0})+2|,&\text{if }(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}I(f_{0})\geq 0\end{cases}

double points. ∎

4.2. Proof of Corollary 1.3

Using Gromov’s hh-principle for Lagrangian immersions, see [16], we find an exact Lagrangian immersion f:Lst2nf\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} (in the given Lagrangian homotopy class σ\sigma in cases (1) and (3)). Part (1) then follows from the corresponding case of Theorem 1.1. If nn is even then I(f0)=(1)n2χ(L)2I({f_{0}})=(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}\frac{\chi(L)}{2}, see e.g. [7], [Proposition 3.2] and also part (3) follows from the corresponding case of Theorem 1.1. To complete the proof of part (2), we observe that if n=3n=3 then both smooth regular homotopy classes of immersions f:Lst2nf\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, corresponding to I(f)=0I({f})=0 and I(f)=1I({f})=1, can be realized by a Lagrangian immersion.∎

4.3. Further results on s(σ,L)s(\sigma,L)

If nn is even then the smooth regular homotopy class of a Lagrangian immersion f:Lst2nf\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} is determined by χ(L)\chi(L), and thus Corollary 1.3 together with Gromov’s non-existence result for exact Lagrangian embeddings gives complete information on s(L)s(L) if χ(L)0\chi(L)\leq 0. If χ(L)>0\chi(L)>0, s(L)s(L) depends on more intricate, differential topological, properties of LL, see [9, 10] (Theorem 1.4 gives information on the homotopy type of LL in this case). For odd nn, s(L)s(L) (and s(L,σ)s(L,\sigma)) is determined by which of the two smooth regular homotopy classes contain Lagrangian (or equivalently totally real) immersions. The following result gives a partial answer. Recall that χ2(L)=j=0n12rank(Hj(L))mod2\chi_{2}(L)=\sum_{j=0}^{\frac{n-1}{2}}\mathrm{rank}(H_{j}(L))\mod 2.

Theorem 4.1.

If LL is an nn-dimensional orientable closed manifold with TLTL\otimes\mathbb{C} trivial, nn odd and n3n\geq 3, then the following hold:

  1. (1)

    If n=3n=3 then both regular homotopy classes contain exact Lagrangian immersions.

  2. (2)

    If n2q1n\neq 2^{q}-1, q2,3q\neq 2,3 then only one regular homotopy class contains Lagrangian immersions.

  3. (3)

    If n=4k+1n=4k+1 and 4k4k is not a power of two, or if the Stiefel-Whitney number w2(L)wn2(L)w_{2}(L)w_{n-2}(L) vanishes, then only the regular homotopy class with Whitney index If=χ2(L)I_{f}=\chi_{2}(L) contains Lagrangian immersions.

  4. (4)

    If VV is almost parallelizable then only the regular homotopy class with If=χ2(V)I_{f}=\chi_{2}(V) contains Lagrangian immersions.

Proof.

Cases (1), (2), and (4) are proved in [2] and case (3) is a consequence of [1]. ∎

4.4. Proof of Theorem 1.4

We control the homotopy type of exact immersions f:Lst2nf\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}, nn even, with exactly 12χ(V)>0\frac{1}{2}\chi(V)>0 double points using a straightforward generalization of [10, Lemma 2.2]. We refer to [10, Section 2] for background and notation for the parts of (lifted) Legendrian homology that will be used below.

Consider the Legendrian lift f~:Lst2n×\tilde{f}\colon L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}\times\mathbb{R}. The Reeb chords of f~\tilde{f} correspond to the double points of ff, and the grading of all Reeb chords must be even since the sum of grading signs over Reeb chords equals (1)n2χ(L)/2(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}}\chi(L)/2, see [7]. Since no chord has odd grading it follows that the Legendrian algebra admits an augmentation, and since LL is spin we can use arbitrary coefficients in the Legendrian algebra.

Using the duality sequence for linearized Legendrian homology [6] over \mathbb{Q} we find that all odd dimensional homology of LL vanishes. In particular, the Maslov class vanishes and the linearized Legendrian homology admits an integer grading. The duality sequence with coefficients p\mathbb{Z}_{p} for arbitrary prime pp then implies that LL has only even dimensional homology over \mathbb{Z}.

We next claim that π1(L)=1\pi_{1}(L)=1. To this end, consider a connected covering space π:L~L\pi\colon\tilde{L}\to L of LL. Then the “lifted linearized Legendrian homology complex” C~lin(L~,π;k)\tilde{C}^{\mathrm{lin}}(\tilde{L},\pi;k) with coefficients in the field kk, see [10, Section 2], has the form

S~C~MorseL~,\tilde{S}\oplus\tilde{C}_{\mathrm{Morse}}\oplus\tilde{L},

where the elements in S~\tilde{S} have grading 1+2j-1+2j, 0jn20\leq j\leq\frac{n}{2} and the elements in L~\tilde{L} grading 2j+12j+1, 0jn20\leq j\leq\frac{n}{2}. Since f(L)f(L) is Hamiltonian displaceable, the total homology of the complex vanishes. Since L~\tilde{L} is connected, this in turn implies rank(S~1)=1\mathrm{rank}(\tilde{S}_{-1})=1, where S~r\tilde{S}_{r} is the degree rr summand of S~\tilde{S}. Thus the covering π\pi has degree 1, and since the covering was arbitrary, that implies that π1(V)=1\pi_{1}(V)=1, as required.

Finally, if dimL>4\dim L>4 then we can use the Whitney trick to cancel homologically inessential handles. ∎

Appendix A Explicit constructions

In this section we consider explicit constructions of Lagrangian immersions and Lagrangian regular homotopies. In Sections A.1 and A.2 we introduce notation and some background material, which are necessary for the construction of a concrete Lagrangian immersion of P=(S1×Sn1)#(S1×Sn1)P=(S^{1}\times S^{n-1})\#(S^{1}\times S^{n-1}) into st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}. That construction, which is broken down into five stages, is given in the subsequent sections. The construction generalizes to dimensions n3n\geq 3 Sauvaget’s construction from [20] for n=2n=2.

A.1. Symplectization coordinates

Consider st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} with coordinates (x1,y1,,xn,yn)(x_{1},y_{1},\dots,x_{n},y_{n}) and standard exact symplectic form ω=dβ\omega=-d\beta with primitive β=j=1nyjdxj\beta=\sum_{j=1}^{n}y_{j}dx_{j}. Let n1st2n\mathbb{C}^{n-1}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}} denote the subspace given by the equation (xn,yn)=(0,0)(x_{n},y_{n})=(0,0) and let β0=β|n1\beta_{0}=\beta|_{\mathbb{C}^{n-1}}. Consider the contact manifold ×n1\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1} with contact 1-form α=dzβ0\alpha=dz-\beta_{0}, where zz is a coordinate in the additional \mathbb{R}-factor, and with symplectization ××n1\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1} with exact symplectic form d(etα)d(e^{t}\alpha), where tt is the coordinate in the symplectization direction. Write ξ=(x1,,xn1)\xi=(x_{1},\dots,x_{n-1}) and η=(y1,,yn1)\eta=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n-1}), then (ξ,η,xn,yn)(\xi,\eta,x_{n},y_{n}) are coordinates on st2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}_{\mathrm{st}}. Consider the map Φ:××n1n\Phi\colon\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1}\to\mathbb{C}^{n},

Φ(t,z,ξ,η)=(ξ,etη,et,z).\Phi(t,z,\xi,\eta)=(\xi,e^{t}\eta,e^{t},z).

Then

Φ(jyjdxj)=et(ηdξ+zdt)=et(dzηdξ)d(etz)=αd(etz),\Phi^{\ast}(-\sum_{j}y_{j}dx_{j})=-e^{t}(\eta\cdot d\xi+zdt)=e^{t}(dz-\eta\cdot d\xi)-d(e^{t}z)=\alpha-d(e^{t}z),

and hence Φ\Phi is an exact symplectomorphism from the symplectization ××n1\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1} to +n={(ξ,η,xn,yn):xn>0}\mathbb{C}^{n}_{+}=\{(\xi,\eta,x_{n},y_{n})\colon x_{n}>0\}.

If Λ×n1\Lambda\subset\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1} is a Legendrian submanifold then ×Λ\mathbb{R}\times\Lambda is an exact Lagrangian submanifold of the symplectization ××n1\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1}. If

(t,z(λ),ξ(λ),η(λ)),λΛ,t(t,z(\lambda),\xi(\lambda),\eta(\lambda)),\quad\lambda\in\Lambda,\;t\in\mathbb{R}

is a parameterization of ×Λ\mathbb{R}\times\Lambda then its image under Φ\Phi is parameterized by

(ξ(λ),etη(λ),et,z(λ))+n.(\xi(\lambda),e^{t}\eta(\lambda),e^{t},z(\lambda))\in\mathbb{C}^{n}_{+}.

Conversely, if LL is a conical Lagrangian submanifold in +n1\mathbb{C}^{n-1}_{+} parameterized by

(ξ(λ),sη(λ)),s,yn(λ)),λΛ,s+,(\xi(\lambda),s\eta(\lambda)),s,y_{n}(\lambda)),\quad\lambda\in\Lambda,\;s\in\mathbb{R}_{+},

then the image of LL under Φ1\Phi^{-1} is the cylinder on a Legendrian submanifold Λ×n1\Lambda\subset\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{C}^{n-1} parameterized by (z(λ),ξ(λ),η(λ))(z(\lambda),\xi(\lambda),\eta(\lambda)), λΛ\lambda\in\Lambda, where z(λ)=yn(λ)z(\lambda)=y_{n}(\lambda).

A.2. Exact Lagrangian immersions by front slices

Let MM be an nn-manifold and let f:Mnf\colon M\to\mathbb{C}^{n} be an exact Lagrangian immersion. After small perturbation, the following general position properties hold:

  1. (1)

    All self-intersections of f:Mnf\colon M\to\mathbb{C}^{n} are transverse double points.

  2. (2)

    The coordinate function xnf:Mx_{n}\circ f\colon M\to\mathbb{R} is a Morse function.

  3. (3)

    If p=f(p0)=f(p1)p=f(p_{0})=f(p_{1}) is a double point of ff then xn(p)x_{n}(p) is a regular value of xnfx_{n}\circ f.

Assume that (1)(3)(1)-(3) hold. For any regular value aa, the level set Ma=(xnf)1(a)M^{a}=(x_{n}\circ f)^{-1}(a) is a smooth (n1)(n-1)-manifold which is the boundary of the sublevel set Ma=f1((,a])M^{\leq a}=f^{-1}((-\infty,a]), and if πn:nn1\pi_{n}\colon\mathbb{C}^{n}\to\mathbb{C}^{n-1} is the projection that projects out (xn,yn)(x_{n},y_{n}) then fa=πnf:Man1f^{a}=\pi_{n}\circ f\colon M^{a}\to\mathbb{C}^{n-1} is an exact Lagrangian immersion.

Double points of ff are also double points of faf^{a}. In order to determine which double points of faf^{a} correspond to actual double points of ff, we must recover the yny_{n}-coordinate from faf^{a}. Write (x,y)=(ξ,η,xn,yn)(x,y)=(\xi,\eta,x_{n},y_{n}), where ξ=(x1,,xn1)\xi=(x_{1},\dots,x_{n-1}), η=(y1,,yn1)\eta=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n-1}), and (ξ,η)(\xi,\eta) are standard coordinates on n1\mathbb{C}^{n-1} as above. If cc is a double point of faf^{a}, c=fa(c0)=fa(c1)c=f^{a}(c_{0})=f^{a}(c_{1}) for c0c1Mac_{0}\neq c_{1}\in M^{a} and if γ\gamma is a path connecting c0c_{0} to c1c_{1} in MaM^{a} then

yn(c1)yn(c0)=ddxn(γη𝑑ξ),y_{n}(c_{1})-y_{n}(c_{0})=\frac{d}{dx_{n}}\left(\int_{\gamma}\;\eta\,d\xi\right),

where ηdξ=j=1n1yjdxj\eta\,d\xi=\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}y_{j}dx_{j}. In other words, the yny_{n}-coordinate at a double point is the xnx_{n}-derivative of the action of any path connecting its endpoints. Using the exactness of ff, this can be rephrased as follows, if zz is a primitive of f(β)f^{\ast}(\beta) and za=z|Maz^{a}=z|_{M^{a}} then

yn(c1)yn(c0)=dda(za(c1)za(c0)).y_{n}(c_{1})-y_{n}(c_{0})=\frac{d}{da}\left(z^{a}(c_{1})-z^{a}(c_{0})\right). (A.1)

In our constructions below we will depict the exact Lagrangian slices by drawing their fronts in n1×\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times\mathbb{R}. Before discussing slices, we give a brief general description of fronts. Let NN be a closed manifold and consider an exact Lagrangian immersion g:Nng\colon N\to\mathbb{C}^{n}. Pick a primitive ζ:N\zeta\colon N\to\mathbb{R} of g(β)g^{\ast}(\beta). Then the map G=(g,ζ):Nn×G=(g,\zeta)\colon N\to\mathbb{C}^{n}\times\mathbb{R} is a Legendrian immersion, everywhere tangent to the contact plane field ker(dζβ)\mathrm{ker}(d\zeta-\beta) on n×\mathbb{C}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}. The front of gg is the projection πFG:Nn×\pi_{F}\circ G\colon N\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times\mathbb{R}, where πF\pi_{F} projects out the yy-coordinate. For generic gg, the front has singularities; the front determines the original Lagrangian immersion via the equations

yj=zxj,y_{j}=\frac{\partial z}{\partial x_{j}},

which admit solutions that can be extended continuously over the singular set (caustic) of the front. For generic gg, double points of gg lie off of the caustic and correspond to smooth points on the front with the same xx-coordinate and with parallel tangent planes. The Reeb vector field of the contact form dzydxdz-y\,dx on n×\mathbb{C}^{n}\times\mathbb{R} is simply the coordinate vector field z\partial_{z} and thus double points of gg correspond to Reeb chords of GG.

Below, we will study the fronts of exact Lagrangian immersions fa:Man1f^{a}\colon M^{a}\to\mathbb{C}^{n-1} that are slices of a given Lagrangian immersion f:Mnf\colon M\to\mathbb{C}^{n}, and as mentioned above it will be of importance to recover the yny_{n}-coordinate at the double points of faf^{a}. We will call the Reeb chords of the Legendrian lift of an exact slice faf^{a} slice Reeb chords. Thus a slice Reeb chord is a vertical chord that connects two points on the front with parallel tangent planes. In our pictures below, we indicate the difference of the yny_{n}-coordinate at the endpoints by showing whether the vertical chord that connects them grows or shrinks, cf. Equation (A.1).

A.3. Overview: a construction in five pieces

The rest of the Appendix is devoted to the construction of a self-transverse exact Lagrangian immersion P=(S1×Sn1#S1×Sn1)nP=(S^{1}\times S^{n-1}\#S^{1}\times S^{n-1})\rightarrow\mathbb{C}^{n} with exactly one double point. The construction of the immersion is broken down into five stages, two of which are described in terms of fronts, and three of which are described via Lagrangian slices.

In what follows, we write ξ=(x1,,xn1)\xi=(x_{1},\dots,x_{n-1}) and t=xnt=x_{n}. Let η=(y1,,yn1)\eta=(y_{1},\dots,y_{n-1}) be dual to ξ\xi and τ=yn\tau=y_{n} dual to tt. If f(,t)f(\cdot,t) is a function that depends on tt, we write f(,t)f^{\prime}(\cdot,t) for the partial derivative ft\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}.

The construction will be decomposed into the following five pieces: a bottom piece (i)(i) which will be drawn in Section A.4 as a sequence of fronts and which contains five critical slices (i.e. slices containing critical points of the Morse function xn:Px_{n}\colon P\to\mathbb{R}), three middle pieces (ii)(iv)(ii)-(iv), see Sections A.6, A.7, and A.8 all without critical slices where we will draw the corresponding Lagrangian immersions into n\mathbb{C}^{n}, and finally a top piece (v)(v), also drawn by fronts, that contains the unique double point, see Section A.9.

A.4. The first piece of the immersion

The first piece is constructed in four steps.

A.4.1.

We pass the minimum of the tt-coordinate and a standard (n1)(n-1)-sphere appears as shown in Figure 1. It has one slice Reeb chord c1c_{1} of length (c1)\ell(c_{1}) and (c1)>0\ell^{\prime}(c_{1})>0.

Refer to caption
Figure 1. A standard sphere is born.

A.4.2.

We introduce two Bott families 𝐜2\mathbf{c}_{2} and 𝐜3\mathbf{c}_{3} of slice Reeb chords of index 0 and 11, respectively. Both families are topologically (n2)(n-2)-spheres, symmetric about the central slice Reeb chord. The lengths of the slice Reeb chords of the families are (𝐜2)<(𝐜3)\ell(\mathbf{c}_{2})<\ell(\mathbf{c}_{3}), (𝐜2)<0\ell^{\prime}(\mathbf{c}_{2})<0, and (𝐜3)<0\ell^{\prime}(\mathbf{c}_{3})<0; see Figure 2. It will be important later that (𝐜3)\ell(\mathbf{c}_{3}) is not too small compared to (c1)\ell(c_{1}). We introduce the following quantities corresponding to certain areas in the Lagrangian slice projections which appear later, but here related to the lengths of the slice Reeb chords:

(𝐜3)=C,(𝐜2)=B+C,(c1)=AB+C,\ell(\mathbf{c}_{3})=C,\quad\ell(\mathbf{c}_{2})=-B+C,\quad\ell(c_{1})=A-B+C,

where C>0C>0 and A>B>0A>B>0. Then C<0C^{\prime}<0, B+C<0-B^{\prime}+C^{\prime}<0, and A>BCA^{\prime}>B^{\prime}-C^{\prime}. To be definite about (𝐜3)\ell(\mathbf{c}_{3}), we take B=μ05CB=\frac{\mu_{0}}{5}C and A=μ12CA=\frac{\mu_{1}}{2}C, where μj\mu_{j} are parameters such that μj1\mu_{j}\approx 1. (Since the slice Reeb chords must change length with tt, we cannot enforce μj=1\mu_{j}=1 but we can take these parameters to be approximately equal to 11. )

Refer to caption
Figure 2. New born Bott families of shrinking chords.

A.4.3.

We Morse modify along the Bott family 𝐜2\mathbf{c}_{2} of slice Reeb chords of minimal length twice, first adding a family of 1-handles and then removing them, as shown in Figure 3. It is straightforward to check that the manifold that results from these modifications is a punctured connected sum (S1×Sn1)#(S1×Sn1)(S^{1}\times S^{n-1})\#(S^{1}\times S^{n-1}), i.e., PDnP-D^{n}. The slice sphere that appears right after the second Morse modification is depicted in Figure 4.

Refer to caption
Figure 3. Morse modification along the Bott families of minima.

A.4.4.

In the final step of the first piece, we Morsify the Bott family 𝐜2\mathbf{c}_{2} of slice Reeb chords. In doing so, as we shall see below, it is natural to think about the quantities AA, BB, and CC as functions of (v,t)Sn2×(v,t)\in S^{n-2}\times\mathbb{R}, where we think of Sn2S^{n-2} as the unit sphere {ξn1:|ξ|=1}\{\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\colon|\xi|=1\}, which naturally parameterizes the Bott manifold. We Morsify 𝐜2\mathbf{c}_{2} leaving one very short chord c20c_{2}^{0} with (c20)=ϵ2\ell(c_{2}^{0})=\epsilon^{2} lying in direction v0Sn2-v_{0}\in S^{n-2} and one long chord c2n2c_{2}^{n-2} in direction v0Sn2v_{0}\in S^{n-2}, with

(c2n2)=B(v0,t)+C=(1μ05)C45C,\ell(c_{2}^{n-2})=-B(v_{0},t)+C=(1-\frac{\mu_{0}}{5})C\approx\frac{4}{5}C, (A.2)

see Figure 4. Here, μ01\mu_{0}\approx 1 is as above, and CC is constant in vv since we keep the Bott symmetry of 𝐜3\mathbf{c}_{3}. The superscripts on c20c_{2}^{0} and c2n2c_{2}^{n-2} refer to the Morse indices of the slice Reeb chords, considered as positive function differences of the functions defining the two sheets of the front at their endpoints.

Let ϕ=ϕ+ϕ\phi=\phi_{+}-\phi_{-} be such a positive difference between local functions defining the sheets of the front. For future reference, we assume that the Morsification has only a small effect on the level surfaces of ϕ\phi, which remain close to those of the Bott situation. In particular, the level curves of ϕ\phi for values close to ϕ(c2n2)\phi(c^{n-2}_{2}) are everywhere transverse to the radial vectors along an Sn2S^{n-2} slightly outside the former Bott-manifold, see Figure 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 4. Final stage of the first piece.
Refer to caption
Figure 5. Level surfaces after Morsification.

A.5. A guide to reading pictures of Lagrangian slices

For the next three pieces of the immersion, we will not use the front representation as above, but will instead draw a family of exact Lagrangian slices. Before reaching the details we describe how to read the pictures.

Let vSn2={ξn1:|ξ|=1}v\in S^{n-2}=\{\xi\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\colon|\xi|=1\} and let r0r\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}. We construct our exact Lagrangian slice-spheres by drawing their slices in the 22-dimensional half-planes determined by vv and its dual vector ww, i.e. ww is a vector in η\eta-space n1\mathbb{R}^{n-1} dual to vv which lies in ξ\xi-space. These slices are curves γv:[0,1]{rv+ρw:r0,ρ}\gamma_{v}\colon[0,1]\to\{rv+\rho w\colon r\geq 0,\rho\in\mathbb{R}\} that begin and end at a central point (the location of the slice Reeb chord of maximal length of the corresponding front) at (0,0)=0n1(0,0)=0\in\mathbb{C}^{n-1}. In order for the curves γv\gamma_{v} to close up and form a sphere, the integral γvη𝑑ξ\int_{\gamma_{v}}\eta\,d\xi must be independent of vSn2v\in S^{n-2}.

We will draw the immersed curves γv\gamma_{v} with over/under information recording the value of the τ=yn\tau=y_{n}-coordinate at double points. It is also important to keep track of the values of zz at crossings, where zz is a primitive function of the exact Lagrangian slice. We write (Δτ)j(\Delta\tau)_{j} and (Δz)j(\Delta z)_{j} for the differences in τ\tau-coordinate and zz-coordinate, respectively, between the upper and the lower strands at the crossing labeled jj in figures. Note that with these conventions (Δz)j0(\Delta z)_{j}\geq 0.

We next need a description of the actual double points of the slice immersions faf^{a} in terms of the curves γv\gamma_{v}. Note first that any double point of faf^{a} corresponds to a double point of some curve γv\gamma_{v}. Although we break the Sn2S^{n-2} symmetry we stay fairly close to a symmetric situation. In particular, the double points of the curves γv\gamma_{v} (with the exception of the central double point) will come in Sn2S^{n-2}-families and the zz-differences (Δz)j(\Delta z)_{j} then give functions

(Δz)j:Sn20.(\Delta z)_{j}\colon S^{n-2}\to\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}.

Since double points correspond to parallel tangent planes on the front we find that the double points of faf^{a} are exactly the critical points of these functions.

A.6. The second piece of the immersion

We will represent the second piece of the immersion in three steps.

A.6.1.

In the initial step the curves correspond to the front in Figure 4, which is depicted in the slice model in Figure 6. AA, BB, and CC denote the (positively oriented) areas indicated; each is a function of vv and tt. We then have

(Δz)1(t)=AB+C,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{1}(t)=A-B+C, (Δτ)1=(AB+C)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{1}=(A-B+C)^{\prime}>0,
(Δz)2(v,t)=B+C,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{2}(v,t)=-B+C, (Δτ)2=(B+C)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{2}=(-B+C)^{\prime}>0,
(Δz)3(v,t)=C,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{3}(v,t)=-C, (Δτ)3=(C)>0.\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{3}=(-C)^{\prime}>0.

In particular A(v0,t)>B(v0,t)=C(v0,t)ϵ2A(-v_{0},t)>B(-v_{0},t)=C(-v_{0},t)-\epsilon^{2} and, for fixed tt, the functions A(v,t)A(v,t) and B(v,t)B(v,t) have maxima at v0-v_{0} and minima at v0v_{0}, whereas the function C(v,t)C(v,t) is constant in vv.

Refer to caption
Figure 6. Initial Lagrangian slice.

A.6.2.

We apply a finger move across the area B(v,t)B(v,t), splitting it into two pieces B0(v,t)B_{0}(v,t) and D(v,t)D(v,t) as shown in Figure 7, where B0(v,t)B_{0}(v,t) is constant in vv:

B0(v,t)=B0(v0,t)=D(v0,t).B_{0}(v,t)=B_{0}(v_{0},t)=D(v_{0},t).

Consequently, D(v,t)D(v,t) equals B(v,t)constB(v,t)-\mathrm{const}.

The crossing conditions then read:

(Δz)1=AB0+CD,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{1}=A-B_{0}+C-D, (Δτ)1=(AB0+CD)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{1}=(A-B_{0}+C-D)^{\prime}>0,
(Δz)2=B0+CD,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{2}=-B_{0}+C-D, (Δτ)2=(B0+CD)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{2}=(-B_{0}+C-D)^{\prime}>0,
(Δz)3=C,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{3}=-C, (Δτ)3=(C)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{3}=(-C)^{\prime}>0,
(Δz)4=D,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{4}=-D, (Δτ)4=(D)>0.\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{4}=(-D)^{\prime}>0.
Refer to caption
Figure 7. Applying a finger move.

A.6.3.

We continue the finger move and introduce a new small area E(v,t)E(v,t), as shown in Figure 8. We have

(Δz)1=AB0+CD+E,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{1}=A-B_{0}+C-D+E, (Δτ)1=(AB0+CD+E)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{1}=(A-B_{0}+C-D+E)^{\prime}>0, (A.3)
(Δz)2=B0+CD+E,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{2}=-B_{0}+C-D+E, (Δτ)2=(B0+CD+E)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{2}=(-B_{0}+C-D+E)^{\prime}>0, (A.4)
(Δz)3=C,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{3}=-C, (Δτ)3=(C)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{3}=(-C)^{\prime}>0, (A.5)
(Δz)4=D+E,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{4}=-D+E, (Δτ)4=(D+E)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{4}=(-D+E)^{\prime}>0, (A.6)
(Δz)5=D,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{5}=-D, (Δτ)5=(D)>0.\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{5}=(-D)^{\prime}>0. (A.7)
Refer to caption
Figure 8. Final step of lower middle piece. The newly introduced area E(v,t)E(v,t) is everywhere small at this stage.

A.7. The third piece of the immersion

The slices of the third piece will be drawn in the same way as the slices in Section A.6. We will distinguish small and large deformations, and use t\approx_{t} for quantities that are almost constant in time, and (v,t)\approx_{(v,t)} for those that are almost constant in both vSn2v\in S^{n-2} and in time. Recall that we wrote ϵ2\epsilon^{2} for the height of the smallest Reeb chord, where 0<ϵ10<\epsilon\ll 1; by a small deformation we mean one smaller than ϵp\epsilon^{p} for p2p\gg 2. For example C(v,t)(v,t)constC(v,t)\approx_{(v,t)}\mathrm{const} means that the area C(v,t)C(v,t) is independent of vv and that it has tt-derivative of order ϵp\epsilon^{p}, p2p\gg 2, with the sign of the derivative dictated by the crossing conditions.

A.7.1.

In the initial phase of the third piece we change the area functions in such a way that the following conditions are met:

A(v,t)+E(v,t)(v,t)const,B0(v,t)(v,t)const,C(v,t)(v,t)const,D(v,t)tD(v,t),A(v,t)+E(v,t)\approx_{(v,t)}\mathrm{const},\;B_{0}(v,t)\approx_{(v,t)}\mathrm{const},\;C(v,t)\approx_{(v,t)}\mathrm{const},\;D(v,t)\approx_{t}D(v,t^{\prime}),

where tt^{\prime} is the starting time. Consider v0Sn2v_{0}\in S^{n-2} as above. At v0-v_{0}, the values of all area functions stay close to their initial values. At v0v_{0}, A(v,t)A(v,t) shrinks toward 0 and E(v,t)E(v,t) grows correspondingly. We choose these functions so that they have exactly two critical points ±v0\pm v_{0}. Note that these deformations are compatible with (A.3)–(A.7). At the point when A(v0,t)=0A(v_{0},t)=0 we find that the central slice Reeb chord which corresponds to a maximum of the function difference determined by the two sheets of the front and to the double point labeled 11 cancels with the chord c2n2c_{2}^{n-2} corresponding to the largest value of (Δz)2(\Delta z)_{2}. The curve γv0\gamma_{v_{0}} at the cancelling moment is depicted in Figure 9.

Refer to caption
Figure 9. The cancelling moment.

Note that at this point the slice Reeb chord that corresponds to the double point labeled 44 satisfies the following:

(Δz)4(v,t)<E(v0,t)D(v0,t)tA(v0,t)D(v0,t)<C(v,t),(\Delta z)_{4}(v,t)<E(v_{0},t)-D(v_{0},t)\approx_{t}A(v_{0},t^{\prime})-D(v_{0},t)<C(v,t), (A.8)

where we recall that C(v,t)(v,t)constC(v,t)\approx_{(v,t)}\mathrm{const} and that tt^{\prime} denotes the initial instance, before we start shrinking A(v,t)A(v,t), see (i)(i) Step 4. In particular, the Reeb chord of maximal length is the chord labeled 33 (denoted 𝐜3\mathbf{c}_{3} earlier) of length C(v,t)C(v,t).

A.7.2.

In the central region where the Reeb chords cancel, the front of the Lagrangian slice consists of two function graphs. The level sets of the positive difference of these function graphs are shown in Figure 10.

Refer to caption
Figure 10. Level sets in the central region near the moment of cancellation.

Recall the consequence of the earlier Bott set up, see (i)(i) Step 4, that the level sets are transverse to the radial vectors along an Sn2S^{n-2} surrounding the central region. Thus isotoping level sets keeping them fixed along the boundary, we see that there exists a Hamiltonian isotopy which is fixed outside the central region that deforms the Lagrangian so that the central region appears as shown in Figure 11. Here the slice Reeb chord c20c_{2}^{0} is the new central Reeb chord and level sets are everywhere transverse to the radial vector field. Noting that double points in the central region of the radial slices γv\gamma_{v} correspond to tangencies of the level sets and the radial vector field, we find that after this Hamiltonian deformation, the curves γv\gamma_{v} are as shown in Figure 12. We take the slices of our exact Lagrangian to be approximately equal to the instances of this Hamiltonian deformation, deviating from it slightly in order to ensure that the crossing conditions hold.

Refer to caption
Figure 11. Placing the minimal length Reeb chord in central position by an (almost) Hamiltonian deformation.
Refer to caption
Figure 12. Appearance of the curves γv\gamma_{v} after c20c_{2}^{0} became the new central Reeb chord.

We have the following crossing conditions:

ϵ2β+CD+E,\displaystyle\epsilon^{2}\approx-\beta+C-D+E, (Δτ)0=(β+CD+E)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{0}=(-\beta+C-D+E)^{\prime}>0, (A.9)
(Δz)3=C,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{3}=-C, (Δτ)3=(C)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{3}=(-C)^{\prime}>0, (A.10)
(Δz)4=D+E,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{4}=-D+E, (Δτ)4=(D+E)>0,\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{4}=(-D+E)^{\prime}>0, (A.11)
(Δz)5=D,\displaystyle(\Delta z)_{5}=-D, (Δτ)5=(D)>0.\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{5}=(-D)^{\prime}>0. (A.12)

For the deformation described above, the function β(v,t)\beta(v,t) in Figure 12 has only two critical points, with maximum value at v0v_{0}:

β(v0,t)A(v0,t)+B0(v0,t)>C(v,t),\beta(v_{0},t)\approx A(-v_{0},t)+B_{0}(v_{0},t)>C(v,t), (A.13)

and minimum value at v0-v_{0}:

β(v0,t)B0(v0,t)<C(v,t).\beta(-v_{0},t)\approx B_{0}(-v_{0},t)<C(v,t). (A.14)

A.8. The fourth piece of the immersion

We describe the fourth piece in four steps.

A.8.1.

We rotate the ends of the curves γv\gamma_{v} as shown in Figure 13. More precisely, recall that (r,ρ)rv+ρw(r,\rho)\mapsto rv+\rho w are coordinates on the half plane in which γv\gamma_{v} lies. Consider an interval [0,R][0,R] and r0[0,R]r_{0}\in[0,R] small, such that (i) all curves γv\gamma_{v} are of standard form in {(r,ρ):0r2r0}\{(r,\rho)\colon 0\leq r\leq 2r_{0}\}, and (ii) all curves γv\gamma_{v} are contained in {(r,ρ):0r12R}\{(r,\rho)\colon 0\leq r\leq\frac{1}{2}R\}. Consider a Hamiltonian deformation ψt\psi_{t} that is constant in {(r,ρ):0rr0}\{(r,\rho)\colon 0\leq r\leq r_{0}\}, that is a π2\frac{\pi}{2} rotation in the region {(r,ρ):2r0r12R}\{(r,\rho)\colon 2r_{0}\leq r\leq\frac{1}{2}R\}, and that is again constant in {(r,ρ):34Rr}\{(r,\rho)\colon\frac{3}{4}R\leq r\}. The curves γv\gamma_{v} are then given by small deformations of the curves ψtγv\psi_{t}\circ\gamma_{v}; the small deformations shrink the areas C(v,t)C(v,t) and D(v,t)D(v,t), and increase the area β(v,t)\beta(v,t), in each case with very small derivative, in order to have the crossing conditions satisfied.

Refer to caption
Figure 13. A rotation has been applied.

A.8.2.

We shrink the area C(v,t)C(v,t) for vv in a certain subset of Sn2S^{n-2}. Recall from Equations (A.13),(A.14) that the minimum of the function β(v,t)\beta(v,t) is β(v0,t)B0(v0,t)=B(v0,t)<C(v,t)\beta(-v_{0},t)\approx B_{0}(-v_{0},t)=B(v_{0},t)<C(v,t) whereas its maximum β(v0,t)B(v0,t)+A(v0,t)>C(v,t)\beta(v_{0},t)\approx B(v_{0},t)+A(-v_{0},t)>C(v,t). Consider the subset QSn2Q\subset S^{n-2} where

β(v,t)C(v,t)12ϵ.\beta(v,t)\geq C(v,t)-\frac{1}{2}\epsilon.

Over QQ we shrink C(v,t)C(v,t) and β(v,t)\beta(v,t) in such a way that C(v,t)β(v,t)constC(v,t)-\beta(v,t)\approx\mathrm{const} until C(v,t)=ϵC(v,t)=\epsilon. Outside a neighborhood of QQ we keep C(v,t)C(v,t) at its original size. Note that outside QQ we have

E(v,t)=D(v,t)+β(v,t)C(v,t)+ϵ2D(v,t)12ϵ+ϵ2<D(v,t).E(v,t)=D(v,t)+\beta(v,t)-C(v,t)+\epsilon^{2}\leq D(v,t)-\tfrac{1}{2}\epsilon+\epsilon^{2}<D(v,t). (A.15)

A.8.3.

We slide C(v,t)C(v,t) out across E(v,t)E(v,t) without creating double points. To see that this is possible we subdivide into three cases. First, around QQ, C(v,t)C(v,t) is small (size ϵ\epsilon) compared to E(v,t)E(v,t), which is of (order 11) finite size. In this case there are two double points created when C(v,t)C(v,t) enters and leaves E(v,t)E(v,t), see Figure 14. The crossing conditions at the entering crossings read

(Δτ)en=(C~(v,t)D(v,t)+E(v,t))>0,(\Delta\tau)_{\mathrm{en}}=(\tilde{C}(v,t)-D(v,t)+E(v,t))^{\prime}>0,

and those at the exiting crossings

(Δτ)ex=(C~(v,t)D(v,t))>0,(\Delta\tau)_{\mathrm{ex}}=(\tilde{C}(v,t)-D(v,t))^{\prime}>0,

where 0<C~(v,t)<C(v,t)=ϵ0<\tilde{C}(v,t)<C(v,t)=\epsilon. Here we let E(v,t)constE(v,t)\approx\mathrm{const} and we let D(v,t)D(v,t) shrink to keep the above derivative positive. As the total variation of C~(v,t)\tilde{C}(v,t) (i.e. the total amount of area transported in and out of E(v,t)E(v,t)) is 2ϵ2\epsilon and since D(v,t)>2ϵD(v,t)>2\epsilon, D(v,t)D(v,t) is sufficiently large to keep the derivative positive at all times.

Refer to caption
Figure 14. Sliding a small area C(v,t)C(v,t).

Second, well outside a neighborhood of QQ, C(v,t)C(v,t) is large and there are two double points throughout the deformation, see Figure 15, where the crossing conditions read

(Δτ)6\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{6} =(C~(v,t)D(v,t)+E~(v,t))>0,\displaystyle=(\tilde{C}(v,t)-D(v,t)+\tilde{E}(v,t))^{\prime}>0,
(Δτ)7\displaystyle(\Delta\tau)_{7} =(D(v,t)+E~(v,t))>0,\displaystyle=(-D(v,t)+\tilde{E}(v,t))^{\prime}>0,

where C~(v,t)C(v,t)const\tilde{C}(v,t)\approx C(v,t)-\mathrm{const} and where 0E~(v,t)E(v,t)0\leq\tilde{E}(v,t)\leq E(v,t). Here E~(v,t)<0\tilde{E}^{\prime}(v,t)<0 and we ensure that the crossing conditions hold by shrinking D(v,t)D(v,t). Since the total variation of E~(v,t)\tilde{E}(v,t) is at most the area E(v,t)E(v,t) and D(v,t)>E(v,t)D(v,t)>E(v,t) in this region, we find that the crossing condition is met at all times.

Third, in the region where we interpolate between small and large C(v,t)C(v,t), E(v,t)E(v,t) is already smaller than D(v,t)D(v,t), and the amount of area transported through E(v,t)E(v,t) is smaller than the corresponding amount described above; hence the necessary crossing conditions can be arranged by shrinking D(v,t)D(v,t). In conclusion we can thus slide C(v,t)C(v,t) out for all vv.

Refer to caption
Figure 15. Sliding a large area C(v,t)C(v,t).

A.8.4.

The final stage of the fourth piece is shown as a Lagrangian slice in Figure 16 and as the corresponding front in Figure 17. The latter serves as the starting point of the last piece.

Refer to caption
Figure 16. Final shape of the curves γv\gamma_{v}.
Refer to caption
Figure 17. Initial position for the fifth piece.

A.9. The fifth piece of the immersion

For the fifth, final piece of the immersion, we return to the front representation. The initial front of the fifth piece is a sphere with seven Reeb chords, see Figure 17, three that shrink and four that grow. It is the double of a function graph with critical points as follows: (i) the largest maximum is positive and shrinking; (ii) there is another positive local maximum that increases; (iii) one positive index n2n-2 point increases; (iv) there are two positive index 11 chords, one increasing and one decreasing; (v) and there are two index 0 chords, one positive increasing and one negative decreasing.

We pass the decreasing index 11 chord through a double point, making it increasing, see Figure 18. Then we cancel the two index (0,1)(0,1) pairs and the index (n1,n2)(n-1,n-2) pair of increasing chords. This leaves us with a standard sphere, with a decreasing slice Reeb chord corresponding to a maximum, that we cap off with a Lagrangian disk via a standard Morse modification; see Figure 19. This completes the construction of the desired exact Lagrangian immersion PnP\to\mathbb{C}^{n} with one double point.

Refer to caption
Figure 18. Slices passing through the double point.
Refer to caption
Figure 19. The final slice can be capped off with a maximum of xnx_{n}.

References

  • [1] Asadi-Golmankhaneh, M. and Eccles, P. Double point self-intersection surfaces of immersions. Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 149–170.
  • [2] Audin, M. Fibrés normaux d’immersions en dimension double, points doubles d’immersions lagragiennes et plongements totalement réels. Comment. Math. Helv. 63 (1988), no. 4, 593–623.
  • [3] Bourgeois, F., Ekholm, T., and Eliashberg, Y. Effect of Legendrian surgery. Geom. Topol. 16 (2012), no. 1, 301–389.
  • [4] Cieliebak, K. and Eliashberg, Y. From Stein to Weinstein and back. Symplectic geometry of affine complex manifolds. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications 59. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012.
  • [5] Damian, M. Floer homology on the universal cover, a proof of Audin’s conjecture, and other constraints on Lagrangian submanifolds. Comment. Math. Helv. 87 (2012) 433–462.
  • [6] Ekholm, T., Etnyre, J., and Sabloff, J. A duality exact sequence for Legendrian contact homology. Duke Math. J. 150 (2009), no. 1, 1–75
  • [7] T. Ekholm, J. Etnyre and M. Sullivan, Non-isotopic Legendrian submanifolds in 2n+1\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}, J. Differential Geom. 71 (2005), 85–128.
  • [8] Ekholm, T., Etnyre, J., and Sullivan, M. Orientations in Legendrian contact homology and exact Lagrangian immersions. Internat. J. Math. 16 (2005), no. 5, 453–532.
  • [9] Ekholm, T. and Smith, I. Exact Lagrangian immersions with a single double point. Preprint, arXiv:1111.5932.
  • [10] Ekholm, T. and Smith, I. Exact Lagrangian immersions with one double point revisited. Preprint, arXiv:1211.1715.
  • [11] Y. Eliashberg, Topological characterization of Stein manifolds of dimension >2>2. Internat. J. Math. 1 (1990), 29–46.
  • [12] Y. Eliashberg and M. Gromov, Lagrangian intersection theory: finite-dimensional approach. In Geometry of differential equations, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 186, (1998), 27–118.
  • [13] Eliashberg, Y. and Murphy, E. Lagrangian caps Preprint, 2013.
  • [14] K. Fukaya. Application of Floer homology of Lagrangian submanifolds to symplectic topology. In Morse theoretic methods in nonlinear analysis and in symplectic topology, 231-276, NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem. 217, Springer (2006).
  • [15] K. Fukaya, Y.-G. Oh, H. Ohta and K. Ono. Lagrangian intersection Floer theory: anomaly and obstruction. Part I. American Mathematical Society, International Press (2009).
  • [16] Gromov, M. Partial differential relations. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) 9 Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986).
  • [17] Gromov, M. Pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectic manifolds. Invent. Math. 82 (1985), no. 2, 307–347.
  • [18] E. Murphy, Loose Legendrian Embeddings in High Dimensional Contact Manifolds. Preprint, arXiv:1201.2245.
  • [19] L. Polterovich. The surgery of Lagrange submanifolds. Geom. Func. Anal. 2 (1991), 198–210.
  • [20] Sauvaget, D. Curiosités lagrangiennes en dimension 4. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 54 (2004) no. 6, 1997–2020.
  • [21] C. Viterbo. A new obstruction to embedding Lagrangian tori. Invent. Math. 100 (1990), 301–320.
  • [22] Whitney, H. The self-intersections of a smooth nn-manifold in 2n2n-space. Ann. of Math. (2) 45, (1944), 220–246.