This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Controlling periodic Fano resonances of quantum acoustic waves with a giant atom coupled to microwave waveguide

Po-Chen Kuo    \authormark1,2 Jhen-Dong Lin    \authormark1,2 Yin-Chun Huang    \authormark1 and Yueh-Nan Chen\authormark1,2 \authormark1Department of Physics, National Cheng Kung University, 701 Tainan, Taiwan
\authormark2Center for Quantum Frontiers of Research and Technology, NCKU, 701 Tainan, Taiwan
\authormark*yuehnan@mail.ncku.edu.tw
Abstract

Nanoscale Fano resonances, with applications from telecommunications to ultra-sensitive biosensing, have prompted extensive research. We demonstrate that a superconducting qubit, jointly coupled to microwave waveguides and an inter-digital transducer composite device, can exhibit acoustic Fano resonances. Our analytical framework, leveraging the Taylor series approximation, elucidates the origins of these quantum acoustic resonances with periodic Fano-like interference. By analyzing the analytical Fano parameter, we demonstrate that the Fano resonances and their corresponding Fano widths near the resonance frequency of a giant atom can be precisely controlled and manipulated by adjusting the time delay. Moreover, not just the near-resonant Fano profiles, but the entire periodic Fano resonance features can be precisely modulated from Lorentz, Fano to quasi-Lorentz shapes by tuning the coupling strength of the microwave waveguide. Our analytical framework offers insights into the control and manipulation of periodic Fano resonances in quantum acoustic waves, thereby presenting significant potential for applications such as quantum information processing, sensing, and communication.

journal: osacarticletype: Research Article

1 Introduction

Fano resonance is a phenomenon that occurs when a discrete quantum state interferes with a continuum of states, resulting in an asymmetric spectral line shape [1]. Fano resonance has been observed in various physical systems, such as atomic and molecular physics [2, 3], plasmonics [4, 5, 6, 7], metamaterials [4], and photonics [8]. Investigating Fano resonance, especially in quantum systems, is important for several reasons. First, Fano resonance reveals the underlying quantum interference mechanism that governs the interaction between discrete and continuous states [9]. Second, Fano resonance can be used to manipulate light-matter interactions at the nanoscale, and results in enhancing optical absorption, emission [10, 11], and scattering [7]. Third, Fano resonance enables novel applications in sensing [12, 13], lasing [10], switching [14, 15, 16, 17], and nonlinear and slow-light devices [18, 19]. Therefore, Fano resonance is a fundamental and versatile concept that has implications for both basic and applied physics [1, 4, 8].

Surface acoustic waves (SAWs), generated through piezoelectric acousto-electric transducers like interdigital transducers (IDTs) and propagating along elastic materials such as piezoelectric crystals [20], can be used to create a one-dimensional waveguide for phonons. This waveguide can be coupled to a superconducting qubit, allowing for the controlled emission and absorption of phonons [21]. Compared to microwave photons, waveguide quantum electrodynamics (QED) with SAWs present several advantageous features. The significantly reduced propagation speeds of these waves, which are approximately five orders of magnitude slower than light, provide an extended interaction time frame, prolonged decoherence periods, and minimal losses within the GHz frequency range when interacting with quantum systems [22, 23]. These characteristics offer enriched opportunities for precise manipulation and control of quantum states [24]. Additionally, the shorter SAW-phonon wavelength at equivalent frequencies to microwave photons, resulting in smaller acoustic mode volumes, allows for enhanced acoustic coupling to superconducting qubits compared to electrical coupling [25, 26]. Collectively, these features position SAWs as a promising alternative to microwave photons, with significant potential for quantum sensing [27], quantum information processing [28], communication [24], and overall advancements in quantum devices [29].

The integration of Fano resonance with SAWs has garnered considerable interest in recent years, owing to its prospective applications across a multitude of fields including, but not limited to, coupled resonators [30], topological systems [12], quantum devices [31], metasurfaces [32, 33], and phonon laser [34]. This synergy between Fano resonance and SAWs paves the way for novel functionalities and unattainable performance enhancements when either phenomenon operates in isolation. Such advancements include improving the sensitivity [30] and robustness [12] of SAW-based sensors, overcoming the narrow bandwidth constraints of Fano resonance [31], managing potential interactions between hypersound and charge carriers [35], and manipulating the transmission and reflection coefficients of acoustic waves [32, 36].

However, the existing body of work primarily concentrates on the demonstration of a single Fano resonance, leaving the study of periodic Fano resonance features in SAWs comparatively unexplored. The ability to control the periodic Fano resonance of quantum acoustics is an area of research that has not been extensively investigated. Within this context, we propose a system incorporating a "giant atom" jointly coupled to a microwave and an acoustic wave waveguide. This configuration unveils the periodic Fano resonance features in the surface acoustic wave (SAW) scattering spectra and suggests a methodology for controlling and fine-tuning these resonances. In section 2, we first introduce our model Hamiltonian and lay out the theoretical foundation for determining the scattering spectra for both microwave and SAW. Subsequently, in section 3, we present our analytical findings and discuss the behavior of periodic Fano resonances within the scattering spectra, employing Taylor series expansion. Moreover, leveraging the analytical Fano parameter, we delve into the impact of varying parameters such as intrinsic time delay and coupling strength on the periodic Fano resonances. This investigation underscores the ability to control the acoustic Fano characteristics within the scattering spectra.

2 Models and methods

2.1 Model Hamiltonian

Here, we consider a superconducting qubit, which functions as a "giant" two-level atom (a). This qubit is simultaneously connected to a superconducting transmission line for microwave photon conveyance and the IDTs for propagating SAW generated on a piezoelectric substrate through the piezoelectric effect, as depicted in Fig. 1. The total (T) Hamiltonian in our model, therefore, can be characterized as

HT=Ha+Hm+Hs+Ham+Has.\displaystyle H_{\text{T}}=H_{\text{a}}+H_{\text{m}}+H_{\text{s}}+H_{\text{am}}+H_{\text{as}}. (1)

The Hamiltonian, which describes the giant two-level atom with the bare frequency (ωe2.3\omega_{e}\approx 2.3 (GHz) [22]) of the superconducting qubit’s excited state, is denoted as

Ha=ωeσgeσge,\displaystyle H_{\text{a}}=\hbar\omega_{e}\sigma_{ge}^{\dagger}\sigma_{ge}, (2)

where σge=|ge|\sigma_{ge}=|g\rangle\langle e| (σge=|eg|\sigma_{ge}^{\dagger}=|e\rangle\langle g|) with |e|e\rangle (|g|g\rangle) being the excited (ground) state. The propagation of microwave (m) photons on the superconducting transmission line can be described by the model Hamiltonian [37, 38, 39]

Hm=α=r,lωmaαωmaαωm𝑑ωm,\displaystyle H_{\text{m}}=\hbar\sum_{\alpha=\text{r},\text{l}}\int\omega_{\text{m}}a^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}a_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}d\omega_{\text{m}}, (3)

where aαωm(aαωm)a^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega{\text{m}}}(a_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}) represents the creation (annihilation) of right-(α=r\alpha=\text{r}) or left-(α=l\alpha=\text{l}) propagating microwave photons, with frequency ωm\omega_{\text{m}}. The interaction between the superconducting qubit and the propagating microwave photon, with the coupling strength gmg_{\text{m}}, is given by [40, 37, 41, 42]:

Ham=α=r,lgm[aαωmσge+H.c.]𝑑ωm,\displaystyle H_{\text{am}}=\hbar\sum_{\alpha=\text{r},\text{l}}\int g_{\text{m}}\Big{[}a^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}\sigma_{ge}+\text{H.c.}\Big{]}d\omega_{\text{m}}, (4)

where H.c. denotes the Hermitian conjugate. Meanwhile, the propagating SAW (s), described by the piezoelectric transmission line Hamiltonian

Hs=α=r,lωsbαωsbαωs𝑑ωs,\displaystyle H_{\text{s}}=\hbar\sum_{\alpha=\text{r},\text{l}}\int\omega_{\text{s}}b^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}b_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}d\omega_{\text{s}}, (5)

is capacitively coupled to the superconducting qubit through the interaction Hamiltonian [43, 22]

Has=α=r,lgs[ϕsbαωsσge+H.c.]𝑑ωm,\displaystyle H_{\text{as}}=\hbar\sum_{\alpha=\text{r},\text{l}}\int g_{\text{s}}\Big{[}\phi_{\text{s}}b^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}\sigma_{ge}+\text{H.c.}\Big{]}d\omega_{\text{m}}, (6)

where bαωs(bαωs)b^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega{\text{s}}}(b_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}) piezoelectrically creates (annihilate) right-(α=r\alpha=\text{r}) or left-(α=l\alpha=\text{l}) propagating SAW with frequency ωs\omega_{\text{s}}. Since SAWs propagate slower than microwave photons, their wavelength (λs)(\lambda_{s}) is relatively small, comparable to, or even a few times smaller than the distance (L) between the two coupling points on the IDTs. This smaller wavelength introduces a significant intrinsic time delay, which is defined as ϕs=eiksL/2+eiksL/2\phi_{\text{s}}=e^{ik_{s}L/2}+e^{-ik_{s}L/2}. In this equation, the wave vector of the SAW (ksk_{s}) is given by ωs/vg=2π/λs\omega_{\text{s}}/v_{\text{g}}=2\pi/\lambda_{s}, where vgv_{\text{g}} is the traveling velocity of the SAW on the piezoelectric substrate. Because of this relationship, the superconducting qubit can act as a “giant atom” during its interaction with SAW.

2.2 Scattering spectrum within the framework of a single-excitation process

In this investigation, we delve into the complex dynamics of a giant atom specifically in the weak coupling regime, where γm,γsωe\gamma_{\text{m}},\gamma_{\text{s}}\ll\omega_{e}. Within this regime, we can make use of the rotating wave approximation and the single-excitation approximation. These approximations allow us to simplify the system and make it analytically tractable. Thus, the total state of our quantum system, composed of the giant atom, microwave, and the SAW field, can be represented as [40, 37, 43]

|ψ(t)=α=l,r\displaystyle|\psi(t)\rangle=\sum_{\alpha=\text{l},\text{r}} [𝑑ωmcαωm(t)aαωm+𝑑ωscαωs(t)bαωs]|g,0αωm,0αωs\displaystyle\Big{[}\int d\omega_{\text{m}}c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}(t)a^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}+\int d\omega_{\text{s}}c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}(t)b^{\dagger}_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}\Big{]}|g,0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}},0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}\rangle (7)
+e(t)|e,0αωm,0αωs,\displaystyle+e(t)|e,0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}},0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}\rangle,

where cαωm(t)c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}(t), cαωs(t)c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}(t), and e(t)e(t) represent the probability amplitudes of the propagating microwave photon, SAW phonon, and the excited state, respectively. For the left-orientated (α=l\alpha=\text{l}) states, these represent the Fock state of microwave photon |g,1lωm,0αωs|g,1_{\text{l}\omega_{\text{m}}},0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}\rangle and the SAW phonon |g,0αωm,1lωs|g,0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}},1_{\text{l}\omega_{\text{s}}}\rangle. Similarly, for the right-orientated (α=r\alpha=\text{r}) states, they represent the Fock state of microwave photon |g,1rωm,0αωs|g,1_{\text{r}\omega_{\text{m}}},0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}\rangle and the SAW phonon |g,0αωm,1lωs|g,0_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}},1_{\text{l}\omega_{\text{s}}}\rangle. By solving the Schrödinger equation HT|ψ(t)=it|ψ(t)H_{\text{T}}|\psi(t)\rangle=i\hbar\partial_{t}|\psi(t)\rangle, one can obtain the system’s equations of motion [43]. We first examine the long-time behavior of the quantum system, i.e., tt\to\infty. This approach is particularly advantageous for experimental accessibility, especially when detecting the reflected and transmitted microwave photons as well as SAW phonons. The initial condition presumes the injection of a singular microwave photon into the transmission line, such that cαωm(0)=1c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{m}}}(0)=1 and cαωs(0)=0c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}(0)=0. Consequently, the IDT generates a SAW. Therefore, we are able to ascertain the transmission (TT) and reflection (RR) spectra for both microwave photon (m) and SAW phonon (s) in the long-time limit

Rm=limt|clωm(t)|2=γm2|γm+(1+eiωmtL)γsi(ωmωe)|2,\displaystyle R_{\text{m}}=\lim_{t\to\infty}|c_{\text{l}\omega_{\text{m}}}(t)|^{2}=\frac{\gamma_{\text{m}}^{2}}{\left|\gamma_{\text{m}}+\left(1+e^{i\omega_{\text{m}}t_{L}}\right)\gamma_{\text{s}}-i\left(\omega_{\text{m}}-\omega_{e}\right)\right|{}^{2}}, (8)
Rs=Ts=limt|cαωs(t)|2=γmγs[cos(ωstL)+1]|γm+(1+eiωstL)γsi(ωsωe)|2,\displaystyle R_{\text{s}}=T_{\text{s}}=\lim_{t\to\infty}|c_{\alpha\omega_{\text{s}}}(t)|^{2}=\frac{\gamma_{\text{m}}\gamma_{\text{s}}\left[\cos(\omega_{\text{s}}t_{L})+1\right]}{\left|\gamma_{\text{m}}+\left(1+e^{i\omega_{\text{s}}t_{L}}\right)\gamma_{\text{s}}-i\left(\omega_{\text{s}}-\omega_{\text{e}}\right)\right|{}^{2}}, (9)
Tm=1Rm2Rs.\displaystyle T_{\text{m}}=1-R_{\text{m}}-2R_{\text{s}}. (10)
Refer to caption
Figure 1: The proposed system designed to produce periodic Fano resonance in quantum SAW. It comprises a microwave waveguide (upper black transmission line) interfaced with a superconducting qubit. The latter is modeled as a two-level system with states |e|e\rangle and |g|g\rangle, effectively serving as a giant atom. This giant atom setup is achieved by bifurcating the IDT (red and green interdigitated finger structure) into two electrically linked coupling points (with the left point positioned at x=L/2x=-L/2 and the right one at x=L/2x=L/2), separated by distance LL. Interaction between the incident microwave photon and the superconducting qubit induces transitions in the giant atom, causing SAW phonon scattering through the IDT and propagating in both left (RsR_{\text{s}}) and right (TsT_{\text{s}}) directions along the piezoelectric substrate. Concurrently, the incident microwaves are reflected (Rm)(R_{\text{m}}) and transmitted (Tm)(T_{\text{m}}).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Analytical analysis for the periodic Fano resonances

When we initially introduce the microwave photon into the microwave waveguide, the scattering spectrum, specifically RmR_{\text{m}}, discloses the periodic peaks that follow a Lorentzian distribution as illustrated in Fig. 2 (a). To analytically dissect the emergence of these periodic Lorentzian peaks, we resort to a Taylor or Padé approximation [44, 45] of the exponential function or trigonometric function. In this context, a second-order Taylor expansion is more fitting to delineate this characteristic periodicity. Hence, we have eiωtL12tL2(ωωn)2itL(ωωn)1e^{i\omega t_{L}}\approx\frac{1}{2}t_{L}^{2}(\omega-\omega_{n}){}^{2}-it_{L}(\omega-\omega_{n})-1, where ωn=2π(n+1)/tL\omega_{n}=2\pi(n+1)/t_{L} denotes the nn-th periodic frequency that triggers the destructive interference of the SAW with the regulated time delay tL=L/vgst_{L}=L/v_{\text{gs}}. Here, vgsv_{\text{gs}} stands for the group velocity of the SAW. Incorporating this Taylor expansion into Eq.(8), we can derive the analytical Lorentzian form of Rm(n)R_{\text{m}}(n) at the nn-th periodic frequency, which aligns well with the Lorentzian peaks of RmR_{\text{m}} as shown in Fig.2(a). It’s given by the following equation

Rm(n)=ImΓn(ωωeff,n)+2Γn2,\displaystyle R_{\text{m}}(n)=I_{\text{m}}\frac{\Gamma_{n}}{\left(\omega-\omega_{\text{eff},n}\right){}^{2}+\Gamma_{n}^{2}}, (11)

where ImI_{\text{m}}, Γn\Gamma_{n}, and ωeff,n\omega_{\text{eff},n} represent the intensity of the nn-th Lorentz-type peak, nn-th resonance width, and effective frequency of the nn-th resonance peak, respectively. It should be noted that the width of the peak, denoted as Γn\Gamma_{n} [also known as the full width at half maximum (FWHM)], can be manipulated by adjusting both the intrinsic time delay tLt_{L} and the coupling strengths (γm(\gamma_{\text{m}},γs)\gamma_{\text{s}}). This width is determined by the parameters η\eta and ηn\eta_{n}

Γn=ηnη,\displaystyle\Gamma_{n}=\frac{\eta_{n}}{\eta}, (12)

where η=2γmγstL2+2(γstL+1)2\eta=2\gamma_{\text{m}}\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}^{2}+2\left(\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}+1\right){}^{2} and ηn=2γm[2γstL2(ωeωn)+2γmη]\eta_{n}=\sqrt{2\gamma_{\text{m}}\left[2\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}^{2}\left(\omega_{e}-\omega_{n}\right){}^{2}+\gamma_{\text{m}}\eta\right]}. The intensity of the reflection spectrum of the microwave photon is characterized by ImI_{\text{m}}, given by:

Im=2γm2ηn,\displaystyle I_{\text{m}}=\frac{2\gamma_{\text{m}}^{2}}{\eta_{n}}, (13)

where increasing γm\gamma_{\text{m}} enhances the strength of the spectrum. However, increasing γs\gamma_{\text{s}} has the opposite effect, reducing the intensity. This reduction occurs because an increase in γs\gamma_{\text{s}} results in the partial transfer of energy from the microwave photon to the SAW phonon through the IDT, as depicted in Fig. 2(c). The effective resonance frequency ωeff,n\omega_{\text{eff},n}, encoded as ωn\omega_{n}, exhibits periodicity, reflecting the periodic nature of the resonance in the spectrum

ωeff,n=ωn+2η(ωeωn)(γstL+1).\displaystyle\omega_{\text{eff},n}=\omega_{n}+\frac{2}{\eta}\left(\omega_{e}-\omega_{n}\right)\left(\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}+1\right). (14)
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The scattering (reflectance) spectra of microwave and SAW. (a) The reflection probability RR (black-solid curve) of (a) microwave (m) and (b) SAW (s) as functions of microwave and SAW field frequency (ω\omega). The red and green dashed curves display the Taylor approximation of the reflection probabilities at n=57n=57 and n=58n=58, closely aligning with the periodic Lorentzian-like lineshape RmR_{\text{m}} and Fano-like lineshape RsR_{\text{s}}. The red dashed curve, with a resonant frequency near ωe\omega_{e}, exhibits a closer alignment with the exact reflection probability. An overview of the intensities, with (c) representing ImI_{\text{m}} and (d) representing Ds2D_{\text{s}^{2}}, are plotted against the coupling strengths γm\gamma_{\text{m}} (red solid line) and γs\gamma_{\text{s}} (blue solid line). (e) The resonance width (Γn\Gamma_{n}) variation with respect to the time delay tLt_{L}. (f) The density plot of Γn\Gamma_{n} against γm\gamma_{\text{m}} and γs\gamma_{\text{s}}

Crucially, upon scrutinizing the scattering spectra of the SAW, generated via the IDT coupling to the giant atom, we discern a fascinating feature, specifically, the manifestation of periodic Fano resonances as depicted in Fig. 2(b). Proceeding with the same methodology to decompose RsR_{\text{s}} via a second-order Taylor expansion, the RsR_{\text{s}} associated with the nn-th Fano profile can be expressed as

Rs(n)=Ds2(Ωs+q)2Ωs2+1.\displaystyle R_{\text{s}}(n)=D_{\text{s}}^{2}\frac{\left(\Omega_{\text{s}}+q\right){}^{2}}{\Omega_{\text{s}}^{2}+1}. (15)

In this equation, Ωs\Omega_{\text{s}} and qq symbolize the reduced frequency normalized by the resonance width Γn\Gamma_{n}

Ωs=ωωeff,nΓn,\displaystyle\Omega_{\text{s}}=\frac{\omega-\omega_{\text{eff},n}}{\Gamma_{n}}, (16)

and the Fano parameter, respectively

q=2ηn(ωeωn)(γstL+1).\displaystyle q=\frac{2}{\eta_{n}}\left(\omega_{e}-\omega_{n}\right)\left(\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}+1\right). (17)

The latter captures the degree of asymmetry present in the Fano resonance.

The overall intensity of the spectra, encompassing the Fano profiles, can be expressed as

Ds2=γmγstL2η,\displaystyle D_{\text{s}}^{2}=\frac{\gamma_{\text{m}}\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}^{2}}{\eta}, (18)

This can be amplified by increasing γm\gamma_{\text{m}}. However, the increase in γs\gamma_{\text{s}} gradually reduces the intensity due to the even redistribution of the intensity across each periodic Fano profile, as illustrated in Fig. 2 (d). It should be noted that the Fano resonance in RsR_{\text{s}} can be more precisely characterized by Rs(n)R_{\text{s}}(n) when the defined nn-th Fano resonance approaches ωe\omega_{e}. Simultaneously, the resonance width (Γn\Gamma_{n}) can be modulated by variously designed tLt_{L} and the alterations in coupling strengths.

As we extend LL and consequently enlarge tLt_{L}, the intensity of the scattering spectra experiences substantial alterations corresponding to the variations in the frequency of the SAW, in accordance with Eq.(9). This leads to a decreased resonance width (Γn\Gamma_{n}), as illustrated in Fig.2(e). Interestingly, increasing γm\gamma_{\text{m}} enlarges Γn\Gamma_{n}. In contrast, an increment in γs\gamma_{\text{s}} decreases Γn\Gamma_{n}, since Γn\Gamma_{n} is effectively proportional to γm\sqrt{\gamma_{\text{m}}}, but inversely proportional to γs\gamma_{\text{s}}, according to Eq.(12), as shown in Fig.2(f).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a) The variations of the Fano parameter qq with time delay tLt_{L}. (b) Extracting the shorter tLt_{L} regime for periodic qq where RsR_{\text{s}} transitions through Fano, quasi-Lorentz, and back to Fano profiles with respect to tLt_{L} resulting in q=1,n=50q=-1,n=50 (red circles), q=0,n=51q=0,n=51 (blue circles), and q=1,n=52q=1,n=52 (green circles). (c) Extracting the longer tLt_{L} regime for qq with RsR_{\text{s}} reveals sharper quasi-Lorentz and Fano profiles when tLt_{L} is respectively tuned to yield q=0,n=118q=0,n=118 (blue circles) and q=0.8,n=119q=0.8,n=119 (green circles).

3.2 Tunable control of the periodic Fano resonances

The Fano parameter qq, also known as the Fano asymmetry factor, is a dimensionless quantity that characterizes the shape of a resonance profile in quantum systems. It arises from the interference between a discrete state and a continuum of states, and it can vary from zero (quasi-Lorentzian profile) to infinity (Lorentzian profile) [46, 47, 34]. The ability to control the Fano parameter is important for various applications in fundamental quantum processes, quantum sensing, and improved spectroscopic measurements with enhanced sensitivity as well as selectivity, as it can affect the transmission, reflection, absorption, and emission properties of quantum systems [8, 48].

3.2.1 Effects of the time delay variations on Fano resonances properties

In this part of our study, we aim to control the Fano resonance of the quantum SAW by adjusting the Fano parameter. The time delay tLt_{L}, which can be expressed as L/vgsL/v_{\text{gs}}, plays a crucial role in inducing the interference effect. This interference arises from the possibility that a phonon emitted into the acoustic waveguide at one coupling point of the qubit, due to spontaneous decay, may later be reabsorbed by the qubit at the second coupling point, which is separated by a distance LL from the first coupling point. With this understanding, we concentrate on adjusting the Fano profile of the SAW by varying tLt_{L}. By manipulating tLt_{L}, we effectively modify the Fano parameter qq, thus allowing for control over the Fano resonance characteristics exhibited by the SAW. By setting parameters to realistic values such as γm/2π=0.01GHz,γs/2π=0.038GHz\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi=0.01\text{GHz},\gamma_{\text{s}}/2\pi=0.038\text{GHz}, we observe that as tLt_{L} ranges from small to large values, the Fano parameter qq demonstrates periodic fluctuations with the ωn\omega_{n} close to ωe\omega_{e}, as illustrated in Fig. 3 (a).

This periodicity of qq in relation to certain parameters is also shown across a wide range of systems where q=cotδq=\cot\delta, with δ\delta symbolizing the phase shift [1]. Interestingly, in our system, we note that the Fano parameter qq displays larger amplitude periodic variations for smaller tLt_{L}, and the amplitude of these variations decreases as tLt_{L} increases. We specifically focus on the case with smaller tLt_{L}. As depicted in Fig. 3(b), the Fano parameter qq experiences periodic variations roughly between -1 and 1. Therefore, by adjusting tLt_{L}, we can manipulate the value of qq. For example, we can set tLt_{L} to achieve q=1q=1 or q=1q=-1, which follows the equation with Δep=ωeωn\Delta_{\text{ep}}=\omega_{e}-\omega_{n}

Δep2(η4tL2γmγs)=ηγm2,\displaystyle\Delta_{\text{ep}}^{2}\left(\eta-4t_{L}^{2}\gamma_{\text{m}}\gamma_{\text{s}}\right)=\eta\gamma_{\text{m}}^{2}, (19)

where the most prominent Fano resonances in the scattering spectrum are observed. The difference between q=1q=1 and q=1q=-1 simply results in a mirror reflection of the Fano profile shape. Adjusting tLt_{L} to achieve q=0q=0 by fulfilling the condition,

Δep=0,\displaystyle\Delta_{\text{ep}}=0, (20)

we clearly observe a dip in the scattering spectra near the giant atom’s resonance frequency ωe\omega_{e}. This dip is similar to the phenomenon described in other works [8], where the system’s interaction with discrete energy can be significantly suppressed, thereby rendering this giant atom as an invisible discrete state in such instances.

As we increase tLt_{L}, we observe a decrease in the amplitude of the periodic variation of the Fano parameter qq, ranging roughly from 0.8 to -0.8. Taking the derivative of qq with respect to tLt_{L}, or T(q)=0\partial_{T}(q)=0, one can ascertain the maximum absolute value of qq, denoted as qmax=max|q|q_{\max}=\max|q|, by satisfying the following relationship:

TΔepγmγs(Δep2+γm2)=0.\displaystyle T\Delta_{\text{ep}}\gamma_{\text{m}}\gamma_{\text{s}}\left(\Delta_{\text{ep}}^{2}+\gamma_{\text{m}}^{2}\right)=0. (21)

Despite |qmax|<1|q_{\max}|<1 (approximately 0.8), distinct Fano resonances in the scattering spectrum are still observable as shown in Fig. 3(c). Similarly, even when q=0q=0, narrower dips within the spectrum are still discernible. These observations underscore the fact that we can indeed manipulate the characteristics of Fano resonances within the scattering spectra by adjusting the dimension of LL and the corresponding tLt_{L}.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) The variations in the width of the Fano resonances Δωres\Delta\omega_{\text{res}}, near the resonant frequency ωe\omega_{e}, as a function of the time delay tLt_{L}. The inset illustrates the definition of the width of the Fano resonance. (b) A compression of Fano peaks (black-solid curve) is observed with an increase in time delay from T=20T=20 (ns) to T=50T=50 (ns), corresponding to a decrease in Δω\Delta\omega. These near-resonant Fano peaks align well with Rs(n)R_{\text{s}}(n) (red dashed) for n values ranging from 46 to 114.

Besides the Fano parameter qq, the width of the Fano resonance plays a crucial role in various applications, such as quantum switches and sensing. In the case of a quantum switch, a sharp Fano resonance with a narrow width is desirable as it allows for a significant change in transmission within a small range of wavelengths. This enables efficient operation of the switch with minimal energy consumption, as the state of the switch can be toggled by making small adjustments in the input wavelength [49, 14, 15, 50]. Similarly, a narrow width of the Fano resonance is preferred for sensing applications, as it not only enhances sensitivity but also improves the figure of merit [51]. Therefore, it is important to understand how to manipulate the width of the Fano resonance by tuning the system’s parameters.

In addition to analyzing the variation of qq associated with Fano resonances, we can also manipulate the width of Fano resonances by adjusting tLt_{L}. Here, we characterize the Fano width (Δω\Delta\omega) as the frequency disparity between the peak and the dip within the Fano resonance, as shown in the inset of Fig. 4(a). The frequencies where the periodic dips occur can be denoted by ωn\omega_{n}. The frequency corresponding to the periodic peak in the Fano profile, which approaches ωe\omega_{e}, can be identified by setting ω[Rm(n)]=0\partial_{\omega}[R_{\text{m}}(n)]=0. Consequently, we can analytically derive the Fano width

Δω=Δep2+γm2Δep(γstL+1).\displaystyle\Delta\omega=\frac{\Delta_{\text{ep}}^{2}+\gamma_{\text{m}}^{2}}{\Delta_{\text{ep}}\left(\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L}+1\right)}. (22)

Our analysis of the results in Fig.4(a) reveals a periodic behavior in Δω\Delta\omega with the variation of tLt_{L}. To accurately calculate Δω\Delta\omega of the Fano profile as a function of tLt_{L}, we adopt a two-step approach. If qmax>1q_{\max}>1, we first identify specific values of tLt_{L} that yield |q|=1|q|=1, using Eq.(19). These values of tLt_{L} are then incorporated into Eq.(22) to derive Δω\Delta\omega. Alternatively, if qmax<1q_{\max}<1, we directly utilize the tLt_{L} value corresponding to qmaxq_{\max} derived from Eq.(21), and substitute it into Eq. (22) to compute Δω\Delta\omega.

As we increase tLt_{L}, we observe a gradual decrease in Δω\Delta\omega, exhibiting a trend paralleling that shown in Fig.2(e). Our findings suggest that increasing tLt_{L} not only alters the Fano parameter but also leads to a more pronounced change in the spectra with respect to the SAW frequency (ω\omega). This results in the formation of densely packed periodic Fano profiles in the scattering spectra, corroborating the earlier observation made in Fig.3(c). The progressive decrease in Δω\Delta\omega with the enhancement of tLt_{L} fosters the manifestation of more concentrated and distinct Fano resonances, as depicted in Fig. 4(b).

Refer to caption
Figure 5: (a) The density plot of the Fano parameter qq as a function of γs\gamma_{\text{s}} and γm\gamma_{\text{m}}. For a fixed γm/2π=0.01\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi=0.01 GHz, the Fano parameter remains relatively constant (black-dashed line for |q|1|q|\approx 1). When the microwave waveguide coupling strength is increased (with fixed γs/2π=0.038\gamma_{\text{s}}/2\pi=0.038 GHz), different profiles of RsR_{\text{s}} emerge: (b) Lorentz-like for γm/2π0.001\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi\approx 0.001 GHz (light blue circle), (c) Fano-like for γm/2π=0.01\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi=0.01 GHz (red circle), and (d) quasi-Lorentz for γm/2π0.05\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi\approx 0.05 GHz (white circle), with respective |q||q| values of 5, 1, and 0.2.

3.2.2 Effect of coupling strength on Fano features

Furthermore, it is necessary to iteratively restructure the device to design distinct tLt_{L} with their corresponding LL of the IDTs. This is crucial to manipulate the Fano resonance profile, which is not solely adjustable through tLt_{L}, but also through the variation of the coupling strength to influence qq. Initially, if we fix the γm\gamma_{\text{m}} and modify the γs\gamma_{\text{s}}, the Fano profiles show marginal variations due to the negligible change in qq, as displayed in Fig.5 (a). Interestingly, as we escalate γm\gamma_{\text{m}} from weak to strong coupling [specifically, from γm/2π=103\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi=10^{-3} to 5×1025\times 10^{-2} (GHz) with a fixed γm/2π=102\gamma_{\text{m}}/2\pi=10^{-2} (GHz)], we observe the transformations in the Fano profiles. They transit from the periodic Lorentz-like shapes to the asymmetric Fano-like shapes, ultimately evolving into periodic dips. These transformations correspond to the Fano parameter moving from |q|=5,|q|=1|q|=5,|q|=1 to |q|0.2|q|\approx 0.2 as depicted in Fig.5(b), (c), and (d), respectively. Notably, by employing γm[q]=0\partial_{\gamma_{\text{m}}}[q]=0, we can derive the analytical prerequisite of γmLor\gamma_{\text{m}}^{\text{Lor}} for attaining qmaxq_{\max}. This gives rise to the manifestation of a periodic Lorentz-like shape in the SAW scattering spectra, which can be expressed as

γmLor=fs143tL2Δep2fs02fs123Tfs0.\displaystyle\gamma_{\text{m}}^{\text{Lor}}=\frac{\sqrt{f_{\text{s1}}^{4}-3t_{L}^{2}\Delta_{\text{ep}}^{2}f_{\text{s0}}^{2}}-f_{\text{s1}}^{2}}{3Tf_{\text{s0}}}. (23)

Here, for the sake of simplicity, we define fs0=γstLf_{\text{s0}}=\gamma_{\text{s}}t_{L} and fs1=fs0+1f_{\text{s1}}=f_{\text{s0}}+1. Importantly, we can analytically determine the precise value of γmFan\gamma_{\text{m}}^{\text{Fan}} that is essential for the manifestation of a periodic Fano profile within the SAW scattering spectra. This determination is accomplished by resolving Eq. (19),

γsFan=16Tfs0{1+3ihs[fs143(TΔepfs0)2]+(13i)hs2fs12},\displaystyle\gamma_{\text{s}}^{\text{Fan}}=\frac{1}{6Tf_{\text{s0}}}\Big{\{}\frac{1+\sqrt{3}i}{h_{\text{s}}}\left[f_{\text{s1}}^{4}-3\left(T\Delta_{\text{ep}}f_{\text{s0}}\right)^{2}\right]+\left(1-\sqrt{3}i\right)h_{\text{s}}-2f_{\text{s1}}^{2}\Big{\}}, (24)

where hs=(3fs+gs+1)1/3h_{\text{s}}=(3\sqrt{f_{\text{s}}}+g_{\text{s}}+1)^{1/3} with the defined parameters fs=3(TΔepfs0)6+33(TΔepfs0fs1)43(TΔepfs0fs14)2f_{\text{s}}=3(T\Delta_{\text{ep}}f_{\text{s0}})^{6}+33(T\Delta_{\text{ep}}f_{\text{s0}}f_{\text{s1}})^{4}-3(T\Delta_{\text{ep}}f_{\text{s0}}f_{\text{s1}}^{4})^{2} and gs=fs06+6fs05+3(56tL2Δep2)(fs04+fs02)+4(59tL2Δep2)fs03+6fs0g_{\text{s}}=f_{\text{s0}}^{6}+6f_{\text{s0}}^{5}+3(5-6t_{L}^{2}\Delta_{\text{ep}}^{2})(f_{\text{s0}}^{4}+f_{\text{s0}}^{2})+4(5-9t_{L}^{2}\Delta_{\text{ep}}^{2})f_{\text{s0}}^{3}+6f_{\text{s0}}, for the sake of simplification. Nevertheless, as the value of γm\gamma_{\text{m}} continues to escalate, and given that q1/γm3tL2q\propto 1/\sqrt{\gamma_{\text{m}}^{3}t_{L}^{2}}, the parameter qq diminishes, yielding periodic dips within the SAW scattering spectrum. This enables us to modulate the periodic Fano characteristics of SAWs through strategic manipulation of the interaction between a superconducting qubit and the microwave waveguide.

4 Summary and conclusions

In summary, we present an innovative system for regulating periodic Fano resonances within quantum acoustic waves. This control is achieved through the strategic connection of a transducer to a “giant atom", itself coupled to a microwave waveguide. As an incident microwave photon traverses the waveguide, it incites transitions within the superconducting qubit. These transitions prompt the giant atom to produce a SAW phonon, which scatters via an IDT. This scattering process reveals distinct periodic Fano resonance characteristics within the SAW’s spectrum.

To gain a deeper analytical insight into these Fano resonance features, we employ the Taylor expansion approach. This method allows us to extract the Fano parameter, a key determinant in characterizing the form and properties of Fano resonances and signifying the interference occurring between the direct and indirect scattering pathways.

Our analytical exploration uncovers that these periodic Fano resonances emerge due to the additive interference effects invoked by the dual coupling points existing between the giant atom and the acoustic wave waveguide. This understanding grants us the capability to manipulate the Fano parameter by adjusting the spacing (LL) between these paired coupling points, which effectively changes the intrinsic time delay. By controlling the Fano parameter, we can govern the Fano profile, thereby inducing transitions between Fano and quasi-Lorentzian scattering properties, particularly in the vicinity of the resonance frequency of the giant atom’s transition. Additionally, we have also established a robust theoretical framework for accurately modeling and directing the spectral width of the Fano resonances by fine-tuning the intrinsic time delay.

Furthermore, our research exemplifies that the careful adjustment of the coupling strength with the microwave waveguide, in line with our analytical model, facilitates the modulation of the entire periodic Fano resonance features from Lorentz, Fano to quasi-Lorentz shapes, not just the near-resonant Fano resonances. This novel insight allows us to precisely control the scattering behaviors and transitions between distinct resonance profiles. Our study elucidates a potent avenue for the regulation and manipulation of Fano resonances in quantum acoustic wave systems. The ramifications of our findings could have far-reaching impacts, offering exciting prospects in the realm of quantum information processing, sensing, and communication.

\bmsection

Acknowledgments YNC acknowledges the support of the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (MOST Grants No. 111-2123-M-006-001). This work is supported partially by the National Center for Theoretical Sciences.

References

  • [1] A. E. Miroshnichenko, S. Flach, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Fano resonances in nanoscale structures,” \JournalTitleRev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2257–2298 (2010).
  • [2] T. A. Papadopoulos, I. M. Grace, and C. J. Lambert, “Control of electron transport through Fano resonances in molecular wires,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. B 74, 193306 (2006).
  • [3] P. Paliwal, A. Blech, C. P. Koch, and E. Narevicius, “Fano interference in quantum resonances from angle-resolved elastic scattering,” \JournalTitleNat. Commun 12 (2021).
  • [4] B. Luk'yanchuk, N. I. Zheludev, S. A. Maier, N. J. Halas, P. Nordlander, H. Giessen, and C. T. Chong, “The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials,” \JournalTitleNat. Mater 9, 707–715 (2010).
  • [5] W. Chen, G.-Y. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, “Controlling Fano resonance of nanowire surface plasmons,” \JournalTitleOpt. Lett. 36, 3602–3604 (2011).
  • [6] F. Shafiei, F. Monticone, K. Q. Le, X.-X. Liu, T. Hartsfield, A. Alù, and X. Li, “A subwavelength plasmonic metamolecule exhibiting magnetic-based optical Fano resonance,” \JournalTitleNature Nanotechnology 8, 95–99 (2013).
  • [7] P.-C. Kuo, G.-Y. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, “Scattering of nanowire surface plasmons coupled to quantum dots with azimuthal angle difference,” \JournalTitleSci. Rep. 6 (2016).
  • [8] M. F. Limonov, M. V. Rybin, A. N. Poddubny, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Fano resonances in photonics,” \JournalTitleNat. Photon. 11, 543–554 (2017).
  • [9] M. F. Limonov, “Fano resonance for applications,” \JournalTitleAdv. Opt. Photon. 13, 703–771 (2021).
  • [10] B. Zhen, S.-L. Chua, J. Lee, A. W. Rodriguez, X. Liang, S. G. Johnson, J. D. Joannopoulos, M. Soljačić, and O. Shapira, “Enabling enhanced emission and low-threshold lasing of organic molecules using special Fano resonances of macroscopic photonic crystals,” \JournalTitlePNAS 110, 13711–13716 (2013).
  • [11] J. Kröger, B. Doppagne, F. Scheurer, and G. Schull, “Fano description of single-hydrocarbon fluorescence excited by a scanning tunneling microscope,” \JournalTitleNano Lett. 18, 3407–3413 (2018).
  • [12] F. Zangeneh-Nejad and R. Fleury, “Topological Fano resonances,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Lett. 122, 014301 (2019).
  • [13] G.-Y. Chen, N. Lambert, Y.-A. Shih, M.-H. Liu, Y.-N. Chen, and F. Nori, “Plasmonic bio-sensing for the fenna-matthews-olson complex,” \JournalTitleSci. Rep. 7 (2017).
  • [14] L. Stern, M. Grajower, and U. Levy, “Fano resonances and all-optical switching in a resonantly coupled plasmonic–atomic system,” \JournalTitleNat. Commun. 5 (2014).
  • [15] N. Dabidian, I. Kholmanov, A. B. Khanikaev, K. Tatar, S. Trendafilov, S. H. Mousavi, C. Magnuson, R. S. Ruoff, and G. Shvets, “Electrical switching of infrared light using graphene integration with plasmonic Fano resonant metasurfaces,” \JournalTitleACS Photonics 2, 216–227 (2015).
  • [16] F. Wang, X. Wang, H. Zhou, Q. Zhou, Y. Hao, X. Jiang, M. Wang, and J. Yang, “Fano-resonance-based mach-zehnder optical switch employing dual-bus coupled ring resonator as two-beam interferometer,” \JournalTitleOpt. Express 17, 7708–7716 (2009).
  • [17] J.-D. Lin, C.-Y. Huang, N. Lambert, G.-Y. Chen, F. Nori, and Y.-N. Chen, “Space-time dual quantum zeno effect: Interferometric engineering of open quantum system dynamics,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Res. 4, 033143 (2022).
  • [18] S. Wang, T. Zhao, S. Yu, and W. Ma, “High-performance nano-sensing and slow-light applications based on tunable multiple Fano resonances and EIT-like effects in coupled plasmonic resonator system,” \JournalTitleIEEE Access 8, 40599–40611 (2020).
  • [19] C. Wu, A. B. Khanikaev, and G. Shvets, “Broadband slow light metamaterial based on a double-continuum Fano resonance,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107403 (2011).
  • [20] R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, “Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves,” \JournalTitleNat. Commun 8 (2017).
  • [21] M. Forsch, R. Stockill, A. Wallucks, I. Marinković, C. Gärtner, R. A. Norte, F. van Otten, A. Fiore, K. Srinivasan, and S. Gröblacher, “Microwave-to-optics conversion using a mechanical oscillator in its quantum ground state,” \JournalTitleNat. Phys 16, 69–74 (2019).
  • [22] G. Andersson, B. Suri, L. Guo, T. Aref, and P. Delsing, “Non-exponential decay of a giant artificial atom,” \JournalTitleNat. Phys. 15, 1123–1127 (2019).
  • [23] A. Bienfait, K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, É. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, and A. N. Cleland, “Phonon-mediated quantum state transfer and remote qubit entanglement,” \JournalTitleScience 364, 368–371 (2019).
  • [24] K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bienfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y. Cleland, C. R. Conner, É. Dumur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, “Quantum control of surface acoustic-wave phonons,” \JournalTitleNature 563, 661–665 (2018).
  • [25] Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits,” \JournalTitleScience 358, 199–202 (2017).
  • [26] P. Delsing, A. N. Cleland, M. J. A. Schuetz, J. Knörzer, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, K. Srinivasan, M. Wu, K. C. Balram, C. Bäuerle, T. Meunier, C. J. B. Ford, P. V. Santos, E. Cerda-Méndez, H. Wang, H. J. Krenner, E. D. S. Nysten, M. Weiß, G. R. Nash, L. Thevenard, C. Gourdon, P. Rovillain, M. Marangolo, J.-Y. Duquesne, G. Fischerauer, W. Ruile, A. Reiner, B. Paschke, D. Denysenko, D. Volkmer, A. Wixforth, H. Bruus, M. Wiklund, J. Reboud, J. M. Cooper, Y. Fu, M. S. Brugger, F. Rehfeldt, and C. Westerhausen, “The 2019 surface acoustic waves roadmap,” \JournalTitleJ. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 353001 (2019).
  • [27] N. McKibben, B. Ryel, J. Manzi, F. Muramutsa, J. Daw, H. Subbaraman, D. Estrada, and Z. Deng, “Aerosol jet printing of piezoelectric surface acoustic wave thermometer,” \JournalTitleMicrosyst. Nanoeng. 9 (2023).
  • [28] H. Byeon, K. Nasyedkin, J. R. Lane, N. R. Beysengulov, L. Zhang, R. Loloee, and J. Pollanen, “Piezoacoustics for precision control of electrons floating on helium,” \JournalTitleNat. Commun. 12 (2021).
  • [29] A. F. Kockum, “Electrical control of quantum acoustics,” \JournalTitleNat. Electron 5, 325–326 (2022).
  • [30] T. Lee, T. Nomura, X. Su, and H. Iizuka, “Fano-like acoustic resonance for subwavelength directional sensing: 0–360 degree measurement,” \JournalTitleAdvanced Science 7, 1903101 (2020).
  • [31] J. M. Kitzman, J. R. Lane, C. Undershute, N. R. Beysengulov, C. A. Mikolas, K. W. Murch, and J. Pollanen, “Surface acoustic wave Fano interference in the quantum regime,” (2023).
  • [32] Y. Jin, E. H. E. Boudouti, Y. Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, “Tunable Fano resonances of lamb modes in a pillared metasurface,” \JournalTitleJ. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 425304 (2017).
  • [33] Z.-x. Xu, B. Zheng, J. Yang, B. Liang, and J.-c. Cheng, “Machine-learning-assisted acoustic consecutive Fano resonances: Application to a tunable broadband low-frequency metasilencer,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Appl. 16, 044020 (2021).
  • [34] T.-T. Tang, Y. Zhang, C.-H. Park, B. Geng, C. Girit, Z. Hao, M. C. Martin, A. Zettl, M. F. Crommie, S. G. Louie, Y. R. Shen, and F. Wang, “A tunable phonon–exciton Fano system in bilayer graphene,” \JournalTitleNat. Nanotechnol 5, 32–36 (2009).
  • [35] T. Vasileiadis, H. Zhang, H. Wang, M. Bonn, G. Fytas, and B. Graczykowski, “Frequency-domain study of nonthermal gigahertz phonons reveals Fano coupling to charge carriers,” \JournalTitleSci. Adv. 6 (2020).
  • [36] S. E. Zaki, A. Mehaney, H. M. Hassanein, and A. H. Aly, “Fano resonance based defected 1D phononic crystal for highly sensitive gas sensing applications,” \JournalTitleSci. Rep. 10 (2020).
  • [37] D. E. Chang, A. S. Sørensen, E. A. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, “A single-photon transistor using nanoscale surface plasmons,” \JournalTitleNat. Phys. 3, 807–812 (2007).
  • [38] G.-T. Chen, P.-C. Kuo, H.-Y. Ku, G.-Y. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, “Probing higher-order transitions through scattering of microwave photons in the ultrastrong-coupling regime of circuit qed,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. A 98, 043803 (2018).
  • [39] C.-Y. Ju, M.-H. Chou, G.-Y. Chen, and Y.-N. Chen, “Optical quantum frequency filter based on generalized eigenstates,” \JournalTitleOpt. Express 28, 17868–17880 (2020).
  • [40] J.-T. Shen and S. Fan, “Coherent single photon transport in a one-dimensional waveguide coupled with superconducting quantum bits,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213001 (2005).
  • [41] G.-Y. Chen, M.-H. Liu, and Y.-N. Chen, “Scattering of microwave photons in superconducting transmission-line resonators coupled to charge qubits,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. A 89, 053802 (2014).
  • [42] N. Lambert, Y. Matsuzaki, K. Kakuyanagi, N. Ishida, S. Saito, and F. Nori, “Superradiance with an ensemble of superconducting flux qubits,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. B 94, 224510 (2016).
  • [43] L. Guo, A. Grimsmo, A. F. Kockum, M. Pletyukhov, and G. Johansson, “Giant acoustic atom: A single quantum system with a deterministic time delay,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. A 95, 053821 (2017).
  • [44] J. Hu, R.-X. Xu, and Y. Yan, “Communication: Padé spectrum decomposition of Fermi function and Bose function,” \JournalTitleThe Journal of Chemical Physics 133, 101106 (2010).
  • [45] M. Cirio, N. Lambert, P. Liang, P.-C. Kuo, Y.-N. Chen, P. Menczel, K. Funo, and F. Nori, “Pseudofermion method for the exact description of fermionic environments: From single-molecule electronics to the kondo resonance,” \JournalTitlePhys. Rev. Res. 5, 033011 (2023).
  • [46] Z.-L. Deng, N. Yogesh, X.-D. Chen, W.-J. Chen, J.-W. Dong, Z. Ouyang, and G. P. Wang, “Full controlling of Fano resonances in metal-slit superlattice,” \JournalTitleSci. Rep. 5 (2015).
  • [47] Álvaro Nodar, T. Neuman, Y. Zhang, J. Aizpurua, and R. Esteban, “Fano asymmetry in zero–detuned exciton–plasmon systems,” \JournalTitleOpt. Express 31, 10297–10319 (2023).
  • [48] J. Gollwitzer, L. Bocklage, R. Röhlsberger, and G. Meier, “Connecting Fano interference and the jaynes-cummings model in cavity magnonics,” \JournalTitleNpj Quantum Inf. 7 (2021).
  • [49] Y. Yu, M. Heuck, H. Hu, W. Xue, C. Peucheret, Y. Chen, L. K. Oxenløwe, K. Yvind, and J. Mørk, “Fano resonance control in a photonic crystal structure and its application to ultrafast switching,” \JournalTitleAppl. Phys. Lett. 105, 061117 (2014).
  • [50] M. V. Rybin, D. S. Filonov, P. A. Belov, Y. S. Kivshar, and M. F. Limonov, “Switching from visibility to invisibility via Fano resonances: Theory and experiment,” \JournalTitleSci. Rep. 5 (2015).
  • [51] K.-L. Lee, J.-B. Huang, J.-W. Chang, S.-H. Wu, and P.-K. Wei, “Ultrasensitive biosensors using enhanced Fano resonances in capped gold nanoslit arrays,” \JournalTitleSci. Rep. 5 (2015).