This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: narenderkhatri8@iitkgp.ac.inthanks: Corresponding author: psburada@phy.iitkgp.ac.in

Diffusion of chiral active particles in a Poiseuille flow

Narender Khatri Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur - 721302, India    P. S. Burada Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur - 721302, India
Abstract

We study the diffusive behavior of chiral active (self-propelled) Brownian particles in a two-dimensional microchannel with a Poiseuille flow. Using numerical simulations, we show that the behavior of the transport coefficients of particles, for example, the average velocity vv and the effective diffusion coefficient DeffD_{eff}, strongly depends on flow strength u0u_{0}, translational diffusion constant D0D_{0}, rotational diffusion rate DθD_{\theta}, and chirality of the active particles Ω\Omega. It is demonstrated that the particles can exhibit upstream drift, resulting in a negative vv, for the optimal parameter values of u0u_{0}, DθD_{\theta}, and Ω\Omega. Interestingly, the direction of vv can be controlled by tuning these parameters. We observe that for some optimal values of u0u_{0} and Ω\Omega, the chiral particles aggregate near a channel wall, and the corresponding DeffD_{eff} is enhanced. However, for the nonchiral particles (Ω=0\Omega=0), the DeffD_{eff} is suppressed by the presence of Poiseuille flow. It is expected that these findings have a great potential for developing microfluidic and lab-on-a-chip devices for separating the active particles.

I Introduction

During the past decades, the dynamics of self-propelled particles in the low Reynolds number regime have attracted a lot of interest from the biology and physics communities Ramaswamy_ARCMP ; Cates_RPP ; Ebeling_EPJST ; Lowen_RMP . Biological organisms, e.g., bacteria, sperm cells, ciliated microorganisms, etc., can swim independently without the need for external forces Brown_Nature ; Berg_Nature ; Goldstein_PRL ; Howard_Sc ; Woolley_Reproduction ; friedrich . The dynamics of these organisms occur at the low Reynolds number regime, i.e., the viscous force due to the surrounding fluid medium is dominant than the inertia that arises due to their mass purcell . These self-propelled particles employ different propulsion mechanisms to move in a fluid, e.g., ciliated microorganisms swim with the help of the metachronal waves generated by the synchronous beating of cilia lighthill ; blake , sperm cells swim with the help of flagella friedrich , and bacteria propel using a run and tumble mechanism patteson . Motivated by the motion of biological organisms, researchers developed artificial self-propelled particles, micro- and nanoparticles, to understand the collective behavior of the living microorganisms as well as to use them for technological applications Jiang_Book ; Muller_CR . However, the swimming mechanism of artificial self-propelled particles is different from that of real microorganisms. For example, the artificial particles consume energy from the external energy source and transform it under nonequilibrium conditions into directed motion Ramaswamy_ARCMP . Typically, these artificial self-propelled particles, e.g., Janus particles, consist of two distinct faces, out of which only one is chemically active Howse_PRL . Remarkably, because of their functional asymmetry, these particles can induce either concentration gradients (self-diffusiophoresis) by catalyzing a chemical reaction on their active surface Howse_PRL ; Paxton ; Gibbs_APL ; Volpe_SM or thermal gradients (self-thermophoresis) by inhomogeneous light absorption Sano_PRL . Note that the understanding of these artificial self-propelled particles can provide numerous promising applications in several fields, e.g., drug delivery through tissues, localize pollutants in soils, nonequilibrium self-assembly, etc. Weibel_PNAS ; Chin_Lab ; Yang_SM .

The diffusion of self-propelled particles in confined structures is of great interest Ghosh_PRL ; Ao_EPL ; Ai_PRE . When compared to passive Brownian particles, active particles diffusing in confined structures exhibit peculiar features, resulting for example, in spontaneous rectification Ghosh_PRL ; Ai_PRE ; Angelani_PRL , phase separation of particles Speck_PRL ; Fily_PRL , collective motion in complex systems Vicsek_PR ; Vicsek_Nature , spiral vortex formation in circular confinement Dunkel_PRL , depletion of elongated particles from low-shear regions Stocker_Nature , trapping of particles in microwedge Kaiser_PRL , and many more. Note that the behavior of active particles in microchannels with a Poiseuille flow has been investigated both experimentally Hill_et_al@PRL:2007 ; Kaya_Koser ; Kantsler_et_al@Elife:2014 ; Jing_et_al@SA:2020 and theoretically Jing_et_al@SA:2020 ; Zottl_Stark@PRL:2012 ; Ezhilan_Saintillan@JFM:2015 ; Vennamneni_et_al@JFM:2020 ; Costanzo_JPCM ; Nash_PRL ; Stark_EPJE ; Stark_EPJSP ; Shendruk_PRL ; Peng_PRF ; Chilukuri_PF , reporting the upstream flow of particles. Thus, the upstream flow is ubiquitous to active particles in a Poiseuille flow. Ezhilan and Saintillan Ezhilan_Saintillan@JFM:2015 studied the effect of Poiseuille flow on the transport of nonchiral slender active Brownian particles. Using numerical and asymptotic solutions to the Smoluchowski equation, they systematically investigated the distribution of particles in the channel and predicted net upstream flow. On the other hand, Peng and Brady Peng_PRF formulated the transport of nonchiral active Brownian particles in a Poiseuille flow from a continuum perspective using the Smoluchowski equation. Using different numerical methods, they calculated the transport properties, i.e., the average velocity and effective diffusion coefficient, and particles distribution in the channel from an effective advection-diffusion equation. Recently, Jing et al. Jing_et_al@SA:2020 studied the chirality-induced bacterial rheotaxis in a Poiseuille flow using a combined experimental, numerical, and theoretical analysis. They systematically investigated the average rheotactic velocity, velocity distribution, and orientation distribution of E. coli bacteria in a channel flow. However, the transport properties and distribution of chiral active Brownian particles in a channel with the Poiseuille flow are not fully understood and quantitatively scrutinized, which have a great potential in designing microfluidic and lab-on-a-chip devices to control and separate the self-propelled particles.

In this article, we numerically study the transport properties and distribution of chiral active Brownian particles in a channel with the Poiseuille flow. For example, the average particle velocity and effective diffusion coefficient, of both nonchiral and chiral self-propelled particles in a two-dimensional microchannel flow. The flow profile is prescribed by a Poiseuille flow, and the collisional dynamics of the particles at the channel walls are modeled by sliding reflecting boundary conditions. We focus on finding how the self-propulsion mechanism and strength of the fluid flow influence the transport characteristics in this microchannel flow. The rest of this article is organized as follows. In section -II, we introduce the model for the self-propelled particles in a two-dimensional microchannel with a Poiseuille flow. The transport characteristics for both the nonchiral and chiral particles are investigated in section -III and section -IV, respectively. Finally, we present the main conclusions in section -V.

II Model

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the active Brownian particle in a two-dimensional microchannel with a Poiseuille flow us(y)u_{s}(y). The self-propelled velocity v0v_{0}, self-propelled angle θ\theta, angular velocity Ω\Omega, local shear rate ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y), and width of the channel yLy_{L} are indicated. The sliding reflecting boundary conditions at the channel walls assure the confinement of self-propelled particle inside the channel.

We consider active Brownian particles suspended in a two-dimensional microchannel where a Poiseuille flow is imposed (see Fig. 1). The particle possesses an orientational degree of freedom characterized by an unit vector n^=(cosθ,sinθ)\hat{n}=(\cos\theta,\sin\theta), where θ\theta is the angle relative to the xx-axis. This particle self-propels along its orientation with the self-propelled velocity v0=v0n^\vec{v}_{0}=v_{0}\hat{n} with constant modulus v0v_{0}. If this particle is chiral, θ\theta is subjected to a rotation with angular velocity Ω\Omega as a consequence of torque acting on the particle Lowen_RMP ; Volpe_AJP . Additionally, the two-dimensional Poiseuille flow us(y)u_{s}(y) directed along the xx-axis with a shear gradient along the yy-axis affects the dynamics of this particle by forcing its self-propulsion velocity to rotate under the action of the local shear rate ωs(y)=(1/2)dus(y)/dy\omega_{s}(y)=-(1/2)du_{s}(y)/dy. In the overdamped limit, the equation of motion of the particle reads Hagen_PRE :

dxdt\displaystyle\frac{dx}{dt} =us(y)+v0cosθ+2D0ξx(t),\displaystyle=u_{s}(y)+v_{0}\cos\theta+\sqrt{2D_{0}}~{}\xi_{x}(t), (1a)
dydt\displaystyle\frac{dy}{dt} =v0sinθ+2D0ξy(t),\displaystyle=v_{0}\sin\theta+\sqrt{2D_{0}}~{}\xi_{y}(t), (1b)
dθdt\displaystyle\frac{d\theta}{dt} =ωs(y)+Ω+2Dθξθ(t),\displaystyle=\omega_{s}(y)+\Omega+\sqrt{2D_{\theta}}~{}\xi_{\theta}(t), (1c)

where r=(x,y)\vec{r}=(x,y) is the position of the particle, and D0D_{0} and DθD_{\theta} are the translational and rotational diffusion constants, respectively. ξx(t)\xi_{x}(t), ξy(t)\xi_{y}(t), and ξθ(t)\xi_{\theta}(t) are the Gaussian white noises satisfying ξi(t)=0\langle\xi_{i}(t)\rangle=0 and ξi(t)ξj(t)=δi,jδ(tt)\langle\xi_{i}(t)\xi_{j}(t^{\prime})\rangle=\delta_{i,j}\delta(t-t^{\prime}) for i,j=x,y,θi,j=x,y,\theta. Note that the direction of the particle randomly varies with the time scale τθ=2/Dθ\tau_{\theta}=2/D_{\theta}. Accordingly, the trajectory of the particle approximately combines the self-propulsion length lθ=v0τθl_{\theta}=v_{0}\tau_{\theta} and a circular arc of radius RΩ=v0/|Ω|R_{\Omega}=v_{0}/|\Omega| Lowen_RMP ; Teeffelen_PRE .

The two-dimensional microchannel is described by two parallel walls with a separation distance yLy_{L}, see Fig. 1. For the Poiseuille flow between the channel walls, the flow velocity is prescribed as

us(y)=u0[1(2yyL)2],u_{s}(y)=u_{0}\left[1-\left(\frac{2y}{y_{L}}\right)^{2}\right], (2)

where u0u_{0} is the maximum flow speed at the center of the channel and the corresponding vorticity is ωs(y)=4u0y/yL2\omega_{s}(y)=4u_{0}y/y_{L}^{2}. Although the flow velocity decreases away from the centerline and vanishes at the channel walls y=±yL/2y=\pm y_{L}/2, the local shear rate increases linearly with yy, see Fig. 1. In order to have a dimensionless description, we henceforth scale all length variables by the width of the channel yLy_{L}, i.e., xx/yLx\to x/y_{L} and yy/yLy\to y/y_{L}. Analogously, we rescale the time tv0t/yLt\to v_{0}t/y_{L}, so as to work with a constant rescaled self-propelled velocity v0=1v_{0}=1. The other rescaled parameters read D0D0/(yLv0)D_{0}\to D_{0}/(y_{L}v_{0}), DθyLDθ/v0D_{\theta}\to y_{L}D_{\theta}/v_{0}, u0u0/v0u_{0}\to u_{0}/v_{0}, and ΩyLΩ/v0\Omega\to y_{L}\Omega/v_{0}. In the rest of the article, we use dimensionless variables only. The collisional dynamics of the particle at the channel walls is modeled as follows. The translational velocity r˙\dot{\vec{r}} is elastically reflected Khatri_JCP ; Khatri_pre1 ; Khatri_JSTAT ; Khatri_pre2 , and the coordinate θ\theta is unchanged during the collision (sliding reflecting boundary condition Ghosh_PRL ; Zhang_et_al@PF:2010 ). Accordingly, the particle slides along the walls for an average time of the order of τθ\tau_{\theta}, until the fluctuations in θ\theta, i.e., ξθ(t)\xi_{\theta}(t), redirect it towards the interior of the channel. Note that on modeling the boundary conditions, we assume that particles are small in size such that we can safely neglect the hydrodynamic interaction between the particles and the channel walls Lauga_JFM .

The key quantities of interest are the average velocity and effective diffusion coefficient of the particles. Since the Langevin equations (1) turn nonlinear in the presence of the Poiseuille flow, the explicit analytical expressions of the average velocity and effective diffusion coefficient cannot be obtained. For this reason, the behavior of these quantities can be obtained using Brownian dynamics simulations performed by the integration of Langevin equations (1) using standard stochastic Euler algorithm over 2×1042\times 10^{4} trajectories with sliding reflecting boundary conditions at the channel walls. As initial conditions, we have assumed that at t=0t=0, all the particles are randomly distributed with random orientations in the channel. Since particles along the yy-direction are confined, we only calculate the average velocity and effective diffusion coefficient along the xx-direction. Numerically, the average velocity and effective diffusion coefficient along the xx-direction are, respectively, calculated as

v\displaystyle v =limtx(t)t,\displaystyle=\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{\langle x(t)\rangle}{t}, (3)
Deff\displaystyle D_{eff} =limtx2(t)x(t)22t.\displaystyle=\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{\langle x^{2}(t)\rangle-\langle x(t)\rangle^{2}}{2\,t}. (4)

III Diffusion of nonchiral particles

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Deterministic trajectories of a nonchiral (Ω=0\Omega=0) particle in a two-dimensional microchannel with a Poiseuille flow prescribed by equation (2). The particle starts at the center of the channel, i.e., x=y=0x=y=0, with different values of the self-propelled angle θ\theta. Trajectories are obtained by integrating equations (1) numerically for D0=Dθ=0D_{0}=D_{\theta}=0 and u0=1u_{0}=1.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The average velocity vv as a function of the flow strength u0u_{0} is depicted in (a) for different values of rotational diffusion rate DθD_{\theta}. The corresponding scaled effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} is depicted in (b). The right arrows denote the values of Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} in the absence of Poiseuille flow calculated from the well known analytical expression Deff=D0+τθ/4D_{eff}=D_{0}+\tau_{\theta}/4 Howse_PRL . The solid line is a guide to the eyes. The set parameters are D0=0.1D_{0}=0.1 and Ω=0\Omega=0. The dashed cyan line corresponds to the passive Brownian particles.

Although the transport properties of nonchiral active Brownian particles in a channel with the Poiseuille flow are recently reported by Peng and Brady Peng_PRF ; however, for completeness, in this section, we present the diffusive transport of nonchiral particles in a Poiseuille flow. To analyze the main effects of Poiseuille flow on the nonchiral (Ω=0\Omega=0) particle dynamics, in Figure 2, we show the deterministic (D0=Dθ=0D_{0}=D_{\theta}=0) trajectories of a particle positioned initially at the center of the channel with different values of the self-propelled angle θ\theta. When θ=0\theta=0^{\circ}, the particle continues to drift along the centerline, i.e., along the flow direction without any rotation (ωs(y)=0\omega_{s}(y)=0). However, when 0<θθc0^{\circ}<\theta\leq\theta_{c} (θc120\theta_{c}\approx 120^{\circ}), the particle can reach the upper wall and then drifts in the opposite direction to the fluid flow (upstream drift). It is because, near the upper wall, the fluid velocity tends to zero, and due to the large fluid vorticity, the particle reoriented counterclockwise (see Fig. 1). The particle that exhibits upstream drift will then reach the lower wall and reorient clockwise. This leads to a periodic motion. Note that within this range of θ\theta, the qualitative behavior of all trajectories remains the same. In particular, the value of θc\theta_{c} depends on the flow strength u0u_{0}. Interestingly, when θ\theta is greater than the critical self-propelled angle θc\theta_{c}, the particle would not reach the walls (see Fig. 2). However, it still performs a periodic motion, where the temporal period is much longer and the spatial period is shorter. Therefore, we obtain a confined trajectory, where walls do not cause the confinement but due to the combined effect of Poiseuille flow and self-propulsion mechanism. For θ=180\theta=180^{\circ}, the particle would not move at the middle of the channel because, in this situation, v0=u0v_{0}=u_{0}. Similar trajectories are reported in references Peng_PRF ; Zottl_Stark@PRL:2012 ; Costanzo_JPCM .

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The average velocity vv as a function of the flow strength u0u_{0} is depicted in (a) for different values of translational diffusion constant D0D_{0}. The corresponding scaled effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} is depicted in (b). The right arrows denote the values of Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} in the absence of Poiseuille flow calculated from the well known analytical expression Deff=D0+τθ/4D_{eff}=D_{0}+\tau_{\theta}/4. The solid line is a guide to the eyes. The set parameters are Dθ=0.01D_{\theta}=0.01 and Ω=0\Omega=0.

Figure 3 depicts the average velocity vv and effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} as a function of the flow strength u0u_{0} for different values of rotational diffusion rate DθD_{\theta}. In the limit u0v0u_{0}\ll v_{0}, the fluid velocity can be neglected, and vv tends to zero and DeffD_{eff} agrees with the well known analytical expression Deff=D0+τθ/4D_{eff}=D_{0}+\tau_{\theta}/4 Howse_PRL for different values of DθD_{\theta}. Interestingly, the particles exhibit upstream drift for the small and moderate values of DθD_{\theta}, when u0v0u_{0}\leq v_{0}, as demonstrated in Figure 2. Therefore, vv becomes negative. Note that this upstream drift is only possible for active particles, whereas passive particles would simply follow the fluid velocity profile. For the higher DθD_{\theta} value, i.e., DθD_{\theta}\rightarrow\infty, the self-propelled angle θ\theta changes rapidly; therefore, the motion of active particles is similar to passive Brownian motion with a positive vv for any strength of u0u_{0} (see Fig. 3(a)). As one would expect, the magnitude of vv decreases with increasing DθD_{\theta}. It is worth to point out that the combined effect of the Poiseuille flow and self-propulsion mechanism suppresses DeffD_{eff}. When u0v0u_{0}\gg v_{0}, the fluid velocity at the middle of the channel dominates over the self-propulsion mechanism; thus, in this regime, both vv and DeffD_{eff} approach to the transport properties of passive particles. Consequently, vv is positive for any value of DθD_{\theta}, and both vv and DeffD_{eff} increase with increasing u0u_{0}. The similar nonmonotonic behavior of both vv and DeffD_{eff} as a function of u0u_{0} is recently reported by Peng and Brady Peng_PRF in the context of nonchiral active Brownian particles in a channel with the Poiseuille flow.

Figure 4 shows the average velocity vv and effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} as a function of the flow strength u0u_{0} for different values of translational diffusion constant D0D_{0}. We can see that the qualitative behavior of vv and DeffD_{eff}, which has been explained earlier, does not change for different values of D0D_{0}. Also, vv cannot be reversed for any value of D0D_{0}. However, as one would expect, vv decreases with increasing D0D_{0} (see Fig. 4(a)). Particularly, in the limit u0v0u_{0}\ll v_{0}, as mentioned earlier, vv tends to zero and DeffD_{eff} agrees with the well known analytical expression Deff=D0+τθ/4D_{eff}=D_{0}+\tau_{\theta}/4 for different values of D0D_{0}. In the other limit, i.e., u0v0u_{0}\gg v_{0}, the fluid velocity dominates over the self-propulsion mechanism; thus, in this regime, vv is positive, and both vv and DeffD_{eff} increase with increasing u0u_{0}.

IV Diffusion of chiral particles

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Deterministic trajectories of a chiral particle in the two-dimensional microchannel with the Poiseuille flow prescribed by equation (2). The particle starts at the center of the channel, i.e., x=y=0x=y=0, with different values of the self-propelled angle θ\theta. Trajectories have been produced by integrating equations (1) for D0=Dθ=0D_{0}=D_{\theta}=0, Ω=0.3\Omega=0.3, and u0=1u_{0}=1.

In this section, we study the diffusive transport of chiral particles (Ω0\Omega\neq 0). First, in order to analyze the main effects of Poiseuille flow on the chiral particle dynamics, in Figure 5, we study the deterministic trajectories (D0=Dθ=0D_{0}=D_{\theta}=0) of a particle positioned initially at the center of the channel with different values of the self-propelled angle θ\theta and for Ω>0\Omega>0. When 0θθc0^{\circ}\leq\theta\leq\theta_{c} (θc145\theta_{c}\approx 145^{\circ}), the particle exhibits an upstream drift, and its trajectory initially has a transient and then a steady state part. In the latter, the particle performs a periodic motion. As one would expect, due to the chirality of the particle, the up and down symmetry in the motion is broken; thus, in the steady state part, the particle would not reach the upper channel wall. If one considers the case Ω<0\Omega<0, an opposite behavior can be observed. Note that within this range of θ\theta, the qualitative behavior of all the trajectories remains the same. In particular, the value of θc\theta_{c} depends on the flow strength u0u_{0} and angular velocity Ω\Omega. Interestingly, when θ>θc\theta>\theta_{c}, the initial transient part in the trajectory disappears, and the particle would not reach the walls (see Fig. 5). The particle still performs a periodic motion, where the temporal period is much longer and the spatial period is shorter. Consequently, we obtain a confined trajectory caused by the Poiseuille flow and self-propulsion mechanism rather than the channel walls.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The average velocity vv as a function of the flow strength u0u_{0} is depicted in (a) for different values of angular velocity Ω\Omega. The corresponding scaled effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} is depicted in (b). The right arrows denote the values of Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} in the absence of Poiseuille flow calculated from the well known analytical expression Deff=D0+(τθ/4)/[1+(Ωτθ/2)2]D_{eff}=D_{0}\,+\,(\tau_{\theta}/4)/[1\,+\,(\Omega\tau_{\theta}/2)^{2}] Teeffelen_PRE ; Ebbens_PRE . The solid line is a guide to the eyes. The set parameters are Dθ=D0=0.1D_{\theta}=D_{0}=0.1. The dashed cyan line corresponds to the passive Brownian particles.

Figure 6 shows the average velocity vv and the scaled effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} as a function of the flow strength u0u_{0} for different values of angular velocity Ω\Omega. As before, in the limit u0v0u_{0}\ll v_{0}, the fluid velocity can be neglected; thus, v0v\to 0 and DeffD_{eff} agrees with the well known analytical expression Deff=D0+(τθ/4)/[1+(Ωτθ/2)2]D_{eff}=D_{0}+(\tau_{\theta}/4)/[1+(\Omega\tau_{\theta}/2)^{2}] Teeffelen_PRE ; Ebbens_PRE for different values of Ω\Omega. For Ω0.8\Omega\leq 0.8, it is found that vv reversal occurs as a function of u0u_{0}. It indicates that there exist finite values of u0u_{0} for which the particles exhibit upstream drift. On the other hand, for Ω>0.8\Omega>0.8, the self-propelled angle θ\theta changes rapidly; thus, vv remains positive for any value of u0u_{0}. Interestingly, when Ω\Omega is comparable to the local shear rate due to the Poiseuille flow ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y) near the lower channel wall, Ω\Omega cancels out the effect of ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y); thus, the particles aggregate near the lower wall. As a result, vv suddenly drops and tends to zero, and DeffD_{eff} exhibits an enhanced peak. Note that if one considers that Ω<0\Omega<0, the same would happen on the upper channel wall. In the noiseless limit, this happens for Ωωs(yL/2)\Omega\simeq\omega_{s}(-y_{L}/2). This condition can be regarded as the onset of the aggregation mechanism. As mentioned earlier, in the regime u0v0u_{0}\gg v_{0}, both vv and DeffD_{eff} approach to the transport properties of passive particles. Consequently, vv and DeffD_{eff} increase with increasing u0u_{0}.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: The average velocity vv and the scaled effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} as a function of the angular velocity Ω\Omega for a fixed value of the flow strength u0=1u_{0}=1. The solid line is a guide to the eyes. The set parameters are Dθ=D0=0.1D_{\theta}=D_{0}=0.1.

Figure 7 depicts the average velocity vv and the scaled effective diffusion coefficient Deff/D0D_{eff}/D_{0} as a function of the angular velocity Ω\Omega for a fixed value of the flow strength u0=1u_{0}=1. For Ω<0.8\Omega<0.8, the particles exhibit upstream drift resulting in the negative vv. On further increasing Ω\Omega, the self-propelled angle θ\theta changes rapidly; thus, the average velocity reverses its direction and becomes positive. Interestingly, as discussed earlier, when Ω\Omega is comparable to the local shear rate ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y) near the lower channel wall, Ω\Omega cancels out the effect of ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y); therefore, the particles aggregate near the lower wall. In the absence of noise, for the considered u0=1u_{0}=1, this would happen for Ω1\Omega\simeq 1. Whereas, in the presence of noise, this happens for Ω0.8\Omega\simeq 0.8. Accordingly, v0v\to 0 and DeffD_{eff} exhibits an enhanced peak.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: The steady state distribution of chiral particles, for various values of the angular velocity Ω\Omega, is depicted in (a)-(e). The corresponding normalized probability distributions Pst(y)P_{st}(y) along the yy-direction are depicted in (f). The set parameters are Dθ=D0=0.1D_{\theta}=D_{0}=0.1 and u0=1u_{0}=1.

Figure 8 depicts the steady state distribution and the corresponding normalized probability distribution Pst(y)P_{st}(y) of chiral particles for various values of the angular velocity Ω\Omega. For Ω0\Omega\rightarrow 0, the particles distribute uniformly both in the upper and lower regions of the channel. This is reflected in Pst(y)P_{st}(y) (see Fig. 8(f)). Interestingly, on further increasing Ω\Omega, the particles start to aggregate near the lower channel wall, and the aggregation is maximum for Ω0.8\Omega\simeq 0.8. This onset of aggregation mechanism is due to the fact that when Ω\Omega is comparable to the local shear rate ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y) near the lower channel wall, Ω\Omega cancels out the effect of ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y). Accordingly, Pst(y)P_{st}(y) is maximum near the lower wall, and it monotonically decreases away from the lower wall. As mentioned earlier, if one considers the negative sign of Ω\Omega, the same would happen on the upper channel wall. When Ω\Omega dominates over ωs(y)\omega_{s}(y), as one would expect, the particles distribution and the corresponding probability distribution in both the upper region and bottom region of the channel become the same (see (e) and (f) in Fig. 8).

V Conclusions

In this work, we have numerically studied the diffusive transport of both nonchiral and chiral self-propelled particles in a two-dimensional microchannel with a Poiseuille flow. Using Brownian dynamics simulations, we have investigated that the transport characteristics, the average velocity and effective diffusion coefficient, strongly depend on the self-propulsion mechanism and the flow strength. We have demonstrated that the particles exhibit upstream drift, which is a signature of the active particles. It is found that the direction of the average velocity can be reversed by suitably tuning the rotational diffusion rate, flow strength, and angular velocity. In addition, for the case of nonchiral particles, the effective diffusion coefficient is suppressed by the presence of the Poiseuille flow. Interestingly, for the case of chiral particles, we have shown that the particles aggregate near the lower channel wall, and correspondingly the effective diffusion coefficient exhibits an enhanced peak. The present study can provide insights into flow controlled diffusive behavior of self-propelled particles in the microchannel flow. Also, the results are expected to be instructive to design lab-on-a-chip devices for separating the living and non-living organisms as well as chiral and nonchiral self-propelled particles Chin_Lab ; Yang_SM .

VI Acknowledge

This work was supported by the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.

References

  • (1) S. Ramaswamy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  • (2) M. E. Cates, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 042601 (2012).
  • (3) P. Romanczuk, M. Bär, W. Ebeling, B. Lindner, and L. Schimansky-Geier, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 202, 1 (2012).
  • (4) C. Bechinger, R. D. Leonardo, H. Löwen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016).
  • (5) H. C. Berg and D. A. Brown, Nature 239, 500 (1972).
  • (6) W. R. DiLuzio, L. Turner, M. Mayer, P. Garstecki, D. B. Weibel, H. C. Berg, and G. M. Whitesides, Nature 435, 1271 (2005).
  • (7) K. C. Leptos, J. S. Guasto, J. P. Gollub, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 198103 (2009).
  • (8) I. H. Riedel, K. Kruse, and J. Howard, Science 309, 300 (2005).
  • (9) D. M. Woolley, Reproduction 126, 259 (2003).
  • (10) B. M. Friedrich, “Chemotaxis of sperm cells”, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany, 2008.
  • (11) E. M. Purcell, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977).
  • (12) M. J. Lighthill, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 109 (1952).
  • (13) J. R. Blake, J. Fluid Mech. 46, 199 (1971).
  • (14) A. E. Patteson, A. Gopinath, M. Goulian, and P. E. Arratia, Sci. Rep. 5, 15761 (2015).
  • (15) S. Jiang and S. Granick, Janus Particle Synthesis, Self-Assembly and Applications (RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2012).
  • (16) A. Walther and A. H. E. Müller, Chem. Rev. 113, 5194 (2013).
  • (17) J. R. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 048102 (2007).
  • (18) W. F. Paxton, S. Sundararajan, T. E. Mallouk, and A. Sen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 5420 (2006).
  • (19) J. G. Gibbs and Y. P. Zhao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 163104 (2009).
  • (20) G. Volpe, I. Buttinoni, D. Vogt, H. J. Kümmerer, and C. Bechinger, Soft Matter 7, 8810 (2011).
  • (21) H. R. Jiang, N. Yoshinaga, and M. Sano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 268302 (2010).
  • (22) D. B. Weibel, P. Garstecki, D. Ryan, W. R. DiLuzio, M. Mayer, J. E. Seto, and G. M. Whitesides, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 11963 (2005).
  • (23) C. D. Chin, V. Linder, and S. K. Sia, Lab Chip 7, 41 (2007).
  • (24) W. Yang, V. R. Misko, K. Nelissen, M. Kong, and F. M. Peeters, Soft Matter 8, 5175 (2012).
  • (25) P. K. Ghosh, V. R. Misko, F. Marchesoni, and F. Nori, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 268301 (2013).
  • (26) X. Ao, P. K. Ghosh, Y. Li, G. Schmid, P. Hänggi, and F. Marchesoni, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 223, 3227 (2014); Europhys. Lett. 109, 10003 (2015).
  • (27) B. Q. Ai, Q. Y. Chen, Y. F. He, F. G. Li, and W. R. Zhong, Phys. Rev. E 88, 062129 (2013).
  • (28) L. Angelani, R. D. Leonardo, and G. Ruocco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 048104 (2009).
  • (29) I. Buttinoni, J. Bialke, F. Kummel, H. Löwen, C. Bechinger, and T. Speck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 238301 (2013).
  • (30) Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235702 (2012).
  • (31) T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, Physics Reports 517, 71 (2012); A. Zafeiris and T. Vicsek, Nature communications 4, 2484 (2013).
  • (32) T. Nepusz and T. Vicsek, Nature Physics 8, 568 (2012); M. Nagy, Z. Akos, D. Biro, and T. Vicsek, Nature 464, 890 (2010).
  • (33) H. Wioland, F. G. Woodhouse, J. Dunkel, J. O. Kessler, and R. E. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 268102 (2013).
  • (34) R. Rusconi, J. S. Guasto, and R. Stocker, Nature Physics 10, 212 (2014).
  • (35) A. Kaiser, H. H. Wensink, and H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 268307 (2012).
  • (36) J. Hill, O. Kalkanci, J. L. McMurry, and H. Koser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 068101 (2007).
  • (37) T. Kaya and H. Koser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 138103 (2009); Biophys. J. 102, 1514 (2012).
  • (38) V. Kantsler, J. Dunkel, M. Blayney, and R. E. Goldstein, Elife 3, e02403 (2014).
  • (39) G. Jing, A. Zöttl, E. Clément, and A. Lindner, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb2012 (2020).
  • (40) A. Zöttl and H. Stark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 218104 (2012).
  • (41) B. Ezhilan and D. Saintillan, J. Fluid Mech. 777, 482 (2015).
  • (42) L. Vennamneni, S. Nambiar, and G. Subramanian, J. Fluid Mech. 890, A15 (2020).
  • (43) A. Costanzo, R. D. Leonardo, G. Ruocco, and L. Angelani, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 065101 (2012).
  • (44) R. W. Nash, R. Adhikari, J. Tailleur, and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 258101 (2010).
  • (45) A. Zöttl and H. Stark, Eur. Phys. J. E 36, 4 (2013).
  • (46) H. Stark, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 225, 2369 (2016).
  • (47) A. J. T. M. Mathijssen, T. N. Shendruk, J. M. Yeomans, and A. Doostmohammadi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 028104 (2016).
  • (48) Z. Peng and J. F. Brady, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 073102 (2020).
  • (49) S. Chilukuri, C. H. Collins, and P. T. Underhill, Phys. Fluids 27, 031902 (2015).
  • (50) G. Volpe, S. Gigan, and G. Volpe, Am. J. Phys. 82, 659 (2014).
  • (51) B. T. Hagen, R. Wittkowski, and H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. E 84, 031105 (2011).
  • (52) S. V. Teeffelen and H. Löwen, Phys. Rev. E 78, 020101(R) (2008).
  • (53) N. Khatri and P. S. Burada, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 094103 (2019).
  • (54) N. Khatri and P. S. Burada, Phys. Rev. E 102, 012137 (2020).
  • (55) N. Khatri and P. S. Burada, J. Stat. Mech. 2021, 073202 (2021).
  • (56) N. Khatri and P. S. Burada, Phys. Rev. E 104, 044109 (2021).
  • (57) J. Zhang, J. Fan, and F. Fei, Phys. Fluids 22, 122005 (2010).
  • (58) S. E. Spagnolie and E. Lauga, J. Fluid Mech. 700, 105 (2012).
  • (59) S. Ebbens, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, R. Golestanian, and J. R. Howse, Phys. Rev. E 82, 015304(R) (2010).