This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Dirac fermions on wires confined to the graphene Möbius strip

L. N. Monteiro Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Departamento de Física, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, 60455-760, Brazil.    J. E. G. Silva Universidade Federal do Cariri (UFCA), Cidade Universitária, Juazeiro do Norte - CE, 63048-080, Brazil.    C. A. S. Almeida Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Departamento de Física, Campus do Pici, Fortaleza-CE, 60455-760, Brazil.
Abstract

We investigate the effects of the curved geometry on a massless relativistic electron constrained to a graphene strip with a Möbius strip shape. The anisotropic and parity violating geometry of the Möbius band produces a geometric potential that inherits these features. By considering wires along the strip width and the strip length, we find exact solutions for the Dirac equation and the effects of the geometric potential on the electron were explored. In both cases, the geometric potential yields to a geometric phase on the wave function. Along the strip width, the density of states depends on the direction chosen for the wire, a consequence of the lack of axial symmetry. Moreover, the breaking of the parity symmetry enables the electronic states to be concentrated on the inner or on the outer portion of the strip. For wires along the strip length, the nontrivial topology influences the eigenfunctions by modifying their periodicity. It turns out that the ground state has period of 4π4\pi whereas the first excited state is a 2π2\pi periodic function. Moreover, we found that the energy levels are half-integer multiples of the energy of the ground state.

Graphene, geometric phase, Möbius strip

I Introduction

Since its discover, graphene has startled researchers due to its outstanding electronic, mechanical and thermal properties [1, 2]. This single layer sheet of carbon exhibits high carrier mobility (vanishing effective electron mass) [3] and thus, the electron is described as a massless chiral Dirac fermion on a flat surface [4]. As a result, graphene offers a bridge between condensed matter physics and quantum field theory in two dimensions [5]. Indeed, graphene produces well-known relativistic effects, such as the zitterbewegun [6] and the Klein paradox [7]. More recently, relativistic effects were found in Weyl semimetals [8], Majorana fermions [9], Bogoliubov particles [10] and Kagome crystals [11].

By bending the two dimensional sheet or considering the strain effects on the membrane, graphene also becomes a table-top laboratory for curved spaces phenomena [12, 13]. In fact, the curved geometry or the strain tensor modify the effective Hamiltonian leading to a position-dependent Fermi velocity [14]. Moreover, the coupling between the Dirac fermion and the curved geometry/strain provides pseudo gauge fields whose effects depend on the particular geometry/strain [15, 16, 17, 18]. Despite being two dimensional, graphene naturally displays ripples[19, 20] and corrugations [21]. These deformations of the surface significantly modify the electronic and thermal graphene properties [22]. The effects of the curved geometry on the electronic properties, the so called curvatronics has been explored in different geometries, such as the cone [23], helicoid strip [24, 25], the catenoid bridge [26, 27] and the torus [28].

Another noteworthy effect produced by the curved geometry is the so-called geometric phase [29]. The edge states [30] or the presence of defect, such as disclinations [31], produce geometric phases modifying the electronic properties. On conical graphene surfaces, a constant geometric gauge field yields to a geometric phase depending on the conical deficit angle [32]. Furthermore, the out-of-plane deformations of the graphene layer also lead to modifications on the optical conductivity due to Aharonov-Bohm type interference [33].

Besides the curved geometry, nontrivial topology also plays a central role on the electronic features of the low-dimensional system [35]. For instance, performing a π\pi twist on one end of a graphene ribbon and connecting one end to the other we obtain a graphene Möbius strip [36, 37]. This graphene membrane behaves as a topological insulator with stable edge states [38]. Moreover, the half twist modifies the rotational invariance of the fields and particles constrained to move along the Möbius band [39]. Several investigations on the formation [40], stability [41], charge transfer [42], magnetic properties [43], quantum spin-Hall effect [44, 45] of the graphene Möbius strip were performed. These properties are rather different from those obtained from usual cylindrical graphene rings [46]. Indeed, the curvature of the Möbius strip modifies the energy spectrum of non-relativistic electrons, whose isotropic and parity symmetries are broken [47]. For relativistic electrons, the influence of the a flat Möbius strip was investigate by assuming nontrivial boundary conditions [48].

In this work we study the effects of the graphene Möbius strip curved geometry on effective massless relativistic electrons. Unlike some previous works that used discrete tight-bind approach [38, 40, 41], we employed a continuum analysis wherein an effective massless Dirac fermion is constrained to a curved surface. Since Dirac equation on a curved surface does not couple with the curvature [49, 50], the effects of the curved geometry steam from the spinorial connection which acts as a pseudo-magnetic potential induced by the curved geometry [51]. As a result, a geometric phase determines the density of states for wires along the Möbius strip width. The breaking of the parity and isotropy symmetries yields to states localized on the inner or outer portion of the strip depending on the angle chosen for the wire. For wires along the strip length (angular direction), the geometric phase has an Aharonov-Bohm like effect, not modifying the density of states for a single electron. Nevertheless, the ground state wave function has a period of 4π4\pi, whereas the first excited state is a 2π2\pi periodic function, due to the strip twist. Furthermore, the nontrivial topology also leads to an energy spectrum given as half-integer multiples of the ground state energy. These results agree with the modified boundary conditions analysis performed in Ref.([47, 48]).

This work is organized as the following. In the section (II) we briefly review the main definitions and properties of the Möbius strip geometry, such as the metric, curvatures and connection. In the section (III), we obtain the effective Hamiltonian for the massless Dirac particle on the surface and derive the expression for the geometric potential which depends on the geometric connection. In the section (IV) we obtain the exact solutions for the electron on wires along the width and the length of the strip. The energy levels and the effects of the nontrivial topology on the states and spectrum is discussed. Finally, additional comments and perspectives are outlined in section (V).

II Möbius strip and its properties

In this section we present the coordinate system to describe the graphene Möbius strip and study its main geometric features, such as the gaussian and the mean curvatures and the connection one-forms.

The graphene Möbius strip is a surface constructed by joining the two ends of a graphene ribbon after twist one end by a π\pi rotation, as shown in the fig.(1) [36]. This surface can be described by the following coordinate system [36, 47]

𝐫(u,θ)\displaystyle\mathbf{r}(u,\theta) =(a+ucosθ2)cosθ𝐢^+(a+ucosθ2)sinθ𝐣^+usinθ2𝐤^\displaystyle=\left(a+u\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\cos\theta\,\hat{\mathbf{i}}+\left(a+u\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\sin\theta\hat{\mathbf{j}}+u\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{\mathbf{k}}
=(a+ucosθ2)𝐫^+usinθ2𝐤^,\displaystyle=\left(a+u\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\hat{\mathbf{r}}+u\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{\mathbf{k}}, (1)

where 2L2L is the strip width , LuL-L\leq u\leq L is a coordinate along the width, and 0θ2π0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi is the angular coordinate. The coordinate uu is the distance between the center of the strip and its endpoint, as shown in the Fig. 1. Furthermore, the parameter aa is the radius of the central circle and the radial unit vector is 𝐫^=cosθ𝐢^+sinθ𝐣^\hat{\mathbf{r}}=\cos\theta\hat{\mathbf{i}}+\sin\theta\hat{\mathbf{j}}.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Coordinates and base vectors on the Möbius strip.

A remarkable feature of the Möbius strip is its non-orientability. Indeed, performing a 2π2\pi rotation on the outer edge of the strip (u=Lu=L), the outer edge becomes the inner edge (u=L)(u=-L). Throughout the work, we use L=1L=1.

The tangent vectors, defined as ei=𝐫xie_{i}=\frac{\partial\mathbf{r}}{\partial x^{i}}, have the form

eu\displaystyle e_{u} =\displaystyle= ru=cosθ2r^+sinθ2k^\displaystyle\frac{\partial\textbf{r}}{\partial u}=\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{r}+\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{k} (2)
eθ\displaystyle e_{\theta} =\displaystyle= rθ=(a+ucosθ2)θ^u2sinθ2r^+u2cosθ2k^.\displaystyle\frac{\partial\textbf{r}}{\partial\theta}=\bigg{(}a+u\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\bigg{)}\hat{\theta}-\frac{u}{2}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{r}+\frac{u}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2}\hat{k}. (3)

From the tangent vectors, we can define the Möbius strip metric gijg_{ij} as

gij=eiej=(100β2(u,θ),)\displaystyle g_{ij}=e_{i}\cdot e_{j}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\ 0&\beta^{2}(u,\theta),\end{pmatrix} (4)

where the angular metric factor β\beta is given by [47]

β(u,θ)=u24+(a2+ucos(θ2))2.\beta(u,\theta)=\sqrt{\frac{u^{2}}{4}+\left(a^{2}+u\cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\right)^{2}}. (5)

In the fig.(2) we plot the angular metric function β(u,θ)\beta(u,\theta) for some values of the inner radius aa with LL fixed to L=1L=1. In fig.(2)(a) we choose aa such that L/a=0.375L/a=0.375, i.e., a=2.66a=2.66, for which nanorings were obtained [34]. As we increase the ratio L/aL/a, as for L/a=1L/a=1 in fig. (2)(b) and for L/a=1.89L/a=1.89 in fig. (2)(c) the Möbius strip becomes more compact. The ratio L/a=1.89L/a=1.89 is a critical value for a Möbius strip due to mechanical properties [40].

Thus, the 2+12+1 infinitesimal line element has the form

ds2=dt2+du2+β2(u,θ)dθ2.ds^{2}=-dt^{2}+du^{2}+\beta^{2}(u,\theta)d\theta^{2}. (6)
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Angular metric function β(u,θ)\beta(u,\theta) for L=1L=1, with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c), which encodes the geometrical properties of the Möbius graphene strip. The function shows a twisted parity symmetry.

It is worthwhile to mention that the metric tensor for a cylinder (nanotubes) has the form shown in Eq.(6) with β=a\beta=a, whereas for the conical surface (graphitic cone), β=αu\beta=\alpha u, where α\alpha is the so-called angular deficit [23]. Other graphene based surface, such as the helicoid [24], catenoid [26, 27] and the torus [28] can also be described by the metric in Eq.(6).

The anisotropy of the Möbius strip breaks some surfaces symmetries, such as the parity symmetry, as we can see by β(u,θ)β(u,θ)\beta(-u,-\theta)\neq\beta(u,\theta). However, a sort of modified Möbius parity symmetry holds, where

β(u,2πθ)=β(u,θ).\beta(-u,2\pi-\theta)=\beta(u,\theta). (7)

This modified parity symmetry steams from the twist performed on the strip. In the fig.(2), we plotted the angular metric component β\beta for a=1a=1 and 1u1-1\leq u\leq 1, where the Möbius parity symmetry in Eq.(7) is shown.

The Möbius strip curvatures also exhibit the twisted parity symmetry in Eq.(7). Indeed, the expressions for the mean curvature MM and the gaussian curvature KK are given by [47]

M=2(2(a2+u2)+4aucosθ2+u2cosθ)sinθ2[4a2+3u2+2u(4acosθ2+ucosθ)]32,\displaystyle M=\frac{2(2(a^{2}+u^{2})+4au\cos\frac{\theta}{2}+u^{2}\cos\theta)\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}{[4a^{2}+3u^{2}+2u(4a\cos\frac{\theta}{2}+u\cos\theta)]^{\frac{3}{2}}}, (8)

and

K=1β2u2β=4a2(4a2+u2+8aucos(θ/2)+4u2cos2(θ/2))2.\displaystyle K=-\frac{1}{\beta^{2}}\partial^{2}_{u}\beta=-\frac{4a^{2}}{(4a^{2}+u^{2}+8au\cos(\theta/2)+4u^{2}\cos^{2}(\theta/2))^{2}}. (9)

The behaviour of the gaussian and the mean curvatures are shown in the fig.(3) and in the fig.(4), respectively. We adopt the same values for the ratio L/aL/a as done for the β\beta function, i.e., L/a=0.375L/a=0.375 (a), L/a=1L/a=1 (b) and L/a=1.89L/a=1.89 (c). Note that the curvatures profiles depend on the ratio L/aL/a. Unlike the cylindrical nanorings, where the gaussian curvature vanishes and the mean curvature is constant, the distribution of the curvatures on the Möbius strip depends on the position u,θu,\theta and the ration L/aL/a.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Gaussian curvature on the Möbius strip, with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c), showing how the curvature is intrinsically distributed over the surface.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Mean curvature on the Möbius strip with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c), showing how the curvature is extrinsically distributed over the surface.

As we will see in the next section, the massless relativistic electron couples with the surface connection instead of the curvature. Accordingly, in order to define the fermion dynamics on the surface, we have to adopt the so-called vielbein formalism [13]. Indeed, consider a set of matrices eμae^{a}_{\mu} such that [23]

gμν=eμaeνbηab.g_{\mu\nu}=e^{a}_{\mu}e^{b}_{\nu}\eta_{ab}. (10)

In (2+1)D(2+1)-D, the matrices eμae^{a}_{\mu} are SO(1,2)SO(1,2) invariant and they are called dreinbeins. Using the dreinbeins we can define a local moving co-frame as ea=eμadxμe^{a}=e^{a}_{\mu}dx^{\mu}. For the Möbius metric in Eq.(6), the moving co-frame has the form

e0\displaystyle e^{0} =\displaystyle= dt\displaystyle dt
e1\displaystyle e^{1} =\displaystyle= cosθduβsinθdθ\displaystyle\cos\theta du-\beta\sin\theta d\theta
e2\displaystyle e^{2} =\displaystyle= sinθdu+βcosθdθ.\displaystyle\sin\theta du+\beta\cos\theta d\theta. (11)

The presence of the trigonometric functions in eq.(11) reveals the local rotational invariance on the surface. Using the torsion-free condition, dea+ωbaeb=0de^{a}+\omega^{a}_{b}\wedge e^{b}=0, the only non-vanishing connection 1-form ωba=Γbμadxμ\omega^{a}_{b}=\Gamma^{a}_{\phantom{d}b\mu}dx^{\mu} is given by

ω21=(uβ1)dθ.\omega^{1}_{2}=-(\partial_{u}\beta-1)d\theta. (12)

Note that for a conical graphitic surface, β=αu\beta=\alpha u, and then, ω21=(α1)dθ\omega^{1}_{2}=-(\alpha-1)d\theta [23].

III Fermions coupled to the Möbius strip

Once we reviewed the main geometric features of the graphene Möbius strip, in this section we describe how the effective massless electron couples to the graphene Möbius strip. We study the electron properties in the continuum limit, where the electron dynamics is governed by a Dirac equation defined on the curved graphene strip [13]. The curved geometry induces a pseudo-magnetic potential vector Γμ\Gamma_{\mu}, known as the spinorial connection. Then, we explore some features and effects of the spinorial connection, such as the geometric potential.

We employ the intrinsic coupling of the electron to the curved surface, wherein the massless Dirac equation on the surface is given by [13]

iγμDμψ=0.i\hbar\gamma^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi=0. (13)

In the Eq.(13), the gamma matrices on the surface γμ\gamma^{\mu} as defined as

γμ=eaμγa,\gamma\,^{\mu}=e^{\mu}_{a}\gamma^{a}, (14)

where eμae^{a}_{\mu} are the dreinbeins. The spinorial covariant derivative DμD_{\mu} is defined as

Dμ=μΓμ,D_{\mu}=\partial_{\mu}-\Gamma_{\mu}, (15)

where the spinorial connection Γμ\Gamma_{\mu} is defined as

Γμ=14ωμabγaγb.\displaystyle\Gamma_{\mu}=\frac{1}{4}\omega^{ab}_{\mu}\,\gamma_{a}\gamma_{b}. (16)

Since the curved covariant derivative in Eq.(15) is similar to the minimal coupling between an electron and a magnetic vector AμA_{\mu}, the spinorial connection can be interpreted as a pseudo-magnetic potential vector induced by the curved geometry. In the spinorial connection in Eq.(16), ωμab\omega^{ab}_{\mu} are the connection 1-form and γa\gamma_{a} are the flat Dirac matrices. In this work we use the following representation of the Dirac matrices γ0=iσ3\gamma^{0}=-i\sigma_{3}, γ1=σ2\gamma^{1}=-\sigma_{2}, and γ2=σ1\gamma^{2}=\sigma_{1} [27].

From Eq.(12), since ω21=(uβ1)dθ\omega^{1}_{2}=-(\partial_{u}\beta-1)d\theta, the only non-vanishing component of the spinorial connection is given by

Γθ=i2(uβ1)σ3.\Gamma_{\theta}=-\frac{i}{2}(\partial_{u}\beta-1)\sigma_{3}. (17)

Thus, the pseudo-magnetic potential has only one component along the angular direction. Incidentally, the corresponding pseudo-magnetic field should point into the normal direction and it should be proportional to the Gaussian curvature [13].

The behaviour of the spinorial connection along the graphene Möbius strip is shown in the fig.(5). We adopt the same values for the ratio L/aL/a as done before, i.e. L/a=0.375L/a=0.375 (a), L/a=1L/a=1 (b) and L/a=1.89L/a=1.89 (c). Note that the spinorial connection profile is rather different from the Gaussian and mean curvatures. Indeed, the connection is greater for inner points (u<0)(u<0) than for outer points (u>0)(u>0) of the strip. For the sake of comparison, the spinorial connection for a cone is constant Γθ=i2(α1)σ3\Gamma_{\theta}=-\frac{i}{2}(\alpha-1)\sigma_{3} [23] and it vanishes for a single layer graphene, where α=1\alpha=1.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Spinorial connection on the graphene Möbius strip with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c).

III.1 Hamiltonian

Let us consider a stationary electronic states, i. e.,

ψ(r,t)=eiEtφ(r).\psi(\textbf{r},t)=\text{e}^{\frac{iEt}{\hbar}}\varphi(\textbf{r}). (18)

Thus, the Dirac equation (13) reads

Hφ=Eφ,H\varphi=E\varphi, (19)

where, HH is the stationary Hamiltonian of the relativistic electron at the graphene Möbius strip of form

H=ivF[σ1(u12(uβ1)β)+σ2βθ].\displaystyle H=-i\hbar v_{F}\bigg{[}\sigma^{1}\bigg{(}\partial_{u}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{\beta}\bigg{)}+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}\bigg{]}. (20)

Using the hermiticity relations of Dirac matrices, (γi)=γ0γiγ0(\gamma^{i})^{\dagger}=\gamma^{0}\gamma^{i}\gamma^{0}, it is possible to show that the Hamiltonian in eq.(20) is indeed Hermitian. In matrix notation, the Dirac equation in terms of the spinors is

i(0uiβθ(uβ1)2βu+iβθ(uβ1)2β0)(φ1φ2)=k(φ1φ2),\displaystyle-i\begin{pmatrix}0&\partial_{u}-\frac{i}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}-\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{2\beta}\\ \partial_{u}+\frac{i}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}-\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{2\beta}&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\varphi_{1}\\ \varphi_{2}\end{pmatrix}=k\begin{pmatrix}\varphi_{1}\\ \varphi_{2}\end{pmatrix}, (21)

where φ1,2(𝐫)=φ1,2(u,θ)\varphi_{1,2}(\mathbf{r})=\varphi_{1,2}(u,\theta) and k=EvFk=\frac{E}{\hbar v_{F}} is the wave-vector norm (momentum).

It is worthwhile to mention that in the Hamiltonian Eq.(21) there is a geometric potential UgU_{g} of the form

Ug=12σ1(uβ1)β.U_{g}=-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^{1}\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{\beta}. (22)

The geometric potential UgU_{g} has natural dimension of L1L^{-1} and it steams from the coupling between the fermion and the spinorial connection. Note that for a conical surface, Ug(α1)uU_{g}\approx\frac{(\alpha-1)}{u} [23], and thus, the geometric potential vanishes for a flat single layer graphene sheet. We plotted the geometric potential for L=1L=1 in the fig.(6), where L/a=0.375L/a=0.375 (a), L/a=1L/a=1 (b) and L/a=1.89L/a=1.89 (c). The geometric potential has regions with positive and negative values near each other. Moreover, the potential exhibits a sort of Möbius modified parity symmetry of the form (u,θ)(u,2πθ)(u,\theta)\rightarrow(-u,2\pi-\theta).

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Geometric potential UgU_{g} on the Möbius strip with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c).

Another noteworthy feature of the Hamiltonian in Eq.(21) is that it is no longer possible to write the wave function as φ(u,θ)=eiθϕ(u)\varphi(u,\theta)=\text{e}^{i\ell\theta}\phi(u), as done for other surfaces such as the cone [23], the helicoid [24], catenoid [26, 27] and the torus [28]. The reason for that steams from the lack of axial symmetry of the Möbius strip, which leads to a non-conservation of the angular momentum along the zz axis [47]. As a result, no centrifugal term of form lβ\frac{l}{\beta} arises naturally in the Hamiltonian Eq.(21).

IV Dirac fermion on wires

In the last section we described how the electron dynamics is modified by the curved geometry of the graphene Möbius strip. In this section we explore the electronic properties of the Dirac fermion constrained to wires along the graphene Möbius strip. By doing so, the fermion dynamics is dependent not only on the wire curvature but on the geometric potential UgU_{g} as well.

IV.1 Wires along the width

Let us start with a wire directed along the strip width. In order to do it, we consider a given angle θ=θ0\theta=\theta_{0} and vary the Hamiltonian in Eq.(21) only along the uu direction. Since the Hamiltonian is highly dependent on the angular coordinate θ\theta, we investigate how the electron properties change as we consider different direction on the strip.

Along the uu direction, we use β=β(u,θ0)\beta=\beta(u,\theta_{0}) and uβ=β(u,θ)u|θ=θ0\partial_{u}\beta=\frac{\partial\beta(u,\theta)}{\partial u}\bigg{|}_{\theta=\theta_{0}}. The Dirac equation Eq.(21) yields to

(u(1uβ)2β)(u(1uβ)2β)φi=k2φi,\displaystyle\left(\partial_{u}-\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{2\beta}\right)\left(\partial_{u}-\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{2\beta}\right)\varphi_{i}=-k^{2}\varphi_{i}, (23)

where ii can take on values 11 or 22. This equation, valid for both components of the spinor, can be rewritten as

u2φi((1uβ)β)uφi+[((1uβ)2β)2u((1uβ)2β)+k2]φi=0,\displaystyle\partial_{u}^{2}\varphi_{i}-\left(\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{\beta}\right)\partial_{u}\varphi_{i}+\left[\left(\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{2\beta}\right)^{2}-\partial_{u}\left(\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{2\beta}\right)+k^{2}\right]\varphi_{i}=0, (24)

where the components of the spinor are decoupled and they satisfy the same Eq.(24).

The Eq. (24) can be further simplified by considering the change on the wave function

φi(u)=e12(1uβ)β𝑑uχi(u),\displaystyle\varphi_{i}(u)=e^{-\frac{1}{2}\int{\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{\beta}}du}\chi_{i}(u), (25)

where the new wave function χi(u)\chi_{i}(u) satisfies

d2χi(u)du2=k2χi(u).\displaystyle-\frac{d^{2}\chi_{i}(u)}{du^{2}}=k^{2}\chi_{i}(u). (26)

Accordingly, the exact wave function along the wire for (u,θ0)(u,\theta_{0}) is given by

φi(u,θ0)=β(u,θ0)e(121β𝑑u)[Acos(ku)+Bsin(ku)].\varphi_{i}(u,\theta_{0})=\sqrt{\beta(u,\theta_{0})}e^{(-\frac{1}{2}\int{\frac{1}{\beta}}du)}\bigg{[}A\cos(ku)+B\sin(ku)\bigg{]}. (27)

Since the factor in the brackets are the solution for a free particle constrained inside the range LuL-L\leq u\leq L, the effect of the Möbius geometry on the electron constrained to a wire along the width is encoded in the geometric phase

Δϕ=e12(1uβ)β𝑑u.\Delta\phi=e^{-\frac{1}{2}\int{\frac{(1-\partial_{u}\beta)}{\beta}}du}. (28)

It is worthwhile to mention that, this geometric phase steams from the geometric potential UgU_{g} in Eq.(22) which depends on the connection rather than on the surface curvature. In a cylindrical surface (nanotubes), uβ=0\partial_{u}\beta=0 and the geometric phase is constant. On the other hand, for a flat plane (single layer graphene), β2=u2\beta^{2}=u^{2} and thus, the geometric phase vanishes identically.

Imposing the boundary conditions

φi(u=L,θ0)=φi(u=L,θ0)=0,\displaystyle\varphi_{i}(u=L,\theta_{0})=\varphi_{i}(u=-L,\theta_{0})=0, (29)

one obtains

A=0andsin(kL)=0,\displaystyle A=0\hskip 28.45274pt\text{and}\hskip 28.45274pt\sin(kL)=0, (30)

for which the allowed energy spectrum is given by

En=nπLvF.\displaystyle E_{n}=n\frac{\pi}{L}\hbar v_{F}. (31)

Note that the energy spectrum increases as the strip width LL decreases. Moreover, the energy levels grow linearly with nn and vF\hbar v_{F}, as expected from the Dirac equation. In the Ref.([47]), the authors found the energy spectrum for a non-relativistic electron in the Möbius band is proportional to n2n^{2}, an expected result steaming from the Schrödinger equation. In addition, the energy levels found in Eq.(31) is similar to the spectrum in a cylindrical ring. Indeed, since the geometric potential effects are encoded into the phase, the spectrum is the same for a flat surface. For a ring with the same width as one studied in Ref.([34]), i.e., for 2L=150nm2L=150nm, a typical electron with Fermi velocity vF=c/300v_{F}=c/300 has a ground state energy about E02.75×102eVE_{0}\approx 2.75\times 10^{-2}eV.

Therefore, the wave function along the wire is given by

φ1(u,θ0)=Cβ(u,θ0)e(121β𝑑u)sin(nπuL).\displaystyle\varphi_{1}(u,\theta_{0})=C\sqrt{\beta(u,\theta_{0})}e^{(-\frac{1}{2}\int{\frac{1}{\beta}}du)}\sin\bigg{(}\frac{n\pi u}{L}\bigg{)}. (32)

The effects of the geometric phase on the electron is shown in the Fig.(7), where we plotted the probability density φ(u,θ0)φ¯(u,θ0)\varphi(u,\theta_{0})\bar{\varphi}(u,\theta_{0}) for the four first energy levels. It is worthwhile to mention that the region where the fermion is localized on the wire depends on which angle θ0\theta_{0} the wire is on the strip. Indeed, for θ0=π2\theta_{0}=\frac{\pi}{2}, the wave function is concentrated at the outer region of the strip, whereas for θ0=3π2\theta_{0}=\frac{3\pi}{2}, the fermion is more localized at the inner region. Thus, the angle θ0\theta_{0} can be understood as a parameter to tune the region where the electron is more concentrated. Moreover, note that the probability density does not possesses parity symmetry for θ0={0,π/2,3π/2}\theta_{0}=\{0,\pi/2,3\pi/2\}.

Another noteworthy feature shown in the fig.(7) is that the geometric phase tends to a damping of the amplitude of the Dirac fermion. In fact, by comparing the graphics of the wave function and the geometric potential, we can see that the fermion is more concentrated in the regions where the potential is less strong.

In fig.(8), we plot the density of states on the Möbius strip for n=1n=1. We vary the ratio a/La/L for L/a=0.375L/a=0.375 (a), L/a=1L/a=1 (b) and L/a=1.89L/a=1.89, where we can see the formation of edge states. The presence of robust edge states has already been pointed out in Ref.[38], where the topological insulator behaviour of the Möbius strip was investigated. Moreover, note that the ground state (n=1)(n=1) in fig.(8) exhibits only one ring state whereas the excited state for (n=4)(n=4) in fig.(9) shows more ring states.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Density of states along the width for θ0\theta_{0} fixed. It shows the effect of the geometric phase concentrating the wave function at the outer region of the strip, leading to the formation of edge states.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Density of states along the Möbius surface for n=1 with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c). The electron is more concentrated around the edges of the strip.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Density of states along the Möbius surface for n=4 with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c). Note the formation of more rings near the edges of the strip.

IV.2 Wire along the strip length

Let us now consider the Dirac fermion constrained in a wire for a fixed u=u0u=u_{0}. For this case, we have no momentum along uu, so that uψ=0\partial_{u}\psi=0. Also, β=β(u0,θ)\beta=\beta(u_{0},\theta) and uβ=β(u,θ)u|u=u0\partial_{u}\beta=\frac{\partial\beta(u,\theta)}{\partial u}|_{u=u_{0}}. Thus, by applying the Hamiltonian (20) to the wavefunction ψ\psi, we obtain

Hψ=ivF[12(uβ1)βσ1+σ2βθ]ψ.\displaystyle H\psi=-i\hbar v_{F}\bigg{[}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{\beta}\sigma^{1}+\frac{\sigma^{2}}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}\bigg{]}\psi. (33)

By making the change in the wave function

ψ(θ,u0)=eΓμxμψ0=ei2(uβ1)βσ3ψ0(θ,u0),\displaystyle\psi(\theta,u_{0})=e^{\Gamma_{\mu}x^{\mu}}\psi_{0}=e^{-\frac{i}{2}\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{\beta}\sigma^{3}}\psi_{0}(\theta,u_{0}), (34)

we can simplify the equation (33) to

Hψ0=ivFσ2βθψ0.\displaystyle H\psi_{0}=-i\hbar v_{F}\frac{\sigma^{2}}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}\psi_{0}. (35)

Thus, the Dirac equation Hψ0=Eψ0H\psi_{0}=E\psi_{0} for the spinor ψ0\psi_{0} whose components are of form

ψ0=(Φ1(θ)Φ2(θ)),\displaystyle\psi_{0}=\begin{pmatrix}\Phi_{1}(\theta)\\ \Phi_{2}(\theta)\end{pmatrix}, (36)

yields to to the system

i(0iβθiβθ0)(Φ1Φ2)=k(Φ1Φ2),\displaystyle-i\begin{pmatrix}0&-\frac{i}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}\\ \frac{i}{\beta}\partial_{\theta}&0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\Phi_{1}\\ \Phi_{2}\end{pmatrix}=k\begin{pmatrix}\Phi_{1}\\ \Phi_{2}\end{pmatrix}, (37)

where k=EvFk=\frac{E}{\hbar v_{F}}. By decoupling the system in eq.(37) leads us to a differential equations valid for both components of the spinor given by

1βddθ(1βdΦidθ)=k2Φi(θ).\displaystyle-\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{d}{d\theta}\bigg{(}\frac{1}{\beta}\frac{d\Phi_{i}}{d\theta}\bigg{)}=k^{2}\Phi_{i}(\theta). (38)

The Eq.(38) can be further simplified by considering the change of coordinate

v(θ)=0θβ(u0,θ)𝑑θ,\displaystyle v(\theta)=\int_{0}^{\theta}\beta(u_{0},\theta^{\prime})d\theta^{\prime}, (39)

where dv=β(u0,θ)dθdv=\beta(u_{0},\theta)d\theta is the infinitesimal arc length. Accordingly, the decoupled Dirac equation Eq.(38) reads

d2Φi(v)dv2+k2Φi(v)=0,\displaystyle\frac{d^{2}\Phi_{i}(v)}{dv^{2}}+k^{2}\Phi_{i}(v)=0, (40)

whose exact solution for each component of the spinor ψ\psi along the strip length are given by

φ1(θ)\displaystyle\varphi_{1}(\theta) =\displaystyle= eiW(θ)[Acos(k0θβ(u0,θ)𝑑θ)+Bsin(k0θβ(u0,θ)𝑑θ)]\displaystyle e^{iW(\theta)}\bigg{[}A\cos\bigg{(}k\int_{0}^{\theta}\beta(u_{0},\theta^{\prime})d\theta^{\prime}\bigg{)}+B\sin\bigg{(}k\int_{0}^{\theta}\beta(u_{0},\theta^{\prime})d\theta^{\prime}\bigg{)}\bigg{]}
φ2(θ)\displaystyle\varphi_{2}(\theta) =\displaystyle= eiW(θ)[Ccos(k0θβ(u0,θ)𝑑θ)+Dsin(k0θβ(u0,θ)𝑑θ)],\displaystyle e^{-iW(\theta)}\bigg{[}C\cos\bigg{(}k\int_{0}^{\theta}\beta(u_{0},\theta^{\prime})d\theta^{\prime}\bigg{)}+D\sin\bigg{(}k\int_{0}^{\theta}\beta(u_{0},\theta^{\prime})d\theta^{\prime}\bigg{)}\bigg{]}, (41)

where the geometric phase W(θ)W(\theta) along the angular wire is given by

W(θ)=12(uβ1)β.W(\theta)=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{(\partial_{u}\beta-1)}{\beta}. (42)

It is worthwhile to mention that, despite the geometric phase eiW(θ)e^{iW(\theta)} modifies the wave function, the probability distribution φφ¯\varphi\bar{\varphi} is independent of WW. This is key feature of the geometric phases [23], and similar property is also shared with the Aharonov-Bohm phase [34].

Another noteworthy result is related to the period of the wave function. Indeed, by eq.(IV.2) the period strongly depends on the metric function β(u0,θ)\beta(u_{0},\theta). Thus, let us now investigate the effects of the geometry of the angular wires on the electronic states.

IV.2.1 Central ring

At the center of the strip, i.e., for u=0u=0 the wire forms a closed ring. The angular metric factor β\beta takes the form

β(u0=0,θ)=a,\displaystyle\beta(u_{0}=0,\theta)=a, (43)

and thus, the metric on this ring is independent of θ\theta. As a result, the geometric phase has the form

W(θ)=12(1cos(θ2)),W(\theta)=\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\right), (44)

and the first spinor component wave function is given by

φ1(θ)=ei12(1cos(θ2))[Acoskaθ+Bsinkaθ].\varphi_{1}(\theta)=e^{i\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)\right)}\bigg{[}A\cos ka\theta+B\sin ka\theta\bigg{]}. (45)

The second spinor component wave function can be obtained from Eq.(45) by making WWW\rightarrow-W. Interestingly, although the wire for u=0u=0 forms a circular ring, the Möbius strip still induces an anisotropic geometric phase. This result shows the difference between an usual ring and one constrained on the Möbius surface.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Geometric phase along the θ\theta direction for u0u_{0} = 0,±10,\pm 1 showing its 4π4\pi periodic behaviour.

Even though the geometric phase W(θ)W(\theta) is a 4π4\pi periodic function, as shown in the Fig.(10), the period of the wave function is determined by the trigonometric function inside the brackets. In fact, by considering the periodic boundary conditions

φ1(0,θ=0)=φ1(0,θ=2π)=0,\varphi_{1}(0,\theta=0)=\varphi_{1}(0,\theta=2\pi)=0, (46)

the wave function has the form

φ1(θ)=AeiW(θ)sin(akθ).\displaystyle\varphi_{1}(\theta)=Ae^{iW(\theta)}\sin\big{(}ak\theta\big{)}. (47)

Since eiW(θ)e^{iW(\theta)} lies at the unit circle in the complex plane, this factor never vanishes. Thus, the wave function period is determined by the sinkaθ\sin ka\theta function.

Using the boundary condition on the central ring in Eq.(46), the momentum is given by

kn=n2a,k_{n}=\frac{n}{2a}, (48)

and thus, the wave function has the form

φ1(θ)=AeiW(θ)sin(nθ2),\varphi_{1}(\theta)=Ae^{iW(\theta)}\sin\left(n\frac{\theta}{2}\right), (49)

where nn is a integer number. It is worthwhile to mention that the ground state (n=1)(n=1) has a period of 4π4\pi, whereas the first excited state (n=2)(n=2) is a 2π2\pi periodic function. For the nn-th state, the period is Tn=4π/nT_{n}=4\pi/n, and hence for nn odd, the period is a non-integer multiple of 4π4\pi. This feature results from the Möbius strip geometry and similar results were found for a non-relativistic electron [47].

In the fig.(11) we plotted the probability density ψψ¯\psi\bar{\psi} for the first electronic states. The figure shows that the ground state (n=1)(n=1) is centred at θ=π\theta=\pi, whereas the first excited state (n=2)(n=2) has two peaks symmetrically displaced from θ=π\theta=\pi. As nn increases, the number of peaks increases as well. Besides, for odd nn the probability density has a peak at θ=π\theta=\pi, whereas for even nn the probability vanishes at this point.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: Density of states at the central ring (u=0u=0) for the initial four energy levels. The wave function shows a free particle behaviour, since in this case the geometric phase doesn’t affect the density probability.

Accordingly, the allowed energies EnE_{n} are given by

En=n2vFa,\displaystyle E_{n}=\frac{n}{2}\frac{\hbar v_{F}}{a}, (50)

Note that the energy decreases as the inner radius aa increases, as expected for an usual ring. Furthermore, it is important to mention that the spectrum is the same for both components of the spinor. However, the nontrivial topology leads to an energy spectrum which is the half-integer multiple of the ground state, shown in Eq.(50). A similar result for a non-relativistic electron was found in the Ref.([47]). For a ring with the same inner radius as one studied in the Ref.([34]), i.e., for a=200nma=200nm, the energy of the ground state is E01,64×103eVE_{0}\approx 1,64\times 10^{-3}eV, which is lower than the ground state energy for a wire along the width. It is worthwhile to mention that the values a=200nma=200nm and L=75nmL=75nm leads to the ratio L/a=0,375L/a=0,375 and thus, they can be used to form stable Möbius strip [40].

IV.2.2 Edge wires

For wires at the edge of the Möbius band, i.e., for u=±1u=\pm 1, the wires do not form closed rings. The arc length variable vv for the outer edge is given by

v(θ)|u=1=0θ[14+(1+cos(θ/2))2]1/2𝑑θ,\displaystyle v(\theta)|_{u=1}=\int_{0}^{\theta}\bigg{[}\frac{1}{4}+(1+\cos(\theta^{\prime}/2))^{2}\bigg{]}^{1/2}d\theta^{\prime}, (51)

whereas for the inner edge has the form

v(θ)|u=1=0θ[14+(1cos(θ/2))2]1/2𝑑θ,\displaystyle v(\theta)|_{u=-1}=\int_{0}^{\theta}\bigg{[}\frac{1}{4}+(1-\cos(\theta^{\prime}/2))^{2}\bigg{]}^{1/2}d\theta^{\prime}, (52)

where we assume that 1u1-1\leq u\leq 1. Since the β(±1,θ)\beta(\pm 1,\theta) is periodic of with period 4π4\pi, then v(θ)v(\theta) is also a 4π4\pi periodic function. Therefore, the wave function has the form

φ1(θ)\displaystyle\varphi_{1}(\theta) =\displaystyle= eiW(θ)[Acos(kv(θ))+Bsin(kv(θ))].\displaystyle e^{iW(\theta)}\bigg{[}A\cos\bigg{(}kv(\theta)\bigg{)}+B\sin\bigg{(}kv(\theta)\bigg{)}\bigg{]}. (53)

Since v(0)=0v(0)=0, using the boundary conditions, the wave function is given by

φ1(θ)=AeiW(θ)sin[knv(θ)],\varphi_{1}(\theta)=Ae^{iW(\theta)}\sin[k_{n}v(\theta)], (54)

where knk_{n} satisfies the condition

kn04πβ(u0,θ)𝑑θ=nπ.\displaystyle k_{n}\int_{0}^{4\pi}\beta(u_{0},\theta)d\theta=n\pi. (55)

We plot the probability densities in Fig. 12. Note that the probability associated with the ground state is concentrated at θ=2π\theta=2\pi for u=1u=-1 and u=1u=1. Moreover, the first excited state has two peaks shifted from the point 2π2\pi. As nn increases, the number of peaks also increases. Besides, the pattern of the wave functions for even nn differs from those for odd nn.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 12: Density of states at the edge wires (u=±1u=\pm 1) for the initial four energy levels.

The fig.(13) shows how the density of states are distributed on the Möbius strip for n=1n=1. Note that the ground state (upper graphics) resembles the geometric potential profile shown in fig.(6). For n=4n=4, shown in the fig.(14), note that the density of states are rather dependent on the ratio a/La/L.

Refer to caption
Figure 13: Density of states along the Möbius strip for n=1 with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c).
Refer to caption
Figure 14: Density of states along the Möbius strip for n=4 with L/a = 0.375 (a), L/a = 1 (b) and L/a = 1.89 (c).

V Discussion and perspectives

In this work we found exact solutions for an electron constrained to wires along a graphene Möbius strip. Such a surface can be formed by performing a twist on one graphene ribbon end and connecting it to the another end. By considering the electron effectively described as a massless Dirac fermion, the Möbius strip curved geometry provides a geometric potential depending on the geometric connection instead of the curvature. The geometry of the wires depends not only on the wire metric but on the Möbius geometry and symmetries, as well.

For wires along the strip width, i.e., for a given θ0\theta_{0}, the effects of the curved geometry are encoded into a geometric phase which steams from the geometric potential. As a result, exact solutions for the Dirac equation were found which shows the formation of edge states. As we increase the energy, additional edge states forming rings appear. Moreover, the electronic probability density is highly dependent on the direction θ0\theta_{0} chosen for the wire. In fact, for some θ0\theta_{0} the electron is more concentrated near the inner edge, whereas for other values of θ0\theta_{0} the wave function is localized towards the outer edge of the band. This behaviour agrees with the lack of parity symmetry of the Möbius band, i.e., β(u,θ0)β(u,θ0)\beta(-u,\theta_{0})\neq\beta(u,\theta_{0}).

On the other hand, the wires along the strip length have a rather different geometry to those along the width. For u=0u=0, the wire forms a ring of radius aa, whereas for u=±Lu=\pm L (strip edges) the wire is open in the interval 0θ2π0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi. Due to the Möbius strip geometry, the wires for u00u_{0}\neq 0 are actually close if we consider the period 4π4\pi. Accordingly, we expect that the wave function to be a periodic function of period 4π4\pi. It turns out that, for the central ring at u=0u=0, the ground state is a 4π4\pi periodic function whose probability density is localized around θ=π\theta=\pi. For nn odd, the wave function has a period that is a non-integer multiple of 2π2\pi. Similarly, the energy levels are half-integer multiple of the quantum vF/a\hbar v_{F}/a. These non-integer features of both the electronic states and the spectrum are the result of the non-trivial geometry of the Möbius band. For a ring with the same inner radius as the cylindrical ring studied in the Ref.([34]), i.e., for a=200nma=200nm, the energy of the ground state is E01,64×103eVE_{0}\approx 1,64\times 10^{-3}eV. Since the ratio L/a=0.375L/a=0.375 is smaller than the critical ratio, the non-trivial topology of the Möbius strip could be used to generate a geometric Aharonov-Bohm effect due to pseudo-magnetic field.

For the wires along the edges of the Möbius strip, the ground states n=1n=1 exhibit a localized probability density around θ=2π\theta=2\pi. Once again, the break of the parity symmetry yields to a different profile between the ground state at the inner edge (u0=L)(u_{0}=-L) and at the outer edge (u0=L)(u_{0}=L). The electronic states for the outer edge are more concentrate than those at the inner edge.

A remarkable result we found is the role played by the geometric phase on the electronic states. For the wires along the width, the Dirac equation can be simplified by considering a geometric phase depending on the geometric potential. It turns out that the energy levels and the period of the electronic states are determined as if the strip were flat. A similar result was found numerically by Ref.([47]), though the authors considered a non-relativistic electron. On the other hand, the geometric phase provides a damping of the wave function, what leads to the parity breaking profile discussed above. Along the angular direction, the geometric phase is given by the geometric (spinor) connection. Likewise the well-known Aharonov-Bohm phase, the geometric phase does not alter the density of states for a single electron. Hence, the period of the electronic states and the energy levels are determined by the angular metric function along the wire, i.e., β(u0,θ)\beta(u_{0},\theta). This shows that the electronic properties on wires along the Möbius strip are different of those in usual circular wires, for the wires inherit the anisotropic Möbius geometry.

This work suggests as a perspective the investigation of the effects of the geometric phase on the interference pattern between electrons. Indeed, Aharanov-Bohm effects on graphene gated cylindrical nanorings of width L=75nmL=75nm and inner radius a=200nma=200nm (L/a=0.375)(L/a=0.375) were investigated [34]. By considering a Möbius ring with the same size, similar effects could be observed due to the geometric phase. Moreover, the inclusion of external fields might lead to an additional parameter to control the density of states. In addition, the interaction of the confined electron to the external electric or magnetic fields should leave a peculiar signature which could be used to characterize the material. In fact, as proposed in Ref.[13] transmission electron microscopy (TEM) or scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) can be used to probe the morphology and relate it to the density of states. For the Möbius graphene strip, these microscopic techniques could be used to determine the ratio L/aL/a of the samples.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), grants no 312356/2017-0 (JEGS), no 309553/2021-0 (CASA) for financial support.

References

  • [1] A. K. Geim, K. S. Novoselov, Nat. Mater. 6, 183 (2007).
  • [2] A. K. Geim, Science, v. 324, (2009) 1530.
  • [3] K. S. Novoselov, K. Geim, V. Morozov, D. Jiangy, Y. Zhangs, S. V. Dubonos, V. Grigorieva and A. A. Firsov, Science 306, (2004) 666.
  • [4] A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009).
  • [5] M. I. Katsnelson, Graphene: carbon in two dimensions, Cambridge University Press (2012).
  • [6] M. I. Katsnelson, Eur. Phys. J. B 51, 157–160 (2006).
  • [7] M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, Nature Physics volume 2, 620 (2006).
  • [8] A. Cortijo, Y. Ferreirós, K. Landsteiner and María A. H. Vozmediano Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 177202 (2015).
  • [9] S. Rachel, L. Fritz and M. Vojta1, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 167201 (2016).
  • [10] E. M. Nica and M. Franz, Phys. Rev. B 97, 024520 (2018).
  • [11] T. Liu, Phys. Rev. B 102, 045151 (2020)
  • [12] V. M. Pereira, A. H. Castro Neto, H. Y. Liang, and L. Mahadevan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 156603 (2010).
  • [13] F. de Juan, A. Cortijo, and María A. H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165409 (2007).
  • [14] F. de Juan, M. Sturla, and María A. H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 227205 (2012).
  • [15] M.A.H. Vozmediano, M.I. Katsnelson, F. Guinea, Phys. Reports., 496, 109 (2010).
  • [16] F. de Juan, J. L. Mañes, and María A. H. Vozmediano, Phys. Rev. B 87, 165131 (2013).
  • [17] P. Castro-Villarreal and R. Ruiz-Sánchez Phys. Rev. B 95, 125432 (2017).
  • [18] T. Liu and Z. Shi, Phys. Rev. B 103, 144420 (2021).
  • [19] A. Fasolino, J. H. Los, M. I. Katsnelson , Nature Materials 6, 858 (2007).
  • [20] F. Guinea, B. Horovitz, P. Le Doussal, Solid State Commun. 149 (2009).
  • [21] V. Atanasov and A. Saxena, Phys. Rev. B 81, 205409 (2010).
  • [22] Shikai Deng, Vikas Berr, Mat. Today, 19 4, (2016).
  • [23] C. Furtado, F. Moraes, A.M. de M. Carvalho, Phys. Lett. A, 372, 32, (2008).
  • [24] M. Watanabe, H. Komatsu, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 92, (2015) 205425.
  • [25] V. Atanasov and A. Saxena, Phys. Rev. B 92, 035440 (2015).
  • [26] J. E. G. Silva, J. Furtado, T. M. Santiago, A. C. A. Ramos and D. R. Da Costa, Phys. Lett. A 384, (2020) 126458.
  • [27] Ö. Yeşiltaş, J. Furtado, and J. E. G. Silva, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137, (2022) 416.
  • [28] J. E. G. Silva, J. Furtado, T. M. Santiago, A. C. A. Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. B 93, 225 (2020).
  • [29] F. de Juan, A. Cortijo, María A. H. Vozmediano, A. Cano Nature Physics volume 7, 810 (2011).
  • [30] S.-Jun Choi, S. Park, and H.-S. Sim, Phys. Rev. B 89, 155412 (2014).
  • [31] A. Mesaros, D. Sadri, and J. Zaanen, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155111 (2009).
  • [32] Paul E. Lammert and Vincent H. Crespi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5190 (2000).
  • [33] A J Chaves et al 2014 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26 185301.
  • [34] P. Recher, B. Trauzettel, A. Rycerz, Ya. M. Blanter, C. W. J. Beenakker, and A. F. Morpurgo, Phys. Rev. B 76, 235404 (2007).
  • [35] Nan Zhao, H. Dong, Shuo Yang, and C. P. Sun, Phys. Rev. B 79, 125440 (2009).
  • [36] M. Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry, Vol. 3, third edition, publish or perish (1999).
  • [37] E. L. Starostin and G. H. M. van der Heijden, J. Elast. 119, (2014) 67.
  • [38] Z. L. Guo, Z. R. Gong, H. Dong, and C. P. Sun, Phys. Rev. B 80, 195310 (2009).
  • [39] Douglas J. Ballon and Henning U. Voss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 247701 (2008).
  • [40] X. Wang, X. Zheng, M. Ni, L. Zou, and Z. Zenga, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 123103 (2010).
  • [41] E. W. S. Caetano, V. N. Freire, S. G. dos Santos, D. S. Galvão, and F. Sato, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 164719 (2008).
  • [42] X. Zhang, B. Tian, W. Zhen, Z. Li, Y. Wu, G. Lu, Jour. of Catal., 354, 258, (2017).
  • [43] S. Yue, Q. Yan, Z. Zhu, H. Cui, Q. Zheng, G. Su, Carbon 71, 150 (2014).
  • [44] A. Quelle, W. Beugeling, C. Morais Smith, Solid State commun., 215 (2015).
  • [45] K. Flouris, M. M. Jimenez, and H. J. Herrmann, Phys. Rev. B 105, (2022) 235122.
  • [46] A. Güçlü, M. Grabowski, and P. Hawrylak Phys. Rev. B 87, 035435 (2013).
  • [47] Z. Li and L. R. Ram-Mohan, Phys. Rev. B 85, (2012).
  • [48] J. F. O. de Souza and C. Furtado, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 30, (2016) 1650224.
  • [49] M. Burgess and B. Jensen, Phys. Rev. A 48, (1993) 1861.
  • [50] B. Jensen and R. Dandoloff, Phys. Lett. A 375, (2011) 448.
  • [51] A Cortijo, M. A. H Vozmediano, Europhysics Letters 77 (4), 47002.