This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Discovery of Griffiths phase in itinerant magnetic semiconductor Fe1-xCoxS2

S. Guo Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA    D.P. Young Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA    R.T. Macaluso Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA    D.A. Browne Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA    N.L. Henderson Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA    J.Y. Chan Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA    L.L. Henry Department of Physics, Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70813 USA    J.F. DiTusa Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 USA
(July 27, 2025)
Abstract

Critical points that can be suppressed to zero temperature are interesting because quantum fluctuations have been shown to dramatically alter electron gas properties. Here, the metal formed by Co doping the paramagnetic insulator FeS2, Fe1-xCoxS2, is demonstrated to order ferromagnetically at x>xc=0.01±0.005x>x_{c}=0.01\pm 0.005 where we observe unusual transport, magnetic, and thermodynamic properties. We show that this magnetic semiconductor undergoes a percolative magnetic transition with distinct similarities to the Griffiths phase, including singular behavior at xcx_{c} and zero temperature.

pacs:
75.50.Pp, 75.40.-s, 72.15.Qm, 75.20..Hr

The paramagnetic (PM) to ferromagnetic (FM) transition in magnetic semiconductors is a prominent topic in condensed matter physics because of efforts to discover materials useful for spintronicsspintrev . Magnetic semiconducting materials are considered essential for use as spin injectors in this nascent technology, yet single phase materials with Curie temperatures, TCT_{C}, well above 300 K that are compatible with today’s technologies have not been identified. Problems encountered by efforts to increase TCT_{C} of Mn doped III-V semiconductors suggest that a deeper understanding is neededmatsukura and recent theoretical investigations have provided some progresspriour ; schulthess . However, disorder and strong Coulomb interactions are both central issues in semiconductors with magnetic impurities and this makes modeling difficult. In Mn doped III-V semiconductors, Mn provides localized magnetic moments as well as a smaller number of hole carriers that couple the local moments via the RKKY interaction. Models based on a magnetic-polaron Hamiltonian with random arrangements of RKKY-coupled moments have predicted a zero-temperature, TT, percolative transition at critical magnetic moment and charge carrier densitiespriour . This critical point is governed by the competition between a nonmagnetic ground state and the magnetically ordered one and because of the doping induced disorder these materials are expected to display Griffiths phase singularities. Other than reports in doped LaMnO3 and LaCoO4 suggestive of Griffiths phase physicssalamon , there are no convincing demonstrations of Griffiths phases in magnetic semiconductors. A second class of materials predicted to display the Griffiths phase is the heavy fermion metals tuned by chemical substitution to be near a T=0T=0 quantum critical point (QCP)Stewart ; Griffiths ; CastroNeto ; ouyang . In this case, rare clusters of strongly coupled magnetic moments are predicted to tunnel between magnetization states over classically forbidden regions resulting in non-analytic thermodynamic quantities at T=0T=0CastroNeto .

In this letter we report on a magnetic and semiconducting system which resembles (GaMn)As with the advantage that single crystals can easily be grown and characterized; Co doped iron pyrite or ’fools gold’. FeS2 is an insulator with a 1\sim 1 eV band gap. It is isostructural to CoS2, an itinerant ferromagnet with TC=120T_{C}=120 KJarrett . FeS2 and CoS2 form a continuous solid solution over the entire concentration range, xx, in Fe1-xCoxS2, where it is fully spin-polarized for 0.25<x<0.90.25<x<0.9PyriteHalfMetal . Previous magnetic susceptibility, χ\chi, measurements found FM order at T>2T>2 K for x0.05x\geq 0.05Jarrett . Here, we discover metallic behavior for x0.001x\geq 0.001 with magnetic order at x>xc=0.01±0.005x>x_{c}=0.01\pm 0.005 consistent with earlier work. In addition, we observe an evolution from a partially Kondo screened metal at x<xcx<x_{c} to a ferromagnet characterized by a percolative transition for x>xcx>x_{c}. For xxcx\approx x_{c} we find a divergent Sommerfeld coefficient at low-TT indicating non-Fermi liquid behavior along with a magnetic field HH and TT dependent magnetization MM that suggests a critical transition to a Griffiths phase-like state. In metallic Fe1-xCoxS2 we discover evidence for the unusual coexistence of magnetically ordered phases and partial Kondo screening of magnetic moments. In contrast the modelpriour for (GaMn)As predicts a Griffiths phase under the conditions of localized electronic carriers where magnetic-polarons are important. In light of the inferred competition between the RKKY coupling and Kondo screening, as well as the divergent thermodynamic properties at xcx_{c} and T0T\rightarrow 0, this system may be more closely described by models of ff-electron materials displaying quantum criticalityCastroNeto .

Single crystals were synthesized by standard I2 vapor techniques from high purity starting materials. Crystals were etched in HCl to remove any remaining flux and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis. The Co concentration of our crystals is consistent with the saturated MM at 5 T and 1.8 K and is about 70% of the nominal concentration of our starting materials. MM and χ\chi were measured in a SQUID magnetometer for T>1.8T>1.8 K and a dilution refrigerator above 50 mK. The resistivity, ρ\rho, and Hall effect were measured using four-probe lock-in techniques at 17 or 19Hz, with thin Pt wires attached using silver paste or silver epoxy. The specific heat was measured using a standard thermal relaxation method.

Our MM measurements identify magnetically ordered states with TCT_{C}s shown in Fig. 1a by way of a peak in the real part of the AC susceptibility, χ\chi^{\prime} (Fig. 2a), that is apparent in all of our samples with x>xC=0.01±0.005x>x_{C}=0.01\pm 0.005. We have checked that TcT_{c} signals a FM transition by comparing to a standard Arrott analysis of a dense set of M(H,T)M(H,T) data for a few samples with x0.05x\geq 0.05Arrott . A comparison is made in Fig. 1a between TCT_{C} and the Weiss temperature, θW\theta_{W}, determined from the TT-dependence of χ\chi^{\prime} at TT’s well above TCT_{C}, Fig. 2a, b. It is apparent that for x>xcx>x_{c} a FM phase emerges and that TCT_{C} increases systematically with xx. The scatter in these data is likely due to the variations in simultaneously grown crystals as is evident by the range of θW\theta_{W} values for crystals of the same or similar xx. In Fig. 1b the density of magnetic moments, nn, determined from fits of the Curie-Weiss (CW) form (Fig. 2b) to χ(T)\chi(T) for T>>TCT>>T_{C} are displayed. We have assumed an effective moment of J=1/2J=1/2 and found nn much larger than the high-HH low-TT saturated moment for x>xcx>x_{c}. This could indicate either a large Rhodes-Wohlfarth ratio as in itinerant ferromagnets (between 1.8 and 7 as compared to 3.5 in MnSi), or J>1/2J>1/2 local momentsmoriya . To investigate this we have measured the Hall effect to determine the carrier concentration, nHalln_{Hall}, of our samples. nHalln_{Hall} was determined at high-HH to eliminate anomalous contributions. Fig. 1b shows that nHalln_{Hall} ranges from 10 to 30% of xx indicating that only a fraction of dopants donate electrons to a conducting band. Thus, it is likely that the difference between the Curie and saturated moments results from localized electrons with J>1/2J>1/2.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color) Doping dependence (a) TCT_{C} from peak in AC susceptibility, χ\chi^{\prime} and from Arrott analysis Arrott , Weiss temperature, ΘW\Theta_{W}, Kondo temperature, TT^{*}. Lines are linear fits. (b) Curie moment per formula unit from Curie-Weiss analysis and Hall carrier density per formula unit, nHalln_{Hall}, multiplied by ten. (c) Density, NN, and JJ of spin clusters per formula unit.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color) Susceptibility and Specific heat. (a) Temperature TT dependence of real part of AC susceptibility, χ\chi^{\prime}. Inset: χ(H)\chi^{\prime}(H) at 4 K with power law fit (red line). (b) TT dependence of 1/χ1/\chi^{\prime} at 0 and 1 mT. Red line is fit of Curie-Weiss form at high-TT. Inset: 1/χ(0)1/\chi^{\prime}(0) vs. reduced TT, (T/TCr1T/T_{C}^{r}-1). Red line is 1/χ=a(TTCr)δ1/\chi^{\prime}=a(T-T_{C}^{r})^{\delta} with δ=0.45±0.04\delta=0.45\pm 0.04 and TCr=24±0.5T_{C}^{r}=24\pm 0.5 K. (c) Specific heat, CC divided by TT, vs. TT for x=0.002x=0.002 (circles), 0.0050.005 (bullets), 0.0070.007 at H=0H=0 (blue squares), H=1H=1 T (solid line), and H=3H=3 T (dashed line), 0.030.03 (FM) (triangles), and 0.0450.045 (FM) (diamonds). Red line is fit of the form aTαaT^{-\alpha} with α=0.69±0.05\alpha=0.69\pm 0.05, for x=0.005x=0.005. Dotted lines are fits of a Sommerfeld plus Schottky model to the data at T>2T>2 K.

To explore more fully the properties of Fe1-xCoxS2, we have measured the specific heat, CC, finding nearly identical CC for all our crystals above 20 K since this region is dominated by phonons. However, at lower TT’s we find a contribution that grows with xx shown in Fig. 2c. Samples that display a finite-TT peak in χ\chi also display a broad maximum in C(T)/TC(T)/T, albeit at a lower TT. The idea of spin clusters suggested by M(H,T)M(H,T) and χ(T)\chi^{\prime}(T) was probed by comparing C(T)C(T) and χ(T)\chi^{\prime}(T) to determine JJ, the fluctuating moment above TCT_{C}. At T>2KT>2K we fit C(T)C(T) by the sum of γT\gamma T, a phonon term βT3\beta T^{3} (β=2.17×105\beta=2.17\times 10^{-5} J/mol K4), and a Schottky term due to localized magnetic moments with nJ(J+1)nJ(J+1) determined by fits of the CW form to χ(T)\chi^{\prime}(T) (Fig. 2c). The best fit nn and JJ are shown in Fig. 1c where we observe that J>1/2J>1/2, n<xn<x, and that both grow with xx. Thus, spin clusters are consistent with both C(T)C(T) above 2 K and χ(T)\chi^{\prime}(T).

The magnetic transitions were explored in detail by measuring the low-HH χ(H,T)\chi^{\prime}(H,T) as in Fig. 2a, b. What is interesting is that both the TT and magnitude of the χ\chi^{\prime} maxima are significantly suppressed by very small HH. χ(H)\chi^{\prime}(H) at 4 K is displayed in the inset to Fig. 2a where a power law form χ(H)=bHβ\chi^{\prime}(H)=bH^{-\beta} with β=0.62±0.03\beta=0.62\pm 0.03 describes the data well. In addition to this extreme field sensitivity we have observed deviations from CW behavior. In Fig. 2b we plot 1/χ1/\chi^{\prime} at DC fields of 0 and 1 mT with dramatic changes evident below 30 K. The 1 mT data follow a CW form, χ(TθW)1\chi^{\prime}\propto(T-\theta_{W})^{-1} with θW=13\theta_{W}=13 K for T>θWT>\theta_{W}. In contrast, the H=0H=0 data cannot be described by a CW form to much higher TTs and the deviation is in the direction of smaller 1/χ1/\chi^{\prime}. The growth of χ\chi^{\prime} beyond the CW form is an indication of short range FM correlations [See e.g.ouyang ] as spin clusters imply larger χ\chi^{\prime}. In the inset of Fig. 2b we display a fit of the form 1/χ=(TTCr)δ1/\chi^{\prime}=(T-T_{C}^{r})^{\delta} to the data, TCr=24T_{C}^{r}=24 ±0.5\pm 0.5 K 2ΘW\approx 2\Theta_{W} the critical TT for the largest clusters and δ=0.45±0.04\delta=0.45\pm 0.04, suggestive of Griffiths phase formation.

Samples that remain PM down to our lowest TT have a C(T)/TC(T)/T that decreases with TT and that can be accurately described by a aTαaT^{-\alpha} form with α<1\alpha<1. The red line in Fig. 2c represents this form with α=0.69±0.03\alpha=0.69\pm 0.03. Application of H>0H>0 suppresses the low-TT C(T)/TC(T)/T of all of our samples and the PM samples display a C(T)/TC(T)/T that resembles our FM samples. If we make the assumption that the conduction electron gas acts independently from a set of weakly interacting local moments, then C(T)C(T) would be well fit by the sum of γT\gamma T, βT3\beta T^{3} and a Schottky-like anomaly down to zero-TT. At finite field, the anomaly would evolve into a Schottky peak. Although this description works well above 1 K, our low-TT data does not conform to this simple picture. Interestingly, materials in proximity to metal-insulator transitions have a diverging C(T)/TC(T)/T also described by a TαT^{-\alpha} form. This is ascribed to the random position of local moments that are interacting antiferromagnetically leading to a singlet ground stateBhattandLee . However, since our samples are either FM or nearly FM, we do not consider this to be a likely explanation of our data. Instead, we suggest that the divergence of C(T)/TC(T)/T for xxcx\sim x_{c} is indicative of Griffiths phase physics and/or to the proximity to a FM QCP. Magnetic fields or ordering return C(T)/TC(T)/T to a Fermi liquid form at TT’s proportional to HH or TCT_{C}.

The charge carrier transport properties of our crystals are presented in Fig. 3. While nominally pure FeS2 displays insulating behavior, Co doping at a level of x=0.001x=0.001 is sufficient to create a metal (Fig. 3a). Larger xx tends to increase nHalln_{Hall} and decrease the resistivity, ρ\rho. One interesting feature is that the TT-dependence of ρ\rho for xxcx\approx x_{c} closely follows a TξT^{\xi} form with ξ=1.6±0.1\xi=1.6\pm 0.1 over a wide TT-range similar to that found in MnSi near the critical pressure for suppression of ferromagnetism. It is also consistent with the spin fluctuation model of nearly FM metals where a T5/3T^{5/3} dependence is predicted for itinerant magnets. However, as noted above, the magnetic moments are likely to result from localized electrons so it is not clear that this model is appropriate. Evidence for the importance of magnetic fluctuationsmoriya ; millis1 ; nicklas in determining ρ(T)\rho(T) can be seen in Fig. 3b where the TT-derivative of ρ\rho normalized by ρ0=ρ(4K)\rho_{0}=\rho(4K), dρ/dT/ρ0d\rho/dT/\rho_{0}, is displayed. The normalization removes error in crystal geometry determination as well as changes due to variations in nHalln_{Hall}. This quantity is strongly peaked near xcx_{c}. Thus, we observe a reduced power-law behavior of ρ(T)\rho(T) along with an increased scattering rate over a wide TT-range in proximity to the zero-TT critical point for magnetism.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color) Carrier Transport (a) Resistivity, ρ\rho, vs. temperature to the 1.6 power, T1.6T^{1.6}, for a subset of our crystals. (b) TT-derivative of ρ\rho, dρ/dTd\rho/dT, normalized by ρ(4\rho(4 K)), ρ0\rho_{0}, vs TT. (c) TT dependence of ρ\rho for x=0.005x=0.005 at magnetic fields, HH, identified in the figure. Blue line is fit of a lnT\ln{T} behavior for H=0H=0 and red line is fit of Kondo theoryHamann . (d) Scaling plot of magnetoresistance at TTs and HHs identified in (c) and (d).

In addition, a second contribution to ρ\rho is apparent at T<20T<20 K as demonstrated for a PM sample in Fig. 3c. Here ρ\rho increases with decreasing TT in a manner that is well described by a logarithm over more than a decade in TT with Kondo temperatures T=T^{*}= 0.8, 1.5, 1.4, and 2.5 K for x=x=0.002, 0.004, 0.005, and 0.007, Fig. 1aHamann . We have also measured a large negative magnetoresistance (MR) (Fig. 3c, d) that is identical in the transverse and longitudinal current directions. This indicates a spin, rather than orbital, mechanism for the MR consistent with a Kondo effect dominating ρ(T,H)\rho(T,H). Furthermore, all of our TT- and HH-dependent data can be scaled by a single ion Kondo form; ρ(T,H)ρ(T,0)/ρ(T,0)\rho(T,H)-\rho(T,0)/\rho(T,0) scales as H/(T+T)H/(T+T^{*}) for TTT\geq T^{*} as shown in Fig. 3dSchlottmann . We conclude that a single energy scale, likely a Kondo coupling of conduction electrons with the local moments associated with the Co ions, determines the low-TT ρ\rho of Fe1-xCoxS2.

The observation of power-law divergent CC and χ\chi^{\prime} for xxcx\sim x_{c} with similar exponents suggests that a single physical mechanism describes both. The sensitivity to magnetic fields indicates that there is weak coupling between clusters creating a fragile magnetic order for small xx. In Fig. 4 we summarize the evolution of Fe1-xCoxS2 from a strongly PM low-carrier-density metal to a FM with increasing xx. In Fig. 4a, for x<xcx<x_{c} and T=0T=0, the system consists of a small density of magnetic moments localized on the Co impurity sites. The electron carriers screen only a portion of these moments via the Kondo coupling evident in the carrier transport. As xx increases to xcx_{c} in Fig. 4b there is a percolative transition at T=0T=0 and we observe a divergent C(T)/TC(T)/T at low-TT. Clearly for a magnetic transition to occur at x0.01x\sim 0.01 long range interactions between moments is necessary. Thus, a percolative transition occurs at xc<<0.2x_{c}<<0.2 required for a face-centered-cubic lattice with short range interactionslorenz . At still larger xx, Figs. 4c and d, the FM state is complete at low-TT. For TTs above the critical point the system is dominated by super-paramagnetic regions where magnetic moments are correlated, but long range ordering is not apparent. The system consists of weakly coupled clusters that are easily modified by small HH. In addition, the clusters have a finite probability to tunnel to nearly degenerate MM states.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color) Evolution. (a) Low Co concentration (x<xcx<x_{c}) with disperse local moments (red arrows) and low density of itinerant electrons (blue arrows). Electrons partially screen moments via Kondo coupling. (b) At x=xcx=x_{c} a percolative magnetic transition occurs at T=0T=0. Ordered regions are red with magnetization, MM, direction green. (c) Larger xx, x>xcx>x_{c}, fully ordered at T=0T=0 with large MM domains. (d) T>TCT>T_{C}, clusters of strongly coupled spins form for T<TCrT<T_{C}^{r}. Tunneling of clusters indicated by the double-ended green arrows.

These features are described by Griffiths phase models Griffiths ; CastroNeto where disorder is sufficient to cause clusters of localized short lived magnetic order at TT’s above the global ordering temperature. As the system is cooled toward TCT_{C}, these clusters grow and display switching of MM via tunneling. The consequence of this model is a power-law form, 1/(TTCr)1λ1/(T-T_{C}^{r})^{1-\lambda}, with λ<1\lambda<1, of the thermodynamic quantities above TCT_{C} that can be suppressed with small to moderate magnetic fields. For Fe1-xCoxS2 0.30<λ<0.550.30<\lambda<0.55. Griffiths phase physics has been suggested to explain the non-Fermi liquid behavior of heavy fermion antiferromagnets with Néel temperatures driven to zero by chemical substitution. However, Millis et al.millis2 point out that the coupling of magnetic clusters to conduction electrons will suppress tunneling, removing the non-Fermi liquid response in the model. In contrast to well developed conductors, our materials are nascent metals with poor electrical screening formed by doping an insulator. Although Fe1-xCoxS2 does not appear to be described by a magnetic-polaron Hamiltonian as in Ref. [3], our data suggest that Griffiths phase anomalies, likely influenced by Kondo screening, are in fact observable in magnetic semiconductors. The result is singular behavior at T=0T=0 similar to models of Griffiths phases in ff-electron antiferromagnets.

We thank I. Vekhter and C. Capan for discussions. JFD, DPY, and JYC acknowledge support of the NSF under DMR0406140, DMR0449022, and DMR0237664.

References

  • (1) S. A. Wolf et al., Science 294, 1488 (2001); S. von Molnar & D. Read, Proc. IEEE 91, 715 (2003).
  • (2) F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, A. Shen,& Y. Sugawara, Phys. Rev. B 57, R2037 (1998); M. L. Reed et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3473 (2001); R. C. Myers et al, Phys. Rev. B 74, 155203 (2006).
  • (3) D. J. Priour & S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 127201 (2006). V. M. Galitski,A. Kaminski, & S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92,177203 (2004).
  • (4) T. C. Schulthess et al., Nature Mat. 4, ;838 (2005).
  • (5) M. B. Salamon, P. Lin, & S. H. Chun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 197203 (2002); J. Deisenhofer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257202 (2005); Y. Shimada, S. Miyasaka, R. Kumai, & Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. B 73, 134424 (2006).
  • (6) G. R. Stewart, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73,797 (2001)
  • (7) R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23,17 (1969).
  • (8) A. H. Castro Neto, G. Castilla, & B. A. Jones, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81,3531 (1998); A. H. Castro Neto & B. A. Jones, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14975 (2000).
  • (9) Z. W. Ouyang et al., Phys. Rev. B 74, 94404 (2006).
  • (10) H. S. Jarrett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 617 (1968).
  • (11) I. I. Mazin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3000 (2000); S. F. Cheng et al., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 6847 (2003); K.Ramesha et al., Phys. Rev. B 70, 214409 (2004); L.Wang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94,056602 (2005).
  • (12) A. Arrott & J. E.Noakes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 786 (1967).
  • (13) See e.g. T. Moriya,Spin fluctuations in itinerant electron magnetism., edited by P. Fulde (Springer, Berlin, 1985).
  • (14) R. N. Bhatt and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 344 (1982). M. A. Paalanen, J. E. Graebner, R. N. Bhatt, & S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 597 (1988).
  • (15) A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7183 (1993).
  • (16) M. Nicklas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4268 (1999).
  • (17) D. R. Hamann, et al. Phys. Rev. 158, 570 (1967); J. S. Schiling, Adv. Phys. 28, 657 (1979).
  • (18) P. Schlottmann, Phys. Rep. 181, 1 (1989) ; B. Andraka & G. R. Stewart Phys. Rev. B 49, 12359 (1994).
  • (19) C. D. Lorenz & R. M. Ziff, Cond-Mat 9806224 (2006).
  • (20) A. J. Millis, D. K. Morr, & J. Schmalian, Phys. Rev. B 66, 174433 (2002).