This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Elementary construction of some Jenkins-Strebel differentials

©2010     A.B.Bogatyrev Partially supported by RFBR grants 10-01-00407 and RAS Program ”Modern problems of theoretical mathematics”

The behavior of trajectories of a regular quadratic differential on a Riemann surface is chaotic but in one case. When the critical graph of the foliation is compact, its complement is a finite set of cylinders swept out by homotopic closed leaves. The existence of such differentials was proved by Jenkins and Strebel yet in 1950-1960 [1, 2, 3]. Later a more simple proof was given by Wolf [9]. Mentioned results are purely existence theorems and there are very few explicit constructions of those differentials. See e.g. [5, 6] for one- parametric families of them. Of course, one should not think that Jenkins-Strebel (or JS) differentials are somewhat exceptional. After all, they are dense in the space of regular quadratic differentials. The purpose of this note is to give an explicit multi-parametric construction for JS differentials on real algebraic curves. Roughly speaking, the square of any real holomorphic abelian differential subjected to certain linear restrictions will be a JS quadratic differential.

Let a compact genus gg Riemann surface XX admits an anticonformal involution J¯\bar{J} which we also call reflection. The components of the set of fixed points of the involution are smooth closed curves known as real ovals [4]. The reflection J¯\bar{J} acts naturally on the space of 1-homologies of the surface and splits it into the subspaces corresponding to eigenvalues ±1\pm 1 of operator J¯\bar{J}:

2gH1(X,)=H1+(X,)H1(X,),H1±(X,):=(I±J¯)H1(X,).\mathbb{R}^{2g}\cong H_{1}(X,\mathbb{R})=H_{1}^{+}(X,\mathbb{R})\oplus H_{1}^{-}(X,\mathbb{R}),\qquad H_{1}^{\pm}(X,\mathbb{R}):=(I\pm\bar{J})H_{1}(X,\mathbb{R}). (1)

The elements C=J¯CC=\bar{J}C of the subspace H1+(X)H_{1}^{+}(X) we call even cycles. Respectively, the elements C=J¯CC=-\bar{J}C of the subspace H1(X)H_{1}^{-}(X) we call odd cycles. The subspaces of even and odd cycles contain the full rank lattices of integer cycles H1±(X,):=H1±(M,)H1(X,)H_{1}^{\pm}(X,\mathbb{Z}):=H_{1}^{\pm}(M,\mathbb{R})\cap H_{1}(X,\mathbb{Z}). For example, the oriented real ovals of the surface (if any) are its even integer cycles.

The intersection index of cycles is a non-degenerate skew-symmetric form on the space H1(M,)H_{1}(M,\mathbb{R}). The reflection J¯\bar{J} changes the orientation in any intersection point of integer cycles, therefore

J¯C1J¯C2=C1C2,C1,C2H1(M,).\bar{J}C_{1}\circ\bar{J}C_{2}=-C_{1}\circ C_{2},\qquad C_{1},C_{2}\in H_{1}(M,\mathbb{R}). (2)

Now we easily see that the subspaces of even and odd cycles are lagrangian (i.e. the intersection form vanishes in the subspaces), their dimensions are equal and therefore equal to gg.

The space Ω1(X)g\Omega^{1}(X)\cong\mathbb{C}^{g} of holomorphic differentials on XX contains the subspace of the so called real differentials Ω1(X)g\Omega^{1}_{\mathbb{R}}(X)\cong\mathbb{R}^{g}, which become complex conjugate after the action of reflection: J¯η:=η¯\bar{J}^{*}\eta:=\overline{\eta}, ηΩ1(X)\eta\in\Omega^{1}_{\mathbb{R}}(X). The integration of real differentials along even (resp. odd) cycles give us real (resp. pure imaginary) numbers:

Cξ=±J¯Cξ=±CJ¯ξ=±Cξ¯=±Cξ¯.\int_{C}\xi=\int_{\pm\bar{J}C}\xi=\pm\int_{C}\bar{J}^{*}\xi=\pm\int_{C}\overline{\xi}=\pm\overline{\int_{C}\xi}.
Lemma 1

The space (H1(X,))g(H_{1}^{-}(X,\mathbb{R}))^{*}\cong\mathbb{R}^{g} of real linear functionals over odd cycles is canonically isomorphic to each of the following two spaces:
(i) H1+(X,)H_{1}^{+}(X,\mathbb{R});        (ii) Ω1(X)\Omega^{1}_{\mathbb{R}}(X).

(i). In this case the functional is given by the intersection form. The non-degeneracy of this form implies that an even cycle annihilating all odd cycles should be zero.
(ii). In this case the functional is given by the formula

η|C:=iCη,CH1(X).\langle\eta|C^{-}\rangle:=i\int_{C^{-}}\eta,\qquad C^{-}\in H_{1}^{-}(X).

If real differential η\eta annihilates all odd cycles, then all of its periods are real and therefore η=0\eta=0.    

Remarks: 1) Usually, for the normalization of abelian differentials they take half of a canonical basis in the homologies: AA- cycles or BB-cycles. From statement (ii) of the above lemma it follows that one can use either even or odd cycles for this purpose once the surface admits a reflection. To generalize this observation let us show that any gg-dimensional lagrangian subspace of the homology space may be used for the normalization. In other words, there exist a unique holomorphic differential on the surface XX with given periods in the basis of the lagrangian subspace of homologies.
We choose the basis C1,C2,,C2gC_{1},C_{2},\dots,C_{2g} in the space of real homologies of the curve XX so that the first gg elements are in the given lagrangian subspace. We do not assume that this basis is either canonical or even integer. Riemann bilinear identity holds:

0η2=iXηη¯=is,j=12gFsjCsηCjη¯,0\leq||\eta||^{2}=i\int_{X}\eta\wedge\overline{\eta}=-i\sum\limits_{s,j=1}^{2g}F_{sj}\int_{C_{s}}\eta\overline{\int_{C_{j}}\eta}, (3)

where the matrix FsjF_{sj} is the inverse of the intersection matrix CsCjC_{s}\circ C_{j}. If Cjη=0\int_{C_{j}}\eta=0 for j=1,,gj=1,\dots,g, then the sum in the right-hand side contains the terms with s,j>gs,j>g only. But in the latter case Fsj=0F_{sj}=0. Indeed, the intersection matrix has block 2×22\times 2 structure with zero g×gg\times g matrix in (1,1) position. The inverse matrix has zero block of the same size in (2,2) position. We see that only zero holomorphic differential has zero periods along all cycles of our lagrangian subspace.

2)From the above lemma it follows that there is a 1-1 correspondence between even cycles C+C^{+} and real differentials η\eta on the surface given by the rule:

iCη=C+C,CH1(X,).i\int_{C}\eta=C^{+}\circ C,\qquad\forall C\in H_{1}^{-}(X,\mathbb{R}).

This correspondence is not Poincare duality as the latter equality is not true for even cycles CC.

3) Let the surface XX has kk real ovals. The span of real ovals in the homology space has real dimension kk if the surface is not separating (i.e. the surface with real ovals removed is connected). Otherwise the dimension is 1 less. We’ll show that the differentials corresponding to the points of this linear span are JS when squared. Therefore we give a kk or (k1)(k-1) -parametric family of JS differentials on a given surface XX.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Function H(x)H(x) as a height function on the surface with real ovals removed.
Theorem 1

Let the integral of real holomorphic differential η\eta along an odd cycle CC^{-} vanishes if the intersection index of CC^{-} with any real oval is zero. Then the foliation η2>0\eta^{2}>0 is Jenkens-Strebel.

Proof. Let us remove real ovals from the surface. In the remaining part(s) of the surface one can correctly define the function

H(x):=Imxη,xX{real ovals}.H(x):=Im\leavevmode\nobreak\ \int_{*}^{x}\eta,\qquad x\in X\setminus\{\mbox{\rm real ovals}\}.

Indeed, if the closed path CC does not intersect real ovals, then

2ImCη=ImCJ¯Cη=0,2Im\leavevmode\nobreak\ \int_{C}\eta=Im\leavevmode\nobreak\ \int_{C-\bar{J}C}\eta=0,

because (CJ¯C)C+=2CC+=0(C-\bar{J}C)\circ C^{+}=2C\circ C^{+}=0, where C+C^{+} is any real oval.

This globally defined function H(x)H(x) is constant on the boundary components of the cut surface and its level lines are the leaves of the foliation η2>0\eta^{2}>0 – see Fig. 1.     

Example. Let us consider a hyperelliptic curve with real branchpoints. The span of real ovals is the entire space of even cycles. Therefore, the square of any real holomorphic differential is JS. For general real hyperelliptic curves the bases in the lattices of even and odd integer cycles are described in [8]. This makes the condition of Theorem 1 being explicit.

References

  • [1] Jenkins J.A. On the existence of certain general extremal metrics, Ann. of Math. 66 (1957), 440-453.
  • [2] Strebel, K., Über quadratishe Differentiale mit geschlossenen Trajektorien und extremale quasiconforme Abbildungen// Festband zum 70 Geburtstag von rolf Nevanlinna, Springer (1966), 105-127.
  • [3] Strebel, K., Bemerkungen über quadratishe Differentiale mit geschlossenen Trajektorien// Ann. Acad. Sci Fenn. A.I., 405 (1967), 1–12.
  • [4] Natanzon S.M., Moduli of Riemann surfaces, real algebraic curves, and their superanalogs. – Transl. Math. Mono. 225, AMS, 2004.
  • [5] N.Ya.Amburg, An example of a regular Strebel differential//Russian Math. Surveys, 57:5 (2002), 145 – 146
  • [6] I. V. Artamkin, Yu. A. Levitskaya, G. B. Shabat, Examples of Families of Strebel Differentials on Hyperelliptic Curves// Funct. Anal. Appl., 43:2 (2009), 73 – 75.
  • [7] Strebel, K., Quadratic differentials – Springer , 1984.
  • [8] Bogatyrev A.B., Chebyshev construction for rational functions// Sbornik: Math., 201:11, 2010.
  • [9] Wolf M., On the existence of Jenkins-Strebel differentials using harmonic maps from surfaces to graphs// Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. AI Math., 20 (1995), 269 – 278

119991 Russia, Moscow GSP-1, ul. Gubkina 8,
Institute for Numerical Mathematics,
Russian Academy of Sciences
gourmet@inm.ras.ru, ab.bogatyrev@gmail.com