This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Embedding products of graphs into Euclidean spaces

Mikhail Skopenkov Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119992, Russia mikhail\cdotskopenkov  gmail\cdotcom

For any collection of graphs G1,,GNG_{1},\dots,G_{N}, we find the minimal dimension dd such that the product G1××GNG_{1}\times\dots\times G_{N} is embeddable into d\mathbb{R}^{d}. In particular, we prove that (K5)n(K_{5})^{n} and (K3,3)n(K_{3,3})^{n} are not embeddable into 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}, where K5K_{5} and K3,3K_{3,3} are the Kuratowski graphs. This is a solution to a problem by Menger from 1929. The idea of the proof is a reduction to a problem from so-called Ramsey link theory: we show that any embedding LS2n1L\to S^{2n-1}, where LL is the join of nn copies of a 44-point set, has a pair of linked (n1)(n-1)-dimensional spheres.

Embedding, van Kampen obstruction, graph, product, almost embedding, linkless embedding, Ramsey link theory
:
57Q35, 57Q45
support: This is an improved version of the paper published in Fund. Math. 179 (2003), 191–197. The author was supported in part by INTAS grant 06-1000014-6277, Russian Foundation of Basic Research grants 05-01-00993-a, 06-01-72551-NCNIL-a, 07-01-00648-a, President of the Russian Federation grant NSh-4578.2006.1, Agency for Education and Science grant RNP-2.1.1.7988, and Moebius Contest Foundation for Young Scientists.

Introduction. Our main result is a solution to the Menger problem from his paper [Men29]:

(K5)N↪̸2Nand(K3,3)N↪̸2N.(K_{5})^{N}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2N}\qquad\text{and}\qquad(K_{3,3})^{N}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2N}.

Hereafter we denote by KnK_{n} a complete graph on nn vertices and by Kn,nK_{n,n} a complete bipartite graph with nn vertices in each part. We write KLK\hookrightarrow L if a compact polyhedron KK is piecewise linearly embeddable into a polyhedron LL, i.e., there is an injective piecewise linear map KLK\to L. Space n\mathbb{R}^{n} is viewed as a non-compact polyhedron. We get the same result on topological non-embeddability.

Menger posed this problem explicitly for N=2N=2 but the title of his paper [Men29] suggests that he was interested in arbitrary NN as well. We also solve a more general problem posed by Dranishnikov [Gal92]: given a collection of graphs G1,,GNG_{1},\dots,G_{N}, find the minimal dimension dd such that G1××GNdG_{1}\times\dots\times G_{N}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{d}.

The topological problem of embeddability is an important one (e. g., see [Sch84, ReSk99, ARS01, Sko07]). Our special case of the problem is interesting because the complete answer can be obtained and is stated easily, but the proof is nontrivial and contains interesting ideas. For applications of the result, see the works by Gromov [Gr10] and Lindenstrauss–Tsukamoto [LT14].

Theorem~1

Let G1,,GnG_{1},\dots,G_{n} be finite connected graphs, not homemorphic to a point, a closed interval II, and a circle S1S^{1}. The minimal dimension dd such that

G1××Gn×(S1)s×IidG_{1}\times\dots\times G_{n}\times(S^{1})^{s}\times I^{i}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{d}

equals

d={2n+s+i,if i0 or one of the graphs G1,,Gn is planar (i.e., k:K5,K3,3↪̸Gk), (1)2n+s+1,otherwise. (2)d=\begin{cases}2n+s+i,\quad\text{if $i\neq 0$ or one of the graphs $G_{1},\dots,G_{n}$ is planar }\text{{\rm(}i.e., $\exists k:K_{5},K_{3,3}\not\hookrightarrow G_{k}${\rm),} }\quad&(1)\\ 2n+s+1,\quad\text{otherwise. }&(2)\end{cases}

The Menger conjecture is the particular case of the theorem when G1==Gn=K5G_{1}=\dots=G_{n}=K_{5} or K3,3K_{3,3}.

Hereafter a dd-dimensional sphere SdS^{d} is any polyhedron that is piecewise linearly homeomorphic to the boundary of a (d+1)(d+1)-dimensional simplex (a slight deviation from the common notation), and I=[0;1]I=[0;1].

Theorem 1 remains true in topological category, i.e., with KLK\hookrightarrow L replaced by KTOPLK\hookrightarrow_{TOP}L. We write KTOPLK\hookrightarrow_{TOP}L if KK is compact and there is an injective continuous map KLK\to L. We first prove Theorem 1 in piecewise linear category and then deduce the topological version from the piecewise linear one. From now and till that moment we work in the piecewise linear category. See [RS82] for an introduction to the latter.

Theorem 1 was stated (without proof) in [Gal93], cf. [Gal92]. The proof of embeddability is trivial (see below). The non-embeddability has been proved earlier in some particular cases. For example, it was known that Yn↪̸2n1Y^{n}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}, where YY is a triod (a graph homeomorphic to the letter ”Y”). A nice proof of this folklore result is presented in [Sko07], cf. [ReSk01]. Also it was known that K5×S1↪̸3K_{5}\times S^{1}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{3} (Tom Tucker, private communication). In [Um78] Ummel proved that K5×K5↪̸4K_{5}\times K_{5}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4} and K3,3×K3,3↪̸4K_{3,3}\times K_{3,3}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4}, thus solving the problem explicitly posed by Menger in [Men29]. That proof contained about 10 pages of calculations involving spectral sequences. We obtain a shorter geometric proof of this result (see Example 2 and Lemma 2 below). The proof of the non-embeddability in case (2), namely, Lemma 2, is the main point of Theorem 1 (while case (1) is reduced easily to a result of van Kampen.)

Our proof of Theorem 1 is quite elementary, in particular, we do not use any abstract algebraic topology. A popular-science introduction to the method is given in [Sko24]. We use a reduction to a problem from so-called Ramsey link theory [S81, CG83, SeSp92, RST93, RST95, LS98, Neg98, SSS98, T00, ShTa]. The classical Conway–Gordon–Sachs theorem of Ramsey link theory asserts that any embedding of K6K_{6} into 3\mathbb{R}^{3} has a pair of (homologically) linked cycles. In other words, K6K_{6} is not linklessly embeddable into 3\mathbb{R}^{3}. The graph K4,4K_{4,4} has the same property (the Sachs theorem, proved in [S81]). Denote by σnm\sigma^{m}_{n} the mm-skeleton of an nn-simplex. For a polyhedron σ\sigma, let σn\sigma^{*n} be the join of nn copies of σ\sigma. In our proof of Theorem 1, we use the following higher dimensional generalization of the Sachs theorem.

Lemma 1

Any embedding (σ30)nS2n1(\sigma^{0}_{3})^{*n}\to S^{2n-1} has a pair of (homologically) linked (n1)(n-1)-dimensional spheres.

Lemma 1 follows from Lemma 11^{\prime} below. Higher dimensional generalizations of the Conway–Gordon–Sachs theorem are known in arbitrary codimension [SeSp92, SSS98, T00]. An open question: is there an nn-dimensional polyhedron such that any its embedding into n+2\mathbb{R}^{n+2} contains a knotted nn-dimensional sphere, for n>1n>1?


The easy part of Theorem 1 and some heuristic considerations. First, let us prove all the assertions of Theorem 1 except for the nonembeddability in case (2).

Demonstration Proof of the embeddability in Theorem 1

We need the following two simple results:

(*) If a compact polyhedron KdK\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{d} and d>0d>0, then K×IK\times I, K×S1d+1K\times S^{1}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{d+1} (it is sufficient to prove this for K=IdK=I^{d}, for which this is trivial).

(**) For any compact dd-dimensional polyhedron KK, the cylinder K×I2d+1K\times I\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2d+1} [RSS95].

Denote G=G1××GnG=G_{1}\times\dots\times G_{n}. By general position, G2n+1G\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}. If i0i\neq 0, then by (**) G×I2n+1G\times I\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}. If, say, G1G_{1} is planar, that is, G1I2G_{1}\hookrightarrow I^{2}, then by (**) and (*) we get I2×G2××Gn2nI^{2}\times G_{2}\times\dots\times G_{n}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n}, whence G2nG\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n}. Applying (*) repeatedly, we get the embeddability assertion in all cases considered. ∎

Demonstration Proof of the non-embeddability in Theorem 1 in case (1)

Note that any connected graph, not homemorphic to a point, II, and S1S^{1}, contains a triod YY. So it suffices to prove that Yn×Is+i↪̸2n+s+i1Y^{n}\times I^{s+i}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n+s+i-1}. Since CK×CLC(KL)CK\times CL\cong C(K*L) and Kσ00=CKK*\sigma^{0}_{0}=CK for any polyhedra KK and LL, it follows that

Yn×Is+i=(Cσ20)n×(Cσ00)s+iCCs+i+1 times(σ20)n.Y^{n}\times I^{s+i}=(C\sigma^{0}_{2})^{n}\times(C\sigma^{0}_{0})^{s+i}\cong\underbrace{C\dots C}_{s+i+1\text{ times}}(\sigma^{0}_{2})^{*n}.

If a polyhedron K↪̸SdK\not\hookrightarrow S^{d} then the cone CK↪̸d+1CK\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{d+1} (because we work in piecewise linear category). So the non-embeddability in case (1) follows from (σ20)n↪̸S2n2(\sigma^{0}_{2})^{*n}\not\hookrightarrow S^{2n-2}, which is proved in [Kam32] (or alternatively from Yn↪̸S2n1Y^{n}\not\hookrightarrow S^{2n-1}, which is proved in [Sko07]). ∎

We are thus left with the proof of the non-embeddability in case (2). To make it clearer, we anticipate it with considering heuristically three simplest cases. Even a more visual way to express the main idea is given in [Sko24], where the so-called linear non-embeddability in the three examples is proved.

Example 1. Let us first prove that the Kuratowski graph K5K_{5} not planar. Suppose to the contrary that K52K_{5}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2}. Let OO be a vertex of K5K_{5} and D2D^{2} a small disc with the center OO. Then the intersection K5D2K_{5}\cap\partial D^{2} consists of 4 points. Denote them by AA, BB, CC, DD, in the order along the circle D2\partial D^{2}. Note that the pairs A,CA,C and B,DB,D are the endpoints of two disjoint arcs contained in K5D˚2K_{5}-\mathaccent 28695{D}^{2}, and, consequently, in 2D˚2\mathbb{R}^{2}-\mathaccent 28695{D}^{2}. Then the cycles OAC,OBDK5OAC,OBD\subset K_{5} intersect each other “transversely” at the single point OO, which is impossible in the plane. So K5↪̸2K_{5}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2}.

Example 2. Now let us outline why K5×K5↪̸4K_{5}\times K_{5}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4}. (Another proof is given in [Um78].) Recall that if KK is a polyhedron with a fixed cell decomposition and OKO\in K is a vertex, then the star StO\operatorname{St}O is the union of all closed cells of KK containing OO, and the link LkO\operatorname{Lk}O is the union of all cells of StO\operatorname{St}O not containing OO. In our previous example, LkO\operatorname{Lk}O consists of 4 points and the proof is based on the fact that there are two pairs of points of LkO\operatorname{Lk}O linked in D2\partial D^{2}.

Now take K=K5×K5K=K_{5}\times K_{5}. Suppose to the contrary that K4K\subset\mathbb{R}^{4}. Let OO be a vertex of KK and D4D^{4} be a small disc with the center OO. Without loss of generality, the intersection KD4=LkOK4,4K\cap\partial D^{4}=\operatorname{Lk}O\cong K_{4,4}. So by the Sachs theorem from the introduction, any embedding LkOD4\operatorname{Lk}O\hookrightarrow\partial D^{4} has a pair of linked cycles α,βLkO\alpha,\beta\subset\operatorname{Lk}O. Two linked cycles in D4\partial D^{4} cannot bound two disjoint non-self-intersecting surfaces in 4D˚4\mathbb{R}^{4}-\mathaccent 28695{D}^{4}. If we construct two such surfaces in KStOK-\operatorname{St}O, then we get a contradiction, and thus prove that K↪̸4K\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4}. This construction is simple; see the proof of Lemma 2 below for details.

Analogously it can be shown that σ62↪̸4\sigma^{2}_{6}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4} (another proof is given in [Kam32].)

Example 3. Let us show that K5×S1↪̸3K_{5}\times S^{1}\not\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{3}. (Another proof was given by Tom Tucker; the simplest proof is analogous to Example 2 but we wish to illustrate another idea now.) Suppose that K5×S13K_{5}\times S^{1}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{3}; then by (*) we have K5×S1×S14K_{5}\times S^{1}\times S^{1}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4}. But K5S1×S1K_{5}\hookrightarrow S^{1}\times S^{1}, so K5×K54K_{5}\times K_{5}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{4}, which contradicts Example 2.


Proof of the non-embeddability in case (2) modulo a lemma. Let KK and LL be two polyhedra, and a cell decomposition of KK is fixed. We say that a map f:KLf:K\to L is an almost embedding [FKT94], if:

- for any two disjoint closed cells a,bKa,b\subset K of the fixed decomposition we have fafb=fa\cap fb=\emptyset; and

- ff is piecewise linear on some subdivision of the fixed decomposition of KK.

A nontrivial example of an almost embedding K5K3,3K_{5}\to K_{3,3} is shown in Fig. 1. The following lemma is a “half” of the Menger conjecture up to replacement of “almost embeddability” by “embeddability”. Hereafter the fixed cell decomposition is obvious and is not described explicitly.

Lemma~2

(For n=2n=2, see [Um78]) The polyhedron (K5)n(K_{5})^{n} is not almost embeddable into 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}.

Demonstration Proof of the non-embeddability in case (2)(2) of Theorem 1 modulo Lemma 2

First we reduce the theorem to the particular case s=0s=0 analogously to Example 3. Indeed, assume that s>0s>0 and Theorem 1 does not hold in case (2) for a product G×(S1)s=G1××Gn×(S1)sG\times(S^{1})^{s}=G_{1}\times\dots\times G_{n}\times(S^{1})^{s}, i.e., G×(S1)s2n+sG\times(S^{1})^{s}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n+s}. Then by assertion (*) from the proof of the embeddability in Theorem 1 it follows that

G×(K5)sG×(S1)2s2n+2s.G\times(K_{5})^{s}\hookrightarrow G\times(S^{1})^{2s}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{2n+2s}.

The composition of the two embeddings is an embedding of a product containing no factors homeomorphic to S1S^{1}. The existence of the latter embedding contradicts to the case s=0s=0 of Theorem 1 because the theorem gives the dimension d=2n+2s+1d=2n+2s+1 for the product G×(K5)sG\times(K_{5})^{s}. The obtained contradiction reduces the theorem to the particular case s=0s=0, which is considered now.

By the Kuratowsky graph planarity criterion any nonplanar graph contains a subgraph homeomorhic to K5K_{5} or K3,3K_{3,3}. So we may assume that each GkG_{k} is either K5K_{5} or K3,3K_{3,3}. Now we are going to replace all the graphs K3,3K_{3,3} by K5K_{5}-s.

Note that K5K_{5} is almost embeddable to K3,3K_{3,3} (Fig. 1). Indeed, map a vertex of K5K_{5} into the midpoint of an edge of K3,3K_{3,3} and map the remaining four vertices bijectively onto the four vertices of K3,3K_{3,3} not belonging to this edge. Then map each edge ee of K5K_{5} onto the shortest (with respect to the number of vertices) arc in K3,3K_{3,3}, joining the images of the endpoints of ee, and the almost embedding is constructed.

A product of almost embeddings is again an almost embedding, thus we get an almost embedding (K5)nG1××Gn(K_{5})^{n}\to G_{1}\times\dots\times G_{n}. Assume that there is an embedding G1××Gn2nG_{1}\times\dots\times G_{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}. The composition of the almost embedding and the embedding is an almost embedding (K5)n2n(K_{5})^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, which contradicts to Lemma 2. Thus the non-embeddability in case (2) of Theorem 1 follows from Lemma 2. ∎


[Uncaptioned image]

Fig. 1.


A few standard auxiliary facts. For the proof of Lemma 2, we need the following notions. Let AA be a compact nn-dimensional polyhedron. Its boundary modulo 22, denoted A\partial A, is the union of all (n1)(n-1)-dimensional simplices contained in an odd number of nn-dimensional ones, for some triangulation. Let f:A2nf:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, g:B2ng:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} be a pair of piecewise-linear maps such that dimA=dimB=n0\dim A=\dim B=n\neq 0 and fAgB=fAgB=f\partial A\cap gB=fA\cap g\partial B=\emptyset. We say that the intersection index fAgBfA\cap gB is even (respectively, odd) and put fAgB:=0/2fA\cap gB:=0\in\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} (respectively, 1/21\in\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}), if the number of points in the set f¯Ag¯B\bar{f}A\cap\bar{g}B is even (respectively, odd), for a general position pair of piecewise-linear maps f¯:A2n\bar{f}:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and g¯:B2n\bar{g}:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} close to the pair of maps ff and gg.

Let us explain the precise meaning of general position here. Take triangulations of AA and BB such that the maps f:A2nf:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, g:B2ng:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} are linear, i.e., linear on each simplex of the triangulations. Identify a pair of linear maps f¯:A2n\bar{f}:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, g¯:B2n\bar{g}:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} with a point (f¯,g¯)2nN(\bar{f},\bar{g})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}, where NN is the total number of vertices in the triangulations of AA and BB. We say that (f¯,g¯)(\bar{f},\bar{g}) is ε\varepsilon-close to (f,g)(f,g) if |f¯afa|<ε|\bar{f}a-fa|<\varepsilon and |g¯bgb|<ε|\bar{g}b-gb|<\varepsilon for any vertices aAa\in A and bBb\in B. We say that a property P(f¯,g¯)P(\bar{f},\bar{g}) holds for a general position pair of piecewise-linear maps (f¯,g¯)(\bar{f},\bar{g}) close to (f,g)(f,g), if there is ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that for each pair of triangulations of AA and BB such that ff and gg are linear, the property P(f¯,g¯)P(\bar{f},\bar{g}) holds for almost all (f¯,g¯)2nN(\bar{f},\bar{g})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN} that are ε\varepsilon-close to (f,g)(f,g).

We are going to use the following simple well-known result.

Parity Lemma 3

If AA and BB are compact polyhedra of dimension n0n\neq 0 with A=B=\partial A=\partial B=\emptyset, then for any piecewise-linear maps f:A2nf:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and g:B2ng:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} the intersection index fAgBfA\cap gB is even.

The lemma just means vanishing of the intersection form in the homology of 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n} modulo 2. But it is simpler to prove it directly. See also §4.5 in [Sko24] and Remark 4.7.3c in [Sko23].

Demonstration Proof of Lemma 3

Take triangulations of AA and BB and identify pairs of linear maps f¯:A2n\bar{f}:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, g¯:B2n\bar{g}:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} with points in 2nN\mathbb{R}^{2nN}. For a pair of simplices aAa\subset A, bBb\subset B and almost all (f¯,g¯)2nN(\bar{f},\bar{g})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}, the set f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b has at most one point, if dima=dimb=n\dim a=\dim b=n, and is empty, if dima+dimb=2n1\dim a+\dim b=2n-1. Indeed, otherwise f¯a\bar{f}a and g¯b\bar{g}b lie in one hyperplane in 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}, which is only possible for (f¯,g¯)(\bar{f},\bar{g}) on certain algebraic hypersurface in 2nN\mathbb{R}^{2nN}. Analogously, for almost all (f¯,g¯)2nN(\bar{f},\bar{g})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}, the set f¯Ag¯B\bar{f}A\cap\bar{g}B is in bijection with the set SS of pairs of simplices aA,bBa\subset A,b\subset B such that f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b\neq\emptyset. In what follows we often omit the phrase “for almost all (f¯,g¯)2nN(\bar{f},\bar{g})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}”.

It remains to prove that SS has an even number of elements. Extend f¯:A2n\bar{f}:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} linearly to the cone CACA so that the cone vertex is mapped to the origin of 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}. The extension is still denoted by f¯\bar{f}. Analogously to the above, for each pair of simplices aAa\subset A, bBb\subset B, the set f¯Cag¯b\bar{f}Ca\cap\bar{g}b, if nonempty, is a single straight line segment when dima=dimb=n\dim a=\dim b=n, and a single point when dima+dimb=2n1\dim a+\dim b=2n-1; it is empty when dima+dimb<2n1\dim a+\dim b<2n-1. Construct the following graph. The set of vertices is the set of pairs of simplices aCA,bBa\subset CA,b\subset B such that dima+dimb=2n\dim a+\dim b=2n and f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b\neq\emptyset. Two distinct vertices (a1,b1)(a_{1},b_{1}) and (a2,b2)(a_{2},b_{2}) are joined by an edge, if there are top-dimensional simplices aCAa\subset CA and bBb\subset B such that aa1,a2a\supset a_{1},a_{2} and bb1,b2b\supset b_{1},b_{2}. In this case, f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b is the segment joining f¯a1g¯b1\bar{f}a_{1}\cap\bar{g}b_{1} and f¯a2g¯b2\bar{f}a_{2}\cap\bar{g}b_{2}; in particular, the latter points are distinct (otherwise, either f¯|a\bar{f}\left|{}_{a}\right. is non-injective and 1=dimf¯ag¯b=dimf¯ag¯b=01=\dim\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b=\dim\bar{f}\partial a\cap\bar{g}b=0, or g¯|b\bar{g}\left|{}_{b}\right. is non-injective, or f¯(a1a2)g¯(b1b2)\bar{f}(a_{1}\cap a_{2})\cap\bar{g}(b_{1}\cap b_{2})\neq\emptyset). There is no other vertex (a3,b3)(a_{3},b_{3}) with a3a,b3ba_{3}\subset a,b_{3}\subset b because the segment has just two endpoints. Thus the set of edges is in a bijection with the set of pairs of top-dimensional simplices aCAa\subset CA and bBb\subset B such that f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b\neq\emptyset. Hence the degree of a vertex (a,b)(a,b) is odd if and only if aAa\subset A, i.e., (a,b)S(a,b)\in S (because (CA)=ACA\partial(CA)=A\cup C\partial A and A=B=\partial A=\partial B=\emptyset). Thus SS has an even number of elements. ∎

We need a well-known formula for the change of the intersection index upon a homotopy (Lemma 33^{\prime} below). Let |S||S| be the number of elements in a set SS. For a map F:A×I2nF:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, denote Ft(x):=F(x,t)F_{t}(x):=F(x,t). Let F:A×I2nF:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, G:B×I2nG:B\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} be piecewise-linear maps such that dimA=n\dim A=n, dimB=n1\dim B=n-1 (or B=B=\emptyset), and FtAGtB=FtAGtB=FτAGτB=F_{t}\partial A\cap G_{t}B=F_{t}A\cap G_{t}\partial B=F_{\tau}A\cap G_{\tau}B=\emptyset for each tI,τ{0,1}t\in I,\tau\in\{0,1\}. We say that the intersection index tIFtAGtB\bigcup_{t\in I}F_{t}A\cap G_{t}B of homotopies is even (respectively, odd) and put tIFtAGtB:=0\bigcup_{t\in I}F_{t}A\cap G_{t}B:=0 (respectively, 11), if the number |tI(F¯tAG¯tB)|\left|\bigcup_{t\in I}\left(\bar{F}_{t}A\cap\bar{G}_{t}B\right)\right| is even (respectively, odd), for a general position pair of piecewise-linear maps F¯:A×I2n\bar{F}:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and G¯:B×I2n\bar{G}:B\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} close to FF and GG. (This number equals the number of common points of the images of the maps F¯(x,t):=(F¯(x,t),t)\bar{F}^{\uparrow}(x,t):=(\bar{F}(x,t),t) and G¯(y,t):=(G¯(y,t),t)\bar{G}^{\uparrow}(y,t):=(\bar{G}(y,t),t) in 2n×I\mathbb{R}^{2n}\times I.)

Lemma $3'$

Let AA and BB be compact polyhedra of dimension n0n\neq 0. Let F:A×I2nF:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and G:B×I2nG:B\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} be piecewise-linear maps such that FtAGtB=FτAGτB=FτAGτB=F_{t}\partial A\cap G_{t}\partial B=F_{\tau}\partial A\cap G_{\tau}B=F_{\tau}A\cap G_{\tau}\partial B=\emptyset for each tI,τ{0,1}t\in I,\tau\in\{0,1\}. Then for a general position pair of piecewise-linear maps (F¯,G¯)(\bar{F},\bar{G}) close to (F,G)(F,G), we have

|F¯1AG¯1B||F¯0AG¯0B|=|tI(F¯tAG¯tB)|+|tI(F¯tAG¯tB)|mod2.(3)|\bar{F}_{1}A\cap\bar{G}_{1}B|-|\bar{F}_{0}A\cap\bar{G}_{0}B|=\left|\bigcup_{t\in I}(\bar{F}_{t}\partial A\cap\bar{G}_{t}B)\right|+\left|\bigcup_{t\in I}(\bar{F}_{t}A\cap\bar{G}_{t}\partial B)\right|\mod 2.\qquad(3)

Moreover, the intersection index is well-defined, i.e., is always either even or odd, and therefore,

F1AG1BF0AG0B=tIFtAGtB+tIFtAGtBmod2.F_{1}A\cap G_{1}B-F_{0}A\cap G_{0}B=\bigcup_{t\in I}F_{t}\partial A\cap G_{t}B+\bigcup_{t\in I}F_{t}A\cap G_{t}\partial B\mod 2.
Demonstration Proof of Lemma 33^{\prime}

Eq. (3) is proved analogously to Lemma 3. Indeed, take triangulations of A×IA\times I and B×IB\times I and identify pairs of linear maps F¯:A×I2n\bar{F}:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, G¯:B×I2n\bar{G}:B\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} with points in 2nN\mathbb{R}^{2nN}. For a pair of simplices aA×Ia\subset A\times I, bB×Ib\subset B\times I and almost all (F¯,G¯)2nN(\bar{F},\bar{G})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}, the intersection F¯a˚G¯b˚\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{a}\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{b} is a single open interval of a straight line or empty when dima=dimb=n+1\dim a=\dim b=n+1, a single point or empty when dima+dimb=2n+1\dim a+\dim b=2n+1 or dima+dimb=2n\dim a+\dim b=2n with aA×{t}a\subset A\times\{t\}, bB×{t}b\subset B\times\{t\} for some tIt\in I; and the intersection is empty otherwise. For almost all (F¯,G¯)2nN(\bar{F},\bar{G})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}, we have |tI(F¯tAG¯tB)|=|F¯(A×I)G¯(B×I)|\left|\bigcup_{t\in I}(\bar{F}_{t}\partial A\cap\bar{G}_{t}B)\right|=\left|\bar{F}^{\uparrow}(\partial A\times I)\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}(B\times I)\right|. Take (F¯,G¯)(\bar{F},\bar{G}) close enough to (F,G)(F,G) so that F¯tAG¯tB=F¯τAG¯τB=F¯τAG¯τB=\bar{F}_{t}\partial A\cap\bar{G}_{t}\partial B=\bar{F}_{\tau}\partial A\cap\bar{G}_{\tau}B=\bar{F}_{\tau}A\cap\bar{G}_{\tau}\partial B=\emptyset for each tI,τ{0,1}t\in I,\tau\in\{0,1\}. Then Eq. (3) is equivalent to the set (F¯(A×I)G¯(B×I))(F¯(A×I)G¯(B×I))\left(\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\partial(A\times I)\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}(B\times I)\right)\cup\left(\bar{F}^{\uparrow}(A\times I)\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\partial(B\times I)\right) having an even number of elements. We may assume that the latter set is in bijection with the set SS of pairs of simplices aA×I,bB×Ia\subset A\times I,b\subset B\times I, where a(A×I)a\subset\partial(A\times I) or b(B×I)b\subset\partial(B\times I), such that F¯a˚G¯b˚\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{a}\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{b}\neq\emptyset. In what follows, we may impose assumptions, which are automatic for almost all (F¯,G¯)2nN(\bar{F},\bar{G})\in\mathbb{R}^{2nN}, without listing them explicitly.

To show that |S||S| is even, construct the following graph. The set of vertices is the set of pairs of simplices aA×I,bB×Ia\subset A\times I,b\subset B\times I such that F¯a˚G¯b˚\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{a}\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{b} is a single point. Two distinct vertices (a1,b1)(a_{1},b_{1}) and (a2,b2)(a_{2},b_{2}) are joined by an edge, if there are top-dimensional simplices aA×Ia\subset A\times I, bB×Ib\subset B\times I such that aa1,a2a\supset a_{1},a_{2} and bb1,b2b\supset b_{1},b_{2}. In this case, F¯aG¯b\bar{F}^{\uparrow}a\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}b is the segment joining F¯a˚1G¯b˚1\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{a}_{1}\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{b}_{1} and F¯a˚2G¯b˚2\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{a}_{2}\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{b}_{2} (in particular, the latter points are distinct because the images of the interiors of faces of aa are disjoint unless dimF¯an\dim\bar{F}^{\uparrow}a\leq n). Thus the set of edges is in a bijection with the set of pairs of top-dimensional simplices aA×Ia\subset A\times I, bB×Ib\subset B\times I such that F¯a˚G¯b˚\bar{F}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{a}\cap\bar{G}^{\uparrow}\mathaccent 28695{b}\neq\emptyset. Thus the set of vertices of odd degree is precisely SS. Thus |S||S| is even, and (3) holds.

Eq. (3) implies that the intersection index fAgBfA\cap gB is well-defined (if f:A2nf:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and g:B2ng:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} satisfy fAgB=fAgB=f\partial A\cap gB=fA\cap g\partial B=\emptyset). Indeed, let F(x,t)=f(x)F(x,t)=f(x) and G(x,t)=g(x)G(x,t)=g(x) be constant homotopies. Take two triangulations of AA such that ff is linear on both and two maps F¯0:A2n\bar{F}_{0}:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and F¯1:A2n\bar{F}_{1}:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} linear on the first and the second triangulation respectively. Extend the two triangulations to a triangulation of A×IA\times I such that FF is linear and the two maps to a linear map F¯:A×I2n\bar{F}:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}. Construct a triangulation of B×IB\times I and maps G,G¯:B×I2nG,\bar{G}:B\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} analogously. All pairs (F¯,G¯)(\bar{F},\bar{G}) linear on our triangulations can be obtained by this construction. If (F¯,G¯)(\bar{F},\bar{G}) is close to (F,G)(F,G), then the right side of (3) vanishes, thus for some ε>0\varepsilon>0 the number |F¯0AG¯0B||\bar{F}_{0}A\cap\bar{G}_{0}B| has the same parity for all triangulations of AA and BB and almost all (F¯0,G¯0)(\bar{F}_{0},\bar{G}_{0}), ε\varepsilon-close to (f,g)(f,g).

As a consequence, if linear maps f:A2nf:A\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and g:B2ng:B\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} intersect ’transversely’, i.e. each point of fAgBfA\cap gB has a single ff-preimage and a single gg-preimage, both lying in the interior of top-dimensional simplices, then the intersection index fAgB=|fAgB|mod2fA\cap gB=|fA\cap gB|\mod 2.

Finally, the intersection index of homotopies tIFtAGtB\bigcup_{t\in I}F_{t}A\cap G_{t}B is well-defined (if F:A×I2nF:A\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} and G:B×I2nG:B\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} satisfy the assumptions in its definition; in particular, now dimB=n1\dim B=n-1 or B=B=\emptyset) because

tIFtAGtB=|tI(F¯tAG¯tB)|=|F¯(A×I)G¯C|=F¯(A×I)G¯C=F(A×I)GCmod2\bigcup_{t\in I}F_{t}A\cap G_{t}B=\left|\bigcup_{t\in I}\left(\bar{F}_{t}A\cap\bar{G}_{t}B\right)\right|=\left|\bar{F}^{\uparrow}(A\times I)\cap\bar{G}^{\Uparrow}C\right|=\bar{F}^{\uparrow}(A\times I)\cap\bar{G}^{\Uparrow}C=F^{\uparrow}(A\times I)\cap G^{\Uparrow}C\mod 2

for a general position pair (F¯,G¯)(\bar{F},\bar{G}) close to (F,G)(F,G). Here the first equality is the definition. The second one is obvious, where we denote C:=C(B×I)B×I2/B×I×{0}C:=C(B\times I)\cong B\times I^{2}/B\times I\times\{0\} and G¯(y,t,s):=(2sG¯(y,t),12s)2n+1×\bar{G}^{\Uparrow}(y,t,s):=(2s\bar{G}^{\uparrow}(y,t),1-2s)\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n+1}\times\mathbb{R} for all yBy\in B and t,sIt,s\in I. The third one follows from the previous paragraph. The last equality is obtained by applying (3) to the rectilinear homotopy between (F¯,G¯)(\bar{F}^{\uparrow},\bar{G}^{\Uparrow}) and (F,G)(F^{\uparrow},G^{\Uparrow}). ∎


Completion of the proof of Theorem 1. To complete the proof, it remains to prove Lemma 2. It will be deduced from the following generalization of Lemma 1.

Lemma~$1'$

Let L=(σ30)nL=(\sigma^{0}_{3})^{*n}. Then for any almost embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} there exist two disjoint (n1)(n-1)-dimensional spheres α,βL\alpha,\beta\subset L such that the intersection index fCαfCβfC\alpha\cap fC\beta is odd.

The cone CLCL is considered here instead of LL itself. This auxiliary cone is essentially used only in the proof of almost non-embeddability in Lemma 2, not just non-embeddability.

Demonstration Proof of Lemma 2 modulo Lemma 11^{\prime}

Assume that there exists an almost embedding f:K=K5××K52nf:K=K_{5}\times\dots\times K_{5}\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}. Let O=O1××OnO=O_{1}\times\dots\times O_{n} be a vertex of KK. By the well-known formulae, we get

LkOLkO1LkOn and StO=CLkOC(σ30)n.\operatorname{Lk}O\cong\operatorname{Lk}O_{1}*\dots*\operatorname{Lk}O_{n}\text{ and }\operatorname{St}O=C\operatorname{Lk}O\cong C(\sigma^{0}_{3})^{*n}.

Let α,βLkO\alpha,\beta\subset\operatorname{Lk}O be a pair of (n1)(n-1)-spheres given by Lemma 11^{\prime}. Identify LkO\operatorname{Lk}O and LkO1LkOn\operatorname{Lk}O_{1}*\dots*\operatorname{Lk}O_{n}. Since α\alpha and β\beta are disjoint, it follows that for each k=1,,nk=1,\dots,n the sets αLkOk\alpha\cap\operatorname{Lk}O_{k} and βLkOk\beta\cap\operatorname{Lk}O_{k} are disjoint. Each of the sets αLkOk\alpha\cap\operatorname{Lk}O_{k} and βLkOk\beta\cap\operatorname{Lk}O_{k} contains more than 11 point because one of the spheres α\alpha and β\beta would be a cone otherwise. Thus each of the sets consists of exactly 2 points. By definition, put {Ak,Ck}:=αLkOk\{A_{k},C_{k}\}:=\alpha\cap\operatorname{Lk}O_{k} and {Bk,Dk}:=βLkOk\{B_{k},D_{k}\}:=\beta\cap\operatorname{Lk}O_{k}. Consider two nn-tori

Tα=O1A1C1××OnAnCnandTβ=O1B1D1××OnBnDnT_{\alpha}=O_{1}A_{1}C_{1}\times\dots\times O_{n}A_{n}C_{n}\qquad\text{and}\qquad T_{\beta}=O_{1}B_{1}D_{1}\times\dots\times O_{n}B_{n}D_{n}

contained in KK.

Clearly, TαCαT_{\alpha}\supset C\alpha, TβCβT_{\beta}\supset C\beta and TαTβ=OT_{\alpha}\cap T_{\beta}=O. Since ff is an almost embedding, it follows that the intersection index fTαfTβ=fCαfCβfT_{\alpha}\cap fT_{\beta}=fC\alpha\cap fC\beta. So fTαfTβfT_{\alpha}\cap fT_{\beta} is odd by the choice of α\alpha and β\beta. By Parity Lemma 3 we obtain a contradiction, hence KK is not almost embeddable into 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}. ∎

Demonstration Proof of Lemma 11^{\prime}

The proof is similar to that of Conway–Gordon–Sachs theorem and applies the idea of [Kam32], with a slightly more refined obstruction. The reader can restrict attention to the case when n=2n=2 and obtain an alternative proof of the Sachs theorem. (The proof for n>2n>2 is analogous to that for n=2n=2.)

We show that for any (n1)(n-1)-simplex cc of LL and any almost embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} there exist a pair of disjoint (n1)(n-1)-spheres α,βL\alpha,\beta\subset L such that αc\alpha\supset c and the intersection index fCαfCβfC\alpha\cap fC\beta is odd.

For an almost embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, let

v(f)=(fCαfCβ)mod2v(f)=\sum(fC\alpha\cap fC\beta)\mod 2

be the Van Kampen obstruction to linkless embeddability. Here the sum is over all pairs of disjoint (n1)(n-1)-spheres α,βL\alpha,\beta\subset L such that cαc\subset\alpha. It suffices to prove that v(f)=1v(f)=1. Our proof is in 2 steps: first we show that v(f)v(f) does not depend on ff; then we calculate v(f)v(f) for certain ‘standard’ embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}.

Let us prove that v(f)v(f) does not depend on ff [cf. Kam32, CG83]. Take any two almost embeddings F0,F1:CL2nF_{0},F_{1}:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}. By general position in piecewise linear category, there exists a piecewise linear homotopy F:CL×I2nF:CL\times I\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} between them such that

1) there is a finite number of singular moments tt, i.e., tIt\in I such that FtF_{t} is not an almost embedding;

2) for a singular tt, there is a unique pair of disjoint (n1)(n-1)-simplices a,bLa,b\subset L such that FtCaFtbF_{t}Ca\cap F_{t}b\neq\emptyset;

3) the intersection FtCaFtbF_{t}Ca\cap F_{t}b is ’transversal in time’, i.e., Ft1(FtCaFtb)×tF_{t}^{-1}(F_{t}Ca\cap F_{t}b)\times t consists of exactly two points, and F|Ca×I\left.F\right|_{Ca\times I} and F|b×I\left.F\right|_{b\times I} are smooth at those points.

Consider a singular moment tt and the pair a,ba,b of simplices given by condition 2). Conditions 3) and 1) imply that the intersection index of homotopies τ[tε,t+ε]FτCaFτb\bigcup_{\tau\in[t-\varepsilon,t+\varepsilon]}F_{\tau}Ca\cap F_{\tau}b is odd for small enough ε>0\varepsilon>0. Then by Lemma 33^{\prime}, for a pair of disjoint (n1)(n-1)-spheres α,βL\alpha,\beta\subset L, the intersection index FtCαFtCβF_{t}C\alpha\cap F_{t}C\beta changes with the increasing of tt if and only if either αa\alpha\supset a, βb\beta\supset b or αb\alpha\supset b, βa\beta\supset a. Such pairs (α,β)(\alpha,\beta) satisfying the condition αc\alpha\supset c are called critical. If c(ab)=c\cap(a\cup b)=\emptyset, then there are exactly 22 critical pairs. Indeed, we have either αac\alpha\supset a\cup c or αbc\alpha\supset b\cup c. Each of these two conditions determines a unique critical pair. If c(ab)c\cap(a\cup b)\neq\emptyset, then there are two distinct vertices v,wL(abc)v,w\in L-(a\cup b\cup c) belonging to the same copy of σ30\sigma^{0}_{3}. Then there is an involution without fixed points on the set of critical pairs. Indeed, /2\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} acts on the set of vertices of LL by interchanging vv and ww, and it also acts on the set of critical pairs, because v,wabcv,w\notin a\cup b\cup c. So the number of critical pairs is even, thus v(F0)=v(F1)v(F_{0})=v(F_{1}).

[Uncaptioned image] Fig. 2.

Now let us prove that v(f)=1v(f)=1 for certain ‘standard’ embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} (Fig. 2). To define the standard embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n}, take a general position collection of nn lines in 2n12n\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}\subset\mathbb{R}^{2n}. For each k=1,,nk=1,\dots,n take a quadruple σk\sigma_{k} of distinct points on kk-th line. Taking the join of all σk\sigma_{k}, we obtain an embedding L2n1L\to\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}. The standard embedding f:CL2nf:CL\to\mathbb{R}^{2n} is defined to be the cone over this embedding. Further we omit ff from the notation of ff-images.

Clearly, for a pair of disjoint (n1)(n-1)-spheres α,βL\alpha,\beta\subset L, the intersection index fCαfCβfC\alpha\cap fC\beta has the same parity as the linking number lk(α,β)\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta) in 2n1\mathbb{R}^{2n-1}. Indeed, let HH be the half-space bounded by 2n1\mathbb{R}^{2n-1} and containing the cone vertex. Take a pair of triangulations of CαC\alpha and CβC\beta and a pair of linear embeddings (f¯:CαH,g¯:CβH)(\bar{f}\colon C\alpha\to H,\bar{g}\colon C\beta\to H) close enough to (f|Cα,f|Cβ)(\left.f\right|_{C\alpha},\left.f\right|_{C\beta}) such that f¯α=α\bar{f}\alpha=\alpha, g¯β=β\bar{g}\beta=\beta, and f¯ag¯b=\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b=\emptyset for each pair of simplices aCα,bCβa\subset C\alpha,b\subset C\beta unless dima=dimb=n\dim a=\dim b=n. Applying Lemma 33^{\prime} to the rectilinear homotopy between (f¯,g¯)(\bar{f},\bar{g}) and (f|Cα,f|Cβ)(\left.f\right|_{C\alpha},\left.f\right|_{C\beta}), we get fCαfCβ=f¯Cαg¯Cβ=|f¯Cαg¯Cβ|mod2fC\alpha\cap fC\beta=\bar{f}C\alpha\cap\bar{g}C\beta=|\bar{f}C\alpha\cap\bar{g}C\beta|\mod 2. Passing to a subdivision, if necessary, we guarantee that for each simplex bCβb\subset C\beta there is at most one simplex aCαa\subset C\alpha such that f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b\neq\emptyset. Then β\beta is homologous in Hf¯CαH-\bar{f}C\alpha to the sum of the boundaries b\partial b of all simplices bCβb\subset C\beta such that f¯ag¯b\bar{f}a\cap\bar{g}b\neq\emptyset for some simplex aCαa\subset C\alpha. A simple computation shows that each such b\partial b contributes 11 to lk(α,β)mod2\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta)\mod 2, hence |f¯Cαg¯Cβ|=lk(α,β)mod2|\bar{f}C\alpha\cap\bar{g}C\beta|=\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta)\mod 2.

Let us show that lk(α,β)=1mod2\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta)=1\mod 2 if and only if for each k=1,,nk=1,\dots,n the 0-spheres ασk\alpha\cap\sigma_{k} and βσk\beta\cap\sigma_{k} are linked in kk-th line. Indeed, if, say, the two points ασk\alpha\cap\sigma_{k} lie between the two points of βσk\beta\cap\sigma_{k} for some kk, then take the segment IαI_{\alpha} with Iα=ασk\partial I_{\alpha}=\alpha\cap\sigma_{k}. The piecewise linear disk

Dα=(ασ1)(ασk1)Iα(ασk+1)(ασn)D_{\alpha}=(\alpha\cap\sigma_{1})*\dots*(\alpha\cap\sigma_{k-1})*I_{\alpha}*(\alpha\cap\sigma_{k+1})*\dots*(\alpha\cap\sigma_{n})

spans α\alpha and is disjoint with β\beta, hence lk(α,β)=0mod2\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta)=0\mod 2. If ασk\alpha\cap\sigma_{k} and βσk\beta\cap\sigma_{k} are linked for each k=1,,nk=1,\dots,n, then take the minimal segment IkI_{k} containing σk\sigma_{k}. The complement to ασk\alpha\cap\sigma_{k} in IkI_{k} deformationally retracts to βσk\beta\cap\sigma_{k}, thus the complement to α\alpha in the simplex I1InI_{1}*\dots*I_{n} deformationally retracts to β\beta. Then for any (n1)(n-1)-sphere γ\gamma in the latter complement, lk(α,γ)\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\gamma) is a multiple of lk(α,β)\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta). Since there exists γ\gamma with lk(α,γ)=1mod2\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\gamma)=1\mod 2, it follows that lk(α,β)=1mod2\operatorname{lk}(\alpha,\beta)=1\mod 2. (Another explanation is that DαD_{\alpha} and β\beta intersect transversely at a single point, but we avoid piecewise linear transversality.)

Now it is obvious that there exists a unique pair α,β\alpha,\beta such that αc\alpha\supset c and fCαfCβ=1mod2fC\alpha\cap fC\beta=1\mod 2. So v(f)=1v(f)=1, which proves the lemma. ∎

We conclude the paper by the proof of Theorem 1 in topological category (due to the referee):

Demonstration Proof of Theorem 1 in topological category

For codimension 3\geq 3, the assertion of Theorem 1 in topological category follows from the one in piecewise linear one, because by a theorem of Bryant [Bry72] each topological embedding of a polyhedron into a piecewise-linear manifold in codimension 3\geq 3 can be approximated by a piecewise linear embedding.

The cases of codimension 1 and 2 are reduced to codimension 3\geq 3 case analogously to Example 3. Indeed, assume that Theorem 1 does not hold for a polyhedron K=G1×Gn×Ii×(S1)sK=G_{1}\times\dots G_{n}\times I^{i}\times(S^{1})^{s}. This means that KTOPd(K)1K\hookrightarrow_{TOP}\mathbb{R}^{d(K)-1}, where d=d(K)d=d(K) is the dimension given by (1)–(2). By assertion (*),

K×K5×K5TOPK×(S1)4TOPd(K)+3.K\times K_{5}\times K_{5}\hookrightarrow_{TOP}K\times(S^{1})^{4}\hookrightarrow_{TOP}\mathbb{R}^{d(K)+3}.

The composition of the two embeddings is now a codimension 3\geq 3 embedding. The existence of the latter contradicts to the codimension 3\geq 3 case of Theorem 1 in topological category because d(K×K5×K5)=d(K)+4d(K\times K_{5}\times K_{5})=d(K)+4. The obtained contradiction proves the theorem. ∎

Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to Arkady Skopenkov for permanent interest to this work and to the referee for useful suggestions and a remark proving one of the author’s conjectures. The author thanks Emil Alkin for a discussion that inspired the addition of proofs on p. 4–5 to the updated version.

References

  • ARS01 P. Akhmetiev, D. Repovš and A. Skopenkov, Embedding products of low–dimensional manifolds in m\mathbb{R}^{m}, Topol. Appl. 113 (2001), 7–12.
  • Bry72 J.L. Bryant, Approximating embeddings of polyhedra in codimension 3, Trans.Amer.Math.Soc. 170 (1972), 85-95.
  • CG83 J. Conway and C. Gordon, Knots and links in spatial graphs, Jour. Graph Theory 7 (1983), 445–453.
  • FKT94 M. H. Freedman, V. S. Krushkal and P. Teichner, Van Kampen’s embedding obstruction is incomplete for 2-complexes in 4\mathbb{R}^{4}, Math. Res. Letters 1 (1994), 167–176.
  • Gal92 M. Galecki, On embeddability of CW-complexes in Euclidean space, vol. , preprint, 1992.
  • Gal93 M. Galecki, Enchanced Cohomology and Obstruction Theory, Doctoral Dissertation, 1993.
  • Gr10 M. Gromov, Singularities, expanders and topology of maps. Part 2: From combinatorics to topology via algebraic isoperimetry, Geom. Funct. Anal. 20:2 (2010), 416–526.
  • Kam32 E. R. van Kampen, Komplexe in euklidische Raumen, Abb. Math. Sem. Hamburg 9 (1932), 72–78. , berichtigung dazu, 152–153.
  • LT14 E. Lindenstrauss and M. Tsukamoto, Mean dimension and an embedding problem: an example., Isr. J. Math. 199 (2014), 573–584.
  • LS98 A. O. Lovasz and A. Schrijver, A Borsuk theorem for antipodal links and a spectral characterization of linklessly embeddable graphs, Proc. of AMS 126:5 (1998), 1275–1285.
  • Men29 K. Menger, Über plättbare Dreiergraphen und Potenzen nicht plättbarer Graphen, Ergebnisse Math. Kolloq. 2 (1929), 30-31.
  • Neg98 S. Negami, Ramsey-type theorem for spatial graphs, Graphs and Comb. 14 (1998), 75–80.
  • ReSk99 D. Repovš and A. Skopenkov, New results on embeddings of polyhedra and manifolds into Euclidean spaces, Russ. Math. Surv. 54:6 (1999), 1149–1196.
  • ReSk00 D. Repovš and A. B. Skopenkov, The obstruction theory for beginners, Mathematical Enlightment (Matematich-eskoye Prosveschenie) 2nd series 4 (2000), 154–180.
  • ReSk01 D. Repovš and A. Skopenkov, On contractible nn-dimensional compacta, non-embeddable into 2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), 627–628.
  • RSS95 D. Repovš, A. B. Skopenkov, and E. V. Ščepin, On embeddability of X×IX\times I into Euclidean space, Houston J. Math 21 (1995), 199–204.
  • RST93 N. Robertson, P. P. Seymor, and R. Thomas, Linkless embeddings of graphs in 3-space, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 28:1 (1993), 84–89.
  • RST95 N. Robertson, P. P. Seymor, and R. Thomas, Sach’s linkless embedding conjecture, J. Combin. Theory, Series B 64 (1995), 185–227.
  • RS82 C. P. Rourke, B. J. Sanderson, Introduction to piecewise-linear topology, Springer, 1982.
  • S81 H. Sachs, On spatial representation of finite graphs, in “Finite and infinite sets”, Colloq. Math. Soc. Janos Bolyai 37 (1981).
  • Sch84 E. V. Ščepin, Soft mappings of manifolds, Russian Math. Surveys 39:5 (1984), 209–224.
  • SSS98 J. Segal, A. Skopenkov, and S. Spiez, Embeddings of polyhedra in m\mathbb{R}^{m} and the deleted product obstruction, Topol. Appl. 85 (1998), 335–344.
  • SeSp92 J. Segal and S. Spiez, Quasi-embeddings and embedding of polyhedra in m\mathbb{R}^{m}, Topol. Appl. 45 (1992), 275–282.
  • ShTa M. Shirai, K. Taniyama, A large complete graph in a space contains a link with large link invariant, J. Knot Th. Ram. 12:7 (2003), 915–919.
  • Sko23 A. Skopenkov, Algebraic topology from a geometric point of view, preprint.
  • Sko24 A. Skopenkov, Realizability of hypergraphs and intrinsic linking, Mathematical Enlightment (Matematicheskoye Prosveschenie) 2nd series 32 (2024), 125–159, arXiv:1402.0658.
  • Sko07 A. Skopenkov, Embedding and knotting of manifolds in Euclidean spaces, in: Surveys in Contemporary Mathematics, Ed. N. Young and Y. Choi, London Math. Soc. Lect. Notes 347 (2007), 248–342.
  • T00 K. Taniyama, Higher dimensional links in a simplicial complex embedded in a sphere, Pacific J. Math. 194:2 (2000), 465–467.
  • Um78 B. R. Ummel, The product of nonplanar complexes does not imbed in 4-space, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242 (1978), 319–328.