This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Equichordal Points of Convex Bodies

Leo Jang Department of Computer Sciences, POSTECH, South Koreathanks: leo630@postech.ac.kr Donghan Kim Department of Mathematical Sciences, KAIST, South Koreathanks: patrick6231@kaist.ac.kr
Abstract

The equichordal point problem is a classical question in geometry, asking whether there exist multiple equichordal points within a single convex body. An equichordal point is defined as a point through which all chords of the convex body have the same length. This problem, initially posed by Fujiwara and further investigated by Blaschke, Rothe, and Weitzenböck, has remained an intriguing challenge, particularly in higher dimensions. In this paper, we rigorously prove the nonexistence of multiple equichordal points in nn-dimensional convex bodies for n2n\geq 2. By utilizing topological tools such as the Borsuk-Ulam theorem and analyzing the properties of continuous functions and mappings on convex bodies, we resolve this long-standing question.

  11footnotetext: Equal contribution

1 Introduction

Problem. Does there exist (for n2n\geq 2) an nn-dimensional convex body that possesses two equichordal points?[3]

The concept of equichordal points originates from classical geometry and the study of convex bodies. For a set CC that is star-shaped with respect to an interior point pp—meaning CC contains every line segment connecting pp to any other point in CC—the point pp is called an equichordal point if all chords of CC passing through pp have the same length. A straightforward example is the center of a spherical region, which serves as an equichordal point due to the inherent symmetry of the sphere.

The equichordal point problem for plane convex bodies was first posed by Fujiwara [2], who conjectured the existence of multiple equichordal points in certain convex shapes. Independently, Blaschke, Rothe, and Weitzenböck [1] extended this question to more general geometric settings. However, despite substantial progress, the existence of multiple equichordal points in higher-dimensional convex bodies remained an open question.

In this paper, we address the nonexistence of multiple equichordal points in nn-dimensional convex bodies (n2n\geq 2). By employing tools from topology, such as the Borsuk-Ulam theorem, and leveraging the properties of continuous mappings, we establish that such configurations are impossible.

2 Preliminaries

Diameter of a Set. The diameter of a set of points in a metric space is the largest distance between points in the set. If SS is a set of points with metric dd, the diameter is

diam(S)=supx,ySd(x,y).\text{diam}(S)=\sup\limits_{x,y\in S}d(x,y).

Convex Bodies. A convex body in nn-dimensional Euclidean space n\mathbb{R}^{n} is a compact convex set with non-empty interior.

Chord and Equichordal Point. A chord of a circle is a straight line segment whose endpoints both lie on a circular arc. If a chord were to be extended infinitely on both directions into a line, the object is a secant line. In geometry, an equichordal point is a point defined relative to a convex plane curve such that all chords passing through the point are equal in length.

Borsuk-Ulam Theorem.[4] The Borsuk–Ulam theorem states that every continuous function from an nn-sphere into Euclidean nn-space maps some pair of antipodal points to the same point. Here, two points on a sphere are called antipodal if they are in exactly opposite directions from the sphere’s center.

Theorem 2.1 (Borsuk-Ulam).

The are no nonconstant antipodal continuous map f:𝕊nkf:\mathbb{S}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{k} for every n,kn,k\in\mathbb{N} with knk\leq n.

Uniform Metric and Spaces of Continuous Functions.[5]

Definition 2.2.

Let (Y,d)(Y,d) be a metric space. Define the bounded metric d¯\bar{d} on YY by

d¯(a,b)=min{d(a,b),1}.\bar{d}(a,b)=\min\{d(a,b),1\}.

If 𝐱=(xα)αJ\mathbf{x}=(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in J} and 𝐲=(yα)αJ\mathbf{y}=(y_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in J} are elements of the Cartesian product YJY^{J}, the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho} on YJY^{J} is given by

ρ¯(𝐱,𝐲)=sup{d¯(xα,yα)|αJ}.\bar{\rho}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y})=\sup\{\bar{d}(x_{\alpha},y_{\alpha})\ |\ \alpha\in J\}.

For functions f,g:JYf,g:J\to Y, the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho} takes the form

ρ¯(f,g)=sup{d¯(f(α),g(α))|αJ}.\bar{\rho}(f,g)=\sup\{\bar{d}(f(\alpha),g(\alpha))\ |\ \alpha\in J\}.
Theorem 2.3.

If (Y,d)(Y,d) is a complete metric space, then the product space YJY^{J} is also complete under the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho}.

Now consider the subset 𝒞(X,Y)YX\mathcal{C}(X,Y)\subseteq Y^{X} consisting of all continuous functions f:XYf:X\to Y. If YY is complete under the metric dd, then 𝒞(X,Y)\mathcal{C}(X,Y) is also complete under the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho}. Similarly, the set (X,Y)\mathcal{B}(X,Y) of bounded functions f:XYf:X\to Y (where a function ff is bounded if f(X)f(X) is a bounded subset of YY) is complete under the same metric.

Theorem 2.4.

Let XX be a topological space and (Y,d)(Y,d) a metric space. The set 𝒞(X,Y)\mathcal{C}(X,Y) of continuous functions and the set (X,Y)\mathcal{B}(X,Y) of bounded functions are both closed subsets of YXY^{X} under the uniform metric. Consequently, if YY is complete under dd, then 𝒞(X,Y)\mathcal{C}(X,Y) and (X,Y)\mathcal{B}(X,Y) are complete under ρ¯\bar{\rho}.

Given a sequence of functions (fn)(f_{n}) in 𝒞(X,Y)\mathcal{C}(X,Y) converging to a function ff under the uniform metric, for all xXx\in X and nNn\geq N, we have

d¯(fn(x),f(x))ρ¯(fn,f)<ϵ,\bar{d}(f_{n}(x),f(x))\leq\bar{\rho}(f_{n},f)<\epsilon,

which implies uniform convergence of (fn)(f_{n}) to ff.

Definition 2.5.

For a metric space (Y,d)(Y,d), another metric on (X,Y)\mathcal{B}(X,Y) is defined as

ρ(f,g)=sup{d(f(x),g(x))|xX}.\rho(f,g)=\sup\{d(f(x),g(x))\ |\ x\in X\}.

This metric, known as the sup metric, is well-defined since the union f(X)g(X)f(X)\cup g(X) is bounded whenever ff and gg are bounded functions.

The relationship between the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho} and the sup metric ρ\rho is straightforward. For f,g(X,Y)f,g\in\mathcal{B}(X,Y):

ρ¯(f,g)=min{ρ(f,g),1}.\bar{\rho}(f,g)=\min\{\rho(f,g),1\}.

If ρ(f,g)>1\rho(f,g)>1, then there exists x0Xx_{0}\in X such that d(f(x0),g(x0))>1d(f(x_{0}),g(x_{0}))>1. Hence, d¯(f(x0),g(x0))=1\bar{d}(f(x_{0}),g(x_{0}))=1, and ρ¯(f,g)=1\bar{\rho}(f,g)=1. Conversely, if ρ(f,g)1\rho(f,g)\leq 1, then d¯(f(x),g(x))=d(f(x),g(x))1\bar{d}(f(x),g(x))=d(f(x),g(x))\leq 1 for all xXx\in X, so ρ¯(f,g)=ρ(f,g)\bar{\rho}(f,g)=\rho(f,g). Therefore, on (X,Y)\mathcal{B}(X,Y), the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho} coincides with the bounded version of the sup metric ρ\rho.

If XX is compact, every continuous function f:XYf:X\to Y is bounded, so the sup metric is defined on 𝒞(X,Y)\mathcal{C}(X,Y). If YY is complete under dd, then 𝒞(X,Y)\mathcal{C}(X,Y) is complete under both the uniform metric ρ¯\bar{\rho} and the sup metric ρ\rho. In practice, the sup metric is often preferred in this context.

3 Nonexistence of Multiple Equichordal Points in Convex Bodies

In this section, we prove the nonexistence of multiple equichordal points in a convex body XX for n2n\geq 2.

Let XX be a convex body in nn-dimensional Euclidean space n\mathbb{R}^{n} for n2n\geq 2. Pick any point xIntXx\in\mathrm{Int}X. Since xx is an interior point of XX, there exists ϵ>0\epsilon>0 such that Bd(x,ϵ)XB_{d}(x,\epsilon)\subset X. Thus, we can consider a unit vector aa on Sn1S^{n-1}, the unit sphere in nn-dimensional space. Let dd be a fixed length of the half-chord starting at xx in the given direction aa. Thus, we have

d=supt>0{d(x,x+at)|x+atX}.d=\sup\limits_{t>0}\{d(x,x+at)\ |\ x+at\in X\}.

Since d(x,x+at)d(x,x+at) is a continuous function of >0\mathbb{R}_{>0} and BB is a closed set, there exists a unique t0>0t_{0}>0 such that d=d(x,x+at0)d=d(x,x+at_{0}) and a0:=x+at0a_{0}:=x+at_{0} lies on BB such that the chord in the given direction starting at xx has a fixed length dd, where dd is the distance from the given interior point to the point a0a_{0}.

Define the function

φ:IntX𝒞(𝕊n1,)\varphi:\mathrm{Int}X\to\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{S}^{n-1},\mathbb{R})

with

φ(x)(a)=d(x,a0),\varphi(x)(a)=d(x,a_{0}),

where φ(x)\varphi(x) is a function from 𝕊n1\mathbb{S}^{n-1} to \mathbb{R}. We will show that φ\varphi is a continuous injective map.

3.1 Continuity of φ(x)\varphi(x) for each xIntXx\in\mathrm{Int}X

For a fixed xXx\in X and any a,b𝕊n1a,b\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}, we have

|φ(x)(a)φ(x)(b)|=|d(x,a0)d(x,b0)|d(a0,b0).|\varphi(x)(a)-\varphi(x)(b)|=|d(x,a_{0})-d(x,b_{0})|\leq d(a_{0},b_{0}).

Since,

d(a0,b0)diam(X)d(a,b),d(a_{0},b_{0})\leq\text{diam}(X)d(a,b),

where the inequality holds because the maximum distance between two points on XX is less than the geodesic distance. Since d(x,a)diam(X)d(x,a)\leq\text{diam}(X) and d(x,b)diam(X)d(x,b)\leq\text{diam}(X), the geodesic distance between a,ba,b is less than diam(X)d(a,b)\text{diam}(X)d(a,b). Thus, we have |φ(x)(a)φ(x)(b)|diam(X)d(a,b)|\varphi(x)(a)-\varphi(x)(b)|\leq\text{diam}(X)d(a,b). Since XX is a compact set, diam(X)\text{diam}(X) is finite. Hence, φ(x)\varphi(x) is a 11-Lipschitz map and therefore a continuous function.

3.2 Injectivity of φ\varphi

Suppose x,yIntXx,y\in\mathrm{Int}X are distinct points. Let a𝕊n1a\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1} be the unit vector in the direction from xx to yy. i.e., a=yxyxa=\frac{y-x}{||y-x||}. Then, for the chord passing through xx and yy, we have

d(x,a0)=d(y,a0)+d(x,y).d(x,a_{0})=d(y,a_{0})+d(x,y).

This implies that φ(x)(a0)φ(y)(a0)\varphi(x)(a_{0})\neq\varphi(y)(a_{0}), so φ(x)φ(y)\varphi(x)\neq\varphi(y). Therefore, φ\varphi is injective.

3.3 Continuity of φ\varphi

To show φ\varphi is continuous, let x,yIntXx,y\in\mathrm{Int}X and consider any a𝕊n1a\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}. Then,

|φ(x)(a)φ(y)(a)|=|d(x,a0)d(y,a0)|d(x,y).|\varphi(x)(a)-\varphi(y)(a)|=|d(x,a_{0})-d(y,a_{0})|\leq d(x,y).

Since the inequality holds for all a𝕊n1a\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}, we have

ρ(φ(x),φ(y))d(x,y),\rho(\varphi(x),\varphi(y))\leq d(x,y),

where ρ\rho is the uniform metric on 𝒞(𝕊n1,)\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{S}^{n-1},\mathbb{R}). Thus, φ\varphi is a 11-Lipschitz map and therefore a continuous function.

3.4 Nonexistence of Multiple Equichordal Points

Suppose there exist two distinct equichordal points x,yIntXx,y\in\mathrm{Int}X. Let a𝕊n1a\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1} be the unit vector from xx to yy, and let b=ab=-a. The length of the chord passing through xx is given by

d(x,a0)+d(x,b0)d(x,a_{0})+d(x,b_{0})

and for yy, it is

d(y,a0)+d(y,b0)=d(x,a0)d(x,y)+d(x,b0)+d(x,y)=d(x,a0)+d(x,b0).d(y,a_{0})+d(y,b_{0})=d(x,a_{0})-d(x,y)+d(x,b_{0})+d(x,y)=d(x,a_{0})+d(x,b_{0}).

Thus, the chord lengths at both xx and yy are equal, with a common length rr. For every s𝕊n1s\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}, we have

φ(x)(s)+φ(x)(s)=r.\varphi(x)(s)+\varphi(x)(-s)=r.

Define the function

g:𝕊n1,g(s)=φ(x)(s)φ(y)(s).g:\mathbb{S}^{n-1}\to\mathbb{R},\quad g(s)=\varphi(x)(s)-\varphi(y)(s).

Since φ(x)\varphi(x) and φ(y)\varphi(y) are continuous, gg is also continuous. Moreover,

g(s)\displaystyle g(-s) =φ(x)(s)φ(y)(s)\displaystyle=\varphi(x)(-s)-\varphi(y)(-s)
=(rφ(x)(s))(rφ(y)(s))\displaystyle=(r-\varphi(x)(s))-(r-\varphi(y)(s))
=(φ(x)(s)φ(y)(s))\displaystyle=-(\varphi(x)(s)-\varphi(y)(s))
=g(s).\displaystyle=-g(s).

Thus, gg is an antipodal continuous map on 𝕊n1\mathbb{S}^{n-1}. By the Borsuk-Ulam theorem (Theorem 2.1), g(s)=0g(s)=0 for all s𝕊n1s\in\mathbb{S}^{n-1}, implying φ(x)=φ(y)\varphi(x)=\varphi(y).

Since φ\varphi is injective, this implies x=yx=y, which is a contradiction. Therefore, there cannot exist multiple equichordal points in XX.

References

  • [1] W. Blaschke, H. Rothe, and R. Weitzenbock. Aufgabe 552. Archiv der Math. u. Physik, 27:82, 1917.
  • [2] Matsusaburo Fujiwara. Über die mittelkurve zweier geschiossenen konvexen kurven in bezug auf einen punkt. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, First Series, 10:99–103, 1916.
  • [3] Victor Klee. Some unsolved problems in geometry. American Mathematical Monthly, 1960.
  • [4] Jiří Matoušek, Anders Björner, Günter M Ziegler, et al. Using the Borsuk-Ulam theorem: lectures on topological methods in combinatorics and geometry, volume 2003. Springer, 2003.
  • [5] James R. Munkres. Topology. Prentice Hall, 2000.