This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Explicit rationality of some cubic fourfolds

Francesco Russo Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università degli Studi di Catania, Viale A. Doria 5, 95125 Catania, Italy frusso@dmi.unict.it, giovannistagliano@gmail.com  and  Giovanni Staglianò
Abstract.

Recent results of Hassett, Kuznetsov and others pointed out countably many divisors CdC_{d} in the open subset of 55=(H0(𝒪5(3)))\mathbb{P}^{55}=\mathbb{P}(H^{0}(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{5}}(3))) parametrizing all cubic 4-folds and lead to the conjecture that the cubics corresponding to these divisors should be precisely the rational ones. Rationality has been proved by Fano for the first divisor C14C_{14} and in [RS19a] for the divisors C26C_{26} and C38C_{38}. In this note we describe explicit birational maps from a general cubic fourfold in C14C_{14}, in C26C_{26} and in C38C_{38} to 4\mathbb{P}^{4}, providing concrete geometric realizations of the more abstract constructions in [RS19a], see also [RS19b] for a theoretical framework.

*Partially supported by the PRIN Geometria delle varietà algebriche and by the FIR2017 Proprietà algebriche locali e globali di anelli associati a curve e ipersuperfici of the University of Catania; the author is a member of the G.N.S.A.G.A. of INDAM

Introduction

The rationality of smooth cubic hypersurfaces in 5\mathbb{P}^{5} is an open problem on which a lot of new and interesting contributions and conjectures appeared in the last decades. The classical work by Fano in [Fan43], correcting some wrong assertions in [Mor40], has been the only known result about the rationality of cubic fourfolds for a long time and, together with a great amount of recent theoretical work on the subject (see for example the survey [Has16]), lead to the expectation that the very general cubic fourfold should be irrational. More precisely, in the moduli space 𝒞\mathcal{C} the locus Rat(𝒞)\operatorname{Rat}(\mathcal{C}) of rational cubic fourfolds is the union of a countable family of closed subsets Ti𝒞T_{i}\subseteq\mathcal{C}, ii\in\mathbb{N}, see [dFF13, Proposition 2.1] and [KT19, Theorem 1].

Hassett defined in [Has99, Has00] (see also [Has16]) via Hodge Theory infinitely many irreducible divisors 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d} in 𝒞\mathcal{C} and introduced the notion of admissible values dd\in\mathbb{N}, i.e. those even integers d>6d>6 not divisible by 4, by 9 and nor by any odd prime of the form 2+3m2+3m. More recent contributions by Kuznetzsov via derived categories in [Kuz10, Kuz16] (see also [AT14, Has16]) fortified the conjecture that

Rat(𝒞)=d admissible𝒞d.\operatorname{Rat}(\mathcal{C})=\bigcup_{d\text{ admissible}}\mathcal{C}_{d}.

The first admissible values are d=14,26,38,42d=14,26,38,42 and Fano showed the rationality of a general cubic fourfold in 𝒞14\mathcal{C}_{14}, see [Fan43, BRS19]. The main results of [RS19a] are summarised in the following:

Theorem.

Every cubic fourfold in the irreducible divisors 𝒞26\mathcal{C}_{26} and 𝒞38\mathcal{C}_{38} is rational.

The geometrical definition of 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d} can be also given as the (closure of the) locus of cubic fourfolds X5X\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} containing an explicit surface SdXS_{d}\subset X. These surfaces are obviously not unique and a standard count of parameters shows that in specific examples the previous locus is a divisor (the degree and self-intesection of SdS_{d} determine the value dd via the formula d=3S2deg(S)2d=3\cdot S^{2}-\deg(S)^{2}), see [Has99, Has00] for more details on the Hodge theoretical definition of 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d} and also [YY19] for recent interesting contributions on the divisors 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d}. For example, the divisor 𝒞14\mathcal{C}_{14} can be described either as the closure of the locus of cubic fourfolds containing a smooth quintic del Pezzo surface or, equivalently, a smooth quartic rational normal scroll, see [Fan43, BRS19] and also [Nue15] for other descriptions with 12d4412\leq d\leq 44, d42d\neq 42 or [Lai17] for d=42d=42.

Fano proved that the restriction of the linear system of quadrics through a smooth quintic del Pezzo surface, respectively a smooth quartic rational normal scroll, to a general cubic through the surface defines a birational map to 4\mathbb{P}^{4}, respectively onto a smooth four dimensional quadric hypersurface. Indeed, a general fiber of the map 54\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} given by quadrics through a quintic del Pezzo surface is a secant line to it, yielding the birationality of the restriction to XX (the other case is similar). The extension of this explicit geometrical approach to rationality for other (admissible) values dd appeared to be impossible because there are no other irreducible surfaces with one apparent double point contained in a cubic fourfold, see [CR11, BRS19].

In [RS19a] we discovered irreducible surfaces Sd5S_{d}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} admitting a four-dimensional family of 5-secant conics such that through a general point of 5\mathbb{P}^{5} there passes a unique conic of the family (congruences of 5-secant conics to SdS_{d}) for dd=14, 26 and 38. From this we deduced the rationality of a general cubic in |H0(Sd(3))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}(3))|, showing that it is a rational section of the universal family of the congruence of 5-secant conics.

Here we come back to Fano’s method and we propose an explicit realisation of the previous abstract approach. Some simplifying hypotheses, based on the known examples in [RS19a], suggest that rationality might be related to linear systems of hypersurfaces of degree 3e13e-1 having points of multiplicity e1e\geq 1 along a right surface SdS_{d} contained in the general X𝒞dX\in\mathcal{C}_{d}, see Section 1. Clearly the problem is to find the right SdS_{d}, prove that the above map is birational and, if the dimension of the linear system is bigger than four, describe the image (which might be highly non trivial). This expectation is motivated by the remark, due to János Kollár, that if the surface Sd5S_{d}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} admits a congruence of (3e1)(3e-1)-secant curves of degree e1e\geq 1 generically transversal to the cubics through SdS_{d} (see Section 1 for precise definitions), then the above linear systems contract the curves of the congruence. So if the general fiber of the map is a curve of the congruence, then a general cubic through SdS_{d} is birational to the image of the associated map. We shall see that, quite surprisingly, this really occurs for the first three admissible values d=14,26,38d=14,26,38 and, even more surprisingly, that these linear systems provide by restriction explicit birational maps from a general cubic fourfold in 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d} for d=14,26,38d=14,26,38 to 4\mathbb{P}^{4} (and also to a four dimensional linear section of a 𝔾(1,3)\mathbb{G}(1,3), respectively 𝔾(1,4)\mathbb{G}(1,4), respectively 𝔾(1,5)\mathbb{G}(1,5)), a fact which was not known before at least for d=26,38d=26,38 (see also [Kol96, Section 5, §29]). The theoretical framework explaining the birationality of these maps, the relations with the theory of congruences to the surfaces SdS_{d} and to the associated K3 surfaces has been developed recently in [RS19b].

To analyze the algebraic and geometric properties of the surfaces Sd5S_{d}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} involved as well the particular linear systems of hypersurfaces of degree 3e13e-1 having points of multiplicity ee along the SdS_{d}’s we used Macaulay2 [GS19] together with some standard semicontinuity arguments to pass from a particular verification to the general case.

Acknowledgements. We wish to thank János Kollár for asking about the maps defined by the linear systems of quintics singular along surfaces admitting a congruence of 5-secant conics and for his interest in our subsequent results.

dd Surface S5S\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5}
22-secant
lines
55-secant
conics
88-secant
twisted
cubics
h0(S/5(3))h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S/{\mathbb{P}}^{5}}(3)) h0(NS/5)h^{0}(N_{S/{\mathbb{P}}^{5}}) h0(NS/X)h^{0}(N_{S/X})
14{14}
Smooth del Pezzo surface of degree 55
11 0 0 2525 3535 55
14{14}
Rational normal scroll of degree 44
11 0 0 2828 2929 22
14{14}
Isomorphic projection of a smooth surface
in 6\mathbb{P}^{6} of degree 88 and sectional genus 33,
obtained as the image of 2\mathbb{P}^{2} via the linear
system of quartic curves with 88 general
base points
77 11 0 1313 4949 77
26{26}
Rational scroll of degree 77 with 33 nodes
77 11 0 1313 4444 22
38{38}
Smooth surface of degree 1010 and sectional
genus 66, obtained as the image of 2{\mathbb{P}}^{2} via
the linear system of curves of degree 1010
with 1010 general triple points
77 11 0 1010 4747 22
26{26}
Projection of a smooth del Pezzo surface
of degree 77 in 7{\mathbb{P}}^{7} from a line intersecting
the secant variety in one general point
55 11 0 1414 4242 11
38{38}
Rational scroll of degree 88 with 66 nodes
99 44 11 1010 4747 22
Table 1. Surfaces S5S\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5} contained in a cubic fourfold [X]𝒞d[X]\in\mathcal{C}_{d} and admitting a congruence of (3e1)(3e-1)-secant rational normal curves of degree e3e\leq 3.
dd ee Multidegree Y4Y^{4} δ\delta deg(𝔅)\deg(\mathfrak{B}) g(𝔅)g(\mathfrak{B}) deg(𝔅red)\deg(\mathfrak{B}_{\mathrm{red}}) g(𝔅red)g(\mathfrak{B}_{\mathrm{red}})
14{14} 11 3,6,7,4,13,6,7,4,1 4{\mathbb{P}}^{4} 44 99 88 99 88
14{14} 11 3,6,8,6,23,6,8,6,2 𝔾(1,3)5{\mathbb{G}}(1,3)\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5} 33 1010 77 1010 77
14{14} 22 3,15,19,9,13,15,19,9,1 4{\mathbb{P}}^{4} 99 5252 256256 3232 106106
26{26} 22 3,15,20,9,13,15,20,9,1 4{\mathbb{P}}^{4} 99 5151 246246 3131 100100
38{38} 22 3,15,27,9,13,15,27,9,1 4{\mathbb{P}}^{4} 99 4242 165165 1818 3939
26{26} 22 3,15,31,25,53,15,31,25,5 𝔾(1,4)77{\mathbb{G}}(1,4)\cap{\mathbb{P}}^{7}\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{7} 55 7777 212212 4343 7373
38{38} 33 3,24,80,70,143,24,80,70,14 𝔾(1,5)1010{\mathbb{G}}(1,5)\cap{\mathbb{P}}^{10}\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{10} 55 204204 633633 9494 144144
Table 2. Birational maps from a cubic fourfold [X]𝒞d[X]\in\mathcal{C}_{d} to a fourfold Y4Y^{4} defined by the restrictions to XX of the linear systems |H0(Se(3e1))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}^{e}(3e-1))|, where S5S\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5} are the surfaces in Table 1 admitting a congruence of (3e1)(3e-1)-secant rational normal curves of degree e3e\leq 3. Here, 𝔅\mathfrak{B} denotes the base locus of the inverse map, which is a 22-dimensional scheme; gg stands for the sectional arithmetic genus; δ\delta is the degree of the forms defining the inverse map.

1. Explicit rationality via linear systems of hypersurfaces of degree 3e13e-1 having points of multiplicity ee along a right surface

Let us recall the following definitions introduced in [RS19a, Section 1]. Let \mathcal{H} be an irreducible proper family of (rational or of fixed arithmetic genus) curves of degree ee in 5\mathbb{P}^{5} whose general element is irreducible. We have a diagram

𝒟\textstyle{\mathcal{D}\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces\ignorespaces}ψ\scriptstyle{\psi}π\scriptstyle{\pi}\textstyle{\mathcal{H}}5\textstyle{\mathbb{P}^{5}}

where π:𝒟\pi:\mathcal{D}\to\mathcal{H} is the universal family over \mathcal{H} and where ψ:𝒟5\psi:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{P}^{5} is the tautological morphism. Suppose moreover that ψ\psi is birational and that a general member [C][C]\in\mathcal{H} is (re1re-1)-secant to an irreducible surface S5S\subset\mathbb{P}^{5}, that is CSC\cap S is a length re1re-1 scheme, rr\in\mathbb{N}. We shall call such a family \mathcal{H} a congruence of (re1re-1)-secant curves of degree ee to SS. Let us remark that necessarily dim()=4\dim(\mathcal{H})=4.

An irreducible hypersurface X|H0(S(r))|X\in|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))| is said to be transversal to the congruence \mathcal{H} if the unique curve of the congruence passing through a general point pXp\in X is not contained in XX. A crucial result is the following.

Theorem 1.

[RS19a, Theorem 1] Let S5S\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} be a surface admitting a congruence of (re1re-1)-secant curves of degree ee parametrized by \mathcal{H}. If X|H0(S(r))|X\in|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))| is an irreducible hypersurface transversal to \mathcal{H}, then XX is birational to \mathcal{H}.

If the map Φ=Φ|H0(S(r))|:5(H0(S(r)))\Phi=\Phi_{|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))|}:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}(H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))) is birational onto its image, then a general hypersurface X|H0(S(r))|X\in|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))| is birational to \mathcal{H}.

Moreover, under the previous hypothesis on Φ\Phi, if a general element in |H0(S(r))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))| is smooth, then every X|H0(S(r))|X\in|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(r))| with at worst rational singularities is birational to \mathcal{H}.

Thus, when a surface S5S\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} admits a conguence of (3e1)(3e-1)-secant curves of degree e1e\geq 1 which is transversal to a general cubic fourfold through it, such a cubic fourfold is birational to \mathcal{H} via πψ|X1\pi\circ\psi^{-1}_{|X}, see the proof of the above result. Obviously, the difficult key point is to find a congruence as above with \mathcal{H} rational (or irrational, depending on the application).

Since ψ:𝒟5\psi:\mathcal{D}\to\mathbb{P}^{5} is birational, we also have a rational map

φ=πψ1:5,\varphi=\pi\circ\psi^{-1}:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathcal{H},

whose general fiber through p5p\in\mathbb{P}^{5}, F=φ1(φ(p))¯F=\overline{\varphi^{-1}(\varphi(p))}, is the unique curve of the congruence passing through pp. On the contrary, if there exists a map φ:5YN\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow Y\subseteq\mathbb{P}^{N} with YY a four dimensional variety, whose general fiber FF is an irreducible curve of degree ee which is (3e1)(3e-1)-secant to a surface S5S\subset\mathbb{P}^{5}, then we have found a congruence for SS, a birational realization of the variety \mathcal{H} and a concrete representation of the abstract map πψ1\pi\circ\psi^{-1}.

It is natural to ask what linear systems on 5\mathbb{P}^{5} can give maps φ:5Y\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow Y as above. Since a linear system in |H0(Se(3e1))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}^{e}(3e-1))| contracts the fibers of φ\varphi, these (complete) linear systems appear as natural potential candidates, as remarked by János Kollár. A posteriori we shall see that, quite surprisingly, this really occurs with Y=4Y=\mathbb{P}^{4} (or with YY a linear section of a Grassmannian of lines) for the first three admissible values d=14,26,38d=14,26,38 and, even more surprisingly, that these linear systems provide the explicit rationality of a general cubic fourfold in 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d} for d=14,26,38d=14,26,38.

Let EBlS5E\subset\operatorname{Bl}_{S}\mathbb{P}^{5} be the exceptional divisor of the blow-up of 5\mathbb{P}^{5} along SS, let HBlS5H\subset\operatorname{Bl}_{S}\mathbb{P}^{5} be the pull back of a hyperplane in 5\mathbb{P}^{5}, let FF^{\prime} be the strict transform of FF and let φ~:BlS5\tilde{\varphi}:\operatorname{Bl}_{S}\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathcal{H} be the rational map induced by φ\varphi. Then EF=3e1E\cdot F^{\prime}=3e-1 by hypothesis and (3HE)F=1(3H-E)\cdot F^{\prime}=1. The last condition translates both that a general cubic through SS is mapped birationally onto \mathcal{H} by φ\varphi, both the fact that the linear system |H0(S(3))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(3))| sends a general FF into a line contained in the image of the corresponding map ψ:5(H0(S(3)))\psi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}(H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(3))) and, last but not least, also that the congruence is transversal to a general cubic through SS (see [RS19a] for a systematic use of these key remarks).

For e=1e=1 one should consider linear systems of quadric hypersurfaces through SS; for e=2e=2 quintics having double points along SS; for e=3e=3 hypersurfaces of degree 8 having triple points along SS and so on.

For e=1e=1 we have a unique secant line to SS passing through a general point of 5\mathbb{P}^{5}, which is a very strong restriction. Indeed, such a SS is a so called surface with one apparent double point. These surfaces are completely classified in [CR11] and those contained in a cubic fourfold are only quintic del Pezzo’s and smooth quartic rational normal scrolls. Cubic fourfolds through these surfaces describe the divisor 𝒞14\mathcal{C}_{14} as it was firstly remarked by Fano in [Fan43] (see also [BRS19, Theorem 3.7] for a modern account of Fano’s original arguments using deformations of quartic scrolls).

Let D5D\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} be an arbitrary smooth quintic del Pezzo surface. Then |H0(D(2))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{D}(2))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} and this linear system determines a dominant rational map φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4}, whose general fiber FF is a secant line to DD. Then the restriction of φ\varphi to a cubic fourfold through DD yields a birational map ψ:X4\psi:X\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} and hence the rationality of a general X𝒞14X\in\mathcal{C}_{14}, as firstly remarked by Fano in [Fan43].

Let T4T\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} be a smooth quartic rational normal scroll. Then |H0(T(2))|=5|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{T}(2))|=\mathbb{P}^{5} and this linear system determines a dominant rational map φ:5Q5\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow Q\subset\mathbb{P}^{5}, whose general fiber FF is a secant line to TT and with QQ a smooth quadric hypersurface. Then the restriction of φ\varphi to a cubic fourfold through TT yields a birational map ψ:XQ\psi:X\dasharrow Q and another proof of the rationality of a general X𝒞14X\in\mathcal{C}_{14}, see [Fan43].

We shall mainly consider the surfaces Sd5S_{d}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} admitting a congruence of 5-secant conics parametrised by a rational variety studied in [RS19a] (but also other new examples) to determine explicitly the rationality of a general X𝒞dX\in\mathcal{C}_{d} for d=14,26,38d=14,26,38 with e=2e=2 (or also for other values e3e\geq 3). To this aim we shall summarise some well known facts in the next subsection.

1.1. Linear systems of quintics with double points along a general Sd𝒮dS_{d}\in\mathcal{S}_{d}

Let 𝒮d\mathcal{S}_{d} be an irreducible component of the Hilbert scheme of surfaces in 5\mathbb{P}^{5} with a fixed Hilbert polynomial p(t)p(t) and such that

𝒞d={[X]𝒞 for which [Sd]𝒮d:SdX}¯.\mathcal{C}_{d}=\overline{\{[X]\in\mathcal{C}\text{ for which }\exists\,[S_{d}]\in\mathcal{S}_{d}\,:\,S_{d}\subset X\}}.

One can verify explicitly the previous equality by comparing the Hodge theoretic definition on the left with the geometrical description on the right. A modern count of parameters usually shows that the right side is at least a divisor in 𝒞\mathcal{C} so that equality holds because 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d} is an irreducible divisor if not empty. The hard problem is to compute the dimension of the family of SdS_{d}’s contained in a fixed (general) XX belonging to the set on the right side above, see [Nue15, RS19a] for some efficient computational arguments based on semicontinuity.

For every a,ba,b\in\mathbb{N} the functions h0(Sdb(a))h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}^{b}(a)) are upper semicontinuous on 𝒮d\mathcal{S}_{d}. In particular there exists an open non empty subsets U𝒮dU\subseteq\mathcal{S}_{d} on which h0(Sdb(a))h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}^{b}(a)) attains a minimum value m=m(a,b)m=m(a,b).

We shall be mainly interested in the case a=5a=5 and b=2b=2, that is the computation of the dimension of the linear system |H0(Sd2(5))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}^{2}(5))| for Sd𝒮dS_{d}\in\mathcal{S}_{d} general. To this aim we consider the exact sequence

(1) 0Sd2(5)Sd(5)NSd/5(5)0.0\to\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{d}}(5)\to\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}(5)\to N^{*}_{S_{d}/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5)\to 0.

Suppose that we know h0(NSd/5(5))=yh^{0}(N^{*}_{S_{d}/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5))=y and h0(Sd(5))=xh^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}(5))=x for the general Sd𝒮dS_{d}\in\mathcal{S}_{d} via standard exact sequences (or also computationally) or for some geometrical property of the surfaces. From (1) we deduce h0(Sd2(5))xyh^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{d}}(5))\geq x-y for a general SdS_{d}. By the upper semicontinuity of h0(Sd2(5))h^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{d}}(5)) it will be sufficient to find a surface S𝒮dS\in\mathcal{S}_{d} with h0(S2(5))=xyh^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S}(5))=x-y to deduce that the same holds for a general Sd𝒮dS_{d}\in\mathcal{S}_{d}.

If π:χd𝒮d\pi:\chi_{d}\to\mathcal{S}_{d} is the universal family and if a general [Sd]𝒮d[S_{d}]\in\mathcal{S}_{d} is smooth, let V𝒮dV\subseteq\mathcal{S}_{d} be the non empty open set of points [S]𝒮d[S]\in\mathcal{S}_{d} such that S5S\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} is a smooth surface. Then π1(V)V\pi^{-1}(V)\to V is a smooth morphism and the function h0(NS/5(a))h^{0}(N^{*}_{S/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(a)) is upper semicontinuos on VV for every aa\in\mathbb{N}. In particular, if there exists [S]V[S]\in V such that h0(NS/5(a))=zh^{0}(N^{*}_{S/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(a))=z, then, for a general [Sd]missingSd[S_{d}]\in\mathcal{\mathcal{missing}}S_{d}, we have h0(NSd/5(a))zh^{0}(N^{*}_{S_{d}/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(a))\leq z and hence h0(Sd2(a))m(a,2)zh^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}^{2}(a))\geq m(a,2)-z . If moreover h0(S2(a))=m(a,2)zh^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S^{\prime}}^{2}(a))=m(a,2)-z for a [S]𝒮d[S^{\prime}]\in\mathcal{S}_{d}, then the same holds for a general [Sd]𝒮d[S_{d}]\in\mathcal{S}_{d}. These standard and well known remarks will be useful in our analysis of the examples in the next sections, where we shall also deal with the case e=3e=3 and the linear systems |H0(Sd3(8))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{d}}^{3}(8))| for d=14,38d=14,38.

1.2. Computations via Macaulay2

To study surfaces in 5\mathbb{P}^{5} admitting congruences of (3e1)(3e-1)-secant curves of degree ee, the rational maps given by hypersurfaces of degree 3e13e-1 having points of multiplicity ee along these surfaces and also the lines contained in the images of 5\mathbb{P}^{5} via the linear system of cubics through these surfaces we mostly used Macaulay2 [GS19].

Our proofs of various claims exploit the fact that the irreducible components 𝒮d\mathcal{S}_{d} of the Hilbert schemes considered here are unirational. Therefore, by introducing a finite number of free parameters, one can explicitly construct the generic surface in 𝒮d\mathcal{S}_{d} in function of the specified parameters. Adding more parameters one can also take the generic point of 5\mathbb{P}^{5}, and then one can for instance compute the generic fiber of the map defined by the cubics through the generic [Sd]𝒮d[S_{d}]\in\mathcal{S}_{d}, which will depend on all these parameters. In principle, there are no theoretical limitations to perform this computation, but in practice this is far beyond what computers can do today. Anyway, the answer we get is equivalent to the one obtained on the original field via a generic specialization of the parameters and, above all, the generic specialization commutes with this type of computation. So, using a common computer one can get an experimental proof that a certain property holds or not for the generic [Sd][S_{d}]. In the affirmative case, one then applies some semicontinuity arguments to get a rigorous proof.

2. Explicit birational maps to 4\mathbb{P}^{4} via linear system of quintics with double points for cubics in 𝒞d\mathcal{C}_{d}, d=14,26,38d=14,26,38.

Let S145S_{14}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} be an isomorphic projection of an octic smooth surface S6S\subset\mathbb{P}^{6} of sectional genus 3 in 6\mathbb{P}^{6}, obtained as the image of 2\mathbb{P}^{2} via the linear system of quartic curves with 8 general base points. Let 𝒮14\mathcal{S}_{14} be the irreducible component of the Hilbert scheme parametrizing surfaces S145S_{14}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} as above. In [RS19a, Theorem 2] we verified that a general X𝒞14X\in\mathcal{C}_{14} contains a surface S14S_{14} and that each S14S_{14} admits a congruence of 5-secant conics (birationally) parametrized by its symmetric product and transversal to XX.

Theorem 2.

For a general surface S145S_{14}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} as above we have |H0(S142(5))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{14}}^{2}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} and this linear system determines a rational map φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} whose general fiber is a 5-secant conic to S14S_{14}. In particular, the restriction of φ\varphi to a general cubic through S14S_{14} is birational.

Proof.

A general S14𝒮14S_{14}\in\mathcal{S}_{14} is kk-normal for every k2k\geq 2, see [AR04, Example 3.8], yielding h0(S14(5))=141h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{14}}(5))=141. For a particular smooth S𝒮14S\in\mathcal{S}_{14} we verified that h0(NS/5(5))=136h^{0}(N^{*}_{S/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5))=136 so that for a general S14𝒮14S_{14}\in\mathcal{S}_{14} we have h0(NS14/5(5))136h^{0}(N^{*}_{S_{14}/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5))\leq 136. By (1) we have h0(S142(5))5h^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{14}}(5))\geq 5 for a general S14𝒮14S_{14}\in\mathcal{S}_{14}. Since in the example we studied h0(S2(5))=5h^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S}(5))=5, the same holds for a general S14𝒮14S_{14}\in\mathcal{S}_{14}, see Subsection 1.1.

Let φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} be the rational map associated to |H0(S142(5))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{14}}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} with S14S_{14} general. We verified that the closure of a general fiber of φ\varphi is a 5-secant conic to S14S_{14}, concluding the proof. ∎

Let S265S_{26}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} be a rational septimic scroll with three nodes recently considered by Farkas and Verra in [FV18], where they also proved that a general X𝒞26X\in\mathcal{C}_{26} contains a surface of this kind. Also these surfaces admit a congruence of 5-secant conics transversal to XX and parametrized by a rational variety, see [RS19a, Remark 6].

Theorem 3.

For a general surface S265S_{26}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} as above we have |H0(S262(5))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{26}}^{2}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} and this linear system determines a rational map φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} whose general fiber is a 5-secant conic to S26S_{26}. In particular, the restriction of φ\varphi to a general cubic through S26S_{26} is birational.

Proof.

For a general S26𝒮26S_{26}\in\mathcal{S}_{26} as above, we have h0(S26(5))=144h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{26}}(5))=144, h0(NS26/5(5))=139h^{0}(N^{*}_{S_{26}/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5))=139 and in an explicit example of S𝒮26S\in\mathcal{S}_{26} we verified that h0(S2(5))=5h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}^{2}(5))=5. Thus |H0(S262(5))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{26}}^{2}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} for a general S26S_{26}, see Subsection 1.1. Let φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} be the rational map associated to |H0(S262(5))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{26}}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} with S26S_{26} general. We verified that a general fiber of the corresponding φ\varphi is a 5-secant conic to S26S_{26}, concluding the proof. ∎

Let S385S_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} be a general degree 10 smooth surface of sectional genus 6 obtained as the image of 2\mathbb{P}^{2} by the linear system of plane curves of degree 10 having 10 fixed triple points. As shown by Nuer in [Nue15], these surfaces are contained in a general [X]𝒞38[X]\in\mathcal{C}_{38}. In [RS19a, Theorem 4] we proved that a general S38S_{38} admits a congruence of 5-secant conics transversal to XX and parametrised by a rational variety.

Theorem 4.

For a surface S385S_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} as above we have |H0(S382(5))|=4|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{38}}^{2}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{4} and this linear system defines a rational map φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} whose general fiber is a 5-secant conic to S38S_{38}. In particular, the restriction of φ\varphi to a general cubic through S38S_{38} is birational.

Proof.

A general S38𝒮38S_{38}\in\mathcal{S}_{38} has ideal generated by 10 cubic forms and is thus 5-normal by [BEL91, Proposition 1], yielding h0(S38(5))=126h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S_{38}}(5))=126 for a general S38S_{38} (a fact which can also be verified by a direct computation). For a particular smooth S𝒮38S\in\mathcal{S}_{38} we verified that h0(NS/5(5))=121h^{0}(N^{*}_{S/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5))=121 so that for a general S38𝒮38S_{38}\in\mathcal{S}_{38} we have h0(NS38/5(5))121h^{0}(N^{*}_{S_{38}/\mathbb{P}^{5}}(5))\leq 121. From (1) we deduce h0(S382(5))5h^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S_{38}}(5))\geq 5 for a general S38𝒮38S_{38}\in\mathcal{S}_{38}. Since in the previous explicit example we also have h0(S2(5))=5h^{0}(\mathcal{I}^{2}_{S}(5))=5, the same holds for a general S38𝒮38S_{38}\in\mathcal{S}_{38}, see Subsection 1.1. We verified that a general fiber of the corresponding rational map φ\varphi is a 5-secant conic to S38S_{38}, concluding the proof. ∎

3. Explicit birational maps to linear sections of 𝔾(1,3+k)\mathbb{G}(1,3+k) for cubics in 𝒞14+12k\mathcal{C}_{14+12k} for k=1,2k=1,2

In this section we analyse some examples and look at them as suitable generalisation of those considered by Fano. A smooth quintic del Pezzo surface D5D\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} can be realized as a divisor of type (1,2)(1,2) on the Segre 3-fold Z=1×25Z=\mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{2}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} while a smooth quartic rational normal scroll T5T\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} can be realized (also) as a divisor of type (2,1)(2,1). Moreover, a general cubic through DD will cut ZZ along DD and a smooth divisor of type (2,1)(2,1), that is a smooth rational normal scroll TT (and viceversa).

One might wonder if something similar happens for the next admissible values d=26d=26 and d=38d=38 or if, at least, also in these cases there exist surfaces SdS_{d} giving explicit birational maps to four dimensional (smooth) linear sections of 𝔾(1,3+k)\mathbb{G}(1,3+k), d=14+12kd=14+12k. We shall see that very surprisingly this is the case although the linkage phenomenon described above appears again only for d=38d=38.

Let S6S\subset\mathbb{P}^{6} be a septimic surface with a node, which is the projection of a smooth del Pezzo surface of degree seven in 7\mathbb{P}^{7} from a general point on its secant variety. Let S265S^{\prime}_{26}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} be the projection of SS from a general point outside the secant variety Sec(S)6\operatorname{Sec}(S)\subset\mathbb{P}^{6}. These surfaces admit a congruence of 5-secant conics parametrised by a rational variety and a general cubic in 𝒞26\mathcal{C}_{26} contains such a surface, see [RS19a, Theorem 4].

Theorem 5.

For a general surface S265S^{\prime}_{26}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} as above we have |H0(S262(5))|=7|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S^{\prime}_{26}}^{2}(5))|=\mathbb{P}^{7} and this linear system determines a rational map φ:5Y47\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow Y^{4}\subset\mathbb{P}^{7} with Y4Y^{4} a smooth linear section of 𝔾(1,4)9\mathbb{G}(1,4)\subset\mathbb{P}^{9}. A general fiber of φ\varphi is a 5-secant conic to S26S^{\prime}_{26} and the restriction of φ\varphi to a general cubic through S26S^{\prime}_{26} is birational.

Proof.

For a general S26𝒮26S^{\prime}_{26}\in\mathcal{S}^{\prime}_{26} as above we verified that h0(S262(5))=8h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S^{\prime}_{26}}^{2}(5))=8 and that the closure of the image of φ:57\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{7} is a smooth four dimensional linear section Y4Y^{4} of 𝔾(1,4)\mathbb{G}(1,4). Moreover, a general fiber of the corresponding map φ\varphi is a 5-secant conic to S26S^{\prime}_{26}, concluding the proof. ∎

The two surfaces S26S_{26} and S26S^{\prime}_{26} are not linked in a variety of dimension three via cubics because the sum of their degrees is 14, which is not divisible by 3.

Studying the rational map φ:54\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{4} treated in Theorem 4 we realized that its base locus contains an irreducible component of dimension three B5B\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} of degree 6 and sectional genus 3. This variety has 7 singular points and it has homogeneous ideal generated by four cubics. So B5B\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} is a degeneration of the so called Bordiga scroll, which is a threefold given by the maximal minors of a general 3×43\times 4 matrix of linear forms on 5\mathbb{P}^{5}. The variety BB contains the surface S385S_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} and a general cubic through S38S_{38} cuts BB along S38S_{38} and an octic rational scroll S385S^{\prime}_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} with 6 nodes belonging to the singular locus of BB. The scroll S38S^{\prime}_{38} is a projection of a smooth octic rational normal scroll S9S\subset\mathbb{P}^{9} from a special 3\mathbb{P}^{3} cutting the secant variety to SS in six points.

As far as we know this octic rational scroll with six nodes has not been constructed before and, in this context, it is the right generalization of the smooth quartic rational normal scroll considered by Fano. Moreover, it is remarkable also because it does not come from the diagonal construction via the associated K3K3 surfaces as for the Farkas-Verra and Lai scrolls (see [FV18, Lai17] also for more details on this construction). Let us now describe some geometrical properties of the octic rational scroll S385S^{\prime}_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5}.

Theorem 6.

A general [X]𝒞38[X]\in\mathcal{C}_{38} contains an octic rational scroll S385S^{\prime}_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} with 6 nodes. Moreover, for a general surface S385S^{\prime}_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} we have |H0(S383(8))|=10|H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S^{\prime}_{38}}^{3}(8))|=\mathbb{P}^{10} and this linear system determines a rational map φ:5Y410\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow Y^{4}\subset\mathbb{P}^{10} with Y4Y^{4} a linear section of 𝔾(1,5)14\mathbb{G}(1,5)\subset\mathbb{P}^{14}. The general fiber of φ\varphi is an 8-secant twisted cubic to S38S^{\prime}_{38} and the restriction of φ\varphi to a general cubic through S38S^{\prime}_{38} is birational. In particular, an octic rational scroll S385S^{\prime}_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} admits a congruence of 8-secant cubics.

Proof.

A general octic scroll S385S^{\prime}_{38}\subset\mathbb{P}^{5} depends on 47 parameters and it has homogeneous ideal generated by 10 cubics forms. In an explicit example S𝒮38S\in\mathcal{S}^{\prime}_{38} we verified that h0(NS/5)=47h^{0}(N_{S/\mathbb{P}^{5}})=47 and that SS is contained in smooth cubic hypersurfaces. Therefore 𝒮38\mathcal{S}^{\prime}_{38} is generically smooth of dimension 47 and the natural incidence correspondence in 𝒮38×𝒞\mathcal{S}^{\prime}_{38}\times\mathcal{C} above the open subset of 𝒮38\mathcal{S}^{\prime}_{38} where h0(S(3))=10h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S}(3))=10 has an irreducible component 𝒞38~\widetilde{\mathcal{C}_{38}} of dimension 56. Since (S38)2=34(S^{\prime}_{38})^{2}=34 to prove that a general [X]𝒞38[X]\in\mathcal{C}_{38} contains such a surface, we verified in an explicit general example that h0(NS38/X)=2h^{0}(N_{S^{\prime}_{38}/X})=2.

For a general S38𝒮38S^{\prime}_{38}\in\mathcal{S}^{\prime}_{38} we have h0(S383(8))=11h^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{S^{\prime}_{38}}^{3}(8))=11 and the closure of the image of the associated rational map φ:510\varphi:\mathbb{P}^{5}\dasharrow\mathbb{P}^{10} is a linear section Y410Y^{4}\subset\mathbb{P}^{10} of 𝔾(1,5)14\mathbb{G}(1,5)\subset\mathbb{P}^{14}. We verified that a general fiber of φ\varphi is an 8-secant twisted cubic to S38S^{\prime}_{38}, concluding the proof. ∎

4. Computations

The aim of this section is to show how one can ascertain the contents of Theorems 2, 3, 4, and similar results in specific examples using the computer algebra system Macaulay2 [GS19].

We begin to observe that given the defining homogeneous ideal of a subvariety XnX\subset\mathbb{P}^{n}, the computation of a basis for the linear system |H0(Xe(d))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{X}^{e}(d))| of hypersurfaces of degree dd with points of multiplicity at least ee along XX can be perfomed using pure linear algebra. This approach is implemented in the Macaulay2 package Cremona (see [Sta18]), which turns out to be effective for small values of dd and ee. In practice, in any Macaulay2 session with the Cremona package loaded, if I is a variable containing the ideal of XX, we get a rational map defined by a basis of |H0(Xe(d))||H^{0}(\mathcal{I}_{X}^{e}(d))| by the command111For all the examples treated in this paper, the linear system of hypersurfaces of degree dd with points of multiplicity at least ee along XnX\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{n} coincides with the homogeneous component of degree dd of the saturation with respect to the irrelevant ideal of n{\mathbb{P}}^{n} of the ee-power of the homogeneous ideal of XX. So one can also compute it using the code: gens image basis(d,saturate(I^e)). rationalMap(I,d,e).

Now we consider a specific example related to Theorem 4. In the following code, we produce a pair (f,φ)(f,\varphi) of rational maps: f:25f:{\mathbb{P}}^{2}\dashrightarrow{\mathbb{P}}^{5} is a birational parameterization of a smooth surface S=S385S=S_{38}\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5} of degree 1010 and sectional genus 66 as in Theorem 4, and φ:59\varphi:{\mathbb{P}}^{5}\dashrightarrow{\mathbb{P}}^{9} is a rational map defined by a basis of cubic hypersurfaces containing SS (see also Section 5 of [RS19a]). Here we work over the finite field 𝔽10000019\mathbb{F}_{10000019} for speed reasons.

Macaulay2, version 1.14with packages: ConwayPolynomialsEliminationIntegralClosureInverseSystems,               LLLBasesPrimaryDecompositionReesAlgebraTangentConeTruncationsi1 : needsPackage "Cremona";i2 : f = rationalMap(ZZ/10000019[vars(0..2)],{10,0,0,10});o2 : RationalMap (rational map from PP^2 to PP^5)i3 : S = image f;i4 : phi = rationalMap S;o4 : RationalMap (cubic rational map from PP^5 to PP^9) We now compute the rational map ψ\psi defined by the linear system of quintic hypersurfaces of 5{\mathbb{P}}^{5} which are singular along SS. From the information obtained by its projective degrees we deduce that ψ\psi is a dominant rational map onto 4{\mathbb{P}}^{4} with generic fibre of dimension 11 and degree 22 and with base locus of dimension 33 and degree 5219=65^{2}-19=6.

i5 : time psi = rationalMap(S,5,2);     -- used 9.07309 secondso5 : RationalMap (rational map from PP^5 to PP^4)i6 : projectiveDegrees psio6 = {1, 5, 19, 13, 2, 0} Next we compute a special random fibre FF of the map ψ\psi.

i7 : p = point source psi;  -- a random point on P^5i8 : F = psi^*(psi(p)); It easy to verify directly that FF is an irreducible 55-secant conic to SS passing through pp. One can also see that FF coincides with the pull-back φ1(L)¯\overline{\varphi^{-1}(L)} of the unique line Lφ(5)¯9L\subset\overline{\varphi({\mathbb{P}}^{5})}\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{9} passing through φ(p)\varphi(p) that is not the image of a secant line to SS passing through pp (see [RS19a] for details on this computation). Finally, the following lines of code tell us that the restriction of ψ\psi to a random cubic fourfold containing SS is a birational map whose inverse map is defined by forms of degree 99 and has base locus scheme of dimension 22 and degree 9227=549^{2}-27=54.

i9 : psi’ = psi|sum(S_*,i->random(ZZ/10000019)*i);o9 : RationalMap (rational map from hypersurface in PP^5 to PP^4)i10 : projectiveDegrees psi’o10 = {3, 15, 27, 9, 1}

For the convenience of the reader, we have included in a Macaulay2 package (named ExplicitRationality and provided as an ancillary file to our arXiv submission) the examples listed in Table 2 of birational maps between cubic fourfolds and other rational fourfolds. The two examples with d=38d=38 can be obtained as follows:

i11 : needsPackage "ExplicitRationality";i12 : time example38();      -- used 1.2428 seconds The above command produces the following 66 rational maps:

  1. (1)

    a parameterization f:25f:{\mathbb{P}}^{2}\dashrightarrow{\mathbb{P}}^{5} as that obtained above of a surface S=S385S=S_{38}\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5} of degree 1010 and sectional genus 66;

  2. (2)

    the rational map ψ:54\psi:{\mathbb{P}}^{5}\dashrightarrow{\mathbb{P}}^{4} defined by the quintic hypersurfaces with double points along SS;

  3. (3)

    the restriction of ψ\psi to a cubic fourfold XX containing SS, which is a birational map;

  4. (4)

    the linear projection of a smooth scroll surface of degree 88 in 9{\mathbb{P}}^{9} from a linear 33-dimensional subspace intersecting the secant variety of the scroll in 66 points, so that the image is a scroll surface T5T\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{5} of degree 88 with 66 nodes; moreover, we have the relation: TS=Xtop(Bs(ψ))T\cup S=X\cap\mathrm{top}(\mathrm{Bs}(\psi)), where top(Bs(ψ))\mathrm{top}(\mathrm{Bs}(\psi)) denotes the top component of the base locus of ψ\psi;

  5. (5)

    the rational map η:5Z10\eta:{\mathbb{P}}^{5}\dashrightarrow Z\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{10} defined by the octic hypersurfaces with triple points along TT, and where Z10Z\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{10} is a 44-dimensional linear section of 𝔾(1,5)14\mathbb{G}(1,5)\subset{\mathbb{P}}^{14};

  6. (6)

    the restriction of η\eta to the cubic fourfold XX, which is a birational map onto ZZ.

Now we can quickly get information on the maps, e.g. on the inverse of the last one:

i13 : g = last oo;o13 : RationalMap (birational map from hypersurface in PP^5 to 4-dimensional subvariety of PP^10)i14 : describe inverse go14 = rational map defined by forms of degree 5      source variety: 4-dimensional variety of degree 14 in PP^10 cut out by 15                      hypersurfaces of degree 2      target variety: smooth cubic hypersurface in PP^5      birationality: true      projective degrees: {14, 70, 80, 24, 3}

References

  • [AR04] A. Alzati and F. Russo, Some elementary extremal contractions between smooth varieties arising from projective geometry, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 89 (2004), 25–53.
  • [AT14] N. Addington and R. Thomas, Hodge theory and derived categories of cubic fourfolds, Duke Math. J. 163 (2014), no. 10, 1886–1927.
  • [BEL91] A. Bertram, L. Ein, and R. Lazarsfeld, Vanishing theorems, a theorem of Severi, and the equations defining projective varieties, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 4 (1991), no. 3, 587–602.
  • [BRS19] M. Bolognesi, F. Russo, and G. Staglianò, Some loci of rational cubic fourfolds, Math. Ann. 373 (2019), no. 1, 165–190.
  • [CR11] C. Ciliberto and F. Russo, On the classification of OADP varieties, Sci. China Math. 54 (2011), 1561–1575, Special Volume on the occasion of the 60 years of Fabrizio Catanese.
  • [dFF13] T. de Fernex and D. Fusi, Rationality in families of threefolds, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 62 (2013), no. 1, 127–135.
  • [Fan43] G. Fano, Sulle forme cubiche dello spazio a cinque dimensioni contenenti rigate razionali del 44^{\circ} ordine, Comment. Math. Helv. 15 (1943), no. 1, 71–80.
  • [FV18] G. Farkas and A. Verra, The universal K3 surface of genus 14 via cubic fourfolds, J. Math. Pures Appl. 111 (2018), 1–20.
  • [GS19] D. R. Grayson and M. E. Stillman, Macaulay2 — A software system for research in algebraic geometry (version 1.14), Home page: http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/, 2019.
  • [Has99] B. Hassett, Some rational cubic fourfolds, J. Algebraic Geom. 8 (1999), no. 1, 103–114.
  • [Has00] by same author, Special cubic fourfolds, Comp. Math. 120 (2000), no. 1, 1–23.
  • [Has16] by same author, Cubic fourfolds, K3 surfaces, and rationality questions, Rationality Problems in Algebraic Geometry: Levico Terme, Italy 2015 (R. Pardini and G. P. Pirola, eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 29–66.
  • [Kol96] J. Kollár, Rational curves on algebraic varieties, Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), vol. 32, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
  • [KT19] M. Kontsevich and Y. Tschinkel, Specialization of birational types, to appear in Invent. Math., preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.05699, 2019.
  • [Kuz10] A. Kuznetsov, Derived categories of cubic fourfolds, Cohomological and Geometric Approaches to Rationality Problems, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 282, Birkhäuser Boston, 2010, pp. 219–243.
  • [Kuz16] by same author, Derived categories view on rationality problems, Rationality Problems in Algebraic Geometry: Levico Terme, Italy 2015 (R. Pardini and G. P. Pirola, eds.), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 67–104.
  • [Lai17] K. Lai, New cubic fourfolds with odd-degree unirational parametrizations, Algebra & Number Theory 11 (2017), 1597–1626.
  • [Mor40] U. Morin, Sulla razionalità dell’ipersuperficie cubica dello spazio lineare S5S_{5}, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova 11 (1940), 108–112.
  • [Nue15] H. Nuer, Unirationality of moduli spaces of special cubic fourfolds and K3 surfaces, Algebr. Geom. 4 (2015), 281–289.
  • [RS19a] F. Russo and G. Staglianò, Congruences of 55-secant conics and the rationality of some admissible cubic fourfolds, Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 5, 849–865.
  • [RS19b] by same author, Trisecant Flops, their associated K3 surfaces and the rationality of some Fano fourfolds, arXiv preprint, 2019.
  • [Sta18] G. Staglianò, A Macaulay2 package for computations with rational maps, J. Softw. Alg. Geom. 8 (2018), no. 1, 61–70.
  • [YY19] S. Yang and X. Yu, Rational cubic fourfolds in Hassett divisors, preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.01936, 2019.