This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Extending Van Cott’s bounds for the τ\tau and ss-invariants of a satellite knot

Lawrence P. Roberts

1. Introduction

For a knot KS3K\subset S^{3}, both Khovanov homology and knot Floer homology define maps ν:K\nu:K\longrightarrow\mathbb{Z} such that

  1. (1)

    ν\nu is a homomorphism from the group of concordance classes to \mathbb{Z},

  2. (2)

    |ν(K)|g4(K)|\nu(K)|\leq g_{4}(K), where g4g_{4} is the smooth four ball genus,

  3. (3)

    ν(Tp,q)=(p1)(q1)2\nu(T_{p,q})=\displaystyle{\frac{(p-1)(q-1)}{2}} where p,q>0p,q>0 and Tp,qT_{p,q} is the (p,q)(p,q)-torus knot.


We assume throughout that ν\nu is a map as above satisfying these properties. We note that these imply ν(K¯)=ν(K)\nu(\overline{K})=-\nu(K), where K¯\overline{K} is the mirror of KK, and ν(K#J)=ν(K)+ν(J)\nu(K\#J)=\nu(K)+\nu(J). Furthermore, for any orientable surface, Σ\Sigma, smoothly and properly embedded in B4B^{4}, with Σ=K\partial\Sigma=K, we have |ν(K)|g(Σ)|\nu(K)|\leq g(\Sigma).
 
If we denote by Kl,nK_{l,n}, the (l,n)(l,n) cable of KK, C. Van Cott proved

Theorem 1 (Thrm. 2, [6]).

Let h(n)=ν(Kl,n)(l1)n2h(n)=\nu(K_{l,n})-\displaystyle{\frac{(l-1)n}{2}}. Then for n>rn>r, n,rn,r relatively prime to ll,

(l1)h(n)h(r)0-(l-1)\leq h(n)-h(r)\leq 0

In this paper we aim to generalize Van Cott’s techniques to all satellites. Let AA be an annulus, and PA×IP\subset A\times I be an embedded copy of S1S^{1}. Let CS3C\subset S^{3} be a knot. Define Sr(C,P)S_{r}(C,P) to be the isotopy class of the image of PP under a map taking A×IA\times I to a tubular neighborhood of CC, preserving orientations, and mapping A×I\partial A\times I to two parallel rr-framings of CC (relative to the Seifert framing). Now take A×IS1×I2A\times I\cong S^{1}\times I^{2}, and orient PP so that the intersection number of PP with I2I^{2} is non-negative. Let n+n_{+} be the number of positive intersections, and nn_{-} be the number of negative intersections.

Theorem 2.

Let

g(r)=ν(Sr(C,P))l(l1)2rg(r)=\nu(S_{r}(C,P))-\frac{l(l-1)}{2}r

Then if s>rs>r and n+>nn_{+}>n_{-} then

(n+1)g(s)g(r)n-(n_{+}-1)\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}

If s>rs>r and n+=nn_{+}=n_{-} then

n+g(s)g(r)(n1)-n_{+}\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq(n_{-}-1)

Van Cott’s cabling result corresponds to n+=ln_{+}=l, n=0n_{-}=0. PP can be taken to be the closure of (σl1σ1)m)(\sigma_{l-1}\ldots\sigma_{1})^{m}) for n=lr+mn=l\,r+m where 0m<l0\leq m<l. We recover most111Van Cott’s result applies to all values of nn and rr, whereas ours applies to those congruent mod ll of Van Cott’s result by subtracting m(l1)2\frac{m(l-1)}{2} from g(r)g(r) for each rr (as this is constant in rr it does not change the inequalities).
 

2. Proof of Theorem 2

Refer to caption
Figure 1. Initial band sums and simplifications in the proof of Theorem 2. The knot Sr(C¯,P¯)S_{-r}(\overline{C},\overline{P}) with tangle T¯\overline{T} was rotated by π\pi about the horizontal axis of the page before taking the band sums. See the next figure for an illustration. The last arrow, pointing diagonally, is a concordance of links, whereas the initial arrows are isotopies, handleslides and cancellations
Refer to caption
Figure 2. An example beginning after we have used a concordance to remove dependence on CC and after we have placed TT in Morse position. The lowest row of diagrams shows the effect of taking the mirror image followed by a rotation of π\pi around the horizontal axis of the page. This is used to simplify the diagrams above. Finally, the final diagram shows the link after band summing two components of opposite orientation in a torus link with orientations altered. The “cup” can be isotoped around the diagram to form an unknot with the “cap”.

We start with PS1×I2P\subset S^{1}\times I^{2}, as above. We may isotope PP so that {p}×I2\{p\}\times I^{2} intersects PP transversely in n+n_{+} positive intersection points, and nn_{-} negative intersection points. There is an ambient isotopy of S1×I2S^{1}\times I^{2}, which preserves the framing, but ensures that PP is a product on (pπ/2,p+π/2)(p-\pi/2,p+\pi/2). Consequently we may assume that PP has the following schematic representation:

[Uncaptioned image]

Within the box, PP induces a tangle, TPT_{P}, which can be isotoped so that the projection pr1:(p+π/2,pπ/2)×I2(p+π/2,pπ/2)pr_{1}:(p+\pi/2,p-\pi/2)\times I^{2}\rightarrow(p+\pi/2,p-\pi/2) has only local maxima and minima for critical points. We can then isotope this portion of PP to have the following structure for some braid on n++n+2kn_{+}+n_{-}+2k strands:

[Uncaptioned image]

This is a Morse presentation of the tangle, and can be obtained by “pulling” the maxima up and to the right, and the minima down and to the right, in any manner that remains embedded. Choose such a representation for PP, and call the braid σT\sigma_{T}. Note that the isotopies induce on the boundary a map that is isotopic to the identity (indeed, this could have been done rel boundary if we had preferred), so we may use this presentation of PP in the construction of a satellite without affecting the isotopy class of the satellite.
 
We will think of Sr(C,P)S_{r}(C,P) as the image of the knot PP under the diffeomorphism of S3S^{3} induced by canceling the 11-handle/22-handle pair depicted in the following surgery diagram for B4B^{4}:

[Uncaptioned image]

Note that the rr on CC provides the twisting defined above, and the meridian of the 11-handle corresponds to the framing on S1×D2S^{1}\times D^{2}. To see that we obtain Sr(C,P)S_{r}(C,P) under the diffeomorphism, slide PP over CC n++nn_{+}+n_{-} times so that it no longer runs over the 11-handle.
 
Consider Ks=Ss(C,P)K_{s}=S_{s}(C,P) and Kr=Sr(C,P)K_{r}=S_{r}(C,P) with s>rs>r. Let KrK^{\prime}_{-r} be the mirror of KrK_{r} with reversed strand orientation. We will start by considering Ks#KrK_{s}\#K^{\prime}_{r}, see as an example Figure 1. Let n=n++nn=n_{+}+n_{-} be the number of strands, where n+n_{+} are oriented up and nn_{-} are oriented down, and band sum n1n-1 times as in the figure. The result is a satellite link of C#C¯C\#\overline{C} with twisting number srs-r. As such it is concordant to a satellite with companion the unknot and the same pattern, with twisting number srs-r after employing

Lemma 1.

Let C¯\overline{C} be the mirror of CC. The knot Sm(C¯,Sr(C,P))S_{m}(\overline{C},S_{r}(C,P)) is concordant to Sm+r(U,P)S_{m+r}(U,P) where UU is the unknot.

Proof: Since C#C¯C\#\overline{C} is a ribbon knot, we can find a slice disk for it. If we trivialize a neighborhood of this disc to obtain a region of B4B^{4} diffeomorphic to D2×D2D^{2}\times D^{2}. If we take D2×{0}D^{2}\times\{0\} to be the slice disc, we can construct nn parallel copies by choosing nn points, xix_{i}, in the second factor, and taking the image of D2×{xi}D^{2}\times\{x_{i}\} under the diffeomorphism for each ii. In S3S^{3} this gives a link formed by m+rm+r parallel copies of C#C¯C\#\overline{C}. Each copy is a longitude since it bounds a disc disjoint from the slice disc. We place this configuration close to Sm+r(U,P)S_{m+r}(U,P), and orient the longitudes in such a way that we can perform nn band sums and obtain an oriented knot. This knot is the same as Sm(C¯,Sr(C,P))S_{m}(\overline{C},S_{r}(C,P)). \Diamond
 
We note that the argument in the lemma does not require PP to be a knot, provided concordance for links is the relation generated by collections of disjoint, smoothly embedded annuli in S3×IS^{3}\times I.
 
The resulting link, LL, is composed of two pieces, a region of srs-r full twists, and the composition of two tangles on nn strands. If TT is one tangle, then the other is T¯\overline{T}, the mirror with the orientations on all components reversed, and the ends of D2×ID^{2}\times I switched, i.e. the tangle is turned upside down. As above we consider TT in Morse position, i.e. a composition of a trivial nn tangle with some number of cups, a braid σT\sigma_{T}, the same number of caps, followed by a trivial nn-tangle. The mirror tangle is then given by the same diagram with each generator in σ\sigma replaced by its inverse. If we change orientations, rotate 180180^{\circ} about the horizontal axis, and then compose, we are composing TT with a tangle whose Morse position is determined by (σT)1(\sigma_{T})^{-1}. We can then band sum the caps of TT with the cups of T¯\overline{T} to obtain a diagram isotopic to a trivial nn tangle and some number of circles (since σT(σT)1=I\sigma_{T}(\sigma_{T})^{-1}=I). The circles can then be made to bound discs disjoint from one another. We have the same number of discs as bands, thus the the corresponding cobordism of tangles can be applied locally to LL, see Figure 2.
 
The resulting link, LL^{\prime}, has the same projection as Tn,n(sr)T_{n,n(s-r)} but with different orientations on the strands. Now find two adjacent strands with opposite orientations and band connect them. The result is a new link with one unlinked unknot. This can be seen by noting that LL^{\prime} is the same as taking srs-r  1-1-framed unknots parallel to the axis of the closure of the trivial nn braid, with appropriate orientations. The braid sits in a copy of S1×D2S^{1}\times D^{2} in which there is an oriented annulus bounded by the two strands. The image of this annulus under blowing down the 1-1-components provides the required degeneration. If n+nn_{+}\geq n_{-} we can repeat this to pair off all the nn_{-} strands
 
Case i: If n+=nn_{+}=n_{-}, repeating this pairing will ultimately consume all the strands. We will thus have constructed a surface in B4B^{4} with boundary the knot Ks#KrK_{s}\#K^{\prime}_{-r}, and used n1+n++#caps(T)n-1+n_{+}+\#\mathrm{caps}(T) bands and #caps(T)+n+\#\mathrm{caps}(T)+n_{+} discs in the process. Consequently, the surface has Euler characteristic 1n=12n+1-n=1-2n_{+}. Therefore, the genus of this surface, which has one boundary, is g=n+=ng=n_{+}=n_{-}. Since |ν(K)|g4(K)|\nu(K)|\leq g_{4}(K), and ν(Kr)=ν(Kr)\nu(K^{\prime}_{r})=-\nu(K_{r}) we have

|ν(Ks)ν(Kr)|n+\big{|}\nu(K_{s})-\nu(K_{r})\big{|}\leq n_{+}

Since l=0l=0, g(r)=ν(Kr)g(r)=\nu(K_{r}), so we can conclude that n+g(s)g(r)n-n_{+}\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}.
 
However, we may construct a different surface. There are at least two strands intersecting I2I^{2} in this case. Pair all but two, oppositely oriented strands, as before. This introduces n+1n_{+}-1 bands and n+1n_{+}-1 discs. The remaining two strands bound an annulus, twisted positively srs-r times. We may now band the two strands together as in:

[Uncaptioned image]

The resulting knot is the srs-r twisted negatively clasped Whitehead double of the unknot, D(U,sr)D_{-}(U,s-r) in the notation of [3]. However, ν(D(U,sr))=1\nu(D_{-}(U,s-r))=-1 when sr>0s-r>0, since by Theorem 2 of [5]

Lemma 2.

For each KK, ν(D+(K,t))=1\nu(D_{+}(K,t))=1 for tTB(K)t\leq\mathrm{TB}(K).

In particular D(U,sr)¯=D+(U,rs)\overline{D_{-}(U,s-r)}=D_{+}(U,r-s), and rs1=TB(U)r-s\leq-1=\mathrm{TB}(U). Consequently, ν(D(U,sr)¯)=1\nu(\overline{D_{-}(U,s-r)})=1 and ν(D(U,sr))=1\nu(D_{-}(U,s-r))=-1. We have added another band in order to do this. Consequently, we have used n1+#caps(T)+n+1+1n-1+\#\mathrm{caps}(T)+n_{+}-1+1 bands and #caps(T)+n+1\#\mathrm{caps}(T)+n_{+}-1 to create a surface with two boundaries: Ks#KrK_{s}\#K_{r}^{\prime} and D(U,sr)D_{-}(U,s-r). This surface has Euler characteristic n=2n+n=2n_{+} and genus n+n_{+} as before. Therefore, the knot Ks#Kr#D+(U,rs)K_{s}\#K_{r}^{\prime}\#D_{+}(U,r-s) bounds a surface of genus n+n_{+} and

|ν(Ks)ν(Kr)+1|n+\big{|}\nu(K_{s})-\nu(K_{r})+1\big{|}\leq n_{+}

Consequently, (n++1)g(s)g(r)n1-(n_{+}+1)\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}-1. As both sets of inequalities must be true, we have n+g(s)g(r)n1-n_{+}\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}-1.
 
Case ii: When l=1l=1, i.e. n+=n+1n_{+}=n_{-}+1, we can pair the strands as above to remove all the strands contributing to nn_{-}. This requires nn_{-} band sums, and nn_{-} disc attachments. This results in an unknot, which we can fill with a disc. The surface so constructed has n1+#(caps)+nn-1+\#(caps)+n_{-} bands and #(caps)+n+1\#(caps)+n_{-}+1 discs, for an Euler characteristic of 2n=2(n++n)=2(n++n+1)=32n+2-n=2-(n_{+}+n_{-})=2-(n_{+}+n_{+}-1)=3-2n_{+}. The surface’s genus, therefore, is n+1n_{+}-1. Consequently,

|ν(Ks)ν(Kr)|(n+1)\big{|}\nu(K_{s})-\nu(K_{r})\big{|}\leq(n_{+}-1)

When l=1l=1, g(r)=ν(KR)g(r)=\nu(K_{R}) so this implies (n+1)g(s)g(r)n+1-(n_{+}-1)\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{+}-1. Since l=1l=1, n+1=nn_{+}-1=n_{-}, so we conclude that (n+1)g(s)g(r)n-(n_{+}-1)\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}.
 
Case iii: When l>1l>1, we can again band the strands contributing to nn_{-} to some of the strands contributing to n+n_{+}. This gives nn_{-} new bands, and nn_{-} unknots which we fill with discs. The remaining link is the torus link Tl,l(sr)T_{l,l(s-r)}. We may now use n+n1n_{+}-n_{-}-1 additional band sums to convert to either one of the torus knots Tl,l(sr)+1T_{l,l(s-r)+1} or Tl,l(sr)1T_{l,l(s-r)-1} (see Figure 2 of [6]). Since s>rs>r and l>1l>1, l(sr)±1>0l(s-r)\pm 1>0.

[Uncaptioned image]

We have used a total of n2+n+n+n+#(caps)n-2+n_{+}-n_{-}+n_{-}+\#(caps) band sums when l>1l>1. On the other hand, in this case we also fill #caps(T)+n\#\mathrm{caps}(T)+n_{-} unknots by discs. The surface we have constructed has Euler characteristic n+2n++n=2n++2-n+2-n_{+}+n_{-}=-2n_{+}+2 and two boundary components. Therefore, its genus is g=n+1g=n_{+}-1. We can conclude that both Ks#Kr#Tl,l(sr)±1¯K_{s}\#K^{\prime}_{-r}\#\overline{T_{l,l(s-r)\pm 1}} bound smoothly embedded orientable surfaces with genus g=n+1g=n_{+}-1.
 
Consequently

|ν(Ks#Kr#Tl,l(sr)±1)¯|g\big{|}\nu(K_{s}\#K^{\prime}_{-r}\#\overline{T_{l,l(s-r)\pm 1})}\big{|}\leq g

Using the properties of ν\nu listed in the introduction, we may write down two inequalities:

|τ(Ks)τ(Kr)(l1)l(sr)2|g\big{|}\tau(K_{s})-\tau(K_{r})-\frac{(l-1)l(s-r)}{2}\big{|}\leq g

and

|τ(Ks)τ(Kr)(l1)l(sr)2+(l1)|g\big{|}\tau(K_{s})-\tau(K_{r})-\frac{(l-1)l(s-r)}{2}+(l-1)|\leq g

Let g(r)=τ(Kr)l(l1)2rg(r)=\tau(K_{r})-\frac{l(l-1)}{2}r, then the first inequality is equivalent to gg(s)g(r)g-g\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq g whenever srs\geq r. This simplifies to (n+1)g(s)g(r)(n+1)-(n_{+}-1)\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq(n_{+}-1). The second inequality is gl+1g(s)g(r)gl+1-g-l+1\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq g-l+1. As g=n+1g=n_{+}-1, gl+1=ng-l+1=n_{-} and gl+1=(n+1)(n+n)+1=-g-l+1=-(n_{+}-1)-(n_{+}-n_{-})+1= 2n++n+2-2n_{+}+n_{-}+2, so this simplifies to 22n++ng(s)g(r)n2-2n_{+}+n_{-}\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}. Both sets of inequalities must be true, but when l>1l>1, n+1>nn_{+}-1>n_{-}, and (n+1)2(n+1)+n-(n_{+}-1)\geq-2(n_{+}-1)+n_{-}, the stricter bounds on each side yield (n+1)g(s)g(r)n-(n_{+}-1)\leq g(s)-g(r)\leq n_{-}. \Diamond
 

References

  • [1] P. Ozsváth & Z. Szabó, Knot Floer homology and the four ball genus. Geom. Topol. 7 (2003) 615–639.
  • [2] M. Hedden, On knot Floer homology and cabling II. math.GT 0806.2172v2
  • [3] M. Hedden, Knot Floer homology of Whitehead doubles. Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 2277–2338.
  • [4] C. Livingston, Computations of the P. Ozsváth -Z. Szabó knot concordance invariant. Geom. Topol. 8 (2004) 735–742.
  • [5] C. Livingston & S. Naik, Ozsváth – Z. Szabó and Rasmussen invariants of doubled knots. Alg. & Geom. Top. 6(2006) 651-657.
  • [6] C. Van Cott, P. Ozsváth -Z. Szabó and Rasmussen invariants of cabled knots. math.GT 0803.0500