This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Geometry of planar surfaces and exceptional fillings

Neil R. Hoffman School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia  and  Jessica S. Purcell School of Mathematical Sciences, 9 Rainforest Walk, Monash University, VIC, 3800, Australia
Abstract.

If a hyperbolic 3–manifold admits an exceptional Dehn filling, then the length of the slope of that Dehn filling is known to be at most six. However, the bound of six appears to be sharp only in the toroidal case. In this paper, we investigate slope lengths of other exceptional fillings. We construct hyperbolic 3–manifolds that have the longest known slopes for reducible fillings. As an intermediate step, we show that the problem of finding the longest such slope is equivalent to a problem on the maximal density horoball packings of planar surfaces, which should be of independent interest. We also discuss lengths of slopes of other exceptional Dehn fillings, and prove that six is not realized by a slope corresponding to a small Seifert fibered space filling.

1. Introduction

By the 2π2\pi–Theorem of Thurston and Gromov, any Dehn filling of a cusped hyperbolic 3–manifold along slopes of length more than 2π2\pi results in a manifold with a negatively curved metric (see [3]). By the Geometrization Theorem, such a negatively curved 3–manifold must admit a complete hyperbolic structure. Thus if a Dehn filling does not yield a hyperbolic manifold, i.e. if it is an exceptional filling, then at least one of the slopes of the filling must have length at most 2π2\pi. Independently, Agol [2] and Lackenby [14] proved the 66–Theorem, which lowered the upper bound on the length of an exceptional filling to six.

The Geometrization Theorem implies that any non-hyperbolic 3–manifold is either reducible, Seifert fibered, or toroidal. Agol showed that the 6–Theorem gives a sharp bound on slope length of exceptional fillings by exhibiting a hyperbolic manifold with a toroidal filling of length exactly six. In addition, Adams et al [1] found an infinite family of hyperbolic knots KiK_{i} such that each S3KiS^{3}-K_{i} admits a toroidal filling of length six. In addition to these examples of toroidal fillings, obtaining bounds on the meridians of knot complements has also been a subject of inquiry. It is conjectured that four is the maximal length of a meridian of a knot complement. This conjectural bound is asymptotically sharp as observed in a number of places (see for example [2, §\S7] and [18, Theorem 4.3]). As far as we are aware, no one has previously considered the natural question of determining upper bounds on slope lengths for other types of exceptional fillings.

In this paper, we investigate that question. Our primary focus for the first part of the paper is reducible Dehn fillings, i.e. those that produce a 3–manifold with an embedded essential 2–sphere. For such fillings, the bound of six does not appear to be sharp. We wish to determine the longest possible slope giving a reducible filling of a hyperbolic 3–manifold. Towards this goal, we present the following theorem which proves the existence of reducible fillings that asymptotically approach length 10/3>5.7710/\sqrt{3}>5.77.

Theorem 1.1.

For every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there exists a hyperbolic 3–manifold MM and slopes s1,,sns_{1},\dots,s_{n} such that the Dehn filled manifold M(s1,,sn)M(s_{1},\dots,s_{n}) is reducible and sis_{i} has length at least 103ϵ\frac{10}{\sqrt{3}}-\epsilon.

Note that if a hyperbolic 3–manifold MM admits a reducible filling, then it contains an essential punctured 2–sphere. We may pleat this 2–sphere in MM to obtain a hyperbolic structure on a planar surface. One question that can be asked is, which hyperbolic planar surfaces arise in this manner? The cusp neighborhoods of MM induce cusp neighborhoods of SS, and the lengths of curves tracing out the boundary of these cusp neighborhoods of SS must be at least as long as the exceptional slopes of MM (see, for example [12, Lemma 2.5]). Thus a lower bound on slope length of MM gives a lower bound on slope length of SS.

On the other hand, in this paper we show:

Theorem 2.6.

Let RR be a hyperbolic structure on a planar surface with a fixed cusp neighborhood HH. Then for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, in any neighborhood of RR in its moduli space, there exists a hyperbolic surface RR^{\prime}, and a hyperbolic 3–manifold MM such that:

  1. (1)

    RR^{\prime} is isometric to a totally geodesic surface embedded in MM.

  2. (2)

    There exists a cusp neighborhood of MM such that each boundary slope of RR^{\prime} in MM has length within ϵ\epsilon of the corresponding length on H\partial H in RR.

  3. (3)

    Dehn filling MM along the boundary slopes of RR^{\prime} results in a reducible manifold.

Note that this theorem and the discussion above imply that finding long reducible slopes can be reduced to finding hyperbolic structures on planar surfaces with long cusp lengths. For if RR is a hyperbolic planar surface with cusps of length L1,,LnL_{1},\dots,L_{n}, the theorem implies that for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there is a 3–manifold MM admitting a reducible filling with slope lengths at least L1ϵ,,LnϵL_{1}-\epsilon,\dots,L_{n}-\epsilon, respectively. On the other hand, the discussion above implies that the slope lengths for this reducible filling are at most the lengths of the cusps of RR^{\prime}, which are at most L1+ϵ,,Ln+ϵL_{1}+\epsilon,\dots,L_{n}+\epsilon, respectively. Thus for any hyperbolic structure on a planar surface, there is a sequence of 3–manifolds with reducible fillings whose slope lengths approach those of RR. Hence finding long reducible slopes becomes a question of finding hyperbolic structures on planar surfaces, and in particular, finding a horoball packing of a planar surface that maximizes the minimal area horoball.

Along these lines, we submit the following conjecture, which if true would show that our examples in Theorem 1.1 produce the (asymptotically) longest possible reducible fillings.

Conjecture 1.2.

Let FF be a planar surface admitting a hyperbolic structure. For any horoball packing of FF, there is at least one horoball of area less than 10/310/\sqrt{3}.

We conclude the paper with discussion of the Seifert fibered and finite exceptional filling cases. Similar to the reducible case, for such fillings the longest possible slope yielding this type of manifold is still unknown. We discuss the longest known examples of these, and note that experimental and theoretical evidence points to bounds strictly less than six in these cases. For the Seifert case, we prove the following.

Theorem 4.4.

Let MM be a hyperbolic manifold with one cusp, and let ss be a slope such that M(s)M(s) is a small Seifert fibered space with infinite fundamental group. Then the length of ss is strictly less than six.

1.1. Acknowledgements

The first author is partially supported by ARC Discovery Grant DP130103694. The second author is partially supported by NSF Grant DMS-1252687 and DMS-1128155, and thanks the University of Melbourne for hosting her while working on this project. We thank Craig Hodgson and Ian Agol for helpful discussions. We also thank the referee for very helpful comments.

2. Existence of reducible fillings

At most countably many hyperbolic structures on a planar surface can be embedded as a totally geodesic surface in a finite volume hyperbolic 3–manifold, because there are only countably many finite volume hyperbolic 3–manifolds. However, the following theorem shows that the set of hyperbolic structures on planar surfaces that can be embedded is dense in the moduli space of the surface.

Theorem 2.1.

Let RR be a hyperbolic surface with finite genus and with at least one but at most finitely many cusps. Then in any neighborhood of RR in its moduli space, there exists a hyperbolic surface RR^{\prime} with the following properties.

  1. (1)

    There exists a finite volume cusped hyperbolic 3–manifold MM that contains an embedded surface isometric to RR^{\prime}.

  2. (2)

    For any ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and any embedded cusp neighborhood HH of RR, we may take MM such that there exists an embedded cusp neighborhood of MM for which each boundary slope of RR^{\prime} in MM has length within ϵ\epsilon of the corresponding length on H\partial H in RR.

  3. (3)

    Each cusp of RR^{\prime} is embedded in a distinct cusp of MM.

The proof of Theorem 2.1 constructs MM by appealing to circle packing techniques of Brooks, [5] and [6]. This argument is similar to ideas of Fujii [11] that state that closed surfaces satisfy a similar property.

Definition 2.2.

A circle packing of a polygonal region is a collection of circles with disjoint interiors embedded in the closure of the region, such that all circles are tangent to other circles, and the exterior of the union of circles is a disjoint union of curvilinear triangles. Given a collection of circles, an interstice is a curvilinear polygon in the complement of the interiors of the circles, with boundary made up of pieces of the circles. Thus a circle packing is a collection of circles for which all interstices are triangles.

Given a hyperbolic surface RR, begin by taking a fundamental domain for RR in 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2} that is a finite ideal polygon PP, with side pairings given by isometries of 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2}. For example, PP can be obtained by fixing a cusp neighborhood for cusps of RR, and taking the corresponding canonical decomposition of RR as in Epstein–Penner [9].

The universal cover of RR is 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2}, which we view as the equatorial plane of 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} under the ball model. For each edge of PP, take a geodesic plane in 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} whose intersection with 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2} is that edge, and such that the plane is orthogonal to the copy of 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2}. Notice that a side–pairing isometry of this edge will take the geodesic plane in 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} to a geodesic plane meeting 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2} orthogonally, with intersection another edge of PP. Thus the side–pairing isometries, which generate the fundamental group of RR by the Poincaré polyhedron theorem, act on this collection of geodesic planes in 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3}. The boundaries of these geodesic planes give a collection of circles on 3=S2{\partial}_{\infty}{\mathbb{H}}^{3}=S^{2}_{\infty} that are tangent in pairs, all orthogonal to the equator of S2S^{2}_{\infty}. We color these circles blue. The collection of face pairing isometries ΓIsom+(3)\Gamma\subset{\rm{Isom}}^{+}({\mathbb{H}}^{3}) forms a Fuchsian group that preserves blue circles. The quotient of the action of Γ\Gamma on 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} gives an infinite volume Fuchsian manifold, with rank–1 cusps.

Lemma 2.3.

In any neighborhood of RR in its moduli space, there exists a hyperbolic surface RR^{\prime} for which the infinite volume Fuchsian manifold as above admits a circle packing on its boundary at infinity.

Proof.

We build the circle packing in four steps, beginning with the Fuchsian manifold associated to RR given by face pairings of blue hemispheres.

Step 1: Select circles tangent to ideal vertices. Select an ideal vertex vv of PP and choose a small circle on S2S^{2}_{\infty} tangent to the equatorial plane at vv. Also take its image under reflection in the equatorial plane. The face pairings of PP take these circles to a finite collection of circles, all tangent to the equatorial plane at ideal vertices of PP. By choosing the initial radius small enough, these circles will be mapped to disjoint circles under Γ\Gamma. Add such circles for each ideal vertex of PP, and color them green. Note the green circles are preserved under the action of Γ\Gamma.

Step 2: Select circles on edges. Next, select an ideal edge of PP. This corresponds to half of a blue circle in the northern hemisphere of S2S^{2}_{\infty}. Choose a finite collection of pairwise tangent circles orthogonal to this blue circle with the initial and final circles tangent to the green circles at the endpoints of the corresponding ideal edge. One of the face pairings of Γ\Gamma takes this collection of circles to a collection of pairwise tangent circles on another blue half-circle, identified to the original. See for example Figure 1(a). Again we may ensure the circles have disjoint interiors, and again reflect through the equatorial plane. Repeat this process for each ideal edge, and color the resulting circles green. When finished, we have a collection of pairwise tangent green circles with disjoint interiors, orthogonal to blue circles. The collection of blue circles, green circles, and the equatorial plane is preserved under the action of Γ\Gamma.

Refer to caption Refer to caption Refer to caption
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 1. (a) Packing green circles along edges. (b) A packing of circles in a finite ideal polygon PP, with semi-circles coming from face pairings (blue) and other circles (green) in the interior. (c) The packing from before together with some of the dual circles (red).

Step 3: Select circles in interior. Now in the region of the northern hemisphere of S2S^{2}_{\infty} disjoint from all interiors of blue circles, add finitely many circles with disjoint interiors, tangent to existing green circles. The result will not necessarily be a circle packing, with all triangular interstices. However, we may arrange such that all interstices are triangles and quadrilaterals, with only a finite number of quadrilateral interstices. Continue to color these circles green, and reflect them across the equator to obtain a collection of circles in S2S^{2}_{\infty}, colored green and blue, that meet in triangular interstices and a finite number of quadrilateral interstices. As in [5], the quadrilaterals are parameterized by {\mathbb{R}}, with rational numbers corresponding to quadrilaterals which admit an actual circle packing.

Step 4: Deform to a circle packing. Again following Brooks, for each green circle, adjoin to Γ\Gamma the reflection in that green circle. Also add reflection in the equator. This forms a new group Γ\Gamma^{\prime}, which is still discrete by the Poincaré polyhedron theorem. Then as in [6], there exists a quasi-conformal deformation of Γ\Gamma^{\prime} by an arbitrarily small amount δ\delta to a new group Γδ\Gamma_{\delta}^{\prime}, taking reflections in circles to reflections in circles, for which all quadrilaterals have rational parameters. That is, the result admits a finite circle packing, by adding finitely many circles to the quadrilateral interstices. Let Γδ\Gamma_{\delta} denote the image of Γ\Gamma under this deformation. It is still a Fuchsian group, because Γδ\Gamma_{\delta}^{\prime} preserves the plane corresponding to the equator, by a reflection. Then R=2/ΓδR^{\prime}={\mathbb{H}}^{2}/\Gamma_{\delta} is a quasi-conformal deformation of RR that is δ\delta-close to RR, and RR^{\prime} satisfies the conclusions of the lemma. ∎

Figure 1(b) shows a finite ideal polygon with a circle packing by green circles.

Note that for the infinite volume Fuchsian manifold of Lemma 2.3, distinct cusps of RR^{\prime} are embedded in distinct cusps of the Fuchsian manifold.

To obtain the full result of Theorem 2.1, we need to add more structure to our argument, namely, we want to include the cusp neighborhood of RR. To do so, we use a bit of extra bookkeeping, namely the decorated moduli space. The decorated moduli space can be described locally by what are commonly known as Penner coordinates on the decorated Teichmüller space, defined (but not named as such) in Penner [17]. We will not need a precise description of these coordinates. Instead, we will appeal to the following two properties.

  1. (1)

    The lift of a point in the moduli space of the surface RR to the decorated moduli space is homeomorphic to c{\mathbb{R}}^{c}, where cc is the number of cusps of RR. (The coordinates of c{\mathbb{R}}^{c} can be viewed as measuring signed distance between cusps.)

  2. (2)

    If RR^{\prime} is a point in a neighborhood of (undecorated) moduli space of RR and HH is an embedded cusp of RR, then there exists (R,H)(R^{\prime},H^{\prime}) in the decorated moduli space of (R,H)(R,H) such that cusp lengths associated to HH^{\prime} are arbitrarily close to those of HH, and HH^{\prime} is an embedded cusp neighborhood.

Lemma 2.4.

Let (R,H)(R,H) be a surface and its embedded cusp neighborhood. Then in any neighborhood of (R,H)(R,H) in its decorated moduli space, there exists a point (R,H)(R^{\prime},H^{\prime}) such that Lemma 2.3 holds for RR^{\prime}, and moreover HH^{\prime} is an embedded cusp of RR^{\prime} whose lifts are horoballs, each of which meets a hemisphere bounded by a circle in the circle packing of Lemma 2.3 only when that circle is tangent to the center of the horoball. In this case, the intersection of the horoball and the hemisphere is a noncompact region of the hemisphere.

Proof.

Given RR and HH, the cusp neighborhood HH lifts to a disjoint collection of horoballs in the Fuchsian manifold 3/Γ{\mathbb{H}}^{3}/\Gamma. We let H~\widetilde{H} denote finitely many horoballs, one at each ideal vertex of PP. We prove the result by stepping back through the proof of Lemma 2.3, ensuring that we may choose circles at each step to be disjoint from the collection H~\widetilde{H}, or to meet them only in noncompact regions if they share a point on the boundary at infinity.

In the first step of the proof of Lemma 2.3, we choose green circles tangent to vertices of PP. To see that these can be chosen as in the statement of the lemma, consider the (finitely many) vertices of PP identified by face pairings. As we shrink any circle tangent to such a vertex, its images under face pairings also shrink. Thus we may shrink any such circle until the hyperplane bounded by it meets only the horoball at the ideal vertex at which it is tangent, and similarly for its translates under face pairings.

Now view the ball model of 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} as the unit ball in 3{\mathbb{R}}^{3}. Let CC denote the complement on S2S^{2} of the interiors of disks bounded by blue circles and the green circles tangent to the equator, selected in the last paragraph. Then CC is compact, as is the collection of finite (closed) horoballs H~\widetilde{H}, and these two sets are disjoint. Thus the Euclidean distance d(C,H~)d(C,\widetilde{H}) is some positive value d0>0d_{0}>0. Let r0=d0/2r_{0}=d_{0}/2. Then any Euclidean hemisphere with center in CC of radius r0r_{0} will have Euclidean distance at least d0/2d_{0}/2 from H~\widetilde{H}, hence its hyperbolic distance will also be bounded away from zero.

Use this to complete the second and third steps of selecting the circle packing. We may ensure that all circles selected in these steps have radius less than r0r_{0}; since their centers lie in CC, they are disjoint H~\widetilde{H}. By compactness, we may also ensure that the triangle and quadrilateral interstices are shaped such that if we were to add any additional circles to the collection, those circles must have radius less than r0/2r_{0}/2, so adding any finite collection of circles to the existing collection yields new hemispheres disjoint from H~\widetilde{H}.

Followng the fourth step, we next adjust the hyperbolic structure to RR^{\prime} admitting a circle packing. Further, for any neighborhood of (R,H)(R^{\prime},H^{\prime}) in decorated moduli space, we may obtain an embedded cusp neighborhood HH^{\prime} of RR^{\prime} such that (R,H)(R^{\prime},H^{\prime}) lies in that neighborhood. Let H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} denote the finitely many horoballs that are lifts of the horoball neighborhood HH^{\prime} with centers on points corresponding to deformed points of PP.

Before deforming RR to RR^{\prime}, the distance between horoballs H~\widetilde{H} and those green hemispheres that are not tangent to the equator is bounded away from 0, say by d>0d>0, so we can ensure our deformation is small enough that the distance from new hemispheres to H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} is still at least d/2>0d/2>0. Moreover, we can ensure that after the deformation, interstices are still sufficiently small that any added circles correspond to hemispheres disjoint H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime}. Thus when we complete to a circle packing, all green circles satisfy the conclusion of the lemma. ∎

Theorem 2.1 requires a finite volume manifold MM. So far, Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4 provide us with an infinite volume Fuchsian manifold admitting a circle packing (by green circles) on its conformal boundary. To form the finite volume 3–manifold, add red circles: There exists a unique red circle that meets each vertex of each triangular interstice between green circles. Figure 1(c) shows some of the dual red circles for the packing example from that figure. The red and green circles meet orthogonally.

Lemma 2.5.

Red circles formed as above are disjoint from H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime}.

Proof.

Suppose by way of contradiction that some red circle meets a horoball H0H_{0} of H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime}. The red circle is determined by a triangular interstice, with three sides determined by green circles. At most one of these circles is tangent to the equator, so at most one meets the center of a horoball. Thus two green circles disjoint from H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} meet in a vertex vv of the interstice. Apply an isometry taking 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} to the upper half space model, taking vv to infinity. Then we have two green hemispheres that are disjoint from H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} mapping to parallel vertical planes. Ensure one maps to the vertical plane parallel to the real line through the point i-i in {\mathbb{C}}, and one maps to the parallel vertical plane through ii, and the third has boundary mapping to the unit circle in {\mathbb{C}}. The horoball H0H_{0} maps to a horoball disjoint from all three green circles, except possibly centered at a point on the unit circle. In any case, its center will be on {\mathbb{C}} in the infinite strip between the two parallel vertical planes. Finally, the red circle maps to the unique hyperplane meeting the three points of tangency of the green; this is the vertical plane with boundary on the imaginary axis of {\mathbb{C}}.

By assumption, the image of H0H_{0} intersects the red vertical plane. However, it cannot meet any of the green planes. Thus its Euclidean radius is strictly less than the imaginary coordinate of its center. Since its center lies no closer to the imaginary axis than the unit circle, it is impossible that it intersects the red plane while remaining disjoint from the two green vertical planes. This is a contradiction. ∎

Proof of Theorem 2.1.

Starting with (R,H)(R,H), obtain (R,H)(R^{\prime},H^{\prime}) and its circle packing as in Lemma 2.4, with Γ\Gamma^{\prime} denoting the group of isometries of 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} giving face pairings of the blue hemispheres associated with RR^{\prime}. Adjoin to Γ\Gamma^{\prime} reflections in the green circles and reflections in the equatorial plane. Finally, adjoin reflections in the red planes. The quotient of 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} by this group gives a finite volume hyperbolic 3–manifold with fundamental domain cut out by red, blue, and green hemispheres in 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3}. It contains an embedded surface isometric to RR^{\prime}, namely the image of the equatorial plane.

By construction, each cusp of RR^{\prime} is embedded in a distinct cusp of MM. To finish the proof it suffices to show that the embedded cusp neighborhood HH^{\prime}, which has lengths within ϵ\epsilon of those corresponding to HH, lifts to an embedded neighborhood of (some of) the cusps of MM.

For suppose lifts of HH^{\prime} are not embedded. Since HH^{\prime} is embedded in RR^{\prime}, horoballs H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} with centers on the equator are all disjoint. Thus some horoball H1H_{1} must intersect a horoball H2H_{2} in the fundamental domain for MM, and at least one of those horoballs, say H2H_{2}, does not have its center on the equator. But then H2H_{2} cannot have its center at any of the ideal vertices of the fundamental domain. Hence H2H_{2} must intersect one of the red, green, or blue faces of the fundamental domain in a compact region. Because H2H_{2} is a translate of some horoball of H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} under the fundamental group of MM, it follows that one of the horoballs of H~\widetilde{H}^{\prime} meets a red, green, or blue hemisphere in a compact region. This contradicts our choice of circle packings. ∎

Theorem 2.6 from the introduction is an immediate consequence of the above theorem with RR a planar surface.

Theorem 2.6.

Let RR be a hyperbolic structure on a planar surface with a fixed cusp neighborhood HH. Then for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, in any neighborhood of RR in its moduli space, there exists a hyperbolic surface RR^{\prime}, and a hyperbolic 3–manifold MM such that:

  1. (1)

    RR^{\prime} is isometric to a totally geodesic surface embedded in MM.

  2. (2)

    There exists a cusp neighborhood of MM such that each boundary slope of RR^{\prime} in MM has length within ϵ\epsilon of the corresponding length on H\partial H in RR.

  3. (3)

    Dehn filling MM along the boundary slopes of RR^{\prime} results in a reducible manifold.

Proof.

Take the manifold MM of Theorem 2.1, with embedded surface R0:=RR_{0}:=R^{\prime} in the neighborhood of RR in the moduli space, and cusp neighborhood satisfying the requirements of the theorem. When we Dehn fill along boundary slopes of RR^{\prime}, we attach a collection of disks to RR^{\prime}, capping off the punctures to obtain a sphere SS. Dehn filling along a single cusp attaches a disk to RR^{\prime} that meets the core cc of the Dehn filling solid torus exactly once. Because each cusp of MM meets at most one cusp of RR^{\prime}, it follows that after all Dehn fillings, the core cc meets the sphere SS exactly once. Hence SS cannot bound a ball to either side, and so it is a reducing sphere for the Dehn filling. ∎

3. Packings of planar surfaces

In light of the previous section, in order to find 3–manifolds with reducible fillings with long slopes, it suffices to find horoball packings of planar surfaces where all horoballs are above a given length. In this section, we construct horoball packings of a planar surface where each horoball has length at least 10/3ϵ10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon (with ϵ>0\epsilon>0). Our construction relies on a limiting argument, and so the bound of 10/310/\sqrt{3} is only realized asymptotically.

The remainder of this section will be dedicated to proving the following proposition.

Proposition 3.1.

For any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there is a planar surface FF with hyperbolic structure and an embedded horoball neighborhood of the cusps of FF such that each cusp neighborhood has area AA with A>10/3ϵA>10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon.

3.1. The triangulated surfaces

First, we construct a sequence {(Fm,Tm)}\{(F_{m},T_{m})\}, where FmF_{m} is a planar surface (later decorated with a specific horoball packing), and TmT_{m} is a triangulation of FmF_{m}.

To begin consider the icosahedron, which gives a triangulation of the sphere with 12 vertices (each of degree five), 30 edges, and 20 triangular faces. This also gives an ideal triangulation of the 12–punctured sphere where each ideal vertex is degree 5. We call this triangulation T0T_{0} and the corresponding surface F0F_{0}. Initially, we will consider F0F_{0} as a topological surface, namely a 12–punctured sphere. Later, we will decorate F0F_{0} with geometric data. We will consider (F0,T0)(F_{0},T_{0}) as the starting point of a sequence of triangulations of planar surfaces.

We obtain (Fm,Tm)(F_{m},T_{m}) from (F0,T0)(F_{0},T_{0}), for m1m\geq 1, as follows. For each triangular face of (F0,T0)(F_{0},T_{0}), partition each of the three edges of the triangle into 2m2m pieces by adding 2m12m-1 new vertices in the interior of the edge. Then, connect the vertices along edges by lines parallel to the sides of the triangle, as in Figure 2. This adds 4m24m^{2} triangles to each triangular face of (F0,T0)(F_{0},T_{0}), giving a new triangulation of S2S^{2}. Note twelve of the vertices remain degree five, but all additional vertices have degree six. Again make each vertex an ideal vertex, and denote the result by (Fm,Tm)(F_{m},T_{m}); the surface FmF_{m} is a punctured sphere. For m1m\geq 1, the resulting triangulation TmT_{m} will have 80m280m^{2} triangular faces, 40m2+240m^{2}+2 vertices and 120m2120m^{2} edges.

Refer to caption
m=2m=2m=3m=3m=1m=1
Figure 2. Subdivisions of triangles making up the icosohedron.

3.2. Local packings of the surfaces

We now decorate the triangulation TmT_{m} by assigning a cusp area to each ideal vertex of each ideal triangle. We denote by [a,b,c][a,b,c] a packing of an ideal triangle with cusps of areas a,b,ca,b,c. If a cusp has area aa, then the triangle is isometric to a triangle in 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2} with vertices 0, aa, and \infty, with a cusp about infinity of height 11 (hence area aa). Cusps with areas bb and cc are mapped into horoballs centered at 0 and aa, respectively. See Figure 3.2(a).

Refer to caption
1/a1/a0aa11aaaa1/a1/a

(a) (b)

Figure 3. (a) Ideal triangle with vertices 0, aa, \infty, and cusp areas aa, bb, cc. (b) Ideal quadrilateral made of two triangles with decorations [a,1/a,1/a][a,1/a,1/a].
Definition 3.2.

A choice of decorations for each triangle of a triangulation (F,T)(F,T) is said to be geometric if the following conditions hold.

  1. (A)

    No vertex of a triangle is decorated with area more than two.

  2. (B)

    If one vertex is decorated with AA, the remaining vertices are decorated with areas no more than 1/A1/A.

  3. (C)

    If two triangles share an edge in a triangulation, with ideal vertices of that edge labeled a1a_{1} and b1b_{1} in one triangle, and a2a_{2} and b2b_{2} in the other, then a1b1=a2b2a_{1}b_{1}=a_{2}b_{2}.

Condition (A) ensures that the cusps of the triangle are embedded in the triangle. Condition (B) ensures that the cusps are disjoint in each triangle. Finally, condition (C) ensures that triangles can be glued together across edges of the triangulation TT, for in that case the edge between the triangles will have the same length outside the horoballs corresponding to cusp areas, as ensured by the following lemma.

Lemma 3.3.

On an ideal triangle with embedded cusps of area aa and bb, the distance between those cusps is log(ab)-\log(ab).

Proof.

The proof is by elementary hyperbolic geometry. One way to see it is to consider the ideal triangle with vertices 0, aa, and \infty, with the cusp about \infty of height 11 (area aa), and the cusp of area bb at 0. The desired distance is log(h)-\log(h) where hh is the diameter of the horoball about 0. Apply the isometry zh/zz\mapsto-h/z, taking 0 to \infty, \infty to 0, and ihih to ii. Comparing lengths on the triangle, this must take the point aa to b-b. Thus h/a=b-h/a=-b, and h=abh=ab. ∎

Lemma 3.4.

A decoration of (F,T)(F,T) that is geometric, in the sense of Definition 3.2, determines a complete hyperbolic structure on FF with a choice of horoball neighborhood at each cusp, such that horoball neighborhoods are embedded.

Proof.

We obtain a hyperbolic structure by giving each ideal triangle of TT the structure of a hyperbolic ideal triangle. For each such triangle, take horoball neighborhoods of each ideal vertex that have the areas specified by the decoration. These will give embedded horoballs about the cusps of FF. We need to check that the resulting structure will be complete. Completeness follows from the Poincaré theorem (see, e.g. [10]) and condition (C). By the Poincaré theorem, the structure will be complete provided horoball neighborhoods of the cusps “close up,” i.e. a curve running once around a cusp lifts to a Euclidean translation along a horocycle. In terms of a triangulation, this means that if we lift the triangles meeting a cusp in a cycle, the initial and final triangle (which are identified by a covering transformation) differ only by a Euclidean translation, with no rescaling. In our case, lift the initial triangle to 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2} with cusp at \infty. Our decoration determines a horoball about \infty. The lengths of edges between this cusp and the other two determine (Euclidean) diameters of the other two horoballs. Successively lift other ideal triangles to form a cycle. Condition (C) ensures the horoballs between them are consistent. Finally, when we lift the final triangle, because we have fixed the distance between horoballs by (C), and the horoball about \infty has not changed, the diameters of horoballs on {\mathbb{R}} must also have the same diameter as in the initial triangle. Thus the initial and final triangles cannot differ by a (non-trivial) scaling, and must differ only by a Euclidean translation. ∎

In our construction below, conditions (A) and (B) of Definition 3.2 will be easy to check. For condition (C), for many triangles, we will identify one marked edge of the triangle, such that two triangles are glued across marked edges forming a quadrilateral (with marked edge as the diagonal). We will choose cusp areas on opposite vertices of the quadrilateral to have areas aa and 1/a1/a, respectively, as in Figure 3.2(b). This will ensure that the diagonal edge has the same length between horoballs in each triangle. Moreover, exterior edges of the quadrilateral all have length zero. Hence we may glue any two such quads together along an exterior edge consistently. For the remaining triangles, which will not fit into quadrilaterals, we must check edge lengths between horoballs using the formula of Lemma 3.3.

We now construct a horoball packing of a planar surface with the desired properties.

For each large triangle region in TmT_{m} that was formed by replacing one triangle in T0T_{0} with 4m24m^{2} triangles, color the middle m2m^{2} triangles in the region gray, as in Figure 4(a), and color the remaining triangles white.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption(2)(2)(1)(1)(2)(2)(4)(4)(4)(4)(5)(5)(5)(5)(2)(2)(2)(2)(3)(3)(3)(3)(6)(6)
Refer to caption1/cm1/c_{m}1/c11/c_{1}c1c_{1}c2c_{2}cmc_{m}cm1c_{m-1}1/c11/c_{1}1/cm1/c_{m}cmc_{m}1/c21/c_{2}
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 4. (a) Shade the middle triangles gray. (b) Types of vertices. (c) Decorated packing.

In order to describe our horoball packing, we will consider six types of vertices in the small triangles appearing in TmT_{m}, also shown in Figure 4(b):

  1. (1)

    vertices of degree five at the corners of the large triangular regions coming from the triangles of the original icosohedron;

  2. (2)

    vertices along the edges of the white triangular regions, thus lying on an edge of the original triangle, but in the interior of that edge;

  3. (3)

    interior vertices in the white triangular regions;

  4. (4)

    vertices where four white triangular regions and two gray triangular regions are identified;

  5. (5)

    vertices on the edges of a gray triangular region, but in the interior of the edge; and

  6. (6)

    vertices in the interior of the gray triangular regions.

The proof will assign a cusp area to each cusp of each triangle in TmT_{m} depending on the pattern of the vertices in that triangle.

Lemma 3.5.

For any mm, the triangulated surface (Fm,Tm)(F_{m},T_{m}) constructed above admits a decoration depending on a choice of positive areas {c1,,cm}\{c_{1},\dots,c_{m}\} such that, if 1ci21\leq c_{i}\leq 2, then the decoration gives a complete hyperbolic structure on FmF_{m} and embedded cusp neighborhoods with areas of the cusp neighborhoods satisfy the following.

  • On the 12 vertices of type (1), the area is Lm=5cmL_{m}=5\,c_{m}.

  • On vertices of type (2), the area is Lj=4/cj+1+2cjL_{j}=4/c_{j+1}+2c_{j}, for 1j<m1\leq j<m.

  • On vertices of type (3), the area is Lj=4/cj+1+cj+cj+2L_{j}^{\prime}=4/c_{j+1}+c_{j}+c_{j+2} for 1j<m11\leq j<m-1.

  • On vertices of type (4), the area is 2/c12+4/c12/c_{1}^{2}+4/c_{1}.

  • On vertices of type (5), the area is either c2+2+3/c1c_{2}+2+3/c_{1}, or c2+1+4/c1c_{2}+1+4/c_{1}.

  • On vertices of type (6), the area is 2c1+42\,c_{1}+4, or c1+5c_{1}+5, or 66.

Proof.

Consider first one of the three white triangular regions making up the original larger triangle of the icosohedron. Let vv be a vertex coming from the original triangle, of type (1), and let TT denote the (small) triangle of TmT_{m} that lies in this triangular region and that has vv as a vertex. Inside TT, decorate vv with cm1c_{m}\geq 1. The value cmc_{m} will correspond to the area of the cusp in TT. Note that with this decoration in all triangles adjacent vv, the cusp of FmF_{m} corresponding to vv will have area Lm=5cmL_{m}=5c_{m}.

Now consider the other vertices of the (small) white triangle TT. Decorate the two remaining vertices with 1/cm1/c_{m}. Across the edge of TT opposite vv, apply the mirror image decoration. Thus TT and its adjacent triangle in the large white triangular region will both have packing [cm,1/cm,1/cm][c_{m},1/c_{m},1/c_{m}], as in Figure 4(c).

Next consider the edges of the large white triangular regions, and the vertices in the interior of this edge, i.e. those of type (2). For ease of explanation, rotate the triangular region such that the vertex vv lies at the top. Then (if m>1m>1) the vertex nearest vv belongs to exactly one small white triangle in this triangular region that has not yet been labeled, and this is the top-most triangle lying along this edge with top vertex in the interior of the edge. Decorate the vertices of this triangle with [cm1,1/cm1,1/cm1][c_{m-1},1/c_{m-1},1/c_{m-1}], and decorate the triangle sharing the bottom edge of this triangle with the reflected packing. These two triangles together form a diamond, with top and bottom vertices labeled cm1c_{m-1}.

Now consider the “diamonds” just below this top-most diamond, at height m2m-2. Label the top triangle in the diamond by [cm2,1/cm2,1/cm2][c_{m-2},1/c_{m-2},1/c_{m-2}], with cm2c_{m-2} at the top, and assign labels to the bottom triangle by reflecting across the common edge of the two triangles in the diamond. Inside the large white triangular region, there are exactly three diamonds at height m2m-2. Label all three of them in this manner, as in Figure 4(c).

Continue, labeling all diamonds at height kk with labels [ck,1/ck,1/ck][c_{k},1/c_{k},1/c_{k}]. Repeating this process will label all interior vertices of all triangles inside the large white triangular region, with the exception of the triangles across the bottom, sharing an edge with a gray triangle. Label these triangles [c1,1/c1,1/c1][c_{1},1/c_{1},1/c_{1}], with c1c_{1} at the top, as in Figure 4(c).

Using this labeling, a vertex at height jj of type (2), i.e. along an edge of the white triangular region in the interior of the edge, will glue up to a cusp with area Lj=(4/cj+1)+2cjL_{j}=(4/c_{j+1})+2c_{j} for 1j<m1\leq j<m. A vertex of type (3), in the interior of the white triangular region, will have area Lj=(4/cj)+cj+1+cj1L^{\prime}_{j}=(4/c_{j})+c_{j+1}+c_{j-1} for 2j<m2\leq j<m.

Now we label gray triangles. For one of the three gray triangles in the corners of the large gray triangular region, decorate the vertices with [1,1,1/c12][1,1,1/c_{1}^{2}], such that the cusp labeled 1/c121/c_{1}^{2} corresponds to a vertex of type (4). This triangle has two sides sharing an edge with a small white triangle, with labels on the endpoints of the edges in those white triangles given by 1/c11/c_{1} and 1/c11/c_{1}. Note by Lemma 3.3 that the length of the edge shared by these white and gray triangles will be 2log(1/c1)-2\log(1/c_{1}) in both triangles, and so the gluing will satisfy condition (c) of Definition 3.2. The total area of the cusp at the vertex of type (4) will be 4/c1+2/c124/c_{1}+2/c_{1}^{2}.

For the other gray triangles, if the gray triangle shares an edge with a white triangle, decorate its cusps with [c1,1/c1,1/c1][c_{1},1/c_{1},1/c_{1}], with c1c_{1} opposite that edge. For all other gray triangles in the interior, decorate their vertices with [1,1,1][1,1,1].

Thus a vertex of type (5) will correspond to a cusp of area 2+3/c1+c12+3/c_{1}+c_{1} if the vertex shares an edge with a vertex of type (4), and area c2+4/c1+1c_{2}+4/c_{1}+1 otherwise. Vertices of type (6) either correspond to cusps with area 2c1+42c_{1}+4, c1+5c_{1}+5, or 66.

Note that for all choices of 1cj21\leq c_{j}\leq 2, for j=1,,mj=1,\dots,m, this decoration will satisfy conditions (A), (B), and (C) of Definition 3.2 by construction, hence by Lemma 3.4, it can be realized by a complete hyperbolic structure on FmF_{m} with embedded cusps. ∎

Lemma 3.5 is stated in terms of areas of cusps, but recall that for a hyperbolic surface, cusp area is the same as length of boundary curve for a cusp. We wish to ensure that the smallest of the lengths obtained in Lemma 3.5 is as large as possible. We will do so by focusing on the lengths LjL_{j}. Provided we can show that cjcj+1c_{j}\leq c_{j+1} for all jj, this will prove that LjLjL_{j}^{\prime}\geq L_{j}. We will also check the lengths of LmL_{m} and lengths along gray triangles.

Lemma 3.6.

For the decoration of Lemma 3.5, for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there exists mm and a choice of constants {c1,,cm}\{c_{1},\dots,c_{m}\} such that each cic_{i} satisfies 1ci21\leq c_{i}\leq 2, such that cici+1c_{i}\leq c_{i+1} for i=1,,m1i=1,\dots,m-1, and such that each length along a cusp is at least 10/3ϵ10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon.

Proof.

Set all of the LjL_{j} to be equal to LL. This gives a system of equations. Considering this system as a discrete dynamical system in the cjc_{j}, we obtain the recursive formula

cj+1=4L2cj.c_{j+1}=\frac{4}{L-2c_{j}}.

Notice that this defines cj+1c_{j+1} in terms of a Möbius transformation fixing the upper half plane 2{\mathbb{H}}^{2}. Any initial choice of c1c_{1} determines all following cjc_{j}. Moreover, the condition 5cm=Lm=L5\,c_{m}=L_{m}=L enables us to compute values for the system. As jj approaches \infty, the numbers cjc_{j} will approach an attracting fixed point. That is, they will approach xx such that

x=4L2x.x=\frac{4}{L-2x}.

Appealing to the condition that Lm=5xL_{m}=5x, we obtain x=4/(3x)x=4/(3x), indicating that x=±2/3x=\pm 2/\sqrt{3}. Using the positive root, we obtain L=10/3L=10/\sqrt{3}. Furthermore, for this choice of LL, 2/32/\sqrt{3} is the attracting fixed point, and 3\sqrt{3} the repelling fixed point, of the dynamical system given by the cjc_{j}’s. Thus the Möbius transformation is a hyperbolic translation of the upper half plane, translating along the axis from 3\sqrt{3} to 2/32/\sqrt{3}, and so for c1<2/3c_{1}<2/\sqrt{3}, the sequence {c1,c2,}\{c_{1},c_{2},\dots\} will increase monotonically to approach 2/32/\sqrt{3}.

Therefore, for any pair (c1,ϵ)(c_{1},\epsilon) such that c1<2/3c_{1}<2/\sqrt{3} and ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there exists an mm such that cm>2/3ϵ/5c_{m}>2/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon/5, Lm>10/3ϵL_{m}>10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon and cjcj+1c_{j}\leq c_{j+1}.

Thus, given ϵ\epsilon, any such c1c_{1} will ensure lengths of cusps around vertices of types (1), (2), and (3) are at least 10/3ϵ10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon. We need to ensure lengths of cusps around other vertices are also long. Solving 2/c12+4/c1=L=10/32/c_{1}^{2}+4/c_{1}=L=10/\sqrt{3} for c1c_{1}, we obtain

c1=3+3+5351.029353<23.c_{1}=\frac{\sqrt{3}+\sqrt{3+5\sqrt{3}}}{5}\approx 1.029353<\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}.

Thus if we choose this value of c1c_{1}, the vertices of type (4) will have area exactly 10/310/\sqrt{3}. A vertex of type (5) will have area either c2+2+3/c1c1+2+3/c15.944>10/3c_{2}+2+3/c_{1}\geq c_{1}+2+3/c_{1}\approx 5.944>10/\sqrt{3}, or c2+1+4/c1c1+1+4/c15.915>10/3c_{2}+1+4/c_{1}\geq c_{1}+1+4/c_{1}\approx 5.915>10/\sqrt{3}.

Finally, vertices of type (6) either correspond to cusps with area 2c1+42c_{1}+4, c1+5c_{1}+5 or 66. Since c1>1c_{1}>1, these cusps are all at least area 66. ∎

Proof of Proposition 3.1.

Given ϵ>0\epsilon>0, select mm and {c1,,cm}\{c_{1},\dots,c_{m}\} such that the triangulation and decoration of Lemma 3.5 satisfy the conclusions of Lemma 3.6. ∎

The above packing has the seemingly undesirable property that the average area of a cusp in the packing is not equal to the minimum area of a cusp in the packing. Thus, we might hope to shrink the area of the cusps with area above 10/310/\sqrt{3} and use that room to increase the smallest cusp areas in the packing. However, we were unable to find such a packing that could increase the areas around the vertices of type (1) to a value above 10/310/\sqrt{3}.

3.3. Proof of Theorem 1.1.

We now prove the main theorem.

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

Proposition 3.1 shows for all ϵ>0\epsilon^{\prime}>0 there exists a horoball packing HH of a planar surface FF such that all cusps have area at least 10/3ϵ10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon^{\prime}. For any ϵ′′>0\epsilon^{\prime\prime}>0, Theorem 2.6 provides a cusped hyperbolic 3–manifold MM, a horoball packing HMH_{M} of MM, and a topological embedding of FF into MM such that boundary slopes of the image of FF have length at least 10/3ϵϵ′′10/\sqrt{3}-\epsilon^{\prime}-\epsilon^{\prime\prime} on HM\partial H_{M}. To complete the proof, choose ϵ\epsilon^{\prime} and ϵ′′\epsilon^{\prime\prime} such that ϵ>ϵ+ϵ′′\epsilon>\epsilon^{\prime}+\epsilon^{\prime\prime}. By Theorem 2.6, the Dehn filling along those boundary slopes is a reducible manifold. ∎

4. Graph manifolds and Seifert fibered spaces

In this section, we will consider lengths of slopes giving exceptional fillings besides reducible. Refining our discussion from the introduction, an exceptional filling ss of a one–cusped hyperbolic manifold MM is either reducible, finite (i.e. |π1(M(s))|<|\pi_{1}(M(s))|<\infty), small Seifert fibered with infinite fundamental group, or toroidal. We treat each case separately.

4.1. Toroidal fillings and fillings along torus slopes

We first consider lengths of slopes of manifolds that admit a toroidal filling, or more generally, lengths of slopes that are parallel to the boundary components of an essential punctured torus. As noted in the introduction, in the toroidal case, the bound of six is realized. Agol has examples in [2], as does Adams et al for knots in S3S^{3} [1]. Both of these examples involve a specific packing of an embedded totally geodesic once–punctured torus. In each case, these packings are as dense as possible. In fact, this behavior is required for a toroidal filling realizing the bound of six, due to the following lemma, which follows quickly from the proof of [2, Theorem 5.1].

Lemma 4.1.

Let MM be a cusped hyperbolic 3–manifold and let SS be an essential punctured torus properly immersed in MM. Let s1,,sns_{1},\dots,s_{n} be slopes on the cusps of MM homotopic to the boundary slopes of SS. Then there exists a cusp neighborhood CC for MM such that each sjs_{j} has length exactly 66 on C{\partial}C if and only if the following hold:

  1. (1)

    SS is totally geodesic,

  2. (2)

    H=CSH=C\cap S is a maximal cusp of SS, and

  3. (3)

    the canonical decomposition of SS corresponding to HH consists of ideal triangles, each with a [1,1,1][1,1,1] packing given by its intersection with HH.

Proof.

In [2, Theorem 5.1], Agol proves that the sum of the lengths of the slopes sjs_{j} is at most 6|χ(S)|6|\chi(S)|. We walk through the proof of that theorem to determine what must occur when we have equality. First, pleat SS in MM, and consider SCS\cap C, shrinking CC if necessary to CC^{\prime} to avoid compact regions of intersection. The lengths of the slopes sis_{i} on C{\partial}C^{\prime} in MM are at most the lengths of the curves running along the cusp CSC^{\prime}\cap S of SS in the hyperbolic structure it inherits from the pleating. We have equality in this case if and only if there is no bending along the pleating locus, i.e. the surface SS is totally geodesic.

Next, the length of a curve along H=CSH^{\prime}=C^{\prime}\cap S is known to be the area of HH^{\prime}. By work of Böröczky [4], this area will be at most 3/π3/\pi times the area of SS. We will have equality if and only if the cusp HH^{\prime} is as dense as possible in SS, which will happen if and only if the canonical decomposition of SS with respect to HH^{\prime} consists of triangles, each with packing [1,1,1][1,1,1]. Since CC^{\prime} cannot be expanded without H=CSH^{\prime}=C^{\prime}\cap S becoming no longer embedded, HH^{\prime} must equal HH, and the lemma follows. ∎

Remark 4.2.

Suppose SS has a horoball packing HH that is as dense as possible as in Böröczky [4], and suppose we have an ideal triangulation of SS. It does not follow that each triangle has a [1,1,1][1,1,1] packing. For example, a triangle might have a [2,1/2,1/2][2,1/2,1/2] packing. However, these triangles are not canonical. The canonical packing is shown in Figure 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 5. The local picture of a horoball packing of FF. Each horoball tangent to the horoball at \infty is diameter one. The centers of the curvilinear triangles in the complement of the horoball packing are at height 3/2\sqrt{3}/{2}.

This packing will be a key tool used to address the slope lengths of Dehn fillings that produce Seifert fibered manifolds with infinite fundamental group.

4.2. The Seifert fibered case

Next we consider examples of manifolds with long slopes yielding small Seifert fibered fillings with infinite fundamental group. The following proposition gives a lower bound on the longest such slope length.

Proposition 4.3.

There exists a sequence of hyperbolic 3–manifolds MnM_{n}, each with one cusp, and slopes sns_{n} with length approaching 55 such that Mn(sn)M_{n}(s_{n}) is a small Seifert fibered manifold with infinite fundamental group.

Proof.

Consider the Whitehead Sister manifold, which is m125m125 in the SnapPy census [8]. Our numbering and framing of cusps of this manifold will be consistent with SnapPy.

Choose a horoball packing of m125m125 such that cusp 0 touches itself. We first find a slope on cusp 0 of length 55 that yields a manifold with interesting properties.

Consider a fundamental domain for m125m125 such that the point of tangency of cusp 0 occurs at height 1. Then there exists a representation ρ:π1(m125)PSL(2,)\rho\colon\thinspace\pi_{1}(m125)\to{\rm PSL}(2,{\mathbb{C}}) such that cusp 0 lifts to \infty in the universal cover, and so an element of the peripheral subgroup at \infty can be realized as a translation in the plane at height 1. If we identify this plane with the complex plane, we can further assume (after conjugating by a rotation fixing \infty if necessary) that the slope (1,0)(1,0) corresponds to translation by 2i2-i and the (0,1)(0,1) slope can be realized as a translation by 1+2i1+2i. Under this representation, the (2,1)(2,1) slope on cusp 0 is realized by a translation by 4+3i4+3i. Hence it has length 55. Using Regina [7], one can identify explicitly the manifold obtained by Dehn filling this slope; it is the one-cusped graph manifold

MD2(2,1)(3,1)(1110)A(2,1).M^{\prime}\cong D^{2}(2,1)(3,1)\cup_{\tiny{\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\ 1&0\end{pmatrix}}}A(2,1).

(This result can also be verified by [15], where the notation is explained, but it will not be important in our argument. Note also that the framing of SnapPy has changed since that paper was published; adjust their framings on the Whitehead Sister manifold in [15, Table A.1] by +2+2 to obtain the current framing.)

Now consider cusp 1 on m125m125. Another feature of this manifold is that there is a 1–parameter family of fillings (r,1)(r,1) of cusp 1 such that

m125()(r,1)S2(2,1)(3,1)(2r+1,2r+1))Kr,m125()(r,1)\cong S^{2}(2,1)(3,1)(2r+1,-2r+1))-K_{r},

for some knot KrK_{r} with meridian corresponding to the (2,1)(2,1) slope of cusp 0 on m125m125, hence

m125(2,1)(r,1)S2(2,1)(3,1)(2r+1,2r+1)).m125(2,1)(r,1)\cong S^{2}(2,1)(3,1)(2r+1,-2r+1)).

This is a small Seifert fibered space. Its fundamental group will be infinite provided rr is not one of 3,2,1,0,1,2-3,-2,-1,0,1,2. Thus, for sufficiently large rr, the cusped manifolds

Mr=m125()(r,1)S2(2,1)(3,1)(2r+1,2r+1))KrM_{r}=m125()(r,1)\cong S^{2}(2,1)(3,1)(2r+1,-2r+1))-K_{r}

approach m125, and so are hyperbolic by Thurston’s Hyperbolic Dehn Surgery Theorem [20, 5.8.2]. The slope on MrM_{r} corresponding to the slope (2,1)(2,1) on cusp 0 of m125m125 has length approaching its maximal length in m125m125, which, as mentioned above, is 55. ∎

Proposition 4.3 gives a lower bound of five on the length of the longest slope yielding a small Seifert fibered space with infinite fundamental group. We do not claim this is a sharp lower bound. However, we can prove that no slope corresponding to a small Seifert fibered space has length exactly six.

Theorem 4.4.

Let MM be a hyperbolic manifold with one cusp, and let ss be a slope such that M(s)M(s) is a small Seifert fibered space with infinite fundamental group. Then the length of ss is strictly less than six.

Proof.

Suppose M(s)M(s) is a small Seifert fibered space with infinite fundamental group, but the length of ss is at least six. The 6–Theorem implies the length is exactly six.

The base orbifold of M(s)M(s) is a sphere with three cone points. Work of Scott [19] implies that there is an immersed essential torus in M(s)M(s). Because MM is hyperbolic, there must be an immersed essential punctured torus TT in MM, punctured nn times. Thus TT meets M\partial M nn times, each with slope ss.

We may use the hyperbolic structure of MM to give a pleating on TT in MM. Since the length of each slope is exactly six, the immersed surface must be totally geodesic, and the horoball packing on each cusp must be the densest packing possible, by Lemma 4.1. Thus in the universal cover 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3}, TT lifts to a geodesic plane T¯\bar{T} and the maximal cusp for MM lifts to the densest possible horoball packing on this plane. That is, horoballs meet in triples with triangular regions in the complement.

Now, because TT is merely immersed and not embedded, there must be another lift T~\tilde{T} of TT to 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} that intersects T¯\bar{T}. Note T~\tilde{T} must also be totally geodesic, hence T¯T~\bar{T}\cap\tilde{T} is a geodesic in 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} on the vertical plane T¯\bar{T}. First, note that T¯T~\bar{T}\cap\tilde{T} cannot be a vertical geodesic, for then T¯\bar{T} and T~\tilde{T} would be nonparallel planes, defining distinct slopes on M\partial M. So T¯T~\bar{T}\cap\tilde{T} is a geodesic γ3\gamma\in{\mathbb{H}}^{3} with endpoints disjoint from the centers of horoballs in the packing on TT.

We claim γ\gamma must intersect some horoball H0H_{0} in a compact interval with nonempty interior. This is because, first, the endpoints of γ\gamma are disjoint from horoballs. Next, the complement of all horoballs in TT is a collection of curvilinear triangles. If γ\gamma meets no such H0H_{0} then it meets a triangle. It cannot meet it in its edges, which are boundaries of horoballs, since then γ\gamma would continue through the interior of the corresponding horoball. But if it meets the triangle only in vertices, then it must run along the geodesic between those vertices, which runs through the interior of a horoball.

So γ\gamma must intersect some horoball H0H_{0} in a compact interval with nonempty interior. It follows that T~\tilde{T} must intersect H0H_{0} in a compact disk. Since T~\tilde{T} differs from T¯\bar{T} by a covering isometry, there must be some horoball lift of the embedded maximal cusp H13H_{1}\subset{\mathbb{H}}^{3} such that H1T¯H_{1}\cap\bar{T} is a compact disk. We will show this leads to a contradiction.

Since the maximal cusp of MM is embedded, all lifts of the cusp to 3{\mathbb{H}}^{3} are disjoint. Thus if H1T¯H_{1}\cap\bar{T} is a compact disk, it must lie in one of the triangular regions in the complement of the horoballs with centers on T¯\partial\bar{T}. In particular, the disk must have a center closest to some horoball H2H_{2} on T¯\bar{T}. Applying a hyperbolic isometry, we may assume that H2H_{2} is the horoball at infinity, of height one, and the disk of intersection H1T¯H_{1}\cap\bar{T} lies in one of the small triangles between the horoball at infinity and two tangent horoballs of diameter one. Denote the Euclidean center of the disk H1T¯2H_{1}\cap\bar{T}\cong{\mathbb{H}}^{2} by qq. The height of qq is also the Euclidean radius of H1H_{1}. But qq lies in a triangular region above horoballs of diameter one, hence it has height at least 3/2\sqrt{3}/2. But then the diameter of H1H_{1} is at least 3>1\sqrt{3}>1, contradicting the fact that H1H_{1} is disjoint from the horoball at infinity. This contradiction concludes the proof that the length of the slope ss is strictly less than six. ∎

Remark 4.5.

The above proof applies to any space with a Dehn filling yielding a manifold with an immersed essential torus. For example, this will apply to many graph manifolds as well. The longest graph manifold slope for one–cusped manifolds in the SnapPy census has length 2525.3182\sqrt{5\sqrt{2}}\approx 5.318, and occurs for the manifold m130. It would be interesting to find a sharp upper bound for slope length for graph manifold fillings.

To put this into a better context, the example in [2] has eight tetrahedra and the first example of [1] has nine tetrahedra, and so both manifolds appear in the census with nine or fewer tetrahedra. While we expect to see some very interesting behavior regarding exceptional surgeries in the cusped census, not all long slopes appear this way. For example, the reducible fillings of the main theorem have too many cusps to appear in any existing census.

4.3. Finite fillings

We say only a few words on what is known in the case of finite fillings, and conclude this section with a summary.

There are many examples of one–cusped hyperbolic manifolds with slopes that yield S3S^{3} fillings with slope lengths approaching 44, for example [2, Section 7] and [18, Section 4]. Note the same basic construction of used in the proof of [18, Corollary 4.4] can also produce hyperbolic knots in lens spaces with meridians of length approaching 4. The final step of that argument is to fill an unknotted component of a link by a slope of 1/c21/c_{2}. However, if we allow p/c2p/c_{2} fillings with p>1p>1 and pp and c2c_{2} relatively prime, then the knot complements constructed still have meridian lengths approaching 4, but will be knot complements in (non-trivial) lens spaces as opposed to in S3S^{3}. A similar argument can also be applied to the knot complements constructed in [2, Section 7].

If we allow multiple cusps, work of Goerner shows that 44 is not an upper bound on slope length. In [13, Table 1], Goerner exhibits an arithmetic construction of a link in S3S^{3} with 64 cusps such that each meridian is at least length 214.5826\sqrt{21}\approx 4.5826.

Notice that this difference between known lengths of slopes for one-cusped versus multi-cusped manifolds also appears in the reducible case. The examples of Theorem 1.1 prove that the maximal length reducible slope in the multi-cusped case is at least 10/310/\sqrt{3}. However, when we restrict to one-cusped manifolds, the longest length examples we could find were reducible fillings obtained from a sequence of fillings of the minimally–twisted 5-chain link, with slope lengths approaching 44. Details on fillings of the minimally–twisted 5-chain link can be found in [16].

Type one-cusp multi-cusp
Finite 4* 21\sqrt{21}
Reducible 4* 10/310/\sqrt{3}*
small SFS 5* 5
Toroidal 6 6
Table 1. A table of the lengths of observed slopes that realize each type of exceptional filling. Slope lengths marked with an asterisk are those for which the bound is realized asymptotically. The lengths of the toroidal fillings are the only ones known to be sharp.

Table 1 provides a summary of these examples and the other examples given in this paper. In the table, “small SFS” refers to small Seifert fibered space fillings with infinite fundamental group. An asterisk indicates that the bound is realized asymptotically.

We conclude by asking the following questions motivated by the table.

Question 4.6.

If MM is a one-cusped hyperbolic manifold and ss is a reducible, finite, or small Seifert fibered slope, what is the maximal length of ss?

Question 4.7.

If MM is a multi-cusped hyperbolic manifold and ss is a reducible, finite, or small Seifert fibered slope, what is the maximal length of ss?

References

  • [1] Colin Adams, Hanna Bennett, Christopher Davis, Michael Jennings, Jennifer Kloke, Nicholas Perry, and Eric Schoenfeld, Totally geodesic Seifert surfaces in hyperbolic knot and link complements. II, J. Differential Geom. 79 (2008), no. 1, 1–23.
  • [2] Ian Agol, Bounds on exceptional Dehn filling, Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 431–449.
  • [3] Steven A. Bleiler and Craig D. Hodgson, Spherical space forms and Dehn filling, Topology 35 (1996), no. 3, 809–833.
  • [4] Károly Böröczky, Packing of spheres in spaces of constant curvature, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 32 (1978), no. 3–4, 243–261.
  • [5] Robert Brooks, On the deformation theory of classical Schottky groups, Duke Math. J. 52 (1985), no. 4, 1009–1024.
  • [6] by same author, Circle packings and co-compact extensions of Kleinian groups, Invent. Math. 86 (1986), no. 3, 461–469.
  • [7] Benjamin A. Burton, Regina: Normal surface and 3–manifold topology software, http://regina.sourceforge.net/, 1999–2009.
  • [8] Marc Culler, Nathan M. Dunfield, and Jeffrey R. Weeks, SnapPy, a computer program for studying the geometry and topology of 3 -manifolds, http://snappy.computop.org.
  • [9] David B. A. Epstein and Robert C. Penner, Euclidean decompositions of noncompact hyperbolic manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 27 (1988), no. 1, 67–80.
  • [10] David B. A. Epstein and Carlo Petronio, An exposition of Poincaré’s polyhedron theorem, Enseign. Math. (2) 40 (1994), no. 1-2, 113–170.
  • [11] Michihiko Fujii, Deformations of a hyperbolic 33-manifold not affecting its totally geodesic boundary, Kodai Math. J. 16 (1993), no. 3, 441–454.
  • [12] David Futer and Saul Schleimer, Cusp geometry of fibered 3-manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 136 (2014), no. 2, 309–356.
  • [13] Matthias Goerner, Regular tessellation links, arXiv:1406.2827, 2014.
  • [14] Marc Lackenby, Word hyperbolic Dehn surgery, Invent. Math. 140 (2000), no. 2, 243–282.
  • [15] Bruno Martelli and Carlo Petroni, Dehn filling of the “magic” 3-manifold, Comm. Anal. Geom. 14 (2006), no. 5, 969–1026.
  • [16] Bruno Martelli, Carlo Petronio, and Fionntan Roukema, Exceptional Dehn surgery on the minimally twisted five-chain link, Comm. Anal. Geom. 22 (2014), no. 4, 689–735.
  • [17] Robert C Penner, The decorated teichmüller space of punctured surfaces, Communications in Mathematical Physics 113 (1987), no. 2, 299–339.
  • [18] Jessica S. Purcell, Slope lengths and generalized augmented links, Comm. Anal. Geom. 16 (2008), no. 4, 883–905.
  • [19] Peter Scott, There are no fake Seifert fibre spaces with infinite π1\pi_{1}, Ann. of Math. (2) 117 (1983), no. 1, 35–70.
  • [20] William P. Thurston, The geometry and topology of three-manifolds, Princeton Univ. Math. Dept. Notes, 1979.