Global Hypersurfaces of Section for Geodesic Flows on Convex Hypersurfaces
Abstract.
We construct a global hypersurface of section for the geodesic flow of a convex hypersurface in Euclidean space admits an isometric involution. This generalizes the Birkhoff annulus to higher dimensions.
1. Introduction
Global surfaces of section, an idea introduced by Poincaré in his work on celestial mechanics [Poi87] and also explored by Birkhoff [Bir66], feature prominently in the literature on the 3-dimensional dynamics. They allow us to reduce the dynamics of vector fields on 3-manifolds to the dynamics of surface diffeomorphisms. Ghys [Ghy09] called the existence of a global surface of section as a paradise for dynamicists, since it eliminates technical difficulties and allows to investigate the pure nature of dynamical systems.
Beyond their versatile utility, the existence of the global surfaces of section already gives us some information about the dynamics. Unless the given 3-manifold fibers over a circle, a global surface of section must have a boundary which is a set of periodic orbits. Hence the existence of periodic orbits is an essential obstruction, which cannot be overcome easily. Kuperberg [Kup94] introduced an example of a nonvanishing vector field on without periodic orbits. Ginzburg [Gin99] has given examples of the Hamiltonian system without periodic orbits. The horocycle flow on unit cotangent bundle of higher genus surfaces provides another class of Hamiltonian flows without periodic orbits.
This obstruction can be removed in the case of Reeb dynamics in dimension three. The Weinstein conjecture [Wei79] asserts the existence of at least one periodic Reeb orbit on any compact contact manifold. Hofer [Hof93] proved the Weinstein conjecture on , and Taubes [Tau07] proved the Weinstein conjecture in dimension three in a full generality using embedded contact homology. The work of Hofer was followed by the joint work with Wysocki and Zehnder [HWZ98] constructing disk-like global surface of section on a dynamically convex . Recent developments along this way can be found in [HSa11], [HMSa15], and [SaH18]. [CDHR23], [CM22] and [CKMS22] contain results about the existence of a Birkhoff section for Reeb flows in dimension three, a generalization of a global surface of section that allows immersed boundary.
The notion of global surface of section can be generalized to higher dimensions as mentioned by Birkhoff [Bir66]. However, there are only few results known in higher dimensional dynamics even in the case of Reeb flows, due to the difficulty caused by the instability of the boundary of global hypersurface of section. Moreno and van Koert [MvK22] resolved this problem by imposing a symmetry which guarantees the existence of high dimensional invariant set, and provided a concrete example of a global hypersurface of section arising from the restricted three-body problem.
Our main result concerns the existence of global hypersurfaces of section of the geodesic flows on compact convex hypersurfaces in Euclidean space which satisfying certain conditions.
Theorem 1.1.
Let be a regular closed hypersurface and be a codimension 1 submanifold. Assume that there exists a tubular neighborhood of and an isometric involution whose fixed point locus is . In addition, assume that has positive sectional curvature. Then the geodesic flow on admits a global hypersurface of section
where is a fixed normal vector field of with respect to . Moreover, the return map extends smoothly to the boundary of .
We note that the positivity of sectional curvature is equivalent to the convexity of the hypersurface. We first prove the existence part in 3.10, and 4.5 establishes that we can extend the return map smoothly to the boundary. Note that if the dimension of is 2, our theorem reduces to a special case of the theorem of Birkhoff [Bir66] which established the existence of a global surface of section of geodesic flow of a 2-sphere with positive curvature. In this sense, our result can be regarded as a generalization of the Birkhoff annulus to higher dimensions.
1.1. Acknowledgement
Sunghae Cho and Dongho Lee were supported by National Science Foundation of Korea Grant NRF2023005562 funded by the Korean Government.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Global Hypersurfaces of Section and Open Book Decompositions
Let be a smooth closed manifold, i.e. a compact manifold without boundary, and be a non-vanishing vector field on . A global hypersurface of section for is an embedded submanifold of codimension 1 with (possibly empty) boundary such that
-
the vector field is transverse to the interior of ,
-
the boundary is -invariant; in other words, is tangent to ,
-
for any , there exist such that .
If is a global hypersurface of section, we can define the (first) return time for each by and the (first) return map by .
Example 2.1.
Let be , the unit cotangent bundle of the -sphere with the standard metric, and be the unit geodesic vector field on . Consider as a subset of and use the coordinates . Consider the submanifold
which is the set of upward directions on the equator. Then one can see that is a global hypersurface of section, the boundary of is the unit cotangent bundle of the equator of , and the first return map is the identity.
Open book decompositions are closely related to the global hypersurfaces of section. An open book decomposition on a closed manifold is a pair of a codimension 2 closed submanifold and a map from to which satisfies the following.
-
The normal bundle of is trivial. We call the binding. Let be a fixed trivialization of the normal bundle, which is identified with a tubular beighborhood, of .
-
The map is a fiber bundle such that on , where is a polar coordinate on . We call the closure of each fiber the page. Note that for any .
Let be a vector field on , and be an open book on . If is transverse to each page and tangent to , then we say is adapted to .
Lemma 2.2.
Let be a closed manifold, be a codimension 2 closed submanifold, be a vector field on , and be a map from to . Assume that
-
(1)
for any ,
-
(2)
has a trivial tubular neighborhood, say , such that ,
-
(3)
is tangent to .
Then is an open book decomposition of , which is adapted to.
Proof.
By (1), is a submersion. We can remove an open tubular neighborhood of on which (2) holds, then is still a submersion. In particular, (2) guarantees that is a submersion. Since is proper, we can apply the Ehresmann fibration theorem and conclude that defines a fiber bundle. With (2), we can see that is an open book decomposition on .
Since , cannot be tangent to the level sets of . This means that is transverse to each page. With (3), we can see that is adapted to . ∎
If a vector field is adapted to , then each page can be regarded as a candidate for the global hypersurface of section. There might exist an orbit of which does not return to the page in a finite time. Such an orbit should be asymptotic to the boundary as becomes large. A discussion about a case of dimension 3 can be found in [HWZ98]. In 3.5, we will show that the case of unbounded return time does not appear in our setting.
2.2. Symplectic Manifolds and Contact Manifolds
Let be a manifold without boundary and be a 2-form on . If is a non-degenerate closed form, we say is a symplectic form and is a symplectic manifold. A symplectomorphism is a diffeomorphism between symplectic manifolds which preserves the symplectic form. Let be a submanifold such that is also a symplectic form on . We call a symplectic submanifold. A diffeomorphism between manifolds induces a symplectomorphism between cotangent bundles via pullback. Also, if is a submanifold of , then is a symplectic submanifold of .
Let be a symplectic manifold with a boundary, and assume that has a primitive , i.e. . A vector field such that is called Liouville vector field. If a Liouville vector field exists and defines an outward vector field on the boundary, we call a Liouville domain.
Given a smooth function , we can associate a vector field to via
This is well-defined by non-degeneracy of . We say is a Hamiltonian vector field, and in this sense, we call a Hamiltonian function or simply Hamiltonian. If a diffeomorphism can be written as a time 1-flow of a Hamiltonian vector field, we say it is a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism. Note that we can also use time-dependent Hamiltonian and get time-dependent Hamiltonian diffeomorphism. By definition, a Hamiltonian vector field vanishes at a point if and only if . A Hamiltonian diffeomorphism is a symplectomorphism, as by the Cartan magic formula. An important observation is that the Hamiltonian vector field of an autonomous Hamiltonian is tangent to the regular level set of the generating Hamiltonian. In other words, the value of is preserved under the flow of . More detailed explanations with examples about symplectic geometry and Hamiltonian mechanics can be found in [Arn89], [CdS01], [Ber01], [HZ11] or [MS17].
Let be Hamiltonians. The Poisson bracket is defined by . It’s clear that the Poisson bracket is alternating. If , we have the following formula, which can be found for example in the chapter 1 of [MS17]
Let be a -dimensional manifold, and be a -dimensional distribution on . Then we can locally write as for some 1-form . Assume that is coorientable, i.e. is orientable. Then we can find a globally defined 1-form . If is a volume form, we say is a contact form, is a contact structure, and is a contact manifold. A contact form defines a unique vector field such that , . We call the Reeb vector field. Note that the Reeb vector field is always non-vanishing. A standard example of a contact manifold is the boundary of a Liouville domain with contact form , and a regular level set of Hamiltonian function with the same contact form. In the second case, the Hamiltonian vector field restricted to the regular level set of is the Reeb vector field. We can consider an open book decomposition on a contact manifold which the Reeb vector field adapted to. The close relationship between contact structures on a manifold and an open book decomposition is explored in [Gir02].
2.3. Geodesic Flow as a Hamiltonian Flow
Let be a complete Riemannian manifold. For each and , we have a unique geodesic with the initial condition , . The geodesic flow is a 1-parameter family of diffeomorphisms on defined by . By differentiating by , we get the geodesic vector field on which generates the geodesic flow.
The metric on induces the dual metric on by natural pairing, and we can also define the (co-)geodesic flow and (co-)geodesic vector field on .
Proposition 2.3.
The geodesic vector field on is a Hamiltonian vector field with Hamiltonian
where is equipped with a canonical symplectic form
The regular level set is a unit cotangent bundle , which naturally is a contact manifold, whose Reeb vector field is Hamiltonian vector field restricted to .
For notational convenience, we write a point in by so that is a point in . For a function , we denote the partial derivative by , and the gradient vector field by . We will also write the Hessian matrix of which is computed in by . We use coordinate for the cotangent fiber , and also for the cotangent fiber of a hypersurface contained in .
Let be a smooth function, and be a regular value. The level set is an -dimensional Riemannian manifold, whose metric is inherited from . We can embed into by
Here, is a standard inner product on , and we identified to by the metric on . Let on , and . Define by
so that is an intersection .
Proposition 2.4.
Let be a symplectic manifold, and be a Hamiltonian on . Consider smooth functions with as the regular values of such that is a symplectic submanifold of codimension 2. Let . Then the Hamiltonian vector field is given by
Proof.
We can write as for some functions . Since is defined on the level set of and , we must have . We also have from the definition. It follows that
Putting into the first equation yields the result. ∎
Remark 2.5.
The formula of 2.4 can be directly generalized to the case of any -functions, say . The coefficients of ’s in that case will be a solution of a linear equation consisting of Poisson brackets.
From a straightforward computation, we have
Using the formula for the Poisson bracket, we have
To sum up, we have the following.
Theorem 2.6.
Let be a smooth function, and be a regular value of . Let . Then, the geodesic vector field on is given by
Alternatively, this formula can be derived by orthogonal projection.
2.4. Sectional Curvature of Hypersurfaces
An important quantity associated to the Riemannian manifold is the sectional curvature , which is defined for a point and two vectors in . This can be regarded as the Gauss curvature of a 2-dimensional subspace ‘spanned’ by . For the precise definition and properties of sectional curvature, we refer to [Mil63], [KN63], [Spi79], or [dC92]. Let be an oriented hypersurface, and be the unit normal vector field on .
Proposition 2.7.
[[dC92], Theorem 6.2.5] Let . Then the following formula holds.
The formula becomes simpler in the case of a hypersurface in the Euclidean space, whose sectional curvature vanishes.
Corollary 2.8.
[[dC92], Theorem 6.2.5] Let be a function, and be a regular hypersurface. Let be orthonormal vector fields on . Then we have the following.
3. A Global Hypersurface of Section of the Geodesic Flow on a Convex Hypersurface
3.1. Setting
We consider the case is a smooth function and is a regular value. Let be the regular level set . We assume the following conditions for .
-
(A1)
For any point in such that is small enough, .
-
(A2)
The Hessian of is positive definite. Explicitly, for any , , .
Here is a classical theorem which explains the role of (A1). For the proof, see [KN69] Chapter VII.8.
Lemma 3.1.
Let be a Riemannian manifold and be a closed submanifold. Assume that there exist a tubular neighborhood of and an isometric involution , i.e., is an isometry, and . In addition, assume that is the fixed point locus of . Then is a totally geodesic submanifold. In other words, the geodesic vector field of restricted to is tangent to .
Let be the codimension submanifold Then it is clear that is a fixed point set of a locally defined isometric involution , and it follows that is a totally geodesic submanifold from 3.1. Let and . Then can be written as
We note the triviality of the normal bundle of in .
Lemma 3.2.
Let be a Riemannian manifold diffeomorphic to an -sphere, and be a codimension closed submanifold. Then has a trivial normal bundle in .
Proof.
We’ll first show that the normal bundle of is trivial, which is equivalent to the orientability of . Suppose not, then for any section of which meets zero section transversely, there exists a loop such that has odd number of zeros. It follows that the intersection form in -coordinate is not , which is a contradiction because .
Now, let . For , we have , implying
where is the metric inherited from . Thus, the normal fiber at is
where is embedded in along the equator. ∎
Condition (A2) implies that is a convex function, and bounds a compact convex domain. It follows that is diffeomorphic to , where the diffeomorphism can be explicitly written as , assuming that is in the interior of the bounding region of . Since is convex and is in the interior of the domain bounds, this is well-defined.
3.2. Existence of a Global Hypersurface of Section
With the setting of the previous section, we define a map by
The angular form is defined by
Put which was computed in 2.6 into , we have the following.
We define a function by
so that .
Proposition 3.3.
Proof.
Since is a regular value of and is compact, there exists some such that on . Also, by the compactness of , condition (A2) implies that there exists some such that for any .
By condition (A1), we have . Thus, we can perform a Taylor expansion with respect to :
Since , we have for any . We can choose a small such that for , . Consequently, we have for .
For , we only need to bound . However, and implies that if and if . By the compactness of , there exists some such that . This implies for . Taking , we obtain the desired lower bound. ∎
Theorem 3.4.
Proof.
We will apply 2.2 to this situation. From 3.3, it is evident that there exists such that
for any . Since , the first condition on and in 2.2 is satisfied.
Now consider the trivial tubular neighborhood of , the existence of which is guaranteed by 3.2, denoted as
where are small enough. Note that .
Theorem 3.5.
Proof.
The hypersurface corresponds to a page of the open book constructed in 3.4. To conclude, we need to demonstrate that the return time is bounded. It suffices to show that there exists such that . From 3.3, we observe the existence of such that . Thus, we have
By the intermediate value theorem, we can conclude that there exists a positive number such that , which means that It means that is a bounded positive finite return time for . The boundedness of the negative return time can be demonstrated similarly. ∎
Corollary 3.6.
Proof.
We have an open book decomposition with bounded return time, so we can choose any page of the open book, let’s say , as a global hypersurface of section. ∎
Note that if we take , then is 2-sphere so in 3.5 is the Birkhoff annulus. In this sense, our construction can be regarded as a generalization of the Birkhoff annulus.
3.3. Relation with Sectional Curvature
We can apply 2.8 on our hypersurface . The unit normal vector is , and we have
It follows that
for . The second term vanishes because implies that .
Put this into 2.8, and we get the following.
Proposition 3.7.
Let be orthogonal unit tangent vectors of a point . Then,
Hence, the sign of depends on the sign of the ()-minors of . Since the formula holds for any and , we have the following.
Corollary 3.8.
The sectional curvature is positive for any point and plane if and only if is either positive definite or negative definite.
Proof.
Since is symmetric bilinear form, there exists a basis of that diagonalizes , and it continuously varies with . Let
Since , we must have for any . It means that all have the same sign, which implies that is either positive definite or negative definite. Since the process depends on continuously, the sign of cannot change since . The converse follows from the formula in 3.7. ∎
The following corollary can also be found in various literature, for example [Sac60].
Corollary 3.9.
Let and be a regular hypersurface. Assume that has a positive sectional curvature. Then is diffeomorphic to the -sphere.
Proof.
By 3.8, is either positive definite or negative definite. If is positive definite, is convex and we can get the result. If is negative definite, then for , , and is positive definite, and we can use the same argument. ∎
Now we can formulate 3.5 in another form.
Theorem 3.10.
3.4. Topology of the Global Hypersurface of Section
Using the same notations from the previous sections, we will explore the topology of and .
Proof.
We can express as
The convexity of is preserved if we restrict to the subspace , so we obtain the result. ∎
Proposition 3.12.
The global hypersurface of section constructed in 3.5 is diffeomorphic to , which is the subset of consisting of covectors of length . The boundary is homeomorphic to .
Proof.
Let be a diffeomorphism from the upper hemisphere to the closed disk . Define a map by , then it’s clear that is a diffeomorphism. With 3.11, we can conclude the result. ∎
4. Return Map
4.1. General Properties
In this subsection, we investigate the general properties of the global hypersurfaces of sections for Reeb vector fields. Let be a contact form on a manifold and be its Reeb vector field. Assume that there exists an open book decomposition of to which is adapted. Let be a page, and assume that the first return map is well-defined, i.e. the return time is bounded for each point .
Lemma 4.1.
The interior of is a symplectic manifold with symplectic form .
Proof.
Let . Since is contact, never vanishes. Since is transverse to , we can take a local frame of such that is a local frame of , and
It means that is a non-degenerate closed 2-form on , so it’s a symplectic form. ∎
Proposition 4.2.
For the return map , we have
In particular, is a symplectomorphism.
Proof.
This is a generalization of the well-known fact in dimension 3, which can be found, for example, in [ABHSa17] or [FvK18]. We have . Differentiating both sides and plugging in a vector field , we have
Since preserves , we have that
The second statement follows if we take exterior derivative on both sides. ∎
Remark 4.3.
If we equip to the whole , which is a manifold with boundary, then is not a Liouville domain. More precisely, degenerates at the boundary of . The Reeb vector field is tangent to and , indicating that degenerates on the boundary. But even though degenerates at the boundary, is a contact manifold.
4.2. Extension to the Boundary
In the preceding sections, we constructed a global hypersurface of section for the geodesic flow on a convex hypersurface in and we obtained a return map . As demonstrated in 4.1, is a symplectic manifold, with its symplectic form being the restriction of the standard symplectic form on . Furthermore, as indicated in 4.2, is a symplectomorphism.
Now we investigate the boundary behavior of the return map in terms of the defining function . Given that forms a normal symplectic frame of a contact submanifold , it follows from Lemma 8.1 of [MvK22] the linearized Hamiltonian flow decomposes into two blocks; one corresponding to and the other to . Let be the normal part of a flowline linearized near . Then we have
where is the normal part of the standard complex structure on and is a matrix called the normal Hessian.
Proposition 4.4.
[MvK22] If the normal Hessian is positive definite, the return map extends to the boundary smoothly, and such an extension is unique.
Theorem 4.5.
Proof.
Instead of working with a normal Hessian, we will use linearized flow. According to Proposition 8.2 of [MvK22], we must have
near . From the previous section, we also have
It follows that
From the condition (A2), we observe that and are always positive, and it follows that is positive definite. From 4.4, we get the result. If we impose the positive sectional curvature condition, it follows that and have the same sign, which leads to the same result. ∎
Example 4.6.
3.4 can be applied to ellipsoids, since they are convex and satisfying the symmetry condition (A1). In particular, consider an ellipsoid given by
where . The global hypersurface of section constructed in 3.4 is the upper-hemisphere bundle on the equator,
The return map on can be computed in terms of elliptic integrals
where is given by
where is the elliptic integral of the first kind and is the elliptic integral of the third kind.
This can be regarded as a specific case of a hypersurface of revolution. Let satisfy (A1) globally, (A2) and the third condition; if , then . For convenience, we assume that if and only if . The hypersurface of revolution is given by a regular level set . In this case, we can parametrize the set by , where is a function on . Note that in the case of ellipsoid, . We can compute the return map with a help of the Clairaut integral [Arn89], which has a same form as in the case of ellipsoid with
It’s straightforward to see that the return map is a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism generated by .
Sending to 0, the dynamics converges to a billiard on the unit disk , which is defined on a set
The global hypersurface of section converges to . We write for , where is a component tangent to , and and is a component normal to . Then the return map converges to the second iterate of the high-dimensional billiard map
where , which agrees with the function with .
References
- [ABHSa17] Alberto Abbondandolo, Barney Bramham, Umberto L. Hryniewicz, and Pedro A. S. Salomão, A systolic inequality for geodesic flows on the two-sphere, Math. Ann. 367 (2017), no. 1-2, 701–753. MR 3606452
- [Arn89] V. I. Arnold̀, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 60, Springer-Verlag, New York, [1989?], Translated from the 1974 Russian original by K. Vogtmann and A. Weinstein, Corrected reprint of the second (1989) edition. MR 1345386
- [Ber01] Rolf Berndt, An introduction to symplectic geometry, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 26, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001, Translated from the 1998 German original by Michael Klucznik. MR 1793955
- [Bir66] George D. Birkhoff, Dynamical systems, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. Vol. IX, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1966, With an addendum by Jurgen Moser. MR 209095
- [CDHR23] Vincent Colin, Pierre Dehornoy, Umberto Hryniewicz, and Ana Rechtman, Generic properties of -dimensional Reeb flows: Birkhoff sections and entropy, 2023.
- [CdS01] Ana Cannas da Silva, Lectures on symplectic geometry, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1764, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001. MR 1853077
- [CKMS22] Gonzalo Contreras, Gerhard Knieper, Marco Mazzucchelli, and Benjamin H. Schulz, Surfaces of section for geodesic flows of closed surfaces, 2022.
- [CM22] Gonzalo Contreras and Marco Mazzucchelli, Existence of Birkhoff sections for Kupka-Smale Reeb flows of closed contact 3-manifolds, Geom. Funct. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 5, 951–979. MR 4498837
- [dC92] Manfredo Perdigão do Carmo, Riemannian geometry, portuguese ed., Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1992. MR 1138207
- [FvK18] Urs Frauenfelder and Otto van Koert, The restricted three-body problem and holomorphic curves, Pathways in Mathematics, Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2018. MR 3837531
- [Gei08] Hansjörg Geiges, An introduction to contact topology, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 109, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008. MR 2397738
- [Ghy09] Étienne Ghys, Right-handed vector fields & the Lorenz attractor, Jpn. J. Math. 4 (2009), no. 1, 47–61. MR 2491282
- [Gin99] Viktor L. Ginzburg, Hamiltonian dynamical systems without periodic orbits, Northern California Symplectic Geometry Seminar, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, vol. 196, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999, pp. 35–48. MR 1736212
- [Gir02] Emmanuel Giroux, Géométrie de contact: de la dimension trois vers les dimensions supérieures, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. II (Beijing, 2002), Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002, pp. 405–414. MR 1957051
- [HMSa15] Umberto Hryniewicz, Al Momin, and Pedro A. S. Salomão, A Poincaré-Birkhoff theorem for tight Reeb flows on , Invent. Math. 199 (2015), no. 2, 333–422. MR 3302117
- [Hof93] H. Hofer, Pseudoholomorphic curves in symplectizations with applications to the Weinstein conjecture in dimension three, Invent. Math. 114 (1993), no. 3, 515–563. MR 1244912
- [HSa11] Umberto Hryniewicz and Pedro A. S. Salomão, On the existence of disk-like global sections for Reeb flows on the tight 3-sphere, Duke Math. J. 160 (2011), no. 3, 415–465. MR 2852366
- [HWZ98] H. Hofer, K. Wysocki, and E. Zehnder, The dynamics on three-dimensional strictly convex energy surfaces, Ann. of Math. (2) 148 (1998), no. 1, 197–289. MR 1652928
- [HZ11] Helmut Hofer and Eduard Zehnder, Symplectic invariants and Hamiltonian dynamics, Modern Birkhäuser Classics, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2011, Reprint of the 1994 edition. MR 2797558
- [KN63] Shoshichi Kobayashi and Katsumi Nomizu, Foundations of differential geometry. Vol I, Interscience Publishers (a division of John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), New York-London, 1963. MR 152974
- [KN69] by same author, Foundations of differential geometry. Vol. II, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 15, vol. Vol. II, Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-London-Sydney, 1969. MR 238225
- [Kup94] Krystyna Kuperberg, A smooth counterexample to the Seifert conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2) 140 (1994), no. 3, 723–732. MR 1307902
- [Mil63] J. Milnor, Morse theory, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. No. 51, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1963, Based on lecture notes by M. Spivak and R. Wells. MR 163331
- [MS17] Dusa McDuff and Dietmar Salamon, Introduction to symplectic topology, third ed., Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017. MR 3674984
- [MvK22] Agustin Moreno and Otto van Koert, Global hypersurfaces of section in the spatial restricted three-body problem, Nonlinearity 35 (2022), no. 6, 2920–2970. MR 4443924
- [Poi87] H. Poincaré, Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste. Tome I, Les Grands Classiques Gauthier-Villars. [Gauthier-Villars Great Classics], Librairie Scientifique et Technique Albert Blanchard, Paris, 1987, Solutions périodiques. Non-existence des intégrales uniformes. Solutions asymptotiques. [Periodic solutions. Nonexistence of uniform integrals. Asymptotic solutions], Reprint of the 1892 original, With a foreword by J. Kovalevsky, Bibliothèque Scientifique Albert Blanchard. [Albert Blanchard Scientific Library]. MR 926906
- [Sac60] Richard Sacksteder, On hypersurfaces with no negative sectional curvatures, Amer. J. Math. 82 (1960), 609–630. MR 116292
- [SaH18] Pedro A. S. Salomão and Umberto L. Hryniewicz, Global surfaces of section for Reeb flows in dimension three and beyond, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Rio de Janeiro 2018. Vol. II. Invited lectures, World Sci. Publ., Hackensack, NJ, 2018, pp. 941–967. MR 3966795
- [Spi79] Michael Spivak, A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry. Vol. II, second ed., Publish or Perish, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 1979. MR 532831
- [Tau07] Clifford Henry Taubes, The Seiberg-Witten equations and the Weinstein conjecture, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007), 2117–2202. MR 2350473
- [Wei79] Alan Weinstein, On the hypotheses of Rabinowitz’ periodic orbit theorems, J. Differential Equations 33 (1979), no. 3, 353–358. MR 543704