Hyperbolic manifolds with a large number of systoles
Abstract.
In this article, for any we construct a sequence of compact hyperbolic -manifolds with number of systoles at least as for any . In dimension 3, the bound is improved to . These results generalize previous work of Schmutz for , and Dória-Murillo for to higher dimensions.
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
53C22, 11F061. Introduction
A hyperbolic -manifold is a -dimensional manifold without boundary, equipped with a complete Riemannian metric of constant curvature . Any hyperbolic manifold is isometric to a quotient space , where is the hyperbolic -space and is a torsion-free discrete group of isometries of . In recent years a lot of progress has been made in the study of hyperbolic manifolds with extremal properties. For example, such spaces with minimal volume [Bel14], minimal diameter [BCP21], large systolic length [Mur19] and large kissing number (see below the definitions of systolic length and kissing number). In this article we are interested in hyperbolic manifolds with large kissing number, and their relation with its systolic length and volume.
It is well known that any finite volume hyperbolic manifold contains closed geodesics, and there exists at least one of minimal length, which is called a systole of . The length of any systole of will be called the systolic length of and denoted by .
We define the kissing number of as the number of systoles of . This is a well-defined invariant since, in negative curvature there are finitely many closed geodesics with the same length. This terminology was introduced by Schmutz Schaller, and it was inspired by the classical kissing number of lattices arising in sphere packings (see [Sch96a],[Sch96b],[Sch95]).
In general, it follows from a classical result of Anosov [Ano83] that a generic Riemannian manifold has at most one systole. For a closed hyperbolic -manifold , it is possible to bound by above in terms of or . It follows from works by Keen [Kee74] and Buser [Bus80] that there exist constants depending only on such that if , then
(1.1) |
Recently, Bourque and Petri proved an upper bound of which holds for any systolic length (see [BP22, Theorem 1]). More precisely,
(1.2) |
for some constant which depends only on Since whenever , we can unify the inequalities (1.1) and (1.2) in
(1.3) |
for some constant which depends only on 111We thank the referee for providing us this remark.. However, if is large, Inequality (1.2) implies that
(1.4) |
(see [BP22, Corollary 1.2]). In dimension 2, this result was previously established in by Parlier (see [Par13]). In [FP16], similar upper bounds were established for non-compact hyperbolic surfaces of finite area. Whether a version of (1.2) and (1.4) holds for non-compact finite volume hyperbolic manifolds in remains open.
These restrictions for , and the aforementioned result by Anosov motivated us to study the following question formulated in [Pet20]: Let and
Question 1.
How does grows as a function of ?
Although this question is independent of the size of , it is interesting to understand according to whether is small or large. The first result in this article shows that there exist a sequence of closed hyperbolic manifolds with bounded systolic length, and growing at least as linearly with .
Theorem A.
Let and . Then, there exist positive real numbers with , and a sequence of closed hyperbolic -manifolds such that
-
•
for all ,
-
•
-
•
.
In particular,
for any .
This result shows that the exponent one of in (1.2) is the best possible that we can obtain. The manifolds in Theorem A are obtained by taking cyclic covers of a fix hyperbolic manifold with positive first Betti number. The use of this technique is well known in spectral geometry (see e.g [Ran74]). The proof of Theorem (A) is given in Section 6.
The main part of the article is devoted to give an answer to Question 1 independently on the size of the systoles. For , it follows from results by Schmutz in [Sch95] that
(1.5) |
To prove this result, in [op. cit.] the author constructed a sequence of closed (also non-compact of finite area) hyperbolic surfaces with large kissing number as congruence coverings of a fixed arithmetic hyperbolic surface. It is worth to note that the surfaces also satisfy
More generally, if a sequence of non-diffeomorphic closed hyperbolic -manifolds has growing super linearly in (i.e. for some constants ), then grows logarithmic in . Indeed, it follows from (1.3) since , and implies for any . Hence
(1.6) |
In [Mur19], the third author showed that congruence coverings of closed arithmetic hyperbolic -manifold of the first type have systole with length growing logarithmically in the volume, and determined the precise growth ratio. It is then natural to investigate the kissing number of such manifolds, and to ask whether they can provide a version of (1.5) in higher dimension. In this direction we obtain the following
Theorem B.
For any , there exists a compact arithmetic hyperbolic n-manifold of the first type , and a sequence of congruence coverings of arbitrarily large degree such that
(1.7) |
for some constant independent of . In particular,
for any
Although the systolic length of congruence coverings of arithmetic manifolds is large, exhibiting the systoles in these spaces is a much more delicate problem. We overcome this by constructing containing a totally geodesic surface whose systoles are also systoles of .
Theorem C.
For any , the manifold obtained in Theorem B contains a closed totally geodesic surface such that for any , the congruence coverings contains a congruence covering satisfying
This is the key part of the proof of Theorem B (see Corollary 5.7). The result then follows from an argument of high multiplicity inspired by [Sch95]. The proof is presented in Section 6.
The last part of the article reserves a special attention to dimension . In [DM21], the first and last authors constructed non-compact hyperbolic manifolds satisfying
In this case, the manifolds are congruence coverings of Bianchi orbifolds. Once more, the technique includes ideas by Schmutz, but a new length-trace relation was needed, and also a result on averages of class numbers of imaginary binary forms proved by Sarnak. These results are no longer available in the compact setting. Instead, we have now been able to use the holonomy of closed geodesics. We are able to construct closed arithmetic hyperbolic -manifolds with a large number of systoles using the relation between length and trace of matrices, and a result on the equidistribution of closed geodesics with holonomy in prescribed intervals proved by Sarnak and Wakayama in [SW99] (see also [MMO14]). We finish the article with the proof of the following theorem in Section 7.
Theorem D.
There exists a sequence of compact arithmetic hyperbolic -manifold with going to infinity such that
where is a universal constant.
Comments and an open question. We recall that two positive sequences and satisfy the relation (resp. ) when for any there exists such that (resp. ) for . Hence, the sequences satisfy if and only if and A natural question arising from Theorem B is the following:
Question 2.
Is there a universal such that for any , there is a sequence of closed hyperbolic -manifolds with and
We have already noticed that this would imply
(1.8) |
(see Inequality (1.6)). From the Appendix of [Mur19], for any there is a sequence of compact arithmetic hyperbolic -manifolds with such that
(1.9) |
and the hypothetical bound (1.8) would be considerably larger than the growth in (1.9). While writing this article the authors do not know any improvement for (1.9).
Acknowledgements. We would like to thank the referees for their comments and suggestions which substantially improved the previous version of this article.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Hyperbolic Manifolds
The hyperbolic -space is the complete simply connected -dimensional Riemannian manifold with constant sectional curvature equal to . The hyperboloid model of the hyperbolic -space is given by
with the metric .
The identity component of the Lie group is isomorphic to the orientation preserving isometries of . Given a lattice , i.e, a discrete subgroup having finite covolume with respect to the Haar measure, the associated quotient space is a finite volume hyperbolic orbifold. It is a manifold whenever is torsion-free.
2.2. Systole and Kissing number
We recall that an element in is called
-
•
elliptic, if it has a fixed point on .
-
•
parabolic, if it has exactly one fixed point in .
-
•
loxodromic, if it has two fixed points in .
The displacement at of a loxodromic element is defined by . The displacement of (also called translation length) is defined by
A systole of a hyperbolic orbifold is any closed geodesic of shortest length in , and its length is denoted by . The kissing number is defined as the number of free homotopy classes of oriented closed geodesics in that realize . It is well known that when is a manifold, there exists a one-to-one correspondence between parametrized closed geodesic in up to unit speed reparametrization and conjugacy classes of loxodromic elements in . Moreover, the length of the closed geodesic corresponds to the translation length of the loxodromic element. This relation allows to study and through the number of conjugacy classes of loxodromic elements in that realize as their translation length.
2.3. Clifford algebras and the Spin group
In this section we will recall the construction of spinor groups. These are the algebraic groups associated to fundamental groups of arithmetic hyperbolic orbifolds. For further details, we refer the reader to [Mur19, Section 2], and the references therein.
Let be a field with char , a -dimensional vector space over , and a non-degenerate quadratic form on with associated bilinear form . The Clifford algebra of , denoted by , is a unitary associative algebra over given by the quotient , where denotes the tensor algebra of , and is the two-sided ideal of generated by the elements . If we choose an orthogonal basis of with respect to we have in the relations and for Let be the power set of . For with we define , where we adopt the convention . The elements , determine a basis for . Hence, any is written uniquely as
with . We call the coefficient as the real part of . We identify with , and with the -linear subspace in generated by . The algebra has an anti-involution . On the elements this map acts by , where . The span of the elements with even is a subalgebra of called the even Clifford subalgebra of . The spin group of is defined as
In the case , and , the corresponding spin group is denoted by . For an element the linear map given by lies in , and the map is a two-sheeted covering of , with kernel . Since the image of a lattice under a finite covering map is also a lattice, in order to produce hyperbolic orbifolds we will implicitly contruct lattices in and project them to . Furthermore, we will abuse terminology saying that an element is elliptic (resp. parabolic or loxodromic) if is elliptic (resp. parabolic or loxodromic).
3. Length inequality in
In order to obtain explicitly the systole of a closed manifold , we need to find a hyperbolic element such that for any nontrivial element . As it has been observed in [Mur19], it is useful to estimate the displacement of hyperbolic elements using information about the real part of elements in the spin group. Now we will give a more precise version of this relation. The main tool will be the connection between spin and Vahlen groups established by Elstrodt, Grunewald and Mennicke [EGM87], and a characterization of the translation length by Waterman [Wat93].
Proposition 3.1.
For any loxodromic element we have that
Proof.
Let us consider and the quadratic forms
It is clear that . By [EGM87, Theorem 4.1], any element is the image under a group isomorphism of a matrix with coefficients in the Clifford algebra . More precisely, and following the notation in [loc. cit] a direct computation shows that
(3.1) | ||||
where . Here and denote a basis of orthogonal elements for , and denotes the -algebra homomorphism from to given by
where
(see [EGM87, Section 2]). The important point for us is that are not elements in the center of , and the real part of is equal to that of , for any . Looking at (3.1), this implies that the real part of is determined by the real part of . More precisely
(3.2) |
On the other hand, by [Wat93, Lemma 14]
(3.3) |
where is the multiplier of , and , denote its rotational angles. In this case, and we get by (3.2) and (3.3) that
Hence, , and the proposition follows. ∎
4. Arithmetic subgroups of
4.1. Arithmetic Hyperbolic Manifolds
We recall that a discrete subgroup is arithmetic if there exist a number field , a -algebraic group H, and an epimorphism with compact kernel such that is commensurable to . Here, denotes the ring of integers of and with respect to some fixed embedding of H into . The field is the field of definition of . Any algebraic -group H satisfying these properties is called admissible. A hyperbolic orbifold such that is an arithmetic subgroup of is called an arithmetic hyperbolic orbifold. It follows from Borel and Harish–Chandra’s Theorem that any arithmetic hyperbolic orbifold has finite volume [BHC62].
4.2. Arithmetic groups of the first type
The admissibility condition implies that is a totally real number field, H is a simply-connected algebraic -group, and by fixing an embedding we can assume that (see [BE12, Sec. 2.2] and [Eme09, Sec. 13.1]). Suppose is a totally real number field, and is a quadratic form over . The admissibility of the algebraic -group is equivalent to the fact that has signature over , and is definite for any non-trivial embedding , where is the quadratic form defined on the same -space of , given by . A quadratic form satisfying these conditions will be called an admissible quadratic form. The arithmetic groups commensurable to with admissible, are called arithmetic groups of the first type. For even, any arithmetic subgroup of is of the first type. There is a second class in odd dimensions, arising from skew-hermitian forms over division quaternion algebras. For there is a third class, arising from certain Cayley algebras. In this work we will deal with arithmetic hyperbolic orbifolds of the first type in dimensions .
4.3. Congruence subgroups
Let be an arithmetic subgroup of commensurable with , and the corresponding hyperbolic arithmetic orbifold. If is a non-zero ideal of , the principal congruence subgroup of associated to is the subgroup , where
and denotes the reduction modulo map. The associated principal congruence covering is . Since is a normal finite-index subgroup of , the covering is a regular finite-sheeted covering map. More generally, a discrete subgroup is called a congruence subgroup if for some ideal .
Let be an admissible quadratic form over a totally real number field of degree . We can describe the group and its principal congruence subgroups in the following way. Denote by an orthogonal basis with respect to . Then under the linear representation given by left multiplication in we get
4.4. Length inequality for
For a principal ideal , , we denote simply by . In the same way, we denote by the norm of the ideal . We will present a series of results relating the real part of elements in with that will be necessary in the course of the investigation.
Lemma 4.1.
Let be a nonzero element. For any we have the equality
for some
Proof.
By definition, we can write for some . Since we have
Now, implies that lies in . By taking the equality of real parts, and observing that , the lemma follows with . ∎
The following complement of Lemma 4.1 will also be useful.
Lemma 4.2.
Let be a nonzero element and such that . For any we have the equality
for some
Proof.
Again, we have for some with for some Since for some we can write
Since , then lies in . When we take the real part in the last equality we finish the proof with ∎
Proposition 4.3.
Let be a nonzero element. For any loxodromic element we have
where .
Proof.
See [Mur19, Lemma 4.1]. ∎
4.5. The congruence subgroup
An important example of congruence subgroup which will play a special role in this work is the following. Fix an element . Suppose that is an element of order 2, and define
The group is a normal subgroup of . Indeed, let such that . We note that is a central subgroup of , hence is normal since it is the preimage of this normal subgroup under the natural projection map .
5. Hyperbolic manifolds with a systole lying in a surface
The goal of this section is to show that, under certain conditions, the manifold has a systole contained in a totally geodesic surface.
5.1. A totally geodesic surface embedded in
Let be a totally real number field, and be an admissible -dimensional quadratic space over (see subsection 4.2). Since has signature and , by the Gram-Schmidt process and the Law of Inertia, there exists a basis of such that in this basis has the diagonal form , with and positive for all . In fact, we can suppose that the coefficients are in if we replace by where is a denominator of . By admissibility, is positive definite for any non-trivial Galois embedding , hence and for all .
Let be the subspace generated by , and the restriction of to . The inclusion defines a natural inclusion . For any and of order two, by definition we get an inclusion
Consider an isometric embedding of into equivariant with respect to the actions of and and the inclusions above. For any and as before, we obtain a totally geodesic embedding
(5.1) |
where and . This implies in particular that .
Proposition 5.1.
Let be a nonzero element and such that . Then has order two in . Furthermore, for any loxodromic element we have
Proof.
Indeed, since is contained in a quaternion algebra we have for some with . Hence, the equation implies that . Since the index , we need to estimate the real part of any product with . In this case, by Lemma 4.2, we get
(5.2) |
5.2. Embeddings of quadratic fields in
A direct computation shows that the Clifford algebra is a quaternion algebra of (see [MR03, Section 12.2]). In fact, it coincides with the invariant quaternion algebra. It is well known that closed geodesics in are related with quadratic extensions of that embed in . In this subsection we will recall the important properties of this connection that will be useful in the sequel.
For any the reduced trace , and the reduced norm are elements of . Hence is a root of the quadratic polynomial . If is irreducible over , and is the quadratic extension where splits, then for any fixed root of in , there exists a unique monomorphism such that , is the identity, and for the non-trivial Galois automorphism of over . In particular, via the identification of with , the map coincides with the restriction of ∗ to .
The following proposition is a well-known fact about quaternion algebras which we recall here for reader convenience.
Proposition 5.2.
Let be a loxodromic element. There exist a quadratic extension for some positive, and a -homomorphism such that
Proof.
Consider the irreducible polynomial
(5.3) |
over . Since is loxodromic, has two distinct real roots and , and let be the quadratic extension . Without loss of generality, suppose that . We note that and are roots of , thus there is a unique -homomorphism with . If we define , the equality implies , and then . Moreover, loxodromic implies that , thus . To finish the proof, if we take , otherwise we consider . ∎
By Proposition 5.2, we can write where . Thus we have an isomorphism between the cyclic group generated by in , and the cyclic group generated by in . For each we can write with . In the next result we obtain asymptotic relations between and .
Lemma 5.3.
If is a unit in and then for each , we have
(5.4) |
and
(5.5) |
where the O notation is considered with respect to
Proof.
Recall that a real algebraic integer is a Salem number if is a Galois conjugate of , and the other conjugates of lie on the unit circle. It is well known that the roots of the characteristic polynomial associated to loxodromic elements in are Salem numbers (see [GH01]). In this work, we will only deal with Salem numbers of degree four. The next subsection contains the main result that will be necessary for our purpose.
5.3. Salem numbers of degree four
For the interest of this work, it is important to develop some results about Salem numbers of low degree. Let be a Salem number of degree four. The field is a totally real number subfield of , with nontrivial -isomorphism . Since , there exists a unique nontrivial -isomorphism such that . Hence, the four embeddings of into are the inclusion, , and , where is the extension of the nontrivial -morphism of into . In particular, we can assume that for some .
Now, suppose that there exists such that and for some . Since is the non-trivial -automorphism of then , and
(5.6) |
(5.7) |
Thus and . For geometric reasons, it is important to get Salem numbers in this form such that is not very small. The next proposition shows that we can assume that this property is true up to a small power of .
Proposition 5.4.
Let be a Salem number of degree four. With the previous notations, if , there exists such that with
Proof.
For each , if with , then
Hence, and . Hence if, and only if, On the other hand,
where . Then, it remains to show that for some . Indeed, consider the sets . For each , we have . The lemma is now proven since only contains rational multiples of and Salem numbers do not have conjugates of finite order. ∎
5.4. Congruence subgroups with explicit elements of minimal displacement
The purpose of this section is to construct hyperbolic manifolds with systole lying in a totally geodesic surface. More specifically, we are looking for conditions on and such that the manifold has a systole in (see Section 5.1). Since , it is necessary to bound from below. Proposition 4.3 and Proposition 5.1 show that this require a lower bound for the norm of in the base field , which at the same time implies that the Galois conjugates of cannot be very small. We are able to find such when is a real quadratic number field.
In the sequel, we consider the definitions of , as in Section 5.1, and a real quadratic field, with the nontrivial embedding of into .
Lemma 5.5.
Let be a primitive loxodromic element with . There exists which depends only on such that with , and
Moreover, if , then the following asymptotic relation
holds for some constant which depends only on .
Proof.
By Proposition 5.2 and the discussion in Section 5.1, the element corresponds to a Salem number , and is a quadratic extension of . Since is a real quadratic number field, is a Salem number of degree four. By Proposition 5.4, there exists such that with . For convenience, we can rewrite
where and . It is straightforward to check that
If is given by then
where and . Since we conclude that . The asymptotic behaviour of follows directly from (5.4) and the equality ∎
We will now prove that for any primitive element producing a closed geodesic with length sufficiently large, some power with uniformly bounded realizes the systole of some congruence hyperbolic -manifold.
Proposition 5.6.
There exists a universal constant such that for any loxodromic element with we can find depending only on with , for some and
where is the class of modulo .
Proof.
Fix loxodromic with real part . By Lemma 5.5 there exists depending only on such that for some with . Let , it follows from Proposition 5.1 that . Hence, if we denote by the class of , we have
If , since , Proposition 4.3 gives us that
Since , by Proposition 3.1, in order to show that it is sufficient to guarantee that . By Lemma 5.5 and Equation (5.4) we have
Hence, whenever is sufficiently large.
Analogously, if and , we have by Lemma 4.2 that
And whenever which holds whenever is large enough. ∎
The previous result has Theorem C mentioned in Introduction as geometric counterpart. We recall it as a corollary, adapted to the terminology used so far.
Corollary 5.7.
With the notation as in Proposition 5.6, the hyperbolic manifold contains the totally geodesic surface with
Proof.
Indeed, by Proposition 5.6, we exhibit a loxodromic element in , namely , of minimal displacement in . In particular this element is also of minimal displacement in . Hence, its length is at same time the systolic length of and ∎
6. Proof of Theorem A and Theorem B
Any closed geodesic on a hyperbolic manifold is parametrized by a constant speed curve from the circle to and we can identify the geodesic with the equivalence class of such parametrization up to reparametrization. Let be a closed geodesic, we say that is primitive if is injective, i.e. if is an embedding. Any closed geodesic is a -fold iterate of some primitive geodesic , i.e. there exists such that (up to reparametrizations of and ). We note that is uniquely determined by the relation and because of this, we call it as the order of .
Let be a covering map between two hypebolic -orbifolds and , we recall that a closed geodesic lifts to if there is a closed geodesic such that . In this case, we say that is a lift of .
We note that the deck group is always finite whenever and have finite volume. In the sequel, we consider the natural action of on the set of closed geodesics of .
Lemma 6.1.
Let be a covering map between the hyperbolic -orbifolds and of finite volume, and let .
-
(1)
If are closed geodesics on which are liftings of two distinct closed geodesics on respectively, then the orbits and are disjoint.
-
(2)
If is a closed geodesic on of order which lifts, then for any lifting its isotropy group has at most elements.
Proof.
Indeed, if (up to reparametrization of , and ) then which proves . For we can suppose that and where . With this identification, the group can be seen as , where denotes the normalizer of in . Moreover, a closed geodesic on can be associated with a conjugacy class of a loxodromic element . The action of on the set of closed geodesics is given by . If denotes a closed geodesic of order on , we can use the same notation for its lifting on since . Hence means that for some , then commutes with . By hypothesis, , and for results in hyperbolic geometry we have that the centralizer of is the cyclic group generated by . Therefore, . ∎
Remark 1.
Let be a closed hyperbolic -manifold and let be a totally geodesic submanifold. If are distinct primitive closed geodesics on then and are distinct primitive closed geodesics in . Indeed, if is a -folded iterated of for some primitive , we have and , thus is a closed geodesic on and then . In particular, if then .
Proof of Theorem A.
For each we can consider a fixed closed arithmetic hyperbolic -manifold of the first type . By [Xue92, Main Theorem] there exists a sequence of congruence coverings of such that , since . Moreover, it follows from [Mur17, Theorem 6.1] that . Hence, given we can suppose that we have a closed hyperbolic -manifold with and .
If we write where , then there exists an epimorphism . Let be the cyclic cover of degree obtained by the kernel of the map
Let be a nontrivial loxodromic element of minimal displacement satisfying . If corresponds to the closed geodesic induced by , then is lifted for all covering , thus for all .
For any , there exists a closed geodesic on whose lifting in satisfies . Let be the deck group of the covering . We claim that the isotropy subgroup of under the action of has cardinality at most for some constant which does not depend on . Indeed, for some primitive closed geodesic . Hence,
Therefore, by Lemma 6.1 the order of the isotropy group of by the action of the deck group is bounded from above by
For any prime with we conclude that the orbit has elements. Putting all the information above together, we have proved that for any , and . Thus, the theorem is proved with and . ∎
We are now ready to present the proof of Theorem B.
Proof of Theorem B.
Let denote the number of conjugacy classes of loxodromic elements in with reduced trace equal to . By the Prime Geodesic Theorem there is a sequence such that (see [Sch95])
For each with large enough, for some loxodromic element . Let us now consider
Furthermore, take and as given in Lemma 5.5 and Proposition 5.6. Then the manifold and the totally geodesic surface satisfy (see Remark 1)
(6.1) |
On the other hand, take the isometry group acting on the set of closed geodesics of . By Lemma 6.1(1), if we denote by the systoles of embedded in , the orbit sets , are pairwise disjoint. It follows that
(6.2) | ||||
(6.3) |
where denotes the isotropy group of under the action of . By Lemma 6.1(2), is at most the order of , and this is smaller than a fixed constant since . Therefore, we get from (6.1) and (6.3) that
Since , the above inequality becomes
(6.4) |
The goal now is to bound from below in terms of . Since has index two in , then
(6.5) |
Note that the norm of the ideal goes to infinity (see Lemma 5.5), thus we can apply the results in [Mur19, Section 5] along with the fact that , to obtain the following
7. The three-dimensional case
7.1. Hyperbolic 3-manifolds
In the three-dimensional case it will be convenient to consider the upper-half model of the hyperbolic -space given by
with the Riemannian metric . Note that we realize as a subset of Hamilton’s quaternion algebra
where we represent a point as a Hamiltonian quaternion
where . Moreover acts by isometries on , and this action is described as follows. For each
where the inverse is taken in the skew field of Hamilton’s quaternions. This action is not faithful since acts trivially, but the finite quotient is isomorphic to (see [EGM13, Chapter. 1]). As we have already observed with Spin groups, there is no loss of generality in identifying elements in with their projection in . We recall that an element is said to be:
-
•
elliptic if is conjugate to ,
-
•
parabolic if is conjugate to ,
-
•
loxodromic if is conjugate to ,
We define the trace of as
where is chosen so that with and .
Consider the eigenvalues of as the eigenvalues of a lift to . Hence the roots of the characteristic polynomial relative to are
These are the eigenvalues of one of the representatives of , and we denote by the eigenvalue with norm greater than one. We also choose the branch of the argument function on with . It is well-known that determines the translation length of a . More precisely,
(7.1) |
The holonomy of is defined as
(7.2) |
We end this section by recalling how can be determined from .
Proposition 7.1.
For any loxodromic element we have
In particular
7.2. Arithmetic Kleinian groups
A Kleinian group is a discrete group of . Let be a number field with exactly one complex place and let be a quaternion algebra over ramified at all real places. A Kleinian group is arithmetic if it is commensurable with the projection , where be a -embedding of into and denotes the group of elements of reduced norm one of an order of . When we say that is derived from a quaternion algebra.
A hyperbolic -orbifold is arithmetic if is an arithmetic Kleinian group. For explicity examples, consider for each square-free positive integer the Kleinian group , where is the ring of integers of These groups are known as Bianchi groups (see [EGM13, Chapter 7]).
Let be a quaternion algebra over a number field , with ring of integers . For any ideal , and any order we have an ideal defined by
The principal congruence subgroup of of level is then given by
Suppose that is a Kleinian group. We will denote by the preimage of by the natural projection of into . In particular, if is arithmetic derived from a quaternion algebra, then for some order . In this way, for any ideal we define the principal congruence subgroup of of level as the projection of onto . If is a principal ideal, generated by , we denote by instead of . The key fact about congruence subgroups is the following lemma (Compare with Lemma (4.1)).
Lemma 7.2.
For any we have
Proof.
Let , by definition we can write , with . Since and (see [KSV07, Lemma 3.3]), we have
Therefore , and then . ∎
7.3. Displacement estimates for congruence subgroups
We will now construct hyperbolic 3-orbifolds for which we can determine their set of systoles. Before that, we introduce some notation that will be convenient for this purpose.
Let be the surjective holomorphic map given by , and let . We observe that, if is loxodromic, and with largest eigenvalue , then . On the other hand, is a continuous map from to . If we write in its polar coordinates with , we have that
Thus, if, and only if, . Moreover, if and we obtain
(7.3) |
Proposition 7.3.
Let be an imaginary quadratic field, and an arithmetic Kleinian group derived from a quaternion algebra over . Then, there exist such that if is a loxodromic element with
then realizes the systole of .
Proof.
By hypothesis, there exist a quaternion algebra over , an order of and a -monomorphism of algebras such that . Hence, we can assume that
Suppose that , and let be a representative of in . By definition
and . Since in we get that , and then .
Now, let be the eigenvalue of with . By (7.1) we have . Since we get that
Our purpose is to give conditions on such that this inequality becomes an equality. Let be a loxodromic element. There exists a representative, say , of with . It follows from Lemma 7.2 that, if , then for some and . If with , since , then can be rewritten as
(7.4) |
By (7.1) it is sufficient to show that . We will divide our analysis in two cases:
Case 1. : Since is a quadratic field, we have , and then . Firstly, we can rewrite (7.4) as
(7.5) | ||||
(7.6) |
where is defined on . Since for any , it follows that for any there exists such that for with , it holds In particular, we can choose such that implies
Case 2. : Since is a quadratic imaginary field, is a root of unity. In particular, is an algebraic integer of degree , where denotes the Euler’s totient function (see [Lan94, Chapter IV, Theorem 2]). Since has degree , we conclude that , i.e. , where is a primitive sixth root of unity.
By Proposition 7.1 we have that
However, and then Equation (7.4) implies that
Hence, we can guarantee that whenever
(7.7) |
for any . In order to compute the difference , we consider the map defined on , by
where and are fixed. In this way Inequality (7.7) is equivalent to
(7.8) |
for any . We then look for conditions on such that (7.8) holds for any . It is clear that for any and , so we can assume that .
It is straightforward to check that
.
Hence, if , since we have for all . It follows from that
(7.9) |
and
(7.10) |
Therefore whenever
(7.11) |
Suppose now that . If then (7.11) follows from (7.9). On the other hand, if , by (7.10) we get , and together with (7.9) we obtain that
from which (7.11) follows. Then, if , then by (7.3) and the fact that . Therefore (7.8) follows as desired.
Since and , we conclude from the analysis of the two cases for (with given in Case 1), and , that if and , then minimizes the set of displacements of , and therefore
∎
7.4. Proof of Theorem D
Let be a loxodromic element. We can associate to the complex number . Thus, by construction in Section (7.1) we have that is the trace of some lifting of in . Thereby, we will adopt as the trace of the complex number written as
Note that this definition of trace remains invariant under conjugation and extend the definition of trace to the conjugacy class of any subgroup of . For a complex number we will define the norm of as the nonnegative real number . If is a Kleinian group, we define (resp. ) as the number of primitive conjugacy classes of with norm of trace at most and holonomy in counted with multiplicity (resp. counted without multipliticy). By definition, the mean multiplicity is given by
These definitions will be convenient for presenting the following proposition.
Proposition 7.4.
Let be an arithmetic Kleinian group derived from a quaternion algebra over an imaginary quadratic field . For any subinterval , let be the mean multiplicity of primitive conjugacy classes of with trace of norm at most and holonomy contained in . Then there exists a constant depending only on and such that
Proof.
Let be the ring of integers of . For any conjugacy class we have . Moreover, if , then the norm of is at most . For any and , consider
By [SW99, Corollary] (see also [MMO14, Thm. 1.3] for a more explicit statement), there exists a constant which depends only on such that
Hence, is at least , implying that
(7.12) |
for some constant depending only on and sufficiently large.
On the other hand, since is a lattice in , there exists a constant depending only on such that
(see [Lan94, Ch. V, Thm. 2]). Hence, when is big enough we have
(7.13) |
Thus, if we combine the asymptotic bounds (7.12) and (7.13), by the definition of mean multiplicity there exists a constant which depends only in and such that
∎
We are now ready to finish the proof of Theorem D. In fact, we will state a more precise result which implies that every commensurability class of arithmetic hyperbolic -manifolds with imaginary quadratic invariant trace field contains a sequence of manifolds with kissing number as stated. It is well known by the Classification Theorem of Quaternions Algebras over number fields (see [MR03, Theorem 7.3.6]) that there exist compact and non compact arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds with this property.
Theorem 7.5.
Let be an arithmetic Kleinian group with an imaginary quadratic invariant trace field. There exists a sequence of torsion-free subgroups of with arbitrarily large index such that the corresponding sequence of finite volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds satisfies
for some constant which does not depend on .
Proof.
We can suppose that is derived from a quaternion algebra since has finite index in and is derived from a quaternion algebra ([MR03, Corollary 8.3.5]).
Consider the constants and given in Proposition 7.3, and let be the invariant trace field of . If we set , then by Proposition 7.4 there exists a sequence of traces with such that the number of primitive conjugacy classes of with trace satisfy
where .
By Lemma (7.2), if is large enough, or . Thus we can assume that for sufficiently large is torsion-free and for all . Now we can argue as in theorem B.
Let be a set of representatives of all primitive conjugacy classes in of trace , and let be a subgroup of isometries of . By Proposition 7.3, each , and their induced closed geodesics are systoles of . Since has order , by Lemma 6.1 we have that
It is a well-known fact that for some constant , which does not depend on (see [Mak13],[KSV07] or [Kuc15]). Moreover, for all , where . Putting together the inequalities above, as in the proof of Theorem B, we obtain that
for any , where does not depend on .
∎
References
- [Ano83] Dmitry V Anosov, On generic properties of closed geodesics, Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya 21 (1983), no. 1, 1.
- [BCP21] Thomas Budzinski, Nicolas Curien, and Bram Petri, On the minimal diameter of closed hyperbolic surfaces, Duke Mathematical Journal 170 (2021), no. 2, 365–377.
- [BE12] Mikhail Belolipetsky and Vincent Emery, On volumes of arithmetic quotients of , n odd, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 105 (2012), no. 3, 541–570.
- [Bel14] Mikhail Belolipetsky, Hyperbolic orbifolds of small volume, Proceeding of the International Congress of Mathematicans, ICM 2014, 2014, pp. 837–851.
- [BHC62] Armand Borel and Harish-Chandra, Arithmetic subgroups of algebraic groups, Annals of Mathematics 75 (1962), no. 3, 485–535.
- [BP22] Maxime Fortier Bourque and Bram Petri, Kissing numbers of closed hyperbolic manifolds, Amer. J. Math. 144 (2022), no. 4, 1067–1085.
- [Bus80] Peter Buser, On Cheeger’s inequality , Geometry of the Laplace operator (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1979) (1980), 29–77.
- [DM21] Cayo Dória and Plinio Murillo, Hyperbolic 3-manifolds with large kissing number, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 149 (2021), no. 11, 4595–4607.
- [EGM87] Jürgen Elstrodt, Fritz Grunewald, and Jens Mennicke, Vahlen’s group of Clifford matrices and spin-groups, Mathematische Zeitschrift 196 (1987), no. 3, 369–390.
- [EGM13] by same author, Groups acting on hyperbolic space: Harmonic analysis and number theory, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
- [Eme09] Vincent Emery, Du volume des quotients arithmétiques de l’espace hyperbolique, Ph.D. thesis, University of Fribourg Fribourg, Switzerland, 2009.
- [FP16] Federica Fanoni and Hugo Parlier, Systoles and kissing numbers of finite area hyperbolic surfaces, Algebraic & Geometric Topology 15 (2016), no. 6, 3409–3433.
- [Gen15] Matthieu Gendulphe, Systole et rayon interne des variétés hyperboliques non compactes, Geometry and Topology 19 (2015), no. 4, 2039–2080.
- [GH01] Eknath Ghate and Eriko Hironaka, The arithmetic and geometry of Salem numbers, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 38 (2001), no. 3, 293–314.
- [Kee74] Linda Keen, Collars on Riemann surfaces, Discontinuous groups and Riemann surfaces (Proc. Conf., Univ. Maryland, College Park, Md., 1973), 1974, pp. 263–268.
- [KSV07] Mikhail Katz, Mary Schaps, and Uzi Vishne, Logarithmic growth of systole of arithmetic Riemann surfaces along congruence subgroups, Journal of Differential Geometry 76 (2007), no. 3, 399–422.
- [Kuc15] Robert Kucharczyk, Modular embeddings and rigidity for Fuchsian groups, Acta Arithmetica 169 (2015), no. 1, 77–100.
- [Lan94] Serge Lang, Algebraic number theory, vol. 110, Springer-Verlag New York, 1994.
- [Mak13] Shotaro Makisumi, A note on Riemann surfaces of large systole, Journal of the Ramanujan Mathematical Society 28 (2013), no. 3, 359–377.
- [MMO14] Gregory Margulis, Amir Mohammadi, and Hee Oh, Closed geodesics and holonomies for Kleinian manifolds, Geometric and Functional Analysis 24 (2014), no. 5, 1608–1636.
- [MR03] Colin Maclachlan and Alan W. Reid, The arithmetic of hyperbolic 3-manifolds, vol. 219, Springer, 2003.
- [Mur17] Plinio G P Murillo, On arithmetic manifolds with large systole, Ph.D. thesis, IMPA, 2017.
- [Mur19] by same author, Systole of congruence coverings of arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds, Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics 13 (2019), no. 3, 1083–1102.
- [Par13] Hugo Parlier, Kissing numbers for surfaces, Journal of Topology 6 (2013), no. 3, 777–791.
- [Pet20] Bram Petri, Extremal problems and probabilistic methods in hyperbolic geometry, Available at https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~bram.petri/notes_eppmhg_200825.pdf.
- [Ran74] Burton Randol, Small eigenvalues of the Laplace operator on compact Riemann surfaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 80 (1974), 996–1000. MR 400316
- [Sch95] Paul Schmutz, Extremal Riemann surfaces with a large number of systoles., extremal Riemann surfaces (san francisco, ca, 1995), 9–19, Contemp. Math 201 (1995).
- [Sch96a] by same author, Arithmetic Fuchsian groups and the number of systoles, Mathematische Zeitschrift 223 (1996), no. 1, 13–25.
- [Sch96b] by same author, Compact Riemann surfaces with many systoles, Duke Mathematical Journal 84 (1996), no. 1, 191–198.
- [SW99] Peter Sarnak and Masato Wakayama, Equidistribution of holonomy about closed geodesics, Duke mathematical journal 100 (1999), no. 1, 1–58.
- [Wat93] Peter Waterman, Möbius transformations in several dimensions, Advances in Mathematics 101 (1993), no. 1, 87–113.
- [Xue92] X Xue, On the Betti numbers of a hyperbolic manifold, Geometric & Functional Analysis GAFA 2 (1992), no. 1, 126–136.