Increasing rate of weighted product of partial quotients in continued fractions
Abstract
Let be the continued fraction expansion of . In this paper, we study the increasing rate of the weighted product ,where are weights. More precisely, let be a function with as . For any with and at least one , the Hausdorff dimension of the set
is obtained. Under the condition that with , we also obtain the Hausdorff dimension of the set
keywords:
Continued fractions, Hausdorff dimension, Product of partial quotientsMSC:
[2010] Primary 11K50, Secondary 37E05, 28A801 Introduction
Each irrational number admits a unique continued fraction expansion of the from
(1.1) |
where for each , the positive integers are known as the partial quotients of The partial quotients can be generated by using the Gauss transformation defined as
(1.2) |
In fact, let (where denotes the integral part of real number). Then for . Sometimes (1.1) is written as Further, the -th convergent of is defined by
The metrical aspect of the theory of continued fractions has been very well studied due to its close connections with Diophantine approximation. For example, for any the famous Jarník-Besicovitch set
can be described by using continued fractions. In fact,
(1.3) |
For further details about this connection we refer to [11]. Thus the growth rate of the partial quotients reveals how well a real number can be approximated by rationals.
The well-known Borel-Bernstein Theorem [3, 4] states that for Lebesgue almost all holds for finitely many or infinitely many according to the convergence or divergence of the series respectively. However, for rapidly growing function the Borel-Bernstein Theorem does not give any conclusive information other than Lebesgue measure zero. To distinguish the sizes of zero Lebesgue measure sets, Hausdorff dimension is considered as an appropriate conception and has gained much importance in the metrical theory of continued fractions. Jarník [14] proved that the set of real numbers with bounded partials quotients has full Hausdorff dimension. Later on, Good [11] showed that the Hausdorff dimension of the set of numbers whose partial quotients tend to infinity is one half.
After that, a lot of work has been done in the direction of improving Borel-Bernstein Theorem, for example, the Hausdorff dimension of sets when partial quotients obeys different conditions has been obtained in [6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20].
Motivation for studying the growth rate of the products of consecutive partial quotients aroses from the works of Davenport-Schmidt [5] and Kleinbock-Wadleigh [16] where they considered improvements to Dirichlet’s theorem. Let be a monotonically decreasing function, where is fixed. Denote by the set of all real numbers for which the system
has a nontrivial integer solution for all large enough . A real number (resp. ) will be referred to as -Dirichlet improvable (resp. -Dirichlet non-improvable) number.
The starting point for the work of Davenport-Schmidt [5] and Kleinbock-Wadleigh [16, Lemma 2.2] is an observation that Dirichlet improvability is equivalent to a condition on the growth rate of the products of two consecutive partial quotients. Precisely, they observed that
Then
where i.m. stands for infinitely many.
In other words, a real number is -Dirichlet improvable if and only if the products of consecutive partial quotients of do not grow quickly. We refer the reader to [1, 2, 10, 12, 13] for more metrical results related with the set of Dirichlet non-improvable numbers.
As a consequence of Borel-Bernstein Theorem, for almost all there exists a subsequence of partial quotients tending to infinity with a linear speed. In other words, for Lebesgue almost every
Taking inspirations from the study of the growth rate of the products of consecutive partial quotients for the real numbers, in this paper we consider the growth rate of the products of the consecutive weighted partial quotients. More precisely, by [2, Theorem 1.4], we have for Lebesgue almost all
(1.4) |
where . This paper is concerned with Hausdorff dimension of some exceptional sets of (1.4). Let be a function satisfying as and let . Define the sets
and
The study of the level sets about the growth rate of relative to that of was discussed in [12]. Let be an integer and be a positive function. The Lebesgue measure and the Hausdorff dimension of the set
(1.5) |
have been comprehensively determined by Huang-Wu-Xu [13]. Very recently the results of [13] were generalized by Bakhtawar-Hussain-Kleinbock-Wang [2] to a weighted generalization of the set (1.5). For more details we refer the reader to [2, 13].
Our main results are as follows.
Theorem 1.1.
Let be a function satisfying as . Write
Assume . Then for any with and at least one ,
Theorem 1.2.
Let be a function satisfying as . Write
Assume . Then for any with , we have
Remark 1.1.
Note that in Theorem 1.2 we are only able to treat the case when the sequence is nondecreasing. We would like to drop this monotonic condition. Indeed, our method for the upper bound is true for all sequences . However, when dealing with the lower bound, the sequence we construct (see the proof for details) might not be bounded away from 0 once we drop the monotonic condition, which is important in constructing a suitable subset of .
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we fix some notations and recall some known results in theory of continued fraction expansions.
For an irrational number , recall is the -th partial quotient of in its continued fraction expansion. The sequences are the numerator and denominator of the -th convergent of . It is well-known that and can be obtain by the following recursive relations (see [15]):
(2.1) |
with the conventions and .
For any -tuple with , we call
a cylinder of order .
Note that and are determined by the first partial quotients of . So all points in determine the same and . Hence for simplicity, if there is no confusion, we write , and to denote , and for respectively.
The following lemma is a collection of basic facts on continued fractions which can be found in the book of Khintchine [15].
Lemma 2.1.
For any , let and be given recursively by (2.1). Then
(1)
(2)
(3)
and for any the derivative of is given by
The next theorem, known as Legendre’s Theorem, connects 1-dimensional Diophantine approximation with continued fractions.
Theorem 2.1 (Legendre).
Let be an irreducible rational number. Then
According to Legendre’s theorem if an irrational is “well” approximated by a rational , then this rational must be a convergent of . So, the continued fraction expansions is a quick and efficient tool for finding good rational approximations to real numbers. For more basic properties of continued fraction expansions, one can refer to [15]. We also give some auxiliary results on the Hausdorff dimension theory of continued fractions that will be used later.
Lemma 2.2 ([6]).
Let be a sequence of positive integers tending to infinity, then for any positive integer number ,
Applying Lemma 2.3, we obtain the follwing corollary which will be useful for the upper bound estimation on
Corollary 2.1.
For any and with and at least one ,
Proof.
Denote . It is clear that for some
From Lemma 2.3, we deduce that for some
Then the desired results are obtained. ∎
3 Proof of theorem 1.1
Let be a positive function with as . For any with and at least one , we introduce the sets
and
In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we first give a complete characterization on the size of the sets and in terms of Hausdorff dimension.
Proposition 3.1.
For any with and at least one ,
We remark that recently Zhang ([21]) obtained the Hausdorff dimension results of and for the special case ,
3.1 Proof of Proposition 3.1
To prove Proposition 3.1, we start with the following lemma.
Lemma 3.1.
For any with and at least one ,
Proof.
Denote by the set above and . It is evident that
So,
In the following, we give the upper bound for .
Step I. We find a cover for . For any ,
It is clear that , since , and by [11, Lemma 1], we have for any . So it is sufficient to estimate the upper bound for . For any , set
Hence,
(3.1) |
Step II. We construct a family of Bernoulli measures on . For each and any put
where It is easy to see that
and
So the measures are well defined by Kolmogorov’s consistency theorem.
Fix and set . Choose sufficiently large such that
(3.2) |
where .
Now we are ready to prove Proposition 3.1.
Proof of Proposition 3.1: We see that The proof is divided into two cases according to or .
On the other hand,
Thus,
(2) If , by the definition of limsup, for any ,
Therefore
Applying Corollary 2.1, we obtain
By the arbritrary of , we have
On the other hand,
Let us give a proof of Theorem 1.1.
3.2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Lower bound: It is trivial for , so we only need to consider the case .
We construct a suitable Cantor subset of in two steps.
Step I. Since for any , we have for large enough. Hence,
We define a sequence : For , let
Define . Clearly,
(3.4) |
By the first part of (3.4),
Hence
(3.5) |
We claim that
(3.6) |
In fact, on the one hand, in view of the second part of (3.4), we see at once that
For the opposite inequality, let . Notice that for many consecutive s, the number will be the same. More precisely, if , if , Let be the sequence of all s in the strictly increasing order. Then we obtain and thus
Let
We claim that
where . In fact, by the first part of (3.4) and (3.6), we can check that
On the other hand,
Step II. We use the sequence and to construct a subset of Define
Taking , we conclude
∎
4 Proof of Theorem 1.2
In this section, we give a proof of Theorem 1.2. We adopt the strategies in [19]. The proof of the theorem splits into two parts: finding the upper bound and the lower bound separately.
Upper bound: For , for any , there exist infinitely many such that
Then by [2, Theorem 1.5],
Lower bound: We construct a suitable Cantor subset of in two steps.
Step I. We will construct a sequence of positive real numbers such that
and
For all , let Since , as , is well defined. Thus, for all . We claim that
If not, there exists such that for any , Then for , which contradicts to the definition of .
We define a sequence as follows:
(4.1) | ||||
Since with and is nondecreasing, we have for all . Thus
(4.2) |
We also claim that
(4.3) |
In order to prove (4.3), we first show that
(4.4) |
If not, there exists such that for any ,
Now we begin to prove (4.3). If the equality (4.4) holds for some such that , then , and the equality (4.4) holds for , since
By the fact that for infinitely many , we can repeat this argument until we get to some such that . Then the desired result is obtained.
Step II. We use the sequence to construct a subset of
By as , we choose an increasing sequence such that for each
Let if and
For any , there exists such that . Then
(4.9) |
and
(4.10) |
For any take . Then we have as .
Acknowledgements
A. Bakhtawar is supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Project (ARC Grant DP180100201) and J. Feng is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 11901204). J. Feng would like to thank China Scholarship Council financial support (No. 202106160053). The authors are grateful to Professor Lingmin Liao for helpful discussions.
References
References
- [1] A. Bakhtawar. Hausdorff dimension for the set of points connected with the generalized Jarník-Besicovitch set. J. Aust. Math. Soc., 112(1):1–29, 2022.
- [2] A. Bakhtawar, M. Hussain, D. Kleinbock, and B.-W. Wang. Metrical properties for the weighted products of multiple partial quotients in continued fractions. Pre-Print: https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11212, 2022.
- [3] F. Bernstein. Über eine Anwendung der Mengenlehre auf ein aus der Theorie der säkularen Störungen herrührendes Problem. Math. Ann., 71(3):417–439, 1911.
- [4] E. Borel. Sur un problème de probabilités relatif aux fractions continues. Math. Ann., 72(4):578–584, 1912.
- [5] H. Davenport and W.-M. Schmidt. Dirichlet’s theorem on diophantine approximation. In Symposia Mathematica, Vol. IV (INDAM, Rome, 1968/69), pages 113–132. Academic Press, London, 1970.
- [6] A. Fan, L.-M. Liao, B.-W. Wang, and J. Wu. On the fast Khintchine spectrum in continued fractions. Monatsh. Math., 171(3-4):329–340, 2013.
- [7] A.-H. Fan, L.-M. Liao, B.-W. Wang, and J. Wu. On Khintchine exponents and Lyapunov exponents of continued fractions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 29(1):73–109, 2009.
- [8] L.-L. Fang, J. Ma, and K.-K. Song. Some exceptional sets of Borel-Bernstein theorem in continued fractions. Ramanujan J., 56(3):891–909, 2021.
- [9] D.-J. Feng, J. Wu, J.-C. Liang, and S. Tseng. Appendix to the paper by T. Łuczak—a simple proof of the lower bound: “On the fractional dimension of sets of continued fractions”. Mathematika, 44(1):54-55, 1997.
- [10] J. Feng and J. Xu. Sets of Dirichlet non-improvable numbers with certain order in the theory of continued fractions. Nonlinearity, 34(3):1598–1611, 2021.
- [11] I.-J. Good. The fractional dimensional theory of continued fractions. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 37:199–228, 1941.
- [12] L.-L. Huang and J. Wu. Uniformly non-improvable Dirichlet set via continued fractions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 147(11):4617–4624, 2019.
- [13] L.-L. Huang, J. Wu, and J. Xu. Metric properties of the product of consecutive partial quotients in continued fractions. Israel J. Math., 238(2):901–943, 2020.
- [14] V. Jarnik. Zur Theorie der diophantischen Approximationen. Monatsh. Math. Phys., 39(1):403–438, 1932.
- [15] A.-Y. Khintchine. Continued Fractions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, 1964.
- [16] D. Kleinbock and N. Wadleigh. A zero-one law for improvements to Dirichlet’s Theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 146(5):1833–1844, 2018.
- [17] T. Łuczak. On the fractional dimension of sets of continued fractions. Mathematika, 44(1):50–53, 1997.
- [18] L.-M. Liao and M. Rams. Subexponentially increasing sums of partial quotients in continued fraction expansions. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 160(3):401–412, 2016.
- [19] L.-M. Liao and M. Rams. Upper and lower fast Khintchine spectra in continued fractions. Monatsh. Math., 180(1):65–81, 2016.
- [20] B.-W. Wang and J. Wu. Hausdorff dimension of certain sets arising in continued fraction expansions. Adv. Math., 218(5):1319–1339, 2008.
- [21] L.-L. Zhang. Set of extremely Dirichlet non-improvable points. Fractals, 28(02):2050034, 2020.