This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Influences of non-standard interactions on PeV neutrino events with and without a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry

Qiu-Xia Yi 1020221818@glut.edu.cn    Ya-Ru Wang 1020231946@glut.edu.cn    Shu-Jun Rong rongshj@glut.edu.cn College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
Abstract

The recently reported astrophysical neutrinos events in the TeV-PeV energy range open a winder to explore new physics at energy frontiers. In this paper, we examine effects of non-standard interactions (NSIs) on the PeV neutrinos events. We consider NSIs with and without a gauge symmetry LαL_{\alpha} - LβL_{\beta}. We find that, for typical μ±\mu^{\pm} damping and π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources, the NSI with an extra gauge symmetry has more noticeable effects on the PeV events. Therefore, the detection of the events in the upcoming experiments could set stringent constraints on the NSI parameters in the LαL_{\alpha} - LβL_{\beta} symmetric case.

I Introduction

Searching for signals of physics beyond the standard model (SM) is an active field in particle physics, which is mainly focused on the precision or energy frontier. Recent observed astrophysical neutrino events in the TeV-PeV energy rangeAartsen et al. (2013a, b, 2014, 2016); Abbasi et al. (2022) provide a probe to explore new physics such as Lorentz invariance violationColladay and Kostelecky (1998); Coleman and Glashow (1999); Kostelecky and Mewes (2004); Roberts (2021); Zhang and Yang (2022), neutrino decayBeacom et al. (2003); Meloni and Ohlsson (2007); Baerwald et al. (2012); Pagliaroli et al. (2015); Bustamante et al. (2017); Denton and Tamborra (2018); Huang and Zhou (2024); Valera et al. (2024), pseudo-Dirac neutrinosKobayashi and Lim (2001); Beacom et al. (2004); Carloni et al. (2024); Rink and Sen (2024); Franklin et al. (2023), non-unitary leptonic mixing matrixAntusch and Fischer (2014); Blennow et al. (2023); Aloni and Dery (2024), non-standard interaction (NSI)Huitu et al. (2016); Adamson et al. (2017); Esteban et al. (2018); Agarwalla et al. (2020); Masud et al. (2021); Abbasi et al. (2021a); Bakhti and Rajaee (2021); Brahma and Giri (2022); Lazo Pedrajas (2024). Based on a direct modification of the Lagrangian of SM, NSIs of neutrinos could change their flavor oscillation. The NSI parameters are constrained by atmospheric neutrinos Fornengo et al. (2002); Abbasi et al. (2021a), long-baseline oscillationAdamson et al. (2017); Bakhti and Rajaee (2021), and the coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments like COHERENTLiao et al. (2024). In this paper, we investigate the constrains on NSI parameters with the updated data of IceCubeAbbasi et al. (2023) and examine the effects of NSI on astrophysical neutrino events at PeV energies.

The influence of NSI on neutrino oscillation is parameterized by a 3×33\times 3 Hamiltonian matrix. The matrix contains 9 real parameters, which makes predictions on the deviation from the standard oscillation complex at high energies. In the case where the NSI satisfies some symmetry, the form of the Hamiltonian can be simplified. A well-known example is the gauge symmetry LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta}He et al. (1991), where α,β\alpha,\beta represents e,μ,τe,\mu,\tau. Furthermore, if the mass of the extra gauge boson is tiny, the propagation of neutrinos could be impacted by a long-range potentialBustamante and Agarwalla (2019); Coloma et al. (2021); Agarwalla et al. (2023, 2024). In this case, the Hamiltonian matrix of NSI is diagonal in the flavor bases. The long-range interaction parameters are constrained by the results of neutrino oscillations experiments and IceCube observations. For astrophysical neutrinos, the effect of the long-range potential on the flavor ratio at Earth is mainly considered. However, because of the limitation of the resolution of neutrino flavor at IceCube, the constraint on the flavor ratio is loose at present. In this paper, we examine effects of the NSI satisfying a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry on the PeV astrophysical neutrinos to complement the work on the long-range interaction influences. To be specific, we study the impacts of the NSI potential on the Glashow resonance eventsGlashow (1960); Barger et al. (2014); Huang and Liu (2020); Xu and Rong (2023) and ντ\nu_{\tau} eventsAbbasi et al. (2024). Although the number of the events is rare by now, several PeV events in the upcoming experiments (e.g., P-ONE)Agostini et al. (2020), IceCube-Gen2Aartsen et al. (2021)) may give strong restrictions on the NSI potential. In addition, we consider the effects of NSI without a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry on the events as a comparison.

The paper is organised as follows. In Sec. II, the neutrino flavor transition probability on the bases of NSI is introduced. In Sec. III, the impacts of NSI on PeV neutrinos, including the flavor ratio, the flux, and the events number, are examined. Finally, a conclusion is given.

II Flavor conversion probability

The effective neutrino-matter interaction leading to a long-range potential is subject to three contributions, namely the Standard Model (SM) term mediated by the Z boson, the interaction of the gauge symmetry LαL_{\alpha}-LβL_{\beta} mediated by a novel boson ZαβZ^{{}^{\prime}}_{\alpha\beta}, and the contribution of mixing between the Z and ZαβZ^{{}^{\prime}}_{\alpha\beta}Agarwalla et al. (2023). It reads as follow,

Leff=LSM+LZ+Lmix.L_{eff}=L_{SM}+L_{Z^{{}^{\prime}}}+L_{mix}. (1)

The first item on the right-hand is the contribution from the SM

LSM=esinθWcosθWZμ[12l¯αγμPLlα+12ν¯αγμPLνα+12u¯γμPLu12d¯γμPLd].L_{SM}=\frac{e}{sin\theta_{W}cos\theta_{W}}Z_{\mu}[-\frac{1}{2}\overline{l}_{\alpha}\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}l_{\alpha}+\frac{1}{2}\overline{\nu}_{\alpha}\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}\nu_{\alpha}+\frac{1}{2}\overline{u}\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}u-\frac{1}{2}\overline{d}\gamma^{\mu}P_{L}d~{}]. (2)

The second term describes neutrino-matter interactions through the new mediator ZαβZ^{{}^{\prime}}_{\alpha\beta}Agarwalla et al. (2023), i.e.,

LZ=gαβZσ(l¯αγσlαl¯βγσlβ+ν¯αγσPLναν¯βγσPLνβ).L_{Z^{{}^{\prime}}}=g^{{}^{\prime}}_{\alpha\beta}Z^{{}^{\prime}}_{\sigma}(\overline{l}_{\alpha}\gamma^{\sigma}l_{\alpha}-\overline{l}_{\beta}\gamma^{\sigma}l_{\beta}+\overline{\nu}_{\alpha}\gamma^{\sigma}P_{L}\nu_{\alpha}-\overline{\nu}_{\beta}\gamma^{\sigma}P_{L}\nu_{\beta}). (3)

It shows the contribution from the LeLμL_{e}-L_{\mu} and LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} gauge symmetries, and the corresponding interaction is noticeable due to a source rich of electrons. The third term generated from the mixing of the bosons ZZ and ZZ^{{}^{\prime}} is written asAgarwalla et al. (2023)

Lmix=gαβ(ξsinθWχ)esinθWcosθWJρJ3ρ.L_{mix}=-g^{{}^{\prime}}_{\alpha\beta}(\xi-sin\theta_{W}\chi)\frac{e}{sin\theta_{W}cos\theta_{W}}J^{{}^{\prime}}_{\rho}J^{\rho}_{3}. (4)

It only affects the results under the LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} symmetry due to a neutron sourceAgarwalla et al. (2023). On the bases LeffL_{eff} and the assumption that the matter is isoscalar and electrically neutral, the total potential of the Earth, Moon, Sun, Milky Way and Cosmological should be consideredBustamante and Agarwalla (2019), namely

Vαβ=VαβE+VαβM+VαβS+VαβMW+Vαβ<COS>.V_{\alpha\beta}=V_{\alpha\beta}^{E}+V_{\alpha\beta}^{M}+V_{\alpha\beta}^{S}+V_{\alpha\beta}^{MW}+V_{\alpha\beta}^{<COS>}. (5)

Since the number density of electrons and neutrons in the universe changes as the universe expands, the redshift-averaged potential is employed. In this paper, we take a simplified view-point, and treat the total VαβV_{\alpha\beta} as a new-physics parameter to constrain by observations, irrespective of its specific origins.

Accordingly, the Hamiltonian matrix of neutrinos during their propagation is generalised as

𝐇=𝐇𝟎+𝐕αβ.\mathbf{H}=\mathbf{H_{0}}+\mathbf{V_{\alpha\beta}}. (6)

The first term on the right-hand determines oscillations in vacuum and the standard neutrino-matter interactions, i.e., Wolfenstein (1978); Mikheyev and Smirnov (1985)

𝐇𝟎=U(0000Δm2122E000Δm3122E)U+(VCC00000000),\mathbf{H_{0}}=U\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}0&0&0\\ 0&\frac{\Delta m^{2}_{21}}{2E}&0\\ 0&0&\frac{\Delta m^{2}_{31}}{2E}\\ \end{array}\right)U^{\dagger}+\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}V_{CC}&0&0\\ 0&0&0\\ 0&0&0\\ \end{array}\right), (7)

where UU is the leptonic mixing matrix in vacuum, VCC=2GFNeV_{CC}=\sqrt{2}G_{F}N_{e} is the standard matter potential. The second term working as the long-range potential is due to tiny masses of mediators of the new neutrino-matter interactions.

According to the analysis of the referenceAgarwalla et al. (2023), the potentials of the form LeLμL_{e}-L_{\mu} and LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} bring similar results of flavor conversion probability. So the forms of LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} and LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} are considered in the following sections. As α,β=e,τ;μ,τ\alpha,\beta=e,\tau;\mu,\tau, the expressions of the term 𝐕αβ\mathbf{V_{\alpha\beta}} are respectively

𝐕𝐞τ=(Veτ0000000Veτ);𝐕μτ=(0000Vμτ000Vμτ).\mathbf{V_{e\tau}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}V_{e\tau}{}&~{}0{}&~{}0{}\\ 0&~{}0{}&~{}0{}\\ 0{}&~{}0{}&~{}-V_{e\tau}\end{array}\right);~{}~{}\mathbf{V_{\mu\tau}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}0{}&~{}0{}&~{}0{}\\ 0{}&~{}V_{\mu\tau}{}&~{}0{}\\ 0{}&~{}0{}&~{}-V_{\mu\tau}\end{array}\right). (8)

Considering antineutrinos, VαβantV^{ant}_{\alpha\beta}=Vαβ-V_{\alpha\beta}.

The 𝐕αβ\mathbf{V_{\alpha\beta}} shown here is a special case derived from a NSI between neutrinos and matter. In order to compare the effects of NSIs with and without a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry, we introduce the non-diagonal potential from general NSIs, namely

𝐕𝐞τ(non)=(00Veτ000Veτ00);𝐕μτ(non)=(00000Vμτ0Vμτ0).\mathbf{V_{e\tau}}^{(non)}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}0{}&~{}0{}&~{}V_{e\tau}{}\\ 0{}&~{}0{}&~{}0{}\\ V_{e\tau}{}&~{}0{}&~{}0\end{array}\right);~{}~{}\mathbf{V_{\mu\tau}}^{(non)}=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}0{}&~{}0{}&~{}0{}\\ 0{}&~{}0{}&~{}V_{\mu\tau}{}\\ 0{}&~{}V_{\mu\tau}{}&~{}0\end{array}\right). (9)

For simplicity, VαβV_{\alpha\beta} still takes real values in this case.

Considering the limited energy resolution of neutrino telescopes which are only sensitive to the average probability, the νανβ\nu_{\alpha}\rightarrow\nu_{\beta} transition probability reads

P¯αβN=|Uα1N|2|Uβ1N|2+|Uα2N|2|Uβ2N|2+|Uα3N|2|Uβ3N|2,\overline{P}^{N}_{\alpha\beta}=|U^{N}_{\alpha 1}|^{2}|U^{N}_{\beta 1}|^{2}+|U^{N}_{\alpha 2}|^{2}|U^{N}_{\beta 2}|^{2}+|U^{N}_{\alpha 3}|^{2}|U^{N}_{\beta 3}|^{2}, (10)

where UNU^{N} is derived from the diagonalization of the total Hamiltonian.

Note that the influence of VCCV_{CC} can be neglected in the case that the range of the new interaction is larger than the size of the Earth. Accordingly, we focus on the case that VαβV_{\alpha\beta} is dominant in the 𝐇\mathbf{H} for the PeV neutrinos.

III Constraints of potential parameters

Now we examine the constraints on the NSI parameters. As for the data sample, 4318 days of high-energy start-up events are used for the analysis, with a total of 164 updated eventsAbbasi et al. (2023). Considering that there may be background events in the sample, namely atmospheric μ\mu, atmospheric neutrinos, and transient neutrinosAartsen et al. (2016); Halzen and Wille (2016a, b), we need a clean set of events to obtain more reliable analysis results. Based on the reason, the maximum likelihood analysis considers the shower events mainly generated by the interaction of νe(ν¯e)\nu_{e}(\overline{\nu}_{e}) and ντ(ν¯τ)\nu_{\tau}(\overline{\nu}_{\tau})Aartsen et al. (2015a, b); Kopper (2018); Denton and Tamborra (2018), and sets the energy range of neutrinos to 60TeV-3PeV with a total of 64 data samples, see Fig.1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The shower events number in the energy-range 60TeV-3PeV.

We employ a binned maximum likelihood method to constrain the parameters of the NSI potential in the neutrino propagation path. The expected number of events at each energy bin k is

Nk(Vαβ)=4πT(kΦνe+ν¯e(E,Vαβ)Ae,k(E)𝑑E+kΦντ+ν¯τ(E,Vαβ)Aτ,k(E)𝑑E),N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})=4\pi T(\int_{k}\Phi_{\nu_{e}+\overline{\nu}_{e}}(E,V_{\alpha\beta})A_{e,k}(E)dE+\int_{k}\Phi_{\nu_{\tau}+\overline{\nu}_{\tau}}(E,V_{\alpha\beta})A_{\tau,k}(E)dE), (11)

where T=4318 days is the time of data-collecting, k\int_{k} represents the integral over each interval k. Aα,k(E)A_{\alpha,~{}k}(E) represents the effective area of the IceCube Collaboration corresponding to the α\alpha-flavor neutrino at the k energy intervalAartsen et al. (2013a), and Φνα+ν¯α(E,Vαβ)=Φν+ν¯(E)(βP¯αβN(E,Vαβ)ϕβs)\Phi_{\nu_{\alpha}+\overline{\nu}_{\alpha}}(E,V_{\alpha\beta})=\Phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}(E)(\sum_{\beta}\overline{P}^{N}_{\alpha\beta}(E,V_{\alpha\beta})\phi^{s}_{\beta}) with ϕβs\phi^{s}_{\beta} being the flavor ratio at the source of astrophysical neutrinos. Φν+ν¯(E)\Phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}(E) indicates the entire diffuse flow, and its specific expression is as follow

Φν+ν¯(E)=ϕ×(E100TeV)γ1018GeV1cm2s1sr1.\Phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}(E)=\phi\times(\frac{E}{100~{}\rm TeV})^{-\gamma}\cdot 10^{-18}~{}\rm GeV^{-1}cm^{-2}s^{-1}sr^{-1}. (12)

The best fit values and 68% confidence level of energy-spectrum parameters in the all-sky model are listed in Table IAbbasi et al. (2021b).

Table 1: The best fit values and 68% confidence level of energy-spectrum parameters in the all-sky modelAbbasi et al. (2021b).
      parameters       best fit value       68% confidence level(C.L.)
      ϕ\phi       6.37         4.75 - 7.83
      γ\gamma       2.87         2.68 - 3.08

The number of shower events in the energy interval k is denoted by Nk¯\overline{N_{k}}. It is further assumed that the expected number of shower events Nk(Vαβ)N_{k}({V_{\alpha\beta}}) in different energy intervals k obey the poisson distribution, namely

P[Nk¯|Nk(Vαβ)]=Nk(Vαβ)Nk¯Nk¯!exp{Nk(Vαβ)}.P[\overline{N_{k}}|N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})]=\frac{N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})^{\overline{N_{k}}}}{\overline{N_{k}}!}\exp\{-N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})\}. (13)

Each likelihood function is

L(Vαβ)=kP[Nk¯|Nk(Vαβ)].L(V_{\alpha\beta})=\prod_{k}P[~{}\overline{N_{k}}|N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})]. (14)

Taking the logarithm of both sides of the above equation, we can obtain the following expression

ln[L(Vαβ)]=kln{P[Nk¯|Nk(Vαβ)]}.\ln[L(V_{\alpha\beta})]=\sum_{k}\ln\{~{}P[~{}\overline{N_{k}}|N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})]\}. (15)

The value of the function ln[L(Vαβ)]\ln[L(V_{\alpha\beta})] is dependent on the leptonic mixing parameters and the energy-spectrum parameters of the diffuse flux. However, we find that the mixing parameters and the spectrum index γ\gamma moderately impact the magnitude of ln[L(Vαβ)]\ln[L(V_{\alpha\beta})], and the normalization parameter ϕ\phi determines the characteristic of dependence of ln[L(Vαβ)]\ln[L(V_{\alpha\beta})] on VαβV_{\alpha\beta}. Therefore, the best fit data of the mixing parameters with the normal mass-ordering (NO) from the global fit analysis NuFIT5.0 published by PDGEsteban et al. (2020) and the best fit value of the spectrum index in Tab.1 are taken here. The influence of normalization parameter ϕ\phi on ln[L(Vαβ)]\ln[L(V_{\alpha\beta})] is averaged with a Monte Carlo integration method. Based on the set-up of the nuisance parameters, the behaviors of ln[L(Vαβ)]-\ln[L(V_{\alpha\beta})] of the models are shown in Fig.2-3. Accordingly, the upper limits (95% C.L.) on the potentials are obtained, see Tab.2-3. We note that although the statistic procedure employed here is simple, the updated sample data of IceCube can set more stringent constraints on the potential parameters in comparison with the results from the long-baseline experimentsAgarwalla et al. (2024).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The dependence of the function ln[L(Vαβ)]-\ln[~{}L(V_{\alpha\beta})~{}] on the parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model. The first row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} model with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. The first row, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} model with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. The second row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. The second row, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. The flavor ratio for μ±\mu^{\pm} damping is ϕαS=(0,1,0)\phi^{S}_{\alpha}=(0,1,0), and ratio for π±\pi^{\pm} decay is ϕαS=(1/3,2/3,0)\phi^{S}_{\alpha}=(1/3,2/3,0).
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The dependence of the function ln[L(Vαβ)]-\ln[~{}L(V_{\alpha\beta})~{}] on the parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model. The first row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} model with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. The first row, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} model with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. The second row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. The second row, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. The flavor ratio for μ±\mu^{\pm} damping is ϕαS=(0,1,0)\phi^{S}_{\alpha}=(0,1,0), and ratio for π±\pi^{\pm} decay is ϕαS=(1/3,2/3,0)\phi^{S}_{\alpha}=(1/3,2/3,0).
Table 2: The potential parameters in the models with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source.
  Different models     [ Best fit value , Upper limit(95% C.L.) ] [GeV]
  LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model    VeτV_{e\tau}     [1.571028,4.891028[~{}1.57*10^{-28},4.89*10^{-28} ]
   VμτV_{\mu\tau}     [1.091028,5.971028][~{}1.09*10^{-28},5.97*10^{-28}~{}]
  LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model    VeτV_{e\tau}     [5.991028,1.171027][~{}5.99*10^{-28},1.17*10^{-27}~{}]
   VμτV_{\mu\tau}     [2.131028,6.011028][~{}2.13*10^{-28},6.01*10^{-28}~{}]
Table 3: The potential parameters in the models with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source.
  Different models     [ Best fit value , Upper limit(95% C.L.) ] [GeV]
  LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model    VeτV_{e\tau}     [8.271027,1.861026][~{}8.27*10^{-27},1.86*10^{-26}~{}]
   VμτV_{\mu\tau}     [3.741027,1.211026][~{}3.74*10^{-27},1.21*10^{-26}~{}]
  LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model    VeτV_{e\tau}     [8.791027,1.581026][~{}8.79*10^{-27},1.58*10^{-26}~{}]
   VμτV_{\mu\tau}     [3.011027,5.171026][~{}3.01*10^{-27},5.17*10^{-26}~{}]

IV Impacts of NSI on PeV neutrinos with and without LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry

IV.1 Influences on the flavor ratio of high energy astrophysical neutrinos

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Ternary plot of the flavor ratio at Earth in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric models. The fixed neutrino energy is 1PeV, Neutrino oscillation parameters are taken in the 3σ3\sigma allowed range of NuFITNuFIT 5.0 for the global fit data(NO). The left panel: μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. Right panel: π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. The orange dashed lines encompasses the 2020 3σ3\sigma C.R. with the π\pi decay source based on IceCubeAartsen et al. (2021). The purple dashed line covers the 2040 3σ3\sigma C.R. based on IceCube and IceCube-Gen2Aartsen et al. (2021). The black dash lines denotes the 3σ3\sigma C.R. boundary based on the TeV-PeV neutrino telescopes available in 2040Song et al. (2021). The black heart symbols represent the best-fit points.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Ternary plot of the flavor ratio at Earth in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model. The left panel: μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. Right panel: π±\pi^{\pm} decay source.

In this section, the effects of new interactions on the detection of PeV neutrinos are examined. We first study the impacts of NSIs on the flavor composition of astrophysical neutrinos at Earth. As an illustrative example, the neutrino energy is taken 1 PeV, assuming NO leptonic mixing parameters. We consider two typical sources, namely μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source with ϕαS=(0,1,0)\phi^{S}_{\alpha}=(0,1,0), and π±\pi^{\pm} decay source with ϕαS=(1/3,2/3,0)\phi^{S}_{\alpha}=(1/3,2/3,0). The potential parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} takes value in the ranges listed in Tab.2-3, namely from its best fit value to the 0.95 upper limit. Based on the given parameters, we show ternary plots of the flavor ratio at Earth (see Fig.4- 5). For ease of comparison, the ternary plots also show the area from the standard flavor conversion scheme. The following observations can be obtained from these figures.

For μ±\mu^{\pm} damping sources, the predictions of both the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric and breaking models, deviate noticeably from the result of the standard model. In contrast, for the models under the π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources, the flavor ratio of PeV neutrinos is almost concentrated at special points. In particular, in the symmetric case (See right panel of Fig.4)) the regions of LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} and LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case overlap each other.

Let us give a simple comment on the difference. When the potential parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} reaches a threshold, it would dominate the Hamilton and the flavor transition matrix could be fixed on a decoupling pattern ((see Eqs.17- 18) in the following section). Correspondingly, the flavor ratio at Earth could be given on a special point. Based on the ranges of parameter values in Tab.2-3, we can see that the parameters with the π±\pi^{\pm} decay source approximate the flavor decoupling thresholds both in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric and breaking models. Hence the concentration of flavor ratio region appears.

IV.2 Influences on the energy spectrum of astrophysical neutrinos

The NSI interactions bring a significant effect on the flavor conversion probability of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, which can cause the variation of the flux of a special flavor at Earth. For the flux ϕν¯e\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{e}} produced from the pppp collision, we have

ϕν¯e(E)=12ϕν+ν¯(E)×(α=e,μ,τP¯eα(E,V)ϕαS).\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{e}}(E)=\frac{1}{2}\phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}(E)\times(\sum_{\alpha=e,\mu,\tau}\overline{P}_{e\alpha}(E,V)~{}\phi^{S}_{\alpha}~{}). (16)

For ϕντ\phi_{\nu_{\tau}} and ϕν¯τ\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{\tau}}, the corresponding expression is obtained by the replacement eτe\rightarrow\tau in P¯eα(E,V)\overline{P}_{e\alpha}(E,V), with ϕν¯τ+ντ=2ϕντ\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{\tau}+\nu_{\tau}}=2\phi_{\nu_{\tau}}. Based on the ϕν+ν¯(E)\phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}(E) of single power law (eq.12) and the neutrino oscillation and potential parameters specified in Fig.4- 5, we show the influences of NSI on the energy spectrum of ν¯e\overline{\nu}_{e} and ντ\nu_{\tau}(see Fig.6-9).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The energy spectrum of ν¯e\overline{\nu}_{e} in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model. The first row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping sources. The second row, left panel : LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources. The ranges of the parameters of the energy spectrum ϕν+ν¯\phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}} are taken in the 68% C.L. in Tab.1. The potential parameters VαβV_{\alpha\beta} are the same as the values given in Fig.4. The neutrinos oscillation parameters are taken in the 3σ3\sigma allowed ranges of the global fit data of NO. Blue lines: arising from the standard transition matrix Ps¯\overline{P^{s}} without the long range potential effects. Red lines: from the matrix P¯\overline{P} including the long range potential effects. The black line: arising from the P¯\overline{P} with the best fit values of all the given parameters. The dashed black line: from Ps¯\overline{P^{s}} with the best fit values of the given parameters.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The energy spectrum of ν¯e\overline{\nu}_{e} in the symmetry breaking model. The first row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping sources. The second row, left panel : LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources. The potential parameters VαβV_{\alpha\beta} are the same as the values given in Fig.5. The conventions for other parameters, colors and lines are the same as those in Fig.6.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: The energy spectrum of ντ{\nu}_{\tau} in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model. The first row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping sources. The second row, left panel : LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources. The conventions for parameters, colors and lines are the same as those in Fig.6.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: The energy spectrum of ντ{\nu}_{\tau} in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model. The first row, left panel: LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with μ±\mu^{\pm} damping sources. The second row, left panel : LeLτL_{e}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay source, right panel: LμLτL_{\mu}-L_{\tau} case with π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources. The conventions for parameters, colors and lines are the same as those in Fig.7.

As is seen in the Fig.6-Fig.7, in the range Eν>5E_{\nu}>5PeV the flux ϕν¯e(E)\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{e}}(E) is apparently damped for neutrinos from the μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source both in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric and breaking models with the parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} around their best fit data. As a comparison, the damping of ϕν¯e(E)\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{e}}(E) in the case of π±\pi^{\pm} decay source is undermined by by the large uncertainty of the parameters of ϕν+ν¯\phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}.

Let us give some comments on the suppressing effect on ϕν¯e\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{e}} from NSIs. Since the factor E1E^{-1} is in the Hamiltonian H0H_{0}, for PeV neutrinos in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model, when the long range potential Vαβ>6.291027V_{\alpha\beta}>6.29*10^{-27}GeV, the flavor transition matrix approximates the unit matrix, i.e.,

P¯(100010001).\overline{P}\simeq\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 0&0&1\end{array}\right). (17)

Therefore, the flavor ratio of the neutrinos at Earth is nearly equal to the value at the source. In particular, for the μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source, ϕν¯e\phi_{\overline{\nu}_{e}} becomes negligible at Earth.

In the breaking models, when the parameter Vαβ>91027V_{\alpha\beta}>9*10^{-27}GeV, the conversion matrix with Eν>1E_{\nu}>1PeV also shows the characteristic of flavor decoupling, namely

P¯(Veτ)(1201201012012);P¯(Vμτ)(1000121201212).\overline{P}(V_{e\tau})\simeq\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}\frac{1}{2}{}&~{}0{}&~{}\frac{1}{2}{}\\ 0{}&~{}1{}&~{}0{}\\ \frac{1}{2}{}&~{}0{}&~{}\frac{1}{2}\end{array}\right);~{}~{}\overline{P}(V_{\mu\tau})\simeq\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}1{}&~{}0{}&~{}0{}\\ 0{}&~{}\frac{1}{2}{}&~{}\frac{1}{2}{}\\ 0{}&~{}\frac{1}{2}{}&~{}\frac{1}{2}\end{array}\right). (18)

Thus, the flux of νe\nu_{e}(ν¯e\overline{\nu}_{e}) at the PeV energy-scale from the μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source is also noticeably reduced by the NSI.

Because of the flavor decoupling from the VαβV_{\alpha\beta} dominated Hamiltonian, similar observations are obtained for the flux ϕντ\phi_{\nu_{\tau}}, see Fig.8-9. In this case, the suppressing of ϕντ\phi_{\nu_{\tau}} at PeV energies in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model is remarkable for neutrinos from the π±\pi^{\pm} decay source .

IV.3 Influences on the events of PeV neutrinos

Now we discuss the influence of NSI on the Glashow resonance and PeV ντ(ν¯τ)\nu_{\tau}(\overline{\nu}_{\tau}) events with and without a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry. As is known, Glashow resonance events provide a window to explore new physics at the PeV energy-scale. For the description of the intensity of the resonance events, V. Barger and et al. proposed a measure in terms of the ratio of resonant events to non-resonant continuous events, namelyBarger et al. (2014)

NResNnonRes(E>Emin)\displaystyle\frac{N_{Res}}{N_{non-Res}(E>E^{min})} =10π18(ΓWMW)(σRespeakσνNCC(E=6.3PeV))(α1.4)(Emin6.3PeV)α1.4[1(EminEmax)(α1.4)]×[re]E=6.3PeV\displaystyle=\frac{10\pi}{18}(\frac{\Gamma_{W}}{M_{W}})(\frac{\sigma^{peak}_{Res}}{\sigma^{CC}_{\nu N}(E=6.3\rm PeV)})\frac{(\alpha-1.4)(\frac{E^{min}}{6.3\rm PeV})^{\alpha-1.4}}{[1-(\frac{E^{min}}{E^{max}})^{(\alpha-1.4)}]}\times[r_{e}]_{E=6.3\rm PeV} (19)
=11×(α1.4)(Emin6.3PeV)α1.4[1(EminEmax)(α1.4)]×[re]E=6.3PeV.\displaystyle=11\times\frac{(\alpha-1.4)(\frac{E^{min}}{6.3\rm PeV})^{\alpha-1.4}}{[1-(\frac{E^{min}}{E^{max}})^{(\alpha-1.4)}]}\times[r_{e}]_{E=6.3\rm PeV}~{}.

Here rer_{e} is fraction of ν¯e\overline{\nu}_{e} at Earth, the spectral index α\alpha is related to the neutrino acceleration mechanism. We let α\alpha be equal to 2 Anchordoqui et al. (2014a, b). Using the best fit data of the netrino oscillation parameters (NO), the potential parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} and the diffuse flux ϕν+ν¯\phi_{\nu+\overline{\nu}}, the ratio of the Glashow resonance event is calculated near the resonance energy (see Tab.4-5). For comparison purposes, the results obtained from the standard flavor conversion matrix are also listed in the tables.

Table 4: The ratio of resonance event to nonresonant event with and without the NSI effect in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model for the μ±\mu^{\pm} damped source and π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. Here α=2\alpha~{}=~{}2, EminE^{min} = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 PeV, Emax=E^{max}~{}=~{}\infty, rer_{e} takes the value [re]E=6.3PeV[r_{e}]_{E~{}=~{}6.3\rm PeV}
Emin(PeV)E^{min}(\rm PeV) 1 2 3 4 5    rer_{e}
(010)T(0~{}~{}1~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 6.31036.3*10^{-3} 9.61039.6*10^{-3} 1.21021.2*10^{-2} 1.41021.4*10^{-2} 1.61021.6*10^{-2} 2.91032.9*10^{-3}
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 9.71029.7*10^{-2} 0.14 0.18 0.22 0.25 4.41024.4*10^{-2}
SM 0.18 0.28 0.36 0.43 0.49 8.61028.6*10^{-2}
(1/32/30)T(1/3~{}~{}2/3~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 0.36 0.55 0.70 0.83 0.95 0.16
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 0.36 0.55 0.70 0.83 0.95 0.16
SM 0.32 0.49 0.63 0.75 0.85 0.14
Table 5: The ratio of resonance event to nonresonant event with and without the NSI effect in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model.
Emin(PeV)E^{min}(\rm PeV) 1 2 3 4 5    rer_{e}
(010)T(0~{}~{}1~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 3.81023.8*10^{-2} 5.71025.7*10^{-2} 7.31027.3*10^{-2} 8.71028.7*10^{-2} 0.10 1.71021.7*10^{-2}
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 0.20 0.30 0.38 0.46 0.52 9.11029.1*10^{-2}
SM 0.18 0.28 0.36 0.43 0.49 8.61028.6*10^{-2}
(1/32/30)T(1/3~{}~{}2/3~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 0.18 0.27 0.35 0.41 0.47 8.31028.3*10^{-2}
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 0.36 0.55 0.70 0.83 0.95 0.16
SM 0.32 0.49 0.63 0.75 0.85 0.14

We can see that the Glashow resonant event ratio is obviously decreased by the NSI for neutrinos from μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source. At the best fit value of VeτV_{e\tau}, the resonant event ratio in the symmetric model is around 30 times smaller than the value in SM scheme, while in the symmetry breaking model the ratio is near 5 times smaller than the standard result. Similar to the discussions on the flavor ratio in the previous section, the difference results from the Hamiltonian under the two models, which affects the flavor transition matrix. Using the best fit value of the VeτV_{e\tau} parameter, the flavor conversion matrices of the two models are obtained as follows:

P¯sm(Veτ)(0.980.00580.00480.00580.650.340.00480.340.65),P¯bm(Veτ)(0.480.0340.480.0340.940.0160.480.0160.49),\overline{P}^{sm}(V_{e\tau})\simeq\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}0.98{}&~{}0.0058{}&~{}0.0048{}\\ 0.0058{}&~{}0.65{}&~{}0.34{}\\ 0.0048{}&~{}0.34{}&~{}0.65\end{array}\right),~{}~{}\overline{P}^{bm}(V_{e\tau})\simeq\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}0.48{}&~{}0.034{}&~{}0.48{}\\ 0.034{}&~{}0.94{}&~{}0.016{}\\ 0.48{}&~{}0.016{}&~{}0.49\end{array}\right), (20)

where P¯sm(Veτ)\overline{P}^{sm}(V_{e\tau}) and P¯bm(Veτ)\overline{P}^{bm}(V_{e\tau}) represent the matrix under the symmetric and symmetry breaking model respectively. We can see that the former matrix with the μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source can reduce the fraction rer_{e} to the order 10310^{-3}, while the latter gives rer_{e} of order 10210^{-2}. The damping of the Glashow resonance event ratio is proportional to the damping of rer_{e}. Thus, the difference takes place. Furthermore, we note that the ratio is sensitive to the parameter VeτV_{e\tau}. Under the 95% upper limit, the ratio can be damped to 10310^{-3} times the magnitude of the SM result. In contrast, the ratio is moderately reduced by the NSI for neutrinos from π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. These observations are consistent with those read from Fig.6-7.

In a similar way, we examine suppressing effects of NSIs on ντ\nu_{\tau} events. The number of ντ\nu_{\tau} events is calculated as follow

Nk(Vαβ)=4πTkΦντ+ν¯τ(E,Vαβ)Aτ,k(E)𝑑E.N_{k}(V_{\alpha\beta})=4\pi T\int_{k}\Phi_{\nu_{\tau}+\overline{\nu}_{\tau}}(E,V_{\alpha\beta})A_{\tau,k}(E)dE. (21)

where T=4318 days is the data collection time IceCube Observatory. The parameter VαβV_{\alpha\beta} is at the best fit value. We compare the results in the NSI models with those in SM method(see Tab.6-7). In this case, the damping of the events is notable for neutrinos from π±\pi^{\pm} decay sources in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model. Thus, the symmetric NSI, making the detection of ντ\nu_{\tau} events at PeV from the source impossible, would be stringently constrained by observations in the near future.

Table 6: The influence of NSI on the number of ντ\nu_{\tau} events in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetric model.
E(PeV)E(\rm PeV)     2.3 - 3.3     2.3 - 4     1.9 - 10
(010)T(0~{}~{}1~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 0.27 0.35 0.72
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 0.19 0.25 0.35
SM 0.23 0.31 0.68
(1/32/30)T(1/3~{}~{}2/3~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 7.2×1047.2\times 10^{-4} 8.6×1048.6\times 10^{-4} 1.8×1031.8\times 10^{-3}
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 9.6×1049.6\times 10^{-4} 1.1×1031.1\times 10^{-3} 2.5×1032.5\times 10^{-3}
SM 0.21 0.28 0.62
Table 7: The influence of NSI on the number of ντ\nu_{\tau} events in the LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} breaking model.
E(PeV)E(\rm PeV)     2.3 - 3.3     2.3 - 4     1.9 - 10
(010)T(0~{}~{}1~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 0.067 0.079 0.18
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 0.22 0.30 0.72
SM 0.23 0.31 0.68
(1/32/30)T(1/3~{}~{}2/3~{}~{}0)^{T} VeτV_{e\tau} 0.10 0.14 0.30
VμτV_{\mu\tau} 0.21 0.28 0.59
SM 0.21 0.28 0.62

V conclusion

We examined the effects of NSI with and without a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry on the HAN events at PeV energies. The constraints on potential parameters of NSI are obtained with the updated IceCube shower data. On the bases the given parameters, the impacts of NSI on the flavor ratio of HANs at Earth, the flux ϕν\phi_{\nu}, and expected events number at IceCube Observatory are shown. In general, the considered NSI with a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry can notably reduce the Glashow resonance events for neutrinos from μ±\mu^{\pm} damping source and the ντ\nu_{\tau} events for neutrinos from π±\pi^{\pm} decay source. Considering the upcoming neutrino observatories, the observations of PeV events may give more stringent constraints on the NSIs with a LαLβL_{\alpha}-L_{\beta} symmetry.

Acknowledgements.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant No. 12065007, the Research Foundation of Guilin University of Technology under grant No. GUTQDJJ2018103.

References