This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Laser propagation in a highly magnetized over-dense plasma

K.Li Corresponding Author: 93793444@qq.com Institute of Physics of the ASCR, ELI-Beamlines, Na Slovance 2, 18221 Prague, Czech Republic W.Yu Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai 201800, China

Propagation of right-hand circularly polarized laser into highly magnetized over-dense collisional plasma is analytically studied from basic equations. Highly magnetized plasma with density of 102310^{23} cm3cm^{-3} is efficiently heated from 100 eV to 1 keV within depth of around 20 μm\mu{m} in one nanosecond by Nd:YAG laser with moderate irradiance of around 101410^{14} Wcm2Wcm^{-2}.

1 INTRODUCTION

The research on inertial confinement fusion started as early as 1960s. In this process, the energy of incident laser is mainly deposited in the corona region of laser-produced plasma and energy transfer to compressed over-dense deuterium-tritium fuel is achieved through shock waves or secondary particles such as energetic electrons or ions [1, 2], which intrinsically decreases the conversion efficiency from laser to compressed fuel. The interaction of electromagnetic (EM) wave with magnetized plasma has been studied since 1960s and described in several popular textbooks [3, 4, 5], where early study was mainly in the region of weak magnetic field and low frequency EM wave, for example, at Earth’s magnetic field and radio frequency [4]. In our previous work [6], the interaction of circularly polarized (CP) laser at moderate irradiance with highly magnetized over-dense plasma was preliminarily studied, where laser could propagate into overdense plasma and its basic physics is described briefly below.

When left-hand circularly polarized (LHCP) and right-hand circularly polarized (RHCP) laser propagate in magnetized plasma with propagation direction parallel to that of magnetic field, the relative permittivity is shown below, respectively.

ϵL=1n/(1+B)\displaystyle\epsilon_{L}=1-n/(1+B) (1)
ϵR=1n/(1B)=1+n/(B1)\displaystyle\epsilon_{R}=1-n/(1-B)=1+n/(B-1) (2)

It is clear that LHCP laser is reflected at density where n=1+Bn=1+B in both weakly (B<1B<1) or highly (B>1B>1) magnetized plasma with 0<ϵL<10<\epsilon_{L}<1. RHCP laser is also confined in regime of 0<ϵR<10<\epsilon_{R}<1 when B<1B<1. However when B>1B>1, it is found that the relative permittivity is always larger than 1, ϵR>1\epsilon_{R}>1, which means that RHCP can propagate into "any" over-dense magnetized plasma. Here, n=ne/ncn=n_{e}/n_{c} is dimensionless plasma density and B=B0/BcB=B_{0}/B_{c} is dimensionless magnetic field, where nen_{e} is electron plasma density, ncn_{c} is critical density of plasma with nc=meωL2/4πe21.12×1021λL,μm2n_{c}=m_{e}\omega_{L}^{2}/4\pi e^{2}\approx 1.12\times 10^{21}\lambda_{L,\mu{m}}^{-2} cm3cm^{-3}, B0B_{0} is amplitude of extermal magnetic field, BcB_{c} is amplitude of magnetic field related with electron gyrofrequency with Bc=mecωL/e1.07×104λL,μm1B_{c}=m_{e}c\omega_{L}/e\approx 1.07\times 10^{4}\lambda_{L,\mu{m}}^{-1} tesla, ωL\omega_{L} is angular frequency of laser in unit of radian per second and λL\lambda_{L} is laser wavelength in unit of micrometer. To satisfy the condition that B>1B>1, the amplitude of magnetic field must be extremely high for lasers, for example, B0>104B_{0}>10^{4} tesla for fundamental wavelength of Nd:YAG laser.

Neodymium magnet is the most widely used static magnet with amplitude of magnetic field being only a couple of tesla. Howeve, the amplitude of pulsed magnetic field is much stronger and has been increased greatly in recent years thanks to various new techniques and physics [7, 8, 9], such as superconductor, laser-driven capacity coil, flux compression, interaction of intense laser with plasma and et al. For example, microsecond magnetic field of 1200 T is generated by electromagnetic flux-compression [10] and picosecond magnetic field as high as 7×1047\times 10^{4} tesla is generated by intense laser during its interaction with solid target [11]. As a result, application of RHCP laser in overdense plasma in region of B>1B>1 might become reality in the not-too-far future. In previous work [6], the temperature of plasma was assumed to be constant. In this paper, the plasma heating will analytically studied with process of collisional absorption because it is the dominant process for laser irradiance below 101410^{14} cm2cm^{-2}. Appropriate parameters will also be investigated as to heating magnetized overdense cold plasma to temperature of 10s eV to 1000s eV which is of great interest in fields such as warm dense matter, fusion and et al.

2 LASER PROPAGATION IN HIGHLY MAGNETIZED PLASMA

Consider a step-like density profile with vacuum in region of z<0z<0 and over-dense plasma in region of z0z\geq 0, where external magnetic field is applied along z+ direction. Circularly polarized (CP) laser propagates from vacuum side and normally onto plasma with direction parallel to that of external magnetic field, where laser irradiance is only slightly above the ionization threshold excluding both pondermotive and relativistic effects. In this way, the governing equations of the laser interactions with magnetized plasma are written as

tu=Eu×Bzνun1p××E+ttE=t(nu)E=Znintn=(nu)\displaystyle\begin{split}&\partial_{t}\textbf{u}=-\textbf{E}-\textbf{u}\times\textbf{B}_{z}-\nu\textbf{u}-n^{-1}\nabla{p}\\ &\nabla\times\nabla\times\textbf{E}+\partial_{tt}\textbf{E}=\partial_{t}(n\textbf{u})\\ &\nabla\cdot\textbf{E}=Zn_{i}-n\\ &\partial_{t}n=-\nabla\cdot(n\textbf{u})\end{split} (3)

where p=nTp=nT is dimensionless plasma pressure, T=TeV/(mec2)T=T_{eV}/(m_{e}c^{2}) is dimensionless plasma temperature with TeVT_{eV} being plasma temperature in unit of electron volt, mem_{e} being static mass of electron and cc being velocity of light in vacuum, E=EL/(mecωL/e)E=E_{L}/(m_{e}c\omega_{L}/e) is dimensionless electric field of laser, u=ue/cu=u_{e}/c is dimensionless velocity, x=kLx0x=k_{L}x_{0} is dimensionless space and t=ωLt0t=\omega_{L}t_{0} is dimensionless time, respectively. And ν\nu is the electron-ion collisional rate normalized to angular frequency of laser

ν=νei/ωL1.72lnΛZnλL1TeV3/2\displaystyle\nu=\nu_{ei}/\omega_{L}\approx 1.72ln\Lambda Zn\lambda_{L}^{-1}T_{eV}^{-3/2} (4)

where νei=2.91×106ZnelnΛTeV3/2s1\nu_{ei}=2.91\times 10^{-6}Zn_{e}ln\Lambda T_{eV}^{-3/2}s^{-1}[12] is electron-ion collisional rate, ZZ is number of free electron per atom set to 1 and lnΛln\Lambda is Coulomb logarithm set to be 1 here.

As a vector, the electric field in plasma can be written in the form of E=Et+El\textbf{E}=\textbf{E}_{t}+\textbf{E}_{l}, with transverse components being Et=ta\textbf{E}_{t}=-\partial_{t}\textbf{a}, Et=0\nabla\cdot\textbf{E}_{t}=0 and longitudinal component being El=ϕ\textbf{E}_{l}=-\nabla\phi, ×El=0\nabla\times\textbf{E}_{l}=0, respectively. In our case where laser is normally incident into plasma, the transverse mode Et\textbf{E}_{t} is perpendicular to laser direction, while the longitudinal component El\textbf{E}_{l} parallel to it. The inter-conversion between the transverse and longitudinal modes occurs when laser frequency is close to the local plasma frequency, however the plasma density under consideration here is much higher than the critical density of laser, thus the mode conversion (or resonance) between the transverse and longitudinal modes is not likely to occur. In this way, the starting equations can be simplified to be

t(uta)+νut+ut×Bz=tulELνulp/n=02attanut=nultEL=0\displaystyle\begin{split}&\partial_{t}(\textbf{u}_{t}-\textbf{a})+\nu\textbf{u}_{t}+\textbf{u}_{t}\times\textbf{B}_{z}=-\partial_{t}\textbf{u}_{l}-\textbf{E}_{L}-\nu\textbf{u}_{l}-\nabla{p}/n=0\\ &\nabla^{2}\textbf{a}-\partial_{tt}\textbf{a}-n\textbf{u}_{t}=n\textbf{u}_{l}-\partial_{t}\textbf{E}_{L}=0\end{split} (5)

3 TRANSEVERSE COMPONENT

Because fusion laser usually has temporal and spatial flat-top profile, the dimensionless potential vector of laser is simply expressed as below within the temporal and spatial range of laser pulse

a=a0ei(kσzt)(xiσy)\displaystyle\textbf{a}=a_{0}e^{i(k_{\sigma}z-t)}(\vec{x}-i\sigma\vec{y}) (6)

where kσ=ϵσ=kσr+ikσik_{\sigma}=\sqrt{\epsilon_{\sigma}}=k_{\sigma{r}}+ik_{\sigma{i}} is the dimensionless complex wave vector with ϵσ=ϵσr+iϵσi\epsilon_{\sigma}=\epsilon_{\sigma{r}}+i\epsilon_{\sigma{i}} is relative permittivity of plasma, σ=1\sigma=-1 for RHCP and σ=1\sigma=1 for LHCP laser, respectively. The dimensionless velocity of electron in CP laser is expressed as ut=ut(xiσy)\textbf{u}_{t}=u_{t}(\vec{x}-i\sigma\vec{y}), thus the force equation for transverse movement of electron in the field of CP laser becomes

tut=taut×Bzνut\displaystyle\partial_{t}\textbf{u}_{t}=\partial_{t}\textbf{a}-\textbf{u}_{t}\times\textbf{B}_{z}-\nu\textbf{u}_{t} (7)
ut=a1+σBz+iν\displaystyle\textbf{u}_{t}=\frac{\textbf{a}}{1+\sigma B_{z}+i\nu} (8)

Then relative permittivity of magnetized plasma is obtained here, same as in previous work [6].

ϵσ=1n1+σBz+iν\displaystyle\epsilon_{\sigma}=1-\frac{n}{1+\sigma B_{z}+i\nu} (9)

The reflection and transmission coefficients of laser at vacuum-plasma interface are given by Fresnel equations [13]

rσ=(1kσ)/(1+kσ)tσ=2/(1+kσ)\displaystyle r_{\sigma}=(1-k_{\sigma})/(1+k_{\sigma})\ \ \ \ \ t_{\sigma}=2/(1+k_{\sigma}) (10)

As laser propagates inside plasma, it deposits energy obeying equation of energy conservation [14]

t(wP+wL)=StIm(JtEt)\displaystyle\partial_{t}{(w_{P}+w_{L})}=-\nabla\cdot\textbf{S}_{t}-Im(\textbf{J}_{t}\cdot\textbf{E}_{t}) (11)

Here, wP=3/2nTw_{P}=3/2\cdot nT is dimensionless energy density of plasma, assuming that plasma behaves like ideal gas [15]. wL=(ϵrE2+B2)/2=(1+ϵr)a2/2w_{L}=(\epsilon_{r}E^{2}+B^{2})/2=(1+\epsilon_{r})a^{2}/2 is dimensionless energy density of laser in plasma. St=z(a1a1)\nabla\cdot\textbf{S}_{t}=\partial_{z}(a_{1}a_{1}^{*}) is laser absorption rate in plasma where a1=tσaa_{1}=t_{\sigma}\cdot a is dimensionless potential vector of transmitted laser. Imaginary part of JtEt=nuta1-\textbf{J}_{t}\cdot\textbf{E}_{t}=-nu_{t}\cdot a_{1} is the plasma heating rate due to transverse electron current. After required parameters are inserted into equ. 11, plasma temperature at vacuum-plasma interface, T(0, t), is obtained and transmission coefficients of laser into plasma is calculated. Then equ.11 is applied again in region of z>0z>0 to obtain temperature distribution of plasma, T(z, t). Thus the propagation of CP laser into plasma is fully understood.

Before solving the above equations, the permittivity and absorption rate are discussed in case that magnetic field is extremely high (B1B\gg 1) and plasma temperature is either very low (νB\nu\gg B) or very high (νB\nu\ll B), as shown below.

ϵR1+n/B1+ν2/B2+in/B1+ν2/B2νB{1+nB/ν2+in/ννB1+n/B+inν/B2νB\displaystyle\epsilon_{R}\approx 1+\frac{n/B}{1+\nu^{2}/B^{2}}+i\frac{n/B}{1+\nu^{2}/B^{2}}\frac{\nu}{B}\approx\left\{\begin{array}[]{ll}1+nB/\nu^{2}+in/\nu&\textrm{$\nu\gg B$}\\ 1+n/B+in\nu/B^{2}&\textrm{$\nu\ll B$}\end{array}\right. (14)

When plasma temperature is very low (νB\nu\gg B), laser absorption rate increases with plasma temperature or laser heating based on relationship between dimensionless collisional rate and plasma temperature shown in equ. 4. When plasma temperature is very high (νB\nu\ll B), laser absorption decreases with higher temperature and even becomes negligible at extremely high temperature, i.e., ϵR1+n/B\epsilon_{R}\approx 1+n/B. The threshold of plasma temperature in case of νB\nu\approx B is TeV(1.72lnΛλL1Zn/B)2/3T_{eV}\approx(1.72ln\Lambda\lambda_{L}^{-1}Zn/B)^{2/3}, which is around 7 eV with parameters of B=10B=10, n=100n=100, Z=1 and λL=1.06\lambda_{L}=1.06 μm\mu{m} as applied in next section.

4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 1: (a) Amplitude of electric fields for reflected (dashed) and transmitted (solid) RHCP laser at t=10t=10 ps, where plasma is in region of z > 0 and vacuum in region of z < 0; (b) Dimensionless poynting vector of RHCP laser in plasma is shown at t = 1 ps, 10 ps, 100 ps and 1 ns (from left to right), respectively. Parameters: a0=0.01a_{0}=0.01, λL=1.06\lambda_{L}=1.06 μm\mu{m}, Bz=10B_{z}=10, n=100n=100 and initial plasma temperature is T0T_{0} = 100 eV.
Refer to caption
(a)
Refer to caption
(b)
Figure 2: (a) Temperature of plasma at t=10t=10 ps (red) and t=1t=1 ns (black). (b) Energy density of plasma at t = 1 ps, 10 ps, 100 ps and 1 ns (from left to right). Parameter are the same as in fig.1.

Equ.11 is solved with initial conditions same to that in our previous work [6], that is, irradiance of incident RHCP laser is around 101410^{14} Wcm2Wcm^{-2} (a0a_{0} = 0.01) with wavelength of λL=1.064\lambda_{L}=1.064 μm\mu{m}, plasma has density of around 102310^{23} cm3cm^{-3} (n = 100) and initial temperature of T0T_{0} = 100 eV, amplitude of magnetic field is around 10510^{5} Tesla (B = 10). This initial condition exists in the region of νB\nu\ll B in equ. 14, where laser absorption decreases with plasma temperature but transmittance does not depend on it. The amplitude of electric field for reflected and transmitted laser at t = 10 ps is calculated and shown in fig.1(a). Poynting vector of laser propagating in plasma, which is normalized by that of incident laser, is shown in fig. 2(a) for various time, t = 1 ps, 10 ps, 100 ps and 1 ns, respectively. Plasma temperature at 10 ps and 1 ns is shown in fig. 1(b) and dimensionless energy density of heated plasma at 1 ps, 10 ps, 100 ps and 1 ns is shown in 2(b).

It is found that as RHCP laser propagates inside, laser front slowly heats up plasma and is absorbed while laser at later time propagates in the heated plasma "freely". Temperature of plasma at vacuum-plasma boundary reaches above 1.4 keV at 1 ns, which scales with time approximately as Tb(keV)1.42tns0.4T_{b}(keV)\approx 1.42*t_{ns}^{0.4} from the calculations at various time. The energy density of plasma at depth of 20 μm\mu{m} increases to around 21072*10^{7} J/cm3J/cm^{3} at 1 ns, and the conversion efficiency from laser to plasma is calculated to be as large as 40%\sim 40\% (radiant fluence of incident laser is around 10510^{5} J/cm2J/cm^{2} and areal energy density of heated plasma is around 41044*10^{4} J/cm2J/cm^{2}).

The dependence of laser propagation and plasma heating on initial parameters is discussed qualitatively below.

  • Magnetic field: At higher magnetic field, propagation depth increases while temperature of heated plasma decreases.

  • Plasma density: At higher plasma density, propagation depth decreases while temperature of heated plasma increases.

  • Initial plasma temperature: At higher plasma temperature, propagation depth increases while temperature of heated plasma almost does not change.

  • Laser irradiance: At higher laser irradiance, both propagation depth and temperature of heated plasma increase but the interaction will not be dominated by collisional absorption.

  • Laser wavelength: At larger wavelength of laser, propagation depth increases while temperature of heated plasma decreases greatly. It should be noted that required threshold of magnetic field decreases at larger laser wavelength. For example, BcB_{c} is as "low" as 1000 tesla for powerful CO2CO_{2} laser, as being pursued in BESTIA project [16].

The energy density of 21072*10^{7} Jcm3Jcm^{-3} obtained here is translated to 8106\sim 8*10^{6} J/gJ/g for specific energy, which is larger than the specfic energy of 6.41066.4*10^{6} J/gJ/g generated by accelerated heavy ions in Facility for Antiprotons and Ion Research [17]. It is also translated to pressure of 200\sim 200 Mbar, which is higher than shock pressure generated by laser ablation or hot electrons from parametric instabilities of stimulated Raman scattering and two-plasmon instability in scheme of shock ignition [18]. Thus, this phenomena might find applications in fields such as warm dense matter, high energy density plasma or inertial confinement fusion. To reach higher pressure as required by applications such as ignition, one RHCP laser and one LHCP laser could be irradiated in opposite directions in the magnetized plasma and then head-on collide, as depicted in fig. 3 in our previous work [6]. Profile of the required strong magnetic field is cylindrical, which could be generated by compression of initially much lower magnetic field. Assuming radius of cylindrical magnetic field is 20 micrometer and length of 0.2 millimeter, the energy of static magnetic field is as low as 1 kJ, since energy density of magnetic field is around 41094*10^{9} J/cm3J/cm^{3} at 10510^{5} tesla. And initial plasma temperature of 100 eV could be realisticly obtained by some degree of fuel compression. By the way, this approach is, somehow, similar to scheme of fast ignition [2] and Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion [19].

The limitation of equ. 14 is also mentioned here. In the above, the initial plasma temperature is chosen to be 100 eV, where Spitzer model for collisional absorption is valid at the given plasma density of 102310^{23} cm3cm^{-3}. However, in the range of lower temperature, i.e., temperature of 10 - 100 eV, the electrons are strongly coupled and below 10 eV they are degenerate and collision frequency depends on ion temperature, thus processes other than collisional absorption should be investigated. It could be imagined that RHCP laser propagates into and heat up plasma, although with smaller depth. Furthermore, processes such as dynamic ionization and plasma hydrodynamics are not included in equ. 14, which are applied in particle-in-cell simulation giving similar results [20].

5 CONCLUSION

Process of laser propagation and collisional heating of highly magnetized over-dense plasma at moderate laser irradiance is investigated from basic equations. Plasma with density of 102310^{23} cm3cm^{-3} and initial temperature of 100 eV is heated up to more than 1 keV within depth of around 20 μm\mu{m} at 1 nanosecond by RHCP laser with irradiance of 101410^{14} Wcm2Wcm^{-2}, where energy density of plasma is around 21072*10^{7} J/cm3J/cm^{3} and conversion efficiency from laser to plasma is as large as 40%40\%. With the development of strong magnetic field, especially with field above 10510^{5} tesla, volume above (10100μm)3(10\sim 100\mu{m})^{3} and duration longer than 1 nanosecond, this phenomena might find some applications in the fields of high energy density plasma or even inertial confinement fusion in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the discussion with Prof. Vladimir Tikhonchuk of Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications and University of Bordeaux.

Data availability. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Atzeni and Meyer-ter Vehn [2004] S. Atzeni and J. Meyer-ter Vehn, The Physics of Inertial Fusion: BeamPlasma Interaction, Hydrodynamics, Hot Dense Matter, Vol. 125 (OUP Oxford, 2004).
  • Tabak et al. [2014] M. Tabak, P. Norreys, V. Tikhonchuk,  and K. Tanaka, Nucl. Fusion 54, 54001 (2014).
  • Ginzburg [1970] V. L. Ginzburg, The propagation of electromagnetic waves in plasmas (International Series of Monographs in Electromagnetic Waves, Oxford: Pergamon, 1970, 2nd rev. and enl. ed., 1970).
  • Chen [2013] F. F. Chen, Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion volume 1: Plasma physics (Springer, 2nd edition, 2013).
  • Boyd and Sanderson [2003] T. Boyd and J. Sanderson, The Physics of Plasmas (Cambridge University Press, NYC, 2003).
  • Li and Yu [2019] K. Li and W. Yu, Physics of Plasmas 26, 092106 (2019).
  • Battesti et al. [2018] R. Battesti, J. Beard, S. Böser, N. Bruyant, D. Budker, S. A. Crooker, E. J. Daw, V. V. Flambaum, T. Inada, I. G. Irastorza, et al., Physics Reports 765, 1 (2018).
  • Knauer et al. [2010] J. Knauer, O. Gotchev, P. Chang, D. Meyerhofer, O. Polomarov, R. Betti, J. Frenje, C. Li, M.-E. Manuel, R. Petrasso, et al., Physics of Plasmas 17, 056318 (2010).
  • Fujioka et al. [2013] S. Fujioka, Z. Zhang, K. Ishihara, K. Shigemori, Y. Hironaka, T. Johzaki, A. Sunahara, N. Yamamoto, H. Nakashima, T. Watanabe, et al., Scientific reports 3, 1170 (2013).
  • Nakamura et al. [2018] D. Nakamura, A. Ikeda, H. Sawabe, Y. Matsuda,  and S. Takeyama, Review of Scientific Instruments 89, 095106 (2018).
  • Wagner et al. [2004] U. Wagner, M. Tatarakis, A. Gopal, F. Beg, E. Clark, A. Dangor, R. Evans, M. Haines, S. Mangles, P. Norreys, et al., Physical Review E 70, 026401 (2004).
  • Kruer [2003] W. Kruer, The Physics Of Laser Plasma Interactions (CRC Press, 2003).
  • Born and Wolf [1980] M. Born and E. Wolf, “Principle of optics: Electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference, and diffraction of light, 6 th (corrected) edition,”  (1980).
  • Jackson [1999] J. D. Jackson, “Classical electrodynamics,”  (1999).
  • Paul Drake [2006] R. Paul Drake, “High energy density physics: Fundamentals, inertial fusion and experimental astrophysics,”  (2006).
  • Pogorelsky et al. [2016] I. V. Pogorelsky, M. Babzien, I. Ben-Zvi, J. Skaritka,  and M. N. Polyanskiy, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 829, 432 (2016).
  • Tahir et al. [2007] N. Tahir, P. Spiller, A. Shutov, I. Lomonosov, V. Gryaznov, A. Piriz, G. Wouchuk, C. Deutsch, V. Fortov, D. Hoffmann, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 577, 238 (2007).
  • Batani et al. [2014] D. Batani, S. Baton, A. Casner, S. Depierreux, M. Hohenberger, O. Klimo, M. Koenig, C. Labaune, X. Ribeyre, C. Rousseaux, et al., Nuclear Fusion 54, 054009 (2014).
  • Peterson [2016] K. Peterson, Demonstrating Fuel Magnetization and Laser Heating Tools for Low-Cost Fusion Energy., Tech. Rep. (Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States), 2016).
  • Wu et al. [2020] D. Wu, W. Yu, Z. Sheng, S. Fritzsche,  and X. He, Physical Review E 101, 051202 (2020).