This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

LEPTODERMIC CORRECTIONS TO THE TOV EQUATIONS AND NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS WITHIN THE EFFECTIVE SURFACE APPROXIMATION

A.G. Magner Email: magner@kinr.kiev.ua Institute for Nuclear Research, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA    S.P. Maydanyuk Institute for Nuclear Research, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine    A. Bonasera Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA    H. Zheng School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University,Xi’an 710119, China    T. Depastas Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA    A.I. Levon Institute for Nuclear Research, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine    U.V. Grygoriev Institute for Nuclear Research, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract

The macroscopic model for a neutron star (NS) as a liquid drop at the equilibrium is used to extend the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equations taking into account the gradient terms responsible for the system surface. The parameters of the Schwarzschild metric in the spherical case are found with these surface corrections in the leading (zero) order of the leptodermic approximation a/R<<1a/R<<1, where aa is the NS effective-surface (ES) thickness, and RR is the effective NS radius. The energy density \mathcal{E} is considered in a general form including the functions of the particle number density and of its gradient terms. The macroscopic gravitational potential Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho) is taken into account in the simplest form as expansion in powers of ρρ¯\rho-\overline{\rho}, where ρ¯\overline{\rho} is the saturation density, up to second order, in terms of its contributions to the separation particle energy and incompressibility. Density distributions ρ\rho across the NS ES in the normal direction to the ES, which are derived in the simple analytical form at the same leading approximation, was used for the derivation of the modified TOV (MTOV) equations by accounting for their NS surface corrections. The MTOV equations are analytically solved at first order and the results are compared with the standard TOV approach of the zero order.

I INTRODUCTION

The macroscopic effective-surface approach (ESA) wilets ; strtyap ; tyapin ; strmagbr ; strmagden ; MS09 ; BM13 ; BM15 taking into account the gradient terms of the energy density was applied MS24 for the neutron stars. Following the works of Tolman, Oppenheimer, and Volkoff (TOV) RT39 ; OV39 we consider the neutron star (NS) as a liquid drop at equilibrium under the gravitational, and other realistic forces; see also the Tolman and Rowlinson books RT87 ; RW82 . As shown in Ref. RT87 , the TOV equations were derived OV39 from the equations of the General Relativistic Theory (GRT) assuming the spherical symmetry and the macroscopic approximation to the energy-momentum tensor. The expression for the energy-momentum tensor was essentially used in the TOV derivations for a macroscopic system as the perfect liquid drop LLv2 ; LLv6 . Many applications in terms of the Schwarzschild metric solutions in the spherical case can be found in Refs. LLv2 ; WF88 ; CB97 ; SH06 ; Ko08 ; FCPG13 ; AB14 ; BC15 ; LH19 ; SBL23 . For the basic relations of the nuclear and neutron liquid-drop models to NS properties we should also mention a pioneer work BBP71 done by Baym, Bethe, and Pethick. They discussed the liquid matter drop with the leptodermic property having a sharp decrease of the particle number density in a relatively small edge region considered as its surface. See also Refs. LLv2 ; RT87 ; OV39 ; SBL23 ; LP01 ; HP01PRL ; HP01PRC ; PH00Poland ; ABCG09 ; PFCPS13 ; FCPG13 ; FG23 ; DFG23 ; HPY07 ; LH19 ; ST04 for the description of the finite NS dense matter systems in terms of the leptodermic approximation, a/R1a/R\ll 1, where aa is the crust thickness, and RR is the mean curvature radius of the ES. Clear specific definitions and complete updated results for the energy density with density gradient (surface) terms and for equations of the infinite matter state with many inter-particle forces in the non-relativistic and relativistic cases can be found in the recent review Ref. SBL23 .

Using the step-function for the particle number density ρ\rho, which is a constant inside and zero outside of the system, in line of the Schwarzschild derivations KS16 , Tolman obtained RT87 the explicit analytical solutions for the pressure. They were found in terms of the Schwarzschild metric coefficients for the spherical system symmetry, and the macroscopic energy-momentum tensor for the perfect liquid drop. Analytical expressions for the pressure in terms of the simple one-dimensional integrals can be obtained also for the leptodermic particle-number density ρ\rho, e.g., as shown in Fig. 1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Particle number density, ρ\rho, in units of the saturation value, ρ¯\overline{\rho}, as function of the radial variable rr (in km) for a neutron star in a simple compressed liquid-drop model at the stable equilibrium. Solid line is related to the asymmetric solution, Eq. (32) [the asterisk means the equation taken from Table 1 of Ref. MS24 , line “1”], which is the leading approximation over a small leptodermic parameter, a/R1a/R\ll 1. Dashed line presents the same but for the Wilets symmetric solution wilets ; MS24 (line “2”). Parameters, for example: the effective radius R=10R=10 km, diffuseness of the NS crust a=1a=1 km, and temperature T=0T=0; see, e.g., Refs. ST04 ; HPY07 ; MS24 . The dots ES1 and ES2 show the ES at the effective radius RR for the solid and dashed lines, respectively (from Ref. MS24 ).
Equations Symbols Meaning
(3) \mathcal{E} Energy density
(8) Φ\Phi Macroscopic gravitational potential
(9) 𝒜\mathcal{A} Volume energy density
(10) εG\varepsilon_{G} Volume energy density component
(11) KGK_{G} Total incompressibility
(12) \mathcal{B} Surface energy density coefficient
(16) 𝒜V\mathcal{A}_{V} Volume energy density
(19) ϵ\epsilon Dimensionless energy density
(21) 1st ρ=ρV\rho=\rho_{V} Volume particle number density
(21) 2nd \mathcal{M} Chemical potential correction
(24) Zero order equation For particle density ρ\rho
(27) Zero order equation For dimensionless density y(x)y(x)
(31) x(y)x(y) Leading order solution
(32) y(x)y(x) vdW-Skyrme solution
(60) PP Total pressure
(61) PVP_{\rm V} Volume pressure
(62) PSP_{\rm S} Surface pressure
Table 1: Equations of Ref. MS24 (the first column), marked by the asterisk in the text, are presented for the quantity with symbols in the second column, and explained in the third column. The vdW-Skyrme is the van der Waals and Skyrme inter-particle interaction.

In this work we derive the modified TOV (MTOV) equations by taking into account the gradient surface corrections within the leptodermic approximation Refs. LJ23 ; LP01 ; HP01PRL ; HP01PRC ; PH00Poland ; ABCG09 ; PFCPS13 ; FCPG13 ; FG23 ; DFG23 ; HPY07 ; LH19 ; MS24 . We consider first a dense one-component system as in Ref. MS24 , and take the energy density functional \mathcal{E} in a rather general form, linear in (ρ)2(\nabla\rho)^{2} terms, with the coefficients which are smooth functions of the particle density ρ\rho. In such a system, the particle density ρ\rho in the leading order approximation is function of the radial coordinate with exponentially decreasing behavior from almost a constant saturation value inside of the dense system to that of zero through the NS effective surface in a relatively small crust range aa; see, e.g., Fig. 1. The ES is defined as the inflection points of spatial coordinates, i.e., with density gradients maximum. To obtain the analytical solutions for the particle number density and Equation of State (EoS), we use the leptodermic approximation. In this approximation, the gravitational forces can be taken into account through the macroscopic gravitational potential Φ\Phi determined by the second order expansion over deflection of the density ρ\rho from its saturation value ρ¯\overline{\rho} (see, e.g., Ref. MS24 ).

Within the leptodermic approximation, a/R1a/R\ll 1, simple and accurate solutions of many nuclear and liquid-drop problems involving the particle number density distributions were obtained by using the ES approach for nuclei wilets ; strtyap ; tyapin ; strmagbr ; strmagden ; MS09 ; BM13 ; BM15 ; see also Ref. MS24 for applications to the neutron stars. The ESA exploits the property of saturation of the nuclear particle density ρ\rho inside of the system, which is a characteristic feature of dense systems such as molecular systems, liquid drops (amorphous solids), nuclei, and presumably, NSs. The realistic energy-density distribution per particle is minimal at a certain saturation density ρ¯\overline{\rho}, corresponding approximately to the infinite dense matter bete . As a result, relatively narrow edge region exists in finite nuclei or NS (crust) in which the density drops sharply from its almost central value to zero. We assume here that the part inside of the system far from the ES can be changed a little (saturation property of the dense system as hydrostatic liquid drop, nucleus, or NS in the final evolution state).

The coordinate system related to the effective surface is defined in such a way that one of the spatial coordinates (ξ\xi) is the distance from a given point to the ES, and others (η\eta) are tangent to the ES. This nonlinear coordinate system ξ,η\xi,\eta is conveniently used in a region near the nuclear and NS edge. They allow for an easy extraction of the relatively large terms in density distribution equations for the condition of a variational equilibrium. This condition means that the variation of the total energy EE over the density ρ\rho is zero under the constraints which fix some integrals of motion beyond the energy EE by the Lagrange method. The Lagrange multipliers are determined by these constraints within the local energy-density theory, in particular, the extended Thomas-Fermi (ETF) approach from nuclear, dense molecular, and metallic-cluster physics brguehak ; brbhad . Neglecting the other smaller-order perpendicular- and all parallel-to-ES contributions, sum of such terms leads to a simple one-dimensional equation (in special local coordinates with the coordinate normal-to-surface ξ\xi). Such an equation mainly determines approximately the density distribution across the diffused surface layer. The latter is of the relatively small order over the ratio of the diffuseness parameter aa to the (mean curvature) ES radius RR, a/R<<1a/R<<1, for sufficiently heavy systems. A small parameter, a/Ra/R, of the expansion within the ES approach can be used for analytical solving the variational problem for the minimum of the energy density functional per volume with constraints for a fixed particle number, and other integrals of motion, such as angular momentum, quadrupole deformation, etc. When this edge distribution of the density is known, the leading static and dynamic density distributions which correspond to the diffused surface conditions can be easily constructed. To do so, one has to determine the dynamics of the effective surface which is coupled to the volume dynamics of the density by certain liquid-drop model boundary conditions bormot ; strmagbr ; magstr . Our ESA is based on the catastrophe theory for solving differential equations with a small parameter of the order of a/Ra/R as the coefficient in front of the high order derivatives in normal to the ES direction Ti52 . A relatively large change of the density ρ\rho on a small distance aa with respect to the curvature radius RR takes place for a finite liquid-matter drop (nuclei, molecular water drops, neutron stars). We emphasize that the macroscopic ESA theory MS24 allows to consider the deformed and superdeformed systems for which the same coordinate system ξ,η\xi,\eta can be used locally near the ES. Inside of such dense systems, the density ρ\rho is changed a little around constant saturation density ρ¯\overline{\rho}. Therefore, including also the second order expansion of the gravitational potential near ρ¯\overline{\rho}, one obtains essential effects of the surface capillary pressure.

The accuracy of the ESA was checked in Ref. strmagden for the case of static and dynamic nuclear physics by comparing the results with the existing nuclear theories like Hartree-Fock (HF) vauthbrink and ETF brguehak ; brbhad , based on the Skyrme forces vauthbrink ; skyrme ; barjac ; ringshuk ; blaizot ; brguehak ; gramvoros ; krivin ; CB97 ; CB98 , but for the simplest case without spin-orbit and asymmetry terms of the energy density functional. The direct variational principle for finding numerically the parameters of the tested particle number density functions in simple forms of the Woods-Saxon-like in Ref. BB03 or their powers (Ref. kolsan ) were applied by using the realistic Skyrme energy functional CB97 ; CB98 ; see also recently published variational ETF approach KS18 ; KS20 . The extension of the ES approach to the nuclear isotopic symmetry and spin-orbit interaction has been done in Refs. MS09 ; BM13 ; BM15 . The Swiatecki derivative terms of the symmetry energy for heavy nuclei myswann69 ; myswiat85 ; danielewicz2 ; vinas1 ; vinas2 ; vinas4 ; vinas5 ; Pi09 were taken into account within the ESA in Ref. BM15 . The discussions of the progress in nuclear physics and astrophysics within the relativistic local density approach, can be found in reviews Refs. SBL23 ; NVR11 ; see also Refs. CH08 ; Pi21 ; Pe23 .

In the present work we apply the effective surface approach for the neutron stars of Ref. MS24 , based on Refs. strmagden ; MS09 ; BM13 ; BM15 of nuclear physics, to derive the MTOV equations taking into account the surface leptodermic corrections. In Sect. II we present the TOV derivations at the zero order approach. In Sect. III we derive the MTOV equations with accounting for the first order surface corrections to the TOV equations. The derivations of the analytical solutions to the MTOV equations are obtained too. Sect. IV is devoted to the discussions of the results. These results are summarized in the conclusion section V. Some details of the calculations are given in Appendix A.

II Tolman-Oppengeimer-Volkoff approach

Starting from the Einstein-Gilbert equations of the GRT for the spherically symmetric system, one has the Schwarzschild gravitational metric in a general form:

ds2=eλdr2r2dθ2r2sin2θdϕ2+c2eνdt2,{\rm d}s^{2}=-e^{\lambda}{\rm d}r^{2}-r^{2}{\rm d}\theta^{2}-r^{2}\hbox{sin}^{2}\theta{\rm d}\phi^{2}+c^{2}e^{\nu}{\rm d}t^{2}, (1)

where cc is the speed of light. Functions λ=λ(r)\lambda=\lambda(r) and ν=ν(r)\nu=\nu(r) are given by the differential equations (see Ref. RT87 at zero cosmological constant Λ\Lambda). First, outside of the system on big distances from masses, or for relatively small gravitational forces RT87 ; LLv2 , one can derive these equations using the macroscopic properties of a dense spherical system for the energy-momentum tensor. Transforming then the radial coordinate rr of the spherical four-coordinate system r,θ,ϕr,\theta,\phi, and tt, due to the GRT invariance, for the line element in this space, Eq. (1), one obtains the simple differential equations for λ\lambda and ν\nu of the Schwarzschild metric for the region inside of the liquid-drop system (see, Refs. RT87 ; LLv2 ),

8πGc4P=eλ(νr+1r2)1r2,\displaystyle\frac{8\pi G}{c^{4}}P=e^{-\lambda}\left(\frac{\nu^{\prime}}{r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\right)-\frac{1}{r^{2}}~{}, (2)
8πGc4=eλ(λr1r2)+1r2,\displaystyle\frac{8\pi G}{c^{4}}\mathcal{E}=e^{-\lambda}\left(\frac{\lambda^{\prime}}{r}-\frac{1}{r^{2}}\right)+\frac{1}{r^{2}}~{},
dPdr=12(+P)ν,\displaystyle\frac{dP}{dr}=-\frac{1}{2}\left(\mathcal{E}+P\right)\nu^{\prime}~{},

where GG is the gravitational constant. Primes above λ\lambda and ν\nu mean the corresponding derivatives over the radial coordinate rr, and \mathcal{E} is the energy density. With the EoS, =(ρ)\mathcal{E}=\mathcal{E}(\rho) [or, P=P(ρ)P=P(\rho)], one arrives at the complete system of equations for λ\lambda, ν\nu, \mathcal{E} (or density ρ\rho), and PP.

Using the substitution eλ=fe^{-\lambda}=f, one can solve the second equation in Eq. (2), as a linear first-order differential equation over f(r)f(r), in terms of the quadratures. Then, the derivative ν\nu^{\prime} can be found from the first equation of Eq. (2). Integrating it over rr, one obtains the Schwarzschild metric (1) in terms of these solutions for λ(r)\lambda(r) and ν(r)\nu(r). Substituting the derivative ν\nu^{\prime} into the third equation of Eq. (2), one finally obtains the famous TOV equations RT39 ; OV39 ; LJ23 ,

dPdr=G(+P)(mc2+4πr3P)rc2(rc22Gm),\displaystyle\frac{{\rm d}P}{{\rm d}r}=-\frac{G(\mathcal{E}+P)(mc^{2}+4\pi r^{3}P)}{rc^{2}(rc^{2}-2Gm)},
dmdr=4πr2c2.\displaystyle\frac{{\rm d}m}{{\rm d}r}=\frac{4\pi r^{2}\mathcal{E}}{c^{2}}. (3)

Here, m(r)m(r) is the gravitational mass interior to the radius rr, and \mathcal{E} is a given energy density. Boundary conditions for these equations are given by

m(r=0)=0,(dP/dr)r=0=0.m(r=0)=0,\quad(\hbox{d}P/\hbox{d}r)_{r=0}=0~{}~{}. (4)

The integrations are terminated when P=0P=0, which defines the surface r=Rr=R. A specified value of the central pressure P0=P(r=0)P_{0}=P(r=0) determines the NS volume mass M=m(r=R)M=m(r=R). Notice that the surface corrections to the NS volume mass were obtained in Ref. MS24 .

As shown in Ref. RT87 , taking approximately into account the step-function density, ρ=ρ¯\rho=\overline{\rho} for r<Rr<R inside of the system, and ρ=0\rho=0 for r>Rr>R outside of it, one can solve TOV equations (II) explicitly analytically (see Refs. RT87 ; MS24 ). (For instance, ρ¯\overline{\rho} is the constant density ρ00\rho_{00} using units G=c=1G=c=1, inside of the system in the notations of Tolman). Our leading order solutions for the density ρ\rho are obtained in Ref. MS24 by using the ESA within the leading leptodermic approximation; see Eqs. (31) for more general inter-particle interaction and (32) for the specific vdW-Skyrme forces. They have a sharp transition from the saturation to zero value, which agrees with above mentioned approximation at zero order of the leptodermic expansion in small parameter a/R1a/R\ll 1 (see Fig. 1). Taking also into account the first boundary condition in Eq. (4), the second equation in Eq. (II) can be integrated analytically,

m(r)=4π03c2r3,m(r)=\frac{4\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}}{3c^{2}}r^{3}, (5)

where 0\mathcal{E}_{0} is a constant at r<Rr<R,

0=(ρ=ρ¯)Θ(ρ¯ρ)=𝒜(ρ¯)Θ(Rr),\mathcal{E}_{0}=\mathcal{E}(\rho=\overline{\rho})~{}\Theta\left(\overline{\rho}-\rho\right)=\mathcal{A}(\overline{\rho})\Theta(R-r), (6)

and ρ¯\overline{\rho} is the saturation approximation for the density ρ\rho. We introduced here the Heaviside step function, Θ(x)\Theta(x), Θ(x)=1\Theta(x)=1 for x0x\geq 0 and 0 for x<0x<0. The function 𝒜(ρ)\mathcal{A}(\rho) in Eq. (6) is given by Eq. (9) of Ref. MS24 for 𝒜(ρ)\mathcal{A}(\rho) at the saturation density ρ=ρ¯\rho=\overline{\rho}; see Table 1. The density ρ¯\overline{\rho} and energy density 0\mathcal{E}_{0} can be taken approximately as those found in Ref. MS24 ; see Eqs. (3), (9), (10), and (11), including the macroscopic gravitational field. Formally, one can consider the expression (9) for 0(ρ¯)\mathcal{E}_{0}(\overline{\rho}) inside of the system [or Eq. (16)] as the macroscopic EoS additional to the TOV equations (II). Therefore, the total mass MM neglecting the surface effects and the influence of the Schwarzschild metric curvature, is given within this zero order ESA approximation by

M=m(R)=4π03c2R3,M=m(R)=\frac{4\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}}{3c^{2}}R^{3}, (7)

where RR is the effective NS radius (r1r_{1} in the notations of Tolman’s book, Ref. RT87 ).

For the Schwarzschild metric in the interior region, one has

ds2=dr21r2/RS2r2dθ2r2sin2θdϕ2\displaystyle{\rm d}s^{2}=-\frac{{\rm d}r^{2}}{1-r^{2}/R^{2}_{\rm S}}-r^{2}{\rm d}\theta^{2}-r^{2}\hbox{sin}^{2}\theta{\rm d}\phi^{2}
+c2[ASBS1r2/RS2]2dt2,\displaystyle+c^{2}\left[A_{\rm S}-B_{\rm S}\sqrt{1-r^{2}/R^{2}_{\rm S}}\right]^{2}{\rm d}t^{2}~{}, (8)

where RSR_{\rm S}, ASA_{\rm S}, and BSB_{\rm S} are the specific integration constants, and r<RSr<R_{\rm S}. This metric, Eq. (II), is nonsingular at r=0r=0, in contrast to the original Schwarzschild metric RT87 ; LLv2 , which is valid outside of the gravitating system. Therefore, it can be applied for the part of the space inside of this system (see Ref. RT87 ). A smooth match of the external and internal Schwarzschild metrics through the effective radius, r=Rr=R, is assumed to be carried out. The radius RSR_{\rm S} in Eq. (II) is expressed in terms of the energy density \mathcal{E} inside of the system, 0\mathcal{E}_{0}, far away from the ES as

RS=(8πG03c4)1/2.R_{\rm S}=\left(\frac{8\pi G\mathcal{E}_{0}}{3c^{4}}\right)^{-1/2}. (9)

Other constants, ASA_{\rm S} and BSB_{\rm S}, as well as RSR_{\rm S}, are the following parameters of the transformed Schwarzschild metric, Eq.  (II) (see the derivations in Ref. RT87 ),

AS=321R2RS2,BS=12.A_{\rm S}=\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{1-\frac{R^{2}}{R_{\rm S}^{2}}},\quad B_{\rm S}=\frac{1}{2}~{}. (10)

Substituting Eq. (5) into the first TOV Eq. (II), one can see that the variables PP and rr are separated. Therefore, we analytically find the solution for rRRSr\leq R\leq R_{S}:

P=033ζ1(r/RS)211ζ1(r/RS)2,P=\frac{\mathcal{E}_{0}}{3}\frac{3\zeta\sqrt{1-(r/R_{S})^{2}}-1}{1-\zeta\sqrt{1-(r/R_{S})^{2}}}, (11)

where

ζ=|P0+0/3P0+0|,\zeta=\Big{|}\frac{P_{0}+\mathcal{E}_{0}/3}{P_{0}+\mathcal{E}_{0}}\Big{|}~{}, (12)

and P0P(ρ¯)=P(r=0)P_{0}\equiv P(\overline{\rho})=P(r=0). Here, RSR_{\rm S} is the radius parameter, Eq. (9), in the Schwarzschild metric, Eq. (II).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Contour plots for the pressure P(r)P(r), Eq. (11), in units of the central value, P(r=0)P(r=0) as function of the radial coordinate rr and the dimensionless parameter ASA_{\rm S} of the Schwarzschild metric, Eq. (II). The numbers in squares show the values of this pressure. White color presents regions where we have indetermination, infinity by infinity, with the finite limit 1 at r0r\rightarrow 0. Red color shows negative values of the ratio P(r)/P(r=0)P(r)/P(r=0) [a positive pressure P(r)P(r)]. The value “0.00” displays the zero value in the horizontal and vertical coordinate lines on right of plots. The effective NS radius R=10R=10 km is the same as in Fig.  1 (from Ref. MS24 ).
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The pressure P(r)P(r), Eq. (11), in units of the central value, P(r=0)P(r=0), as function of the radial coordinate rr for the Schwarzschild metric, Eq. (II), at two values of the parameter ASA_{\rm S}, AS=1.15A_{\rm S}=1.15 (solid line) and AS0.96A_{\rm S}\approx 0.96 (dashed line). The latter corresponds to the two values for the NS masses, M=1.4MM=1.4M_{\odot} and M=2.0MM=2.0M_{\odot} (RS13.0R_{\rm S}\approx 13.0 km and 15.615.6 km, respectively; see Refs. GR21 ; CC20 ; TR21 ; OL20 and text). The effective NS radius R=10R=10 km is the same as in Figs.  1 and 2.

Notice that the solution, Eq. (11), coincides, up to a constant, with that presented in Tolman’s book at ζ=BS/AS=1/(2AS)\zeta=B_{\rm S}/A_{\rm S}=1/(2A_{\rm S}) (see Refs. RT87 ; MS24 and Eq. (9) for RSR_{\rm S}). The cosmological constant also is assumed to be zero, and the units for the dimensionless pressure are used, 0RS2\mathcal{E}_{0}\propto R^{-2}_{\rm S}, Eq. (9). Thus, one obtains the relation of these parameters of the Schwarzschild metric, Eq. (II), to the initial condition P=P0P=P_{0} at r=0r=0 through Eq. (12) for ζ\zeta. Notice that according to Eq. (11) for the pressure PP, one has P=0P=0 at the boundary r=Rr=R because of Eq. (10) for the constants ASA_{\rm S} and BSB_{\rm S}. Finally, our result for the pressure, Eq. (11), coincides identically with that of Ref. RT87 .

Figure 2 shows the contour plots for the pressure P(r)P(r) [in units of P(r=0)P(r=0)], as function of rr (km) and parameter ASA_{\rm S}, Eq. (10). It is more convenient to use the finite dimensionless values of ASA_{\rm S}, 0AS1.50\leq A_{\rm S}\leq 1.5, instead of dimensional RSR_{\rm S} for the fixed effective NS radius R=10R=10 km, 0rR0\leq r\leq R. For a very rough estimate neglecting the relatively small gravitational mass defect, 0c2ρ(0)\mathcal{E}_{0}\sim c^{2}\rho^{(0)}, where the central mass density ρ(0)M/(4πR3/3)M/(4πR3/3)\rho^{(0)}\approx M/(4\pi R^{3}/3)\sim M_{\odot}/(4\pi R^{3}/3), (MMVM\approx M_{V}) and M=1.9891030M_{\odot}=1.989*10^{30} kg is the Sun mass, one finds significantly larger Schwarzschild radius parameter RSR_{\rm S} than the effective radius RR, RS15.6R_{\rm S}\approx 15.6 km for M=1.4MM=1.4M_{\odot}, as example. By definition, RSR_{\rm S} is always larger than (or equal to) the effective NS radius RR, RRSR\leq R_{\rm S}, while the gravitational radius rgr_{\rm g} should be smaller than RR, rg=2GM/c2Rr_{\rm g}=2GM/c^{2}\leq R LLv2 . These conditions are fulfilled in our calculations for the values RS15.6R_{\rm S}\approx 15.6 km, and rg4.1r_{\rm g}\approx 4.1 km in the case of the effective radius R=10R=10 km. With these evaluations, one has the constant AS1.15A_{\rm S}\approx 1.15. The maximum value AS1.5A_{\rm S}\approx 1.5 corresponds to zero pressure P(r)P(r).

Figure 3 shows the two cuts of the contour plots (Fig. 2) at the value, AS1.15A_{\rm S}\approx 1.15 (RS15.6R_{\rm S}\approx 15.6 km, solid black line), and the value, AS=0.96A_{\rm S}=0.96 (RS=13.0R_{\rm S}=13.0 km, dashed red line). The physical mass region, M/M1.42.0M/M_{\odot}\approx 1.4-2.0, in line with the experimental data for NS masses and radii (see, Refs. GR21 ; CC20 ; TR21 ; OL20 ), is related to a small range in Fig. 3. These curves have the same starting value 1 and final value 0 for the ratio of pressures P(r)/P(0)P(r)/P(0). For more realistic values of RSR_{\rm S}, for instance, taking into account the gravitational defect of mass LLv2 in the evaluations of the central energy density 0\mathcal{E}_{0}, one may have different values of ASA_{\rm S} presented in Fig. 2. Thus, as seen from the solid and dashed lines of Fig. 3 and assumed in the derivations of the TOV equations OV39 ; RT87 , the pressure PP turns, indeed, to zero at the boundary of the NS system, r=Rr=R.

III Modified TOV approach

We now derive the leptodermic corrections to the TOV equations due to the gradient terms of the energy density \mathcal{E}, in line of Ref. MS24 . The details of these derivations are shown in Appendix A.

III.1 General points

The key quantity of our derivations is the energy density (ρ)\mathcal{E}\left(\rho\right) strmagden ; BM15 ; MS24 ,

(ρ)=𝒜(ρ)+𝒞(ρ)2.\mathcal{E}\left(\rho\right)=\mathcal{A}(\rho)+\mathcal{C}\left(\nabla\rho\right)^{2}. (13)

which determines the total system energy,

E=d𝒱[ρ(𝐫)].E=\int\hbox{d}\mathcal{V}\;\mathcal{E}[\rho({\bf r})]~{}. (14)

The volume element, d𝒱\hbox{d}\mathcal{V}, for a spherical system is determined by the Schwarzschild metric, d𝒱=exp(λ/2)d𝐫\hbox{d}\mathcal{V}=\hbox{exp}(\lambda/2)\hbox{d}{\bf r}, where d𝐫=r2sinθdθdφ\hbox{d}{\bf r}=r^{2}\hbox{sin}\theta~{}\hbox{d}\theta\hbox{d}\varphi. In Eq. (13), 𝒜(ρ)\mathcal{A}(\rho) is the volume non-gradient part, Eq. (9),

𝒜=bVρ+ε(ρ)+G4ρΦ(ρ),\mathcal{A}=-b_{V}\rho+\varepsilon(\rho)+\frac{G}{4}\rho\Phi(\rho), (15)

where bVb_{V} is the non-gravitational contribution into the energy of separation of particle from the matter. In Eq. (15),

ε(ρ)=K18ρ¯2ρ(ρρ¯)2,\varepsilon(\rho)=\frac{K}{18\overline{\rho}^{2}}~{}\rho\left(\rho-\overline{\rho}\right)^{2}, (16)

where KK is the non-gravitational part of the incompressibility modulus, e.g., due to the Skyrme nuclear interaction (for nuclear matter K200K\sim 200 MeV), Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho) is the statistically averaged (macroscopic) gravitational potential; see Eq. (8) and discussions around it in Ref. MS24 . For simplicity, we will consider the gradient term of the inter-particle interaction with a main constant 𝒞\mathcal{C} of Eq. (12) for a smooth coefficient (ρ)\mathcal{B}(\rho) in front of the gradient-density square term.

We also use the condition for a minimum of the energy per particle, 𝒲\mathcal{W}, at a stable equilibrium,

(d𝒲dρ)ρ=ρ¯=0,𝒲=ρ.\left(\frac{\hbox{d}\mathcal{W}}{\hbox{d}\rho}\right)_{\rho=\overline{\rho}}=0~{},\quad\mathcal{W}=\frac{\mathcal{E}}{\rho}~{}. (17)

Therefore, when we can neglect external forces, there is no linear terms in expansion of 𝒜\mathcal{A}, Eq. (15), over powers of the difference ρρ¯\rho-\overline{\rho} near the saturation value ρ¯\overline{\rho}. Near the saturation value, ρρ¯\rho\rightarrow\overline{\rho}, one has 𝒲=𝒜/ρ\mathcal{W}=\mathcal{A}/\rho. Expanding the potential Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho) near the saturation density ρ¯\overline{\rho} up to second order, and taking into account Eq. (17), one indeed finds that there is no linear term, namely, Φ/ρ=0\partial\Phi/\partial\rho=0 at ρ=ρ¯\rho=\overline{\rho}, i.e., Φ=Φ0+(1/2)Φ2(ρρ¯)2\Phi=\Phi_{0}+(1/2)\Phi_{2}(\rho-\overline{\rho})^{2} with some constants Φ0\Phi_{0} and Φ2\Phi_{2}. Combining different terms in Eq. (15), one writes

𝒜=bV(G)ρ+εG(ρ),\mathcal{A}=--b^{(G)}_{V}\rho+\varepsilon_{G}(\rho), (18)

where bV(G)=bVmΦ0b^{(G)}_{V}=b_{V}-m\Phi_{0}, mm is the particle mass, Φ0=Φ(ρ¯)\Phi_{0}=\Phi(\overline{\rho}). The particle separation energy, bV(G)b^{(G)}_{V}, and energy density component, εG(ρ)\varepsilon_{G}(\rho) (see Eq. (16) for ε(ρ)\varepsilon(\rho)) are modified both by the gravitational field Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho),

εG(ρ)=ε(ρ)+m2Φ2(ρρ¯)2=KG18ρ¯2ρ(ρρ¯)2.\varepsilon_{G}(\rho)=\varepsilon(\rho)+\frac{m}{2}\Phi_{2}(\rho-\overline{\rho})^{2}=\frac{K_{G}}{18\overline{\rho}^{2}}~{}\rho\left(\rho-\overline{\rho}\right)^{2}~{}. (19)

Here, KGK_{G} is the total incompressibility modulus modified by the gravitational field Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho) (KG>0K_{G}>0) as

KG=K+9mρ¯2Φ2.K_{G}=K+9m\overline{\rho}^{2}\Phi_{2}~{}. (20)

and Φ2\Phi_{2} is the second derivative of Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho), Φ2=2Φ/ρ2\Phi_{2}=\partial^{2}\Phi/\partial\rho^{2}, taken at the saturation density value ρ=ρ¯\rho=\overline{\rho}.

For non-rotated one-component NS system we have to fix the particle number NN,

N=d𝒱ρ(𝐫).N=\int\hbox{d}\mathcal{V}\rho({\bf r})~{}. (21)

Therefore, introducing the chemical potential μ\mu as the Lagrange multiplier, one obtains from Eqs. (14) and (13) the equation for the equilibrium,

δδρ𝒜ρ2𝒞Δρ=μ.\frac{\delta\mathcal{E}}{\delta\rho}\equiv\frac{\partial\mathcal{A}}{\partial\rho}-2\mathcal{C}\Delta\rho=\mu~{}. (22)

Equation (21) determines the chemical potential μ\mu in terms of the particle number NN. For nuclear liquid drop, one has two equations related to the two constraints for the fixed neutron and proton numbers (Refs. MS09 ; BM13 ; BM15 ). They determine the two (neutron and proton) chemical potentials.

The solution of the Lagrange equation (22) at leading order of the leptodermic expansion over the parameter a/Ra/R, ρ(r)=ρ¯y((rR)/a)\rho(r)=\overline{\rho}y((r-R)/a), as function of the radial coordinate rr, is shown in Fig. 1 in the main case (i), =𝒞=const\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{C}=const, for typical parameters, the thickness of the NS diffused layer (crust) a=1a=1 km and the effective radius R=10R=10 km, in units of the saturation value ρ¯\overline{\rho}; see Refs. ST04 ; HPY07 ; MS24 . We compare the two dimensionless solutions for the particle density ρ(r)/ρ¯\rho(r)/\overline{\rho}. One of them (solid line) is related to the vdW-Skyrme interaction constant 𝒞\mathcal{C} “1” for a dense liquid drop; see Eq. (32) for the universal dimensionless particle number density of a dense liquid drop, y=ρ/ρ¯y=\rho/\overline{\rho}, as function of x=(rR)/ax=(r-R)/a. Another limit case corresponds to the symmetric Wilets solution (ii) wilets ; MS24 for zero constant 𝒞\mathcal{C} and no spin-orbit term but with taking into account the only kinetic gradient term in a gas system; see Eq. (12) for \mathcal{B}. These two curves are very different in the surface layer, especially outside of the system far away from the NS, and almost the same inside of the NS. As seen from Fig. 1 and expected, the range of the exponential decrease of ρ(r)\rho(r) becomes much smaller for the vdW-Skyrme liquid-drop case (i) than for the Wilets gas case (ii). But the surface effects on the local density ρ(r)\rho(r) in both cases are still very important to get a continuous analytical behavior through the ES. The smallness factor, proportional to a/Ra/R, with respect to the volume contribution, appears because of the integration over the normal-to-ES (radial in this example) variable x=(rR)/ax=(r-R)/a in this ES region. Thus, for the calculations of the surface corrections to the NS total energy EE, Eq. (14), and particle number NN, Eq. (21), it would seem possible to assume that they are not (very) important for so small relative diffuseness thickness a/R=0.1a/R=0.1. However, as shown in Ref. MS24 , the influence of the NS surface becomes really important for the local quantities as the particle density ρ(r)\rho(r), Fig. 1, the EoS, and therefore, for the pressure P(r)P(r) calculating through Eqs. (13) and (17),

P=ρ2δ𝒲δρ.P=\rho^{2}\frac{\delta\mathcal{W}}{\delta\rho}~{}. (23)

Moreover, the gravitational mass defect due to the radial curvature of the nonlinear Schwarzschild metric in calculations of the NS mass leads to its dramatic nonmonotonic behavior of M=M(R)M=M(R); see Ref. MS24 .

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Pressure PP, Eq.  (60), in units of ρ¯KG/9\overline{\rho}K_{G}/9 through the NS diffuse surface as function of the density variable yy, (a), for the universal Equation of State, and the radial coordinate rr, (b), through the particle number density, ρ=ρ¯y((rR)/a)\rho=\overline{\rho}y((r-R)/a). The density y(x)y(x) is given, e.g., by Eq. (32) (solid lines). Dashed and dotted lines show the surface (S) and volume (V) components, PSP_{\rm S} [Eq. (62)] and PVP_{\rm V} [Eq. (61)], respectively. The crust thickness a=1.0a=1.0 km and the effective radius parameter R=10R=10 km are the same as in Figs. 1 and 2. The full dots and arrows present the ES for y=y0y=y_{0}, (a), and r=Rr=R, (b).

Figure 4 shows the pressure PP as function of the dimensionless density yy [panel (a)] and radial variable rr [panel (b)] through the density, y((rR)/a)y((r-R)/a), at leading order over the parameter a/Ra/R; see Eq. (60) for the full pressure (PP), Eq. (61) for the volume (PVP_{\rm V}), and Eq. (62) for the surface (PSP_{\rm S}) components of the pressure (Table 1 and Ref. MS24 ). As seen from Fig. 4 (a), all pressures, PP, PVP_{\rm V} and PSP_{\rm S}, take zero value at y=0y=0. The surface pressure, PSP_{\rm S}, takes zero value also asymptotically in the limit y1y\rightarrow 1, in contrast to the volume part, PVP_{\rm V}, as well as the total pressure PP. The full dot shows the ES at y=y0=1/3y=y_{0}=1/3 for the (i) case. As expected, the volume pressure PVP_{\rm V} is monotonically increasing function of the density yy. In Fig. 4 (b), the pressure P(ρ(r))P(\rho(r)) (solid line) has a typical leptodermic behavior with a relatively short thickness of the order of aa, where the pressure decreases sharply from the almost constant asymptote inside of the system at r > Rar\hbox{\kern 1.00006pt\lower 2.58334pt\hbox{$\sim$} \kern-11.19997pt\raise 2.58334pt\hbox{$>$} \kern 1.00006pt}R-a to zero. Dashed red and dotted lines show the surface (PSP_{\rm S}) and volume (PVP_{\rm V}) components, respecively. Sum of these components is the total pressure PP with zero value at the ES because of the equilibrium; see the full point (ES) and arrow which present the effective surface and radius RR, respectively.

III.2 Surface corrections to the TOV equations

For the energy density \mathcal{E}, Eq. (13), one can write

=0+1,\mathcal{E}=\mathcal{E}_{0}+\mathcal{E}_{1}~{}, (24)

where 0\mathcal{E}_{0} is given by Eq. (6); see Eqs. (3) and (12) (Table 1). The second component can be considered as a small leptodermic correction,

1=𝒞(ρ)2.\mathcal{E}_{1}=\mathcal{C}\left(\nabla\rho\right)^{2}. (25)

Indeed, 1\mathcal{E}_{1} enters the solutions of Eq. (2) in terms of the integral over the radial coordinate rr. Our derivations at leading order over leptodermic parameter a/Ra/R are similar to those for the equation for the density ρ\rho and its solutions in Ref. MS24 .

Starting from the same equations (2), as presented in the previous section (see Ref. RT87 ), we split all their solutions into two components, the leading component and leptodermic corrections,

P=P0+P1,λ=λ0+λ1,ν=ν0+ν1,P=P_{0}+P_{1},\quad\lambda=\lambda_{0}+\lambda_{1},\quad\nu=\nu_{0}+\nu_{1}~{}, (26)

where P0P_{0} is the zero order solution shown in Eq. (11). It is related to the constant saturation value for the density ρ¯\overline{\rho} inside of the system and zero outside, and corresponding energy density constant 0\mathcal{E}_{0}; see Eq. (6). These quantities correspond to the zero order Schwarzschild metric parameter, λ0(r)\lambda_{0}(r), which is the function of rr (see Eq. (1) and Ref. RT87 ),

eλ0=1r2/RS2,r<RS.e^{-\lambda_{0}}=1-r^{2}/R^{2}_{\rm S}~{},\quad r<R_{\rm S}~{}. (27)

The component ν0(r)\nu_{0}(r) for the Schwarzschild metric (1) can be found similarly as done in Ref. RT87 . The leptodermic corrections, P1P_{1} and ν1\nu_{1}, Eq. (26), can be expressed in terms of the λ1\lambda_{1}.

As shown in Appendix A, using approximately the property of the energy density component 1(ρ/r)2\mathcal{E}_{1}\propto(\partial\rho/\partial r)^{2}, which is concentrated near the ES, for the correction λ1\lambda_{1}, at first order in the leptodermic expansion, one finally obtains from the second equation of Eq. (2),

λ1(r)=8πRS1R2/RS2𝒟1(r),\lambda_{1}(r)=-\frac{8\pi R_{\rm S}}{1-R^{2}/R_{\rm S}^{2}}~{}\mathcal{D}_{1}(r)~{}, (28)

where

𝒟1dr1(r)aRRKG9ρ¯dξ(ρξ)2.\mathcal{D}_{1}\equiv\int{\rm d}r\mathcal{E}_{1}(r)\approx\frac{a}{R}\frac{RK_{G}}{9\overline{\rho}}\int\hbox{d}\xi\left(\frac{\partial\rho}{\partial\xi}\right)^{2}~{}. (29)

Substituting the asymptote of the solutions, ρexp(ξ/a)\rho\sim\hbox{exp}(-\xi/a), for larger distances ξ/a1\xi/a\gg 1 (see Ref. MS24 ), one has an exponential disappearance of the integral 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1}, Eq. (29),

𝒟1exp(2ξ/a).\mathcal{D}_{1}\propto\hbox{exp}\left(-2\xi/a\right)~{}. (30)

For the interior region, one finds also the exponentially decreasing asymptotes of 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1}, Eq. (29),

𝒟1aRρ¯RKG9𝒴(y).\mathcal{D}_{1}\approx-\frac{a}{R}~{}\frac{\overline{\rho}RK_{G}}{9}\mathcal{Y}(y). (31)

The function 𝒴\mathcal{Y} is given by

𝒴(y)=dyy(1y)\displaystyle\mathcal{Y}(y)=\int{\rm d}y\sqrt{y}(1-y)
=23y3/225y5/2+Cy,\displaystyle=\frac{2}{3}y^{3/2}-\frac{2}{5}y^{5/2}+C_{y}~{}, (32)

where y=ρ/ρ¯y=\rho/\overline{\rho} (see Ref. MS24 ), CyC_{y} is an integration constant. To remove singularity at the origin, we shall assign the value 4/15-4/15 for the constant CyC_{y}. Notice that in the derivations for λ0\lambda_{0}, Eq.(27) [Eq. (96.7) in Tolman’s book RT87 ] similar corrections were neglected by the same arguments. The solution λ1(r)\lambda_{1}(r), Eq. (28), is zero outside of the system because of zero 0\mathcal{E}_{0}, Eq. (6), and P0P_{0}, Eq. (11). Therefore, λ1(r)\lambda_{1}(r) is concentrating near the NS surface, as it should be true (see also Appendix A).

Substituting the derivative dν/dr{\rm d}\nu/{\rm d}r from the first equation of Eq. (2) to its last equation, for a given energy density \mathcal{E}, one obtains the modified TOV equation for the pressure PP,

dPdr=+P2r[(8πPr2+1)eλ1],\frac{{\rm d}P}{{\rm d}r}=-\frac{\mathcal{E}+P}{2r}~{}\left[\left(8\pi Pr^{2}+1\right)e^{\lambda}-1\right], (33)

where λ=λ0+λ1\lambda=\lambda_{0}+\lambda_{1}; see Eqs. (27) and (28). This is valid approximately up to high, e.g. second order in the leptodermic expansion. Let us use now Eqs. (24) for \mathcal{E} and (26) for PP. Using also Eq. (A1) for P0P_{0} at zero order of the leptodermic parameter a/Ra/R, one can derive the linearized equation for P1P_{1} beyond the analytical solutions (27) and (11) of the standard TOV equations for λ0\lambda_{0} and P0P_{0}, respectively.

For the leptodermic correction P1P_{1} to the pressure PP, one has the same standard form as Eq. (A2) for λ1\lambda_{1},

dP1dr+βP1=β1.\frac{{\rm d}P_{1}}{{\rm d}r}+\beta P_{1}=\beta_{1}~{}. (34)

Here, β(r)\beta(r) and β1(r)\beta_{1}(r) are new functions of the radial variable rr,

β=8πr2(0+P0)+8πP0r2+r~22r(1r~2),\beta=\frac{8\pi r^{2}\left(\mathcal{E}_{0}+P_{0}\right)+8\pi P_{0}r^{2}+\tilde{r}^{2}}{2r\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)}~{}, (35)
β1=8πP0r2+r~22r(1r~2)1+(0+P0)(8πP0r2+1)1r~2λ1,\!\beta_{1}\!=\!-\frac{8\pi P_{0}r^{2}\!+\!\tilde{r}^{2}}{2r\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)}\mathcal{E}_{1}\!+\!\frac{\left(\mathcal{E}_{0}\!+\!P_{0}\right)\left(8\pi P_{0}r^{2}+1\right)}{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}\lambda_{1}~{}, (36)

where r~=r/RS\tilde{r}=r/R_{\rm S}, as in Appendix A. In these equations, P0(r)P_{0}(r) is the analytical solution of the TOV equations at zero order of the leptodermic parameter for the pressure, Eq. (11); see Refs. RT87 ; MS24 . Using the same method of the arbitrary constant variations, one obtains the solution in terms of the quadratures (see Appendix A),

P1=C1(P)(r)exp(drβ(r)),P_{1}=-C_{1}^{(P)}(r)\hbox{exp}\left(-\int{\rm d}r\beta(r)\right), (37)

where

C1(P)(r)=drβ1(r)exp[drβ(r)].C_{1}^{(P)}(r)=\int{\rm d}r\beta_{1}(r)\hbox{exp}\left[\int{\rm d}r\beta(r)\right]. (38)

III.3 Leading solutions for the pressure

Substituting the function β(r)\beta(r), Eq. (35), into the integral for the pressure correction P1P_{1}, Eqs. (37) and (38), one finds

exp[drβ(r)]=(1ζ1r~2)2r~(1r~2),\hbox{exp}\left[{\int{\rm d}r\beta(r)}\right]=\frac{\left(1-\zeta\sqrt{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}\right)^{2}}{\sqrt{\tilde{r}\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)}}~{}, (39)

where ζ=1/(31R~2)\zeta=1/(3\sqrt{1-\tilde{R}^{2}}). Using then Eq. (36) for β1(r)\beta_{1}(r) in Eq. (38) for C1(P)C_{1}^{(P)}, one obtains the sum of the two terms,

C1(P)(r)=dr[8πP0r2+r~22r(1r~2)1\displaystyle C_{1}^{(P)}(r)=-\int{\rm d}r\left[\frac{8\pi P_{0}r^{2}+\tilde{r}^{2}}{2r\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)}\mathcal{E}_{1}\right.
+(0+P0)(8πP0r2+1)1r~2λ1]exp[drβ(r)].\displaystyle+\left.\frac{\left(\mathcal{E}_{0}+P_{0}\right)\left(8\pi P_{0}r^{2}+1\right)}{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}\lambda_{1}\right]~{}\hbox{exp}\left[\int{\rm d}r\beta(r)\right]. (40)

The integrand of one of them is proportional to 1\mathcal{E}_{1}, Eq. (25), while the second one is proportional to λ1\lambda_{1}, Eq. (28). The first order corrections, 1\mathcal{E}_{1} and λ1\lambda_{1}, are determined by Eqs. (25) and (28), respectively [see also the approximate Eq. (A6)]. Both these functions exponentially decrease for rr outside of a relatively small range aa of the NS crust at small leptodermic parameter, a/Ra/R. Therefore, the first integral in Eq. (III.3) can be taken approximately at leading order, a/Ra/R, in the leptodermic expansion as for the derivation of λ1\lambda_{1}. Notice that the second integral in Eq. (III.3), with the integrand λ1(r)\propto\lambda_{1}(r), over radial coordinate rr can be neglected as the second order of (a/R)2(a/R)^{2} in the leptodermic expansion. Therefore, it does not contribute at first order over a/Ra/R. Indeed, this integral is reduced approximately to dr𝒴(y)\int{\rm d}r\mathcal{Y}(y),

drλ1(r)aRKGρ¯94πR21R2/RS2\displaystyle\int{\rm d}r\lambda_{1}(r)\approx-\frac{a}{R}\frac{K_{G}\overline{\rho}}{9}\frac{4\pi R^{2}}{\sqrt{1-R^{2}/R_{\rm S}^{2}}}
×dr𝒴(y).\displaystyle\times\int{\rm d}r\mathcal{Y}(y). (41)

Notice that by the same reason, the λ1\lambda_{1} surface correction to the mass defect owing to the curved space can be neglected in calculations of the NS mass MM (Ref. MS24 ) at the first order over a/Ra/R. Transferring the last integral over rr to the variable ρ\rho, dr=dρ(dr/dρ){\rm d}r={\rm d}\rho({\rm d}r/{\rm d}\rho), and using Eqs. (24), and (19) for the inverse derivative of ρ\rho over rr (dr=dξ{\rm d}r={\rm d}\xi), one finds

dr𝒴(y)aRRdyy(1y)𝒴(y).\int{\rm d}r\mathcal{Y}(y)\approx-\frac{a}{R}R\int\frac{{\rm d}y}{\sqrt{y}(1-y)}\mathcal{Y}(y). (42)

The integral on the right hand side is finite because its integrand has no singularity in the limit y1y\rightarrow 1 by the L’hospital theorem, 𝒴/(1y)\mathcal{Y}/(1-y)\rightarrow 𝒴(y)/(1)(1y)0\mathcal{Y}^{\prime}(y)/(-1)\rightarrow(1-y)\rightarrow 0~{}. There is also no singularity at small yy, dy/y=2y\int{\rm d}y/\sqrt{y}=2\sqrt{y}.

Taking all smooth quantities in front of 1\mathcal{E}_{1} off the first integral in Eq. (III.3) over the radial variable rr at r=Rr=R, one approximately finds

C1(P)(r)R~22R(1R~2)𝒟1,C_{1}^{(P)}(r)\approx-\frac{\tilde{R}^{2}}{2R\left(1-\tilde{R}^{2}\right)}~{}\mathcal{D}_{1}~{}, (43)

where 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1} is given by Eq. (29) with the same asymptotic properties (30) and (31) outside of the narrow NS crust, and R~=R/RS\tilde{R}=R/R_{\rm S}. With Eq. (39) for the integral exponent taken at r=Rr=R and the coefficient C1(P)C^{(P)}_{1}, Eq. (43), one arrives at the final analytical approximation for the surface pressure correction P1P_{1},

P1=3R3/24RS5/21R2/RS2𝒟1;P_{1}=-\frac{3R^{3/2}}{4R_{\rm S}^{5/2}\sqrt{1-R^{2}/R^{2}_{\rm S}}}~{}\mathcal{D}_{1}~{}; (44)

see Eq. (37). Here, RR is the effective radius, RSR_{\rm S} is the Schwartzschild radius, Eq. (9), related to the initial value of the energy density, 0\mathcal{E}_{0}, and 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1} is given above by Eq. (29) with the internal (31) and external (30) asymptotes. Therefore, these leptodermic corrections for C1(P)C_{1}^{(P)}, and hence, for P1P_{1}, (as 𝒟1\propto\mathcal{D}_{1}), are exponentially decreasing functions of radial coordinate rr, rr\rightarrow\infty outside [see Eq. (30)] and to zero inside of the system [Eqs. (31) and (III.2)]. In particular, inside of the system, Eq. (31) for 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1}, one arrives at

P1=aRρ¯KG12R5/2RS5/21R2/RS2𝒴(y).P_{1}=\frac{a}{R}~{}\frac{\overline{\rho}K_{G}}{12}~{}\frac{R^{5/2}}{R^{5/2}_{\rm S}\sqrt{1-R^{2}/R^{2}_{\rm S}}}~{}\mathcal{Y}(y)~{}. (45)

Thus, as expected, the leading leptodermic correction P1P_{1} to the zero order pressure P0P_{0} is peaked at the NS effective-surface range due to the function 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1} [Eqs. (29)-(30)]. Therefore, one finds the equation of state in the form:

PP(ρ)=P0(y)+P1(y),P\equiv P(\rho)=P_{0}(y)+P_{1}(y), (46)

where y=ρ/ρ¯y=\rho/\overline{\rho}, P0P_{0} and P1P_{1} are given approximately, at the first order leptodermic approach, by Eqs. (11) and (44), respectively. Substituting the solutions y=y(r)y=y(r) [x=x(y)x=x(y), Eq. (31) with explicitly given Eq. (32)] into Eq. (46) we obtain rr coordinate dependence of the pressure P(ρ(r))P(\rho(r)) at first order in a/Ra/R.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Contour plots for the dimensionless pressure p0(r,AS)p_{0}(r,A_{\rm S}), Eq. (47), as function of the radial coordinate rr and the dimensionless parameter ASA_{\rm S} of the Schwarzschild metric, Eq. (II). Other notations and parameters are the same as in Fig. 2.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The same as in Fig. 5 but for the total pressure p(r,AS)p(r,A_{\rm S}), Eq. (50), as function of the radial coordinate rr and the dimensionless parameter ASA_{\rm S} of the Schwarzschild metric, Eq. (II). The numbers in squares show again the values of this pressure. White color presents regions where we have zero values. The effective NS radius R=10R=10 km is the same as in Figs. 1-4. The leptodermic parameter has a typical value a/R=0.1a/R=0.1. For example, the parameter κρ¯KG/120=10\kappa\equiv\overline{\rho}K_{G}/12\mathcal{E}_{0}=10 for large gravitational forces (κ1\kappa\gg 1).
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The dimensionless pressure p=P(8πGR2/c4)p=P(8\pi GR^{2}/c^{4}), Eq. (50), as function of the radial coordinate rr for the Schwarzschild metric in the form of Eq. (II) at the same value of the parameter ASA_{\rm S}, AS1.15A_{\rm S}\approx 1.15, and different values of the incompressibility parameter κ=0\kappa=0 [black solid for only zero order pressure p0p_{0}, Eq. (47)], 11 [red dashed line, Eq. (50)], 55 (green dotted line), and 1010 (blue dash-dotted line). The NS mass is the same as for the solid line in Fig. 3, M=1.4MM=1.4M_{\odot}. Other parameters are the same as in Fig. 6.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: The same as in Fig. 7 but for the NS mass presented as the dashed line in Fig. 3, M=2.0MM=2.0M_{\odot} (AS=0.96A_{\rm S}=0.96). Other parameters are the same as in Figs. 6 and 7.

It is also convenient to introduce the following dimensionless pressures as functions of rr and ASA_{\rm S} variables, which are explicitly related to the constants cc and GG,

p08πP0GR2c4=R2RS231r2/RS2/2ASAS1r2/RS2/2.\!p_{0}\!\equiv\!\frac{8\pi P_{0}GR^{2}}{c^{4}}\!=\!\frac{R^{2}}{R_{\rm S}^{2}}\frac{3\sqrt{1\!-\!r^{2}/R_{\rm S}^{2}}/2\!-\!A_{\rm S}}{A_{\rm S}\!-\!\sqrt{1\!-\!r^{2}/R_{\rm S}^{2}}/2}~{}. (47)

The explicit relation of the ratio R/RSR/R_{\rm S} to ASA_{\rm S} is given by R/RS=14AS2/9R/R_{\rm S}=\sqrt{1-4A_{\rm S}^{2}/9}; see Eqs. (10) and (9). Then, for the correction P1P_{1}, one similarly writes

p18πP1GR2c4=3κR9/2RS9/21R2/RS2𝒴(y)aR,\!p_{1}\!\equiv\!\frac{8\pi P_{1}GR^{2}}{c^{4}}\!=\!\frac{3\kappa R^{9/2}}{R^{9/2}_{\rm S}\sqrt{1\!-\!R^{2}/R^{2}_{\rm S}}}\mathcal{Y}(y)\frac{a}{R}~{}, (48)

where

κρ¯KG120=K+9mρ¯2Φ212(bVmΦ0),\kappa\equiv\frac{\overline{\rho}K_{G}}{12\mathcal{E}_{0}}=-\frac{K+9m\overline{\rho}^{2}\Phi_{2}}{12(b_{V}-m\Phi_{0})}~{}, (49)

KK is a non-gravitative (e.g., nuclear) incompressibility; see also Eqs. (6) for 0\mathcal{E}_{0} and (18) for a smooth part of the energy density 𝒜(ρ)\mathcal{A}(\rho) in terms of the gravitational potential derivatives of Φ\Phi. For the total dimensionless pressure pp, at first order in the leptodermic parameter a/Ra/R, one finally obtains

pp0+p1,p\approx p_{0}+p_{1}~{}, (50)

where p0p_{0} and p1p_{1} are given by Eqs. (47) and (48).

IV Discussions of the results

Figures 5 and 6 show the dimensionless pressure p0p_{0}, Eq. (47), at zero order and the total pressure pp, Eq. (50), at the first order over a leptodermic parameter a/R=0.1a/R=0.1 as function of the radial coordinate rr and Schwarzschild metric constant ASA_{\rm S}, relatively. The first order contribution p1p_{1} of the pressure pp is proportional to the dimensional incompressibility parameter κ\kappa, Eq. (49). As seen from the comparison of Figs. 6 (κ=10\kappa=10) and 5 (κ=0\kappa=0), the effect of the gravitational field on the pressure is significant near the ES (r > Rr\hbox{\kern 1.00006pt\lower 2.58334pt\hbox{$\sim$} \kern-11.19997pt\raise 2.58334pt\hbox{$>$} \kern 1.00006pt}R) for this change because of the ES correction p1p_{1}, Eq. (48) at a large dimensionless incompressibility κ\kappa, Eq. (49).

Figures 7 and 8 show the cuts of the contour plot of Fig. 6 at AS1.15A_{\rm S}\approx 1.15 corresponding approximately to the typical NS mass M=1.4MM=1.4M_{\odot} and AS0.96A_{\rm S}\approx 0.96 for M=2.0MM=2.0M_{\odot}, respectively, as function of the radial coordinate rr (in km). These NS masses MM and approximately the radii by the order of the magnitude were found in the recent experiments presented in Refs. GR21 ; CC20 ; TR21 ; see also the comparison with the theoretical results in Ref. OL20 . We specify different values of the incompressibility parameter κ\kappa from a weak (almost nuclear κ=1\kappa=1) to a strong value (κ=10\kappa=10) of the gravitational potential. As mentioned above, the value κ=0\kappa=0 is related to the pressure p0p_{0} over zero order leptodermic parameter a/Ra/R; see Fig. 5. For example, one can consider stronger gravitational field up to the value κ=10\kappa=10 in Fig. 8. For nuclear physics, one has κK/(12bV)=1.25\kappa\equiv K/(12b_{\rm V})=1.25 for K=240K=240 MeV, and bV=16b_{\rm V}=16 MeV (or K=225K=225 MeV and bV=15b_{V}=15 MeV from Ref. AB14 ).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: The dimensionless pressures, pp, Eq. (50), (thick solid black line for the surface component p1p_{1} and thin red one for the total volume and surface quantity pp) as functions of the dimensionless particle number density, yy, (density ρ\rho in units of ρ¯\overline{\rho}) for the solution (32) of leading order over the leptodermic parameter a/Ra/R, (a,c), and over the radial coordinate rr, (b,d), for different dimensionless incompressibilites κ=1\kappa=1, (a,b), and 1010, (c,d), [see Eq. (49)], for the NS mass 1.4M1.4M_{\odot}. Dashed (rare green p1p_{1} and frequent blue pp ) lines show these pressures for the NS mass 2.0M2.0M_{\odot}. The arrows show the ES value y0=1/3y_{0}=1/3 in (a,c) and the effective radius RR in (b,d).

Figure 9 shows the EoS (a,c), p(y)p(y), for small [κ=1\kappa=1, (a)] and large [κ=10\kappa=10, (c)] gravitational forces, and the same p(y(r))p(y(r)) (b,d) but with y=y(r)y=y(r) for the vdW-Skyrme interaction, Eq. (32). Again, we compare two characteristic cases, small (M=1.4MM=1.4M_{\odot}, red solid) and relatively large (M=2.0MM=2.0M_{\odot}, blue frequent dashed) NS masses. The EoS pressures p=p(y)p=p(y), Fig. 9(a,c), are increasing functions of the density yy while the pressures p=p(y(r))p=p(y(r)), (b,d), are decreasing as functions of the radial variable rr because of the leptodermic properties of the particle number density y(r)y(r) for the vdW-Skyrme forces, Eq. (32). The surface (SS) components, p1p_{1}, Eq. (48), are shown by black solid (M=1.4MM=1.4M_{\odot}) and green long dashed (M=2.0MM=2.0M_{\odot}) lines, respectively. The surface effects become much more significant with increasing gravitational parameter κ\kappa. These results for the pressure are basically in agreement with those presented in Fig. 4 for the macroscopic EoS. However, the surface correction p1p_{1} leads to a more wide coordinate dependence of the total pressure pp near the ES (Fig. 9 (b,d)). As mentioned above, the NS masses MM and effective radii RR correspond largely to very accurate experimental data; see Refs. GR21 ; CC20 ; TR21 ; OL20 ). Notice also that the mass dependence is also essential for all results presented in Fig. 9 for the volume and surface contributions especially for a large gravitational field. We should emphasize that our results for the volume (pVp_{V}) contribution to the total pressure pp are in good agreement with the numerical calculations based on the TOV equations discussed in Ref. MS24 .

V Conclusions

The effective surface approximation based on the leptodermic expansion over a small parameter - a ratio of the crust thickness aa to the effective radius RR of the system - is extended for the description of neutron star properties. The neutron star was considered as a dense finite liquid (including amorphous solid) system at the equilibrium. The mean gravitational potential Φ(ρ)\Phi(\rho) was taken into account in the simplest form as expansion over powers of differences ρρ¯\rho-\overline{\rho}, where ρ¯\overline{\rho} is the saturation density, up to second order in terms of the particle separation energy and incompressibility. Taking into account the gradient terms of the energy density in a rather general form we analytically obtained the leading (over a small parameter a/R1a/R\ll 1) particle number density ρ\rho. The density ρ\rho was derived as function of the normal-to-ES coordinate ξ\xi of the orthogonal local nonlinear-coordinate system ξ,η\xi,\eta through the effective surface. With its help, one finds the equation of state (EoS) for the pressure P=P(ρ)P=P(\rho). The TOV equations were re-derived within the same ESA approximation taking into account the leptodermic surface corrections. Our results for the leading order volume pressure components are in good agreement with those of Tolman RT87 and numerical calculations MS24 . We obtained the first order leptodermic surface corrections owing to the Schwartzschild metric, and corresponding modified TOV equations, and have solved them analytically within the same order. These first order corrections, being of the order of a/Ra/R, are also proportional to the dimensionless incompressibility depending essentially on the gravitational interaction constant, along with the nuclear interaction part. The surface pressure corrections are significantly increased with increasing NS mass, and even more pronouncely, with the gravitational contribution to the total incompressibility.

As perspectives, one can generalize our analytical approach to the the many-component and rotating systems. It is especially interesting to extend this approach to take into account the symmetry energy of the isotopically asymmetric systems, and collective NS rotations. As this approach was formulated in the local nonlinear system of coordinates ξ,η\xi,\eta for deformed and superdeformed shapes of the NS surface, one can apply our method to the pair of neutron star pulsars at their large angular momenta.

Acknowledgements.
The authors greatly acknowledge C.A. Chin, V.Z. Goldberg, S.N. Fedotkin, J. Holt, C.M. Ko, E.I. Koshchiy, J.B. Natowitz, A.I. Sanzhur, and G.V. Rogachev for many creative and useful discussions. A. Bonasera, T. Depastas, and A.G. Magner are partially supported by the US Department of Energy under Grant no. DE-FG03-93ER-40773.

Appendix A Derivations for λ1\lambda_{1}

Substituting Eqs. (24) and (26) into the second equation in Eq. (2), one has at zero order leptodermic parameter,

8π0=eλ0(1rdλ0dr1r2)+1r2.8\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}=e^{-\lambda_{0}}\left(\frac{1}{r}\frac{{\rm d}\lambda_{0}}{{\rm d}r}-\frac{1}{r^{2}}\right)+\frac{1}{r^{2}}~{}. (A1)

Then, using this zero order equation, from Eq. (2), one obtains in the linear order in λ1\lambda_{1} (G=c=1G=c=1),

8π1=1reλ0dλ1drλ1(8π01r2).8\pi\mathcal{E}_{1}=\frac{1}{r}e^{-\lambda_{0}}\frac{{\rm d}\lambda_{1}}{{\rm d}r}-\lambda_{1}\left(8\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}-\frac{1}{r^{2}}\right). (A2)

This equation has the standard form with respect to the surface correction λ1\lambda_{1} as the first order linear differential equation,

dλ1dr+αλ1=α1,\frac{{\rm d}\lambda_{1}}{{\rm d}r}+\alpha\lambda_{1}=\alpha_{1}~{}, (A3)

where

α(r)=reλ0(8π0+1r2)\displaystyle\alpha(r)=re^{\lambda_{0}}\left(-8\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\right)
=1r(1r~2)8π0r1r~2,\displaystyle=\frac{1}{r(1-\tilde{r}^{2})}-\frac{8\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}r}{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}, (A4)

r~=r/RS\tilde{r}=r/R_{\rm S}, and

α1=8πr11r~28πr𝒞1r~2(dρdr)2\displaystyle\alpha_{1}=\frac{8\pi r\mathcal{E}_{1}}{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}\approx\frac{8\pi r\mathcal{C}}{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}\left(\frac{{\rm d}\rho}{{\rm d}r}\right)^{2}
8πrεG1r~2.\displaystyle\approx\frac{8\pi r\varepsilon_{G}}{1-\tilde{r}^{2}}~{}. (A5)

Here,

1𝒞(dρdr)2εG;\mathcal{E}_{1}\approx\mathcal{C}\left(\frac{{\rm d}\rho}{{\rm d}r}\right)^{2}\approx\varepsilon_{G}~{}; (A6)

see Eq. (27) for λ0\lambda_{0} and Eq. (26) for 1\mathcal{E}_{1} at the leading order of the leptodermic expansion for r<RSr<R_{\rm S} (r~<1\tilde{r}<1), as well as Eq. (24) for the last approximation. According to Eq. (19) for εG\varepsilon_{G}, one has εGy(1y)2\varepsilon_{G}\propto y(1-y)^{2}, i.e., εG\varepsilon_{G} has a sharp maximum of the width aa near the boundary ES (see Fig. 1).

Using the method of an arbitrary constant variation, one obtains from Eq. (A2) the solution for λ1\lambda_{1} in the form:

λ1=C1(λ)(r)exp(drα(r)),\lambda_{1}=C_{1}^{(\lambda)}(r)\hbox{exp}\left(-\int{\rm d}r\alpha(r)\right), (A7)

where

C1(λ)(r)=drα1(r)exp(drα(r)).C_{1}^{(\lambda)}(r)=\int{\rm d}r\alpha_{1}(r)\hbox{exp}\left(\int{\rm d}r\alpha(r)\right). (A8)

For the integrals in exponent of Eq. (A7) and (A8), one obtains

drα(r)=ln(r~1r~2)+8π0RS2ln1r~2,\!\int\!{\rm d}r\alpha(r)\!=\!\ln\left(\frac{\tilde{r}}{\sqrt{1\!-\!\tilde{r}^{2}}}\right)\!+\!8\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}R^{2}_{\rm S}\ln\sqrt{1\!-\!\tilde{r}^{2}}, (A9)

i.e.,

exp(drα(r))=r~(1r~2)1/2+4π0RS2.\hbox{exp}\left(\int{\rm d}r\alpha(r)\right)=\tilde{r}\left(1-\tilde{r}^{2}\right)^{-1/2+4\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}R_{\rm S}^{2}}. (A10)

Therefore, for C1(λ)(r)C^{(\lambda)}_{1}(r), Eq. (A8), one has

C1(λ)(r)=8πrdr1(r)(1r~2)4π0RS23/2.\!C_{1}^{(\lambda)}(r)\!=\!8\pi\int\!r{\rm d}r\mathcal{E}_{1}(r)\!\left(1\!-\!\tilde{r}^{2}\right)^{4\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}R^{2}_{\rm S}-3/2}. (A11)

Taking into account that α11(dρ/dr)2\alpha_{1}\propto\mathcal{E}_{1}\propto({\rm d}\rho/{\rm d}r)^{2}, Eq. (A), at leading order of the leptodermic expansion, one can take the smooth coefficient in the integrand of Eq. (A11) off the integral at the ES, r=Rr=R. The reason is that the derivative square, (ρ/r)2(\partial\rho/\partial r)^{2}, is a bell-like function of rr with a relatively small width of the order of the crust thickness aa. We assume here that rr is not close to the Schwarzschild radius RSR_{\rm S}, where the integrand in Eq. (A11) is singular. In line of Ref. MS24 , the remaining integration within the same precision can be taken analytically. Finally, for C1(λ)(r)C^{(\lambda)}_{1}(r) one finds (r<RSr<R_{\rm S})

C1(λ)(r)=8πR(1R~2)4π0RS23/2𝒟1,C_{1}^{(\lambda)}(r)=8\pi R\left(1-\tilde{R}^{2}\right)^{4\pi\mathcal{E}_{0}R_{\rm S}^{2}-3/2}\mathcal{D}_{1}~{}, (A12)

where 𝒟1\mathcal{D}_{1} is given by Eq. (29); see also Eq. (30) for the asymptote outside and Eq. (31) [in terms of 𝒴(y)\mathcal{Y}(y), Eq. (III.2)] inside of the system. The effective radius RR is presented in units of RSR_{\rm S} and c=G=1c=G=1, for shortness. From Eqs. (A12) and (A10), one arrives at the final expression (28) for λ1\lambda_{1}.

Using Eqs. (24) for \mathcal{E} and (26) for PP and λ\lambda, and Eq. (A1) for P0P_{0} at the zero order of leptodermic parameter a/Ra/R, one can derive the linearized equation (34) for P1P_{1} beyond the standard TOV equations (A1) and (II) for P0P_{0}. Equation (34) for the leptodermic pressure correction P1P_{1} has the same standard form as Eq. (A2) for λ1\lambda_{1}. Using also the same method of the arbitrary constant variations, one obtains the solution in terms of the quadratures, Eqs. (37) for P1P_{1} and (38) for C1(P)C_{1}^{(P)}. Substituting the function β(r)\beta(r), Eq. (35), into the integrals in Eqs. (37) and (38), one finds Eqs. (39) for drβ(r)\int{\rm d}r\beta(r) and (III.3) for C1(P)C_{1}^{(P)}. As shown in section III, within the first order over a/Ra/R, one has to neglect λ1\lambda_{1} which gives the second order leptodermic correction to the pressure correction P1P_{1}. Finally, with Eq. (43) for C1(P)C^{(P)}_{1}, for the leptodermic correction P1P_{1}, one arrives at Eq. (44).

References

  • (1) L. Wilets, Phys.Rev. 101, 1805 (1956); Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 542 (1958).
  • (2) V.M. Strutinsky, and A.S. Tyapin, Exp. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 18, 664 (1964).
  • (3) A.S. Tyapin, Sov. Journ. Nucl. Phys. 11, 401 (1970), 13, 32 (1971), 14, 50 (1972).
  • (4) V.M. Strutinsky, A.G. Magner, and M. Brack, Z. Phys. A 319, 205 (1984).
  • (5) V.M. Strutinsky, A.G. Magner, and V. Yu. Denisov, Z. Phys., 322, 149 (1985).
  • (6) A.G. Magner, A.I. Sanzhur, and A.M. Gzhebinsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 92, 064311 (2009).
  • (7) J.P. Blocki, A.G. Magner, P. Ring, and A.A. Vlasenko, Phys. Rev. C 87, 044304 (2013).
  • (8) J.P. Blocki, A.G. Magner, and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 92, 064311 (2015).
  • (9) A.G. Magner, A.I. Sanzhur, S.P. Maydanyuk, H. Zheng, A. Bonasera, T. Depastas, A.I. Levon, U.V. Grygoriev, arXiv:2403.01445 (nucl-th), accepted by the Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. E, 2024.
  • (10) R.C. Tolman, Phys. Rev. C55, 364 (1939).
  • (11) J.R. Oppenheimer and G.M. Volkoff, Phys. Rev. C55, 374 (1939).
  • (12) R.C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology, (Dover Publications, New York, 1987; Oxford, the University Press, 1934, 1946, 1949, 1987).
  • (13) J.S. Rowlinson and B. Widom, Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1982).
  • (14) L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Theoretical Physics, v.2, The Classical Theory of Fields (Elsevier, Amsterdam,1951-1971; FIZMATGIZ, Moscow, 2003).
  • (15) G. Baym, H. Bethe, and C.J. Pethick, Nucl. Phys. A 175 (1971) 225.
  • (16) R.B. Wiringa, V. Fiks, A. Fabrocini, Phys. Rev. C 38, 1010 (1988).
  • (17) E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P.Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Shaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A 627, 710 (1997).
  • (18) I. Sagert, M. Hempel, C. Greiner, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Eur, J. Phys. 27, 577 (2006).
  • (19) Bao-An Li, Lie-Wen Chen, and Che Ming Ko, Phys. Rep., 464, 113 (2008).
  • (20) A.Y. Potekhin, A. F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J.M. Pearson, and S. Goriely, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 560, A48 (2013).
  • (21) G. Giuliani, H. Zheng, A. Bonasera, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 76, 116 (2014).
  • (22) Y. Lim and J.W. Holt, Eur.Phys. J. A 55, 209 (2019).
  • (23) Boyang Sun, Saketh Bhattiprolu, and James M. Lattimer, archiv:2311.00843v1, 2023.
  • (24) R. Belverde, F. Cipolletta, C. Cherubini, S.M. de Carvalho, S. Filippi, R. Negreiros, J. P. Pereira, J.A. Rueda, and R. Ruffini, Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars, The second ICRANet César Lattes Meeting, AIP Conf. Proc. 1693,030001-1-030001-19; doi;10.1063/1.4937184 (AIP Publishing LLC 978-0-7354-5/$30.00), p.030001-1 (2015).
  • (25) L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Theoretical Physics, v.6, Fluid Mechanics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1959-1987).
  • (26) K. Schwarzschild, Berl. Ber., p. 424 (1916).
  • (27) P. Haensel, A.Y. Potehin, D.G. Yakovlev, Astrophysics and space science library, vol. 326, Neutron Stars 1. Equation of State and Structure (Springer, New York, 2007).
  • (28) J.M. Lattimer, J. Phys., Conf. Ser., 2536, 012009 (2023).
  • (29) J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, The astrophysical Journal, 550, 426 (2001).
  • (30) C.J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 5647 (2001).
  • (31) C.J. Horowitz and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev. C, 64, 062802(R) (2001).
  • (32) P.Haensel, Neutron Star Crusts, N. Copernicus Astronomical Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18, PL-00-716 Warszawa, Poland, 2000.
  • (33) Z. Arzoumanian, S. Bogdanov, J. Cordes, K. Gendreau, D. Lai, J. Lattimer, B. Link, A. Lommen, C. Miller, P. Ray, R. Rutledge, T. Strohmayer, C. Wilson-Hodge, and K. Wood, arXiv:0902.3264  , 2009; https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0902.3264.
  • (34) A.F. Fantina, N. Chamel, J.M. Pearson, and S. Goriely, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 559, A128 (2013).
  • (35) A.F. Fantina, and F. Gulminelli, J. Phys., Conf. Ser. 2586, 012112 (2023); doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2586/1/012112 .
  • (36) H. Dinh, A.F. Fantina, and F. Gulminelli, Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 292(2023); https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01199-x .
  • (37) H. Bethe, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci., 21, 93 (1971).
  • (38) M. Brack and R. K. Bhaduri, Semiclassical Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA) 1997; 2nd edition (Westview Press, Boulder) 2003.
  • (39) M. Brack, G. Guet, H.-B. Håkansson, Phys. Rep. 123, 275 (1985).
  • (40) A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear structure (W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1975), Vol. II.
  • (41) A. G. Magner, V. M. Strutinsky, Z. Phys. A 324, 633 (1985).
  • (42) J.S. Rowlinson, Journ. Stat. Phys. 20, 197 (1979).
  • (43) A.N. Tikhonov, Systems of differential equations containing a small parameter in front of the derivatives, Mat. Sb. , 31 : 3 (1952) pp. 575-586 (In Russian).
  • (44) D. Vautherin, D. Brink, Phys. Rev. C 5 626 (1972).
  • (45) T.H.R. Skyrme, Philos. Mag., 1 8th ser., 1043 (1956).
  • (46) R.C. Barrett, D.F. Jacson, Nuclear sizes and structure Oxford, Clarendon Press 1977.
  • (47) P. Ring, P. Schuck, The nuclear many-body problem, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag 1980.
  • (48) J.P. Blaizot, Phys. Rep. 64, 172 (1980).
  • (49) H. Krivine, J. Treiner, and O. Bohigas, Nucl. Phys. A, 336, 155, (1980).
  • (50) E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P.Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Shaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A 635, 231 (1998).
  • (51) B. Gramaticos, A. Voros, Ann.Phys., 123, 359 (1979); 129, 153 (1980.)
  • (52) M. Brack and R. K. Bhaduri, Semiclassical Physics. Frontiers in Physics No. 96, 2nd ed. (Westview Press, Boulder CO, USA, 2003).
  • (53) V.M. Kolomietz and A.I. Sanzhur, Eur. Phys. J. A 38, 345–354 (2008).
  • (54) V.M. Kolomietz, A.I. Sanzhur, and S. Shlomo, Phys. Rev. C 97, 064302 (2018).
  • (55) V.M. Kolomietz and S. Shlomo, Mean Field Theory, World Scientific, Singapore (2020).
  • (56) W.D. Myers and W.J. Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. (NY) 55, 395 (1969); 84, 186 (1974).
  • (57) W.D. Myers, W.J. Swiatecki, and C.S. Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 436, 185 (1985).
  • (58) P. Danielewicz and J. Lee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18, 892 (2009).
  • (59) M. Centelles, X. Roca-Maza, X. Viñas, and M. Warda, Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, 122502 (2009).
  • (60) M. Warda, X. Viñas, X. Roca-Maza, and M. Centelles, Phys. Rev. C 80, 024316 (2009); 81, 054309 (2010); 82, 054314 (2010); arXiv:0906.0932 [nucl-th] (2009).
  • (61) X. Roca-Maza, M. Centelles, X. Viñas, and M. Warda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 252501 (2011).
  • (62) X. Viñas, M. Centelles, X. Roca-Maza, and M. Warda, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 27 (2014).
  • (63) J. Piekarewicz and M. Centelles, Phys. Rev.  C 79, 054311 (2009).
  • (64) T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 66, 519 (2011).
  • (65) B.D. Reed, F.J. Fattoyev, C.J. Horowitz, and J. Piekarewicz, Phys. Rev.  Lett.  126, 172503 (2021).
  • (66) N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Liv. Rev. Relativ. 11, 10 (2008).
  • (67) N. N. Shchechilin, N. Chamel, J. M. Pearson, Phys. Rev. C 108, 025805 (2023).
  • (68) V.M. Strutinsky, N.Ya. Ljashtchenko, N.A. Popov, Nucl. Phys. 46 171 (1963).
  • (69) S.L. Shapiro, S.A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact objects (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH& Co.KGaA, Weinheim, 2004).
  • (70) G. Raaijmaket et al., The Astrophysical Journ. Lett. 918: L29 (2021), 1 (13 pp).
  • (71) C.D. Capano et al., Nature Astronomy 4, (2020) 625.
  • (72) T.E. Riley et al., The Astrophysical Journ. Lett. 918: L27 (2021), 1 (30 pp).
  • (73) O. Lorenco, M. Bhuyan, C.H. Lenzi, M. Dutra, C. Gonzalez-Boquera, M. Centelles, X. Viñas, Phys. Lett. B 803, (2020) 135306.
  • (74) H. Zheng and A. Bonasera, Phys. Rev. C83, 057602 (2011).
  • (75) L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Theoretical Physics, v.5, Statistical Physics (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1951-1980).