This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Light dark-matter window in 𝑲+𝝅+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}++𝑬\not{\!\!E}

Xiao-Gang He ,1,2,,^{1,2,}111 Xiao-Dong Ma ,3,4,,^{3,4,}222 Jusak Tandean ,1,2,,^{1,2,}333 and German Valencia 5,444
1State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Tsung-Dao Lee Institute & School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201210, China
2Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE) & Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Tsung-Dao Lee Institute & School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201210, China
3State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
4Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Guangzhou 510006, China
5School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Abstract
We explore the potential presence of new physics in the recent NA62 observation of the kaon decay K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+E\not{\!\!E} with missing energy E\not{\!\!E} in the context of a dark-matter (DM) scenario that can explain the Belle II finding of enhanced rate of the bb-meson decay B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+E\not{\!\!E} compared to the standard-model expectation. Specifically, assuming that a light real scalar boson ϕ\phi plays the role of DM and working in an effective field-theory-framework, we study model-independently the impact of operators involving ϕ\phi and ordinary quarks on the aforementioned transitions over the kaon mode’s kinematical mass region of mϕ<(mKmπ)/2=177m_{\phi}<(m_{K}-m_{\pi})/2=177 MeV. The DM particle is subject to significant restrictions from the observed relic abundance and from DM direct detection experiments incorporating the Migdal effect, indirect searches including that in cosmic microwave background data, and collider searches, except when its mass is between 110 MeV and 146 MeV. We demonstrate that K+π+ϕϕK^{+}\to\pi^{+}\phi\phi can saturate the new-physics window in the NA62 result if mϕm_{\phi} lies in the 110-130 MeV portion of the range left by the DM constraints. Improved data from future Belle II and NA62 measurements and DM quests will test our scenario more stringently.
0000-0001-7059-6311 hexg@sjtu.edu.cn 0000-0001-7207-7793 maxid@scnu.edu.cn 0000-0001-7581-2351 jtandean@yahoo.com 0000-0001-6600-1290 german.valencia@monash.edu

I Introduction

Recently the NA62 collaboration has reported the first observation of kaon decay K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}, with missing energy (\not{E}) carried away by emitted invisible particles, its branching ratio measured to be  (K+π+{\cal B}(K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+)exp=(13.03.0+3.3)×1011\not{E})_{\rm exp}=\big{(}13.0_{-3.0}^{+3.3}\big{)}\times 10^{-11} [1], making this mode the rarest one discovered to date. In the standard model (SM), neutrinos (νν¯\nu\bar{\nu}) act as the invisibles, and the K+π+νν¯K^{+}\to\pi^{+}\nu\bar{\nu} prediction is remarkably precise [2] but still suffers from significant parametric uncertainty arising from the input values of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) angles. This is illustrated by the three different branching-ratio numbers quoted in Ref. [1]. Conservatively, the one with the largest quoted uncertainty,  (K+π+νν¯)SM=(8.4±1.0)×1011{\cal B}(K^{+}\to\pi^{+}\nu\bar{\nu})_{\rm SM}=(8.4\pm 1.0)\times 10^{-11} [3], may be adopted for discussion purposes. It is less than the measurement by  ΔK=(4.63.2+3.4)×1011\Delta{\cal B}_{K}=(4.6^{+3.4}_{-3.2})\times 10^{-11}.

The preceding ΔK\Delta{\cal B}_{K} value can be regarded as a potential window into new physics beyond the SM. If  ΔK0\Delta{\cal B}_{K}\neq 0  persists with increasing statistical significance as more data are collected in the future, it might be due to dark matter (DM) particles contributing to \not{E}. Analogous ideas have lately been proposed [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26] to explain the recent Belle II measurement [27] on the bb-meson decay B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E}  with a rate that is higher than the SM expectation. It is therefore interesting to consider the possibility that the same new physics can be responsible for both  ΔK0\Delta{\cal B}_{K}\neq 0  and the  B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E}  anomaly, with the obvious condition that the DM mass not exceed  (mK+mπ+)/2=177(m_{K^{+}}-m_{\pi^{+}})/2=177 MeV in order that the K+K^{+} channel with the DM could occur. The DM candidate must additionally be able to reproduce the observed relic abundance and comply with bounds inferred from DM direct, indirect, and collider searches. Here we carry out a model-independent analysis of this kind of scenario to look for the parameter space at the level of low-energy effective field theory (LEFT) where all these requisites can be fulfilled. We arrive at interesting allowed parameter regions which can be tested further with future data, especially from Belle II, NA62, and the various DM searches, and which were not covered in the earlier B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E}  studies.

The organization of the paper is as follows. In the next section, we discuss the effective interactions of the DM with SM quarks. In Sec. III, we address in greater detail the implications for the B+B^{+} and K+K^{+} transitions of interest. In Sec. IV, we examine the restrictions on the parameter space from various DM searches. In Sec. V, we give our conclusions.

II Effective DM-quark interactions

We suppose that the DM particle is a real scalar boson ϕ\phi which is a SM-gauge singlet and interacts only in pair with SM quarks due to it being charged under some symmetry of a dark sector beyond the SM or odd under a 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} symmetry which does not influence SM fields. This ensures the stability of ϕ\phi. In the LEFT-like framework that we adopt, the lowest-dimension operators describing the ϕ\phi-quark couplings of interest are given by [28, 29]

qqϕ2ϕ𝙻𝙴𝙵𝚃\displaystyle\mathcal{L}_{qq\phi^{2}}^{\phi\tt LEFT} 12[CdϕS,kl(dk¯dl)+CdϕP,kl(dk¯iγ5dl)+CuϕS,uu(u¯u)+CuϕP,uu(u¯iγ5u)]ϕ2,\displaystyle\,\supset\,\frac{1}{2}\Big{[}C_{d\phi}^{S,kl}\big{(}\overline{d_{k}}d_{l}\big{)}+C_{d\phi}^{P,kl}\big{(}\overline{d_{k}}i\gamma_{5}d_{l}\big{)}+C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}(\overline{u}u)+C_{u\phi}^{P,uu}(\overline{u}i\gamma_{5}u)\Big{]}\phi^{2}\,, (1)

where summation over (kl)=(dd,ss,sd,sb)(kl)=(dd,ss,sd,sb) is implicit and the CCs are generally complex, independent constants. The Hermiticity of this Lagrangian implies that  CdϕS(P),kl=CdϕS(P),lkC_{d\phi}^{S(P),kl}=C_{d\phi}^{S(P),lk*}  and CuϕS(P),uuC_{u\phi}^{S(P),uu} is real. Only the (d¯kdl)ϕ2(\bar{d}_{k}d_{l})\phi^{2} term in Eq. (1) can supply the bsϕ2bs\phi^{2} and sdϕ2sd\phi^{2} couplings that contribute to  B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E}  and  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E},  respectively, as the matrix element of a pseudoscalar quark bilinear between two pseudoscalar mesons vanishes.555If  CdϕP,bs0C_{d\phi}^{P,bs}\neq 0  in Eq. (1), the (b¯iγ5s)ϕ2(\bar{b}i\gamma_{5}s)\phi^{2} operator could affect the yet-unobserved  BKB\to K^{*}+\not{E}  at levels similar to what is required of (b¯s)ϕ2(\bar{b}s)\phi^{2} to explain the B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E} excess without violating their experimental bounds [30]. If  CdϕP,sd0C_{d\phi}^{P,sd}\neq 0,  the (s¯iγ5d)ϕ2(\bar{s}i\gamma_{5}d)\phi^{2} operator could contributes to  KππK\to\pi\pi+\not{E}  and  KK\to\not{E} [29], their SM branching ratios being of order 101310^{-13} or less [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36], as well as to analogous hyperon decays [37], all of which still have relatively weak empirical limits [38, 39, 40, 41, 42], implying that these kaon and hyperon modes each offer a potentially wide window into new physics [37, 40, 43]. For ϕ\phi to be the cosmological DM candidate, we demand that its annihilation generate the observed relic abundance via the freeze-out mechanism and include the (u¯u)ϕ2(\bar{u}u)\phi^{2} and (d¯d)ϕ2(\bar{d}d)\phi^{2} operators. Since the ϕ\phi mass must be  mϕ<177m_{\phi}<177 MeV  and the latest results of DM direct-detection experiments have translated into strict bounds on sub-GeV DM, especially when the Migdal effect is taken into consideration, it turns out that the impact of the latter can be alleviated by turning on the (s¯s)ϕ2(\bar{s}s)\phi^{2} term as well, which does not affect the relic density. These are discussed in more detail below.

III 𝑩+𝑲+B^{+}\to K^{+}++\not{E} and 𝑲+𝝅+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}++\not{E}

In 2023 the Belle II experiment [27] came up with  (B+K+{\cal B}(B^{+}\to K^{+}+)exp=(2.3±0.7)×105\not{E})_{\rm exp}=(2.3\pm 0.7)\times 10^{-5}, which is 2.7σ\sigma bigger than the SM prediction  (B+K+νν¯)SM=(4.43±0.31)×106{\cal B}(B^{+}\to K^{+}\nu\bar{\nu})_{\rm SM}=(4.43\pm 0.31)\times 10^{-6} [44, 7].666This does not include the tree-level contribution mediated by the tau lepton [27]. Combining this new measurement with the earlier findings by BaBar [45, 46], Belle [47, 48], and Belle II [49] yields the weighted average  (B+K+{\cal B}(B^{+}\to K^{+}+)exp=(1.3±0.4)×105\not{E})_{\rm exp}=(1.3\pm 0.4)\times 10^{-5} [27], which is larger than the SM value by 2.1σ\sigma. This could be interpreted as attributable to the presence of the exotic channel  B+K+ϕϕB^{+}\to K^{+}\phi\phi  induced by the (b¯s)ϕ2(\bar{b}s)\phi^{2} operator with  CdϕS,bs0C^{S,bs}_{d\phi}\neq 0  in Eq. (1) and DM mass  mϕ<(mB+mK+)/2m_{\phi}<(m_{B^{+}}-m_{K^{+}})/2.  It has been shown [7, 16] that this can indeed explain the Belle II anomaly if, for example,  CdϕS,bs[3,7]/(105C^{S,bs}_{d\phi}\in[3,7]/(10^{5} TeV)  and mϕ[0.1,1]m_{\phi}\in[0.1,1] GeV.

If the same underlying new physics is to induce  K+π+ϕϕK^{+}\to\pi^{+}\phi\phi  as well and fill the potential new-physics window ΔK\Delta{\cal B}_{K} in the aforementioned  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}  data from NA62, the DM needs to be sufficiently light with mass  mϕ<(mK+mπ+)/2=177m_{\phi}<(m_{K^{+}}-m_{\pi^{+}})/2=177 MeV.  In this range, the  B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E} anomaly can be accounted for with  CdϕS,bs(2.56)/(105TeV)C_{d\phi}^{S,bs}\sim(2.5-6)/(10^{5}\,\rm TeV) [7, 16].

For such low-mass DM, we can deal with  KπϕϕK\to\pi\phi\phi  and the DM annihilation into light hadrons brought about by the LEFT operators in Eq. (1) by means of chiral perturbation theory. This leads to the ϕ\phi interactions with light mesons given by

ϕPB02ϕ2{(CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd)(π+π+12π0π0)+(CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,ss)K+K+(CdϕS,dd+CdϕS,ss)K0K¯0+16(CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd+4CdϕS,ss)η2+13(CuϕS,uuCdϕS,dd)π0η+[CdϕS,sd(πK+12π0K016ηK0)+H.c.]},\displaystyle\begin{array}[b]{rl}\mathcal{L}_{\phi P}\!&\displaystyle\supset\,\frac{B_{0}}{2}\phi^{2}\Bigg{\{}\Big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\Big{)}\bigg{(}\pi^{+}\pi^{-}+\frac{1}{2}\pi^{0}\pi^{0}\bigg{)}+\Big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,ss}\Big{)}K^{+}K^{-}\\ &\displaystyle~{}~{}~{}+~{}\Big{(}C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}+C_{d\phi}^{S,ss}\Big{)}K^{0}\bar{K}^{0}+\frac{1}{6}\Big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}+4C_{d\phi}^{S,ss}\Big{)}\eta^{2}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\Big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}-C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\Big{)}\pi^{0}\eta\\ &\displaystyle~{}~{}~{}+~{}\Bigg{[}C_{d\phi}^{S,sd}\left(\pi^{-}K^{+}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\pi^{0}K^{0}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\eta K^{0}\right)+{\rm H.c.}\Bigg{]}\Bigg{\}}\,,\end{array} (5)

where  B0=mπ+2/(mu+md)=2.8B_{0}=m_{\pi^{+}}^{2}/(m_{u}+m_{d})=2.8 GeV  with mu,dm_{u,d} values from Ref. [30]. From the CdϕS,sdC_{d\phi}^{S,sd} terms, we derive the differential rates of  KπϕϕK\to\pi\phi\phi [50]

dΓK+π+ϕϕdq2\displaystyle\frac{d\Gamma_{K^{+}\to\pi^{+}\phi\phi}}{dq^{2}} =λ1/2(mK+2,mπ+2,q2)λ1/2(mϕ2,mϕ2,q2)B02512π3mK+3q2|CdϕS,sd|2,\displaystyle=\frac{\lambda^{1/2}\big{(}m_{K^{+}}^{2},m_{\pi^{+}}^{2},q^{2}\big{)}\,\lambda^{1/2}\big{(}m_{\phi}^{2},m_{\phi}^{2},q^{2}\big{)}\,B_{0}^{2}}{512\pi^{3}\,m_{K^{+}}^{3}\,q^{2}}\Big{|}C_{d\phi}^{S,sd}\Big{|}^{2}\,, (6)
dΓKLπ0ϕϕdq2\displaystyle\frac{d\Gamma_{K_{L}\to\pi^{0}\phi\phi}}{dq^{2}} =λ1/2(mK02,mπ02,q2)λ1/2(mϕ2,mϕ2,q2)B02512π3mK03q2(ReCdϕS,sd)2,\displaystyle=\frac{\lambda^{1/2}\big{(}m_{K^{0}}^{2},m_{\pi^{0}}^{2},q^{2}\big{)}\,\lambda^{1/2}\big{(}m_{\phi}^{2},m_{\phi}^{2},q^{2}\big{)}\,B_{0}^{2}}{512\pi^{3}\,m_{K^{0}}^{3}\,q^{2}}\Big{(}{\rm Re}\,C_{d\phi}^{S,sd}\Big{)}^{2}\,,~{}~{}~{} (7)

where q2q^{2} is the squared invariant-mass of the ϕϕ\phi\phi pair and  λ(x,y,z)=(xyz)24yz\lambda(x,y,z)=(x-y-z)^{2}-4yz.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Left: the green-shaded region represents the |CdϕS,sd|\big{|}C_{d\phi}^{S,sd}\big{|} versus mϕm_{\phi} parameter space excluded by the latest NA62 [1] measurement of  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}.  The unshaded region between the solid and dashed green curves is where the new-physics window ΔK\Delta{\cal B}_{K} can be populated by K+π+ϕϕK^{+}\to\pi^{+}\phi\phi. Only the  mϕ[110,146]m_{\phi}\in[110,146] MeV  range, as indicated, is permitted by the DM relic density requirement. The hatched region is excluded by the recent KOTO [51] search for  KLπ0K_{L}\to\pi^{0}+\not{E}  if CdϕS,sdC_{d\phi}^{S,sd} is purely real. Right: the same as the left panel but using only the branching-ratio value reported by NA62 [1] and without regard to its signal regions.

In the left panel of Fig. 1 we have displayed the |CdϕS,sd|\big{|}C_{d\phi}^{S,sd}\big{|} values versus mϕm_{\phi} (the unshaded area under the green solid curve) allowed by the NA62 [1] measurement on  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}  in two signal regions (SR), the first one (SR1) being specified by   q2=[0.000,0.010]GeV2q^{2}=[0.000,0.010]\,\rm GeV^{2}  and  |pπ|=[15,35]GeV|\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|=[15,35]\rm\,GeV and the second (SR2) by  q2=[0.026,0.068]GeV2q^{2}=[0.026,0.068]\,\rm GeV^{2}  and  |pπ|=[15,45]GeV|\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|=[15,45]\rm\,GeV.  The right panel of Fig. 1 is the same as the left, except that only the total branching-ratio result from NA62 has been used. In the left (right) panel, the unshaded area between the solid and dashed green (purple) curves corresponds to the aforementioned possible new-physics window ΔK\Delta{\cal B}_{K} in the NA62 data. The plots in Fig. 1 also indicate the only mass interval,  mϕ=[110,146]m_{\phi}=[110,146] MeV,  not yet ruled out by the DM direct and indirect searches, to be discussed in Sec. IV. Additionally, we have drawn on these plots the hatched areas which, if CdϕS,sdC_{d\phi}^{S,sd} is purely real, are excluded by the limit from the KOTO search for the isospin-related neutral-kaon mode:  (KLπ0{\cal B}(K_{L}\to\pi^{0}+)<2.2×109\not{E})<2.2\times 10^{-9} at 90% confidence level [51]. If  ReCdϕS,sd=0\,C_{d\phi}^{S,sd}=0  instead, the KOTO constraint would be absent.

Clearly, the fact that NA62 has to exclude some kinematic regions from their analysis affects significantly the region allowed for new physics that its latest data can accommodate. In particular, when combined with the DM constraints, it leaves a modest window for our scenario, namely that mϕm_{\phi} has to be between 110 MeV and 130 MeV, as can be viewed in the left panel of Fig. 1. Nevertheless, on the upside, this means that the ϕ\phi interactions in the 130-146 MeV interval remain unrestrained.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The normalized distribution of the rate, Γ\Gamma, of  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}  against q2q^{2} (left) and the π+\pi^{+}-momentum |pπ||\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}| (right) for several benchmark masses of the DM particle. The labels of the vertical axes are  dΓ~/dq2(1/Γ)dΓ/dq2d\tilde{\Gamma}/dq^{2}\equiv(1/\Gamma)d\Gamma/dq^{2}  and  dΓ~/d|pπ|(1/Γ)dΓ/d|pπ|d\tilde{\Gamma}/d|\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|\equiv(1/\Gamma)d\Gamma/d|\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|, respectively.

To understand why the NA62 measurement produces the exclusion region in the left panel of Fig. 1 instead of the one in the right panel, we have depicted in Fig. 2 the kinematic distributions with respect to the squared missing-mass, q2q^{2}, and charged-pion momentum, |pπ||\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|, in the lab for the SM and for three different values of DM mass mϕm_{\phi}, along with vertical dashed lines indicating the experimental cuts imposed by NA62. The left plot in Fig. 2 reveals that the peaking of the new-physics distributions puts them outside the signal region for mass values  mϕ130m_{\phi}\gtrsim 130 MeV,  in which case as remarked above they would not be constrained by this measurement and cannot contribute to any observed enhancement over the SM rate. Similarly, our scenario does not contribute to this mode in SR1 for the DM masses of interest. The shape of these two distributions could be used in the future to distinguish between the SM and dark scalars. However, it turns out that within the relevant SR2 the possible dark scalar models have a kinematic |pπ||\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|-distribution remarkably similar to its SM counterpart.

The pion-momentum distribution seen in Fig. 2 changes significantly when the q2q^{2} limits of the signal region are applied, as displayed in Fig. 3. This result is surprising at first but can be easily understood because the matrix element squared for the new physics is a constant. This implies that the Dalitz plot distribution for the final state with the pion and a pair of dark scalars simply follows phase space, and all of the features seen in Fig. 2 simply reflect the kinematic limits. The NA62 signal region SR2 (which is the relevant one for us) is away from the kinematic limits leading to the result seen in Fig. 3. The immediate consequence is that the experimental efficiencies will have minimal impact on our signal as it closely resembles the SM within SR2.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The normalized distribution against the π+\pi^{+} momentum, |pπ||\textbf{{p}}_{\pi}|, for several benchmark masses of the DM particle after taking into account the NA62 cuts on q2q^{2}.

IV Constraints on dark-matter sector

IV.1 Relic density requirement

We regard ϕ\phi as a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) which is a thermal relic of the early Universe and undergoes the so-called freeze-out mechanism for the DM production. This implies that the observed cosmological abundance of DM can be reproduced from the total self-annihilation cross-section of ϕ\phi. For  mϕ177m_{\phi}\leq 177 MeV,  the pertinent interactions of ϕ\phi are those with pions, already written down in Eq. (5), leading to the cross sections of  ϕϕπ+π/π0π0\phi\phi\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}/\pi^{0}\pi^{0}

σ(ϕϕπ+π/π0π0)\displaystyle\sigma\big{(}\phi\phi\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}/\pi^{0}\pi^{0}\big{)} =1𝒮B02|CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd|216πs^s^4mπ2s^4mϕ2,\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{1}{\mathscr{S}}\frac{B_{0}^{2}\,\big{|}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{|}^{2}}{16\pi\hat{s}}\sqrt{\frac{\hat{s}-4m_{\pi}^{2}}{\hat{s}-4m_{\phi}^{2}}}\,, (8)

where  𝒮=1\mathscr{S}=1 and 2  for the π+π\pi^{+}\pi^{-} and π0π0\pi^{0}\pi^{0} channels, respectively, and s^\hat{s} is the squared invariant mass of the ϕϕ\phi\phi pair. The thermal averages of the corresponding annihilation rates are [52]

σv(ϕϕπ+π/π0π0)\displaystyle\langle\sigma v\rangle\big{(}\phi\phi\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}/\pi^{0}\pi^{0}\big{)} =1𝒮B02|CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd|2η~(x,zπ)64πmϕ2,\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{1}{\mathscr{S}}\frac{B_{0}^{2}\,\big{|}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{|}^{2}\,\tilde{\eta}(x,z_{\pi})}{64\pi m_{\phi}^{2}}\,, (9)

where  xmϕ/Tx\equiv m_{\phi}/T  involves the thermal-bath temperature TT of the early Universe,  zπmπ2/mϕ2z_{\pi}\equiv m_{\pi}^{2}/m_{\phi}^{2},  and the thermal average integration is captured by the function

η~(x,z)\displaystyle\tilde{\eta}(x,z) 4xK22(x)ϵth𝑑ϵϵ1+ϵz1+ϵK1(2x1+ϵ),\displaystyle\,\equiv\,\frac{4x}{K_{2}^{2}(x)}\int_{\epsilon_{\rm th}}^{\infty}d\epsilon\,\frac{\sqrt{\epsilon}\,\sqrt{1+\epsilon-z}}{\sqrt{1+\epsilon}}K_{1}\big{(}2x\sqrt{1+\epsilon}\big{)}\,, (10)

with KiK_{i} standing for the modified Bessel function of order ii and  ϵthmax(0,zπ1)\epsilon_{\rm th}\equiv{\rm max}(0,z_{\pi}-1)  extending the mϕm_{\phi} region to below the pion mass to include threshold effects [52]. Following Ref. [16], we determine the ϕ\phi-quark couplings that can successfully lead to the observed DM relic abundance by matching the total σv\langle\sigma v\rangle with the required value given in the Fig. 5 of Ref. [53]. In the left panel of Fig. 4, we have graphed the cyan solid curve to indicate the resulting |CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd|\big{|}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{|} range over the mϕm_{\phi} region of interest.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Left: the cyan solid curve represents the values of |CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd|\big{|}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{|} versus DM mass mϕm_{\phi} that yield the observed DM relic density. The brown and green regions are excluded by the CMB constraints [54]. Right: the RR_{-}-RsR_{s} regions allowed by the DM direct search result of PandaX-4T [55] incorporating the Migdal effect.

IV.2 Indirect searches

Since for  mϕ<177m_{\phi}<177 MeV  the DM annihilates mostly into pion pairs, these processes can also take place within the DM halo of the Milky Way galaxy. Subsequently, the neutral pions emit photons and the charged ones produce them radiatively or via the inverse Compton scattering of their secondary electrons/positrons off the background photons. As a result, the DM couplings are subject to constraints from astrophysical XX-ray and gamma-ray observations (from telescopes such as INTEGRAL, XMM-Newton, Fermi-LAT, etc). Moreover, when DM annihilation occurs during the epoch of cosmic microwave background (CMB) formation in the early Universe, the energy injected into the cosmic fluid from the annihilation products can alter the CMB anisotropy spectrum. Therefore, measurements of CMB temperature and polarization anisotropies also imply restrictions on the annihilation processes. Constraints on the annihilation channels into pions and photons from both types of observables have been extensively studied in the literature. Since the CMB limits have smaller uncertainties compared to those from the astrophysical XX/gamma-ray observations, and are also the most stringent, we use the recent Planck CMB limits on σv\langle\sigma v\rangle presented in Ref. [54] to probe our parameter space.

Since the DM is nonrelativistic at the time of CMB formation, the DM velocity effect in σv\langle\sigma v\rangle is negligible due to the 𝚂\tt S-wave nature of the ϕϕ\phi\phi scattering. For  mπ<mϕ<177m_{\pi}<m_{\phi}<177 MeV,  the main annihilation channels are those into π+π\pi^{+}\pi^{-} and π0π0\pi^{0}\pi^{0}

σv(ϕϕπ+π/π0π0)𝙸.𝙳.\displaystyle\langle\sigma v\rangle\big{(}\phi\phi\to\pi^{+}\pi^{-}/\pi^{0}\pi^{0}\big{)}_{\tt I.D.} 1𝒮B02|CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd|232πmϕ21mπ2mϕ2,\displaystyle\,\approx\,\frac{1}{\mathscr{S}}\frac{B_{0}^{2}\,\big{|}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{|}^{2}}{32\pi m_{\phi}^{2}}\sqrt{1-{m_{\pi}^{2}\over m_{\phi}^{2}}}\,, (11)

where the subscript “I.D.” indicates that the quantity has been derived for DM indirect searches. For  mϕmπm_{\phi}\leq m_{\pi},  the leading annihilation channel is into 2 photons,  ϕϕγγ\phi\phi\to\gamma\gamma,  due to a charged-pion loop.777The corresponding charged-kaon loop has a significantly smaller effect. At tree level  ϕϕπ0γγ\phi\phi\to\pi^{0}\gamma\gamma  can occur, mediated by a virtual π0\pi^{0}, but is not important compared to the γγ\gamma\gamma channel due to phase-space suppression. The amplitude is calculated to be

(ϕϕγγ)\displaystyle{\cal M}(\phi\phi\to\gamma\gamma) =αemπB0(CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd)mπ+2[(q1q2)(ϵ1ϵ2)(q1ϵ2)(q2ϵ1)]F(ρπ),\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{\alpha_{\rm em}}{\pi}\frac{B_{0}\,\big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{)}}{m_{\pi^{+}}^{2}}\left[(q_{1}\cdot q_{2})\big{(}\epsilon_{1}^{*}\cdot\epsilon_{2}^{*}\big{)}-\big{(}q_{1}\cdot\epsilon_{2}^{*}\big{)}\big{(}q_{2}\cdot\epsilon_{1}^{*}\big{)}\right]F(\rho_{\pi})\,,~{}~{} (12)

where αem\alpha_{\rm em} denotes the fine structure constant, ϵ1,2\epsilon_{1,2} (q1,2)(q_{1,2}) are the photons’ polarizations (momenta), and the loop function

F(ρπ)\displaystyle F(\rho_{\pi}) =1ρπ(1ρπln2ρπ4ρπρπ4+ρπ+1),\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{-1}{\rho_{\pi}}\left(\frac{1}{\rho_{\pi}}\ln^{2}\frac{\sqrt{\rho_{\pi}-4}-\sqrt{\rho_{\pi}}}{\sqrt{\rho_{\pi}-4}+\sqrt{\rho_{\pi}}}+1\right), ρπ\displaystyle\rho_{\pi} =2q1q2mπ+24mϕ2mπ+2.\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{2q_{1}\cdot q_{2}}{m_{\pi^{+}}^{2}}\,\approx\,\frac{4m_{\phi}^{2}}{m_{\pi^{+}}^{2}}\,. (13)

This translates into the annihilation rate

σv(ϕϕγγ)𝙸.𝙳.\displaystyle\langle\sigma v\rangle(\phi\phi\to\gamma\gamma)_{\tt I.D.} B02|CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd|264πmϕ28αem2mϕ4π2mπ+4|F(ρπ)|2.\displaystyle\,\approx\,\frac{B_{0}^{2}\,\big{|}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{|}^{2}}{64\pi m_{\phi}^{2}}~{}\frac{8\alpha_{\rm em}^{2}m_{\phi}^{4}}{\pi^{2}m_{\pi^{+}}^{4}}|F(\rho_{\pi})|^{2}\,. (14)

The amplitude for the photon mode is expected to receive a considerable correction from higher-order chiral terms. For a conservative estimation, we assume that this correction is at most of similar magnitude to the contribution from the pion loop to the cross-section. In the numerical analysis, a factor of 2 is incorporated into the above equation to account for this effect. An 𝒪(1){\cal O}(1) factor difference will not substantially affect the limits shown in the plot.

The constraints on the pion and photon modes inferred in Ref. [54] from the Planck CMB data turn out to exclude the light-orange and light-green areas depicted in the left panel of Fig. 4. As can be seen, the Planck CMB measurements impose very stringent bounds on the coupling combination for  mϕ146m_{\phi}\gtrsim 146 MeV.  However, due to the loop suppression of the photon mode, the mass range  110MeVmϕ146110\,{\rm MeV}\lesssim m_{\phi}\lesssim 146 MeV  remains viable for reproducing the correct DM relic density.

IV.3 Collider searches

Searches for DM have also been performed at colliders. Relevant to the effective interactions in Eq. (1) are the recent constraints acquired in Ref. [56] from LHC monojet data. We have included the results in the left panel of Fig. 4 (the dashed purple line) for comparison with the other limits. Since the LHC monojet bound was obtained under the assumption that light quarks have flavor-universal couplings, the plotted region contains some minor uncertainties.

IV.4 Direct searches

The DM-quark interactions given in Eq. 1 can also generate signals in DM direct detection experiments. For sub-GeV DM, the sensitivity of the conventional nuclear recoil searches rapidly diminishes because of detection threshold limitations, making it difficult to obtain meaningful constraints on the relevant parameter space. Nevertheless, it has been pointed out that the inelastic Migdal effect could offer a way to overcome this kinematic barrier and probe the low-mass region [57]. This idea has been implemented in liquid xenon and argon experiments, including XENON1T [58], DarkSide50 [59], LZ [60], and PandaX-4T [55], leading to significant bounds on the spin-independent DM-nucleon cross-section.

To apply these results to our DM scenario, we evaluate the corresponding cross-section of DM-nucleon scattering in the zero-momentum-transfer limit. For the interactions in Eq. (1), only the flavor-diagonal operators contribute. By performing a nonrelativistic matching with the standard spin-independent DM-nucleon nonrelativistic operator  𝒪1N1ϕ1N{\cal O}_{1}^{N}\equiv 1_{\phi}1_{N},  where N=protonN=\rm proton (p)(p) or neutron (n)(n), we arrive at the matching coefficients

c1N\displaystyle c_{1}^{N} =2mN2mufTu(N)CuϕS,uu+2mN2mdfTd(N)CdϕS,dd+2mN2msfTs(N)CdϕS,ss\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{2m_{N}^{2}}{m_{u}}f_{T_{u}}^{(N)}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+\frac{2m_{N}^{2}}{m_{d}}f_{T_{d}}^{(N)}C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}+\frac{2m_{N}^{2}}{m_{s}}f_{T_{s}}^{(N)}C_{d\phi}^{S,ss}
=2mN2msfTs(N)(CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd)(r+N+rNR+Rs),\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{2m_{N}^{2}}{m_{s}}f_{T_{s}}^{(N)}\big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{)}\big{(}r_{+}^{N}+r_{-}^{N}R_{-}+R_{s}\big{)}\,, (15)

where mu,d,sm_{u,d,s} denote the masses of the three light quarks (u,d,su,d,s) and fTu,d,s(N)f_{T_{u,d,s}}^{(N)} represent the nucleon form factors associated with the scalar quark currents at zero momentum transfer, which are defined by  fTq(N)=(mq/mN)N|q¯q|Nf_{T_{q}}^{(N)}=(m_{q}/m_{N})\langle N|\bar{q}q|N\rangle.  In the second equality above, we have defined

r±N\displaystyle r_{\pm}^{N} =12[fTu(N)msfTs(N)mu±fTd(N)msfTs(N)md],\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{1}{2}\Bigg{[}\frac{f_{T_{u}}^{(N)}m_{s}}{f_{T_{s}}^{(N)}m_{u}}\pm\frac{f_{T_{d}}^{(N)}m_{s}}{f_{T_{s}}^{(N)}m_{d}}\Bigg{]}\,, R\displaystyle R_{-} =CuϕS,uuCdϕS,ddCuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd,\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}-C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}}{C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}}\,, Rs\displaystyle R_{s} =CdϕS,ssCuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd.\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{C_{d\phi}^{S,ss}}{C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}}\,. (16)

If the nucleon matrix elements respect isospin symmetry,  r+p=r+nr+r_{+}^{p}=r_{+}^{n}\equiv r_{+}  and  rp=rnrr_{-}^{p}=-r_{-}^{n}\equiv r_{-}.  In the case of DM-quark couplings, a nonzero value of RR_{-} implies that c1pc1nc_{1}^{p}\neq c_{1}^{n}, which corresponds to the isospin-violating DM scenario.

By incorporating these isospin-violating couplings, the corresponding effective DM-nucleon cross-section is calculated to be (see eq. (H.37) in Ref. [61])

σϕN\displaystyle\sigma_{\phi N} =μϕN24πmϕ2|mNmsfTs(N)(CuϕS,uu+CdϕS,dd)|2|r++Rs(12Z/A)rR|2,\displaystyle\,=\,\frac{\mu_{\phi N}^{2}}{4\pi m_{\phi}^{2}}\bigg{|}\frac{m_{N}}{m_{s}}f_{T_{s}}^{(N)}\big{(}C_{u\phi}^{S,uu}+C_{d\phi}^{S,dd}\big{)}\bigg{|}^{2}\big{|}r_{+}+R_{s}-(1-2Z/A)r_{-}R_{-}\big{|}^{2}\,, (17)

where μϕN\mu_{\phi N} is the reduced mass of the DM-nucleon system and AA (ZZ) the atomic (mass) number of the target nucleus. Since the target material of xenon-based experiments such as PandaX-4T have several isotopes with abundances summarized in the table 1 of Ref. [61], we need to employ the weighted average  iξiσϕNi\sum_{i}\xi_{i}\,\sigma_{\phi N}^{i},  where the sum runs over all isotopes ii with abundance ξi\xi_{i}.

Numerically, to establish our bound we use the strictest limit on the effective cross-section from PandaX-4T, represented by the red line for a heavy mediator in Fig. 3 of Ref. [55]. For the nucleon form factors, we find that r±r_{\pm} are connected to the nucleon isovector charge gSudg_{S}^{u-d} and the nucleon σ\sigma-terms, σπN\sigma_{\pi N} and σs\sigma_{s} [62], through the relations  r+=(ms/2σs)(σπN/mud)r_{+}=(m_{s}/2\sigma_{s})(\sigma_{\pi N}/m_{ud})  and  r=(ms/2σs)gSudr_{-}=(m_{s}/2\sigma_{s})g_{S}^{u-d},  where  mud(mu+md)/2m_{ud}\equiv(m_{u}+m_{d})/2.  Furthermore,  (mN/ms)fTs(N)=σs/ms(m_{N}/m_{s})f_{T_{s}}^{(N)}=\sigma_{s}/m_{s}.  The parameters gSudg_{S}^{u-d}, σπN\sigma_{\pi N}, and σs\sigma_{s} currently have large uncertainties in lattice computations. For our illustration, we adopt the latest FLAG [62] global average values with three flavors: gSus=1.083(69)g_{S}^{u-s}=1.083(69),  σπN=42.2(2.4)\sigma_{\pi N}=42.2(2.4) MeV, and  σs=44.9(6.4)\sigma_{s}=44.9(6.4) MeV  from Eqs.  (428), (448), and (450), respectively, in Ref. [62]. For the quark masses and their ratios, we employ  ms/mud=27.330.14+0.18m_{s}/m_{ud}=27.33_{-0.14}^{+0.18}  and  ms=93.5(8)m_{s}=93.5(8) MeV  from Ref. [30]. The above numbers lead to  σs/ms=0.48(7)\sigma_{s}/m_{s}=0.48(7),  r+=12.8(2.0)r_{+}=12.8(2.0),  and  r=1.13(18)r_{-}=1.13(18).  In the right panel of Fig. 4, we present the permitted regions on the RR_{-}-RsR_{s} plane for three benchmark DM masses, mϕ=(120,130,140)m_{\phi}=(120,130,140) MeV, that fulfill the restrictions inferred from DM indirect and collider searches. As displayed in this figure, to comply with the Migdal-effect limits, RR_{-} must significantly deviate from unity, indicating that substantial isospin violation is needed. It is worth noting that the Migdal-effect constraints are affected by uncertainties in the form factors, which may cause slight shifts in the allowed parameter space.

V Conclusions

We have explored the possibility that the recently measured excess of  B+K+B^{+}\to K^{+}+\not{E}  rate relative to its SM expectation originates from DM-quark interactions that can also saturate the potential new-physics window in the newly observed  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}.  Starting with effective operators involving quarks and the real scalar boson ϕ\phi acting as the DM, we investigate the ranges of their couplings that can satisfy the preceding requirements, taking into account the constraints from the DM sector. In particular, restrictions from the relic density data and from DM direct, indirect, and collider searches turn out to restrain the ϕ\phi mass to be between 110 MeV and 146 MeV. We further find that the NA62 data on  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E},  including the information on its signal regions, reduce this range to  110MeVmϕ 130110{\rm~{}MeV}\;\mbox{\small$\lesssim$}\;m_{\phi}\;\mbox{\small$\lesssim$}\;130 MeV.  On the upside, this implies that the ϕ\phi interactions for  130MeVmϕ 146130{\rm~{}MeV}\;\mbox{\small$\lesssim$}\;m_{\phi}\;\mbox{\small$\lesssim$}\;146 MeV  remain unconstrained. Improved data from future measurements of  BKB\to K+\not{E}  by Belle II,  K+π+K^{+}\to\pi^{+}+\not{E}  by NA62, and  KLπ0K_{L}\to\pi^{0}+\not{E}  by KOTO and from various upcoming DM searches can be expected to test our new-physics scenario more stringently. It goes without saying that more precise predictions for these decay modes in the SM and better estimation of the Migdal effect are desirable for a sharper comparison of experiment and theory.

Acknowledgements

X.-G.H. was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, by the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China (Nos. 12090064, 11735010, 12205063, 11985149, 12375088, and W2441004), and by MOST 109–2112-M-002–017-MY3. X.-D.M. was supported by Grant No. NSFC-12305110. J.T. and G.V. thank the Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, for kind hospitality and support during the preparation of this paper.

References