Light dark-matter window in
I Introduction
Recently the NA62 collaboration has reported the first observation of kaon decay +, with missing energy () carried away by emitted invisible particles, its branching ratio measured to be + [1], making this mode the rarest one discovered to date. In the standard model (SM), neutrinos () act as the invisibles, and the prediction is remarkably precise [2] but still suffers from significant parametric uncertainty arising from the input values of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) angles. This is illustrated by the three different branching-ratio numbers quoted in Ref. [1]. Conservatively, the one with the largest quoted uncertainty, [3], may be adopted for discussion purposes. It is less than the measurement by .
The preceding value can be regarded as a potential window into new physics beyond the SM. If persists with increasing statistical significance as more data are collected in the future, it might be due to dark matter (DM) particles contributing to . Analogous ideas have lately been proposed [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26] to explain the recent Belle II measurement [27] on the -meson decay + with a rate that is higher than the SM expectation. It is therefore interesting to consider the possibility that the same new physics can be responsible for both and the + anomaly, with the obvious condition that the DM mass not exceed MeV in order that the channel with the DM could occur. The DM candidate must additionally be able to reproduce the observed relic abundance and comply with bounds inferred from DM direct, indirect, and collider searches. Here we carry out a model-independent analysis of this kind of scenario to look for the parameter space at the level of low-energy effective field theory (LEFT) where all these requisites can be fulfilled. We arrive at interesting allowed parameter regions which can be tested further with future data, especially from Belle II, NA62, and the various DM searches, and which were not covered in the earlier + studies.
The organization of the paper is as follows. In the next section, we discuss the effective interactions of the DM with SM quarks. In Sec. III, we address in greater detail the implications for the and transitions of interest. In Sec. IV, we examine the restrictions on the parameter space from various DM searches. In Sec. V, we give our conclusions.
II Effective DM-quark interactions
We suppose that the DM particle is a real scalar boson which is a SM-gauge singlet and interacts only in pair with SM quarks due to it being charged under some symmetry of a dark sector beyond the SM or odd under a symmetry which does not influence SM fields. This ensures the stability of . In the LEFT-like framework that we adopt, the lowest-dimension operators describing the -quark couplings of interest are given by [28, 29]
(1) |
where summation over is implicit and the s are generally complex, independent constants. The Hermiticity of this Lagrangian implies that and is real. Only the term in Eq. (1) can supply the and couplings that contribute to + and +, respectively, as the matrix element of a pseudoscalar quark bilinear between two pseudoscalar mesons vanishes.555If in Eq. (1), the operator could affect the yet-unobserved + at levels similar to what is required of to explain the + excess without violating their experimental bounds [30]. If , the operator could contributes to + and [29], their SM branching ratios being of order or less [31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36], as well as to analogous hyperon decays [37], all of which still have relatively weak empirical limits [38, 39, 40, 41, 42], implying that these kaon and hyperon modes each offer a potentially wide window into new physics [37, 40, 43]. For to be the cosmological DM candidate, we demand that its annihilation generate the observed relic abundance via the freeze-out mechanism and include the and operators. Since the mass must be MeV and the latest results of DM direct-detection experiments have translated into strict bounds on sub-GeV DM, especially when the Migdal effect is taken into consideration, it turns out that the impact of the latter can be alleviated by turning on the term as well, which does not affect the relic density. These are discussed in more detail below.
III and
In 2023 the Belle II experiment [27] came up with +, which is 2.7 bigger than the SM prediction [44, 7].666This does not include the tree-level contribution mediated by the tau lepton [27]. Combining this new measurement with the earlier findings by BaBar [45, 46], Belle [47, 48], and Belle II [49] yields the weighted average + [27], which is larger than the SM value by 2.1. This could be interpreted as attributable to the presence of the exotic channel induced by the operator with in Eq. (1) and DM mass . It has been shown [7, 16] that this can indeed explain the Belle II anomaly if, for example, TeV) and GeV.
If the same underlying new physics is to induce as well and fill the potential new-physics window in the aforementioned + data from NA62, the DM needs to be sufficiently light with mass MeV. In this range, the + anomaly can be accounted for with [7, 16].
For such low-mass DM, we can deal with and the DM annihilation into light hadrons brought about by the LEFT operators in Eq. (1) by means of chiral perturbation theory. This leads to the interactions with light mesons given by
(5) |
where GeV with values from Ref. [30]. From the terms, we derive the differential rates of [50]
(6) | ||||
(7) |
where is the squared invariant-mass of the pair and .


In the left panel of Fig. 1 we have displayed the values versus (the unshaded area under the green solid curve) allowed by the NA62 [1] measurement on + in two signal regions (SR), the first one (SR1) being specified by and and the second (SR2) by and . The right panel of Fig. 1 is the same as the left, except that only the total branching-ratio result from NA62 has been used. In the left (right) panel, the unshaded area between the solid and dashed green (purple) curves corresponds to the aforementioned possible new-physics window in the NA62 data. The plots in Fig. 1 also indicate the only mass interval, MeV, not yet ruled out by the DM direct and indirect searches, to be discussed in Sec. IV. Additionally, we have drawn on these plots the hatched areas which, if is purely real, are excluded by the limit from the KOTO search for the isospin-related neutral-kaon mode: + at 90% confidence level [51]. If Re instead, the KOTO constraint would be absent.
Clearly, the fact that NA62 has to exclude some kinematic regions from their analysis affects significantly the region allowed for new physics that its latest data can accommodate. In particular, when combined with the DM constraints, it leaves a modest window for our scenario, namely that has to be between 110 MeV and 130 MeV, as can be viewed in the left panel of Fig. 1. Nevertheless, on the upside, this means that the interactions in the 130-146 MeV interval remain unrestrained.


To understand why the NA62 measurement produces the exclusion region in the left panel of Fig. 1 instead of the one in the right panel, we have depicted in Fig. 2 the kinematic distributions with respect to the squared missing-mass, , and charged-pion momentum, , in the lab for the SM and for three different values of DM mass , along with vertical dashed lines indicating the experimental cuts imposed by NA62. The left plot in Fig. 2 reveals that the peaking of the new-physics distributions puts them outside the signal region for mass values MeV, in which case as remarked above they would not be constrained by this measurement and cannot contribute to any observed enhancement over the SM rate. Similarly, our scenario does not contribute to this mode in SR1 for the DM masses of interest. The shape of these two distributions could be used in the future to distinguish between the SM and dark scalars. However, it turns out that within the relevant SR2 the possible dark scalar models have a kinematic -distribution remarkably similar to its SM counterpart.
The pion-momentum distribution seen in Fig. 2 changes significantly when the limits of the signal region are applied, as displayed in Fig. 3. This result is surprising at first but can be easily understood because the matrix element squared for the new physics is a constant. This implies that the Dalitz plot distribution for the final state with the pion and a pair of dark scalars simply follows phase space, and all of the features seen in Fig. 2 simply reflect the kinematic limits. The NA62 signal region SR2 (which is the relevant one for us) is away from the kinematic limits leading to the result seen in Fig. 3. The immediate consequence is that the experimental efficiencies will have minimal impact on our signal as it closely resembles the SM within SR2.

IV Constraints on dark-matter sector
IV.1 Relic density requirement
We regard as a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) which is a thermal relic of the early Universe and undergoes the so-called freeze-out mechanism for the DM production. This implies that the observed cosmological abundance of DM can be reproduced from the total self-annihilation cross-section of . For MeV, the pertinent interactions of are those with pions, already written down in Eq. (5), leading to the cross sections of
(8) |
where and 2 for the and channels, respectively, and is the squared invariant mass of the pair. The thermal averages of the corresponding annihilation rates are [52]
(9) |
where involves the thermal-bath temperature of the early Universe, , and the thermal average integration is captured by the function
(10) |
with standing for the modified Bessel function of order and extending the region to below the pion mass to include threshold effects [52]. Following Ref. [16], we determine the -quark couplings that can successfully lead to the observed DM relic abundance by matching the total with the required value given in the Fig. 5 of Ref. [53]. In the left panel of Fig. 4, we have graphed the cyan solid curve to indicate the resulting range over the region of interest.


IV.2 Indirect searches
Since for MeV the DM annihilates mostly into pion pairs, these processes can also take place within the DM halo of the Milky Way galaxy. Subsequently, the neutral pions emit photons and the charged ones produce them radiatively or via the inverse Compton scattering of their secondary electrons/positrons off the background photons. As a result, the DM couplings are subject to constraints from astrophysical -ray and gamma-ray observations (from telescopes such as INTEGRAL, XMM-Newton, Fermi-LAT, etc). Moreover, when DM annihilation occurs during the epoch of cosmic microwave background (CMB) formation in the early Universe, the energy injected into the cosmic fluid from the annihilation products can alter the CMB anisotropy spectrum. Therefore, measurements of CMB temperature and polarization anisotropies also imply restrictions on the annihilation processes. Constraints on the annihilation channels into pions and photons from both types of observables have been extensively studied in the literature. Since the CMB limits have smaller uncertainties compared to those from the astrophysical /gamma-ray observations, and are also the most stringent, we use the recent Planck CMB limits on presented in Ref. [54] to probe our parameter space.
Since the DM is nonrelativistic at the time of CMB formation, the DM velocity effect in is negligible due to the -wave nature of the scattering. For MeV, the main annihilation channels are those into and
(11) |
where the subscript “I.D.” indicates that the quantity has been derived for DM indirect searches. For , the leading annihilation channel is into 2 photons, , due to a charged-pion loop.777The corresponding charged-kaon loop has a significantly smaller effect. At tree level can occur, mediated by a virtual , but is not important compared to the channel due to phase-space suppression. The amplitude is calculated to be
(12) |
where denotes the fine structure constant, are the photons’ polarizations (momenta), and the loop function
(13) |
This translates into the annihilation rate
(14) |
The amplitude for the photon mode is expected to receive a considerable correction from higher-order chiral terms. For a conservative estimation, we assume that this correction is at most of similar magnitude to the contribution from the pion loop to the cross-section. In the numerical analysis, a factor of 2 is incorporated into the above equation to account for this effect. An factor difference will not substantially affect the limits shown in the plot.
The constraints on the pion and photon modes inferred in Ref. [54] from the Planck CMB data turn out to exclude the light-orange and light-green areas depicted in the left panel of Fig. 4. As can be seen, the Planck CMB measurements impose very stringent bounds on the coupling combination for MeV. However, due to the loop suppression of the photon mode, the mass range MeV remains viable for reproducing the correct DM relic density.
IV.3 Collider searches
Searches for DM have also been performed at colliders. Relevant to the effective interactions in Eq. (1) are the recent constraints acquired in Ref. [56] from LHC monojet data. We have included the results in the left panel of Fig. 4 (the dashed purple line) for comparison with the other limits. Since the LHC monojet bound was obtained under the assumption that light quarks have flavor-universal couplings, the plotted region contains some minor uncertainties.
IV.4 Direct searches
The DM-quark interactions given in Eq. 1 can also generate signals in DM direct detection experiments. For sub-GeV DM, the sensitivity of the conventional nuclear recoil searches rapidly diminishes because of detection threshold limitations, making it difficult to obtain meaningful constraints on the relevant parameter space. Nevertheless, it has been pointed out that the inelastic Migdal effect could offer a way to overcome this kinematic barrier and probe the low-mass region [57]. This idea has been implemented in liquid xenon and argon experiments, including XENON1T [58], DarkSide50 [59], LZ [60], and PandaX-4T [55], leading to significant bounds on the spin-independent DM-nucleon cross-section.
To apply these results to our DM scenario, we evaluate the corresponding cross-section of DM-nucleon scattering in the zero-momentum-transfer limit. For the interactions in Eq. (1), only the flavor-diagonal operators contribute. By performing a nonrelativistic matching with the standard spin-independent DM-nucleon nonrelativistic operator , where or neutron , we arrive at the matching coefficients
(15) |
where denote the masses of the three light quarks () and represent the nucleon form factors associated with the scalar quark currents at zero momentum transfer, which are defined by . In the second equality above, we have defined
(16) |
If the nucleon matrix elements respect isospin symmetry, and . In the case of DM-quark couplings, a nonzero value of implies that , which corresponds to the isospin-violating DM scenario.
By incorporating these isospin-violating couplings, the corresponding effective DM-nucleon cross-section is calculated to be (see eq. (H.37) in Ref. [61])
(17) |
where is the reduced mass of the DM-nucleon system and () the atomic (mass) number of the target nucleus. Since the target material of xenon-based experiments such as PandaX-4T have several isotopes with abundances summarized in the table 1 of Ref. [61], we need to employ the weighted average , where the sum runs over all isotopes with abundance .
Numerically, to establish our bound we use the strictest limit on the effective cross-section from PandaX-4T, represented by the red line for a heavy mediator in Fig. 3 of Ref. [55]. For the nucleon form factors, we find that are connected to the nucleon isovector charge and the nucleon -terms, and [62], through the relations and , where . Furthermore, . The parameters , , and currently have large uncertainties in lattice computations. For our illustration, we adopt the latest FLAG [62] global average values with three flavors: , MeV, and MeV from Eqs. (428), (448), and (450), respectively, in Ref. [62]. For the quark masses and their ratios, we employ and MeV from Ref. [30]. The above numbers lead to , , and . In the right panel of Fig. 4, we present the permitted regions on the - plane for three benchmark DM masses, MeV, that fulfill the restrictions inferred from DM indirect and collider searches. As displayed in this figure, to comply with the Migdal-effect limits, must significantly deviate from unity, indicating that substantial isospin violation is needed. It is worth noting that the Migdal-effect constraints are affected by uncertainties in the form factors, which may cause slight shifts in the allowed parameter space.
V Conclusions
We have explored the possibility that the recently measured excess of + rate relative to its SM expectation originates from DM-quark interactions that can also saturate the potential new-physics window in the newly observed +. Starting with effective operators involving quarks and the real scalar boson acting as the DM, we investigate the ranges of their couplings that can satisfy the preceding requirements, taking into account the constraints from the DM sector. In particular, restrictions from the relic density data and from DM direct, indirect, and collider searches turn out to restrain the mass to be between 110 MeV and 146 MeV. We further find that the NA62 data on +, including the information on its signal regions, reduce this range to MeV. On the upside, this implies that the interactions for MeV remain unconstrained. Improved data from future measurements of + by Belle II, + by NA62, and + by KOTO and from various upcoming DM searches can be expected to test our new-physics scenario more stringently. It goes without saying that more precise predictions for these decay modes in the SM and better estimation of the Migdal effect are desirable for a sharper comparison of experiment and theory.
Acknowledgements
X.-G.H. was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, by the National Natural Science Foundation of the People’s Republic of China (Nos. 12090064, 11735010, 12205063, 11985149, 12375088, and W2441004), and by MOST 109–2112-M-002–017-MY3. X.-D.M. was supported by Grant No. NSFC-12305110. J.T. and G.V. thank the Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, for kind hospitality and support during the preparation of this paper.
References
- [1] NA62 Collaboration, E. Cortina Gil et al., “Observation of the decay and measurement of its branching ratio,” JHEP 02 (2025) 191, arXiv:2412.12015 [hep-ex].
- [2] J. Brod, M. Gorbahn, and E. Stamou, “Two-Loop electroweak corrections for the decays,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 034030, arXiv:1009.0947 [hep-ph].
- [3] A. J. Buras, D. Buttazzo, J. Girrbach-Noe, and R. Knegjens, “ and in the Standard Model: status and perspectives,” JHEP 11 (2015) 033, arXiv:1503.02693 [hep-ph].
- [4] T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, “When energy goes missing: new physics in with sterile neutrinos,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 12, (2023) 1135, arXiv:2309.02940 [hep-ph].
- [5] M. Abdughani and Y. Reyimuaji, “Constraining light dark matter and mediator with data,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 5, (2024) 055013, arXiv:2309.03706 [hep-ph].
- [6] Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. Günther, “The decay at Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85 no. 1, (2025) 66, arXiv:2309.03727 [hep-ph].
- [7] X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, “Revisiting models that enhance in light of the new Belle II measurement,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 7, (2024) 075019, arXiv:2309.12741 [hep-ph].
- [8] A. Berezhnoy and D. Melikhov, “ vs as a probe of a scalar-mediator dark matter scenario,” EPL 145 no. 1, (2024) 14001, arXiv:2309.17191 [hep-ph].
- [9] A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, “, MiniBooNE and muon anomalies from a dark sector,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 3, (2024) L031701, arXiv:2310.15136 [hep-ph].
- [10] W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, “Light new physics in ?,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 7, (2024) 075008, arXiv:2311.14629 [hep-ph].
- [11] D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, and D. Tuckler, “Higgs portal interpretation of the Belle II measurement,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 7, (2024) 075006, arXiv:2312.00982 [hep-ph].
- [12] K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, “Decoding the excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 11, (2024) 115006, arXiv:2312.12507 [hep-ph].
- [13] S.-Y. Ho, J. Kim, and P. Ko, “Recent Excess and Muon Illuminating Light Dark Sector with Higgs Portal,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 5, (2025) 055029, arXiv:2401.10112 [hep-ph].
- [14] E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, “Explaining the excess via a massless dark photon,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84 no. 5, (2024) 460, arXiv:2402.05901 [hep-ph].
- [15] B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, “Deciphering the Belle II data on decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation,” JHEP 06 (2024) 172, arXiv:2402.19208 [hep-ph].
- [16] X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, “Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II + invisible measurement,” JHEP 07 (2024) 168, arXiv:2403.12485 [hep-ph].
- [17] P. D. Bolton, S. Fajfer, J. F. Kamenik, and M. Novoa-Brunet, “Signatures of light new particles in ,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 5, (2024) 055001, arXiv:2403.13887 [hep-ph].
- [18] A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, “Disentangling new physics in and observables,” JHEP 10 (2024) 087, arXiv:2405.06742 [hep-ph].
- [19] G. Kumar and A. A. Petrov, “Constraints on light dark sector particles from lifetime difference of heavy neutral mesons,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 5, (2024) 055031, arXiv:2407.14673 [hep-ph].
- [20] C. Hati, J. Leite, N. Nath, and J. W. F. Valle, “QCD axion, color-mediated neutrino masses, and anomaly,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 1, (2025) 015038, arXiv:2408.00060 [hep-ph].
- [21] W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, “A joint explanation of the puzzle and the excess,” arXiv:2411.06592 [hep-ph].
- [22] Q.-Y. Hu, “Are the new particles heavy or light in ?,” arXiv:2412.19084 [hep-ph].
- [23] L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, “Is Dark Matter the origin of the excess at Belle II?,” arXiv:2502.04900 [hep-ph].
- [24] X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, “, dark matter, and violation in hyperon decays,” arXiv:2502.09603 [hep-ph].
- [25] A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, “Analysis of -distribution for and decays in a scalar-mediator dark-matter scenario,” arXiv:2502.14313 [hep-ph].
- [26] K. Ding, Y. Li, X. Liu, Y. Liu, C.-T. Lu, and B. Zhu, “Resonant ALP-Portal Dark Matter Annihilation as a Solution to the Excess,” arXiv:2504.00383 [hep-ph].
- [27] Belle-II Collaboration, I. Adachi et al., “Evidence for decays,” Phys. Rev. D 109 no. 11, (2024) 112006, arXiv:2311.14647 [hep-ex].
- [28] A. Badin and A. A. Petrov, “Searching for light dark matter in heavy meson decays,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 034005, arXiv:1005.1277 [hep-ph].
- [29] J. F. Kamenik and C. Smith, “FCNC portals to the dark sector,” JHEP 03 (2012) 090, arXiv:1111.6402 [hep-ph].
- [30] Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001.
- [31] C. Q. Geng, I. J. Hsu, and Y. C. Lin, “-conserving and -violating contributions to ,” Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 5744–5750, arXiv:hep-ph/9406313.
- [32] L. S. Littenberg and G. Valencia, “The decays within the standard model,” Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 379–384, arXiv:hep-ph/9512413.
- [33] C. Q. Geng, I. J. Hsu, and Y. C. Lin, “Study of long distance contributions to ,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 877–881, arXiv:hep-ph/9604228.
- [34] C.-W. Chiang and F. J. Gilman, “ decays within and beyond the standard model,” Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 094026, arXiv:hep-ph/0007063.
- [35] W. J. Marciano and Z. Parsa, “Rare kaon decays with “missing energy”,” Phys. Rev. D 53 no. 1, (1996) R1.
- [36] B. Bhattacharya, C. M. Grant, and A. A. Petrov, “Invisible widths of heavy mesons,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 9, (2019) 093010, arXiv:1809.04606 [hep-ph].
- [37] G. Li, J.-Y. Su, and J. Tandean, “Flavor-changing hyperon decays with light invisible bosons,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 7, (2019) 075003, arXiv:1905.08759 [hep-ph].
- [38] E787 Collaboration, S. Adler et al., “Search for the decay ,” Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 032004, arXiv:hep-ex/0009055.
- [39] E391a Collaboration, R. Ogata et al., “Study of the decay,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 052009, arXiv:1106.3404 [hep-ex].
- [40] C.-Q. Geng and J. Tandean, “Probing new physics with the kaon decays ,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 115021, arXiv:2009.00608 [hep-ph].
- [41] J.-Y. Su and J. Tandean, “Kaon decays shedding light on massless dark photons,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 9, (2020) 824, arXiv:2006.05985 [hep-ph].
- [42] BESIII Collaboration, M. Ablikim et al., “Search for invisible decays,” arXiv:2501.06426 [hep-ex].
- [43] E. Goudzovski et al., “New physics searches at kaon and hyperon factories,” Rept. Prog. Phys. 86 no. 1, (2023) 016201, arXiv:2201.07805 [hep-ph].
- [44] D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, “Revisiting decays in the Standard Model and beyond,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 3, (2023) 252, arXiv:2301.06990 [hep-ph].
- [45] BaBar Collaboration, P. del Amo Sanchez et al., “Search for the Rare Decay ,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 112002, arXiv:1009.1529 [hep-ex].
- [46] BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., “Search for and invisible quarkonium decays,” Phys. Rev. D 87 no. 11, (2013) 112005, arXiv:1303.7465 [hep-ex].
- [47] Belle Collaboration, O. Lutz et al., “Search for with the full Belle data sample,” Phys. Rev. D 87 no. 11, (2013) 111103, arXiv:1303.3719 [hep-ex].
- [48] Belle Collaboration, J. Grygier et al., “Search for decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 9, (2017) 091101, arXiv:1702.03224 [hep-ex]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 97, 099902 (2018)].
- [49] Belle-II Collaboration, F. Abudinén et al., “Search for Decays Using an Inclusive Tagging Method at Belle II,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 18, (2021) 181802, arXiv:2104.12624 [hep-ex].
- [50] X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, “FCNC and meson decays with light bosonic Dark Matter,” JHEP 03 (2023) 037, arXiv:2209.05223 [hep-ph].
- [51] KOTO Collaboration, J. K. Ahn et al., “Search for the Decay at the J-PARC KOTO Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 no. 8, (2025) 081802, arXiv:2411.11237 [hep-ex].
- [52] P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, “Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,” Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145–179.
- [53] G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, “Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 023506, arXiv:1204.3622 [hep-ph].
- [54] K. E. O’Donnell and T. R. Slatyer, “Constraints on dark matter with future MeV gamma-ray telescopes,” Phys. Rev. D 111 no. 8, (2025) 083037, arXiv:2411.00087 [hep-ph].
- [55] PandaX Collaboration, D. Huang et al., “Search for Dark-Matter-Nucleon Interactions with a Dark Mediator in PandaX-4T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 19, (2023) 191002, arXiv:2308.01540 [hep-ex].
- [56] A. Belyaev, E. Bertuzzo, C. Caniu Barros, O. Eboli, G. Grilli Di Cortona, F. Iocco, and A. Pukhov, “Interplay of the LHC and non-LHC dark matter searches in the effective field theory approach,” Phys. Rev. D 99 no. 1, (2019) 015006, arXiv:1807.03817 [hep-ph].
- [57] M. Ibe, W. Nakano, Y. Shoji, and K. Suzuki, “Migdal effect in dark matter direct detection experiments,” JHEP 03 (2018) 194, arXiv:1707.07258 [hep-ph].
- [58] XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Search for Light Dark Matter Interactions Enhanced by the Migdal Effect or Bremsstrahlung in XENON1T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 no. 24, (2019) 241803, arXiv:1907.12771 [hep-ex].
- [59] DarkSide Collaboration, P. Agnes et al., “Search for Dark-Matter-Nucleon Interactions via Migdal Effect with DarkSide-50,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 no. 10, (2023) 101001, arXiv:2207.11967 [hep-ex].
- [60] LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al., “Search for new physics in low-energy electron recoils from the first LZ exposure,” Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 7, (2023) 072006, arXiv:2307.15753 [hep-ex].
- [61] E. Del Nobile, “The Theory of Direct Dark Matter Detection: A Guide to Computations,” arXiv:2104.12785 [hep-ph].
- [62] Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG) Collaboration, Y. Aoki et al., “FLAG Review 2024,” arXiv:2411.04268 [hep-lat].