This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Likely intersections

Sebastian Eterović School of Mathematics
University of Leeds
Leeds, LS2 9JT
United Kingdom
s.eterovic@leeds.ac.uk
 and  Thomas Scanlon Department of Mathematics
University of California, Berkeley
Evans Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-3840
United States of America
scanlon@math.berkeley.edu
Abstract.

We prove a general likely intersections theorem, a counterpart to the Zilber-Pink conjectures, under the assumption that the Ax-Schanuel property and some mild additional conditions are known to hold for a given category of complex quotient spaces definable in some fixed o-minimal expansion of the ordered field of real numbers.

For an instance of our general result, consider the case of subvarieties of Shimura varieties. Let SS be a Shimura variety. Let π:DΓ\D=S\pi:D\to\Gamma\backslash D=S realize SS as a quotient of DD, a homogeneous space for the action of a real algebraic group GG, by the action of Γ<G\Gamma<G, an arithmetic subgroup. Let SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S be a special subvariety of SS realized as π(D)\pi(D^{\prime}) for DDD^{\prime}\subseteq D a homogeneous space for an algebraic subgroup of GG. Let XSX\subseteq S be an irreducible subvariety of SS not contained in any proper weakly special subvariety of SS. Assume that the intersection of XX with SS^{\prime} is persistently likely meaning that whenever ζ:S1S\zeta:S_{1}\to S and ξ:S1S2\xi:S_{1}\to S_{2} are maps of Shimura varieties (meaning regular maps of varieties induced by maps of the corresponding Shimura data) with ζ\zeta finite, dimξζ1X+dimξζ1SdimξS1\dim\xi\zeta^{-1}X+\dim\xi\zeta^{-1}S^{\prime}\geq\dim\xi S_{1}. Then XgG,π(gD) is special π(dD)X\cap\bigcup_{g\in G,\pi(gD^{\prime})\text{ is special }}\pi(dD^{\prime}) is dense in XX for the Euclidean topology.

1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
03C64, 11G18, 14D07, 14G35

1. Introduction

If XX is an complex manifold and f:YXf:Y\to X and g:ZXg:Z\to X are two sufficiently nice maps from complex analytic spaces to XX, then we say that an intersection between YY and ZZ is unlikely if dimf(Y)+dimg(Z)<dimX\dim f(Y)+\dim g(Z)<\dim X 111 We will be working with cases in which f(Y)f(Y) is automatically a finite Boolean combination of (at least) real analytic subvarieties of XX. This happens, for example, when f:YXf:Y\to X is proper or definable in an o-minimal expansion of the real field. In this case, we could take dim\dim to mean the o-minimal dimension or the maximal dimension of a submanifold of f(Y)f(Y). and that it is likely otherwise. Conjectures of Zilber-Pink type predict that in many cases of interest there are very few unlikely intersections. For example, the Zilber-Pink conjecture for Shimura varieties takes the following form. We let XX be a Shimura variety and YXY\subseteq X a Hodge generic subvariety, meaning that there is no proper weakly special subvariety (in the sense of Shimura varieties) TXT\subsetneq X with YTY\subseteq T. The conclusion of the conjecture in this case is that the union of all unlikely intersections between YY and special subvarieties of XX is not Zariski dense in YY. In this paper, we address the complementary question of describing the likely intersections.

This is not the first time that the likely intersection problem has been addressed. In Section 4 we discuss several specializations of our main theorem and the relation between our results and those which appear in the literature. Three notable instances are the “all or nothing” theorem of Baldi, Klingler, and Ullmo [8] on the density of the typical Hodge locus, the results of Tayou and Tholozan [29] describing the typical Hodge locus of polarized variations of Hodge structure over a smooth complex quasiprojective variety, and the work of Gao [12, 14] (following on the work of André, Corvaja, and Zannier [1]) on the generic rank of the Betti map, from which a sufficient condition for the density of torsion in subvarieties of abelian schemes is derived.

We formulate and prove our main theorem (Theorem 3.4) in terms of definable analytic maps from complex algebraic varieties to definable complex quotient spaces. See Section 2 for details. In brief, a definable complex quotient space SS is a complex analytic space which may be presented as a double coset space Γ\G/M\Gamma\backslash G/M where GG is the connected component of the real points of an algebraic group, MGM\leq G is a suitable subgroup, and ΓG\Gamma\leq G is a discrete subgroup together with a choice of a definable (in a fixed o-minimal expansion of the real numbers) fundamental set \mathcal{F}. Examples of such definable complex quotient spaces include complex tori, Shimura varieties, Hopf manifolds, and (mixed) period spaces. We then define a special subvariety of a definable complex quotient space SS to be the image of a map of definable complex quotient space SSS^{\prime}\to S (or possibly taken only from some subcategory of definable complex quotient spaces) which is a definable map induced by an algebraic group homomorphism followed by translation. For example, the special subvarieties of complex tori would be translates by torsion points of subtori and the special subvarieties of period spaces would come from period subdomains. We must also consider a more general class of weakly special varieties, which are the fibers of maps of definable complex quotient spaces and the images of these fibers under other maps of definable complex quotient spaces. We identify a condition we call well-parameterization of weakly special subvarieties whereby all of the weakly special varieties in some given definable complex quotient space come from those appearing in countably many families of weakly special subvarieties. In our applications this condition is easy to verify as we restrict to subcategories of definable complex quotient spaces for which there are only countably many morphisms all told.

Consider S=Γ\G/M=Γ\DS=\Gamma\backslash G/M=\Gamma\backslash D and DDD^{\prime}\subseteq D a homogeneous space for a subgroup GGG^{\prime}\leq G. We will write πΓ:DS\pi_{\Gamma}:D\to S for the quotient map. It may happen that πΓ(gD)S\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime})\subseteq S is a special subvariety of SS for many choices of gGg\in G, where “many” might mean that the set of such gg is dense in GG. For example, if D=𝔥2D=\mathfrak{h}^{2} is the Cartesian square of the upper half plane, Γ=PGL22()\Gamma=\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{2}(\mathbb{Z}) and D={(τ,τ):τ𝔥}D^{\prime}=\{(\tau,\tau):\tau\in\mathfrak{h}\} is the diagonal, then all modular plane curves may be expressed as πΓ(gD)\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}) as gg ranges through PGL22()\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{2}(\mathbb{Q}) acting via pairs of rational linear transformations. In such a situation we might expect that if XX is a quasiprojective complex algebraic variety and f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S is a definable complex analytic map from the analytification of XX to SS, then the set f1gG,πΓ(gD) special πΓ(gD)f^{-1}\bigcup_{g\in G,\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime})\text{ special }}\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}) of special intersections is dense in XX provided that the intersections are likely in the sense that dimf(X)+dimDdimS\dim f(X)+\dim D^{\prime}\geq\dim S. This is not quite right as the intersection may become unlikely after transformation through a special correspondence. We account for this complication with the notion of persistently likely intersections. Our main Theorem 3.4 asserts that if we know that the Ax-Schanuel theorem holds for our given category of definable complex quotient spaces (which satisfies some natural closure properties and the well-parameterization of weakly special subvarieties condition), then, in fact, when the intersection of f(X)f(X) with πΓ(D)\pi_{\Gamma}(D^{\prime}) is persistently likely, the set of special intersections is dense in XX.

When working in the setting of variations of Hodge structures, our result improves the “all or nothing” theorem of [8] first by giving a criterion for the typical Hodge locus to be dense (namely persistent likeliness), and secondly by obtaining a euclidean dense set of likely intersections using a specific subcollection of the family of all special varieties. On the other hand, the general setting of definable quotients spaces does not allow for measure theoretic techniques, so we are unable to recover the equidistribution results appearing in, for example, [8] and [29]. But our result does imply some of the applications of these equidistribution results. For example, in the setting of the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties of dimension gg, given two subvarieties SS and DD of 𝒜g\mathcal{A}_{g} of complimentary dimensions and so that dimS2\dim S\leq 2, our result implies the part of [29, Theorem 1.22] stating that the set of points in SS isogenous to a point in DD is euclidean dense in SS. See also Section 4 for more applications. An advantage of the present work is that our results apply directly to the likely intersections problem to contexts not covered by [29], such as for mixed Shimura varieties, or more generally, for variations of mixed Hodge structures.

Unsurprisingly, Ax-Schanuel theorems play key roles in the existing proofs of the density of special intersections. What may be surprising is that our argument is not an abstraction of the proofs appearing, for example, in [8], [29] or [12]. Instead, our arguments are inspired by the work of Aslanyan and Kirby [3], especially with the proof of their Theorem 3.1. The reader will recognize a resemblance between our notion of persistent likeliness and the JJ-broad and JJ-free conditions of [3], which themselves extend freeness and rotundity conditions from earlier works on existential closedness as a converse to Schanuel-type statements. While the contents of our arguments differ, the structure of many of the results of Daw and Ren in [11] inspired our approach.

Our own interest in the likely intersections problem was motivated by [24, Conjecture 3.13] in the second author’s work with Pila on effective versions of the Zilber-Pink conjecture.

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we define definable quotient spaces and develop some of their basic theory. These definitions and results owe their form to the formalism of Bakker, Brunebarbe, Klingler and Tsimerman [5, 4] used to study arithmetic quotients and more generally mixed period spaces. In that section we express precisely what the Ax-Schanuel condition means and show that under the well-parameterization of weakly special subvarieties hypothesis, it implies a uniform version of itself. Section 3 is devoted to the statement and proof of our main theorem on dense special intersections. In Section 4 we detail several specializations of the main theorem, including to Hodge loci, intersections with modular varieties, and density of torsion in subvarieties of abelian schemes.

Acknowledgments

During the writing of this paper S.E. was partially supported through the NSF grant RTG DMS-1646385 and T.S. was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-1800492, FRG DMS-1760414, and DMS-22010405. The authors have no competing interests, financial or otherwise. S.E. thanks E. Ullmo and G. Baldi for hosting him at IHÉS, for sharing an early version of [8], and for discussing problems around the density of special intersections. T.S. thanks Z. Gao, M. Orr, and U. Zannier for offering detailed accounts of the state of the art on likely intersection problems for modular curves and torsion in abelian schemes. Both authors thank an anonymous referee of an earlier version of this paper for suggesting several improvements.

2. Complex quotient spaces and 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special varieties

We express our theorems on likely intersections in terms of classes of definable complex quotient spaces. Our formalism is similar to what appears in [5], though we explicitly include the fundamental domain giving the definable structure as part of our data.

Throughout we work in an appropriate o-minimal expansion of the real field \mathbb{R} (usually an,exp\mathbb{R}_{\mathrm{an},\exp}), and the word definable is meant with respect to this choice of o-minimal structure.

Definition 2.1.

A definable quotient space is given by the data of

  • a definable group GG,

  • a definable compact subgroup MGM\leq G of GG,

  • a discrete subgroup ΓG\Gamma\leq G of GG, and

  • D:=G/M\mathcal{F}\subseteq D:=G/M a definable open fundamental set for the action of Γ\Gamma on DD (that is, D=γΓγD=\bigcup_{\gamma\in\Gamma}\gamma\mathcal{F} and there is a finite subset ΓΓ\Gamma^{\prime}\subseteq\Gamma so that if xx\in\mathcal{F} and γx\gamma x\in\mathcal{F} for some γΓ\gamma\in\Gamma, then γΓ\gamma\in\Gamma^{\prime}) for which the closure ¯\overline{\mathcal{F}} of \mathcal{F} is contained in γΓ′′γ\bigcup_{\gamma\in\Gamma^{\prime\prime}}\gamma\mathcal{F} for some finite subset Γ′′Γ\Gamma^{\prime\prime}\subseteq\Gamma.

We write SΓ,G,M;S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}} both for the quotient space Γ\D=Γ\G/M\Gamma\backslash D=\Gamma\backslash G/M regarded as a definable, real analytic space where the definable structure comes from \mathcal{F}, and for the data (G,M,Γ,)(G,M,\Gamma,\mathcal{F}) giving this space. We denote the corresponding quotient map by πΓ:DSΓ,G,M;\pi_{\Gamma}:D\rightarrow S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}}. When the data are understood, we suppress them and write SS for SΓ,G,M;S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}} and π:DS\pi:D\to S for the quotient map.

The class of definable quotient spaces forms a category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} with the following notion of a morphism.

Definition 2.2.

A morphism f:SΓ1,G1,M1;1SΓ2,G2,M2;2f:S_{\Gamma_{1},G_{1},M_{1};\mathcal{F}_{1}}\to S_{\Gamma_{2},G_{2},M_{2};\mathcal{F}_{2}} is given by a definable map of groups φ:G1G2\varphi:G_{1}\to G_{2} and an element aG2a\in G_{2} for which

  • φ(M1)M2\varphi(M_{1})\leq M_{2},

  • φ(Γ1)a1Γ2a\varphi(\Gamma_{1})\leq a^{-1}\Gamma_{2}a, and

  • there is a finite set ΞΓ2\Xi\subseteq\Gamma_{2} with aφ¯(1)ξΞξ2a\overline{\varphi}(\mathcal{F}_{1})\subseteq\bigcup_{\xi\in\Xi}\xi\mathcal{F}_{2}, where φ¯:D1D2\overline{\varphi}:D_{1}\to D_{2} is the map induced on the quotient space.

The induced map on the double quotient space is a definable real analytic map which we also denote by ff.

Remark 2.3.

If f:SΓ1,G1,M1;1SΓ2,G2,M2;2f:S_{\Gamma_{1},G_{1},M_{1};\mathcal{F}_{1}}\to S_{\Gamma_{2},G_{2},M_{2};\mathcal{F}_{2}} is a morphism of definable quotient spaces as in Definition 2.2, then it is definable in the sense that its graph on the specified fundamental domains

Graph(f):={(x,y)1×2:f(πΓ1(x))=πΓ2(y)}\operatorname{Graph}(f):=\{(x,y)\in\mathcal{F}_{1}\times\mathcal{F}_{2}:f(\pi_{\Gamma_{1}}(x))=\pi_{\Gamma_{2}}(y)\}

is definable. Indeed, it is clear that the induced map φ¯:D1D2\overline{\varphi}:D_{1}\to D_{2} is definable and for (x,y)1×2(x,y)\in\mathcal{F}_{1}\times\mathcal{F}_{2} we have that (x,y)Graph(f)(x,y)\in\operatorname{Graph}(f) if and only if ξΞξy=aφ¯(x)\bigvee_{\xi\in\Xi}\xi\cdot y=a\overline{\varphi}(x).

The category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} has a terminal object and is closed under fiber products.

Proposition 2.4.

There is a terminal object in 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S}.

Proof.

Take G=M=Γ={1}G=M=\Gamma=\{1\} to be trivial group and then let :=G/M\mathcal{F}:=G/M, which is a singleton. The one point space {}=SG,Γ,M;\{\ast\}=S_{G,\Gamma,M;\mathcal{F}} is a definable quotient space and for any definable quotient space S=SG,Γ,M;S=S_{G^{\prime},\Gamma^{\prime},M^{\prime};\mathcal{F}^{\prime}}, the unique set theoretic map S{}S\to\{\ast\} is induced by the unique map of groups φ:G{1}\varphi:G^{\prime}\to\{1\} and a=1{1}a=1\in\{1\}. ∎

Proposition 2.5.

The category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} has pullbacks.

Proof.

More concretely, we need to show that given maps f:S2S1f:S_{2}\to S_{1} and g:S3S1g:S_{3}\to S_{1} of definable quotient spaces, there are maps of definable quotient spaces g¯:S4S2\overline{g}:S_{4}\to S_{2} and f¯:S4S3\overline{f}:S_{4}\to S_{3} fitting into the following Cartesian square.

\xymatrixS4\ar[d]g¯\ar[r]f¯&S3\ar[d]gS2\ar[r]fS1\xymatrix{S_{4}\ar[d]_{\overline{g}}\ar[r]^{\overline{f}}&S_{3}\ar[d]^{g}\\ S_{2}\ar[r]^{f}S_{1}}

Express Si=SGi,Γi,Mi;iS_{i}=S_{G_{i},\Gamma_{i},M_{i};\mathcal{F}_{i}} and f:S2S1f:S_{2}\to S_{1} as Γ2xM2Γ1a2φ(x)M1\Gamma_{2}xM_{2}\mapsto\Gamma_{1}a_{2}\varphi(x)M_{1} and g:S3S1g:S_{3}\to S_{1} as Γ3xM3Γ1a3ψ(x)M1\Gamma_{3}xM_{3}\mapsto\Gamma_{1}a_{3}\psi(x)M_{1} where φ:G2G1\varphi:G_{2}\to G_{1} and ψ:G3G1\psi:G_{3}\to G_{1} are definable group homomorphisms, a2G1a_{2}\in G_{1} and a3G1a_{3}\in G_{1}. Let G4:=G2×G1G3G_{4}:=G_{2}\times_{G_{1}}G_{3}, M4:=M2×M1M3M_{4}:=M_{2}\times_{M_{1}}M_{3}, and Γ4:=Γ2×Γ1Γ3\Gamma_{4}:=\Gamma_{2}\times_{\Gamma_{1}}\Gamma_{3}. For the fiber products defining G4G_{4} and M4M_{4} we use the maps φ:G2G1\varphi:G_{2}\to G_{1} (and its restriction to M2M_{2}) and ψ:G3G1\psi:G_{3}\to G_{1} (and its restriction to M3M_{3}). In defining Γ4\Gamma_{4}, we use the maps xa2φ(x)a21x\mapsto a_{2}\varphi(x)a_{2}^{-1} and xa3ψ(x)a31x\mapsto a_{3}\psi(x)a_{3}^{-1}. Regarding G4G_{4} as a subgroup of G2×G3G_{2}\times G_{3} and then D4:=G4/M4D_{4}:=G_{4}/M_{4} as a subset of G2/M2×G3/M3=D2×D3G_{2}/M_{2}\times G_{3}/M_{3}=D_{2}\times D_{3}, we let 4:=D4(2×3)\mathcal{F}_{4}:=D_{4}\cap(\mathcal{F}_{2}\times\mathcal{F}_{3}). ∎

A useful observation is that morphisms of definable quotient spaces always factor as a surjective map followed by a map induced by an inclusion of subgroups.

Proposition 2.6.

Every map f:S1S2f:S_{1}\to S_{2} of definable quotient spaces fits into a commutative diagram

\xymatrixS1\ar[rr]f\ar[rd]q&S2S3\ar[ru]p\xymatrix{S_{1}\ar[rr]^{f}\ar[rd]_{q}&S_{2}\\ S_{3}\ar[ru]_{p}}

where q:S1S3q:S_{1}\to S_{3} is surjective and p:S3S2p:S_{3}\to S_{2} is induced by an inclusion of subgroups. If we further assume that the group M2M_{2} in the presentation of S2=SG2,Γ2,M2;S_{2}=S_{G_{2},\Gamma_{2},M_{2};\mathcal{F}} is compact, then pp has compact fibers.

Proof.

Take Si=SGi,Γi,Mi;iS_{i}=S_{G_{i},\Gamma_{i},M_{i};\mathcal{F}_{i}} for 1i21\leq i\leq 2 and let φ:G1G2\varphi:G_{1}\to G_{2} be a definable homomorphism and aG2a\in G_{2} so that f:S1S2f:S_{1}\to S_{2} is given by Γ1xM1Γ2aφ(x)M2\Gamma_{1}xM_{1}\mapsto\Gamma_{2}a\varphi(x)M_{2}.

Define G3:=φ(G1)G2G_{3}:=\varphi(G_{1})\leq G_{2}, a definable group. Set Γ3:=φ(Γ1)\Gamma_{3}:=\varphi(\Gamma_{1}), M3:=φ(M1)M_{3}:=\varphi(M_{1}), and 3:=φ¯(1)\mathcal{F}_{3}:=\overline{\varphi}(\mathcal{F}_{1}) where φ¯:G1/M1G3/M3\overline{\varphi}:G_{1}/M_{1}\to G_{3}/M_{3} is the induced map. Since φ¯\overline{\varphi} is a definable open map, 3\mathcal{F}_{3} is open and clearly 3\mathcal{F}_{3} is a fundamental set of the action of Γ3\Gamma_{3} on G3/M3G_{3}/M_{3}. Set S3:=SG3,Γ3,M3;S_{3}:=S_{G_{3},\Gamma_{3},M_{3};\mathcal{F}} and let q:S1S3q:S_{1}\to S_{3} be the map Γ1xM1Γ3φ(x)M3\Gamma_{1}xM_{1}\mapsto\Gamma_{3}\varphi(x)M_{3}. The map p:S3S2p:S_{3}\to S_{2} is then given by Γ3xM3Γ2axM2\Gamma_{3}xM_{3}\mapsto\Gamma_{2}axM_{2}. The fibers of pp are contained in a finite union of sets definably homeomorphic to the homogeneous space (M2G3)/M3(M_{2}\cap G_{3})/M_{3}, which is compact if M2M_{2} is. ∎

For the problems we consider in this paper we require that our definable quotient spaces come equipped with a complex structure and for the domain DD to arise as a subset of an algebraic variety.

Definition 2.7.

A definable complex quotient space is a definable quotient space SΓ,G,M;S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}} together with the data of a real algebraic group 𝐆\mathbf{G} and an algebraic subgroup 𝐁𝐆\mathbf{B}\leq\mathbf{G}_{\mathbb{C}} of the base change of 𝐆\mathbf{G} to \mathbb{C} for which G=𝐆()+G=\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{R})^{+} is the connected component of the identity in the real points of a real algebraic group 𝐆\mathbf{G}, M=𝐁()GM=\mathbf{B}(\mathbb{C})\cap G, and D=G/M(𝐆/𝐁)()=:Dˇ()D=G/M\subseteq(\mathbf{G}/\mathbf{B})(\mathbb{C})=:\check{D}(\mathbb{C}) is an open domain in the complex points of the algebraic variety Dˇ\check{D}.

A morphism f:SΓ1,G1,M1;1SΓ2,G2,M2;2f:S_{\Gamma_{1},G_{1},M_{1};\mathcal{F}_{1}}\to S_{\Gamma_{2},G_{2},M_{2};\mathcal{F}_{2}} of definable complex quotient spaces is a morphism of definable quotient spaces for which the definable map of groups is given by a map of algebraic groups φ:𝐆1𝐆2\varphi:\mathbf{G}_{1}\to\mathbf{G}_{2} for which φ(𝐁1)𝐁2\varphi(\mathbf{B}_{1})\leq\mathbf{B}_{2}.

The class of definable complex quotient spaces with this notion of morphism forms a category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S}.

We leave it to the reader to check that the proofs of the basic closure properties for the category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S}, such as the existence of a terminal object and closure under fiber products, go through for the category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S}. In practice, the morphisms in 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} we consider satisfy a stronger conclusion than what Proposition 2.6 gives. That is, in practice, a map f:SG1,Γ1,M1;1SG2,Γ2,M2;2f:S_{G_{1},\Gamma_{1},M_{1};\mathcal{F}_{1}}\to S_{G_{2},\Gamma_{2},M_{2};\mathcal{F}_{2}} in 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} is given by a map of algebraic groups φ:𝐆1𝐆2\varphi:\mathbf{G}_{1}\to\mathbf{G}_{2} (and an element aG2a\in G_{2}) for which M1M_{1} is a finite index subgroup of φ1(M2)\varphi^{-1}(M_{2}). It then follows from the proof of Proposition 2.6 that ff factors as f=pqf=p\circ q where q:S1S3q:S_{1}\to S_{3} is a surjective 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} morphism and p:S3S2p:S_{3}\to S_{2} is a 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} morphism with finite fibers.

As we have defined definable complex quotient spaces, such a space SG,Γ,M;S_{G,\Gamma,M;\mathcal{F}} may have singularities. When we restrict to the case that the group MM is compact, then the singularities are at worst locally isomorphic to those coming from a quotient by a finite group. In our applications, we will consider only cases where these quotients may be desingularized by passing to a finite cover by another definable complex quotient space.

For some purposes we may wish to restrict to an even smaller category 𝖲\mathsf{S}. We always assume about our given category 𝖲\mathsf{S} of definable complex quotient spaces that it satisfies some basic closure properties. Let us specify these with the following convention.

Convention 2.8.

The category 𝖲\mathsf{S} is a subcategory of 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S} satisfying the following conditions.

  • The one point space {}\{\ast\} is a terminal object of 𝖲\mathsf{S}.

  • The category 𝖲\mathsf{S} is closed under fiber products.

  • Every 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism f:S1S2f:S_{1}\to S_{2} factors as f=pqf=p\circ q where q:S1S3q:S_{1}\to S_{3} is a surjective 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism and p:S3S2p:S_{3}\to S_{2} is an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism with finite fibers.

In Section 3 we will impose an additional restriction on 𝖲\mathsf{S}.

Definition 2.9.

If f:S1S2f:S_{1}\to S_{2} is an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism, then the image f(S1)f(S_{1}) is called an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety of S2S_{2}.

In Definition 2.9 we refer to f(S1)f(S_{1}) as a special subvariety. It is, in fact, always a complex analytic subvariety of S2S_{2}. Indeed, if we factor f=pqf=p\circ q as given by Convention 2.8, then p:S3S2p:S_{3}\to S_{2} is a finite, and hence, proper, map of complex analytic spaces so that by Remmert’s proper mapping theorem its image p(S3)=f(S1)p(S_{3})=f(S_{1}) is a complex analytic subvariety of S2S_{2}. Using this observation, we may modify Definition 2.9 to require the morphism f:S1S2f:S_{1}\to S_{2} witnessing that f(S1)f(S_{1}) is an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety of S2S_{2} to be finite.

Definition 2.10.

An 𝖲\mathsf{S}-family of weakly special subvarieties of S𝖲S\in\mathsf{S} is given by a pair of 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphisms

\xymatrix&S1\ar[ld]ζ\ar[rd]ξSS2\xymatrix{&S_{1}\ar[ld]_{\zeta}\ar[rd]^{\xi}\\ SS_{2}}

for which ζ\zeta is a finite map over its image and ξ\xi is surjective. For each bS2b\in S_{2}, the image ζξ1{b}\zeta\xi^{-1}\{b\} is a weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety of SS.

Remark 2.11.

An 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special variety is weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special as if f:S1Sf:S_{1}\to S expresses f(S1)f(S_{1}) as an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety of SS with ff finite, then we can take ζ=f\zeta=f, S2={}S_{2}=\{\ast\}, ξ:S1S2\xi:S_{1}\to S_{2} the unique map to {}\{\ast\}. If we take 𝖲\mathsf{S} to be the category 𝖣𝖰𝖲\mathsf{D}\mathbb{C}\mathsf{Q}\mathsf{S}, then the converse that every weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special variety is actually 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special holds.

In another extreme, every singleton in S𝖲S\in\mathsf{S} is a weakly special variety witnessed by S1=S2S_{1}=S_{2} and ξ=ζ=idS\xi=\zeta=\operatorname{id}_{S}.

For our results it will be important that all 𝖲\mathsf{S}-weakly special varieties come from countably many 𝖲\mathsf{S}-families of weakly special subvarieties. We isolate it as an hypothesis and verify it in cases of interest.

Definition 2.12.

We say that the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties of S𝖲S\in\mathsf{S} are well-parameterized if there are countably many 𝖲\mathsf{S}-families of weakly special subvarieties of SS,

\xymatrix&S1,i\ar[ld]ζi\ar[rd]ξiSS2,i\xymatrix{&S_{1,i}\ar[ld]_{\zeta_{i}}\ar[rd]^{\xi_{i}}\\ SS_{2,i}}

for ii\in\mathbb{N} so that for every weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S of SS there is some ii\in\mathbb{N} and cS2,ic\in S_{2,i} so that S=ζiξi1{c}S^{\prime}=\zeta_{i}\xi_{i}^{-1}\{c\}. More generally, we say that the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties are well-parameterized if for every S𝖲S\in\mathsf{S} the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties of SS are well-parameterized.

Remark 2.13.

When 𝖲\mathsf{S} is itself countable, by which we mean that there are only countably many objects in 𝖲\mathsf{S} and the set of 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphisms between any two such objects is itself countable, then the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties are well-parameterized.

Remark 2.14.

The well-paramaterization condition may fail in some cases. From the theory of Douady spaces, we know that all complex analytic subvarieties of a given compact definable complex quotient space SS are parameterized by countably many complex analytic families of analytic spaces. However, when parameterizing weakly special varieties, the Douady universal family need not arise as a weakly special family as defined in Definition 2.10. Moreover, there need not be natural parameterizations of the weakly special varieties in the cases that SS is non-compact. The Hopf manifold construction is be instructive here. For example, consider pp and qq two multiplicatively independent complex numbers of modulus less than one, X:=2{(0,0)}X:=\mathbb{C}^{2}\smallsetminus\{(0,0)\}, Γ:=(p,q)\Gamma:=\langle(p,q)\rangle is the subgroup of Aut(X)\operatorname{Aut}(X) generated by the map (x,y)(px,qy)(x,y)\mapsto(px,qy), and M:=Γ\XM:=\Gamma\backslash X. The Hopf manifold MM may be realized as a definable complex quotient space and is a compact complex manifold with a noncompact, connected group of automorphisms. One by one, these automorphisms define special subvarieties of M×MM\times M, but they cannot be parameterized by a family of weakly special varieties.

Let us indicate now the key functional transcendence condition which may hold in a category 𝖲\mathsf{S} of definable complex quotient spaces.

Definition 2.15.

Fix a category 𝖲\mathsf{S} of definable complex quotient spaces. We say that f:XanSSΓ,G,M;𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S^{\prime}\subseteq S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}}\in\mathsf{S}, a definable complex analytic map from the analytification of a complex algebraic variety XX to a weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special variety SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S satisfies the Ax-Schanuel condition relative to 𝖲\mathsf{S} if whenever k+k\in\mathbb{Z}_{+} is a positive integer, and (γ,γ~):ΔkX×D(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma}):\Delta^{k}\to X\times D is a complex analytic map, where

Δ={z:z<1} ,\Delta=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\|z\|<1\}\text{ ,}

with πΓγ~=fγ\pi_{\Gamma}\circ\widetilde{\gamma}=f\circ\gamma, then either

tr.deg((γ,γ~))dimS+rk(dγ~)\operatorname{tr.deg}_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{C}(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma}))\geq\dim S^{\prime}+\operatorname{rk}(d\widetilde{\gamma})

or f(γ(Δk))f(\gamma(\Delta^{k})) is contained in a proper weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety of SS^{\prime}.

Under the hypothesis that the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties are well-parameterized, the Ax-Schanuel condition implies a uniform version of itself.

Since our statement of this uniform version, expressed as Proposition 2.20 below, is a bit dense, we take this opportunity to explain it with a few words. Basically, what it says is that if we are given an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-family of weakly special varieties and a family of algebraic varieties which might witness the failure of the transcendence degree lower bound in the Ax-Schanuel property, then weakly special variety in the alternative provided by the Ax-Schanuel property may be chosen from one of finitely many preassigned 𝖲\mathsf{S}-families of weakly special varieties.

Before proving Proposition 2.20 we require two lemmas. The first describes families of weakly special subvarieties algebraically. The second allows us to recast Ax-Schanuel in differential algebraic terms.

Lemma 2.16.

Let f:XanSΓ,G,M;=:S𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}}=:S\in\mathsf{S} be a definable complex analytic map from a complex algebraic variety to a definable complex quotient space in 𝖲\mathsf{S}. Let

\xymatrix&S1\ar[ld]ζ\ar[rd]ξSS2\xymatrix{&S_{1}\ar[ld]_{\zeta}\ar[rd]^{\xi}\\ SS_{2}}

be an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-family of weakly special subvarieties. Then there are algebraically constructible sets BB and TX×BT\subseteq X\times B so that the set of fibers {Tb:bB()}\{T_{b}:b\in B(\mathbb{C})\} is equal to {f1ζξ1{c}:cS2}\{f^{-1}\zeta\xi^{-1}\{c\}:c\in S_{2}\}.

Proof.

By the Riemann Existence Theorem [25, Théorème 5.2], there is an algebraic variety XX^{\prime}, a regular map of algebraic varieties ζ:XX\zeta^{\prime}:X^{\prime}\to X and an analytic map f:(X)anS1f^{\prime}:(X^{\prime})^{\text{an}}\to S_{1} realizing (X)an(X^{\prime})^{\text{an}} as the fiber product Xan×SS1X^{\text{an}}\times_{S}S_{1}. The fiber equivalence relation

Eξf:={(x,y)X×X:ξ(f(x))=ξ(f(y))}E_{\xi\circ f^{\prime}}:=\{(x,y)\in X^{\prime}\times X^{\prime}:\xi(f^{\prime}(x))=\xi(f^{\prime}(y))\}

is analytic and definable, and hence algebraic by the definable Chow theorem [23]. The quotient B:=X/EξfB:=X^{\prime}/E_{\xi\circ f^{\prime}} may be realized within the category of constructible sets as a constructible set. Let us write ν:XB\nu:X^{\prime}\to B for the quotient map. We may then take

T:={(x,b)X×B:(xX)ζ(x)=x and ν(x)=b} .T:=\{(x,b)\in X\times B:(\exists x^{\prime}\in X)\zeta^{\prime}(x^{\prime})=x\text{ and }\nu(x^{\prime})=b\}\text{ .}

Definition 2.17.

Let f:XanS𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S\in\mathsf{S} be a definable complex analytic map from the complex algebraic variety XX to the definable complex quotient space SS in 𝖲\mathsf{S}. We say that a subvariety YXY\subseteq X is relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special of relative dimension at most dd if there is a weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S of dimension at most dd for which Y=f1SY=f^{-1}S^{\prime}.

Note that in Definition 2.17, because we allow for the possibility that ff is not a finite map, it could happen that the dimension of YY itself is greater than dd. On the other hand, the intersection of SS^{\prime} with f(X)f(X) may even be empty! Thus, the dimension of YY could be less than dd.

It follows from Lemma 2.16 that if the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties are well-parameterized, then for any definable complex analytic map f:XanS𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S\in\mathsf{S} from a complex algebraic variety XX to some definable complex quotient space SS in 𝖲\mathsf{S} that we can recognize the pullbacks under ff of prespecials in the sense that for each number dd the collection of relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties of dimension at most dd comprise a countable collection of algebraic families of subvarieties of XX.

Definition 2.18.

Let f:XanS𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S\in\mathsf{S} be a definable complex analytic map from the complex algebraic variety XX to to a definable complex quotient space SS in 𝖲\mathsf{S}. Given any field MM over which XX and a countable collection of families of relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties of XX including all such relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties are defined, by an MM-relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special variety of dimension at most dd we mean an MM-variety of the form YbY_{b} where YX×BY\subseteq X\times B is an algebraic family of weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties of dimension at most dd and bB(M)b\in B(M).

Using the Seidenberg embedding theorem we may reformulate the Ax-Schanuel property in differential algebraic terms. To be completely honest, the embedding theorem as stated and proven by Seidenberg in [27, 28] is not quite sufficient in that he starts with a finitely generated differential subfield K(U)K\subseteq\mathcal{M}(U) of a differential field of meromorphic functions on the open domain UnU\subseteq\mathbb{C}^{n} and then shows that for any finitely generated differential field extension LL of KK at the cost of shrinking UU to some open subdomain VUV\subseteq U we may embed LL into (V)\mathcal{M}(V) over the embedding of KK. For our purposes, we will need to start with a possibly countably generated differential field K(U)K\subseteq\mathcal{M}(U). The necessary extension of embeddings theorem is a consequence of the the Cauchy-Kovalevskaya theorem [30] and appears as Theorem 1 of [22]. Iterating this construction countably many steps, we see that if K(U)K\subseteq\mathcal{M}(U) is a countable differential subfield of the meromorphic functions on some open domain in n\mathbb{C}^{n} and LL is a countably generated differential field extension of KK, then LL embeds into the differential field of germs of meromorphic functions at some point xUx\in U over the embedding of KK.

We recall the generalized Schwartzian and generalized logarithmic derivative constructions from [26]. Consider S=SG,Γ,M;S=S_{G,\Gamma,M;\mathcal{F}} a definable complex quotient space and fix an integer kk. From the action 𝐆Dˇ\mathbf{G}\curvearrowright\check{D} of the algebraic group 𝐆\mathbf{G} on the quasiprojective algebraic variety Dˇ\check{D} and a positive integer kk, there is a differentially constructible map χ~:DˇZ\widetilde{\chi}:\check{D}\to Z from Dˇ\check{D} to some algebraic variety ZZ so that for any differential field (L,1,,k)(L,\partial_{1},\ldots,\partial_{k}) extending \mathbb{C} (where the derivations i\partial_{i} commute and vanish on )\mathbb{C}) we have that for x,yDˇ(L)x,y\in\check{D}(L),

χ~(x)=χ~(y)(g𝐆(C))gx=y\widetilde{\chi}(x)=\widetilde{\chi}(y)\Longleftrightarrow(\exists g\in\mathbf{G}(C))gx=y

where

C={aL:i(a)=0 for 1ik}C=\{a\in L:\partial_{i}(a)=0\text{ for }1\leq i\leq k\}

is the common constant field of LL. In particular, if this common constant field is \mathbb{C}, then we may express the quotient of Dˇ\check{D} by the 𝐆()\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{C}) as the image of χ~\widetilde{\chi}. When f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S is a definable, complex analytic map from the analytification of a quasiprojective algebraic variety XX to SS, then we may define a differentially analytically constructible function χ:XZ\chi:X\to Z by the rule that for any meromorphic γ:UX\gamma:U\to X (where UkU\subseteq\mathbb{C}^{k} is an open domain in k\mathbb{C}^{k}), χ(γ):=χ~(πΓ1(f(γ))\chi(\gamma):=\widetilde{\chi}(\pi_{\Gamma}^{-1}(f(\gamma)) where πΓ1\pi_{\Gamma}^{-1} is any branch of the inverse of πΓ\pi_{\Gamma}. Theorem 3.12 of [26] shows that χ\chi is actually differentially constructible. (That theorem is stated in the case where Xan=SX^{\text{an}}=S and f=idSf=\operatorname{id}_{S}, but the proof goes through in the more general case.)

Lemma 2.19.

Fix 𝖲\mathsf{S} a category of definable complex quotient spaces. Suppose that the weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties are well-parameterized and that f:XanSSΓ,G,M;𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S^{\prime}\subseteq S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}}\in\mathsf{S} is a definable complex analytic map from the analytification of a complex algebraic variety XX to an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-weakly special subvariety of a definable complex quotient space in 𝖲\mathsf{S}. Let KK be a countable subfield of \mathbb{C} over which XX and a complete collection of algebraic families of relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special varieties are defined. Let kk and dd be two positive integers. Then for any differential field (L,δ1,,δk)(L,\delta_{1},\ldots,\delta_{k}) with kk-commuting derivations for which KK is a subfield of the constants CC of LL and CC is algebraically closed and any CC-relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special YY of dimension at most dd, if (γ,γ~)Y(L)×Dˇ(L)(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma})\in Y(L)\times\check{D}(L) satisfies χ(γ)=χ~(γ~)\chi(\gamma)=\widetilde{\chi}(\widetilde{\gamma}), rk((δiγ)1ik)=k\operatorname{rk}(\left(\delta_{i}\gamma\right)_{1\leq i\leq k})=k and tr.degCC(γ,γ~)<d+k\operatorname{tr.deg}_{C}C(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma})<d+k, then there is a CC-relatively weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special ZYZ\subsetneq Y for which γZ(L)\gamma\in Z(L).

Proof.

Consider YY and (γ,γ~)Y(L)(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma})\in Y(L) as in the statement of the lemma. Let MM be a countable differential subfield of LL with an algebraically closed field of constants CC^{\prime} containing KK and over which YY and the point (γ,γ~)(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma}) are defined. By the embedding theorem, we may realize MM as a differential field of germs of meromorphic functions. Let SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S be the 𝖲\mathsf{S}-weakly special variety of dimension at most dd for which Y=f1SY=f^{-1}S^{\prime}. By Ax-Schanuel applied to γ\gamma and γ~\widetilde{\gamma} regarded as meromorphic functions, there is a proper weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvariety S′′SS^{\prime\prime}\subsetneq S^{\prime} with the image of fγf\circ\gamma contained in S′′S^{\prime\prime}. The algebraic variety Z:=f1S′′Z:=f^{-1}S^{\prime\prime} is then relatively \mathbb{C}-weakly special. Let M:=MdcM^{\prime}:=M^{\text{dc}} be the differential closure of MM and M′′:=M()dcM^{\prime\prime}:=M(\mathbb{C})^{\text{dc}} be the differential closure of the differential field generated over MM by \mathbb{C}. In M′′M^{\prime\prime}, γ\gamma satisfies the condition that it belongs to a 𝖢\mathsf{C}-relatively weakly special variety of relative dimension strictly less than dd where 𝖢\mathsf{C} is the constant field. As M′′M^{\prime\prime} is an elementary extension of MM^{\prime}, the same is true in MM^{\prime}. Since the constant field of the differential closure is the algebraic of the constant field of the initial field, we see that γ\gamma belongs to a CC-relatively weakly special variety of relative dimension strictly less than dd. ∎

A uniform version of the Ax-Schanuel condition follows from Lemma 2.16 using the compactness theorem.

Proposition 2.20.

Let f:XanSSΓ,G,M;𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S^{\prime}\subseteq S_{\Gamma,G,M;\mathcal{F}}\in\mathsf{S} be a definable complex analytic map from the analytification of a complex algebraic variety XX to a definable complex quotient space satisfying the same hypotheses as in Lemma 2.19.

Given an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-family

\xymatrix&S1\ar[ld]ζ\ar[rd]ξSS2\xymatrix{&S_{1}\ar[ld]_{\zeta}\ar[rd]^{\xi}\\ SS_{2}}

of weakly 𝖲\mathsf{S}-special subvarieties of SS, a positive integer k+k\in\mathbb{Z}_{+}, and a family Y(X×Dˇ)×BY\subseteq(X\times\check{D})\times B of subvarieties of X×DˇX\times\check{D}, then there are finitely many 𝖲\mathsf{S}-families of weakly special subvarieties

\xymatrix&S1,i\ar[ld]ζi\ar[rd]ξiSS2,i\xymatrix{&S_{1,i}\ar[ld]_{\zeta_{i}}\ar[rd]^{\xi_{i}}\\ SS_{2,i}}

for 1in1\leq i\leq n so that for any pair of parameters bBb\in B and cS2c\in S_{2} and analytic map (γ,γ~):ΔkYbX×D(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma}):\Delta^{k}\to Y_{b}\subseteq X\times D with γ(Δk)ζξ1{c}=:Sc\gamma(\Delta^{k})\subseteq\zeta\xi^{-1}\{c\}=:S^{\prime}_{c}, fγ=πΓγ~f\circ\gamma=\pi_{\Gamma}\circ\widetilde{\gamma}, rk(dγ~)=k\operatorname{rk}(d\widetilde{\gamma})=k, and dimYb<k+dimSc\dim Y_{b}<k+\dim S_{c}^{\prime}, there is some ini\leq n and dS2,id\in S_{2,i} for which fγ(Δk)ζiξi1{d}Scf\circ\gamma(\Delta^{k})\subseteq\zeta_{i}\xi_{i}^{-1}\{d\}\subsetneq S^{\prime}_{c}.

Proof.

Apply the compactness theorem to Lemma 2.16. See the proofs of [2, Theorem 3.5] or [18, Theorem 4.3] for details on how to formalize the compactness argument. ∎

3. Density of special intersections

In this section we state and prove our general theorem that, when persistently likely, intersections with special varieties are dense.

Throughout this section 𝖲\mathsf{S} is a category of definable complex quotient spaces satisfying our usual hypotheses from Convention 2.8 and some further requirements. Let us specify with the following convention the properties we require.

Convention 3.1.

The category 𝖲\mathsf{S} of definable complex quotient spaces satisfies the following conditions.

  • 𝖲\mathsf{S} is closed under fiber products.

  • The terminal definable complex quotient (one point) space {}\{\ast\} belongs to 𝖲\mathsf{S} as do the unique maps S{}S\to\{\ast\} for S𝖲S\in\mathsf{S}.

  • If f:S1S2f:S_{1}\to S_{2} is an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism then there are 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphisms q:S1S3q:S_{1}\to S_{3} and p:S3S2p:S_{3}\to S_{2} so that f=pqf=p\circ q, qq is surjective, and pp has finite fibers.

  • For every S𝖲S\in\mathsf{S} there is some smooth S𝖲S^{\prime}\in\mathsf{S} and a finite surjective 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism SSS^{\prime}\to S.

  • The 𝖲\mathsf{S}-weakly special varieties are well-parameterized.

  • Every definable analytic map f:XanS𝖲f:X^{\text{an}}\to S\in\mathsf{S} from the analytification of an algebraic variety to a definable complex quotient space in 𝖲\mathsf{S} considered in this section satisfies the Ax-Schanuel condition relative to 𝖲\mathsf{S} .

With the following definition we specify what is meant by intersections being persistently likely.

Definition 3.2.

Let S=SG,Γ,M;𝖲S=S_{G,\Gamma,M;\mathcal{F}}\in\mathsf{S}. We suppose that the inclusion S=SG,ΓG,MH;SS^{\prime}=S_{G^{\prime},\Gamma\cap G^{\prime},M\cap H;\mathcal{F}^{\prime}}\hookrightarrow S is an 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism where if D=G/MD=G/M and D=G/(GM)D^{\prime}=G^{\prime}/(G^{\prime}\cap M), then =D\mathcal{F}^{\prime}=\mathcal{F}\cap D^{\prime}. Suppose that GGG^{\prime}\leq G and D=G/(MG)D^{\prime}=G^{\prime}/(M\cap G^{\prime}). Let f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S be a definable complex analytic map. We say that XX and SS^{\prime} have likely intersection if dimf(X)+dimSdimS\dim f(X)+\dim S^{\prime}\geq\dim S, where here, the dimension is the o-minimal dimension. We say the intersection is persistently likely if whenever ζ:S1S\zeta:S_{1}\to S and ξ:S1S2\xi:S_{1}\to S_{2} are 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphisms with ζ\zeta finite and ξ\xi surjective, then dimξ(ζ1f(X))+dimξ(ζ1S)dimS2\dim\xi(\zeta^{-1}f(X))+\dim\xi(\zeta^{-1}S^{\prime})\geq\dim S_{2}.

Note that this definition does not actually require f(X)Sf(X)\cap S^{\prime} to be non-empty for the intersection to be likely.

Remark 3.3.

In Definition 3.2, we have consider only one special subvariety SS^{\prime} of SS, but we really intend to consider many. With the notation as in Definition 3.2, for any gGg\in G, the set πΓ(gD)S\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F})\subseteq S is locally (away from πΓ(gD())\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\partial(\mathcal{F}))) a complex analytic subvariety of SS of dimension equal to that of DD^{\prime}. Indeed, in several cases of interest for many choices of gg (where this may mean that the set of suitable gg is dense in GG) the set πΓ(gD)\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}) is actually a special subvariety of SS. Persistent likelihood of the intersection of XX with SS^{\prime} is equivalent to the persistent likelihood of the intersection of XX with these πΓ(gD)\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}).

With this definition in place we may now state our main theorem.

Theorem 3.4.

Let S=SG,Γ,M;𝖲S=S_{G,\Gamma,M;\mathcal{F}}\in\mathsf{S} and let f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S be a definable complex analytic map from the irreducible quasi-projective complex algebraic variety XX to SS. Suppose that SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S is a special subvariety expressible as πΓ(D)\pi_{\Gamma}(D^{\prime}) where DD=G/MD^{\prime}\subseteq D=G/M is a homogeneous space in DD. Suppose moreover that the intersection of XX with SS^{\prime} is persistently likely. Let UX()U\subseteq X(\mathbb{C}) be an open subset of the complex points of XX. Then the set B:={gG:f(U)πΓ(gD)}B:=\{g\in G:f(U)\cap\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F})\neq\varnothing\} has nontrivial interior. In particular, if the set {gG:πΓ(gD) is a special subvariety of S}\{g\in G:\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime})\text{ is a special subvariety of }S\} is Euclidean dense in GG, then the set of special intersections,

f1gG,πΓ(gD) is specialπΓ(gD)f^{-1}\bigcup_{g\in G,\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime})\text{ is special}}\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime})

is dense in XX for the Euclidean topology.

Proof.

We break the proof of Theorem 3.4 into several claims. The claims at the beginning of the proof are really just reductions permitting us to consider a simpler situation. The main steps of the proof begin with Claim 3.4.9 in which we compute the dimension of the incidence correspondence RR. We then use this computation to show that BB and GG have the same o-minimal dimension, so that BB has nontrivial interior in GG.

Claim 3.4.1.

We may assume that f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S is an embedding.

Proof of Claim: The equivalence relation Ef:={(x,y)X×X:f(x)=f(y)}E_{f}:=\{(x,y)\in X\times X:f(x)=f(y)\} is a definable and complex analytic subset of the quasi-projective algebraic variety X×XX\times X. Hence, by the definable Chow theorem, EfE_{f} is itself algebraic. Let YY be a nonempty Zariski open subset of X/EfX/E_{f}, considered as constructible set. Then ff induces an embedding f¯:YS\overline{f}:Y\hookrightarrow S for which the image of f¯\overline{f} is dense in f(X)f(X). Shrinking UU, we may assume that f(U)f¯(Y)f(U)\subseteq\overline{f}(Y) and then replacing UU by U:=f¯1f(U)Y()U^{\prime}:=\overline{f}^{-1}f(U)\subseteq Y(\mathbb{C}), we see that if the theorem holds for f¯:YanS\overline{f}:Y^{\text{an}}\to S and UU^{\prime}, then it also holds for f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S and UU. \maltese

With Claim 3.4.1 in place, from now on we will regard XX as a locally closed subvariety of SS. With the next claim we record the simple observations that it suffices to prove the theorem for any given open subset of UU in place of UU and that we take UU to be definable.

Claim 3.4.2.

If Theorem 3.4 holds for some nonempty open VUV\subseteq U in place of UU, then it holds as stated. Moreover, we may assume that UU is definable.

Proof of Claim: The set {gG:Vπ(gD)}\{g\in G:V\cap\pi(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F})\neq\varnothing\} is a subset of {gG:Uπ(gD)}\{g\in G:U\cap\pi(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F})\neq\varnothing\}. Hence, if the former set has nonempty interior, so does the latter. For the “moreover” clause apply the main body of the claim to the case that VUV\subseteq U is a nonempty open ball. \maltese

From now on we will take UU to be definable and will continue to refer to the open subset of XX under consideration as UU even after taking various steps to shrink it.

Another basic reduction we shall employ is that it suffices to prove the theorem for a finite cover of SS.

Claim 3.4.3.

If ρ:S~S\rho:\widetilde{S}\to S is a finite surjective 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism, then we may find an instance of the statement of Theorem 3.4 with S~\widetilde{S} in place of SS so that the truth of Theorem 3.4 for S~\widetilde{S} implies the result of SS.

Proof of Claim: Filling the Cartesian square

\xymatrixY\ar[r]f¯\ar[d]ρ¯&S~\ar[d]ρXan\ar[r]fS\xymatrix{Y\ar[r]^{\overline{f}}\ar[d]_{\overline{\rho}}&\widetilde{S}\ar[d]^{\rho}\\ X^{\text{an}}\ar[r]^{f}S}

we obtain a complex analytic space Y:=Xan×SS~Y:=X^{\text{an}}\times_{S}\widetilde{S}. Since ρ¯:YXan\overline{\rho}:Y\to X^{\text{an}} is finite, YY is itself the analytification of an algebraic variety. Let X~\widetilde{X} be a component of this algebraic variety and then let U~:=ρ¯1U\widetilde{U}:=\overline{\rho}^{-1}U.

The map ρ:S~S\rho:\widetilde{S}\to S comes from a homomorphism of algebraic groups φ:𝐆~𝐆\varphi:\widetilde{\mathbf{G}}\to\mathbf{G} and some element aGa\in G where S~=SG~,Γ~,M~;~\widetilde{S}=S_{\widetilde{G},\widetilde{\Gamma},\widetilde{M};\widetilde{\mathcal{F}}}. This map induces a map ρ^:G~/M~=:D~D\widehat{\rho}:\widetilde{G}/\widetilde{M}=:\widetilde{D}\to D. Let D~\widetilde{D}^{\prime} be a component of ρ^1D\widehat{\rho}^{-1}D^{\prime}. If we succeed in showing that {gG:f¯(U~)πΓ~(gD~~}\{g\in G^{\prime}:\overline{f}(\widetilde{U})\cap\pi_{\widetilde{\Gamma}}(g\widetilde{D}^{\prime}\cap\widetilde{\mathcal{F}}\} contains some nonempty open set VV, then aφ(V)a\varphi(V) would be a nonempty open subset of {gG:f(U)πΓ(gD)}\{g\in G:f(U)\cap\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F})\}, as required. \maltese

Let us record a useful consequence of Claim 3.4.3.

Claim 3.4.4.

We may assume that SS is smooth.

Proof of Claim: By Convention 3.1, we may find a finite and surjective 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism S~S\widetilde{S}\to S with S~\widetilde{S} smooth. By Claim 3.4.3, if we know the theorem for S~\widetilde{S}, then we may deduce it for SS. \maltese

Another useful consequence of Claim 3.4.3 is that we may assume that f(X)f(X) is dense in SS with respect to the weakly special topology.

Claim 3.4.5.

We may assume that there is no proper weakly special variety S′′SS^{\prime\prime}\subsetneq S with f(X)S′′f(X)\subseteq S^{\prime\prime}.

Proof of Claim: Let us prove Theorem 3.4 by induction on the dimension of SS. If f(X)S′′Sf(X)\subseteq S^{\prime\prime}\subsetneq S where S′′S^{\prime\prime} is a weakly special variety, then we could find a finite 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism ζ:S1S\zeta:S_{1}\to S, a surjective 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism ξ:S1S2\xi:S_{1}\to S_{2}, and a point bS2b\in S_{2} so that f(X)ζ(ξ1{b})f(X)\subseteq\zeta(\xi^{-1}\{b\}). By Claim 3.4.3, we may assume that S1=SS_{1}=S and ζ=idS\zeta=\operatorname{id}_{S}. That is, f(X)ξ1{b}=:SbSf(X)\subseteq\xi^{-1}\{b\}=:S_{b}\subsetneq S. By Convention 3.1, the weakly special variety SbS_{b}, being the fiber product of SS with the the one-point space {}\{\ast\} over S2S_{2}, is definably isomorphic to a space in 𝖲\mathsf{S}. By induction on dimension, Theorem 3.4 already holds for SbS_{b}. \maltese

By our hypothesis that the intersection between XX and SS^{\prime} is persistently likely, it is, in particular, likely. Since we have reduced to the case that f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S is an embedding by Claim 3.4.1, we may express the likeliness of this intersection by an equation

dim(X)+dim(S)=dim(S)+k\dim_{\mathbb{C}}(X)+\dim_{\mathbb{C}}(S^{\prime})=\dim_{\mathbb{C}}(S)+k

for some nonnegative integer kk. Notice that we have expressed this equality with dimensions as complex analytic spaces. Later, when we write “dim\dim” without qualification we mean the o-minimal dimension, for which we would have

dimX+dimS=dimS+2k .\dim X+\dim S^{\prime}=\dim S+2k\text{ .}

By the uniform Ax-Schanuel condition, which holds in 𝖲\mathsf{S} by Convention 3.1 and Proposition 2.20, there is a finite list of families of weakly special varieties

\xymatrix&S1,i\ar[ld]ζi\ar[rd]ξiSS2,i\xymatrix{&S_{1,i}\ar[ld]_{\zeta_{i}}\ar[rd]^{\xi_{i}}\\ SS_{2,i}}

for 1in1\leq i\leq n where ζi:S1,iS\zeta_{i}:S_{1,i}\to S is a finite 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism and ξi:S1,iS2,i\xi_{i}:S_{1,i}\to S_{2,i} is a surjective 𝖲\mathsf{S}-morphism and if \ell is a natural number with (γ,γ~):ΔU×D(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma}):\Delta^{\ell}\to U\times D is complex analytic with πΓγ~=gγ\pi_{\Gamma}\circ\widetilde{\gamma}=g\circ\gamma, rk(dγ)=>k\operatorname{rk}(d\gamma)=\ell>k, and γ~(Δ)gD\widetilde{\gamma}(\Delta^{\ell})\subseteq gD^{\prime} for some gGg\in G, then for some ini\leq n and bS2,ib\in S_{2,i} we have γ~(Δ)ζi(ξi1{b})S\widetilde{\gamma}(\Delta^{\ell})\subseteq\zeta_{i}(\xi_{i}^{-1}\{b\})\subsetneq S.

Claim 3.4.6.

We may assume that ζi:S1,iS\zeta_{i}:S_{1,i}\to S is surjective for each ini\leq n.

Proof of Claim: By Claim 3.4.5, we have reduced to the case that f(X)f(X) is not contained in any proper weakly special subvariety of SS. For any ini\leq n with ζi(S1,i)S\zeta_{i}(S_{1,i})\neq S, we would thus have that ζi(S1,i)f(X)\zeta_{i}(S_{1,i})\cap f(X) is a proper complex analytic subvariety of f(X)f(X). Thus, we may shrink UU so that for such an ii we have ζi(S1,i)U=\zeta_{i}(S_{1,i})\cap U=\varnothing. We will thus never encounter weakly special varieties of the form ζi(ξ1{b})\zeta_{i}(\xi^{-1}\{b\}) with γ(Δ)ζi(ξ1{b})U\gamma(\Delta^{\ell})\subseteq\zeta_{i}(\xi^{-1}\{b\})\cap U. Thus, we may omit these families of weakly special varieties from our list. \maltese

We may adjust our family of weakly special varieties to remember only the maps ξi:S1,iS2,i\xi_{i}:S_{1,i}\to S_{2,i}.

Claim 3.4.7.

We may assume that S1,i=SS_{1,i}=S and ζi:S1,iS\zeta_{i}:S_{1,i}\to S is the identity map idS:SS\operatorname{id}_{S}:S\to S.

Proof of Claim: Work by induction on nn. In the inductive case of n+1n+1, apply Claim 3.4.3 to replace SS by Sn+1,1S_{n+1,1}. We then need to replace Si,1S_{i,1} for ini\leq n by Si,1×SSn+1,iS_{i,1}\times_{S}S_{n+1,i}. Conclude by induction. \maltese

We shrink UU once again to ensure that all of the fibers of ξi\xi_{i} have the same dimension when restricted to UU.

Claim 3.4.8.

We may shrink UU to a smaller nonempty open set so that for all ini\leq n there is some number did_{i}\in\mathbb{N} so that for all uUu\in U we have dim(ξi1{ξi(u)}f(U))=di\dim(\xi_{i}^{-1}\{\xi_{i}(u)\}\cap f(U))=d_{i}.

Proof of Claim: For each ini\leq n and each natural number jdimUj\leq\dim U, let

Fi,j:={uU:dimu(f1ξi1{ξi(f(u))})}=j .F_{i,j}:=\{u\in U:\dim_{u}(f^{-1}\xi_{i}^{-1}\{\xi_{i}(f(u))\})\}=j\text{ .}

Here dimu()\dim_{u}(~{}) refers to the o-minimal dimension at uu.

The definable set UU is the finite disjoint union of the definable sets

i=1nFi,di\bigcap_{i=1}^{n}F_{i,d_{i}}

as (d1,,dn)(d_{1},\ldots,d_{n}) ranges through [0,dim(U)]n[0,\dim(U)]^{n}. We may cell decompose UU subjacent to these definable sets. Let VV be an open cell in this cell decomposition. Then for some sequence (d1,,dn)(d_{1},\ldots,d_{n}) we have Vi=1nFi,diV\subseteq\bigcap_{i=1}^{n}F_{i,d_{i}}. Because VV is an open cell, for each uVu\in V, we have

dimu(f1ξi1{ξ(f(u))})\displaystyle\dim_{u}(f^{-1}\xi_{i}^{-1}\{\xi(f(u))\}) =\displaystyle= dimu(Vf1ξi1{ξ(f(u))})\displaystyle\dim_{u}(V\cap f^{-1}\xi_{i}^{-1}\{\xi(f(u))\})
=\displaystyle= dim(Vf1ξi1{ξi(f(u))}) .\displaystyle\dim(V\cap f^{-1}\xi_{i}^{-1}\{\xi_{i}(f(u))\})\text{ .}

Apply Claim 3.4.2 to conclude. \maltese

Consider now the following incidence correspondence.

R:={(u,g)U×G:f(u)πΓ(gD)}R:=\{(u,g)\in U\times G:f(u)\in\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F})\}

Note that RR is definable.

Claim 3.4.9.

We have

dim(R)=dim(G)+2k .\dim(R)=\dim(G)+2k\text{ .}

Proof of Claim: Fix the base point D=G/M\ast\in D^{\prime}=G^{\prime}/M^{\prime} corresponding to M=MGM^{\prime}=M\cap G^{\prime} in the coset space. For uUu\in U, let u~\widetilde{u}\in\mathcal{F} with πΓ(u~)=u\pi_{\Gamma}(\widetilde{u})=u. Let g0Gg_{0}\in G with g0=u~g_{0}\ast=\widetilde{u}. We will check that Ru:={gG:(u,g)R}R_{u}:=\{g\in G:(u,g)\in R\} is a homogenous space for M×GM\times G^{\prime} with fibers isomorphic to GMG^{\prime}\cap M. Indeed, if hGh\in G^{\prime} and mMm\in M, we have u~=g0mhh1\widetilde{u}=g_{0}mhh^{-1}\ast, demonstrating that f(u)πΓ((g0mh)D)f(u)\in\pi_{\Gamma}((g_{0}mh)D^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F}). That is, g0mhRug_{0}mh\in R_{u}. On the other hand, if gRug\in R_{u}, then we can find some hh so that g0=u~=gh1g_{0}\ast=\widetilde{u}=gh^{-1}\ast. That is, m:=g01gh1Mm:=g_{0}^{-1}gh^{-1}\in M, the stabilizer of \ast in GG. That is, g=g0mhg0MGg=g_{0}mh\in g_{0}MG^{\prime}. We compute that for g1,g2Gg_{1},g_{2}\in G^{\prime} and m1,m2Mm_{1},m_{2}\in M, we have g0g1m1=g0g2m2g_{0}g_{1}m_{1}=g_{0}g_{2}m_{2} only if g21g1=m2m11=:hGM=Mg_{2}^{-1}g_{1}=m_{2}m_{1}^{-1}=:h\in G^{\prime}\cap M=M^{\prime}.

Using the fiber dimension theorem, since all fibers over UU have the same dimension, dim(M×G)dim(MG)\dim(M\times G^{\prime})-\dim(M\cap G^{\prime}), we now compute that

dimR\displaystyle\dim R =\displaystyle= dimf(U)+dimRu for any uU\displaystyle\dim f(U)+\dim R_{u}\text{ \small for any $u\in U$}
=\displaystyle= dimU+dim(M×G)dim(MG)\displaystyle\dim U+\dim(M\times G^{\prime})-\dim(M\cap G^{\prime})
=\displaystyle= dimX+dimM+(dimGdim(MG))\displaystyle\dim X+\dim M+(\dim G^{\prime}-\dim(M\cap G^{\prime}))
=\displaystyle= dimX+dimM+dimS\displaystyle\dim X+\dim M+\dim S^{\prime}
=\displaystyle= dimX+(dimGdimS)+dimS\displaystyle\dim X+(\dim G-\dim S)+\dim S^{\prime}
=\displaystyle= dimG+2k .\displaystyle\dim G+2k\text{ .}

\maltese

Abusing notation somewhat, for gGg\in G we will also write RgR_{g} for the fiber {uU:(u,g)R}\{u\in U:(u,g)\in R\}. Note that RgR_{g} is definably, complex analytically isomorphic to f(U)πΓ(gD)f(U)\cap\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F}^{\prime}) which is a locally closed complex analytic subset of SS. It follows that the o-minimal dimension of RgR_{g} is always even.

For each idimXi\leq\dim X, let us define

Bi:={gG:dimRg=i} .B_{i}:=\{g\in G:\dim R_{g}=i\}\text{ .}
Claim 3.4.10.

For i<2ki<2k, we have Bi=B_{i}=\varnothing.

Proof of Claim: We have reduced through Claim 3.4.4 to the case that SS is smooth. Hence, each component of f(U)πΓ(gD)f(U)\cap\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F}^{\prime}) has complex dimension at least dimU+dimDdimS=k\dim U+\dim D^{\prime}-\dim S=k. \maltese

The set BB of the statement of the theorem may be expressed as

B=i=0dimUBi .B=\bigcup_{i=0}^{\dim U}B_{i}\text{ .}

By Claim 3.4.10, we actually have

B=i=2kdimUBi .B=\bigcup_{i=2k}^{\dim U}B_{i}\text{ .}

With the next claim we show that (again by shrinking UU) we may arrange that B=B2kB=B_{2k}.

Claim 3.4.11.

Possibly after shrinking UU, we have Bi=B_{i}=\varnothing for i>2ki>2k.

Proof of Claim: Suppose that >k\ell>k and gB2g\in B_{2\ell}. Then the complex analytic set f(U)πΓ(gD)f(U)\cap\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}\cap\mathcal{F}) has a component LL of complex dimension \ell. Let (γ,γ~):ΔU×gD(\gamma,\widetilde{\gamma}):\Delta^{\ell}\to U\times gD^{\prime} be a complex analytic map with rk(dγ)=\operatorname{rk}(d\gamma)=\ell and πΓγ~=fγ\pi_{\Gamma}\circ\widetilde{\gamma}=f\circ\gamma. By our choice of the witnesses to the Ax-Schanuel property for 𝖲\mathsf{S}, for some ini\leq n and bS2,ib\in S_{2,i} we have

fγ(Δ)ξi1{b}=:SbS .f\circ\gamma(\Delta^{\ell})\subseteq\xi_{i}^{-1}\{b\}=:S_{b}\subsetneq S\text{ .}

By our reduction from Claim 3.4.8 and the fiber dimension theorem, we have

dimX=dimU=dimf(U)=dimξif(U)+dim(f(U)Sb) .\dim X=\dim U=\dim f(U)=\dim\xi_{i}f(U)+\dim(f(U)\cap S_{b})\text{ .}

Moreover, by the homogeneity of SS^{\prime}, we also have

dimS=dimξi(S)+dim(SSb)\dim S^{\prime}=\dim\xi_{i}(S^{\prime})+\dim(S^{\prime}\cap S_{b})

and, of course,

dimS=dimS2,i+dimSb .\dim S=\dim S_{2,i}+\dim S_{b}\text{ .}

By our hypothesis of persistent intersection, we have

dimξif(U)+dimξiS=dimS2,i+k\dim_{\mathbb{C}}\xi_{i}f(U)+\dim_{\mathbb{C}}\xi_{i}S^{\prime}=\dim S_{2,i}+k^{\prime}

for some k0k^{\prime}\geq 0.

Written in terms of o-minimal dimension this says

dimξf(U)+dimξiS=dimS2,i+2k .\dim\xi f(U)+\dim\xi_{i}S^{\prime}=\dim S_{2,i}+2k^{\prime}\text{ .}

Combining this equalities, we compute that

dim(f(U)Sb)+dim(SSb)=dimSb+2k2k .\dim(f(U)\cap S_{b})+\dim(S^{\prime}\cap S_{b})=\dim S_{b}+2k-2k^{\prime}\text{ .}

Since, k0k^{\prime}\geq 0, this means that the expected (complex) dimension of a component of f(U)SbSbf(U)\cap S_{b}\cap S_{b} is at most kk, but LL is such a component of complex dimension greater than kk. That is, LL is an atypical component of the intersection inside ScSS_{c}\subsetneq S. Applying uniform Ax-Schanuel again, we may extend the family of weakly special varieties

\xymatrix&S1,i\ar[ld]ζi\ar[rd]ξiSS2,i\xymatrix{&S_{1,i}\ar[ld]_{\zeta_{i}}\ar[rd]^{\xi_{i}}\\ SS_{2,i}}

for n+1in2n+1\leq i\leq n_{2} so that each such atypical component will satisfy Lζi(ξi1{b2})SbSL\subseteq\zeta_{i}(\xi_{i}^{-1}\{b_{2}\})\subsetneq S_{b}\subsetneq S for some in2i\leq n_{2} and b2S2,ib_{2}\in S_{2,i}.

Repeating the reductions of the earlier claims and this extension of the list of weakly special witnesses to Ax-Schanuel dimS+1\dim S+1 times, we reach a contradiction to the hypothesis that RiR_{i} is nonempty for some i>2ki>2k. \maltese

Thus, B=B2kB=B_{2k}. So we have

dimG+2k=dimR=dimB2k+2k=dimB+2k .\dim G+2k=\dim R=\dim B_{2k}+2k=\dim B+2k\text{ .}

Subtracting 2k2k from both sides, we conclude that dimB=dimG\dim B=\dim G. Hence, by cell decomposition, BB contains an open subset of GG. ∎

4. Applications

In this section we illustrate Theorem 3.4 by considering various situations in which it applies.

4.1. Arithmetic quotients

Our formalism is derived from that of Bakker, Klingler, and Tsimerman in [5] for the study of arithmetic quotients. They consider definable complex quotient spaces SG,Γ,M;S_{G,\Gamma,M;\mathcal{F}} in which the algebraic group 𝐆\mathbf{G} is a semisimple \mathbb{Q}-algebraic group, Γ\Gamma is arithmetic (so commensurable with 𝐆()\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{Z}) for some / any choice of an integral model for 𝐆\mathbf{G}), and MM is compact. They often require Γ\Gamma to be neat; we will return to that issue in a moment. The definable fundamental domain \mathcal{F} is not chosen sufficiently carefully in [5], an issue that was then addressed and fixed in [6]. A similar issue is addressed in [21] in that one needs to take \mathcal{F} to be constructed from a Siegel set associated to a maximal compact subgroup of GG containing MM.

If we drop the neatness requirement on Γ\Gamma, then an arithmetic quotient need not be smooth, but because every arithmetic group has a neat subgroup of finite index, for any arithmetic quotient SS we may find a smooth arithmetic quotient S~\widetilde{S} and a finite surjective map of arithmetic quotients S~S\widetilde{S}\to S.

The one point space is clearly a terminal object in the category of arithmetic quotients and the pullback construction of Proposition 2.5 specializes to the category of arithmetic quotients. Since there are only countably many arithmetic quotients all told and at most countably many maps of algebraic groups between algebraic groups defined over the rational numbers, it follows that the weakly special varieties are well-parameterized within the category of arithmetic quotients.

The main theorem of [7] is that period mappings associated to polarized variations of integral Hodge structures satisfy the Ax-Schanuel condition with respect to 𝖲\mathsf{S}. It is an interesting open question whether every definable analytic map f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S where SS is an arithmetic definable complex quotient space necessarily satisfies the Ax-Schanuel condition with respect to 𝖲\mathsf{S}.

Our last observation in verifying Convention 3.1 and the hypotheses of Theorem 3.4 for arithmetic quotients is that if DDD^{\prime}\subseteq D is a homogeneous space for which πΓ(D)S\pi_{\Gamma}(D^{\prime})\subseteq S is a special variety, then for every g𝐆()Gg\in\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{Q})\cap G, πΓ(gD)\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}) is also special. Thus the set of gGg\in G for which πΓ(gD)\pi_{\Gamma}(gD^{\prime}) is special is dense in GG for the Euclidean topology.

Returning to the case where we know f:XanSf:X^{\text{an}}\to S to be a period mapping and f(X)f(X) to be Hodge generic in SS, that is, not contained in any proper weakly special subvariety, the union of f1Sf^{-1}S^{\prime} ranging over all proper special subvarieties SSS^{\prime}\subsetneq S is called the Hodge locus. In [19], a dichotomy theorem is proven for a modified form of the Hodge locus which they call the Hodge locus of positive period dimension: either this locus is Zariski dense in XX or it is itself a proper algebraic subvariety of XX. In a very recent preprint [17], tight conditions for the density of the Hodge loci are established.

Because the special subvarieties of SS come from \mathbb{Q}-semisimple algebraic subgroups of 𝐆\mathbf{G} and there are only finitely many such subgroups up to G=𝐆()+G=\mathbf{G}(\mathbb{R})^{+}-conjugacy, all special subvarieties of SS come from finitely many families of homogeneous spaces in the sense of Theorem 3.4. That is, we can find finitely many homogeneous spaces D1,,DnDD_{1},\ldots,D_{n}\subseteq D so that for any special subvariety SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S there is some gGg\in G and ini\leq n with S=πΓ(gDi)S^{\prime}=\pi_{\Gamma}(gD_{i}). Thus, if for some special subvariety SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S the intersection of XX with SS^{\prime} is persistently likely, then the Hodge locus is Euclidean dense in XX. In fact, we may take DiD_{i} so that S=π(gDi)S^{\prime}=\pi(gD_{i}) for some gGg\in G and we see that the subset of the Hodge locus of the form f1hG,πΓ(hDi) special πΓ(hDi)f^{-1}\bigcup_{h\in G,\pi_{\Gamma}(hD_{i})\text{ special }}\pi_{\Gamma}(hD_{i}) is Euclidean dense in XX. In [8] a theorem of a similar flavor is proven. They show that if the typical Hodge locus is nonempty, then it is analytically dense in XX. Here the typical Hodge locus is the union of all components of f1Sf^{-1}S^{\prime} of expected dimension as SS^{\prime} ranges through the special subvarieties of SS. The proof in [8] uses some elements in common with ours. Notably, Ax-Schanuel plays a central role in both proofs. To pass from a nonempty typical locus to one which is dense, they argue an analysis of Lie algebras to find enough special varieties. Such a technique is not available to us in general as we must postulate the existence of special varieties of a given shape. On the other hand, such an argument does not immediately lend itself to a study of intersections with a restricted class of special varieties.

Definability of the period mappings associated to admissible, graded polarized, variation of mixed Hodge structures has been established by Bakker, Brunebarbe, Klingler, and Tsimerman in [4] and then Ax-Schanuel for these maps was proven independently by Chiu [10] and Gao and Klingler [15]. Indeed, Chiu has established a stronger Ax-Schanuel theorem with derivatives for such period maps associated to variations of mixed Hodge structures [9]. These results give the necessary ingredients to extend our result on the density of Hodge loci to variations of mixed Hodge structures. We will return to the special case of universal abelian schemes over moduli spaces in Section 4.3 to draw a conclusion from the combination of our Theorem 3.4 and Ax-Schanuel in the context of mixed Shimura varieties.

4.2. Modular varieties

For the sake of illustration, let us consider a very special case of Theorem 3.4. We take S=𝔸n=X0(1)nS=\mathbb{A}^{n}=X_{0}(1)^{n}. That is, SS is affine nn-space (for some positive integer nn) regarded as the coarse moduli space of nn-tuples of elliptic curves. We may see SS as an arithmetic quotient space, taking 𝐆=PGL2n\mathbf{G}=\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{n}, Γ=PGL2n()\Gamma=\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{n}(\mathbb{Z}), and the homogeneous space DD may be identified with 𝔥n\mathfrak{h}^{n} where 𝔥={z:Im(z)>0}\mathfrak{h}=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:\operatorname{Im}(z)>0\} is the upper half plane.

If σ=σ1,,σm\sigma=\langle\sigma_{1},\ldots,\sigma_{m}\rangle is a finite sequence taking values in {1,,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} we may define πσ:S𝔸m\pi_{\sigma}:S\to\mathbb{A}^{m} by (x1,,xn)(xσ1,,xσn)(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n})\mapsto(x_{\sigma_{1}},\ldots,x_{\sigma_{n}}). For J{1,,n}J\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\} we list the elements of JJ in order as J={j1<j2<<jm}J=\{j_{1}<j_{2}<\ldots<j_{m}\} and write πJ\pi_{J} for πj1,,jm\pi_{\langle j_{1},\ldots,j_{m}\rangle}. For a singleton J={j}J=\{j\}, we just write πj\pi_{j} for πJ\pi_{J}.

For SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S a special subvariety of SS provided that for each ini\leq n the projection map πi:S𝔸1\pi_{i}:S\to\mathbb{A}^{1} is dominant, then SS^{\prime} defines a partition Π(S)\Pi(S^{\prime}) of {1,,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} by the rule that ii and jj lie in a common element of the partition if and only if dimπi,jS=1\dim\pi_{\langle i,j\rangle}S^{\prime}=1. Given a partition Π\Pi of {1,,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} we say that SS^{\prime} is a special variety of type Π\Pi if Π(S)=Π\Pi(S^{\prime})=\Pi. Let us observe that a special variety of type Π\Pi has dimension equal to #Π\#\Pi.

Fix a partition Π\Pi with #Π=m\#\Pi=m. Let DΠDD_{\Pi}^{\prime}\subseteq D be the homogeneous subspace of DD defined by τi=τj\tau_{i}=\tau_{j} if and only there is some νΠ\nu\in\Pi with {i,j}ν\{i,j\}\subseteq\nu. Then πΓ(DΠ)=:S\pi_{\Gamma}(D_{\Pi}^{\prime})=:S^{\prime} is the corresponding multi-diagonal subvariety of SS and is a special variety of type Π\Pi. Indeed, the special varieties of the form πΓ(gDΠ)\pi_{\Gamma}(gD_{\Pi}^{\prime}) as gg ranges through PGL2()G\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(\mathbb{Q})\cap G are exactly the special varieties of type Π\Pi.

For a partition Π\Pi of {1,,n}\{1,\ldots,n\} and subset J{1,,n}J\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\} of {1,,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}, we define

ΠJ:={νJ:νΠ,νJ}\Pi\upharpoonright J:=\{\nu\cap J:\nu\in\Pi,\nu\cap J\neq\varnothing\}

to be the restriction of the partition Π\Pi to JJ.

It is easy to check that for any special variety SSS^{\prime}\subseteq S and subset J{1,,n}J\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\}, the projection πJ(S)\pi_{J}(S^{\prime}) is a special variety and Π(πJ(S))=ΠJ\Pi(\pi_{J}(S^{\prime}))=\Pi\upharpoonright J. With these combinatorial preliminaries in place, we may state the specialization of Theorem 3.4 to the case of Y0(1)nY_{0}(1)^{n}.

Proposition 4.1.

Let n1n\geq 1 be a positive integer and Π\Pi a partition of {1,,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}. If X𝔸nX\subseteq\mathbb{A}^{n} is an irreducible complex algebraic subvariety of affine nn-space, regarded as the coarse moduli space of nn-tuples of elliptic curves, and for every J{1,,n}J\subseteq\{1,\ldots,n\} we have #ΠJ+dimπJ(X)#J\#\Pi\upharpoonright J+\dim\pi_{J}(X)\geq\#J, then

XS𝔸n special of type ΠSX\cap\bigcup_{S^{\prime}\subseteq\mathbb{A}^{n}\text{ special of type }\Pi}S^{\prime}

is dense in XX for the Euclidean topology.

Proof.

Let us check that the intersection between XX and S:=πΓ(DΠ)S^{\prime}:=\pi_{\Gamma}(D_{\Pi}) is persistently likely. Let

\xymatrix&S1\ar[ld]ζ\ar[rd]ξSS2\xymatrix{&S_{1}\ar[ld]_{\zeta}\ar[rd]^{\xi}\\ SS_{2}}

be a pair of surjective maps of arithmetic quotients with ζ\zeta finite. The arithmetic quotients S1S_{1} and S2S_{2} will take the form S1=SPGL2n,Γ1,M1;1S_{1}=S_{\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{n},\Gamma_{1},M_{1};\mathcal{F}_{1}} and S2=SPGL2k,Γ2,M2;2S_{2}=S_{\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{k},\Gamma_{2},M_{2};\mathcal{F}_{2}} with knk\leq n where Γj\Gamma_{j} is an arithmetic group in for j=1j=1 and 22 and the corresponding homogeneous spaces are 𝔥n\mathfrak{h}^{n} and 𝔥k\mathfrak{h}^{k}, respectively. Since each PGL2\operatorname{PGL}_{2} factor is simple, the maps of algebraic groups corresponding ζ\zeta and ξ\xi are given by coordinate projections followed by an inner automorphism defined over \mathbb{Q}. That is, the map of groups corresponding to ξ\xi is given by g1,,gngj1,,gjk\langle g_{1},\ldots,g_{n}\rangle\mapsto\langle g_{j_{1}},\dots,g_{j_{k}}\rangle followed by an inner automorphism of PGL2k\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{k} defined over \mathbb{Q} for some collection of kk distinct numbers j1,,jkj_{1},\ldots,j_{k} between 11 and nn, and likewise for ζ\zeta. Let J={j1,,jk}J=\{j_{1},\ldots,j_{k}\}, then permuting coordinates we see that this family of weakly special varieties fits into the commuting square

\xymatrix&S1\ar[ld]ζ\ar[rd]ξS\ar[rd]πJS2\ar[ld]ζ~𝔸k\xymatrix{&S_{1}\ar[ld]_{\zeta}\ar[rd]^{\xi}\\ S\ar[rd]_{\pi_{J}}S_{2}\ar[ld]^{\widetilde{\zeta}}\\ \mathbb{A}^{k}}

where ζ~:S2𝔸k\widetilde{\zeta}:S_{2}\to\mathbb{A}^{k} is finite. We then have

dimξζ1X+ξζ1S\displaystyle\dim\xi\zeta^{-1}X+\xi\zeta^{-1}S^{\prime} =\displaystyle= dimπJX+dimπJ(S)\displaystyle\dim\pi_{J}X+\dim\pi_{J}(S^{\prime})
=\displaystyle= dimπJX+#ΠJ\displaystyle\dim\pi_{J}X+\#\Pi\upharpoonright J
\displaystyle\geq k\displaystyle k
=\displaystyle= dimS2\displaystyle\dim S_{2}

Since PGL2n()+\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{n}(\mathbb{Q})^{+} is the commensurator of PGL2n()\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{n}(\mathbb{Z}) and is dense in G=PGL2n()+G=\operatorname{PGL}_{2}^{n}(\mathbb{R})^{+}, the concluding “in particular” clause of Theorem 3.4 applies and we find that the intersections of XX with special varieties of type Π\Pi is dense in XX in the Euclidean topology. ∎

Instances of Proposition 4.1 appear in the literature. Habegger shows in [16, Theorem 1.2] that if X𝔸2X\subseteq\mathbb{A}^{2} is a curve defined over the algebraic numbers, then there is a constants c=c(X)>0c=c(X)>0 and p0(X)>0p_{0}(X)>0 so that for every prime number p>p0(X)p>p_{0}(X) there is an algebraic point PX(alg)Y0(p)(alg)P\in X(\mathbb{Q}^{\text{alg}})\cap Y_{0}(p)(\mathbb{Q}^{\text{alg}}) with logarithmic height h(P)clog(p)h(P)\geq c\log(p) where here Y0(p)Y_{0}(p) is the modular curve parametrizing the isomorphism classes of pairs of elliptic curves E,E\langle E,E^{\prime}\rangle for which there is an isogeny EEE\to E^{\prime} of degree pp. Habegger’s result implies in particular that for n=2n=2 and Π={{1,2}}\Pi=\{\{1,2\}\}, if X𝔸alg2X\subseteq\mathbb{A}^{2}_{\mathbb{Q}^{\text{alg}}} is an affine plane curve defined over the algebraic numbers, then the intersection of XX with the special varieties of type Π\Pi is Zariski dense in XX. Using equidistribution results, this Zariski density could be upgraded to Euclidean density.

In the discussion after Remark 3.4.5 in [31], Zannier sketches an argument showing that if X𝔸2X\subseteq\mathbb{A}^{2} is a rational affine plane curve, then the intersections of XX with special curves of type Π\Pi, as in the previous paragraph, are dense in XX in the Euclidean topology.

4.3. Torsion in families of abelian varieties

If π:AB\pi:A\to B is an abelian scheme of relative dimension gg over the irreducible quasiprojective complex algebraic variety BB and XAX\subseteq A is a quasi-section of π\pi, by which we mean that π\pi restricts to a generically finite map on XX, then under some mild nondegeneracy conditions, we expect that the set

π(XAtor)={bB():(n+)XbAb()[n]}\pi(X\cap A_{\text{tor}})=\{b\in B(\mathbb{C}):(\exists n\in\mathbb{Z}_{+})X_{b}\cap A_{b}(\mathbb{C})[n]\neq\varnothing\}

of points on the base over which XX meets the torsion subgroup of the fiber is dense in BB if and only if dimBg\dim B\geq g. Masser-Zannier prove in [20] that when B=1{0,1,}B=\mathbb{P}^{1}\smallsetminus\{0,1,\infty\} and π:AB\pi:A\to B is the square of the Legendre family of elliptic curves defined in affine coordinates by y12=x1(x11)(x1λ)y_{1}^{2}=x_{1}(x_{1}-1)(x_{1}-\lambda) and y22=x2(x21)(x2λ)y_{2}^{2}=x_{2}(x_{2}-1)(x_{2}-\lambda) where λ\lambda ranges over BB, and XX is the curve defined by x1=2x_{1}=2 and x2=3x_{2}=3, then the set π(XAtor)\pi(X\cap A_{\text{tor}}) is finite. This theorem sparked much work on torsion in families of abelian varieties culminating in a result announced by Gao and Habegger that, at least for such abelian schemes π:AB\pi:A\to B defined over alg\mathbb{Q}^{\text{alg}}, if XAX\subseteq A is an algebraic variety, also defined over alg\mathbb{Q}^{\text{alg}} so that the group generated by XX is Zariski dense in AA and π(XAtor)\pi(X\cap A_{\text{tor}}) is Zariski dense in BB, then dimXg\dim X\geq g.

In the opposite direction, André, Corvaja, and Zannier study in [1] the problem of density of torsion through an analysis of the rank of the Betti map. In an appendix to that paper written by Gao, it is shown that if π:AB\pi:A\to B is a principally polarized abelian scheme of relative dimension gg which has no non-trivial endomorphism (on any finite covering), and for which the image of SS in the moduli space 𝒜g\mathcal{A}_{g} of abelian varieties of dimenion gg itself has dimension at least gg and XAX\subseteq A is the image of a section of π\pi, then π(XAtor)\pi(X\cap A_{\text{tor}}) is dense in BB in the Euclidean topology. The proof of this result made use of the Ax-Schanuel theorem for pure Shimura varieties and was subsequently upgraded. See in particular Gao’s work on the Ax-Schanuel theorem for the universal abelian variety [13] and on the Betti map in [12, 14].

Gao’s main theorem, Theorem 1.1, in [12] may be seen as a geometric elaboration of what Theorem 3.4 means for the density of torsion. Gao considers an abelian scheme π:AB\pi:A\to B of relative dimension gg over a quasiprojective complex algebraic variety BB and a closed irreducible subvarierty XAX\subseteq A and then establishes the conditions under which the generic rank of the Betti map restricted to XX may be smaller than expected. It is noted with [1, Proposition 2.2.1] that density of the torsion in XX follows from the Betti map, generically, having rank 2g2g on XX. Thus, the converse of Gao’s condition gives a criterion for when the torsion is dense.

In more detail, taking finite covers if necessary, one may pass from the problem of density of torsion in XX as a subvariety of AA, to the density of torsion in ι~(X)\widetilde{\iota}(X) in 𝔄\mathfrak{A} where 𝔄𝒜\mathfrak{A}\to\mathcal{A} is a universal abelian variety over a moduli space 𝒜\mathcal{A} of abelian varieties of some fixed polarization type with some fixed level structure and the Cartesian square

\xymatrixA\ar[r]ι~\ar[d]π&𝔄\ar[d]πB\ar[r]ι𝒜\xymatrix{A\ar[r]^{\widetilde{\iota}}\ar[d]_{\pi}&\mathfrak{A}\ar[d]^{\pi}\\ B\ar[r]^{\iota}\mathcal{A}}

expresses ABA\to B as coming from this universal family. To ease notation, we replace BB by ι(B)\iota(B) and XX by X~\widetilde{X}. Shrinking the moduli space, possibly taking covers, and moving to an abelian subscheme of 𝔄B\mathfrak{A}_{B}, we may arrange that XX is not contained in any proper weakly special varieties. At this point, Theorem 3.4 says that X𝔄torX\cap\mathfrak{A}_{\text{tor}} is dense in XX in the Euclidean topology if the intersection of XX with the zero section is persistently likely. Gao’s criterion expresses geometrically what persistent likelihood means here: for any abelian subscheme 𝔄\mathfrak{A}^{\prime} of 𝔄B\mathfrak{A}_{B}, if p:𝔄B𝔄B/𝔄p:\mathfrak{A}_{B}\to\mathfrak{A}_{B}/\mathfrak{A}^{\prime} is the quotient map, then dimp(X)\dim p(X) is at least the relative dimension of 𝔄B/𝔄\mathfrak{A}_{B}/\mathfrak{A}^{\prime} over BB.

References

  • [1] Y. André, P. Corvaja, and U. Zannier, The Betti map associated to a section of an abelian scheme, Invent. Math., 222 (2020), pp. 161–202.
  • [2] V. Aslanyan, Weak modular Zilber-Pink with derivatives, Math. Ann., 383 (2022), pp. 433–474.
  • [3] V. Aslanyan and J. Kirby, Blurrings of the JJ-function, Q. J. Math., 73 (2022), pp. 461–475.
  • [4] B. Bakker, Y. Brunebarbe, B. Klingler, and J. Tsimerman, Definability of mixed period maps. arXiv:2006.12403, to appear in the Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2021.
  • [5] B. Bakker, B. Klingler, and J. Tsimerman, Tame topology of arithmetic quotients and algebraicity of Hodge loci, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 33 (2020), pp. 917–939.
  • [6]  , Erratum to “Tame topology of arithmetic quotients and algebraicity of Hodge loci”, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 36 (2023), pp. 1305–1308.
  • [7] B. Bakker and J. Tsimerman, The Ax-Schanuel conjecture for variations of Hodge structures, Invent. Math., 217 (2019), pp. 77–94.
  • [8] G. Baldi, B. Klingler, and E. Ullmo, On the distribution of the Hodge locus. arXiv:2107.08838, 19 July 2021.
  • [9] K. C. T. Chiu, Ax-Schanuel for variations of mixed Hodge structures. arXiv:2101.10968, 2021.
  • [10]  , Ax-Schanuel with derivatives for mixed period mappings. arXiv:2110.03489, 2021.
  • [11] C. Daw and J. Ren, Applications of the hyperbolic Ax-Schanuel conjecture, Compos. Math., 154 (2018), pp. 1843–1888.
  • [12] Z. Gao, Generic rank of Betti map and unlikely intersections, Compos. Math., 156 (2020), pp. 2469–2509.
  • [13]  , Mixed Ax-Schanuel for the universal abelian varieties and some applications, Compos. Math., 156 (2020), pp. 2263–2297.
  • [14]  , Corrigendum: Generic rank of Betti map and unlikely intersections, Compos. Math., 157 (2021), pp. 2747–2748.
  • [15] Z. Gao and B. Klingler, The Ax-Schanuel conjecture for variations of mixed Hodge structures. arXiv:2101.10938, 2021.
  • [16] P. Habegger, Weakly bounded height on modular curves, Acta Math. Vietnam., 35 (2010), pp. 43–69.
  • [17] N. Khelifa and D. Urbanik, Existence and density of typical Hodge loci. arXiv:2303.16179, 2023.
  • [18] J. Kirby, The theory of the exponential differential equations of semiabelian varieties, Selecta Math. (N.S.), 15 (2009), pp. 445–486.
  • [19] B. Klingler and A. Otwinowska, On the closure of the hodge locus of positive period dimension, Invent. Math., 225 (2021), pp. 857–883.
  • [20] D. Masser and U. Zannier, Torsion anomalous points and families of elliptic curves, Amer. J. Math., 132 (2010), pp. 1677–1691.
  • [21] M. Orr and C. Schnell, Correction to “Height bounds and the Siegel property”. https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~cschnell/pdf/papers/correction.pdf, 2021.
  • [22] D. Pavlov, G. Pogudin, and Y. P. Razmyslov, From algebra to analysis: New proofs of theorems by Ritt and Seidenberg, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/16065.
  • [23] Y. Peterzil and S. Starchenko, Complex analytic geometry and analytic-geometric categories, J. Reine Angew. Math., 626 (2009), pp. 39–74.
  • [24] J. Pila and T. Scanlon, Effective transcendental Zilber-Pink for variations of Hodge structures. arXiv:2105.05845v1, 2021.
  • [25] M. Raynaud, Exposé XII: Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique, in Séminaire de géométrie algébrique du Bois Marie: Revêtements étale et groupe fondamental (SGA 1), 1961.
  • [26] T. Scanlon, Algebraic differential equations from covering maps, Adv. Math., 330 (2018), pp. 1071–1100.
  • [27] A. Seidenberg, Abstract differential algebra and the analytic case, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 9 (1958), pp. 159–164.
  • [28]  , Abstract differential algebra and the analytic case. II, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 23 (1969), pp. 689–691.
  • [29] S. Tayou and N. Tholozan, Equidistribution of Hodge loci II, Compos. Math., 159 (2023), pp. 1–52.
  • [30] S. von Kowalevsky, Zur Theorie der partiellen Differentrialgleichung, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 80 (1875), pp. 1 – 32.
  • [31] U. Zannier, Some problems of unlikely intersections in arithmetic and geometry, vol. 181 of Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012. With appendixes by David Masser.