This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Lump chains in the KP-I equation

Charles Lester Andrey Gelash Dmitry Zakharov Vladimir Zakharov Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia Institute of Automation and Electrometry SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia Department of Mathematics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI Department of Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Abstract

We construct a broad class of solutions of the KP-I equation by using a reduced version of the Grammian form of the τ\tau-function. The basic solution is a linear periodic chain of lumps propagating with distinct group and wave velocities. More generally, our solutions are evolving linear arrangements of lump chains, and can be viewed as the KP-I analogues of the family of line-soliton solutions of KP-II. However, the linear arrangements that we construct for KP-I are more general, and allow degenerate configurations such as parallel or superimposed lump chains. We also construct solutions describing interactions between lump chains and individual lumps, and discuss the relationship between the solutions obtained using the reduced and regular Grammian forms.

keywords:
Grammian form , lump solutions , line-solitons , tau-function

1 Introduction

The Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation

[ut+6uux+uxxx]x=3α2uyy[u_{t}+6uu_{x}+u_{xxx}]_{x}=-3\alpha^{2}u_{yy} (1)

was derived in [15], and was first mentioned by its current name in [41]. The KP equation is the subject of hundreds of research papers and several monographs [2, 16, 18, 25, 26]. The KP-I and KP-II forms of the equation are physically distinct and correspond to α2=1\alpha^{2}=-1 and α2=1\alpha^{2}=1, respectively.

The KP-I and KP-II equations are universal models describing weakly nonlinear waves in media with dispersion of velocity. However, from a mathematical point of view they are quite distinct. They have numerous physical applications, such as the theory of shallow water waves (see, for instance, the monographs [2, 16]) and plasma physics (Kadomtsev and Petviashvili were both renowned plasma physicists). Both KP-I and KP-II are Hamiltonian systems. The Cauchy problem for both equations is uniquely solvable for initial data in L1L^{1} (see [11, 22, 44]). However, KP-II is completely integrable, while KP-I, in general, is not (see the paper [40] for the analysis of the difference between the two equations).

Both versions of the KP equation are solvable using the inverse scattering method. The KP equation is the compatibility condition for an overdetermined linear system

αΨy+Ψxx+uΨ=0,Ψt+4Ψxxx+6uΨx+(3ux+3αw)Ψ=0,wx+uy=0.\alpha\Psi_{y}+\Psi_{xx}+u\Psi=0,\quad\Psi_{t}+4\Psi_{xxx}+6u\Psi_{x}+(3u_{x}+3\alpha w)\Psi=0,\quad w_{x}+u_{y}=0. (2)

The Lax representation for KP was found independently by Zakharov and Shabat [41] and Dryuma [10]. For KP-I we have α=i\alpha=i and Equation (2) is a non-stationary one-dimensional Schrödinger equation with the potential u-u, while α=1\alpha=1 corresponds to KP-II, and the linear problem is a heat equation with a source term. This fact alone reveals the substantial underlying difference between the theories of KP-I and KP-II.

The KP-I equation has a rich family of rational solutions, describing the interactions of stable, spatially localized solitons known as lumps. A lump solution of KP-I was first constructed numerically by Petviashvili [31], who developed an original method for numerically constructing stationary solutions for a wide class of nonlinear PDEs. Lumps and their interactions were first studied analytically in [23], and received their name in [32], where they were constructed using the Hirota transform. Krichever [19, 20] showed that the dynamics of the lumps in KP-I is controlled by the Calogero–Moser system. Lumps with distinct asymptotic velocities retain their velocities and phases after scattering, but lumps with the same velocity undergo anomalous scattering, and may form bound states known as multilumps [12, 14, 27, 28, 29, 34]. Lump and multilump solutions of KP-I were described in the framework of the inverse scattering method in [1, 35].

Unlike the KP-I equation, KP-II is not known to have spatially localized solutions, nor does it have nonsingular rational solutions. Instead, the KP-II equation has an interesting family of line-soliton solutions. An individual line-soliton is a translation-invariant traveling wave. When several line-solitons interact, they form complicated evolving polyhedral arrangements [3, 4, 5, 6, 8] that are described by an elaborate combinatorial theory (see [17] and the monograph [16]). Line-soliton solutions also exist for KP-I but are unstable with respect to transverse perturbations; this was shown in the original paper [15] for large perturbations and in [30, 37] for all scales. For stability of three-dimensional solitons, see [21].

The goal of this paper is to describe a new class of solutions of the KP-I equation, which we call lump chains. A simple chain consists of lumps evenly spaced along a line, with the lumps propagating with a single velocity at an arbitrary angle to the line. Lump chains can interact by splitting or merging, and the large-scale structure of lump chain solutions of KP-I resembles that of the line-soliton solutions of KP-II. However, lump chains may have degenerate behavior that does not occur with line-solitons, such as parallel and superimposed chains. More generally, we construct solutions consisting of lump chains that emit individual lumps, which may be then absorbed by other chains. Solutions of KP-I containing a periodic chain of lumps have been described by a number of authors [7, 13, 18, 30, 36, 43]. However, to the best of our knowledge, solutions consisting of several interacting lump chains have never been considered before.

We construct solutions of KP-I using the Grammian form of the τ\tau-function. This form was derived using the dressing method in [41], and using Sato theory in [24], and is perhaps less known than the Wronskian form. The dressing method was first used to solve the KdV equation in the pioneering paper [33], and was generalized and applied to the KP-II equation in [41]. A more modern treatment can be found in the papers [38, 39, 42].

As we have noted, individual lump solutions of KP-I are stable, while line-solitons and lump chains are unstable. In [30] it was shown that a line-soliton can emit a lump chain, hence the latter should be considered as an intermediate stage of the instability development. In the long run, a line-soliton transforms into an expanding cloud of lumps, which can be treated as a model of integrable turbulence.

2 The Grammian form of the τ\tau-function

The purpose of this paper is to study a family of solutions of the KP-I equation that can be constructed using the Grammian form of the τ\tau-function, which we now recall [24, 25, 30]. Fix a positive integer MM, which we call the rank of the solution. Let ψj=ψj+(x,y,t)\psi_{j}=\psi^{+}_{j}(x,y,t) for j=1,,Mj=1,\ldots,M be a linearly independent set of solutions to the linear system

iyψ+x2ψ=0,tψ+4x3ψ=0,i\partial_{y}\psi+\partial_{x}^{2}\psi=0,\quad\partial_{t}\psi+4\partial_{x}^{3}\psi=0, (3)

and similarly let ψj(x,y,t)\psi^{-}_{j}(x,y,t) be solutions to the conjugate system

iyψx2ψ=0,tψ+4x3ψ=0.i\partial_{y}\psi-\partial_{x}^{2}\psi=0,\quad\partial_{t}\psi+4\partial_{x}^{3}\psi=0.

Assume that all ψj±\psi^{\pm}_{j} lie in L2((,x0])L^{2}((-\infty,x_{0}]) with respect to the variable xx for any x0x_{0}, and let cjkc_{jk} be an arbitrary constant M×MM\times M-matrix. Then the function

u(x,y,t)=2x2logτ,τ(x,y,t)=det[cjk+ψj+,ψk],ψj+,ψk=xψj+(x,y,t)ψk(x,y,t)𝑑xu(x,y,t)=2\partial_{x}^{2}\log\tau,\quad\tau(x,y,t)=\det\left[c_{jk}+\langle\psi^{+}_{j},\psi^{-}_{k}\rangle\right],\quad\langle\psi^{+}_{j},\psi^{-}_{k}\rangle=\int_{-\infty}^{x}\psi_{j}^{+}(x^{\prime},y,t)\psi_{k}^{-}(x^{\prime},y,t)dx^{\prime} (4)

is a solution of the KP-I equation (1). To obtain real-valued solutions, we let cjkc_{jk} be real-valued, and we set ψj=ψ¯j\psi^{-}_{j}=\overline{\psi}_{j}.

It is customary to choose cjk=δjkc_{jk}=\delta_{jk} to ensure that the solution (4) is non-singular; we call solutions of KP-I obtained in this way regular. In this paper, however, we are more interested in the case cjk=0c_{jk}=0; we call such solutions reduced. We note that if the solutions ψj\psi_{j} are linearly independent, then the reduced τ\tau-function (4) is the determinant of a Gram matrix, and hence the solution is nonsingular. We discuss the relationship between regular and reduced solutions of KP-I in Section 4, for now we note that the latter can be obtained from the former by setting ψj+=Cψj\psi^{+}_{j}=C\psi_{j}, where CC is a real constant, and taking the limit C+C\to+\infty. It would also be interesting to consider solutions where the matrix cjkc_{jk} is nonzero but does not have maximal rank, however this is beyond the scope of our paper.

In this paper, we restrict our attention to functions ψj\psi_{j} with finite spectral support. Fix a positive integer NN, called the order of the solution, and fix distinct eigenvalues λ1,,λN\lambda_{1},\ldots,\lambda_{N} with positive real parts. Denote

ϕ(x,y,t,λ)=λx+iλ2y4λ3t,\phi(x,y,t,\lambda)=\lambda x+i\lambda^{2}y-4\lambda^{3}t,

and let ps(x,y,t,λ)p_{s}(x,y,t,\lambda) denote the polynomial (homogeneous of degree ss in xx, yy, and tt) defined by

ps(x,y,t,λ)=eϕ(x,y,t,λ)λseϕ(x,y,t,λ),p_{s}(x,y,t,\lambda)=e^{-\phi(x,y,t,\lambda)}\partial_{\lambda}^{s}e^{\phi(x,y,t,\lambda)},

so that for example

p0=1,p1=x+2iλy12λ2t,p2=p12+2iy24λt,p_{0}=1,\quad p_{1}=x+2i\lambda y-12\lambda^{2}t,\quad p_{2}=p_{1}^{2}+2iy-24\lambda t,\quad\ldots

Any function of the form λseϕ=pseϕ\partial_{\lambda}^{s}e^{\phi}=p_{s}e^{\phi} is a solution of (3).

We now consider solutions of KP-I given by the tau-function (4), where the eigenfunctions ψj\psi_{j} are given by

ψj(x,y,t)=n=1Ns=0SCjnsps(x,y,t,λjn)eϕ(x,y,t,λjn).\psi_{j}(x,y,t)=\sum_{n=1}^{N}\sum_{s=0}^{S}C_{jns}p_{s}(x,y,t,\lambda_{jn})e^{\phi(x,y,t,\lambda_{jn})}. (5)

The highest degree SS of a polynomial psp_{s} that occurs in any of the ψj\psi_{j} is called the depth of the solution. The complex constants CjnsC_{jns} are required to satisfy a non-degeneracy condition to ensure that the functions ψj\psi_{j} are linearly independent. We do not spell out this condition, and instead verify it in each particular example.

An exhaustive classification of the solutions of KP-I obtained in this manner is far beyond the scope of this paper. Instead, our goal is to describe several interesting families of solutions that illuminate the behavior of the generic solution.

  1. 1.

    Line-solitons. The simplest solution of KP-I, called a line-soliton, is the regular solution obtained from (4) and (5) for M=1M=1, N=1N=1, and S=0S=0, in other words by setting ψ(x,y,t)=Ceϕ(x,y,t,λ)\psi(x,y,t)=Ce^{\phi(x,y,t,\lambda)}. This solution is a translation-invariant traveling wave, and a similar solution exists for KP-II. However, unlike the KP-II case, a line-soliton solution of KP-I is unstable (see [30, 37]).

  2. 2.

    Rational solutions: lumps and multi-lumps. A distinguishing feature of the KP-I equation is the existence of rational, spatially localized solutions, which are not known for KP-II. Consider the solution of KP-I given by (4) and (5), where each function ψj\psi_{j} is a polynomial multiple of a single exponential eϕ(x,y,t,λj)e^{\phi(x,y,t,\lambda_{j})} (the eigenvalues λj\lambda_{j} corresponding to the ψj\psi_{j} may or may not be distinct). In this case the integral ψj+,ψk\langle\psi^{+}_{j},\psi^{-}_{k}\rangle occurring in (4) is a polynomial multiple of e(λj+λ¯k)xe^{(\lambda_{j}+\overline{\lambda}_{k})x}. In the regular case (when cjk=δjkc_{jk}=\delta_{jk}), the τ\tau-function is a sum of distinct exponentials. However, in the reduced case (when cjk=0c_{jk}=0), the τ\tau-function is a polynomial multiple of a single exponential term exp(λj+λ¯j)x\exp\sum(\lambda_{j}+\overline{\lambda}_{j})x, and the exponential disappears when taking the second logarithmic derivative. Therefore, the corresponding solution uu is a rational function of xx, yy, and tt. These are the so-called lump and multi-lump solutions of KP-I. Corresponding to each distinct eigenvalue λj\lambda_{j} there is a lump, or, more generally, a collection of lumps, whose number is related to the depth SS. The lumps in each collection are either bounded or undergo anomalous scattering, while the collections of lumps corresponding to different λj\lambda_{j} undergo normal scattering without phase shifts. Multilump solutions of KP-I were obtained in a number of papers (see for example [12, 14, 19, 20, 27, 28, 29, 34]). The most general Grammian form of the multilump solutions of KP-I was considered in [9].

  3. 3.

    Lump chains. In this paper, we are mostly concerned with reduced solutions of depth S=0S=0, in other words when each function ψj\psi_{j} is a linear combination of exponentials. In order for the solution to be non-singular, we require NMN\geq M. As we will see, the corresponding reduced solution uu of KP-I is an arrangement of lump chains, which are sequences of lumps moving along parallel trajectories (the group velocity of the chain is in general distinct from the velocity of the individual lumps). The time evolution of the underlying linear arrangement supporting the lumps is very similar to that of the line-soliton solutions of KP-II (see [16]). However, the linear arrangements that can occur for lump chains are more general than those of KP-II line-solitons, and allow for various degenerate configurations such as parallel or superimposed lump chains. The regular solution of KP-I of depth S=0S=0 and rank M=1M=1 consists of a linear arrangement of lump chains interacting with a single line-soliton of KP-I. We give a detailed description of certain families of reduced lump chain solutions in Section 3, and we give a single example of a regular solution of depth S=0S=0 in Section 4.

  4. 4.

    Lumps and lump chains. In Section 4, we also construct an example of a reduced solution of depth S>0S>0 that is not rational. The solution consists of a chain of lumps that emits, at a certain moment of time, a single lump which propagates away from the chain. We conjecture that the general reduced solution of KP-I with depth S>0S>0 consists of an arrangement of lump chains, with an additional number of individual lumps being either emitted or reabsorbed by the chains. The general regular solution consists of such an arrangement, and additional line-solitons.

3 Lump chains: reduced solutions of depth S=0S=0.

In this section, we consider solutions of KP-I given by (4) that are reduced (cjk=0c_{jk}=0), and where the auxiliary ψ\psi-functions are given by (5) with depth S=0S=0, in other words are sums of pure exponential terms with no polynomial multiples. We mostly focus on solutions of rank M=1M=1, in other words having the form

u(x,y,t)=2x2logτ,τ(x,y,t)=x|ψ(z,t,y)|2𝑑z,u(x,y,t)=2\partial_{x}^{2}\log\tau,\quad\tau(x,y,t)=\int_{-\infty}^{x}|\psi(z,t,y)|^{2}\,dz, (6)

where the ψ\psi-function is a sum of NN exponentials. We will see that such a solution is an arrangement of linear lump chains, with the individual lumps moving with constant velocity along the chains, and the entire assembly evolving with time. Such lump chain solutions of KP-I bear a strong resemblance to the well-known line-soliton solutions of KP-II, which are the subject of an elaborate combinatorial theory (see [16]).

The ψ\psi-function defining a lump chain solution of rank M=1M=1 and order NN is defined by 2N2N complex parameters. It is convenient to introduce them as follows. Let

λn=an+ibn,θn=ρn+iφn,n=1,,N,\lambda_{n}=a_{n}+ib_{n},\quad\theta_{n}=\rho_{n}+i\varphi_{n},\quad n=1,\ldots,N,

be complex constants, where we assume that 0<a1a2aN0<a_{1}\leq a_{2}\leq\cdots\leq a_{N} and that λnλm\lambda_{n}\neq\lambda_{m} for nmn\neq m. Define the functions

Φn(x,y,t)=λnx+iλn2y4λn3t+θn,\Phi_{n}(x,y,t)=\lambda_{n}x+i\lambda_{n}^{2}y-4\lambda_{n}^{3}t+\theta_{n},

then the function

ψ(x,y,t)=n=1N2aneΦn(x,y,t)\psi(x,y,t)=\sum_{n=1}^{N}\sqrt{2a_{n}}e^{\Phi_{n}(x,y,t)}

satisfies the linear system (3). Plugging ψ\psi into (6), we obtain the following formula for the τ\tau-function:

τ(x,y,t)=n=1Ne2Fn+n=1N1m=n+1N2μnmeFn+Fmcos(GnGmφnm),\tau(x,y,t)=\sum_{n=1}^{N}e^{2F_{n}}+\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\sum_{m=n+1}^{N}2\mu_{nm}e^{F_{n}+F_{m}}\cos(G_{n}-G_{m}-\varphi_{nm}), (7)

where we have denoted

Fn(x,y,t)=ReΦn(x,y,t),Gn(x,y,t)=ImΦn(x,y,t),F_{n}(x,y,t)=\operatorname{Re}\Phi_{n}(x,y,t),\quad G_{n}(x,y,t)=\operatorname{Im}\Phi_{n}(x,y,t),

and the constants μnm\mu_{nm} and φnm\varphi_{nm} are given by

μnm=2anam(an+am)2+(bnbm)2,φnm=tan1(bnbman+am).\mu_{nm}=2\sqrt{\frac{a_{n}a_{m}}{(a_{n}+a_{m})^{2}+(b_{n}-b_{m})^{2}}},\quad\varphi_{nm}=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{b_{n}-b_{m}}{a_{n}+a_{m}}\right).

The large-scale structure of the solution is governed by the linear functions

Fnm(x,y,t)=Fn(x,y,t)Fm(x,y,t)=Anmx+Bnmy+Cnmt+Dnm=0,F_{nm}(x,y,t)=F_{n}(x,y,t)-F_{m}(x,y,t)=A_{nm}x+B_{nm}y+C_{nm}t+D_{nm}=0,

where

Anm=Re(λnλm),Bnm=Im(λn2λm2),Cnm=4Re(λn3λm3),Dnm=Re(θnθm).A_{nm}=\operatorname{Re}(\lambda_{n}-\lambda_{m}),\quad B_{nm}=-\operatorname{Im}(\lambda_{n}^{2}-\lambda_{m}^{2}),\quad C_{nm}=-4\operatorname{Re}(\lambda_{n}^{3}-\lambda_{m}^{3}),\quad D_{nm}=\operatorname{Re}(\theta_{n}-\theta_{m}). (8)

We now describe the structure of the corresponding solution u(x,y,t)u(x,y,t) for N2N\geq 2 (the solution is trivial for N=1N=1). We note that adding a common complex constant to the θn\theta_{n} multiplies τ\tau by a real constant, and hence does not change uu, therefore the solution is in fact determined by 2N12N-1 complex parameters.

3.1 Lump chain of rank M=1M=1 and order N=2N=2.

The solution of KP-I with τ\tau-function (7) of rank M=1M=1 and order N=2N=2 is the basic building block for solutions of order N3N\geq 3, so we study it in detail. This solution is a linear traveling wave consisting of an infinite chain of lumps, and is analogous to the simple line-soliton solution of KP-II. In the N=2N=2 case, the τ\tau-function (7) can be simplified by factoring out the exponential term eF1+F2e^{F_{1}+F_{2}}. The corresponding solution of KP-I is given by

u(x,y,t)=22x2log[cosh(F21)+μ12cos(G2G1φ21)].u(x,y,t)=2\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}\log\left[\cosh(F_{21})+\mu_{12}\cos(G_{2}-G_{1}-\varphi_{21})\right]. (9)

The arguments of the cosh\cosh and cos\cos functions are linear:

F21=A21x+B21y+C21t+D21,G2G1φ21=α21x+β21y+γ21t+δ21,F_{21}=A_{21}x+B_{21}y+C_{21}t+D_{21},\quad G_{2}-G_{1}-\varphi_{21}=\alpha_{21}x+\beta_{21}y+\gamma_{21}t+\delta_{21},

where we have denoted

α21=Im(λ2λ1),β21=Re(λ22λ12),γ21=4Im(λ23λ13),δ21=Im(θ2θ1).\alpha_{21}=\operatorname{Im}(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1}),\quad\beta_{21}=\operatorname{Re}(\lambda_{2}^{2}-\lambda_{1}^{2}),\quad\gamma_{21}=-4\operatorname{Im}(\lambda_{2}^{3}-\lambda_{1}^{3}),\quad\delta_{21}=\operatorname{Im}(\theta_{2}-\theta_{1}).

Introduce the quantities

X=B21γ21C21β21A21β21B21α21,Y=C21α21A21γ21A21β21B21α21,X=\frac{B_{21}\gamma_{21}-C_{21}\beta_{21}}{A_{21}\beta_{21}-B_{21}\alpha_{21}},\quad Y=\frac{C_{21}\alpha_{21}-A_{21}\gamma_{21}}{A_{21}\beta_{21}-B_{21}\alpha_{21}},

then the non-degeneracy condition 0<a1a20<a_{1}\leq a_{2} implies that the vector (X,Y)(X,Y) is nonzero, and that the denominators do not vanish. The functions F21=F2F1F_{21}=F_{2}-F_{1} and G2G1G_{2}-G_{1}, and therefore uu, satisfy the differential equation ft+Xfx+Yfy=0f_{t}+Xf_{x}+Yf_{y}=0, hence u(x,y,t)=u(xXt,yYt)u(x,y,t)=u(x-Xt,y-Yt) is a traveling wave with the velocity vector (X,Y)(X,Y). Furthermore, uu satisfies the stationary Boussinesq equation

[XuxYuy+6uux+uxxx]x=3uyy.\left[-Xu_{x}-Yu_{y}+6uu_{x}+u_{xxx}\right]_{x}=3u_{yy}.

For a fixed moment of time tt, the solution (9) is localized near the line F21=0F_{21}=0 in the (x,y)(x,y)-plane. Indeed, away from the line, the argument of cosh\cosh has a large absolute value, so the τ\tau-function has a single dominant exponential term and hence uu is exponentially small. The normal direction vector 𝐔21=(A21,B21)\mathbf{U}_{21}=(A_{21},B_{21}) of the line F21=0F_{21}=0 may be an arbitrary nonzero vector, and is not in general parallel to the velocity (X,Y)(X,Y). In particular, if a1=a2a_{1}=a_{2} then the line F21=0F_{21}=0 is parallel to the xx-axis, which cannot happen for a line-soliton of KP-II. The line F21=0F_{21}=0 propagates with the wave vector

𝐕21=C21A212+B212(A21,B21),\mathbf{V}_{21}=-\frac{C_{21}}{A_{21}^{2}+B_{21}^{2}}(A_{21},B_{21}), (10)

and is stationary if C21=0C_{21}=0 (which also cannot happen for a KP-II line-soliton). Note, however, that C210C_{21}\neq 0 if the line F21=0F_{21}=0 is vertical.

Along the line F21=0F_{21}=0, the phase of the solution (9) is determined by the argument of the cosine function. The solution is periodic along the line, and consists of a sequence of lumps (see Figure 1). The distance between two consecutive lumps is equal to

L21=2πA212+B212A21β21B21α21.L_{21}=2\pi\frac{\sqrt{A_{21}^{2}+B_{21}^{2}}}{A_{21}\beta_{21}-B_{21}\alpha_{21}}. (11)

The individual lumps propagate with velocity vector (X,Y)(X,Y), which may be oriented arbitrarily relative the chain F21=0F_{21}=0. To see that the individual peaks are indeed KP-I lumps, we note that the distance L21L_{21} between two consecutive lumps diverges as λ2λ1\lambda_{2}\to\lambda_{1}. Setting

a1=aε,b1=bεμ,a2=a+ε,b2=b+εμ,θ1=θ2=0,a_{1}=a-\varepsilon,\quad b_{1}=b-\varepsilon\mu,\quad a_{2}=a+\varepsilon,\quad b_{2}=b+\varepsilon\mu,\quad\theta_{1}=\theta_{2}=0,

in the limit ε0\varepsilon\to 0 we obtain (for t=0t=0 and arbitrary μ\mu) the lump solution of KP-I:

u(x,y)=22x2log[1+a2(xby)2+a4y2]=4a2(1a2(xby)2+a4y2)(1+a2(xby)2+a4y2)2.u(x,y)=2\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}\log[1+a^{2}(x-by)^{2}+a^{4}y^{2}]=\frac{4a^{2}(1-a^{2}(x-by)^{2}+a^{4}y^{2})}{(1+a^{2}(x-by)^{2}+a^{4}y^{2})^{2}}. (12)

The KP-I equation has infinitely many integrals of motion, the simplest being u(x,y,t)𝑑x\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}u(x,y,t)dx (in general, this integral is a linear function of yy, but for our solutions it is in fact constant). It is easy to verify that for a lump chain of order N=2N=2 we have

14u(x,y,t)𝑑x=A21.\frac{1}{4}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}u(x,y,t)\,dx=A_{21}.

We call the quantity A21A_{21} the flux of the lump chain.

We note that the integral u(x,y,t)𝑑x\displaystyle\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}u(x,y,t)\,dx is equal to zero for a one-lump solution (12), since u(x,y)u(x,y) is the xx-derivative of a rational function that vanishes at infinity. This agrees with the limiting procedure, since A210A_{21}\to 0 as λ2λ1\lambda_{2}\to\lambda_{1}. However, for the one-lump solution u(x,y)u(x,y) given by (12) the integral over the entire plane is nonzero:

2u(x,y)𝑑xdy=4πa>0.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}u(x,y)\,dx\wedge dy=\frac{4\pi}{a}>0.

There is no contradiction here, since u(x,y)u(x,y) does not vanish sufficiently rapidly as x2+y2x^{2}+y^{2}\to\infty, and this improper integral cannot be evaluated using Fubini’s theorem.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Reduced lump chain of order M=1M=1 and rank N=2N=2, given by Equation (9) with λ1=1/2+i/2\lambda_{1}=1/2+i/2 and λ2=3/8i/4\lambda_{2}=3/8-i/4 at t=0t=0. (a) 22D profile of u(x,y)u(x,y). (b) Amplitude of u(x~,y)u(\tilde{x},y) along the line F12=0F_{12}=0.

It has already been observed by a number of authors that a linear chain of lumps can occur as part of a solution of the KP-I equation. A chain of lumps appears in [43], and formula (9) occurs in [18] (see p. 74), but is not analyzed in detail. In [30], chains of lumps parallel to the yy-axis are shown to result from the decay of an unstable line-soliton. Zaitsev [36] developed a procedure for constructing stationary wave solutions of integrable systems out of spatially localized solitons, and constructed a lump chain for KP-I in this manner. Burtsev showed in [7] that a lump chain is unstable with respect to transverse perturbations, as is the case for a line-soliton. The development of the instability of the chain soliton was studied in [30]

3.2 Lump chains of rank M=1M=1 and order N=3N=3.

We now consider the reduced solutions u(x,y,t)u(x,y,t) of KP-I with τ\tau-function given by (7) in the case N=3N=3. A generic solution of this form consists of three lump chains meeting at a triple point, and a number of degenerate configurations are also possible.

The τ\tau-function (7) for N=3N=3 consists of three purely exponential terms e2F1e^{2F_{1}}, e2F2e^{2F_{2}}, and e2F3e^{2F_{3}}, and three mixed terms. Introduce the normal vectors 𝐔mn=(Amn,Bmn)\mathbf{U}_{mn}=(A_{mn},B_{mn}), where AmnA_{mn} and BmnB_{mn} are given by (8). The normal vectors satisfy 𝐔31=𝐔21+𝐔32\mathbf{U}_{31}=\mathbf{U}_{21}+\mathbf{U}_{32}, and their collinearity is controlled by the quantity

η123=A21B31A31B21=a1b1(a2a3)+a2b2(a3a1)+a3b3(a1a2).\eta_{123}=A_{21}B_{31}-A_{31}B_{21}=a_{1}b_{1}(a_{2}-a_{3})+a_{2}b_{2}(a_{3}-a_{1})+a_{3}b_{3}(a_{1}-a_{2}). (13)

For generic values of λ1\lambda_{1}, λ2\lambda_{2}, and λ3\lambda_{3} we have η1230\eta_{123}\neq 0, and no two of the three vectors 𝐔mn\mathbf{U}_{mn} are collinear. In this case, the (x,y)(x,y)-plane is partitioned, for fixed tt, into three sectors meeting at a triple point. In each sector, one of the pure exponential terms e2Fme^{2F_{m}} is dominant, and the solution uu is exponentially small. Along the boundary of two sectors, given by the equation Fmn=0F_{mn}=0, two of the exponentials e2Fme^{2F_{m}} and e2Fne^{2F_{n}} are equal and are comparable to the mixed exponential term containing eFm+Fne^{F_{m}+F_{n}}. The triple point is given by the equation F1=F2=F3=0F_{1}=F_{2}=F_{3}=0, moves linearly with tt, and passes through (0,0)(0,0) at t=0t=0 if the phases θm\theta_{m} are purely imaginary.

The solution itself is localized on the boundaries of the sectors. Along the boundary Fmn=0F_{mn}=0, the solution can be approximated by an order N=2N=2 solution described in Subsection 3.1. In other words, it is a lump chain with normal vector 𝐔mn\mathbf{U}_{mn}, which we call an [m,n][m,n]-chain. Depending on the values of the spectral parameters, there are two possibilities. In the first, shown on Figure 2, the [2,1][2,1]- and [3,2][3,2]-lump chains meet at the triple point. The individual lumps from the two chains interlace one by one and form the new [3,1][3,1]-chain. Conversely, the lumps on the [3,1][3,1]-chain may split at the triple point into two new chains. In either case, individual lumps are preserved, and the fluxes of the three chains satisfy the local conservation law A31=A21+A32A_{31}=A_{21}+A_{32}. In addition to the orientation of the chains, the position of the triple point, and the velocities of the lumps along the chains, there are two free parameters that determine the solution, namely the relative phases δmn=Im(θmθn)\delta_{mn}=\operatorname{Im}(\theta_{m}-\theta_{n}). Figure 3 shows the solution for three different sets of values of the relative chain phases.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: N=3N=3 lump chain with λ1=1/2+i/2\lambda_{1}=1/2+i/2, λ2=3/8i/4\lambda_{2}=3/8-i/4 and λ3=1/4+i/8\lambda_{3}=1/4+i/8 at different moments of time.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: N=3N=3 lump chain with λ1=1/2+i/2\lambda_{1}=1/2+i/2, λ2=3/8i/4\lambda_{2}=3/8-i/4 and λ3=1/4+i/8\lambda_{3}=1/4+i/8 at t=0t=0, and with different relative phases. (a) δ12=0\delta_{12}=0 and δ13=0\delta_{13}=0 (b) δ12=π\delta_{12}=\pi and δ13=0\delta_{13}=0 (c) δ12=0\delta_{12}=0 and δ13=π\delta_{13}=\pi.

There are additionally a number of degenerate configurations, corresponding to η123=0\eta_{123}=0. In this case the vectors 𝐔21\mathbf{U}_{21}, 𝐔31\mathbf{U}_{31}, and 𝐔32\mathbf{U}_{32} are collinear, and hence so are the lines F21=0F_{21}=0, F31=0F_{31}=0 and F32=0F_{32}=0. Depending on the values of the λm\lambda_{m}, for fixed tt, either the (x,y)(x,y)-plane consists of half-planes in which e2F1e^{2F_{1}} and e2F3e^{2F_{3}} are dominant, or there is an additional intermediate strip in which e2F2e^{2F_{2}} is dominant. For generic λ1\lambda_{1}, λ2\lambda_{2}, and λ3\lambda_{3} (satisfying η123=0\eta_{123}=0), the solution may consist of two parallel [2,1][2,1]- and [3,2][3,2]-chains merging into the [3,1][3,1]-chain, as shown on Figure 4. The opposite case is also possible: a single [3,1][3,1]-chain may, at a certain moment of time, split into two lump chains, both parallel to the original chain. A similar splitting process was observed in [30].

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Two parallel lump chains merging into one: NN=3, λ1=1/2+i/2\lambda_{1}=1/2+i/2, λ2=3/8i/4\lambda_{2}=3/8-i/4 and λ3=3/7+i/8\lambda_{3}=3/7+i/8 at different moments of time. (a) t=15.0t=-15.0 (b) t=10.0t=-10.0 (c) t=5.0t=-5.0 (d) t=0.0t=0.0 (e) t=10.0t=10.0 (a) t=20.0t=20.0

Imposing the additional condition A21C31A31C21=0A_{21}C_{31}-A_{31}C_{21}=0, we obtain a further degeneration: the three lines F21=0F_{21}=0, F31=0F_{31}=0, and F32=0F_{32}=0 that can support the chains move are not only parallel, but move with equal velocity. In this case, the solution consists either of two parallel lump chains propagating at a fixed distance, or of a single lump chain (in the latter case, the solution may be visually indistinguishable from a lump chain of order N=2N=2).

Finally, it is possible that the three lines F21=0F_{21}=0, F31=0F_{31}=0, and F32=0F_{32}=0 are the same for all values of tt. The three lump chains merge into a complex, periodic or quasi-periodic chain supported along the common line, which propagates linearly (see Figure 5).

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Quasi-periodic lump chain of order M=1M=1 and rank N=3N=3, λ1=1+i/2\lambda_{1}=1+i/2, λ2=1/4i/4\lambda_{2}=1/4-i/4 and λ3=0.443+0.186i\lambda_{3}=0.443+0.186i, at times t=20.0t=-20.0, t=0.0t=0.0, and t=20.0t=20.0. Inset in (a) shows amplitude along the quasi-periodic lump chain.

3.3 Lump chains of rank M=1M=1 and order N4N\geq 4.

We now discuss the general form of the solution (7) for arbitrary NN, which is determined by the spectral parameters λn\lambda_{n}. The τ\tau-function is a sum of purely exponential terms e2Fne^{2F_{n}} and mixed exponentials eFn+Fme^{F_{n}+F_{m}} with trigonometric multipliers. For fixed tt, the shape of the solution is determined by the relative values of the FnF_{n}: if one exponential e2Fne^{2F_{n}} is dominant in the τ\tau-function, then the solution uu is exponentially small (a mixed term containing eFn+Fme^{F_{n}+F_{m}} cannot be the only dominant term). Hence the (x,y)(x,y)-plane is divided into finitely many polygonal regions, in the interior of which a single term FnF_{n} is dominant. In fact, a given term FnF_{n} may in general fail to be dominant anywhere, so there may be fewer than NN regions, and there may be only two. On the boundary of Fnm=FnFm=0F_{nm}=F_{n}-F_{m}=0 of two regions, where Fn=FmF_{n}=F_{m} and all other FkF_{k} are significantly smaller, the solution can be approximated by an order N=2N=2 solution described in Subsection 3.1. In other words, it is a lump chain with normal vector 𝐔nm=(Anm,Bnm)\mathbf{U}_{nm}=(A_{nm},B_{nm}), which we call an [n,m][n,m]-chain. Hence the (x,y)(x,y)-plane decomposes into finitely many polygonal regions with lump chains along the boundaries, and the entire arrangement evolves linearly with tt. The structure of the lump chains closely resembles the arrangement of line-solitons in KP-II (see [3, 16]).

We do not develop a general theory describing the line structure of the solutions. Instead, we give two generic examples of order N=4N=4, and discuss the possible degenerate behavior. The first example, shown on Figure 6, may be called an HH-configuration. It consists two triple points that are separated by a lump chain bridge. The bridge contracts and disappears at t=0t=0, and the triple points scatter along a different bridge. A similar configuration appears in the KP-II equation (see [3, 16]).

Refer to caption
Figure 6: H-shaped arrangement of chains of order M=1M=1 and rank N=4N=4, with eigenvalues λ1=17/32+i/8\lambda_{1}=17/32+i/8, λ2=3/8i/8\lambda_{2}=3/8-i/8, λ3=11/32+i/5\lambda_{3}=11/32+i/5, λ4=3/32+i/4\lambda_{4}=3/32+i/4 and times t=20.0t=-20.0, t=0t=0 and t=20.0t=20.0.

The second example, shown on Figure 7, has three triple points bounding a finite triangular region. The region shrinks and disappears at t=0t=0, and the solution henceforth resembles a solution of order N=3N=3. This configuration can be reversed in time, with a triangular region appearing out of a triple point. We stress that both these examples are generic, in other words the structure of the lump chains does not change under small perturbations of the λn\lambda_{n}.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Triangular arrangement of chains of order M=1M=1 and rank N=4N=4, with eigenvalues λ1=1\lambda_{1}=1, λ2=1/2+i3/2\lambda_{2}=1/2+i\sqrt{3}/2, λ3=1/2i3/2\lambda_{3}=1/2-i\sqrt{3}/2, λ4=1/3i/(23)\lambda_{4}=1/\sqrt{3}-i/(2\sqrt{3}), and times t=2.0t=-2.0, t=1.0t=-1.0 and t=0.0t=0.0.

The reader may recognize that the structure of lump chain solutions of KP-I is very similar to the structure of line-soliton solutions of KP-II. We point out that the line structure in the KP-I case may in fact be more complex. Specifically, the following kinds of behavior, all of them forbidden for KP-II line-solitons, can occur for KP-I lump chains of rank M=1M=1 and order NN.

3.3.1 Generic solutions: the number of chains at infinity and forbidden configurations.

We first consider the case when the eigenvalues λn\lambda_{n} are sufficiently generic. A natural first question is to determine the linear configurations of chains that may occur, in particular, the number of lump chains extending to infinity. An order NN line-soliton of KP-II always has NN solitons extending to infinity, but a generic order NN solution of KP-I may have anywhere between 3 and NN infinite lump chains. Similarly, certain configurations of lines are forbidden for KP-II line-solitons but may occur for KP-I lump chain solutions. For example, the solution given on Figure 7 has N=4N=4 and three infinite chains, and represents a line arrangement that cannot occur in KP-II (see Exercise 4.6 in [16]).

3.3.2 Degenerate solutions: stable points, parallel chains, and higher order chains.

Various degenerate configurations may be achieved by imposing appropriate conditions on the eigenvalues λn\lambda_{n}. The triple points where lump chains meet may be stationary relative to one another, and may even coincide for all times, producing stable quadruple points and points of higher multiplicity. A solution may have sets of parallel lump chains, in which case the number of chains at infinity may be greater than the order NN. Finally, lump chains may coincide, producing quasiperiodic chains of higher order.

3.4 Lump chains of rank M2M\geq 2.

The structure of reduced solutions of KP-I of depth S=0S=0 and higher rank M2M\geq 2 is broadly similar to the M=1M=1 case. The τ\tau-function (4) is a sum of purely exponential terms and mixed terms involving trigonometric multipliers. For a given moment of time tt, the (x,y)(x,y)-plane is partitioned into finitely many polygons, and this decomposition evolves linearly with time. Polygonal regions may appear and disappear at certain moments of time. The boundaries of the polygons support lump chains, and the total flux of the lump chains arriving at a given vertex is equal to the flux of the chains that are leaving. In degenerate cases, there may be coinciding polygonal boundaries supporting quasiperiodic superpositions of lump chains. We give a single example of such a solution with rank M=2M=2 and order N=4N=4 in Figure 8.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: The time evolution of a rank 2 order 4 solution with eigenvalues λ11=1/2+i/8\lambda_{11}=1/2+i/8, λ12=3/8i/8\lambda_{12}=3/8-i/8, λ13=1/4+i/5\lambda_{13}=1/4+i/5, λ14=1/8+i/4\lambda_{14}=1/8+i/4, λ21=4/9+i/9\lambda_{21}=4/9+i/9, λ22=3/9i/9\lambda_{22}=3/9-i/9, λ23=2/9+i/3\lambda_{23}=2/9+i/3, λ24=1/9+i/7\lambda_{24}=1/9+i/7

4 Regular solutions and solutions of depth S>0S>0: line-solitons and individual lumps.

We now discuss the relationship between regular and reduced solutions of depth S=0S=0, and solutions of positive depth. We first consider regular solutions, and for simplicity restrict our attention to rank N=1N=1. The τ\tau-function of such a solution is nearly identical to that of the reduced solution (7), and has the form

τ(x,y,t)=1+n=1Ne2Fn+n=1N1m=n+1N2μnmeFn+Fmcos(GnGmφnm).\tau(x,y,t)=1+\sum_{n=1}^{N}e^{2F_{n}}+\sum_{n=1}^{N-1}\sum_{m=n+1}^{N}2\mu_{nm}e^{F_{n}+F_{m}}\cos(G_{n}-G_{m}-\varphi_{nm}). (14)

As before, the (x,y)(x,y)-plane is partitioned into polygonal regions, in each of which one of the terms in (14) is dominant. However, there is now a new region, on which the dominant term in the τ\tau-function is the constant 1. Since an=Reλn>0a_{n}=\operatorname{Re}\lambda_{n}>0, this region contains, for a given fixed yy, all points (x,y)(x,y) with sufficiently large negative xx. Inside this region the τ\tau-function is approximately constant, and the solution uu is exponentially small. At the boundary of this region, the two dominant terms in the τ\tau-function are the 1 and one of the exponentials e2Fne^{2F_{n}}. Hence the boundary of the region where 1 dominates is a line-soliton of KP-I, instead of a lump chain. In other words, the solution consists of an infinite line-soliton of KP-I coupled with an arrangement of lump chains (see Figure 9).

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Regular solution of rank M=1M=1 and order N=3N=3, with eigenvalues λ1=1/2+i/2\lambda_{1}=1/2+i/2, λ2=3/8i/4\lambda_{2}=3/8-i/4, and λ3=1/4+i/8\lambda_{3}=1/4+i/8, at different moments of time.

It is possible to degenerate a regular solution to a reduced solution by replacing the 11 in Equation (14) with an ε\varepsilon and taking the limit ε0\varepsilon\to 0. The line-soliton occurs on the boundary of the region where the ε\varepsilon is the dominant term, and this region moves in the negative xx-direction as ε0\varepsilon\to 0. In the limit, the line-soliton disappears to infinity, and we are left with a solution consisting entirely of lump chains. Therefore, the limiting procedure that produces reduced solutions out of regular solutions has the effect of removing the line-soliton and isolating the lump chain structure.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: A lump chain radiates an individual lump, which propagates away. λ1=1/4\lambda_{1}=1/4, λ2=1/2\lambda_{2}=1/2 with multiplicities of 1 and 2, respectively.

We also briefly consider the structure of reduced solutions of depth S>0S>0. Consider again the general form of the τ\tau-function (4), where cjk=0c_{jk}=0 and the ψj\psi_{j} are given by (5). As discussed in Section 2, the τ\tau-function is rational if each ψj\psi_{j} is a polynomial multiple of a single exponential term eϕ(x,y,t,λj)e^{\phi(x,y,t,\lambda_{j})}. The corresponding solution is localized in the (x,y)(x,y)-plane and represents the normal (if all λj\lambda_{j} are distinct) or anomalous scattering of lumps, or even bound states of lumps. We now consider what happens in general, when each ψj\psi_{j} is a multiple of several exponentials. For sufficiently large xx and yy, the polynomial terms are negligible compared to the exponentials, and the ψj\psi_{j} can be assumed to be purely exponential. Hence the solution can be assumed to have depth S=0S=0 and is an arrangement of lump chains, as described in Section 3. In the finite part of the (x,y)(x,y)-plane, however, the polynomial terms in the ψj\psi_{j} produce individual lumps. Hence, the overall structure of the solution is an arrangement of lump chains interacting with finitely many individual lumps: a lump chain may emit or absorb an individual lump, and the lumps may scatter on one another. A detailed classification of such solutions appears to be a challenging combinatorial problem. In Figure 10, we give a single example of such a solution, consisting of a lump chain emitting an individual lump. We note that the local number of lumps is conserved: two lumps from the chain meet and scatter, with one lump propagating away and the other filling the resulting gap in the chain. Figure 10 gives an example of such a solution with rank M=1M=1, order N=2N=2, and depth S=1S=1, with the ψ\psi-function given by

ψ(x,y,t)=e14(2t+2x+iy)(3t+x+iy+1)+e116(t+4x+iy).\psi(x,y,t)=e^{\frac{1}{4}(-2t+2x+iy)}(-3t+x+iy+1)+e^{\frac{1}{16}(-t+4x+iy)}.

5 Summary and conclusion

We have constructed a new family of lump chain solutions of the KP-I equations using the Grammian form of the τ\tau-function. A simple lump chain consists of an infinite line of equally spaced lumps. The lumps propagate with equal velocity, which is in general distinct from the group velocity of the line. The general solution consists of an evolving polyhedral arrangement of lump chains. At a point where three or more lump chains meet, the individual lumps from the incoming chains are redistributed along the outgoing chains, with the number of lumps being locally conserved. The linear structure of the solutions is very similar to that of the line-soliton solutions of KP-II. However, various degenerate configurations may occur for KP-I lump chains that cannot occur for KP-II line-solitons: parallel chains, chains of equal velocity, quasiperiodic superimposed chains, stable points of high multiplicity, and forbidden polyhedral configurations. We have also constructed more general solutions of KP-I using the Grammian method. Such solutions consist of an arrangement of lump chains as described above, together with line-solitons and individual lumps that are emitted and/or absorbed by the lump chains. A detailed classification of the solutions of KP-I that may be obtained by the Grammian method is an interesting and difficult problem, and is beyond the scope of this paper. We plan to return to this problem in future work.

6 Acknowledgments

The work of the second and fourth author on the third chapter was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 19-72-30028).

References

  • [1] M. J. Ablowitz, S. Chakravarty, A. D. Trubatch, and J. Villarroel. A novel class of solutions of the non-stationary Schrödinger and the Kadomtsev-–Petviashvili I equations. Physics Letters A 267(2-3), 132-146, 2000.
  • [2] M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson. Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  • [3] D. Anker, N. C. Freeman. Interpretation of three-soliton interactions in terms of resonant triads. J. Fluid Mech., v. 87, pp. 17–31, 1978.
  • [4] G. Biondini. Line soliton interactions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. Physical review letters 99(6), 064103, 2007
  • [5] G. Biondini and S. Chakravarty. Soliton solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili II equation. Journal of mathematical physics 47.3, 033514, 2006.
  • [6] G. Biondini and Y. Kodama. On a family of solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation which also satisfy the Toda lattice hierarchy. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 36.42, 10519, 2003.
  • [7] S. P. Burtsev. The instability of a periodic chain of two-dimensional solitons. Zhurnal Eksperimental’noi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki 88, pp. 1609-1615, 1985.
  • [8] S. Chakravarty and Y. Kodama. Classification of the line-soliton solutions of KPII. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41.27, 275209, 2008.
  • [9] J.-H. Chang. Asymptotic analysis of multilump solutions of the Kadomtsev-–Petviashvili-I equation. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 195.2, 676-689, 2018.
  • [10] V. S. Dryuma. Analytic solution of the two-dimensional Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) equation. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 19, p.387, 1974.
  • [11] A. S. Fokas and M. J. Ablowitz. On the inverse scattering of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and the associated Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. Stud. Appl. Math. 69, no. 3, 211-228, 1983.
  • [12] K. A. Gorshkov, D. E. Pelinovsky, and Yu. A. Stepanyants. Normal and anomalous scattering, formation and decay of bound states of two-dimensional solitons described by the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. JETP 104, pp. 2704-2720, 1993.
  • [13] K. A. Gorshkov, L. A. Ostrovsky, and Yu. A. Stepanyants. Dynamics of soliton chains: From simple to complex and chaotic motions. In: Long-Range Interactions, Stochasticity and Fractional Dynamics, pp. 177–218, eds. Albert C.J. Luo and Valentin Afraimovich, Springer, 2010.
  • [14] W. Hu, W. Huang, Z. Lu, and Y. Stepanyants. Interaction of multi-lumps within the Kadomtsev–-Petviashvili equation. Wave Motion 77, pp. 243-256, 2018.
  • [15] B. B. Kadomtsev, V. I. Petviashvili. On the stability of solitary waves in weakly dispersing media. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 15, no. 6, pp. 539-541, 1970.
  • [16] Y. Kodama. Solitons in two-dimensional shallow water. SIAM, 2018.
  • [17] Y. Kodama and L. Williams. KP solitons and total positivity for the Grassmannian. Inventiones mathematicae 198.3, pp. 637-699, 2014.
  • [18] B. G. Konopelchenko. Solitons in multidimensions: inverse spectral transform method. World Scientific, 1993.
  • [19] I. M. Krichever. Rational solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation and integrable systems of N particles on a line. Functional Analysis and Its Applications 12.1, pp. 59-61, 1978
  • [20] I. M. Krichever. On the rational solutions of Zakharov–Shabat equations and completely integrable systems of N particles on a line. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. LOMI, v. 84, pp. 117–130, 1979.
  • [21] E. A. Kuznetsov, S. K. Turitsyn. Two- and three-dimensional solitons in weakly dispersive media. Sov. Phys. JETP, v. 55, n. 5, 844–847, 1982.
  • [22] S. V. Manakov. The inverse scattering transform for the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. Physica D 3 (1-2), pp. 420-427, 1981.
  • [23] S. V. Manakov, V. E. Zakharov, L. A. Bordag, A. R. Its, V. B. Matveev. Two-dimensional solitons of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation and their interaction. Physics Letters A 63(3), pp. 205-206, 1977.
  • [24] A. Nakamura. A bilinear NN-soliton formula for the KP equation. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 58, no. 2, pp. 412–422, 1989.
  • [25] S. Novikov, S. V. Manakov, L. P. Pitaevskij, V. E. Zakharov. Theory of solitons. The inverse scattering method. Russian: Nauka, Moscow, 1980. English: Contemporary Soviet Mathematics. New York - London: Plenum Publishing Corporation. Consultants Bureau, 1984.
  • [26] A. R. Osborne. Nonlinear Ocean Wave and the Inverse Scattering Transform. Academic Press, 2010.
  • [27] D. Pelinovsky. Rational solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili hierarchy and the dynamics of their poles. I. New form of a general rational solution. J. Math. Phys. 35, no. 11, pp. 5820–5830, 1994.
  • [28] D. Pelinovsky. Rational solutions of the KP hierarchy and the dynamics of their poles. II. Construction of the degenerate polynomial solutions. Journal of Mathematical Physics 39.10, pp. 5377-5395, 1998.
  • [29] D. E. Pelinovsky, Yu. A. Stepanyants. New multisoliton solutions of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. JETP Letters 57, pp. 24-28, 1993.
  • [30] D. E. Pelinovsky, Yu. A. Stepanyants. Self-focusing instability of plane solitons and chains of two-dimensional solitons in positive-dispersion media. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 104, pp. 3387-3400, 1993.
  • [31] V. I. Petviashvili. Equation of an extraordinary soliton. Plasma Physics 2, pp. 469-472, 1976.
  • [32] J. Satsuma, M. J. Ablowitz. Two‐dimensional lumps in nonlinear dispersive systems. Journal of Mathematical Physics 20(7), pp.1496-1503, 1979.
  • [33] A. Shabat. The Korteweg–de Vries equation. Sov. Math. Dokl. 14, pp. 1266-1270, 1973.
  • [34] Yu. Stepanyants. Multi-lump structures in the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation. Advances in Dynamics, Patterns, Cognition, pp. 307-324. Springer, Cham, 2017.
  • [35] J. Villarroel, M. J. Ablowitz. On the discrete spectrum of the nonstationary Schrödinger equation and multipole lumps of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili I equation. Communications in mathematical physics 207(1), pp. 1-42, 1999.
  • [36] A. A. Zaitsev. Formation of stationary nonlinear waves by superposition of solitons. Soviet Physics Doklady 28, p. 720, 1983.
  • [37] V. E. Zakharov. Instability and nonlinear oscillations of solitons. JETP Lett. 22 (7), pp. 172-173, 1975.
  • [38] V. E. Zakharov. On the dressing method. In: Inverse methods in action, Proc. Multicent. Meet., Montpellier/Fr. 1989 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990), pp. 602-623, 1990.
  • [39] V. E. Zakharov, S. V. Manakov. Construction of higher-dimensional nonlinear integrable systems and of their solutions. Funct. Anal. Appl. 19(2), pp. 89-101, 1985.
  • [40] V. E. Zakharov, E. I. Schulman. Integrability of nonlinear systems and perturbation theory. In: What is integrability?, Springer Ser. Nonlinear Dyn., 185-250 (1991).
  • [41] V. E. Zakharov, A. B. Shabat. A scheme for integrating the nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of the inverse scattering problem. I. Functional analysis and its applications 8 (3), pp. 226-235, 1974.
  • [42] V. E. Zakharov, A. B. Shabat. Integration of nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of inverse scattering. II. Functional Analysis and Its Applications 13.3, pp. 166-174, 1979.
  • [43] S. K. Zhdanov, B. A. Trubnikov. Soliton chains in a plasma with magnetic viscosity. ZhETF Pisma Redaktsiiu 39, pp.110-113, 1984.
  • [44] X. Zhou. Inverse scattering transform for the time dependent Schrödinger equation with applications to the KPI equation. Comm. Math. Phys. 128, no. 3, pp. 551-564, 1990.