This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: Results based on Ph.D. theses of A. DeGrush and A. Maschinot.thanks: Deceased

The BLAST collaboration

Measurement of the Vector and Tensor Asymmetries at Large Missing
Momentum in Quasielastic (𝒆,𝒆𝒑)\bm{(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p)} Electron Scattering from Deuterium

A. DeGrush Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    A. Maschinot Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    T. Akdogan Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    R. Alarcon Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287    W. Bertozzi Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    E. Booth Boston University, Boston, MA 02215    T. Botto Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    J.R. Calarco University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824    B. Clasie Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    C. Crawford University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40504    K. Dow Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    M. Farkhondeh Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    R. Fatemi University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40504    O. Filoti University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824    W. Franklin Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    H. Gao Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory and Duke University, Durham, NC 27708    E. Geis Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287    S. Gilad Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    D.K. Hasell hasell@mit.edu Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    P. Karpius University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824    M. Kohl Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668 and Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606    H. Kolster Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    T. Lee University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824    J. Matthews Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    K. McIlhany United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402    N. Meitanis Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    R. Milner Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    J. Rapaport Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701    R. Redwine Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    J. Seely Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    A. Shinozaki Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    A. Sindile University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824    S. Širca Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, and Jožef Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia    E. Six Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287    T. Smith Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755    B. Tonguc Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287    C. Tschalär Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    E. Tsentalovich Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    W. Turchinetz Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    Y. Xiao Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    W. Xu Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory and Duke University, Durham, NC 27708    Z.-L. Zhou Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    V. Ziskin Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139    T. Zwart Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Bates Linear Accelerator Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
(July 28, 2025)
Abstract

We report the measurement of the beam-vector and tensor asymmetries AedVA^{V}_{ed} and AdTA^{T}_{d} in quasielastic (e,ep)(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) electrodisintegration of the deuteron at the MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center up to missing momentum of 500 MeV/c. Data were collected simultaneously over a momentum transfer range 0.1<Q2<0.50.1<Q^{2}<0.5 (GeV/c)2 with the Bates Large Acceptance Spectrometer Toroid using an internal deuterium gas target, polarized sequentially in both vector and tensor states. The data are compared with calculations. The beam-vector asymmetry AedVA^{V}_{ed} is found to be directly sensitive to the DD-wave component of the deuteron and have a zero-crossing at a missing momentum of about 320 MeV/c, as predicted. The tensor asymmetry AdTA^{T}_{d} at large missing momentum is found to be dominated by the influence of the tensor force in the neutron-proton final-state interaction. The new data provide a strong constraint on theoretical models.

deuteron, form factor, tensor polarization, internal target, elastic
pacs:
13.40.-f, 13.40.Gp, 13.85.Dz, 13.88.+e, 25.30.Bf, 27.10.+h

Understanding the structure and properties of the nucleon-nucleon system is a cornerstone of nuclear physics. Classic studies of the properties of the bound state, (the deuteron) like the magnetic and quadrupole moments, have elucidated the non-relativistic SS- and DD-state wave function components. However, modern polarized beams and targets provide new tools to revisit this subject to provide more stringent tests of our understanding. Spin-dependent quasielastic (e,ep)(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) electron scattering from both vector and tensor polarized deuterium provides unique access to the orbital angular momentum structure of the deuteron, which is inaccessible in unpolarized scattering Boeglin:2014gda . The combination of a pure, highly polarized gas target internal to a storage ring with an intense, highly polarized electron beam and a large acceptance detector allows the simultaneous measurement of the asymmetries as a function of initial-state proton momentum and momentum transfer. To see the direct effects of the DD-state, initial-state momenta up to 500 MeV/c are required. Further, nucleon-nucleon correlations with high relative momenta are known to play a significant role in nuclear structure Hen2016 . The tensor force between the neutron and proton can be probed via final-state interaction (FSI) effects in spin-dependent quasielastic H2(e,ep){}^{2}{\rm H}(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) at large initial-state momenta Jeschonnek:2017 ; Mayer:2016zmv . In this Letter, we report on new measurements of the vector and tensor asymmetries in quasielastic (e,ep)(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) scattering from deuterium over a broad range of kinematics and compare with theoretical calculations.

The deuteron’s simple structure enables reliable calculations to be performed in sophisticated theoretical frameworks. These calculations use nucleon-nucleon potentials as input, which show that the ground-state wave function is dominated by the SS-state at low relative proton-neutron momentum 𝒑{\bm{p}}. The tensor component of the NN interaction generates an additional DD-state component. Models predict that the SS- and DD-state components strongly depend on 𝒑{\bm{p}}. In the H2(e,ep){}^{2}{\rm H}(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) reaction, energy ν\nu and three-momentum 𝒒\bm{q} are transferred to the deuteron. The cross section can be measured as a function of the missing momentum 𝒑m𝒒𝒑f{\bm{p}_{m}}\equiv{\bm{q}}-{\bm{p}_{f}}, where 𝒑f{\bm{p}_{f}} is the measured momentum of the ejected proton.

The cross section can be written in terms of the unpolarized cross section S0S_{0} multiplied by asymmetries diluted by various combinations of the beam’s longitudinal polarization hh, the target vector polarization PzP_{z}, and the target tensor polarization PzzP_{zz} Aren1992 as:

dσdωdΩedΩpnCM\displaystyle\frac{d\sigma}{d\omega d\Omega_{e}d\Omega^{CM}_{pn}} =\displaystyle= S0[ 1+PzAdV+PzzAdT\displaystyle S_{0}\,[\,1+P_{z}A^{V}_{d}+P_{zz}A^{T}_{d} (1)
+h(Ae+PzAedV+PzzAedT)]\displaystyle\,+\,h\,(\,A_{e}+P_{z}A^{V}_{ed}+P_{zz}A^{T}_{ed}\,)\,]

In the Born approximation AeA_{e}, AdVA^{V}_{d}, and AedTA^{T}_{ed} are all zero. In a purely SS-state AdTA^{T}_{d} is also zero but will vary from zero as DD-state contributions become important providing a measure of the tensor component of the NN interaction. Similarly, AedVA^{V}_{ed} will vary from hPzhP_{z} as DD-state contributions become significant.

Previous measurements of the asymmetries AdTA^{T}_{d} up to pm=p_{m}= 150 MeV/c NIKHEF:1999 and of AedVA^{V}_{ed} up to pm=p_{m}= 350 MeV/c NIKHEF:2002 were carried out at NIKHEF. These pioneering measurements did not have the kinematic reach to observe the effects of the DD-state in AedVA^{V}_{ed} or the FSI effects in AdTA^{T}_{d}.

Our experiment was carried out with the Bates Large Acceptance Spectrometer Toroid (BLAST) Hasell:2009 ; Hasell:2011 . The BLAST experiment; including details on the detector, the South Hall Ring (SHR) of the MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center, the longitudinal polarized electron beam, the atomic beam source Cheever:2006 (ABS) that produced the vector and tensor polarized deuterium, and the experimental operation; has been described extensively in the cited references and will not be repeated here.

The target spin states were switched every 5 minutes. The longitudinal beam polarization was reversed every injection cycle and was monitored continuously using a Compton back-scattering polarimeter. The average polarization was h=0.6558±0.007(stat)±0.04(sys)h=0.6558\pm 0.007{\rm(stat)}\pm 0.04{\rm(sys)}.

The data were taken in two separate running periods and acquired simultaneously with the BLAST measurements of GEnG^{n}_{E} Geis:2008 and T20T_{20} Zhang:2011 . The average target spin angles were 31.3°±0.43°31.3\degree\pm 0.43\degree and 47.4°±0.45°47.4\degree\pm 0.45\degree with respect to the beam axis for the two run periods. The target spin angle was in the horizontal plane pointing into the left sector and was determined using elastic electron-deuteron scattering Zhang:2011 . Electrons scattered into the right (left) sector delivered momentum transfer predominantly parallel (perpendicular) to the target spin vector, so-called same sector (opposing sector) kinematics.

The average product of beam and target polarization was determined from measuring AedVA^{V}_{ed} in the H2(e,ep){}^{2}\vec{\rm H}(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) reaction in the quasielastic limit (low missing momentum, pm<0.1p_{m}<0.1 GeV/c) where the reaction is close to elastic epep scattering. The results were hPz=0.5796±0.0034(stat)±0.0054(syst)hP_{z}=0.5796\pm 0.0034{\rm(stat)}\pm 0.0054{\rm(syst)} in the first run and 0.5149±0.0043(stat)±0.0054(syst)0.5149\pm 0.0043{\rm(stat)}\pm 0.0054{\rm(syst)} in the second run. In parallel, hPzhP_{z} was similarly determined from the quasielastic H2(e,en){}^{2}\vec{\rm H}(\vec{e},e^{\prime}n) reaction and was found to be in good agreement.

The target tensor polarizations were determined from fits to the elastic electron-deuteron observable T20T_{20} Zhang:2011 using parameterizations to previous data Abbott:2000 . The results were Pzz=0.683±0.015±0.013±0.034P_{zz}=0.683\pm 0.015\pm 0.013\pm 0.034 and 0.563±0.013±0.023±0.0280.563\pm 0.013\pm 0.023\pm 0.028, where the three uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and due to the parametrization of T20T_{20}, in that order.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Histograms (color online) of the yields versus missing mass for target spin angle 31°\approx 31\degree without (red) and with (black) Čerenkov cuts for 0.1<Q2<0.50.1<Q^{2}<0.5 (GeV/c)2 for opposing (left) and same (right) sector kinematics.

The event selection is described in detail in the theses of A. Maschinot Maschinot and A. DeGrush DeGrush . Briefly, electron-proton coincidence events were selected using a series of PID, timing, and vertex cuts. Events were chosen with two oppositely charged (curvature) tracks in opposing sectors. The Čerenkov detectors were used to distinguish electrons from π\pi^{-} and time of flight was used to select proton events while rejecting events with π+\pi^{+} or a deuteron. To ensure that the two particles came from the same event, a cut was placed on the relative separation of their vertices in the target |zpze|<5|z_{p}-z_{e}|<5 cm. Once these events were selected each track’s kinematic variables, (pe,θe,ϕe,ze)(p_{e},\theta_{e},\phi_{e},z_{e}) for the electron and (pp,θp,ϕp,zp)(p_{p},\theta_{p},\phi_{p},z_{p}) for the proton, were used to determine the variables (Q2,pm,mm)(Q^{2},p_{m},m_{m}). The quasielastic events were selected by placing a 2.5σ2.5\sigma cut around the peak of the missing mass spectrum (see Fig. 1) representing the remaining neutron.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Beam vector asymmetries AedVA^{V}_{ed} for 0.1<Q2<0.50.1<Q^{2}<0.5 (GeV/c)2 vs. pmp_{m}. Panels (a) and (c) refer to same sector kinematics for target spin angles 31\approx 31^{\circ} and 47\approx 47^{\circ}. Panels (b) and (d) refer to opposing sector kinematics for the same target spin angles.

After background subtraction and correcting for false asymmetries determined from the empty target runs the resulting yield in the various Q2Q^{2} and pmp_{m} bins could be determined for the combinations of beam and deuterium vector and tensor orientations (±\pm1, ±\pm1 or 0, +1 or -2) for which data was collected. The charge normalized yields or event rates could be combined to give the desired asymmetries. For this paper:

S0\displaystyle S_{0} =\displaystyle= 16[R(1,1,1)+R(1,1,1)\displaystyle\frac{1}{6}[R(1,1,1)+R(-1,1,1) (2)
+R(1,1,1)+R(1,1,1)\displaystyle+R(1,-1,1)+R(-1,-1,1)
+2R(1,0,2)+2R(1,0,2)]\displaystyle+2R(1,0,-2)+2R(-1,0,-2)]
AedV\displaystyle A^{V}_{ed} =\displaystyle= 14hPzS0[R(1,1,1)R(1,1,1)\displaystyle\frac{1}{4hP_{z}S_{0}}[R(1,1,1)-R(-1,1,1) (3)
R(1,1,1)+R(1,1,1)]\displaystyle-R(1,-1,1)+R(-1,-1,1)]
AdT\displaystyle A^{T}_{d} =\displaystyle= 112PzzS0[R(1,1,1)+R(1,1,1)\displaystyle\frac{1}{12P_{zz}S_{0}}[R(1,1,1)+R(-1,1,1) (4)
+R(1,1,1)+R(1,1,1)\displaystyle+R(1,-1,1)+R(-1,-1,1)
2R(1,0,2)+2R(1,0,2)]\displaystyle-2R(1,0,-2)+-2R(-1,0,-2)]

where R(h,Pz,Pzz)R(h,P_{z},P_{zz}) is the charge normalized yield or event rate for each spin orientation combination.

Radiative corrections to the asymmetries were calculated using the MASCARAD code MASCARAD and all found to be less than 1%. Thus, no corrections were applied to the asymmetries but a systematic uncertainty of ±1\pm 1% was included. Background arose predominantly from beam collisions with the target cell wall. Estimates for this rate were made by acquiring data with and without gas in the target cell. Background was subtracted on a bin-by-bin basis and increased from a typical value of <1<1% at low pmp_{m} to of order 10% at the highest pmp_{m}.

The beam-vector asymmetries AedVA^{V}_{ed} for the runs with the two target spin orientations are shown in Fig. 2. The data are shown in same sector and opposing sector kinematics as a function of the missing momentum pmp_{m} for momentum transfers 0.1<Q2<0.50.1<Q^{2}<0.5 (GeV/c)2. The values of pmp_{m} extend up to about 500 MeV/c and the data are compared with theoretical calculations based on the model of Arenhövel, Leidemann, and Tomusiak Aren2005 . The model was calculated for the kinematics of the experiment folding in the detector acceptances and efficiencies in a comprehensive GEANT simulation. The curves shown in each plot correspond to a plane-wave Born approximation (PWBA) which includes the coupling to the neutron, a PWBA with final state interactions (FSI) and a full calculation beyond PWBA+FSI including the effects of meson-exchange currents (MEC), isobar configurations (IC) and relativistic corrections (RC). The two-body wave functions needed for the calculation of the observables are based on the realistic Bonn potential Bonn1987 , which is defined in purely nucleonic space. The theoretical calculations were found to be insensitive to the choice of different realistic potentials (e.g. Reid Reid:1968 , Paris Paris:1980 , Argonne V14 and V18 Argonne:1995 ). The treatment of MEC, IC, and RC is done consistently according to Aren2005 ; Bonn1997 .

At the pm=0p_{m}=0 limit the opposing sector asymmetries are directly proportional to the product hPzhP_{z}, a key parameter that has been determined with better than 1% absolute accuracy. The target vector polarization PzP_{z} is directly related to the polarization PP of the proton or neutron bound in the deuteron such that Aren1988

P\displaystyle P =\displaystyle= 23Pz(PS12PD)\displaystyle\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}P_{z}(P_{S}-\frac{1}{2}P_{D}) (5)

where PSP_{S} and PDP_{D} are the SS- and DD-state probabilities of the deuteron, respectively. This illustrates the fact that the polarization of a nucleon in the DD-state is opposite to that of a nucleon in the SS-state, as expected from angular momentum considerations for a Jπ=1+J^{\pi}=1^{+} system like the deuteron. The present results for the AedVA^{V}_{ed} asymmetries show for the first time the evolution going from the SS-state to the DD-state in momentum space. The AedVA^{V}_{ed} are constant up to about pm=150p_{m}=150 MeV/c which is consistent with an SS-state, then as pmp_{m} increases, the presence of the DD-state lowers the proton polarization in the deuteron until it changes sign when PD2PSP_{D}\geq 2P_{S}.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Tensor asymmetries AdTA^{T}_{d} for 0.1<Q2<0.50.1<Q^{2}<0.5 (GeV/c)2 vs. pmp_{m}. Panels (a) and (c) refer to same sector kinematics for target spin angles 32\approx 32^{\circ} and 47\approx 47^{\circ}. Panels (b) and (d) refer to opposing sector kinematics for the same target spin angles.

Figure 2 shows that the experimental asymmetries AedVA^{V}_{ed} are in good agreement with the full theoretical calculations over a wide range of Q2Q^{2} and pmp_{m}. The only previous measurement of AedVA^{V}_{ed} was carried out in perpendicular kinematics at NIKHEF NIKHEF:2002 up to pmp_{m} of about 300 MeV/c, although with limited statical precision after 200 MeV/c. The BLAST data in the region of pmp_{m} around 200 MeV/c, where the SS- and DD-states strongly interfere, are very well described by the full theoretical calculation in contrast to the claim in NIKHEF:2002 where the data suggested an underestimation by the theory. The AedVA^{V}_{ed} asymmetries directly relate to the deuteron momentum distribution for the Md=±1M_{d}=\pm 1 spin states. It has been pointed out Forest1996 that the Md=1M_{d}=1 momentum distribution has a zero around 300 MeV/c, which in a simple picture can be related to the dimensions of the toroidal shape of the density distribution. The Fourier transform of the deuteron density calculated in the model of Ref. Forest1996 yields a zero at 320 MeV/c for the Md=1M_{d}=1 momentum distribution DeGrush , which is where the AedVA^{V}_{ed} asymmetries in Fig. 2 have their zero-crossings. This zero crossing was also predicted by Jeschonnek and Donnelly Donnelly1998 using an improved treatment of the non-relativistic reduction of the electromagnetic current operator.

Figure 3 shows the tensor analyzing powers AdTA^{T}_{d} as a function of pmp_{m} for the same kinematics and target spin orientations as that of Fig. 2, and compared also with the same theoretical model folded with the detector acceptances and efficiencies. Just as for AedVA^{V}_{ed} the only previous measurement of AdTA^{T}_{d} was carried out in parallel kinematics at NIKHEF NIKHEF:1999 up to pmp_{m} of only 150 MeV/c with limited statistics. The BLAST AdTA^{T}_{d} data extend up to pmp_{m} = 500 MeV/c and for the first time into the region where the DD-state dominates over the SS-state. As expected, where the SS-state dominates, the AdTA^{T}_{d} are small and well described by the theoretical calculations, including the simple PWBA. Beyond about pmp_{m} = 150 MeV/c AdTA^{T}_{d} grows, indicating the effect of the tensor polarization. The PWBA calculations show that the sign is different for the AdTA^{T}_{d} in same sector and opposing sector kinematics.

As shown in Fig. 3, in contrast to the vector asymmetries AedVA^{V}_{ed}, the tensor asymmetries AdTA^{T}_{d} are significantly modified by the effects of the FSI for pm150p_{m}\geq 150 MeV/c. In same sector kinematics, the effects of FSI bring the AdTA^{T}_{d} calculations into reasonable agreement with the present data. In opposing sector kinematics, the effects of the FSI are also sizable but not sufficient to agree with the data; the effects of MEC and IC contribute equally after FSI to produce the full calculations of Fig. 3. The kinematic reach of the BLAST data is such that the proton-neutron interaction is sampled via the FSI over a large spatial range: from short distances, where the nucleons are expected to overlap, to long distances where the interaction is dominated by one-pion-exchange. The AdTA^{T}_{d} data at pm250p_{m}\geq 250 MeV/c are particularly sensitive to the tensor part of the interaction at short distances, where it has significant model dependence Forest1996 . It is to be noted that the theoretical model used here works well, given that it is mainly based on nucleon degrees of freedom.

We have presented data for the vector AedVA^{V}_{ed} and tensor AdTA^{T}_{d} spin asymmetries from the deuteron for 0.1<Q2<0.50.1<Q^{2}<0.5  (GeV/c)2. The asymmetries were mapped out for quasielastic kinematics (e,ep)(\vec{e},e^{\prime}p) over a range of pmp_{m} up to 500\sim 500 MeV/c. The data were taken using an internal deuterium gas target polarized in both vector and tensor spin states that minimized systematic errors. This was done simultaneously with precise measurements of the elastic Zhang:2011 and the (e,en)(e,e^{\prime}n) Geis:2008 channels that also permitted measurements of PzzP_{zz} and PzP_{z}. The new data are in good agreement with theoretical calculations and provide a strong constraint on our understanding of deuteron structure and the tensor force between a neutron and a proton. The DD-state contribution is clearly evident in both asymmetries as pmp_{m} increases and highlights the importance of measurements at large pmp_{m}. The tensor asymmetries with same and opposing sector kinematics probes the proton-neutron interaction over a large spatial range. These results and approach are important for future theoretical calculations and experiments that study the deuteron and details of the proton-neutron interaction.

Acknowledgements.
We thank the staff at the MIT-Bates Linear Accelerator Center for the high quality electron beam and their technical support. We thank H. Arenhövel for many enlightening discussions. This work has been supported in part by the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Physics and by the National Science Foundation.

References

  • (1) W.U. Boeglin, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 543 012011, (2014).
  • (2) O. Hen, G. Miller, E. Piasetzky and L.B. Weinstein, arXiv: 1611.09748, to be published in Reviews of Modern Physics.
  • (3) S. Jeschonnek and J.W. Van Orden, Phys. Rev. C95, 044001 (2017).
  • (4) M. Mayer et al., Phys. Rev. C95, 024005 (2017)
  • (5) H. Arenhövel, W. Leidemann, and E.L. Tomusiak, Phys. Rev. C46, 455 (1992).
  • (6) Z.L. Zhou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 687 (1999).
  • (7) I. Passchier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 102302 (2002).
  • (8) D.K. Hasell et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A603, 247 (2009).
  • (9) D.K. Hasell et al., Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 61, 409 (2011).
  • (10) D. Cheever et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A556, 410 (2006).
  • (11) E. Geis et al. (The BLAST Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 042501 (2008).
  • (12) C. Zhang et al. (The BLAST Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 252501 (2011).
  • (13) D. Abbott et al., Eur. Phys. J. A7, 421 (2000).
  • (14) A. Maschinot, Ph.D. thesis, MIT (2005), http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34390.
  • (15) A. DeGrush, Ph.D. thesis, MIT (2010), http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/62644.
  • (16) A. Afanasev, I. Akushevich, and N. Merenkov, Phys. Rev. D64, 113009 (2001).
  • (17) H. Arenhövel, W. Leidemann, and E.L. Tomusiak, Eur. Phys. J. A23, 147–190 (2005).
  • (18) R. Machleidt, K. Holinde, Ch. Ester, Phys. Rep. 149, 1 (1987).
  • (19) R. Reid, Ann. Phys. 50, 411 (1968).
  • (20) M. Lacombe et al., Phys. Rev. C21 861 (1980).
  • (21) R. Wiringa, V.G.J. Stoks, and R. Schiavilla, Phys. Rev. C51 38 (1995).
  • (22) F. Ritz, H. Goller, T. Wilbois, H. Arenhovel, Phys. Rev. C55, 2214 (1997).
  • (23) H. Arenhövel, W. Leidemann, and E.L. Tomusiak, Z. Phys. Rev. A331, 123–138 (1988).
  • (24) J.L. Forest et al., Phys. Rev. C54, 646 (1996).
  • (25) S. Jeschonnek and T.W. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. C57, 2438 (1998).