Present address: ]Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA.
Mixed-symmetry octupole and hexadecapole excitations in the isotones
Abstract
Background: Excitations with mixed proton-neutron symmetry have been previously observed in the isotones. Besides the well established quadrupole mixed-symmetry states (MSS), octupole and hexadecapole MSS have been recently proposed for the nuclei 92Zr and 94Mo.
Purpose: The heaviest stable isotone 96Ru was investigated to study the evolution of octupole and hexadecapole MSS with increasing proton number.
Methods: Two inelastic proton-scattering experiments on 96Ru were performed to extract branching ratios, multipole mixing ratios, and level lifetimes. From the combined data, absolute transition strengths were calculated.
Results: Strong transitions between the lowest-lying and states were observed, providing evidence for a one-phonon mixed-symmetry character of the and states.
Conclusions: -IBM-2 calculations were performed for 96Ru. The results are in excellent agreement with the experimental data, pointing out a one-phonon hexadecapole mixed-symmetry character of the state. The matrix element is found to scale with the matrix element.
pacs:
21.10.Re, 21.10.Tg, 23.20.Lv, 21.60.EvIntroduction. Protons and neutrons are the building blocks of atomic nuclei, which feature collective excitations which are symmetric or not symmetric with respect to the proton-neutron degree of freedom Heyde and Sau (1986). Excitations resulting from the antisymmetric coupling of proton and neutron eigenstates are usually referred to as mixed-symmetry states (MSS), whereas the symmetric coupling results in fully-symmetric states (FSS) Iachello (1984). Mixed-symmetry quadrupole excitations are predicted within the proton-neutron version of the interacting boson model (-IBM-2) Arima and Iachello (1975); Arima et al. (1977); Otsuka et al. (1978); van Isacker et al. (1986), where - and -bosons are obtained by coupling protons and neutrons to pairs with angular momentum and , respectively. In the IBM-2, MSS and FSS can be distinguished by their -spin quantum number Arima et al. (1977); Otsuka et al. (1978), which is the bosonic analog of isospin for fermions. Strong -vector () transitions from MSS to their symmetric counterparts are predicted by the model. In the IBM-1, where proton and neutron bosons are not distinguished, transitions with a one-body transition operator are forbidden. Thus, transitions serve as a key signature for MSS Heyde et al. (2010); Pietralla et al. (2008).
Mixed-symmetry quadrupole excitations are well established in the stable isotones Pietralla et al. (1999, 2000, 2001); Werner et al. (2002); Klein et al. (2002); Fransen et al. (2003, 2005); Linnemann et al. (2005); Orce et al. (2006); Pietralla et al. (2008), see Ref. Pietralla et al. (2008) for a review. In addition, the existence of higher-order multipolarity mixed-symmetry states has been recently proposed for the isotones 92Zr and 94Mo, namely, of octupole () Fransen et al. (2003); Smirnova et al. (2000); Scheck et al. (2010) and hexadecapole () character Fransen et al. (2003, 2005); Casperson et al. (2013). As for the quadrupole MSS, experimental evidence came from the observation of remarkably strong transition strengths in the order of between the lowest-lying and states, respectively.
Candidates for octupole excitations with mixed-symmetry character have been proposed in various nuclei in the mass region Scheck et al. (2010), among others also in the isotones 92Zr and 94Mo Fransen et al. (2005, 2003). MS octupole excitations were predicted in -IBM-2 calculations Smirnova et al. (2000). Along with the fingerprint, a sizable transition to the FS one-phonon quadrupole state is expected in the limit, according to the two-body nature of the operator Pietralla et al. (2003); Scheck et al. (2010). In addition, a strong transition to the MS one-phonon quadrupole state has been observed in the case of 94Mo.
Recently, the strong transition between the lowest-lying states of 94Mo was successfully reproduced within the -IBM-2 without abandoning the description of quadrupole MSS Casperson et al. (2013), suggesting the strong transition to result from MS and FS one-phonon hexadecapole components in the and states, respectively. Additional evidence for this interpretation is provided by shell-model calculations for 92Zr and 94Mo Werner et al. (2002); Lisetskiy et al. (2000); Fransen et al. (2003), indicating dominant , configurations for the lowest-lying states. These are by definition identified with -bosons in the IBM; here, denotes the seniority.
The study in Ref. Casperson et al. (2013) was based on the only experimentally known case at that time. The intention of the present work is to show, that the case of 94Mo is not exceptional, but that the presence of hexadecapole components in the wave functions of low-lying states in near-spherical nuclei is a general phenomenon. For this purpose, we have studied the heaviest stable isotone 96Ru in two proton-scattering experiments. In addition, the structure of the low-lying states was investigated in the framework of -IBM-2 calculations. Details on the experimental aspects will be given in a more extensive article.
Experiments. To identify MSS based on absolute transition strength, two inelastic proton scattering experiments were performed. The first one at the Wright Nuclear Structure Laboratory (WNSL) at Yale University, USA, the second one at the Institute for Nuclear Physics at the University of Cologne, Germany.
In the former, an proton beam, provided by the ESTU Tandem Accelerator, impinged on a enriched 96Ru target, supported by a 12C backing with a thickness of . The scattered protons were detected using five silicon surface-barrier detectors, positioned predominantly at backward angles. For the -ray detection, eight BGO-shielded Clover-type HPGe detectors of the YRAST Ball spectrometer Beausang et al. (2000) were used. Further information on the experimental setup can be found in Ref. Elvers et al. (2011). From the energy information of scattered protons, the excitation energy was deduced on an event-by-event basis. Thus, -decay branching ratios were extracted with high sensitivity from the acquired coincidence data by gating on a specific excitation energy Wilhelm et al. (1996). Spin quantum numbers and multipole mixing ratios were obtained by means of the angular-correlation technique Krane et al. (1973).
For the extraction of level lifetimes, a second proton-scattering experiment was performed at the Institute for Nuclear Physics at the University of Cologne. The same target was bombarded with a proton beam, provided by the 10 MV FN Tandem accelerator. For the coincident detection of the scattered protons and de-exciting -rays, the particle-detector array SONIC, equipped with six passivated implanted planar silicon (PIPS) detectors, was embedded within the -ray spectrometer HORUS. Nuclear level lifetimes were measured by means of the Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) Alexander and Forster (1978); Petkov et al. (1998) using coincidence data Seaman et al. (1969). Peak centroids were extracted from -ray spectra that were gated on the excitation energy of the level of interest. This way, feeding from higher-lying states is eliminated. The stopping process of the recoil nuclei in the target and stopper material was modeled by means of a Monte-Carlo simulation Currie (1969) using the computer code dstop96 Petkov et al. (1998) which is based on the code desastop Winter (1983). More detailed information on the experimental technique and the data analysis will be the subject of an upcoming publication. Absolute transition strengths were finally calculated from the combined experimental data of both experiments.
Mixed-symmetry octupole excitations. For the state of 96Ru at , a negative parity has been previously assigned based on the observation of a decay to the state at Adamides et al. (1986). As in Klein et al. (2002), this decay was not confirmed in the present experiments. However, since the candidates of 94Mo () and 92Zr () have been observed at similar excitation energies, a negative parity was assigned tentatively. With this assumption, an transition strength of was obtained for the transition. Therewith, the state is a likely candidate for the one-phonon MS octupole state. As for the case of 94Mo, an strength of to the known state at was obtained. However, only a weak strength of was extracted for the transition.
As expected for collective excitations, the matrix element scales with the one for the transition for several nuclei in the mass region Scheck et al. (2010), in particular also for the isotones 92Zr and 94Mo. With the bare factors ( and ), a value of is predicted in the limit of the -IBM-2 for the ratio of the matrix elements Smirnova et al. (2000). The experimental ratios are close to unity but stay rather constant Scheck et al. (2010). Only the value for 96Mo deviates from the others by a factor of 2. From our new data, we calculated a ratio of for 96Ru, close to the value for 96Mo. The deviation of the ratio for 96Ru compared to the values for the other isotones might result from the more -like structure of 96Ru compared to, e.g., 94Mo (see below).
Hexadecapole excitations. For the state of 96Ru at , a positive parity was assigned because of a newly observed -decay to the state. A lifetime of has been previously reported for this state Adamides et al. (1986), characterized by large uncertainties in the determination of the Doppler-shift attenuation factor. From our present analysis a lifetime of was extracted. Figure 1 shows the centroid energy of the -transition as a function of , where is the angle between the initial direction of motion of the recoil nucleus and the direction of the -ray emission. For the transition to the state, an transition strength of was derived, which is even stronger than the strength of the transition Pietralla et al. (2001). The strength between the lowest-lying states of 94Mo is of comparable size Fransen et al. (2003). Hence, the state is a likely candidate to show one-phonon hexadecapole MS contributions.

-IBM-2 calculations. The first -IBM-2 calculations on the isotones were performed by Casperson et al. for the nucleus 94Mo Casperson et al. (2013). For the first time, the strong transition between the lowest-lying states in 94Mo was reproduced without deteriorating the description of the well established quadrupole mixed-symmetry features. Motivated by this work, we chose the same Hamiltonian and transition operators for the description of 96Ru:
(1) | |||||
with
(2) | |||||
and . The and transition operators are defined as
(3) |
and
(4) |
respectively. For detailed information on the Hamiltonian and the transition operators, see Casperson et al. (2013). The calculations were performed with the computer code ArbModel Heinze (2008). The number of valence bosons was chosen with respect to 100Sn as inert core, resulting in and .
Parameter | 96Ru | 94Mo |
---|---|---|
To reduce the number of parameters, the proton -factors and were set equal and the neutron effective charges and factors and were set to zero, as were the parameters and . To fix the remaining five free parameters of the Hamiltonian, a parameter scan was performed to optimize the calculation to reproduce the energy of the state, the ratio, the ratio, the energy of the known one-phonon quadrupole MSS, which is the state of 96Ru Pietralla et al. (2001), and the ratio.
The effective charges set the scale for transitions and were fixed to reproduce the value. The factor was fixed to describe the value. The obtained parameters are quoted in Table 1 and are similar to those obtained for 94Mo Casperson et al. (2013). The larger value of for 96Ru indicates a more -like structure compared to 94Mo. Only little difference is found for the excitation energies of the and bosons for 96Ru, governed by the parameter .
The -IBM-2 with the chosen Hamiltonian and parameters is a simplified approach. A more sophisticated description has to include for example non-vanishing parameters to allow contributions. However, the choice of would result in a breaking of -spin symmetry, which was avoided to maintain a clear distinction between MSS and FSS. In addition, the chosen Hamiltonian conserves -parity Pietralla et al. (1998).

The calculated level scheme is in good agreement with the data, as shown in Fig. 2. In particular, the excitation energies of the states are well reproduced. Only for the excitation energies of the and states significant deviations from the experimental values were obtained.
Energies | Transition strengths B() | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exp. | IBM | ||||||
2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | - | - | - | - | |
1 | 3.154 | 2.944 | 0.17(5)111A value of was reported in Linnemann et al. (2005). | 0.13 | |||
2 | 0.832 | 0.832 | 18.1(5)222Adopted from Klein et al. (2002). | 18.4 | |||
2 | 1.932 | 2.165 | 0.05(2) | 0 | |||
28(9)333A value of was reported in Klein et al. (2002). | 24 | ||||||
1 | 2.283 | 2.322 | 0.69(14)444A value of was reported in Pietralla et al. (2001). | 0.69 | |||
1.36(19) | 2.53 | ||||||
2 | 2.852 | 3.072 | 0 | ||||
0.008(1) | 0 | ||||||
14.7 | |||||||
1 | 2.898 | 3.158 | 3.17 | ||||
0.02(4) | 0 | ||||||
0.078(14) | 0.563 | ||||||
2 | 1.518 | 1.523 | 22.6(17)b | 25.6 | |||
- | 1.09 | ||||||
1 | 2.462 | 2.482 | 0.90(18) | 1.13 | |||
1.52(19) | 1.44 | ||||||
10.5 | |||||||
- | 0.55 | ||||||
2 | - | 2.884 | - | 0 | |||
- | 0 | ||||||
2 | - | 3.025 | - | 0.84 | |||
- | 0 |
The experimental and calculated level energies as well as the and transition strengths are compiled in Table 2. As for the level scheme, the transition strengths are in overall agreement. Only the transitions depopulating the states are predicted too strong by about one order of magnitude. For transitions which are forbidden for the applied Hamiltonian, only small transition strengths are observed experimentally. Of particular interest for the investigation of hexadecapole components in the states is the transition. The IBM predicts a transition strength of which is close to the experimental value of . No other state is found to show enhanced transitions to the state in the calculations. Also the transition strength is reproduced by the model. The predicted branching with sizable strength of to the state is way below the experimental sensitivity limit.
The predicted -spin quantum numbers are shown in Table 2 as well. -spin quantum numbers of are obtained for the , , , and states. From their decay properties, the state and the and states can be identified as the experimentally known one- and two-phonon quadrupole MSS, respectively Pietralla et al. (2001); Klein et al. (2002). They will be discussed in an upcoming publication. A mixed-symmetry character is also predicted for the state. A variation of the strength parameters and revealed, that the state is most sensitive to the operator. Thus a one-phonon mixed-symmetry hexadecapole character is obtained for the state. In contrast, a fully-symmetric character is predicted for the state based on the calculated -spin quantum number.
To quantify the amount of strength of the transition related to the - and -boson parts of the operator, the matrix element was recalculated with the values and , respectively. The respective other value was kept at the value obtained from the parameter scan. With a contribution of the matrix element is dominated by the -boson part of the operator, while only is related to the -boson part.

The - and -boson contents of the low-lying, positive-parity low-spin states are shown in Fig. 3. With a value of , the largest -boson content is obtained for the state, supporting the one-phonon hexadecapole assignment. A similar -boson contribution is predicted for the state. This can be explained assuming a dominant structure. In this case the transition to the state would be forbidden by -parity selection rules. This is supported by the calculation and is in remarkable agreement with the data (see Table 2). Also for the state a large -boson content is obtained which is considerably enhanced compared to, e.g., the state, which is known to be the member of the () triplet. In addition to the -boson content, a -boson contribution of about is predicted by the IBM for the state. For the chosen parameter of , a mixing of the one-phonon -boson excitation with two-phonon -boson excitations is allowed, which are at similar energies. This is also reflected by the collective transition strength. In contrast, the -boson content of the state is a factor of 2 less compared to the state.
If the enhanced -boson contributions can be attributed to one-phonon hexadecapole contents in the wave functions, this should lead to sizable strengths. The transition operator was defined in the same way as in Casperson et al. (2013), namely
(5) |
Since no strengths are known for 96Ru so far, the value was arbitrarily set to . With this, transition strengths of and are predicted for the and states, respectively. Their strengths are enhanced compared to, e.g., that of the state. However, a similar transition to the ground state is predicted for the state as well. Further constraints for the transition operator might be obtained from a measurement of strengths, e.g., in experiments.
To conclude, the -IBM-2 calculations provide strong evidences for MS and FS one-phonon hexadecapole contributions to the lowest-lying states of 96Ru. However, other mechanisms, such as the factors of the individual microscopic configurations in their wave functions have to be considered as well as being responsible for the generation of strengths between low-lying states. They might be studied within the scope of shell-model calculations with realistic interactions or the quasiparticle phonon model (QPM).
Comparison to 92Zr and 94Mo. With the new experimental data obtained in this work, one-phonon MSS of quadrupole and possible octupole and hexadecapole character were studied in the isotones as a function of proton number. Figure 4 shows the transition strengths of the one-phonon MS to FS states for the different multipolarities for the nuclei 92Zr, 94Mo, and 96Ru. While for the quadrupole states an increase of strength is observed with increasing proton number, the strength decreases from 94Mo to 96Ru for higher multipolarities. It has to be mentioned, that the decrease might be related to a possible fragmentation of the one-phonon octupole and hexadecapole mixed-symmetry states which can not be excluded on the basis of the present experimental data.

The trend for the quadrupole states agrees with shell-model calculations, predicting a maximum strength for 96Ru, based on the concept of configuration isospin polarization (CIP) Holt et al. (2007). Unfortunately, no results on states were reported in Ref. Holt et al. (2007). The decrease of the strengths for the states with increasing proton number is not reproduced by the IBM, which predicts a similar trend as for the quadrupole states.
Summary. The observation of strong transitions in 96Ru between the lowest-lying and states provides experimental evidence for one-phonon mixed-symmetry octupole and hexadecapole components in the wavefunctions of the and states, respectively. The interpretation on the latter is supported by -IBM-2 calculations. Together with the results of Ref. Casperson et al. (2013), the new data on 96Ru suggest that the presence of hexadecapole components in the wave functions of low-lying states is a general phenomenon in near spherical nuclei.
Acknowledgments. The authors thank R. Casperson and S. Heinze for support with the IBM calculations and A. Poves for useful discussions. Furthermore, we highly acknowledge the support of the accelerator staff at WNSL, Yale and IKP, Cologne during the beam times. This work is supported by the DFG under grant No. ZI 510/4-2 and grant No. SFB 634, the U.S. Department of Energy grant No. DE-FG02-01ER40609, and the BMBF grant No. 05P12RDFN8. P.P. is grateful for the financial support of the Bulgarian Science Fund under contract DFNI-E 01/2. D.R. and D.S. acknowledge the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) for financial support. S.G.P. and M.S. are supported by the Bonn-Cologne Graduate School of Physics and Astronomy.
References
- Heyde and Sau (1986) K. Heyde and J. Sau, Phys. Rev. C 33, 1050 (1986).
- Iachello (1984) F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1427 (1984).
- Arima and Iachello (1975) A. Arima and F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1069 (1975).
- Arima et al. (1977) A. Arima, T. Otsuka, F. Iachello, and I. Talmi, Phys. Lett. B 66, 205 (1977).
- Otsuka et al. (1978) T. Otsuka, A. Arima, and F. Iachello, Nucl. Phys. A 309, 1 (1978).
- van Isacker et al. (1986) P. van Isacker, K. Heyde, J. Jolie, and A. Sevrin, Ann. Phys. 171, 253 (1986).
- Heyde et al. (2010) K. Heyde, P. von Neumann-Cosel, and A. Richter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2365 (2010).
- Pietralla et al. (2008) N. Pietralla, P. von Brentano, and A. F. Lisetskiy, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 60, 225 (2008).
- Pietralla et al. (1999) N. Pietralla, C. Fransen, D. Belic, P. von Brentano, C. Frießner, U. Kneissl, A. Linnemann, A. Nord, H. H. Pitz, T. Otsuka, I. Schneider, V. Werner, and I. Wiedenhöver, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1303 (1999).
- Pietralla et al. (2000) N. Pietralla, C. Fransen, P. von Brentano, A. Dewald, A. Fitzler, C. Frießner, and J. Gableske, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3775 (2000).
- Pietralla et al. (2001) N. Pietralla, C. J. Barton, R. Krücken, C. W. Beausang, M. A. Caprio, R. F. Casten, J. R. Cooper, A. A. Hecht, H. Newman, J. R. Novak, and N. V. Zamfir, Phys. Rev. C 64, 031301(R) (2001).
- Werner et al. (2002) V. Werner, D. Belic, P. von Brentano, C. Fransen, A. Gade, H. von Garrel, J. Jolie, U. Kneissl, C. Kohstall, A. Linnemann, A. F. Lisetskiy, N. Pietralla, H. H. Pitz, M. Scheck, K.-H. Speidel, F. Stedile, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Lett. B 550, 140 (2002).
- Klein et al. (2002) H. Klein, A. F. Lisetskiy, N. Pietralla, C. Fransen, A. Gade, and P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 65, 044315 (2002).
- Fransen et al. (2003) C. Fransen, N. Pietralla, Z. Ammar, D. Bandyopadhyay, N. Boukharouba, P. von Brentano, A. Dewald, J. Gableske, A. Gade, J. Jolie, U. Kneissl, S. R. Lesher, A. F. Lisetskiy, M. T. McEllistrem, M. Merrick, H. H. Pitz, N. Warr, V. Werner, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Rev. C 67, 024307 (2003).
- Fransen et al. (2005) C. Fransen, V. Werner, D. Bandyopadhyay, N. Boukharouba, S. R. Lesher, M. T. McEllistrem, J. Jolie, N. Pietralla, P. von Brentano, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Rev. C 71, 054304 (2005).
- Linnemann et al. (2005) A. Linnemann, C. Fransen, M. Gorska, J. Jolie, U. Kneissl, P. Knoch, D. Mücher, H. H. Pitz, M. Scheck, C. Scholl, and P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064323 (2005).
- Orce et al. (2006) J. N. Orce, J. D. Holt, A. Linnemann, C. J. McKay, S. R. Lesher, C. Fransen, J. W. Holt, A. Kumar, N. Warr, V. Werner, J. Jolie, T. T. S. Kuo, M. T. McEllistrem, N. Pietralla, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 062504 (2006).
- Smirnova et al. (2000) N. A. Smirnova, N. Pietralla, T. Mizusaki, and P. van Isacker, Nucl. Phys. A 678, 235 (2000).
- Scheck et al. (2010) M. Scheck, P. A. Butler, C. Fransen, V. Werner, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Rev. C 81, 064305 (2010).
- Casperson et al. (2013) R. J. Casperson, V. Werner, and S. Heinze, Phys. Lett. B 721, 51 (2013).
- Pietralla et al. (2003) N. Pietralla, C. Fransen, A. Gade, N. A. Smirnova, P. von Brentano, V. Werner, and S. W. Yates, Phys. Rev. C 68, 031305(R) (2003).
- Lisetskiy et al. (2000) A. F. Lisetskiy, N. Pietralla, C. Fransen, R. V. Jolos, and P. von Brentano, Nucl. Phys. A 677, 100 (2000).
- Beausang et al. (2000) C. W. Beausang, C. J. Barton, M. A. Caprio, R. F. Casten, J. R. Cooper, R. Krücken, B. Liu, J. R. Novak, Z. Wang, M. Wilhelm, A. N. Wilson, N. V. Zamfir, and A. Zilges, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 452, 431 (2000).
- Elvers et al. (2011) M. Elvers, S. Pascu, T. Ahmed, T. Ahn, V. Anagnostatou, N. Cooper, C. Deng, J. Endres, P. Goddard, A. Heinz, G. Ilie, E. Jiang, C. Küppersbusch, D. Radeck, D. Savran, N. Shenkov, V. Werner, and A. Zilges, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054323 (2011).
- Wilhelm et al. (1996) M. Wilhelm, E. Radermacher, A. Zilges, and P. von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C 54, R449 (1996).
- Krane et al. (1973) K. S. Krane, R. M. Steffen, and R. M. Wheeler, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 11, 351 (1973).
- Alexander and Forster (1978) T. K. Alexander and J. S. Forster, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 10, 197 (1978).
- Petkov et al. (1998) P. Petkov, J. Gableske, O. Vogel, A. Dewald, P. von Brentano, R. Krücken, R. Peusquens, N. Nicolay, A. Gizon, J. Gizon, D. Bazzacco, C. Rossi-Alvarez, S. Lunardi, P. Pavan, D. R. Napoli, W. Andrejtscheff, and R. V. Jolos, Nucl. Phys. A 640, 293 (1998).
- Seaman et al. (1969) G. G. Seaman, N. Benczer-Koller, M. C. Bertin, and J. R. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. 188, 1706 (1969).
- Currie (1969) W. M. Currie, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 73, 173 (1969).
- Winter (1983) G. Winter, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. 214, 537 (1983).
- Adamides et al. (1986) E. Adamides, J. Sinatkas, L. D. Skouras, A. C. Xenoulis, E. N. Gazis, C. T. Papadopoulos, and R. Vlastou, Phys. Rev. C 34, 791 (1986).
- Heinze (2008) S. Heinze, “Computer program ArbModel,” unpublished, University of Cologne (2008).
- Pietralla et al. (1998) N. Pietralla, P. von Brentano, A. Gelberg, T. Otsuka, A. Richter, N. A. Smirnova, and I. Wiedenhöver, Phys. Rev. C 58, 191 (1998).
- Holt et al. (2007) J. D. Holt, N. Pietralla, J. W. Holt, T. T. S. Kuo, and G. Rainovski, Phys. Rev. C 76, 034325 (2007).