This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Motion-selective coherent population trapping by Raman sideband cooling along two paths in a Λ\Lambda configuration

Sooyoung Park, Meung Ho Seo, Ryun Ah Kim, and D. Cho111e-mail address:cho@korea.ac.kr Department of Physics, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
Abstract

We report our experiment on sideband cooling with two Raman transitions in a Λ\Lambda configuration that allows selective coherent population trapping (CPT) of the motional ground state. The cooling method is applied to 87Rb atoms in a circularly-polarized one-dimensional optical lattice. Owing to the vector polarizability, the vibration frequency of a trapped atom depends on its Zeeman quantum number, and CPT resonance for a pair of bound states in the Λ\Lambda configuration depends on their vibrational quantum numbers. We call this scheme motion-selective coherent population trapping (MSCPT) and it is a trapped-atom analogue to the velocity-selective CPT developed for free He atoms. We observe a pronounced dip in temperature near a detuning for the Raman beams to satisfy the CPT resonance condition for the motional ground state. Although the lowest temperature we obtain is ten times the recoil limit owing to the large Lamb-Dicke parameter of 2.3 in our apparatus, the experiment demonstrates that MSCPT enhances the effectiveness of Raman sideband cooling and enlarges the range of its application. Discussions on design parameters optimized for MSCPT on 87Rb atoms and opportunities provided by diatomic polar molecules, whose Stark shift shows strong dependence on the rotational quantum number, are included.

I INTRODUCTION

Raman sideband cooling (RSC) is by far the most effective method to laser cool trapped atoms. The method can put atoms into the motional ground state with high probability when the Lamb-Dicke condition ηLD2=R/ν1\eta_{LD}^{2}=\mathcal{E}_{R}/\hbar\nu\ll 1 is satisfied. Here, ηLD\eta_{LD} is the Lamb-Dicke parameter, ν\nu is the vibrational frequency of a trapped atom, and R\mathcal{E}_{R} is the recoil energy accompanying an emission of a photon. RSC was originally developed for an ion in a Paul trap Wineland1989 where Coulomb interaction makes the Lamb-Dicke condition well satisfied. However, it is difficult to satisfy the condition in an optical dipole trap, and only a lattice configuration with a submicron confinement has ηLD1\eta_{LD}\ll 1. Early experiments applied RSC to cesium atoms in an optical lattice as a precooling stage aiming at quantum degeneracy Weiss2000 ; Chu2000 . Recently, rubidium atoms were cooled by RSC to the quantum degeneracy in a dynamically controlled optical lattice without resorting to evaporative cooling Vuletic2017 . A single atom in an optical tweezer was also cooled to the motional ground state by employing either a very tight focusing Regal2012 or an RSC sequence tailored to address high-order sidebands Ni2018 .

The order Δn\Delta n of the red sideband used in RSC should be larger than a few times ηLD2\eta_{LD}^{2} for the energy deficit by the red-detuned transition to exceed the recoil heating during an optical pumping (OP) cycle. When ηLD1\eta_{LD}\ll 1, tuning the Raman transition to the first-order red sideband achieves the net cooling, and the n=0n=0 state is the only dark state, where atoms accumulate. Here, nn is the vibrational quantum number. However, as ηLD\eta_{LD} increases, Δn\Delta n should also be increased, and the n=0n=0 state is no longer the only dark state. Atoms distribute over larger nn raising temperature above the recoil limit TR=R/kBT_{R}=\mathcal{E}_{R}/k_{B}. kBk_{B} is the Boltzmann constant. In this paper, we introduce a cooling method that incorporates nn-selective coherent population trapping (CPT) to RSC so that the motional ground state remains the only dark state even outside the Lamb-Dicke regime. We call this method motion-selective coherent population trapping (MSCPT), and it is a trapped-atom analogue to the velocity-selective coherent population trapping developed for subrecoil cooling of free He atoms VSCPT 1988 . We apply the method to 87Rb atoms in a 1D optical lattice. Although we cannot reach the subrecoil temperature because we use an existing apparatus, which is not optimal for MSCPT in a few regards, we achieve temperature of 10TR10T_{R} for the transverse motion, where ηLD=2.3\eta_{LD}=2.3, and demonstrate that the method enhances the effectiveness of RSC and enlarges the range of its application.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Inverted 𝖸\mathsf{Y} configuration for MSCPT experiment. Specific levels and transitions in 87Rb are assigned in the inset.

II Theory

Figure 1 shows the inverted 𝖸\mathsf{Y} configuration for our MSCPT experiment. In the inset, specific levels and transitions in 87Rb are assigned: |ϕ1=|5S1/2,F=2,mF=2|\phi_{1}\rangle=|5S_{1/2},F=2,m_{F}=2\rangle, |ϕ2=|2,1|\phi_{2}\rangle=|2,1\rangle, |ϕ3=|1,1|\phi_{3}\rangle=|1,1\rangle, and |ϕ4=|5P1/2,2,2|\phi_{4}\rangle=|5P_{1/2},2,2\rangle. FF is the total angular momentum and mFm_{F} is its zz component. A usual RSC consists of a red-detuned Raman transition |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle\rightarrow |ϕ3|\phi_{3}\rangle, which we call pp transition, and the DD transition |ϕ3|ϕ4|\phi_{3}\rangle\rightarrow|\phi_{4}\rangle for an OP back to |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle. To incorporate nn-selective CPT, we add qq Raman transition |ϕ2|ϕ3|\phi_{2}\rangle\rightarrow|\phi_{3}\rangle to form a Λ\Lambda configuration, and use a circularly polarized trap beam so that ν1ν2\nu_{1}\neq\nu_{2} owing to the vector polarizability. Here, ν1\nu_{1} and ν2\nu_{2} are the vibration frequencies of the motional states, |χ1|\chi_{1}\rangle and |χ2|\chi_{2}\rangle, for the potential wells of |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle and |ϕ2|\phi_{2}\rangle, respectively. When pp and qq pairs of Raman beams are tuned to the Λ\Lambda resonance between the |ϕ1,χ1(0)|\phi_{1},\chi_{1}(0)\rangle and |ϕ2,χ2(0)|\phi_{2},\chi_{2}(0)\rangle states, the motional ground states form a CPT dark state. A pair of |ϕ1,χ1(n)|\phi_{1},\chi_{1}(n)\rangle and |ϕ2,χ2(n)|\phi_{2},\chi_{2}(n)\rangle states, in general, are detuned from the CPT resonance by nΔν12n\Delta\nu_{12}, where Δν12=ν1ν2\Delta\nu_{12}=\nu_{1}-\nu_{2}, and a pair with the larger nn is brighter. Atoms accumulate in the low-nn states, which are comparatively darker. Δν12\Delta\nu_{12} in a circularly polarized trap is

Δν12=β4αν0,\Delta\nu_{12}=\frac{\beta}{4\alpha}\,\nu_{0}, (1)

where α\alpha and β\beta are the scalar and vector polarizabilities, respectively, and ν0\nu_{0} is the vibration frequency in a linearly polarized trap optical Ster-Gerlach . Heavy alkali-metal atoms with large β\beta are favored for MSCPT. For 87Rb atom, if the trap wavelength is 860 nm and ηLD=1\eta_{LD}=1, Δν12/2π=65\Delta\nu_{12}/2\pi=65 Hz, while the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the CPT resonance in our radio frequency (rf) experiment was 150 Hz M1 CPT . In our recent publication MSCPT theory , we write the master equations that describe the MSCPT scheme in Fig. 1, and solve them numerically to show that MSCPT performs better than RSC, and even at ηLD1\eta_{LD}\simeq 1 it can cool atoms below TRT_{R} under a favorable, but experimentally feasible, condition.

Another advantage of the inverted 𝖸\mathsf{Y} configuration is that it is a closed system. The |ϕ4|\phi_{4}\rangle state decays only to one of the |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle, |ϕ2|\phi_{2}\rangle, and |ϕ3|\phi_{3}\rangle states with the probability p1=1/3,p_{1}=1/3, p2=1/6,p_{2}=1/6, and p3=1/2p_{3}=1/2, respectively. While the RSC scheme of |ϕ1|ϕ3|ϕ4|\phi_{1}\rangle\rightarrow|\phi_{3}\rangle\rightarrow|\phi_{4}\rangle requires repumping from |ϕ2|\phi_{2}\rangle and, on average, three OP cycles to pump an atom from |ϕ3|\phi_{3}\rangle to |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle, MSCPT in the inverted 𝖸\mathsf{Y} does not require repumping, and two OP cycles are sufficient. Each OP cycle, consisting of an absorption and a spontaneous emission, causes a recoil heating of 2R2\mathcal{E}_{R}. The D1D1 transition is used to avoid an off-resonant transition and subsequent decay to a state outside the Λ\Lambda. In our previous work M1 CPT , using optically trapped 7Li atoms and rf fields for pp and qq transitions, we demonstrated that the inverted 𝖸\mathsf{Y} exhibited CPT phenomena of a closed Λ\Lambda system in a wide range of experimental parameters.

There are a few challenges to experimentally realize the idea of MSCPT. The decoherence rate γ12\gamma_{12} between the |ϕ1,χ1|\phi_{1},\chi_{1}\rangle and |ϕ2,χ2|\phi_{2},\chi_{2}\rangle states should be minimized. Noise in a magnetic field and phase of the Raman beams are the main sources, and experimental techniques normally reserved for precision spectroscopy are required. A high-density atomic sample is not suitable for MSCPT because the Raman and the OP beams, which stay on throughout the cooling process, will cause photo-associative loss of atoms. In addition, collisions between the atoms contribute to γ12\gamma_{12} collisional dephasing . Although the experiment we report here is carried out using a medium-density sample, MSCPT is best suited for a single atom in an optical lattice or an optical tweezer. Cooling by MSCPT also proceeds slower than that by RSC because even a superposition of n0n\neq 0 states is partially dark, reducing the Raman transition rate. There can also be a parasitic CPT dark state with a large nn.

III Apparatus

We use a double magneto-optical trap (MOT) system with an octagonal glass chamber for the second MOT. A pair of spherical mirrors, engraved on diagonal windows of the octagon, form a Fabry-Perot cavity for a 1D optical lattice PMSW RSC . At the design wavelength λOL\lambda_{\rm OL} of 980 nm, FWHM of the cavity resonance is 13 MHz and the minimum spot size w0w_{0} is 50 μ\mum. Optical mounts, coils, and a 6.8-GHz rf antenna surround the octagon, and a double-layer magnetic shield is installed. Fluorescence from atoms is imaged to an electron-multiplying charge-coupled device camera with a numerical aperture of 0.28 and a threefold magnification.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Raman beams applied to atoms in a 1D optical lattice for the MSCPT scheme in Fig. 1. For RSC in the xyxy plane, (x,p)(\mathcal{E}_{x},\mathcal{E}_{p}) and (x,q)(\mathcal{E}_{x},\mathcal{E}_{q}) pair drive pp and qq transitions, respectively. The z\mathcal{E}_{z} beam plays the same role as the x\mathcal{E}_{x} in the yzyz plane.

Each of the pp and qq Raman transitions in Fig. 1 requires two laser beams, and their arrangement is shown in Fig. 2. The x\mathcal{E}_{x} beam propagating along x^\hat{x} and polarized along y^\hat{y} pairs with each of orthogonally polarized p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q} applied along y^\hat{y} to drive pp and qq transitions, respectively. In this way, linear momentum transferred to an atom by a pp transition is the same as that by a qq transition, neglecting the Zeeman shift of less than 1 MHz between |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle and |ϕ2|\phi_{2}\rangle. Otherwise, |ϕ1,χ1(n)|\phi_{1},\chi_{1}(n)\rangle and |ϕ2,χ2(n)|\phi_{2},\chi_{2}(n)\rangle make pp and qq transitions, respectively, to groups of |ϕ3,χ3(n3)|\phi_{3},\chi_{3}(n_{3})\rangle with different n3n_{3}, and destructive interference of the transition amplitudes for CPT is incomplete MSCPT theory . The Raman beams are linearly polarized so that they do not cause a differential ac Stark shift between the |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle and |ϕ2|\phi_{2}\rangle states. The x\mathcal{E}_{x} beam is blue detuned from the D2D2 transition by 30 GHz, and the p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q} beams are derived from it by using a fiber electro-optic modulator operating at 6.8 GHz and two acousto-optic modulators PMSW RSC . Oscillators driving the modulators are phase locked to an atomic clock. Furthermore, we add a phase-lock loop for beating between p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q}, obtained immediately before the two beams enter the chamber, because phase stability between them is critical in reducing γ12\gamma_{12}. For 3D cooling, we add an z\mathcal{E}_{z} beam which plays the same role as x\mathcal{E}_{x} in the yzyz plane. The D1D1 beam is added to complete the inverted 𝖸\mathsf{Y} configuration. We take much care to control its polarization to avoid an unintended transition out of |ϕ3|\phi_{3}\rangle and subsequent decay outside Λ\Lambda. We use its intensity to control the effective decay rate ROPR_{\rm OP} of |ϕ3|\phi_{3}\rangle, and hence, the width of the Raman transitions.

IV Experiment and results

Atoms are loaded into the 1D lattice and its depth is lowered to U0/kB=125U_{0}/k_{B}=125 μ\muK. At this depth, inhomogeneous broadening from the vector polarizability cancels that from anharmonicity for the red (blue) sideband of zz motion when the lattice beam is left (right) circularly polarized PMSW RSC . It narrows the sideband to facilitate RSC along the zz axis. At U0/kB=125U_{0}/k_{B}=125 μ\muK and w0=50w_{0}=50 μ\mum, along the transverse direction, ν0/2π\nu_{0}/2\pi = 700 Hz and ηLD=2.3\eta_{LD}=2.3, being far from the Lamb-Dicke regime. At λOL\lambda_{\rm OL} = 980 nm, α=873\alpha=-873 and β=25\beta=-25 in atomic units for 87Rb, and Δν12/2π=5\Delta\nu_{12}/2\pi=5 Hz from Eq. (1). Longitudinally, ν0L/2π=155\nu_{0}^{L}/2\pi=155 kHz, ηLDL=0.15\eta_{LD}^{L}=0.15, and Δν12L/2π=1.1\Delta\nu_{12}^{L}/2\pi=1.1 kHz. Atoms in the lattice show a Gaussian distribution with 100 atoms per site at the center and the standard deviation of 300 sites. Their temperature is 20 μ\muK.

As a preliminary experiment, we apply RSC in the transverse plane while changing the Raman detunings, defined as δRp=ωpx(ω3ω1)\delta_{\rm R}^{p}=\omega_{p}^{x}-(\omega_{3}-\omega_{1}) and δRq=ωqx(ω3ω2)\delta_{\rm R}^{q}=\omega_{q}^{x}-(\omega_{3}-\omega_{2}) in Fig. 1. Here, ωpx\omega_{p}^{x} (ωqx\omega_{q}^{x}) is the difference between frequencies of the p\mathcal{E}_{p} (q\mathcal{E}_{q}) and x\mathcal{E}_{x} beams in Fig. 2, and ωj\hbar\omega_{j} is the energy of the |ϕj,χj(0)|\phi_{j},\chi_{j}(0)\rangle state for j=1,2,3j=1,2,3. In this experiment, we keep δRp=δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{p}=\delta_{\rm R}^{q} while detuning from the CPT resonance for the n=0n=0 pair of states, δCPT(0)=δRqδRp\delta_{\rm CPT}(0)=\delta_{\rm R}^{q}-\delta_{\rm R}^{p}, is close to zero. In general, CPT detuning for the nnth pair is

δCPT(n)=(ωqxωpx)(ω1ω2)nΔν12.\delta_{\rm CPT}(n)=(\omega_{q}^{x}-\omega_{p}^{x})-(\omega_{1}-\omega_{2})-n\Delta\nu_{12}. (2)

δRp,δRq,\delta_{\rm R}^{p},\delta_{\rm R}^{q}, and hence, δCPT(0)\delta_{\rm CPT}(0) are referenced to the differences, ω3ω1\omega_{3}-\omega_{1} and ω3ω2\omega_{3}-\omega_{2}, which are measured by 6.8-GHz rf spectroscopy. However, in a circularly polarized lattice, the rf lineshape is asymmetric and broad rf spectroscopy , and extracting the difference by fitting a theoretical curve to a lineshape is susceptible to errors. We estimate the uncertainty to be 1 kHz. For the experiment, atoms are optically pumped to |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle, and p\mathcal{E}_{p}, q\mathcal{E}_{q}, y\mathcal{E}_{y} and the OP beams are applied. The quantization field is 1 G, the Rabi frequencies are Ωp/2π=4.3\Omega_{p}/2\pi=4.3 kHz and Ωq/2π=7.6\Omega_{q}/2\pi=7.6 kHz for pp and qq transitions, respectively, and ROP/2π=2.8R_{\rm OP}/2\pi=2.8 kHz. After the beams are applied for 3 s, only 20% of the atoms are left mainly owing to the photo-associative loss. The transverse temperature TT is measured by the time-of-flight method. Red squares in Fig. 3 denote TT versus the common detuning δR\delta_{\rm R}. TT increases sharply near δR=δR/2π=15\delta_{\rm R}^{\prime}=\delta_{\rm R}/2\pi=-15 kHz, which is the minimum red detuning to overcome the recoil heating of 4R4\mathcal{E}_{R}. The lowest TT of 4.7 μ\muK is obtained at δR=60\delta_{\rm R}^{\prime}=-60 kHz, limited by the cross-dimensional heating by the zz motion. We add the z\mathcal{E}_{z} beam, tuned to the red sideband of the zz motion, and obtain the lowest TT of 3.0 μ\muK at δR=30\delta_{\rm R}^{\prime}=-30 kHz, as represented by blue circles in Fig. 3. Removing the heat load from the zz motion allows us to use smaller |δR||\delta_{\rm R}|, which, in turn, narrows the distribution of the atoms over nn. The cooling time required to reach the steady state is also reduced to 2 s. Although addition of the z\mathcal{E}_{z} beam adds another Λ\Lambda configuration, it does not interfere with MSCPT in the xyxy plane because, once an atom falls into the nz=0n_{z}=0 state, transitions driven by z\mathcal{E}_{z} are far-off resonant.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Temperature of transverse motion versus the common detuning δR\delta_{\rm R} of pp and qq Raman transitions. Detuning from the CPT resonance for a pair of motional ground states, δCPT(0)\delta_{\rm CPT}(0), is kept close to zero. Red squares are from 2D RSC in the xyxy plane and blue circles are from 3D RSC with the addition of the z\mathcal{E}_{z} beam.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Temperature of transverse motion versus detuning from the CPT resonance for the motional ground state, δCPT(0)=δRqδRp\delta_{\rm CPT}(0)=\delta_{\rm R}^{q}-\delta_{\rm R}^{p}. δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{q} is scanned while δRp/2π\delta_{\rm R}^{p}/2\pi is kept at -60 kHz in 2D MSCPT (red square), and at -30 kHz in 3D MSCPT (blue circle). Red dotted and blue dashed vertical lines denote δCPT(0)\delta_{\rm CPT}(0) where the lowest temperature in 2D and 3D experiment occurs, respectively. Black triangles represent results when the p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q} beams are alternately turned on at 1 kHz.

As we scan δCPT(0)=δRqδRp\delta_{\rm CPT}(0)=\delta_{\rm R}^{q}-\delta_{\rm R}^{p} by changing δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{q}, a pronounced dip in TT appears, demonstrating the extra cooling effect of MSCPT. Figure 4 shows the results from an experiment in 2D at δRp=δRp/2π=60\delta^{\prime\,p}_{\rm R}=\delta_{\rm R}^{p}/2\pi=-60 kHz (red square) and that in 3D at δRp=30\delta^{\prime\,p}_{\rm R}=-30 kHz (blue circle). For a direct comparison with RSC in 3D, we alternately turn on the p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q} beams at 1 kHz for 4 s while x\mathcal{E}_{x} and z\mathcal{E}_{z} stay on. The results (black triangle) show gradual change in TT without a dip. In the 2D MSCPT experiment, the lowest TT of 3.4 μ\muK occurs at δCPT(0)=δCPT(0)/2π=3.3\delta^{\prime}_{\rm CPT}(0)=\delta_{\rm CPT}(0)/2\pi=3.3 kHz, and in 3D, T=1.8T=1.8 μ\muK at δCPT(0)=2.2\delta^{\prime}_{\rm CPT}(0)=2.2 kHz. Ideally, the lowest TT should be at δCPT(0)=0\delta_{\rm CPT}(0)=0, and we interpret this shift as a result of the width of the Raman transition being much smaller than |δR||\delta_{R}|. The half-width at half maximum, contributed by the power and radiative broadening, for the pp and qq transition is 3.3 kHz and 5.5 kHz, respectively. The low-nn states are already dark owing to the much larger Raman detuning, and the CPT does not have an impact on the atoms in those states. From Eq. (2), at positive δCPT(0)\delta_{\rm CPT}(0), ωqxωpx\omega_{q}^{x}-\omega_{p}^{x} is CPT resonant for the n>0n>0 states, and we conjecture that the observed position of the dip is where the CPT-induced darkness can best complement that induced by |δR||\delta_{\rm R}| to produce the lowest TT. δCPT(0)\delta_{\rm CPT}(0) at the dip in 2D with δRp=60\delta^{\prime\,p}_{\rm R}=-60 kHz is one and a half times that in 3D with δRp=30\delta^{\prime\,p}_{\rm R}=-30 kHz, and it is consistent with the conjecture. The 1D simulations also show that MSCPT loses advantage over RSC when the Raman width is much smaller than |δR||\delta_{\rm R}| MSCPT theory . In our experiment, the available laser power and the loss of atoms from photo-association limit Ωp,q\Omega_{p,q} and ROPR_{\rm OP}, and hence, the range of the Raman width. In addition to being the result of an extra cooling effect, the dips are, to the best of our knowledge, the first observation of CPT phenomena driven by a pair of stimulated Raman transitions. To confirm this, we repeat δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{q} scans at a few δRp\delta_{\rm R}^{p}. The results are shown in Fig. 5: three upper traces from the right to the left are at δRp=30,40,\delta^{\prime\,p}_{\rm R}=-30,-40, and -60 kHz in 2D, and two lower traces are at δRp=30\delta^{\prime\,p}_{\rm R}=-30 and -60 kHz in 3D. The dips appear when δRqδRp\delta_{\rm R}^{q}\simeq\delta_{\rm R}^{p}, independent of δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{q} and δRp\delta_{\rm R}^{p} themselves.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Temperature of transverse motion versus δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{q} at a few δRp\delta_{\rm R}^{p}. Three upper traces are from 2D MSCPT at δRp/2π=\delta_{\rm R}^{p}/2\pi= -30 (blue circle), -40 (green triangle), and -60 kHz (red square). Two lower traces are form 3D MSCPT at δRp/2π=\delta_{\rm R}^{p}/2\pi= -30 and -60 kHz. Vertical dashed lines are placed where temperature is the lowest for each δRq\delta_{\rm R}^{q} scan.

In MSCPT, it is critical to minimize the decoherence rate γ12\gamma_{12} between |ϕ1,χ1|\phi_{1},\chi_{1}\rangle and |ϕ2,χ2|\phi_{2},\chi_{2}\rangle. We consider two sources for γ12\gamma_{12}: noise δB(t)\delta B(t) in a magnetic field and phase fluctuation δϕ(t)\delta\phi(t) between the p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q} beams. For a given δB(t)\delta B(t), γ12\gamma_{12} is proportional to Δν122\Delta\nu_{12}^{2}, and we use the hyperfine transition between |5S1/2,F=1,mF=1|5S_{1/2},F=1,m_{F}=1\rangle and |F=2,mF=0|F=2,m_{F}=0\rangle as a substitute for the |ϕ1|ϕ2|\phi_{1}\rangle\rightarrow|\phi_{2}\rangle transition to measure γ12\gamma_{12}. The ladder structure of the Zeeman sublevels in the |5S1/2,F=2|5S_{1/2},F=2\rangle state makes spectroscopy on the isolated |ϕ1|\phi_{1}\rangle and |ϕ2|\phi_{2}\rangle states difficult. In order to be free from inhomogeneous broadening, we use spin-echo spectroscopy on atoms in a linearly polarized lattice at the well depth of only 11 μ\muK. With a two-layer magnetic shield and a low-noise current supply, γ12\gamma_{12} from δB(t)\delta B(t) at B0=1B_{0}=1 G is 2π×1.82\pi\times 1.8 Hz. γ12\gamma_{12} from δϕ(t)\delta\phi(t), estimated from an rf spectrum of the beating between p\mathcal{E}_{p} and q\mathcal{E}_{q}, is 2π×1.82\pi\times 1.8 Hz and it is reduced to 2π×1.42\pi\times 1.4 Hz when the beating signal is phase locked to an atomic clock. Figure 6(a) shows the lowest TT in 3D MSCPT versus log10(γ12/γ120)\log_{10}(\gamma_{12}/\gamma_{12}^{0}), where γ120=2π×1\gamma_{12}^{0}=2\pi\times 1 Hz. γ12\gamma_{12} is increased by injecting white noise to the rf which modulates the q\mathcal{E}_{q} beam. We observe gradual disappearance of the dip and an increase in TT. Finally, we change the degree of circularity of the lattice beam, ζ=iz^(ϵ^×ϵ^)\zeta=i\hat{z}\cdot(\hat{\epsilon}\times\hat{\epsilon}^{*}), where ϵ^\hat{\epsilon} is the Jones vector. For a given ζ\zeta, Δν12\Delta\nu_{12} in Eq. (1) is reduced to ζ(β/4α)ν0\zeta(\beta/4\alpha)\nu_{0}. Figure 6(b) shows the increase in the lowest TT in 3D MSCPT as the lattice polarization becomes linear. When the polarization is linear, a peak as well as a dip in TT appears as we scan δCPT(0)\delta_{\rm CPT}(0), indicating unintended trapping of population at high-nn states.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: (a) Minimum temperature at a given γ12\gamma_{12} in 3D MSCPT versus log10(γ12/γ120)\log_{10}(\gamma_{12}/\gamma_{12}^{0}), where γ120=2π×1\gamma_{12}^{0}=2\pi\times 1 Hz. (b) Minimum temperature at a given degree of circularity, ζ\zeta, of the optical lattice beam in 3D MSCPT versus ζ\zeta.

V Summary and Discussion

In summary, we apply Raman sideband cooling in a Λ\Lambda configuration to atoms in a circularly-polarized 1D optical lattice. State-dependent variation in vibration frequency allows us to tune the Raman beams for coherent population trapping of the motional ground states. Although we observe CPT dark state of the low-nn states only and not the n=0n=0 state and the lowest temperature obtained is 10 times the recoil limit, our results clearly demonstrate nn-selective CPT phenomena and a cooling efficiency better than that of RSC. To realize the full benefit of the MSCPT scheme, we are building an apparatus optimized for the scheme. The apparatus used in the experiment reported here has ηLD=2.3\eta_{LD}=2.3 and λOL=980\lambda_{\rm OL}=980 nm, resulting in too closely spaced vibrational levels and too small Δν12\Delta\nu_{12}, respectively. The design parameters of the present and the new apparatus are compared in Table I. Fivefold reduction of w0w_{0} at the same well depth U0U_{0} reduces ηLD\eta_{LD} to 1, increasing ν0/2π\nu_{0}/2\pi from 700 Hz to 3.5 kHz. This reduces the density of states in the xyxy plane by a factor of 25, decreasing the number of diffusive steps required to reach the ground state. At λOL=860\lambda_{\rm OL}=860 nm, β/α\beta/\alpha increases by a factor of 2.5. With the new design parameters, Δν12/2π\Delta\nu_{12}/2\pi increases from 5 Hz to 65 Hz, and we expect significant enhancement in the nn selectivity. The photon scattering rate RγR_{\gamma} also increases by 2.5, but it is still less than 2π×0.12\pi\times 0.1 Hz. Finally, we note that a diatomic polar molecule in an optical trap polar molecule provides an excellent opportunity to apply MSCPT because its Stark shift depends strongly on the rotational quantum number. Considering a MgF molecule in a 532-nm optical trap as an example, the fractional difference between vibration frequencies of a pair of states in the same ro-vibrational level can be as large as 12%. This may be compared with Δν12/ν0\Delta\nu_{12}/\nu_{0} of less than 2% for 87Rb in the new design.

    present apparatus     new apparatus
U0/kBU_{0}/k_{B} (μ\muK) 125 125
w0w_{0} (μ\mum) 50 10
ηLD\eta_{LD} 2.3 1.0
ν0/2π\nu_{0}/2\pi (kHz) 0.7 3.5
λOL\lambda_{\rm OL} (nm) 980 860
α\alpha (atomic unit) -873 -1893
β\beta (atomic unit) -25 -139
Δν12/2π\Delta\nu_{12}/2\pi (Hz) 5 65
Rγ/2πR_{\gamma}/2\pi (Hz) 0.03 0.07
Table 1: Design parameters of the present and the new machine for MSCPT experiment using 87Rb atoms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. 2017R1A2B3002543).

References

  • (1) F. Diedrich, J. C. Bergquist, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Wineland, Laser Cooling to the Zero-Point Energy of Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 403 (1989).
  • (2) D.-J. Han, S. Wolf, S. Oliver, C. McCormick, M. T. DePue, and D. S. Weiss, 3D Raman Sideband Cooling of Cesium Atoms at High Density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 724 (2000).
  • (3) A. J. Kerman, V. Vuletić, C. Chin, and S. Chu, Beyond Optical Molasses: 3D Raman Sideband Cooling of Atomic Cesium to High Phase-Space Density, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 439 (2000).
  • (4) J. Hu, A. Urvoy, Z. Vendeiro, V. Crépel, W. Chen, V. Vuletić, Creation of a Bose-condensed gas of 87Rb by laser cooling, Science 358, 1078 (2017).
  • (5) A. M. Kaufman, B. J. Lester, and C. A. Regal, Cooling a Single Atom in an Optical Tweezer to Its Quantum Ground State, Phys. Rev. X 2, 041014 (2012).
  • (6) Y. Yu, N. R. Hutzler, J. T. Zhang, L. R. Liu, J. D. Hood, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Motional-ground-state cooling outside the Lamb-Dicke regime, Phys. Rev. A 97, 063423 (2018).
  • (7) A. Aspect, E. Arimondo, R. Kaiser, N. Vansteenkiste, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Laser Cooling below the One-Photon Recoil Energy by Velocity-Selective Coherent Population Trapping, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 826 (1988).
  • (8) C. Y. Park, J. Y. Kim, J. M. Song, and D. Cho, Optical Stern-Gerlach effect from the Zeeman-like ac Stark shift, Phys. Rev. A 65, 033410 (2002).
  • (9) H. Kim, H. S. Han, T. H. Yoon, and D. Cho, Coherent Population Trapping in a Λ\Lambda Configuration Coupled by Magnetic Dipole Interactions, Phys. Rev. A 89, 032507 (2014).
  • (10) H. G. Lee, S. Park, M. H. Seo, and D. Cho, Motion-selective coherent population trapping for subrecoil cooling of optically trapped atoms outside the Lamb-Dicke regime, arXiv:2205.00685 [physics.atom-ph].
  • (11) Y. Sagi, I. Almog, and N. Davidson, Universal Scaling of Collisional Spectral Narrowing in an Ensemble of Cold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 093001 (2010).
  • (12) M. H. Seo, S. Park, and D. Cho, Relaxation of atomic temperature anisotropy in a one-dimensional optical lattice enhanced by dynamic control of the aspect ratio, Phys. Rev. A 101, 043611 (2020).
  • (13) S. Park, M. H. Seo, and D. Cho, Ground-state hyperfine spectroscopy of 87Rb atoms in a 1D optical lattice, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 235002 (2019).
  • (14) L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, L. W. Cheuk, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Laser Cooling of Optically Trapped Molecules, Nat. Phys. 14 890 (2018).