This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Multiwavelength investigation of extended green object G19.88-0.53: Revealing a protocluster

Namitha Issac1, Anandmayee Tej1, Tie Liu2,3, Watson Varricatt4, Sarita Vig1 Ishwara Chandra C.H.5, Mathias Schultheis6, Govind Nandakumar7,8
1Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram 695 547, Kerala, India
2Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai 200030, People’s Republic of China
3Key Laboratory for Research in Galaxies and Cosmology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai 200030, People’s Republic of China
4Institute for Astronomy, UKIRT Observatory, 660 N. Aóhoku place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA
5National Centre for Radio Astrophysics (NCRA-TIFR), Pune, India
6Laboratoire Lagrange, Université Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Blvd de l’Observatoire, F-06304 Nice, France
7Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Australian National University, ACT 2611, Australia
8ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in Three Dimensions (ASTRO-3D), Australia
E-mail: namithaissac.16@res.iist.ac.in
Abstract

A multiwavelength analysis of star formation associated with the extended green object, G19.88-0.53 is presented in this paper. With multiple detected radio and millimetre components, G19.88-0.53 unveils as harbouring a protocluster rather than a single massive young stellar object. We detect an ionized thermal jet using the upgraded Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope, India, which is found to be associated with a massive, dense and hot ALMA 2.7 mm core driving a bipolar CO outflow. Near-infrared spectroscopy with UKIRT-UIST shows the presence of multiple shock-excited H2 lines concurrent with the nature of this region. Detailed investigation of the gas kinematics using ALMA data reveals G19.88-0.53 as an active protocluster with high-mass star forming components spanning a wide evolutionary spectrum from hot cores in accretion phase to cores driving multiple outflows to possible UCHii regions.

keywords:
stars: formation - ISM: jets and outflows - ISM: individual objects (G19.88-0.53) - infrared: stars - infrared: ISM - radio continuum: ISM
pagerange: Multiwavelength investigation of extended green object G19.88-0.53: Revealing a protoclusterLABEL:lastpage

1 INTRODUCTION

The last decade has seen a plethora of studies focussed on understanding the formation mechanism of massive (M8M\rm M\gtrsim 8M{{}_{\odot}}) stars. Recent reviews by Tan et al. (2014) and Motte, Bontemps & Louvet (2018) detail the significant progress made in the field. State-of-the-art numerical simulations (e.g. Krumholz, Klein & McKee, 2007; Kuiper et al., 2010) and tremendous advancement in observational facilities (Spitzer Space Telescope, Herschel Space Observatory, ALMA) have enabled us to probe the intricacies involved and get a better insight of the complex processes associated with high-mass star formation.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a)IRAC colour composite image of the region around G19.88-0.53 where the 3.6, 4.5, and 8.0 μm\rm\mu m bands are displayed in red, green, and blue, respectively. Location of the identified IRDC is shown with the ‘×\times’ symbol. The ‘++’ marks the position of the MYSO located at 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission peak and the black circles are the positions of the EGO knots discussed by De Buizer & Vacca (2010). (b)UKIDSS colour composite image of the same region. Here, JJ (1.25 μm\rm\mu m), HH (1.63 μm\rm\mu m) and KK (2.20 μm\rm\mu m) band data are shown in red, green, and blue, respectively.

Of particular interest are the initial phases of massive star formation, which are observationally the most challenging. The discovery of an interesting population of ‘extended green objects’ (EGOs) (Cyganowski et al., 2008; Chambers et al., 2009), with the Spitzer Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire (GLIMPSE) (Benjamin et al., 2003), has created a unique database to systematically probe these early phases and aptly constrain the proposed theories. Dedicated studies spanning various frequency regimes have been conducted on EGOs and they are now regarded as signposts of high-mass star formation where the enhanced, extended emission in the IRAC 4.5 μm\rm\mu m band (colour-coded green in the IRAC colour composite images and hence the nomenclature) is attributed to shocked emission in outflows from massive YSOs (MYSOs).

Several studies have been carried out to decipher the population of identified EGOs (e.g. Marston et al., 2004; Noriega-Crespo et al., 2004; Rathborne et al., 2005; Smith & Rosen, 2005), but focussed multiwavelength studies towards individual objects are still few. Such studies are crucial in gaining deeper insights into the nature of these objects. In this paper, we conduct a rigorous multiwavelength investigation of the region associated with the EGO, G19.88-0.53, which is catalogued as a “likely” outflow candidate associated with the infrared source, IRAS 18264-1152 (Cyganowski et al., 2008). The kinematic distance ambiguity to G19.88-0.53 has been resolved and it is placed at the near distance of 3.31 kpc (Roman-Duval et al., 2009; Ge et al., 2014). The bolometric luminosity of the Red MSX Source (RMS), G019.8817-00.5347, associated with IRAS 18264-1152 is estimated to be 7.8×103L7.8\times 10^{3}\,L_{\odot} (Lumsden et al., 2013). This number has been recently refined to 4.7×103L4.7\times 10^{3}\,L_{\odot} in the RMS survey website111http://rms.leeds.ac.uk/cgi-bin/public/RMS_DATABASE.cgi. Class I and II methanol masers and H2O\rm H_{2}O maser are detected towards the region (Sridharan et al., 2002; Beuther et al., 2002c; Chen et al., 2011). Fig. 1 displays the infrared (IR) morphology of G19.88-0.53. The colour composite images use the Spitzer-IRAC (Fazio et al., 2004) and the UKIDSS-Galactic Plane Survey (Lucas et al., 2008) bands. Both plots show extended emission in the east-west direction with the enhanced IRAC 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission elongated westwards beyond the UKIDSS KK band nebulosity. The Simbad database also reveals the presence of an infrared dark cloud (IRDC) possibly associated with G19.88-0.53 and is marked in the figure.

The structure of the paper, which involves an in-depth observational study of the region associated with G19.88-0.53 at infrared, submillimeter and radio wavelengths, is as follows. New observations carried out by us, and the archival data used are discussed in Section 2; the data reduction procedures are also included in this section. Results obtained from multiwavelength data are highlighted in Section 3. In Section 4, we deliberate on the the observational evidence of the presence of a protocluster and the existence of an ionized jet, and discuss on the kinematics of the identified dust cores. Section 5 summarizes the results and discussion.

2 OBSERVATIONS AND ARCHIVAL DATA

2.1 Radio continuum observation

Low-frequency radio emission associated with G19.88-0.53 is studied with the upgraded Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope (uGMRT), located near Pune, India. Observations for G19.88-0.53 were carried out in Band 4 (550850550-850 MHz) and Band 5 (100014501000-1450 MHz). Observation and map details are listed in Table 1. The data were calibrated incorporating spectral index and spectral curvature across the wide band using the Astronomical Image Processing System (AIPS). Data reduction is carried out along the lines discussed in Issac et al. (2019). We refer the reader to this paper for an elaborate discussion of GMRT configuration and data reduction steps. In case of G19.88-0.53, calibrated and channel averaged data are split into sub-bands of bandwidth 32\sim 32 and 36\sim 36 MHz in Band 4 and Band 5, respectively. This is done with the envisaged goal of obtaining in-band spectral index of the radio source. We retain six clean sub-bands in Band 4 and three in Band 5, with central frequencies 651.4, 682.5, 714.1, 745.9, 777.1, and 808.3 MHz and 1320.7, 1355.8, and 1391.6 MHz, respectively. Continuum maps for each sub-band were generated separately by limiting the uv coverage to a common range of 0.1536Kλ\rm 0.15-36\,K\lambda with beams matched to 11.5 arcsec×\times7.6 arcsec, the largest beam among the six sub-bands. Similarly, for Band 5 the uv range is fixed to 0.17100Kλ\rm 0.17-100\,K\lambda and beams matched to 4.3 arcsec×\times2.5 arcsec. As discussed in Issac et al. (2019), scaling factors are estimated to range between 1.65 to 2.10 and 1.22 to 1.24 within Band 4 and Band 5, respectively. Using these, the primary beam corrected and self-calibrated sub-band maps are scaled to account for variations in the system temperatures of the antennas at the GMRT while observing targets located in the Galactic plane. .

Table 1: GMRT observations and map details for G19.88-0.53
Details Band 4 Band 5
Date of Obs. 19 June 2018 18 June 2018
Flux calibrators 3C286 3C286
Phase calibrators 1822-096 1743-038
Integration time 5\sim 5 hrs 5\sim 5 hrs
Synthesized beam \sim 11.5 arcsec \sim 4.3 arcsec
×\times 7.6 arcsec ×\times 2.7 arcsec
rms (μJybeam1\rm\mu Jy\,beam^{-1}) 100150100-150 444744-47

2.2 Near-infrared spectroscopic observation

We carried out the near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopic observations towards G19.88-0.53 with the 3.8-m United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT), Hawaii. Observations were obtained on 2 April 2015 with the UKIRT 15μm\rm 1-5\,\mu m Imager Spectrometer (UIST, Ramsay Howat et al. 2004) using the HK grism set-up. The slit (\sim0.48 arcsec wide and 120 arcsec long) was oriented at an angle 88°east of north and centered at (αJ2000=18h29m14.7s,δJ2000=11°5016.7\rm\alpha_{J2000}=18^{h}29^{m}14.7^{s},\delta_{J2000}=-11\degree 50\arcmin 16.7\arcsec) as shown in Fig. 3. The exposure time per frame was 120s and the total on-source integration time was 720s. SAO 142372, an A5 IV/V type star, was also observed, with the same instrument settings as for the target, for telluric and instrumental corrections. Following the standard procedures explained in Issac et al. (2019), UKIRT pipeline ORAC-DR and Starlink packages FIGARO and KAPPA were used for data reduction, spectra extraction and wavelength calibration. As the sky conditions during our observations were not photometric, the final spectra are not flux calibrated.

2.3 Far-infrared data from Hi-GAL survey

To understand the physical properties of the cold dust emission associated with G19.88-0.53, we use Herschel far-infrared (FIR) archival data. The Herschel Space Observatory houses a 3.5-m telescope with instruments covering the spectral range of 55671μm\rm 55-671\,\mu m (Pilbratt et al., 2010). For our study, we have utilized observations carried out with the Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS, Poglitsch et al. 2010) and Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE, Griffin et al. 2010). The 70500μm\rm 70-500\,\mu m images retrieved were observed as a part of the Herschel infrared Galactic plane Survey (Hi-GAL, Molinari et al. 2010). The images have resolutions of 5, 13, 18.1, 24.9 and 36.4 \arcsec at 70, 160, 250, 300, and 500 μm\rm\mu m, respectively.

2.4 APEX+Planck data

APEX+Planck database provides 870 μm\rm\mu m images. These are generated by combining 870 μm\rm\mu m LABOCA bolometer array data from the APEX Telescope Large Area Survey of the Galaxy (ATLASGAL, Schuller et al. 2009) and 850 μm\rm\mu m data from Planck/HFI. The combined data-set offers improved spatial dynamic range of Galactic cold dust emission (Csengeri et al., 2016). The retrieved APEX+Planck image of the region associated with G19.88-0.53 has pixel size of 3.4\arcsec and angular resolution of 21\arcsec.

2.5 Atacama Large Millimeter Array archival data

Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) archival data at 2.7 mm (Band 3) and 870 μm\rm\mu m (Band 7) are used to study the G19.88-0.53 complex. Observations were made during 2017-2018 (PI: S. Leurini #2017.1.00377.S). The high- and medium-resolution ALMA observations were obtained with the 12-m array in the FDM Spectral Mode and the low-resolution observations used the 7-m array in the ACA Spectral Mode. The high resolution 2.7 mm continuum map, with a beam size of 0.46 arcsec×\times0.28 arcsec, is used to identify the compact dust cores associated with G19.88-0.53. Along with the continuum observations, data cubes in both the bands are also retrieved. Three data sets with resolutions 16.9 arcsec×\times8.0 arcsec, 2.6 arcsec×\times2.2 arcsec, and 0.46 arcsec×\times0.28 arcsec and velocity resolution of 0.67kms1\rm 0.67\,km\,s^{-1} in Band 3 (84116GHz\rm 84-116\,GHz) and two data sets with resolutions 5.2 arcsec×\times2.6 arcsec and 0.67 arcsec×\times0.47 arcsec and velocity resolution of 0.86kms1\rm 0.86\,km\,s^{-1} in Band 7 (275373GHz\rm 275-373\,GHz) are used. In Band 3, rms of 4.2, 3.6 and 17 mJy are achieved for high, medium and low resolution observations, respectively. In Band 7, rms of 3.5 and 17 mJy are achieved for high and low resolution observations, respectively. Analysis of molecular line data is carried out using CLASS90 (Continuum Line Analysis Single-dish Software), a GILDAS222http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS software (Grenoble Image and Line Data Analysis Software).

3 RESULTS

3.1 Low-frequency radio emission

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The radio continuum map of G19.88-0.53 at 1391.6 MHz is shown in grey scale with contour levels at 3, 4, 5, and 6σ\sigma (σ=45μJybeam1\rm\sigma=45\,\mu Jy\,beam^{-1}). This map has a beam size of 4.3 arcsec×\times2.7 arcsec that is represented by the black ellipse. The positions of the two radio components, R1 and R2 are marked on the image by ‘\star’s. Radio sources AH\rm A-H, identified by Rosero et al. (2016), are marked by filled circles and the three radio components IRAS 18264-1152a, IRAS 18264-1152b and IRAS 18264-1152c, identified by Zapata et al. (2006), are indicated by filled triangles. Contours of the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission are overlaid in red with the contour levels at 3, 9, 30 and 120σ\sigma (σ=5.0MJysr1\rm\sigma=5.0\,MJy\,sr^{-1}). The position of the MYSO (De Buizer & Vacca, 2010) associated with G19.88-0.53 is indicated with ‘\ast’.
Table 2: Physical parameters of radio components R1 and R2 associated with G19.88-0.53.
Component Peak position Peak flux density
α(J2000)()hms\rm\alpha(J2000)\,({{}^{h}}\,{{}^{m}}\,{{}^{s}}) δ(J2000)(°)\rm\delta(J2000)\,(\degree\,\arcmin\,\arcsec) (mJybeam1\rm mJy\,beam^{-1})
 R1 18 29 14.3 -11 50 22.3 0.25±\pm0.01
R2 18 29 14.7 -11 50 23.0 0.20±\pm0.01

Using the uGMRT, we probe the low-frequency domain of the ionized emission associated with G19.88-0.53. In Band 4, none of the sub-band images have detection above the 3σ3\sigma level while faint, elongated emission is seen in the Band 5 maps. The deep uGMRT maps in Band 5 with a rms level of 45μJybeam1\rm\sim 45\,\mu Jy\,beam^{-1} enable the detection of weak ionized emission. In comparison, there is no emission detected in the VLA 20 cm map from MAGPIS. The sub-band image at 1391.6 MHz is shown in Fig. 2. This map clearly reveals the presence of an elongated, two-component emission feature in the east-west direction. The two distinct and compact radio components are labelled R1 and R2. The contours of the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission plotted show that the radio emission is confined to the central part of the EGO.

The radio emission associated with G19.88-0.53 has been studied by Zapata et al. (2006), Rosero et al. (2016), and Rosero et al. (2019) using VLA. Based on observations at 3.6 cm (8.5 GHz), 1.3 cm (22.5 GHz) and 7 mm (43.3 GHz), Zapata et al. (2006) classify this source as a ‘triple stellar system’ and identify three radio components (IRAS 18264-1152a, b, and c), the positions of which are shown in Fig. 2. In the recent paper, Rosero et al. (2016) present high-sensitivity, sub-arcsecond resolution observations at 6 cm (4.9 and 7.4 GHz) and 1.3 cm (20.9 and 25.5 GHz), where twelve compact radio sources are detected towards G19.88-0.53. Eight among them, sources AH\rm A-H, lie within the 3σ3\sigma level of the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission and are marked Fig. 2. The component R1 is co-spatial (within 1\sim 1 arcsec) with the radio sources, F and IRAS 18264-1152b. Component R2 has similar positional match with the radio source, A. The position of the MYSO located at the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission peak (De Buizer & Vacca, 2010) also agrees well with the coordinates of R2. However, this component is not detected in the VLA maps presented by Zapata et al. (2006).

The position of the components and the peak flux densities are listed in Table 2. Component R1 is barely resolved and component R2 is unresolved in the uGMRT maps. It is thus difficult to get a reliable estimate of the integrated flux density for these unresolved sources with weak emission (Urquhart et al., 2009; Rosero et al., 2016). Hence, in the estimation of the spectral index we use the peak flux density. Following the discussion in Urquhart et al. (2009), the upper limits to the deconvolved sizes of R1 and R2 are taken to be half the FWHM of the restored beam size. This gives a value of 2.1 arcsec×\times1.3 arcsec for the components.

3.2 Near-infrared line emission

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Continuum subtracted H2 image of G19.88-0.53 from Varricatt et al. (2010). The positions of the identified radio components, R1 and R2 are marked by ‘×\times’s. The contours of the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission are given in red with the contour levels same as Fig. 2. The blue line indicates the orientation of the slit and the cyan rectangles are the apertures over which the spectra are extracted. The MHOs (2203-2205,2245,2246) identified by Varricatt et al. (2010), Lee et al. (2012), and Ioannidis & Froebrich (2012) are highlighted in the black ellipses. The yellow contours trace the location and extent of the H2 knots identified by Froebrich et al. (2011).
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The HK spectrum of G19.88-0.53 extracted over the apertures K1, K2 and K3 covering three H2 knots (refer Fig. 3). The spectral lines identified along all the three apertures are marked over the spectra and the details of these lines are given in Table 3.

As propounded by several authors (Caratti o Garatti et al., 2015, and references therein), shock-excited lines of H2 and [Feii] and broad bandheads of CO are the spectral carriers responsible for the enhanced 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission of EGOs. Of the few spectroscopic studies of EGOs (e.g. De Buizer & Vacca, 2010; Caratti o Garatti et al., 2015; Onaka et al., 2016; Issac et al., 2019), De Buizer & Vacca (2010) focussed on MIR spectroscopy of two EGOs including G19.88-0.53 using the NIRI instrument on the Gemini North telescope. The spectra extracted towards the three associated knots of G19.88-0.53 show the presence of the shock-excited 00S(9)\rm 0-0~{}S(9) line of H2 at 4.695 μm\rm\mu m. Moreover no continuum emission was detected towards these knots. In our study, we investigate the NIR regime to identify shock indicators and confirm the association of G19.88-0.53 with protostellar outflows.

The H2 line image towards G19.88-0.53, presented in Varricatt et al. (2010) reveals the presence of a bipolar outflow in the east-west direction which is consistent with CO outflow detected by Beuther et al. (2002b). Same results were obtained by Lee et al. (2012) using the UWISH2 survey and they enlist G19.88-0.53 as an EGO with a large-scale (angular scale of \sim 1.6 arcmin) bipolar outflow. In Fig. 3 we display the continuum-subtracted H2 line image from Varricatt et al. (2010) where the orientation of the slit position for UIST observations is marked. The identified apertures, K1, K2, and K3, over which the spectra are extracted are also highlighted in the figure. Molecular hydrogen objects (MHOs) from the catalogue of molecular hydrogen emission-line objects333http://cdsweb.u-strasbg.fr/cgi-bin/qcat?J/A+A/511/A24 (Davis et al., 2010) are also indicated. MHO 2245 and MHO 2246 are new additions to the catalogue by Lee et al. (2012) and Ioannidis & Froebrich (2012), respectively. Identified locations and extent of H2 knots from Froebrich et al. (2011) are also shown in the figure. Apertures K1 and K2 probe the knots in MHO 2204 and K3 samples the central knot in MHO 2203. The extracted spectra are shown in Fig. 4 where we see strong detections of several H2 lines. The lines detected and their corresponding wavelengths are listed in Table 3.

Table 3: Lines detected in the spectra extracted along the apertures K1, K2 and K3 towards G19.88-0.53.
 Line Wavelength (μm\rm\mu m)
 H2 101-0 S(7) 1.7480
H2 101-0 S(6) 1.7880
H2 101-0 S(5) 1.8358
H2 101-0 S(4) 1.8920
H2 101-0 S(3) 1.9576
H2 101-0 S(2) 2.0338
H2 212-1 S(3) 2.0735
H2 101-0 S(1) 2.1218
H2 101-0 S(0) 2.2235
H2 212-1 S(1) 2.2477

The H2 lines detected in the spectra could have either a thermal or a non-thermal origin. Jets and outflows that are heated to typically few 1000 K can give rise to thermal emission from shock fronts. Whereas, non-thermal emission is ascribed to fluorescence produced by non-ionizing UV photons. Shock excited emission arises from low levels of excitation, whereas UV fluorescence populates both high and low-v states (Davis et al., 2003; Caratti o Garatti et al., 2015). Our spectra do not show the presence of transitions with v\geq 6. In addition, the ratio of 10S(1)/21S(1)\rm 1-0\,S(1)/2-1\,S(1) is estimated to be 8:1\sim 8:1. These suggest the origin of the detected H2 lines to be due to thermal excitation. However, the absence of relevant fluorescent H2 emission in G19.88-0.53 can also be attributed to high extinction that screens the UV photons emanating from the central star. Nonetheless, morphological resemblance of the extended H2 emission knots to a bipolar jet and the association with an outflow source supports the shock excitation scenario. The shock-excited origin of the detected H2\rm H_{2} lines confirms that the transitions of this molecule within the IRAC 4.5 μm\rm\mu m band are among the spectral carriers responsible for the enhanced ‘green’ emission that classifies G19.88-0.53 as an EGO.

3.3 Emission from dust

IRAC bands trace the thermal emission associated with the warm dust component and emission from the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons excited by the UV photons in the photodissociation regions. However, emission from the stellar photosphere dominates the shorter wavelength bands (3.6 and 4.5 um) (Watson et al., 2008). In addition to this, the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m band includes emission from shock-excited H2 lines and CO (v=10=1-0) band at 4.6 μm\rm\mu m with contribution from the Brα\alpha and Pfβ\beta lines. The spatial distribution of dust emission towards G19.88-0.53 is shown in Fig. 5(a), which is a colour composite image generated using the IRAC 8.0, 4.5, and 3.6 μm\rm\mu m bands. The APEX+Planck 870 μm\rm\mu m contours are overlaid along with the contours of the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission. A clump is clearly identified at 870 μm\rm\mu m. Warm dust sampled at 8.0 μm\rm\mu m is seen to be extended towards the south and west of the clump and, at 870 μm\rm\mu m, a clearly discernible large-scale filamentary structure is visible with the clump located within it.

3.3.1 Dust clump

Refer to caption
Figure 5: (a) Colour composite image of the region associated with G19.88-0.53, using IRAC 3.6 μm\rm\mu m (blue), 4.5 μm\rm\mu m (green) and 8.0 μm\rm\mu m (red) bands. The white contours depict the APEX+Planck 870 μm\rm\mu m emission with levels 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 20, and 26σ\sigma (σ=0.3Jybeam1\rm\sigma=0.3\,Jy\,beam^{-1}). The yellow contours represent the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission with the contour levels same as in Fig. 2. (b) The high resolution 2.7 mm ALMA map towards G19.88-0.53 is depicted in the colour scale. The positions of the two radio components and the six mm peaks identified are marked on the map. The yellow contours represent emission at 7 mm from Zapata et al. (2006) with contour levels at 4, 8, 18, 22, and 26σ\sigma (σ=53.8μJybeam1\rm\sigma=53.8\,{\mu}Jy\,beam^{-1}). The filled black triangles are the positions of the radio peaks identified by these authors. The beams of the 2.7 and 7 mm maps are shown as filled red and yellow ellipses, respectively, towards the bottom right of the image.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Spectral energy distribution of the APEX+Planck clump associated with G19.88-0.53 in the wavelength range 70 to 870 μm\rm\mu m. The integrated flux density within the clump, represented by black circles is plotted in log-scale with a 15% error bar. The best-fit modified blackbody model is represented by the solid curve. The data point corresponding to 70 μm\rm\mu m is excluded in the SED fitting.

From the APEX+Planck 870 μm\rm\mu m map, a clump is identified using the two-dimensional Clumpfind procedure (Williams, de Geus & Blitz, 1994) with a 3σ\sigma (σ=0.3Jybeam1\rm\sigma=0.3\,Jy\,beam^{-1}) threshold and optimum contour levels. The aperture of this clump coincides with the 3σ\sigma level contour of the 870 μm\rm\mu m emission. To investigate the nature of the cold dust associated with the identified clump, we assume the FIR emission to be optically thin and model the same with a modified single-temperature blackbody following the formalism discussed in detail in Issac et al. (2019). The SED and the best fit modified blackbody are shown in Fig. 6. The model derived dust temperature and line-of-sight column density values are 18.6±\pm1.2 K and 5.3±1.0×1022cm25.3\pm 1.0\times 10^{22}\,\rm cm^{-2}, respectively. The mass of the clump is estimated to be 1911 MM_{\odot}. This is in good agreement with the estimate of 2100M\sim 2100\,M_{\odot} derived by Beuther et al. (2002a, 2005) from the 1.2 mm emission. Both these values derived from dust emission are lower by a factor of 2\sim 2 in comparison with the value of 3900M3900\,M_{\odot} obtained from the H13CO+\rm H^{13}CO^{+} line emission (Qiu et al., 2007). The discrepancy could be due to the fact that the H13CO+\rm H^{13}CO^{+} line traces the lower density gas and could even be slightly optically thick as opposed to the optically thin assumption we have employed while estimating the clump mass. Moreover, the H13CO+\rm H^{13}CO^{+} is likely to be affected by outflows and shocks associated with the clump. The derived clump parameters are listed in Table 4.

Table 4: Physical parameters derived for the clump identified to be associated with G19.88-0.53. The peak position of the 870 μm\rm\mu m emission, radius, mean temperature and column density, mass, and volume number density of the clump are listed.
Peak position Radius Mean TdT_{d} Mean N(H2)N(\rm H_{2}) Mass Number density, n(H2)n(\rm H_{2})
α(J2000)()hms\rm\alpha(J2000)\,({{}^{h}}\,{{}^{m}}\,{{}^{s}}) δ(J2000)(°)\rm\delta(J2000)\,(\degree\,\arcmin\,\arcsec) (pc) (K) (1022cm2\rm 10^{22}\,cm^{-2}) (MM_{\odot}) (103cm3\rm 10^{3}\,cm^{-3})
 18 29 14.14 -11 50 28.57 0.7 18.6±\pm1.2 5.3±\pm1.0 1911 18.0

3.3.2 Millimeter cores

Table 5: Physical parameters of the 2.7 mm cores associated with G19.88-0.53.
Core Peak position Deconvolved size Integrated flux density Peak flux density VLSRV_{\rm LSR} ΔV\Delta V
RA (J2000) ()hms({{}^{h}}~{}{{}^{m}}~{}{{}^{s}}) Dec (J2000) (°)(\degree~{}\arcmin~{}\arcsec) (arcsec×\timesarcsec) (mJy) (mJy/beam) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1})
MM1 18 29 14.4 -11 50 24.5 0.65×\times0.44 10.7 3.4 44.2 6.0
MM2 18 29 14.4 -11 50 22.6 1.49×\times0.94 30.9 3.5 45.3 5.7
MM3 18 29 14.4 -11 50 24.0 0.98×\times0.50 11.9 2.3 43.3 4.5
MM4 18 29 14.4 -11 50 23.7 0.98×\times0.50 11.9 2.3 43.3 4.5
MM5 18 29 14.8 -11 50 25.3 0.74×\times0.26 5.4 1.9 43.3 2.3
MM6 18 29 14.8 -11 50 24.3 0.62×\times0.46 3.9 1.1 42.3 1.6

MM3 and MM4 are unresolved in the map, hence the quoted deconvolved size, integrated, peak flux density, LSR velocity, and velocity width refer to the combined region covering both the cores.

The high-resolution ALMA 2.7 mm dust continuum map displayed in Fig. 5(b) shows the presence of six dense, compact dust cores labelled MM1MM6\rm MM1-MM6. Contours of the 7 mm VLA map from the study by Zapata et al. (2006) is overlaid on the image. The 7 mm emission is more extended, especially in the east-west direction. In an earlier study, Qiu et al. (2007) have mapped IRAS 18264-1152 at 1.3 and 3.4 mm with Plateau de Bure Interferometer. They identify two peaks at both the wavelengths. Their western peak seems to be in the vicinity of cores, MM1MM4\rm MM1-MM4 and the eastern component likely associated with cores, MM5 and MM6. Parameters of the identified mm cores are listed in Table 5. The deconvolved sizes of the cores are estimated by fitting 2D Gaussians to each component using the 2D fitting tool of CASA viewer. MM3 and MM4 are unresolved in the map, hence the quoted size, integrated and peak flux density refer to the combined region covering both the cores.

3.4 Molecular line emission

Molecular line observations are tools for understanding the kinematics and chemical environment of a molecular cloud and and its stage in the evolutionary sequence. In this work, we use archival data from ALMA to study the emission from molecular lines in the region associated with G19.88-0.53.

3.4.1 CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH line emission

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Spectra of the A/ECH3OHA/E-\rm CH_{3}OH lines detected towards the mm cores associated with G19.88-0.53 extracted from the high-resolution Band 7 spectral cube. The dashed red and blue lines indicate the peak positions of the ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH and ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH lines, respectively.

A forest of CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH lines are detected towards the mm cores in ALMA Band 7 (275373GHz)\rm(275-373\,GHz) within a frequency interval of 3 GHz (337.1340.1GHz)\rm(337.1-340.1\,GHz). This is expected as the CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH molecule is believed to be present in massive star forming regions from the very early stages (Wirström et al., 2011). For identification of the lines, the data cube is corrected for the LSR velocity of 43.6kms1\rm 43.6\,km\,s^{-1} (Qiu et al., 2007; Beuther et al., 2002a). Subsequently, the detected lines are identified by comparing with the rest frequencies reported in the molecular databases, NIST444http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/micro/table5/start.pl (Lovas, 2004), CDMS555https://cdms.astro.uni-koeln.de/cdms/portal (Müller et al., 2005), and JPL666https://spec.jpl.nasa.gov (Pickett et al., 1998). The CDMS and JPL databases are interactively loaded on the spectra employing the Weeds extension of CLASS90. The extracted spectra towards the mm cores are plotted in Fig. 7 displaying the identified set of AA- and ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH lines corresponding to the J=76J=7-6 transition. It should be noted here that for cores MM3 and MM4, the separation is less than the beam size, hence the combined spectrum is plotted in the figure. CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH lines are seen to be much stronger towards MM1 and MM2 as compared to the other cores. The accurate identification of the detected lines enables us to determine the LSR velocities of the individual cores which are listed in Table 5.

3.4.2 Emission in isotopologues of CO

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Low-resolution spectra of the CO13(10)\rm{}^{13}CO\,(1-0) and C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) lines towards G19.88-0.53. The area over which the spectra are extracted covers all the cores. The vertical green line denotes the LSR velocity, 43.6kms1\rm 43.6\,km\,s^{-1}. The red and blue arrows in (b) spans the range over which the integrated intensity map is constructed to trace the outflow wings (discussed in Section 4.3.2).
Refer to caption
Figure 9: The J=32J=3-2 transition of C17O\rm C^{17}O towards the mm cores associated with G19.88-0.53 from the (a) low-resolution (5.2 arcsec×\times2.6 arcsec) data averaged over the beam and (b) high resolution (0.67 arcsec×\times0.47 arcsec) data averaged over a region covering each core. The magenta curve represents the best fit to each spectrum. Double Gaussians are used to fit the spectra towards MM5 and MM6 (low-resolution) and MM6 (high-resolution). The dashed green line denotes the LSR velocity of each core. The magenta lines in the spectra mark the emission peaks.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Same as Fig. 9 for the C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) transition detected towards the mm cores associated with G19.88-0.53 from the (a) medium-resolution (2.6 arcsec×\times2.2 arcsec) data extracted over the same region as in Fig. 9(a) and (b) high-resolution (0.46 arcsec×\times0.28 arcsec) data averaged over a region covering each core.
Table 6: Parameters of the isotopologues of the CO molecule detected towards G19.88-0.53 from spectral data cubes at different spatial resolutions. The LSR velocity (VLSRV_{\rm LSR}), line width (ΔV\Delta V), intensity and velocity integrated intensity (Iν𝑑V\int I_{\nu}dV) of each transition are obtained from the single or double Gaussian profiles fits to the extracted spectra.
Core VLSRV_{\rm LSR} ΔV\Delta V Intensity Iν𝑑V\int I_{\nu}dV
(kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}) (Jybeam1\rm Jy\,beam^{-1}) (Jybeam1kms1\rm Jy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1})
CO13(10)\rm{}^{13}CO\,(1-0)
Low-resolution (16.9 arcsec×\times8.0 arcsec)
MM1-MM6 43.7 6.7 4.9 34.8
C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2)
Low-resolution (5.2 arcsec×\times2.6 arcsec)
MM1, MM3 & MM4 43.8 4.0 3.0 12.7
MM2 44.1 3.6 4.0 15.3
MM5 & MM6 42.8 (B) 2.5 (B) 1.8 (B) 4.6 (B)
48.8 (R) 2.8 (R) -0.1 (R) -0.3 (R)
High-resolution (0.67 arcsec×\times0.47 arcsec)
MM1 43.8 2.4 0.1 0.3
MM2 44.7 3.7 0.2 0.7
MM3 & MM4 43.4 2.3 0.2 0.4
MM5 43.6 1.1 0.04 0.04
MM6 42.1 (B) 1.7 (B) 0.09 (B) 0.2 (B)
45.2 (R) 0.9 (R) -0.02 (R) -0.02 (R)
C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0)
Low-resolution (16.9 arcsec×\times8.0 arcsec)
MM1-MM6 44.2 3.0 1.9 6.0
Medium-resolution (2.6 arcsec×\times2.2 arcsec)
MM1, MM3 & MM4 44.0 3.4 0.2 0.6
MM2 44.1 2.9 0.2 0.8
MM5 & MM6 42.9 2.2 0.1 0.3
High-resolution (0.46 arcsec×\times0.28 arcsec)
MM1 43.2 1.0 0.01 0.01
MM2 44.6 2.9 0.01 0.04
MM3 & MM4 43.1 1.6 0.02 0.03
MM5 43.8 1.7 0.004 0.01
MM6 43.2 1.9 0.004 0.01

In the ALMA Band 3 (84116GHz)\rm(84-116\,GHz) and Band 7 (275373GHz)\rm(275-373\,GHz), we detect three CO transitions, CO13(10)\rm{}^{13}CO\,(1-0), C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) and C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2), with rest frequencies 110.2013543, 109.7821734, and 337.7061123 GHz, respectively. The rotational transition lines of the isotopologues of CO are well known tracers of both outflow and inflow motion (Kutner & Tucker, 1975; Zhang et al., 2001; Beuther et al., 2002b; Wu et al., 2009). Transitions from different energy levels probe the kinematic structure of different parts of the molecular clouds. Since transitions from higher rotational levels of CO molecules have a higher critical density, their emission arises from high density regions like the dense cores. On the other hand, emission lines corresponding to lower J transitions trace the kinematics of the low density regions of the molecular cloud (Rygl et al., 2013).

Low-resolution spectra probing the CO13(10)\rm{}^{13}CO\,(1-0) and C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) molecular line emission is plotted in Fig. 8. The beam covers all the cores. Single Gaussians are used to fit these spectra. The CO13(10)\rm{}^{13}CO\,(1-0) line peaks at the LSR velocity of the dust clump. Multiple peaks noticeable in C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) spectrum are the combined effect of the cores and the peak velocities are consistent with the LSR velocities derived for the cores. In case of the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) line, spectra from the lower resolution Band 7 data cube are extracted over the beam area covering three regions (1) MM1, MM3, and MM4 (2) MM2, and (3) MM5 and MM6 and shown in Fig. 9(a). Region (1), covering MM1, MM3, and MM4, shows a clear red wing. However, for region (2), probing MM2, the wing is not very prominent. In case of region (3), an inverse P-Cygni profile is seen. A double Gaussian is used to fit this profile. Fig. 9(b) shows the high-resolution spectra of this line. As discussed earlier, since the separation between MM3 and MM4 is less than the beam size, the spectrum is extracted over a region covering both cores. Given the signal-to-noise ratio of the high-resolution spectra for MM1, MM3, and MM4 it is difficult to interpret the second red-shifted peaks seen as genuine additional components. These features are mostly broad outflow wings. Core MM6 displays a distinct inverse P-Cygni profile and is fitted by a double Gaussian.

Medium resolution C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) line spectra extracted over the same three regions used for the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) spectra are plotted in Fig. 10(a) with the high-resolution spectra presented in Fig. 10(b). Similar features are seen though the signal-to-noise of the high-resolution spectra, especially for MM5 and MM6, is poor compared to that of the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) line spectra. Also, the medium resolution combined spectrum for MM5 and MM6 shows an additional red-shifted narrow component which is difficult to understand. This component is, however, not detected in the high-resolution spectrum extracted over the same region, and hence could possibly be an artifact. Line parameters for the three transitions of CO determined by fitting Gaussian profiles using CLASS90 are listed in Table 6.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 Ionized jet

Refer to caption
Figure 11: Radio SED for component R1 (IRAS 18264-1152b) using the data points at 1391.6 MHz, 8 GHz (3.6 cm) and 23 GHz (1.3 cm). At 651.4 MHz, an upper limit for the flux density is given. The straight line gives the linear fit with spectral index estimate of 0.58±0.190.58\pm 0.19.

Given that G19.88-0.53 is classified as an EGO, and hence likely associated with a jet/outflow, we are prompted to investigate the nature of the associated radio emission. As seen in Fig. 2(b), the ionized emission associated with G19.88-0.53 exhibits a linear morphology consisting of the components R1 and R2 in the east-west direction. The radio emission from both the components is weak (0.2mJy\rm\sim 0.2\,mJy) and they are located towards the centroid of a large scale (\sim 1 arcmin) molecular outflow (Fig. 15a, Section 4.3.2). These traits are in agreement with the typical observational features expected in ionized jets (Anglada, 1996; Rodriguez, 1997; Purser et al., 2016; Rosero et al., 2019; Obonyo et al., 2019).

The spectral index is a crucial parameter that helps in understanding the nature of the radiation mechanism. This is defined as SνναS_{\nu}\propto\nu^{\alpha}, where, SνS_{\nu} is the flux density at frequency ν\nu. As discussed in Section 3.1, G19.88-0.53 is not detected in Band 4. Further, weak emission in Band 5 would render the in-band spectral index estimation highly unreliable as has also been discussed by Rosero et al. (2016). Emission at 1391.6 MHz encompasses the component IRAS 18264-1152b. This makes it possible to use this uGMRT sub-band and VLA maps from Zapata et al. (2006) to derive the spectral index of R1. An accurate determination of the spectral index requires same spatial scales to be probed at the frequencies used. The synthesized beam sizes of uGMRT 1391.6 MHz and VLA 8 GHz (3.6 cm) maps are nearly identical indicating similar uv coverage and hence similar spatial scales probed. This is not the case for the 1.3 cm data. For this, we convolve the map to the match the resolution of the other two frequencies. The radio SED is shown in Fig. 11. For 651.4 MHz, we obtain an upper limit for the flux density (rms of the map) which is shown in the plot. For the VLA maps, we use the peak flux density as well. The fit to the radio SED of component R1 (IRAS 18264-1152b) yields a spectral index value of 0.58±0.190.58\pm 0.19. that corroborates well with radio continuum emission originating due to the thermal free-free emission from an ionized collimated stellar wind (Rosero et al., 2019, and references therein). For component R2, similar analysis of spectral index estimation is not possible given that this component is not detected in the VLA maps of Zapata et al. (2006).

The spectral index estimation of R1 obtained from the combination of uGMRT and VLA maps of Zapata et al. (2006) is in excellent agreement with value of 0.6±0.10.6\pm 0.1 derived by Rosero et al. (2016) using flux densities at four central frequencies (4.9 and 7.4 GHz at 6 cm and 20.9 and 25.5 GHz at 1.3 cm). In comparison, Zapata et al. (2006) obtain a lower value of 0.27±0.060.27\pm 0.06. The 3.6 cm flux density of IRAS 18264-1152b used by these authors would also include emission from IRAS 18264-1152a and IRAS 18264-1152c thus rendering a shallower slope. Based on the weak emission, elongated morphology, association with molecular outflows and rising spectral index values, the radio emission favours shock ionization over the HII region picture. Hence, Rosero et al. (2019) list source F (R1) as a ionized jet/wind candidate. Inference of a likely thermal jet or a partially optically thick HII region is drawn by Zapata et al. (2006) as well. The identification of R1 as a thermal jet is well supported by the detection of several shock-excited H2 lines in the UKIRT-NIR spectra of G19.88-0.53 presented in Section 3.2. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detection of the ionized jet associated with G19.88-0.53 at the lower frequency regime of uGMRT. Similar result is obtained by our group for EGO G12.42+0.50 (Issac et al., 2019). The authors propose the coexistence of a thermal jet and a UC Hii region driven by the same MYSO to explain the observed radio, mm, and IR emission for G12.42+0.50.

4.2 A protocluster revealed

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Multifrequency picture of the various components of the protocluster. The ALMA 2.7 mm map is depicted in the colour scale. The yellow contour traces the 3σ3\sigma level of the 4.5μm\rm\mu m emission. The red stars mark the positions of the radio components R1 and R2 from the uGMRT map. The black filled circles indicate the positions of the radio sources identified by Rosero et al. (2016). The magenta triangles represent the radio components from Zapata et al. (2006). The position of the MYSO associated with G19.88-0.53 is indicated with ‘\ast’. The filled yellow squares are the 44 GHz methanol masers spots in the vicinity of G19.88-0.53 identified by Rodríguez-Garza et al. (2017).
Table 7: Identified radio and mm components of the protocluster associated with G19.88-0.53.
Compact radio sources Radio components Radio components Millimetre cores
VLA1 VLA2 uGMRT 1391.6 MHz3 ALMA 2.7 mm 3 Remark
A - R2 - MYSO4/Ionized jet
B - - - UCHii/Ionized jet
C - - - UCHii/Ionized jet
D - - MM3 & MM4 UCHii/Ionized jet
E IRAS 18264-1152c - MM1 UCHii/Ionized jet
F IRAS 18264-1152b R1 MM2 Ionized jet
G - - - UCHii/Ionized jet
H - - - UCHii/Ionized jet
- IRAS 18264-1152a - - UCHii/Ionized jet
- - - MM5 Dense core
- - - MM6 Dense core

1Rosero et al. (2016); 2 Zapata et al. (2006); 3This work; 4De Buizer & Vacca (2010)

EGO G19.88-0.53 has been proposed as an outflow powered by a MYSO (De Buizer & Vacca, 2010) and a multiple outflow source (Varricatt et al., 2010). Several studies (e.g. Cyganowski, Brogan & Hunter, 2007; Cyganowski et al., 2011) have shown that MYSOs are actually protoclusters harbouring protostars with different masses and in various stages of evolution. Given the predilection of high-mass stars to form in clustered environments, it is likely that EGOs, in fact harbour protoclusters rather than single high-mass stars. Based on SOFIA FORCAST imaging and archival infrared data of twelve EGOs, Towner et al. (2019) suggest the number of massive sources per EGO to be between 0.9 to 1.9. Similar inferences have been drawn from studies towards other identified EGOs (e.g. Brogan et al., 2011; Cyganowski et al., 2012).

The 870 μm\rm\mu m clump cocoons the EGO G19.88-0.53 where the extended 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission lies towards the centre as is seen in Figure 5(a). In Fig. 12, we present the various radio and mm sources associated with this EGO. The 2.7 mm dust emission, with the cluster of detected cores lie deeply embedded within the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission. Portion of the 3σ3\sigma contour of the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission is seen in the region displayed in the figure. Within the dust emission lie the two radio components R1 and R2 mapped at 1391.6 MHz with uGMRT. As discussed in the previous section, R1 (VLA source F) is most likely an ionized thermal jet. Regarding component R2 (VLA source A) and the other six compact VLA sources (B, C, D, E, G, and H) located within the EGO, Rosero et al. (2016) discuss the likelihood of them being Hii regions around rapidly accreting massive stars that quench the UV photons thus giving rise to weak radio sources. They also keep alive the debate of these being ionized jets instead. Zapata et al. (2006) also suggest that the component IRAS 18264-1152c (VLA source E) is likely to be an optically thick Hii region. These authors detect an additional component IRAS 18264-1152a of similar nature taking the number of distinct radio sources to be nine. Furthermore, from the analysis of ALMA 2.7 mm high-resolution continuum map, we discover six compact cores located within the EGO. Table 7 lists the radio and mm sources and their cross-identification.

Given the detection of several radio components and mm cores, the picture of a protocluster with multiple (eleven) members is clearly perceivable. The observational signatures of the members show clear evidence of different evolutionary phases. However, high-sensitivity radio surveys of ionized jets have shown association with extended lobes and string of radio knots (e.g. Garay et al., 2003; Guzmán, Garay & Brooks, 2010; Purser et al., 2016; Hofner et al., 2017). From the alignment of the radio sources B, C and F, and the spectral index of F, one can visualize a similar scenario. It is thus plausible that we are probing a string of knots of a single ionized jet driven by R1/MM2/F. Similarly, the components A and G could be part of this jet system though the possibility of another jet driven by R2/MYSO/A cannot be ruled out. If these radio components are indeed knots/lobes of the identified jet-systems, then the number of distinct members of the detected protocluster would be less than eleven. Further studies are required to interpret the exact nature the compact radio sources.

4.2.1 CH3OHCH_{3}OH rotational temperature

Refer to caption
Figure 13: Spectra of the A/ECH3OHA/E-\rm CH_{3}OH lines detected towards G19.88-0.53 extracted over three regions from the low-resolution Band 7 spectral cube. The top panel is the spectrum extracted over the region covering MM1, MM3 and MM4, middle panel corresponds to MM2 and the bottom panel is over the region covering MM5 and MM6. The dashed red and blue lines indicate the peak positions of the ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH and ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH lines, respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 14: The rotational temperature diagram of the CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH lines at the mm cores, MM1 through MM6 towards G19.88-0.53. The circles indicate the data points with 3σ\sigma error bars. The linear least-squares fit is indicated by the dashed line.

Molecular line transitions can be used to analyse the core properties. As seen in Fig. 7, multiple transitions of CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH are detected towards the mm cores associated with G19.88-0.53. This motivates us to use rotational temperature diagram (RTD) (also referred to as Boltzman diagram) to estimate the rotational temperature and the beam averaged column density of the identified mm cores. To generate the RTDs, we use the low-resolution (5.3 arcsec×\times2.6 arcsec) ALMA data cubes. Given the beam size, we extract the spectrum covering three regions (1) MM1, MM3, and MM4, (2) MM2, and (3) MM5 and MM6. The retrieved spectra are shown in Fig. 13 and the line parameters are listed in Table A11,A12, and A13. The detected methanol lines have linewidths of several kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and none show unusually high line intensities. Thus these are unlikely to be associated with maser excitations.

Considering the molecular emission to be optically thin, the column density of the upper level, NuN_{\rm u} can be computed from the integrated line intensity following the expression,

Nu=8πkν2hc3AuIν(Jy beam1)𝑑V(km s1)/ηbfN_{\rm u}=\frac{8\pi k\nu^{2}}{hc^{3}A_{\rm u}}\int I_{\nu}(\textrm{Jy\,beam}^{-1})dV(\textrm{km\,s}^{-1})/\eta_{\rm bf} (1)

where AuA_{\rm u} is Einstein coefficient and ηbf\eta_{\rm bf} is the beam-filling factor, taken to be 1 since the emission region is larger than the beam size (Ren et al., 2012). Further, under conditions of local thermodynamic equilibrium, the measured line intensities are proportional to the level populations that are characterized by a single rotational temperature. The rotational temperature, TrotT_{\rm rot} and the beam averaged column density, NTN_{\rm T} can be determined using the expression (Blake et al., 1987; Liu et al., 2002; Remijan et al., 2004),

ln(Nugu)=ln(NTQrot)EuTrot=ln[2.04×1020Iν(Jy beam1)𝑑V(km s1)θaθb(arcsec2)ν3(GHz)Sμ2(debye2)]\textrm{ln}\bigg{(}\frac{N_{\rm u}}{g_{\rm u}}\bigg{)}=\textrm{ln}\bigg{(}\frac{N_{\rm T}}{Q_{\rm rot}}\bigg{)}-\frac{E_{\rm u}}{T_{\rm rot}}\\ =\textrm{ln}\bigg{[}2.04\times 10^{20}\frac{\int I_{\nu}(\textrm{Jy\,beam}^{-1})dV(\textrm{km\,s}^{-1})}{\theta_{a}\theta_{b}\,(\textrm{arcsec}^{2})\nu^{3}(\rm GHz)S\mu^{2}(\textrm{debye}^{2})}\bigg{]} (2)

where, NuN_{\rm u}, gug_{\rm u} and EuE_{\rm u} are the upper-level column density, rotational degeneracy factor, and energy, respectively, Qrot(=1.23Trot1.5)Q_{\rm rot}(=1.23T_{\rm rot}^{1.5}) is the rotational partition function (Remijan et al., 2004; Ren et al., 2012), θa\theta_{a} and θb\theta_{b} are the beam sizes, ν\nu is the rest frequency, SS is the line strength, μ\mu is the dipole moment, and the integration of IνI_{\nu} over velocity, VV, is the integrated line intensity. Values for EuE_{\rm u} and Sμ2S\mu^{2} for detected transitions are retrieved from splatalogue - database for astronomical spectroscopy777http://www.cv.nrao.edu/php/splat/ and compiled in Table A10. The generated RTDs towards the mm cores are plotted in Fig. 14. Linear least-square fits to the data points gives the estimate of the rotational temperature, TrotT_{\rm rot} and the beam averaged column density, NTN_{\rm T} of the cores and are listed in Table 8. For cores MM1, MM3, and MM4, the estimates would be an average value of the three clumps as is the case with the estimates for MM5 and MM6. Estimated values of TrotT_{\rm rot} and NTN_{\rm T} lie in the range 47116K\sim\rm 47-116\,K and 0.74×1015cm2\sim\rm 0.7-4\times 10^{15}\,cm^{-2}, respectively with core MM2 being the hottest with a rotational temperature of 115.9 K. The rotational temperatures for the cores are greater than the average cold dust temperature of 18.6 K deduced for the dust clump (Section 3.3.1). The difference in these temperatures could be that the CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH emission arises from the hot cores. The gas and dust could also be thermally decoupled and the higher rotational temperatures could be the result of enhanced collisional excitations of the molecular gas by shocks in the outflow region. A large scatter is seen in the combined RTD of MM5 and MM6 possibly indicating more than one temperature components. However, higher resolution and better signal-to-noise ratio data are required to address this.

To examine the assumption of optically thin transitions, we derived the optical depth of the CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH lines adopting the following expression from Ren et al. (2012)

τ=c34ln28πν3πΔVNuAu[exp(hνkTrot)1]\tau=\frac{c^{3}\sqrt{4\ln 2}}{8\pi\nu^{3}\sqrt{\pi}\Delta V}N_{\rm u}A_{\rm u}\bigg{[}\exp\bigg{(}\frac{h\nu}{kT_{\rm rot}}\bigg{)}-1\bigg{]} (3)

The estimated values are listed in Table A11,A12, and A13. Only two transitions for the combined cores of MM1, MM3, and MM4 show values 0.1\sim 0.1. Rest of the lines are far more optically thin. Considering TdT_{d} (18.6 K) instead of TrotT_{\rm rot}, to account for temperature uncertainties, if any, also gives optically thin estimates for the transitions. In case of optically thick lines, effects of optical depth can be taken into account by multiplying the term Nu/gu{N_{\rm u}}/{g_{\rm u}} with a correction factor Cτ=τ/(1eτ)C_{\tau}=\tau/(1-{\rm e}^{-\tau}) and subsequently fitting for the rotational temperature iteratively (Ren et al., 2012). We also estimate the relative abundance of CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH with respect to the H2 molecule and tabulate the values in Table 8 along with the H2 number density.

Menten et al. (1986), in their study of EE-type methanol lines towards a few Galactic molecular line sources concluded that these lines originate from hot clumps embedded in the molecular gas and have densities 106107cm3\sim\rm 10^{6}-10^{7}\,cm^{-3}, temperatures 100K\sim\rm 100\,K, and sizes 1pc\sim\rm 1\,pc. The abundance relative to the H2 molecule was found to be in the range of 10710610^{-7}-10^{-6}. In another study of molecular clouds, Leurini et al. (2007) study the early phases of high-mass stars, particularly the protostellar objects and IRDCs, using methanol as a diagnostic tool. In their study, they discuss on the origin of CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH lines which could arise from the different components of the protostellar object, which includes the overall emission from the clump and the dense, hot core. In some cases contribution of outflow emission is also included. Temperatures, densities, and abundances fall in the range of 1736K\rm 17-36\,K, 2×1053×106cm3\rm 2\times 10^{5}-3\times 10^{6}\,cm^{-3}, and 7×10102×1087\times 10^{-10}-2\times 10^{-8}, respectively, if the molecular transition occurs from the bulk emission of the clump. The range changes to 60300K\rm 60-300\,K, 106cm3\rm\gtrsim 10^{6}cm^{-3}, and 107\gtrsim 10^{-7}, respectively for hot cores. The estimated values for cores associated with G19.88-0.53 indicates the origin of the CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH emission from hot cores, especially for MM1 to MM4.

4.2.2 Nature of mm cores

Table 8: Derived parameters of the mm cores associated with G19.88-0.53.
Core Radius (10310^{-3} pc) TrotT_{\rm rot} (K) NT(1015cm2)N_{\rm T}\,(\rm 10^{15}\,cm^{-2}) NT/N(H2)(107)N_{\rm T}/N(\rm H_{2})\,(\rm 10^{-7}) MassTrot{}_{T_{\rm rot}} (MM_{\odot}) n(H2)(108cm3)n(\rm H_{2})\,(\rm 10^{8}\,cm^{-3})
MM1 5.4 82.7±\pm13.4 3.3±\pm0.4 0.6 14.5 3.2
MM2 10.1 115.9±\pm23.5 3.9±\pm0.5 0.7 29.6 1.0
MM3 & MM4 6.6 82.7±\pm13.4 3.3±\pm0.4 0.6 16.1 1.9
MM5 5.2 47.2±\pm21.7 0.7±\pm0.3 0.1 13.1 3.2
MM6 5.3 47.2±\pm21.7 0.7±\pm0.3 0.1 9.5 2.2

To decipher the nature of the mm cores, we estimate the masses. This is done following the formalism described in Cheng et al. (2018). Assuming optically thin emission, the core masses can be expressed as

M =\displaystyle= 0.0417M(e0.533(λ/1.3mm)1(T/20K)11)(FνmJy)\displaystyle\displaystyle 0.0417\,M_{\odot}\left({\textrm{e}}^{0.533(\lambda/{1.3\,\textrm{mm}})^{-1}(T/{20\,\textrm{K}})^{-1}}-1\right)\left(\frac{F_{\nu}}{\textrm{mJy}}\right) (4)
×(κν0.00638cm2g1)1(d2.4kpc)2(λ1.3mm)3\displaystyle\displaystyle\times\left(\frac{\kappa_{\nu}}{0.00638\,\textrm{cm}^{2}\,\textrm{g}^{-1}}\right)^{-1}\left(\frac{d}{2.4\,\textrm{kpc}}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{\lambda}{1.3\,\textrm{mm}}\right)^{3}

where the opacity

κν=0.1(ν/1000 GHz)βcm2g1\kappa_{\nu}=0.1({\nu}/\textrm{1000~{}GHz})^{\beta}\,{\rm cm}^{2}\,{\rm g}^{-1} (5)

with β\beta, the dust emissivity spectral index, fixed at 2.0 is the same as used for modelling the FIR SED. FνF_{\nu} is the integrated flux density of each component, dd is the distance to the source and λ\lambda is the wavelength taken as 2.7 mm. Since we do not have the information of dust temperatures at the dense core scales, we use the estimated TrotT_{\rm rot} values in the above expression to derive masses. Compared to the average dust temperature of the clump, these temperatures would be a better choice to represent the hot cores. The mass estimates range between 1030M10-30\,{\rm M_{\odot}} and are listed in Table 8. Angular sizes given in Table 5 are converted to linear sizes and listed in the table. From the estimated masses and sizes, the detected cores satisfy the criterion, m(r)>870M(r/pc)1.33m(r)>870{\rm M_{\odot}}(r/\rm pc)^{1.33} (Kauffmann et al., 2010) and qualify as high-mass star forming cores. In comparison to the numbers discussed by Towner et al. (2019), we detect as many as eleven possible distinct massive components in the G19.88-0.53 protocluster that include MYSOs driving ionized jets/outflows and UCHii regions.

4.3 Kinematics of the protocluster G19.88-0.53

4.3.1 Infall signature in MM6

Table 9: The infall velocity, VinfV_{\rm inf} and mass infall rate, M˙inf\dot{M}_{\rm inf} of core MM6 associated with G19.88-0.53, estimated using the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) line.
Core VLSRV_{\rm LSR} VRV_{\rm R} VinfV_{\rm inf} M˙inf\dot{M}_{\rm inf}
(kms1\rm km~{}s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km~{}s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km~{}s^{-1}) (103Myr110^{-3}\,M_{\odot}\,\rm yr^{-1})
 MM6 42.3 45.2 2.9 16.1

As discussed in Section3.4, CO transitions from higher energy levels are likely tracers of the inner parts of molecular clouds. The C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) molecular transition shows an inverse P-Cygni profile for core MM6. Inverse P-Cygni profiles are generally considered as evidence of gas infall (Wu et al., 2009; Liu, Wu & Zhang, 2013). In such profiles, the redshifted absorption feature originates from the dense gas along the line-of-sight and located towards the near side of the observer and moving away. The emission component is due to the gas on the far side of the central source with its motion towards the observer. Although several studies have attributed the presence of an inverse P-Cygni or redshifted absorption profile to possible gas inflow to the central core (e.g. Keto, Ho & Reid, 1987; Zapata et al., 2008; Qin et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2013; Liu, Wu & Zhang, 2013), detailed investigations of inverse P-Cygni profiles of CO lines in high-mass star forming regions are fairly limited (e.g. Wu et al., 2009; Beltrán et al., 2011; Klaassen et al., 2011).

We make use of the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) line profile to estimate the infall velocity and the mass infall rate of the compact core, MM6 associated with G19.88-0.53. The infall velocity is estimated as VinfV_{\rm inf} = |VLSRVR||V_{\rm LSR}-V_{\rm R}| (Beltrán et al., 2011), where VRV_{\rm R} is the peak of the redshited absorption. From the infall velocity, the mass infall rate is determined following the expression M˙inf=4πR2Vinfρ\dot{M}_{\rm inf}=4\pi R^{2}V_{\rm inf}\rho (López-Sepulcre, Cesaroni & Walmsley, 2010), where ρ\rho is the average volume density of the cores, given by ρ=M/43πR3\rho=M/\frac{4}{3}\pi R^{3}. From the estimated core mass and radius, the infall velocity and mass infall rate are calculated to be 2.9kms1\rm 2.9\,km\,s^{-1} and 16.1×103Myr116.1\times 10^{-3}\,M_{\odot}\,\rm yr^{-1}, respectively and listed in Table 9. The infall velocity and mass infall rate are consistent with the typical values of several kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and 103102Myr1\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-2}\,M_{\odot}\,\rm yr^{-1}, respectively, found towards hot molecular cores (Liu, Wu & Zhang, 2013).

4.3.2 Outflow activity

Refer to caption
Figure 15: (a) The Spitzer IRAC colour composite image of G19.88-0.53 with the 3σ\sigma (σ=0.12mJybeam1\rm\sigma=0.12\,mJy\,beam^{-1}) ALMA 2.7 mm emission contours in black. The moment zero map from the the low-resolution data of the C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) line integrated from 36.1 to 42.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and from 45.1 to 51.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} are represented using blue and red contours, respectively. The contours start from the 3σ\sigma level for both the blue and red lobes and increase in steps of 2σ\sigma (σ=0.1\sigma=0.1 (blue); 0.2Jybeam1kms1\rm 0.2\,Jy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1} (red)). Magenta ellipses denote the location of the H2 knots identified by Lee et al. (2012); Varricatt et al. (2010). (b) The 2.7 mm emission is depicted in the grey scale. The positions of the mm cores are marked using ‘x’s. The moment zero map from the high-resolution data of C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) line over the velocity ranges 36.1 to 42.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and 45.1 to 51.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}, covering the blue and red lobes are illustrated in blue and red contours, respectively. The contours star from 5σ\sigma level for both lobes and increase in steps of 4σ\sigma (σ=16.2mJybeam1kms1\rm\sigma=16.2\,mJy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1}). The filled circles correspond to the radio sources detected by Rosero et al. (2016). (c) Same as (b) for the high-resolution C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) line integrated over the velocity ranges 41.6 to 43.6 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and 43.6 to 45.6 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} covering the blue and red lobes, respectively. The contours star from 3σ\sigma level for both lobes and increase in steps of 1σ\sigma (σ=7.7mJybeam1kms1\rm\sigma=7.7\,mJy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1}).
Refer to caption
Figure 16: Channel maps of C18O(32)\rm C^{18}O\,(3-2) line associated with G19.88-0.53 with a velocity resolution of 1kms1\rm 1\,km\,s^{-1} from the high-resolution data. Each box contains a pair of maps corresponding to the red and blueshifted emissions at the same offset from the LSR velocity. Channel widths are indicated at the top left of each map. The contours start from the 3σ\sigma level of each map and increases in steps of 1σ\sigma. The positions of MM1, MM2, MM3, MM4, MM5, and MM6 are marked.

Co-existing with ionized jets, molecular outflows are ubiquitous in active star forming cores (e.g. Beuther et al., 2002b; Purser et al., 2016). These outflows are understood to be driven by the jets that entrain the gas and dust from the surrounding clump. Based on a large number of studies, broad wings of CO lines are accepted as signatures of molecular outflow (Beuther et al., 2002b; Qiu et al., 2009). The detection of the isotopologues of CO towards G19.88-0.53 enables us to investigate the associated outflow(s). Towards this, we construct the zeroth moment map of the C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) emission from the low-resolution cube using the CASA task, IMMOMENTS. The velocity range to integrate is estimated from the extracted spectra discussed earlier and shown in Fig. 8(b). Following Sanna et al. (2014) and Issac et al. (2019), we define the inner limits of the velocity at VLSR±FWHM/2\sim V_{\rm LSR}\pm\rm FWHM/2, where FWHM is the C18O\rm C^{18}O linewidth. Thus, for the blue wing, the emission is integrated over the velocity range of 36.1 to 42.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}. Similarly, for the red wing the integration is done from 45.1 to 51.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}. The spatial extent and morphology of the outflow is revealed in Fig. 15(a). To facilitate morphological correlation of the outflow with the EGO, the contours of the blue and red lobes are overlaid on the Spitzer IRAC colour composite image. Magenta ellipses denote the location of the H2 knots identified by Lee et al. (2012) and Varricatt et al. (2010) from the continuum subtracted H2 image. Two distinct and spatially separated outflow lobes in the north-east and south-west direction are identified with the central part of G19.88-0.53 located towards the centroid of the outflow. The direction and location of the blue lobe is towards MHOs 2203 and 2205. In their survey of massive molecular outflows in high-mass star forming regions using the CO12(21)\rm{}^{12}CO\,(2-1) transition, Beuther et al. (2002b) discuss the detection of a bipolar CO outflow towards the infrared source, IRAS 18264-1152, associated with G19.88-0.53. The orientation is consistent with that seen in Fig. 15(a).

The figure also shows the 2.7 mm emission outlined by the black contour. A zoomed-in picture of the 2.7 mm map covering the central part of the extended green emission is displayed in Fig. 15(b) and (c). We investigate outflow signatures in the high-resolution C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) and C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) emission in Band 7 and Band 3 cubes, respectively. From a visual inspection of the outflow wings seen in the spectra presented in Fig. 9, the moment zero maps of the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) over the velocity ranges 36.1 to 42.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and 45.1 to 51.1 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} are constructed. The contours of the moment zero maps are overlaid in Fig. 15(b). Similarly, for the C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) emission, the moment zero maps are built over the velocity ranges 41.6 to 43.6 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} and 43.6 to 45.6 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}, the contours of which are overlaid on Fig. 15(c). Since the high-resolution C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) data have poor signal-to-noise ratio in comparison to the high-resolution C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2), no emission was detected above the noise beyond the outer limits, 41.6 and 45.6 kms1\rm km\,s^{-1} of the blue and red lobes, respectively. Interestingly, from the contours of the moment zero maps overlaid in Fig. 15(b) and (c), the high-resolution data traces another relatively collimated outflow in the south-east and north-west direction with core MM2 located in the close vicinity of its centroid.

To delve further, we generate channel maps of the high-resolution C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) transition shown in Fig. 16. The emission in the velocity range 41.643.6kms1\rm 41.6-43.6\,km\,s^{-1} is elongated towards south-east of core MM2, whereas the emission with velocities 44.645.6kms1\rm 44.6-45.6\,km\,s^{-1}, the elongation is towards north-west of MM2 thus giving clear indication of the presence of an outflow. Close to the LSR velocity of the MM2 (44.6kms1\rm 44.6\,km\,s^{-1}), as expected, there is overlap of emission from the blue and the red components. The small projected velocities seen is possibly due to the effect of small inclination angle.

Using the high-resolution SiO(21)\rm SiO(2-1) emission, Qiu et al. (2007) detected the presence of two quasi-perpendicular collimated outflows, one in the south-east and north-west direction and one in the north-east direction. Our high-resolution ALMA map probes the central portion of the outflow presented in Qiu et al. (2007). A close visual scrutiny of the figures presented by these authors indicate that the south-east and north-west SiO outflow is aligned with the C17O(32)\rm C^{17}O\,(3-2) and C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) outflows displayed in Fig. 15(b) and (c). Comparison with the H2 outflows and the MHOs show a possible alignment with MHO 2204. Further, the direction of north-east SiO(21)\rm SiO(2-1) outflow is consistent with MHO 2245. SiO is believed to be an excellent tracer of collimated molecular jets and shocks in the interstellar molecular clouds, since it is formed due to the sputtering of Si atoms from the grains due to fast shocks (Hatchell, Fuller & Millar, 2001; López-Sepulcre et al., 2011; Miettinen et al., 2006). In studies of several massive star forming regions, protostellar jets were revealed by SiO emission (e.g. Cesaroni et al., 1999; Leurini et al., 2013; Codella et al., 2013). From their study of the massive star formation region IRAS 19410+2336, Widmann et al. (2016) conclude that the SiO emission is possible from the high-velocity C-type or CJ-type shocks associated with protostellar jets. uGMRT results have identified an ionized jet with the core MM2 which is in excellent agreement with the collimated outflow from high-resolution C18O(10)\rm C^{18}O\,(1-0) transition and the co-spatial SiO outflow of Qiu et al. (2007). Several studies point to the possibility that the massive outflows are powered by mm sources (e.g. Beuther et al., 2002b; Marseille et al., 2008). From the spatial extent and the maximum velocity of the flow, the dynamical timescale (Tdyn=Lflow/vmaxT_{\rm dyn}=L_{\rm flow}/v_{\rm max}) is estimated to be of the order of 104yr\rm 10^{4}\,yr which is typical of outflows originating from mm cores rather than UC Hii regions (Shepherd et al., 1998; Shepherd, Testi & Stark, 2003; Qiu et al., 2009). This lends crucial support to our conclusion of R1 (MM2) being an ionized jet.

Based on multiwavelength data, the results and discussion presented in this paper enables us to draw a comprehensive picture of the star forming region associated with G19.88-0.53. The EGO, which is embedded in a massive cold clump within an IRDC, is unveiled to be a young and active protocluster harbouring several massive components in early evolutionary phases. In conjunction with ionized and H2 jets, the kinematic picture reveals multiple molecular outflows driven by one or more members of the protocluster.

5 SUMMARY

From the multi-frequency and multi-phase study of the EGO, G19.88-0.53 an interesting picture of it being a protocluster is revealed with multiple components spanning a wide evolutionary spectrum from hot cores in accretion phase to cores driving multiple outflows to possible UC Hii regions. The main results are summarized below:

  1. 1.

    G19.88-0.53 is located within a massive dust clump of mass 1911 MM_{\odot}, identified from the 870 μm\rm\mu m map with the 4.5 μm\rm\mu m emission towards its centre. Deeply embedded within this are nine distinct radio components and six dense mm cores unraveling a protocluster.

  2. 2.

    Deep uGMRT observations detect weak radio emission associated with G19.88-0.53. The radio continuum emission at 1391.6 MHz exhibits a linear structure consisting of two radio components, R1 and R2, in the east-west direction. The spectral index estimate of the radio component, R1, 0.58±0.190.58\pm 0.19, confirms it as a thermal jet.

  3. 3.

    The shock-excited H2 emission is established from the NIR spectroscopy in concordance with the jet/outflow scenario.

  4. 4.

    Six dense and compact dust cores (MM1-MM6) are identified from the high resolution ALMA map at 2.7 mm map. The brightest of these cores, MM2, is coincident with the radio component R1. Based on the mass and size estimates, the cores qualify as high-mass star forming cores.

  5. 5.

    RTDs from detected CH3OH\rm CH_{3}OH transitions yield rotational temperature and beam averaged column densities that are consistent with hot cores.

  6. 6.

    The J=32J=3-2 transition of C17O\rm C^{17}O towards MM6 show a clear inverse P-Cygni profile which is a signature of protostellar infall.

  7. 7.

    From the J=10J=1-0 transition of the C18O\rm C^{18}O, we detect the presence of a large scale molecular outflow in the direction of one of the lobes of the bipolar H2 outflow. At higher resolution an additional collimated, bipolar outflow in the south-east and north-west direction is detected likely powered by MM2. This suggests that G19.88-0.53 harbours multiple outflows.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the referee for valuable suggestions which has helped improve the manuscript. The authors would like to thank Prof. Luis A. Zapata for kindly providing the fits images of the VLA maps of G19.88-0.53 presented in Zapata et al. (2006). CHIC acknowledges the support of the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, under the project 12-R&D-TFR-5.02-0700. We thank the staff of the GMRT, who made these observations possible. GMRT is run by the National Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research. We also thank the staff of UKIRT for their assistance in the observations. UKIRT is owned by the University of Hawaii (UH) and operated by the UH Institute for Astronomy. When some of the data reported here were acquired, UKIRT was supported by NASA and operated under an agreement among the University of Hawaii, the University of Arizona, and Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center; operations were enabled through the cooperation of the East Asian Observatory. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#\#2017.1.00377.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. This research made use of NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech under contract with NASA. This publication also made use of data products from Herschel (ESA space observatory) and the ATLASGAL data products. The ATLASGAL project is a collaboration between the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, the European Southern Observatory (ESO) and the Universidad de Chile.

References

  • Anglada (1996) Anglada G., 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 93, Radio Emission from the Stars and the Sun, Taylor A. R., Paredes J. M., eds., pp. 3–14
  • Beltrán et al. (2011) Beltrán M. T., Cesaroni R., Neri R., Codella C., 2011, \aap, 525, A151
  • Benjamin et al. (2003) Benjamin R. A. et al., 2003, \pasp, 115, 953
  • Beuther et al. (2002a) Beuther H., Schilke P., Menten K. M., Motte F., Sridharan T. K., Wyrowski F., 2002a, \apj, 566, 945
  • Beuther et al. (2005) Beuther H., Schilke P., Menten K. M., Motte F., Sridharan T. K., Wyrowski F., 2005, \apj, 633, 535
  • Beuther et al. (2002b) Beuther H., Schilke P., Sridharan T. K., Menten K. M., Walmsley C. M., Wyrowski F., 2002b, \aap, 383, 892
  • Beuther et al. (2002c) Beuther H., Walsh A., Schilke P., Sridharan T. K., Menten K. M., Wyrowski F., 2002c, \aap, 390, 289
  • Blake et al. (1987) Blake G. A., Sutton E. C., Masson C. R., Phillips T. G., 1987, \apj, 315, 621
  • Brogan et al. (2011) Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Cyganowski C. J., Friesen R. K., Chandler C. J., Indebetouw R., 2011, \apjl, 739, L16
  • Caratti o Garatti et al. (2015) Caratti o Garatti A., Stecklum B., Linz H., Garcia Lopez R., Sanna A., 2015, \aap, 573, A82
  • Cesaroni et al. (1999) Cesaroni R., Felli M., Jenness T., Neri R., Olmi L., Robberto M., Testi L., Walmsley C. M., 1999, \aap, 345, 949
  • Chambers et al. (2009) Chambers E. T., Jackson J. M., Rathborne J. M., Simon R., 2009, \apjs, 181, 360
  • Chen et al. (2011) Chen X., Ellingsen S. P., Shen Z.-Q., Titmarsh A., Gan C.-G., 2011, \apjs, 196, 9
  • Cheng et al. (2018) Cheng Y., Tan J. C., Liu M., Kong S., Lim W., Andersen M., Da Rio N., 2018, \apj, 853, 160
  • Codella et al. (2013) Codella C., Beltrán M. T., Cesaroni R., Moscadelli L., Neri R., Vasta M., Zhang Q., 2013, \aap, 550, A81
  • Csengeri et al. (2016) Csengeri T. et al., 2016, \aap, 585, A104
  • Cyganowski, Brogan & Hunter (2007) Cyganowski C. J., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., 2007, \aj, 134, 346
  • Cyganowski et al. (2011) Cyganowski C. J., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Churchwell E., Zhang Q., 2011, \apj, 729, 124
  • Cyganowski et al. (2012) Cyganowski C. J., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Zhang Q., Friesen R. K., Indebetouw R., Chand ler C. J., 2012, \apjl, 760, L20
  • Cyganowski et al. (2008) Cyganowski C. J. et al., 2008, \aj, 136, 2391
  • Davis et al. (2010) Davis C. J., Gell R., Khanzadyan T., Smith M. D., Jenness T., 2010, \aap, 511, A24
  • Davis et al. (2003) Davis C. J., Smith M. D., Stern L., Kerr T. H., Chiar J. E., 2003, \mnras, 344, 262
  • De Buizer & Vacca (2010) De Buizer J. M., Vacca W. D., 2010, \aj, 140, 196
  • Fazio et al. (2004) Fazio G. G. et al., 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
  • Froebrich et al. (2011) Froebrich D. et al., 2011, \mnras, 413, 480
  • Garay et al. (2003) Garay G., Brooks K. J., Mardones D., Norris R. P., 2003, \apj, 587, 739
  • Ge et al. (2014) Ge J. X., He J. H., Chen X., Takahashi S., 2014, \mnras, 445, 1170
  • Griffin et al. (2010) Griffin M. J. et al., 2010, \aap, 518, L3
  • Guzmán, Garay & Brooks (2010) Guzmán A. E., Garay G., Brooks K. J., 2010, \apj, 725, 734
  • Hatchell, Fuller & Millar (2001) Hatchell J., Fuller G. A., Millar T. J., 2001, \aap, 372, 281
  • Hofner et al. (2017) Hofner P., Cesaroni R., Kurtz S., Rosero V., Anderson C., Furuya R. S., Araya E. D., Molinari S., 2017, \apj, 843, 99
  • Ioannidis & Froebrich (2012) Ioannidis G., Froebrich D., 2012, \mnras, 421, 3257
  • Issac et al. (2019) Issac N., Tej A., Liu T., Varricatt W., Vig S., Ishwara Chandra C. H., Schultheis M., 2019, \mnras, 485, 1775
  • Kauffmann et al. (2010) Kauffmann J., Pillai T., Shetty R., Myers P. C., Goodman A. A., 2010, \apj, 716, 433
  • Keto, Ho & Reid (1987) Keto E. R., Ho P. T. P., Reid M. J., 1987, \apjl, 323, L117
  • Klaassen et al. (2011) Klaassen P. D., Wilson C. D., Keto E. R., Zhang Q., Galván-Madrid R., Liu H. Y. B., 2011, \aap, 530, A53
  • Krumholz, Klein & McKee (2007) Krumholz M. R., Klein R. I., McKee C. F., 2007, \apj, 656, 959
  • Kuiper et al. (2010) Kuiper R., Klahr H., Beuther H., Henning T., 2010, \apj, 722, 1556
  • Kutner & Tucker (1975) Kutner M. L., Tucker K. D., 1975, \apj, 199, 79
  • Lee et al. (2012) Lee H.-T., Takami M., Duan H.-Y., Karr J., Su Y.-N., Liu S.-Y., Froebrich D., Yeh C. C., 2012, \apjs, 200, 2
  • Leurini et al. (2013) Leurini S., Codella C., Gusdorf A., Zapata L., Gómez-Ruiz A., Testi L., Pillai T., 2013, \aap, 554, A35
  • Leurini et al. (2007) Leurini S., Schilke P., Wyrowski F., Menten K. M., 2007, \aap, 466, 215
  • Liu et al. (2002) Liu S.-Y., Girart J. M., Remijan A., Snyder L. E., 2002, \apj, 576, 255
  • Liu et al. (2013) Liu T., Wu Y., Wu J., Qin S.-L., Zhang H., 2013, \mnras, 436, 1335
  • Liu, Wu & Zhang (2013) Liu T., Wu Y., Zhang H., 2013, \apj, 776, 29
  • López-Sepulcre, Cesaroni & Walmsley (2010) López-Sepulcre A., Cesaroni R., Walmsley C. M., 2010, \aap, 517, A66
  • López-Sepulcre et al. (2011) López-Sepulcre A. et al., 2011, \aap, 526, L2
  • Lovas (2004) Lovas F. J., 2004, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 33, 177
  • Lucas et al. (2008) Lucas P. W. et al., 2008, \mnras, 391, 136
  • Lumsden et al. (2013) Lumsden S. L., Hoare M. G., Urquhart J. S., Oudmaijer R. D., Davies B., Mottram J. C., Cooper H. D. B., Moore T. J. T., 2013, \apjs, 208, 11
  • Marseille et al. (2008) Marseille M., Bontemps S., Herpin F., van der Tak F. F. S., Purcell C. R., 2008, \aap, 488, 579
  • Marston et al. (2004) Marston A. P. et al., 2004, \apjs, 154, 333
  • Menten et al. (1986) Menten K. M., Walmsley C. M., Henkel C., Wilson T. L., 1986, \aap, 157, 318
  • Miettinen et al. (2006) Miettinen O., Harju J., Haikala L. K., Pomrén C., 2006, \aap, 460, 721
  • Molinari et al. (2010) Molinari S. et al., 2010, \pasp, 122, 314
  • Motte, Bontemps & Louvet (2018) Motte F., Bontemps S., Louvet F., 2018, \araa, 56, 41
  • Müller et al. (2005) Müller H. S. P., Schlöder F., Stutzki J., Winnewisser G., 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215
  • Noriega-Crespo et al. (2004) Noriega-Crespo A. et al., 2004, \apjs, 154, 352
  • Obonyo et al. (2019) Obonyo W. O., Lumsden S. L., Hoare M. G., Purser S. J. D., Kurtz S. E., Johnston K. G., 2019, \mnras, 486, 3664
  • Onaka et al. (2016) Onaka T., Mori T., Sakon I., Ardaseva A., 2016, \apj, 829, 106
  • Pickett et al. (1998) Pickett H. M., Poynter R. L., Cohen E. A., Delitsky M. L., Pearson J. C., Müller H. S. P., 1998, \jqsrt, 60, 883
  • Pilbratt et al. (2010) Pilbratt G. L. et al., 2010, \aap, 518, L1
  • Poglitsch et al. (2010) Poglitsch A. et al., 2010, \aap, 518, L2
  • Purser et al. (2016) Purser S. J. D. et al., 2016, \mnras, 460, 1039
  • Qin et al. (2008) Qin S.-L., Zhao J.-H., Moran J. M., Marrone D. P., Patel N. A., Wang J.-J., Liu S.-Y., Kuan Y.-J., 2008, \apj, 677, 353
  • Qiu et al. (2007) Qiu K., Zhang Q., Beuther H., Yang J., 2007, \apj, 654, 361
  • Qiu et al. (2009) Qiu K., Zhang Q., Wu J., Chen H.-R., 2009, \apj, 696, 66
  • Ramsay Howat et al. (2004) Ramsay Howat S. K. et al., 2004, in \procspie, Vol. 5492, Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, Moorwood A. F. M., Iye M., eds., pp. 1160–1171
  • Rathborne et al. (2005) Rathborne J. M., Jackson J. M., Chambers E. T., Simon R., Shipman R., Frieswijk W., 2005, \apjl, 630, L181
  • Remijan et al. (2004) Remijan A., Shiao Y.-S., Friedel D. N., Meier D. S., Snyder L. E., 2004, \apj, 617, 384
  • Ren et al. (2012) Ren Z., Wu Y., Zhu M., Liu T., Peng R., Qin S., Li L., 2012, \mnras, 422, 1098
  • Rodriguez (1997) Rodriguez L. F., 1997, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 182, Herbig-Haro Flows and the Birth of Stars, Reipurth B., Bertout C., eds., pp. 83–92
  • Rodríguez-Garza et al. (2017) Rodríguez-Garza C. B., Kurtz S. E., Gómez-Ruiz A. I., Hofner P., Araya E. D., Kalenskii S. V., 2017, \apjs, 233, 4
  • Roman-Duval et al. (2009) Roman-Duval J., Jackson J. M., Heyer M., Johnson A., Rathborne J., Shah R., Simon R., 2009, \apj, 699, 1153
  • Rosero et al. (2016) Rosero V. et al., 2016, \apjs, 227, 25
  • Rosero et al. (2019) Rosero V. et al., 2019, \apj, 880, 99
  • Rygl et al. (2013) Rygl K. L. J., Wyrowski F., Schuller F., Menten K. M., 2013, \aap, 549, A5
  • Sanna et al. (2014) Sanna A., Cesaroni R., Moscadelli L., Zhang Q., Menten K. M., Molinari S., Caratti o Garatti A., De Buizer J. M., 2014, \aap, 565, A34
  • Schuller et al. (2009) Schuller F. et al., 2009, \aap, 504, 415
  • Shepherd, Testi & Stark (2003) Shepherd D. S., Testi L., Stark D. P., 2003, \apj, 584, 882
  • Shepherd et al. (1998) Shepherd D. S., Watson A. M., Sargent A. I., Churchwell E., 1998, \apj, 507, 861
  • Smith & Rosen (2005) Smith M. D., Rosen A., 2005, \mnras, 357, 1370
  • Sridharan et al. (2002) Sridharan T. K., Beuther H., Schilke P., Menten K. M., Wyrowski F., 2002, \apj, 566, 931
  • Tan et al. (2014) Tan J. C., Beltrán M. T., Caselli P., Fontani F., Fuente A., Krumholz M. R., McKee C. F., Stolte A., 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 149
  • Towner et al. (2019) Towner A. P. M., Brogan C. L., Hunter T. R., Cyganowski C. J., Friesen R. K., 2019, \apj, 875, 135
  • Urquhart et al. (2009) Urquhart J. S. et al., 2009, \aap, 501, 539
  • Varricatt et al. (2010) Varricatt W. P., Davis C. J., Ramsay S., Todd S. P., 2010, \mnras, 404, 661
  • Watson et al. (2008) Watson C. et al., 2008, \apj, 681, 1341
  • Widmann et al. (2016) Widmann F., Beuther H., Schilke P., Stanke T., 2016, \aap, 589, A29
  • Williams, de Geus & Blitz (1994) Williams J. P., de Geus E. J., Blitz L., 1994, \apj, 428, 693
  • Wirström et al. (2011) Wirström E. S. et al., 2011, \aap, 533, A24
  • Wu et al. (2009) Wu Y., Qin S.-L., Guan X., Xue R., Ren Z., Liu T., Huang M., Chen S., 2009, \apjl, 697, L116
  • Zapata et al. (2008) Zapata L. A., Palau A., Ho P. T. P., Schilke P., Garrod R. T., Rodríguez L. F., Menten K., 2008, \aap, 479, L25
  • Zapata et al. (2006) Zapata L. A., Rodríguez L. F., Ho P. T. P., Beuther H., Zhang Q., 2006, \aj, 131, 939
  • Zhang et al. (2001) Zhang Q., Hunter T. R., Brand J., Sridharan T. K., Molinari S., Kramer M. A., Cesaroni R., 2001, \apjl, 552, L167

APPENDIX

Table A10: Spectroscopic parameters of the ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH and ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH lines detected towards G19.88-0.53 taken from the spectroscopic databases, CDMS and JPL from spalatalogue.
Transition Frequency EuE_{u} Sμ2S\mu^{2}
JkJ_{k} (MHz) (K) (debye2)
ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338408.698 64.98 5.66
76667_{6}-6_{6} 338442.367 258.7 3.01
75657_{5}-6_{5} 338486.322 202.88 5.57
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338512.632 145.33 3.82
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338543.152 114.79 4.61
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338639.802 102.72 5.23
22312_{2}-3_{1} 340141.143 44.67 0.31
ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH
33423_{3}-4_{2} 337135.853 61.64 0.99
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338124.488 78.08 5.65
71617_{-1}-6_{-1} 338344.588 70.55 5.55
76667_{6}-6_{6} 338430.981 253.95 1.50
75657_{-5}-6_{-5} 338456.521 189.00 2.76
75657_{5}-6_{5} 338475.217 201.06 2.76
74647_{-4}-6_{-4} 338504.065 152.89 3.81
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338530.256 160.99 3.82
73637_{-3}-6_{-3} 338559.963 127.71 4.64
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338583.216 112.71 4.63
71617_{1}-6_{1} 338614.936 86.05 5.68
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338721.693 87.26 5.14
Table A11: ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH and ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH lines towards MM1, MM3 and MM4 of G19.88-0.53. Columns 1 and 2 are the transitions and the corresponding frequencies, respectively. Columns 3-5 are the parameters and the uncertainties from the Gaussian fits to each line; they are line flux (Iν𝑑V\int I_{\nu}dV), LSR velocity (VLSRV_{\rm LSR}), and the line width (ΔV\Delta V). Column 6 is the optical depth for each transition with two values, the first for TrotT_{\rm rot} and the second for Td=18.6KT_{d}=18.6\,\rm K, respectively.
Transition Frequency VLSRV_{\rm LSR} Iν𝑑V\int I_{\nu}dV ΔV\Delta V τTrot/τTd\tau_{T_{\rm rot}}/\tau_{T_{d}}
JkJ_{k} (MHz) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}) (Jybeam1kms1\rm Jy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1})
ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338408.698 43.6±\pm0.4 40.3±\pm0.9 4.1±\pm0.4 0.112/0.496
76667_{6}-6_{6} 338442.367 44.9±\pm0.1 1.6±\pm0.1 5.6±\pm0.3 0.003/0.015
75657_{5}-6_{5} 338486.322 44.7±\pm0.1 2.5±\pm0.1 5.4±\pm0.2 0.005/0.023
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338512.632 43.7±\pm0.1 11.9±\pm0.5 4.2±\pm0.2 0.032/0.142
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338543.152 44.8±\pm0.4 15.7±\pm0.4 5.4±\pm0.4 0.033/0.147
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338639.802 43.9±\pm0.4 9.0±\pm0.6 4.3±\pm0.4 0.024/0.106
22312_{2}-3_{1} 340141.143 44.3±\pm0.03 2.4±\pm0.1 4.7±\pm0.1 0.006/0.025
ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH
33423_{3}-4_{2} 337135.853 44.6±\pm0.1 1.8±\pm0.05 5.0±\pm0.1 0.004/0.016
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338124.488 43.6±\pm0.01 23.9±\pm0.2 3.7±\pm0.03 0.073/0.324
71617_{-1}-6_{-1} 338344.588 43.6±\pm0.01 36.4±\pm0.2 3.9±\pm0.02 0.105/0.466
76667_{6}-6_{6} 338430.981 44.9±\pm0.1 1.5±\pm0.1 6.0±\pm0.3 0.003/0.013
75657_{-5}-6_{-5} 338456.521 44.8±\pm0.2 1.9±\pm0.2 5.0±\pm0.6 0.004/0.019
75657_{5}-6_{5} 338475.217 44.8±\pm1.1 1.7±\pm0.8 4.7±\pm2.1 0.004/0.018
74647_{-4}-6_{-4} 338504.065 44.0±\pm0.1 4.0±\pm0.2 6.1±\pm0.4 0.007/0.033
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338530.256 44.3±\pm0.2 3.2±\pm0.3 6.2±\pm0.7 0.006/0.026
73637_{-3}-6_{-3} 338559.963 44.1±\pm0.1 4.7±\pm0.3 4.9±\pm0.3 0.011/0.048
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338583.216 43.9±\pm0.1 6.9±\pm0.3 4.7±\pm0.2 0.017/0.075
71617_{1}-6_{1} 338614.936 43.7±\pm0.4 18.9±\pm0.5 3.9±\pm0.4 0.055/0.246
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338721.693 44.4±\pm0.4 30.3±\pm0.7 4.0±\pm0.4 0.085/0.380
Table A12: Same as Table A11 for MM2 towards G19.88-0.53.
Transition Frequency VLSRV_{\rm LSR} Iν𝑑V\int I_{\nu}dV ΔV\Delta V τTrot/τTd\tau_{T_{\rm rot}}/\tau_{T_{d}}
(MHz) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}) (Jybeam1kms1\rm Jy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1})
ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338408.698 44.1±\pm0.02 27.5±\pm0.2 4.1±\pm0.04 0.054/0.335
76667_{6}-6_{6} 338442.367 45.6±\pm0.4 2.8±\pm0.5 5.0±\pm1.1 0.004/0.028
75657_{5}-6_{5} 338486.322 45.4±\pm0.2 3.8±\pm0.3 5.2±\pm0.4 0.006/0.037
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338512.632 44.4±\pm0.1 11.3±\pm0.6 4.3±\pm0.3 0.021/0.131
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338543.152 45.5±\pm0.2 14.3±\pm0.9 5.4±\pm0.4 0.022/0.135
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338639.802 44.5±\pm0.02 8.2±\pm0.1 4.0±\pm0.1 0.016/0.102
22312_{2}-3_{1} 340141.143 45.3±\pm0.4 3.6±\pm0.1 5.0±\pm0.4 0.006/0.036
ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH
33423_{3}-4_{2} 337135.853 45.5±\pm0.1 2.3±\pm0.1 4.4±\pm0.1 0.004/0.026
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338124.488 44.3±\pm0.4 18.7±\pm0.4 4.2±\pm0.4 0.036/0.227
71617_{-1}-6_{-1} 338344.588 44.2±\pm0.01 25.7±\pm0.1 4.1±\pm0.02 0.051/0.316
76667_{6}-6_{6} 338430.981 45.7±\pm0.4 2.3±\pm0.4 4.7±\pm0.9 0.004/0.025
75657_{-5}-6_{-5} 338456.521 45.3±\pm0.4 3.2±\pm0.1 5.0±\pm0.4 0.005/0.032
75657_{5}-6_{5} 338475.217 45.3±\pm0.2 3.0±\pm0.2 4.7±\pm0.4 0.005/0.032
74647_{-4}-6_{-4} 338504.065 45.0±\pm0.2 4.7±\pm0.4 5.3±\pm0.5 0.007/0.045
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338530.256 45.2±\pm0.1 4.1±\pm0.1 5.2±\pm0.2 0.006/0.040
73637_{-3}-6_{-3} 338559.963 44.9±\pm0.2 5.3±\pm0.5 4.5±\pm0.5 0.009/0.059
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338583.216 44.8±\pm0.1 6.9±\pm0.2 4.6±\pm0.2 0.012/0.076
71617_{1}-6_{1} 338614.936 44.4±\pm0.4 15.4±\pm0.4 4.0±\pm0.4 0.031/0.193
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338721.693 44.9±\pm0.01 23.9±\pm0.1 4.3±\pm0.01 0.045/0.280
Table A13: Same as Table A11 for MM5 and MM6 towards G19.88-0.53.
Transition Frequency VLSRV_{\rm LSR} Iν𝑑V\int I_{\nu}dV ΔV\Delta V τTrot/τTd\tau_{T_{\rm rot}}/\tau_{T_{d}}
(MHz) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1}) (Jybeam1kms1\rm Jy\,beam^{-1}\,km\,s^{-1}) (kms1\rm km\,s^{-1})
ACH3OHA-\rm CH_{3}OH
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338408.698 42.7±\pm0.01 9.6±\pm0.6 2.1±\pm0.04 0.091/0.230
74647_{4}-6_{4} 338512.632 42.8±\pm0.04 2.3±\pm0.1 3.1±\pm0.1 0.015/0.038
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338543.152 44.0±\pm0.05 3.2±\pm0.1 4.2±\pm0.1 0.015/0.039
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338639.802 42.9±\pm0.02 1.6±\pm0.03 2.9±\pm0.1 0.011/0.027
22312_{2}-3_{1} 340141.143 43.0±\pm0.1 0.2±\pm0.02 2.5±\pm0.3 0.002/0.005
ECH3OHE-\rm CH_{3}OH
70607_{0}-6_{0} 338124.488 42.8±\pm0.01 4.5±\pm0.2 2.1±\pm0.04 0.043/0.109
71617_{-1}-6_{-1} 338344.588 42.9±\pm0.01 13.3±\pm0.1 2.5±\pm0.02 0.107/0.271
73637_{-3}-6_{-3} 338559.963 42.5±\pm0.1 0.3±\pm0.04 2.3±\pm0.4 0.003/0.007
73637_{3}-6_{3} 338583.216 42.7±\pm0.4 0.8±\pm0.3 2.7±\pm1.0 0.006/0.015
71617_{1}-6_{1} 338614.936 43.1±\pm0.1 5.5±\pm0.2 3.0±\pm0.1 0.036/0.092
72627_{2}-6_{2} 338721.693 43.7±\pm0.02 9.4±\pm0.1 3.0±\pm0.03 0.062/0.158