This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996, USAthanks: Present address: Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USAthanks: Present address: Photon Science Division, Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland

Nematic fluctuations in the non-superconducting iron pnictide BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2

Dongliang Gong Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China    Ming Yi Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Meng Wang School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China    Tao Xie Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China    Wenliang Zhang Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China    Sergey Danilkin Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights NSW-2234, Australia    Guochu Deng Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights NSW-2234, Australia    Xinzhi Liu School of Physics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China    Jitae T. Park Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany    Kazuhiko Ikeuchi Neutron Science and Technology Center, Comprehensive Research Organization for Science and Society, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan    Kazuya Kamazawa Neutron Science and Technology Center, Comprehensive Research Organization for Science and Society, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan    Sung-Kwan Mo Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, 94720 California, USA    Makoto Hashimoto Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA    Donghui Lu Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA    Rui Zhang Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice Center for Quantum Materials, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA    Pengcheng Dai Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice Center for Quantum Materials, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA    Robert J. Birgeneau Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA    Shiliang Li Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China    Huiqian Luo hqluo@iphy.ac.cn Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China
Abstract

The main driven force of the electronic nematic phase in iron-based superconductors is still under debate. Here, we report a comprehensive study on the nematic fluctuations in a non-superconducting iron pnictide system BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 by electronic transport, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements. Previous neutron diffraction and transport measurements suggested that the collinear antiferromagnetism persists to x=0.8x=0.8, with similar Néel temperature TNT_{N} and structural transition temperature TsT_{s} around 32 K, but the charge carriers change from electron type to hole type around x=x= 0.5. In this study, we have found that the in-plane resistivity anisotropy also highly depends on the Cr dopings and the type of charge carriers. While ARPES measurements suggest possibly weak orbital anisotropy onset near TsT_{s} for both x=0.05x=0.05 and x=0.5x=0.5 compounds, INS experiments reveal clearly different onset temperatures of low-energy spin excitation anisotropy, which is likely related to the energy scale of spin nematicity. These results suggest that the interplay between the local spins on Fe atoms and the itinerant electrons on Fermi surfaces is crucial to the nematic fluctuations of iron pnictides, where the orbital degree of freedom may behave differently from the spin degree of freedom, and the transport properties are intimately related to the spin dynamics.
Keywords: Iron-based superconductors, Electronic nematic phase, Nematic fluctuations, Resistivity, Spin excitations, Orbital ordering, Neutron scattering

pacs:
74.70.Xa, 75.50.Ee, 75.25.-j, 74.25.F-

I Introduction

Electronic nematic phase breaks the rotational symmetry but preserves the translational symmetry of the underlying lattice in correlated materials oganesyan2001 ; fradkin2010a ; fradkin2010b ; wwang2021 . In iron-based superconductors, the nematic order associated with a tetragonal-to-orthorhombic structural transition at temperature TsT_{s} acts as a precursor of the magnetic order below TNT_{N} and the superconducting state below TcT_{c} fernandes2012 ; fernandes2017 ; chen2014 ; pdai2015 ; si2016 ; gong2018 . The nematic fluctuations can be described by the electronic nematic susceptibility, which is defined as the susceptibility of electronic anisotropy to the uniaxial in-plane strain bohmer2016 . Divergent nematic susceptibility upon approaching TsT_{s} from high temperature are revealed by the elastoresistance and elastic moduli measurements, suggesting nematic fluctuations well above TsT_{s} jhchu2012 ; hhkuo2014 ; hhkuo2013 ; bohmer2014 ; dgong2017 . The nematic fluctuations commonly exist in iron-based superconductors, and are even present in compounds with tetragonal crystal symmetry without any static nematic order bohmer2020 . Accumulating evidence suggests that the optimal superconductivity with maximum TcT_{c} usually occurs near a nematic quantum critical point where the nematic fluctuations are the strongesthhkuo2016 ; yshizawa2012 ; jdai2009 ; skasahara2012 ; tshibauchi2013 ; slderer2015 ; hluo2012 ; xlu2013 ; dhu2015 ; wzhang2019 ; zliu2016 ; ygu2017 . However, the charge, spin and orbital degrees of freedom are always intertwined in the presence of nematic fluctuations chandra1990 ; jphu2012 ; fernandes2014 ; fernandes2012b ; fwang2015 ; cma2014 ; cthorsmolle2014 ; qswang2015 ; chubukov2015 ; yamakawa2016 , giving a twofold rotational (C2C_{2}) symmetry in many physical properties fernandes2012 ; fernandes2017 ; chen2014 ; pdai2015 ; si2016 ; gong2018 ; bohmer2016 ; cclee2009 ; kruger2009 ; wclv2009 ; cchen2010 ; valenzuela2010 including anisotropic in-plane electronic resistivity and optical conductivity jhchu2010 ; matanatar2010 ; jjying2011 ; hman2015 ; xluo2015 ; cmirri2014 ; fisher2011 , lifting of degeneracy between dxzd_{xz}/dyzd_{yz} orbitals myi2011 ; myi2014 ; myi2012 ; myi2019 ; yzhang2012 ; myi2017 ; watson2019 , anisotropic spin excitations at low energies hluo2013 ; xlu2014 ; wzhang2016 ; ysong2015 ; xlu2018 , phonon-energy split in lattice dynamics xren2015 ; ywhu2016 , and splitting of the Knight shift baek2014 ; tiye2015 . In addition, it has been proposed that the local anisotropic impurity scattering of chemical dopants likely induces the twofold symmetry in the transport properties rosenthal2014 ; sishida2013 ; allan2013 . Such complex cases make it is difficult to clarify the main driven force of nematic phase by a single experimental probe.

Our previous works suggest that the Cr substitution is an effective way both to suppress the superconductivity and to tune the magnetism in iron-based superconductors wzhang2019 ; rzhang2014 ; rzhang2015 ; dgong2018 . Specifically in the BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 system, by continuously doping Cr to the optimally superconducting compound BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 with Tc=20T_{c}=20 K, the superconductivity is quickly suppressed above x=0.05x=0.05, but the magnetic transition temperature TNT_{N} and the structural transition temperature TsT_{s} remain between 30 K and 35 K as shown by neutron diffraction results on naturally twinned samples [Fig. 1(a)]. Moreover, the effective moment mm is significantly enhanced first then suppressed for dopings higher than x=0.5x=0.5, where the charge carriers change from electron type to hole type as shown by the sign of Hall and Seebeck coefficients dgong2018 . These make BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 a rare example to separately tune the magnetically ordered temperature TNT_{N} by the local spin interactions and the magnetically ordered strength by the scattering of itinerant electrons on Fermi surfaces, respectively. The extra holes introduced by Cr substitutions compensate the electron doping thus may drive those non-superconducting compounds to a half-filled Mott insulator similar to the parent compounds of cuprate and nickelate superconductors jmpizarro2017 ; medelmann2017 ; medici2014 ; paLee2014 ; qgu2022 ; ysong2016b . It would be interesting to monitor the evolution of the nematic fluctuations starting from a metallic state toward to a localized insulating state zpyin2011 ; georges2013 ; ysong2016b , especially on the detwinned samples [Fig. 1(b)].

In this paper, we further report a multi-probe study on the nematic fluctuations in the non-superconducting compounds BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 (x=0.050.8x=0.05\sim 0.8) by electronic transport, angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements. The in-plane resistivity anisotropy measured in the detwinned samples under uniaxial pressure shows a strong dependence on the Cr content with a clear sign change above x=0.6x=0.6. By focusing on two compounds with x=0.05x=0.05 and 0.5, ARPES measurements suggest possible band shifts induced by orbital anisotropy near TsT_{s}/TNT_{N} for both dopings, but INS experiments reveal clearly different behaviors on the spin nematicity. The onset temperature of low-energy spin excitation anisotropy between Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1) for x=0.05x=0.05 is about 110 K, but for x=0.5x=0.5 is much lower, only about 35 K near the magnetic transition. Such temperature dependence of spin nematicity is consistent with the results of in-plane resistivity anisotropy. At high energies, the spin nematicity for x=0.05x=0.05 extends to about 120 meV, much larger than the case for x=0.5x=0.5 (about 40 meV), suggesting a possible linear correlation between the highest energy scale and the onset temperature of spin nematicity. Therefore, the nematic behaviors in iron pnictides is highly related to the interplay between local moments and itinerant electrons. While the C2C_{2}-type anisotropies in spin excitations and in-plane resistivity are strongly correlated to each other xlu2014 , the orbital anisotropy induced band splitting may behave differently as affected by the complex Fermi surface topology myi2009 ; richard2011 ; ysong2017 ; ysong2016 ; txie2018a ; txie2018b ; txie2020 ; twang2020a ; jguo2019 ; cliu2022 .

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) Phase diagram and in-plane resistivity anisotropy of BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2. (a) The PM, AF and SC mark the region of paramagnetic, antiferromagnetic, superconducting phases defined by TsT_{s}, TNT_{N} and TcT_{c}, respectively. Here TsT_{s} and TNT_{N} were measured by neutron diffraction in our previous work on the naturally twinned samples dgong2018 . (b) The gradient color maps the in-plane resistivity anisotropy δρ\delta_{\rho} measured on detwinned samples. The vertical dashed line divides the regions for electron-type and hole-type charge carriers as determined by the sign of Hall and Seebeck coefficients dgong2018 .

II Experiment details

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) In-plane resistivity anisotropy of BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 under uniaxial pressure. Here ρb\rho_{b} is the in-plane resistivity along the direction of uniaxial pressure, and ρa\rho_{a} is the in-plane resistivity perpendicular to the direction of uniaxial pressure. For easy comparison, each curve is normalized by its resistivity at 150 K, there is no resistivity anisotropy above this temperature.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) Temperature dependence of the in-plane resistivity anisotropy δρ\delta_{\rho} from x=0.05x=0.05 to 0.8. (a) In electron-type compounds, δρ\delta_{\rho} gets weaker but keeps positive when increasing Cr doping. (b) In hole-type compounds, δρ\delta_{\rho} is very weak and becomes negative when x0.7x\geq 0.7.

High-quality single crystals of BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 were grown by the self-flux method rzhang2014 ; rzhang2015 ; dgong2018 ; hqluo2008 ; ychen2011 ; txie2017 ; twang2020b , the characterization results of our sample can be found in previous reports rzhang2014 ; dgong2018 . The crystalline directions of our sample were determined by a X-ray Laue camera (Photonic Sciences) in backscattering mode with incident beam along cc-axis. After that, the crystals were cut into rectangle shapes (typical sizes: 1 mm ×\times 2 mm) by a wire saw under the directions [1, 0, 0] ×\times [0, 1, 0] in orthorhombic lattice notation (a=b=5.6a=b=5.6 Å). By applying a uniaxial pressure around 10 MPa, the crystal can be fully detwinned at low temperature, where the direction of pressure was defined as bb direction, and the pressure-free direction was defined as aa direction xlu2014 ; wzhang2016 ; ysong2015 ; xlu2018 ; xlu2016 ; dwtam2019 ; dwtam2020 ; pliu2020 . The in-plane resistivity (ρa,b\rho_{a,b}) was measured by the standard four-probe method with the Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS) from Quantum Design. To compare the temperature dependence of resistivity at different directions, we normalized the resistivity ρa,b(T)\rho_{a,b}(T) data at 150 K for each sample. The in-plane resistivity anisotropy was defined by δρ=(ρbρa)/(ρb+ρa)\delta_{\rho}=(\rho_{b}-\rho_{a})/(\rho_{b}+\rho_{a}) same as other literatures jhchu2010 ; matanatar2010 ; jjying2011 .

ARPES experiments were performed at beamline 10.0.1 of the Advanced Light Source and beamline 5-4 of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Light source with R4000 electron analyzers. The angular resolution was 0.3 degree, and the total energy resolution was 15 meV. All samples were cleaved in-situ at 10 K and measured in ultra-high vacuum with a base pressure lower than 4 ×1011\times 10^{-11} Torr. We note that we used twinned samples without uniaxial pressure for the ARPES experiments. INS experiments were carried out at two thermal triple-axis spectrometers: PUMA at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ) sobolev2015 , Germany, and TAIPAN at Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering (ACNS) danilkin2009 , ANSTO, Australia. The wave vector 𝐐\bf Q at (qxq_{x}, qyq_{y}, qzq_{z}) was defined as (H,K,L)=(qxa/2π,qyb/2π,qzc/2π)(H,K,L)=(q_{x}a/2\pi,q_{y}b/2\pi,q_{z}c/2\pi) in reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.) using the orthorhombic lattice parameters ab=5.6a\approx b=5.6 Å, and c13c\approx 13 Å. All measurements were done with a fixed final energy Ef=14.8E_{f}=14.8 meV, and double focusing monochromator and analyzer using pyrolytic graphite crystals. To gain better signal-noise ratio, 8 pieces of rectangularly cut crystals (typical sizes: 7 mm ×\times 8 mm ×\times 0.5 mm) were assembled in a detwinned device made by aluminum and springy gaskets xlu2014 ; wzhang2016 ; ysong2015 ; xlu2018 . To reach both Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1), the sample holder was designed to easily rotate by 90 degrees, thus the scattering plane can switch from [H,0,0]×[0,0,L][H,0,0]\times[0,0,L] to [0,K,0]×[0,0,L][0,K,0]\times[0,0,L]. The total mass of the crystals used in INS experiments was about 2 grams from each sample set of x=0.05x=0.05 and x=x=0.5. Time-of-flight neutron scattering experiments were carried out on the same sample sets at 4SEASONS spectrometer (BL-01) at J-PARC nakamura2009 ; kajimoto2011 , Tokai, Japan, with multiple incident energies Ei=250,73,34,20E_{i}=250,73,34,20 meV, kik_{i} parallel to the cc axis, and chopper frequency f=250f=250 Hz. The data were only corrected by the efficiency of detectors from the incoherent scattering of vanadium with white beam. As we were comparing two samples with similar mass under the same measured conditions at the same spectrometer, it was not necessary to do the vanadium normalization with mono beam. The data was analyzed by the Utsusemi and MSlice software packages inamura2013 ; mslice .

III Results and discussions

We first present the resistivity results in Fig. 1, Fig. 2 and Fig. 3. Apparently, the in-plane resistivity anisotropy show a strong dependence on the Cr doping level. In the Cr free sample BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2, difference between ρa\rho_{a} and ρb\rho_{b} presents above the superconducting transition temperature Tc=20T_{c}=20 K, where ρa\rho_{a} is metallic and ρb\rho_{b} is semiconducting-like with a upturn at low temperature (namely ρa<ρb\rho_{a}<\rho_{b}) [Fig. 2(a)]. The superconductivity is completely suppressed at x=0.05x=0.05, there is a dramatic difference between ρa\rho_{a} and ρb\rho_{b} with a anisotropy δρ\delta_{\rho} persisting to about T=110T=110 K [Fig. 2(b)]. By further increasing Cr doping, both ρa\rho_{a} and ρb\rho_{b} become semiconducting-like even insulating-like above x=0.1x=0.1, and the resistivity anisotropy gets weaker and weaker, until it nearly disappears at x=0.5x=0.5 and 0.6 compounds [Fig. 2(c) - (h)]. For those high doping compounds x=0.7x=0.7 and 0.8, it seems that δρ\delta_{\rho} changes sign with ρa>ρb\rho_{a}>\rho_{b} at low temperatures [Fig. 2(i) and (j)]. To clearly compare the resistivity anisotropy upon Cr doping, we plot δρ\delta_{\rho} as gradient color mapping in Fig. 1(b) and show its detailed temperature dependence in Fig. 3. Interestingly, the sign of δρ\delta_{\rho} is also related to the type of charge carriers. δρ\delta_{\rho} keeps strong and positive in the electron-type compounds but changes to negative and weak (<1%<1\%) in the hole-type compounds [Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 3(b)]. This is consistent with the results in the electron doped BaFe2-x(Ni, Co)xAs2 and the hole doped Ba1-xKxFe2As2, Ca1-xNaxFe2As2, BaFe2-xCrxAs2 systems jhchu2010 ; matanatar2010 ; jjying2011 ; hman2015 ; blomberg2013 ; jqma2013 ; kobayashi2015 ; ishida2020 . However, in those cases, the onset temperature of δρ\delta_{\rho} decreases with the structural transition temperature TsT_{s} when increasing the doping level from the non-superconducting parent compounds to optimally doped superconducting compounds. Here in BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 system, both TNT_{N} and TsT_{s} are actually within the range 323532\sim 35 K for all probed dopings dgong2018 , but the onset temperature of δρ\delta_{\rho} still extends to high temperatures, it is then strongly suppressed by Cr doping [Fig. 3(a)]. In those hole-type compounds, δρ\delta_{\rho} shows a peak feature (for x=0.5x=0.5 and 0.6) or a kink (for x=0.7x=0.7 and 0.8) responding to the magnetic and structural transitions [Fig. 3(b)]. The non-monotonic behavior of δρ\delta_{\rho} may come from the competition between the scattering from hole bands and electron bands, similar behaviors were observed in the nematic susceptiblity of the Cr doped BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 system wzhang2019 .

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online) ARPES results on x=0.05x=0.05 (left) and x=0.5x=0.5 (right) compounds. (a)-(b) The measured Fermi surfaces around the Γ\Gamma and XX points. (c)-(d) Band dispersions along the high symmetry direction Γ\Gamma-XX obtained from the second derivatives in the energy direction. (e)-(f) Temperature dependence of the fitted band position from the XX point. All dashed lines are guides for eyes.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: (Color online) Inelastic neutron scattering results on the spin excitations of uniaxially detwinned samples for x=0.05x=0.05 (left) and x=0.5x=0.5 (right) compounds measured by two triple-axis spectrometers TAIPAN and PUMA. We compared the constant-energy scans (QQ-scans along [H,0,1][H,0,1] or [0,K,1][0,K,1], S1S1 rocking scans at Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) or (0, 1, 1)) for E=E= 3, 6, 9, 12 meV, respectively. All data are corrected by a linearly QQ-dependent background, and the solid lines are gaussian fittings. The spurious signals in 6 meV data are ignored.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online) The order parameter of antiferromagnetism and spin nematicity χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} for x=0.05x=0.05 and x=0.5x=0.5 compounds.(a) and (b) The magnetic order parameters measured at Q=(1,0,3)Q=(1,0,3) on twinned samples, Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1) on detwinned samples by elastic neutron scattering. All data are subtracted by the normal state background and normalized by the intensity at base temperature for Q=(1,0,3)Q=(1,0,3) or Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1). (c) and (d) Spin nematicity measured by inelastic neutron scattering. The solid symbols are the differences of local susceptibility χ′′\chi^{\prime\prime} between Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1) (left y-axis), and the open symbols are similar but obtained by integrating the constant-energy scans in Fig. 5 corrected by the Bose population factor (right y-axis). The vertical dash lines mark the magnetic transition temperature TNT_{N} on twinned samples and TNT^{\prime}_{N} on detwinned samples. All solid lines are guides to eyes.

Next, we focus on the electronic structure and the spin excitations in two typical dopings x=0.05x=0.05 with TN=32T_{N}=32 K and x=0.5x=0.5 with TN=35T_{N}=35 K. The Fermi surface topology and band structure measured by ARPES on naturally twinned samples are shown in Fig. 4. From the Fermi surface mapping in Fig. 4 (a) and (b), we can find typical hole pockets around the zone center Γ\Gamma point. Near the XX point, an electron pocket is observed for x=0.05x=0.05. For x=0.5x=0.5, however, the Fermi surface resembles that of the hole-doped (Ba,K)Fe2As2myi2014 . This is due to the hole doping introduced by the Cr substitution, which also introduces disorder directly in the Fe-planes, thus resulting in spectral features that appear broad myi2009 . Figures 4 (c) and (d) show the second energy derivatives of the spectral images along the high symmetry direction (Γ\Gamma-XX). Larger hole pockets can indeed be seen for x=0.5x=0.5 compared to x=0.05x=0.05. As has been demonstrated previously on BaFe2As2, NaFeAs, and FeSe, the onset of TsT_{s} is associated with the onset of an observed anisotropic shift of the dxzd_{xz} and dyzd_{yz} orbital-dominated bands where the dxzd_{xz} band shifts down and the dyzd_{yz} band shifts upmyi2011 ; myi2014 ; myi2012 ; myi2019 ; yzhang2012 . This shift is most prominently observed near the X point of the Brillouin zone. Moreover, such band splitting as measured on uniaxially-strained crystals can be observed above TsT_{s} in the presence of this symmetry-breaking field. On a structurally twinned crystal, the anisotropic band shifts would appear in the form of a band splitting due to domain mixing. While we do not observe clearly the band splitting as shown in Fig. 4(c)-(d), we can clearly observe the lower branch with dominant intensity that shifts with temperature. This can be understood as the lower dxzd_{xz} band. We can fit the energy position of the band extracted from the X point and plot as a function of temperature. The temperature evolution clearly identifies a temperature scale associated with an onset of the band shift myi2014 ; myi2012 ; myi2019 . As shown in Fig. 4 (e) and (f), the XX band shifts at low temperature T25T\approx 25 K for x=0.05x=0.05 and T45T\approx 45 K for x=0.5x=0.5, respectively, closing to their structural or magnetic transition temperatures. We do note that while we cannot conclusively state that this represents the orbital anisotropy, the behavior we observe here on these twinned crystals is consistent with the expectation of the onset of orbital anisotropymyi2011 ; myi2017 ; ysong2015 . We note here that the observed onset temperature of band splitting is close to the TsT_{s} (or TNT_{N}), in contrast to the much higher onset in the resistivity anisotropy shown in Fig. 3 measured on a strained crystal.

We then turn to search the connection between the resistivity anisotropy and the spin excitation anisotropy. The first evidence of spin nematicity was observed in BaFe2-xNixAs2 (x=0x=0, 0.065, 0.085, 0.10, 0.12) xlu2014 ; wzhang2016 ; ysong2015 ; xlu2018 , where BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 is the starting compound of this study. Low-energy spin excitations are measured on the detwinned BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 (x=0.05x=0.05 and 0.5) samples by INS experiments using two triple-axis spectrometers. The results of constant-energy scans at E=E= 3, 6, 9, and 12 meV are summarized in Fig. 5. With convenient design of the detwinned device and sample holder, we can easily perform constant-energy scans (QQ-scans) either along [H,0,1][H,0,1] or [0,K,1][0,K,1] direction after rotating the whole sample set by 90 degree. For x=0.5x=0.5 sample, we instead do the S1S1 rocking scans at Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and (0, 1, 1). It should be noticed that the Néel temperature TNT_{N} is slightly enhanced by the applied uniaxial pressure in x=0.05x=0.05 sample from 32 K to 40 K (so does TsT_{s}), but does not change for x=0.5x=0.5 sample (TNTN=35T_{N}\approx T^{\prime}_{N}=35 K) [Fig. 6(a) and (b)]. Such effect has been detected in the BaFe2-x(Ni, Co)xAs2 system dwtam2017 . The detwinned ratio can be estimated by comparing the integrated intensities of magnetic Bragg peak between Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1) positions, which is about 10 : 1 for the x=0.05x=0.05 samples, and 4 : 1 for the x=0.5x=0.5 samples, respectively. Such large ratio means successful detwin for both sample sets. At the first glance, it is very clear for the difference of the spin excitations between Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) and Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1) especially at low temperatures, which could be attributed to the spin Ising-nematic correlations (so called spin nematicity). After warming up to high temperatures, the spin excitations at Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) decrease and become nearly identical to those at Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1). The nematic order parameter for the spin system can be approximately represented by χnematic′′=χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{nematic}=\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01}, in which χ10′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10} (or χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01}) is the local spin susceptibility at Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) (or Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1)). Figure 6 (c) and (d) show the temperature dependence of χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} for both compounds, where the Bose population factor is already corrected. We also plot the data (open symbols) obtained from the integrated intensity of those QQ-scans in Fig. 5. For x=0.05x=0.05 compound, the spin nematicity decreases slightly upon increasing energy and terminates well above TN=40T^{\prime}_{N}=40 K [Fig. 6(c)] dgong2018 . For the lowest energy we measured (3 meV), the onset temperature of spin nematicity is about 110 K, similar to the in-plane resistivity anisotropy in Fig. 3(a). The results for x=0.5x=0.5 compound show markedly differences, where χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} quickly decreases both with energy and temperature, and the onset temperature is around TN=35T^{\prime}_{N}=35 K [Fig. 6(d)]. No spin anisotropy can be detected above 40 K both for QQ-scans and energy scans, this is also consistent with the very weak in-plane resistivity anisotropy for x=0.5x=0.5 [Fig. 3(b)]. The spin nematic theory predicts that the nematic fluctuations enhance both the intensity and the correlation length of spin excitations at (π\pi, 0) but suppress those at (0, π\pi) even above TsT_{s}. This was firstly testified in the detwinned BaFe1.935Ni0.065As2 and can be also seen here in Fig. 5 wzhang2016 . Although the peak intensities at Q=(1,0,1)Q=(1,0,1) seem stronger than those at Q=(0,1,1)Q=(0,1,1) in Fig. 5(g) and (h), the peak width is smaller, and the integrated intensity of the QQ-scans are closed to each other. The above results of spin nemacticity in BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 (x=0.05x=0.05 and 0.5) resemble to those in BaFe2-xNixAs2, where spin excitations at low energies change from C4C_{4} to C2C_{2} symmetry in the tetragonal phase at temperatures approximately corresponding to the onset of the in-plane resistivity anisotropy.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: (Color online) Inelastic neutron scattering results on the spin excitations of the uniaxially detwinned samples for x=0.05x=0.05 (left) and x=0.5x=0.5 (right) compounds measured at T=5T=5 K by time-of-flight spectrometer 4SEASONS. All data are presented both in 2D slices for [H,K][H,K] plane and 1D cuts along [H,0][H,0] or [0,K][0,K] at typical energy windows E=3±1,15±2,42±4,110±10E=3\pm 1,15\pm 2,42\pm 4,110\pm 10 meV. The solid lines are gaussian fittings guiding for eyes, which are not shown in panel (p) due to poor data quality. The dashed diamonds in panel (d) and (l) illustrate the integrated Brillouin zone for spin excitations around Q=(1,0)Q=(1,0) and Q=(0,1)Q=(0,1), respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: (Color online) Energy dependence of the total spin fluctuations χ10′′+χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} and the spin nematicity χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} of uniaxially detwinned samples for x=0.05x=0.05 (left) and x=0.5x=0.5 (right) compounds. Different symbols correspond to different incident energy in the measurements. Both of χ10′′+χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} and χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} can be fitted with a power-law dependence on the energy, A/Eα\sim A/E^{\alpha}, where the amplitude AA and exponent α\alpha are listed in each panel. Inset of panel (d) shows the correlation between the highest energy and the onset temperature at low energy of χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01}.

Moreover, INS experiments on detwinned BaFe2As2 and BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 suggest the spin anisotropy can persist to very high energy ysong2015 ; xlu2018 , even in the later case the splitting of the dxzd_{xz} and dyzd_{yz} bands nearly vanishes myi2017 . To quantitatively determine the energy dependence of spin excitation anisotropy, we have performed time-of-flight INS experiments on the uniaxially detwinned BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 (x=0.05x=0.05 and 0.5), the results are shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. It should be noted that for such experiments, the energy transfer is always in coupled with LL due to kick_{i}\parallel c nakamura2009 ; kajimoto2011 . The two-dimensional (2D) energy slices and one-dimensional (1D) cuts along [H,0][H,0] and [0,K][0,K] at various energies are presented in Fig. 7. Indeed the spin excitations are twofold symmetric below 100 meV for both compounds. The spin excitations at E=3E=3 meV, Q=(0,±1)Q=(0,\pm 1) are very weak in x=0.05x=0.05 compound, then continuously increase upon energy and become nearly the same as Q=(±1,0)Q=(\pm 1,0) around 110 meV. For x=0.5x=0.5 compound, although the spin excitations at Q=(0,±1)Q=(0,\pm 1) can be initially observed at E=3E=3 meV, the spin anisotropy still exists at 15 meV, then disappears above 42 meV. To further compare the spin excitations in both compounds, we have calculated the total spin fluctuations χ10′′+χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} and the spin nematicity χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} from the integrated intensity marked by the dashed diamonds in Fig. 7 (d) and (l). In principle, the local dynamic susceptibility χ′′\chi^{\prime\prime} can be estimated from the integration outcome of the spin excitations within one Brillouin zone, here χ′′\chi^{\prime\prime} can simply be calculated through dividing the integration signal in the Q=Q= (0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 0), (1, -1) boxes, giving the diamond shape integration zone pdai2015 . The total spin susceptibility χ10′′+χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} in x=0.5x=0.5 compound is stronger than that in x=0.05x=0.05, but decays much quickly with energy [Fig. 8 (a) and (c)]. The spin nematicity χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} apparently has different energy scale for two compounds, where it is about 120 meV for x=0.05x=0.05 but only 40 meV for x=0.5x=0.5, respectively. The energy scale of χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} in the superconducting compound BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 is 60 meV ysong2015 , and for the parent compound BaFe2As2 is about 200 meV up to the band top of the spin waves xlu2018 . These facts lead to a possible linear correlation between the highest energy and the onset temperature of spin nematicity at low energy [inset of Fig. 8(d)]. Within the measured energy range, both χ10′′+χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} and χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} can be fit with a power-law dependence on the energy, A/Eα\sim A/E^{\alpha}, where the amplitude AA and exponent α\alpha are listed in each panel of Fig. 8. Indeed, the larger value of α\alpha for x=0.5x=0.5 in comparison to that for x=0.05x=0.05 suggests faster decay with energy both for the spin fluctuations and the spin nematicity. Similar fitting on the results of BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 gives parameters in between them ysong2015 . Although the low energy data below 10 meV may be affected by the LL-modulation of spin excitations, and by the superconductivity in BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2, the similar quantum critical behavior both for χ10′′+χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} and χ10′′χ01′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{10}-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{01} in these three compounds is expected by the Ising-nematic scenario ysong2015 ; xlu2014 ; xlu2018 ; wzhang2016 .

In our previous neutron diffraction results on the BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 system, the Cr dopings have limited effects on the magnetically ordered temperature TNT_{N} but significantly enhance the effective ordered moment mm by reaching a maximum value at x=0.5x=0.5 dgong2018 . The Néel temperature TNT_{N} is mostly determined by the local magnetic coupling related to the local FeAs4 tetrahedron structure. The evolution of ordered moment probably induced by the changes of the density of states and the orbital angular momentum from itinerant electrons on the Fermi surfaces. The Cr doping introduces both local distortion on the lattices and hole doping on the Fermi pockets, yielding a non-monotonic change of the conductivity of charge carriers. As shown in Fig. 2, the low-temperature upturn of resistivity is enhanced by Cr doping first but then weakens in those hole-type compounds. Among these dopings, x=0.5x=0.5 has the most insulating-like behavior, and thus strongly localized charge carriers and maximum ordered moment, but its spin nematicity quickly drops down both for the temperature and energy dependence. In contrast to the magnetically ordered strength, both the structural transition temperature TsT_{s} and the lattice orthorhombicity δ=(ab)/(a+b)\delta=(a-b)/(a+b) are nearly Cr doping independent dgong2018 . This means the static nematic order is also nearly Cr independent in this system, as opposed to the case for dynamic nematic fluctuations.

The nature of iron-based superconductor can be theoretically described as a magnetic Hund’s metal, in which the strong interplay between the local spins on Fe atoms and the itinerant electrons on Fermi surfaces gives correlated electronic states zpyin2011 ; georges2013 . Indeed, time-of-flight INS experiments on the detwinned BaFe2As2 suggest the spin waves in parent compound are preferably described by a multi-orbital Hubbard-Hund model based on the itinerant picture with moderate electronic correlation effects, instead of a Heisenberg model with effective exchange couplings from local spins. Upon warming up to high temperatures, the intensities of spin excitation anisotropy decrease gradually with increasing energy and finally cut off at a energy away from the band top of spin waves xlu2018 . Therefore, the energy scale of spin nematicity sets an upper limit for the characteristic temperature for the nematic spin correlations, as well as the onset temperature of resistivity anisotropy. Here by adding up the results on the in-plane anisotropies of resistivity, orbital energy and spin excitations in BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2, they clearly suggest that the electronic nematicity is intimately related to the spin dynamics, which seems consistent with the Hund’s metal picture. Specifically, by doping Cr to suppress the superconductivity in BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2 makes the charge carriers initially localized with enhanced electron correlations dgong2018 , which may enhance the electronic correlations by increasing the intra- and inter-orbital onsite repulsion UU as well as the Hund’s coupling JHJ_{H} xlu2018 , and thus gives rise to stronger spin excitations and larger spin anisotropy in Cr doping x=0.05x=0.05 compound. Another effect is the lifting up of dyzd_{yz} and dxyd_{xy} along Γ\Gamma-X direction to the Fermi level, which primarily contributes to the effective moments zpyin2011 . The orbital-weight redistribution triggered by the spin order suggests that the orbital degree of freedom are coupled to the spin degree of freedom mdaghofer2010 . By further increasing Cr doping to x=0.5x=0.5, the localization effect is so strong that electron system becomes insulating at low temperature. In this case, the itinerant picture based on Hund’s metal may not be applicable anymore. The low density of itinerant electrons weakens the nematic fluctuations and probably limits them inside the magnetically ordered state. In either case for x=0.05x=0.05 or x=0.5x=0.5, the band splitting does not directly correspond to the spin nematic correlations but only present below the nematic ordered temperature. This may attribute to the weak spin-orbit coupling in this system, as the spin anisotropy in spin space can only present at very low energies hluo2013 . In addition, our results can rule out the picture of local impurity scattering driven nematicity, since the impurity scattering from Cr substitutions is certainly stronger in the x=0.5x=0.5 compound but it does not promote the nematic fluctuations.

IV Conclusion

In conclusion, we have extensively studied the in-plane resistivity anisotropy, orbital ordering and spin nematicity in a non-superconducting BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2 system. We have found the Cr doping strongly affect on the anisotropy of resistivity and spin excitations along with the itinerancy of charge carriers. While the onset temperatures of resistivity anisotropy and spin nematicity are similar and correlated to the energy scale of spin anisotropy, the orbital anisotropy shows a onset temperature irrelevant to them. These results suggest that the electronic correlations from the interplay between local moments and itinerant electrons is crucial to understand the nematic fluctuations, thus inspire the quest for the driven force of the electronic nematic phase in iron-pnictide superconductors.

Additional Requirements For additional requirements for specific article types and further information please directly refer to Huiqian Luo (hqluo@iphy.ac.cn).

Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Author Contributions H. L. and D. G. proposed and designed the research. D. G., T. X., W. Z. and R. Z. contributed in sample growth and resistivity measurements. M. Y., M. W., S. M., M. H., D. L. and R. J. B. contributed to the ARPES measurements. D. G. and H. L. carried out the neutron scattering experiments with S. D., G. D., X. L., J. T. P., K. I., and K. K.. D. G., H. L., S. L. and P. D. analyzed the data. H. L., D. G. and M. Y. wrote the paper. All authors participated in discussion and comment on the paper.

Funding This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grants No. 2018YFA0704200, No. 2017YFA0303100 and No. 2017YFA0302900), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11822411, No. 11961160699, and No. 12061130200), the Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the CAS (Grants No. XDB25000000 and No. XDB07020300) and K. C. Wong Education Foundation (GJTD-2020-01). H. Luo is grateful for the support from the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (Grant No. Y202001) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grants No. JQ19002). M. Wang is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 11904414, No.12174454), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2021B1515120015), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2019YFA0705702). Work at University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under Contract No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 within the Quantum Materials Program (KC2202) and the Office of Basic Energy Sciences. The ARPES work at Rice University was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant No. C-2024 (M. Y.).

Acknowledgements The authors thank the helpful discussion with Xingye Lu at Beijing Normal University and Yu Song at Zhejiang University. The neutron scattering experiments in this work are performed at thermal triple-axis spectrometer PUMA at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Germany, thermal triple-axis spectrometer TAIPAN at Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering (ACNS), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO), Australia (Proposal No. P4263), and time-of-flight Fermi-chopper spectrometer 4SEASONS (BL-01) at the Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility of J-PARC (Proposal Nos. 2015A0005, 2016A0169). ARPES measurements were performed at the Advanced Light Source and the Stanford Radiation Lightsource, which are both operated by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE.

References

  • (1) Oganesyan V, Kivelson SA, Fradkin E. Quantum theory of a nematic Fermi fluid. Phys. Rev. B (2001) 64: 195109.
  • (2) Fradkin E, Kivelson SA. Electron Nematic Phases Proliferate. Science (2010) 327: 155-156.
  • (3) Fradkin E, Kivelson SA, Lawler MJ, Eisenstein JP, Mackenzie AP. Nematic Fermi fluids in condensed matter physics. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. (2010) 1: 153.
  • (4) Wang W, Luo J, Wang C, Yang J, Kodama Y, Zhou R, Zheng G-Q. Microscopic evidence for the intra-unit-cell electronic nematicity inside the pseudogap phase in YBa2Cu4O8. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. (2021) 64: 237413.
  • (5) Fernandes RM, Schmalian J. Manifestations of nematic degrees of freedom in the magnetic, elastic, and superconducting properties of the iron pnictides. Supercond. Sci. Technol. (2012) 25: 084005.
  • (6) Fernandes RM, Chubukov AV. Low-energy microscopic models for iron-based superconductors: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. (2017) 80: 014503.
  • (7) Chen X, Dai P, Feng D, Xiang T, Zhang F-C. Iron-based high transition temperature superconductors. Nat. Sci. Rev.(2014) 1: 371-395.
  • (8) Dai P. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. (2015) 87: 855.
  • (9) Si Q, Yu R, Abrahams E. High-temperature superconductivity in iron pnictides and chalcogenides. Nat. Rev. Mater. (2016) 1: 16017.
  • (10) Gong D, Luo H. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Acta Phys. Sin. (2018) 67: 207407.
  • (11) Böhmer AE, Meingast C. Electronic nematic susceptibility of iron-based superconductors. C. R.Physique (2016) 17: 90-112.
  • (12) Chu J-H, Kuo H-H, Analytis JG, Fisher IR. Divergent Nematic Susceptibility in an Iron Arsenide Superconductor. Science (2012) 337: 710-712.
  • (13) Kuo H-H, Fisher IR. Effect of Disorder on the Resistivity Anisotropy Near the Electronic Nematic Phase Transition in Pure and Electron-Doped BaFe2As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2014) 112: 227001.
  • (14) Kuo H-H, Shapiro MC, Riggs SC, Fisher IR. Measurement of the elastoresistivity coefficients of the underdoped iron arsenide Ba(Fe0.975Co0.025)2As2, Phys. Rev. B (2013) 88: 085113.
  • (15) Böhmer AE, Burger P, Hardy F, Wolf T, Schweiss P, Fromknecht R, Reinecker M, Schranz W, Meingast C. Nematic Susceptibility of Hole-Doped and Electron-Doped BaFe2As2 Iron-Based Superconductors from Shear Modulus Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2014) 112: 047001.
  • (16) Gong D, Liu Z, Gu Y, Xie T, Ma X, Luo H, Yang Y, Li S. Nature of the antiferromagnetic and nematic transitions in Sr1-xBaxFe1.97Ni0.03As2. Phys. Rev. B (2017) 96: 104514.
  • (17) Böhmer AE, Chen F, Meier WR, Xu M, Drachuck G, Merz M, Wiecki PW, Bud’ko SL, Borisov V, Valenti R, Christensen MH, Fernandes RM, Meingast C, Canfield PC. Evolution of nematic fluctuations in CaK(Fe1-xNix)4As4 with spin-vortex crystal magnetic order [Preprint] (2020). Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13207.
  • (18) Kuo H-H, Chu J-H, Kivelson SA, Fisher IR. Ubiquitous signatures of nematic quantum criticality in optimally doped Fe-based superconductors. Science (2016) 352: 958-962.
  • (19) Yoshizawa M, Kimura D, Chiba T, Simayi S, Nakanishi Y, Kihou K, Lee C-H, Iyo A, Eisaki H, Nakajima M, Uchida S. Structural Quantum Criticality and Superconductivity in Iron-Based Superconductor Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2012) 81: 024604.
  • (20) Dai J, Si Q, Zhu JX, Abrahams E. Iron pnictides as a new setting for quantum criticality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2009) 106: 4118-4121.
  • (21) Kasahara S, Shi HJ, Hashimoto K, Tonegawa S, Mizukami Y, Shibauchi T, Sugimoto K, Fukuda T, Terashima T, Nevidomskyy AH, Matsuda Y. Electronic nematicity above the structural and superconducting transition in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2. Nature (2012) 486: 382-385.
  • (22) Shibauchi T, Carrington A, Matsuda Y. Quantum critical point lying beneath the superconducting dome in iron-pnictides. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. (2014) 5: 113-135.
  • (23) Lederer S, Schattner Y, Berg E, Kivelson SA. Enhancement of Superconductivity near a Nematic Quantum Critical Point. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2015) 114: 097001.
  • (24) Luo H, Zhang R, Laver M, Yamani Z, Wang M, Lu X, Wang M, Chen Y, Li S, Chang S, Lynn JW, Dai P. Coexistence and Competition of the Short-Range Incommensurate Antiferromagnetic Order with the Superconducting State of BaFe2-xNixAs2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2012) 108: 247002.
  • (25) Lu X, Gretarsson H, Zhang R, Liu X, Luo H, Tian W, Laver M, Yamani Z, Kim Y-J, Nevidomskyy AH, Si Q, Dai P. Avoided Quantum Criticality and Magnetoelastic Coupling in BaFe2-xNixAs2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2013) 110: 257001.
  • (26) Hu D, Lu X, Zhang W, Luo H, Li S, Wang P, Chen G, Han F, Banjara SR, Sapkota A, Kreyssig A, Goldman AI, Yamani Z, Niedermayer C, Skoulatos M, Georgii R, Keller T, Wang P, Yu W, Dai P. Structural and Magnetic Phase Transitions near Optimal Superconductivity in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2015) 114: 157002.
  • (27) Zhang W, Wei Y, Xie T, Liu Z, Gong D, Ma X, Hu D, Čermák P, Schneidewind A, Tucker G, Meng S, Huesges Z, Lu Z, Song J, Luo W, Xu L, Zhu Z, Yin X, Li H, Yang Y, Luo H, Li S. Unconventional Antiferromagnetic Quantum Critical Point in Ba(Fe0.97Cr0.03)2(As1-xPx)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2019) 122: 037001.
  • (28) Liu Z, Gu Y, Zhang W, Gong D, Zhang W, Xie T, Lu X, Ma X, Zhang X, Zhang R, Zhu J, Ren C, Shan L, Qiu X, Dai P, Yang Y, Luo H, Li S. Nematic Quantum Critical Fluctuations in BaFe2-xNixAs2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016) 117: 157002.
  • (29) Gu Y, Liu Z, Xie T, Zhang W, Gong D, Hu D, Ma X, Li C, Zhao L, Lin L, Xu Z, Tan G, Chen G, Meng ZY, Yang Y, Luo H, Li S. Unified Phase Diagram for Iron-Based Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2017) 119: 157001.
  • (30) Chandra P, Coleman P, Larkin AI. Ising transition in frustrated Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. (1990) 64: 88.
  • (31) Hu JP, Xu CK. Nematic orders in iron-based superconductors. Physica C (2012) 481: 215.
  • (32) Fernandes RM, Chubukov AV, Schmalian J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. (2014) 10: 97-104.
  • (33) Fernandes RM, Chubukov AV, Knolle J, Eremin I, Schmalian J. Preemptive nematic order, pseudogap, and orbital order in the iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B (2012) 85: 024534.
  • (34) Wang F, Kivelson SA, Lee D-H. Nematicity and quantum paramagnetism in FeSe. Nat. Phys. (2015) 11: 959-963.
  • (35) Ma C, Wu L, Yin W-G, Yang H, Shi H, Wang Z, Li J, Homes CC, Zhu Y. Strong Coupling of the Iron-Quadrupole and Anion-Dipole Polarizations in Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2014) 112: 077001.
  • (36) Thorsmølle VK, Khodas M, Yin ZP, Zhang C, Carr SV, Dai P, Blumberg G. Critical quadrupole fluctuations and collective modes in iron pnictide superconductors. Phys. Rev. B (2016) 93: 054515.
  • (37) Wang Q, Shen Y, Pan B, Hao Y, Ma M, Zhou F, Steffens P, Schmalzl K, Forrest TR, Abdel-Hafiez M, Chen X, Chareev DA, Vasiliev AN, Bourges P, Sidis Y, Cao H, Zhao J. Strong interplay between stripe spin fluctuations, nematicity and superconductivity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. (2015) 15: 159.
  • (38) Chubukov AV, Fernandes RM, Schmalian J. Origin of nematic order in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B (2015) 91: 201105(R).
  • (39) Yamakawa Y, Onari S, Kontani H. Nematicity and Magnetism in FeSe and Other Families of F-Based Superconductors. Phys. Rev. X (2016) 6: 021032.
  • (40) Lee CC, Yin WG, Ku W. Ferro-Orbital Order and Strong Magnetic Anisotropy in the Parent Compounds of Iron-Pnictide Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2009) 103: 267001.
  • (41) Krüger F, Kumar S, Zaanen J, van den Brink J. Spin-orbital frustrations and anomalous metallic state in iron-pnictide superconductors. Phys. Rev. B (2009) 79: 054504.
  • (42) Lv WC, Wu JS, Phillips P. Orbital ordering induces structural phase transition and the resistivity anomaly in iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B (2009) 80: 224506.
  • (43) Chen C-C, Maciejko J, Sorini AP, Moritz B, Singh RRP, Devereaux TP. Orbital order and spontaneous orthorhombicity in iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B (2010) 82: 100504(R).
  • (44) Valenzuela B, Bascones E, Calderón MJ. Conductivity Anisotropy in the Antiferromagnetic State of Iron Pnictides. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2010) 105: 207202.
  • (45) Chu J-H, Analytis JG, De Greve K, McMahon PL, Islam Z, Yamamoto Y, Fisher IR. In-Plane Resistivity Anisotropy in an Underdoped Iron Arsenide Superconductor. Science (2010) 329: 824.
  • (46) Tanatar MA, Blomberg EC, Kreyssig A, Kim MG, Ni N, Thaler A, Bud’ko SL, Canfield PC, Goldman AI, Mazin II, Prozorov R. Uniaxial-strain mechanical detwinning of CaFe2As2 and BaFe2As2 crystals: Optical and transport study. Phys. Rev. B (2010) 81: 184508.
  • (47) Ying JJ, Wang XF, Wu T, Xiang ZJ, Liu RH, Yan YJ, Wang AF, Zhang M, Ye GJ, Cheng P, Hu JP, Chen XH. Measurements of the Anisotropic In-Plane Resistivity of Underdoped FeAs-Based Pnictide Superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2011) 107: 067001.
  • (48) Man H, Lu X, Chen JS, Zhang R, Zhang W, Luo H, Kulda J, Ivanov A, Keller T, Morosan E, Si Q, Dai P. Electronic nematic correlations in the stress-free tetragonal state of BaFe2-xNixAs2. Phys. Rev. B (2015) 92: 134521.
  • (49) Luo X, Stanev V, Shen B, Fang L, Ling XS, Osborn R, Rosenkranz S, Benseman TM, Divan R, Kwok W-K, Welp U. Antiferromagnetic and nematic phase transitions in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 studied by ac microcalorimetry and SQUID magnetometry. Phys. Rev. B (2015) 91: 094512.
  • (50) Mirri C, Dusza A, Bastelberger S, Chu J-H, Kuo H-H, Fisher IR, Degiorgi L. Hysteretic behavior in the optical response of the underdoped Fe arsenide Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 in the electronic nematic phase0. Phys. Rev. B (2014) 89, 060501(R).
  • (51) Fisher IR, Degiorgi L, Shen Z-X. In-plane electronic anisotropy of underdoped ’122’ Fe-arsenide superconductors revealed by measurements of detwinned single crystals. Rep. Prog. Phys. (2011) 74: 124506.
  • (52) Yi M, Lu DH, Chu JH, Analytis JG, Sorini AP, Kemper AF, Moritz B, Moore RG, Hashimoto M, Lee WS, Hussain Z, Devereaux TP, Fisher IR, Shen ZX. Symmetry-breaking orbital anisotropy observed for detwinned Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 above the spin densitywave transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2011) 108: 6878.
  • (53) Yi M, Zhang Y, Liu Z-K, Ding X, Chu J-H, Kemper AF, Plonka N, Moritz B, Hashimoto M, Mo S-K, Hussain Z, Devereaux TP, Fisher IR, Wen H-H, Shen Z-X, Lu DH. Dynamic competition between spin-density wave order and superconductivity in underdoped Ba1-xKxFe2As2. Nat. Comm. (2014) 5: 3711.
  • (54) Yi M, Lu DH, Moore RG, Kihou K, Lee C-H, Iyo A, Eisaki H, Yoshida T, Fujimori A, Shen Z-X. Electronic reconstruction through the structural and magnetic transitions in detwinned NaFeAs. New J. Phys. (2012) 14: 073019.
  • (55) Yi M, Pfau H, Zhang Y, He Y, Wu H, Chen T, Ye Z-R, Hashimoto M, Yu R, Si Q, Lee D-H, Dai P, Shen Z-X, Lu DH, Birgeneau RJ. Nematic Energy Scale and the Missing Electron Pocket in FeSe. Phys. Rev. X (2019) 9: 041049.
  • (56) Zhang Y, He C, Ye ZR, Jiang J, Chen F, Xu M, Ge QQ, Xie BP, Wei J, Aeschlimann M, Cui XY, Shi M, Hu JP, Feng DL. Symmetry breaking via orbital-dependent reconstruction of electronic structure in detwinned NaFeAs. Phys. Rev. B (2012) 85: 085121.
  • (57) Yi M, Zhang Y, Shen Z-X, Lu D. Role of the orbital degree of freedom in iron-based superconductors. npj Quantum Materials (2017) 2: 57.
  • (58) Watson MD, Dudin P, Rhodes LC, Evtushinsky DV, Iwasawa H, Aswartham S, Wurmehl S, Büchner B, Hoesch M, Kim TK. Probing the reconstructed Fermi surface of antiferromagnetic BaFe2As2 in one domain. npj Quantum Mater. (2019) 4: 36.
  • (59) Luo H, Wang M, Zhang C, Lu X, Regnault L-P, Zhang R, Li S, Hu J, Dai P. Spin Excitation Anisotropy as a Probe of Orbital Ordering in the Paramagnetic Tetragonal Phase of Superconducting BaFe1.904Ni0.096As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2013) 111: 107006.
  • (60) Lu X, Park JT, Zhang R, Luo H, Nevidomskyy AH, Si Q, Dai P. Nematic spin correlations in the tetragonal state of uniaxial-strained BaFe2-xNixAs2. Science (2014) 345: 657.
  • (61) Zhang W, Park JT, Lu X, Wei Y, Ma X, Hao L, Dai P, Meng ZY, Yang Y, Luo H, Li S. Effect of Nematic Order on the Low-Energy Spin Fluctuations in Detwinned BaFe1.935Ni0.065As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016) 117: 227003.
  • (62) Song Y, Lu X, Abernathy DL, Tam DW, Niedziela JL, Tian W, Luo H, Si Q, Dai P. Energy dependence of the spin excitation anisotropy in uniaxial-strained BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2. Phys. Rev. B (2015) 92: 180504(R).
  • (63) Lu X, Scherer DD, Tam DW, Zhang W, Zhang R, Luo H, Harriger LW, Walker HC, Adroja DT, Andersen BM, Dai P. Spin Waves in Detwinned BaFe2As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2018) 121: 067002.
  • (64) Ren X, Duan L, Hu Y, Li J, Zhang R, Luo H, Dai P, Li Y. Nematic Crossover in BaFe2As2 under Uniaxial Stress. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2015) 115: 197002.
  • (65) Hu Y, Ren X, Zhang R, Luo H, Kasahara S, Watashige T, Shibauchi T, Dai P, Zhang Y, Matsuda Y, Li Y. Nematic magnetoelastic effect contrasted between Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 and FeSe. Phys. Rev. B (2016) 93: 060504(R).
  • (66) Baek S-H, Efremov DV, Ok JM, Kim JS, van den Brink J, Büchner B. Orbital-driven nematicity in FeSe. Nat. Mater. (2015) 14: 210-214.
  • (67) Iye T, Julien M-H, Mayaffre H, Horvatić M, Berthier C, Ishida K, Ikeda H, Kasahara S, Shibauchi T, Matsuda Y. Emergence of Orbital Nematicity in the Tetragonal Phase of BaFe2(As1-xPx)2. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2015) 84: 043705.
  • (68) Rosenthal EP, Andrade EF, Arguello CJ, Fernandes RM, Xing LY, Wang XC, Jin CQ, Millis AJ, Pasupathy A. N. Visualization of electron nematicity and unidirectional antiferroic fluctuations at high temperatures in NaFeAs. Nat. Phys. (2014) 10: 225-232.
  • (69) Ishida S, Nakajima M, Liang T, Kihou K, Lee CH, Iyo A, Eisaki H, Kakeshita T, Tomioka Y, Ito T, Uchida S. Anisotropy of the In-Plane Resistivity of Underdoped Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Superconductors Induced by Impurity Scattering in the Antiferromagnetic Orthorhombic Phase. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2013) 110: 207001.
  • (70) Allan MP, Chuang T-M, Massee F, Xie Y, Ni N, Bud’ko SL, Boebinger GS, Wang Q, Dessau DS, Canfield PC, Golden MS, Davis JC. Anisotropic impurity states, quasiparticle scattering and nematic transport in underdoped Ca(Fe1-xCox)2As2. Nat. Phys. (2013) 9: 220-224.
  • (71) Zhang R, Gong D, Lu X, Li S, Dai P, Luo H. The effect of Cr impurity to superconductivity in electron-doped BaFe2-xNixAs2. Supercond. Sci. Technol. (2014) 27: 115003.
  • (72) Zhang R, Gong D, Lu X, Li S, Laver M, Niedermayer C, Danilkin S, Deng G, Dai P, Luo H. Doping evolution of antiferromagnetism and transport properties in nonsuperconducting BaFe2-2xNixCrxAs2. Phys. Rev. B (2015) 91: 094506.
  • (73) Gong D, Xie T, Zhang R, Birk J, Niedermayer C, Han F, Lapidus SH, Dai P, Li S, Luo H. Doping effects of Cr on the physical properties of BaFe1.9-xNi0.1CrxAs2. Phys. Rev. B (2018) 98: 014512.
  • (74) Pizarro JM, Calderón MJ, Liu J, Muñoz MC, Bascones E. Strong correlations and the search for high-TcT_{c} superconductivity in chromium pnictides and chalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B (2017) 95: 075115.
  • (75) Edelmann M, Sangiovanni G, Capone M, de’Medici L. Chromium analogs of iron-based superconductors, Phys. Rev. B (2017) 95: 205118.
  • (76) de’Medici L, Giovannetti G, Capone M. Selective Mott physics as a key to iron superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2014) 112: 177001.
  • (77) Lee PA, Nagaosa N, Wen X-G. Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. (2006) 78: 17.
  • (78) Gu Q, Wen H-H. Superconductivity in nickel-based 112 systems. The Innovation (2022) 3: 100202.
  • (79) Song Y et al., A Mott insulator continuously connected to iron pnictide superconductors, Nat. Commun. (2016) 7: 13879.
  • (80) Yin ZP, Haule K, Kotliar G. Kinetic frustration and the nature of the magnetic and paramagnetic states in iron pnictides and iron chalcogenides. Nat. Mater. (2011) 10: 932-935.
  • (81) Georges A, de’Medici L, Mravlje J. Strong Correlations from Hund’s Coupling. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. (2013) 4: 137.
  • (82) Yi M, Lu DH, Analytis JG, Chu J-H, Mo S-K, He R-H, Moore RG, Zhou XJ, Chen GF, Luo JL, Wang NL, Hussain Z, Singh DJ, Fisher IR, Shen Z-X. Electronic structure of the BaFe2As2 family of iron-pnictide superconductors. Phys. Rev. B (2009) 80: 024515.
  • (83) Richard P, Sato T, Nakayama K, Takahashi T, Ding H. Fe-based superconductors: an angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy perspective. Rep. Prog. Phys. (2011) 74: 124512.
  • (84) Song Y, Wang W, Zhang C, Gu Y, Lu X, Tan G, Su Y, Bourdarot F, Christianson AD, Li S, Dai P. Temperature and polarization dependence of low-energy magnetic fluctuations in nearly optimally doped NaFe0.9785Co0.0215As. Phys. Rev. B (2017) 96: 184512.
  • (85) Song Y, Man H, Zhang R, Lu X, Zhang C, Wang M, Tan G, Regnault L-P, Su Y, Kang J, Fernandes RM, Dai P. Spin anisotropy due to spin-orbit coupling in optimally hole-doped Ba0.67K0.33Fe2As2. Phys. Rev. B (2016) 94: 214516.
  • (86) Xie T, Wei Y, Gong D, Fennell T, Stuhr U, Kajimoto R, Ikeuchi K, Li S, Hu J, Luo H. Odd and Even Modes of Neutron Spin Resonance in the Bilayer Iron-Based Superconductor CaKFe4As4. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2018) 120: 267003.
  • (87) Xie T, Gong D, Ghosh H, Ghosh A, Soda M, Masuda T, Itoh S, Bourdarot F, Regnault L-P, Danilkin S, Li S, Luo H. Neutron Spin Resonance in the 112-Type Iron-Based Superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2018) 120: 137001.
  • (88) Xie T, Liu C, Bourdarot F, Regnault L-P, Li S, Luo H. Spin-excitation anisotropy in the bilayer iron-based superconductor CaKFe4As4. Phys. Rev. Research (2020) 2: 022018(R).
  • (89) Wang T, Zhang C, Xu LC, Wang JH, Jiang S, Zhu ZW, Wang ZS, Chu JN, Feng JX, Wang LL, Li W, Hu T, Liu XS, Mu G. Strong Pauli paramagnetic effect in the upper critical field of KCa2Fe4As4F2. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. (2020) 63: 227412.
  • (90) Guo J, Yue L, Iida K, Kamazawa K, Chen L, Han T, Zhang Y, Li Y. Preferred Magnetic Excitations in the Iron-Based Sr1-xNaxFe2As2 Superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2019) 122: 017001.
  • (91) Liu C, Bourges P, Sidis Y, Xie T, He G, Bourdarot F, Danilkin S, Ghosh H, Ghosh S, Ma X, Li S, Li Y, Luo H. Preferred Spin Excitations in the Bilayer Iron-Based Superconductor CaK(Fe0.96Ni0.04)4As4 with Spin-Vortex Crystal Order. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2022) 128: 137003.
  • (92) Luo H, Wang Z, Yang H, Cheng P, Zhu X, Wen H-H. Growth and characterization of A1-xKxFe2As2 (A = Ba, Sr) single crystals with x=x= 0 - 0.4. Supercond. Sci. Technol. (2008) 21: 125014.
  • (93) Chen Y, Lu X, Wang M, Luo H, Li S. Systematic growth of BaFe2-xNixAs2 large crystals, Supercond. Sci. Technol. (2011) 24: 065004.
  • (94) Xie T, Gong D, Zhang W, Gu Y, Huesges Z, Chen D, Liu Y, Hao L, Meng S, Lu Z, Li S, Luo H. Crystal growth and phase diagram of 112-type iron pnictide superconductor Ca1-yLayFe1-xNixAs2. Supercond. Sci. Technol. (2017) 30: 095002.
  • (95) Wang T, Chu JN, Feng JX, Wang LL, Xu XG, Li W, Wen HH, Liu XS, Mu G. Low temperature specific heat of 12442-type KCa2Fe4As4F2 single crystals. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. (2020) 63: 297412.
  • (96) Lu X, Tseng K-F, Keller T, Zhang W, Hu D, Song Y, Man H, Park JT, Luo H, Li S, Nevidomskyy AH, Dai P. Impact of uniaxial pressure on structural and magnetic phase transitions in electron-doped iron pnictides. Phys. Rev. B (2016) 93: 134519.
  • (97) Tam DW, Wang W, Zhang L, Song Y, Zhang R, Carr SV, Walker HC, Perring TG, Adroja DT, Dai P. Weaker nematic phase connected to the first order antiferromagnetic phase transition in SrFe2As2 compared to BaFe2As2. Phys. Rev. B (2019) 99: 134519.
  • (98) Tam DW, Yin ZP, Xie Y, Wang W, Stone MB, Adroja DT, Walker HC, Yi M, Dai P. Orbital selective spin waves in detwinned NaFeAs. Phys. Rev. B (2020) 102: 054430.
  • (99) Liu P, Klemm ML, Tian L, Lu X, Song Y, Tam DW, Schmalzl K, Park JT, Li Y, Tan G, Su Y, Bourdarot F, Zhao Y, Lynn JW, Birgeneau RJ, Dai P. In-plane uniaxial pressure-induced out-of-plane antiferromagnetic moment and critical fluctuations in BaFe2As2. Nat. Commun. (2020) 11: 5728.
  • (100) Sobolev O, Park JT. PUMA: Thermal three axes spectrometer. J. Large Scale Res. Facil. (2015) 1: A13.
  • (101) Danilkin SA, Yethiraj M. TAIPAN: Thermal Triple-Axis Spectrometer, Neutron News (2009) 20: 37-39.
  • (102) Nakamura M, Kajimoto R, Inamura Y, Mizuno F, Fujita M, Yokoo T, Arai M. First Demonstration of Novel Method for Inelastic Neutron Scattering Measurement Utilizing Multiple Incident Energies. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2009) 78: 093002.
  • (103) Kajimoto R et al. The Fermi Chopper Spectrometer 4SEASONS at J-PARC. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2011) 80: SB025.
  • (104) Inamura Y, Nakatani T, Suzuki J, Otomo T. Development Status of Software ”Utsusemi” for Chopper Spectrometers at MLF, J-PARC. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2013) 82: SA031.
  • (105) ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK (2000) https://www.isis.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/Excitations-Software.aspx.
  • (106) Blomberg EC, Tanatar MA, Fernandes RM, Mazin II, Shen B, Wen H-H, Johannes MD, Schmalian J, Prozorov R. Sign-reversal of the in-plane resistivity anisotropy in hole-doped iron pnictides. Nat. Commun. (2013) 4: 1914.
  • (107) Ma JQ, Luo XG, Cheng P, Zhu N, Liu DY, Chen F, Ying JJ, Wang AF, Lu XF, Lei B, Chen XH. Evolution of anisotropic in-plane resistivity with doping level in Ca1-xNaxFe2As2 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B (2014) 89: 174512.
  • (108) Kobayashi T, Tanaka K, Miyasaka S, Tajima S. Importance of Fermi Surface Topology for In-Plane Resistivity Anisotropy in Hole- and Electron-Doped Ba(Fe1-xTMx)2As2 (TM = Cr, Mn, and Co). J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. (2015) 84: 094707.
  • (109) Ishida K, Tsujii M, Hosoi S, Mizukami Y, Ishida S, Iyo A, Eisaki H, Wolf T, Grube K, Löhneysen Hv, Fernandes RM, Shibauchi T. Novel electronic nematicity in heavily hole-doped iron pnictide superconductors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2020) 117: 6424-6429.
  • (110) Tam DW et al. Uniaxial pressure effect on the magnetic ordered moment and transition temperatures in BaFe2-xTxAs2 (T = Co, Ni). Phys. Rev. B (2017) 95: 060505(R).
  • (111) Daghofer M, Luo Q-L, Yu R, Yao DX, Moreo A, Dagotto E. Orbital-weight redistribution triggered by spin order in the pnictides. Phys. Rev. B (2010) 81: 180514(R).