This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

11institutetext: UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR 7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France 22institutetext: CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014, Paris, France 33institutetext: Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1 Hwaam-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 205-348, Korea

Non-equilibrium ionization states in galaxy clusters.

D. A. Prokhorov 112233
(Accepted . Received ; Draft printed: September 22, 2025)
Abstract

Context. X-ray imaging observatories have revealed hydrodynamic structures with linear scales 10\sim 10 kpc in clusters of galaxies, such as shock waves in the 1E0657-56 and A520 galaxy clusters and the hot plasma bubble in the MKW 3s cluster. The future X-ray observatory IXO will resolve for the first time the metal distribution in galaxy clusters at the these scales.

Aims. Heating of plasmas by shocks and AGN activities can result in non-equilibrium ionization states of metal ions. We study the effect of the non-equilibrium ionization at linear scales 50\lesssim 50 kpc in galaxy clusters.

Methods. A condition for non-equilibrium ionization is derived by comparing the ionization time-scale with the age of hydrodynamic structures. Modeling of non-equilibrium ionization when the plasma temperature suddenly change is performed. An analysis of relaxation processes of the FeXXV and FeXXVI ions by means of eigenvectors of the transition matrix is given.

Results. We conclude that the non-equilibrium ionization of iron can occur in galaxy clusters if the baryonic overdensity δ\delta is smaller than 11.0/τ11.0/\tau, where τ1\tau\ll 1 is the ratio of the hydrodynamic structure age to the Hubble time. Our modeling indicates that the emissivity in the helium-like emission lines of iron increases as a result of deviation from the ionization equilibrium. A slow process of helium-like ionic fraction relaxation was analyzed. A new way to determine a shock velocity is proposed.

Key Words.:
Galaxies: clusters: general; Atomic processes; Shock waves
offprints: phdmitry@gmail.com

1 Introduction

Clusters of galaxies are gravitationally bound structures of mass 10141015\sim 10^{14}-10^{15} M and size 13\sim 1-3 Mpc (for a review, see Kaastra et al. 2008). Their mass budget consists of dark matter (80%)(\simeq 80\%), hot diffuse intracluster plasma (20%)(\lesssim 20\%) and a small fraction of other components such as stars and dust. The mean baryonic overdensity in galaxy clusters equal to δ=nH/n¯H200\delta=n_{\mathrm{H}}/\bar{n}_{\mathrm{H}}\simeq 200, where nHn_{\mathrm{H}} and n¯H\bar{n}_{\mathrm{H}} are the mean hydrogen densities in galaxy clusters and in the Universe, respectively.

Many chemical elements reside in galaxy clusters. The plasma temperatures kT310\simeq 3-10 keV in galaxy clusters are close to the values of the K-shell ionization potentials of heavy elements (IZ=Z2RyI_{Z}=Z^{2}Ry, where Z is the atomic number and RyRy the Rydberg constant). Emission lines from heavy elements were detected by X-ray telescopes from galaxy clusters. The current instruments (XMM-Newton, Chandra and Suzaku) have largely enhanced our knowledge on the chemical abundances of many elements. Metal abundances around 0.3 in Solar Units of Anders & Grevesse (1989) were derived under the assumptions of collisional ionization equilibrium (for a review, Werner et al. 2008).

Non-equilibrium processes such as non-equilibrium ionization and relaxation of the ion and electron temperatures are usually taken into account only in the outskirts of galaxy clusters and in the warm hot intergalactic medium (WHIM) where baryonic overdensity δ\delta is less than 200 (e.g. Yoshikawa & Sasaki 2006; Prokhorov 2008). However, we show that non-equilibrium ionization can also be produced as the result of merging processes and AGN activity in galaxy clusters where the baryonic overdensity δ1000\delta\gtrsim 1000.

Evidences for merging processes of galaxy clusters and AGN activity, such as shocks and hot plasma bubbles, were revealed by means of Chandra high-resolution observations. For example, strong shocks in the 1E0657-56 and A520 galaxy clusters propagating with a velocity of 4700 km/s and 2300 km/s, respectively, were derived by Markevitch et al. (2002) and Markevitch et al. (2005). The corresponding Mach numbers of the shocks are 3.03.0 and 2.12.1. Hot plasmas inside bubbles arising from AGN activity were detected in galaxy clusters (e.g. Mazzotta et al. 2002). Heating of plasmas produced by shocks or AGNs can result in a non-equilibrium ionization state.

In this paper we study the effect of non-equilibrium ionization near merger shock fronts and in hot plasma bubbles. We give a theoretical analysis of collisional non-equilibrium ionization in Sect. 2. We show numerically the importance of this effect in galaxy clusters in Sect. 3. We analyze helium-like and hydrogen-like non-equilibrium ionization states by means of eigenvectors of the transition matrix in Sect. 4. A new approach to determine the value of the shock velocity is considered in Sect. 5 and our results are discussed in Sect. 6.

2 A condition for non-equilibrium ionization.

Non-equilibrium ionization is often assumed in supernova remnants (e.g. Gronenschild & Mewe 1982, Masai 1994) and may be important in the WHIM (Yoshikawa & Sasaki 2006). The non-equilibrium ionization state in the linked region between the Abell 399 and Abell 401 clusters was also studied by Akahori & Yoshikawa (2008). We are going to show that non-equilibrium ionization can occur not only in the outskirts of galaxy clusters but also in galaxy clusters, in which merging processes and AGN activity play a role. We derive here a condition on the baryonic overdensity for deviation from collisional ionization equilibrium, by comparing the ionization time-scale with the age of hydrodynamic structures.

The number of collisions between electrons and an ion resulting in electron impact ionization per unit time is ν=σionvthrn~\nu=\sigma_{\mathrm{ion}}v_{\mathrm{thr}}\tilde{n}, where σion\sigma_{\mathrm{ion}} is the characteristic value of the ionization cross-section, vthrv_{\mathrm{thr}} corresponds to the threshold velocity (energy) of the ionization process, and n~\tilde{n} is the number density of electrons which have sufficient energy for electron impact ionization. The ionization time-scale is given by tion=1/νt_{\mathrm{ion}}=1/\nu, and therefore

tion=1σionvthrn~.t_{\mathrm{ion}}=\frac{1}{\sigma_{\mathrm{ion}}v_{\mathrm{thr}}\tilde{n}}. (1)

As it was noted by Yoshikawa & Sasaki (2006) and Akahori & Yoshikawa (2008), helium-like and hydrogen-like ions are interesting for the analysis of non-equilibrium ionization. Therefore, electron impact ionization of a helium-like ion will be considered in this section as a physically important case (a consideration of hydrogen-like ions is analogous).

For helium-like ions the characteristic value of the ionization cross-section is approximately (see Bazylev & Chibisov 1981)

σionHe2πa02Z4\sigma^{\mathrm{He}}_{\mathrm{ion}}\approx\frac{2\pi a^{2}_{\mathrm{0}}}{Z^{4}} (2)

where a0=2/mee2a_{\mathrm{0}}=\hbar^{2}/m_{\mathrm{e}}e^{2} is the Bohr radius, Z is the atomic number.

Since the ionization potential of a He-like ion is approximately IZZ2mee42/2I_{\mathrm{Z}}\approx Z^{2}m_{\mathrm{e}}e^{4}\hbar^{-2}/2111The exact value of the ionized potential of a He-like ions is obtained by changing ZZ with Zeff=Z5/16Z_{\mathrm{eff}}=Z-5/16. We consider the case Z1Z\gg 1 and, therefore, the approximative value is sufficient., the electron threshold velocity vthr=2IZ/mev_{\mathrm{thr}}=\sqrt{2I_{\mathrm{Z}}/m_{\mathrm{e}}} can be approximated as

vthrZe2.v_{\mathrm{thr}}\approx Z\frac{e^{2}}{\hbar}. (3)

The number density of electrons with energies higher than the ionization potential of a He-like ion is

n~=n0pthrx2fM(x)𝑑x\tilde{n}=n_{0}\int^{\infty}_{\mathrm{p_{\mathrm{thr}}}}x^{2}f_{\mathrm{M}}(x)dx (4)

where n0n_{0} is the plasma number density, pthr=2IZ/kTp_{\mathrm{thr}}=\sqrt{2I_{\mathrm{Z}}/kT} is the dimensionless threshold momentum and fM(x)=2/π×exp(x2/2)f_{\mathrm{M}}(x)=\sqrt{2/\pi}\times\exp\left(-x^{2}/2\right) is the Maxwellian distribution.

If the dimensionless threshold momentum pthr1p_{\mathrm{thr}}\gtrsim 1 then a simplified form of Eq. (4) is given by

n~2πn0exp(IZkT)IZkT\tilde{n}\approx\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}n_{0}\exp\left(-\frac{I_{\mathrm{Z}}}{kT}\right)\sqrt{\frac{I_{\mathrm{Z}}}{kT}} (5)

Using Eqs. (2), (3) and (5) we rewrite Eq. (1) as

tion14πZ2me3/2kTn02exp(IZkT)t_{\mathrm{ion}}\approx\frac{1}{4\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{Z^{2}m^{3/2}_{\mathrm{e}}\sqrt{kT}}{n_{0}\hbar^{2}}\exp\left(\frac{I_{\mathrm{Z}}}{kT}\right) (6)

It is most convenient to write the plasma number density in terms of the baryonic overdensity n0=δΩbρcrit/mpn_{\mathrm{0}}=\delta\Omega_{\mathrm{b}}\rho_{\mathrm{crit}}/m_{\mathrm{p}}, where the critical density is ρcrit=3H02/(8πG)\rho_{\mathrm{crit}}=3H^{2}_{\mathrm{0}}/(8\pi G), and to denote the ratio of the thermal energy kTkT and the ionization potential by λ=kT/IZ\lambda=kT/I_{\mathrm{Z}}. Thus,

tion2π32Z3me2mpe2G3H02ΩbΦ(λ)δt_{\mathrm{ion}}\approx\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}}{3\sqrt{2}}\frac{Z^{3}m^{2}_{\mathrm{e}}m_{\mathrm{p}}e^{2}G}{\hbar^{3}H^{2}_{\mathrm{0}}\Omega_{\mathrm{b}}}\frac{\Phi(\lambda)}{\delta} (7)

where Φ(λ)=λexp(1/λ)\Phi(\lambda)=\sqrt{\lambda}\exp\left(1/\lambda\right).

Ionization states will be non-equilibrium if the ionization time-scale tiont_{\mathrm{ion}} is longer than the hydrodynamic structure age t=τH01t=\tau H^{-1}_{\mathrm{0}}, i.e. tion>τH01t_{\mathrm{ion}}>\tau H^{-1}_{0}. This condition is equivalent to the inequality

δ2πZ3me2mpe2G323H0ΩbΦ(λ)τ.\delta\lesssim\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}Z^{3}m^{2}_{\mathrm{e}}m_{\mathrm{p}}e^{2}G}{3\sqrt{2}\hbar^{3}H_{\mathrm{0}}\Omega_{\mathrm{b}}}\frac{\Phi(\lambda)}{\tau}. (8)

In an important case of the iron ions (Z=26), the numerical value of the first dimensionless term on the right-hand side of Eq. (8) is

2πZ3me2mpe2G323H0Ωb2.4\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}Z^{3}m^{2}_{\mathrm{e}}m_{\mathrm{p}}e^{2}G}{3\sqrt{2}\hbar^{3}H_{\mathrm{0}}\Omega_{\mathrm{b}}}\approx 2.4 (9)

and, therefore,

δ2.4Φ(λ)τ.\delta\lesssim 2.4\frac{\Phi(\lambda)}{\tau}. (10)

In rich galaxy clusters with plasma temperature of kTpl5kT_{\mathrm{pl}}\approx 5 keV, the value of the function Φ(kTpl/IZ)\Phi(kT_{\mathrm{pl}}/I_{\mathrm{Z}}) is 4.6\approx 4.6. Therefore, in this case we find δ11.0/τ\delta\lesssim 11.0/\tau and conclude that, if the hydrodynamic structure age is of order 10710810^{7}-10^{8} years (i.e. τ\tau lies in the range 6.6×104<τ<6.6×1036.6\times 10^{-4}<\tau<6.6\times 10^{-3}) then non-equilibrium ionization occurs in galaxy clusters where the baryonic overdensity δ1000\delta\approx 1000 (see Eq. 8).

Mazzotta et al. (2002) have estimated the age of a hot plasma bubble of diameter 50\sim 50 kpc to be t2.7×107t\approx 2.7\times 10^{7} yr, which is much shorter than the age of the MKW 3s cluster. In the 1E0657-56 and A520 clusters the downstream velocities of the shocked gas flowing away from the shock are 1600 km s-1 and 1000 km s-1 (Markevitch et al. 2002, Markevitch et al. 2005), therefore the shocked gas covers a distance 5050 kpc in times 3.1×1073.1\times 10^{7} and 4.7×1074.7\times 10^{7} yrs respectively. Thus, in light of the above conclusion non-equilibrium ionization can occur at linear scales \lesssim 50 kpc in galaxy clusters in which merging processes and AGN activity present.

3 Modeling of non-equilibrium ionization.

Non-equilibrium ionization occurs when the physical conditions of the plasma, such as the temperature, suddenly change. Shocks, for example, can lead to an almost instantaneous rise in temperature and to a deviation from ionization equilibrium. However, it takes some time for the plasma to respond to an instantaneous temperature change, as the ionization balance is recovered by collisions.

In this section we consider the following situation: the plasma temperature instantaneously increases from kT1=3.4kT_{1}=3.4 keV to kT2=10.0kT_{2}=10.0 keV. Such a temperature change may correspond to a temperature jump at a shock with a Mach number M=2.6M=2.6 or to plasma heating by AGN activity. We assume that the age of the hot plasma region is 3×1073\times 10^{7} yr and the baryonic overdensity is δ=4000\delta=4000 which corresponds to the plasma number density in the post-shock region in the A520 cluster (see Fig. 2b of Markevitch et al. 2005). Following Markevith (2006) we assume that the electron and ion temperatures are equal.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Dependence of the He-like (solid line) and H-like (dashed line) ionic fractions of iron on the dimensionless time t/(3×107t/(3\times 10^{7} yr)).

At the temperature kT1=3.4kT_{1}=3.4 keV the ionic fractions of Li-like, He-like and H-like ions of Fe relative to the total Fe abundance are 12%\approx 12\%, 77%\approx 77\%, and 9%\approx 9\% respectively. Therefore we consider below four iron-ion-states Fe(+23), Fe(+24), Fe(+25) and Fe(+26). In the case the collisional ionization rate equation for each element is written as

dn0dtn=(I+23R+2400I+23I+24R+24R+2500I+24I+25R+25R+2600I+25R+26)n\displaystyle\frac{d}{n_{0}dt}\@vec{n}=\left(\begin{array}[]{cccc}-I_{+23}&R_{+24}&0&0\\ I_{+23}&-I_{+24}-R_{+24}&R_{+25}&0\\ 0&I_{+24}&-I_{+25}-R_{+25}&R_{+26}\\ 0&0&I_{+25}&-R_{+26}\end{array}\right)\@vec{n} (15)

where n\@vec{n} is the vector with four components (n+23n_{+23}, n+24n_{+24}, n+25n_{+25}, n+26n_{+26}), normalized such that i=2326n+i=1\sum^{26}_{\mathrm{i}=23}n_{+\mathrm{i}}=1, which correspond to the four iron-ion-states mentioned above, I+zI_{+\mathrm{z}} and R+zR_{+\mathrm{z}} represent the rate coefficients for ionization and recombination from an ion of charge z to charges z+1 and z-1, respectively. All the coefficients necessary to calculate the direct ionization cross sections are taken from Arnaud & Rothenflug (1985), the radiative recombination rates are taken from Verner & Ferland (1996), and the dielectronic recombination rates are taken from Mazzotta et al. (1998). To solve the system of equations (15) we use the fourth order Runge-Kutta method.

The time-dependence of the He-like and H-like ionic fractions of iron is shown in Fig. 1.

At the temperature kT2=10.0kT_{2}=10.0 keV the equilibrium ionic fractions of He-like and H-like ions of iron are 27%\approx 27\% and 45%\approx 45\% respectively. Therefore, the He-like ionic fraction which equals 35% at time 3×1073\times 10^{7} yr does not reach its equilibrium value and non-equilibrium ionization occurs. However, the H-like ionic fraction almost reaches its equilibrium value at time 3×1073\times 10^{7} yr.

We now show that the effect of non-equilibrium ionization on the helium-like emission lines of iron can be significant and that non-equilibrium ionization leads to the increase of volume emissivity in the helium-like spectral lines.

The helium-like volume emissivity for a chemical element of atomic number Z is given by

ϵZ=nenHAZ×(n+(Z2)Q+(Z2)+n+(Z1)α+(Z1))\epsilon_{\mathrm{Z}}=n_{\mathrm{e}}n_{\mathrm{H}}A_{\mathrm{Z}}\times\left(n_{+\mathrm{(Z-2)}}Q_{\mathrm{+(Z-2)}}+n_{+(\mathrm{Z-1})}\alpha_{\mathrm{+(Z-1)}}\right) (16)

where nen_{\mathrm{e}} is the electron number density, nHn_{\mathrm{H}} is the hydrogen number density, AZA_{Z} is the abundance of the considered chemical element, n+(Z2)n_{+(\mathrm{Z-2})} and n+(Z1)n_{+(\mathrm{Z-1})} are the ionic fractions of helium-like and hydrogen-like ions respectively, Q+(Z2)Q_{\mathrm{+(Z-2)}} is the impact excitation rate coefficient and α+(Z1)\alpha_{\mathrm{+(Z-1)}} is the rate coefficient for the contribution from radiative recombination to the spectral lines. Excitation rate coefficients are taken from Prokhorov et al. (2009). Let us note the reduced volume emissivity in the iron helium-like emission lines as

U=ϵZ=26nenHAZΓU=\frac{\epsilon_{\mathrm{Z=26}}}{n_{\mathrm{e}}n_{\mathrm{H}}A_{\mathrm{Z}}\Gamma} (17)

where Γ=Z4πa02IZ/me\Gamma=Z^{-4}\pi a^{2}_{0}\sqrt{I_{\mathrm{Z}}/m_{\mathrm{e}}} corresponds to the characteristic rate coefficient value (see also Prokhorov 2009).

In Fig. 2 the reduced emissivity UU when the ionic fractions are in ionization equilibrium is shown in the range of temperatures between 3.5 keV and 11 keV.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Dependence of the equilibrium reduced iron volume emissivity in the helium-like lines on the plasma temperature.

In the situation considered above we find that at temperatures kT1=3.4kT_{1}=3.4 keV and kT2=10.0kT_{2}=10.0 keV the equilibrium values of the reduced volume emissivities are approximately equal. However, in the presence of non-equilibrium processes approximate equality of these volume emissivities does not hold. Since the fraction of electrons with energy higher than the impact excitation threshold Eex6.7E_{\mathrm{ex}}\approx 6.7 keV is 27%27\% at the temperature kT1=3.4kT_{1}=3.4 keV and is much less than 72%72\% that is at temperature kT2=10.0kT_{2}=10.0 keV, more effective impact excitation should be at temperature kT2=10.0kT_{2}=10.0 keV. Furthermore the non-equilibrium ionic fraction of helium-like iron in the region of temperature kT2=10.0kT_{2}=10.0 keV is higher than the equilibrium ionic fraction (see Fig.1) and, therefore, non-equilibrium ionization leads to the increase of volume emissivity in the helium-like spectral lines.

Using the dependence of the ionic fractions of iron on the dimensionless time t/(3×107t/(3\times 10^{7} yr)) (see Eq. 15) we study the time evolution of the reduced volume emissivity in the iron helium-like emission lines. This time evolution is shown in Fig. 3.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Evolution of the reduced iron volume emissivity in the iron helium-like lines in the region with temperature 10.0 keV. The dimensionless time is given by t/(3×1073\times 10^{7} yr).

Since the maximal value UmaxU_{\mathrm{max}} of the equilibrium reduced emissivity U(T)U(T) is at the temperature kT6kT\approx 6 keV and equal to 1.25\approx 1.25 (see Fig. 2), we conclude that the non-equilibrium value of U(t)U(t) (see Fig. 3) is higher than the maximal equilibrium value UmaxU_{\mathrm{max}} up to the time t=2×107t=2\times 10^{7} yr (up to the dimensionless time equal to 0.65). The value UeqU_{\mathrm{eq}} of the equilibrium reduced emissivity at the temperature kT=10.0kT=10.0 keV equal to 0.8\approx 0.8 is less than the non-equilibrium value of U(t)U(t) during the time interval t=3×107t=3\times 10^{7} yr. Therefore, the iron abundance AZ,eqA_{\mathrm{Z,eq}} derived from the assumption that ionization states are in equilibrium will be higher than the correct iron abundance value AZA_{\mathrm{Z}} (see Eq. 17), which is given by

AZ=AZ,eqUeqU(t).A_{\mathrm{Z}}=A_{\mathrm{Z,eq}}\frac{U_{\mathrm{eq}}}{U(t)}. (18)

4 An analysis of He-like and H-like non-equilibrium ionization states by means of eigenvectors

In the previous section we showed that the ionic fraction of He-like iron ions can remain in non-equilibrium while the H-like iron ionic fraction almost achieves equilibrium. This somewhat paradoxical behavior can be more easily understood by means of eigenvectors of the transition matrix M, which is (see Eq. 15)

M=n0tage(I+23R+2400I+23I+24R+24R+2500I+24I+25R+25R+2600I+25R+26),M=n_{0}t_{\mathrm{age}}\left(\begin{array}[]{cccc}-I_{+23}&R_{+24}&0&0\\ I_{+23}&-I_{+24}-R_{+24}&R_{+25}&0\\ 0&I_{+24}&-I_{+25}-R_{+25}&R_{+26}\\ 0&0&I_{+25}&-R_{+26}\end{array}\right), (19)

where tage=3×107t_{\mathrm{age}}=3\times 10^{7} yr is the age of the hydrodynamical structure (see Sect. 3).

Here we calculate the values of the eigenvalues of the transition matrix and the corresponding eigenvectors, and show how the ionic fraction of He-like iron ions can remain non-equilibrium longer than that of H-like iron ions.

The eigenvalues λ\lambda of the transition matrix M are derived from the equation

Det(Mλ×E)=0,\mathrm{Det}(M-\lambda\times E)=0, (20)

where EE is the unit matrix.

One of the eigenvalues of the transition matrix M is of the form Eq. (19) equal to zero (λ0=0\lambda_{0}=0). Consequently, the ionization equilibrium is achieved in the end.

The solution of the system of differential equations (Eq. 15) can be written as

n=i=03ciViexp(λittage),\@vec{n}=\sum^{3}_{\mathrm{i=0}}c_{\mathrm{i}}\@vec{V}_{\mathrm{i}}\exp\left(\frac{\lambda_{\mathrm{i}}t}{t_{\mathrm{age}}}\right), (21)

where cic_{\mathrm{i}} are constants, n\@vec{n} is the vector (n+23,n+24,n+25,n+26)(n_{+23},n_{+24},n_{+25},n_{+26}) and Vi\@vec{V}_{\mathrm{i}} are the eigenvectors of the transition matrix M.

At the temperature kT=10.0kT=10.0 keV we derive three eigenvalues which equal to λ117.80\lambda_{1}\approx-17.80, λ23.40\lambda_{2}\approx-3.40 and λ31.46\lambda_{3}\approx-1.46. The eigenvectors which correspond to the derived eigenvalues are respectively

V1=(0.660.740.080.00),V2=(0.030.480.820.31),V3=(0.030.610.140.78).\@vec{V_{1}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}-0.66\\ 0.74\\ -0.08\\ 0.00\end{array}\right),\ \ \@vec{V_{2}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}-0.03\\ -0.48\\ 0.82\\ -0.31\end{array}\right),\ \ \@vec{V_{3}}=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}-0.03\\ -0.61\\ -0.14\\ 0.78\end{array}\right). (22)

The eigenvector which corresponds to the eigenvalue λ0\lambda_{0} determines equilibrium ionic fractions at temperature kT=10.0kT=10.0 keV.

Since λ3\lambda_{3} is the smallest absolute value of the eigenvalues (excluding λ0\lambda_{0} which does not correspond to any relaxation process) the process which corresponds to the eigenvector V3\@vec{V_{3}} is the slowest (see Eq. 21). This slow process corresponds to the increase in the FeXXVII ionic fraction due to decreases in the FeXXV and FeXXVI ionic fractions. However, the absolute value of the second component of V3\@vec{V}_{3}, which corresponds to the decrease in the FeXXV ionic fraction and equals 0.61, is higher than the absolute value of the third component of V3\@vec{V}_{3}, which corresponds to the decrease in the FeXXVI ionic fraction and equals 0.14. Therefore, the variation in the helium-like FeXXV ionic fraction which is proportional to the value of the second component of V3\@vec{V}_{3} is more substantial during this relaxation process than the variation in the hydrogen-like FeXXVI ionic fraction.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Dependence of the He-like (solid line), H-like (dashed line) and fully ionized (dot-dashed line) ionic fractions of iron on the dimensionless time t/(3×107t/(3\times 10^{7} yr)).

The quantitative difference between the variations in the He-like and H-like ionic fractions is illustrated in Fig. 4.

5 Mach number determination

Clusters of galaxies form via gravitational infall and mergers of smaller mass concentrations. In the course of a merger, a significant portion of the kinetic energy of the colliding subclusters, that carried by the gas, is dissipated by shocks.

The shocks in the A520 and 1E0657-06 clusters have Mach numbers M=23M=2-3, derived from the Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions (for a review, see Markevitch & Vikhlinin 2007), relating the density and temperature jumps at the shock and the Mach number, M=v/c1M=v/c_{1}, where c1c_{1} is the velocity of sound in the pre-shocked gas and vv is the velocity of the pre-shock gas in the reference frame of the shock. Thus, if the pre-shock and post-shock temperatures (T1T_{1} and T2T_{2}, respectively) are determined from observations, the Mach number of the shock can be derived from the equation:

T2T1=(2γMsh2(γ1))×((γ1)Msh2+2)(γ+1)2Msh2\frac{T_{2}}{T_{1}}=\frac{(2\gamma M^{2}_{\mathrm{sh}}-(\gamma-1))\times((\gamma-1)M^{2}_{\mathrm{sh}}+2)}{(\gamma+1)^{2}M^{2}_{\mathrm{sh}}} (23)

where γ\gamma is the adiabatic index. It is usually assumed that the pre-shock velocity in the reference frame of the shock is equal to the shock velocity in the reference frame of the galaxy cluster and that the adiabatic index is γ=5/3\gamma=5/3 (see Markevitch & Vikhlinin 2007).

The comparison of the X-ray image and gravitational lensing mass map of the 1E0657-06 merging cluster (Clowe et al. 2006) shows that the mass peak of the subcluster is offset from the baryonic mass peak. Clowe et al. (2006) interpret this as the first direct evidence for the existence of dark matter.

Such merging clusters offer the unique opportunity to study gas physics through direct comparison of the observed shock properties with the predictions of gas + dark matter modeling (e.g. Prokhorov & Durret 2007; Springel & Farrar 2007). In this section we provide a new way to derive shock parameters based on measurements of the flux ratio of the FeXXV and FeXXVI iron lines.

The fluxes of the FeXXV and FeXXVI lines have the same dependence on the metal abundance, as well as on the emission measure, their ratio is independent of these parameters. This iron line ratio can therefore be used to determine the temperature of the intracluster gas (e.g. Nevalainen et al. 2003) and the presence of supra-thermal electrons (e.g. Prokhorov et al. 2009).

Taking into account both electron-impact-excitation and radiative recombination the iron line flux ratio is given by

R=n+24QFeXXV12+n+25αRRFeXXV12n+25QFeXXVI12+n+26αRR,FeXXVI12,R=\frac{n_{+24}Q^{1-2}_{\mathrm{FeXXV}}+n_{+25}\alpha^{1-2}_{\mathrm{RR}\,\mathrm{FeXXV}}}{n_{\mathrm{+25}}Q^{1-2}_{\mathrm{FeXXVI}}+n_{+26}\alpha^{1-2}_{\mathrm{RR},\ \mathrm{FeXXVI}}}, (24)

where the rate coefficients are QFeXXV12=ab(<a)SFeXXV1s2aBabQ^{1-2}_{\mathrm{FeXXV}}=\sum\limits_{a}\sum\limits_{b(<a)}S^{1s^{2}-a}_{\mathrm{FeXXV}}B_{ab}, QFeXXVI12=ab(<a)SFeXXVI1saBabQ^{1-2}_{\mathrm{FeXXVI}}=\sum\limits_{a}\sum\limits_{b(<a)}S^{1s-a}_{\mathrm{FeXXVI}}B_{ab}, and SFeXXVI1saS^{1s-a}_{\mathrm{FeXXVI}} are the impact-excitation rates. The excited states bb correspond to the upper levels of the He-like triplet and the H-like doublet, and the radiative, branching ratios are given by,

Bab=Aabc(<a)Aac.B_{ab}=\frac{A_{ab}}{\sum\limits_{c(<a)}A_{ac}}\;. (25)

and αRR,FeXXV12\alpha^{1-2}_{\mathrm{RR},\ \mathrm{FeXXV}} and αRR,FeXXVI12\alpha^{1-2}_{\mathrm{RR},\ \mathrm{FeXXVI}} are the rate coefficients for the contribution from radiative recombination to the spectral lines FeXXV (He-like triplet) and FeXXVI (H-like doublet), respectively, and AacA_{ac} are the transition probabilities.

Below we study the situation which was considered in Sects. 3 and 4. The variation of the iron line flux ratio in the region with temperature 10.0 keV as a function of dimensionless time is shown in Fig. 5.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Evolution of the iron line flux ratio in the region with temperature 10.0 keV. The dimensionless time is given by t/(3×1073\times 10^{7} yr).

Let the downstream velocity of the shocked gas which flows away from the shock be VdV_{\mathrm{d}}. Then the distance covered by shocked gas passes in a time tt is L=VdtL=V_{d}t. Therefore, if the iron line flux ratio RR is known from observations at distance LL from the shock front then using the function R(t)R(t) we can derive the value of the downstream velocity Vd=L/t(R)V_{d}=L/t(R), where t(R)t(R) is the inverse function for R(t)R(t).

The Mach number of the shock and the downstream velocity are related by (e.g. Landau & Lifshitz 1959)

Msh=2+(γ1)Md22γMd2(γ1)M_{\mathrm{sh}}=\sqrt{\frac{2+(\gamma-1)M^{2}_{\mathrm{d}}}{2\gamma M^{2}_{\mathrm{d}}-(\gamma-1)}} (26)

where Md=Vd/c2M_{\mathrm{d}}=V_{\mathrm{d}}/c_{2} and c2c_{2} is the velocity of sound in the post-shocked gas.

On the observational side, it will be important to derive the flux ratio of the FeXXV and FeXXVI iron lines from the region between the shock front and the considered distance LL which shocked gas covers in a time t=L/Vdt=L/V_{\mathrm{d}}. Since non-equilibrium ionization can occur at linear scale 50\lesssim 50 kpc (see Sect. 2), we choose L=25L=25 kpc. The flux ratio of the iron lines FeXXV and FeXXVI from this region is then

R=0L/Vd(n+24QFeXXV12+n+25αRRFeXXV12)×𝑑t0L/Vd(n+25QFeXXVI12+n+26αRR,FeXXVI12)×𝑑t,R=\frac{\int^{L/V_{\mathrm{d}}}_{0}\left(n_{+24}Q^{1-2}_{\mathrm{FeXXV}}+n_{+25}\alpha^{1-2}_{\mathrm{RR}\,\mathrm{FeXXV}}\right)\times dt}{\int^{L/V_{\mathrm{d}}}_{0}\left(n_{\mathrm{+25}}Q^{1-2}_{\mathrm{FeXXVI}}+n_{+26}\alpha^{1-2}_{\mathrm{RR},\ \mathrm{FeXXVI}}\right)\times dt}, (27)

Using Eqs. (26) and (27), we find the Mach number MM of the shock as a function of the iron line flux ratio RR. The dependence M(R) is plotted in Fig. 6.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Dependence of the Mach number of the shock M on the iron line flux ratio R.

Thus, we conclude that the Mach number of the shock can be derived from the iron line flux ratio. Methods based on the Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions and on measuring the iron line flux ratio are independent for deriving the Mach number of the shock.

6 Conclusions

The currently operating X-ray imaging observatories provide us with a detailed view of the intracluster medium in galaxy clusters. Chandra’s 1′′ angular resolution, the best among the current X-ray observatories, corresponds to linear scales <1<1 kpc at z<0.05z<0.05 and 4\approx 4 kpc at z=0.3z=0.3 (the redshift of the 1E0657 56 cluster). This enables us to study hydrodynamic phenomena in galaxy clusters, such as shock waves and hot plasma bubbles.

Metal observations are always limited by the number of X-ray photons. For diffuse low surface brightness objects, like galaxy clusters, the effective area is a major issue, therefore for a reasonable observation time, Chandra metal abundance maps will have lower spatial resolution than XMM-Newton (see Werner et al. 2008). IXO 222http://ixo.gsfc.nasa.gov/ is planned to be a follow-up mission of XMM-Newton and will have a sensitivity much higher than XMM-Newton. The expected effective area of the IXO mirror and focal plane instruments showing the large improvement at all energy (including the 6-7 keV band) in comparison with those of current X-ray observatories is plotted in a figure 333http://ixo.gsfc.nasa.gov/images/science/effective-area.jpg. The larger effective area in the 6-7 keV band the higher accuracy of the iron line flux measurements is achieved. With IXO we will be able to resolve for the first time the metal distribution in the ICM on the scales of single galaxies in nearby clusters (simulations of metallicity maps which will be provided by the next generation X-ray telescope are given by Kapferer et al. 2006). Therefore, the sensitivity of IXO will provide metal observations near shock fronts and in hot plasma bubbles.

We have considered in this paper the non-equilibrium ionization at linear scales 50\lesssim 50 kpc in galaxy clusters. The necessary condition on the baryonic overdensity (see Eq. 8) for the existence of non-equilibrium ionization in regions of galaxy clusters where δ>200\delta>200 holds for ions of iron. This is because the iron atomic number Z=26 is high enough for the threshold value of the overdensity, which is proportional to Z3Z^{3} (see Eq. 8), to become higher than the mean cluster baryonic overdensity.

The dependence of the He-like and H-like ionic fractions of iron on time is given in Sect. 3. We found that the He-like ionic fraction of iron does not achieve its equilibrium value during the age of the hydrodynamical structures and non-equilibrium ionization takes place.

We calculated the reduced emissivity in the He-like iron spectral lines and concluded that the iron abundance derived from the assumption that ionization states are in equilibrium predicted to be higher than the correct iron abundance value (see Fig. 3).

We found that the slowest relaxation process corresponds to the increase in the FeXXVII ionic fraction due to decreases in the FeXXV and FeXXVI ionic fractions. However, the decrease in the FeXXV ionic fraction is much higher than the decrease in the FeXXVI ionic fraction during this relaxation process.

A new way to derive the Mach number of a shock based on measurements of the flux ratio of the FeXXV and FeXXVI iron lines is proposed in Sect. 5. The advantage of this method with respect to the method based on the Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions is that the first is more accurate. Fortunately the iron line flux ratio is constrained without the effect of hydrogen column density (NHN_{\mathrm{H}}) uncertainties. In practice, the X-ray data can be fitted in a narrow band containing the FeXXV and FeXXVI lines, where the absorption is negligible (see Nevalainen et al. 2009). The drawback is that the number of photons is small in this narrow energy band, but the next generation X-ray telescope IXO with larger effective area overcomes this drawback and will be able to measure the flux ratio of the iron KαK_{\mathrm{\alpha}} lines and, therefore, the Mach number of a shock with high precision. Using the narrow energy band instead of the full X-ray spectrum minimizes the dependence on calibration accuracy (see Nevalainen et al. 2003), therefore the FeXXV to FeXXVI lines are insensitive to the details of the effective area function in contrast to the continuum spectrum. Note that the method based on the Rankine-Hugoniot jump conditions uses the densities and temperatures derived from the continuum spectrum.

Another advantage of the proposed method is that it permits us to determine independently the Mach number of a shock by using measurements of the iron line flux ratio at different distances from a shock (see Sect. 5) since it takes into account an evolution of ionization states.

The effect of the apparent iron overabundance under the assumption of ionization equilibrium and the slow process of helium-like ionic fraction relaxation should be analyzed in galaxy clusters by means of future X-ray observatories and may have implications in different astrophysical plasmas (e.g. in supernova remnants). New high-spectral-resolution instruments with higher sensitivity, such as IXO, are needed to measure the flux ratio of the iron Kα\alpha lines with the purpose of independent by determining the shock parameters.

Acknowledgements.
I am grateful to Joseph Silk, Florence Durret, Igor Chilingarian and Anthony Moraghan for valuable suggestions and discussions and thank the referee for very useful comments.

References

  • (1) Akahori, T., Yoshikawa, K. 2008, PASJ, 60, L19
  • (2) Anders, E., Grevesse, N. 1989, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 197
  • (3) Arnaud, M., Rothenflug, R. 1985, A&ASS, 60, 425
  • (4) Bazylev, V. A., Chibisov, M. I. 1981, Sov. Phys. Usp., 4, 617
  • (5) Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H. et al. 2006, ApJ, 648, L109
  • (6) Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., Mewe, R. 1982, A&ASS, 48, 305
  • (7) Kaastra, J. S. (Editor), 2008, Cluster of Galaxies: beyond the thermal view, SSRv, 134, Issues 1-4, Springer
  • (8) Kapferer, W., Ferrari, C., Domainko, W. et al. 2006, A&A, 447, 827
  • (9) Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M. 1959, Fluid Mechanics (Addison- Wesley Reading)
  • (10) Markevitch, M., Gonzalez, A. H., David, L. et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, L27
  • (11) Markevitch, M., Govoni, F., Brunetti, G., Jerius, D. 2005, ApJ, 627, 733
  • (12) Markevitch, M. 2006, ESA SP-604: The X-ray Universe 2005, 723
  • (13) Markevitch, M, Viklinin, A. 2007, Phys. Rep., 443, 1
  • (14) Masai, K. 1994, ApJ, 437, 770
  • (15) Mazzotta, P., Mazzitelli, G., Colafrancesco, S. et al. 1998, A&AS, 133, 403
  • (16) Mazzotta, P., Kaastra, J. S., Paerels, F. B. S. et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, L37
  • (17) Nevalainen, J., Lieu, R., Bonamente, M. et al. 2003, ApJ, 584, 716
  • (18) Nevalainen, J., Eckert, D., Kaastra, J. et al. 2009, A&A, in press, arXiv:0910.1364
  • (19) Prokhorov, D. A., Durret, F. 2007, A&A, 474, 375
  • (20) Prokhorov, D. A. 2008, A&A, 492, 651
  • (21) Prokhorov, D. A., Durret, F., Dogiel, V. A., Colafrancesco, S. 2009, A&A, 496, 25
  • (22) Prokhorov, D. A. 2009, A&A, in press, arXiv:0910.1640
  • (23) Springel, V., Farrar, G. R. 2007, MNRAS, 380, 911
  • (24) Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J. 1996, ApJS, 103, 467
  • (25) Werner, N., Durret, F., Ohashi, T. et al. 2008, Space Sci. Rev., 134, 337
  • (26) Yoshikawa, K., Sasaki, S. 2006, PASJ, 58, 641