This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Non-thermal distributions of charm and charmonium in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Chaoyu Pan    Shuhan Zheng    Meimei Yang    Zhiwei Liu    Baoyi Chen baoyi.chen@tju.edu.cn Department of Physics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300354, China
Abstract

We employ the Boltzmann transport model to study the charmonium regeneration with non-thermal charm quarks in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. As heavy quarks do not reach kinetic thermalization in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP), the final transverse momentum distribution of regenerated charmonium depends on the degree of charm quark kinetic thermalization. When the charm momentum distribution becomes harder, more charm quarks are distributed in the middle and high pTp_{T}, where the production of regenerated charmonium also becomes larger. With non-thermal momentum distribution of charm quarks in their coalescence process, the nuclear modification factor RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_{T}) of charmonium enhances at middle pTp_{T}. Besides, the elliptic flow v2(pT)v_{2}(p_{T}) of charmonium also enhances at middle pTp_{T} as more regenerated charmonium are distributed in this pTp_{T} region. The theoretical calculations with non-thermal charm distribution explain well the pTp_{T} dependence of charmonium RAAR_{AA} and v2v_{2}, which indicates that charm quarks do not reach complete kinetic thermalization in the QGP when charmonium are regenerated.

I introduction

In relativistic heavy-ion collisions, it is believed that an extremely hot and deconfined medium made up of quarks and gluons, called “Quark-Gluon Plasma” (QGP) is produced Bazavov:2011nk . The study of signals Matsui:1986dk ; Stoecker:2004qu and properties Ding:2015ona of this new deconfined matter, such as transport coefficients and initial energy densities helps to comprehend the strong interaction at finite temperatures. Heavy quarks and quarkonium are predominantly produced in the nuclear parton hard scatterings due to their large masses. They have been proposed as clean probes of early stage of the hot medium generated in nucleus-nucleus (AA) collisions in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) Zhao:2020jqu ; Zhao:2011cv ; He:2012df ; Yan:2006ve ; Liu:2010ej ; Chen:2019qzx . In this hot medium, the heavy quark potential is screened by thermal light partons Wen:2022utn ; Wen:2022yjx , which results in the “melt” of quarkonium-bound states when the medium temperature is sufficiently high Karsch:2005nk ; Satz:2005hx . The highest temperature at which quarkonium-bound states can survive is called the “dissociation temperature” TdT_{d} Liu:2012zw ; Guo:2012hx ; Chen:2013wmr . Below this TdT_{d}, inelastic collisions from thermal light partons can also dissociate the quarkonium-bound states Adil:2006ra ; Wong:2001td ; Zhu:2004nw . The survival probability of quarkonium decreases when traveling through the QGP due to both color screening and parton inelastic scatterings. The hot medium effects are characterized by the nuclear modification factor RAAR_{AA}, which is defined as the ratio of quarkonium production in AA collisions to the production in proton-proton (pp) collisions scaled by the number of nucleon binary collisions NcollN_{coll}.

At the LHC, where there are many heavy quarks in the QGP, charm and anti-charm quarks have a significant chance to combine into new bound states when they move to areas with lower temperatures. This process becomes even more dominant in the production of charmonium with the presence of more charm pairs Du:2017qkv ; Zhao:2017yan . As charm quarks lose energy as they travel through the QGP Braaten:1991we ; Gyulassy:2000fs ; Djordjevic:2003zk ; Qin:2007rn , the pTp_{T} spectrum of regenerated charmonium depends on the momentum distribution of charm quarks before their coalescence into charmonium states. When charm quarks have a non-thermal distribution, the mean pTp_{T} of regenerated charmonium will be larger than that of the thermal case.

This work studies the pTp_{T} dependence of charmonium RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_{T}) and v2(pT)v_{2}(p_{T}) by employing various momentum distributions of charm quarks. Cold nuclear matter effects have been included in the initial distributions of charm quarks and charmonium. Hot medium evolution is described using hydrodynamic equations. The manuscript is organized as follows. In Section II, the transport model is introduced. In Section III, non-thermal distributions of charm quarks are discussed. Hot medium evolution is given as a background in Section IV. In Section V, the scaled RAAR_{AA} and v2v_{2} of charmonium are calculated and compared with experimental data for different non-thermal momentum distributions of charm quarks. Lastly, a final summary is given in Section VI.

II transport model

The distribution of heavy quarkonium in a medium has been extensively studied using various models, including transport models Grandchamp:2003uw ; Du:2015wha ; Chen:2016dke ; Yao:2020eqy ; Yao:2018sgn , coalescence models Zhao:2017yan ; Chen:2021akx ; Thews:2000rj , statistical Hadronization model Braun-Munzinger:2000csl , open quantum system approaches Yao:2021lus ; Brambilla:2020qwo ; Akamatsu:2018xim , etc. Transport model takes into account both primordial production and regeneration. The Boltzmann transport equation for charmonium evolution is written as Yan:2006ve ,

tfψ+𝐯𝐱fψ=αfψ+β,\displaystyle\partial_{t}f_{\psi}+{\bf v}\cdot{\bf\bigtriangledown_{x}}f_{\psi}=-\alpha f_{\psi}+\beta, (1)

where the distribution of charmonium in phase space, denoted by fψf_{\psi}, varies over time due to charmonium diffusion which is represented by the term 𝐯𝐱fψ{\bf v}\cdot{\bf\bigtriangledown_{x}}f_{\psi}. 𝐯{\bf v} is the velocity of charmonium. The decay rate α\alpha accounts for inelastic collisions and the color screening effect that can dissociate charmonium states. This rate depends on both the density of light partons and the inelastic cross sections Zhu:2004nw ,

α(𝒑,x)\displaystyle\alpha({\bm{p}},x) =12ETd3𝒑g(2π)32EgWgψcc¯(s)fg(𝒑g,x)Θ(T(x)Tc),\displaystyle={1\over 2E_{T}}\int{d^{3}{\bm{p}}_{g}\over(2\pi)^{3}2E_{g}}W_{g\psi}^{c\bar{c}}(s)f_{g}({\bm{p}}_{g},x)\Theta(T(x)-T_{c}), (2)

where 𝐩g{\bf p}_{g} and EgE_{g} are the momentum and the energy of thermal gluons. ET=mψ+pT2E_{T}=\sqrt{m_{\psi}+p_{T}^{2}} is the transverse energy of charmonium with the mass mJ/ψ=3.1m_{J/\psi}=3.1 GeV. fgf_{g} is the Bose distribution of massless gluons. The step function Θ(TTc)\Theta(T-T_{c}) ensures that the gluon-dissociation process only happens above the critical temperature TcT_{c} of the deconfined phase transition. Wgψcc¯=4σgψcc¯(s)Fgψ(s)W_{g\psi}^{c\bar{c}}=4\sigma_{g\psi}^{c\bar{c}}(s)F_{g\psi}(s) is the charmonium dissociation probability in the reaction g+J/ψc+c¯g+J/\psi\rightarrow c+\bar{c}, where ss is the center-of-mass energy of the gluon and the charmonium. FgψF_{g\psi} is the flux factor. σgψcc¯\sigma_{g\psi}^{c\bar{c}} is the gluon-dissociation cross section. It is obtained via the operator-production-expansion (OPE) method Peskin:1979va ; Bhanot:1979vb ,

σgJ/ψ(ω)\displaystyle\sigma_{g-J/\psi}(\omega) =\displaystyle= A0(x1)3/2x5.\displaystyle A_{0}{(x-1)^{3/2}\over x^{5}}. (3)

We use ww to represent the gluon energy, while xx refers to the ratio of the gluon energy to the J/ψJ/\psi in-medium binding energy ϵψ\epsilon_{\psi}. The constant factor A0=211π/(27mc3ϵψ)A_{0}=2^{11}\pi/(27\sqrt{m_{c}^{3}\epsilon_{\psi}}) has charm quark mass mc=1.87m_{c}=1.87 GeV. For loosely bound excited states such as χc(1P)\chi_{c}(1P) and ψ\psi^{\prime}, we obtain the decay widths using the geometry scale Chen:2018kfo .

Above the critical temperature, heavy quark potential is partially restored Lafferty:2019jpr ; Liu:2018syc , allowing charm and anti-charm quarks to combine and form new bound states through the reaction c+c¯J/ψ+gc+\bar{c}\rightarrow J/\psi+g. The regeneration rate of charmonium β\beta is proportional to the densities of charm and anti-charm quarks,

β(𝒑,x)\displaystyle\beta({\bm{p}},x) =12ETd3𝒑g(2π)32Egd3𝒑c(2π)32Ecd3𝒑c¯(2π)32Ec¯\displaystyle={1\over 2E_{T}}\int{d^{3}{\bm{p}}_{g}\over(2\pi)^{3}2E_{g}}{d^{3}{\bm{p}}_{c}\over(2\pi)^{3}2E_{c}}{d^{3}{\bm{p}}_{\bar{c}}\over(2\pi)^{3}2E_{\bar{c}}}
×Wcc¯gψ(s)fc(𝒑c,𝐱)fc¯(𝒑c¯,𝐱)\displaystyle\quad\times W_{c\bar{c}}^{g\psi}(s)f_{c}({\bm{p}}_{c},{\bf x})f_{\bar{c}}({\bm{p}}_{\bar{c}},{\bf x})
×Θ(T(𝐱)Tc)(2π)4δ(p+pgpcpc¯),\displaystyle\quad\times\Theta(T({\bf x})-T_{c})(2\pi)^{4}\delta(p+p_{g}-p_{c}-p_{\bar{c}}), (4)

where 𝐩c{\bf p}_{c} and 𝐩c¯{\bf p}_{\bar{c}} represent the momentum of charm and anti-charm quarks respectively. Ec=mc2+pc2E_{c}=\sqrt{m_{c}^{2}+p_{c}^{2}} denotes the energy of charm quark. The probability of combination of cc and c¯\bar{c}, denoted by Wcc¯gψW_{c\bar{c}}^{g\psi}, is determined through the detailed balance. The delta function δ(p+pgpcpc¯)\delta(p+p_{g}-p_{c}-p_{\bar{c}}) ensures a four energy-momentum conservation in the reaction. Charm quark distribution fc(𝐩c,𝐱)f_{c}({\bf p}_{c},{\bf x}) in the QGP will be obtained by fitting the results from the Langevin model He:2014cla ; Qin:2010pf ; Xu:2017obm .

III non-thermal distribution of charm quarks

Heavy quarks experience significant energy loss when they move through a hot medium. The Langevin equation can be used to obtain the spatial and momentum distributions of heavy quarks. For simplicity, we assume that the heavy quark distribution in phase space can be separated into a production of the spatial density ρc(𝐱,t)\rho_{c}({\bf x},t) and the momentum distribution as fc(𝐩c,𝐱,t)=ρc(𝐱,t)f(𝐩c,t)f_{c}({\bf p}_{c},{\bf x},t)=\rho_{c}({\bf x},t)f({\bf p}_{c},t). The spatial density ρc(𝐱,t)\rho_{c}({\bf x},t) decreases with the times in the expanding QGP. It mainly affects the yield of regenerated charmonium. Therefore, we approximate the spatial density with the diffusion equation, μ(ρcuμ)=0\partial_{\mu}(\rho_{c}u^{\mu})=0 Zhou:2014kka , which is usually used in the limit of the kinetic thermalization. The heavy quark spatial density only depends on the four-velocity of the medium, which is given by hydrodynamic equations. The initial profile of ρc\rho_{c} is proportional to the dσppcc¯/dyTA(𝐱T𝐛/2)TB(𝐱T+𝐛/2)d\sigma_{pp}^{c\bar{c}}/dyT_{A}({\bf x}_{T}-{\bf b}/2)T_{B}({\bf x}_{T}+{\bf b}/2), where dσppcc¯/dy=(1.165, 0.718)mbd\sigma_{pp}^{c\bar{c}}/dy=(1.165,\ 0.718)\ \rm{mb} ALICE:2021dhb ; LHCb:2016ikn are the rapidity differential cross sections of charm quarks in central and forward rapidities respectively. TA(B)T_{A(B)} is the nuclear thickness function.

As for the momentum distribution, charm quarks do not reach kinetic thermalization during charmonium regeneration. The realistic momentum distribution of charm quarks in the QGP is obtained by the event-by-event simulations of the Langevin equation Cao:2015hia ; He:2019vgs . Charm quarks are randomly regenerated according to the momentum distribution obtained from FONLL calculation Cacciari:1998it ; Cacciari:2001td . These charm quarks are evolved in QGP with the Langevin equation, where heavy quark energy loss is determined by the spatial diffusion coefficient 𝒟s(2πT)=5\mathcal{D}_{s}(2\pi T)=5, which has been previously used for open heavy flavor hadrons He:2012df ; Rapp:2018qla ; Dong:2019unq . When charm quarks move to regions with a relatively low temperature, the heavy quark potential is partially restored and cc and c¯\bar{c} can combine into a bound state. Most J/ψJ/\psi are regenerated below the temperature Trege1.2TcT_{\rm rege}\sim 1.2\ T_{c} where the heavy quark potential is mostly restored at the distance of the J/ψJ/\psi radius Satz:2005hx ; Chen:2018kfo . The normalized momentum distribution of charm quarks on the hypersurface with T(𝐱)=TregeT({\bf x})=T_{\rm rege} is given by the Langevin equation. It is plotted as dots in Fig.1.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) Normalized transverse momentum distribution dN/dpTdN/dp_{T} of charm quarks in the most central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. Dots are the normalized pTp_{T} distribution of charm quarks given by the Langevin equation on the hypersurface specified with the J/ψJ/\psi regeneration temperature Trege(𝐱)1.2TcT_{\rm rege}({\bf x})\sim 1.2\ T_{c}. The spatial diffusion coefficient is taken to be 𝒟s(2πT)=5\mathcal{D}_{s}(2\pi T)=5. Different Fermi distributions are plotted where TeffT_{\rm eff} controls the charm quark momentum distribution.

To incorporate the non-thermal distribution of charm quarks into the transport model, we use the Fermi distribution to simulate a distribution that is close to the realistic distribution given by the Langevin model. The TeffT_{\rm eff} parameter in the Fermi distribution can be determined based on the realistic distribution of charm,

fc(𝐩c)=Nnormeupc/Teff+1,\displaystyle f_{c}({\bf p}_{c})={N_{\rm norm}\over e^{u\cdot p_{c}/T_{\rm eff}}+1}, (5)

where TeffT_{\rm eff} does not represent the temperature of the medium anymore. It characterizes the realistic momentum distribution of charm quarks in the regeneration process and is connected with the charm energy loss in the medium. NnormN_{\rm norm} is the normalization factor satisfying the relation 𝑑𝐩cfc(𝐩c)=1\int d{\bf p}_{c}f_{c}({\bf p}_{c})=1. uu and pcp_{c} are the four-velocity and four-momentum of the fluid and charm quarks respectively. We take the spatial diffusion coefficient 𝒟s(2πT)=5\mathcal{D}_{s}(2\pi T)=5 to evolve charm quarks in the QGP and stop the evolution at T(𝐱)=TregeT({\bf x})=T_{\rm rege}. In Fig.1, the normalized final transverse momentum distribution of charm quarks in the most central Pb-Pb collisions is plotted with dots. Different Fermi distributions are also plotted where TeffT_{\rm eff} is taken as different values. When TeffT_{\rm eff} is larger than the medium temperature TregeT_{\rm rege}, it indicates that charm quarks are further away from the kinetic thermalization. The line with Teff0.4T_{\rm eff}\sim 0.4 GeV fits the Langevin results better than other lines. Furthermore, the degree of charm kinetic thermalization differs in different collision centralities. We will take different transverse momentum distributions of charm quarks in the charmonium regeneration.

IV hot medium evolution

Relativistic heavy ion collisions produce a hot, deconfined medium that behaves like a nearly perfect fluid. The dynamical evolution of the medium can be described with hydrodynamic equations. We assume that the longitudinal expansion of the hot medium follows a Bjorken evolution and use 2+1 dimensional ideal hydrodynamic equations to simulate its expansion,

μνTμν=0.\displaystyle\partial_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu}=0. (6)

The energy-momentum tensor is Tμν=(e+p)uμuνgμνpT^{\mu\nu}=(e+p)u^{\mu}u^{\nu}-g^{\mu\nu}p. uμu^{\mu} is the four-velocity of the medium. Energy density ee and the pressure pp change with the times and the position. An equation of the state of the medium is necessary to close the equations. QGP is treated as an ideal gas made up of massless u,du,d quarks, gluons and the strange quark with a mass of ms=150m_{s}=150 MeV. Meanwhile the hadronic medium is treated as an ideal gas composed of all known hadrons and resonances with mass up to 2 GeV ParticleDataGroup:2020ssz . The phase transition between the QGP and the hadronic gas is a first-order phase transition with a critical temperature Tc=165T_{c}=165 MeV Sollfrank:1996hd . The initial energy density of the medium is determined by the final charged multiplicity, where the maximum initial temperature at the center of the fireball is extracted to be T0(τ0,𝐱T=0|𝐛=0)=510T_{0}(\tau_{0},{\bf x}_{T}=0|{\bf b}=0)=510 MeV at the starting time of hydrodynamic equations in the most central 5.025.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions Zhao:2017yhj . τ0=0.6\tau_{0}=0.6 fm is the time scale of the medium reaching local equilibrium Shen:2014vra . The initial temperatures at other positions 𝐱T{\bf x}_{T} are obtained with the Glauber model.

V Initial conditions

At the beginning of nuclear collisions, charmonium production is produced in parton hard scatterings. Their production can be treated as the production in pp collisions scaled with the number of binary collisions NcollN_{coll}. In pp collisions without hot medium effects, the momentum distribution of J/ψJ/\psi has been measured in experiments, which can be parametrized using a power law function,

d2σppJ/ψdy2πpTdpT=(n1)π(n2)pT2pp[1+pT2(n2)pT2pp]ndσppJ/ψdy,\displaystyle{d^{2}\sigma_{pp}^{J/\psi}\over dy2\pi p_{T}dp_{T}}={(n-1)\over\pi(n-2)\langle p_{T}^{2}\rangle_{pp}}[1+{p_{T}^{2}\over(n-2)\langle p_{T}^{2}\rangle_{pp}}]^{-n}{d\sigma_{pp}^{J/\psi}\over dy}, (7)

where the parameters are fitted to be pT2pp=12.5(GeV/c)2\langle p_{T}^{2}\rangle_{pp}=12.5\ \rm{(GeV/c)^{2}} and n=3.2n=3.2 in the central rapidities, and the rapidity differential cross section of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi is taken to be dσppJ/ψ/dy=5.2μbd\sigma_{pp}^{J/\psi}/dy=5.2\ \mu b (in central rapidity) ALICE:2012vup ; ALICE:2012vpz ; CMS:2018gbb . In the forward rapidity, the differential cross section is fitted to be dσppJ/ψ/dy=3.25μbd\sigma_{pp}^{J/\psi}/dy=3.25\ \mu b. For excited states of charmonium, their normalized pTp_{T} distribution is the same as the distribution of J/ψJ/\psi due to the small difference between their masses. The inclusive charmonium consists of both the non-prompt part from B decay, and the prompt part which is defined as the sum of the primordial production and the regeneration. The inclusive nuclear modification factor related to the prompt and the non-prompt RAAR_{AA} is as follows Chen:2013wmr ,

RAAincl=RAAprompt1+rB+RAABrB1+rB,\displaystyle R_{AA}^{incl}={R_{AA}^{prompt}\over 1+r_{B}}+{R_{AA}^{B}r_{B}\over 1+r_{B}}, (8)

where the RAApromptR_{AA}^{prompt} and RAABR_{AA}^{B} is the prompt and the non-prompt nuclear modification factors. rB=fB/(1fB)r_{B}=f_{B}/(1-f_{B}) is the ratio of non-prompt and prompt charmonium production in pp collisions. The fraction of non-prompt J/ψJ/\psi in the inclusive production is fitted to be fB=0.04+0.23(pT/(GeV/c))f_{B}=0.04+0.23(p_{T}/\rm{(GeV/c)}) CDF:2004jtw ; CMS:2010nis ; ALICE:2012vpz , without clear dependence on the collision energy. RAApromptR_{AA}^{prompt} is calculated with the transport model which includes charmonium dissociation and regeneration. While in the non-prompt part, the final distribution of non-prompt J/ψJ/\psi is connected with the bottom quark energy loss in the hot medium. The non-prompt nuclear modification factor RAABR_{AA}^{B} can be extracted from the Langevin equation Yang:2023rgb .

Charmonium initial distribution in AA collisions is also modified by the cold nuclear matter effects compared with the case in pp collisions. The partons scatter with other nucleons to obtain extra energy before fusing into charm pairs and charmonium. This process is called the Cronin effect Cronin:1974zm , making the momentum distribution of primordial charmonium become harder than the distribution extracted in pp collisions. This is included via the modification pT2pp+agNl\langle p_{T}^{2}\rangle_{pp}+a_{gN}\langle l\rangle. Here l\langle l\rangle is the average path length of partons traveling through the nucleus before the hard scattering. The transverse momentum square parton obtained per unit length is denoted by agNa_{gN}. The value of agNa_{gN} is determined to be agN=0.15(GeV/c)2a_{gN}=0.15\ \rm{(GeV/c)^{2}} Chen:2016dke ; Zhou:2014kka based on the charmonium momentum broadening observed in proton-nucleus collisions. Another important cold nuclear matter effect is the shadowing effect Mueller:1985wy . Parton densities in the nucleons of the nucleus become different compared to those in free nucleons. This effect results in the suppression of parton density and hence the reduction of the number of charmonium and charm pairs in heavy-ion collisions. The shadowing effect is calculated to be 0.6 in the most central Pb-Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV with the EPS09 package Eskola:2009uj . The shadowing factor at other centralities can be obtained via the scale of the thickness function Zhou:2014kka .

VI charmonium distribution in heavy-ion collisions

In the regeneration, when the charm quark momentum distribution becomes different, the pTp_{T} distribution of regenerated charmonium from the reaction c+c¯J/ψ+gc+\bar{c}\rightarrow J/\psi+g also becomes different. Additionally, the total production of charmonium depends on the degree of charm kinetic thermalization. To focus on the shape of charmonium pTp_{T} distribution with different non-thermal distributions of charm quarks, the total yields of regeneration are scaled to the same value to fit the experimental data of RAA(Np)R_{AA}(N_{p}) in the most central collisions. With this disposure, we can clearly see how the pTp_{T} distribution of charmonium RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_{T}) and v2(pT)v_{2}(p_{T}) are affected by the non-thermal charm quarks, especially at middle and high pTp_{T}.

In Fig.2, we calculated the J/ψJ/\psi nuclear modification factor as a function of pTp_{T} in the centrality 0-10% in sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, where regeneration dominates the total production of J/ψJ/\psi. With smaller TeffT_{\rm eff}, charm quark momentum distribution before regeneration becomes softer, leading to regenerated charmonia carry small pTp_{T} and are distributed in low pTp_{T} region. At middle and high pTp_{T}, regeneration contribution becomes negligible as the density of charm quarks is small, shown as the lines labeled with Teff=0.2T_{\rm eff}=0.2 and 0.160.16 GeV. These lines with softer charm distributions underestimate the experimental data at middle pTp_{T}. When the momentum distribution of charm quarks becomes harder, such as the cases with Teff=(0.3,0.4)T_{\rm eff}=(0.3,0.4) GeV, regenerated J/ψJ/\psi tends to carry larger pTp_{T} and enhance the inclusive production of J/ψJ/\psi at pT45p_{T}\sim 4-5 GeV/c, shown as the lines Teff=(0.3,0.4)T_{\rm eff}=(0.3,0.4) GeV. However, when the charm momentum distribution used in the regeneration becomes extremely hard (Teff=0.6T_{\rm eff}=0.6 GeV), the J/ψJ/\psi inclusive RAAR_{AA} enhances significantly at high pTp_{T} which is far away from the realistic case. Inspired by the realistic distributions of charm quarks given by the Langevin equation in Fig.1, the value of TeffT_{\rm eff} is expected to be around Teff0.4T_{\rm eff}\sim 0.4 GeV. We can see that the shape of the line with Teff=0.30.4T_{\rm eff}=0.3\sim 0.4 GeV can give a better explanation of the data compared to the case of completely kinetic thermalization (Teff=0.160.2T_{\rm eff}=0.16\sim 0.2 GeV).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) pTp_{T} dependence of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi nuclear modification factor in the central rapidity of sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. Different non-thermal distributions of charm quarks are considered by taking Teff=(0.16,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.6)T_{eff}=(0.16,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.6) GeV in the collision centrality 0-10% where regeneration contribution becomes dominant. The primordial production, regeneration, and decay from B-hadron have been included in the lines. The experimental data is cited from the ALICE Collaboration ALICE:2019lga .

In Fig.3, the elliptic flows of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi are also calculated by taking different non-thermal distributions of charm quarks. Primordially produced charmonium carries small elliptic flows when moving along different trajectories in the anisotropic medium. Charmonium dissociation along different paths results in a non-zero v2v_{2} through medium dissociation. This effect becomes important at large pTp_{T} where primordial production dominates the total yield of J/ψJ/\psi. On the other hand, charm quarks are strongly coupled with QGP. Charm quarks develop collective flows via elastic scatterings with thermal partons, which will be inherited by the regenerated J/ψJ/\psi. Therefore, when the charm momentum distribution becomes harder, the regenerated J/ψJ/\psis are mainly distributed at higher pTp_{T}. The elliptic flows of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi are enhanced by the regeneration. When charm quarks are kinetically thermalized, they satisfy a normalized Fermi distribution with the medium temperature TregeT_{\rm rege}. In the non-thermal cases, charm distributions become hard, and are characterized by a parameter TeffT_{\rm eff} which is usually larger than the medium temperature. Lines with Teff0.4T_{\rm eff}\sim 0.4 GeV can better explain the large v2v_{2} at pT6p_{T}\sim 6 GeV/c than cases with softer charm distributions. This indicates that regeneration is still important in this middle pTp_{T} region.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) pTp_{T} dependence of inclusive J/ψJ/\psi elliptic flows in the forward rapidity of sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. Different non-thermal distributions of charm quarks are considered by taking Teff=(0.16,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.6)T_{eff}=(0.16,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.6) GeV. The experimental data is cited from ALICE Collaboration ALICE:2017quq ; ALICE:2020pvw .

From the shapes of RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_{T}) and v2(pT)v_{2}(p_{T}), one can see that regeneration with non-thermal momentum distributions of charm quarks becomes more important at middle and high pTp_{T}. This will increase the elliptic flows of J/ψJ/\psi at pT6p_{T}\sim 6 GeV/c. While in the thermal case, the contribution of regeneration decreases rapidly with increasing pTp_{T}. The parameter TeffT_{\rm eff} characterizing the degree of charm kinetic thermalization is extracted to be around Teff=0.30.4T_{\rm eff}=0.3\sim 0.4 GeV, which is larger than the medium temperatures of charmonium regeneration. Charm momentum distribution is expected to be non-thermal when charmonium regeneration happens, even when DD mesons are close to kinetic thermalization after experiencing the whole evolution of the hot medium.

VII Summary

We employ the transport model to study the pTp_{T} distribution of charmonium with non-thermal charm quarks in sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. As the heavy quark potential is partially restored above the critical temperature TcT_{c}, charmonium can be regenerated above TcT_{c} where charm quarks do not reach complete kinetic thermalization. The realistic momentum distribution of charm quarks in charmonium regeneration is simulated with the Langevin equation. To incorporate non-thermal charm distributions into the transport model, we introduce a parameter TeffT_{\rm eff} in a normalized Fermi distribution, where TeffT_{eff} is determined by fitting the realistic distribution of charm quarks from the Langevin model. The value of TeffT_{\rm eff} is found to be larger than the temperature of J/ψJ/\psi regeneration, which indicates that the charm quark distribution is harder than that in the thermal case. We take different values of TeffT_{\rm eff} in the transport model to calculate RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_{T}) and v2(pT)v_{2}(p_{T}). The regeneration of charmonium with different non-thermal distributions has been scaled to fit the RAA(Np)R_{AA}(N_{p}) of J/ψJ/\psi, which allows us to focus on the shapes of RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_{T}) and v2(pT)v_{2}(p_{T}) when taking different momentum distributions of charm quarks. The RAAR_{AA} and v2v_{2} enhance evidently at middle pTp_{T} when taking a non-thermal charm distribution, as more charm quarks and regenerated charmonium are distributed in middle and high pTp_{T} region. This helps to extract the realistic momentum distribution of charm quarks in charmonium regeneration.

Acknowledgement: Chaoyu Pan and Shuhan Zheng contributed equally to this work. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 12175165.

References

  • (1) A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. Cheng, C. DeTar, H. T. Ding, S. Gottlieb, R. Gupta, P. Hegde, U. M. Heller and F. Karsch, et al. Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012)
  • (2) T. Matsui and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 178, 416-422 (1986).
  • (3) H. Stoecker, Nucl. Phys. A 750, 121-147 (2005)
  • (4) H. T. Ding, F. Karsch and S. Mukherjee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, no.10, 1530007 (2015)
  • (5) J. Zhao, K. Zhou, S. Chen and P. Zhuang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114, 103801 (2020)
  • (6) X. Zhao and R. Rapp, Nucl. Phys. A 859, 114-125 (2011)
  • (7) M. He, R. J. Fries and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no.11, 112301 (2013)
  • (8) L. Yan, P. Zhuang and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 232301 (2006)
  • (9) Y. Liu, B. Chen, N. Xu and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B 697, 32-36 (2011)
  • (10) B. Chen, M. Hu, H. Zhang and J. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135271 (2020)
  • (11) L. Wen, X. Du, S. Shi and B. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 46, no.11, 114102 (2022)
  • (12) L. Wen and B. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137774 (2023)
  • (13) F. Karsch, D. Kharzeev and H. Satz, Phys. Lett. B 637, 75-80 (2006)
  • (14) H. Satz, J. Phys. G 32, R25 (2006)
  • (15) Y. Liu, N. Xu and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B 724, 73-76 (2013)
  • (16) X. Guo, S. Shi and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B 718, 143-146 (2012)
  • (17) B. Chen, Y. Liu, K. Zhou and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B 726, 725-728 (2013)
  • (18) A. Adil and I. Vitev, Phys. Lett. B 649, 139-146 (2007)
  • (19) C. Y. Wong, E. S. Swanson and T. Barnes, Phys. Rev. C 65, 014903 (2002) [erratum: Phys. Rev. C 66, 029901 (2002)]
  • (20) X. l. Zhu, P. f. Zhuang and N. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 607, 107-114 (2005)
  • (21) X. Du, R. Rapp and M. He, Phys. Rev. C 96, no.5, 054901 (2017)
  • (22) J. Zhao and B. Chen, Phys. Lett. B 776, 17-21 (2018)
  • (23) E. Braaten and M. H. Thoma, Phys. Rev. D 44, no.9, R2625 (1991)
  • (24) M. Gyulassy, P. Levai and I. Vitev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5535-5538 (2000)
  • (25) M. Djordjevic and M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A 733, 265-298 (2004)
  • (26) G. Y. Qin, J. Ruppert, C. Gale, S. Jeon, G. D. Moore and M. G. Mustafa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 072301 (2008)
  • (27) L. Grandchamp, R. Rapp and G. E. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 12301 (2004)
  • (28) X. Du and R. Rapp, Nucl. Phys. A 943, 147-158 (2015)
  • (29) B. Chen, T. Guo, Y. Liu and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B 765, 323-327 (2017)
  • (30) X. Yao and B. Müller, Phys. Rev. D 100, no.1, 014008 (2019)
  • (31) X. Yao and T. Mehen, JHEP 02, 062 (2021)
  • (32) R. L. Thews, M. Schroedter and J. Rafelski, Phys. Rev. C 63, 054905 (2001)
  • (33) B. Chen, L. Jiang, X. H. Liu, Y. Liu and J. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C 105, no.5, 054901 (2022)
  • (34) P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B 490, 196-202 (2000)
  • (35) N. Brambilla, M. Á. Escobedo, M. Strickland, A. Vairo, P. Vander Griend and J. H. Weber, JHEP 05, 136 (2021)
  • (36) Y. Akamatsu, M. Asakawa, S. Kajimoto and A. Rothkopf, JHEP 07, 029 (2018)
  • (37) X. Yao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, no.20, 2130010 (2021)
  • (38) M. E. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B 156, 365-390 (1979)
  • (39) G. Bhanot and M. E. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B 156, 391-416 (1979)
  • (40) B. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 43, no.12, 124101 (2019)
  • (41) D. Lafferty and A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rev. D 101, no.5, 056010 (2020)
  • (42) S. Y. F. Liu, M. He and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. C 99, no.5, 055201 (2019)
  • (43) G. Y. Qin, H. Petersen, S. A. Bass and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. C 82, 064903 (2010)
  • (44) M. He, R. J. Fries and R. Rapp, Phys. Lett. B 735, 445-450 (2014)
  • (45) Y. Xu, J. E. Bernhard, S. A. Bass, M. Nahrgang and S. Cao, Phys. Rev. C 97, no.1, 014907 (2018)
  • (46) K. Zhou, N. Xu, Z. Xu and P. Zhuang, Phys. Rev. C 89, no.5, 054911 (2014)
  • (47) S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], Phys. Rev. D 105, no.1, L011103 (2022)
  • (48) R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], JHEP 06, 147 (2017)
  • (49) S. Cao, G. Y. Qin and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 92, no.2, 024907 (2015)
  • (50) M. He and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, no.4, 042301 (2020)
  • (51) M. Cacciari, M. Greco and P. Nason, JHEP 05, 007 (1998)
  • (52) M. Cacciari, S. Frixione and P. Nason, JHEP 03, 006 (2001)
  • (53) R. Rapp, P. B. Gossiaux, A. Andronic, R. Averbeck, S. Masciocchi, A. Beraudo, E. Bratkovskaya, P. Braun-Munzinger, S. Cao and A. Dainese, et al. Nucl. Phys. A 979, 21-86 (2018)
  • (54) X. Dong and V. Greco, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 97-141 (2019)
  • (55) P. A. Zyla et al. [Particle Data Group], PTEP 2020, no.8, 083C01 (2020)
  • (56) J. Sollfrank, P. Huovinen, M. Kataja, P. V. Ruuskanen, M. Prakash and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. C 55, 392-410 (1997)
  • (57) W. Zhao, H. j. Xu and H. Song, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.9, 645 (2017)
  • (58) C. Shen, Z. Qiu, H. Song, J. Bernhard, S. Bass and U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 61-85 (2016)
  • (59) B. Abelev et al. [ALICE], Phys. Lett. B 718, 295-306 (2012) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 748, 472-473 (2015)]
  • (60) A. M. Sirunyan et al. [CMS], Phys. Lett. B 790, 509-532 (2019)
  • (61) B. Abelev et al. [ALICE], JHEP 11, 065 (2012)
  • (62) D. Acosta et al. [CDF], Phys. Rev. D 71, 032001 (2005)
  • (63) V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS], Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1575 (2011)
  • (64) M. Yang, S. Zheng, B. Tong, J. Zhao, W. Ouyang, K. Zhou and B. Chen, [arXiv:2302.06179 [nucl-th]].
  • (65) J. W. Cronin et al. [E100], Phys. Rev. D 11, 3105-3123 (1975)
  • (66) A. H. Mueller and J. w. Qiu, Nucl. Phys. B 268, 427-452 (1986)
  • (67) K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen and C. A. Salgado, JHEP 04, 065 (2009)
  • (68) S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], JHEP 02, 041 (2020)
  • (69) S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, no.24, 242301 (2017)
  • (70) S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], JHEP 10, 141 (2020)