This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Nonlinear hydrodynamic response confronts LHC data

Li Yan Subrata Pal and Jean-Yves Ollitrault Institut de Physique Théorique, Université Paris Saclay, CEA, CNRS, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France Department of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai, 400005, India
Abstract

Higher order harmonic flow vnv_{n} (with n4n\geq 4) in heavy-ion collisions can be measured either with respect to their own plane, or with respect to a plane constructed using lower-order harmonics. By assuming that higher flow harmonics are the superposition of medium nonlinear and linear responses to initial anisotropies, we propose a set of nonlinear response coefficients χn\chi_{n}’s, which are independent of initial state by construction. In experiments, χn\chi_{n}’s can be extracted as the ratio between higher order harmonic flow measured in the plane constructed by v2v_{2} and v3v_{3}, and moments of lower order harmonic flow. Simulations with single-shot hydrodynamics and AMPT model lead to results of these nonlinear response coefficients in good agreement with the experimental data at the LHC energy. Predictions for v7v_{7} and v8v_{8} measured with respect to plane of lower order harmonics are given accordingly.

keywords:
Harmonic flow, nonlinear hydrodynamics response, heavy-ion collisions

1 Introduction

The observed flow phenomena in high energy heavy-ion collisions carried out at RHIC and the LHC provides great opportunities in analyzing the collective dynamics of the strongly-coupled Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP) (for a recent review, cf. [1]). To a quantitative level, the analysis of harmonic flow VnV_{n}, which is defined through a Fourier decomposition of the observed particle spectrum,

Vn=vneinΨn={einϕp},\displaystyle V_{n}=v_{n}e^{in\Psi_{n}}=\{e^{in\phi_{p}}\}\,, (1)

has led to strong constraints on the dissipative properties of the QGP medium in various aspects. For instance, correlations among flow harmonics have been studied in terms of the correlations between event-plane Ψn\Psi_{n} [2], which present non-trivial patterns depending on the shear viscosity over entropy ratio η/s\eta/s of the medium. Recent measurements of harmonic flow VnV_{n} have achieved results with high precisions, which extends the studies of harmonic flow to flow fluctuations [3] and higher order harmonic flow (n4n\geq 4[4]. In particular, higher order flow harmonics have been measured with respect to their own event-plane, and plane constructed by lower order flow harmonics, from which nonlinear medium response to initial eccentricities can be studied. In this work, we focus on the nonlinear generation of higher order flow harmonics in heavy-ion collisions. By assuming that higher harmonics are the superposition of medium nonlinear and linear responses, a new set of nonlinear response coefficients are formulated.

2 Nonlinear hydrodynamic response and χn\chi_{n}

We expand harmonic flow VnV_{n} in a series of initial eccentricities n\mathcal{E}_{n}, accounting for the fact that magnitudes of initial eccentricities are small. Note that in this work, n\mathcal{E}_{n}, as well as VnV_{n} defined in Eq. (1) are taken as complex quantities. For higher order flow harmonics, it has been shown that nonlinear hydro response to initial eccentricities result in significant contributions [5, 6]. Taking the fourth order harmonic flow V4V_{4} as an example, in addition to the component V4LV_{4}^{L} which is linearly proportional to 4\mathcal{E}_{4}, there exists a large fraction induced by hydro response to 22\mathcal{E}_{2}^{2}. Therefore, one can write V4V_{4} as,

V4=V4L+χ4V22.\displaystyle V_{4}=V_{4}^{L}+\chi_{4}V_{2}^{2}\,. (2)

22\mathcal{E}_{2}^{2} has been absorbed into V22V_{2}^{2} in the second term on the right hand side of Eq. (2), accordingly the coefficient χ4\chi_{4} is found independent of initial eccentricities by construction. Similar strategy can be applied to other higher order harmonic flow as well. For V5V_{5}, V6V_{6} and V7V_{7}, the corresponding expansion leads to

V5\displaystyle V_{5} =V5L+χ5V2V3,\displaystyle=V_{5}^{L}+\chi_{5}V_{2}V_{3}\,, (3a)
V6\displaystyle V_{6} =V6L+χ63V32+χ62V23,\displaystyle=V_{6}^{L}+\chi_{63}V_{3}^{2}+\chi_{62}V_{2}^{3}\,, (3b)
V7\displaystyle V_{7} =V7L+χ7V22V3.\displaystyle=V_{7}^{L}+\chi_{7}V_{2}^{2}V_{3}\,. (3c)

The nonlinear terms in the right-hand side are the lowest-order terms involving V2V_{2} and V3V_{3} which are compatible with rotational symmetry. For V6V_{6}, there exists a non-negligible component from cubic order hydro response to 23\mathcal{E}_{2}^{3}, which has already been noticed through the observed event-plane correlation between V6V_{6} and V2V_{2} [2], thus one must expand V6V_{6} to cubic order, with an extra cubic order coefficient χ62\chi_{62}. For V7V_{7}, there is no contributions of quadratic order, thus the coefficient χ7\chi_{7} is defined regarding the cubic order hydro response to 223\mathcal{E}_{2}^{2}\mathcal{E}_{3}.

In the hydro response formalism, χn\chi_{n}’s are interpreted as ratios between nonlinear and linear flow response coefficients, which are independent of the initial density profile for a given centrality class. Each χn\chi_{n} can be readily evaluated in a single-shot hydrodynamic simulation [6] by choosing an initial density profile such that only the term involving χn\chi_{n} is nonvanishing in the expansion of Eqs. (2) and (3). If one analyses a set of events in a centrality class, where the flow fluctuates event to event, as in actual heavy-ion experiments and AMPT simulations [7], χn\chi_{n}’s can be isolated using Eqs. (2) and (3) under the assumption that the terms in the right-hand side are mutually uncorrelated [8]:

χ4\displaystyle\chi_{4} =V4(V2)2|V2|4=v4{Ψ2}|V2|4\displaystyle=\frac{\langle V_{4}(V_{2}^{*})^{2}\rangle}{\langle|V_{2}|^{4}\rangle}=\frac{v_{4}\{\Psi_{2}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{4}\rangle}} (4a)
χ5\displaystyle\chi_{5} =V5V2V3|V2|2|V3|2=v5{Ψ23}|V2|2|V3|2\displaystyle=\frac{\langle V_{5}V_{2}^{*}V_{3}^{*}\rangle}{\langle|V_{2}|^{2}|V_{3}|^{2}\rangle}=\frac{v_{5}\{\Psi_{23}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{2}|V_{3}|^{2}\rangle}} (4b)
χ62\displaystyle\chi_{62} =V6(V2)3|V2|6=v6{Ψ2}|V2|6,χ63=V6(V3)2|V3|4=v6{Ψ3}|V3|4\displaystyle=\frac{\langle V_{6}(V_{2}^{*})^{3}\rangle}{\langle|V_{2}|^{6}\rangle}=\frac{v_{6}\{\Psi_{2}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{6}\rangle}}\,,\qquad\chi_{63}=\frac{\langle V_{6}(V_{3}^{*})^{2}\rangle}{\langle|V_{3}|^{4}\rangle}=\frac{v_{6}\{\Psi_{3}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{3}|^{4}\rangle}} (4c)
χ7\displaystyle\chi_{7} =V7(V2)2V3|V2|4|V3|2=v7{Ψ23}|V2|4|V3|2.\displaystyle=\frac{\langle V_{7}(V_{2}^{*})^{2}V_{3}^{*}\rangle}{\langle|V_{2}|^{4}|V_{3}|^{2}\rangle}=\frac{v_{7}\{\Psi_{23}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{4}|V_{3}|^{2}\rangle}}. (4d)

The expressions on the right hand side of Eqs. (4) involve the higher order harmonic flow measured in the plane of lower order harmonics. For example, V4V_{4} can be measured in experiments in its own event-plane Ψ4\Psi_{4} which is defined in Eq. (1), as well as the event-plane Ψ2\Psi_{2} which is determined by V2V_{2}. More explicitly, V4V_{4} measured with respect to Ψ2\Psi_{2} is

v4{Ψ2}ReV4(V2)2|V2|4=cos4(Ψ4Ψ2)w×v4{Ψ4}.\displaystyle v_{4}\{\Psi_{2}\}\equiv\frac{Re\langle V_{4}(V_{2}^{*})^{2}\rangle}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{4}\rangle}}=\langle\cos 4(\Psi_{4}-\Psi_{2})\rangle_{w}\times v_{4}\{\Psi_{4}\}\,. (5)

It is worth mentioning that measuring higher order flow harmonics in the event plane of V2V_{2} and/or V3V_{3} is equivalent to the corresponding measurement of event plane correlations [2], as demonstrated by the second identity in Eq. (5). The denominators in Eqs. (4) involve various moments of the distributions of V2V_{2} and V3V_{3}. There is no direct measurement of flow moments up to date in experiments, though it can be done in a generalized scalar-product method, with sufficient rapidity gap [9]. In this work, we extract flow moments from flow cumulants [10] which are measured. For instance, the fourth order moment of V2V_{2} is related to v2{2}v_{2}\{2\} and v2{4}v_{2}\{4\} by

|V2|4=2v2{2}4v2{4}4\displaystyle\langle|V_{2}|^{4}\rangle=2v_{2}\{2\}^{4}-v_{2}\{4\}^{4} (6)

3 Results and discussions

Refer to caption
Fig. 1: (Color online) Nonlinear response coefficients χn\chi_{n} as a function of centrality percentile for sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV PbPb at the LHC. Symbols with errors are extracted results from CMS and ATLAS collaborations. Lines are from single-shot hydro simulations with η/s=1/4π\eta/s=1/4\pi (solid line) or η/s=0\eta/s=0 (dashed line). Shaded bands are results from AMPT simulations with parton ellastic cross-section σ=1.5\sigma=1.5 mb.

The CMS collaboration has measured v4{Ψ2}v_{4}\{\Psi_{2}\}, v6{Ψ2}v_{6}\{\Psi_{2}\} and cumulants of V2V_{2} distributions [4]111 Cumulants of V2V_{2} distributions from the CMS collaboration have so far been published up to v2{4}v_{2}\{4\}. In this work we approximately take v2{8}v2{6}v2{4}v_{2}\{8\}\approx v_{2}\{6\}\approx v_{2}\{4\}, as being implied from the measurements by the ATLAS collaboration [3]. , therefore we are able to assess χ4\chi_{4} and χ62\chi_{62} according to Eqs. (4). To evaluate χ5\chi_{5} and χ63\chi_{63}, we estimate v5{Ψ23}v_{5}\{\Psi_{23}\} and v6{Ψ3}v_{6}\{\Psi_{3}\} from the event-plane correlations cos(5Ψ52Ψ23Ψ3)w\langle\cos(5\Psi_{5}-2\Psi_{2}-3\Psi_{3})\rangle_{w} and cos6(Ψ6Ψ3)w\langle\cos 6(\Psi_{6}-\Psi_{3})\rangle_{w} measured by the ATLAS collaboration [2], in addition to the cumulants of V3V_{3} distributions from the CMS collaboration. χn\chi_{n}’s from the sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV PbPb at the LHC are shown as symbols in Fig. 1. To make comparisons, we calculate these nonlinear response coefficients from single-shot hydro simulations [6] as well as AMPT [7]. There is no event-by-event fluctuations implemented in our hydro simulations, where the initial condition is taken by perturbing a smooth and azimuthally symmetric Gaussian density profile with specific initial eccentricities. The normalization of the Gaussian profile is adjusted to fit the values of dNch/dydN_{\small{ch}}/dy of LHC PbPb in a given centrality class. Results from ideal and viscous (with η/s=1/4π\eta/s=1/4\pi) hydro simulations are depicted as dashed and solid lines respectively in Fig. 1, which present an overall agreement comparing with the experimental data. AMPT simulations contain non-trivial event-by-event fluctuations at the nucleonic and partonic levels, and the parton ellastic cross-section is taken to be σ=1.5\sigma=1.5 mb. It is worth mentioning that ideal hydrodynamics predicts quantitative relations among these nonlinear response coefficients due to Cooper-Fyer freeze-out [11]: χ4χ6312χ5\chi_{4}\sim\chi_{63}\sim\frac{1}{2}\chi_{5}, and χ6213χ7\chi_{62}\sim\frac{1}{3}\chi_{7}, which are consistent with the experimental data in Fig. 1 as well as the results obtained from AMPT.

Refer to caption
Fig. 2: (Color online) Hydro predictions for v7v_{7} and v8v_{8} measured in the event-plane constructed by v2v_{2} and v3v_{3}. Boundaries of the colored bands are determined by ideal and viscous (η/s=1/4π\eta/s=1/4\pi) hydro calculations respectively.

Although there is no experimental data available so far for the extraction of nonlinear response coefficients χn\chi_{n} for the flow harmonics of order n>6n>6, we make predictions in our model simulations for V7V_{7} and V8V_{8}. For V8V_{8}, there exist a cubic order term and a quartic order term allowed by rotational symmetry,

V8=V8L+χ8(23)232+χ8(2)24,\displaystyle V_{8}=V_{8}^{L}+\chi_{8(23)}\mathcal{E}_{2}\mathcal{E}_{3}^{2}+\chi_{8(2)}\mathcal{E}_{2}^{4}\,, (7)

which correspond in experiments to the measurements of V8V_{8} in the event-plane constructed by V2V_{2} and V3V_{3}, and event-plane of V2V_{2} respectively,

χ8(23)=v8{Ψ23}|V2|2|V3|4,χ8(2)=v8{Ψ2}|V2|8\displaystyle\chi_{8(23)}=\frac{v_{8}\{\Psi_{23}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{2}\rangle\langle|V_{3}|^{4}\rangle}}\,,\qquad\chi_{8(2)}=\frac{v_{8}\{\Psi_{2}\}}{\sqrt{\langle|V_{2}|^{8}\rangle}} (8)

χ7\chi_{7} from our model simulations are presented in Fig. 1. In Fig. 2, V7V_{7} and V8V_{8} measured in the event-plane consturcted by V2V_{2} and V3V_{3} are predicted with single-shot hydro simulations according to Eqs. (4d) and (8).

4 Conclusions

Under fairly general assumptions, we have proposed a new set of nonlinear response coefficients χn\chi_{n} based on the measurements of higher order harmonic flow with respect to the event-plane constructed by v2v_{2} and v3v_{3}. These coefficients are independent of the detailed information of initial state by construction. Model simulations with single-shot hydrodynamics and AMPT give rise to predictions in good agreement with experimental data. We noticed that the relative ratios among these coefficients are consistent with an ideal hydro expectation based on the analysis of freeze-out. Nonlinear response coefficients associated with v7v_{7} and v8v_{8} are calculated as well in our theoretical models as predictions.

Acknowledgements

LY is funded by the European Research Council under the Advanced Investigator Grant ERC-AD-267258.

References

  • [1] Heinz U and Snellings R 2013 Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 123–151 (Preprint 1301.2826)
  • [2] Aad G et al. (ATLAS) 2014 Phys. Rev. C90 024905 (Preprint 1403.0489)
  • [3] Aad G et al. (ATLAS Collaboration) 2013 JHEP 1311 183 (Preprint 1305.2942)
  • [4] Chatrchyan S et al. (CMS) 2014 Phys. Rev. C89 044906 (Preprint 1310.8651)
  • [5] Gardim F G, Grassi F, Luzum M and Ollitrault J Y 2012 Phys. Rev. C85 024908 (Preprint 1111.6538)
  • [6] Teaney D and Yan L 2012 Phys. Rev. C86 044908 (Preprint 1206.1905)
  • [7] Lin Z W, Ko C M, Li B A, Zhang B and Pal S 2005 Phys. Rev. C72 064901 (Preprint nucl-th/0411110)
  • [8] Yan L and Ollitrault J Y 2015 Phys. Lett. B744 82–87 (Preprint 1502.02502)
  • [9] Bhalerao R S, Ollitrault J Y and Pal S 2015 Phys. Lett. B742 94–98 (Preprint 1411.5160)
  • [10] Borghini N, Dinh P M and Ollitrault J Y 2001 Phys. Rev. C64 054901 (Preprint nucl-th/0105040)
  • [11] Borghini N and Ollitrault J Y 2006 Phys.Lett. B642 227–231