This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

On the nature of the 35-day cycle in HZ Her/Her X-1111Paper presented at the Fourth Zeldovich virtual meeting, September 7-11, 2020.

N. I. Shakura Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia D. A. Kolesnikov Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia K. A. Postnov Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia Kazan Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia
Abstract

Regular variations of the pulse period of Her X-1 with X-ray flux observed by Fermi/GBM are examined. We argue that these regular variations result from free precession of the neutron star in Her X-1.

Among outstanding discoveries of the 1960s, the most bright is the discovery of accreting black holes and neutron stars in close binary stars made by the Uhuru X-ray satellite. Her X-1 is one of the first X-ray pulsars discovered. It is a magnetized accreting neutron star (NS) in a 1.7-day orbit with the Roche-lobe filling optical star HZ Her [1]. The NS mass is mx=1.4Mm_{\rm x}=1.4\,M_{\odot}, the NS spin period is Px=1.24P_{\rm x}=1.24 s. The mass of HZ Her is mo=2.0Mm_{\rm o}=2.0\,M_{\odot}.

The optical brightness of HZ Her demonstrates a significant modulation with the orbital period of Pb=1.7P_{\mathrm{b}}=1.7 d. This modulation is due to a strong irradiation effect of the donor star [2, 3]. The X-ray light curve of Her X-1 shows sharp eclipses because of the high inclination of the binary system to the line of sight, about 90°90\degree.

In X-ray binaries similar to HZ Her/Her X-1, the mass transfer from the optical component to the compact star occurs through the inner Lagrangian point to form a turbulent near-Keplerian accretion disk around the compact object. Due to turbulent viscosity, the matter in the disk loses the angular momentum and slowly approaches the central object. The heat released during accretion is radiated from the disk surface. In Her X-1, at a distance of 100RNS\sim 100\,R_{\rm NS} from the center, the NS magnetic field breaks the disk, and at lower distances the matter freely falls along the magnetic field lines towards the NS surface and stops near the magnetic poles. Near the surface, the velocity of the infalling matter is close to one third of the speed of light. During the collision, the huge kinetic energy of the accreting plasma is transformed into heat and is radiated away in X-rays.

Soon after the discovery of the X-ray source in 1971 [1], a 35-d modulation of the X-ray flux from Her X-1 was discovered by the Uhuru satellite [4]. The 35-day X-ray cycle of Her X-1 comprises four states: (1) the Main-on lasting for 7\sim 7 orbits with the highest X-ray flux; (2) the first low state lasting for 4\sim 4 orbits; (3) the Short-on lasting for 4\sim 4 orbits with the X-ray flux about three times as low as in the Main-on; (4) the second low-state lasting for 4\sim 4 orbits (see, e.g., [5] for more detail and [6] for the recent update).

The 35-d X-ray cycle is associated with a tilted, retrograde precessing accretion disk. In the middle of the Main-on and Short-on, the disk is maximum open to the observer, and the central X-ray source is visible. During the low states, the outer parts of the tilted disk block the X-ray source. Recent observations by the SRG/eROSITA telescope during the low states of Her X-1 revealed the orbital variations of the X-ray flux [7]. The analysis of a large amount of the optical photometric data of HZ Her [8, 9] independently supports the presence of such a disk.

On the other hand, the model of free precession of the neutron star has been suggested as the possible explanation of 35-d X-ray cycle [10, 11, 12]. The EXOSAT observations showed that the X-ray pulse profiles of Her X-1 change during the 35-d cycle [13]. Later on, the Ginga and RXTE observations were used to study in detail the evolution of X-ray pulses with the 35-day phase [14, 15, 16].

The RXTE observations of Her X-1 suggest that the observed evolution of X-ray pulses could be explained by free precession of a NS with complex surface magnetic field [17]. The NS free precession is also able to explain the optical light curves of HZ Her [18, 19]. In this model, a more stable 35-day NS free precession period serves as a clock mechanism of the entire 35-day cycle via synchronization of the disk precession period by the action of gas streams forming the outer parts of the disk [20]. Possible synchronization mechanisms are further discussed in [18, 19].

As shown for the first time in [21], the NS free precession should be accompanied by small (about several microseconds) regular variations of the observed pulse period. These variations are clearly detected in the Fermi/GBM data222https://gammaray.nsstc.nasa.gov/gbm/science/pulsars/lightcurves/herx1.html.

The observable pulse frequency is a sum of non-periodical and periodical variations:

ωo(t)=ωns(t)+dϕ(t)dt\omega_{\rm o}(t)=\omega_{\rm ns}(t)+\frac{d\phi(t)}{dt} (1)
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Scheme of the NS free precession. The NS rotational equator is in the picture plane, the NS spin axis (R) is perpendicular to the figure plane. The dashed line indicates the path of the north magnetic pole (N) path of the freely precessing NS. The center of the dashed circle coincides with the NS principal momentum of inertia (I). The sides of the spherical triangle RNI are a=50°a=50\degree and b=30°b=30\degree. ψ\psi is the free precession angle. The time derivative of the angle ϕ\phi defines the pulse frequency variation.

As seen from Fig.1, the NS free precession should modulate the observed pulse frequency. The angle ϕ\phi can be found from sine and cosine theorem for spherical triangles:

cosϕ(t)=sinbsinψ(t)1[cosacosb+sinasinbcosψ(t)]2\cos\phi(t)=\frac{\sin{b}\sin{\psi(t)}}{\sqrt{1-[\cos{a}\cos{b}+\sin{a}\sin{b}\cos{\psi(t)}]^{2}}} (2)

Here a=50°a=50\degree is the side of the spherical triangle connecting the NS spin and inertia axes, bb is the side of the spherical triangle connecting the NS inertia axis and the magnetic pole, ψ(t)\psi(t) is the NS free precession angle linearly depending on time:

ψ(t)=Ωt+ψ0\psi(t)=\Omega t+\psi_{0} (3)

Here Ω\Omega is the NS free precession angular frequency. The function ωo(t)\omega_{\rm o}(t) is shown in Fig. 2.

However, the Fermi/GBM pulse frequency measurements show high-amplitude irregular variations. Fig. 2 shows that the observed Fermi/GBM variations agree with theoretical behaviour of ωo(t)\omega_{\rm o}(t).

So far we have supposed only two-axial NS free precession. However, in Her X-1 a triaxial NS free precession is also possible [22].

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The measured pulsar frequency of Her X-1 as a function of time. Black dots show the Fermi/GBM measurements. Only points with errors smaller than 0.1 μ\muHz are shown. The solid line indicates theoretical variation of the pulsar frequency due to NS free precession, Eq. 1. The slow drift of the pulsar frequency on timescale longer than 35 d can be due to possible irregular variations in the NS free precession parameters.

.

The authors acknowledge Drs. M. R. Gilfanov and S. V. Molkov for drawing attention to the Fermi/GBM observations of Her X-1. The research is supported by the RFBR grant no. 18-502-12025 and the Interdisciplinary Scientific and Educational School of Moscow University “Fundamental and Applied Space Research”.

References

  • [1] H. Tananbaum, H. Gursky, E. M. Kellogg, R. Levinson, E. Schreier, and R. Giacconi, “Discovery of a Periodic Pulsating Binary X-Ray Source in Hercules from UHURU,” ApJ, vol. 174, p. L143, June 1972.
  • [2] A. M. Cherepashchuk, Y. N. Efremov, N. E. Kurochkin, N. I. Shakura, and R. A. Sunyaev, “On the Nature of the Optical Variations of HZ Her = Her X1,” Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, vol. 720, p. 1, Sept. 1972.
  • [3] J. N. Bahcall and N. A. Bahcall, “The Period and Light Curve of HZ Herculis,” ApJ, vol. 178, p. L1, Nov. 1972.
  • [4] R. Giacconi, H. Gursky, E. Kellogg, R. Levinson, E. Schreier, and H. Tananbaum, “Further X-ray observations of Hercules X-1 from Uhuru.,” ApJ, vol. 184, p. 227, Aug. 1973.
  • [5] N. I. Shakura, N. A. Ketsaris, M. E. Prokhorov, and K. A. Postnov, “RXTE highlights of the 34.85-day cycle of HER X-1,” MNRAS, vol. 300, pp. 992–998, Nov. 1998.
  • [6] D. Leahy and Y. Wang, “Swift/BAT and RXTE/ASM Observations of the 35 day X-Ray Cycle of Hercules X-1,” ApJ, vol. 902, p. 146, Oct. 2020.
  • [7] N. I. Shakura, D. A. Kolesnikov, P. S. Medvedev, R. A. Sunyaev, M. R. Gilfanov, K. A. Postnov, and S. V. Molkov, “Observations of Her X-1 in low states during SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey,” A&A, vol. 648, no. A39, 2021.
  • [8] P. E. Boynton, R. Canterna, L. Crosa, J. Deeter, and D. Gerend, “Color photometric study of HZ Herculis.,” ApJ, vol. 186, p. 617, Dec. 1973.
  • [9] P. E. Boynton, “Hercules X-1 - The clockwork wonder,” in Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars and Black Holes (R. Giacconi and R. Ruffini, eds.), pp. 111–147, Jan. 1978.
  • [10] K. Brecher, “Her X-1: A Processing Binary Pulsar?,” Nature, vol. 239, pp. 325–326, Oct. 1972.
  • [11] I. D. Novikov, “Free precession as an explanation for the 36-day period of Hercules X-1,” AZh, vol. 50, p. 459, June 1973.
  • [12] J. I. Katz, “Thirty-five-day Periodicity in Her X-1,” Nature Physical Science, vol. 246, pp. 87–89, Dec. 1973.
  • [13] J. Truemper, P. Kahabka, H. Oegelman, W. Pietsch, and W. Voges, “EXOSAT Observations of the 35 Day Cycle of Hercules X-1: Evidence for Neutron Star Precession,” ApJ, vol. 300, p. L63, Jan. 1986.
  • [14] J. E. Deeter, D. M. Scott, P. E. Boynton, S. Miyamoto, S. Kitamoto, S. Takahama, and F. Nagase, “The 35 Day Evolution of the Hercules X-1 Pulse Profile: GINGA Observations and Their Implications,” ApJ, vol. 502, pp. 802–823, Aug. 1998.
  • [15] D. M. Scott, D. A. Leahy, and R. B. Wilson, “The 35 Day Evolution of the Hercules X-1 Pulse Profile: Evidence for a Resolved Inner Disk Occultation of the Neutron Star,” ApJ, vol. 539, pp. 392–412, Aug. 2000.
  • [16] R. Staubert, D. Klochkov, D. Vasco, K. Postnov, N. Shakura, J. Wilms, and R. E. Rothschild, “Variable pulse profiles of Hercules X-1 repeating with the same irregular 35 d clock as the turn-ons,” A&A, vol. 550, p. A110, Feb. 2013.
  • [17] K. Postnov, N. Shakura, R. Staubert, A. Kochetkova, D. Klochkov, and J. Wilms, “Variable neutron star free precession in Hercules X-1 from evolution of RXTE X-ray pulse profiles with phase of the 35-d cycle,” MNRAS, vol. 435, pp. 1147–1164, Oct. 2013.
  • [18] N. I. Shakura, D. A. Kolesnikov, K. A. Postnov, I. M. Volkov, I. F. Bikmaev, T. R. Irsmambetova, R. Staubert, J. Wilms, E. Irtuganov, P. Shurygin, P. Y. Golysheva, S. Y. Shugarov, I. V. Nikolenko, E. M. Trunkovsky, G. Schonherr, A. Schwope, and D. Klochkov, “Accretion processes in astrophysics,” Phys. Usp., vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 1126–1135, 2019.
  • [19] D. A. Kolesnikov, N. I. Shakura, K. A. Postnov, I. M. Volkov, I. F. Bikmaev, T. R. Irsmambetova, R. Staubert, J. Wilms, E. Irtuganov, P. Y. Golysheva, S. Y. Shugarov, I. V. Nikolenko, E. M. Trunkovsky, G. Schönherr, A. Schwope, and D. Klochkov, “Modelling of 35-d superorbital cycle of B and V light curves of IMXB HZ Her/Her X-1,” MNRAS, vol. 499, pp. 1747–1757, Oct. 2020.
  • [20] N. I. Shakura, M. E. Prokhorov, K. A. Postnov, and N. A. Ketsaris, “On the origin of X-ray dips in HER X-1,” A&A, vol. 348, pp. 917–923, Aug. 1999.
  • [21] N. I. Shakura, HER X-1/HZ Her: 35-day Cycle, Freely Precessing Neutron Star and Accompanying Effects, p. 55. Nova Science Publishers, 1995.
  • [22] N. I. Shakura, K. A. Postnov, and M. E. Prokhorov, “On some features of free precession of a triaxial body: the case of HER X-1,” A&A, vol. 331, pp. L37–L40, Mar. 1998.