This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

ON THE RIBENBOIM - LANDAU CONJECTURE

F. Sidokhine
Abstract.

We prove the Ribenboim hypothesis, which states that if, starting from some integer NN, consecutive prime numbers pnp_{n}, pn+1p_{n+1} satisfy the inequality pn+1pn<1\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<1, then the Landau problem # 4 (1912) has a positive solution.

1. Introduction

P. Ribenboim, [1], p.191, (2004), hypothesizes the solution of the Landau problem using the inequality pn+1pn<1\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<1, formulating this problem as follows: ”from this inequality, if true, it would follow that between the squares of any two consecutive integers, there is always a prime” (the Landau Problem # 4 (1912), [2]). In this note, we will prove the Ribenboim conjecturel, and also consider some other problems with prime numbers.

2. The Landau - Ingham problems and the Ribenboim conjecture

Before proving the Ribenboim conjecture, we will discuss the Ribenboim hypothesis, in the context of understanding what it states in terms of the Landau problem itself. In other words, let the Landau hypothesis be true, then:

Theorem 1. Let there be a positive integer constant N, such that for any integer n greater than N between squares of consecutive integers nn and n+1n+1, there is always a prime, then the consecutive prime numbers pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfy the relation pm+1pm=O(1\sqrt{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m}}=O(1).

Proof.

There is a positive integer M such that pM1<(N+1)2<pMp_{M-1}<\left(N+1\right)^{2}<p_{M}, where pM1p_{M-1}, pMp_{M} are primes. Let CC be an arbitrary integer greater than 2, and there exists an integer m0m_{0} greater than M, such that primes pm0,pm0+1p_{m_{0}},p_{m_{0}+1} satisfies the inequality pm0+1pm0>C\sqrt{p_{m_{0}+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}>C. We have two possibilities for pm0+1\sqrt{p_{m_{0}+1}}, or [pm0]<pm0<pm0+1<[pm0]+1\left[\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}\right]<\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}<\sqrt{p_{m_{0}+1}}<\left[\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}\right]+1, or [pm0]+1<pm0+1<[pm0]+2\left[\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}\right]+1<\sqrt{p_{m_{0}+1}}<\left[\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}\right]+2, since [pm0]>N\left[\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}\right]>N. Thus, pm0+1pm0<2\sqrt{p_{m_{0}+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m_{0}}}<2 and we have a contradiction that proves Theorem 1. ∎

Thus, the Landau hypothesis states that, the consecutive prime numbers pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1}, where mm is greater than MM, must satisfy the inequality pm+1pm<C\sqrt{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m}}<C, where CC is some positive constant. The question arises at what value of the constant CC the converse statement is true. The Ribenboim hypothesis states that this value of the constant CC is 1.

Theorem 2 (Ribenboim’s conjecture). Let there be a positive integer constant M, such that for any integer m greater than M the consecutive prime numbers pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfy the inequality pm+1pm<1\sqrt{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m}}<1, then between squares of consecutive integers nn and n+1n+1, where n>pMn>p_{M}, there is always a prime number.

Proof.

To prove Theorem 2, the following Lemmas 1 and 2 are necessary:

Lemma 1. There is a positive integer constant M greater than 2, such that for any integer mm greater than M the open interval of real numbers (pm+12pm+1,pm+1)\left(p_{m+1}-2\sqrt{p_{m+1}},p_{m+1}\right), where pm+1p_{m+1} is a prime, contains a prime number.

Proof.

According to the condition of Theorem 2, there exists an integer M such that for any integer mm greater than M, the inequality pm+1pm<pm+1+pm<2pm+1p_{m+1}-p_{m}<\sqrt{p_{m+1}}+\sqrt{p_{m}}<2\sqrt{p_{m+1}} holds, where pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} are consecutive prime numbers. So we have pm+12pm+1<pm<pm+1p_{m+1}-2\sqrt{p_{m+1}}<p_{m}<p_{m+1}, and Lemma 1 is proved. ∎

Lemma 2. Let there be a positive integer constant M greater than 2, such that for any integer m greater than M the difference of consecutive prime numbers pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfies the inequality pm+1pm<2pm+1p_{m+1}-p_{m}<2\sqrt{p_{m+1}}, then for any real number xx greater than pM+1p_{M+1}, the open interval of real numbers (x2x,x)(x-2\sqrt{x},x) contains a prime number.

Proof.

Let there be some real number x0>pM+1x_{0}>p_{M+1} such that the open interval (x02x0,x0)(x_{0}-2\sqrt{x_{0}},x_{0}) does not contain primes. Let us construct an open interval (pk+12pk+1,pk+1)\left(p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}},p_{k+1}\right), where pk<x0<pk+1p_{k}<x_{0}<p_{k+1}, since k>Mk>M, therefore, the open interval (pk+12pk+1,pk+1)\left(p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}},p_{k+1}\right) contains a prime, according to Lemma 1. However, on the other hand, the open interval (pk+12pk+1,pk+1)=(pk+12pk+1,x0)[x0,pk+1)\left(p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}},p_{k+1}\right)=\left(p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}},x_{0}\right)\cup\left[x_{0},p_{k+1}\right), where pk+12pk+1<x0p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}}<x_{0} otherwise x0<pk<pk+1x_{0}<p_{k}<p_{k+1}, (pk+12pk+1,x0)(x02x0,x0)\left(p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}},x_{0}\right)\subset\left(x_{0}-2\sqrt{x_{0}},x_{0}\right), since x02x0<pk+12pk+1x_{0}-2\sqrt{x_{0}}<p_{k+1}-2\sqrt{p_{k+1}}, does not contain prime numbers. We have obtained a contradiction, and Lemma 2 is proved. ∎

Let the integer m0m_{0} greater than pMp_{M} and such that the interval (m02,(m0+1)2)(m_{0}^{2},(m_{0}+1)^{2}) does not contain primes. Using directly Lemma 2, where x=(m0+1)2x=(m_{0}+1)^{2}, we conclude that the interval (m021,(m0+1)2)(m_{0}^{2}-1,(m_{0}+1)^{2}) contains a prime number. Thus, we have m021<m02<p<(m0+1)2m_{0}^{2}-1<m_{0}^{2}<p<(m_{0}+1)^{2}, where p is the prime number, so as m021m_{0}^{2}-1 and m02m_{0}^{2} are neighboring composite integers. We have obtained a contradiction, and Theorem 2 is proved. ∎

Note. Numerical tests (see [1], p. 191) confirm that, starting from some fixed integer NN, consecutive primes pnp_{n}, pn+1p_{n+1} satisfy the inequality pn+1pn<1\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<1, and there is every reason to believe that this hypothesis (Andrica’s hypothesis) is true with high probability.

Developing the Ribenboim approach, we linked the solution of some problems with prime numbers with the relation pm+1npmn=O(1)\sqrt[n]{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt[n]{p_{m}}=O(1), where nn and mm are integers and n>n> 1. Here are some examples:

Theorem 3 (direct). Let there be a positive integer constant N, such that for any integer n greater than N between squares of any two rational numbers nn, n+12n+\frac{1}{2} and n+12n+\frac{1}{2}, n+1n+1, there are always prime numbers, then there exists a positive integer M, such that for any integer m greater than M the consecutive prime numbers pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfy the relation pm+1pm<1\sqrt{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m}}<1.

Theorem 4 (inverse). Let there be a positive integer constant M, such that for any integer m greater than M consecutive primes pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfy the inequality pm+1pm<12\sqrt{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt{p_{m}}<\frac{1}{2}, then between squares of any two rational numbers nn, n+12n+\frac{1}{2} and n+12n+\frac{1}{2}, n+1n+1, where the integer n>pMn>p_{M}, there are always prime numbers.

Theorem 5 (direct). Let there be a positive integer N, such that for any integer n greater than N between cubes of consecutive integers nn and n+1n+1, there is always a prime, then consecutive prime numbers pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfies the relation pm+13pm3=O(1)\sqrt[3]{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt[3]{p_{m}}=O(1).

Theorem 6 (inverse, Ingham’s problem). Let there be a positive integer M, such that for any integer m greater than M the primes pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfy the inequality pm+13pm3<1δ\sqrt[3]{p_{m+1}}-\sqrt[3]{p_{m}}<1-\delta, where δ\delta is any real number satisfying the inequality 0<δ<10<\delta<1, then between cubes of consecutive integers nn and n+1n+1, where n>pMn>p_{M}, there is always a prime number.

Proof.

Ingham’s problem implies that consecutive prime numbers pnp_{n}, pn+1p_{n+1} satisfy the relation pn+1pn=O(pn+11/6)\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}=O(p_{n+1}^{1/6}). According to [3], the relation pn+1pn=O(pn+13/46)\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}=O(p_{n+1}^{3/46}) is true, hence pn+1pn=o(pn+11/6)\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}=o(p_{n+1}^{1/6}) and consecutive primes pnp_{n}, pn+1p_{n+1} satisfy the relations pn+1pn=o(pn+12/3){p_{n+1}}-{p_{n}}=o(p_{n+1}^{2/3}) and pn+11/3p_{n+1}^{1/3} - pn1/3p_{n}^{1/3} =o(1)=o(1). Thus, starting from some integer NN, consecutive prime numbers pnp_{n}, pn+1p_{n+1} must satisfy the inequality pn+11/3p_{n+1}^{1/3} - pn1/3p_{n}^{1/3} <1δ<1-\delta.

To prove Theorem 6, the following Lemmas 3, 4 and 5 are necessary:

Lemma 3. Let there be a positive integer constant M, such that for any integer mm greater than M consecutive prime numbers pmp_{m}, pm+1p_{m+1} satisfy the inequality pn+11/3p_{n+1}^{1/3} - pn1/3p_{n}^{1/3} <1δ<1-\delta, then consecutive primes pmp_{m}, pm+1p_{m+1} satisfy the inequality pm+1pm<3(1δ)pm+12/3p_{m+1}-p_{m}<3(1-\delta)p_{m+1}^{2/3}.

Lemma 4. Let there be a positive integer M, such that for any integer mm greater than M the open interval (pm+13(1δ)pm+12/3,pm+1)p_{m+1}-3(1-\delta)p_{m+1}^{2/3},p_{m+1}), where pm+1p_{m+1} is a prime and pM3>3(1δ)\sqrt[3]{p_{M}}>3(1-\delta), contains a prime number.

Lemma 5. Let there be a positive integer constant M, such that for any integer m greater than M consecutive primes pm,pm+1p_{m},p_{m+1} satisfy the inequality pm+1pm<3(1δ)pm+12/3p_{m+1}-p_{m}<3(1-\delta)p_{m+1}^{2/3}, where pM3>3(1δ)\sqrt[3]{p_{M}}>3(1-\delta), then for any real number xx greater than pMp_{M}, the open interval of real numbers (x3(1δ)x2/3,x)(x-3(1-\delta)x^{2/3},x) contains a prime number.

Let the integer m0m_{0} be greater than pMp_{M} and such that the interval (m03,(m0+1)3)(m_{0}^{3},(m_{0}+1)^{3}) does not contain prime numbers. Using Lemma 5, where x=x=(m0+1)3(m_{0}+1)^{3}, we conclude that the interval ((m0+1)33(1δ)(m0+1)2,(m0+1)3)((m_{0}+1)^{3}-3(1-\delta)(m_{0}+1)^{2},(m_{0}+1)^{3}) contains a prime number. Then we have

m03<(m0+1)33(1δ)(m0+1)2m_{0}^{3}<(m_{0}+1)^{3}-3(1-\delta)(m_{0}+1)^{2} <p<(m0+1)3<p<(m_{0}+1)^{3}.

This inequality is true since m0>pMm_{0}>p_{M}, where pMp_{M} is also greater than max(27(1δ)3,3/δ)(27\left(1-\delta\right)^{3},3/\delta). Thus, we have obtained a contradiction, and Theorem 6 is proved. ∎

3. Solving Problems with Primes Numbers within the framework of the Ribenboim hypothesis

Using Ribenboim’s hypothesis we can prove stronger results, Theorems 7, 9 and 10.

Theorem 7. Let the consecutive primes pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the relation pnpn1=O(1)\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}=O(1), then there exists a positive integer constant MM, such that between cubes of consecutive integers mm and m+1m+1, where m>Mm>M, there is always a prime number.

Theorem 7 is a direct consequence of the following statement:

Theorem 8. Let there be positive integer constants AA and B, such that for any integer nn greater than AA the consecutive primes pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<B/2,\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<B/2, where B4B\geq 4; pA>B\sqrt{p_{A}}>B, then between cubes of any two real numbers x1x-1 and xx, where x greater than pAp_{A}, there is always a prime number.

Proof.

To prove Theorem 8, the following Lemmas 6, 7 and 8 are necessary:

Lemma 6. There be positive integer constants A and B, such that for any integer nn greater than A consecutive prime numbers pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<B/2\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<B/2, where the integer B4B\geq 4, then the difference of consecutive prime numbers pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfies the inequality pnpn1<Bpnp_{n}-p_{n-1}<B\sqrt{p_{n}}.

Lemma 7. Let there be positive integers A and B, such that for any integer nn greater than A the interval (pnBpn,pn)\left(p_{n}-B\sqrt{p_{n}},p_{n}\right), where pnp_{n} is a prime and pA>B\sqrt{p_{A}}>B, contains a prime.

Lemma 8. Let there be positive integers A and B, such that for any integer n greater than A the difference of consecutive primes pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfies the inequality pnpn1<Bpnp_{n}-p_{n-1}<B\sqrt{p_{n}}, where pA>B\sqrt{p_{A}}>B, then for any real number xx greater than pAp_{A}, the open interval of real numbers (xBx,x)(x-B\sqrt{x},x) contains a prime number.

Let the real number x0x_{0} greater than pAp_{A}, such that the interval ((x01)3,x03)((x_{0}-1)^{3},x_{0}^{3}) does not contain prime numbers. Using Lemma 8, where x=x= x03x_{0}^{3}, we conclude that the interval (x03Bx03/2,x03)(x_{0}^{3}-Bx_{0}^{3/2},x_{0}^{3}) contains a prime number. Then we have

(x01)3<x03(x_{0}-1)^{3}<x_{0}^{3} – 3 x02+3x0<x03Bx03/2x_{0}^{2}+3x_{0}<x_{0}^{3}-Bx_{0}^{3/2} as a consequence of the inequality B3x0+1x0<1\frac{B}{3\sqrt{x_{0}}}+\frac{1}{x_{0}}<1.

This inequality is true since x0>pA>B2>4x_{0}>p_{A}>B^{2}>4, so (x01)3<x03Bx03/2<p<x03(x_{0}-1)^{3}<x_{0}^{3}-Bx_{0}^{3/2}<p<x_{0}^{3}, where pp is some prime. Thus, we have obtained a contradiction, and Theorem 8 is proved. ∎

Theorem 9. Let there be positive integer constants A and B, such that for any integer nn greater than AA consecutive primes pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<B/2,\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<B/2, where B4B\geq 4 and PA4>B\sqrt[4]{P_{A}}>B, then between (x1)2.5\left(x-1\right)^{2.5} and x2.5x^{2.5}, where x is a real number greater than pAp_{A}, there is always a prime number.

Theorem 10. Let there be a positive integer constant A, such that for any integer nn greater than AA consecutive primes pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<1,\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<1, then between (x1.5x4)1.5\left(x-1.5\sqrt[4]{x}\right)^{1.5}and x1.5x^{1.5}, where x is a real number greater than pAp_{A}, there is always a prime.

4. The Legendre – Schinzel hypothesis and the Ribenboim concept

According to W. Sierpiński: ”It was Legendre who formulated the conjecture that for sufficiently large numbers x there is at least one prime between x and x+xx+\sqrt{x}” ([4], p.155). One of the possible versions of Legendre’s statement was formulated by A. Schinzel ([4], p.155), which can be presented as follows:

Conjecture 1. There is a positive constant C, such that for any real number x greater than C the open interval of real numbers (x,x+x)(x,x+\sqrt{x}) contains at least one prime number.

Below we will show that the above hypothesis can be presented in a fundamentally different alternative form, in which only prime numbers is used.

Theorem 11. There is a positive constant CC, such that for any real number x greater than CC the open interval of real numbers (x,x+x)(x,x+\sqrt{x}) contains a prime if and only if there is a positive integer constant N, such that for any integer n greater than N the open interval of real numbers (pn,pn+pn)(p_{n},p_{n}+\sqrt{p_{n}}) contains a prime number.

Proof.

Let Conjecture 1 be true then there is a positive integer N such that pN1<CpNp_{N-1}<C\leq p_{N} therefore, for any integer n greater than N, the open interval (pn,pn+pn)\left(p_{n},p_{n}+\sqrt{p_{n}}\right) contains at least one prime number qq. And vice versa also is true. Let there be a positive integer constant N such that for any integer n greater than N, the open interval (pn,pn+pn)\left(p_{n},p_{n}+\sqrt{p_{n}}\right) contains at least one prime qq, then for any real number x greater than pN+1p_{N+1}, the open interval (x,x+x)\left(x,x+\sqrt{x}\right) contains at least one prime number p. Indeed, let there be some real number x0x_{0} greater than pN+1p_{N+1} such that the open interval (x0,x0+x0)\left(x_{0},x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}}\right) does not contain primes. Let us construct an open interval (pk,pk+pk)\left(p_{k},p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}}\right), where pN<pk<x0<pk+1p_{N}<p_{k}<x_{0}<p_{k+1} since k>Nk>N, therefore, (pk,pk+pk)\left(p_{k},p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}}\right) contains a prime. However, on the other hand, the open interval (pk,pk+pk)=(pk,x0](x0,pk+pk)\left(p_{k},p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}}\right)=\left(p_{k},x_{0}\right]\cup\left(x_{0},p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}}\right), where x0<pk+pkx_{0}<p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}} otherwise pk<pk+1<x0p_{k}<p_{k+1}<x_{0}, (x0,pk+pk)(x0,x0+x0)(x_{0},p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}})\subset(x_{0},x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}}), since pk+pk<x0+x0p_{k}+\sqrt{p_{k}}<x_{0}+\sqrt{x_{0}}, does not contain prime numbers. We have obtained a contradiction, and Theorem 11 is proved. ∎

Comment. Using the LegendreSchinzel hypothesis, which assumes that the difference of consecutive primes pn,pn+1p_{n},p_{n+1} satisfies the inequality pn+1pn<pnp_{n+1}-p_{n}<\sqrt{p_{n}}, it is not difficult to show that there exists a constant CC such that for any integer m greater than CC, intervals (m2,(m+12)2)(m^{2},\left(m+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}) and ((m+12)2,(m+1)2)(\left(m+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2},\left(m+1\right)^{2}) contain primes, we got exactly this result, guided by the Ribenboim concept and using the algorithmic proof model, Theorem 4, where we consider that primes pn,pn+1p_{n},p_{n+1} satisfy the inequality pn+1pn<12\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<\frac{1}{2} and, as one of the consequences, the difference of primes pn,pn+1p_{n},p_{n+1} satisfies the inequality pn+1pn<pn+1p_{n+1}-p_{n}<\sqrt{p_{n+1}}.

5. Prospects for using the Ribenboim concept in solving Problems with Prime Numbers

Let’s look at another possibility of using the Ribenboim concept: if it is true that there are integer positive constants A and B such that for any integer nn greater than A, any pair of consecutive prime numbers pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfies the inequality pnpn1<12B\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<\frac{1}{2B}, which is consistent with a stronger version of estimating the difference of consecutive primes from the relation pnpn1=\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}= o(1)o(1), which is considered correct by researchers, for more details see [1], p.191, then the following statements are true:

Theorem 12. Let there be positive integer constants A and B, such that for any n greater than A the prime numbers pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<12B\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<\frac{1}{2B}, then for any integer m1m-1 greater than pAp_{A}, open intervals ((ms+12B)2,(ms2B)2)((m-\frac{s+1}{2B})^{2},(m-\frac{s}{2B})^{2}), where the integer ss takes values from 0 to 2B12B-1, m>Bm>B and m0modBm\equiv 0\mod{B}, contain prime numbers.

Corollary 1. Let there be a positive integer constant A, such that for any n greater than A the consecutive prime numbers pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<12\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<\frac{1}{2}, then for any integer m1m-1 greater than pAp_{A}, the open intervals ((ms+12)2,(ms2)2)((m-\frac{s+1}{2})^{2},(m-\frac{s}{2})^{2}), where the integer ss takes the values 0; 1, contain prime numbers.

Theorem 13. Let there be positive integer constants A and B, such that for any n greater than A the prime numbers pn1,pnp_{n-1},p_{n} satisfy the inequality pnpn1<12B\sqrt{p_{n}}-\sqrt{p_{n-1}}<\frac{1}{2B}, then for any integer m1m-1 greater than pAp_{A}, open intervals ((ms+12B)2,(ms2B)2)((m-\frac{s+1}{2B})^{2},(m-\frac{s}{2B})^{2}), where the integer ss takes values from 0 to 2B12\sqrt{B}-1, m>Bm>B and m0modBm\not\equiv 0\mod{B}, contain prime numbers.

6. Conclusion

In this note, we proposed an original method of proving some statements concerning problems with prime numbers, so we proved the Ribenboim conjecture, in other words, we showed that this hypothesis really solves the Landau problem # 4 (1912), from this proof it is clear that using the inequality pn+1pn<1\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<1 is crucial and cannot be weakened.

Next, we showed that if, starting from some integer N,N, consecutive prime numbers pnp_{n}, pn+1p_{n+1} satisfy the inequality pn+1pn<1/2\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<1/2, then there exists an integer positive constant M such that for any integer mm greater than M between the squares of any two numbers mm, m+12m+\frac{1}{2} and m+12m+\frac{1}{2}, m+1m+1, there are always prime numbers.

Applying Ribenboim’s approach, we obtained an original solution of Ingham’s problem about primes between cubes of consecutive integers, which agrees with the results of [5].

We also proved that the solution of the Landau problem without the Ribenboim hypothesis, as a consequence, evaluates the difference of consecutive prime numbers pn,pn+1p_{n},p_{n+1} by the relation pn+1pn=O(pnp_{n+1}-p_{n}=O(\sqrt{p_{n}}).

We proved that the Legendre-Schinzel hypothesis (1961) about the existence of a prime number between the real numbers xx and x+xx+\sqrt{x} is equivalent to the hypothesis that the difference of consecutive prime numbers pn,pn+1p_{n},p_{n+1} satisfies the inequality pn+1pn<pnp_{n+1}-p_{n}<\sqrt{p_{n}}.

Thus, we have demonstrated a number of applications of the Ribenboim concept to known problems with prime numbers, both already solved and not yet solved, using really expected estimates of the difference of consecutive prime numbers pn,pn+1p_{n},p_{n+1} from the inequality pn+1pn<A\sqrt{p_{n+1}}-\sqrt{p_{n}}<A, where the values AA are 1/2;1;21/2;1;2.

REFERENCES

1. P. Ribenboim, TheThe LittleLittle BookBook ofof BiggerBigger PrimesPrimes, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2004.

2. J. Pintz, Landau’s problems on primes, J.J. The´or.Th\acute{e}or. NombresNombres BordeauxBordeaux, 21, 2, 357-404, 2009.

3. H. Iwaniec, M. Jutila, Primes in short intervals, ArkivArkiv MatMat. 17,167–176, 1979.

4. W. Sierpiński, ElementaryElementary TheoryTheory ofof Numbers,Numbers, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

5. A. Ingham, On the difference between consecutive primes, QuartQuart. JJ. MathMath. OxfordOxford, 8, 255-266, 1937.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. W., Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada

References

  • [1]