This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Phase separation near the charge neutrality point in FeSe1-xTex crystals with x << 0.15

Y.A. Ovchenkov1∗, D.A. Chareev2,3.4, E.S. Kozlyakova1,4, E.E. Levin5,6, M.G. Miheev1, D.E. Presnov1,7,8, A.S. Trifonov1,7, O.S. Volkova1,3,4 and A.N. Vasiliev1,3,4 1Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia 2Institute of Experimental Mineralogy (IEM RAS), Chernogolovka 142432, Russia 3Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia 4National University of Science and Technology ’MISiS’, Moscow 119049, Russia 5 Faculty of Chemistry, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia 6FSRC “Crystallography and Photonics” RAS, Moscow 119333, Russia 7MSU Quantum Technology Centre, Moscow 119991, Russia 8Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow 119991, Russia $^*$ovtchenkov@mig.phys.msu.ru
Abstract

Our study of FeSe1-xTex crystals with x << 0.15 shows that the phase separation in these compositions occurs into phases with a different stoichiometry of iron. This phase separation may indicate structural instability of the iron plane in the studied range of compositions. To explain it, we discuss the bond polarity and the peculiarity of the direct dd exchange in the iron plane in the framework of the basic phenomenological description such as the Bethe-Slater curve. With this approach, when the distance between iron atoms is close to the value at which the sign of the magnetic exchange for some dd orbitals changes, structural and electronic instability can occur. Anomalies in the crystal field near the point of charge neutrality can also be a significant component of this instability. A similar instability of the iron plane may also be an important factor for other series of iron-based superconductors.

1 Introduction

Crystallographic phase instability is an important factor for enhancing superconductivity [1]. Some anomalies in the properties of compositions FeSe1-xTex with a low tellurium content, including the observation of phase separation in these compositions, indicate that phase instability may exist in these compounds.

The tetragonal plane of iron atoms, surrounded by pnictogen or chalcogen atoms, is the main motif of the crystal structure of iron-based superconductors (IBS). Therefore, the properties of this plane is of key importance for superconductivity in these compounds. In particular, the temperature of superconducting transitions depends on the structural parameters of this plane, such as, for example, the degree of deformation of the tetragonal environment of iron [2] or the distance from pnictogen to the iron plane [3].

The properties of the tetragonal plane of iron, surrounded by the pnictogens, could be thoroughly studied using almost ideal compositions of the 11 series of IBS [4, 5, 6]. The structure of these compounds is close to stoichiometric, and they have no intercalating elements that could distort the electronic properties of the iron plane. Nevertheless, to date, the properties of the 11 series of IBS have been studied only partially. There remains a whole range of compositions, the properties of which have not yet been sufficiently studied. In particular, the synthesis of Fe(Se,Te) compounds with low tellurium content usually leads to phase separation in both crystals and films [7]. The nature of this phase separation is not yet been understood.

We studied the synthesis and properties of FeSe1-xTex crystals in the range of x<0.15x<0.15. We find that for the studied compositions the phase separation manifests itself in transport properties as a distortion of the anomaly on dR/dTdR/dT curves near the structural transition points. For as-synthesized samples with different iron contents, the anomaly on dR/dTdR/dT splits into two distinct anomalies indicating the formation of two phases. Heat treatments of studied compositions can suppress phase separation, which leads to the disappearance of the anomaly in the dR/dTdR/dT curve located at a lower temperature. We also found suppression of phase separation in compositions after long-term storage, which suggests that, during annealing, the partial oxidation and removal of the excess of iron may have a major impact. Thus, the results obtained indicate that phase separation in the studied compositions is caused by deviations in the stoichiometry of iron. In turn, this may mean that phase separation in the studied compositions is a consequence of the structural instability of the iron plane at certain lattice parameters

One of the possibilities for describing the dependence of the properties of compounds with transition elements on their structure is to study the properties of individual orbitals or orbital-selective effects [8]. The properties of an individual orbital state has a relatively universal dependence on the interatomic distance [9], which for the case of direct dd interaction can be expressed by the Bethe-Slater curve. In FeSe, similar to pure metallic iron, the distance between the iron atoms is close to the value at which the sign of the direct magnetic exchange changes. Recent studies of cubic lattices of the elemental 3d3d metals have shown that the exchange interaction for Fe has different signs for different groups of orbitals [10]. Thus, the change in the sign of the interaction or, in other words, the degeneration of the singlet and triplet states can occur independently for different groups of the iron orbitals.

The electronic instability in series 11 for compositions close to FeSe has many experimental demonstrations [11, 12]. For these compositions, small changes in the lattice parameters can produce significant changes in the electronic properties. In particular, a significant change in the mobility of carriers occurs in FeSe1-xTex with a low tellurium content [13, 14], which corresponds to a crossover from bad to good metal. This crossover accompanies the majority carriers inversion in series 11. Formally, from neutrality, a change in the sign of mobile charges means an inversion of the charge of the ionic core. Thus, the inversion of carriers under an isovalent substitution [15] can be considered as evidence of a change in the polarity of the bond in these compounds, which in turn can be caused by the transformation of the dd orbitals with a change in the iron-iron distance in the plane.

The assumed structural instability of the iron/chalcogen plane near the charge neutrality point deserves further investigation as a possible important ingredient of superconductivity in IBS. Besides, this instability can be the reason for the splitting of some structural transitions in other series of iron-based superconductors.

2 Experiment

The studied crystals of FeSe1-xTex were prepared using the AlCl3/KCl/NaCl eutectic mixture in evacuated quartz ampoules in permanent gradient of temperature [16, 17]. The quartz ampoules with the Fe(Te,Se) charge and maximum quantity of AlCl3/KCl/NaCl eutectic mixture were placed in a furnace so as to maintain their hot end at a temperature of 500 C and the cold end at a temperature of 433 C for x=0.15x=0.15 and x=0.11x=0.11, and hot end at a temperature of 453 C and the cold end at a temperature of 400 C in the case of x=0.055x=0.055 . The chalcogenide charge is gradually dissolved in the hot end of the ampoule and precipitates in the form of single crystals at the cold end. After keeping for 8 weeks in the furnace, iron monochalcogenide platelike crystals were found at the cold ends of the ampoules.

To study the effect of heat treatment on the properties of crystals, two evacuated quartz ampoules with the x=0.055x=0.055 crystals were heat-treated at the temperature 445 C for one week. Next, one of the ampoules was quenched in water, and another ampoule cooled with the oven. Other thermal treatments of crystals were also always carried out in evacuated ampoules.

The chemical composition of the crystals was determined using a Tescan Vega II XMU scanning electron microscope equipped with an INCA Energy 450 energy-dispersive spectrometer; the accelerating voltage was 20 kV. For X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, selected crystals of as-prepared and heat-treated FeSe0.945Te0.055 were ground into powders. The XRD patterns of powders were collected using Rigaku D/Max RC diffractometer (Bragg-Brentano geometry, CuKα\alpha radiation, graphite analyzer crystal, scintillation counter). Full-profile calculations and phase quantitation were performed using the Rietveld method [18, 19] with derivative difference minimization routine implemented in DDM 1.95 software [20]. The preferred orientation effect was taken into account within the framework of the March-Dollase model [21].

Magnetization was measured using a Quantum Design MPMS SQUID in a field of 10 Oe under zero-field cooled conditions and in field of 10 kOe for χ(T)\chi(T) dependence in the temperature range 10 - 300 K . Electrical measurements were done on cleaved samples with contacts made by sputtering of Au/Ti layers.

3 Results

The results of studying the transport properties of as-prepared crystals are shown in Fig.1. The temperature dependence of the resistivity ρxx\rho_{xx} has a similar metallic behavior for all compositions (Fig.1, a). The temperatures of the superconducting transitions decrease insignificantly with increasing tellurium content (Fig.1, b). The temperature dependence of the Hall constant also shows a slight change (Fig.1, c). In particular, only one inversion point remains on Rh(T)Rh(T) for x=0.11x=0.11 and x=0.15x=0.15.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The properties of as-prepared crystals of FeSe1-xTex with xx=0.055, 0.11, and 0.15. (a) Temperature dependence of the resistivity ρxx\rho_{xx}. (b) Temperature dependence of the resistivity ρxx\rho_{xx} at low temperatures. (c) Temperature dependence of the Hall constant RHR_{H}. (d) Temperature dependencies of the magnetic susceptibility χ\chi in an applied field of 10 kOe. (e) ZFC and FC magnetic susceptibility χ\chi in an applied field of 30 Oe. (f) Magnetic field dependence of the Hall resistivity ρxy\rho_{xy}. (g) Magnetoresistance MRMR=(ρxx\rho_{xx}(B)-ρxx\rho_{xx}(0))/ρxx\rho_{xx}(0) versus B2B^{2} at 15 K. (h) Temperature dependence of the derivative of the resistivity dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT. (i) Temperature dependence of the derivative of the resistivity dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT between 40 K and 120 K.

The temperature dependencies of the magnetic susceptibility for compositions x=0.11x=0.11 and x=0.15x=0.15 have humps in the temperature range 100-200 K (Fig.1, d), which may indicate the presence of a hexagonal phase. This is most likely because the synthesis temperature of these compositions was higher than the stability limit of the hexagonal phase for FeSe. Nevertheless, based on the values of the susceptibility of the hexagonal phase, the amplitudes of the humps indicate that the content of the hexagonal phase is negligible [13]. Thus, we can assume that the susceptibility data indicate a high quality of the synthesized crystals.

The ZFC-FC curves for the samples composed of several plate crystals oriented parallel to the magnetic field (Fig.1, e), show a full Meissner effect, although the systematic difference between the transition temperatures determined from magnetic and transport measurements may indicate a complex microstructure of crystals.

Similar to FeSe, the field dependencies of the Hall component of resistivity ρxy\rho_{xy} have a nonlinear form at low temperatures, which indicates the presence of mobile carriers [22]. As can be seen from Fig.1 f), the nonlinearity is noticeably suppressed with increasing tellurium content, which agrees with a significant decrease in the carrier mobility in these compositions.

The field dependencies of the magnetoresistance MRMR (Fig.1 g) confirm a significant change in the carrier mobility. The slope of the MR(B2)MR(B^{2}) dependencies for the compounds under study, with fairly good accuracy, is equal to the square of the carrier mobility [23]. Thus, a change in the magnitude of the magnetoresistance MRMR in a field of 7 T from 33% to 5% corresponds to a change in the mobility by a factor of two and a half. This means that the studied compositions are close to the crossover from bad to good metal, which occurs in the 11 and some other series of IBS [24].

The resistivity of the samples is also sensitive to the transition from the high-temperature tetragonal phase to the low-temperature orthorhombic phase. The temperature dependence of the derivative of the resistivity dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT exhibits anomalies in the region of the structural transition (Fig.1 h and 1 i). The appearance of these anomalies makes it possible, in particular, to control the phase separation in the samples. It is known that phase separation in FeSe1-xTex with a low tellurium content occurs into two tetragonal phases with different lattice parameters [7]. As seen from Fig.1 i), the anomaly for the studied compositions has a split form. This shows the presence of two distinct phases with different temperatures of the structural transition. It can be noted that while the position of the anomaly at higher temperatures is different for the samples, the position of the low-temperature anomaly is the same for all samples.

The analysis of XRD data for as-prepared FeSe0.945Te0.055 (Fig.2(a) and (b)) revealed that the main phase is the tetragonal polymorph of the FeSe structure [25]. The significant asymmetry of the diffraction peaks is associated with the presence of a second isostructural phase with slightly different cell parameters. Its presence was confirmed by full-prole calculations. During the refinement, the parameters of the unit cells were calculated, as well mass fractions of the phases (Table 1). During the analysis of XRD patterns of annealed samples (Fig.2(c) and (d) for HT-A), it was found that the content of the second phase decreases significantly. At the same time, the cell parameters are not changing significantly.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Full-profile analysis of diffraction patterns of as-prepared FeSe0.945Te0.055 (panels (a) and (b)) and heat-treated FeSe0.945Te0.055 (panels (c) and (d) for HT-A). Panels (b) and (d) are enlarged portions of (a) and (c), respectively. Intensity is given on a square root scale to enhance low-intensity peaks details. Peak positions of phases #1 and #2 are given as ticks.
Table 1: The results of the XRD analysis for as-prepared and heat-treated FeSe0.945Te0.055. The error in the content value ranges from about 1.5 to about 3%.
Sample Phase Content (%) a (Å) c (Å)
as-prepared #1 52.3 3.7731(6) 5.5338(6)
as-prepared #2 47.7 3.787(2) 5.558(1)
HT-A #1 87.2 3.7725(9) 5.5334(3)
HT-A #2 12.8 3.799(5) 5.556(1)
HT-Q #1 84.3 3.773(1) 5.5351(4)
HT-Q #2 15.7 3.797(7) 5.557(1)

The crystals of FeSe1-xTex are often non-uniform at a microscopic level [26]. The temperature of synthesis is usually reduced at low tellurium content because of the shift of the stability boundary of the hexagonal phase. With a decrease in the synthesis temperature, a deterioration in the homogeneity of the tellurium distribution can be expected. We initially assumed that the phase separation at low xx can be due to the non-uniform distribution of tellurium and the formation of clusters with high tellurium content. We were going to find the optimal heat treatments that would allow achieving a more uniform distribution of tellurium. We expected to see the difference introduced by quenching, and we expected that long heat treatment at intermediate temperature should enhance phase separation. However, the results obtained do not confirm the original assumptions.

We found that heat treatment at a temperature close to the synthesis temperature already suppresses the second phase quite effectively. Fig.3 a) shows the dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT curves for the as-prepared crystal and two crystals heat-treated at 445 C. Both heat-treated samples have no low-temperature anomaly on the dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT, although quenching changes the shape of ρxx(T)\rho_{xx}(T) near phase transitions, as can be seen from Fig.3 a) and Fig.3 c). In general, heat treatment had a rather slight effect on ρxx(T)\rho_{xx}(T) (Fig.3 c). And at the same time, the decrease in mobility at low temperatures by about 20-25% (see the values of MR plotted in Fig.3 e), indicates a possible degradation of the microstructure of the sample in both heat treatments.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The properties of as-prepared and heat-treated crystals of FeSe0.945Te0.055. (a) Temperature dependence of the derivative of the resistivity dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT between 40 K and 120 K. (b) Temperature dependence of the resistivity ρxx\rho_{xx} at low temperatures. (c) Temperature dependence of the resistivity ρxx\rho_{xx} normalized at 300 K. (d) Magnetoresistance MRMR=(ρxx\rho_{xx}(B)-ρxx\rho_{xx}(0))/ρxx\rho_{xx}(0) versus B2B^{2} at 15 K.

After heat treatment at 445 C, we carried out heat treatment at 150 C for two weeks. Our measurements did not reveal any changes in transport properties after the second heat treatment. However, we found that the phase composition can change during long-term storage at room temperature. For example, Fig.4 shows the dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT for the sample FeSe1-xTex with x=0.11x=0.11 prepared immediately after synthesis and two samples studied after long-term storage in an evacuated quartz ampoule.

Thus, the results obtained indicate that the main effect on phase separation could have been partial oxidation of the sample, which, as is well established [27], effectively removes excess iron. On the other hand, variations in the stoichiometry of iron are possible in all compositions of 11 series. Therefore, there must be some additional factor causing phase separation in the investigated range of compositions. Below, we will discuss one of the possible reasons for the structural instability of the iron plane for the FeSe1-xTex compositions with low tellurium content.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Temperature dependence of the derivative of the resistivity dρxx/dTd\rho_{xx}/dT between 40 K and 120 K for FeSe0.89Te0.11 sample prepared immediately after synthesis and two samples prepared after one year of storage in an evacuated quartz ampoule.

4 Discussion

For the iron-based superconductors, several types of electronic instability have been identified that may be related to superconductivity in these compounds [28]. Structural instabilities can also be expected at certain values of the lattice parameters, which should be investigated in coordinate space. An effective way to consider the properties of compounds in real space is the molecular orbital (MO) method.

In the iron plane of IBS, there is a direct dd-dd exchange between neighboring iron atoms, which can be considered separately from iron-chalcogen or iron-pnictogen bonds. The degree of participation of the direct dd-dd exchange in the total energy of the chemical bond is measured by the dispersion of the corresponding bands, which is usually 3-4 eV for the IBS.

A simple illustrative model of the direct dd-dd exchange is the Bethe-Slater curve, which describes the change in the sign of the exchange between neighboring dd ions depending on the distance between them. In body-centered cubic Fe the exchange has different sign for ege_{g} and t2gt_{2g} orbitals [29] and is strongly negative for the latter. In FeSe1-xTex the Fe-Fe distance is in the range 2.6-2.7 Å [30], which is slightly larger than the value 2.5 Å for the body-centered cubic Fe. Thus, the plane of iron atoms in FeSe1-xTex can be close to the condition of the change in the sign of exchange for some orbitals.

A change in the sign of the exchange means some equilibrium between tensile and compressive strain for dd orbitals in the plane of iron atoms. At this point, the triplet and singlet dd orbitals are degenerate, which should lead to a significant rearrangement of the electronic structure near this point. This must be the point of instability for the electronic structure. We consider that a change in the sign of the exchange can account for the quantum criticality observed in FeSe [31], the anomalous behavior of FeSe in ultrasonic experiments [32, 33], and the large elastoresistance effect [34].

The low polarity of the iron-pnictogen bond may be an important component of electronic instability in 11 series. Low values of the Coulomb contribution to the energy of the crystal field, as well as close to zero values of the Madelung energy, facilitate the charge redistribution, which should occur during changes in the electronic structure. In our opinion, the inversion of the majority carriers is a consequence of these changes in the electronic structure near the point of inversion of the direct dd-dd exchange.

The crystals FeSe1-xTex with a high tellurium content usually grow with an excess of iron while the crystals FeSe1-xSx usually have an iron deficiency. Thus we can formally assume that the energy corresponding to the addition of one iron atom to the structure changes its sign along 11 series. Then there must be an equilibrium point for which adding iron to the structure costs zero energy. In our opinion, near this point, phases with different values of iron stoichiometry can exist simultaneously.

5 Conclusion

Materials with electronic instability can be of interest for various fields of application, for example, for piezoresistive and thermoelectric applications. It is interesting to consider ways to enhance the orbital degeneracy effect and electronic instability in FeSe. The substitution of elements can have limited success because the introduced disorder removes the degeneracy and increases the crystal field. Optimal doping probably can be achieved by the addition of intercalating layers, which can also suppress structural instability.

6 Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research through Grant 20-02-00561A. OSV acknowledge the financial support by Russian Science Foundation through the project 19-42-02010. ESK and ANV acknowledge the financial support by the Megagrant 2020-220-08-6358 of the Government Council on Grants of the Russian Federation.

References

References

  • [1] B.T. Matthias. Criteria for superconducting transition temperatures. Physica, 69(1):54–56, 1973.
  • [2] C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, H. Kito, M. Teresa Fernandez-Diaz, T. Ito, K. Kihou, H. Matsuhata, M. Braden, and K. Yamada. Effect of structural parameters on superconductivity in fluorine-free LnFeAsO1-y (Ln= La, Nd). Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 77(8):083704, 2008.
  • [3] K. Kuroki, H. Usui, S. Onari, R. Arita, and H. Aoki. Pnictogen height as a possible switch between high-Tc nodeless and low-Tc nodal pairings in the iron-based superconductors. Physical Review B, 79(22):224511, 2009.
  • [4] F.-C. Hsu, J.-Y. Luo, K.-W. Yeh, T.-K. Chen, T.-W. Huang, P. M. Wu, Y.-C. Lee, Y.-L. Huang, Y.-Y. Chu, D.-C. Yan, et al. Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α\alpha-FeSe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(38):14262–14264, 2008.
  • [5] A.I. Coldea and M.D. Watson. The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 9(1):125–146, 2018.
  • [6] A. E. Bohmer and A. Kreisel. Nematicity, magnetism and superconductivity in FeSe. Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter, 30(2), JAN 17 2018.
  • [7] J. Zhuang, W. K. Yeoh, X. Cui, X. Xu, Y. Du, Z. Shi, S. P. Ringer, X. Wang, and S. X. Dou. Unabridged phase diagram for single-phased FeTe1-xSex thin films. Scientific reports, 4:7273, 2014.
  • [8] S.V. Streltsov and D.I. Khomskii. Orbital physics in transition metal compounds: new trends. Physics-Uspekhi, 60(11):1121, 2017.
  • [9] J.C. Slater. Cohesion in monovalent metals. Physical Review, 35(5):509, 1930.
  • [10] R. Cardias, A. Szilva, A. Bergman, I. Di Marco, M.I. Katsnelson, A.I. Lichtenstein, L. Nordström, A.B. Klautau, O. Eriksson, and Y.O. Kvashnin. The Bethe-Slater curve revisited; new insights from electronic structure theory. Scientific reports, 7(1):1–11, 2017.
  • [11] Y.S. Kushnirenko, A.A. Kordyuk, A.V. Fedorov, E. Haubold, T. Wolf, B. Büchner, and S.V. Borisenko. Anomalous temperature evolution of the electronic structure of FeSe. Physical Review B, 96(10):100504, 2017.
  • [12] G.N. Phan, K. Nakayama, K. Sugawara, T. Sato, T. Urata, Y. Tanabe, K. Tanigaki, F. Nabeshima, Y. Imai, A. Maeda, and T. Takahashi. Effects of strain on the electronic structure, superconductivity, and nematicity in FeSe studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B, 95:224507, Jun 2017.
  • [13] Y. A. Ovchenkov, D.A. Chareev, V.A. Kulbachinskii, V.G. Kytin, D.E. Presnov, Y. Skourski, L.V. Shvanskaya, O.S. Volkova, D.V. Efremov, and A.N. Vasiliev. Nematic properties of FeSe1-xTex crystals with a low Te content. arXiv1909.00711, 2019.
  • [14] K. Terao, T. Kashiwagi, T. Shizu, R.A. Klemm, and K. Kadowaki. Superconducting and tetragonal-to-orthorhombic transitions in single crystals of FeSe1-xTex (0(0\leq xx 0.61)\leq 0.61). Phys. Rev. B, 100:224516, Dec 2019.
  • [15] Y.A. Ovchenkov, D.A. Chareev, V.A. Kulbachinskii, V.G. Kytin, S.V. Mishkov, D.E. Presnov, O.S. Volkova, and A.N. Vasiliev. Majority carrier type inversion in the FeSe family and a ‘doped semimetal’ scheme in iron-based superconductors. Superconductor Science and Technology, 32(6):065005, may 2019.
  • [16] D. Chareev, E. Osadchii, T. Kuzmicheva, J.-Y. Lin, S. Kuzmichev, O. Volkova, and A. Vasiliev. Single crystal growth and characterization of tetragonal FeSe1-xSx superconductors. CrystEngComm, 15:1989–1993, 2013.
  • [17] D.A. Chareev, Y.A. Ovchenkov, L.V. Shvanskaya, A.M. Kovalskii, M. Abdel-Hafiez, D. Traine, E. Lechner, M. Iavarone, O.S. Volkova, and A.N. Vasiliev. Single crystal growth, transport and scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy of FeSe1-xSx. CrystEngComm, 20:2449–2454, 2018.
  • [18] H.M. Rietveld. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. Journal of applied Crystallography, 2(2):65–71, 1969.
  • [19] D.L. Bish and S.A. Howard. Quantitative phase analysis using the Rietveld method. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 21(2):86–91, 1988.
  • [20] L.A. Solovyov. Full-profile refinement by derivative difference minimization. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 37(5):743–749, 2004.
  • [21] W.A. Dollase. Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 19(4):267–272, 1986.
  • [22] Y.A. Ovchenkov, D.A. Chareev, V.A. Kulbachinskii, V.G. Kytin, D.E. Presnov, O.S. Volkova, and A.N. Vasiliev. Highly mobile carriers in iron-based superconductors. Superconductor Science and Technology, 30(3):035017, 2017.
  • [23] Y.A. Ovchenkov, D.A. Chareev, V.A. Kulbachinskii, V.G. Kytin, D.E. Presnov, Y. Skourski, O.S. Volkova, and A.N. Vasiliev. Magnetotransport properties of FeSe in fields up to 50T. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 459:221 – 225, 2018.
  • [24] M. Nakajima, T. Tanaka, S. Ishida, K. Kihou, C. H. Lee, A. Iyo, T. Kakeshita, H. Eisaki, and S. Uchida. Crossover from bad to good metal in BaFe2(As1-xPx)2 induced by isovalent P substitution. Phys. Rev. B, 88:094501, Sep 2013.
  • [25] G. Hägg and A.-L. Kindström. Röntgenuntersuchung am system eisen—selen. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 22(1):453–464, 1933.
  • [26] K. Prokes, M. Schulze, S. Hartwig, N. Schafer, S. Landsgesell, C.G.F. Blum, D. Abou-Ras, M.Y. Hacisalihoglu, E. Ressouche, B. Ouladdiaf, B. Buchner, and S. Wurmehl. Structural inhomogeneities in FeTe0.6Se0.4: Relation to superconductivity. Journal of Crystal Growth, 432:95 – 104, 2015.
  • [27] Y. Sun, Z. Shi, and T.i Tamegai. Review of annealing effects and superconductivity in Fe1+yTe1-xSex superconductors. Superconductor Science and Technology, 32(10):103001, aug 2019.
  • [28] I.I. Mazin, D.J. Singh, M.D. Johannes, and M.H. Du. Unconventional superconductivity with a sign reversal in the order parameter of LaFeAsO1-xFx. Phys. Rev. Lett., 101:057003, Jul 2008.
  • [29] Y.O. Kvashnin, R. Cardias, A. Szilva, I. Di Marco, M.I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, L. Nordström, A. B. Klautau, and O. Eriksson. Microscopic origin of heisenberg and non-heisenberg exchange interactions in ferromagnetic bcc Fe. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:217202, May 2016.
  • [30] V.G. Ivanov, D.A. Chareev, A.A. Ivanov, A.N. Vasiliev, and A.P. Menushenkova. Local features of the crystal structure of superconducting iron chalcogenides Fe(TeSe)1-δ. Physics of the Solid State, 58(3):447–453, 2016.
  • [31] V. Grinenko, R. Sarkar, P. Materne, S. Kamusella, A. Yamamshita, Y. Takano, Y. Sun, T. Tamegai, D. V. Efremov, S.-L. Drechsler, J.-C. Orain, T. Goko, R. Scheuermann, H. Luetkens, and H.-H. Klauss. Low-temperature breakdown of antiferromagnetic quantum critical behavior in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B, 97:201102, May 2018.
  • [32] G. A. Zvyagina, T. N. Gaydamak, K. R. Zhekov, I. V. Bilich, V. D. Fil, D. A. Chareev, and A. N. Vasiliev. Acoustic characteristics of FeSe single crystals. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 101(5):56005, 2013.
  • [33] V.D. Fil, D.V. Fil, K.R. Zhekov, T.N. Gaydamak, G.A. Zvyagina, I.V. Bilich, D.A. Chareev, and A.N. Vasiliev. Piezomagnetism of FeSe single crystals. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 103(4):47009, 2013.
  • [34] J.-H. Chu, H.-H. Kuo, J.G. Analytis, and I.R. Fisher. Divergent nematic susceptibility in an iron arsenide superconductor. Science, 337(6095):710–712, 2012.