This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: e-mail:panyu@cqupt.edu.cn

Phase transition and entropic force of de Sitter black hole in massive gravity

Yubo Ma1, Yang Zhang1, Lichun Zhang1, Liang Wu1, Ying Gao2, Shuo Cao3, Yu Pan4∗ 1Institute of Theoretical Physics, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, 037009, China
2School of Mathematical and Statistical, Shanxi Datong University, Datong, 037009, China
3Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China
4School of Science, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, 400065, China
Abstract

It is well known that de Sitter(dS) black holes generally have a black hole horizon and a cosmological horizon, both of which have Hawking radiation. But the radiation temperature of the two horizons is generally different, so dS black holes do not meet the requirements of thermal equilibrium stability, which brings certain difficulties to the study of the thermodynamic characteristics of black holes. In this paper, dS black hole is regarded as a thermodynamic system, and the effective thermodynamic quantities of the system are obtained. The influence of various state parameters on the effective thermodynamic quantities in the massive gravity space-time is discussed. The condition of the phase transition of the de Sitter black hole in massive gravity space-time is given. We consider that the total entropy of the dS black hole is the sum of the corresponding entropy of the two horizons plus an extra term from the correlation of the two horizons. By comparing the entropic force of interaction between black hole horizon and the cosmological horizon with Lennard-Jones force between two particles, we find that the change rule of entropic force between the two system is surprisingly the same. The research will help us to explore the real reason of accelerating expansion of the universe.

I Introduction

In recent years, the study of thermodynamic properties of black holes has aroused great interest. Especially, after treating the cosmological constant as the thermodynamic pressure, the first law of black hole thermodynamics in extended phase space has been derived. Comparing the state parameters of black holes with that of the Van der Waals equation, the critical phenomena of various AdS space-time black holes have been studied. The influence of various parameters on the phase transition is discussed. Some progress has been made in the study of black hole phase transition (David Kubiznak et al., 2012; Robie A. Hennigar et al., 2017; Aruna Rajagopal et al., 2014; Hendi et al., 2017, 2017, 2015; Panahiyan et al., 2019; Rong-Gen Cai et al., 2013, 2016; Jia-Lin Zhang et al., 2015, 2015; Hendi et al., 2016; Wei Xu et al., 2014; Wen et al., 2014; Wilson G. Brenna et al., 2015; Rabin Banerjee et al., 2017, 2011, 2012; Meng-Sen Ma et al., 2017, 2017; Hendi et al., 2017; Dayyani et al., 2017; De-Cheng Zou et al., 2017; Peng Cheng et al., 2016; Mozhgan Mir et al., 2017; Zixu Zhao et al., 2014; Ren Zhao et al., 2013; Zeinab et al., 2018; Run Zhou et al., 2019; Toledo et al., 2019). For de Sitter space-time, space-time has black hole horizon and cosmological horizon. Both horizons have Hawking radiation, and the radiation temperatures of the two horizons are generally different. Therefore dS black holes do not meet the requirements of thermal stability, which brings certain difficulties to the study of the thermodynamic properties of black hole. In recent years, the study of the thermodynamic properties of de Sitter space-time has attracted extensive attention (Saoussen Mbarek et al., 2019; Fil Simovic et al., 2019; Brian P. Dolan et al., 2013; Hendi et al., 2017; Sekiwa et al., 2006; David Kubiznak et al., 2016; James McInerney et al., 2016; Miho Urano et al., 2009; Sourav Bhattacharya et al., 2013; Cai et al., 2002, 2002; Yu-Bo Ma et al., 2018; Azreg-Aiou et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016; Li-Chun Zhang et al., 2014; Hui-Hua Zhao et al., 2014; Huaifan Li et al., 2017; Li-Chun Zhang et al., 2016; Yu-Bo Ma et al., 2018). Because in the early period of inflation, our universe is a quasi de Sitter space-time, and the constant term introduced in the study of de Sitter space-time is the contribution of vacuum energy, which is also a form of material energy. If the cosmological constant corresponds to dark energy, our universe will evolve into a new de Sitter phase. In order to construct the whole history of universe evolution, we should have a clear understanding of the classical and quantum properties of the de Sitter space-time.

Since the thermodynamic quantities corresponding to the two horizons in de Sitter space-time are all functions of mass MM, charge QQ and cosmological constant Λ\Lambda. There must be certain relation between the thermodynamic quantities corresponding to the two horizons. Considering whether the corresponding thermodynamic quantity in the de Sitter space-time has the thermodynamic characteristics of AdS black hole after the correlation of black hole horizon and universe horizon; What is the relationship between the entropy of de Sitter space and the corresponding entropy of two horizons? What is the relationship between the entropic force caused by the interaction of two horizons and the ratio of the position of the two horizons? These problems are very important to study the stability and evolution of de Sitter space-time. Therefore, it is worth to establish a self-consistent relationship between the thermodynamic quantities of de Sitter space-time. In (Hinterbichler et al., 2012), the authors suggest a massive gravity which overcomes the traditional problems and yield an avenue for addressing the cosmological constant naturalness problem. Fierz and Pauli firstly provided the possibility of a massive graviton (Fierz et al., 1939, 1939). Further, van Dam and Veltman (van Dam et al., 1970) and Zakharov (Zakharov et al., 1970) had found the linear theory which was coupled to a source, they found that even when the mass of the graviton approaches to zero, the prediction of the theory is different from that of the linear theory. Later, Boulware-Deser ghost theories had been studied, which were nonlinear and ghostlike instability massive gravity theories (Boulware et al., 1972, 1972). In the absence of such instability, significant progress has been made in establishing the theory of massive gravity (de Rham et al., 2010, 2011; B. Eslam Panah et al., 2019, 2019, 2020; S. H. Hendi et al., 2018). The most straightforward way to construct the massive gravity theories is to simply add a mass term to the GR action, giving the graviton a mass in such a way that GR is recovered as mass vanishes. Recently, a charged BTZ black holes has been studied in (Hendi et al., 2016, 2017), which consider a massive gravity. The massive BTZ black holes in the presence of Maxwell and Born-Infeld electrodynamics in asymptotically (A)dS spacetimes was studied in (Hendi et al., 2015). In (Majhi et al., 2017; Cai et al., 2015; Jianfei Xu et al., 2015; Upadhyay et al., 1), thermodynamics and entropy of AdS black hole in massive gravity were obtained, and the phase transition was discussed.

In this paper, on the basis of effective thermodynamic quantity of de Sitter black hole in massive gravity (DSBHMG), the thermodynamic characteristics of de Sitter space-time are discussed. The condition of the phase transition of DSBHMG space-time is found, and the influence of each parameter on the critical point is analyzed. It is noted that DSBHMG space-time has a second-order phase transition similar to that AdS black hole when the parameters meet certain conditions, except that the heat capacity at constant volume of DSBHMG is not zero. By calculating the entropic force of the interaction between the two horizons, the changing law of entropic force with the ratio of the position of two horizons is given. By comparing the curve with that of Lennard-Jones force (David C. Johnston et al., 2) between two particles, it is found that the curve of entropic force changing with the position ratio of two horizons is similar to the curve of Lennard-Jones force changing with the distance between two particles, which has the same change rule. This discovery provides a new way to study the internal cause of accelerating expansion of the universe.

This paper is arranged as follows: for the continuity of this paper, in the second part, we briefly introduce the corresponding thermodynamic quantities of black hole horizon and cosmological horizon in DSBHMG and the effective thermodynamic quantities of DSBHMG. In the third part, we discuss the critical phenomena of DSBHMG. In the fourth part, we discuss the entropic force of interaction between the two horizons, and obtain the entropic force and the Lennard-Jones force between two particles has a similar law of change. The fifth part of the paper discusses the conclusion. (We use the units G=h=kB=1G=h=k_{B}=1).

II Thermodynamics of black holes in massive gravity

We consider (3+1)(3+1) -dimensional massive gravity with a Maxwell field (Cai et al., 2015; Jianfei Xu et al., 2015; Upadhyay et al., 1; Hassan et al., 2011; Allan Adams et al., 2015), the action is as follows

S=1k2d4xg(R2Λ14F2+m2i4ciμi),S=\frac{1}{k^{2}}\int d^{4}x\sqrt{g}(R-2\Lambda-\frac{1}{4}F^{2}+m^{2}\sum_{i}^{4}{c_{i}\mu_{i}}), (1)

where Λ\Lambda is the cosmological constant and k=0k=0,11, or 1-1 , correspond to a Ricci flat, sphere, or hyperbolic horizon for the black hole, respectively. Here FμνF_{\mu\nu} is the Maxwell field-strength tensor, cic_{i} are constants, and μi\mu_{i} are symmetric polynomials of the eigenvalues of the matrix gμνfμν\sqrt{g^{\mu\nu}f_{\mu\nu}} where fμνf_{\mu\nu} is a fixed symmetric tensor. The action admits a static black hole solution with the space-time metric and reference metric as

ds2=f(r)dt2+f1dr2+r2hijdxidxj,(i,j=1,2)ds^{2}=-f(r)dt^{2}+f^{-1}dr^{2}+r^{2}h_{ij}dx^{i}dx^{j},\quad(i,j=1,2) (2)

where hijdxidxjh_{ij}dx^{i}dx^{j} is the line element for an Einstein space with constant curvature, f(r)f(r) is the metric function, which is written by (De-Cheng Zou et al., 2017; Petarpa Boonserm et al., 2018).

f(r)=kΛ3r2m0r+q24r2+c1m22r+m2c2,f(r)=k-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^{2}-\frac{m_{0}}{r}+\frac{q^{2}}{4r^{2}}+\frac{c_{1}m^{2}}{2}r+m^{2}c_{2}, (3)

The positions of black hole horizon and universe horizon satisfy the equation f(r+,c)=0f(r_{+,c})=0, thus, the mass m0m_{0} can be expressed in terms of r+,cr_{+,c} as

M=m02=(k+m2c2)rcx(1+x)2(1+x+x2)+q2(1+x)(1+x2)8rcx(1+x+x2)+rc2m2c1x24(1+x+x2),M=\frac{m_{0}}{2}=\frac{\left(k+m^{2}c_{2}\right)r_{c}x(1+x)}{2\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}+\frac{q^{2}(1+x)\left(1+x^{2}\right)}{8r_{c}x\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}+\frac{r_{c}^{2}m^{2}c_{1}x^{2}}{4\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}, (4)

where x=r+rcx=\frac{r_{+}}{r_{c}} and

Λ3rc2(1+x+x2)=kq24rc2x+c12m2rc(1+x)+m2c2,\frac{\Lambda}{3}r_{c}^{2}\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)=k-\frac{q^{2}}{4r_{c}^{2}x}+\frac{c_{1}}{2}m^{2}r_{c}(1+x)+m^{2}c_{2}, (5)

The radiation temperature of black hole horizon and cosmological horizon is

T+,c=±f(r+,c)4π=14πr+,c(kΛr+,c2q24r+,c2+m2c1r+,c+m2c2).T_{+,c}=\pm\frac{f\left(r_{+,c}\right)}{4\pi}=\frac{1}{4\pi r_{+,c}}\left(k-\Lambda r_{+,c}^{2}-\frac{q^{2}}{4r_{+,c}^{2}}+m^{2}c_{1}r_{+,c}+m^{2}c_{2}\right). (6)

The thermodynamic quantities corresponding to the two horizons satisfy the first law of thermodynamics

dM=T+,cdS+,c+V+,cdP+μ+,cdQ,dM=T_{+,c}dS_{+,c}+V_{+,c}dP+\mu_{+,c}dQ, (7)

where

V+,c=v23r+,c3,P=Λ8πV_{+,c}=\frac{v_{2}}{3}r_{+,c}^{3},\quad P=-\frac{\Lambda}{8\pi} (8)

when the radiation temperature T+T_{+} of the black hole horizon is equal to that of the cosmological horizon TcT_{c}, the charge QQ and Λ\Lambda of the system satisfies the equation

1r+(kΛr+2q24r+2+m2c1r++m2c2)=1rc(kΛrc2q24rc2+m2c1rc+m2c2),\frac{1}{r_{+}}\left(k-\Lambda r_{+}^{2}-\frac{q^{2}}{4r_{+}^{2}}+m^{2}c_{1}r_{+}+m^{2}c_{2}\right)=-\frac{1}{r_{c}}\left(k-\Lambda r_{c}^{2}-\frac{q^{2}}{4r_{c}^{2}}+m^{2}c_{1}r_{c}+m^{2}c_{2}\right), (9)

we can get the radiation temperature TT when T+=TcT_{+}=T_{c}.

T=T+=Tc=(1x)2πrc(1+x)2[k+m2c1rc(1+4x+x2)4(1+x)+m2c2].T=T_{+}=T_{c}=\frac{(1-x)}{2\pi r_{c}(1+x)^{2}}\left[k+\frac{m^{2}c_{1}r_{c}\left(1+4x+x^{2}\right)}{4(1+x)}+m^{2}c_{2}\right]. (10)

Recently, through the study of the thermodynamic characteristics of dS space-time, one can get the thermodynamic volume of dS space-time is (Brian P. Dolan et al., 2013; Li-Chun Zhang et al., 2016)

V=4π3(rc3r+3)=4π3rc3(1x3),V=\frac{4\pi}{3}\left(r_{c}^{3}-r_{+}^{3}\right)=\frac{4\pi}{3}r_{c}^{3}\left(1-x^{3}\right), (11)

if the energy MM, charge QQ and volume VV in space-time are taken as the state parameters of a thermodynamic system, the first law of thermodynamics should be satisfied

dM=TeffdSPeffdV+ϕeffdQ,dM=T_{eff}dS-P_{eff}dV+\phi_{eff}dQ, (12)

Considering the interaction between the black hole horizon and the cosmological horizon, we set the entropy of the system (Huaifan Li et al., 2017; Li-Chun Zhang et al., 2016; Yu-Bo Ma et al., 2018)

S=πrc2[1+x2+f(x)],S=\pi r_{c}^{2}\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right], (13)

here the undefined function f(x)f(x) represents the extra contribution from the correlations of the two horizons. When the radiation temperature of black hole horizon and cosmological horizon is equal, the effective temperature of space-time should also be equal to the radiation temperature of two horizons

Teff=T=Tc=T+,T_{eff}=T=T_{c}=T_{+}, (14)

From equations (12), (13) and (14), the effective temperature TeffT_{eff}, pressure PeffP_{eff} and potential ϕeff\phi_{eff} of the system are obtained

Teff=B(x,q)(1x3)4πrcx(1+x4),Peff=D(x,q)(1x3)16πrc2x(1+x4),ϕeff=(MQ)S,V=4π2Q(1+x)(1+x2)v22rcx(1+x+x2).T_{eff}=\frac{B(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)}{4\pi r_{c}x\left(1+x^{4}\right)},\quad P_{eff}=\frac{D(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)}{16\pi r_{c}^{2}x\left(1+x^{4}\right)},\quad\phi_{eff}=\left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial Q}\right)_{S,V}=\frac{4\pi^{2}Q(1+x)\left(1+x^{2}\right)}{v_{2}^{2}r_{c}x\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}. (15)

where

B(x,q)=\displaystyle B(x,q)= (k+m2c2)(1+x2x2+x3+x4)(1+x+x2)\displaystyle\left(k+m^{2}c_{2}\right)\frac{\left(1+x-2x^{2}+x^{3}+x^{4}\right)}{\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)} (16)
q24rc2(1+x+x22x3+x4+x5+x6)x2(1+x+x2)+rcm2c1x(2+x)(1x)+2x32(1+x+x2),\displaystyle-\frac{q^{2}}{4r_{c}^{2}}\frac{\left(1+x+x^{2}-2x^{3}+x^{4}+x^{5}+x^{6}\right)}{x^{2}\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}+r_{c}m^{2}c_{1}x\frac{(2+x)(1-x)+2x^{3}}{2\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)},
D(x,q)=\displaystyle D(x,q)= (k+m2c2)(1+x+x2)2{(1+2x)[1+x2+f(x)]x(1+x)(1+x+x2)[2x+f(x)]}\displaystyle\frac{\left(k+m^{2}c_{2}\right)}{\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)^{2}}\left\{(1+2x)\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]-x(1+x)\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)[2x+f^{\prime}(x)]\right\} (17)
q24rc2x2(1+x+x2)2{2(1+2x+3x2)[1+x2+f(x)]x(1+x)(1+x2)(1+x+x2)[2x+f(x)]}\displaystyle-\frac{q^{2}}{4r_{c}^{2}x^{2}\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)^{2}}\left\{2\left(1+2x+3x^{2}\right)\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]-x(1+x)\left(1+x^{2}\right)\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)[2x+f(x)]\right\}
+rcm2c1x(1+x+x2)2{2(2+x)[1+x2+f(x)]x(1+x+x2)[2x+f(x)]}.\displaystyle+\frac{r_{c}m^{2}c_{1}x}{\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)^{2}}\left\{2(2+x)\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]-x\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)\left[2x+f^{\prime}(x)\right]\right\}.

Considering the initial conditions f(0)=0f(0)=0, we can get

f(x)=2(45x3x5)5(1x3)+85(1x3)2/3f(x)=-\frac{2\left(4-5x^{3}-x^{5}\right)}{5\left(1-x^{3}\right)}+\frac{8}{5}\left(1-x^{3}\right)^{2/3} (18)

we set the initial parameters to m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1, and then take different values for kk, qq, mm, c1c_{1} and c2c_{2} respectively, to get the curve PeffxP_{eff}-x and TeffxT_{eff}-x curve (take rc=1r_{c}=1) as shown in FIG.1 and FIG.2

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: PeffxP_{eff}-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: TeffxT_{eff}-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively.

III Critical phenomena

Heat capacity of the system at constant volume:

CV\displaystyle C_{V} =Teff(STeff)V=Teff(Src)x(Vx)rc(Sx)rc(Vrc)x(Vx)rc(Teffrc)x(Vrc)x(Teffx)rc\displaystyle=T_{eff}\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T_{eff}}\right)_{V}=T_{eff}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}-\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}}{\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial_{r_{c}}}\right)_{x}-\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}} (19)
=2πrc2B(x,q)x(1+x4)(1x3)[B(x,q)(1x3)x2B¯(x,q)B(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)]\displaystyle=\frac{2\pi r_{c}^{2}B(x,q)x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}{\left(1-x^{3}\right)\left[B^{\prime}(x,q)(1-x^{3})x^{2}\bar{B}(x,q)-\frac{B(x,q)(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7})}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}\right]}

where

B¯(x,q)=(k+m2c2)(1+x2x2+x3+x4)(1+x+x2)34μc2(1+x+x22x3+x4+x5+x6)x2(1+x+x2)\bar{B}(x,q)=\left(k+m^{2}c_{2}\right)\frac{\left(1+x-2x^{2}+x^{3}+x^{4}\right)}{\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}-\frac{3}{4}\mu_{c}^{2}\frac{\left(1+x+x^{2}-2x^{3}+x^{4}+x^{5}+x^{6}\right)}{x^{2}\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)} (20)

B(x,q)=dB(x,q)dxB^{\prime}(x,q)=\frac{dB(x,q)}{dx}, and B(x,q)B(x,q) is presented by Eq.(16).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: CVxC_{V}-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively and the initial parameters m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1.

From FIG.3, we know that the heat capacity CVC_{V} of the system in DSBHMG is not zero, which is different from the result for AdS black holes where CV=0C_{V}=0 .

The heat capacity at constant pressure is

CPeff=Teff(STeff)Peff=Teff(Src)x(Peffx)rc(Sx)rc(Peffrc)x(Teffrc)x(Peffrc)x(Teffx)rc=2πrc2B(x,q)E(x,q)F(x,q)C_{P_{eff}}=T_{eff}\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T_{eff}}\right)_{P_{eff}}=T_{eff}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}-\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}}{\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}-\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}}=\frac{2\pi r_{c}^{2}B(x,q)E(x,q)}{F(x,q)} (21)

Here

E(x,q)=[1+x2+f(x)][D(x,q)(1x3)D(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)]+[2x+f(x)]D¯(x,q)(1x3)2x,E(x,q)=\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]\left[D^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)-\frac{D(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}\right]+\left[2x+f^{\prime}(x)\right]\frac{\bar{D}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)}{2x}, (22)
D¯(x,q)=\displaystyle\bar{D}(x,q)= 2(k+m2c2)(1+x+x2)2{(1+2x)[1+x2+f(x)]x(1+x)(1+x+x2)[2x+f(x)]}\displaystyle\frac{2\left(k+m^{2}c_{2}\right)}{\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)^{2}}\left\{(1+2x)\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]-x(1+x)\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)\left[2x+f^{\prime}(x)\right]\right\} (23)
μc2x2(1+x+x2)2{2(1+2x+3x2)[1+x2+f(x)]x(1+x)(1+x2)(1+x+x2)[2x+f(x)]}\displaystyle-\frac{\mu_{c}^{2}}{x^{2}\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)^{2}}\left\{2\left(1+2x+3x^{2}\right)\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]-x(1+x)\left(1+x^{2}\right)\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)\left[2x+f^{\prime}(x)\right]\right\}
+rcm2c1x(1+x+x2)2{2(2+x)[1+x2+f(x)]x(1+x+x2)[2x+f(x)]},\displaystyle{+\frac{r_{c}m^{2}c_{1}x}{\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)^{2}}\left\{2(2+x)\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right]-x\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)\left[2x+f^{\prime}(x)\right]\right\}},
F(x,q)=\displaystyle F(x,q)= B¯(x,q)[D(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)D(x,q)(1x3)]\displaystyle\bar{B}(x,q)\left[\frac{D(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}-D^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)\right] (24)
+D¯(x,q)[B(x,q)(1x3)B(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)].\displaystyle+\bar{D}(x,q)\left[B^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)-\frac{B(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}\right].

D(x,q)=xD(x,q)dxD^{\prime}(x,q)=\frac{xD(x,q)}{dx}, and D(x,q)D(x,q) is given by Eq.(17).From Eq.(21), the curves are depicted in FIG.4.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: CPeffxC_{P_{eff}}-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively and the initial parameters m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1.

The expansion coefficient is

α\displaystyle\alpha =1V(VTeff)Peff\displaystyle=\frac{1}{V}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial T_{eff}}\right)_{P_{eff}} (25)
=1V(Vrc)x(Peffx)rc(Vx)rc(Peffrc)x(Peffx)rc(Teffrc)x(Peffrc)x(Teffx)rc\displaystyle=\frac{1}{V}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}-\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}}{\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}-\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}}
=12rcx(1+x4)(1x3)F(x,q)[D(x,q)(1x3)D(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)D¯(x,q)x2]\displaystyle=\frac{12r_{c}x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}{\left(1-x^{3}\right)F(x,q)}\left[D^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)-\frac{D(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}-\bar{D}(x,q)x^{2}\right]

The αx\alpha-x curve is shown in FIG.5.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: αx\alpha-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively and the initial parameters m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1.

The isothermal compressibility is

κTeff\displaystyle\kappa_{T_{eff}} =1V(VPeff)Teff\displaystyle=-\frac{1}{V}\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial P_{eff}}\right)_{T_{eff}} (26)
=1V(Vrc)x(Teffx)rc(Vx)rc(Teffrc)x(Peffx)rc(Teffrc)x(Peffrc)x(Teffx)rc\displaystyle=\frac{1}{V}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}-\left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}}{\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}-\left(\frac{\partial P_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}}
=48πrc2x(1+x4)(1x3)F(x,q)[B(x,q)(1x3)B(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)B¯(x,q)x2].\displaystyle=\frac{48\pi r_{c}^{2}x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}{\left(1-x^{3}\right)F(x,q)}\left[B^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)-\frac{B(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}-\bar{B}(x,q)x^{2}\right].

According to Eq.(26), we plot κTeffx\kappa_{T_{eff}}-x curve in FIG.6.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: κTeffx\kappa_{T_{eff}}-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively and the initial parameters m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1.

It can be seen from the curve CPeffxC_{P_{eff}}-x, αx\alpha-x, κTeffx\kappa_{T_{eff}}-x , CPeffC_{P_{eff}}, α\alpha and κTeff\kappa_{T_{eff}} are divergence at x=xcx=x_{c}. The entropy and volume of the system are continuous. According to Ehrenfest’s classification of phase transition, xcx_{c} is the second-order phase transition point of the system.

Gibbs function is given by

G\displaystyle G =MTeffS\displaystyle=M-T_{eff}S (27)
=(k+m2c2)rcx(1+x)2(1+x+x2)+q2(1+x)(1+x2)8rcx(1+x+x2)+rc2m2c1x24(1+x+x2)rcB(x,q)(1x3)4x(1+x4)[1+x2+f(x)].\displaystyle=\frac{\left(k+m^{2}c_{2}\right)r_{c}x(1+x)}{2\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}+\frac{q^{2}(1+x)\left(1+x^{2}\right)}{8r_{c}x\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}+\frac{r_{c}^{2}m^{2}c_{1}x^{2}}{4\left(1+x+x^{2}\right)}-\frac{r_{c}B(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)}{4x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}\left[1+x^{2}+f(x)\right].

the GTeffG-T_{eff} curve is following

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: GTeffG-T_{eff} diagrams when the parameters change respectively and the initial parameters m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1.

From Figures CPeffxC_{P_{eff}}-x, αx\alpha-x, κTeff\kappa_{T_{eff}} and GTeffG-T_{eff}, DSBHMG satisfies Ehrenfest’s second-order phase transition conditions for phase transition classification at x=xcx=x_{c}, so secondary phase transition occurs in DSBHMG space-time at x=xcx=x_{c}.

From the expressions (11) and (13) of the total entropy and volume of space-time, it is known that in the range 0<x<10<x<1 the entropy and volume of DSBHMG are continuous. According to the curve GTeffG-T_{eff}, DSBHMG does not have a first-order phase transition, which is different from the first-order phase transition of AdS black holes.

IV The entropic force of interaction between two horizons

For a general thermodynamic system, when two systems are independent of each other, the corresponding entropy of system A and system B are SAS_{A} and SBS_{B}. When two systems have interactions, the entropy of the total system is

Stotal=SA+SB+SABS_{total}=S_{A}+S_{B}+S_{AB} (28)

In the formula, the SABS_{AB} is an extra entropy caused by the interaction of two systems. From formula (13), we know that the total entropy of the effective thermodynamic system in DSBHMG is divided into two parts, one is the entropy corresponding to the two horizons, and the other term is the increase of the system entropy after considering the interaction of the two horizons as a thermodynamic system, so the entropy is

Sf=SAB=πrc2f(x)=πrc2[85(1x3)2/32(45x3x5)5(1x3)]S_{f}=S_{AB}=\pi r_{c}^{2}f(x)=\pi r_{c}^{2}\left[\frac{8}{5}\left(1-x^{3}\right)^{2/3}-\frac{2\left(4-5x^{3}-x^{5}\right)}{5\left(1-x^{3}\right)}\right] (29)

Entropic force in thermodynamic system is (Erik P. Verlinde et al., 2011; Plastino et al., 2018, 2018; Li-Chun Zhang et al., 2019; Panos et al., 2019; Dmitri E. Kharzeev et al., 2014)

F=TSrF=-T\frac{\partial S}{\partial r} (30)

which TT is the temperature of the system, rr is the location of the boundary surface.

The entropic force in DSBHMG is

F=Teff(Sfr)TeffF=T_{eff}\left(\frac{\partial S_{f}}{\partial r}\right)_{T_{eff}} (31)

Where TeffT_{eff} is the equivalent temperature of the system, r=rcr+=rc(1x)r=r_{c}-r_{+}=r_{c}(1-x), from Eq.(29), we can obtain Eq.(32),

F(x)\displaystyle F(x) =Teff(Sfrc)x(Teffx)rc(Sfx)rc(Teffrc)(1x)(Teffx)rc+rc(Teffrc)x\displaystyle=T_{eff}\frac{\left(\frac{\partial S_{f}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}-\left(\frac{\partial S_{f}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)}{(1-x)\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial x}\right)_{r_{c}}+r_{c}\left(\frac{\partial T_{eff}}{\partial r_{c}}\right)_{x}} (32)
=B(x,q)(1x3)4x(1+x4)[2B(x,q)(1x3)f(x)2B(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)f(x)+B¯(x,q)(1x3)f(x)][B(x,q)(1x3)(1x)B(x,q)(1+2x3+5x42x7)x(1+x4)(1x)B¯(x,q)(1x3)].\displaystyle=\frac{B(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)}{4x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}\frac{\left[2B^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)f(x)-\frac{2B(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}f(x)+\bar{B}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)f^{\prime}(x)\right]}{\left[B^{\prime}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)(1-x)-\frac{B(x,q)\left(1+2x^{3}+5x^{4}-2x^{7}\right)}{x\left(1+x^{4}\right)}(1-x)-\bar{B}(x,q)\left(1-x^{3}\right)\right]}.

The F(x)xF(x)-x curve is shown in FIG.8.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: FxF-x diagrams when the parameters change respectively and the initial parameters m=2.12m=2.12, c1=2c_{1}=2,c2=3.18c_{2}=3.18,q=1.7q=1.7, rc=1r_{c}=1,k=1k=1.

For different parameters, the intersection position of the F(x)xF(x)-x curve and the axis is x0x_{0}. The entropic force between the two horizons is positive(F>0F>0) when 1>x>x01>x>x_{0}, which means that the two horizons are mutually exclusive; and the entropic force between the two horizons is negative (F<0F<0) when x0>x>0x_{0}>x>0, indicating that the two horizons are mutually attractive. Therefore, the position ratio of the two horizons xx is different, and the entropic force between them is different. The two horizons are accelerated to separate under the action of entropic force, and the cosmological horizon expands faster than the black hole horizon when 1>x>x01>x>x_{0}, and they are decelerating to be separated by the entropic force, and the cosmological horizon undergoes a decelerating expansion relative to the black hole horizon when x0>x>0x_{0}>x>0. So we get that the different values S1s2S_{1}-s_{2} between the area S1S_{1} of the curve and the axis in interval 1>x>x01>x>x_{0} and the area S2S_{2} of the curve and the axis in interval x0>x>0x_{0}>x>0 determines whether the cosmological horizon accelerates or oscillates with respect to the black hole horizon. The cosmological horizon changes from accelerating expansion to decelerating expansion when S1S2>0S_{1}-S_{2}>0. When it is equal to or less than zero, the cosmological horizon is changing from accelerating expansion to decelerating expansion, and then changing from accelerating contraction to decelerating contraction. One cycle ends and the next cycle begins. The cosmological horizon is oscillating relative to the horizon of the black hole.

Interactions between neutral molecules or atoms with a center of mass separation rr are often approximated by the so-called Lennard-Jones potential energy ϕL,J\phi_{L,J} which is given by (David C. Johnston et al., 2; Plastino et al., 2018, 2018; Yan-Gang Miao et al., 2018)

ϕL,J=4ϕmin[(r0r)12(r0r)6],\phi_{L,J}=4\phi_{\min}\left[\left(\frac{r_{0}}{r}\right)^{12}-\left(\frac{r_{0}}{r}\right)^{6}\right], (33)

where the first term is a short-range repulsive interaction and the second term is a longer-range attractive interaction. A plot of ϕL,Jϕmin\frac{\phi_{L,J}}{\phi_{min}} versus rr0\frac{r}{r_{0}} is shown in FIG.3. The value r=r0r=r_{0} corresponds to ϕL,J=0\phi_{L,J}=0, and the minimum value of ϕL,J\phi_{L,J} is ϕL,Jϕmin=1\frac{\phi_{L,J}}{\phi_{min}}=-1 at

rminr0=2161.122\frac{r_{min}}{r_{0}}=2^{\frac{1}{6}}\approx 1.122 (34)

By the definition of potential energy, the force between a molecule and a neighbor in the radial direction from the first molecule is Fr=dϕL,JdrF_{r}=\frac{-d\phi_{L,J}}{dr} , which is positive (repulsive) for r<rminr<r_{min} and negative (attractive) for r>rminr>r_{min}. When the center of the first particle coincides with the coordinate center, let the radius of the particle be r02\frac{r_{0}}{2}. When the center of the second particle is at rr, and the boundary of the second particle is at r2r_{2}, then r=r2+r02r=r_{2}+\frac{r_{0}}{2}. Let’s take y=r02r2y=\frac{r_{0}}{2r_{2}}, 0<y10<y\leq 1. Eq.(33) can be expressed as

ϕL,J(y)=4ϕmin[(r0r)12(r0r)6]=4ϕmin26[26(y1+y)12(y1+y)6].\phi_{L,J}(y)=4\phi_{\min}\left[\left(\frac{r_{0}}{r}\right)^{12}-\left(\frac{r_{0}}{r}\right)^{6}\right]=4\phi_{min}2^{6}\left[2^{6}\left(\frac{y}{1+y}\right)^{12}-\left(\frac{y}{1+y}\right)^{6}\right]. (35)

The interaction between the two particles is

F(y)=dϕL,Jdr=4ϕmin6r[2(r0r)12(r0r)6]=3ϕmin210r0[27(y1+y)13(y1+y)7].F(y)=-\frac{d\phi_{L,J}}{dr}=4\phi_{\min}\frac{6}{r}\left[2\left(\frac{r_{0}}{r}\right)^{12}-\left(\frac{r_{0}}{r}\right)^{6}\right]=\frac{3\phi_{min}2^{10}}{r_{0}}\left[2^{7}\left(\frac{y}{1+y}\right)^{13}-\left(\frac{y}{1+y}\right)^{7}\right]. (36)
Refer to caption
Figure 9: ϕL,J(y)y\phi_{L,J}(y)-y diagram when yy from 0 to 11.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: F(y)yF(y)-y diagram when yy from 0 to 11.

From FIG.8 and FIG.10, we can see the relation curve of entropic force between two horizons in DSBHMG with the ratio of the position of the two horizons is very similar to that of the Lenard-Jones interaction force with the position ratio of the two particle boundaries, which has the same change rule.

In order to show the similarity of the two curves more clearly, we show the two curves in the same coordinate as is shown in FIG.11.

Refer to caption
Figure 11: F(x)xF(x)-x and F(y)yF(y)-y diagrams when abscissa xx and yy from 0 to 11.

From FIG.11, we know that the trend of change in curve F(x)xF(x)-x and F(y)yF(y)-y is exactly the same, only the intersection position of the two curves and the abscissa is slightly different. It shows that the entropic force between the horizon of black hole and the cosmological horizon is very similar to the Lenard Jones interaction force between two particles in RN dssq space-time, which provides a new way to explore the interaction force between particles in black hole.

V Conclusion and discussion

When the black hole horizon and the cosmological horizon are viewed separately as independent thermodynamic systems without considering the correlation between them, the space-time does not meet the requirements of thermodynamic equilibrium stability because the radiation temperature of the two horizons are different. Thus the space-time is unstable. When the correlation of two horizons is considered, the effective temperature TeffT_{eff}, effective pressure PeffP_{eff} and effective potential ϕeff\phi_{eff} reflecting the thermal properties of DSBHMG are given by Eq.(15). From curve CpeffxC_{p_{eff}}-x, αx\alpha-x and κTeffx\kappa_{T_{eff}}-x, when the ratio of the positions of the two horizons in DSBHMG is x=xcx=x_{c}, phase transition occurs in the system. According to Ehrenfest’s classification of phase transition, the phase transition of the system at this point is of second-order, which is similar to that of AdS black hole. In the study of the thermodynamic properties of spherically symmetric AdS black holes, people study the critical phenomena of AdS black holes by comparing the thermodynamic quantities of AdS black holes with the thermodynamic quantities of Van der Waals equation and obtain the critical exponents and the heat capacity of AdS black holes, which provides a basis for further study of the thermal effect of black holes and experimental observation. However, it is difficult to accept the fact that the heat capacity at constant volume of AdS black holes is zero. It is shown that the effective thermodynamic quantity of DSBHMG also has the phase transition characteristics similar to that of van der Waals system. From formula (19), the heat capacity of DSBHMG at constant volume is not zero, which is consistent with the result that this heat capacity of van der Waals system is not zero. From the curve of CPeffxC_{P_{eff}}-x, we know that the stability of DSBHMG depends on the value of xx . When x<xcx<x_{c}, space-time meets the requirements of thermodynamic stability. When 1>x>xc1>x>x_{c}, space-time does not meet the requirements of thermodynamic equilibrium stability, and space-time is unstable. Therefore, there is no DSBHMG steady-state space-time satisfying the position ratio 1>x>xc1>x>x_{c} of two horizons in the universe, which provides a theoretical basis to find black holes. The influence of parameters in DSBHMG on space-time stability is shown in CPeffxC_{P_{eff}}-x curve seeing FIG.4.

In the framework of general relativity, the entropic force of interaction between the horizon of black hole and the cosmological horizon given by theory is very similar to the Lennard-Jones force between two particles confirmed by experiments. Since the space-time metric is derived from relativity, the thermodynamics of space-time is based on general relativity, and the thermal effect of black hole is obtained from quantum mechanics. The physical quantities obtained meet the first law of thermodynamics. Therefore, the conclusion we have given reveals the internal relationship among general relativity, quantum mechanics and thermodynamics, and provide a new way for us to study the interaction between particles in black holes and the micro state of particles in black holes, and the relationship between Lennard-Jones potential and micro state of particles in ordinary thermodynamic systems.

Through the analysis of the fourth part, it is known that under the action of entropic force, when the ratio of the positions of the two horizons satisfies x0<x<1x_{0}<x<1, the entropic force between the two horizons is mutually exclusive, and the two horizons in this region are accelerating expansion under the action of entropic force; when 0<x<x00<x<x_{0}, the entropic force between the two horizons is mutually attractive, and the two horizons are decelerating expansion; until x0x\rightarrow{0}, the entropic force between the two horizons is zero, and the two horizons tend to be relatively static. Therefore, in the 0<x<10<x<1 range, the cosmological horizon accelerates to expand relative to the horizon of the black hole under the action of the entropic force. Our universe is a quasi de Sitter space-time, so our discussion provides a new way to explore the internal cause of the expansion of the universe.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Z. H. Zhu for useful discussions.

This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions of Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 2020L0471, No. 2020L0472, No. 2019L0743) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12075143, 11847123, 11475108, 11705106, 11705107, 11605107).

References

  • David Kubiznak et al. (2012) D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes, JHEP 07 (2012) 033.
  • Robie A. Hennigar et al. (2017) R. A. Hennigar, E. Tjoa and R. B. Mann, Thermodynamics of hairy black holes in Lovelock gravity, JHEP 02 (2017) 70.
  • Aruna Rajagopal et al. (2014) A. Rajagopal, D. Kubiznak and R. B. Mann, Van der Waals black hole, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 277.
  • Hendi et al. (2017) S. H. Hendi, R. B. Mann, S. Panahiyan and B. Eslam Panah, van der Waals like behaviour of topological AdS black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 021501(R).
  • Hendi et al. (2017) S. H. Hendi, G. Q. Li, J. X. Mo, S. Panahiyan and B. Eslam Panah, New perspective for black hole thermodynamics in Gauss-Bonnet-Born-Infeld massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 571.
  • Hendi et al. (2015) S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, Einstein-Born-Infeld-massive gravity: AdS black hole solutions and their thermodynamical properties, JHEP 11 (2015) 157.
  • Panahiyan et al. (2019) S. Panahiyan, S. H. hendi and N. Riazi, AdS4AdS_{4} dyonic black holes in gravity’s rainbow, Nucl. Phys. B 938 (2019) 388.
  • Rong-Gen Cai et al. (2013) R. G. Cai, L. M. Cao, L. Li and R. Q. Yang, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space, JHEP 09(2013) 005.
  • Rong-Gen Cai et al. (2016) R. G. Cai, S. M. Ruan, S. J. Wang, R. Q. Yang and R. H. Peng, Complexity Growth for AdS Black Holes, JHEP 09 (2016) 161.
  • Jia-Lin Zhang et al. (2015) J. L. Zhang, R. G. Cai and H. W. Yu, Phase transition and Thermodynamical geometry of Reissner-Nordström-AdS Black Holes in Extended Phase Space, Phys.Rev. D 91 (2015) 044028.
  • Jia-Lin Zhang et al. (2015) J. L. Zhang, R. G. Cai and H. W. Yu, Phase transition and thermodynamical geometry for Schwarzschild AdS black hole in AdS5×S5AdS_{5}\times S^{5} spacetime, JHEP 02 (2015) 143.
  • Hendi et al. (2016) S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, Massive charged BTZ black holes in asymptotically (a)dS spacetimes, JHEP 05 (2016) 029.
  • Wei Xu et al. (2014) W. Xu, H. Xu and L. Zhao, Gauss-Bonnet coupling constant as a free thermodynamical variable and the associated criticality, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2970.
  • Wen et al. (2014) S. W. Wen and Y. X. Liu, Triple points and phase diagrams in the extended phase space of charged Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 044057.
  • Wilson G. Brenna et al. (2015) W. G. Brenna, R. B. Mann and M. Park, Mass and Thermodynamic Volume in Lifshitz Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 044015.
  • Rabin Banerjee et al. (2017) R. Banerjee, B. R. Majhi and S. Samanta, Thermogeometric phase transition in a unified framework, Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 25.
  • Rabin Banerjee et al. (2011) R. Banerjee and D. Roychowdhury, Thermodynamics of phase transition in higher dimensional AdS black holes, JHEP 11 (2011) 004.
  • Rabin Banerjee et al. (2012) R. Banerjee and D. Roychowdhury, Critical behavior of Born Infeld AdS black holes in higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104043.
  • Meng-Sen Ma et al. (2017) M. S. Ma, R. Zhao and Y. S. Liu, Phase transition and thermodynamic stability of topological black holes in Horˇ\check{r}ava-Lifshitz gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 165009.
  • Meng-Sen Ma et al. (2017) M. S. Ma and R. H. Wang, Peculiar P-V criticality of topological Horˇ\check{r}ava-Lifshitz black holes, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 024052.
  • Hendi et al. (2017) S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah, S. Panahiyan and M. S. Talezadeh, Geometrical thermodynamics and P-V criticality of the black holes with power-law Maxwell field, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 133.
  • Dayyani et al. (2017) Z. Dayyani, A. Sheykhi and M. H. Dehghani, Counterterm method in Einstein dilaton gravity and the critical behavior of dilaton black hole with a power-Maxwell field, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 84004.
  • De-Cheng Zou et al. (2017) D. C. Zou, Y. Q. Liu and R. H. Yue, Behavior of quasinormal modes and Van der Waals-like phase transition of charged AdS black holes in massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 365.
  • Peng Cheng et al. (2016) P. Cheng, S. W. Wei and Y. X. Liu, Critical phenomena in the extended phase space of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024025.
  • Mozhgan Mir et al. (2017) M. Mir and R. B. Mann, Charged Rotating AdS Black Holes with Chern-Simons coupling, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 024005.
  • Zixu Zhao et al. (2014) Z. X. Zhao and J. L. Jing, Ehrenfest scheme for complex thermodynamic systems in full phase space, JHEP 11 (2014) 037.
  • Ren Zhao et al. (2013) R. Zhao, H. H. Zhao, M. S. Ma and L. C. Zhang, On the critical phenomena and thermodynamics of charged topological dilaton AdS black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2645.
  • Zeinab et al. (2018) Zeinab, Dayyani and A. Sheykhi, Critical behavior of Lifshitz dilaton black holes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 104026.
  • Run Zhou et al. (2019) R. Zhou and S. W. Wei, Novel equal area law and analytical charge-electric potential criticality for charged Anti-de Sitterblack holes, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 406.
  • Toledo et al. (2019) J. M. Toledo and V. b. Bezerra, Some remarks on the thermodynamic of charged AdS black holes with cloud of strings and quintessence, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 110.
  • Saoussen Mbarek et al. (2019) S. Mbarek and R. B. Mann, Reverse Hawking-Page Phase Transition in de Sitter Black Holes, JHEP 02 (2019) 103.
  • Fil Simovic et al. (2019) F. Simovic and R. B. Mann, Critical Phenomena of Charged de Sitter Black Holes in Cavities, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 014002.
  • Brian P. Dolan et al. (2013) B. P. Dolan, D. Kastor, D. Kubiznak, R. B. Mann and J. Traschen, Thermodynamic Volumes and Isoperimetric Inequalities for de Sitter Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 104017.
  • Hendi et al. (2017) S. H. Hendi, A. Dehghani and Mir Faizal, Black hole thermodynamics in Lovelock gravity’s rainbow with (A)dS asymptote, Nucl. Phys. B 914 (2017) 117.
  • Sekiwa et al. (2006) Y. Sekiwa, Thermodynamics of de Sitter black holes: Thermal cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 084009.
  • David Kubiznak et al. (2016) D. Kubiznak, Thermodynamics of horizons: de Sitter black holes and reentrant phase transitions, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 24.
  • James McInerney et al. (2016) J. McInerney, G. Satishchandran and J. Traschen, Cosmography of KNdS Black Holes and Isentropic Phase Transitions, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 10.
  • Miho Urano et al. (2009) M. Urano and A. Tomimatsu, Mechanical First Law of Black Hole Spacetimes with Cosmological Constant and Its Application to Schwarzschild-de Sitter Spacetime, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 105010.
  • Sourav Bhattacharya et al. (2013) S. Bhattacharya and A. Lahiri, Mass function and particle creation in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2673.
  • Cai et al. (2002) R. G. Cai, Cardy-Verlinde formula and asymptotically de Sitter spaces, Phys. Lett. B 525 (2002) 331 .
  • Cai et al. (2002) R. G. Cai, Cardy-Verlinde formula and thermodynamics of black holes in de Sitter spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 628 (2002) 375.
  • Yu-Bo Ma et al. (2018) Y. B. Ma, S. X. Zhang, Y. Wu, L. Ma and S. Cao, Thermodynamics of de Sitter Black Hole in Massive Gravity, Commun. Theor. Phys. 69 (2018) 544-550.
  • Azreg-Aiou et al. (2015) M. Azreg-Aiou, Charged de Sitter-like black holes: quintessence-dependent enthalpy and new extreme solutions, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 34.
  • Zhang et al. (2016) L. C. Zhang and R. Zhao, The critical phenomena of Schwarzschild-de Sitter Black hole, EPL 113 (2016) 10008.
  • Li-Chun Zhang et al. (2014) X. Y. Guo, H. F. Li, L. C. Zhang and R. Zhao, Continuous phase transition and microstructure of charged AdS black hole with quintessence, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 168.
  • Hui-Hua Zhao et al. (2014) H. H. Zhao, L. C. Zhang, M. S. Ma and R. Zhao, P-V criticality of higher dimensional charged topological dilaton de Sitter black holes, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 064018.
  • Huaifan Li et al. (2017) Y. B. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. C. Zhang, L. Wu, Y. M. Huang and Y. Pan, Thermodynamic properties of higher-dimensional dS black holes in dRGT massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 213.
  • Li-Chun Zhang et al. (2016) L. C. Zhang, R. Zhao and M. S. Ma, Entropy of Reissner-Nordström de Sitter black hole, Phys. Lett. B 761 (2016) 74.
  • Yu-Bo Ma et al. (2018) Y. B. Ma, L. C. Zhang, T. Peng, Y. Pan and S. Cao, Entropy of the electrically charged hairy black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 763 .
  • Hinterbichler et al. (2012) K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical aspects of massive gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671.
  • Fierz et al. (1939) M. Fierz, On the relativistic theory of force-free particles with any spin, Helv. Phys. Acta 12 (1939) 3.
  • Fierz et al. (1939) M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field, Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A 173 (1939) 211.
  • van Dam et al. (1970) H. van Dam and M. J. G. Veltman, Massive and massless Yang-Mills and gravitational fields, Nucl. Phys. B 22 (1970) 397.
  • Zakharov et al. (1970) V. I. Zakharov, Linearized gravitation theory and the graviton mass, JETP Lett. 12 (1970) 312.
  • Boulware et al. (1972) D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, Can gravitation have a finite range, Phys. Rev. D 6 (1972) 3368.
  • Boulware et al. (1972) D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, Inconsistency of finite range gravitation, Phys. Lett. B 40 (1972) 227.
  • de Rham et al. (2010) C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, Generalization of the Fierz-Pauli action, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 044020.
  • de Rham et al. (2011) C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze and A. J. Tolley, Resummation of Massive Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 231101.
  • B. Eslam Panah et al. (2019) B. Eslam Panah and S. H. Hendi, Black hole solutions correspondence between conformal and massive theories of gravity, EPL 125 (2019) 60006.
  • B. Eslam Panah et al. (2020) B. Eslam Panah, S. H. Hendi and Y. C. Ong, Black Hole Remnant in Massive Gravity, Phys. Dark Universe 27 (2020) 100452.
  • S. H. Hendi et al. (2018) S. H. Hendi, G. H. Bordbar, B. Eslam Panah and S. Panahiyan, Neutron stars structure in the context of massive gravity, JCAP 07 (2017) 004.
  • B. Eslam Panah et al. (2019) B. Eslam Panah and H. L. Liu, White dwarfs in de Rham-Gabadadze-Tolley like massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 104074.
  • Hendi et al. (2017) S. H. Hendi, S. Panahiyan, S. Upadhyay and B. Eslam Panah, Charged BTZ black holes in the context of massive gravity’s rainbow, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 084036.
  • Majhi et al. (2017) B. R. Majhi and S. Samanta, P-V criticality of AdS black holes in a general framework, Phys. Lett. B 773 (2017) 203.
  • Cai et al. (2015) R. G. Cai, Y. P. Hu, Q. Y. Pan and Y. L. Zhang, Thermodynamics of Black Holes in Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 024032 .
  • Jianfei Xu et al. (2015) J. F. Xu, L. M. Cao and Y. P. Hu, P-V criticality in the extended phase space of black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 124033.
  • Upadhyay et al. (1) S. Upadhyay, B. Pourhassan and H. Farahani, P-V criticality of first-order entropy corrected AdS black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 106014.
  • David C. Johnston et al. (2) D. C. Johnston, Thermodynamic Properties of the van der Waals Fluid, Online ISBN: 978-1-627-05532-1, arXiv:1402.1205.
  • Hassan et al. (2011) S. F. Hassan, R. A. Rosen, On Non-Linear Actions for Massive Gravity, JHEP 07 (2011) 009.
  • Allan Adams et al. (2015) A. Adams, D. A. Roberts and O. Saremi, Hawking-Page transition in holographic massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 046003.
  • De-Cheng Zou et al. (2017) D. C. Zou, R. H. Yue and M. Zhang, Reentrant pha AdS black holes in dRGT massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 256.
  • Petarpa Boonserm et al. (2018) P. Boonserm and T. Ngampitipan, Greybody factor for black holes in dRGT massive gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 492.
  • Erik P. Verlinde et al. (2011) E. P. Verlinde, On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton, JHEP 04 (2011) 029.
  • Panos et al. (2019) C. P. Panos and Ch. C. Moustakidis, A simple link of information entropy of quantum and classical systems with Newtonian r-2 dependence of Verlinde’s entropic force, Physica A 518 (2019) 384.
  • Dmitri E. Kharzeev et al. (2014) D. E. Kharzeev, Deconfinement as an entropic self-destruction: A solution for the quarkonium suppression puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 074007.
  • Li-Chun Zhang et al. (2019) L. C. Zhang and R. Zhao, The entropic force in Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134798.
  • Plastino et al. (2018) A. Plastino, M. C. Rocca and G. L. Ferri, Quantum treatment of Verlinde entropic force conjecture, Physica A 511 (2018) 139.
  • Plastino et al. (2018) A. Plastino and M. C. Rocca, On the entropic derivation of the r-2 Newtonian gravity force, Physica A 505 (2018) 190.
  • Yan-Gang Miao et al. (2018) Y. G. Miao and Z. M. Xu, On thermal molecular potential among micromolecules in charged AdS black holes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 044001.