This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Phonon renormalization effects accompanying the 6 K anomaly in the Quantum Spin Liquid Candidate κ\kappa-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3

Masato Matsuura Neutron Science and Technology Center, Comprehensive Research Organization for Science and Society (CROSS), Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1106, Japan m˙matsuura@cross.or.jp    Takahiko Sasaki Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan    Makoto Naka School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Denki University, Saitama 350-0394, Japan    Jens Müller Institute of Physics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt (M), Germany    Oliver Stockert Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Physik fester Stoffe, D-01187 Dresden, Germany    Andrea Piovano Institut Laue-Langevin, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France    Naoki Yoneyama Graduate Faculty of Interdisciplinary Research, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, 400-8511, Japan    Michael Lang Institute of Physics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt (M), Germany
Abstract

The low-temperature state of the quantum spin liquid candidate κ\kappa-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 emerges via an anomaly at T6T^{*}\sim 6 K. Although signatures of this anomaly have been revealed in various quantities, its origin has remained unclear. Here we report inelastic neutron scattering measurements on single crystals of κ\kappa-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, aiming at studying phonon renormalization effects at TT^{*}. A drastic change was observed in the phonon damping across TT^{*} for a breathing mode of BEDT-TTF dimers at E=4.7E=4.7 meV. The abrupt change in the phonon damping is attributed to a phase transition into a valence bond solid state based on an effective model describing the spin-charge coupling in this dimer-Mott system.

Quantum spin liquids (QSLs) have been at the center of scientific attention in the field of magnetism as a novel quantum state. The organic charge-transfer salt κ\kappa-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 (κ\kappa-CN), where BEDT-TTF is bis-(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene C6S8[(CH2)2]2 (ET), has attracted attention in this area as a promising QSL candidate: the system is a weak dimer-Mott (DM) insulator forming a nearly isotropic two-dimensional triangular spin lattice which lacks long-range magnetic order down to low temperatures despite its large exchange coupling of J250J\sim 250 K [1]. Despite the absence of a magnetic phase transition, anomalous behavior at low temperatures around T6T^{*}\sim 6 K has been observed in various quantities probing either spin- [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], charge- [7], lattice- [8, 9, 10], or composite properties thereof [11, 12], see also Ref. [13].

Recently, the discussion has taken a new twist by results of an electron spin resonance (ESR) study, reporting the formation of a spin-singlet state below about 6 K, consistent with a valence bond solid (VBS) ground state [4], but contradicting with the QSL scenarios discussed so far. Arguments in favor of a glassy VBS state have been proposed by Riedl et al. [14] based on their analysis of magnetic data [6]. In addition to the signatures in the magnetic response, which are of moderate strength and prone to extrinsic factors [4], clear evidence for the strong involvement of the lattice in the 6 K anomaly was revealed by measurements of thermal expansion [9], 63Cu-NQR, [8], and ultrasound velocity [10]. Since both the proposed QSL and VBS scenarios emerge through the 6 K anomaly, a clarification of its origin is key for understanding the ground state in this material.

Besides the spin- and lattice degrees of freedom, indications for the presence of charge degrees of freedom within the dimers in κ\kappa-CN and various other related DM molecular conductors were pointed out. In κ\kappa-CN, a relaxor-type anomaly was observed in the dielectric constant below about 40 K, suggesting a charge disproportionation within the dimers and a freezing of these fluctuations on cooling towards 6 K [7, 15, 16]. As for the origin of these observations, conflicting results were reported based on measurements of charge-sensitive molecular vibrational modes. Whereas infrared optical spectroscopy failed to detect any clear line splitting, suggesting the absence of charge disproportionation [17], Raman scattering reveals a noticeable line broadening [18]. A similar relaxor-type dielectric behavior was observed for the DM insulator β\beta’-(ET)2ICl2 [19], in which an intra-dimer charge disproportionation was reported. In addition, clear evidence for a first-order ferroelectric transition, accompanied by intra-dimer charge order [20], was revealed for κ\kappa-(ET)2Hg(SCN)2Cl [21]. Moreover, for the closely related DM system κ\kappa-(ET)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl (κ\kappa-Cl), indications for long-range ferroelectric order coinciding with antiferromagnetic ordering below TN=27T_{N}=27 K were observed [22, 23]. In a recent inelastic neutron scattering (INS) study on this κ\kappa-Cl system it was found that the dynamics of a low-lying breathing/shearing mode of the ET dimers reacts sensitively to the charge- and spin degrees of freedom once the π\pi-electrons become localized on the dimer site [24]. Motivated by these findings, we report here an INS study of low-energy intra-dimer vibrational modes on κ\kappa-CN for probing lattice effects and their coupling to charge- and spin fluctuations associated with the 6 K anomaly.

Deuterated single crystals of κ\kappa-CN were grown by utilizing an electrochemical method [25]. The as-grown single crystals are thin plates (thickness of 0.1\sim 0.1 mm) with a flat and large crystal surface (a few mm2) parallel to the bcbc plane [see Figs. S1(a), (b) in the supplemental material (SM)]. Overall, forty-seven crystals (total mass of 26\sim 26 mg) were co-aligned within 10 degree (Fig. S2 in SM) according to their shape, i.e., the crystal edges including characteristic angles [Fig. S1 (b) in SM]. The bb- and cc-axes were also confirmed using polarized micro infrared reflectance spectroscopy measurements for all the single crystals. In neutron scattering, the phonon scattering intensity is proportional to (𝑸𝝃\mbox{\boldmath$Q$}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath$\xi$})2 where 𝑸Q is the momentum transfer between the initial and final states of the neutron, and 𝝃\xi is the polarization vector of the phonon mode. In order to detect the breathing mode of the ET dimers (𝝃\mbox{\boldmath$\xi$}\parallel [011] or [011¯\bar{1}]), we measured phonon signals at 𝑸Q = (060) [Figs. 1 (f) and (g)]. INS experiments were performed using the triple-axis spectrometer IN8 at the Institut Laue Langevin [26]. The momentum transfers in this report are represented in units of reciprocal lattice vectors b=0.733b^{*}=0.733 Å-1 in the monoclinic notation. The initial and final neutron energies were selected using a doubly focused Cu (200) monochromator and analyzer, which resulted in an energy resolution of 0.62 meV at 𝑸=(060)\mbox{\boldmath$Q$}=(060) and E=0E=0. A pyrolytic graphite filter was placed in front of the analyzer to suppress higher-order neutrons.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (color online) (a)-(e) Temperature dependence of constant-Q scans at (060). The red curves are the sum of the fits to damped harmonic oscillator functions at E2.0E\sim~{}2.0, 2.9, 3.7, 4.7, 5.7, and 7.2 meV convolved with the experimental resolution. The dashed curves show the peak profiles for each mode. The breathing mode of the ET dimer at 4.7 meV is marked in red. The horizontal bars represent the instrumental energy resolution at E=4.7E=4.7 meV. (f) Top view of the ET layer. (g) Wave vector QQ=(060) used for phonon measurements in the (0kl0kl) scattering plane. Red arrows in (f) and (g) show the polarization vector ξ\xi of the breathing mode of the ET dimers, which can be detected at (060).

Figure 1 shows the temperature dependence of the phonon spectra measured at Q=Q=(060) and T=1.5T=1.5 - 10 K. At T=1.5T=1.5 K, phonon peaks were observed at E=2.0E=2.0, 2.9, 3.7, 4.7, 5.7, and 7.2 meV, consistent with results of optical conductivity measurements on κ\kappa-CN [27]. According to density-functional-theory calculations [27], the peak at 4.7 meV can be assigned to an intra-dimer breathing mode. As the temperature rises, the intensity of this mode reduces, and all peaks become broad above 6 K. Since the linewidth of the peak is inversely proportional to the phonon lifetime, the broadening of these peaks indicates that the phonon lifetime becomes substantially reduced above 6 K.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (color online) Temperature dependence of (a) the phonon energy EE and (b) the damping factor Γ\Gamma of the breathing mode of ET dimers at E4.7E\sim 4.7 meV. (c) Thermal variation of the energy integrated intensity of the phonon modes (IphononI_{\mathrm{phonon}}). (d) Temperature dependence of the uniform magnetic susceptibility χ\chi measured on a single crystal in a magnetic field of 5 T perpendicular to the bcbc-plane and for κ\kappa-Cl taken from Ref.[24]. Inset in (d) shows the temperature derivative of χ\chi around the 6 K anomaly.

The broadened phonon peaks were fitted using the damped harmonic-oscillator (DHO) function [28]:

DHOi(𝑸,ω)=Γiω[2(ω2ωi2)]2+(Γiω)2,\mathrm{DHO}_{i}(\mbox{\boldmath$Q$},\omega)=\frac{\Gamma_{i}\hbar\omega}{[\hbar^{2}(\omega^{2}-\omega^{2}_{i})]^{2}+(\Gamma_{i}\hbar\omega)^{2}}, (1)

where Γi\Gamma_{i} and ωi\hbar\omega_{i} denote the damping factor and phonon energy of the ii-th mode, respectively. The phonon spectra were fitted to a constant background BG and the sum of the DHO functions convolved with the resolution function R(𝑸,ω)R(\mbox{\boldmath$Q$},\omega) using the RESTRAX simulation package [29]: iDHOi(𝑸,ω)R(𝑸,ω)+BG\sum_{i}\mathrm{DHO}_{i}(\mbox{\boldmath$Q$},\omega)\otimes R(\mbox{\boldmath$Q$},\omega)+BG, where \otimes denotes the convolution operator.

Figures 2 (a)-(c) show the temperature dependence of the DHO fitting parameters for the intra-dimer breathing mode. The peak energy remains constant within the error bars except for a slight hardening below T6T^{*}\sim 6 K [Fig. 2(a)]. Note that a similar small change (ΔE0.2\Delta E\sim 0.2 meV) in the phonon energy was observed also for the organic superconductor κ\kappa-(ET)2Cu(NCS)2 [30] upon cooling through the superconducting transition temperature, indicating a significant electron-phonon interaction in these soft organic compounds. The most prominent phonon anomaly in κ\kappa-CN is the change in the peak width at TT^{*} as observed in the phonon spectra (Fig. 1) and the corresponding reduction in the damping factor Γ\Gamma [Fig. 2(b)]. Whereas the large damping factor above TT^{*} reflects an anharmonic lattice due to scattering processes, the small Γ\Gamma below TT^{*} suggests a freezing of these processes as the width becomes comparable to the instrumental resolution. In addition to the narrowing of the phonon linewidth for TTT\leq T^{*}, the integrated intensity (IphononI_{\mathrm{phonon}}) of the breathing mode at E=4.7E=4.7 meV decreases significantly, whereas IphononI_{\mathrm{phonon}} is enhanced for the E=5.7E=5.7 meV mode [Fig. 2(c)]. The intensity of the mode at E=3.7E=3.7 meV also grows below TT^{*} (Fig. 1). These changes in the phonon intensities at TT^{*} indicate the transfer of spectral weight from the breathing modes to other vibration modes of the ET dimers.

For a deeper understanding of the scattering processes involved in the phonon renormalization effects revealed here for κ\kappa-CN, it is instructive to compare the results with those of the previously reported phonon study on the DM insulator κ\kappa-Cl. Despite some structural differences to κ\kappa-CN (Fig. S1 in SM), in κ\kappa-Cl, a similar increase in the damping of a phonon peak at E=2.6E=2.6 meV was observed below TinsT_{ins}\sim 50 - 60 K where the rapid increase in the resistivity reflects the opening of the charge gap [24]. These observations suggest a close coupling of low-energy intra-dimer breathing/shearing modes to the π\pi-electrons as a characteristic feature of these DM organic compounds.

In fact, following the phonon modes to higher temperatures points to a correlation between the onset of phonon damping and the localization of the π\pi-electrons on the dimer sites, cf. Figs. S4 and S5 in SM. Upon warming to T=100T=100 K, where κ\kappa-CN is still in its insulating, i.e., high-resistance DM state, the phonon modes remain broad. In contrast, for κ\kappa-Cl at this temperature, where the π\pi-electrons have regained a considerable degree of itineracy, as revealed in the resistivity, reflecting the closure of the charge gap, the spectrum exhibits well-defined phonon peaks (Figs. S4 and S5 in SM).

These observations on κ\kappa-CN and κ\kappa-Cl suggest that it is the π\pi-electrons and their localization on the dimer site which cause the observed phonon damping. According to the pseudospin-coupling model [31], we expect the characteristic energy of the electrons’ fluctuations in their charge- or spin components to be of the same size as the energies of the low-lying optical phonon modes, i.e., 242-4 meV. Once the fluctuations become frozen due to ordering in the charge- and/or spin channel, the phonon lifetime recovers. In fact, such a reduction in Γ\Gamma was observed for κ\kappa-Cl upon cooling below TN=27T_{\mathrm{N}}=27 K [24] where magnetic order coinciding with ferroelectric order was observed [22].

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (color online) Schematic phase diagrams of temperature (TT) vs. inter-dimer Coulomb interaction (VV) for (a) the QSL and (b) VBS states. The broken lines represent TNT_{\rm N} for the case of κ\kappa-Cl whereas they correspond to a crossover for κ\kappa-CN. Insets: spheres connected by thick orange lines represent ET dimers. White and red spheres correspond to charge-poor and charge-rich sites, respectively.

Similar to κ\kappa-Cl, the bulk of experimental findings on κ\kappa-CN indicate fluctuations and ordering phenomena in both the charge- [7] and spin [4] sectors. A minimal model that describes the coupling between the spin- and charge degrees of freedom within the dimers has been proposed based on the following Kügel-Khomskii-type Hamiltonian [32, 15, 16]:

\displaystyle\mathcal{H} =ijJij𝑺i𝑺jijVijQixQjx\displaystyle=\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}J_{ij}\mbox{\boldmath$S$}_{i}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath$S$}_{j}-\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}V_{ij}Q_{i}^{x}Q_{j}^{x} (2)
+2tdimiQizijKij𝑺i𝑺jQixQjx,\displaystyle+2t_{\mathrm{dim}}\sum_{i}Q_{i}^{z}-\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}K_{ij}\mbox{\boldmath$S$}_{i}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath$S$}_{j}Q_{i}^{x}Q_{j}^{x},

where ij\langle ij\rangle denotes the nearest-neighbor bonds; 𝑺i\mbox{\boldmath$S$}_{i} and QiQ_{i} are the spin and charge pseudo-spin operators at the ii-th dimer unit, respectively. The xx component in the pseudo-spin, Qx=±1/2Q^{x}=\pm 1/2, represents the polarized states of a hole on the dimer (cf. insets in Fig. 3), and the zz component, Qz=1/2(1/2)Q^{z}=1/2(-1/2), represents a bonding (antibonding) state, where a hole is equally distributed on the two molecules. JijJ_{ij}(>0>0) is the inter-dimer exchange interaction, VijV_{ij} is the inter-dimer Coulomb interaction, tdimt_{\mathrm{dim}} (>0>0) is the intra-dimer hopping integral, and KijK_{ij} (>0>0) is the coupling between spins and dimer dipoles. Owing to the spin-charge coupling KijK_{ij}, the interaction between the neighboring QxQ^{x} is modulated by the spin-spin correlation as Veff=Vij+K𝑺i𝑺jV_{\rm eff}=V_{ij}+K{\bm{S}}_{i}\cdot{\bm{S}}_{j}.

Figure 3 shows schematic phase diagrams in the VV-TT plane, deduced using the mean-field analysis of Eq. (2) [32] where the DM (Qx=0\langle Q^{x}\rangle=0) and charge order (CO) (Qx>0\langle Q^{x}\rangle>0) phases compete. In DM insulators, two patterns of CO are possible: bb-CO and cc-CO types, in which polarization occurs along the bb- and cc-axes, respectively. The direction of the electric polarization strongly depends on the sign of Vij=VpVqV_{ij}=V_{p}-V_{q} on the diagonal bonds, termed pp and qq in Fig. 3. In several κ\kappa-type ET compounds, Vp>VqV_{p}>V_{q} is obtained assuming a 1/r1/r-type dependence of VijV_{ij}, which prefers the cc-CO state [15, 16, 33]. However, since the magnitudes of VpV_{p} and VqV_{q} are almost identical, it is quite possible that other effects, e.g., due to electron-lattice coupling, make the VijV_{ij} effectively negative, resulting in the bb-CO state. When AFM correlations develop (𝑺i𝑺j<0{\bm{S}}_{i}\cdot{\bm{S}}_{j}<0), |Veff||V_{\rm eff}| becomes smaller for the cc-CO (Vij>0V_{ij}>0), whereas |Veff||V_{\rm eff}| is enhanced for the bb-CO (Vij<0V_{ij}<0). Thus, due to the effects of AFM correlations, the cc-CO is suppressed [Fig. 3(a)], while the bb-CO is enhanced [Fig. 3(b)], resulting in a VBS phase, i.e., a spin-singlet state. Therefore, depending on the type of CO, different VV-TT phase diagrams are obtained below TT^{*}.

In what follows, we discuss our experimental findings on phonon damping and its suppression below T6T^{*}\sim 6 K for the two scenarios shown in Fig. 3. In the QSL scenario (cc-CO) [Fig. 3(a)], these charge fluctuations become harder at low temperatures, resulting in a decoupling between the lattice- and charge degrees of freedom. For the VBS scenario (bb-CO) [Fig. 3(b)], spin singlets form via a spin-Peierls-like transition at TT^{*}. In this case, a spin gap is opening and a hardening of charge fluctuations is expected as well. Thus, a phonon anomaly at TT^{*} is expected through the decoupling of the lattice degrees of freedom from either the charge- or the charge- and spin degrees of freedom, corresponding to the QSL or VBS scenarios, respectively. Then, the key difference between these scenarios is whether the system undergoes a distinct phase transition at TT^{*} [Fig. 3(b)] or a crossover [Fig. 3(a)]. The present finding of an abrupt change in the phonon linewidths at TT^{*} is considered a strong indication for a phase transition, supporting the VBS scenario.

For temperatures above TT^{*}, the system is situated in the DM phase near the CO phase, cf. Fig. 3. Upon cooling κ\kappa-CN comes closer to the CO phase boundary, corresponding to a softening of the intra-dimer charge fluctuations [34] (see Fig. S6 in SM). This is consistent with the growth of charge fluctuations observed in the optical conductivity upon cooling towards TT^{*} [35]. The distinct cc-axis polarization of the fluctuations revealed in these experiments would be in support of the QSL scenario. On the other hand, arguments in favor of a VBS scenario can be derived from the observation of a spin gap [4, 13] in combination with findings from thermal expansion measurements where well-pronounced signatures were observed at TT^{*} [9, 36]. In particular, these latter data provide strong evidence for a second-order phase transition at T6T^{*}\sim 6 K, rather than a crossover, albeit with significant sample-to-sample variations in the shape of the anomaly [36]. Moreover, for those crystals were the effects are most strongly pronounced, the phase transition anomaly shows striking similarities to that revealed for the spin-Peierls transition in (TMTTF)2AsF6 [37]. A phase transition into a VBS state, suggested by these results, would also be consistent with the abrupt change in the phonon linewidth, and the sharp feature observed in dχ\chi/dTT at TT^{*} [cf. inset of Fig. 2(d)].

In conclusion, by studying the spectra of selected low-energy optical phonons of the quantum spin liquid candidate κ\kappa-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3 as a function of temperature, we observe an abrupt change in the phonon linewidth at T6T^{*}\sim 6 K. We argue that the recovery of long-lived (underdamped) breathing modes of ET-dimers below 6 K can be attributed to a cooperative phenomenon involving the lattice and its coupling to the charge- and spin degrees of freedom around 6 K. Our data are consistent with the formation of a VBS state below 6 K.

We thank N. Sato and S. Sugiura for their help in preparating the experiments. The neutron experiments were performed with the approval of ILL (7-01-513). This study was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (19H01833, 19K03723, 20H05144, and 22H04459) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Work at Goethe University, Frankfurt, was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) for funding through TRR 288 - 422213477 (project A06 and B02).

References

  • Shimizu et al. [2003] Y. Shimizu, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, M. Maesato, and G. Saito, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 107001 (2003).
  • Pratt et al. [2011] F. Pratt, P. Baker, S. Blundell, T. Lancaster, S. Ohira-Kawamura, C. Baines, Y. Shimizu, K. Kanoda, I. Watanabe, and G. Saito, Nature 471, 612 (2011).
  • Shimizu et al. [2006] Y. Shimizu, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, M. Maesato, and G. Saito, Phys. Rev. B 73, 140407(R) (2006).
  • Miksch et al. [2021] B. Miksch, A. Pustogow, M. J. Rahim, A. A. Bardin, K. Kanoda, J. A. Schlueter, R. Hübner, M. Scheffler, and M. Dressel, Science 372, 276 (2021).
  • Saito et al. [2018] Y. Saito, T. Minamidate, A. Kawamoto, N. Matsunaga, and K. Nomura, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205141 (2018).
  • Isono et al. [2016] T. Isono, T. Terashima, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, and S. Uji, Nat. Commun. 7, 1 (2016).
  • Abdel-Jawad et al. [2010] M. Abdel-Jawad, I. Terasaki, T. Sasaki, N. Yoneyama, N. Kobayashi, Y. Uesu, and C. Hotta, Phys. Rev. B 82, 125119 (2010).
  • Kobayashi et al. [2020] T. Kobayashi, Q.-P. Ding, H. Taniguchi, K. Satoh, A. Kawamoto, and Y. Furukawa, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 042023(R) (2020).
  • Manna et al. [2010] R. S. Manna, M. de Souza, A. Brühl, J. A. Schlueter, and M. Lang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 016403 (2010).
  • Poirier et al. [2014] M. Poirier, M. de Lafontaine, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda, and Y. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. B 89, 045138 (2014).
  • Yamashita et al. [2008a] S. Yamashita, Y. Nakazawa, M. Oguni, Y. Oshima, H. Nojiri, Y. Shimizu, K. Miyagawa, and K. Kanoda, Nat. Phys. 4, 459 (2008a).
  • Yamashita et al. [2008b] M. Yamashita, N. Nakata, Y. Kasahara, T. Sasaki, N. Yoneyama, N. Kobayashi, S. Fujimoto, T. Shibauchi, and Y. Matsuda, Nat. Phys. 5, 44 (2008b).
  • Pustogow [2022] A. Pustogow, Solids 3, 93 (2022).
  • Riedl et al. [2019] K. Riedl, R. Valentí, and S. M. Winter, Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019).
  • Naka and Ishihara [2010] M. Naka and S. Ishihara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 79, 063707 (2010).
  • Hotta [2010] C. Hotta, Phys. Rev. B 82, 241104(R) (2010).
  • Sedlmeier et al. [2012] K. Sedlmeier, S. Elsässer, D. Neubauer, R. Beyer, D. Wu, T. Ivek, S. Tomić, J. A. Schlueter, and M. Dressel, Phys. Rev. B 86, 245103 (2012).
  • Yakushi et al. [2015] K. Yakushi, K. Yamamoto, T. Yamamoto, Y. Saito, and A. Kawamoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 84, 084711 (2015).
  • Iguchi et al. [2013] S. Iguchi, S. Sasaki, N. Yoneyama, H. Taniguchi, T. Nishizaki, and T. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075107 (2013).
  • Drichko et al. [2014] N. Drichko, R. Beyer, E. Rose, M. Dressel, J. A. Schlueter, S. A. Turunova, E. I. Zhilyaeva, and R. N. Lyubovskaya, Phys. Rev. B 89, 075133 (2014).
  • Gati et al. [2018] E. Gati, J. K. H. Fischer, P. Lunkenheimer, D. Zielke, S. Köhler, F. Kolb, H. A. K. von Nidda, S. M. Winter, H. Schubert, J. A. Schlueter, H. O. Jeschke, R. Valenti, and M. Lang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 247601 (2018).
  • Lunkenheimer et al. [2012] P. Lunkenheimer, J. Müller, S. Krohns, F. Schrettle, A. Loidl, B. Hartmann, R. Rommel, M. de Souza, C. Hotta, J. A. Schlueter, et al., Nat. Mater. 11, 755 (2012).
  • Lang et al. [2014] M. Lang, P. Lunkenheimer, J. Müller, A. Loidl, B. Hartmann, N. H. Hoang, E. Gati, H. Schubert, and J. A. Schlueter, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 50, 2700107 (2014).
  • Matsuura et al. [2019] M. Matsuura, T. Sasaki, S. Iguchi, E. Gati, J. Müller, O. Stockert, A. Piovano, M. Böhm, J. T. Park, S. Biswas, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 027601 (2019).
  • Geiser et al. [1991] U. Geiser, H. H. Wang, K. D. Carlson, J. M. Williams, H. A. Charlier Jr, J. E. Heindl, G. A. Yaconi, B. J. Love, and M. W. Lathrop, Inorg. Chem. 30, 2586 (1991).
  • Hiess et al. [2006] A. Hiess, M. Jiménez-Ruiz, P. Courtois, R. Currat, J. Kulda, and F. J. Bermejo, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 385, 1077 (2006).
  • Dressel et al. [2016] M. Dressel, P. Lazić, A. Pustogow, E. Zhukova, B. Gorshunov, J. A. Schlueter, O. Milat, B. Gumhalter, and S. Tomić, Phys. Rev. B 93, 081201(R) (2016).
  • Gesi et al. [1972] K. Gesi, J. D. Axe, G. Shirane, and A. Linz, Phys. Rev. B 5, 1933 (1972).
  • Saroun and Kulda [1997] J. Saroun and J. Kulda, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 234, 1102 (1997).
  • Pintschovius et al. [1997] L. Pintschovius, H. Rietschel, T. Sasaki, H. Mori, S. Tanaka, N. Toyota, M. Lang, and F. Steglich, Europhys. Lett. 37, 627 (1997).
  • Yamada et al. [1974] Y. Yamada, H. Takatera, and D. L. Huber, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 36, 641 (1974).
  • Naka and Ishihara [2016] M. Naka and S. Ishihara, Sci. Rep. 6, 20781 (2016).
  • Watanabe et al. [2019] H. Watanabe, H. Seo, and S. Yunoki, Nat. Commun. 10, 1 (2019).
  • Naka and Ishihara [2013] M. Naka and S. Ishihara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82, 023701 (2013).
  • Itoh et al. [2013] K. Itoh, H. Itoh, M. Naka, S. Saito, I. Hosako, N. Yoneyama, S. Ishihara, T. Sasaki, and S. Iwai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 106401 (2013).
  • Manna et al. [2018] R. S. Manna, S. Hartmann, E. Gati, J. A. Schlueter, M. De Souza, and M. Lang, Crystals 8, 87 (2018).
  • de Souza et al. [2009] M. de Souza, A. Brühl, J. Müller, P. Foury-Leylekian, A. Moradpour, J.-P. Pouget, and M. Lang, Phys. B: Condens. Matter 404, 494 (2009).