3cm3cm1cm2cm
-adic equidistribution of modular geodesics and of Heegner points on Shimura curves
Abstract.
We propose a -adic version of Duke’s Theorem on the equidistribution of closed geodesics on modular curves. Our approach concerns quadratic fields split at as well as a -adic covering of the modular curve. We also prove an equidistribution result of Heegner points in the -adic space attached to Shimura curves.
1. Introduction
In [Duk88], W. Duke proves the equidistribution, inside the complex points of the modular curve endowed with the hyperbolic measure, of arithmetic objects attached to orders in quadratic extensions of . The nature of these objects depends on the behavior at infinity of the extension. For quadratic imaginary fields these objects are Galois orbits of CM points and in the case of real quadratic fields his equidistribution theorem concerns packets of closed geodesics.
Let be a rational prime. Since CM points are defined over number fields, their Galois orbits can be naturally embedded inside the -adic space of -points of the modular curve. In [HMRL20] and [HMRL20], the authors studied the distribution of such Galois orbits obtaining -adic analogues to Duke’s theorem in the case of imaginary quadratic fields. In contrast with Duke’s result, different limit measures can appear, depending on the discriminants of the orders involved in the sequence of CM points.
The aim of this article is to state and prove a -adic version of Duke’s theorem on the equidistribution of packets of closed geodesics. Also, we prove a -adic version of the equidistribution of Galois orbits of Heegner points on Shimura curves, when the prime divides the discriminant of the underlying quaternion algebra. The complex version of the latter result is another extension of Duke’s theorem for which we refer to section 6 in [HM06] or to [Zha05].
We recall Duke’s result following section 2 of [ELMV12]. Let be the complex upper half plane and denote by the modular curve of level . Then we have an identification between the quotient space and . Moreover, the quotient space is identified with , the unit tangent bundle of . Here and elsewhere, the superscript + indicates that we consider matrices of positive determinant. Suppose that is a real quadratic irrational. We can view as an element in the boundary of and we can consider the geodesic in connecting and its Galois conjugate. The projection of to is a closed geodesic. We lift this closed geodesic to a compact geodesic orbit in that depends only on the -orbit of . Also, we denote by the ring of matrices in having the column as an eigenvector. For a real quadratic field, we denote by the set of as before such that is isomorphic to the maximal order . The set is finite and its cardinality equals the class number of . We put , with running through representatives of . Define by the unique probability measure in supported on that is invariant under the geodesic flow. Endow with the unique probability measure coming from a Haar measure on and a counting measure on .
Theorem 1.1 (Duke).
As , the sequence converges to in the weak-* topology. In other words, the collection of closed geodesics becomes equidistributed in with respect to the measure .
We proceed to explain our main result on geodesics. As we have seen, in the complex case, geodesics appear when dealing with real quadratic fields or in other words when the infinite place is split in the extension. Following this point of view, we exchange the role of and and we focus on quadratic extensions such that splits. The role played by and will be held by and , respectively. Let be the set of points in such that generates an imaginary quadratic extension over in which splits. The quotient was studied by Ihara who showed that it is related to the special fiber of the modular curve .
Theorem 1.2 (Chapter 5, Theorem 1 in [Iha08]).
Fix , a prime above in , the integral closure of in . Identify with and recall that by the Theory of Complex Multiplication, for any , we have . The assignment
defines a bijection between and Galois orbits in , where is the set of supersingular -invariants.
The -adic covering of that we consider is the locally compact space
The natural projection is given by taking a right quotient by (see section 5). Let denote the Bruhat-Tits tree of . After identifying the boundary of the tree with , the splitness condition on allows us to see as boundary elements of . For in , we define in Section 5 a cycle inside the space than depends only on the -orbit of . The projection of on is just . The fiber over under the natural projection is . This is a graph having the structure of a -volcano, that can be identified with the -isogeny graph attached to any elliptic curve coming from a -orbit in . The projection of to this graph is its unique closed loop (known as its rim). Observe that there’s a bijection between and , where denotes the stabilizer of in . The aforementioned loop is formed by taking the unique geodesic in joining and its Galois conjugate and projecting it to . This resembles the complex case where the closed geodesics on are projections of geodesics in joining two real quadratic numbers that are conjugated. In [BDIS02], such loops in are called Shintani-cycles, for that reason we refer to as the Ihara-Shintani cycle attached to . In this way, we think of the cycles as the -adic analogues to the compact geodesic orbits on the modular surface and the space as a -adic unit tangent bundle of .
For , we denote by the ring formed by the elements in having the column as an eigenvector. Let be a quadratic imaginary field at which splits and let be a -order inside . We denote by the collection of -orbits of those for which and is isomorphic to the order . The group act simply transitive on and so this set is finite. Let be the diagonal group of . The cycle comes equipped with a unique -right invariant probability measure . Denote by the unique probability measure proportional to .
Equip with the unique probability measure coming from a Haar measure on and the counting measure in . Denote this measure by . Our -adic analogue to Duke’s theorem on the equidistribution of closed geodesics is the following statement.
Theorem A.
As , the sequence converges to in the weak-* topology. In other words, for every continous and compactly supported function ,
Now we discuss our result on Heegner points on Shimura curves. Fix a non-split indefinite quaternion algebra defined over whose discriminant is divisible by . Also fix an Eichler-order in of level . Let be the Shimura curve attached to as in section 6. Let be the unique quadratic unramified extension of . The compact space admits a uniformization by due to Cerednik and Drinfeld. Pushing a Haar measure of we can endow with a natural probability measure . Let be an order in a quadratic imaginary field in which is inert and whose discriminant is coprime to . Let denote the collection of Heegner points in with endomorphism ring isomorphic to defined in Section 6. We obtain the following equidistribution theorem.
Theorem B.
As , the collection becomes equidistributed on with respect to the measure . In other words, for every continuous function ,
A related result by Disegni [Dis22] concerns the case where the power of in the conductor of the Heegner points tends to infinity. In such a situation there is no accumulation measure on describing the asymptotic distribution of their Galois orbits
The main tool for our purposes is Theorem 4.6 in [ELMV11]. In consequence, our strategy is to describe the previous objects and ambient spaces in an -arithmetic and adelic context. In doing so we will appeal to the language of (oriented) optimal embeddings to parametrize our packets as orbits under certain Pic groups which will lead to a description of these as toric orbits inside a homogeneous space. In section 2 we cover the basics about the Bruhat-Tits tree of making special emphasis on how quadratic algebras act on it. In section 3 we recall the language of adelic and -arithmetic homogeneous spaces as presented for instance in [ELMV11]. In section 4 we elaborate on the definition of cycles in a general setting, where runs over embeddings of quadratic extension to a quaternion algebra. More specifically, in section 4.1 and 4.2 we discuss the structure of Eichler orders and oriented optimal embeddings respectively. In section 4.3 we show how the group acts simply and transitively on the set of oriented optimal embeddings (with respect to ), showing that the cycles defined in section 4.4 are finite and they can be recovered from a single oriented optimal embedding. Section 5 is a specialization of the previous sections and it is where we properly define the cycles for in and discuss the analogies with the geodesics in Duke’s theorem. Section 6 deals with the different specialization related to Heegner points on the -adic points of indefinite Shimura curves. Finally, section 7 presents Theorem 4.6 in [ELMV11]. We explain how to apply it to show the equidistribution of the objects defined in sections 5 and 6, proving in particular Theorem A and Theorem B.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my advisor Ricardo Menares for trusting me with this project and for his support throughout this work. I also would like to thank Philippe Michel and the Analytic Number Theory group at EPFL. I was very lucky to enjoy their hospitality during the academic period 2022-2023. This work was supported by ANID Doctorado Nacional No 21200911 and by the Bourse d’excellence de la Confédération suisse No. 2022.0414.
2. Dynamics of tori acting on the Bruhat-Tits tree
Our main references for this section are [Ser03], [Voi21] and [Cas14]. Let be a rational prime. Let be the Bruhat-Tits tree of . Its set of vertices corresponds to homothety classes of -lattices in . The class of a lattice is denoted by and for we set . Two vertices are connected by an edge if they admit representatives and such that and is cyclic of order . With these definitions, is a -regular tree.
If is an edge connecting two vertices, the choice of one of them as its source (denoted ) and the other one as its target (denoted ) make an oriented edge. We denote by the set of oriented edges. Let be the oriented edge such that and . The group acts transitively on and . The subgroups and
are the stabilizer of and respectively. Consequently, we have identifications
A path of length in is sequence of adjacent vertices without backtracking. Paths of length starting from are identified with : To give such a path is equivalent to give a vertex at distance from . The group acts transitively on such vertices and one such vertex is . Its stabilizer in is
Therefore we have -equivariant identifications between
(2.1) |
and paths of length starting from such that the path ending at corresponds to . The action of on the right hand side of (2.1) is by fractional linear transformations.
A branch in is a sequence of adjacent vertices without backtracking. Two branches are equivalent if they differ by a finite initial sequence. An equivalence class of branches is called an end of and we denote the set of ends by . We can see as the boundary of the tree and identify it with : The group acts transitively on the set of ends and the stabilizer of the end coming from the branch is the subgroup of upper triangular elements. We have -equivariant identifications
(2.2) |
such that that the branch coming from corresponds to . As before, under this identification the action of on corresponds to the action by fractional linear transformations.
A geodesic is the path without backtracking in the tree connecting two different points in the boundary. The geodesic joining the points and is given by the vertices and we denote it by . In general denotes the geodesic joining and .
Let and be two vertices in . Being a tree, there exists a unique finite path connecting and . The distance between and is the length of this path. For instance, two vertices are at distance if they are connected by an edge. Let an edge and a path (no necessarily of finite length) in the tree. The distance between and is and the distance between and is .
We denote by the subgroup of diagonal elements.
Proposition 2.1.
The following hold
-
(1)
The group fixes the points and in . For every , it acts transitively on the set of vertices with .
-
(2)
The group has as a unique fixed vertex and for every it acts transitively on the sets of vertices with .
-
(3)
The group has a unique fixed edge . For every , it acts transitively on the set of edges with .
Proof.
See chapter I, sections 3-5 in [Cas14]. ∎
Let be a quadratic -algebra. We denote by the maximal compact and open subring of . The order of conductor is . We set , and for we define , the -th principal subgroup of units.
Corollary 2.2.
Let be a quadratic -algebra. Consider the action of on through the embedding .
-
(1)
If splits, then fixes two points . For , acts transitively on the sets of vertices with . Moreover, the stabilizer of is the image in of the order of conductor in where .
-
(2)
If is an unramified field extension, then has a unique fixed vertex and for , it acts transitively on the sets of vertices with . Moreover, if , the stabilizer of is the image in of .
-
(3)
If is a ramified field extension, then has a unique fixed edge and for , it acts transitively on the set of edges with . Moreover, if , the stabilizer of is the image of the subgroup .
Proof.
The first item follows directly from Proposition 2.1 since there exists such that and in particular . Also working up to conjugation, for and it is enough to prove it for the algebra (isomorphic to ) given by elements of the form where is a non-zero square mod in case (2) and for case (3) . Now we need to observe that in case (2) (resp. case (3)) is contained in (resp. ). The statement about the fixed elements follows immediately from Proposition 2.1.
In case (2), transitivity follows since acts transitively on for every . For (3) one can assume and note that preserves by interchanching and . Therefore, it is enough to show that acts transitively on the vertices in the connected component of connected to and at a given distance to . Now for in the given intersection, and its action on is given by . Hence this orbit in , which corresponds to the orbit of in , has distinct elements which is exactly the number of vertices at distance from in this component.
Once transitivity is proven, the fact about stabilizers follows since these algebras are commutative and by a counting argument: in case (2):
which has cardinality . Then the quotient has cardinality the number of points at distance from .
In case (3),
which has cardinality . Then
has cardinality , the number of vertices in the connected component of and at distance to it. ∎
3. Adelic and -arithmetic homogeneous spaces
Fix be a rational prime. Let be the ring of adeles over . Let be a quaternion algebra over that splits over . Denote by the algebraic group of projectivized units of . We use for the algebraic group of units of reduced norm in .
Let be a ring. If a place of , we denote by the algebra if is finite or if . Let be a finite set of places of containing the place . We use the notations , , and . Anagolously , we use , to denote the closure of in and in respectively. In the same direction, and will denote and respectively. Finally, if is an adelic element in , , , and will denote the respective projection of in , , and . Similarly for -points over and .
The group satisfies the following strong approximation theorem.
Theorem 3.1.
The subgroup is dense in .
Proof.
See [Vig80], Théoreme 4.3, p.81. ∎
In particular, if is an open subgroup, then .
Corollary 3.2.
Let be an open subgroup such that . Then we also have the decomposition . In particular with the image of in .
Proof.
By the decomposition , given , there exist , and such that . We obtain
which allows us to conclude since
∎
Since has no non-trivial -characters, the subgroup is a lattice in by Theorem 5.5 in [PR94]. We will use the notation for the locally compact space of finite measure . If is a compact subgroup of , we use to denote the locally compact space . The symbol denotes the natural projection so that the class of in is .
We denote by G the group . Assume that is the projection in from an open subgroup satisfying the hypothesis of Corollary 3.2 and set . By the conclusion of the cited corollary, given there exists such that . Like this we obtain an identification
(3.1) |
sending to the -orbit of with as before.
4. The cycles
4.1. Eichler orders
Let and be as in the previous section and consider as the product of the primes where ramifies and as a positive integer coprime to . An Eichler -order in is the intersection of two uniquely determined, not necessarily distinct, maximal -orders in . The level of is the index of inside any of the two maximal orders that define it. By a local global-principle (Theorem 9.1.1 in [Voi21]) is determined by its local components for so we focus on these local orders. Being also the intersection of two uniquely determined, not necessarily distinct, maximal -orders in they are Eichler orders in and its level is defined analogously.
If , splits at and we can use an identification and the tree to understand these type of orders. Indeed, maximal orders in are in bijection with by sending the class of a lattice to the order . Consequently, the Eichler order can be identified with a pair of vertices in . If has level , then the two corresponding vertices are at distance . In this fashion, we can identify Eichler orders of level in with paths in of length . We denote by the path that corresponds to . Once given an orientation to this path (select a source and target ), the stabilizer in of this oriented path is (see [Voi21] chapter 23). Since an Eichler order of level (resp. ) correspond a vertex (resp. an edge), we denote in those special cases the associated path as and , respectively.
Remark 1.
All of this shows that the set of maximal -orders in () forms the set of vertices of a tree which we also denote by by an abuse of notation. The action of the group on corresponds to conjugation.
4.2. Oriented optimal embeddings
Fix an Eichler -order in . Let be a quadratic field and a -order in . There exists a unique integer with such that , where , the -order of discriminant . We assume that and if is a prime with , then . An algebra embedding is said to be optimal (with respect to and ) if . Necessarily is inert at primes diving , split at primes dividing and imaginary in the case that is definite.
For a prime, note that induces a morphism (which we denote by the same letter) by tensoring with . For the map induces an action of on through composition with the natural map . If denotes , there is also an induced action of . If , since is a split algebra over , by Corollary 2.2 (1), the group preserves a geodesic in that will be denoted by . In addition, the optimality condition ensures that the stabilizer of in is .
An orientation of at is a ring morphism . There exist two of them and we fix one. An orientation of at is the choice of a maximal order in containing . By the first paragraph, this is equivalent to give an orientation to . There are also two possibilities and we fix one. We orient by declaring that .
For , an orientation of at is a ring morphism . There are two of them an we fix one. Let an optimal embedding as before. We say that is oriented at if it respects the orientations of and at , i.e. if the diagram
is commutative.
Take and assume that . An orientation of at is a group isomorphism . There are two of them and we fix one. Since , is maximal and by Corollary 2.2 (1), the path is contained in . The transformation acts transitively on as a translation. We say that is oriented if and are the two vertices connected by .
Keep the assumption that but assume now that . Since splits at , the prime does not divides the square-free part of so for some . Remember that by our initial asumptions this implies that so is an edge with stabilizer in given by . Since , the edge is not contained in . Its furthest vertex from is located at distance and by consequence the other extreme is located at distance . We will say that is oriented if the furthest vertex is .
Remark 2.
In simple words, for bud , is oriented if is pointing in the same direction as the flow defined by the transformation in . On the other hand, if , being oriented is equivalent to say that is pointing towards .
Lemma 4.1.
The group respects orientations when acting by conjugation on optimal embeddings.
Proof.
Let be an oriented optimal embedding. For , clearly still satisfies the optimality condition so we focus on the orientations. For , we show that respects the orientations if and only if . There exits some such that with and for every , where we denote by the conjugate of in . Since , is maximal in and therefore with maximal ideal (see [Voi21] Theorem 13.3.11). Write in the form with and in . Then and with . This allows us to compute for the equality
From this we see that is congruent to mod , if and to if not. The fact that occurs if and only if belongs to allows us to conclude in this case.
For , we show that respects orientation. Note that since so that and . Also note that . Since preserves distances, these equalities are enough to show that is oriented noting that when , . ∎
4.3. The action of .
Keep the notations from the previous sections. If , there exists a unique maximal order in and therefore is maximal. Now theorem 13.3.11 in [Voi21] implies that since it contains a copy of the ring of integers of the quadratic unramified extension of . Let , then splits at and is the level of if and only if . From Proposition 23.4.3 in [Voi21], after choosing an isomorphism of , is conjugate to the order so we also have in this case.
From now on, will denote the finite set of places if is indefinite and the singleton otherwise. Let to be the image in of if is indefinite or the image of otherwise. Since for , the open subgroup satisfies the hypothesis in Corollary 3.2. Indeed, we have the equalities or in the indefinite or definite case respectively (Lemma 13.4.9 in [Voi21]). Finally, the Hasse-Schilling theorem (Theorem 14.7.4 in [Voi21]) and the decomposition implies the claim.
Therefore, the identification (3.1) holds with and we have
(4.1) |
We recall that the identification is given by sending to the -class of , where is such that .
Let be the algebraic torus . By the local-global principle for lattices ([Voi21] Theorem 9.1.1) and using that is invertible in , we can identify as
We denote by the set of all oriented optimal embeddings and by we mean the set of -conjugacy classes in . The class of an embedding is denoted by . Now we define an action of on . Let and assume that it is related to the class of . The embedding induces an adelic map which in turns induces an injection
Remembering the identification (4.1), the class of is sent to the -class of , where is such that . We define the action of on as .
Lemma 4.2.
The action of on the class of is well defined and gives rise to an action of on
Proof.
It is well defined because the class of depends only on the class of and on the other hand conjugating by an element of changes by since . After conjugating by we obtain again .
Since , is indeed a new embedding that send . For the optimality it is enough to show that for one has . We know but since is commutative, after conjugating by we have and now we use since .
To see that is oriented we have to check locally at . If , so and therefore is oriented. If , observe that by defintion of . Also, we have since . Then, since preserves distances, is at the same distance to . Since preserves the orientation of , it follows that is oriented noting in the case that .
Suppose that and are related to the adelic elements and . Consider such that . The equality shows that .
∎
Proposition 4.3.
The group acts simply transitively on .
Proof.
To show that the action is simple take such that . In particular belongs to the normalizer of which is with any such that , where is the non-trivial -automorphism of . Since normalized each value of we must have . See Corollaire 2.3, p.6 in [Vig80].This implies with and therefore . This shows that is trivial in and therefore the action is simple.
Now we show the transitivity. Let and be two optimal embeddings for . As a consequence of Skolem-Noether there exists such that . To prove transitivity we need to show that there exists an adelic element such that . Since both and are optimal for , we have for
(4.2) |
If , we have . Then the condition is equivalent to . Since and and are oriented, we have indeed that .
If remember that induces an action of on and in this case is a split algebra over so that there exists a unique geodesic preserved by this action. The relation (4.2) shows that and have the same stabilizer in under this action. If in addition , and are actually vertices and Corollary 2.2 shows they are at the same distance to (since same stabilizer implies same distance) and then they are in the same orbit. Therefore there exists some satisfying . This implies .
Now assume that and . The relation (4.2) and the fact that and are oriented implies that and are contained in and they point in the same direction as the flow defined by . Therefore there exists some such that as an oriented path. Since we have that for any lying in when taken mod .
Finally if and , again the condition of being oriented embeddings and relation (4.2) implies that the edges and are at the same distance to and pointing in the same direction relative to . Corollary 2.2 (1) implies that they are in the same orbit under the action of and so there exists such that as oriented edges, implying that . ∎
4.4. The cycles
Keep the previous notations and fix a subgroup of that is the image of the units of an algebra in isomorphic to . Let , we denote by the image in of a set of the form with such that (such exists by Skolem-Noether). Since has index in its normalizer in , there are only such sets and they depend only on the class of in . In the following sections we will make use of the action of on certain spaces to select a single among the possibilities.
Let be the cardinality of and consider ideles in such that . Note that this is equivalent to ask for a full set of representatives for under its identification with .
Proposition 4.4.
Fix . Then, the projection of in is of the form .
5. Ihara-Shintani Cycles
In this section we specialize to the case , , and is imaginary and splits at . In this case and so we have natural identifications
where .
Let be a prime above in , the integral closure of in . This defines an embedding and in particular .
As in section 4.2, let denotes a order in . For any , the torus acts on by fractional linear transformations, having two fixed points conjugate to each other. We denote by its fixed point in . On the other hand, the group has two fixed points in (when identified with , these are the two end points of the geodesic preserved by Corollary 2.2) which are also and its conjugate, since fixes them.
Let denote the diagonal group of and consider . Let be such that (it exists by Skolem-Noether). It is always the case that both and assume the value or . If we multiply by some element in , the normalizer of in , we cover all possibilities. Then we normalize the choice of in by requiring that and .
For in , we take to be the -algebra of matrices such that , together with the zero matrix. The map sending to its eigenvalue (with eigenvector ) is an isomorphism onto . Denote its inverse as and let be as in the Introduction. If belongs to , the map is an element in whose fixed point in is . We could have also taken the embedding coming from the eigenvalue but this one is -conjugate to since there exists taking to .
For in , we define the Ihara-Shintani cycle attacthed to to be the projection of to . It corresponds to the orbit of in . If , the map sending to the -class of induces a uniformization . The measure from the introduction is the push-forward of a finite measure in coming from a Haar measure in .
Let be as in section 4.2. Suppose that . Since and we have that and splits into two primes inside . Both of these primes are proper so that they define elements in . Let be the order of in this group so we can write for some .
Lemma 5.1.
We have .
Proof.
Note that if and only if and for some . Therefore, after multiplying by a power of , we can assume that and is an ideal dividing , so that it is of the shape with by uniqueness of the prime decomposition (principal ideals are proper). Here denotes the conjugate of under the non-trivial automorphism of . If we can divide by a power of or in order to have . If we see that differs from an element in by a power of . If this is not the case, after taking classes in we obtain a contradiction with the minimality of . All of this proves that since . ∎
Denote the stabilizer of in as . Then . Idenfity and by sending to . When , Lemma 5.1 allows us to see that is isomorphic to under . Observe that .
Proposition 5.2.
For , the image of in has the structure of a -volcano. It can be identified with the -isogeny graph of the elliptic curve with ordinary reduction associated with .
Proof.
Assume . The image is and point (1) in Corollary 2.2 together with the previous paragraph implies that is a -volcano with a cycle of lenght as a rim. This rim is the projection of the geodesic preserved by and the levels are given by distance to the geodesic.
For the second claim we work first with the set of vertices. We have an identification between and by sending to , where satisfies . Therefore we can also identify
(5.1) |
Consider . There exist such that . Under the previous identifications this orbit corresponds to the elliptic curve associated with , where . Certainly this elliptic curve is -isogenous to the elliptic curve attached to , for some , and it has CM by for some . This is the case if . But so this condition boils down to . We can check this condition locally. Since for , it is only neccesary to check that . Since the projectivized units of form the stabilizer of and is the order of conductor in , by Corollary 2.2 this is equivalent to being at distance from the geodesic fixed by .
For the edges, we remark that
This shows that two points in are connected by an edge if and only if the respective elliptic curves are -isogenous. This ends the proof of the second claim. ∎
By definition of , the vertex belongs to the geodesic preserved by so we have that the second coordinate of projects to the rim of . This closed cycle in the quotient of the tree is what the authors in [BDIS02] refer to as a -adic Shintani cycle. This justifies the name of and since the rim is a closed cycle we can think of it as a discrete closed geodesic mimicking Duke’s geodesics in the archimedean case. Note the following consequence of Proposition 5.2 and its proof.
Corollary 5.3.
The image of in under (5.1) corresponds to the elliptic curves with CM by and which are -isogenous to the elliptic curve associated with .
The set of elliptic curves described in the above Corollary form a closed orbit under the usual action of on the set of elliptic curves with CM by . In this regard, just as Duke’s geodesics form a closed orbit under the geodesic flow, the cycles are a closed orbit under a “flow ”defined by .
6. Heegner points on Shimura curves
In this section we focus on the cases where is a definite quaternion algebra ramified at and is imaginary and inert at . Remember that is a -Eichler order of level and . Denote by the image in of , the elements in with reduced norm equal to .
Let be the indefinite quaternion algebra over ramified at the primes dividing . Let be an Eichler order of level in . After fixing an isomorphism , the group acts on . The space is a compact Riemann surface that corresponds to the complex points of an algebraic variety defined over i.e. . We refer to as the Shimura curve attached to the data .
Let be the unique unramified quadratic extension of . The compact space admits the following -adic uniformization. Let , the Drinfeld upper-half plane. After fixing an isomorphism , acts on by fractional linear transformations.
Theorem 6.1 (Cerednik-Drinfeld).
The quotient space corresponds to the space of -points of the Shimura curve .
Fix some and a square root of so that . The stabilizer of in is compact (isomorphic to ). Since acts transitively on , we have the identification of locally compacts spaces
as in (4.1).
Let be any element in . Since , it follows that defines an involution on and therefore corresponds to pairs of points in connected by this involution.
According to the moduli interpretation of (see section 4 in [BD98]), the points in corresponds to abelian surfaces over with quaternionic multiplication by and a -level structure. Given , one such abelian surface, we denote by the algebra of endormophism of (over ) which commute with the quaternionic multiplication and respect the -level structure. A Heegner point in is a point whose associated abelian surface has isomorphic to an order in a quadratic imaginary field.
As in section 4.2, let denotes a order in . Let . Then acts in with two fixed points and . We assume that is the fixed point satisfying that for every , acts on the column vector as multiplication by . This time we take and equals the -orbit of with such that . We normalize the choice of by asking that . The projection of in is . It corresponds to the pair of points in associated with and . Let be as in section 4.2.
Theorem 6.2.
Under the identification given by Theorem 6.1, the class of corresponds to a Heegner point in whose associated order is isomorphic to . As varies over , they are all different.
Proof.
Since is inert in , . Now see Theorem 5.3 in [BD98]. ∎
The previous result justifies that we name by , the collection of in as runs over .
7. Adelic methods
In this last section we prove Theorem A and Theorem B. They will be a direct consequence of Proposition 7.4.
The group is unimodular (any left Haar measure is also a right Haar measure) so there is a unique -invariant probability measure in such that for any ,
(7.1) |
where is the counting measure in and a Haar measure on .
Definition 1.
A homogeneous toral subset in is a subset of the form , with and a maximal torus anisotropic over .
The pushforward of the Haar probability measure on defines a probability measure on the homogeneous toral set .
Let be a quadratic field and let be an algebra embedding. Let be the algebraic torus . Then induces a morphism (which we denote by the same letter) . Denote by the image of under in . Then every maximal anisotropic torus defined over is of the form for some embedding . Now, we attach to an order in . Fix a -order in . Then define the local orders . The order is maximal for almost every . Indeed, let be the finite set of places such that , where denotes the image of in . Then if , the intersection is just . But this is the localization of the global order and so it is maximal outside a finite set of places. This shows that is a global order in .
Definition 2 ([Kha19] section 2.4.4 or equivalently [ELMV11]).
The discriminant of a homogeneous toral set of the form , with an embeeding, is the absolute value of the discriminant of the order attached to it as in the previous paragraph.
Theorem 7.1.
Let be a sequence of homogeneous toral sets whose discriminants approach as . Then, any weak* accumulation point of the sequence of measures is a homogeneous probability measure on , invariant under , the image of in .
Proof.
Theorem 4.6 in [ELMV11] ∎
The defect of the limit measure in Theorem 7.1 being -invariant is solved in the following fashion. Assume that weak* converges to . We want to prove that for all in , the space of bounded and uniformly continuous functions, we have
(7.2) |
By the discussion made [ALMW22], sections 9 and 10, we are reduced to prove (7.2) in the case of functions invariant under . Let denote the quotient . The reduced norm induces a homeomorphism
which gives to the structure of a compact abelian group. Since the group of characters is dense in the space of continuous functions, by Weyl’s criterion we are reduced to the case when is a character.
If is a character of , by continuity there exists some compact open group such that and therefore we have a character of the group for some and trivial on squares. Therefore, if we assume maximal, we are in the presence of a primitive real Dirichlet character that must be attached to some quadratic field .
We have reduced the test function to be of the shape where is a quadratic Hecke character.
Proposition 7.2.
Let be a non-trivial character of and an homogeneous toral set with . Then,
Proof.
Assume that is related to in the sense of the previous paragraph. If denotes , then is a Galois extension and class field theory provides the diagram
If and the equality follows from the previous diagram. When there exists a prime split in and inert in . Let be the idele corresponding to the class of a prime above in . Then and so the substitution shows that . ∎
Let be a compact subgroup of with for almost every . Let be the finite set of quadratic fields attached to the characters of the finite group . Equip with the pushforward of under the natural projection.
Proposition 7.3.
Let be a sequence of homogeneous toral sets with such that . Assume also that its sequence of discriminants approaches as . Then the projection of to becomes equidistributed with respect to . In other words, the sequence converges weak* to .
Proof.
In terms of functionals over , the pushforward of corresponds to the restriction of over the space of -right invariant functions over . Therefore, by theorem 7.1 and its following discussion, to prove equidistribution we need to check
with a weak* accumulation measure of and of the form with an -right invariant character . This last condition implies that and now proposition 7.2 allows us to conclude since after taking a subsequence we can assume that weak* converges to and then . ∎
The map sending to induces a uniformization of by . Using a Haar measure in , we equip with a finite measure and push it to a finite -right invariant measure in . We equip with the unique probability measure proportional to . There exits a unique probability measure on the quotient induced by the counting measure on and a Haar measure on satisfying the property analogue to (7.1). It is the pushforward of the measure by means of the projection described in (4.1).
Proposition 7.4.
The collection becomes equidistributed on as . In particular, the collection becomes equidistributed in and becomes equidistributed in .
Proof.
Remember the identification . Fix and let the homogeneous toral set with as before. Since , the set consist only of quadratic fields ramified at , i.e . But our sequence of tori consider split or inert at , so we will always be in the case and therefore by Theorem 7.1 together with Proposition 7.3 there’s equidistribution of the image of in if we show that the discriminant goes to . Note that Proposition 5.1 shows that projects onto .
Take an -order in agreeing with outside . We know . Localizing at we have which implies . Then the discriminant of is the discriminant of for some . Certainly this goes to infinity and we must have equidistribution. ∎
Remark 3.
In the indefinite case, since is chosen so that we have that belongs to the geodesic fixed by . This is equivalent to having stabilizer by the maximal order of which in turn is equivalent to being maximal. This shows that the discriminant of is exactly the discriminant of .
References
- [ALMW22] Menny Aka, Manuel Luethi, Philippe Michel, and Andreas Wieser. Simultaneous supersingular reductions of CM elliptic curves. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), 2022(786):1–43, feb 2022.
- [BD98] Massimo Bertolini and Henri Darmon. Heegner points, -adic -functions, and the Cerednik-Drinfeld uniformization. Invent. Math., 131(3):453–491, 1998.
- [BDIS02] Massimo Bertolini, Henri Darmon, Adrian Iovita, and Michael Spiess. Teitelbaum’s exceptional zero conjecture in the anticyclotomic setting. Amer. J. Math., 124(2):411–449, 2002.
- [Cas14] B. Casselman. The bruhat-tits tree of sl(2). Available at https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/CasselmanOnBruhatTitsTree2014.pdf, March 2014.
- [Cer76] I. V. Cerednik. Uniformization of algebraic curves by discrete arithmetic subgroups of with compact quotient spaces. Mat. Sb. (N.S.), 100(142)(1):59–88, 165, 1976.
- [Dd76] V. G. Drinfel d. Coverings of -adic symmetric domains. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen., 10(2):29–40, 1976.
- [Dis22] Daniel Disegni. -adic equidistribution of CM points. Comment. Math. Helv., 97(4):635–668, 2022.
- [Duk88] W. Duke. Hyperbolic distribution problems and half-integral weight Maass forms. Invent. Math., 92(1):73–90, 1988.
- [ELMV11] Manfred Einsiedler, Elon Lindenstrauss, Philippe Michel, and Akshay Venkatesh. Distribution of periodic torus orbits and Duke’s theorem for cubic fields. Ann. of Math. (2), 173(2):815–885, 2011.
- [ELMV12] Manfred Einsiedler, Elon Lindenstrauss, Philippe Michel, and Akshay Venkatesh. The distribution of closed geodesics on the modular surface, and Duke’s theorem. Enseign. Math. (2), 58(3-4):249–313, 2012.
- [HM06] Gergely Harcos and Philippe Michel. The subconvexity problem for Rankin-Selberg -functions and equidistribution of Heegner points. II. Invent. Math., 163(3):581–655, 2006.
- [HMRL20] Sebastián Herrero, Ricardo Menares, and Juan Rivera-Letelier. -adic distribution of CM points and Hecke orbits I: Convergence towards the Gauss point. Algebra Number Theory, 14(5):1239–1290, 2020.
- [Iha08] Yasutaka Ihara. On congruence monodromy problems, volume 18 of MSJ Memoirs. Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2008. Reproduction of the Lecture Notes: Volume 1 (1968) [MR0289518], Volume 2 (1969) [MR0289519] (University of Tokyo), with author’s notes (2008).
- [Kha19] Ilya Khayutin. Joint equidistribution of CM points. Ann. of Math. (2), 189(1):145–276, 2019.
- [PR94] Vladimir Platonov and Andrei Rapinchuk. Algebraic groups and number theory, volume 139 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1994. Translated from the 1991 Russian original by Rachel Rowen.
- [Ser03] Jean-Pierre Serre. Trees. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003. Translated from the French original by John Stillwell, Corrected 2nd printing of the 1980 English translation.
- [Vig80] Marie-France Vignéras. Arithmétique des algèbres de quaternions, volume 800 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 1980.
- [Voi21] John Voight. Quaternion algebras, volume 288 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, [2021] ©2021.
- [Zha05] Shou-Wu Zhang. Equidistribution of CM-points on quaternion Shimura varieties. Int. Math. Res. Not., (59):3657–3689, 2005.