This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

The Belle Collaboration

Precision measurement of charged pion and kaon differential cross sections in 𝒆+𝒆e^{+}e^{-} annihilation at 𝒔=10.52\sqrt{s}=10.52 GeV

M. Leitgab University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973    R. Seidl RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973    M. Grosse Perdekamp University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801 RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973    A. Vossen Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408    I. Adachi High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    H. Aihara Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033    D. M. Asner Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352    V. Aulchenko Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    T. Aushev Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218    A. M. Bakich School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006    B. Bhuyan Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039    A. Bondar Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    A. Bozek H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow 31-342    M. Bračko University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    J. Brodzicka H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow 31-342    T. E. Browder University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822    V. Chekelian Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München    A. Chen National Central University, Chung-li 32054    P. Chen Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617    B. G. Cheon Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791    K. Chilikin Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218    K. Cho Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon 305-806    V. Chobanova Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München    Y. Choi Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746    D. Cinabro Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202    J. Dalseno Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München Excellence Cluster Universe, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching    Z. Drásal Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague    D. Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039    S. Eidelman Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    D. Epifanov Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033    H. Farhat Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202    J. E. Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352    V. Gaur Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005    N. Gabyshev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    R. Gillard Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202    F. Giordano University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801    Y. M. Goh Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791    B. Golob Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    J. Haba High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    K. Hayasaka Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602    H. Hayashii Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506    Y. Hoshi Tohoku Gakuin University, Tagajo 985-8537    W.-S. Hou Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617    Y. B. Hsiung Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617    H. J. Hyun Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701    T. Iijima Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602 Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602    A. Ishikawa Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578    R. Itoh High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    W. W. Jacobs Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408    T. Julius School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010    J. H. Kang Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749    P. Kapusta H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow 31-342    E. Kato Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578    T. Kawasaki Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181    H. J. Kim Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701    H. O. Kim Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701    J. B. Kim Korea University, Seoul 136-713    J. H. Kim Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon 305-806    M. J. Kim Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701    J. Klucar J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    B. R. Ko Korea University, Seoul 136-713    P. Kodyš Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague    R. T. Kouzes Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352    P. Križan Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    P. Krokovny Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    R. Kumar Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004    T. Kumita Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397    Y.-J. Kwon Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749    J. S. Lange Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Gießen    S.-H. Lee Korea University, Seoul 136-713    Y. Li CNP, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061    Z. Q. Liu Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049    D. Liventsev High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    D. Matvienko Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    K. Miyabayashi Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506    H. Miyata Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181    R. Mizuk Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218 Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, Moscow 115409    A. Moll Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München Excellence Cluster Universe, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching    N. Muramatsu Research Center for Electron Photon Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578    E. Nakano Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585    M. Nakao High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    Z. Natkaniec H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow 31-342    M. Nayak Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036    E. Nedelkovska Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München    C. Ng Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033    N. K. Nisar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005    O. Nitoh Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo 184-8588    A. Ogawa RIKEN BNL Research Center, Upton, New York 11973    S. Ogawa Toho University, Funabashi 274-8510    T. Ohshima Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602    S. Okuno Kanagawa University, Yokohama 221-8686    S. L. Olsen Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742    C. Oswald University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn    P. Pakhlov Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218 Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, Moscow 115409    H. Park Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701    H. K. Park Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701    T. K. Pedlar Luther College, Decorah, Iowa 52101    R. Pestotnik J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    M. Petrič J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    L. E. Piilonen CNP, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061    M. Röhrken Institut für Experimentelle Kernphysik, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 76131 Karlsruhe    H. Sahoo University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822    Y. Sakai High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    S. Sandilya Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005    L. Santelj J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    T. Sanuki Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578    Y. Sato Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578    O. Schneider École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne 1015    G. Schnell University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080 Bilbao Ikerbasque, 48011 Bilbao    C. Schwanda Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna 1050    K. Senyo Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-8560    O. Seon Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602    M. E. Sevior School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010    M. Shapkin Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino 142281    C. P. Shen Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602    T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550    J.-G. Shiu Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617    B. Shwartz Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    A. Sibidanov School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006    F. Simon Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München Excellence Cluster Universe, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching    P. Smerkol J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    Y.-S. Sohn Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749    A. Sokolov Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino 142281    E. Solovieva Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218    M. Starič J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana    M. Sumihama Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193    T. Sumiyoshi Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397    G. Tatishvili Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352    Y. Teramoto Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585    T. Tsuboyama High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    M. Uchida Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550    T. Uglov Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117218 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow Region 141700    Y. Unno Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791    S. Uno High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801    Y. Usov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    C. Van Hulse University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080 Bilbao    G. Varner University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822    V. Vorobyev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    M. N. Wagner Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Gießen    C. H. Wang National United University, Miao Li 36003    J. Wang Peking University, Beijing 100871    M.-Z. Wang Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617    P. Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049    M. Watanabe Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181    Y. Watanabe Kanagawa University, Yokohama 221-8686    K. M. Williams CNP, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061    E. Won Korea University, Seoul 136-713    Y. Yamashita Nippon Dental University, Niigata 951-8580    V. Zhilich Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090    V. Zhulanov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS and Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
Abstract

Measurements of inclusive differential cross sections for charged pion and kaon production in e+ee^{+}e^{-} annihilation have been carried out at a center-of-mass energy of s=10.52\sqrt{s}=10.52 GeV. The measurements were performed with the Belle detector at the KEKB e+ee^{+}e^{-} collider using a data sample containing 113×106113\times 10^{6} e+eqq¯e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow q\overline{q} events, where q={u,d,s,c}q=\{u,d,s,c\}. We present charge-integrated differential cross sections dσh±/dzd\sigma_{h^{\pm}}/dz for h±={π±,K±}h^{\pm}=\{\pi^{\pm},K^{\pm}\} as a function of the relative hadron energy z=2Eh/sz=2E_{h}/\sqrt{s} from 0.20.2 to 0.980.98. The combined statistical and systematic uncertainties for π±\pi^{\pm} (K±K^{\pm}) are 4%4\% (4%4\%) at z0.6z\sim 0.6 and 15%15\% (24%24\%) at z0.9z\sim 0.9. The cross sections are the first measurements of the zz-dependence of pion and kaon production for z>0.7z>0.7 as well as the first precision cross section measurements at a center-of-mass energy far below the Z0Z^{0} resonance used by the experiments at LEP and SLC.

pacs:
13.66.Bc

The fragmentation function (FF) Dq,q¯,gh(z,Q2)D_{q,\overline{q},g}^{h}(z,Q^{2}) parametrizes the transition of quarks qq, antiquarks q¯\overline{q} and gluons gg into the color-neutral hadron hh in high-energy particle collisions as a function of the four-momentum transfer squared, Q2Q^{2}, in the collision and the relative energy carried by the final state hadron, z=2Eh/sz=2E_{h}/\sqrt{s}. FFs are assumed to be process-independent and are extracted through global analysis of inclusive hadron production in e+ee^{+}e^{-} and pppp reactions, and from semi-inclusive hadron production in lNlN reactions at various center-of-mass energies (see Refs. marcopaper ; kumanopaper ; akk ). Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi (DGLAP) evolution equations dglap derived from Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) are used to jointly analyze data sets taken at different Q2Q^{2}. The Q2Q^{2} evolution mixes quark and gluon degrees of freedom and enables the extraction of quark and gluon FFs through the analysis of precise hadron cross section data sets. In e+ee^{+}e^{-} annihilation, the availability of precision data sets was previously limited mostly to results from experiments (e.g., Refs. aleph ; delphi ; opal ; sld ) at LEP and SLC at the energy scale of the Z0Z^{0}-boson mass. Recently, also the BaBar Collaboration reported inclusive hadron production cross sections at a center-of-mass energy of 10.5410.54 GeV babarpaper , however using a significantly smaller dataset compared to the Belle measurement. The large data samples available at Belle complement existing results on hadron production cross sections with precise measurements at Q2=(10.52GeV)2Q^{2}=(10.52~\textnormal{GeV})^{2}. The differential cross sections reported here are expected to improve the precision of FFs and the QCD-based determination of the nucleon quark- and gluon-structure from semi-inclusive deeply inelastic measurements at CERN, DESY and Jefferson Laboratory and inclusive proton-proton measurements at CERN and BNL. In addition, the Belle data will allow first quantitative tests of higher-order QCD effects at z1.0z\sim 1.0 werner .

This analysis is based on a 68.068.0 fb-1 data sample collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e+ee^{+}e^{-} (3.53.5 on 88 GeV) collider kekb operating 6060 MeV below the Υ(4S)\Upsilon(4S) resonance at s=10.52\sqrt{s}=10.52 GeV. The Belle detector is a large-solid-angle magnetic spectrometer that consists of a silicon vertex detector (SVD), a 5050-layer central drift chamber (CDC) and an array of aerogel threshold Cherenkov counters (ACC). The ACC detector is surrounded by a barrel-like arrangement of time-of-flight scintillation counters (ToF) and an electromagnetic calorimeter (ECL) comprised of CsI(Tl) crystals, located inside a superconducting solenoid coil that provides a 1.51.5 T magnetic field. The iron flux-return yoke surrounding the coil is instrumented to detect KL0K_{L}^{0} mesons and to identify muons (KLM). The detector is described in detail elsewhere belledetector . The Belle Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are performed with the PYTHIA 6.2056.205 Sjöstrand (1994) event generator and a GEANT33 Brun et al. (1984) detector simulation.

An event must have at least three charged tracks and a heavy-jet mass (the invariant mass of the summed four-momenta of all tracks and ECL clusters in the jet with the largest invariant mass) at least above 1.81.8 GeV/c2c^{2} or above 25%25\% of the reconstructed visible energy. A reconstructed visible energy of more than 77 GeV is required to reduce contamination from τ+τ\tau^{+}\tau^{-} events. From these events, we retain tracks with a laboratory-frame momentum plabp_{\textnormal{lab}} of more than 500500 MeV/cc, a scattering angle θlab\theta_{\textnormal{lab}} (relative to the beam axis) within the central detector acceptance (0.511cosθlab<0.842-0.511\leq\cos\theta_{\textnormal{lab}}<0.842), at least three SVD hits, and a point of closest approach to the e+ee^{+}e^{-} interaction point of under 44 cm along the beam axis and under 1.31.3 cm in the perpendicular plane.

Using likelihood ratios based on dE/dxdE/dx measurements of the CDC, signals from the ACC, ToF measurements, ECL cluster energies as well as KLM signals, charged particles are identified as pions, kaons, protons, electrons or muons. The initially-measured track yield Nj,measN_{j,\textnormal{meas}} for particle type jj is binned in zz with width 0.010.01, starting from 0.20.2; negatively- and positively-charged tracks are treated separately. In order to obtain final cross sections, several corrections are applied, as described below. Statistical uncertainties are propagated through all corrections and systematic uncertainties from all corrections are added in quadrature.

The true yield Ni,trueN_{i,\textnormal{true}} for particle type ii is obtained from the measured yields via

Ni,true=jMij1Nj,meas,N_{i,\textnormal{true}}=\sum_{j}M^{-1}_{ij}N_{j,\textnormal{meas}}, (1)

where M1M^{-1} is the inverse of the 5×55\times 5 particle identification (PID) probability matrix MM, whose diagonal and off-diagonal elements represent PID efficiencies and misidentification probabilities, respectively. As the elements of MM depend on the laboratory-frame momentum and polar angle, an MM matrix is constructed in each of the 17×917\times 9 bins with plabp_{\textnormal{lab}} boundaries [0.5,0.65,0.8,1.0,,3.0,3.5,4.0,5.0,8.0)[0.5,0.65,0.8,1.0,\ldots,3.0,3.5,4.0,5.0,8.0) GeV/cc and cosθlab\cos\theta_{\textnormal{lab}} boundaries [0.511,0.300,0.152,0.017,[-0.511,-0.300,-0.152,0.017, 0.209,0.355,0.435,0.542,0.692,0.842)0.209,0.355,0.435,0.542,0.692,0.842). These values were chosen to obtain similar track yields in all bins. The elements of MM, called “efficiencies“ for the remainder of this letter, are obtained mostly from experimental data. For pions and kaons, the decay D+πslow++D0πslow++(Kπfast+)D^{*+}\rightarrow\pi^{+}_{\textnormal{slow}}+D^{0}\rightarrow\pi^{+}_{\textnormal{slow}}+(K^{-}\pi^{+}_{\textnormal{fast}}) and its charge-conjugate are used. Similarly, proton PID efficiencies are extracted from Λp++π\Lambda\rightarrow p^{+}+\pi^{-} and charge-conjugate decays and electron and muon efficiencies from J/ψe+e,μ+μJ/\psi\rightarrow e^{+}e^{-},~\mu^{+}\mu^{-} decays. The procedures for calculating PID efficiencies from decays are rather similar and are described here for the pions in the DD^{*} channel. The reconstructed invariant mass distribution mπslow(πfastK)m(πfastK)m_{\pi_{\textnormal{slow}}(\pi_{\textnormal{fast}}K)}-m_{(\pi_{\textnormal{fast}}K)} for candidate triplets of tracks is fitted with a threshold background function and combinations of asymmetric Gaussian and polynomial functions for the signal. The initial yield of true pions in the sample can be obtained from the fitted yield of DD^{*}’s in the invariant mass distribution before applying any PID selection criteria. Performing the fit on the same track sample but with additional PID selection criteria for pions, kaons, protons and leptons, and dividing by the initial yield of true pions, gives pion PID efficiencies. All fit uncertainties are propagated through the efficiencies, accounting for correlations. Several matrix elements, especially the ones for leptons due to the high J/ψJ/\psi mass relative to the quark energy, cannot be filled only from data-driven decay studies. Missing efficiencies are estimated once by extrapolating the trend of extracted probabilities with MC information and a second time by utilizing MC probabilities only, which produces two alternative sets of PID matrices; both are used. Examples of pion efficiencies are shown in Fig. 1. Generally, the diagonal matrix elements have values around 90%90\% with the exception of kaon and proton efficiencies that drop at the highest momenta to about 70%70\% and 50%50\%, respectively. The most prominent misidentification probabilities are πK\pi\rightarrow K (up to 15%15\%), KπK\rightarrow\pi (up to 20%20\%) and pKp\rightarrow K (up to 50%50\%).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (color online). Samples of extracted pion PID efficiencies (green triangles) and pion misidentification probabilities to kaons (blue squares), protons (red circles), muons (purple crosses) and electrons (green diamonds) for pions with 0.4cosθlab<0.50.4\leq\cos\theta_{\textnormal{lab}}<0.5 as a function of the pion laboratory-frame momentum plabp_{\textnormal{lab}}. Electron probabilities are small and overlap with muon probability symbols in the plot.

For the correction according to Eq. 1, both sets of PID matrices are inverted using singular value decomposition tools svdbook . Uncertainties on the elements of M1M^{-1} are obtained by statistical analysis of large samples of inverted PID matrices whose elements are varied before inversion according to their uncertainties. Finally, these uncertainties are propagated as systematic uncertainties to the PID-corrected track yields. Measured yields Nj,measN_{j,\textnormal{meas}} are corrected with each set of alternative matrices. The final PID-corrected yields are calculated from the average of the two corrections. The difference between the corrections is assigned as additional systematic uncertainty. The PID correction changes pion (kaon) yields by around +10%+10\% (20%-20\%) at z0.2z\sim 0.2 and by around +5%+5\% (+10%+10\%) at z1.0z\sim 1.0. The zz-dependence of the changes is due to the kinematic dependence of the extracted PID efficiencies.

After the basic hadronic event selection, experimental data still contain hadron contributions from events other than e+eqq¯e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow q\overline{q}. A simulated sample containing all non-qq¯q\bar{q} physically possible event topologies in e+ee^{+}e^{-} annihilation at Q2=(10.52GeV)2Q^{2}=(10.52~\textnormal{GeV})^{2} is assembled from dedicated QED (BHLUMI bhlumi generator for Bhabha-scattering, KKMC kk generator for μ\mu and τ\tau pair production) and two-photon MC data. Hadron yields from such non-qq¯q\bar{q} events passing the hadronic event selection are scaled to the luminosity of the measurement sample and subtracted from the PID-corrected yields. Contributions from events other than e+eqq¯e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow q\overline{q} are found not to be significant at z0.2z\sim 0.2. At z1.0z\sim 1.0, about 30%30\% of the reconstructed pions and 10%10\% of the reconstructed kaons are created in non-QCD ττ\tau\tau and two-photon events. Statistical uncertainties are propagated as systematic uncertainties on the corrected yields.

The reconstructed values of zz are smeared around the true values because of the non-zero momentum resolution, which is smaller than half of the constant bin width of 0.010.01 at z0.2z\sim 0.2 and comparable to the bin width at z0.9z\sim 0.9. Similar to the particle misidentification correction, the zz-bin migration can be described by a matrix. While a zz cut-off of 0.20.2 is applied to the final cross sections, the smearing matrix needs to be evaluated for z<0.2z<0.2 to take into account smearing into or out of the selection region. Smearing matrices are extracted down to z=0.15z~=~0.15 for pions and z=0.17z~=~0.17 for kaons from the MC simulation. The matrices are inverted using a regularized unfolding procedure described in Ref. regularization . Due to limitations of the method, the correction is only applied to yields below z=0.98z~=~0.98 for pions and kaons and so imposes an upper limit on zz for the final cross sections. All uncertainties are propagated through the unfolding procedure. Additional systematic uncertainties are assigned from tracks smearing out of and into the interval 0.2z<0.980.2\leq z<0.98, the choice of the regularization weights and the difference in momentum resolution of the detector simulation compared to the resolution extracted from experimental cosmic ray data given in Ref. belledetector . The smearing correction causes no significant change in the measured yields because of the good momentum resolution, small bin width and mostly symmetric smearing to lower and higher values of zz.

Some hadrons are lost or gained through decays in flight. In addition, hadrons are lost due to interaction with detector material while others are created in such interactions. Finally, the track finding and fitting algorithm may find fake tracks or fail to reconstruct true tracks because of detector inefficiencies or occupancy effects. Limitations in the MC simulation do not allow us to distinguish these processes. Thus, a joint correction is performed for all processes in each zz bin, extracting ratios between reconstructed and generated particle yields. Concerning decay-in-flight (DIF), the QCD framework used by global analyses usually does not account for hadrons created in weak decays, which are nevertheless present in measured cross sections. Correction factors to remove pions and kaons produced in weak decays (e.g., from τ\tau leptons, kaons and DD mesons, Λ\Lambda and heavier baryons) would be purely simulation-dependent. To be consistent, all weakly produced pions and kaons are included in the results, and all decayed pions and kaons are recovered. For the final cross sections, we provide supplementary fractions of pions and kaons originating from strong and weak decays archiveddata , extracted from MC data. For z0.5z\lesssim 0.5, the fraction of weakly-produced pions (kaons) is 30%30\% (50%50\%) but vanishes towards z1.0z\sim 1.0 due to phase-space limitations. The implementation of DIF in the MC simulation is tested by analytical calculations and found to be consistent. Correlation effects between the PID and DIF corrections are studied; the observed correlations are applied as additional systematic uncertainties. The effect of hadronic interaction modeling on particle yields is estimated by comparing efficiencies from the default FLUKA fluka with the GEISHA geisha package and with no hadronic interactions. The small remaining differences are assigned as systematic uncertainties. Fake- and multiple-track reconstruction is found to be negligible. Track reconstruction inefficiencies are at the few-percent level and are corrected for. The most significant track quality cut is the requirement for three or more hits in the SVD, which also introduces most of the dependence of the efficiencies in this correction for z0.7z\gtrsim 0.7. The overall efficiencies remain above 85%85\% for all zz. Statistical and systematic uncertainties on the efficiencies are propagated as systematic uncertainties on the corrected yields.

To obtain the best-measured reconstructed tracks, the analysis is limited to the barrel region of the detector. A correction is applied to recover the 4π4\pi physical particle yield. Corresponding efficiencies from the MC simulation decrease from about 65%65\% at z0.5z\lesssim 0.5 and level out around 60%60\% at z1.0z\sim 1.0. The behavior at z1.0z\sim 1.0 is consistent with the assumption that hadrons with z1.0z\sim 1.0 follow the known 1+cos2θcms1+\cos^{2}\theta_{\textnormal{cms}} distribution of fragmenting quarks, where θcms\theta_{\textnormal{cms}} is the scattering angle in the center-of-mass frame. For z<1.0z<1.0, additional transverse hadron momentum causes the cosθcms\cos\theta_{\textnormal{cms}} spectra to become constant and efficiencies to increase. The MC description of the cosθcms\cos\theta_{\textnormal{cms}} dependence in the fragmentation process is tested with experimental data yields in a two-dimensional zz and cosθcms\cos\theta_{\textnormal{cms}} binning. Consistency is found within statistical uncertainties and no additional systematic uncertainty is assigned. Statistical uncertainties on the efficiencies are propagated as systematic uncertainties on the corrected yields.

Hard initial-state and final-state photon radiation (ISR/FSR) processes reduce the fragmentation energy scale s/2\sqrt{s}/2 for both (ISR) or for one (FSR) final-state quark. Therefore, experimentally measured yields contain a variety of fragmentation scales s/2\sqrt{s}/2. A theoretical deconvolution of ISR/FSR from measured yields is beyond the scope of this measurement. Instead, we keep the energy scales in the measurement sample within 0.5%0.5\% of the nominal s/2\sqrt{s}/2 in order to remain below the scale resolution of the state-of-the-art next-to-leading order DGLAP evolutions. Corresponding fractions of hadrons from events with summed ISR/FSR photon energies of less than 0.5%×s/20.5\%\times\sqrt{s}/2 are extracted from the MC simulation for each zz bin. These fractions rise from 65%65\% at z0.5z\lesssim 0.5 to almost 100%100\% at maximum zz due to phase-space limitations for ISR/FSR. The fractions are applied bin-by-bin to the measured yields to exclude particles from events with large ISR/FSR contributions. According to MC simulations, 35%35\% of all events are excluded. Systematic uncertainties are assigned from the dependence of the hadron fractions on the chosen PYTHIA MC parameter sets and from accounting for the remaining scale variance in the sample.

Efficiencies for all applied event selections are extracted from MC simulations. Efficiencies for the hadronic event selection are close to unity at z0.2z\sim 0.2. They drop rapidly at larger zz since both the track multiplicity and heavy jet mass requirements disfavor events containing tracks with z1.0z\sim 1.0. In such events, the phase space for additional particles and substantial remaining transverse momentum is significantly reduced. The efficiencies drop to about 60%60\% at z0.9z\sim 0.9 and to less than 10%10\% for z1.0z\sim 1.0. Conversely, efficiencies for the visible energy requirement are above 95%95\% at z1.0z\sim 1.0, but drop to about 75%75\% for particles with z0.2z\sim 0.2. This can be understood from the increased likelihood for events containing tracks with z1.0z\sim 1.0 to deposit sufficient energy in the barrel part of the detector. The measured yields are corrected accordingly and statistical uncertainties are propagated as systematic uncertainties on the corrected yields. The distributions of event shape variables used in the event selection are compared between MC and experimental data. Differences in these distributions causing variations in event selection efficiencies are assigned as systematic uncertainties.

After all corrections, the measured yields are normalized to the time-integrated luminosity of the measurement sample, 68.068.0 fb-1, with an uncertainty of 1.4%1.4\%. The resulting final charge-integrated differential pion and kaon cross sections dσh±/dzd\sigma_{h^{\pm}}/dz for h±={π±,K±}h^{\pm}=\{\pi^{\pm},K^{\pm}\} are displayed in Fig. 2. All cross section values and uncertainties are available in Ref. archiveddata . Combined relative statistical and systematic uncertainties remain below 5%5\% up to fractional hadron energies z0.65z\sim 0.65, then rise to about 15%15\% (pions) and 24%24\% (kaons) at z0.9z\sim 0.9 and reach 55%55\% (pions) and more than 100%100\% (kaons) at maximum zz. As a test of all applied corrections, pion and kaon charge ratios Ri=Ni/Ni+R_{i}=N_{i^{-}}/N_{i^{+}} are fitted with a constant. The results, Rπ=0.995±0.008R_{\pi}=0.995\pm 0.008 and RK=1.000±0.009R_{K}=1.000\pm 0.009 (with a combined statistical and systematic uncertainty), are consistent with 1.01.0 within the extracted uncertainties and indicate consistency of the performed corrections.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (color online). Final charge-integrated differential pion (green solid boxes) and kaon (blue empty boxes) production cross sections as a function of the fractional hadron energy zz. Statistical uncertainties are shown by error bars, systematic uncertainties by error bands.

The precision of the present measurement is systematics-limited for all zz. For z0.5z\lesssim 0.5, the dominant systematic uncertainties arise from the initial/final state radiation correction. At z1.0z\sim 1.0, the momentum smearing, particle identification and DIF/reconstruction corrections represent the largest contributions to the systematic uncertainties. Figures showing different contributions to the systematic uncertainties for the final pion and kaon cross sections are given in Ref. archiveddata .

The final cross sections are compared with normalized cross section measurements from LEP and SLC experiments as well as from other, lower energy e+ee^{+}e^{-} experiments. As an illustration, the pion cross section is compared to those from Refs. aleph ; delphi ; sld ; argus9and10 ; cleo10 ; slac3 ; tasso34and44 ; tpc29prl52 ; tpc29prl61 in Fig. 3. The corresponding plot for kaon cross sections can be found in Ref. archiveddata . The resolution in zz is significantly improved for all compared normalized cross sections over most of the zz range of this measurement. In addition, no other previous measurement probes the zz dependence of hadron production for z0.7z\gtrsim 0.7. The total relative uncertainties of the previous measurements described above are larger or comparable to the uncertainties achieved in the results reported here. In particular, significantly better precision than previous measurements at low energy scales is reached. A comparison of the Belle results with simulated data shows agreement for z0.5z\lesssim 0.5, but exhibits a strong dependence on the chosen simulation parameter values at z0.6z\gtrsim 0.6 (see Ref. archiveddata ).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (color online). Belle results compared to charge-integrated normalized pion cross sections (multiplicities) from selected measurements. For better visibility, all data sets are scaled by arbitrary numbers (indicated between parentheses) 222Presentation style based on plots created by O. Biebel et al. shown in Ref. ffreview . Statistical and systematic uncertainties are added in quadrature.

In conclusion, differential cross sections of identified charged pion and kaon production are measured over a broad range in zz with 0.2z<0.980.2\leq z<0.98 with high relative precision. The analyzed data sample of 68.068.0 fb-1 has been accumulated at a center-of-mass energy of s=10.52\sqrt{s}=10.52 GeV, rendering this measurement the first precision measurement far from LEP/SLC center-of-mass energies. The high statistics and good control of systematic uncertainties will, for the first time, give constraints on the dependence of hadron FFs at z0.7z\gtrsim 0.7 and allow studies of higher order QCD effects at z1.0z\sim 1.0.

Acknowledgements.
The authors would like to thank M. Stratmann, D. de Florian, R. Sassot, S. Kumano, F. Jegerlehner, S. Jadach and H. Czyz for valuable discussions and suggestions. We thank the KEKB group for excellent operation of the accelerator; the KEK cryogenics group for efficient solenoid operations; and the KEK computer group, the NII, and PNNL/EMSL for valuable computing and SINET4 network support. We acknowledge support from MEXT, JSPS and Nagoya’s TLPRC (Japan); ARC and DIISR (Australia); NSFC (China); MSMT (Czechia); DST (India); INFN (Italy); MEST, NRF, GSDC of KISTI, and WCU (Korea); MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MES and RFAAE (Russia); ARRS (Slovenia); IKERBASQUE and UPV/EHU (Spain); SNSF (Switzerland); NSC and MOE (Taiwan); and DOE and NSF (USA).

References

  • (1) D. de Florian, R. Sassot, and M. Stratmann, Phys. Rev. D 75, 114010114010 (20072007).
  • (2) M. Hirai, S. Kumano, T. -H. Nagai, and K. Sudoh, Phys. Rev. D 75, 094009094009 (20072007).
  • (3) S. Albino, B. A. Kniehl, and G. Kramer, Nucl. Phys. B 803, 4242 (20082008).
  • (4) L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 20, 9494 (19751975); V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15, 438438 (19721972); G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. B 126, 298298 (19771977); Yu. L. Dokshitzer, Sov. Phys. JETP 46, 641641 (19771977).
  • (5) R. Barate et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Phys. Rep. 294, 11 (19981998).
  • (6) P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 5, 585585 (19981998).
  • (7) R. Akers et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 63, 181181 (19941994).
  • (8) K. Abe et al. (SLD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 69, 072003072003 (20042004).
  • (9) J. P. Lees et al. (BaBar Collaboration), arXiv:1306.28951306.2895 [hep-ex] (20132013), submitted to Phys. Rev. D.
  • (10) D. P. Anderle, F. Ringer, and W. Vogelsang, arXiv:1212.20991212.2099 [hep-ph] (20122012), submitted to Phys. Rev. D.
  • (11) S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect., A 499, 11 (20032003), and other papers included in this volume; T. Abe et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (20132013) 0303A001001 and following articles up to 0303A011011.
  • (12) A. Abashian et al. (Belle Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. Sect. A 479, 117117 (20022002); also see detector section in J. Brodzicka et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. (20122012) 0404D001001.
  • Sjöstrand (1994) T. Sjöstrand, Comput. Phys. Commun. 82, 74 (1994).
  • Brun et al. (1984) R. Brun, F. Bruyant, M. Maire, A. C. McPherson and P. Zanarini (1984), CERN-DD/EE/84-1.
  • (15) See, e.g., G.E. Forsythe, M.A. Malcolm and C.B. Moler, Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 19771977.
  • (16) S. Jadach, W. Placzek, E. Richter-Was, B.F.L. Ward, and Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. 102, 229229 (19971997).
  • (17) S. Jadach, B.F.L. Ward, and Z. Was, Comput. Phys. Commun. 130, 260260 (20002000).
  • (18) A. Höcker and V. Kartvelishvili, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 372, 469469 (19961996).
  • (19) All differential cross section values and uncertainties, together with the fractions of hadrons from strong and weak decays, are given in the attached supplemental data file.
  • (20) A. Fass , A. Ferrari, J. Ranft, and P.R. Sala, Proc. IV Int. Conf. on Calorimetry in High Energy Physics, La Biodola, Italy, 2121-2626 Sept. 19931993; Ed. A. Menzione and A. Scribano, World Scientific, p. 493493.
  • (21) H. Fesefeldt, RWTH Aachen Report PITHA, 85/0285/02 (19851985).
  • (22) H. Albrecht et al. (ARGUS Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 44, 547547 (19891989).
  • (23) S. Behrends, et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 31, 21612161 (19851985).
  • (24) M. T. Ronan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 367367 (19801980).
  • (25) W. Braunschweig et al. (TASSO Collaboration), Z. Phys. C 42, 189189 (19891989).
  • (26) H. Aihara et al. (TPC/Two Gamma Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 577577 (19841984).
  • (27) H. Aihara et al. (TPC/Two Gamma Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 12631263 (19881988).
  • (28) J. Beringer et al. (PDG), Phys. Rev. D 86, 010001010001 (20122012).