This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Propagation of gamma rays and production of free electrons in air

Y. S. Dimant, G. S. Nusinovich, P. Sprangle, J. Penano, C. A    Romero-Talamas, and V. L. Granatstein
Abstract

A new concept of remote detection of concealed radioactive materials has been recently proposed [1]-[3]. It is based on the breakdown in air at the focal point of a high-power beam of electromagnetic waves produced by a THz gyrotron. To initiate the avalanche breakdown, seed free electrons should be present in this focal region during the electromagnetic pulse. This paper is devoted to the analysis of production of free electrons by gamma rays leaking from radioactive materials. Within a hundred meters from the radiation source, the fluctuating free electrons appear with the rate that may exceed significantly the natural background ionization rate. During the gyrotron pulse of about 10 microsecond length, such electrons may seed the electric breakdown and create sufficiently dense plasma at the focal region to be detected as an unambiguous effect of the concealed radioactive material.

1 Introduction

A new concept of remote detection of concealed radioactive materials has been recently proposed [1]. This concept is based on breakdown in free air at the focal point of a high-power beam of electromagnetic waves. To realize such breakdown, the wave amplitude in a focal region should exceed the breakdown threshold. To initiate the avalanche breakdown process, seed free electrons should be present in this focal region during the electromagnetic pulse. When the wavelength is short enough (sub-THz or THz frequency range) the wave beam can be focused in a spot with dimensions on the order of a wavelength and, then, the total volume where the wave amplitude exceeds the breakdown threshold can be rather small. This fact allows one to realize conditions [1] when the breakdown rate in the case of the ambient electron density is rather low. So in the cases when the breakdown rate is much higher than the expected one can conclude that in the vicinity of a focused wave beam there is a hidden source of radioactive material which ionizes the air. Some issues important for realizing this concept are discussed in Refs. [2] and [3].

In the present paper, we analyze another issue important for realizing this concept which was only briefly discussed in previous references, viz. propagation of γ\gamma-rays in air and production of free electrons by these quanta, mainly due to inelastic Compton scattering. It should be noted that, in principle, due to the atomic reaction radioactive materials emit both MeV-scale γ\gamma-rays and β\beta-electrons. For example, a disintegrating atom of 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co produces one 2.5052.505 MeV β\beta-electron and two γ\gamma-quanta with the energies 1.1731.173 and 1.3321.332 MeV [5]. Metal shielding and container walls largely stop β\beta-electrons, while absorbing only a fraction of γ\gamma-rays. All unabsorbed γ\gamma-rays, even scattered ones, will eventually leak through the walls and propagate in air. An example of energy distribution of γ\gamma-rays and electrons outside the container wall is shown in Fig. 1 reproduced from Ref. [2].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Results of Monte-Carlo simulations (MCNP code) for 1 Curie of 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co showing the energy spectrum of electrons (red) and photons (blue) in a 1cm3 tally volume outside a 0.5 cm thick steel shipping container. Solid lines are the results of calculations for the case when electron cutoff energy inside the steel wall adjacent to tally volume is set to 1 keV, while dotted lines are for electron cutoff energy set to 100 keV.

The energetic γ\gamma-quanta escaped from the container will occasionally collide with air molecules, experiencing Compton scattering and photoelectric absorption, as discussed below. Their propagation distance can be estimated based on the interaction cross-section σ\sigma given, e.g., in Ref. [4] on Figures 2.50 (d) and (e) for nitrogen and oxygen, respectively. (One of these very similar figures was reproduced in Ref. [2].) From these figures one can draw, at least, two conclusions. First, for energies between 0.1 MeV and 1.2 MeV shown in Fig. 1, the dominant effect in the production of free electrons is the Compton scattering (this conclusion agrees with Figures 2.42, 2.43 of Ref. [4]). Second, the interaction cross-section σ\sigma, as the function of energy, gradually increases from about 0.055 cm2/g at 1.2 MeV to about 0.16 cm2/g at 0.1 MeV. Correspondingly, the mean free pass of γ\gamma-rays in air (na=2nm61019n_{a}=2n_{m}\approx 6\cdot 10^{19}\ atoms/cm3) defined as l=1/(naσ)l=1/(n_{a}\sigma) varies from \sim120 m for 1.2 MeV quanta down to about 40 m for 100 keV quanta. When the energy of γ\gamma-quanta decreases down to 30 keV and below, the photoelectric absorption becomes the dominant effect.

It is important that both the Compton scattering and photoelectric absorption ionize air molecules, producing high-energy electrons within the MeV range. These primary electrons, which should not be confused with the β\beta-electrons directly from radioactivity, cannot propagate too far: they will be absorbed by air within a few meters [4]. During their short lifetime, however, most of these primary electrons produce thousands of secondary ones. It is this process that determines the local rate of total electron production required for the avalanche breakdown [3]. As discussed above, all unabsorbed γ\gamma-quanta propagate away from the radioactive source, continuing to produce free electrons. Hence to estimate the total rate of free-electron production at various distances from the radioactive source, one needs to analyze the collisional propagation of γ\gamma-quanta in air. In this paper, we analyze the photon propagation in the near-source zone, i.e., at distances less or of order of the mean free pass ll estimated above.

[Uncaptioned image]
[Uncaptioned image]
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Kinetic energy, KN differential cross section and angular differential cross-section of gamma photons.

2 Production of free electrons

As propagating γ\gamma-quanta collide with air molecules, producing high-energy primary electrons, they experience a strong angular scatter and energy losses. The major electron production takes place when the photon energy γ\mathcal{E}_{\gamma} remains between 30 keV and 1.3 MeV, i.e., in the energy range where the Compton scattering dominates. In this range, one can successfully apply the Klein-Nishina (K-N) theory that describes Compton scattering of photons by free electrons [4]. Indeed, after a typical collision between the incident photon and an electron bound within an O2 or N2 molecule, the originally bound electron becomes free and acquires a significant momentum (energy). If the acquired energy γ\mathcal{E}_{\gamma} greatly exceeds the electron binding energy then both the scattered photons and released electrons will have momentum distributions fairly close to those if the originally bound electron was free and at rest. Furthermore, if the incident-photon energy is well above the maximum electron binding energy (the K-shell edge), K500\mathcal{E}_{K}\simeq 500 eV for the air molecules, then the K-N theory should be applicable to all bound electrons with the exception of small-angle scattering when the released electrons acquire a small energy, eK\mathcal{E}_{e}\lesssim\mathcal{E}_{K} [4, Section 2.6.2.1].

As described in numerous textbooks, see, e.g., Ref. [4, Section 2.6], in the frameworks of the K-N theory, the kinetic energy, Tc(pe2+me2c2)1/2mec2=γγT^{\prime}\equiv c\left(p_{e}^{2}+m_{e}^{2}c^{2}\right)^{1/2}-m_{e}c^{2}=\mathcal{E}_{\gamma}-\mathcal{E}_{\gamma}^{\prime}, of the outgoing electron and the scalar momentum of the scattered photon, pγ=|pγ|=γ/cp_{\gamma}^{\prime}=|\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}|=\mathcal{E}_{\gamma}^{\prime}/c (for the incident photon with pγ=|pγ|=0/cp_{\gamma}=|\vec{p}_{\gamma}|=\mathcal{E}_{0}/c) are given by

T\displaystyle T^{\prime} α2(1cosΘγ)mec21+α(1cosΘγ),\displaystyle\equiv\frac{\alpha^{2}\left(1-\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right)m_{e}c^{2}}{1+\alpha\left(1-\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right)}, (1a)
pγ\displaystyle p_{\gamma}^{\prime} =(1pγ+1cosΘγmec)1,\displaystyle=\left(\frac{1}{p_{\gamma}}+\frac{1-\cos\Theta_{\gamma}}{m_{e}c}\right)^{-1}, (1b)
while the K-N differential scattering cross-section is given by
dσKNdΩγ=r022(pγpγ)2(pγpγ+pγpγsin2Θγ)\displaystyle\frac{d\sigma_{\mathrm{KN}}}{d\Omega_{\gamma}}=\frac{r_{0}^{2}}{2}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}\right)^{2}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}-\sin^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}\right)
=r022[1+α(1cosΘγ)]2[1+cos2Θγ+α2(1cosΘγ)21+α(1cosΘγ)].\displaystyle=\frac{r_{0}^{2}}{2\left[1+\alpha\left(1-\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right)\right]^{2}}\left[1+\cos^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}+\frac{\alpha^{2}\left(1-\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right)^{2}}{1+\alpha\left(1-\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right)}\right]. (2)

In (1)–(2), Θγ\Theta_{\gamma} is the scattering angle, i.e., the angle between the momenta of the incident and scattered photons, pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma} and pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}, which is rigidly related to pγp_{\gamma} and pγp_{\gamma}^{\prime},

cosΘγ=1mecpγ+mecpγ,\cos\Theta_{\gamma}=1-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}, (3)

Ωγ=(Θγ,Φγ)\Omega_{\gamma}=(\Theta_{\gamma},\Phi_{\gamma}) is the solid scattering angle, mem_{e} is the electron rest mass, cc is the vacuum speed of light, αγ/(mec2)=pγ/(mec)\alpha\equiv\mathcal{E}_{\gamma}/(m_{e}c^{2})=p_{\gamma}/(m_{e}c) is the energy of the incident photon normalized to the electron rest energy and r02.818×1013r_{0}\approx 2.818\times 10^{-13} cm\operatorname{cm} is the classical electron radius.

The K-N formula (2) allows one to calculate the total cross-section and, therefore, the production rate of the primary electrons, 2ZAirnmcσKN2Z_{\mathrm{Air}}n_{m}c\sigma_{\mathrm{KN}}, where nm=na/231019n_{m}=n_{a}/2\approx 3\cdot 10^{19}\ cm-3 is the total density of air molecules and ZAirZ_{\mathrm{Air}} is the mean air atomic number (for the standard air composition of 79% N2 with ZN=7Z_{\text{N}}=7 and 21% O2 with ZO=8Z_{\text{O}}=8, we have ZAir7.21Z_{\mathrm{Air}}\approx 7.21). Of prime interest to us is the production rate, dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt, of secondary (knock-on) electrons which will inevitably end up attaching to neutral molecules, i.e., forming negative ions [3]. Each primary electron with the kinetic energy TT produces on average T/(34eV)T/(34\operatorname{eV}) secondary electrons [5][7]. Then, to determine the total average rate of secondary electron production by photons of a given initial energy α\alpha, we should first integrate the K-N differential cross-section over all solid angles with the weight factor TT^{\prime} given by (1a) and (3),

σTdσKNdΩγT𝑑Ωγ=2π11dσKNdΩγT(Θγ)d(cosΘγ)\displaystyle\sigma_{T}\equiv\int\frac{d\sigma_{\mathrm{KN}}}{d\Omega_{\gamma}}\ T^{\prime}d\Omega_{\gamma}=2\pi\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{d\sigma_{\mathrm{KN}}}{d\Omega_{\gamma}}\ T^{\prime}(\Theta_{\gamma})d\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right)
=πr02mec2α211(1x)[1+α(1x)]3[1+x2+α2(1x)21+α(1x)]𝑑x,\displaystyle=\pi r_{0}^{2}m_{e}c^{2}\alpha^{2}\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{\left(1-x\right)}{\left[1+\alpha\left(1-x\right)\right]^{3}}\left[1+x^{2}+\frac{\alpha^{2}\left(1-x\right)^{2}}{1+\alpha\left(1-x\right)}\right]dx, (4)

and then divide the result by 34eV34\operatorname{eV}. The exact calculation of the last integral of (4) yields a function

K(α)α211(1x)[1+α(1x)]3[1+x2+α2(1x)21+α(1x)]𝑑x\displaystyle K(\alpha)\equiv\alpha^{2}\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{\left(1-x\right)}{\left[1+\alpha\left(1-x\right)\right]^{3}}\left[1+x^{2}+\frac{\alpha^{2}\left(1-x\right)^{2}}{1+\alpha\left(1-x\right)}\right]dx
=18+102α+186α2+102α320α43α(1+2α)3+(1+α)(α3)α2ln(1+2α),\displaystyle=\frac{18+102\alpha+186\alpha^{2}+102\alpha^{3}-20\alpha^{4}}{3\alpha\left(1+2\alpha\right)^{3}}+\frac{\left(1+\alpha\right)\left(\alpha-3\right)}{\alpha^{2}}\ln\left(1+2\alpha\right),

shown in Fig. 3 by the black solid line. Note that the function K(α)K(\alpha) is proportional to the average “absorption cross section” [9, Eq. (8e-28)],

σa=πr02K(α)α.\sigma_{a}=\frac{\pi r_{0}^{2}K(\alpha)}{\alpha}. (5)
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Function K(α)K(\alpha) (solid black) and its linear approximation 0.37α0.37\alpha (dashed red)

In the energy range of interest, γ1.332MeV\mathcal{E}_{\gamma}\leq 1.332\ \operatorname{MeV}, i.e., ααmax2.61\alpha\leq\mathcal{\alpha}_{\max}\approx 2.61, the complex function K(α)K(\alpha) can be quite accurately approximated by the dependence 0.37α0.37\alpha (σa=0.37πr029.23×1026cm2\sigma_{a}=0.37\pi r_{0}^{2}\approx 9.23\times 10^{-26}\operatorname{cm}^{2}) shown in Fig. 3 by the red dashed line. This approximation allows us to describe the total average rate of secondary electron production by a simple formula:

dNedt\displaystyle\frac{dN_{e}}{dt} =2ZAirnmcσTnγ2.32ZAirr02nmc(mec234eV)0αFγ(α)𝑑α\displaystyle=2Z_{\mathrm{Air}}n_{m}c\sigma_{T}n_{\gamma}\simeq 2.32Z_{\mathrm{Air}}r_{0}^{2}n_{m}c\left(\frac{m_{e}c^{2}}{34\operatorname{eV}}\right)\int_{0}^{\infty}\alpha F_{\gamma}(\alpha)d\alpha
2.09×1010s10αFγ(α)𝑑α,\displaystyle\approx 2.09\times 10^{10}\operatorname{s}^{-1}\int_{0}^{\mathcal{\infty}}\alpha F_{\gamma}(\alpha)d\alpha, (6)

where Fγ(α)F_{\gamma}(\alpha) is the photon energy distribution normalized to the total photon density, nγ=Fγ(α)𝑑αn_{\gamma}=\int F_{\gamma}(\alpha)d\alpha, and expressed in terms of the full momentum distribution function fγ(pγ)f_{\gamma}(\vec{p}_{\gamma}) (Sect. 3) as Fγ(α)=me3c3α2fγ(pγ,Ωγ)𝑑ΩγF_{\gamma}(\alpha)=m_{e}^{3}c^{3}\alpha^{2}\int f_{\gamma}(p_{\gamma},\Omega_{\gamma})d\Omega_{\gamma}. Thus, to evaluate the average rate of secondary electron production as a function of the distance from the radiation source, one needs to determine the photon energy distribution along with its distance variations. This requres a collisional kinetic theory for propagating photons.

3 Photon kinetics in spherically symmetric approximation

Radiated and scattered γ\gamma-quanta can be treated as a gas of incoherent and unpolarized photons. For photon energies above 30 keV, this gas is prone mainly to Compton scattering, while at lower energies the photoelectric absorption starts dominating. Both processes result in air molecule ionization, i.e., production of free electrons. The coherent Rayleigh scattering is at least an order of magnitude smaller and can be neglected. Also, the process inverse to photon absorption, viz., photon production during collisions of free electrons with air molecules, in the range of electron energies we are dealing with (1.3\leq 1.3 MeV), is negligibly small. Therefore, we will assume the spatial and momentum distribution of photons to be independent of any feedback from the free electrons.

We will treat individual γ\gamma-quanta kinetically as classical particles localized in both real and momentum spaces. The photon momentum distribution, fγ(pγ)f_{\gamma}(\vec{p}_{\gamma}), may have a temporal (tt) and spatial (r\vec{r}) dependences. Since photons propagate and scatter practically instantaneously we will ingore any temporal dependence. Being concerned mainly with distances from the radioactive material much longer than the container size aa, we will treat this material as a point-like source of γ\gamma-quanta. Ignoring possible effects of the ground, air inhomogeneity and container anisotropy, we will assume spherically symmetric propagation of photons.

In the spherically symmetric geometry, the photon momentum distribution depends on one spatial variable, viz., the distance rr of a localized photon from the point-like source, and two momentum components: the absolute value of the momentum, pγp_{\gamma}, and the momentum polar angle with respect to the radius vector at the given location, θγ\theta_{\gamma} (the latter should not be confused with the angle between the scattered and incident photons, Θγ\Theta_{\gamma}). Thus the photon momentum distribution is a function of three variables, fγ(r,pγ,θγ)f_{\gamma}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\theta_{\gamma}\right). Since the angle θγ\theta_{\gamma} is not invariant with respect to the collisionless motion, it is more convenient to pass from θγ\theta_{\gamma} to the “impact parameter” ρ\rho,

ρrsinθγ,cosθγ(ρ)=±(1ρ2r2)1/2,\rho\equiv r\sin\theta_{\gamma},\qquad\cos\theta_{\gamma}(\rho)=\pm\left(1-\frac{\rho^{2}}{r^{2}}\right)^{1/2}, (7)

equal to the shortest distance from the radioactive source (r=0r=0) to the straight-line trajectory of a freely propagating photon. The parameter ρ\rho is proportional to the photon angular momentum and remains invariant during the free photon propagation. It can be changed only during brief collisions that lead to Compton scattering. For any given positive ρ\rho, we distinguish between two groups of photons with different signs of cosθγ(ρ)\cos\theta_{\gamma}(\rho) in (7): the “outgoing” photons with the ‘++’ sign (corresponding to dr/dt>0dr/dt>0) and “ingoing” photons with the ‘-’ sign (dr/dt<0dr/dt<0), as illustrated by Figure 4. We will denote the two corresponding distribution functions by fγ±f_{\gamma}^{\pm}.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Schematics of photon trajectories.

In terms of fγ±(r,pγ,ρ)f_{\gamma}^{\pm}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right), the total photon number density, nγn_{\gamma}, and radial flux density, gγ(r)g_{\gamma}\left(r\right), are given by

nγ(r)\displaystyle n_{\gamma}\left(r\right) ±fγ±d3pγ=2πr±0pγ2𝑑pγ0rfγ±(r,pγ,ρ)ρdρ(r2ρ2)1/2,\displaystyle\equiv\sum_{\pm}\int f_{\gamma}^{\pm}d^{3}p_{\gamma}=\frac{2\pi}{r}\sum_{\pm}\int_{0}^{\infty}p_{\gamma}^{2}dp_{\gamma}\int_{0}^{r}\frac{f_{\gamma}^{\pm}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\rho d\rho}{\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}, (8a)
gγ(r)\displaystyle g_{\gamma}\left(r\right) c±(cosθγ)fγ±d3pγ=2πcr2±(±0pγ2𝑑pγ0rfγ±(r,pγ,ρ)ρ𝑑ρ).\displaystyle\equiv c\sum_{\pm}\int\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}\right)f_{\gamma}^{\pm}d^{3}p_{\gamma}=\frac{2\pi c}{r^{2}}\sum_{\pm}\left(\pm\int_{0}^{\infty}p_{\gamma}^{2}dp_{\gamma}\int_{0}^{r}f_{\gamma}^{\pm}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\rho d\rho\right). (8b)

The momentum distribution function of freely propagating γ\gamma-quanta with occasional spiky collisions satisfies the Boltzmann kinetic equation derived in Appendix A,

±c(1ρ2r2)1/2fγ±r=L^rfγ±ν(pγ)fγ±,\pm c\left(1-\frac{\rho^{2}}{r^{2}}\right)^{1/2}\frac{\partial f_{\gamma}^{\pm}}{\partial r}=\hat{L}_{r}f_{\gamma}^{\prime\pm}-\nu(p_{\gamma})f_{\gamma}^{\pm}, (9)

where the left-hand side describes the collisionless propagation of photons, while the right-hand side (RHS) describes their collisions with air molecules.

The first term in the RHS of (9) describes the kinetic arrival of photons to the elementary phase volume d3pγd^{3}p_{\gamma} around given pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma} due to collisional scattering of incident photons from d3pγd^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime} around pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime},

L^rfγ±=2Zairnmr02mec2pγ2pγ𝑑pγ(pγpγ+pγpγsin2Θγ)\displaystyle\hat{L}_{r}f_{\gamma}^{\prime\pm}=\frac{2Z_{\mathrm{air}}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}c^{2}}{p_{\gamma}^{2}}\int_{p_{\gamma}}^{\infty}dp_{\gamma}^{\prime}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}-\sin^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}\right)
×CC+fγ(pγ,cosθγ)d(cosθγ)S(cosΘγ,cosθγ,cosθγ),\displaystyle\times\int_{C^{-}}^{C^{+}}\frac{f_{\gamma}^{\prime}\left(p_{\gamma}^{\prime},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)d\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)}{\sqrt{S\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)}}, (10)

where

S(cosΘγ,cosθγ,cosθγ)=(C+cosθγ)(cosθγC),\displaystyle S\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)=\left(C^{+}-\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}-C^{-}\right), (11)
C±cos(Θγθγ)=cosΘγcosθγ±(1cos2Θγ)1/2sinθγ\displaystyle C^{\pm}\equiv\cos\left(\Theta_{\gamma}\mp\theta_{\gamma}\right)=\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\cos\theta_{\gamma}\pm\left(1-\cos^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}\right)^{1/2}\sin\theta_{\gamma}

and Θγ\Theta_{\gamma} is the angle of Compton scattering from pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime} to pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma},

cosΘγ(pγ,pγ)=1mecpγ+mecpγ\cos\Theta_{\gamma}(p_{\gamma},p_{\gamma}^{\prime})=1-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}} (12)

(here pγpγp_{\gamma}\leq p_{\gamma}^{\prime}). In (10), we keep θγ\theta_{\gamma}, θγ\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime} for easier integration over the angular variables, but before appplying /r\partial/\partial r in the LHS of (9), cosθγ\cos\theta_{\gamma} should be expressed in terms of ρ\rho using (7).

The last term in the RHS of (9) describes the total kinetic departure of pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}-photons due to their scattering with the total collision frequency, ν(pγ=mecα)\nu(p_{\gamma}=m_{e}c\alpha), proportional to the total K-N cross-section [4],

ν=2cnmZairσKN\displaystyle\nu=2cn_{m}Z_{\mathrm{air}}\sigma_{\mathrm{KN}}
=4πnmr02cZair[2+8α+9α2+α3α2(1+2α)2(2+2αα2)ln(1+2α)2α3].\displaystyle=4\pi n_{m}r_{0}^{2}cZ_{\mathrm{air}}\left[\frac{2+8\alpha+9\alpha^{2}+\alpha^{3}}{\alpha^{2}\left(1+2\alpha\right)^{2}}-\frac{\left(2+2\alpha-\alpha^{2}\right)\ln\left(1+2\alpha\right)}{2\alpha^{3}}\right]. (13)

Equation (9) should be supplemented by the boundary conditions. In accord with (8b), at a small distance rr that satisfies arl=c/νa\ll r\ll l=c/\nu, the photon distribution function radiated by the point-like radioactive source can be written as

fγ+(pγ,ρ)|r0\displaystyle\left.f_{\gamma}^{+}\left(p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\right|_{r\rightarrow 0} =s=1kfγs+(pγ,ρ)|r0,\displaystyle=\sum_{s=1}^{k}\left.f_{\gamma s}^{+}\left(p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\right|_{r\rightarrow 0},
fγs+(pγ,ρ)|r0\displaystyle\left.f_{\gamma s}^{+}\left(p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\right|_{r\rightarrow 0} =Iγ(0)δ(cosθγ1)δ(pγps)8π2cr2ps2=Iγ(0)δ(ρ)δ(pγps)8π2cρps2,\displaystyle=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\delta\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}-1\right)\delta\left(p_{\gamma}-p_{s}\right)}{8\pi^{2}cr^{2}p_{s}^{2}}=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\delta\left(\rho\right)\delta\left(p_{\gamma}-p_{s}\right)}{8\pi^{2}c\rho p_{s}^{2}}, (14)

where Iγ(0)=3.7×1010s1Q(Ci)I_{\gamma}^{(0)}=3.7\times 10^{10}\operatorname{s}^{-1}Q\left(\mathrm{\operatorname{Ci}}\right) is the total number of radioactive decays per unit time, s=1k\sum_{s=1}^{k} denotes summation over all kinds of primary photons radiated during one disintegration of the radioactive material (usually, k=1k=1,22,33) and δ(pγps)\delta\left(p_{\gamma}-p_{s}\right) expresses the fact that all radiated photons have discrete energies s=cps\mathcal{E}_{s}=cp_{s} (e.g., for 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co: k=2k=2, 1=1.332\mathcal{E}_{1}=1.332 MeV\operatorname{MeV} and 2=1.173\mathcal{E}_{2}=1.173 MeV\operatorname{MeV}). Equation (14) represents the inner boundary condition at r0r\rightarrow 0 applicable to the outgoing photons. For the ingoing photons, we use the natural condition of fγ(pγ,ρ)0f_{\gamma}^{-}\left(p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\rightarrow 0 at rr\rightarrow\infty. Between consecutive collisions, some ingoing photons pass the minimum distance r=ρr=\rho and become outgoing. This yields the matching condition between the two groups:

fγ+(r,pγ,ρ=r)=fγ(r,pγ,ρ=r).f_{\gamma}^{+}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho=r\right)=f_{\gamma}^{-}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho=r\right). (15)

Further, all collisional processes lead only to decreasing photon energies, so there are no photons with energies exceeding the initial ones, fγ+(p>max(ps))=0f_{\gamma}^{+}\left(p>\max(p_{s})\right)=0. Lastly, we assume that at ρ=0\rho=0 (cosθγ=±1\cos\theta_{\gamma}=\pm 1) all momentum distributions behave regularly.

The RHS of (9) satisfies automtically the condition 0pγ2𝑑pγ0r(L^rfγ±νfγ±)(r2ρ2)1/2ρ𝑑ρ=0\int_{0}^{\infty}p_{\gamma}^{2}dp_{\gamma}\int_{0}^{r}(\hat{L}_{r}f_{\gamma}^{\prime\pm}-\nu f_{\gamma}^{\prime\pm})\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{-1/2}\rho d\rho=0, which provides in accord with (8b) conservation of the total photon flux through any surface surrounding the radiation source. This flux conservation is due to the fact that kinetic equation (9) includes only photon scattering. Photoelectric absorption and other possible photon losses can also be included in ν(pγ)\nu(p_{\gamma}) by a simple addition to the RHS of (13). Those effects would break the total flux conservation.

Kinetic equation (9) is solved analytically in Appendix B. The complete solution is given by an infinite series of multiply scattered photons (B.2), where f0+=(fγ+)primf_{0}^{+}=\left(f_{\gamma}^{+}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}} is given by (B.1), fn1±f_{n\geq 1}^{\pm} is determined by recurrence relations (B.4) with the linear integral operator L^r\hat{L}_{r} defined by (10). This general solution, however, involves an increasing number of nested integrations which for n2n\geq 2 are difficult to calculate. Below we restrict our treatment to distances rr from the radiation source located within the mean free path for 1.2 MeV γ\gamma-quanta, rlsc/ν(ps)120mr\lesssim l_{s}\equiv c/\nu(p_{s})\sim 120\ \operatorname{m} (the “near zone”). At these distances, one might expect two dominant photon groups: the primary γ\gamma-quanta beams (n=0n=0) and singly scattered photons (n=1n=1). The momentum distribution for singly scattered photons is obtained in Appendix B.2. However, a mere cutoff of the infinite series (B.2) to its first two terms, f0+f_{0}^{+} and f1±f_{1}^{\pm} given by (B.17)–(B.22), becomes less satisfactory at distances rlsr\sim l_{s} because further scattering of singly scattered photons breaks the total flux conservation. Below we modify the two-group description of photons to make it exactly flux conserving.

4 Photon energy distribution in the near zone

To calculate the total electron production rate dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt given by (6), we need to determine the spatially dependent photon energy distribution at various distances from the radioactive source, Fγ(α)F_{\gamma}(\alpha), where α=pγ/(mec)\alpha=p_{\gamma}/(m_{e}c) is the normalized energy. In this section, however, it is more convenient to use

F(pγ)=pγ2fγ(pγ,Ωγ)𝑑Ωγ=2πpγ2r±0rfγ±(r,pγ,ρ)ρdρ(r2ρ2)1/2,F(p_{\gamma})=p_{\gamma}^{2}\int f_{\gamma}(p_{\gamma},\Omega_{\gamma})d\Omega_{\gamma}=\frac{2\pi p_{\gamma}^{2}}{r}\sum_{\pm}\int_{0}^{r}\frac{f_{\gamma}^{\pm}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\rho d\rho}{\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}, (16)

which differs from by the normalization factor following from dnγ=F(pγ)dpγ=F(α)dαdn_{\gamma}=F(p_{\gamma})dp_{\gamma}=F(\alpha)d\alpha: Fγ(α)=mecF(pγ)F_{\gamma}(\alpha)=m_{e}cF(p_{\gamma}). In terms of F(pγ)F(p_{\gamma}), (6) becomes

(dNedt)prim2.09×1010s11mec0pγF(pγ)𝑑pγ.\left(\frac{dN_{e}}{dt}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}\approx 2.09\times 10^{10}\operatorname{s}^{-1}\frac{1}{m_{e}c}\int_{0}^{\infty}p_{\gamma}F(p_{\gamma})dp_{\gamma}. (17)

4.1 Primary photons

For the primary photons, we have the solution (B.1) valid for arbitrary distances from the radiation source. The exponential factors er/lse^{-r/l_{s}} there describe the beam attenuation due to Compton scattering. For the corresponding F(pγ)F(p_{\gamma}), photon density (nγ)prim\left(n_{\gamma}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}, total flux (Iγ)prim\left(I_{\gamma}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}} and the electron production rate (dNe/dt)prim\left(dN_{e}/dt\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}, we obtain simple formulas

[F(pγ)]prim\displaystyle\left[F(p_{\gamma})\right]_{\mathrm{prim}} =Iγ(0)4πcr2s=1kδ(pγps)er/ls,(nγ)prim=(Iγ)prim4πcr2=Iγ(0)4πcr2s=1ker/ls,\displaystyle=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}}{4\pi cr^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\delta\left(p_{\gamma}-p_{s}\right)e^{-r/l_{s}},\qquad\left(n_{\gamma}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}=\frac{\left(I_{\gamma}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}}{4\pi cr^{2}}=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}}{4\pi cr^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}e^{-r/l_{s}},
(dNedt)prim\displaystyle\left(\frac{dN_{e}}{dt}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}} 2.09×1010s1Iγ(0)4πcr2s=1kpsmecer/ls\displaystyle\approx 2.09\times 10^{10}\operatorname{s}^{-1}\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}}{4\pi cr^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\frac{p_{s}}{m_{e}c}\ e^{-r/l_{s}}
4.017×105s1cm3Iγ(0)(Ci)[r(m)]2s=1ks(MeV)er/ls.\displaystyle\approx 4.017\times 10^{5}\operatorname{s}^{-1}\operatorname{cm}^{-3}\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}(\operatorname{Ci})}{\left[r(\operatorname{m})\right]^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\mathcal{E}_{s}(\operatorname{MeV})e^{-r/l_{s}}. (18)

4.2 Scattered photons: extended n=1n=1 solution

Each primary beam of radiated photons denoted by ss produces its own set of scattered photons characterized by the corresponding partial distribution function fγs+f_{\gamma s}^{+}. Bearing in mind that the distribution of all photons is given by fγ+=s=1kfγs+f_{\gamma}^{+}=\sum_{s=1}^{k}f_{\gamma s}^{+} and

F(pγ)=s=1kFs(pγ),Fs(pγ)=2πpγ2r±0rfγs±(r,pγ,ρ)ρdρ(r2ρ2)1/2F(p_{\gamma})=\sum_{s=1}^{k}F_{s}(p_{\gamma}),\qquad F_{s}(p_{\gamma})=\frac{2\pi p_{\gamma}^{2}}{r}\sum_{\pm}\int_{0}^{r}\frac{f_{\gamma s}^{\pm}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right)\rho d\rho}{\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}} (19)

below we consider separately the partial distributions fγs+f_{\gamma s}^{+} and the corresponding partial moments.

As a primary beam of photons leaves the radiation source it starts producing scattered photons with the rate, which in the close proximity to the radiation source, rlsr\ll l_{s}, grows linearly with distance. Convolved with the 1/r21/r^{2} spherical divergence, the population of scattered photons becomes proportional to 1/r1/r. Our simulations show that this spatial dependence for the energy distribution of scattered photons roughly holds through the entire near zone, rlsr\lesssim l_{s}. Until the low-energy photoelectric absorption becomes important, a partial photon flux of all related photons remains constant, Iγs=Iγ(0)I_{\gamma s}=I_{\gamma}^{(0)}. Each partial primary-photon beam ss decays exponentially due to Compton scattering, (Iγs)prim=Iγ(0)er/ls\left(I_{\gamma s}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}=I_{\gamma}^{(0)}e^{-r/l_{s}}, so that at r0.7lsr\geq 0.7l_{s} the corresponding flux of scattered photons, Iγ(0)(1er/ls)I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\left(1-e^{-r/l_{s}}\right), dominates. The corresponding photon density, (nγ)s=Iγ(0)(1er/ls)/vrs\left(n_{\gamma}\right)_{s}=I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\left(1-e^{-r/l_{s}}\right)/\langle v_{rs}\rangle, where vrs\langle v_{rs}\rangle is the mean radial velocity of scattered photons, starts dominating noticeably closer to the radiation source due to the more isotropic momentum distribution (vrsscat<c\langle v_{rs}\rangle_{\mathrm{scat}}<c) compared to that of the almost perfectly directional primary beam (vrsprimc\langle v_{rs}\rangle_{\mathrm{prim}}\approx c). The same pertains to the electron production rate, albeit the distance where dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt produced by scattered photons starts dominating at a larger distance rr than that for the photon density due to the weighting factor pγp_{\gamma} in the integrand of (17). (This factor is biased to higher energies where scattered photons momentum distribution is more directional.) Thus electron production due to scattered photons may become important deeply in the near zone, rlsr\lesssim l_{s}.

We simplify the treatment of scattered photons in the near zone as follows. We will consider all scattered photons, n1n\geq 1, as one unified group and extend for this group the singly-scattered (n=1n=1) photon momentum distribution given by (B.17) and (B.21) with one simple modification. In the exponents of the attenuation factors (B.18) and (B.22), we will retain the terms rs/lsr_{s}/l_{s} responsible for the primary beam attenuation, but will ignore [±(rs2ρ2)1/2±(r2ρ2)1/2]/l(pγ)[\pm(r_{s}^{2}-\rho^{2})^{1/2}\pm(r^{2}-\rho^{2})^{1/2}]/l\left(p_{\gamma}\right). The reason is that the latter terms describe the loss of n=1n=1 photons due to their further scattering. For the entire unified group of all scattered photons, this represents just a particle redistribution and hence must be ignored. This will provide automatically the total photon flux conservation.

The extension of the n=1n=1 solution to all scattered photons will introduce two inaccuracies. On the one hand, multiply scattered photons decrease their energy as nn increases, so that photons with n2n\geq 2 leak into the lower-energy range <min(1)=s[1+2ps/(mec)]0.2MeV\mathcal{E<E}_{\min}^{(1)}=\mathcal{E}_{s}[1+2p_{s}/(m_{e}c)]\simeq 0.2\ \operatorname{MeV}, as discussed in the end of Appendix section B.1. This reduces the photon population in the regular n=1n=1 energy range, min(1)s\mathcal{E}_{\min}^{(1)}\leq\mathcal{E}\leq\mathcal{E}_{s}. Due to the weighting factor pγp_{\gamma} in the integrand of (17), this inaccuracy in the extended n=1n=1 solution would lead to overestimated dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt. On the other hand, multiply scattered photons have a more isotropic angular distribution in the momentum space that leads to the reduced average photon radial velocity and, hence, to the increased photon density. As a result, the more directional extended n=1n=1 solution would, on the contrary, underestimate dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt. We expect the two inaccuracies to partially balance each other. As discussed below by comparing our analytical results with computer simulations, our simplified analytical model describes well the spatial dependence of the photon energy distribution within min(1)s\mathcal{E}_{\min}^{(1)}\leq\mathcal{E}\leq\mathcal{E}_{s}, practically in the entire near zone (r<100mr<100\ \operatorname{m}). Thus it can be employed for reliable estimates of the electron production rate in the near zone.

The extended n=1n=1 solution is even simpler than the original one because (B.18) and (B.22) reduce to a common attenuation factor, Aext±=Aint±=exp(rs/ls)A_{\mathrm{ext}}^{\pm}=A_{\mathrm{int}}^{\pm}=\exp\left(-r_{s}/l_{s}\right). One can easily check that the modified solution conserves exactly the total photon flux through any closed surface surrounding the radiation source. Indeed, the contributions of the ingoing and outgoing photons at r<rsr<r_{s} (see Fig. 4) cancel each other. The remaining partial fluxes of the outgoing photons in the outer sphere yield Iγ(0)(1er/ls)I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\left(1-e^{-r/l_{s}}\right), in full agreement with the flux conservation. Unfortunately, the contributions from the ingoing and outgoing photons within r<rsr<r_{s} to the photon energy distribution and dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt have no opposite signs and add rather than cancel. This leads to more complicated calculations outlined below.

Using the modified n=1n=1 solution, we calculate now the energy distribution of scattered photons. According to the above, the partial momentum distribution assoiciated with a beam ss is

fγs+=ZairIγ(0)nmr02mers4πpγ2ρ2ps2exp(rs(ρ,pγ,ps)ls),f_{\gamma s}^{+}=\frac{Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}r_{s}}{4\pi p_{\gamma}^{2}\rho^{2}p_{s}^{2}}\exp\left(-\ \frac{r_{s}(\rho,p_{\gamma},p_{s})}{l_{s}}\right), (20)

where

lsl(ps)=cν(ps),l_{s}\equiv l(p_{s})=\frac{c}{\nu(p_{s})}, (21)

and rs(ρ,pγ,ps)=ρ/L1/2r_{s}(\rho,p_{\gamma},p_{s})=\rho/L^{1/2}, introduced in (B.14), describes the distance where the scattering of primary photons took place. Introducing L(pγ,ps)=sin2ΘγL(p_{\gamma},p_{s})=\sin^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}, as in (B.9), we obtain

Fs(pγ)=ZairIγ(0)nmr02me2rps2(pγps+pspγL){Sforifpγpcrs=ps1+ps/(mec)Sbackifpγ<pcrs=ps1+ps/(mec),F_{s}(p_{\gamma})=\frac{Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}}{2rp_{s}^{2}}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{s}}+\frac{p_{s}}{p_{\gamma}}-L\right)\left\{\begin{array}[c]{ccc}S_{\mathrm{for}}&\text{if}&p_{\gamma}\geq p_{\mathrm{cr}s}=\frac{p_{s}}{1+p_{s}/(m_{e}c)}\\ S_{\mathrm{back}}&\text{if}&p_{\gamma}<p_{\mathrm{cr}s}=\frac{p_{s}}{1+p_{s}/(m_{e}c)}\end{array}\right., (22)

where the boundary pγ=pcrsp_{\gamma}=p_{\mathrm{cr}s} corresponds to L=1L=1 (Θγ=90\Theta_{\gamma}=90^{\circ}) and

Sfor\displaystyle S_{\mathrm{for}} 1L0rL1/2exp(rs/ls)dρ(r2ρ2)1/2,\displaystyle\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}\int_{0}^{rL^{1/2}}\frac{\exp(-r_{s}/l_{s})d\rho}{\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}, (23a)
Sback\displaystyle S_{\mathrm{back}} 1L(0rL1/2exp(rs/ls)dρ(r2ρ2)1/2+2rL1/2rexp(rs/ls)dρ(r2ρ2)1/2).\displaystyle\equiv\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}\left(\int_{0}^{rL^{1/2}}\frac{\exp(-r_{s}/l_{s})d\rho}{\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}+2\int_{rL^{1/2}}^{r}\frac{\exp(-r_{s}/l_{s})d\rho}{\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\right). (23b)
The function SforS_{\mathrm{for}} describes photons scattered forward (Θγ<90\Theta_{\gamma}<90^{\circ}). It includes only outgoing photons with r>rsr>r_{s} (0<ρ<rL1/20<\rho<rL^{1/2}). The function SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} describes photons scattered backward (Θγ>90\Theta_{\gamma}>90^{\circ}). In the “inner” zone, r<rsr<r_{s} (rL1/2<ρ<rrL^{1/2}<\rho<r), it includes both ingoing and outgoing photons with equal contributions, while in the “outer” zone, r>rsr>r_{s}, it includes only outgoing photons. The integrals over ρ\rho describe the original scattering of photons from the primary beams, where the distance of scattering, rs=ρ/L1/2r_{s}=\rho/L^{1/2}, depends on the angular parameter ρ\rho and on the photon momenta via L(pγ,ps)L(p_{\gamma},p_{s}). In the near zone, r/ls1r/l_{s}\lesssim 1, all outer photons at given rr were scattered at distances rs<rr_{s}<r. The situation for the inner photons is different. Some ingoing photons at given rr could be originally backscattered at large distances, even rsrr_{s}\gg r (for L1L\ll 1), well beyond the near zone. The total contribution of these photons, however, should be relatively small due to exponential attenuation of the primary beams described by exp(rs/ls)=exp[ρ/(L1/2ls)]\exp(-r_{s}/l_{s})=\exp[-\rho/(L^{1/2}l_{s})]. Temporarily introducing
P(L,λs)0L1/2exp(λst)dt(1t2)1/2,P\left(L,\lambda_{s}\right)\equiv\int_{0}^{L^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\lambda_{s}t\right)dt}{\left(1-t^{2}\right)^{1/2}}, (24)
λs(r,pγ,ps)rL1/2ls=(mecpγmecps)1/2(mecpsmecpγ+2)1/2rls,\lambda_{s}(r,p_{\gamma},p_{s})\equiv\frac{r}{L^{1/2}l_{s}}=\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}\right)^{-1/2}\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+2\right)^{-1/2}\frac{r}{l_{s}}, (25)

and tρ/rt\equiv\rho/r, we can rewrite the functions SforS_{\mathrm{for}} and SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} as

Sfor=P(L,λs)L,Sback=2P(1,λs)P(L,λs)L.S_{\mathrm{for}}=\frac{P\left(L,\lambda_{s}\right)}{\sqrt{L}},\qquad S_{\mathrm{back}}=\frac{2P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right)-P\left(L,\lambda_{s}\right)}{\sqrt{L}}. (26)

The transition from SforS_{\mathrm{for}} to SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} at L=1L=1 corresponding to pγ=pcrsp_{\gamma}=p_{\mathrm{cr}s} is smooth. For example, P(L,0)=arcsin(L1/2)P\left(L,0\right)=\arcsin(L^{1/2}), while 2P(1,0)P(L,0)=πarcsin(L1/2)2P\left(1,0\right)-P\left(L,0\right)=\pi-\arcsin(L^{1/2}) is the continuation of the multivalued function arcsin(L1/2)\arcsin(L^{1/2}) from its first quadrant (0arcsin(L1/2)<π/20\leq\arcsin(L^{1/2})<\pi/2) to the second one (π/2arcsin(L1/2)<π\pi/2\leq\arcsin(L^{1/2})<\pi). A similar smooth transition takes place for non-zero λs\lambda_{s}.

If λs1\lambda_{s}\lesssim 1 then the scatter distances rsr_{s} lie within the near zone. However, as mentioned above, ingoing photons scattered backward can arrive from arbitrarily large distances rsr_{s}, so we should consider any possible values of λs0\lambda_{s}\geq 0. All such photons are described in (26) by the function P(1,λs)P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right) shown in Fig. 5

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Function P(1,λs)P(1,\lambda_{s}) given by (27) (solid black), along with its approximation given by (28) (dashed red).

and expressed analytically as

P(1,λs)=π2(I0(λs)L0(λs))\displaystyle P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right)=\frac{\pi}{2}\left(I_{0}(\lambda_{s})-L_{0}(\lambda_{s})\right)
=π2[1+k=1λs2k22kk(k1)!k!]λs{1+k=1[2k(k!)kλsk(2k+1)!]2},\displaystyle=\frac{\pi}{2}\left[1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2k}}{2^{2k}k\left(k-1\right)!k!}\right]-\lambda_{s}\left\{1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\left[\frac{2^{k}\left(k!\right)^{k}\lambda_{s}^{k}}{\left(2k+1\right)!}\right]^{2}\right\}, (27)

where I0(x)I_{0}(x) and L0(x)L_{0}(x) are the modified Bessel and Struve functions [10]. For a simpler analysis, one can approximate P(1,λs)P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right) in terms of elementary functions by combining the power series (27) to the fifth-order term with the large-λs\lambda_{s} asymptotics, P(1,λs)1/λsP\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right)\rightarrow 1/\lambda_{s}, as

P(1,λs){π2(1+λs28)2λs(1+λs29+λs4225)ifλs21/λsifλs>2.P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right)\approx\left\{\begin{array}[c]{ccc}\frac{\pi}{2}\left(1+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}}{8}\right)^{2}-\lambda_{s}\left(1+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}}{9}+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{4}}{225}\right)&\text{if}&\lambda_{s}\leq 2\\ 1/\lambda_{s}&\text{if}&\lambda_{s}>2\end{array}\right.. (28)

This piece-wise approximation mimics the actual P(1,λs)P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right) almost ideally except for a minor kink at 1.5λs41.5\lesssim\lambda_{s}\lesssim 4, as seen in Fig. 5.

Unlike P(1,λs)P\left(1,\lambda_{s}\right), the function P(L,λs)P\left(L,\lambda_{s}\right) in (26) describes only outgoing photons scattered at distances rsr_{s} closer to the source than the given distance rr. According to the near-zone restriction, r/ls1r/l_{s}\lesssim 1, in the entire integration domain of (24), λst1\lambda_{s}t\lesssim 1 holds. This allows us to expand the exponential function in the integrand of P(L,λs)P\left(L,\lambda_{s}\right) in powers of (λst)(\lambda_{s}t) to the fifth power (applicable for λst2\lambda_{s}t\leq 2). This yields

P(L,λs)\displaystyle P\left(L,\lambda_{s}\right) (1+λs28)2arcsinLλs(1+λs29+λs4225)(11L)\displaystyle\approx\left(1+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}}{8}\right)^{2}\arcsin\sqrt{L}-\lambda_{s}\left(1+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}}{9}+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{4}}{225}\right)\left(1-\sqrt{1-L}\right)
λs2L(1L)4{1+λs216λsL9[2+λs2(4+3L)503λsL8]}.\displaystyle-\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}\sqrt{L\left(1-L\right)}}{4}\left\{1+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}}{16}-\frac{\lambda_{s}\sqrt{L}}{9}\left[2+\frac{\lambda_{s}^{2}\left(4+3L\right)}{50}-\frac{3\lambda_{s}\sqrt{L}}{8}\right]\right\}. (29)
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Photon energy distribution for unshielded 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co at various distances rr. The analytical solutions are shown by solid lines.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Photon energy distribution corresponding to Fig. 6, but for the 1 cm thick spherical lead shielding placed at 99 cm from the source.

Returning from the temporary notation λs=r/(lsL)\lambda_{s}=r/(l_{s}\sqrt{L}) (25) back to the distance rr, we obtain

Sfor=(1+r28ls2L)2arcsinLLr(11L)lsL(1+r29ls2L+r4225ls4L2)\displaystyle S_{\mathrm{for}}=\left(1+\frac{r^{2}}{8l_{s}^{2}L}\right)^{2}\frac{\arcsin\sqrt{L}}{\sqrt{L}}-\frac{r\left(1-\sqrt{1-L}\right)}{l_{s}L}\left(1+\frac{r^{2}}{9l_{s}^{2}L}+\frac{r^{4}}{225l_{s}^{4}L^{2}}\right)
r21L4ls2L{1+r216ls2Lr9ls[2+r2(4+3L)50ls2L3r8ls]},\displaystyle-\frac{r^{2}\sqrt{1-L}}{4l_{s}^{2}L}\left\{1+\frac{r^{2}}{16l_{s}^{2}L}-\frac{r}{9l_{s}}\left[2+\frac{r^{2}\left(4+3L\right)}{50l_{s}^{2}L}-\frac{3r}{8l_{s}}\right]\right\}, (30)
Sback=πL[I0(rlsL)L0(rlsL)]Sforward,S_{\mathrm{back}}=\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{L}}\left[I_{0}\left(\frac{r}{l_{s}\sqrt{L}}\right)-L_{0}\left(\frac{r}{l_{s}\sqrt{L}}\right)\right]-S_{\mathrm{forward}}, (31)

where, according to (27)–(28), the first term in the RHS of (31) can be approximated by elementary functions as

πL[I0(rlsL)L0(rlsL)]\displaystyle\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{L}}\left[I_{0}\left(\frac{r}{l_{s}\sqrt{L}}\right)-L_{0}\left(\frac{r}{l_{s}\sqrt{L}}\right)\right]
{πL(1+r28ls2L)22rlsL(1+r29ls2L+r4225ls4L2)ifLr/(2ls)2ls/rifL<r/(2ls).\displaystyle\approx\left\{\begin{array}[c]{ccc}\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{L}}\left(1+\frac{r^{2}}{8l_{s}^{2}L}\right)^{2}-\frac{2r}{l_{s}L}\left(1+\frac{r^{2}}{9l_{s}^{2}L}+\frac{r^{4}}{225l_{s}^{4}L^{2}}\right)&\text{if}&\sqrt{L}\geq r/(2l_{s})\\ 2l_{s}/r&\text{if}&\sqrt{L}<r/(2l_{s})\end{array}\right.. (34)

The function SforS_{\mathrm{for}} describes photons scattered forward (0<Θγ900^{\circ}<\Theta_{\gamma}\leq 90^{\circ}, pcrspγ<pmax=psp_{\mathrm{cr}s}\leq p_{\gamma}<p_{\max}=p_{s}), while SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} describes photons scattered backward (90<Θγ18090^{\circ}<\Theta_{\gamma}\leq 180^{\circ}, pmin=ps/[1+2ps/(mec)]<pγ<pcrsp_{\min}=p_{s}/[1+2p_{s}/(m_{e}c)]<p_{\gamma}<p_{\mathrm{cr}s}). The two functions are smoothly connected at L=1L=1 (Θγ=90\Theta_{\gamma}=90^{\circ}, pγ=pcrsp_{\gamma}=p_{\mathrm{cr}s}). In spite of singular denominators LqL^{-q} in (30)–(34), SforS_{\mathrm{for}} and SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} behave regularly at L=0L=0 (Θγ=0,180\Theta_{\gamma}=0^{\circ},180^{\circ}), except for r=0r=0. At rlsr\ll l_{s}, SforS_{\mathrm{for}} (Θγ=0\Theta_{\gamma}=0^{\circ}, pγ=psp_{\gamma}=p_{s}) approaches 11, while SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} (Θγ=180\Theta_{\gamma}=180^{\circ}, pγ=pminp_{\gamma}=p_{\min}) increases with decreasing rr as 2ls/r2l_{s}/r. This 1/r1/r divergence of Sback(L=0)S_{\mathrm{back}}(L=0) at r0r\rightarrow 0 is due to accumulation of photons scattered almost strictly backward from distances rsrr_{s}\gg r where the primary beams still remain largely unattenuated, rslsr_{s}\ll l_{s}. As rr increases, even remaining within the mean free path lsl_{s} from the radiation source, the exponential attenuation of the primary beams at larger distances rslsr_{s}\gtrsim l_{s} makes such accumulation less significant.

Inserting (30) and (31) into (22), with LL given in terms of pγ,psp_{\gamma},p_{s} by (B.9), i.e.,

L\displaystyle\sqrt{L} =sinΘγ=(mecpγmecps)1/2(mecpsmecpγ+2)1/2,\displaystyle=\sin\Theta_{\gamma}=\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}\right)^{1/2}\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+2\right)^{1/2},
1L\displaystyle\sqrt{1-L} =|cosΘγ|=|1mecpγ+mecps|,\displaystyle=\left|\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\right|=\left|1-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}\right|, (35)

we obtain the complete approximate analytical expression for F(pγ)F(p_{\gamma}) (19) in the near zone.

Figure 6 shows photon energy distributions for unshielded 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co calculated by the MCNPX code (URL: http://mcnpx.lanl.gov/) and the analytical solution given by (22) and (30)–(35) for several distances rr (shown near the curves). The two long spikes on the right correspond to the two monochromatic primary photon beams with 1=1.332\mathcal{E}_{1}=1.332 and 2=1.173\mathcal{E}_{2}=1.173 MeV, described analytically by (B.1). We see an excellent agreement between the simulations and theory in the entire energy range of singly scattered photons, 2/(1+22/me)0.21MeV<<1.332MeV\mathcal{E}_{2}/\left(1+2\mathcal{E}_{2}/m_{e}\right)\approx 0.21\ \operatorname{MeV}<\mathcal{E}<1.332\ \operatorname{MeV}. At <0.21MeV\mathcal{E}<0.21\ \operatorname{MeV}, the simulations show lower-energy multiply scattered photons excluded from the extended n=1n=1 model. In the near zone, especially due to the weighting factor pγp_{\gamma} in the integrand of (17), the lower-energy range makes a small relative contribution to dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt.

Figure 7 shows simulated photon energy distributions for the same radioactive source but shielded with a thin spherical lead cover. The clearly pronounced broad bumps at the high-energy tails of the photon distribution, especially at the closest proximity to the source (r=1mr=1\ \operatorname{m}) are due to primary photons scattered within the shield material and leaked outside. This scattering could also be described by the general solution (B.1)–(B.4) with L^r\hat{L}_{r} defined by (10), where the collisional mean free path for photons in the shielding metal is many orders of magnitude smaller than that in air. Unfortunately, for dense shielding the near-zone approximation is hardly applicable. Besides, photoemission absorption may play a role. This makes analytical calculation much more difficult. Comparing Figs. 6 and 7, we see that the effect of shielding on the energy distribution is especially pronounced in a close proximity to the source. For distances 50\gtrsim 50 m, the photon energy distribution in both shielded and unshielded cases look similar.

4.3 Electron production rate

Now we calculate the electron production rate (17) due to scattered photons with the energy distribution function given by (22), or

Fs(pγ=mecα)=ZairIγ(0)nmr022rmec21αs2(ααs+αsαL){Sforifααs1+αsSbackifα<αs1+αs,F_{s}(p_{\gamma}=m_{e}c\alpha)=\frac{Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}}{2rm_{e}c^{2}}\frac{1}{\alpha_{s}^{2}}\left(\frac{\alpha}{\alpha_{s}}+\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\alpha}-L\right)\left\{\begin{array}[c]{ccc}S_{\mathrm{for}}&\text{if}&\alpha\geq\frac{\alpha_{s}}{1+\alpha_{s}}\\ S_{\mathrm{back}}&\text{if}&\alpha<\frac{\alpha_{s}}{1+\alpha_{s}}\end{array}\right.,

where αsps/(mec)\alpha_{s}\equiv p_{s}/(m_{e}c), L=1(11/α+1/αs)2L=1-\left(1-1/\alpha+1/\alpha_{s}\right)^{2} and SforS_{\mathrm{for}}, SbackS_{\mathrm{back}} are given by (30)–(34). We restrict calculations to the radiation material 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co with E1=1.332MeVE_{1}=1.332\ \operatorname{MeV} and E2=1.173MeVE_{2}=1.173\ \operatorname{MeV}.

When calclulating the production rate for scattered photons, (dNe/dt)scat(dN_{e}/dt)_{\mathrm{scat}}, it is convenient to compare it with production rate for primary photons given by (18). Straightforward numerical integration shows that for each s=1,2s=1,2 a simple approximation

1αs2[αs1+2αsαs1+αs(ααs+αsαL)Sbackα𝑑α+αs1+αsαs(ααs+αsαL)Sforα𝑑α]\displaystyle\frac{1}{\alpha_{s}^{2}}\left[\int_{\frac{\alpha_{s}}{1+2\alpha_{s}}}^{\frac{\alpha_{s}}{1+\alpha_{s}}}\left(\frac{\alpha}{\alpha_{s}}+\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\alpha}-L\right)S_{\mathrm{back}}\alpha d\alpha+\int_{\frac{\alpha_{s}}{1+\alpha_{s}}}^{\alpha_{s}}\left(\frac{\alpha}{\alpha_{s}}+\frac{\alpha_{s}}{\alpha}-L\right)S_{\mathrm{for}}\alpha d\alpha\right]
1.37exp(0.42r/ls)\displaystyle\simeq 1.37\exp\left(-0.42r/l_{s}\right) (36)

holds to a better than 5% accuracy. To compare with (dNe/dt)prim(dN_{e}/dt)_{\mathrm{prim}}, we express ls=c/νsl_{s}=c/\nu_{s}, with νs\nu_{s} in terms of αs\alpha_{s} by (13), and obtain

ZairIγ(0)nmr022rαs2mec2/Iγ(0)4πcr2ps\displaystyle\left.\frac{Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}}{2r\alpha_{s}^{2}m_{e}c^{2}}\right/\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}}{4\pi cr^{2}p_{s}}
=r2ls[2+8αs+9αs2+αs3αs(1+2αs)2(2+2αsαs2)ln(1+2αs)2αs2]1.\displaystyle=\frac{r}{2l_{s}}\left[\frac{2+8\alpha_{s}+9\alpha_{s}^{2}+\alpha_{s}^{3}}{\alpha_{s}\left(1+2\alpha_{s}\right)^{2}}-\frac{\left(2+2\alpha_{s}-\alpha_{s}^{2}\right)\ln\left(1+2\alpha_{s}\right)}{2\alpha_{s}^{2}}\right]^{-1}.

As a result, the total electron production rate becomes

(dNedt)rad=3.5×105cm3s1Iγ(0)(Ci)r2(m)s=1ks(MeV)(er/ls+μsrlse0.42r/ls)\left(\frac{dN_{e}}{dt}\right)_{\mathrm{rad}}=3.5\times 10^{5}\operatorname{cm}^{-3}\operatorname{s}^{-1}\ \frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}(\operatorname{Ci})}{r^{2}(\operatorname{m})}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\mathcal{E}_{s}(\operatorname{MeV})\left(e^{-r/l_{s}}+\frac{\mu_{s}r}{l_{s}}\ e^{-0.42r/l_{s}}\right) (37)

where the last term in the RHS brackets represents the ratio between the production rate due to the scattered photons to that due to the primary photons (for each primary beam ss) and

μs=0.69αs[1+αsαs2(2(1+αs)1+2αsln(1+2αs)αs)+ln(1+2αs)2αs1+3αs(1+2αs)2]\mu_{s}=\frac{0.69}{\alpha_{s}\left[\frac{1+\alpha_{s}}{\alpha_{s}^{2}}\left(\frac{2\left(1+\alpha_{s}\right)}{1+2\alpha_{s}}-\frac{\ln\left(1+2\alpha_{s}\right)}{\alpha_{s}}\right)+\frac{\ln\left(1+2\alpha_{s}\right)}{2\alpha_{s}}-\frac{1+3\alpha_{s}}{\left(1+2\alpha_{s}\right)^{2}}\right]} (38)

Equation (37) shows that the scattered-photon contribition to the total free-electron production rate decays with distance as e0.42r/ls/re^{-0.42r/l_{s}}/r, i.e. noticeably slower than that of the primary photons, er/ls/r2e^{-r/l_{s}}/r^{2}. For 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co, we have l1127l_{1}\approx 127 m\operatorname{m}, αs2.607\alpha_{s}\approx 2.607, μ1\mu_{1}\approx 0.720.72, and l2119l_{2}\simeq 119 m\operatorname{m}, α22.295\alpha_{2}\approx 2.295, μ20.77\mu_{2}\simeq 0.77. The corresponding (dNe/dt)rad\left(dN_{e}/dt\right)_{\mathrm{rad}} is shown in Fig. 8, along with the primary photon rate given by (18). This Figure shows that the latter is a good approximation for r<40mr<40\operatorname{m}. At larger distances, dNe/dtdN_{e}/dt due to scattered photons becomes noticeable and dominates starting from r100mr\simeq 100\ \operatorname{m}. For simple estimates, we can extrapolate equation (37) to larger distances, but for our application only moderate distances, r<150mr<150\ \operatorname{m}, matter (see below).

Figure 8 also shows that a moderate amount (1mg\sim 1\ \operatorname{mg}) of a concealed radioactive material like 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co can provide the total rate of electron production well above the background level (Qrad20Q_{\mathrm{rad}}\sim 20 pairs s1cm3\operatorname{s}^{-1}\operatorname{cm}^{-3}). The enhancement factor αrad=(dNe/dt)rad/Qrad\alpha_{\mathrm{rad}}=\left(dN_{e}/dt\right)_{\mathrm{rad}}/Q_{\mathrm{rad}} exceeds unity within 150m150\ \operatorname{m} from the radiation source. This distance is crucial for implementation of our technique because … As discussed in Ref. [3], all free electrons will eventually end up forming negative ions, but the collisional detachment of some electrons for a brief time make it sufficient to initiate air breakdown within the focal spot of the THz gyrotron during pulse. Equation (37) provides a reliable estimate of the electron production rate at least within the distance of 150m150\ \operatorname{m} critical for implementation of our method.

Conclusion:

In this paper, we analyze the production of free electrons by γ\gamma-rays leaking from radioactive materials. This is important for implementation of a recently proposed concept to remotely detect concealed radioactive materials [1], [3]. We have performed our analysis specifically for the most probable radioactive material 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co, but the general approach can be applied to any γ\gamma-ray sources. In our theory, we have included free-electron production by both primary γ\gamma-quanta radiated by the source and penetrated through the container walls and those scattered in air. Equation (37) and Fig. 8 give a reliable estimate of the total production rate (dNe/dt)rad/Qrad\left(dN_{e}/dt\right)_{\mathrm{rad}}/Q_{\mathrm{rad}} and the corresponding radiation enhancement factor, at least within 150150 m\operatorname{m} from the radiation source. At these distances, the scattered photon contribution to (dNe/dt)rad\left(dN_{e}/dt\right)_{\mathrm{rad}} is comparable or even exceeds that of the primary photons. Even for amount of radiation material as small as 1mg\sim 1\ \operatorname{mg}, the total production rate may exceed significantly the ambient ionization rate. During the gyrotron pulse of about 10 microsecond length, such electrons may seed the electric breakdown and create sufficiently dense plasma at the focal region to be detected as an unambiguous effect of the concealed radioactive material.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Free-electron production rate for 1Ci1\operatorname{Ci} (0.9mg0.\allowbreak 9\operatorname{mg}) of 6027{}_{27}^{60}Co as a function of the distance from the raioactive source. The red dashed line shows the primary-photon rate given by (18), while he black sold line shows the total rate given by (37).

Acknowledgement:

This work is supported by the US Office of Naval Research.


Appendix

Appendix A Deriving kinetic equation (9)

The Boltzmann kinetic equation for freely propagating unpolarized photons colliding with air molecules contains two parts: the collisionless part describing the undisturbed propagation of photons between two consecutive acts of scattering or absorption and the collisional operator [8]. In the assumed spherically symmetric approximation, the stationary kinetic equation for fγ±(r,p,ρ)f_{\gamma}^{\pm}\left(r,p,\rho\right) with ρ\rho given by (7) can be written as

±c(1ρ2r2)1/2fγ±(r,p,ρ)r=[dfγ±dt]coll.\pm c\left(1-\frac{\rho^{2}}{r^{2}}\right)^{1/2}\frac{\partial f_{\gamma}^{\pm}\left(r,p,\rho\right)}{\partial r}=\left[\frac{df_{\gamma}^{\pm}}{dt}\right]_{\mathrm{coll}}. (A.1)

The LHS of (A.1) contains no p,ρp,\rho-derivatives because these variables are invariants of the collisionless motion. The collisional term [dfγ±/dt]coll\left[df_{\gamma}^{\pm}/dt\right]_{\mathrm{coll}} describes scattering, absorption and other possible effects responsible for collisional changes in the photon momentum distribution. In the general case, it has a complicated integral form which can be simplified in the spherically symmetric case.

In this appendix, we obtain the explicit simplified form for [dfγ±/dt]coll\left[df_{\gamma}^{\pm}/dt\right]_{\mathrm{coll}}. We will start directly from the original probabilistic expressions like [8]. Since the photon-molecule collision is a strictly local process where the photon transport plays no role, in the RHS of (A.1) we can temporarily return from ρ\rho back to the momentum polar angle θγ\theta_{\gamma}.

(dfγdt)coll=IarrIdep,\displaystyle\left(\frac{df_{\gamma}}{dt}\right)_{\mathrm{coll}}=I_{\mathrm{arr}}-I_{\mathrm{dep}},
Iarr\displaystyle I_{\mathrm{arr}} =fγ(r,pγ)W(pγpγ)\displaystyle=\int f_{\gamma}^{\prime}(r,\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime})W\left(\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\rightarrow\vec{p}_{\gamma}\right)
×δ(pγ+ecpγmec)δ(pγ+pepγ)d3pγd3pe,\displaystyle\times\delta(p_{\gamma}+\frac{\mathcal{E}_{e}}{c}-p_{\gamma}^{\prime}-m_{e}^{\prime}c)\delta(\vec{p}_{\gamma}+\vec{p}_{e}-\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime})d^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}d^{3}p_{e},
Idep\displaystyle I_{\mathrm{dep}} =fγ(r,pγ)W(pγpγ)\displaystyle=f_{\gamma}(r,\vec{p}_{\gamma})\int W\left(\vec{p}_{\gamma}\rightarrow\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right) (A.2)
×δ(pγ+ecpγmec)δ(pγ+pepγ)d3pγd3pe.\displaystyle\times\delta(p_{\gamma}^{\prime}+\frac{\mathcal{E}_{e}^{\prime}}{c}-p_{\gamma}-m_{e}c)\delta(\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}+\vec{p}_{e}^{\prime}-\vec{p}_{\gamma})d^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}d^{3}p_{e}^{\prime}.

Here IdepI_{\mathrm{dep}} describes the total collisional departure of photons from the kinetic volume d3pγd^{3}p_{\gamma} around given pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma} with scattered photon momenta in the domain d3pγd^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime} and releasing electrons in d3ped^{3}p_{e}^{\prime} around pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime} and pe\vec{p}_{e}^{\prime}, respectively. In the general case, the departure term, IdepI_{\mathrm{dep}}, can include both photon scattering and absorption. The term IarrI_{\mathrm{arr}} describes the arrival of photons and released electrons into the volumes d3pγd^{3}p_{\gamma} and d3ped^{3}p_{e} around pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma} and pe\vec{p}_{e}, respectively, if the incident photons before scattering were at d3pγd^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime} around pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}. Since we neglect any collisional photon production like Bremsstrahlung, fluorescence, etc., IarrI_{\mathrm{arr}} includes only photon scattering. With no photon losses included in IdepI_{\mathrm{dep}}, (A.2) provides automatically the particle conservation, (dfγ/dt)colld3pγ=0\int(df_{\gamma}/dt)_{\mathrm{coll}}d^{3}p_{\gamma}=0.

The function WW of two arguments pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime} and pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma} represents the probability per unit time of the collisional process. This function is proportional to the air molecular density, nm=na/2n_{m}=n_{a}/2. In the general case, the two arguments of WW are not interchangeable. To identify the correct order of the arguments, the time sequence of the collision is denoted by the arrow. The two delta-functions in the integrands describe the energy and momentum conservation. Since we assume energies well above the K-shell edge, the arguments of the delta functions include no small energy spent on the molecule excitation and ionization. They also neglect the kinetic energy and momentum of air molecules. As explained in section 3, we presume Compton scattering in the K-N approximation.

To obtain the explicit expression for WW, we relate it to the corresponding differential collision cross section, dσ/dΩγd\sigma/d\Omega_{\gamma}^{\prime}, given for the K-N theory by Eq. (2). To find the expression is easier through the departure term IdepI_{\mathrm{dep}} because, unlike IarrI_{\mathrm{arr}}, it does not involve the photon distribution function in the integrand. Integrating (A.2), first, over pe\vec{p}_{e}^{\prime} with eliminating δ(pγ+pepγ)\delta(\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}+\vec{p}_{e}^{\prime}-\vec{p}_{\gamma}) and then over pγp_{\gamma}^{\prime} in d3pγ=pγ2dpγdΩγd^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}=p_{\gamma}^{\prime 2}dp_{\gamma}^{\prime}d\Omega_{\gamma}^{\prime} with eliminating the remaining delta-function, we obtain

2cZairnmdσKNdΩγ=W(pγpγ)|e/c=pγ+mecpγ(1+1cepγ)1pγ2.2cZ_{\mathrm{air}}n_{m}\ \frac{d\sigma_{\mathrm{KN}}}{d\Omega_{\gamma}^{\prime}}=\left.W\left(\vec{p}_{\gamma}\rightarrow\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)\right|_{\mathcal{E}_{e}^{\prime}/c=p_{\gamma}+m_{e}c-p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}\left(1+\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial\mathcal{E}_{e}^{\prime}}{\partial p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}\right)^{-1}p_{\gamma}^{\prime 2}. (A.3)

Here 2Zairnm2Z_{\mathrm{air}}n_{m} is the total density of bound electrons and e/pγ\partial\mathcal{E}_{e}^{\prime}/\partial p_{\gamma}^{\prime} should be calculated from the momentum conservation, pγ=pγ+pe\vec{p}_{\gamma}=\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}+\vec{p}_{e}^{\prime}, but before applying the energy conservation, pγ+mec=e/c+pγp_{\gamma}+m_{e}c=\mathcal{E}_{e}^{\prime}/c+p_{\gamma}^{\prime}. As a result, we arrive at

W(pγpγ)=depZairnmr02mec3epγpγ(pγpγ+pγpγ1+cos2Θγ),W\left(\vec{p}_{\gamma}\rightarrow\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)\overset{\mathrm{dep}}{=}\frac{Z_{\mathrm{air}}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}c^{3}}{\mathcal{E}_{e}^{\prime}p_{\gamma}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}-1+\cos^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}\right), (A.4)

where Θγ\Theta_{\gamma} is the scatter angle from pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma} to pγ\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime} given by (3). This results in Idep=ν(pγ)fγ(r,pγ)I_{\mathrm{dep}}=\nu(p_{\gamma})f_{\gamma}(r,\vec{p}_{\gamma}), where ν(pγ)\nu(p_{\gamma}) is given by (13).

Now we proceed to calculating the more complicated arrival term, IarrI_{\mathrm{arr}}. Switching in (A.4) the arguments of WW, we obtain

W(pγpγ)=arrZairnmr02mec3epγpγ(pγpγ+pγpγ1+cos2Θγ),W\left(\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\rightarrow\vec{p}_{\gamma}\right)\overset{\mathrm{arr}}{=}\frac{Z_{\mathrm{air}}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}c^{3}}{\mathcal{E}_{e}p_{\gamma}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}-1+\cos^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}\right), (A.5)

where cosΘγ\cos\Theta_{\gamma} in terms of pγp_{\gamma} and pγpγp_{\gamma}^{\prime}\geq p_{\gamma} is given by (12). After inserting (A.5) to (A.2), as above, the first step to calculating IarrI_{\mathrm{arr}} is to integrate over pe\vec{p}_{e} with eliminating δ(pγ+pepγ)\delta(\vec{p}_{\gamma}+\vec{p}_{e}-\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}). This yields

Ee2pe2+me2=pγ2+pγ2+me22pγpγcosΘγE_{e}^{2}\equiv p_{e}^{2}+m_{e}^{2}=p_{\gamma}^{2}+p_{\gamma}^{\prime 2}+m_{e}^{2}-2p_{\gamma}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}\cos\Theta_{\gamma} (A.6)

Unlike IdepI_{\mathrm{dep}}, however, the arrival term IarrI_{\mathrm{arr}} contains the distribution function fγ(r,pγ)f_{\gamma}^{\prime}\left(r,\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right) within the integrand. This does not allow us to easily integrate over dpγdp_{\gamma}^{\prime} in d3pγ=pγ2dpγdΩγd^{3}p_{\gamma}^{\prime}=p_{\gamma}^{\prime 2}dp_{\gamma}^{\prime}d\Omega_{\gamma}^{\prime} in order to eliminate the remaining delta function. However, the fact that the distribution function fγf_{\gamma}^{\prime} depends on pγp_{\gamma}^{\prime} and θγ\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}, rather than on the axial angle ϕγ\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime} suggests eliminating the remaining delta function via the integration over ϕγ\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}, using a simple geometric relation

cosΘγ=cosθγcosθγ+sinθγsinθγcos(ϕγϕγ).\cos\Theta_{\gamma}=\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\cos\theta_{\gamma}+\sin\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\sin\theta_{\gamma}\cos\left(\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}-\phi_{\gamma}\right). (A.7)

Given pγ,θγ,pγ,θγp_{\gamma},\theta_{\gamma},p_{\gamma}^{\prime},\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}, this yields Ee2(ϕγ)E_{e}^{2}\left(\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right). Integration of in (A.2) over ϕγ\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime} using

δ(pγ+Eepγme)=|Eeϕγ|1δ(ϕγϕc)\delta(p_{\gamma}+E_{e}-p_{\gamma}^{\prime}-m_{e}^{\prime})=\left|\frac{\partial E_{e}^{\prime}}{\partial\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}}\right|^{-1}\delta(\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}-\phi_{\mathrm{c}}^{\prime}) (A.8)

results in

Iarr=2fγW(pγpγ)|Eeϕγ|1pγ2𝑑pγd(cosθγ).I_{\mathrm{arr}}=2\int f_{\gamma}^{\prime}W\left(\vec{p}_{\gamma}^{\prime}\rightarrow\vec{p}_{\gamma}\right)\left|\frac{\partial E_{e}}{\partial\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}}\right|^{-1}p_{\gamma}^{\prime 2}dp_{\gamma}^{\prime}d\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right). (A.9)

The factor 22 in (A.9) originates from existence of two symmetric values of ϕγ=ϕc\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}=\phi_{\mathrm{c}}^{\prime} that set the argument of the delta-function to zero (the energy conservation)

Ee=pγ+mepγ.E_{e}=p_{\gamma}^{\prime}+m_{e}-p_{\gamma}. (A.10)

The specific value of ϕc\phi_{\mathrm{c}}^{\prime} in (A.8) is inconsequential. The differentiation in the normalization factor |Ee/ϕγ|1\left|\partial E_{e}/\partial\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right|^{-1} should be done using (A.6) and (A.7), but before applying (A.10). This yields EeEe/ϕγ=pγpγsinθγsinθγsin(ϕγϕγ)E_{e}^{\prime}\partial E_{e}^{\prime}/\partial\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}=p_{\gamma}^{\prime}p_{\gamma}\sin\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\sin\theta_{\gamma}\sin\left(\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}-\phi_{\gamma}\right). Using (A.7) again in order to express sin(ϕγϕγ)\sin\left(\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}-\phi_{\gamma}\right) and then, applying the energy conservation relation (A.10), we obtain |Ee/ϕγ|1=Ee/(pγpγS1/2)|\partial E_{e}^{\prime}/\partial\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}|^{-1}=E_{e}^{\prime}/(p_{\gamma}^{\prime}p_{\gamma}S^{1/2}), where

S(cosΘγ,cosθγ,cosθγ)\displaystyle S\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime},\cos\theta_{\gamma}\right)
=1cos2θγcos2θγcos2θγ+2cosΘγcosθγcosθγ\displaystyle=1-\cos^{2}\theta_{\gamma}-\cos^{2}\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}-\cos^{2}\theta_{\gamma}+2\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\cos\theta_{\gamma} (A.11)

Implementing the entire procedure, we arrive at the integro-differential equation (9), where SS is recast as (11). This fully symmetric function of three cosine arguments has a simple physical meaning. The restriction S0S\geq 0 covers all possible directions of the incident and scattered photons characterized by the pairs of polar and axial angles Θγ,Φγ\Theta_{\gamma},\Phi_{\gamma}, θγ,ϕγ\theta_{\gamma},\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}, θγ,ϕγ\theta_{\gamma},\phi_{\gamma}, which are coupled by geometric relations like (A.7). The photon energy losses and the scattering angle Θγ\Theta_{\gamma} are rigidly coupled by (12). A photon with given θγ\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}, pγp_{\gamma}^{\prime} can be scattered into another photon with given θγ\theta_{\gamma}, pγp_{\gamma}, provided the photon energies are within the allowed domains. This freedom is reached by a unique choice of two symmetric values of (ϕγϕγ)(\phi_{\gamma}-\phi_{\gamma}^{\prime}).

Appendix B Solving kinetic equation (9)

B.1 General solution of multi-scattered photons

The LHS of kinetic equation (9) is simple, but its RHS is rather complicated, as described by (10). Our approach to solving the kinetic equation is based on the physics of the process. The primary photons with the monochromatic momentum distribution approximated by (14) start efficiently scattering by air molecules within a distance of rl=c/νr\lesssim l=c/\nu from the source. For photon energies between 0.30.3 and 1.3MeV1.3\ \operatorname{MeV}, the maximum K-N differential cross-section is reached near the forward scattering, Θγ=0\Theta_{\gamma}=0 and gradually decreases to the backscatter, Θγ=π\Theta_{\gamma}=\pi, as shown in Fig. 2. This means that photons scatter mainly through large angles, rather than broaden their delta-function angular distribution around the primary beam. This suggests considering the primary photon beam as a separate group that continues keeping its delta-function distribution over long distances from the radiation source. For the primary photons, we can neglect the first (“arrival”) term in the RHS of (9) but must keep the last (“departure”) term. Using the boundary condition (14), we readily obtain for the primary photons the exponentially decaying solution,

(fγ+)prim=Iγ(0)δ(cosθγ1)8π2cr2s=1ker/lsδ(pγps)ps2=Iγ(0)δ(ρ)8π2p02ρs=1ker/lsδ(pγps).\left(f_{\gamma}^{+}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\delta\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}-1\right)}{8\pi^{2}cr^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\frac{e^{-r/l_{s}}\delta\left(p_{\gamma}-p_{s}\right)}{p_{s}^{2}}=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\delta\left(\rho\right)}{8\pi^{2}p_{0}^{2}\rho}\sum_{s=1}^{k}e^{-r/l_{s}}\delta\left(p_{\gamma}-p_{s}\right). (B.1)

This solution gives the entire local source for scattered photons. The solution for all propagating photons, including the primary beam, can be sought as an infinite series

f±=f0++f1±+f2±+f3±+=n=0fn±,f^{\pm}=f_{0}^{+}+f_{1}^{\pm}+f_{2}^{\pm}+f_{3}^{\pm}+\ldots=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f_{n}^{\pm}, (B.2)

where f0+=(fγ+)primf_{0}^{+}=\left(f_{\gamma}^{+}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}} and the subscript nn denotes photons scattered from the primary beam nn times. For each individual group of nn-scattered photons, we obtain a recursive kinetic equation where the source for scattering is provided by the (n1)\left(n-1\right)-th group,

±c(1ρ2r2)1/2fn±r+νfn=L^rfn1±,\pm c\left(1-\frac{\rho^{2}}{r^{2}}\right)^{1/2}\frac{\partial f_{n}^{\pm}}{\partial r}+\nu f_{n}=\hat{L}_{r}f_{n-1}^{\prime\pm}, (B.3)

where L^r\hat{L}_{r} is the linear integral operator defined by (10). The infinite series given by (B.2) converges. If ν\nu includes no absorption then Eq. (B.3) provides automatically the constancy of the total photon flux through any closed surface surrounding the radiation source. Using the boundary and matching conditions for the outgoing (++) and ingoing (-) particles described above, we obtain the exact recursive solution for fn±f_{n}^{\pm} in terms of fn1±f_{n-1}^{\pm}, lc/νl\equiv c/\nu,

fn\displaystyle f_{n}^{-} =exp[(r2ρ2)1/2/l]c±rexp[(y2ρ2)1/2/l]L^yfn1±(y2ρ2)1/2y𝑑y,\displaystyle=\frac{\exp\left[\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]}{c}\sum_{\pm}\int_{r}^{\infty}\frac{\exp\left[-\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]\hat{L}_{y}f_{n-1}^{\prime\pm}}{\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\ ydy,
fn+\displaystyle f_{n}^{+} =exp[(r2ρ2)1/2/l]c±ρexp[(y2ρ2)1/2/l]L^yfn1±(y2ρ2)1/2y𝑑y\displaystyle=\frac{\exp\left[-\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]}{c}\sum_{\pm}\int_{\rho}^{\infty}\frac{\exp\left[-\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]\hat{L}_{y}f_{n-1}^{\prime\pm}}{\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\ ydy (B.4)
+exp[(r2ρ2)1/2/l]c±ρrexp[(y2ρ2)1/2/l]L^yfn1±(y2ρ2)1/2y𝑑y.\displaystyle+\frac{\exp\left[-\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]}{c}\sum_{\pm}\int_{\rho}^{r}\frac{\exp\left[\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]\hat{L}_{y}f_{n-1}^{\prime\pm}}{\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\ ydy.

This solution holds for ρr\rho\leq r, while for ρ>r\rho>r all fn±=0f_{n}^{\pm}=0. As mentioned above, the integrations for L^y\hat{L}_{y} in (10) can be performed it terms of (cosθγ)\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right), but before inserting the results to (B.4) they have to be transformed into functions of ρ\rho using (7). In the integrands of (B.4), the distance rr is replaced by an internal radial variable yy in order to avoid a confusion with rr outside the integral. The exponential factors describe (n1)\left(n-1\right)-photon losses due to their scattering into the nn-group with |(r2ρ2)1/2±(y2ρ2)1/2||(r^{2}-\rho^{2})^{1/2}\pm(y^{2}-\rho^{2})^{1/2}| describing the distance between two points on the rr- and yy-shells along a straight-line photon trajectory corresponding to given ρ\rho (the signs ±\pm depend on whether the two points are on the same or on different sides with respect to the trajectory median r=ρr=\rho, as shown in Fig. 4). The summations over the ingoing and outgoing particles in (B.4) take into account the fact that photons can be scattered through arbitrary scatter angles, so that any ingoing or outgoing particle can be scattered into each of these groups.

The explicit solution for scattered photons with arbitrarily large nn can be found by consecutively applying recursive relation (B.4) starting from n=1n=1 with f0±=(fγ+)primf_{0}^{\prime\pm}=\left(f_{\gamma}^{+}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}} given by Eq. (B.1). At any given distance rr, photons with sufficiently large nn are produced mainly by ingoing photons that originate from the primary source beam at much larger distances and only accidentally come back. One might expect that they will come back less frequently as nn increases, so that the infinite series (B.2) will converge. Additionally, as nn increases, the photon energy distribution gradually moves to lower energies. This effective ”cooling” of scattered photons will eventually put high-nn scattered photons into the keV range where the photoemission absorption of photons starts dominating.

We can easily estimate the energy spread for nn times scattered photons. The maximum energy of scattered photons, pγ=pγIp_{\gamma}=p_{\gamma}^{\prime}-I, where II is the ionization potential, I15eVpsI\sim 15~\mathrm{eV}\lll p_{s}, is reached where θγ\theta_{\gamma} is close to 00^{\circ}, but not too close [4, Sect. 2.6.2.1]. As a result, after nn scatterings of a primary γ\gamma-quanta with pγ=psp_{\gamma}=p_{s}, the maximum scattered photon energy reduces only weakly, pmax(n)=psnIp_{\max}^{(n)}=p_{s}-nI, while in the framework of the K-N theory pmax(n)=psp_{\max}^{(n)}=p_{s}. On the other hand, the minimum energy of scattered photons is reached for strict backscatter, θγ=180\theta_{\gamma}=180^{\circ} [4]. After nn scatterings, the minimum energy, pmin(n)p_{\min}^{(n)}, decreases by the following rule,

pmin(n)=pmin(n1)1+2pmin(n1)/(mec),p_{\min}^{(n)}=\frac{p_{\min}^{(n-1)}}{1+2p_{\min}^{(n-1)}/(m_{e}c)}, (B.5)

starting from pmin(0)=p0p_{\min}^{(0)}=p_{0}. Temporarily denoting Ynme/(2pmin(n))Y_{n}\equiv m_{e}/(2p_{\min}^{(n)}), we obtain from (B.5) Yn=1+Yn1Y_{n}=1+Y_{n-1}, so that Yn=n+Y0Y_{n}=n+Y_{0}, or

pmin(n)=ps1+2nps/(mec)=mec2n(1+mec/(2nps)).p_{\min}^{(n)}=\frac{p_{s}}{1+2np_{s}/(m_{e}c)}=\frac{m_{e}c}{2n\left(1+m_{e}c/(2np_{s})\right)}. (B.6)

The energy of nn-times scattered photons spreads between pmin(n)p_{\min}^{(n)} and pmax(n)p_{\max}^{(n)}. This spread gradually increases with nn due to lowering pmin(n)p_{\min}^{(n)}. For ps1MeVp_{s}\simeq 1\ \operatorname{MeV}, 2ps/(mec)42p_{s}/(m_{e}c)\simeq 4, so that after 2–3 scatterings the minimum photon energy pmin(n)p_{\min}^{(n)} becomes almost inversely proportional to nn, pmin(n)mec/(2n)0.255MeV/np_{\min}^{(n)}\simeq m_{e}c/(2n)\approx 0.255\operatorname{MeV}/n. Hence, after 10\sim 10 scatterings, the minimum energy falls well into the range where photoemission absorption starts dominating. This low-energy photon absorption creates an effective sink for multiply scattered photons.

B.2 Solution for n=1n=1

Here we consider the lowest-order scattered photons, n=1n=1. In the relatively near zone, rl(pγ)r\lesssim l(p_{\gamma}), the cutoff of the infinite chain by the first term of the series represents a good approximation for the entire photon distribution.

For n=1n=1, we obtain from (B.4),

f1\displaystyle f_{1}^{-} =exp[(r2ρ2)1/2/l]crexp[(y2ρ2)1/2/l](Iarr)1(y2ρ2)1/2y𝑑y,\displaystyle=\frac{\exp\left[\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]}{c}\int_{r}^{\infty}\frac{\exp\left[-\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1}}{\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\ ydy,
f1+\displaystyle f_{1}^{+} =exp[(r2ρ2)1/2/l]cρexp[(y2ρ2)1/2/l](Iarr)1(y2ρ2)1/2y𝑑y\displaystyle=\frac{\exp\left[-\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]}{c}\int_{\rho}^{\infty}\frac{\exp\left[-\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1}}{\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\ ydy (B.7)
+exp[(r2ρ2)1/2/l]cρrexp[(y2ρ2)1/2/l](Iarr)1(y2ρ2)1/2y𝑑y.\displaystyle+\frac{\exp\left[-\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]}{c}\int_{\rho}^{r}\frac{\exp\left[\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\right]\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1}}{\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}}\ ydy.

Here (Iarr)1\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1} is given by

(Iarr)1\displaystyle\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1} =2Zairnmr02mec2pγ2pγpmax(pγpγ+pγpγsin2Θγ)𝑑pγ\displaystyle=\frac{2Z_{\mathrm{air}}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}c^{2}}{p_{\gamma}^{2}}\int_{p_{\gamma}}^{p_{\max}}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}-\sin^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}\right)dp_{\gamma}^{\prime}
×CC+(fγ+)primd(cosθγ)S(cosΘγ,cosθγ,cosθγ),\displaystyle\times\int_{C^{-}}^{C^{+}}\frac{\left(f_{\gamma}^{+\prime}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}d\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)}{\sqrt{S\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right)}}, (B.8)

where cosΘγ(pγ,pγ)\cos\Theta_{\gamma}\left(p_{\gamma},p_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right) is given by (12) and, accordingly,

sin2Θγ=L(pγ,ps)(mecpγmecps)(mecpsmecpγ+2)\sin^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}=L(p_{\gamma},p_{s})\equiv\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}\right)\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+2\right) (B.9)
cos2Θγ=1L(pγ,ps)\cos^{2}\Theta_{\gamma}=1-L(p_{\gamma},p_{s}) (B.10)

In accord with (B.1), we obtain

(fγ+)prim=Iγ(0)δ(cosθγ1)8π2cr2s=1ker/lsδ(pγps)ps2.\left(f_{\gamma}^{+\prime}\right)_{\mathrm{prim}}=\frac{I_{\gamma}^{(0)}\delta\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}-1\right)}{8\pi^{2}cr^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\frac{e^{-r/l_{s}}\delta\left(p_{\gamma}^{\prime}-p_{s}\right)}{p_{s}^{2}}. (B.11)

Unlike general equation (B.4), (B.7) contains no summations over ±\pm because the primary photon beams include no ingoing photons. Integration in (B.8) over cosθγ\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime} should be done with care because the straightforward elimination of δ\delta(cosθγ1\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}-1) with S(cosΘγ,cosθγ,cosθγ=1)S\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}=1\right) leads to a singularity. To avoid it, we apply the following. Regardless of the specific values of cosΘγ\cos\Theta_{\gamma} and cosθγ\cos\theta_{\gamma}, the integral CC+(1/S)d(cosθγ)\int_{C^{-}}^{C^{+}}(1/\sqrt{S})d\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\right) equals π\pi, so that we obtain

limθγ01S(cosΘγ,cosθγ,cosθγ)=πδ(cosΘγcosθγ).\lim_{\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime}\rightarrow 0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{S\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma},\cos\theta_{\gamma}^{\prime},\cos\theta_{\gamma}\right)}}=\pi\delta\left(\cos\Theta_{\gamma}-\cos\theta_{\gamma}\right). (B.12)

and hence

(Iarr)1\displaystyle\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1} =2ZairIγ(0)nmr02mec8πpγ2ρ2s=1krsers/lsps2(1ρ2rs2)1/2\displaystyle=\frac{2Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}c}{8\pi p_{\gamma}^{2}\rho^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\frac{r_{s}e^{-r_{s}/l_{s}}}{p_{s}^{2}}\left(1-\frac{\rho^{2}}{r_{s}^{2}}\right)^{1/2} (B.13a)
×(pγpγ+pγpγ+L(pγ,ps))δ(rrs),\displaystyle\times\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}+\frac{p_{\gamma}^{\prime}}{p_{\gamma}}+L(p_{\gamma},p_{s})\right)\delta\left(r-r_{s}\right),
where lsl(ps)=c/ν(ps)l_{s}\equiv l(p_{s})=c/\nu(p_{s}),
rs(ρ,pγ,ps)=ρL1/2=ρ(mecpγmecps)1/2(mecpsmecpγ+2)1/2.r_{s}\left(\rho,p_{\gamma},p_{s}\right)=\frac{\rho}{L^{1/2}}=\rho\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}\right)^{-1/2}\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+2\right)^{-1/2}. (B.14)

These expressions have a simple physical meaning. Photons from the radiated monochromatic and infinitely narrow beams are scattered into angles rigidly coupled to the energy of the scattered photon. Given both the energy and ρ\rho of the scattered photon, one can find the distance where such act of scattering took place, r=rsr=r_{s}. The delta-function δ(rrs)\delta\left(r-r_{s}\right) demonstrates the uniqueness of this scattering distance. The factor erc/lse^{-r_{c}/l_{s}} describes the total attenuation of the primary beam ss on its way from the radiation source to rsr_{s}.

Now we insert the expression for (Iarr)1\left(I_{\mathrm{arr}}\right)_{1} into (B.7), integrate with eliminating δ(yrs)\delta\left(y-r_{s}\right) and use relation (B.14): yrsy\rightarrow r_{s}, (y2ρ2)1/2(rs2ρ2)1/2\left(y^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}\rightarrow\left(r_{s}^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}. The result depends upon whether the photon momentum pγp_{\gamma} is less or greater than a critical value, pcrsp_{\mathrm{cr}s}, corresponding to the 9090^{\circ}-scattering (cosΘγ=0\cos\Theta_{\gamma}=0) from the primary beam ss. For

pcrsps1+ps/(mec)pγ<psp_{\mathrm{cr}s}\equiv\frac{p_{s}}{1+p_{s}/(m_{e}c)}\leq p_{\gamma}<p_{s} (B.15)

all singly-scattered particles are outgoing particles caused by forward scattering (Θγ90\Theta_{\gamma}\leq 90^{\circ}), while for pγ<pcrsp_{\gamma}<p_{\mathrm{cr}s} scattered particles are either ingoing or outgoing particles caused by backscatter (90<Θγ18090^{\circ}<\Theta_{\gamma}\leq 180^{\circ}).

Depending on whether r>rsr>r_{s} or r<rsr<r_{s}, we will separate between ‘outer’ and ‘inner’ photons. For pγpcrsp_{\gamma}\geq p_{\mathrm{cr}s}, all scattered photons are outer (rrsr\geq r_{s}) outgoing photons,

ρL1/2r=(mecpγmecps)1/2(mecpsmecpγ+2)1/2r,\rho\leq L^{1/2}r=\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}\right)^{1/2}\left(\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{s}}-\frac{m_{e}c}{p_{\gamma}}+2\right)^{1/2}r, (B.16)

originating from only one scattering location with given rsr_{s}. We have then

f1ext+=2ZairIγ(0)nmr02me8πpγ2ρ2s=1k(pγps+pspγL(pγ,ps))Aext+rsps2,f_{1\mathrm{ext}}^{+}=\frac{2Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}}{8\pi p_{\gamma}^{2}\rho^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{s}}+\frac{p_{s}}{p_{\gamma}}-L(p_{\gamma},p_{s})\right)\frac{A_{\mathrm{ext}}^{+}r_{s}}{p_{s}^{2}}, (B.17)

where the attenuation factor is

Aext+(r,pγ,ρ)=exp{[(rs2ρ2)1/2(r2ρ2)1/2]/l(pγ)rs/ls}A_{\mathrm{ext}}^{+}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right)=\exp\left\{[\left(r_{s}^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}-\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}]/l\left(p_{\gamma}\right)-r_{s}/l_{s}\right\} (B.18)

For pγ<pcrsp_{\gamma}<p_{\mathrm{cr}s}, or more precisely, for

pmin=ps1+2ps/(mec)<pγ<pcrs=ps1+ps/(mec)p_{\min}=\frac{p_{s}}{1+2p_{s}/(m_{e}c)}<p_{\gamma}<p_{\mathrm{cr}s}=\frac{p_{s}}{1+p_{s}/(m_{e}c)} (B.19)

there are both outer outgoing and inner (r<rsr<r_{s}) photons,

L1/2r<ρr,L^{1/2}r<\rho\leq r, (B.20)

either outgoing or ingoing from two different locations of given rsr_{s}. For the outer photons defined by (B.16), we have the same solution as (B.17). For the inner photons, we have two solutions for the either ingoing or outgoing photons,

f1int±=2ZairIγ(0)nmr02me8πpγ2ρ2s=1k(pγps+pspγL(pγ,ps))Aint±rsps2,f_{1\mathrm{int}}^{\pm}=\frac{2Z_{\mathrm{air}}I_{\gamma}^{(0)}n_{m}r_{0}^{2}m_{e}}{8\pi p_{\gamma}^{2}\rho^{2}}\sum_{s=1}^{k}\left(\frac{p_{\gamma}}{p_{s}}+\frac{p_{s}}{p_{\gamma}}-L(p_{\gamma},p_{s})\right)\frac{A_{\mathrm{int}}^{\pm}r_{s}}{p_{s}^{2}}, (B.21)

which differ by the attenuation factors only,

Aint±(r,pγ,ρ)=exp[(rs2ρ2)1/2/l(pγ)(r2ρ2)1/2/l(pγ)rs/ls]A_{\mathrm{int}}^{\pm}\left(r,p_{\gamma},\rho\right)=\exp\left[-\left(r_{s}^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\left(p_{\gamma}\right)\mp\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/l\left(p_{\gamma}\right)-r_{s}/l_{s}\right] (B.22)

There are different signs in front of ν(pγ)(r2ρ2)1/2/c\nu\left(p_{\gamma}\right)\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2}/c due to the fact that for the outgoing photons the two points corresponding to rr and rsr_{s} lie on the two opposite sides from r=ρr=\rho, so that the two distances (r2ρ2)1/2\left(r^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2} and (rs2ρ2)1/2\left(r_{s}^{2}-\rho^{2}\right)^{1/2} add, rather than subtract, as they do for the ingoing photons.

Note that the only rr-dependence in the above distributions is due to the attenuation factors. As functions of the angular variable ρ=L1/2r\rho=L^{1/2}r, f1±f_{1}^{\pm} contains only a singular factor rs/ρ21/ρr_{s}/\rho^{2}\propto 1/\rho. Since all integrals for calculating the photon densities and fluxes contain d(cosθγ)ρdρd\left(\cos\theta_{\gamma}\right)\propto\rho d\rho this singularity is integrable.

For n>1n>1, the formal general solution (B.2) with the recurrence relations (B.4) involves an increasing number of nested integrations and becomes complicated. The solution for n=1n=1, given by equations (B.17)–(B.22), will be the basis of our analysis of the photon propagation in the near-source zone.

References

  • [1] V. L. Granatstein and G. S. Nusinovich, J. Appl. Phys., 108, 063304 (2010).
  • [2] G. S. Nusinovich et al., J. Infrared, Millimeter, Terahertz Waves, 32, 380 (2011)
  • [3] G. S. Nusinovich, P. Sprangle, C. A. Romero-Talamas and V. L. Granatstein, J. Appl. Phys., 109, 083303 (2011).
  • [4] N. J. Carron, “An Introduction to the Passage of Energetic Particles through Matter,” Taylor & Francis, New York, 2001.
  • [5] G. F. Knoll, “Radiation detection and measurement,” 3rd Edition, Wiley, New York, 2000.
  • [6] W. P. Jesse and J. Sadauskis, Phys. Rev. 97, 1668 (1955).
  • [7] J. M. Valentine and S. C Curran, Rep. Progr. in Physics, 21, 1-29 (1958).
  • [8] E. M. Lifshitz and L. P. Pitaevskii, “Physical Kinetics” (“Course of Theoretical Physics”, Volume 10), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2002.
  • [9] D. E. Gray (Coord. Ed.), American Institute of Physics Handbook, Third Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.
  • [10] M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, Dover Publications, 1999.