This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Quantum information entropy of a particle trapped by the Aharonov-Bohm-type effect

F. C. E. Lima cleiton.estevao@fisica.ufc.br Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento do Física, Fortaleza, CE, 60455-760, Brazil.    A. R. P. Moreira Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento do Física, Fortaleza, CE, 60455-760, Brazil.    C. A. S. Almeida carlos@fisica.ufc.br Universidade Federal do Ceará, Departamento do Física, Fortaleza, CE, 60455-760, Brazil.    C. O. Edet collinsokonedet@gmail.com Institute of Engineering Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia. Faculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia. Department of Physics, Cross River University of Technology, Calabar, Nigeria.    N. Ali norshamsuri@unimap.edu.my Faculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600 Arau, Perlis, Malaysia. Advanced Communication Engineering (ACE) Centre of Excellence, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 01000 Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia.
Abstract

Abstract: In this research article, we use the Shannon’s formalism to investigate the quantum information entropy of a particle trapped by the Aharonov-Bohm-type field. For quantum information study, it is necessary to investigate the eigenstates of the quantum system, i. e., the wave functions and energies of the quantum states. We assumed that the particle is in principle, confined in a cylindrical box in the presence of Aharonov-Bohm-type effect due to dislocation defect. Analysis of the quantum information entropy, reveals that the dislocation influences the eigenstates and, consequently, the quantum information of the system.

Keywords: Shannon’s entropy, Aharonov-Bohm-type effect, Topological defect.

I Introduction

Vector and scalar potentials appear in physics as auxiliary tools describing the electric and magnetic fields AB , Arfken . Furthermore, potentials play a fundamental role in the canonical description of a physical system at the classical Marion and quantum levels Griffiths , Sakurai . In quantum theory, potentials are responsible for the emergence of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect AB . The AB effect is a quantum phenomenon in which an electrically charged particle is affected by an electromagnetic potential Griffiths , Sakurai . In principle, the AB effect tells us that the particle will feel the influence of the field even when the particle is at a null-field region AB , Griffiths , Sakurai . This effect was described in 1959 by Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm in their seminal paper Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory AB .

Several applications discussing AB effects have appeared in the literature Overstreet , Ronen , Mefford , FAhmed1 , FAhmed2 , FAhmed3 , Ba1 , Ba2 , Ba3 . For example, the AB effect arises when studying carbon nanotubes Ajiki , in the scattering process Ruij , and in photonic systems Fang . The fact is that there is a growing interest in the study of the AB effect Vaidman , Caprez , Chaichian . In particular, this interest motivates us to understand the quantum information of a particle trapped by an AB-type effect due to the presence of a cosmic string topological defect, i. e., the dislocation defect.

Cosmic strings are topological defects analogous to the flux tubes that arise in type II superconductors and vortex filaments in superfluid helium. The Ref. Vilenkin suggests that this defect must have formed in a large unification transition or simply conceivable later in the electroweak transition. It is necessary to mention that the standard model does not predict stable strings. However, some generalizations allow this prediction Vilenkin . Generally, the cosmic string is a hypothetical topological defect formed during a symmetry-breaking phase transition in the early universe when the topology of the vacuum manifold associated with this symmetry-breaking was not simply connected. The existence of cosmic string defect was proposed first by Kibble in the seminal paper topology of cosmic domains and strings Kibble , Kibble2 . For more details, see Refs. Kibble , Kibble2 , Helliwell , Gott , Linet .

The idea of quantum information arises in search of a general communication theory Shannon . Claude E. Shannon sought an extension of communication theory to include new factors. In particular, Shannon sought to implement in his study the noise effect on the channel and the possible savings in the propagation process of the message Shannon . This relevant study made Shannon one of the forerunners of communication theory.

Shannon’s theory has been used in quantum mechanics to study information from physical systems Collins , LMA , LMMA , Almeida1 . In quantum theory, Shannon’s theory is a theoretical measuring of the communication responsible for informing us of the measure of uncertainty in the position and momentum of the particle LMA , LMMA . In other words, Shannon’s information is information theoretical-measuring associated with the position space and reciprocal. Indeed, this informational analysis plays a relevant role in the foundations of information theory Shannon and quantum mechanics problems Pathria , Griffiths , Sakurai (see Refs. Dong1 , Dong2 , Dong3 ). Furthermore, Shannon’s entropy is a useful approach used in the study of cryptography Grosshans , noise theory Wyner , harmonic oscillators Boumali , Yanez , Dehesa0 , potential wells Bouvrie , Torres , Dehesa , Sun1 , Majernik , Tserkis , Mukherjee , Kumar , Amadi , and theories of effective mass Serrano , Hua , Navarro , Lima .

Some studies are found in the literature discussing the influence of the AB effect on the system eigenstates Ikot0 . Furthermore, some studies were also performed on the information of quantum-mechanical systems with AB effect with a specific interaction Collins . However, as far as we know, no studies have been carried out purely studying the influence of the AB-type effect on the quantum information of a spinless particle. Therefore, the main purpose is to study how quantum information changes as the AB-type effect is modified.

We organize the paper as follows: In Sec. II, we build the quantum theory and present the analytical solution of the eigenstates of the system. Posteriorly, in Sec. III, the quantum information of the system is studied considering an alteration of the AB-type effect. Finally, in Sec. IV, we announce our findings.

II Quantum description of the system

Our purpose in this section is the quantum description of a spinless particle subjected to the AB effect in the presence of dislocation. So, the eigenstates depend on the AB effect and the dislocation defect. In summary, the dislocation defect corresponds to the distortion of a vertical line into a spiral Valanis:2005pc , Puntigam:1996vy , daSilva:2019lzh . Seeking to understand how the AB effect and dislocation modify the eigenstates, let us consider a quantum system composed of a spinless particle in the presence of a dislocation, i. e.,

ds2=dr2+2βdrdθ+r2dθ2+dz2,\displaystyle ds^{2}=dr^{2}+2\beta\,dr\,d\theta+r^{2}d\theta^{2}+dz^{2}, (1)

where the parameter β\beta describes the dislocation and obeys the constraint 0<β<10<\beta<1. Furthermore, the cylindrical symmetry considered (1) requires that 0<r<0<r<\infty, 0θ2π0\leq\theta\leq 2\pi and z-\infty\leq z\leq\infty.

One classifies the topological defects into three classes, i.e., domain walls, cosmic strings, and monopoles, see Ref. Vachaspati0 . In this article, metric (1) describes a cosmic string defect. In particular, cosmic strings are linear spacetime topological defects Vachaspati0 , Helliwell , Gott , Linet , Kibble , Kibble2 , Vilenkin . Physically, we characterize this class of defects by a conical singularity determined by a concentrated curvature on the symmetry axis. Due to the relevant physical repercussions of concepts related to this defect class, several studies have considered cosmic string defects in their investigations. For more details, see Refs. Ramberg , WAhmed , HChen , KBakkeH , BoumaliNM , HassanabadiHM , ZWang .

Considering a nonrelativistic particle in the presence of dislocation, we write the Schrödinger equation as

12m1gi(gijgj)ψ(r,θ,z)=ψ(r,θ,z).\displaystyle-\frac{1}{2m}\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\partial_{i}(g^{ij}\sqrt{g}\partial_{j})\psi(r,\theta,z)=\mathcal{E}\psi(r,\theta,z). (2)

Here, we use the =c=1\hbar=c=1.

Now using the line element (1) and considering the Eq. (2), one obtains

12m{2r2+z2+1(r2β2)[rr+(θβz)2]}ψ(r,θ,z)=ψ(r,θ,z).\displaystyle-\frac{1}{2m}\bigg{\{}\frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial z^{2}}+\frac{1}{(r^{2}-\beta^{2})}\bigg{[}r\frac{\partial}{\partial r}+\bigg{(}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}-\beta\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\bigg{)}^{2}\bigg{]}\bigg{\}}\psi(r,\theta,z)=\mathcal{E}\psi(r,\theta,z). (3)

To solve Schrödinger’s equation (3), allow us assume

ψ(r,θ,z)=ei(lθ+kz)R(r).\displaystyle\psi(r,\theta,z)=\text{e}^{i(l\theta+kz)}R(r). (4)

Here, l=0,±1,±2,±3,l=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\pm 3,... and kk\in\mathbb{R}. Besides, note that the parameters ll and kk are the eigenvalues associated with the operators p^z=iz\hat{p}_{z}=-i\partial_{z} and L^z=iθ\hat{L}_{z}=-i\partial_{\theta}, respectively.

Assuming the transformation (4) where θ\theta and zz are cyclic coordinates, we write Schrödinger’s equation as

R′′(r)+1(r2β2)[rR(r)(lβk)2R(r)]+(2mk2)R(r)=0.\displaystyle R^{\prime\prime}(r)+\frac{1}{(r^{2}-\beta^{2})}\bigg{[}rR^{\prime}(r)-(l-\beta k)^{2}R(r)\bigg{]}+(2m\mathcal{E}-k^{2})R(r)=0. (5)

Here, prime notation represents the derivative concerning the radial coordinate.

Seeking to describe the confinement of the spinless particle, let us assume the coordinate change

r=x2mk2.\displaystyle r=\frac{x}{\sqrt{2m\mathcal{E}-k^{2}}}. (6)

This coordinate change appears in Refs. daSilva:2019lzh , MulerK to study a particle confinement by a hard wall.

Considering the Eq. (6), we rewrite the Eq. (5) as

(14ς2x2)R¨(x)+1xR˙(x)+(1λx22ς2x2)R(x)=0,\displaystyle\bigg{(}1-\frac{4\varsigma^{2}}{x^{2}}\bigg{)}\ddot{R}(x)+\frac{1}{x}\dot{R}(x)+\bigg{(}1-\frac{\lambda}{x^{2}}-\frac{2\varsigma^{2}}{x^{2}}\bigg{)}R(x)=0, (7)

where

λ=(lβk)2+ς2,\displaystyle\lambda=(l-\beta k)^{2}+\varsigma^{2}, (8)

and

ς2=β2(2mk2)4.\displaystyle\varsigma^{2}=\frac{\beta^{2}(2m\mathcal{E}-k^{2})}{4}. (9)

Here, the point notation represents the derivative concerning the variable xx.

Let us highlight that the parameter that describes the dislocation (or distortion of the metric) has a value restrained in the range [0,1][0,1] Valanis:2005pc , Puntigam:1996vy . So, one can assume the parameter β\beta is small. Therefore, the higher order terms of β\beta will be negligible. In this way, we reformulate the Eq. (7) as follows:

R¨(x)+1xR˙(x)+[1(lβkx)2]R(x)=0.\displaystyle\ddot{R}(x)+\frac{1}{x}\dot{R}(x)+\bigg{[}1-\bigg{(}\frac{l-\beta k}{x}\bigg{)}^{2}\bigg{]}R(x)=0. (10)

Here, allow us to remember that every equation written in the form

f′′(x)+1xf(x)+(k2α2x2)f(x)=0\displaystyle f^{\prime\prime}(x)+\frac{1}{x}f^{\prime}(x)+\bigg{(}k^{2}-\frac{\alpha^{2}}{x^{2}}\bigg{)}f(x)=0 (11)

is known as Bessel’s equation Arfken , Abramowitz , Butkov . Thus, the general solution of the Bessel equation will be

f(x)=c1Jα(x)+c2Jα(x),\displaystyle f(x)=c_{1}\,J_{\alpha}(x)+c_{2}\,J_{-\alpha}(x), (12)

where

Jα(x)=k=0(1)k1k!Γ(α+k+1)(x2)α+2k.\displaystyle J_{\alpha}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{k}\frac{1}{k!\,\Gamma(\alpha+k+1)}\bigg{(}\frac{x}{2}\bigg{)}^{\alpha+2k}. (13)

For more details on the Bessel equation, see Refs. Arfken , Abramowitz , Butkov .

Comparing Eq. (11) and its solution (12) with Eq. (10) and requiring the wave function to be normalizable, one obtains that the solution of Eq. (10) is

R(x)=A0J|lβk|(x).\displaystyle R(x)=A_{0}J_{|l-\beta k|}(x). (14)

Here A0A_{0} is the normalization constant, and J|lβk|(x)J_{|l-\beta k|}(x) is Bessel’s function of first kind Arfken , Abramowitz , Butkov .

Building the general wave function that describes spinless particles in the presence of disclination, one obtains

ψ(r,θ,z)=A0ei(lθ+kz)J|lβk|(2ςβ2r).\displaystyle\psi(r,\theta,z)=A_{0}\text{e}^{i(l\theta+kz)}J_{|l-\beta k|}\bigg{(}\frac{2\varsigma}{\beta^{2}}r\bigg{)}. (15)

As discussed by Silva and Bakke daSilva:2019lzh , let us analyze the confinement of the spinless particle by a hard-wall confining potential in the elastic medium. For this, allow us to assume that

limxx0R(x)=0withx0=β2mk2.\displaystyle\lim_{x\to x_{0}}R(x)=0\,\,\,\,\,\,\text{with}\,\,\,\,\,\,x_{0}=\beta\sqrt{2m\mathcal{E}-k^{2}}. (16)

Applying the constraint (16), one obtains that

n,l,k=12m(Θn,|lβk|r0)2+k22m.\displaystyle\mathcal{E}_{n,l,k}=\frac{1}{2m}\bigg{(}\frac{\Theta_{n,|l-\beta k|}}{r_{0}}\bigg{)}^{2}+\frac{k^{2}}{2m}. (17)

Here Θn,|lβk|\Theta_{n,|l-\beta k|} is the nn-th zero of the |lβk||l-\beta k|-th Bessel’s function Griffiths . Furthermore, n=0,1,2,n=0,1,2,\dots, and the quantum number associated to the angular momentum is l=0,±1,±2,l=0,\pm 1,\pm 2,\dots.

The results of the Eqs. (15) and (17) expose how eigenstates change with disclination. So, we expect the existence of a dependency on the quantum information with the disclination defect. In the next section, we present a study of the variation of Shannon information as the disclination changes.

Note that the parameters nn and |lβk||l-\beta k| play the role of quantum numbers associated with the radial and angular variables, respectively. Therefore, this result allows us to perceive the influence of the defect on the energy eigenvalues. Moreover, one notes this influence by a change in the quantum number of the angular momentum. It is relevant to mention that this change arises even if there is no interaction between the particle and the defect. Indeed, this effect is called the Aharonov-Bohm-type effect and appears due to the presence of the topological defect.

III Information theoretical measure: Shannon’s entropy

The growing interest in studies of information-theoretical measurements of quantum-mechanical systems is evident Grosshans , Wyner , Boumali , Yanez , Dehesa0 , Bouvrie , Torres , Dehesa , Sun1 , Majernik , Tserkis , Mukherjee , Kumar , Amadi , Serrano , Hua , Navarro , Lima , EI . Initially, the entropic measure of information comes up with an alternative proposal to the well-known Heisenberg uncertainty relation Navarro , BBM . Among different approaches used to measure information entropies is the so-called Shannon’s entropy Navarro . In quantum theories, Shannon’s entropy plays an essential role in uncertainty measurement. In particular, this entropy gives us a new version of Heisenberg’s uncertainty relationship between the position and momentum spaces BBM . This relation is

Sr+SpD(1+lnπ).\displaystyle S_{\textbf{r}}+S_{\textbf{p}}\geq D(1+\text{ln}\pi). (18)

Here, DD is the spatial dimension (in our case D=3D=3), SrS_{\textbf{r}} is the information entropy at the position space, and SpS_{\textbf{p}} is the information entropy at the momentum space.

Using the definition of Shannon’s entropy, let us write the quantum information entropy as

Sr=02π0|ψ(r,θ,z)|2ln|ψ(r,θ,z)|2r𝑑r𝑑θ𝑑z,\displaystyle S_{\textbf{r}}=-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\,|\psi(r,\theta,z)|^{2}\,\text{ln}\,|\psi(r,\theta,z)|^{2}\,r\,drd\theta dz, (19)

and

Sp=02π0|ψ(pr,pθ,pz)|2ln|ψ(pr,pθ,pz)|2pr𝑑pr𝑑pθ𝑑pz,\displaystyle S_{\textbf{p}}=-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\,|\psi(p_{r},p_{\theta},p_{z})|^{2}\,\text{ln}\,|\psi(p_{r},p_{\theta},p_{z})|^{2}\,p_{r}\,dp_{r}dp_{\theta}dp_{z}, (20)

where

ψ(pr,pθ,pz)=\displaystyle\psi(p_{r},p_{\theta},p_{z})= 0r𝑑r02π𝑑θ𝑑zψ(r,θ,z)ei2πprrcos(pθθ)ei2πpzz.\displaystyle\int_{0}^{\infty}r\,dr\int_{0}^{2\pi}d\theta\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\,dz\,\psi(r,\theta,z)\,\text{e}^{-i2\pi p_{r}r\cos(p_{\theta}-\theta)}\,\text{e}^{-i2\pi p_{z}z}. (21)

i. e., the three-dimensional Fourier transform in cylindrical coordinates. For more details, see Refs. Arfken , Abramowitz , Butkov .

Shannon’s entropy helps us to calculate the entropic information measures. In this context, Shannon’s entropy has performed a relevant role in several studies. For example, one can apply this approach in investigating Aharonov-Bohm rings Collins , quantum systems with double-well potentials Dong2 , hyperbolic interaction Torres , position-dependent mass theories Lima , Hua , and the Aharonov-Bohm effect CI .

Motivated by these applications, we will use this approach to study quantum information theoretical measurements of a spinless particle. That particle is in the presence of a screw displacement, which produces the Aharonov-Bohm-type effect. It is important to mention that the study of theoretical measurements of information of this system is the first step to understanding the gain (or loss) of quantum information of particles that interact with this class of topological defect. So, to achieve our purpose, let us consider the wave eigenfunctions (15) and substitute in Eq. (19). This substitution leads us to Shannon’s entropy in the position space. Subsequently, we perform Fourier’s transform (21) of the eigenfunctions (15) and calculate Shannon’s entropy in the reciprocal space using Eq. (20). The numerical results shown in the table 1 are obtained numerically solving the integrals (19) and (20) for the first eigenstates. In Fig. 1, the probability densities at the position space for the ground state and the first two excited states used in Shannon’s entropy calculation are displayed. On the other hand, in Fig. 2, probability densities at the reciprocal space used in Shannon’s entropy calculation are exposed.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption

(a)                                                              (b)

Refer to caption

(c)

Figure 1: Probability density at the position space. (a) The case: n=0n=0 and l=0l=0. (b) The case: n=1n=1 and l=1l=-1. (c) The case: n=2n=2 and l=2l=-2.

Analyzing Fig. 1, i. e., the probability density for the first three energy levels, one notes that the more energetic states have greater amplitudes and oscillations. In addition, the results presented in Fig. 1 show that by increasing the influence of the topological defect responsible for the Aharonov-Bohm type effect, the amplitudes of the probability density increase. That suggests that the quantum information of the system increases as the Aharonov-Bohm-type effect increases (i.e., as the parameter β\beta increases).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption

(a)                                                              (b)

Refer to caption

(c)

Figure 2: Probability density at the reciprocal space. (a) The case: n=0n=0 and l=0l=0. (b) The case: n=1n=1 and l=1l=-1. (c) The case: n=2n=2 and l=2l=-2.

Looking at Fig. 2, one can see that the probability density of the particle at the reciprocal space is a Dirac delta-like distribution. This probability density profile suggests minimal uncertainty in the momentum of the spinless particle. Furthermore, with the probability densities shown in Figs. 1 and 2, we obtain the numerical results of the table 1. This result tells us that the quantum information decreases as the disclination increases. This decreasing in information suggests an increase in uncertainty measurements associated with particle position measurements. Besides, the quantum information at the reciprocal space increases when the disclination is larger. Thus, suggesting less uncertainty in the momentum measurement of the particle. Furthermore, one notes that these results remain valid for quantum states with higher energy. It is worth mentioning that in all cases, we have

Sr+Sp6.43419,\displaystyle S_{r}+S_{p}\geq 6.43419, (22)

and therefore, the Bialynicki-Birula and Mycielski BBM relationship is preserved.

nn ll β\beta SrS_{\textbf{r}} SpS_{\textbf{p}} Sr+SpS_{\textbf{r}}+S_{\textbf{p}} 3(1+lnπ)3(1+\ln\pi)
0.2 9.74631 0.06678 9.81309
0 0 0.4 9.74262 0.07558 9.81821 6.43419
0.8 9.74040 0.12158 9.86199
0.2 9.74435 0.05526 9.79961
-1 0.4 9.74424 0.10408 9.84832 6.43419
0.8 9.74387 0.29596 10.03984
0.2 9.74483 0.00770 9.75254
1 0 0.4 9.74439 0.10381 9.84821 6.43419
0.8 9.74353 0.29641 10.03991
0.2 9.74410 0.01640 9.76050
1 0.4 9.74377 0.13777 9.88154 6.43419
0.8 9.74312 0.29938 10.04251
0.2 9.74461 0.02251 9.76713
-2 0.4 9.74329 0.22803 9.97133 6.43419
0.8 9.74277 0.35949 10.10231
0.2 9.74518 0.02720 9.77238
-1 0.4 9.74361 0.25583 9.99944 6.43419
0.8 9.74301 0.48609 10.22910
0.2 9.74482 0.04111 9.78593
2 0 0.4 9.74370 0.25717 10.00091 6.43419
0.8 9.74317 0.52424 10.26742
0.2 9.74435 0.04188 9.78623
1 0.4 9.74335 0.35605 10.09942 6.43419
0.8 9.74291 0.85920 10.60214
0.2 9.74399 0.07462 9.81861
2 0.4 9.74311 0.44406 10.18722 6.43419
0.8 9.74272 0.91082 10.65351
Table 1: Numerical result of Shannon’s entropy.

Finally, analyzing the numerical results presented in table 1, one notes that the quantum information entropy at the position space is always greater than at the momentum space. That is because the probability regions at the position space (Fig. 1) are larger than the probability regions at the momentum space (Fig. 2). Thus, the uncertainty measure related to the particle position is always greater. Furthermore, we notice that the quantity Sr+SpS_{\textbf{r}}+S_{\textbf{p}} decreases when the topological defect contribution decreases. That is because, in the absence of the topological defect, we recover the usual problem of a free particle in a space with cylindrical symmetry. So, in this limit, the particle’s uncertainty measures in both spaces are minimal once the cosmic string defects (dislocation) do not contribute in this case. Meantime, the uncertainty measures on the position and momentum increase as the states become more energetic, i.e., when nn and ll increase. That is a consequence of the particles, in this case, being in more energetic states when nn and ll increase. In other words, the particles have a momentum increase, and their measurement uncertainties concerning their velocity and position suffer alterations. These results are very interesting and allow us to conclude that Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle remains preserved in our theory. To finish, we observe that the particle energy one modifies for different values of ll (l=2l=2 and l=2l=-2). Thus, the uncertainty measures related to the position and momentum of the particle will be distinct.

IV Final remarks

In this research, we have employed Shannon’s entropy to study the quantum information entropy of a non-relativistic particle trapped by the Aharonov-Bohm-type effect. The Schrodinger equation in cylindrical coordinate is solved in the presence of topological defect and the resulting Aharonov-Bohm effect to obtain the wave functions and eigenvalues of quantum system. These eigensolutions are employed to evaluate the Shannon entropy numerically. From our analysis of the quantum information, it is possible to seen that the dislocation influences the eigenstates and, consequently, the quantum information of the system. It is interesting to point out that the famous Bialynicki-Birula and Mycielski (BBM) relationship is satisfied as well. Going forward, the results of this study will find applications in quantum information processing and related areas.

Authors Declaration

Conflicts of interest/Competing interest

All the authors declared that there is no conflict of interest in this manuscript.

Acknowledgements

F. C. E. Lima is grateful to Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), no 88887.372425/2019-00. C. A. S. Almeida thanks to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), no 309553/2021-0. C. O. Edet acknowledges eJDS (ICTP). This research was performed partially under LRGS Grant LRGS/1/2020/UM/01/5/2 (9012-00009) Fault Tolerant Photonic Quantum States for Quantum Key Distribution Provided by the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE).

Data Availability

One can find the datasets that support the findings of this study through the article.

References

  • [1] Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485.
  • [2] G. B. Arfken and H. J. Weber, Mathematical methods for physicists, (6th ed., Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2005).
  • [3] J. B. Marion, Classical dynamics of particles and systems, (5th Revised ed., Cengage Learning, USA, 2003).
  • [4] D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to quantum mechanics, (Prentice Hall, USA, New Jersey, 1994).
  • [5] J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern quantum mechanics, (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA, 1994).
  • [6] C. Overstreet, P. Asenbaum, J. Curti, M. Kim and M. A. Kasevich, Science 375 (2022) 226.
  • [7] Y. Ronen, T. Werkmeister, D. H. Najafabadi, A. T. Pierce, L. E. Anderson, Y. J. Shin, S. Y. Lee, Y. H. Lee, B. Johnson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Yacoby and P. Kim, Nature 16 (2021) 563.
  • [8] E. Mefford and K. Suzuki, JHEP 05 (2021) 026.
  • [9] F. Ahmed, Europhys. Lett. 130 (2020) 40003.
  • [10] F. Ahmed, Advances in High Energy Physics 2020 (2020) 1-10.
  • [11] F. Ahmed, Europhys. Lett. 131 (2020) 30002.
  • [12] A. V. D. M. Maia and K. Bakke, Quant. Stud.: Mathematics and Foundations 10 (2023) 79.
  • [13] K. Bakke, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36 (2021) 2150136.
  • [14] S. L. R. Vieira and K. Bakke, Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020) 032102.
  • [15] H. Ajiki and T. Ando, Physica B 201 (1994) 349.
  • [16] S. N. M. Ruijsenaars, Ann. Phys. 146 (1983) 1-34.
  • [17] K. Fang, Z. Yu and S. Fan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 153901.
  • [18] L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 86 (2012) 040101(R).
  • [19] A. Caprez, B. Barwick and H. Batelaan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 210401.
  • [20] M. Chaichian, P. Prešnajdera, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbaric and A. Tureanu, Phys. Lett. B 527 (2002) 149.
  • [21] A. Vilenkin, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 852.
  • [22] T. W. B. Kibble, J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387.
  • [23] T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rep. 67 (1980) 183.
  • [24] T. M. Helliwell and D. A. Konkowski, Am. J. Phys. 55 (1987) 401.
  • [25] J. R. Gott, Ap. J. 288 (1985) 422.
  • [26] B. Linet, Gen. Rel. Grav. 17 (1985) 1109.
  • [27] C. E. Shannon, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 (1948) 623.
  • [28] C. O. Edet, F. C. E. Lima, C. A. S. Almeida, N. Ali and M. Asjad, Entropy, 24 (2022) 1059.
  • [29] F. C. E. Lima, A. R. P. Moreira and C. A. S. Almeida, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 121 (2021) e26645.
  • [30] F. C. E. Lima, A. R. P. Moreira, L. E. S. Machado and C. A. S. Ameida, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 121 (2021) e26749.
  • [31] C. A. S. Almeida, C. O. Edet, F. C. E. Lima, N. Ali and M. Asjad, Results in Physics 47 (2023) 106343.
  • [32] R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics, (2nd ed., Butterworth Heinemann, Jordan Hill, Oxford, 1996).
  • [33] C. A. Gil-Barrera, R. S. Carrillo, G.-H. Sun and S. -H. Dong, Entropy 24 (2022) 604.
  • [34] G. -H. Sun, S. -H. Dong, K. D. Launey,T. Dytrych and J. P. Draayer, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 115 (2015) 891.
  • [35] G. -H. Sun,S. -H. Dong and N. Saad, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 525 (2013) 934.
  • [36] F. Grosshans, N. J. Cerf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 047905.
  • [37] A. D. Wyner, S. Shamai, Proc. IEEE 86 (1998) 442.
  • [38] A. Boumali, M. Labidi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33 (2018) 1850033.
  • [39] R. J. Yañez, W. V. Assche and J. S. Dehesa, Phys. Rev. A 50 (1994) 3065.
  • [40] J. S. Dehesa, E. D. Belega, I. V. Toranzo and A. I. Aptekarev, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 119 (2019) e25977.
  • [41] P. A. Bouvrie, J. C. Angulo, J. S. Dehesa, Phys. A 390 (2011) 2215.
  • [42] R. Valencia-Torres, G. H. Sun and S. H. Dong, Phys. Scr. 90 (2015) 035205.
  • [43] J. S. Dehesa, A. Martínez-Finkelshtein, V. N. Sorokin, Mol. Phys. 104 (2006) 613.
  • [44] G. -H. Sun, M. A. Aoki, S. -H. Dong, Chin. Phys. B 22 (2013) 050302.
  • [45] V. Majernik, R. Charvot, E. Majernikova, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 (1999) 2207.
  • [46] S. T. Tserkis, C. C. Moustakidis, S. E. Massen, C. P. Panos, Phys. Lett. A 378 (2014) 497.
  • [47] N. Mukherjee, A. K. Roy, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 11, 2018, e25596.
  • [48] P. R. Kumar, G. Kumar, R. Kumar, A. Kumar, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 116 (2016) 1413.
  • [49] P. O. Amadi, A. N. Ikot, A. T. Ngiangia, U. S. Okorie, G. J. Rampho, H. Y. Abdullah, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 120 (2020) e26246.
  • [50] F. A. Serrano, B. J. Falaye, S. H. Dong, Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 446 (2016) 152.
  • [51] S. Guo-Hua, D. Popov, O. Camacho-Nieto, S. H. Dong, Chin. Phys. B 24 (2015) 100303.
  • [52] G. Yañez-Navarro, G. H. Sun, T. Dytrych, K. D. Launey, S. H. Dong, J. P. Draayer, Ann. Phys. 348 (2014) 153.
  • [53] F. C. E. Lima, Ann. Phys. 442 (2022) 168906.
  • [54] C. O. Edet and A. N. Ikot, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2021) 432.
  • [55] A. N. Ikot, C. O. Edet, P. O. Amadi, U. S. Okorie, G. J. Rampho and H. Y. Abdullah, Eur. Phys. J. D 74 (2020) 159.
  • [56] K. S. Valanis and V. P. Panoskaltsis, Acta Mech. 175 (2005) 77.
  • [57] R. A. Puntigam and H. H. Soleng, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997), 1129.
  • [58] W. C. F. da Silva and K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 559.
  • [59] T. Vachaspati, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 3723.
  • [60] N. Ramberg, W. Ratzinger and P. Schwaller, JCAP 02 (2023) 039.
  • [61] M. Yamada and K. Yonekura, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 123515.
  • [62] W. Ahmed, M. Junaid, S. Nasri and U. Zubair, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115008.
  • [63] H. Chen, Z. W. Long, C. Y. Long, S. Zare and H. Hassanabadi, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 19 (2022) 2250133.
  • [64] K. Bakke and H. Mota, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52 (2020) 97.
  • [65] A. Boumali and N. Messai, Can. J. Phys. 95 (2017) 999.
  • [66] H. Hassanabadi, M. Hosseinpour and M. de Montigny, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132 (2017) 541.
  • [67] Z. Wang, Z. W. Long, C. Y. Long and B. Q. Wang, Can. J. Phys. 95 (2017) 331.
  • [68] H. J. W. Müler-Kirsten, Introduction to quantum mechanics: Schrödinger equation and path integral (Word Scientific, Singapore, 2006).
  • [69] M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegum, Handbook of mathematical functions (Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1965).
  • [70] E. Butkov, Mathematical Physics, (1st ed., Addison-Wesley, USA, 1973).
  • [71] A. L. Silva Netto, C. Chesman and C. Furtado, Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 3894.
  • [72] I. Bialynicki-Birula and J. Mycielski, Comm. Math. Phys. 44, (1975) 129.
  • [73] C. O Edet and A. N. Ikot, Eur. Phys. J. C 136 (2021) 432.
  • [74] V. B. Bezerra, J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997), 2553.
  • [75] A. I. Aptekarev, J. S. Dehesa, R. J. Yáñez, J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 4423.
  • [76] W. Van Assche, R. J. Yáñez, J. S. Dehesa, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 4106.
  • [77] I. I. Hirschmann Jr., Amer. J. Math. 79 (1957) 152.