This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Quasinormal modes of phantom Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter black holes

Hang Liu hangliu@mail.nankai.edu.cn College of Physics and Materials Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate some characteristics of phantom Reissner-Nordström-de Sitter (RN-dS) black holes. The peculiar features of phantom field render this kind of black holes quite different from their counterparts. We can only find at most two horizons in this spacetime, i.e. event horizon and cosmological horizon. For the black hole charge parameter, we find that it is not bounded from below. We calculate quasinormal modes (QNMs) frequencies of massless neutral scalar field perturbation in this black hole spacetime, and some properties related to the large charge parameter are disclosed.

I Introduction

One of the stunning discoveries of the modern physics is the observation of the accelerating expansion of our Universe. To understand the underlying physics of this profound phenomena, people have devoted large amounts of endeavors over the past decades. To the best of my knowledge, at preset there are two different perspectives to solve this mystery, one is to resort to modified gravity theory. This kind of viewpoint is based on the idea that the general relativity (GR) should be modified at large scale to incorporate the observed effects of Universe acceleration. One representative of such theories is the f(R)f(R) gravity proposed in 1970 Buchdahl:1970ynr , where f(R)f(R) introduced to the Lagrangian of the theory stands for an arbitrary function in terms of Ricci scalar RR, and the freedom of the choices of f(R)f(R) function makes it possible to explain the accelerated expansion. The another viewpoint to understand the accelerating Universe is by introducing an effective field (dark energy) which can generate repulsive gravity. A field with such repulsion feature can be formulated as a fluid with negative pressure in GR, and the most famous example of this fluid is the cosmological constant Λ\Lambda which was first proposed by Einstein and has been an essential ingredient of the ΛCDM\Lambda\mathrm{CDM} model. Besides the cosmological constant, the so called phantom scalar field can also serve as a possible description of the dark energy Caldwell:1999ew ; Cai:2009zp . By comparing with the observational data Hannestad:2005fg ; WMAP:2008rhx , it has claimed that the phantom field endowed with negative energy density distribution can indeed be used to explain the acceleration of our Universe. The phantom field can appear in the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton system where the sign of dilatonic kinetic term is flipped to be negative Clement:2009ai , and it also emerges in the in the study of ghost branes in the string theory Okuda2006 . Although the phantom field may lead to quantum instabilities Caldwell:1999ew ; Cai:2009zp which poses a challenge to the theory, the authors in Piazza2004 ; Nojiri:2003vn claimed that these instabilities can be avoided and it consequently makes phantom field a candidate for the dark energy model from the theoretical side. Given the usefulness of phantom field, it therefore motivates us to study the physics of phantom field, especially to probe the effects of phantom field on the background of black holes spacetime if black holes solutions can be found in this scenario, since the black holes in the Universe will be inevitably affected by dark energy.

Recently, a new spherically symmetrical black hole solution was obtained in Einstein-anti-Maxwell theory with cosmological constant, called anti-RN-(A)dS solution, or simply called phantom RN-(A)dS black holes solution Jardim:2012se . The phantom nature of the charge possessed by this kind of black holes make them drastically differ from their counterparts, namely usual RN-(A)dS black holes. Hence it is of great interest to study the characteristics of such black holes. The investigation of thermodynamical aspects of this black hole system have been performed in several works. The thermodynamics of phantom RN-AdS was discussed in Jardim:2012se , followed by a further study of geometrothermodynamics of this phantom black holes in Quevedo:2016cge . The authors in Mo:2018hav studied the phase transition and heat engine efficiency of phantom AdS black holes. While in this paper, we would like to focus on the dynamical properties of phantom RN-dS black holes under the scalar field perturbation, which means we are interested in investigating its QNMs spectrum on the background in our consideration.

QNMs has versatile applications in the black holes physics. One of its basic utilization is that we can use QNMs to examine the stability of black holes spacetime under perturbation Berti:2009kk ; Konoplya:2011qq . In the context of astrophysics, QNMs is contained in the gravitational waves (GWs) in the ringdown phase of the mergers of binary black holes system and plays an increasingly essential role in the contemporary gravitational waves astronomy LIGOScientific:2016aoc ; LIGOScientific:2017vwq , due to the fact that it can be regarded as characteristic “sound” of black holes Nollert:1999ji and serve as the basis of black holes spectroscopy. Therefore, in principle, rich informations of the GWs sources and spacetime geometry can be revealed with the successful detection of GWs. This feature of QNMs marks its great importance in the research of gravitational physics. In addition, QNMs has also been used to test GR and the validity of the famous “no-hair” theorem of black holes Dreyer:2003bv ; Berti:2005ys ; Shi:2019hqa ; Isi:2019aib , constrain modified gravity theories Liu:2020ddo ; Bao:2019kgt ; Cano:2021myl ; Blazquez-Salcedo:2016enn ; Franciolini:2018uyq ; Aragon:2020xtm ; Liu:2020qia ; Karakasis:2021tqx and examine strong cosmic censorship conjecture Cardoso:2017soq ; Liu:2019lon ; Hod:2018dpx ; Mo:2018nnu ; Dias:2018ynt ; Hod:2018lmi ; Gwak:2018rba ; Guo:2019tjy , and some other interesting discussions of QNMs in the asymptotically dS spacetime can be found in Sarkar:2023rhp ; Konoplya:2022xid ; Konoplya:2022kld ; Zhidenko:2003wq . Given the significance of QNMs introduced above, hence it is intriguing and meaningful to study QNMs when a new black hole solution is obtained.

The present work is organized as follows. In Section II, we first give a brief introduction to phantom RN-dS black holes, and then analyze the horizon structure and work out the value range of the phantom charge. In Section III, we will numerically calculate QNMs spectrum of massless neutral scalar field perturbation with two methods and analyze the numerical results. The last section is devoted to conclusions. Throughout this paper, we will work with units G=c=1G=c=1.

II phantom RN-dS black holes

In this section, we would like to briefly review phantom RN-dS black holes first, and then pin down its parameter space in which at least two horizons are present. The action of this theory is given by Jardim:2012se

S=d4xg(R+2ηFμνFμν+2Λ),S=\int d^{4}x\sqrt{-g}(R+2\eta F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}+2\Lambda), (1)

where RR is the Ricci scalar, Λ\Lambda is cosmological constant, and FμνF_{\mu\nu} is the coupled vector field strength whose nature is characterized by constant η\eta. For η=1\eta=1, FμνF_{\mu\nu} is just the electromagnetic field strength, while for η=1\eta=-1 it stands for phantom vector field strength. The terminology “phantom” is used here since the energy density of the field is negative for η=1\eta=-1.

Based on action given in Eq. (1), we can get a spherically symmetrical black hole solution Jardim:2012se

ds2=f(r)dt2+f(r)1dr2+r2(dθ2+sinθ2dϕ2),ds^{2}=-f(r)dt^{2}+f(r)^{-1}dr^{2}+r^{2}(d\theta^{2}+\sin\theta^{2}d\phi^{2}), (2)

where

f(r)=12MrΛ3r2+ηq2r2.f(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^{2}+\eta\frac{q^{2}}{r^{2}}. (3)

Obviously, this is the well-known RN-(A)dS spacetime metric when η=1\eta=1. In the present paper, we are interested in the less concerned case η=1\eta=-1 with a positive cosmological constant Λ\Lambda>0, i.e. phantom RN-dS black hole spacetime. For our convenience, we would like to define a charge parameter Qηq2Q\equiv\eta q^{2}. With the parameter replacement, the phantom RN-dS black hole metric function f(r)f(r) takes the form

f(r)=12MrΛ3r2+Qr2,Q<0.f(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^{2}+\frac{Q}{r^{2}},\quad Q<0. (4)

To have a better understanding of this black hole spacetime, it is necessary to figure out the number of horizons, i.e. positive roots of function f(r)f(r) of this spacetime. To simplify this task, we directly deal with function h(r)r2f(r)h(r)\equiv r^{2}f(r) instead of dealing with f(r)f(r). Apparently, the roots of h(r)h(r) must be the roots of f(r)f(r) except r=0r=0, which is the location of black hole singularity so it is excluded from the possible roots. Function h(r)h(r) is polynomial with the form

h(r)=Λ3r4+r22Mr+Q,h(r)=-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^{4}+r^{2}-2Mr+Q, (5)

which is a quartic polynomial suggesting that there exists four roots for equation h(ri)=0h(r_{i})=0. According to Vieta’s theorem, the roots of h(r)h(r) satisfy following relations

r1+r2+r3+r4=0,\displaystyle r_{1}+r_{2}+r_{3}+r_{4}=0, (6a)
r1r2r3r4=3QΛ,\displaystyle r_{1}r_{2}r_{3}r_{4}=-\frac{3Q}{\Lambda}, (6b)

where we have fixed black hole mass M=1M=1 without loss of generality. For the physical reason, we only consider black hole parameters that yield four real roots rir_{i}\in\mathbb{R}. Note that we have Λ>0\Lambda>0 and Q<0Q<0 such that r1r2r3r4=3Q/Λ>0r_{1}r_{2}r_{3}r_{4}=-3Q/\Lambda>0. This means that the sign of rir_{i} has three different combinations, namely 1)four positive roots 2)two positive and two negative roots 3)four negative roots. On the other hand, we have r1+r2+r3+r4=0r_{1}+r_{2}+r_{3}+r_{4}=0 which means that the roots can not be all positive or all negative. Finally, with Eq. (6), we are forced to get two positive roots in addition to two negative roots, so there are at most two horizons in phantom RN-dS black hole spacetime. The two positive roots are labeled as r+r_{+} and rcr_{c} with the relation r+<rcr_{+}<r_{c}. The function h(r)h(r) in Eq. (5) can be rewritten as

h(r)=Λ3(rr1)(rr2)(rr+)(rrc),h(r)=-\frac{\Lambda}{3}(r-r_{1})(r-r_{2})(r-r_{+})(r-r_{c}), (7)

where r1<r2<0<r+<rcr_{1}<r_{2}<0<r_{+}<r_{c}. By Eq. (7), we can see that h(r)<0h(r)<0 in the region 0<r<r+0<r<r_{+} and r>rcr>r_{c}, whereas h(r)>0h(r)>0 in the region r+<r<rcr_{+}<r<r_{c}. This fact reveals that r+r_{+} and rcr_{c} is event horizon and cosmological horizon, respectively. The behavior of h(r)h(r) and the location of roots are clearly demonstrated in Fig. 1, which shows the correctness of previous analysis.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The behavior of h(r)h(r), where we take M=1M=1, Λ=0.08\Lambda=0.08 and Q=0.3Q=-0.3. Two negative and two positive roots are clearly present.

Before taking a further investigation of the properties of phantom RN-dS black hole, we should figure out the parameter space in which both the event horizon and cosmological horizon can exist at the same time. Our first step is to find out the maximum value of cosmological constant Λmax\Lambda_{max}, at which the minimum value of charge parameter QQ is zero. This extreme condition requires

Q=0,h(r)=0,h(r)=0.Q=0,\quad h(r)=0,\quad h^{\prime}(r)=0. (8)

The solution of equations above is

Λ=3(r2)r3=3(r1)2r3.\Lambda=\frac{3(r-2)}{r^{3}}=\frac{3(r-1)}{2r^{3}}. (9)

This equation leads to r=3r=3, which yields

Λmax=19.\Lambda_{max}=\frac{1}{9}. (10)

For a given value of Λ\Lambda, we are now supposed to calculate out the minimum and maximum value of QQ, which is respectively denoted by QminQ_{min} and QmaxQ_{max}. The similar strategy will be adopted as that used in finding Λmax\Lambda_{max}. After some simple calculation, we get analytical formula for QminQ_{min} and QmaxQ_{max} which are given by

Qmin=1Λ(cosα+3sinα)(2Λ+14cosα+16cos3α+34sinα),\displaystyle Q_{min}=-\frac{1}{\Lambda}\left(\cos\alpha+\sqrt{3}\sin\alpha\right)\left(-\sqrt{2\Lambda}+\frac{1}{4}\cos\alpha+\frac{1}{6}\cos 3\alpha+\frac{\sqrt{3}}{4}\sin\alpha\right), (11a)
Qmax=2+cos2α+32Λ(cosα3sinα)+3sin2α4Λ,\displaystyle Q_{max}=\frac{-2+\cos 2\alpha+3\sqrt{2\Lambda}\left(\cos\alpha-\sqrt{3}\sin\alpha\right)+\sqrt{3}\sin 2\alpha}{4\Lambda}, (11b)

where we have defined

α=13arg(3Λ2+Λ(9Λ2)Λ),\alpha=\frac{1}{3}\arg\left(3\Lambda^{2}+\Lambda\sqrt{(9\Lambda-2)\Lambda}\right), (12)

in which arg\mathrm{arg} is the argument function. We compare the values of QminQ_{min} and QmaxQ_{max} in terms of Λ\Lambda in Fig. 2, which shows that QminQ_{min} is negative definite and and QmaxQ_{max} is positive definite, and QmaxQ_{max} is not as sensitive as QminQ_{min} to the change of cosmological constant. This means that only QminQ_{min} is related to charge parameter of phantom RN-dS black hole, QmaxQ_{max} is RN-dS black hole relevant. Actually, QminQ_{min} marks the charge parameter value at which event horizon coincides with cosmological horizon, and QmaxQ_{max} is only relevant to RN-dS black hole, since it is a positive value where Cauchy horizon coincides with event horizon, while for phantom RN-dS black hole, it is simply required that Q<0Q<0 and no Cauchy horizon exists in this spacetime. When we set Λ=Λmax\Lambda=\Lambda_{max}, with Eq. (11a) we can directly get Qmin=0Q_{min}=0, this result is in agreement with our previous discussion about finding the value of Λmax\Lambda_{max}. It is well known that in RN-dS spacetime, charge parameter is limited to guarantee the existence of event horizon. In fact, the maxima and minima of QmaxQ_{max} respectively is

Max(Qmax)=limΛ29Qmax=98,Min(Qmax)=limΛ0+Qmax=1.\mathrm{Max}(Q_{max})=\lim\limits_{\Lambda\to\frac{2}{9}}Q_{max}=\frac{9}{8},\quad\mathrm{Min}(Q_{max})=\lim\limits_{\Lambda\to 0^{+}}Q_{max}=1. (13)

Interestingly, on the contrary to RN-dS black hole, in phantom RN-dS black hole spacetime we find that QminQ_{min} is not bounded from below,

Min(Qmin)=limΛ0+Qmin=,\mathrm{Min}(Q_{min})=\lim\limits_{\Lambda\to 0^{+}}Q_{min}=-\infty, (14)

which serves as a remarkable difference between phantom and usual RN-dS black hole spacetime.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The comparison between values of QminQ_{min} and QmaxQ_{max}.

III Quasinormal modes of the phantom RN-dS black holes

In this section, we focus on the calculation of QNMs frequencies of massless neutral scalar field perturbation on the phantom RN-dS spacetime, and to this end we are required to derive the master equation of scalar field perturbation.

III.1 Master Equation of Scalar Perturbation

We start from a general static and spherically symmetrical black hole metric in 3+13+1 spacetimes,

ds2=A(r)dt2+B(r)dr2+r2(dθ2+sin2θdϕ2).ds^{2}=-A(r)dt^{2}+B(r)dr^{2}+r^{2}(d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2}). (15)

The equation of motion of a massless scalar field Φ\Phi reads

1gμ(ggμννΦ(t,r,θ,ϕ))=0.\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_{\mu}(\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\nu}\Phi(t,r,\theta,\phi))=0. (16)

We decompose scalar field Φ(t,r,θ,ϕ)\Phi(t,r,\theta,\phi) in terms of spherical harmonics function Ylm(θ,ϕ)Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi),

Φ(t,r,θ,ϕ)=l,mΨ(t,r)rYlm(θ,ϕ),\Phi(t,r,\theta,\phi)=\sum_{l,m}\frac{\Psi(t,r)}{r}Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi), (17)

where ll and mm stand for the angular and azimuthal number, respectively. Substituting Eq. (17) into Eq. (16), we get the following radial equation

t2Ψ(t,r)+ABr2Ψ(t,r)+BAAB2B2rΨ(t,r)+A(rB2l(l+1)B2)rBA2r2B2Ψ(t,r)=0,-\partial_{t}^{2}\Psi(t,r)+\frac{A}{B}\partial_{r}^{2}\Psi(t,r)+\frac{BA^{\prime}-AB^{\prime}}{2B^{2}}\partial_{r}\Psi(t,r)+\frac{A(rB^{\prime}-2l(l+1)B^{2})-rBA^{\prime}}{2r^{2}B^{2}}\Psi(t,r)=0, (18)

where a prime denotes a derivative with respect to areal radius rr. We simplify this equation by moving to tortoise coordinate rr_{\ast} defined by

dr=B(r)A(r)dr,dr_{\ast}=\sqrt{\frac{B(r)}{A(r)}}dr, (19)

Eq. (18) can be rewritten as

2Ψ(t,r)t2+2Ψ(t,r)r2V(r)Ψ(t,r)=0,-\frac{\partial^{2}\Psi(t,r)}{\partial t^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2}\Psi(t,r)}{\partial r_{\ast}^{2}}-V(r)\Psi(t,r)=0, (20)

where the effective potential V(r)V(r) is given by

V(r)=A(r)l(l+1)r2+12rddrA(r)B(r).V(r)=A(r)\frac{l(l+1)}{r^{2}}+\frac{1}{2r}\frac{d}{dr}\frac{A(r)}{B(r)}. (21)

We consider the time dependence of Ψ(t,r)\Psi(t,r) as Ψ(t,r)=eiωtϕ(r)\Psi(t,r)=e^{-i\omega t}\phi(r), which gives rise to Schrodinger-like master equation,

d2ϕ(r)dr2+(ω2V(r))ϕ(r)=0,\frac{d^{2}\phi(r)}{dr_{\ast}^{2}}+\left(\omega^{2}-V(r)\right)\phi(r)=0, (22)

The black hole QNMs is determined by solving the eigenvalue problem defined by Eq. (22) with the following boundary conditions for asymptotically de-Sitter and flat spacetimes

ϕ{eiωr,r,e+iωr,r+,\phi\sim\begin{cases}e^{-i\omega r_{\ast}},&r_{\ast}\to-\infty,\\ e^{+i\omega r_{\ast}},&r_{\ast}\to+\infty,\end{cases} (23)

which indicate ingoing wave at the horizon and outoging wave at infinity. Here, the eigenvalue ω\omega is known as the QNMs frequency, which is usually a complex number due to the dissipative nature of boundary condition Eq. (23) that makes the differential operator of this system non-self-joint.

It is time to get back to our specific phantom RN-dS spacetime metric. In our current case, we have

A(r)=1B(r)f(r),A(r)=\frac{1}{B(r)}\equiv f(r), (24)

where metric function f(r)f(r) is given by Eq. (4) . Accordingly, the effective potential Eq. (21) simplifies to read

V(r)=f(r)(l(l+1)r2+f(r)r).V(r)=f(r)\left(\frac{l(l+1)}{r^{2}}+\frac{f^{\prime}(r)}{r}\right). (25)

With this effective potential and the master equation Eq. (22) associated with boundary condition Eq. (23), the QNMs frequencies of scalar field perturbation in phantom RN-dS spacetime can be numerically obtained.

III.2 Numerical Methods

In this subsection, we calculate QNMs with the Asymptotic Iteration Method (AIM), of which an excellent review of this method can be found in Cho:2011sf . At the same time, we also use WKB approximation method which is improved by Pade approximants in order to verify the QNMs frequencies obtained by AIM.

To employ AIM, we are required to deal with master equation Eq. (22) in usual radial coordinate rr, namely,

f(r)f(r)ϕ(r)+f2(r)ϕ′′(r)+(ω2V(r))ϕ(r)=0.f(r)f^{\prime}(r)\phi^{\prime}(r)+f^{2}(r)\phi^{\prime\prime}(r)+(\omega^{2}-V(r))\phi(r)=0. (26)

We introduce a new variable ξ\xi,

ξ=1r,\xi=\frac{1}{r}, (27)

and then take into consideration the asymptotical behavior (or boundary condition in Eq. (23)) of ϕ(r)\phi(r), we rewrite ϕ(r)\phi(r) in terms of ξ\xi as follows,

ϕ(ξ)=(ξ+ξ)iω2κ+(ξξc)iω2κcχ(ξ),\phi(\xi)=(\xi_{+}-\xi)^{-\frac{i\omega}{2\kappa_{+}}}(\xi-\xi_{c})^{-\frac{i\omega}{2\kappa_{c}}}\chi(\xi), (28)

where ξ+=r+1\xi_{+}=r_{+}^{-1} and ξc=rc1\xi_{c}=r_{c}^{-1}, κ+=f(r+)2\kappa_{+}=\frac{f^{\prime}(r_{+})}{2} and κc=f(rc)2\kappa_{c}=-\frac{f^{\prime}(r_{c})}{2} respectively are surface gravity on event horizon and cosmological horizon. To employ AIM, Eq. (26) needs to be transformed into the form as

χ′′(ξ)=λ0(ξ)χ(ξ)+s0(ξ)χ(ξ),\chi^{\prime\prime}(\xi)=\lambda_{0}(\xi)\chi^{\prime}(\xi)+s_{0}(\xi)\chi(\xi), (29)

where λ0\lambda_{0} and s0s_{0} are given by

λ0=2(Λ+3ξ3(M+Qξ))ξ(Λ+3ξ2(12Mξ+Qξ2))iξωκ+(ξξ+)+(iξω+2κ+(ξξ+))(ξξc)κcξκ+κc(ξξ+)(ξξc),\quad\lambda_{0}=\frac{-2\left(\Lambda+3\xi^{3}(-M+Q\xi)\right)}{\xi\left(-\Lambda+3\xi^{2}\left(1-2M\xi+Q\xi^{2}\right)\right)}-\frac{-i\xi\omega\kappa_{+}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)+\left(-i\xi\omega+2\kappa_{+}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)\right)\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)\kappa_{c}}{\xi\kappa_{+}\kappa_{c}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)}, (30)
s0=2Λ3ξ2(l+l2+2ξ(MQξ))ξ2(Λ3ξ2(12Mξ+Qξ2))9ω2(Λ3ξ2(12Mξ+Qξ2))2+\displaystyle s_{0}=\frac{2\Lambda-3\xi^{2}\left(l+l^{2}+2\xi(M-Q\xi)\right)}{\xi^{2}\left(\Lambda-3\xi^{2}\left(1-2M\xi+Q\xi^{2}\right)\right)}-\frac{9\omega^{2}}{\left(\Lambda-3\xi^{2}\left(1-2M\xi+Q\xi^{2}\right)\right)^{2}}+ (31)
ω4ξκ+2(ξξ+)2κc2(ξξc)2{ξωκ+2(ξξ+)2+(ξω+2iκ+(ξ2ξ+))κc2(ξξc)2+\displaystyle\qquad\frac{\omega}{4\xi\kappa_{+}^{2}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)^{2}\kappa_{c}^{2}\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)^{2}}\left\{\xi\omega\kappa_{+}^{2}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)^{2}+\left(\xi\omega+2i\kappa_{+}\left(\xi-2\xi_{+}\right)\right)\kappa_{c}^{2}\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)^{2}+\right.
2κ+(ξξ+)κc(iκ+(ξξ+)(ξ2ξc)+ξω(ξξc))}+\displaystyle\qquad\left.2\kappa_{+}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)\kappa_{c}\left(i\kappa_{+}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)\left(\xi-2\xi_{c}\right)+\xi\omega\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)\right)\right\}+
iω(Λ+3ξ3(M+Qξ))(κ+(ξξ+)+κc(ξξc))ξ(Λ+3ξ2(12Mξ+Qξ2))(ξξ+)(ξξc)κ+κc\displaystyle\qquad\frac{i\omega\left(\Lambda+3\xi^{3}(-M+Q\xi)\right)\left(\kappa_{+}\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)+\kappa_{c}\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)\right)}{\xi\left(-\Lambda+3\xi^{2}\left(1-2M\xi+Q\xi^{2}\right)\right)\left(\xi-\xi_{+}\right)\left(\xi-\xi_{c}\right)\kappa_{+}\kappa_{c}}

Besides the numerical methods, WKB approximation method as a semi-analytical formula is also a powerful approach for finding QNMs frequencies. For our spherically symmetric background, the WKB formula gives a closed form of QNMs frequencies Konoplya:2019hlu ,

ω2\displaystyle\omega^{2} =V0+A2(𝒦2)+A4(𝒦2)+A6(𝒦2)+\displaystyle=V_{0}+A_{2}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)+A_{4}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)+A_{6}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)+\ldots (32)
i𝒦2V2(1+A3(𝒦2)+A5(𝒦2)+A7(𝒦2)),\displaystyle-i\mathcal{K}\sqrt{-2V_{2}}\left(1+A_{3}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)+A_{5}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)+A_{7}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\ldots\right),

where V0V_{0} is the value of effective potential at its maximum V0=V(r0)V_{0}=V(r_{\ast 0}), and so r0r_{\ast 0} represents the location of the peak of V(r)V(r_{\ast}). V2V_{2} stands for the value of second order derivative of V(r)V(r_{\ast}) respect to tortoise coordinate rr_{\ast} at the potential peak r0r_{\ast 0}. Henceforth, we simply denote the mm-th order derivative of V(r)V(r_{\ast}) at r0r_{\ast 0} as VmV_{m},

Vm=dmV(r)drm|r=r0,m2.V_{m}=\left.\frac{d^{m}V(r_{\ast})}{dr_{\ast}^{m}}\right|_{r_{\ast}=r_{\ast 0}},\quad m\geq 2. (33)

Obviously, for m=1m=1 we have V1=0V_{1}=0. Ak(𝒦2)A_{k}(\mathcal{K}^{2}) are polynomials of V2,V3,V2kV_{2},V_{3},\ldots V_{2k}, and each Ak(𝒦2)A_{k}(\mathcal{K}^{2}) should be considered as the kk-th order corrections to the eikonal formula

𝒦=iω2V02V2,\mathcal{K}=i\frac{\omega^{2}-V_{0}}{\sqrt{-2V_{2}}}, (34)

which provides unique solution for 𝒦\mathcal{K} with a given ω\omega. With the boundary conditions of QNMs, 𝒦\mathcal{K} is constrained to be

𝒦=n+12,n,\mathcal{K}=n+\frac{1}{2},\quad n\in\mathbb{N}, (35)

in which nn is the overtone number. With the given formula of 𝒦\mathcal{K} and Eq. (38), we are able to calculate QNMs frequencies directly. Here we list second and third order corrections as follows,

A2(𝒦2)=60(n+12)2V32+36(n+12)2V2V47V32+9V2V4288V22,A_{2}(\mathcal{K}^{2})=\frac{-60\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{3}^{2}+36\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}V_{4}-7V_{3}^{2}+9V_{2}V_{4}}{288V_{2}^{2}}, (36)
A3(𝒦2)\displaystyle A_{3}(\mathcal{K}^{2}) =113824V25[940(n+12)2V34+1800(n+12)2V2V4V32672(n+12)2V22V5V3\displaystyle=\frac{1}{13824V_{2}^{5}}\Bigg{[}-940\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{3}^{4}+1800\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}V_{4}V_{3}^{2}-672\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}^{2}V_{5}V_{3} (37)
204(n+12)2V22V42+96(n+12)2V23V6385V34+918V2V4V32456V22V5V3\displaystyle-204\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}^{2}V_{4}^{2}+96\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}^{3}V_{6}-385V_{3}^{4}+918V_{2}V_{4}V_{3}^{2}-456V_{2}^{2}V_{5}V_{3}
201V22V42+120V23V6].\displaystyle-201V_{2}^{2}V_{4}^{2}+120V_{2}^{3}V_{6}\Bigg{]}.

For higher order corrections one can refer to Konoplya:2019hlu and references therein.

In order to increase the accuracy of higher order WKB method, the Pade approximants have been proposed to use in usual WKB formula Matyjasek:2017psv . This approach is started by defining a polynomial Pk(ϵ)P_{k}(\epsilon) Konoplya:2019hlu ,

Pk(ϵ)\displaystyle P_{k}(\epsilon) =V0+A2(𝒦2)ϵ2+A4(𝒦2)ϵ4+A6(𝒦2)ϵ6+\displaystyle=V_{0}+A_{2}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\epsilon^{2}+A_{4}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\epsilon^{4}+A_{6}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\epsilon^{6}+\ldots (38)
i𝒦2V2(ϵ+A3(𝒦2)ϵ3+A5(𝒦2)ϵ5+A7(𝒦2)ϵ7),\displaystyle-i\mathcal{K}\sqrt{-2V_{2}}\left(\epsilon+A_{3}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\epsilon^{3}+A_{5}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\epsilon^{5}+A_{7}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2}\right)\epsilon^{7}\ldots\right),

where the polynomial order kk is the same as the order of WKB formula. When ϵ=1\epsilon=1, one can get

ω2=Pk(1).\omega^{2}=P_{k}(1). (39)

The Pade approximants Pn~/m~(ϵ)P_{\widetilde{n}/\widetilde{m}}(\epsilon) for Pk(ϵ)P_{k}(\epsilon) near ϵ=0\epsilon=0 can be constructed as

Pn~/m~(ϵ)=Q0+Q1ϵ++Qn~ϵn~R0+R1ϵ++Rm~ϵm~,P_{\widetilde{n}/\widetilde{m}}(\epsilon)=\frac{Q_{0}+Q_{1}\epsilon+\ldots+Q_{\widetilde{n}}\epsilon^{\widetilde{n}}}{R_{0}+R_{1}\epsilon+\ldots+R_{\widetilde{m}}\epsilon^{\widetilde{m}}}, (40)

where n~+m~=k\widetilde{n}+\widetilde{m}=k, and Pn~/m~(ϵ)Pk(ϵ)=𝒪(ϵk+1)P_{\widetilde{n}/\widetilde{m}}(\epsilon)-P_{k}(\epsilon)=\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^{k+1}).

III.3 QNMs Frequencies of Phantom Black Holes

In this subsection, we demonstrate fundamental(overtone number n=0n=0) scalar field QNMs spectrum obtained by AIM and WKB method in Table 1 and Table 2, and discuss the properties of these frequencies.

In Table 1, we display QNMs frequencies for different angular number ll and charge parameter QQ, but cosmological constant is fixed to be Λ=0.5Λmax\Lambda=0.5\Lambda_{max}. For each combination of parameters, the QNMs frequencies obtained by AIM and WKB method are putted together for comparison and cross-check. One can notice that the results from our improved WKB method and AIM are in great agreement with each other indicating the validity of these results, except for l=0l=0, which reflects the well-known fact that WKB methods can give rise to reliable results only for QNMs with higher angular number l>>nl>>n. Although WKB formula corrected by Pade approximation can greatly improve the accuracies for lnl\sim n QNMs, we should still treat the QNMs frequencies with l=n=0l=n=0 from WKB method carefully, as the accuracy for theses modes is not good enough. When fixing charge parameter and cosmological constant but increasing angular number ll, one can find that the real part of QNMs frequencies monotonously grow with ll, as expected from the perspective of physics since the larger angular number corresponds to larger angular momentum which gives rise to a more rapid oscillation frequency. Whereas for the imaginary part related to the damping rate of the modes, its magnitude decreases implying modes with larger ll will live longer. On the other hand, when fixing angular number and cosmological constant but decreasing the charge parameter, we find that the real part of QNMs frequencies decreases while the imaginary part increases.

ll Method Q=0.5Q=-0.5 Q=1Q=-1 Q=2Q=-2 Q=3Q=-3
0 AIM 0.055450.09012i0.05545-0.09012i 0.045060.08281i0.04506-0.08281i 0.027390.06609i0.02739-0.06609i 0.011340.04300i0.01134-0.04300i
WKB 0.049630.08836i0.04963-0.08836i 0.039100.08021i0.03910-0.08021i 0.021760.06209i0.02176-0.06209i 0.006280.03887i0.00628-0.03887i
11 AIM 0.162960.06517i0.16296-0.06517i 0.137150.05728i0.13715-0.05728i 0.094110.04140i0.09411-0.04140i 0.053190.02389i0.05319-0.02389i
WKB 0.162990.06519i0.16299-0.06519i 0.137170.05733i0.13717-0.05733i 0.094060.04151i0.09406-0.04151i 0.053120.02395i0.05312-0.02395i
22 AIM 0.283310.06206i0.28331-0.06206i 0.241150.05459i0.24115-0.05459i 0.169060.03989i0.16906-0.03989i 0.097260.02349i0.09726-0.02349i
WKB 0.283320.06206i0.28332-0.06206i 0.241150.05459i0.24115-0.05459i 0.169060.03989i0.16906-0.03989i 0.097260.02349i0.09726-0.02349i
33 AIM 0.401130.06130i0.40113-0.06130i 0.342270.05396i0.34227-0.05396i 0.241060.03954i0.24106-0.03954i 0.139250.02340i0.13925-0.02340i
WKB 0.401130.06130i0.40113-0.06130i 0.342270.05396i0.34227-0.05396i 0.241060.03954i0.24106-0.03954i 0.139250.02340i0.13925-0.02340i
55 AIM 0.634680.06085i0.63468-0.06085i 0.542330.05358i0.54233-0.05358i 0.382960.03934i0.38296-0.03934i 0.221750.02334i0.22175-0.02334i
WKB 0.634680.06085i0.63468-0.06085i 0.542330.05358i0.54233-0.05358i 0.382960.03934i0.38296-0.03934i 0.221750.02334i0.22175-0.02334i
1010 AIM 1.215730.06064i1.21573-0.06064i 1.039550.05340i1.03955-0.05340i 0.734970.03924i0.73497-0.03924i 0.426060.02332i0.42606-0.02332i
WKB 1.215730.06064i1.21573-0.06064i 1.039550.05340i1.03955-0.05340i 0.734970.03924i0.73497-0.03924i 0.426060.02332i0.42606-0.02332i
Table 1: The dominant QNMs frequency ω\omega for M=1M=1, Λ=0.5Λmax\Lambda=0.5\Lambda_{max}, and Qmin3.66843Q_{min}\approx-3.66843.

In Table 2, we list fundamental QNMs frequencies for different cosmological constant Λ\Lambda while the charge parameter is fixed to be Q=0.5Q=-0.5. We focus on the complex frequencies at the moment, and the same behavior can be observed as in Table 1 when increasing angular number ll, which leads to the real parts grow but the absolute value of imaginary parts decrease, and the WKB and AIM give rise to highly consistent results except for l=0l=0. When we increase Λ\Lambda, the real part of QNMs frequencies will decrease, while the imaginary parts increase. By observing the data in Table 1 and Table 2, one can conclude that the increment of the magnitude of QQ or Λ\Lambda will results in the decrement of the magnitude of real and imaginary parts.

ll Method Λ=0.1Λmax\Lambda=0.1\Lambda_{max} Λ=0.3Λmax\Lambda=0.3\Lambda_{max} Λ=0.5Λmax\Lambda=0.5\Lambda_{max} Λ=0.8Λmax\Lambda=0.8\Lambda_{max}
0 AIM 0.095010.10170i0.09501-0.10170i 0.077690.09886i0.07769-0.09886i 0.055450.09012i0.05545-0.09012i 0.012420.04668i0.01242-0.04668i
WKB 0.096330.10256i0.09633-0.10256i 0.075250.10043i0.07525-0.10043i 0.049630.08836i0.04963-0.08836i 0.010020.04134i0.01002-0.04134i
11 AIM 00.06080i\boxed{0-0.06080i} 0.252570.09100i0.25257-0.09100i 0.210630.08053i0.21063-0.08053i 0.162960.06517i0.16296-0.06517i 0.064030.02572i0.06403-0.02572i
WKB 0.252570.09100i0.25257-0.09100i 0.210600.08052i0.21060-0.08052i 0.162990.06519i0.16299-0.06519i 0.063990.02573i0.06399-0.02573i
22 AIM 0.420160.08902i0.42016-0.08902i 0.357000.07722i0.35700-0.07722i 0.283310.06206i0.28331-0.06206i 0.115880.02537i0.11588-0.02537i
WKB 0.420160.08902i0.42016-0.08902i 0.357000.07722i0.35700-0.07722i 0.283320.06206i0.28332-0.06206i 0.115880.02537i0.11588-0.02537i
33 AIM 0.588200.08844i0.58820-0.08844i 0.502460.07633i0.50246-0.07633i 0.401130.06130i0.40113-0.06130i 0.165540.02529i0.16554-0.02529i
WKB 0.588200.08844i0.58820-0.08844i 0.502460.07633i0.50246-0.07633i 0.401130.06130i0.40113-0.06130i 0.165540.02529i0.16554-0.02529i
55 AIM 0.924400.08806i0.92440-0.08806i 0.792260.07579i0.79226-0.07579i 0.634680.06085i0.63468-0.06085i 0.263290.02524i0.26329-0.02524i
WKB 0.924400.08806i0.92440-0.08806i 0.792260.07579i0.79226-0.07579i 0.634680.06085i0.63468-0.06085i 0.263290.02524i0.26329-0.02524i
1010 AIM 1.764900.08788i1.76490-0.08788i 1.515070.07552i1.51507-0.07552i 1.215730.06064i1.21573-0.06064i 0.505590.02521i0.50559-0.02521i
WKB 1.764900.08788i1.76490-0.08788i 1.515070.07552i1.51507-0.07552i 1.215730.06064i1.21573-0.06064i 0.505590.02521i0.50559-0.02521i
Table 2: The dominant QNMs frequency ω\omega for M=1M=1, Q=0.5Q=-0.5.

In Table 1 and Table 2, the complex QNMs frequencies are classified into photon sphere modes (PS modes) Cardoso:2017soq . Photon sphere is defined as the circular unstable geodesic trajectories that null particles are trapped on. The nearby area of this region is deeply connected to this kind of QNMs, as the authors in Cardoso:2008bp have found that black hole QNMs in the eikonal limit in any dimensions are determined by the parameters of the circular null geodesics on photon sphere, while there are claims that this correspondence is not perfectly guaranteed Konoplya:2022gjp ; Konoplya:2017wot . The dominant PS modes correspond to large ll limit and n=0n=0, and they are well described by WKB approximation, as what we have shown in above two tables.

Among the complex PS modes, in Table 2 one can notice a purely imaginary frequency in a black box for Λ=0.1Λmax\Lambda=0.1\Lambda_{max}, l=1l=1. This kind of modes come from the memory of the pure dS spacetime (i.e. empty dS spacetime), so they are dubbed black hole dS modes (dS modes for short) which are deformations of the pure dS modes and are identified first in Jansen:2017oag for neutral black hole spacetime and then confirmed for RN-dS spacetime in Cardoso:2017soq . In pure dS spacetime, the pure dS modes can be analytically expressed as Lopez-Ortega:2012xvr

ω0,puredSκcdS=il,ωn0,puredSκcdS=i(l+n+1).\frac{\omega_{0,pure\,dS}}{\kappa_{c}^{dS}}=-il,\quad\frac{\omega_{n\neq 0,pure\,dS}}{\kappa_{c}^{dS}}=-i(l+n+1). (41)

The dominant dS modes (l=1,n=0l=1,n=0) is almost identical to pure dS modes, but the deformations will grow for modes with higher overtone number. Substituting Λ=0.1Λmax\Lambda=0.1\Lambda_{max} and l=1l=1 into Eq. (41) in which κcdS=Λ/3\kappa_{c}^{dS}=\sqrt{\Lambda/3}, we get pure dS modes frequency ω0.0608581i\omega\approx-0.0608581i, which is very close to our dS modes frequency ω0.06080i\omega\approx-0.06080i, and this coincidence proves that this frequency indeed belongs to the dS modes. This modes only appear for Λ=0.1Λmax\Lambda=0.1\Lambda_{max} as a consequence of the fact that dS modes are dominant for ΛΛcri\Lambda\lesssim\Lambda_{cri}. In usual RN-dS spacetime, it is claimed that Λcri0.02\Lambda_{cri}\approx 0.02 Cardoso:2017soq and it seems also to be applicable in our case; on the other hand, in Cardoso:2017soq it has also demonstrated that the fundamental dS modes is surprisingly weak dependent on black hole charge and they are almost identical to corresponding pure dS modes. While in our phantom RN-dS black hole spacetime, we will show that the critical value of Λcri\Lambda_{cri} is dependent on the black hole charge parameter QQ, meanwhile the dS modes frequencies will be noticeably deformed by QQ when it is big enough, as a consequence of Q-Q can be arbitrarily large, but it will still remain a weak dependence on QQ.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The dependence of imaginary part of dominant PS modes (at large ll limit) and dominant dS modes (l=1l=1) on the Λ\Lambda for M=1M=1. The left panel is plotted for Q=1Q=-1, and the right panel corresponds to Q=10Q=-10.

In Fig. 3, we show the behavior of the Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}(\omega) of the dominant PS and dS modes under the change cosmological constant Λ\Lambda for Q=1Q=-1 and Q=10Q=-10. One can observe that with the increase of Λ\Lambda, the value of Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}(\omega) for dS and PS modes behaves oppositely, that is dS modes monotonously increase and PS modes monotonously decrease. A crosspoint can be identified in both plots and the corresponding value of Λ\Lambda is denoted as Λcri\Lambda_{cri}. When Λ<Λcri\Lambda<\Lambda_{cri}, the dS modes will dominate over PS modes as in this region dS modes have smaller Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}(\omega). For Q=1Q=-1, we find that Λcri\Lambda_{cri} is about Λcri0.0189\Lambda_{cri}\approx 0.0189, while when QQ is decreased to 10-10 one can find that Λcri0.0089\Lambda_{cri}\approx 0.0089, which means that a smaller charge parameter QQ leads to a smaller Λcri\Lambda_{cri}.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The comparison between dominant dS modes and dominant pure dS modes with M=1M=1.

In Fig. 4, we show the comparison of the value Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}(\omega) between dominant dS modes and dominant pure dS modes under the change of charge parameter Q-Q. The dominant pure dS modes depend only on cosmological constant Λ\Lambda, given by ω=Λ/3i\omega=-\sqrt{\Lambda/3}i, so it is a constant when Λ\Lambda is fixed, as shown in this figure. We find that dS modes is always more dominant than pure dS modes. When Q-Q is close to zero, this two modes almost coincide with each other, but with the grow of Q-Q, the dS modes will gradually deviate from the pure dS modes, manifest as a larger Q-Q results in a larger deviation. Although the deviation is noticeable and can be as large as 0.0004\sim 0.0004, it still remains a quite weak dependence on charge. On the other hand, from the data listed in Table. 3, we find that the frequency deviation from the pure dS modes is more sensitive to Λ\Lambda, as the higher value of which can give rise to a greater frequency deviation, especially we have smaller |Q||Q| for bigger Λ\Lambda.

Modes Family Λ=0.01\Lambda=0.01 Q=40Q=-40 Λ=0.001\Lambda=0.001 Q=500Q=-500 Λ=0.0001\Lambda=0.0001 Q=6000Q=-6000
ωpuredS\omega_{\mathrm{pure\,dS}} 0.057735i-0.057735i 0.0182574i-0.0182574i 0.0057735i-0.0057735i
ωdS\omega_{\mathrm{dS}} 0.0566486i-0.0566486i 0.0178078i-0.0178078i 0.00560731i-0.00560731i
Table 3: The dominant dS and pure dS modes (l=1l=1) frequency ω\omega at M=1M=1.

III.4 Comparison of QNMs Frequencies

In this subsection, we would like to compare the QNMs frequencies between phantom and RN-dS black holes with the purpose of showing the differences between the two black holes and getting a further understanding of the effects of phantom charge on the QNMs. QNMs of different kinds of perturbation fields in the RN-dS spacetime have been extensively studied and one can find relevant calculations of QNMs in Cardoso:2017soq ; Dias:2018etb ; Mo:2018nnu ; Dias:2018ufh .

To make the comparison more natural, we will rewrite the metric function Eq. (4) into following form,

f(r)phantom=12MrΛ3r2Qr2,Q>0,\displaystyle f(r)_{phantom}=1-\frac{2M}{r}-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^{2}-\frac{Q}{r^{2}},\quad Q>0, (42)
f(r)RNdS=12MrΛ3r2+Qr2,Q>0,\displaystyle f(r)_{RN-dS}=1-\frac{2M}{r}-\frac{\Lambda}{3}r^{2}+\frac{Q}{r^{2}},\quad Q>0, (43)

where f(r)phantomf(r)_{phantom} and f(r)RNdSf(r)_{RN-dS} stands for the metric function for phantom and RN-dS black holes, respectively. In such form, we are able to compare the QNMs frequencies of the two black holes under the same value of charge QQ, as well as the other left parameters.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: The comparison of fundamental QNNs frequencies of complex PS modes with l=1l=1 between phantom and RN-dS black holes whose M=1M=1 and Λ=0.5Λmax\Lambda=0.5\Lambda_{\mathrm{max}}. The left plot and the right plot shows the imaginary part Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}\,(\omega) and real part Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) of QNMs frequencies as a function of charge QQ, respectively.

In Fig. 5, we separately compare the frequencies of fundamental complex PS modes with angular number l=1l=1 between phantom and RN-dS black holes. The comparison is made by varying charge value but other parameters remain unchanged. On the left panel, we can see that the imaginary frequency magnitude Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}\,(\omega) of RN-dS black holes is aways bigger than that of phantom RN-dS black holes, which means that QNMs will decay faster in RN-dS spacetime. When increasing charge, the imaginary frequency of phantom RN-dS black holes will monotonously and almost linearly decrease, indicating a larger charge will make the modes live longer. While for the RN-dS black holes, one can find that with the increase of charge the magnitude of imaginary frequency will grow until charge gets to around 0.8\thicksim 0.8 and then it will start to decrease. On the right panel, the real part of QNMs behaves in totally contrary way, i.e. a lager charge can make Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) for RN-dS black holes bigger while smaller for phantom RN-dS black holes, which leads to the differences between real frequencies of the two black holes monotonously increase with the charge. One can observe that Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) from RN-dS black holes is never smaller than phantom RN-dS black holes, which implies a more rapid oscillation frequency of QNMs in RN-dS spacetime.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The comparison of fundamental QNNs frequencies of complex PS modes with l=1l=1 between phantom and RN-dS black holes whose M=1M=1 and Q=0.5Q=0.5. The left plot and the right plot shows the imaginary part Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}\,(\omega) and real part Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) of QNMs frequencies as a function of Λ/Λmax\Lambda/\Lambda_{\mathrm{max}}, respectively.

A similar comparison of QNMs frequencies of phantom and RN-dS black holes is demonstrated in Fig. 6 where the frequency curve is plotted as a function of the ratio Λ/Λmax\Lambda/\Lambda_{\mathrm{max}} instead of charge QQ. Under different Λ\Lambda, we can see that both the imaginary and real part of QNMs frequencies from RN-dS black holes is always higher than phantom RN-dS black holes, and this behavior has also been observed in Fig. 5. On the contrary to the curves in Fig. 5, for phantom and RN-dS black holes, both the imaginary and real part of frequencies synchronously decrease when increasing Λ\Lambda, which suggests a larger cosmological constant will give rise to a smaller oscillation frequency and a slower decay rate.

IV Conclusions

In this article, we have studied some properties of phantom RN-dS black hole, including its horizon structure, the value domain of the charge parameter, and the QNMs spectrum of massless neutral scalar field perturbation. One of the features of the phantom RN-dS black hole that differs from usual RN-dS black hole is that charge parameter of the phantom hole is negative. Under the negative charge condition, we find that there exists at most two horizons in this spacetime, namely event horizon and cosmological horizon. Especially, the value range of the phantom black hole charge is dependent on cosmological constant Λ\Lambda and found to be not bounded from below when Λ0\Lambda\to 0, which exhibits a remarkable difference from normal charged black holes whose charge value is limited in order to avoid naked singularity.

We have analyzed QNMs spectrum of scalar field perturbation obtained by AIM and confirmed by WKB approach which is greatly improved by Pade approximants, and classified the QNMs into dS modes and PS modes. When the angular number ll is increased, one can find that the real part of QNMs frequencies monotonously grow with ll, as expected from the perspective of physics since a larger angular number corresponds to larger angular momentum which gives rise to a more rapid oscillation frequency. Whereas for the imaginary part related to the damping rate of the modes, its magnitude decreases implying modes with larger ll will live longer. When we fix angular number and cosmological constant but decreasing the charge parameter, we find that the real part of QNMs frequencies decreases while the imaginary part increases. On the other hand, when we solely increase Λ\Lambda and leave other parameters unchanged, the real part of QNMs frequencies will decrease, while the imaginary parts increase. With these results, we conclude that the increment of the magnitude of QQ or Λ\Lambda will result in the decrement of the magnitude of real and imaginary parts. The dS modes have the chance to become the dominant modes over PS modes, when Λ<Λcri\Lambda<\Lambda_{cri}. We find that Λcri\Lambda_{cri} is related to the value of charge parameter QQ, as for a larger |Q||Q|, Λcri\Lambda_{cri} will be smaller. Finally, we examine the deviations of dS modes from the pure dS modes. It is known that dS modes originate from pure dS modes, such that in a asymptotically dS black hole spacetime, the dominant dS modes frequencies are almost identical to the corresponding pure dS modes frequencies, just with a tiny deformation. We find that this deformation depends on charge parameter QQ and cosmological constant Λ\Lambda. A larger Λ\Lambda or |Q||Q| can lead to a larger deviation, which can be noticeable and seem to be more sensitive to the variation of Λ\Lambda.

At last, we compared the QNMs frequencies of phantom and RN-dS black holes in order to reveal more effects of phantom charge and highlight the differences between the two black holes. We find that under any combinations of parameters in our consideration, both imaginary and real part of QNMs frequencies from RN-dS black holes are never smaller than that of phantom RN-dS black holes, which means that the QNMs of phantom RN-dS black holes can live longer and oscillate less rapidly compared to RN-dS black holes. When charge is fixed and increasing cosmological constant, we find that Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}\,(\omega) and Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) will decrease, for both black holes. On the other hand, it was found that when the Λ\Lambda is fixed, for phantom RN-dS black holes the Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}\,(\omega) and Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) will become smaller with the grow of QQ. However, for RN-dS black holes a larger QQ will make Re(ω)\mathrm{Re}\,(\omega) monotonously increase but Im(ω)-\mathrm{Im}\,(\omega) behave non-monotonically.

Acknowledgements.
My most sincere thanks go to Yanfei for her consistent support to my career. This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.12305071.

References